pages
438 rows where page = 14
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body, date, text
date (date) 437 ✖
- 2012-06-06 2
- 2005-01-10 1
- 2005-01-24 1
- 2005-01-31 1
- 2005-02-01 1
- 2005-02-14 1
- 2005-02-28 1
- 2005-03-15 1
- 2005-04-05 1
- 2005-04-19 1
- 2005-04-25 1
- 2005-05-03 1
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-05-23 1
- 2005-06-07 1
- 2005-06-13 1
- 2005-06-21 1
- 2005-06-27 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2005-08-02 1
- 2005-08-16 1
- 2005-08-22 1
- 2005-09-06 1
- 2005-09-20 1
- 2005-09-29 1
- 2005-11-01 1
- 2005-11-14 1
- 2005-12-06 1
- 2005-12-20 1
- 2006-02-07 1
- 2006-02-21 1
- 2006-02-27 1
- 2006-03-07 1
- 2006-03-21 1
- 2006-04-04 1
- 2006-04-24 1
- 2006-05-02 1
- 2006-05-16 1
- 2006-06-06 1
- 2006-06-20 1
- 2006-07-05 1
- 2006-07-10 1
- 2006-07-18 1
- 2006-07-24 1
- 2006-09-05 1
- 2006-09-19 1
- 2006-09-25 1
- 2006-10-03 1
- 2006-10-09 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-10-23 1
- 2006-11-13 1
- 2006-11-21 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2006-12-11 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-01-08 1
- 2007-01-16 1
- 2007-02-06 1
- 2007-02-20 1
- 2007-02-26 1
- 2007-03-12 1
- 2007-03-20 1
- 2007-03-26 1
- 2007-04-17 1
- 2007-04-23 1
- 2007-04-25 1
- 2007-05-14 1
- 2007-05-15 1
- 2007-05-29 1
- 2007-06-05 1
- 2007-06-11 1
- 2007-06-19 1
- 2007-07-03 1
- 2007-07-17 1
- 2007-08-07 1
- 2007-08-21 1
- 2007-09-04 1
- 2007-09-11 1
- 2007-09-18 1
- 2007-09-24 1
- 2007-10-02 1
- 2007-10-16 1
- 2007-10-24 1
- 2007-11-06 1
- 2007-11-20 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2008-01-02 1
- 2008-01-15 1
- 2008-01-28 1
- 2008-02-05 1
- 2008-02-19 1
- 2008-02-25 1
- 2008-03-04 1
- 2008-03-18 1
- 2008-04-01 1
- 2008-04-15 1
- 2008-04-23 1
- 2008-04-28 1
- 2008-05-06 1
- 2008-05-12 1
- 2008-05-20 1
- 2008-06-03 1
- 2008-06-17 1
- 2008-06-23 1
- 2008-07-01 1
- 2008-07-15 1
- 2008-07-23 1
- 2008-08-05 1
- 2008-08-11 1
- 2008-08-19 1
- 2008-09-16 1
- 2008-10-07 1
- 2008-10-21 1
- 2008-11-06 1
- 2008-11-18 1
- 2008-12-02 1
- 2008-12-08 1
- 2008-12-16 1
- 2009-01-06 1
- 2009-01-20 1
- 2009-02-03 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-02-17 1
- 2009-03-03 1
- 2009-03-17 1
- 2009-04-21 1
- 2009-04-22 1
- 2009-05-05 1
- 2009-05-19 1
- 2009-06-02 1
- 2009-06-16 1
- 2009-07-07 1
- 2009-07-21 1
- 2009-08-03 1
- 2009-09-01 1
- 2009-09-15 1
- 2009-10-06 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2009-11-03 1
- 2009-11-17 1
- 2009-12-01 1
- 2009-12-02 1
- 2009-12-15 1
- 2010-01-06 1
- 2010-01-26 1
- 2010-02-16 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-06 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-05-04 1
- 2010-05-18 1
- 2010-06-01 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-06-24 1
- 2010-07-06 1
- 2010-07-07 1
- 2010-07-20 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2010-09-07 1
- 2010-09-21 1
- 2010-10-05 1
- 2010-11-03 1
- 2010-11-16 1
- 2010-12-07 1
- 2011-01-04 1
- 2011-01-25 1
- 2011-02-01 1
- 2011-02-15 1
- 2011-02-23 1
- 2011-03-29 1
- 2011-04-05 1
- 2011-05-03 1
- 2011-06-21 1
- 2011-07-05 1
- 2011-07-19 1
- 2011-11-01 1
- 2012-01-09 1
- 2012-02-07 1
- 2012-02-13 1
- 2012-02-21 1
- 2012-02-27 1
- 2012-03-12 1
- 2012-03-20 1
- 2012-04-17 1
- 2012-04-25 1
- 2012-05-08 1
- 2012-05-15 1
- 2012-05-30 1
- 2012-06-19 1
- 2012-07-03 1
- 2012-07-17 1
- 2012-07-24 1
- 2012-11-28 1
- 2013-01-23 1
- 2013-03-05 1
- 2013-04-02 1
- 2013-04-16 1
- 2013-05-07 1
- 2013-06-18 1
- 2013-06-26 1
- 2013-07-23 1
- 2013-09-17 1
- 2013-09-25 1
- 2013-10-15 1
- 2013-10-23 1
- 2013-11-05 1
- 2013-12-17 1
- 2014-03-18 1
- 2014-04-15 1
- 2014-05-06 1
- 2014-05-20 1
- 2014-06-03 1
- 2014-06-17 1
- 2014-07-01 1
- 2014-07-15 1
- 2014-09-16 1
- 2014-11-18 1
- 2014-12-02 1
- 2015-01-06 1
- 2015-01-20 1
- 2015-01-21 1
- 2015-02-02 1
- 2015-02-03 1
- 2015-02-17 1
- 2015-03-03 1
- 2015-03-17 1
- 2015-04-07 1
- 2015-04-21 1
- 2015-04-29 1
- 2015-05-05 1
- 2015-05-19 1
- 2015-06-02 1
- 2015-07-21 1
- 2015-09-01 1
- 2015-09-15 1
- 2015-10-06 1
- 2015-10-20 1
- 2015-11-03 1
- 2015-11-04 1
- 2015-11-18 1
- 2015-12-15 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-01-27 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2016-02-24 1
- 2016-03-01 1
- 2016-03-15 1
- 2016-04-05 1
- 2016-04-19 1
- 2016-05-17 1
- 2016-05-25 1
- 2016-06-07 1
- 2016-06-08 1
- 2016-06-21 1
- 2016-06-27 1
- 2016-07-05 1
- 2016-07-19 1
- 2016-09-06 1
- 2016-09-20 1
- 2016-10-04 1
- 2016-10-12 1
- 2016-10-18 1
- 2016-11-01 1
- 2016-12-06 1
- 2016-12-14 1
- 2016-12-20 1
- 2017-01-03 1
- 2017-01-17 1
- 2017-01-23 1
- 2017-02-08 1
- 2017-02-21 1
- 2017-02-23 1
- 2017-03-07 1
- 2017-03-21 1
- 2017-03-22 1
- 2017-04-04 1
- 2017-04-07 1
- 2017-04-12 1
- 2017-04-18 1
- 2017-05-01 1
- 2017-05-02 1
- 2017-05-16 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-06-14 1
- 2017-06-20 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-09-05 1
- 2017-09-19 1
- 2017-10-03 1
- 2017-10-11 1
- 2017-10-17 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2017-11-21 1
- 2017-12-05 1
- 2017-12-14 1
- 2017-12-19 1
- 2018-01-02 1
- 2018-01-16 1
- 2018-02-06 1
- 2018-02-14 1
- 2018-02-15 1
- 2018-02-20 1
- 2018-03-05 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-03-20 1
- 2018-04-11 1
- 2018-04-17 1
- 2018-05-01 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-05-15 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-06-19 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-07-11 1
- 2018-07-24 1
- 2018-09-04 1
- 2018-09-12 1
- 2018-09-18 1
- 2018-10-02 1
- 2018-10-16 1
- 2018-11-07 1
- 2018-11-27 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2018-12-04 1
- 2019-01-02 1
- 2019-01-15 1
- 2019-01-16 1
- 2019-01-29 1
- 2019-02-05 1
- 2019-02-14 1
- 2019-02-19 1
- 2019-03-05 1
- 2019-03-13 1
- 2019-03-16 1
- 2019-03-19 1
- 2019-04-02 1
- 2019-04-16 1
- 2019-05-07 1
- 2019-06-18 1
- 2019-07-02 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-09-03 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-09-17 1
- 2019-10-01 1
- 2019-10-08 1
- 2019-10-15 1
- 2019-11-05 1
- 2019-11-19 1
- 2019-12-03 1
- 2019-12-12 1
- 2019-12-17 1
- 2019-12-18 1
- 2020-01-07 1
- 2020-01-21 1
- 2020-02-04 1
- 2020-02-18 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-03-17 1
- 2020-04-07 1
- 2020-04-21 1
- 2020-04-22 1
- 2020-05-05 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-05-20 1
- 2020-06-02 1
- 2020-06-16 1
- 2020-06-17 1
- 2020-06-24 1
- 2020-06-29 1
- 2020-07-07 1
- 2020-07-14 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2020-07-25 1
- 2020-09-01 1
- 2020-09-15 1
- 2020-10-06 1
- 2020-10-20 1
- 2020-11-17 1
- 2020-11-23 1
- 2020-12-01 1
- 2021-01-05 1
- 2021-01-14 1
- 2021-01-19 1
- 2021-02-01 1
- 2021-02-02 1
- 2021-02-16 1
- 2021-03-01 1
- 2021-03-02 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-03-30 1
- 2021-04-05 1
- 2021-04-06 1
- 2021-04-20 1
- 2021-04-26 1
- 2021-05-03 1
- 2021-05-04 1
- 2021-05-08 1
- 2021-05-18 1
- 2021-06-01 1
- 2021-06-14 1
- 2021-06-15 1
- 2021-06-28 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-12 1
- 2021-07-19 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-07-26 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-09-21 1
- 2021-10-04 1
- 2021-10-05 1
- 2021-10-19 1
- 2021-11-01 1
- 2021-11-02 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2021-11-30 1
- 2021-12-06 1
- 2021-12-07 1
- 2021-12-21 1
- 2022-01-04 1
- 2022-01-18 1
- 2022-02-01 1
- 2022-02-15 1
- 2022-03-01 1
- 2022-03-15 1
- 2022-04-05 1
- 2022-04-12 1
- 2022-04-19 1
- 2022-05-03 1
- 2022-05-10 1
- 2022-05-17 1
- 2022-06-07 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 17, 2006 -7:29 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 8:02 p.m. Councilmember Matarrese led the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call - Present : ouncilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. Agenda Item (06-028) Resolution No. 13919, "Authorizing Open Market Purchase Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter for the Repair of the Bay Farm Island Seawall Dike, along Shoreline Park, and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Such an Agreement. " Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the requested funding was for interim repair, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired when full repair would be completed and what the plan was for preventive maintenance. The Public Works Director responded the schedule for the full repair was being reviewed; larger ripraps would be added to strengthen the armoring of the slope; the design process would take approximately two to three months because a lot of surveying is required; funding is the big issue; the estimate is approximately $2 million for the riprap. Mayor Johnson inquired whether information has been provided to the public. The Public Works Director responded the area has been barricaded, and warning signs have been posted. Mayor Johnson requested that additional signs be posted along Shoreline Park to provide information on the seawall restoration and to thank the public for their patience. Councilmember deHaan stated the damage occurred because of high tides ; inquired whether further deterioration was evident. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 1 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING TUESDAY- - - -FEBRUARY 1, 2005- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 8:05 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners/Board Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA ITEMS JOINT ACTION: (05-046CC/05-005CIC) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Financial Report and approve mid-year budget adjustments. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated that the report shows the revenues and expenditures for the first six months of the Fiscal Year and recommended adjustments. The Finance Director stated the report provides a snapshot view; matters could get better or worse; the amended budget has a $4.8 million deficit; a report on closing the deficit would be presented at the February 15 City Council Meeting; 45% of the estimated revenues have been received; expenditures are at 43.5% of budget the estimated fund balance is based on estimated revenues and appropriations. Councilmember/Commissioner/Board Member Daysog inquired how much of the projected $13.4 million fund balance is designated, to which the Finance Director responded approximately $8.5 million. Councilmember/Commissioner/Board Member Matarrese inquired whether there would be a budget adjustment due to the 43.5% run rate. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded that a budget adjustment would be made that would equal the estimated overrun of $4.8 million. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the budget situation is a very serious problem. ouncilmember/Commissioner/Board Member Daysog moved acceptance of the staff recommendation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-15 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - - MARCH 15, 2005 - - - 6:35 P. M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:35 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (05-011) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case Community Improvement Commission V. Rite Aid Corporation, Thrifty, Payless, Inc. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Chair Johnson announced that the Commission obtained briefing from Legal Counsel and instruction was given. Adjournment There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission March 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-05 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - - - APRIL 5, 2005 - - - 5:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:25 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Joint Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-135CC/05-013CIC Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation: Name of cases : Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, and City of Alameda V. Alameda Belt Line. Following the Closed Session, the Special Joint Meeting was reconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Council/Commission obtained briefing from Legal Counsel. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 7:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda Cit Council and Community Improvement Commission April 5, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-19 | 14 | APRIL 19, 2005 JOINT HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND ALAMEDA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MINUTES PLACEHOLDER The April 19, 2005 Joint HABOC/APFA Meeting Minutes have not been approved. | CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-03 | 14 | voice vote - 5. Mayor/Chair Johnson directed staff to bring the Central Avenue bike lane issue back to Council. (05-022CIC) Resolution No. 05-135, "Approving and Authorizing Payment of Certain Public Improvements to the Park Street and Otis Drive Intersection. Adopted; and (05-195CC) Resolution No. 13835, "Approving and Authorizing Execution of a Public Improvements Construction Agreement Between the City and Harsch Investment Corporation. Adopted. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated the project is critical to Alameda's economic engine. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired what type of funding would be used. The Development Services Director responded that staff recommends using Community Improvement Commission funds for the project; the primary benefit finding is required because the intersection is just outside the formal boundaries of a redevelopment project area; the improvements are tied to the form and function of the rest of the redevelopment project area; Redevelopment Law has a provision that recognizes that there are projects that may be outside the boundaries which are a primary benefit to the function of the rest of the project area. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether other funding sources were considered. The Development Services Director responded that there was a discussion about using some sales tax dollars from the new South Shore Shopping Center development. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired how the two-third, one- third cost sharing was derived. The Development Services Director responded that the formula was a result of negotiations with the developer ; there was a dispute over the assignment of the impact of the intersection; the developer Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 4 Community Improvement Commission May 3, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 14 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City could require the arborist to submit a periodic report regarding compliance with recommendations, to which the Supervising Planner responded the suggestion might be a good solution. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether Ms. Nader's comments are factually correct, to which the Supervising Planner responded that she did not know. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the Appellants provided information to staff, to which the Supervising Planner responded staff probably visited the site since Ms. Nader mentioned Code Enforcement. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Code Enforcement staff provided feedback about the site visit, to which the Chief Building Official responded that he would review the matter and report back to Council. Councilmember deHaan stated that he visited the site; that he is concerned about the disruption around the tree; the owner should be requested to agree to stipulations overseeing the construction activity. Bill Wong, Architect for Applicant, stated the arborist recommended a fence around the tree during construction. Mayor Johnson stated the Council wants to allow the Applicant to proceed, but the Applicant needs to protect the trees. Mr. Wong stated the fence would be put in place once the project is approved. Mayor Johnson requested the arborist to explain what needs to be done to protect the trees during construction; inquired whether he was retained to provide oversight during construction. Christopher Bowen, Project Arborist, stated that he discussed the matter with Planning staff and determined the drip line should be fenced off. Mayor Johnson inquired whether other measures were being recommended. Mr. Bowen responded the fence was to be installed prior to construction; that he recommends bails of hay be placed around the three, the trunk be wrapped in carpet, and 2" X 4" lumber be Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-07 | 14 | and the possibility having a Blockbuster; requested an update on when construction would start and the leasing mix. (05-291) Councilmember deHaan requested staff to review how existing transit operations, such as paratransit and Kid's Coach services, could provide inter-Alameda transportation intertwining with Alameda Point. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:04 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 June 7, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-21 | 14 | Mayor Johnson noted the matter was not on the agenda and Council could not discuss the matter and could only ask questions. Following Kate Pryor's comments, Councilmember Matarrese requested a catalog on the website indicating where reports can be found regarding the theatre and parking structurel stated that the Planning Board has deferred the design review for both the parking structure and theatre. (05-312) Will Richards, Alameda, stated that Alameda growth is inevitable; redevelopment projects should be reviewed on own merits. (05-313) ) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated that June 25 through June 26 is the annual Amateur Radio Field Day. (05-314) Richard Neveln, Alameda, stated there has been no planning for temporary bus stops during the Park Street and Webster Street construction. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-315) Discussion of the proposed baseball stadium along Alameda and Oakland's shared estuary. Councilmember Daysog requested staff birddog the proposed baseball stadium; stated the matter could be bad or good; noted there is a shared interest in the estuary and the City of Alameda should be part of the planning. (05-316) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Historical Advisory Board, Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board, Housing Commission, Library Board, Planning Board, and Social Service Human Relations Board. Mayor Johnson nominated Randal S. Miller for reappointment to the Historical Advisory Board; Edward Dependbrock for reappointment to the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board [remaining appointment continued] ; Nancy W. Gormley and Garnetta S. King for reappointment to the Housing Commission; Ruth K. Belikove and Alan D. Mitchell for reappointment to the Library Board; Rebecca L. Kohlstrand Parsons and Margaret McNamara for reappointment to the Planning Board; Stewart Chen, Karen Hollinger Jackson, and Cynthia Wasko Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 June 21, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 14 | tell if the Cinema will be a one hit wonder or a movie for the ages; the issues that the Mayor is bringing up can be tackled; there is enough information to proceed with the action tonight; issues raised can be addressed; that he doubts many people will submit applications for theaters; there is a window of opportunity to move forward with the theater. Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to review making the boutique theater regulations apply to all theaters, eliminating the possibility of having a 200 seat live theater. Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember Matarrese's suggestion; stated that staff could review both issues. The City Attorney stated the Council could direct that the zoning text amendment be brought to the Planning Board for an additional amendment in terms of applying restrictions on live theater. Councilmember Matarrese stated a flood of people will not try to get into the theater business; there is cap on the number of seats; the risk is fairly low; the regulations provide definition for what is already an unrestricted business; the two seem no different, except for the fact that there would be a movie projector instead of actors in front of the audience. Mayor Johnson stated that she supports the suggestion to go forward and bring back modifications; concurred with Councilmember Matarrese's suggestion to restrict live theaters. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation [adoption of the resolution and introduction of the ordinance] with the direction to come back with modifications to provide better control and planning, including exploring limiting the number of districts where the activity will be allowed. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 4. Noes: Vice Mayor Gilmore - 1. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she could not support the change based on the merit of the operator instead of policy the modifications that will return might address her conc… | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-02 | 14 | The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated that a construction management contract would be presented at the August 16 CIC Meeting. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the construction manager would be a contractor. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the construction manager would also manage the parking garage project. Commissioner deHaan inquired what the (construction management) Contract would cost, to which the Development Services Director responded approximately $1 million. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether there would be additional oversight, to which the Development Services Director responded not unless a problem arose with the historic property. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether there was a budget for oversight of architecture and engineering for the parking structure, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Morgan, Citizens for a Megaplex Free Alameda, urged that the Commission continue the matter until after a decision has been rendered on the project. Commissioner Daysog inquired what services Architectural Resources Group, Inc. (ARG) was providing and why another layer of consultants was providing advice. The Development Services Director responded that construction projects involving the rehabilitation of a historic structure involve changes and modifications architects are needed to draft up solutions to gray areas. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether said level of services was always contemplated, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Daysog stated that he has a sense of sticker shock with the increased amount of the Contract; that he understands that there is a level of complexity in dealing with a historic structure. The Development Services Director stated that the construction Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 August 2, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-16 | 14 | be downsized if one of the theaters and some retail were removed stated that he is concerned with protrusions going in all different directions; inquired whether the footprint could be reduced. The Development Services Director responded the buildings are linked; eliminating a theater from the Cineplex top level would impact the value of what remains and the project's ability to support the additional cost of going to a second floor; some of the value supports the construction cost. Councilmember deHaan stated protrusions usually cost more money removing the 79-seat theater would allow the building to be brought back; review of other options would allow reduction of mass; that he has concerns about design. Kyle Conner, Project Developer, stated more screens are needed, not less; eliminating a screen on the second level of the Cineplex would leave only nine screens; that he would like to have more than ten screens; that he would have a problem with reducing the number of screens. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Mr. Conner's plan would be to go forward with the balcony eventually, to which Mr. Conner responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Daysog inquired what the $72,000 in rent for the historic theater equals per square foot. Mr. Conner responded the ground floor is approximately 19,000 square feet, including retail; the cinema would be approximately 15,000 square feet. Councilmember Daysog stated that movie theater square footage comparisons are a way to gauge whether the rent is appropriate. Mr. Conner stated debt service for construction should be considered as rent because he has a ground lease and does not own the property; rent would be approximately $1.30 per square foot when considering all of the components to service the debt and rent for the facility. Councilmember Daysog inquired what the figure would be if debt service were not considered, to which Mr. Conner responded $0.40 per square foot. The Development Services Director stated that the rent is based on revenues. Regular Meeting Alameda City C… | CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-06 | 14 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-433) Former Councilmemer Lil Arnerich, Alameda, discussed disaster preparedness; stated that the Council should take charge in working with the Police, Fire, Public Works Departments, and schools to ensure that there is a detailed plan to provide emergency services and information to the community in case of a disaster submitted a list of the Alameda County Fair's response team. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the tabletop exercise was performed once a year. Mr. Arnerich responded in the affirmative; stated that the exercise is different from the City's exercise; noted the responsible parties should be identified before a disaster occurs; the table top exercise has been conducted every year for six years and works very well. (05-434) Bill Smith, Alameda discussed work/live studios, 500 Central Avenue, and fast boats. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-435) - Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Civil Service Board, Economic Development Commission, Historical Advisory Board, Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board, Public Art Commission and Recreation and Parks Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated Karen Lee and K.C. Rosenberg for reappointment to the Public Art Commission, and Terri Bertero Ogden for appointment to the Recreation and Parks Commission. (05-436) The Fire Chief provided information on Hurricane Katrina Disaster Relief and the City's Emergency Operation Plan and upcoming exercises. Mayor Johnson stated that a lot of communication has been received regarding Hurricane Katrina and the City's disaster preparednessi noted that the Fire Chief would provide information on how the community could help the hurricane victims. The Fire Chief stated that Hurricane Katrina is a challenging and unique type of disaster; continual flooding waters have delayed infrastructure repair; financial contributions are needed; provided contact information for the American Red Cross, the Salvation Army and the United Way, Bay Area; stated that the City's Emergency Re… | CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-20 | 14 | (05-466) Gretchen Lipow, Alameda, submitted a handout regarding the November ballot from The Alliance for a Better California. ( 05-467) - Delores Wells Guyton, Buena Vista Community Association, stated that a tenant at the Santa Clara Avenue fire informed the manager that her fire alarm did not work a year ago; annual inspections for rental properties are important. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Fire Department does annual inspections, to which the Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-468 - ) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Civil Service Board, Economic Development Commission, Historical Advisory Board, Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board, and Recreation and Park Commission. Not addressed. (05-469) Councilmember deHaan stated that there was excellent action at the Santa Clara Avenue fire; the Red Cross moved the families into a local church and was working with the last family to determine where the family would spend the night the landlord and manager of the unit had a listing of all the tenants; tenant relocation was being considered to other units owned by the manager ; the situation gave a strong feeling of being able to react when necessary. (05-470) Councilmember deHaan requested a traffic control update on Santa Clara Avenue and Sherman Street. (05-471) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she received a phone call regarding the morning traffic situation at Island Drive and Doolittle Drive and the length of time to get off Bay Farm Island traveling both ways; the citizen noted that he had formally contacted the Public Works Department about the problem a year ago; requested staff to follow up on the matter. Mayor Johnson stated that the traffic situation has worsened recently; inquired whether there has been a change in the timing of the signals; noted the traffic backs up on Island Drive; the southbound traffic on Doolittle Drive is not as bad. Councilmember deHaan stated the morning traffic going out to Harbor Bay is a… | CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-11-01 | 14 | infrastructure plan ideas to the staff prior to the matter being on the agenda in December ; suggested community oversight be established; requested future discussions on how streets are prioritized for crack sealing treatment. Mayor Johnson stated she would not want to have the infrastructure report delayed in order to review options; the Council should review what other cities do; she was very disappointed when the Council learned that the infrastructure spending was cut nearly 50%, which made making the reserve appear to be false; stated the reserve is not false; deferred maintenance occurred; stated there is crack sealing all over the City; a decision was made not to do crack sealing; the Council needs more information on what is prioritized and the affects of the decisions; a long catch-up game is required due to the cuts. Councilmember Daysog requested some level of discussion about an oversight committee that would inform the Council on issues. Mayor Johnson stated there should be a discussion on available options and goals. Councilmember deHaan inquired when the infrastructure report would be brought to the Council, to which the City Manager responded December. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether park deterioration would be included in the report. The City Manager responded the report includes sidewalks, streets, street tree planning, field maintenance, facility maintenance, sewers, and storm drains. (05-527) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she attended the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Conference in Oakland last week; the main topic of conversation was affordable housing there was a strong recognition that individuals are being priced out of the Bay Area market. the 20-3 year old group stated housing was a real problem; unfortunately the language at the conference was harsh on both sides and was not a good coming together to exchange ideas. (05-528) Councilmember deHaan stated that the Chamber of Commerce had a briefing on the Ninth Avenue project in conjunction with the Port of Oakland for… | CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-06 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -DECEMBER 6, 2005 - -6:00 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:25 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-548) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators: Marie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee : City Attorney (05-549) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Mohlen & Skrinde V. City of Alameda. (05-550) Conference with Labor Negotiator - Agency Negotiator: Karen Willis; Employee Organization: Executive Management Employees. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding City Attorney, the Council discussed the matter; regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, the Council obtained a briefing from Legal Counsel ; regarding Executive Management Employees, the Council obtained a briefing and gave direction. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 6, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-20 | 14 | Counci lmember Matarrese concurred with Vice Mayor Gilmore; stated $5,000 is a small amount to pay to ask the question. Counci lmember Matarrese amended the motion to include Vice Mayor Gilmore's caveat [that the process go to bid or the JPA provide a written explanation if there is an impediment with using the open bid process] Councilmember deHaan stated the Council is safeguarding itself with the financial review process. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote - Ayes: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Noes Councilmember Daysog - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-589) louncilmember deHaan stated that the opening of the new Alameda Towne Centre Safeway store was very successful; sale estimates are between $40-50 million for the proposed Target; Target states that 85% of all transactions would be coming from Alameda which is the leakage the City is trying to capture; close to a million $38 to $50 transactions would need to occur per year to achieve $40 million in sales; Target states that the store is a one-stop shop; transportation and corridor impacts could be derived from the one-stop shop concept ; past studies indicate only 65% of the transactions would be recaptured; Alamedans would need to make over 900,000 transactions per year which means that every household would have approximately 30 to 31 transactions per year questioned whether said number of transactions is reasonable; stated a consultant was used in the past everyone needs to understand the dynamics of what is happening; Target knows exactly what is happening but does not always provide information to the public; an independent consultant is needed to establish some of the facts and figures; every household in Alameda would have to spend close to $1200 per year for a 85% recovery; the money would not be new money but would be drawn from elsewhere. Mayor Johnson stated that figures show that Alameda residents spend millions of dollars at Target; … | CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-07 | 14 | is above the 20% level. The Public Works Director stated that the City Manager and Finance Director have assurances that the $2 million is available and is enough to keep the remaining General Reserve funds at 20%. The City Manager stated that the recalculation of the General Fund Reserve is reviewed every year at mid-year to ensure that the reserve is based on the actuals. The Fire Chief provided a brief presentation on the $400,000 for fire station planning and acquisition. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether new sites are being considered which would adjoin existing residential areas. The Fire Chief responded all West End fire stations should be reviewed to determine the best way to proceed over the long term. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the proposed study would be directed to the West End fire stations, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether procurement was being considered for West End fire stations. The Fire Chief responded in the negative; stated the priority is Fire Station 3. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the $400,000 was for the study and acquisition, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. The City Treasurer stated reducing the reserve levels is a serious matter; he is concerned with how the money will be used; a good use would be investing the money in City assets; reserves should be spent on projects that result in a lollar-for-dollar benefit; the Fire Department issues should be addressed during the normal budgeting process the proposal reduced the reserves from 25% to 20%; stated that he understood that reducing the reserves to 20% was temporary. The City Auditor stated that money from the reserves should go toward identifiable projects; he takes exception to using reserve funds for a study; questioned why a planning decision needs to be outsourced; stated staff should make decisions; paying for a study is not a prudent way to spend down the reserves. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 4 Community … | CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-21 | 14 | (06-090) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that residents living near business districts have an issue with litter being left from fast food restaurants; a resident sent her a link to a newspaper article regarding Oakland imposing a mandated City fee on business owners for trash pickup; stated she is not suggesting imposing a similar fee but that Council should review the strategy. (06-091) Councilmember Daysog requested information on fire inspection costs which he requested in the past. The City Manager stated that she would provide Councilmember Daysog with a copy of the fee structure. (06-092) Councilmember deHaan stated that signs were posted throughout the City to buy merchandise at a home on Valentine's Day i he feels that doing so is pushing the envelop to the extreme. stated that Kentucky Fried Chicken near Park Avenue smells of well- - cooked oil; newly constructed restaurants have scrubbers for ventilation; requested staff to review how the odor can be remedied. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City could adopt an ordinance requiring more filters. Vice Mayor Gilmore suggesting reviewing whether another entity regulates the issue. (06-093) Mayor Johnson stated issues have been discussed at Youth Collaborative meetings regarding the youth in the community; suggested that the Council consider forming a Youth Advisory Council or have youth representatives on to certain boards and commissions; volunteer opportunities are available for students, but paying job opportunities are scarce; the Golf Course had a policy regarding not hiring students under eighteen years old in the past; the policy has changed so that 16 year old students can be hired; suggested that the matter be placed on a City Council agenda. (06-094) Mayor Johnson inquired whether anything was being done regarding the fire cleanup at Central Avenue and Park Street. The City Manager responded that the Planning Director was working on regulatory remedies. Mayor Johnson stated that blight has lasted for many years in the downtown district. Regular Meet… | CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-07 | 14 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 10:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 2 March 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-21 | 14 | process would provide the key on whether or not to save the historic theater at any cost; starting now is critical; he would like to see the project go out to bid; another evaluation would be necessary once the bid results are received; he does not believe the size would affect the character of the City because the people are the character; Park Street has blossomed by bringing in Starbuck's Coffee and Peet's Coffee; stated he was ready to move forward. The Development Services Director clarified that the previously mentioned $12.849 million figure for the historic theater] includes acquisition, relocation and contingencies; the rehabilitation is estimated at $7.3 million. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated that tonight's meeting addressees design and the bidding process the financial aspects of the project continue to trouble him; Alameda will collect 30 to 40 cents per-square foot on the historic theater, which is substantially below the $1.50 per-square foot market rate for new theater space; he remains convinced that the City should be collecting a rent significantly north of 40 cents per- square foot and somewhere south of $1.50 per-square foot to ensure that the project is financially beneficial to both the City and the developer; the difference between 40 cents per-square foot and $1.50 per-square foot may seem trivial but equates to millions of dollars that Alameda would be loosing over many years; rehabilitation costs have increased by 30% with strong prospects of increased costs once rehabilitation commences. the City should be collecting a rent commensurate with the project risks; the need for a better deal with the developer is underscored by the fact that both a consultant and City staff agreed that local residents would buy movie tickets in droves; the Central Cinema proves the demand analysis to be correct; both the developer and the City should be sharing in the anticipated strong demand for movie tickets and concessions; the historic downtown area should be revived by refurbishing the old t… | CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-04-04 | 14 | Mayor Johnson stated the tube services two-thirds of the Island: signage should be provided regarding problems ; protocol is needed. (06-194) Mayor Johnson stated she spoke with the Assistant City Attorney regarding the bid protest processi suggested formalizing the process. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 April 4, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-02 | 14 | Members and Commissioners should not be removed from their positions. Councilmember deHaan requested the City Clerk to review the resident status of other Board Members and Commissioners. Mayor Johnson stated that the Council could change the Municipal Code; the Code is intended to be flexible. Councilmember deHaan requested an Off Agenda Report on the matter. Mayor Johnson stated the matter could be brought back to the Council for discussion. Councilmember deHaan requested the Council address commission residency requirements. (06-240) Mayor Johnson reported that she attended the Northern California Power Agency/Northwest Public Power Association Western Federal Policy Conference in Washington D.C. ; the conference is an opportunity for small utilities to express their voice in Washington D. C. ; Alameda Power and Telecom has to keep up on State and federal policy and legislative issues. (06-241) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated pending federal legislation regulating cable companies included the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) overseeing trenching in City streets; the proposal takes away local control; requested information; stated the City should be actively lobbying against such regulations. The City Manager stated lobbying against the regulations was consistent with a resolution Council previously adopted; an update would be provided. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the regular meeting at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 May 2, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -MAY 16, 2006- - -5:31 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:50 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmember deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (06-250) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Campos-Marquez V. City of Alameda. (06-251) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency negotiators: Marie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee City Attorney. (06-253) Public Employment. Title: City Attorney. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, Council received a briefing from Legal Counsel regarding Conference with Labor Negotiators, Council discussed the City Attorney ; regarding Public Employment, Council discussed City Attorney employment. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-06 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JUNE 6, 2006- - -6:30 P.M. Vice Mayor Gilmore convened the Special Meeting at 6:35 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Note: Mayor Johnson was present via teleconference from the Paris Hotel, 3655 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109. Absent : None The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (06-279) - Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Jose Ricabal V. Yu, City of Alameda, et al. (06-280) Conference with Labor Negotiators : Agency negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee organizations and employees Alameda City Employees Association, Chief of Police, Executive Management Group, Fire Chief, International Brotherhood of Electrical Works, and Management and Confidential Employees Association. (06-281) Conference with Labor Negotiators: Agency negotiators: Marie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee City Attorney (06-282) Public Employment; Title: City Attorney. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Vice Mayor Gilmore announced that regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, Council gave direction to Legal Counsel regarding settlement parameters; regarding Employee organizations and employees Alameda City Employees Association, Chief of Police, Executive Management Group, Fire Chief, International] Brotherhood of Electrical Works, and Management and Confidential Employees Association, Council received briefing from labor negotiators and gave direction; regarding City Attorney, Council received a briefing from Labor Negotiators regarding the City Attorney position. Adjournment There being no further business, Vice Mayor Gilmore adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 6, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-20 | 14 | Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 9:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Annual Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 June 20, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-05 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY - -JULY 5, 2006- -7:32 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the meeting at 9:37 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (06-042) Minutes of the Annual Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on June 20, 2006. Approved. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEM (06-043 ) Recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to execute a Contract in the amount of $840,000.00 with Bellecci and Associates for plans, specifications, and engineering for the Tinker/Webster Extension Project (Tinker Extension Design CIP Project No. 04-105) . Commissioner Matarrese inquired why no other bidders are listed for the project. The Redevelopment Manager responded the project went out to bid in 1999 and received two or three bids; stated the Contract was awarded to Bellecci and Associates and then was put on hold. Commissioner Matarrese inquired why the project was not re-bid. The Redevelopment Manager responded Bellecci and Associates has been working on the project; stated the City entered into a $74,000 Contract to complete the project report for CalTrans. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether restarting with another firm would not be cost-effective. The Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative; stated Bellecci and Associates developed all the base drawings. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the City owns the base drawings, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 1 July 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-18 | 14 | the matter should be placed on a Council agenda for action. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 July 18, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-05 | 14 | stretched the envelope; the project drops 18 inches to get into the lower level; there has to be another wayi he is concerned with mass and the eight-foot driveway the Fire Department should review the driveway. Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to clarify whether the eight-foot driveway meets code. The Supervising Planner stated the existing driveway can be retained; further stated the minimum code for driveways now is eight and a half feet. Councilmember Matarrese stated relation to other houses in the neighborhood is a planning and design issue. Mayor Johnson stated more work needs to be done; size is relevant to the historic character of the house; approving the demolition is an extraordinary act and historic preservation should be expected in return; the duplexes are going to be larger than some houses in Alameda; limiting the size and requesting more details would preserve the historic character. Councilmember Matarrese moved that the matter be sent back to the HAB to review the impact of the expansion on the historic nature of the structures and review additional detail to bring the structures closer to original form. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, with the caveat that one of the structures could be moved closer to the property line, which could change the opportunity of making the project work and change access points. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there are examples of remodels that have gone wrong; the project meets Code but no one likes the look; questioned when the Code would be changed stated people trying to do projects should have a better idea about what is acceptable. Councilmember Matarrese stated the big issue is the 30% [demolition] or else the project should go forward. Councilmember deHaan noted the City should be vigilant i City funding is going into the project. The Supervising Planner noted that the houses are covered in asbestos shingles and the detail would not be known until the shingles are removed; therefore, the drawing is devoid of some details; the s… | CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-19 | 14 | Zoning Ordinance No. 1277, N.S. for that Property Located at 500 Maitland Drive. " Finally passed. David Kirwin, Alameda, stated the Chuck Corica Golf Course chain link fence was moved back to make room for moving Maitland Drive; the RV Storage was a harsh way to think about a neighborhood. Councilmember deHaan stated he was not present when the decision o sell the property was made; five acres of the gun range were contaminated and the best use was an RV Storage area; the property was sold for $1 million; the green portion and roadway were sold for approximately $45,000. 1.2 acres was given away for $45,000 and should remain open space. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would vote against rezoning for reasons relating to consistencies regarding RV issues on Webster Street. Mayor Johnson stated the facility is a requirement that the City placed on the developer in the 1970's. The Planner III stated the developer was required to set aside 3 acres for future expansion of the RV Storage facility when triggered by market demand. Councilmember Matarrese stated he would support the proposed ordinance as long as appropriate screening is required to provide a green shield to soften the commercial property and as long as the requirement is binding; the City has benefited and should do something for the neighborhood. The Planner III stated the Planning Board included the landscape requirement; the final development plan and design review have a condition that specific landscaping requirements would screen the RV's; clarified that the gateway into Harbor Bay would not be disturbed. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether an additional review could be added to make sure that the specific landscape requirement happens. The City Attorney responded the additional review would not be included in a zoning ordinance typically; stated the requested condition is already a condition of the project. The Planner III read the following portion of the condition "The developer shall submit a final landscaping plan. Perimeter landscapin… | CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-03 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -OCTOBER 3, 2006- -6:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. (06-487 - ) Conference With Labor Negotiators. Agency negotiators: Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Executive Management Group, Management and Confidential Employees Association, and Police Association Non- Sworn. (06-488) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : VanderHeiden V. City of Alameda. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiatori no action was taken; regarding Existing Litigation, Council received a briefing from Legal Counsel and gave direction to Legal Counsel. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council October 3, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 14 | of the passive space requirements when the matter comes back to Council: stated he is concerned about 83 units; other passive spaces are needed; requested staff to please provide what said amount of space would be so Council understands what is normally required; that he does not believe that it would be 83 units; the number would drop down maybe another quarter of an acre. Councilmember Daysog stated his understanding of the 83 units is predicated on the 17 units per gross acre which he interprets to be the maximum end, which could be lower. Mayor Johnson stated Council direction could incorporate the direction given two weeks ago for the Beltline Task Force; the Beltline Task Force could also be the Task Force for the entire ten acre Estuary Park. The City Manager stated that Council approved developing the Beltline Task Force; the scope would be expanded. (06-520) Resolution No. 14030, "Adoption of Resolution Declaring the Intent of the City Council to Rezone the 22-Acre Beltline Railroad Property Consistent with Voter-Approved Measure E (Open Space/Park Use) as Soon as the Property is Acquired by the City of Alameda. Adopted. The Parks and Recreation Director provided a brief update. Doug Siden, East Bay Regional Park District, stated a lot of cities would be envious of Alameda realizing the opportunity for a park with land in the heart of the City. Jon Spangler, Alameda, stated it is nice to know that the City has moved quickly despite some contrary community comment. Councilmember Daysog thanked the City Attorney and City Manager staff for turning the Resolution around so quickly. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-521) Recommendation to approve Request for Proposals for purchase of five all-electric vehicles for the City fleet. The Public Works Director provided a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff is comfortable with Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 October 17… | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-11-21 | 14 | Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore stated the staff report indicates that the Northern Waterfront Specific Plan (NWSP) would come to the Council/Commission in January; inquired why the Council/Commission is looking at the project now; stated that she was on the NWSP Committee; the School District owns a piece of property on the site; inquired whether a deal has been reached with the School District stated bringing the project forward without said deal is premature; the applicant has not gone through community workshops to see if the public thinks the project is a good idea; the process seems backwards. The Development Services Director stated the process is very forward; typically staff time is spent whittling though issues before anything is in any kind of condition to go out to the public because of just the questions asked; the request is before the Council/Commission because staff is going to spend a lot of time on the project; staff wants to set up a cost recovery mechanism upfront because of the size and scale of the project consultants need to be hired to help staff deal with some of the questions and issues, such as cost and feasibility; a Settlement Agreement with the School District in 2000 gave the District rights to certain properties within the State Tidelands area; the School District' S intentions have to be worked out. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether staff or the developer would work with the School District. The Development Services Director responded staff would work as a team with the developer; stated the State Tidelands properties are leased to Encinal Real Estate until 2029. however, the City manages the lease; a joint effort has to be made; the City deals with more real estate transactions than the School District and could help set out an outline of what needs to be evaluated and a path of actions which need to be accomplished to bring a decision to completion. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the School District was not allowed to go onto the property to complete environmental tes… | CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 14 | Lisa Dickerson, Alameda; Oliver M. Vido, Alameda; Theresa Golden, Alameda; Eric J. Kos, Greater Alameda Business Association (GABA) ; John Abrate, Alameda; Patty Jacobs, Alameda; Diane Lichtenstein, Alameda; Jennifer Cohen, Alameda; Diana Kenney, Miracle League ; Kurt Atherton, Marina Square; Russ Grant, Alameda; Harry Hartman, Alameda ; Kathy Wagner, Marina Square Athletic Club (provided handout ; Cathy Leong, Alameda; Matt Maloon, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 595 (IBEW) ; Bruce Reeves, Alameda Bruce Lymburn, Clif Bar and Company; Diana Thomas, Marina Square Athletic Club; Andy Slivka, Carpenters Union; David Steele, Alameda; Barry Cohn, NAI BT Commercial Don Peterson, Alameda; Lauren Do, Alameda; Lorre Zuppan, Alameda Lucy Gigli, Bike Alameda and Coalition Partners; Jeff Cambra, Bike Alameda and Coalition Partners (provided handout) ; Jon Spangler, Pedestrian Friendly Alameda: Anne Rockwell Miracle League Donna Gianovlis, Cardinal Point; Bill Williford, Oakland; Kent Rosenblum, Rosenblum Cellars; Saboor Zapari, Angela's Restaurant John Rockwell, Alameda; Eugenie Young, Alameda; Bram Briggance, Miracle League; Melody Marr, Alameda Chamber of Commerce; Jim Rockwell, Miracle League; Seth Hamalian, Alameda; Mario Mariani, Alameda; Nick Cabral, Alameda;Roberta Rockwell, Miracle League. Neutral : Jean Sweeney, Alameda (provided handout ) ; David Giovannoli, Alameda; David Kirwin, Alameda; Denise Brady, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. louncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese requested an explanation of the City's financial obligations, including where the money would come from and where the money would go. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore requested an explanation of the City's responsibilitie under the existing DDA and when obligations would start. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated $27.5 million is the tax increment contribution; another $8 million contribution may be required if the … | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 14 | systems need to be analyzed; space planning is needed. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the $1 million plus is not just for the feasibility study but is for all other things that could lead up to the Planning and Building Department and other permit entities moving into the building, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired why Council needs to appropriate over $1 million now. The Planning and Building Director responded the money would go into an account for the study and future improvements. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether said improvements would not be approved by Council. The Planning and Building Director responded in the negative stated expenditure approval would need to come back to Council. louncilmember Matarrese inquired why Council needs to appropriate over $1 million to do approximately $200,000 worth of work. The City Manager responded staff is requesting that the money be placed in the Capital Improvement Fund project stated any expenditures would come back to Council for approval the first expenditure would be the study; staff is recommending to set aside money for the One-Stop Permit Center into an account, recognizing the Carnegie Building would be considered. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the intent is to earmark the money for the project until some other decision is made. The City Manager responded the intent is to take the money identified for the One-Stop Permit Center and put the money in a Capital project. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the money would be released if Council does not want the money going to the One-Stop Permit Center. The City Manager responded the money would be restricted for expenditures related to the One-Stop Permit Center; the money would be maintained as a Capital account for a One-Stop Permit Center and analyze other alternative opportunities if the Carnegie Building is not feasible. Councilmember deHaan inquired how the money is identified in the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1… | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-16 | 14 | direction that the Master Tree Plan be reviewed by the Climate Protection Campaign Task Force. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated the Harbor Bay Trail and Marina Village waterfront homes have no trees; clustered trees are in park areas; he is concerned with the infill proposed for Shoreline Drive. Mayor Johnson stated trees are scattered throughout the Bay Trail area on Harbor Bay; questioned whether the Tree Master Plan review and update would occur before or after the proposed infill. The Public Works Director stated carbon sequester trees would be reviewed as part of tree placement. Mayor Johnson stated Council should review whether fines should be imposed if a homeowner removes a tree. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-034) ) Recommendation to approve funding request for Alameda Big - Box Study Support not to exceed $50,000 from General Fund Reserves. The Business Development Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents (In favor of staff recommendation) : David Howard, Alameda: Gretchen Lipow, Alameda; Denise Brady, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he supports spending reserve funds for infrastructure improvements he has a hard time spending reserve money on a study inquired whether the study could be funded with money budgeted elsewhere; stated that he would not support taking the money from the General Fund Reserves. In response to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry, the Business Development Manager responded all outside consultant fees have been encumbered. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether money could be used from funds that are not encumbered yet, to which the Business Development Manager responded in the negative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 January 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-06 | 14 | (07-068) Councilmember deHaan stated Council discussed setting aside $20,000 to $30,000 to review a salt water pump station; Alameda's housing stock would be vulnerable in an earthquake; a feasibility study should be conducted. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City of Berkeley conducted a feasibility study; stated the Fire Department has not provided Council with sufficient information; Alameda could use the City of Berkeley's information if a study was conducted; she would like the Fire Department to provide information on whether or not the system is feasible. Councilmember deHaan stated the information could be weaved into the Disaster Plan. The City Manager stated staff is in the process of developing the Disaster Mitigation Plan; staff will provide a report on what other cities are doing. Mayor Johnson stated San Francisco is charged with developing an Emergency Response Plan; requested that staff investigate whether Alameda has a representative attending the meetings. (07-069) Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda was established as an electric City in the late 1990's; requested the program be reviewed and reinstated. (07-070) Mayor Johnson stated she attended the Annual Mayor's Conference in Washington, D.C. during the week of January 23; Community Development Block Grant/Section 8 cuts are always a threat but are usually reinstated; interest in alternative power sources, greenhouse gases, and global warming has increased; the Mayor's Conference does a lot to advocate for cities. ADJOURNMENT (07-071) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 10:07 p.m. in a moment of silence for Ruth Herch. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 February 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-20 | 14 | responded in the affirmative. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the General Contractor plans on adding back value engineering items, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the canopies would be standard. The Architect responded that the State Architect and Section 106 Consultant requested that the historic theater, Cineplex and parking structure canopies be different. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 February 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-03-20 | 14 | Walnut Creek; he has the same concerns that he had a year ago regarding bringing the National Guard home; revisiting the issue is appropriate. ADJOURNMENT (07 -139) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:48 p.m. in a moment of silence with thoughts and prayers for those who have lost their lives or have been wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 March 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-04-17 | 14 | additional funding is available. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson thanked the SSHRB for recommendations; stated Council appreciates the SSHRB's time and effort. (07-183) Recommendation to consider initiation of a Zoning Amendment in the area generally bounded by Madison Street to the north, Washington Street to the south, Fernside Drive to the east and Peach Street to the west. The Planning and Building Director gave a brief report. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the rezoning is the first step in the process, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there would be Public Hearings. The Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative; stated the proposal would be reviewed and an analysis would be performed; meetings would be held; it is important to know what the neighbors want to achieve before a new, overlay district is created; the matter would go to the Planning Board before coming to Council. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the proposed rezoning is the first in the City, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore inquired what was the height limit in the R-1 Zone, to which the Planning and Building Director responded thirty feet. Councilmember Matarrese stated a Public Hearing was held regarding remodeled property in the area; inquired how the permit process would be affected and whether said property conforms with the general provisions of what is being proposed tonight. The Planning and Building Director responded the owners are in the process of doing some redesign work and are waiting for tonight's Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 April 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-05-15 | 14 | Councilmember Gilmore stated the meetings could be announced at Council or Planning Board meetings. Councilmember Matarrese agreed to amend the motion. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the motion included Councilmember Gilmore's comments that Vice Mayor Tam included when she originally seconded the motion. Vice Mayor Tam stated Councilmember Gilmore's clarification on the process in which the deliverables come back to the Council was articulated when Councilmember Matarrese restated the motion. Mayor Johnson stated the comments were that there should be a written record. Councilmember Gilmore stated the main point was that there be a written record of what was discussed, how it was discussed, and what conclusions, if anyi there needs to be a full record, not just one line that a meeting was held. Councilmember deHaan stated that Councilmember Gilmore alluded to Measure A itself being the will of the people and would come back through said means via the will of the people. Mayor Johnson stated the statement could be made for the record. Councilmember Gilmore stated the statement could be made for the record; however, it [statement ] did not have anything to do with the motion. Mayor Johnson stated the statement should be made as part of the record: that the Council recognizes Measure A is part of the Charter and can only be changed by a vote of the people; further stated that she personally, and she has heard a majority of the members of the Council state, that they do not believe that the Council should put Measure A on the ballot ; the discussions are not leading towards a campaign; Measure A was originally a grassroots effort; if there is support to change Measure A, it should be through the same grassroots effort; the matter can be made very clear as part of the record. Councilmember deHaan stated louncilmember Gilmore had stated the same thing, which he was reiterating. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she meant her statement, but does Regular Meeting Alameda City Cou… | CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-05 | 14 | system; other cities will be forced to recycle because recycling will be mandated due to landfill limitations; forward thinking was important in making a substantial portion of the fleet alternative fuel; inquired what other mandates might arise that would affect Contract renegotiations, such as electronic waste. The Public Works Director responded batteries are now considered Universal Waste; stated a pilot program is being initiated which will allow residents to drop off Universal Waste items such as batteries, cell phones and florescent tubes; an educational program will be provided. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether a sorting facility might be necessary to ensure that florescent light bulbs do not end up in a landfill; stated cost considerations would need to be addressed at the next Contract negotiation, if a sorting facility is needed. The Public Works Director responded the hope is to avoid the situation through education and resident cooperation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Alameda has a drop off location for computers and other electronic equipment. The Public Works Director responded the City provided a drop off location last year; stated staff is looking into providing a drop off location twice a year. Mr. Grzanka stated E-Waste is a drop off disposal facility for Alameda County. Mayor Johnson stated information should be put on the City's website. Councilmember Matarrese stated that nothing is free the City needs to be forward thinking regarding mandates or new programs which would affect the Contract cost evaluations would need to be made in addition to determining how to educate people. Councilmember deHaan stated that not all residents are recycling to the highest level; an awareness program should be reinforced; ACI's operation is separated and thorough; ACI does a very good job. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-268) Public Hearing to consider a Call for Review of the Regular… | CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-19 | 14 | Operating Budget and Capital Improvements and Appropriating Certain Moneys for the Expenditures Provided in Fiscal Year 2007-08. " Adopted; ARRA Resolution No. 41, "Approving and Adopting the Operating Budget and Appropriating Certain Moneys for the Expenditures Provided in Fiscal Year 2007-08. " Adopted; (07-024 CIC) CIC Resolution No. 07-150, "Approving and Adopting the Operating Budget and Appropriating Certain Moneys for the Expenditures Provided in Fiscal Year 2007-08. Adopted; (07-304A CC ) Resolution No. 14110, "Establishing Guidelines for Reimbursement of Per Diem Allowance for City of Alameda Business Travel. " Adopted; and (07-304B CC) Recommendation to authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Grant Agreement between the City of Alameda and the Alameda Historical Museum. The City Manager/Executive Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated residents have experienced sewage backups because of tree roots; the Public Works Department handles the issue well: inquired whether a long-term plan is in place. The Public Works Director responded a long-term plan is being developed; stated Council approved three $400,000 Contracts to start video taping sewer lines and storm drains; the City's Sewer Lateral Ordinance requires sewer lateral testing before a house is sold. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether a reserve fund has been established; stated expenditures are lower than revenue. The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated money is being held back to complete the Master Plan; $2 to $3 million will be spent on capital construction projects annually; the total budget includes the costs associated with infrastructure. The City Manager/Executive Director stated the Sewer Service Fund is $40 million. Vice Mayor/Board 1Member/Commissioner Tam stated Public Works staff was extremely responsive when she had a sewer backup on her street. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated Council approved the Turf Management Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda… | CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-03 | 14 | Counci lmember Gilmore stated the amount and type of equipment left here is unknown. Mr. Abbey identified said equipment. Councilmember Gilmore requested Mr. Abbey to provide staff with contact information. Mayor Johnson stated there is not a clear understanding of the National Guard and how deployment works; the Governor of Maine stated she is concerned because State law stipulates that National Guard troops cannot be deployed for a certain amount of time after being deployed out of the United States. Mr. Abbey stated federal troops were brought in during the 1906 earthquake because the States of Nevada, Oregon, Washington and Idaho could not send National Guard troops to assist in other states unless federalized. The City Manager stated staff would work with Mr. Abbey as well as National Guard representatives. Mr. Abbey stated the State Offices of Emergency Management Services would be happy to help. Councilmember deHaan requested a status on SB 924; stated said bill would be an advisory question; all California citizens would be requested to vote on the matter. (07-330) - Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Public Utilities Board. Mayor Johnson nominated Gregory Hamm for appointment to the Public Utilities Board. (07-331) Mayor Johnson stated that she attended the Mayor's Conference last week; the Energy Committee has become very popular; Los Angles is doing many innovative things. (07-332) Councilmember Matarrese stated the Council had a joint meeting with the Transportation Commission a few months ago; the congestion disappears on the Bay Farm Island Bridge when school lets out requested that a plan be discussed for reducing student commute traffic at the next louncil/School District meeting ; Lincoln Middle School and Amelia Earhart Elementary School cause congestion in the area; Washington School causes congestion at 8th Street and Santa Clara Avenue; requested that the matter be Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council July 3, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-17 | 14 | The Fire Marshall stated that he did not have said information. Mayor Johnson stated she wants to know whether Alameda would be significantly different from other cities. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the permit activity in the past year where the 25% threshold was reached and sprinklers were not required. The Building Officials responded that he did not know; stated 25% of the current value is pretty high. Councilmember deHaan inquired what percentage of commercial buildings have sprinklers. The Fire Marshall responded since 1983 every commercial building larger than 5,000 square feet has a fire sprinkler. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether 50% of commercial stock does not have sprinklers, to which the Fire Marshall responded 50% is a good estimate. Mayor Johnson stated sprinklers are important; damage was minimized at one of the fires over the weekend [Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) ] because of the sprinkler system. The Fire Marshall stated the FISC property would have been completely lost if not for the sprinkler system. Mayor Johnson stated people should not be discouraged to make minor improvements because of a large sprinkler system expense; 25% of the current value avoids the problem; the changes are good; the ordinance should move forward. Former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda, urged introduction of the ordinance. David Kirwin, Alameda, stated he supports the ordinance with the exception of Group U buildings. Mayor Johnson inquired how detached buildings on residential lots would be handled. The Fire Marshall responded Group U Occupancy types typically have a lot of equipment and storage inside; a fire could affect Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council July 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-07 | 14 | is important because of the recent increase in the Far East production of drug and food products without regulatory infrastructure; continued lobbying efforts would be very helpful. Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember Matarrese; stated things come in from foreign countries that are not tested; problems are not discovered until after the fact; foreign product testing should be increased. (07-384) Mayor Johnson stated that she attended the League of California Cities summer training session; encouraged Councilmembers to attend next year; stated Councilmember deHaan attended also. (07-385) Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Emergency Operations Plan would be coming to Council in the spring. The Assistant City Manager stated he thought the Plan would be coming to Council next year; he will get the exact date. Councilmember Matarrese requested that information be provided on the rate limiting steps. Mayor Johnson requested information on regional funding, how the funding is used, and whether funding comes to Alameda. (07-386 - ) Councilmember deHaan stated Council should express thanks for postponing the decision on the Harbor Bay Business Park lab; the desire to retain the lab should be emphasized. (07-387) - Councilmember deHaan stated that the Tube lighting should be completed by the end of the month. The Assistant City Manager stated the first set of lights are expected to go in this week. Mayor Johnson stated that staff should keep on eye on the matter. (07-388) Councilmember deHaan stated that he attended the League of California Cities meeting; he took a side trip to Fort Ord with the City Manager. (07-389) Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda Towne Center removed the recycling center for clothes. The Salvation Army and Goodwill are still available; grocery stores should be mandated to have on- site recycling if recycled materials are generated; suggested that staff review the matter. Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council August 7, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-21 | 14 | revocation clause that states that the Use Permit can be revoked if there is abuse or deterioration. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue would not go away as long as there is a gas station with a non-conforming use in a residential zone, which is the burden of having neighborhood commercial districts. Mayor Johnson stated that Council would not allow a gas station to be developed if the site was empty; Alameda is an old City that needs to deal with adjacent residential and business areas. (07-407) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Various Sections of Chapter II (Administration) , to Address the Transportation Commission's Purpose and Authority Repealing and Amending Various Sections of Chapter VIII (Traffic, Motor Vehicles and Alternative Transportation Modes) and Chapter XII (Designated Parking) to Reassign the Powers and Duties of the "Technical Transportation Team" to the Public Works Director and the Chief of Police, and Also Designate the Transportation Commission as the Initial Hearing Body for the Administration of Operational Issues Associated with All City Transportation. Continued to October 2, 2007. (07 - 408 ) Recommendation to authorize government delegation to Wuxi , China to attend Sister City forum and designate the Mayor or other members of the City Council to lead the delegation. The Community Development Program Manager gave a brief presentation. Cynthia Wasko, Social Services Human Relations Board [SSHRB] President, provided the itinerary and information regarding the process for attending the trip. Stewart Chen, SSHRB Sister City Work Group Chair, stated the trip would provide a good opportunity to showcase Alameda. Susan Battaglia, Alameda, inquired whether the City would be paying for the trip, to which Mayor Johnson responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson stated Alameda has sister cities in Sweden and Japan and a Friendship City in El Salvador. Regular Meeting 14 Alam… | CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-04 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -SEPTEMBER 4, 2007-6:00 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-416) Conference with Real Property Negotiators: Properties : 1041 W. Midway and Various Easements in Alameda; Negotiating parties : City of Alameda and Alameda Power and Telecom; Under negotiation: Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that the Council received a briefing from its Real Property Negotiator; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council September 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-11 | 14 | City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop - September 11, 2007 Lear Department Project Priority Library Provide facility and service improvements to both Bay 2 high Farm Island and West End Libraries AP&T Enhance Energy/Environmental Sustainability - 2 high evaluate alternatives for reducing carbon footprint Administrative/Support Develop Succession Planning Strategy (including youth 2 high Services outreach component) Public Works Transportation planning 2 high Fire Conduct Fire Station 3 feasibility study 1 high Development Services CDBG-funded project to implement the "West Alameda: 1 high Woodstock to Webster Neighborhood Improvement Plan" Recreation, Parks and Golf Implementation of a Youth Advisory Commission to 1 high advise Council on youth-related issues Recreation, Parks and Golf Review business and financial plan of the Alameda 1 high Museum Recreation, Parks and Golf Estuary Park Task Force - initiate meetings with Task 1 high Force to identify potential funding Administrative/Suppol Develop a compliance plan for GASB-45 regulations by 1 high Services performing an actual study and reviewing options with Council Administrative/Support Labor agreement negotiations with public safety 1 high Services bargaining units Public Works Transportation - Safe Routes to School (Implement 1 high innovative approach to encourage walk/bike/carpool to school Public Works Environmental Protection 1 high Management Partners, Inc. 10 | CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-18 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -SEPTEMBER 18, 2007- - -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:47 p.m. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam lead the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (07-033 CIC) Update on the Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project. The Redevelopment Manager gave a brief presentation. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) funding would be available for setting up electric car charging stations. The Redevelopment Manager responded that she would check with AP&T. Commissioner Matarrese inquired when the historic theater blade sign would be lit. The Redevelopment Manager responded the target date is December 1; stated the exact date would be provided. Chair Johnson stated the blade sign lighting could be coordinated with the holiday tree lighting; the blade sign lighting should take place when the front of the theater looks good. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissione: Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Note: Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore abstained from voting on the minutes. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission September 18, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-02 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -OCTOBER 2, 2007- -6:00 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : ouncilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-467CC) Conference with Labor Negotiators: Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations : All City Bargaining Units. (07-468CC) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases: One. (07-469CC) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Harbor Bay Isle Associates V. City of Alameda. (07-037CIC) Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property: Alameda Theater Retail Spaces, 2315 and 2319 Central Avenue Negotiating parties CIC and Retail Tenants Under negotiation: Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators and gave direction; regarding Anticipated Litigation, Council gave direction to Legal Counsel regarding initiation of litigation; regarding Existing Litigation, Legal Counsel briefed Council on the status of the litigation; regarding Real Property, the Commission received a briefing from its Real Property Negotiators and gave direction. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council October 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-16 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY - -OCTOBER 16, 2007- -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:35 p.m. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY 07-040CIC) Update on the Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project. The Redevelopment Manager gave a brief presentation and provided a handout on parking information. Chair Johnson requested that the parking information be posted on the websitel inquired whether money is available in the budget. The Redevelopment Manager responded $75,000 is left in the garage contingency because of additional signage and security camera allocations; stated staff recommends waiting until the project is closer to completion before additional money is allocated; the theater budget has a balance of approximately $170,000. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the garage's northern elevation would be revisited. The Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the northern elevation and theater restoration funding can be discussed once the project is near completion. Chair Johnson inquired whether the blade sign was added back. The Redevelopment Manager responded the blade sign and marquee were added back; stated a strip is available for the northern elevation landscaping. Commissioner deHaan inquired what is the estimate for the northern elevation art. The Redevelopment Manager responded the estimate depends on the Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission October 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-06 | 14 | never provided with the compromise plan; stated the matter could be remanded back to the Planning Board. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board requested sidewalks on both sides, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether issue is loss of parking. The Planning Services Manager responded the Master Plan established the maximum amount of parking; stated all plans are well within the Master Plan. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. In favor of remanding to the Planning Board Jon Spangler, Alameda; and Karen Bey, Alameda. Aidan Berry, Catellus, outlined the project; stated Catellus concurs with the staff recommendations; the appeal was filed without animosity because philosophical differences were reached; Catellus likes the suggestion to create raised crosswalks and will discuss the matter with its engineers; Catellus supports taking the parking plan back to the Planning Board. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of: 1) sending the compromise plan back to the Planning Board for review; 2) [ adoption of the resolution) incorporating staff recommendations 1 and 2 regarding the Master Demolition, Grading, Infrastructure and Phasing Plan (MDGIP) and the driveway; and 3) adding additional language [to the resolution] to incorporate the language regarding the Stargell driveway right-hand turn condition. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the entire matter should be remanded to the Planning Board since the matter has evolved. The Planning Services Manager responded there is new information regarding the plan, which is why staff thought the matter should be remanded to the Planning Board; stated there is not new information on the MDGIP and driveway. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board was concerned about said two items [MDGIP and driveway] The Planning Services Manager responded the Board's concern was Regular Meeting Alam… | CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-20 | 14 | Alana Dill, Alameda, suggested the Carnegie space be used not just for art display, but also include classroom space. Marilyn Schumacher, Alameda, stated Mr. Carnegie intended his buildings be used for public uses, not just libraries; urged approval of the Community Arts/Planning and Building Center. Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS) stated AAPS concluded that both uses would meet AAPS's suggested selection criteria of public access and historic renovation. Mike Shepard, Frank Bette Center, thanked the Council for considering restoration of the Carnegie building thanked staff for the community involvement process; stated that he supports the Community Arts/Planning and Building Center. Debra Owen, Alameda, stated the two-story area should be used for sculpture; there are not many places to display sculpture. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there could be sculpture display at the Community Arts/Planning and Building Center, to which Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated Muller & Caulfield's retrofit work on the building is beautiful and cannot be seen. Councilmember deHaan stated the retrofit is well hidden; inquired whether the former Children's library is 4,400 square feet. Ms. Muller responded that her firm was responsible for the connection building; she reviewed the drawing and the former Children's library is about 3,800 including the garages and lower level, which has a ceiling height of seven and a half feet. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the [ former Children's library] building is on brick foundation, to which Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired how many people could fit in the space if it were used as an office, to which Ms. Muller responded around thirty. Councilmember deHaan inquired how many people are in the Planning and Building department, to which Ms. Muller responded forty. Councilmember deHaan stated the building would be twice the size, Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 November 20, 200… | CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -DECEMBER 4, 2007 - -6:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (07-560) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations: All Public Safety Bargaining Units. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing on the status of negotiations. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-02 | 14 | Counci lmember deHaan stated the parameters of the RFP have changed. Mr. Singer stated an open ended RFP is an option which would allow potential vendors to propose what should be done. Mayor Johnson inquired whether preferences could be included in the RFP . Mr. Singer responded in the affirmative; stated all four items could be managed as one project simultaneously over the next three or four months. Mayor Johnson stated that she would not like to go through an RFP process and have all responses be for long-term leases if that is not what the City intends to do. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not think the City should be in the business of leasing out the Golf Course entirely; he supports an RFP that solicits various portions he cannot believe that someone holding the Master Lease would lay $10 million on the table, make a profit, pay people decently, and be successful. Mayor Johnson stated she would like the RFP to include the possibility of a hybrid public/private partnership idea; questioned why the City should put out all the money to build a banquet facility and whether the caterer could provide funding. Councilmember Gilmore stated the consultant has been given a lot of ideas regarding the RFP; the consultant should go forward with the Master Plan and RFP and come back to Council with some language for Council review; Council's goal is to improve the Golf Course asset and play, and hopefully attract full fee, outsider golfers. Councilmember deHaan stated a marketing plan is needed. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a marketing plan could be part of the Master Plan, to which Councilmember deHaan responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of directing the City Manager to oversee the preparation of an RFP for Council review, which would include a variety of options with the stated preference not to lease out the entire facility. The City Manager stated the action is to prepare an RFP with a Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council January 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-15 | 14 | the bus looped around at the first possible moment after 12th Street and Broadway Mr. Bruzzone responded said scenarios cannot be done; stated parking the bus is a problem in downtown Oakland; the current route is the best for now. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is not suggesting parking the bus at the end of the line; the end of the line could become the middle where the bus could be parked [at the ferry terminal] . Mr. Bruzzone stated that passengers would sit through a ten-minute break. Councilmember Matarrese stated passengers have to sit through a ten-minute break somewhere. Mr. Bruzzone stated that passengers get off the bus in Oakland; the passenger experience is different. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the idea be considered stated that he would like to review the option of taking the bus down to Shoreline Drive between Willow and Grand Streets; inquired how much more time would be added, to which Mr. Bruzzone responded two minutes. Councilmember Matarrese stated that adding an additional bus would be another suggestion; inquired whether the request is realistic. Mr. Bruzzone responded the matter could be considered; stated an additional bus would cost approximately $350,000 per year; AC Transit is running out of buses. Councilmember Matarrese stated that Line 63 serves Alameda the most and serves intra-City traffic better than any other line; enhancing the line should be reviewed; a bus should be allocated on Shoreline Drive between Grand and Willow Streets, even if temporarily; the cost could be offset with increased ridership and would resolve the Otis Drive issue; reducing speed and managing traffic around Lum School is important; most of the problems at the crosswalk are caused by cars; a bus stop would further complicate automobile issues. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the purpose of turning off Shoreline Drive onto Grand Street. Mr. Bruzzone responded December 2003 had extreme cutbacks; stated Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 January 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-05 | 14 | The Housing Authority Executive Director responded only the Housing Authority can tear down low income units and rebuild multi-family units other agencies would have to build either single family units or duplexes. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the units would count in Guyton numbers. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded that he believes so; adding additional low-income housing units would count. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether it would count as a replacement unit, to which The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the negative. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether a partnership would be explored with other providers of homeless services. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the affirmative; stated currently the Housing Authority does not have any homeless programs; services would be contracted with Building Futures for Women and Children and the Alameda Point Collaborative (APC) ; the Housing Authority would own and manage the units and collect rent; tenant selection and lease enforcement would be done jointly. louncilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether an agreement is in place. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded not currently stated staff has until February 29, 2008 to finalize details. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether additional money would be needed. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the affirmative; stated a Financial Consultant has been hired to help with the Performa. the financial Performa could work out favorably for just building housing; additional subsidies would be needed for support services; Section 8 project vouchers would increase the income; other State and federal subsidies would be sought. buncilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether all funding would need to be new, to which The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether affordable senior housing has Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Ho… | CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-19 | 14 | been successful. The Redevelopment Manager responded flyers were sent to local businesses in the area; stated plans are to advertise in the Park Street Business Association and Chamber of Commerce newsletters; all spaces have not been reserved; more marketing will be done. Commissioner deHaan inquired where are the monthly parking spaces. The Redevelopment Manager responded approximately 40 spaces are restricted to the roof for local business monthly parking; stated expanding the monthly parking spaces to other levels might make sense. Commissioner deHaan stated the public needs to understand that parking is free after 5:00 p.m. Chair Johnson stated parking is also free on Sunday. The Redevelopment Manager stated the increased on-street parking rates would also help. Chair Johnson stated enforcement should help; people are not used to going down Oak Street. The Redevelopment Manager stated better marketing would inform people that the parking garage is open even though half of Oak Street is closed. Commissioner Tam stated that she appreciates that the leak was discovered early; the remaining Theater contingency is $2,777 the remaining garage contingency is $31,000; the original amount of the [parking garage] contingency was $415,000. $604,000 in value engineering was taken out ; additional expenditures were covered by interest from loans; inquired whether overages would be covered by interest or contingency. The Redevelopment Manager responded $55,000 is budgeted for the leakage within the current contingency; pending change orders might come back at a higher price; the $31,000 garage contingency should be enough to cover the eastern elevation leakage the interest from the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) loan has not been committed to anything else; $62,000 was committed from the Cineplex interest income in December: an additional $12,000 available. Commissioner Tam inquired whether there would be an assessment of Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 2 and Redevelopment Authority, and Com… | CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-04 | 14 | Roseville recycle polystyrene; some places recycle post food service materials provided a list of web site addresses that offer polystyrene recycling. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Mr. Peterson had any information on polystyrene recycling costs. Mr. Peterson responded in the affirmative; stated Los Angeles pays $3,000 per ton; polystyrene is approximately 90% air and is fifty times the volume of comparable waste material. a comparable solid material cost is $7 per ton; $98 per ton is charged at Davis Street. COUNCIL REFERRALS (08-106) Consider directing the City Manager to have staff and the Economic Development Commission research and proposed projects and policies in order to attract, retain and expand marine related business for Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to have marine related services expanded from the commercial side and more extensively from the pleasure boat side; Pleasanton had a Boat Show; a local broker advised him that the Boat Show was a bust because there is no water in Pleasanton; he would like to have the Economic Development Commission (EDC) and staff come up with some potential projects to meet the updated Economic Development Strategic Plan; three marine related services left when the Grand Street housing project was developed; two left the island; he would like to have the EDC come up with some ideas and present the ideas to Council. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese was referring to marine related businesses. Councilmember Matarrese responded marine related businesses and services include yacht brokers, yacht repairs, part services such as hull cleaning, and training the commercial side involves berth leasing to commercial boats; the City has a commercial shipyard; the issue is how to increase business in order for businesses to contribute to the City's tax base. Mayor Johnson stated the matter seems like a large project and should be reviewed in light of other Council priorities. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he feels the matter is … | CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-18 | 14 | The Planning Services Manager stated a Conditional Use Permit would be required for anything over 30,000 square feet i suggested layering Livermore's provision on top of said requirement ; inquired whether there would be an exception for historic buildings. Councilmember Matarrese responded historic buildings could have a large retailer; stated anything bigger than 90,000 square feet would not be allowed to have more than 10% non-taxable items. The Planning Services Manager stated the Del Monte Building would be limited to approximately 12,000 square feet of non-taxable retail under the proposal. Councilmember Gilmore stated the issue runs up against the desire to preserve historic buildings. Mayor Johnson stated the proposal is directed at a large retailer that has 10% of non-taxable within the one retail establishment The Planning Services Manager stated he thinks that would prevent the Del Monte project from moving forward. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she is bothered by the fact that language could be crafted which might have unintended consequences for historic buildings the matter should be sent back to the Planning Board along with an explanation of Council's concept. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance with direction to have the Planning Board review superstore language along with consideration for large historic buildings, including, but not be limited to, the Alameda Landing warehouses, Alameda Point hangers, and the Del Monte Building; stated that he is dismayed that the matter was not addressed. Councilmember deHaan requested that the City Attorney review wages and health benefit issues for retailers who have over one hundred employees. Mayor Johnson stated said issue is not a Planning issue. On the call for the question, by consensus, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Gilmore stated that everyone talks about Alameda not having enough shopping the staff report states "Bringing additional retail opportunities to Alameda would be expected to resul… | CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-01 | 14 | The City Manager stated a number of ways would be used to inform Council about changes to the work plans. Councilmember Matarrese stated whatever method is used should indicate the starting point and current status to allow tracking. Ms. Perkins summarized the discussion and completed her Power Point presentation. The Management Partners report is hereto attached and made part of the minutes by reference. Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed finances. * * (08-139 - ) Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of continuing the meeting past midnight. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. * * * ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (08-140) Wu Lu, Human Rights Torch Relay; Michelle Midliff, Human Rights Torch Relay; and Connie Wang, Falun Gong, (submitted handout ) discussed the Human Rights Torch Relay and human right violations in China. (08-141) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed economics. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (08-142) - Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Recreation and Park Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated Lola W. Brown and Gina M. Mariani. (08-143) Mayor Johnson stated that the City received the California development Association award for the Bridgeside redevelopment project. (08-144) Councilmember deHaan congratulated Mayor Johnson on appointment to the Water Emergency Transportation Authority; stated the appointment is good for Alameda. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council April 1, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-15 | 14 | Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated the restaurant is his only concern. The Planning Services Manager stated a Conditional Use Permit would provide the ability to review the issue on a case-by-case basis. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the shuttle service issue is off the table and will be handled by the City. Mayor Johnson responded the City will work with Harbor Bay Home Owner Associations. Councilmember deHaan stated that the 100-foot height limit needs to be addressed. Mayor Johnson stated that the 100-foot height limit is a Disposition and Development Agreement issue. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions Councilmember deHaan - 1. Counci lember deHaan stated that he hopes that the City will be able to review the architectural work to see if some of the buildings can be staggered; he thinks that there is room for further review. (08-166) Recommendation to review Charter Amendments for the November 2008 Ballot. Continued. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS ( (08-167) Mayor Johnson announced that she attended the Mayor's S Conference in January . (08-168) Councilmember Matarrese stated AC Transit provided a report on the 63 line at the most recent Interagency Liaison Committee ( ILC) meeting the changes have been made at the Encinal and Monarch end of the route; AC Transit will have to wait to Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-06 | 14 | right-hand turn lane onto Oak Street; he does not like bulb-outs or people crossing in and out of bike lanes; Oakland's Chinatown has a scramble-type intersection that works very well; he would like to have some type of signal and pedestrian management to ensure that the rules are clear on yielding to pedestrians trying to cross from the Twin Towers side to the Cineplex; the Central Avenue and Oak Street intersection differs from Oak Street and Santa Clara Avenue he likes the recommendation for the loading zone and parking zone ; inquired whether the area could be signalized. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded a sign would be installed to remind motorists to yield for pedestrians. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether a signal would be an option. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded pedestrian volumes need to be reviewed. Mayor Johnson stated the [Oakland Chinatown] scramble-type intersection works well the City of Oakland had people directing and providing information to pedestrians on how to use the intersection. Vice Mayor Tam stated a Metropolitan Transportation Commission grant provides for the construction of bulb-outs at the Chinatown intersection to allow for pedestrian safety. Mayor Johnson stated the streets are very wide in the Chinatown area. The Supervising Civil Engineer stated that the scramble-type intersections are successful if surrounding streets are not close to an area such as Park Street. Councilmember Matarrese stated the concept is to protect the crossing in front of the right-hand turn. Councilmember deHaan stated a formal right-hand turn lane could be reviewed and should be included in the analysis. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation with the following direction: a report be brought back ninety days after the Theater opens; the Police Department is to provide enforcement and education; and that any mitigations brought back be reviewed by interested parties. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council May 6… | CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-20 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -MAY 20, 2008- - -6:00 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:05 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (08-208CC) Conference with Labor Negotiators: Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations : All Public Safety Bargaining Units. (08-27CIC) Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property Fleet Industrial Supply Center (Alameda Landing) ; Negotiating parties CIC and Catellus; Under negotiation Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators; regarding Real Property, the Commission received a briefing from its Real Property Negotiators regarding potential amendments to price and terms requested by Catellus on the Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission May 20, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-03 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JUNE 3, 2008- - -6:30 P. .M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:55 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (08-229) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations : All Public Safety Bargaining Units. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators regarding the status of negotiations; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 3, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 14 | Counci Imember/Authorit; Member deHaan seconded the motion with the caveat that principle would be pushed out. Under discussion, Mayor/Chair Johnson stated refinancing makes sense because the interest rate would be lower and over $300,000 would be saved. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-277B CC) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14223, "Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191. " Adopted. The Assistant City Manager provided a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the prior fire inspection fee. Mayor Johnson stated a chart showing fee comparisons would have helped. In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry, the Fire Marshall stated fire inspection fees are based on an hourly rate and do not have 100% cost recovery; currently, a business fire inspection fee is $77.50; full cost recovery would be approximately $148. Mayor Johnson questioned whether Building staff should perform inspections instead of firefighters; stated business owners have complained about inspection fees; the proposed increase would result in more complaints. The Fire Marshall stated the Fire Department uses civilian inspectors, which lowers the expense. Mayor Johnson questioned what the cost would be if Building staff performed inspections. The Fire Marshall stated Fire Department civilian inspectors have the same salary as the Building Inspectors. Councilmember Gilmore stated Building inspectors are busy already new personnel would need to be added. The Fire Marshall stated that fire and storm water inspectors are very specialized and require additional training. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and 4 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 17, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-01 | 14 | Vice Mayor Tam stated currently, the City receives approximately $900,000 to $1 million in golf revenuel $500,000 would be generated with a private operator and lease holder; the report indicates that transfers would need to cease in order to help with the economic recovery and that the current path would ultimately close the Golf Course; inquired what would be the threshold for delaying action. Mr. Singer responded the clock is ticking rapidly. Mayor Johnson stated that the fund balance is $1.1 million and that next year's projected loss is $700,000. Vice Mayor Tam stated the Golf Course has deteriorated even with reduced staffing and improved pro-shop sales; inquired whether two or three years could be bought by closing the Mif Albright Course and undertaking some renovations with increased fees. Mr. Singer responded perhaps, but the problem would reoccur again. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is any scenario that would allow the City to continue to run the Golf Course as it does now. Mr. Singer responded in the negative; stated reducing the holes from 45 to 18 might buy some additional time. Councilmember Gilmore stated placing a band-aid on things would just allow the City to operate the Golf Course, not take care of infrastructure or improvements. Councilmember deHaan stated the original proposal included finding an operator and sounded viable; now a major overall is being proposed; inquired whether the original proposal would still be viable. Mr. Singer responded potentially; stated cost is the issue; the City would need to come up with money to do improvements. Councilmember deHaan stated that Council was told that a banquet center would be needed to encourage tournament play; the plan shows a banquet center in Phase 7, which seems contradictory. Mr. Singer stated conceptual reuse was placed at the end, but could be done in the first phase. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the RFP could be left open, to which Mr. Singer responded in the affirmative. Mr. Getherall stated Golf Course improvements a… | CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-15 | 14 | Counci lmember Matarrese stated the subcommittee did a good job. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Councilmember Gilmore gave a brief review of the Charter Review Meeting. Vice Mayor Tam stated Council discussed potential, future Charter amendments regarding Mayor and Councilmember compensation; authority of Council over the appointment of department heads; and Council's role in the appointment of Board and Commission members; comments received revolved around the form of government Alameda residents want to see; empowering Council with more responsibilities would require commensurate staffing support. Councilmember Gilmore stated the public thought that the matter should be a citywide discussion. Councilmember deHaan stated the issue could be discussed in the next wave. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember deHaan moved approval of directing the City Attorney to prepare the impartial analyses. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of having the subcommittee [Vice Mayor Tam and Councilmember Gilmore) prepare the arguments in favor and having the Mayor and four Councilmembers sign. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment) (08-313) Alan Elnick, Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA) , discussed contracting out services for the Golf Course to a private enterprise; requested that ACEA be allowed to provide input to any Requests for Proposals. (08-314) - Terry Flippo, ACEA, stated ACEA would like to be part of the solution to the Golf Course situation. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 July 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-05 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- -AUGUST 5, 2008- - -7:25 P. M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 10:08 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore - 1. MINUTES (08-41 - CIC) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on July 15, 2008. Approved. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [ Absent Councilmember/ Commissioner Gilmore - 1. ] AGENDA ITEM (08-319CC/08-42CIC) Recommendation to approve Affordable Housing Agreement with Warmington Homes for the Grand Marina Project. The Development Services Director gave a presentation. louncilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the City has an Affordable Housing Agreement with Warmington, to which the Development Services Director responded in the negative. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether Warming has committed to building 10 units at Grand Marina. The Development Services Director stated the Agreement is being considered tonight and has to be approved before Warmington can pull building permits. The Development Services Director continued her presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated tonight the Council/Commission is considering an Agreement that would allow a project at Island High as an option; inquired what public input opportunities would exist Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission 1 August 5, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-19 | 14 | Vice Mayor Tam stated that she received a call from a gentleman who believes that the City is issuing more tickets and citations in order to generate a quota. The Police Chief stated the Police Department always provides police services that are not disparate in any way and are very appropriate and professionally managed and delivered; fees are not based on a quota. Vice Mayor Tam stated the gentleman is an Oakland Police Officer who lives in Alameda and perceives that his neighborhood is being targeted. The Police Chief stated that he would talk to him. (08-360) Consideration of creating an Ordinance Establishing an Irrevocable Trust Fund for Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) . Councilmember Matarrese stated the referral outlines and references a January 15, 2008 report showing accrued liability for OPEB : the projected accrual was $75 million; currently, the City is using the "pay as you go" approach; requested that Council consider an ordinance establishing an Irrevocable Trust Fund which would include a minimum annual contribution as a percentage of the General Fund budget; further requested that the Fiscal Sustainability Committee recommend a minimum fund contribution level to be included in the ordinance; Council would review the ordinance so that funding the liability could start this year. The City Manager stated staff recommends research be continued and addressed at the Fiscal Sustainability Committee August 26 meeting; the timeline [for adopting the ordinance] would be mid October or November. Councilmember Matarrese stated the end goal is to have the ordinance move along in parallel with starting funding this year ; the commitment is already made. Councilmember deHaan stated the intent is to put the ordinance in place, but not indicate the dollar amount. Councilmember Matarrese stated the dollar amount would be left blank. The Interim Financial Director stated other cities have considered other options beyond a trust alternative; that she has five significantly different options for Council consid… | CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-09-16 | 14 | was much larger and in a different location. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she was on the Planning Board at that time; that she remembers the discussion regarding the shoreline site and wanting to put restaurants at the former movie theatre site; Page 14, paragraph 22 states that "The project may include one store up to 90,000 square feet in floor area and two stores each up of up to 60,000 square feet. Any larger store shall require a Planned Development Amendment. Additions or modifications of less than 5% in overall center area may be approved by Administrative Design Review"; she has been a customer of all retail establishments discussed tonight ; she understand the concerns; one speaker brought up the cigarette store on Park Street; the City was sued and had to pay the rent for several years until tenants rented the site; she needs to balance the consideration of potentially being sued by the shopping center and the precarious budget; she wants Alameda to be known as a City that lives up to agreements. Vice Mayor Tam stated the City's policies reflect the concern and desire to make sure that small businesses survive; the City has allocated money to support the Park Street Business Association, West Alameda Business Association, and Greater Alameda Business Association; a lot of money is spent on advertising, landscape and lighting, and façade grants; the City cannot dictate the tenant at a particular site; the City has to abide by established agreements with Alameda Towne Center there is not a lot of choice in determining tenants at Alameda Towne Centre. Vice Mayor Tam moved adoption of the resolution [upholding the Planning Board's decision]. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Gilmore stated the reality is that OSH could take the building as is and open in one month because OSH is a permitted use. Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda Towne Centre is part of Alameda; the developer would advise the City of an anticipated lawsuit; inquired whether buncilmember Gilmore… | CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-07 | 14 | Councilmember deHaan inquired whether twenty-four hour deliveries would require a Use Permit, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative ouncilmember Gilmore moved approval of the sign program [ included in Resolution No. 14275]. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5; and The Supervising Planner inquired whether the motion to approve hours included conditions, to which louncilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Tam requested a description of noticing concerns raised; stated the City Manager provided an update stating that notice was provided in the Alameda Journal, and notices were mailed to residents within 500 feet. Councilmember deHaan stated Council never quantified what the noticing requirements would be when projects reach a certain threshold. The Planning and Building Director stated the Municipal Code has certain noticing requirements; the Alameda Towne Centre project requires notification to property owners and residents within 100 feet and advertising in the paper ten days before the hearing; Council adopted a policy several years ago which expanded the notification policy to a twenty day notice for hearings before the Planning Board and Historical Advisory Board and a 300 foot radius around the property; the notification process was expanded to 500 feet for Alameda Towne Centre. Councilmember deHaan stated the traffic engineers discussed various corridors that were areas of concern. The Planning and Building Director stated staff published an ad in the newspaper; notice was posted on the website as well. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she has the sense that increased traffic cannot be attributed to Alameda Towne Centre totally; the EIR looked at the worse case scenario and impacts were identified; the EIR does not grant approval to move forward with the expansion of 49,000 square feet. Vice Mayor Tam moved adoption of the resolution approving the Environmental Impact Report and upholding the Planning Board decision. [… | CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-21 | 14 | Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-454) Resolution No. 14280, "Approving the Amended and Restated Northern California Power Agency Power Pooling Agreement. " Adopted. The Utility Planning Supervisor provided a brief presentation. The City Manager stated that the Agreement was unanimously approved at the Public Utilities Board meeting last night. Mayor Johnson inquired whether all Northern California Power Agency members are changing the Agreement, to which the Utility Planning Supervisor responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Agreement would have any affect on the source of power generated. The Utility Planning Supervisor responded there should be no impact stated the City has been operating under revised procedures for a number of years. Vice Mayor Tam moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA 08 3-455 - ) Griff Neal, Alameda, submitted handout; stated undergrounding costs were estimated to cost homeowners between $1,500 and $2,000 that his estimate is $10,000; electric services can be reimbursed but cable and phone service costs are divided by the number of services; hook up costs are not reimbursed if a house requires a non-standard service hook up. Mayor Johnson requested that information be provided to Council on how charges work and the reimbursement process. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the matter be placed on an agenda so that Council can take action. Mr. Neal suggested selling AP&T to balance the budget. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council October 21, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-06 | 14 | is interested in knowing more about the organization which was formed as a result of the non-profit project. Mayor Johnson stated the project was very successful; inquired whether the picture is a satellite photo, to which Mr. Wagner responded the picture is a kite photograph. COUNCIL REFERRALS (08-475) Discussion of referring the Public Safety Memorandums of Understanding to the Fiscal Sustainability Committee for review and consideration. Mayor Johnson stated the City needs to have a long-term vision on how community and public safety services will be provided and paid for; the State will be balancing an $11.2 billion budget deficit in the next seven months. a five to ten year vision is needed; people have a misunderstanding of public safety service costs; the public needs to be provided with information to better understand public safety costs; the City needs to be very proactive in providing future community services; the City Manager proposed to reduce the amount of money transferred from the Golf Course to the General Fund; public safety will always be a priority Library hours have been cut continually; the Library should be more available to the public; other options need to be reviewed with a long-term approach; some cities have special districts for Recreation and Park and are not at risk for being cut every year to pay for public safety; it is important to have well informed public input. Domenick Weaver, Alameda Firefighters, stated the community needs to know that public safety costs are high; the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) is hosting town hall meetings that he does not want public safety Contracts going to the Fiscal Sustainability Committee; agreements should be made at the bargaining table. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not intend to have another committee work on negotiations; the intent is to start public discussions on paying for future levels of service. Councilmember Matarrese stated the community needs the facts; the Fire Chief gave a very clear presentation on fire… | CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-18 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND ALAMEDA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (APFA) MEETING TUESDAY- - -NOVEMBER 18, 2008- -7:32 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 11:36 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Authority Members deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA ITEM (08-493 CC) Resolution No. 14287, "Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of an Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement Related to the Partial Prepayment and Defeasance of the Alameda Public Financing Authority's Series 2004 Revenue Bond Anticipation Notes (Alameda Power & Telecom), and Approving Related Documents and Actions. " Adopted; and (08-05 - APFA) Resolution No. 08-18, "Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of an Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement Related to the Partial Prepayment and Defeasance of the Authority's Series 2004 Revenue Bond Anticipation Notes (Alameda Power & Telecom) and Approving Related Documents and Actions. Adopted; and (08-493 CC A) Ordinance No. 2986, "Approving and Authorizing the Execution of All Necessary Agreements and Documents for the Sale of the Alameda Power & Telecom Telecommunications Business Line to Comcast of Alameda, Inc. " Passed. The Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) General Manager gave a Power Point presentation. * * (08-494 ( - CC) Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of continuing the meeting past midnight. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. * Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether tonight's presentation was provided to the Public Utilities Board last night. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Alameda Public 1 Financing Authority Meeting November 18, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-02 | 14 | Councilmember Gilmore inquired how many people were observed jaywalking. The Police Chief responded specific data is not available. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether anyone has been ticketed for jaywalking in front of the theater. The Police Lieutenant responded in the negative; stated data was not collected for tonight's report; information will be provided. Councilmember Gilmore stated a crosswalk could always be added. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she agrees with her colleagues; a lot of effort is being made to encourage people to use the garage; that she would like to tease out the citation summary on Table 5, recommendation #7; there seems to be a difference in perspective on whether the report was responsive to Council's direction on May 6; requested the City Clerk read the motion made by Councilmember Matarrese on May 6. The City Clerk read the motion buncilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation with the following direction a report be brought back ninety days after the Theater opens; the Police Department is to provide enforcement and education; and that any mitigations brought back be reviewed by interested parties. " Vice Mayor Tam stated the Police Lieutenant mentioned that westbound traffic overtakes cars making a left turn onto Oak Street from Central Avenue by going into the bike lane, which would not be cited because it is not outside the norm of other intersections. of the twenty-five citations issued in the May through August period, none were associated with cars making said violation of the vehicle code. The Police Lieutenant responded in the affirmative; stated patrol officers have been directed to provide additional enforcement at the intersection for any or all violations; he does not have data on how many people were stopped or how many were given a warning. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether none of the 25 citations issued from May through August were for overtaking another car, to which the Police Lieutenant responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore i… | CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-16 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA, AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -DECEMBER 16, 2008- - -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 11:02 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Authority Members / Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the transmittal of the CIC Annual Report [paragraph no. 08-547 CC/08-56 CIC] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. . louncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-547 CC/08-56 CIC) Recommendation to authorize the transmittal of the Community Improvement Commission's Annual Report to the State Controller's Office and the City Council and accept the Annual Report. louncilmember/Commissioner Gilmore stated people have called for independent audit of the City's books; the City gets independently audited every year; the City Auditor is in charge of hiring an outside, independent audit firm; the firm audits all funds, including enterprise and special funds; the audits are available in the City Clerk's office and on the website; compliance reports have to be filed with the State and federal governments a department head spent a week doing the report, which is generally the job of manager; the organization is so lean; there is front line staff and only rare instances of mid level staff; department heads are doing work which would generally be done by lower level staff; that she was shocked to hear how much time it takes to complete the reports; the work reports prepared a year ago listed said type of work below the line; the focus was on the work that affects the residents and mandated things did not receive discussion. Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the staff reco… | CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-06 | 14 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not think the seven calls are worth $344,000. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the City of Alameda response time is 4 minutes; inquired the County's time. The Fire Chief responded the County standard is 8 minutes. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired what the County's actual time is, to which the Fire Chief responded that he does not have said information. Councilmember Tam stated a speaker addressed the City's obligations regarding an initiative; requested the City Attorney to provide an update. The City Attorney stated the title and summary were prepared and e- mailed out today. Councilmember Matarrese inquired when the City would start browning out an ambulance. The City Manager responded the browning out of either an ambulance or rig, which is up to the Fire Chief, would begin at the end of the month in order to meet the budget. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like the Council to establish the desired service level; he would like the issue to come to Council before the service level changes, so that Council can establish the service level and get alternatives to taking the service level down by 5%. Mayor Johnson stated the issue would have to be placed on an agenda; resources can be discussed at the mid-year budget review in February. Councilmember Gilmore inquired when various financial reports would be provided in response to previous ouncilmember questions. The Interim Finance Director responded the reports being prepared on the three revenue sources : property tax, property transfer tax and sales tax will be presented on February 3. Councilmember Gilmore stated the reports would provide information on the City's revenue status and indicate whether or not there is wiggle room. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 January 6, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-20 | 14 | Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to address the timeframe and contractor clarification when the matter comes back. The City Manager stated that the matter would not be brought back; the resolution would be sent to new Government officials. Councilmember Gilmore stated the resolution would be reissued with a cover letter that echoes President Obama's promise of a sixteen month troop withdrawal, including all interested Americans. Councilmember Matarrese suggested including "a meaningful withdrawal. The City Manager stated a cover letter could be attached that would incorporate the President's statements and be consistent with the Council adopted resolution. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (09-035) - Jon Spangler, Alameda, stated that he looks forward to seeing more progress under the new Transportation Master Plan. COUNCIL REFERRALS (09-036) Discussion of bike related issues. Councilmember Matarrese requested that Council consider giving direction on: 1) marketing and promotion of bicycle locker usage at City Hall and Civic Center garage, 2) bicycle crossing using the Fruitvale Bridge and associated bike lanes, and 3) details on implementation of bike parking on Central Avenue between Oak and Park Streets; stated last Saturday night, each sign post on the theatre side of Central Avenue had a bike attached; he is worried about the implementation of Item 1 and 3. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the intent of a Council Referral is to place the item on a future agenda; staff would come back and advise the costs; Councilmember Matarrese's referral would be under the normal scope of the Public Works Department; that he does not know what the cost would be. The City Manager stated additional funds have not been budgeted for bicycle locker marketing and promotion; Items 1 and 3 came Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 January 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-03 | 14 | indicated a drawbridge would not be a viable option; the bridge would be built to a lifeline standard. Councilmember Gilmore stated the price tag includes maintenance for a thirty-year period; inquired how much it would cost to build the bridge, to which the Public Works Director responded $48 million. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the proposed project is an engineering feat. The Public Works Director stated the consultant team determined that construction would be schematically feasible. Mayor Johnson inquired what would be the grant source for the $48 million, to which the Public Works Director responded federal and State grants. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Oakland is proposing to make the estuary crossing project a priority. The Public Works Director responded that Oakland contributed to the feasibility study. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether Alameda and Oakland would each receive funding if both applied. The Public Works Director responded one grant would be co- sponsored. Mayor Johnson stated a joint use bridge should be considered; including transit makes the project more credible. The Public Works Director stated the joint use could be added to the scope. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not see any advisory group or endorsers putting money on the table to move forward; that he is concerned about maintenance costs. Speakers : Nancy Johnson Horton, Alameda; John Strehlow, Alameda; John McKeon, Bike Alameda Lucy Gigli, Bike Alameda; Jon Spangler, Alameda; Evan Lovett-Harris, Cycles of Change; Ricardo Pedevilla, Alameda. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired how many bicycles and pedestrian use the City's bridges. The Public Works Director responded the feasibility study shows 521 Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 February 3, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 14 | she would like to leave in XIII.C. 1 with additional language that the organization is efficient and effective. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired where human resource policies are currently held. The Human Resource Director responded the policies are in various places, such as MOUs and civil service rules, but could be put in one comprehensive document. Mayor Johnson stated that she wants language added about funding an efficient and effective organization. Vice Mayor deHaan suggested the item be moved to the front section. The Interim Finance Director stated the section would be eliminated, made macro and made part of the Guiding Principles at the beginning. The Council expressed consensus. Mayor Johnson stated, wherever Compensation Standards [XIII.I E] ends up, it should include that the City will make an effort to have information presented to the public more understandable. The Interim Finance Director addressed Productivity and Performance Measurement, Section XIV, and Contracting for Services, Section XV; inquired whether Section XV should be kept or deleted. Councilmember Matarrese stated the best way to have control over core day-to-day services is by having employees; projects, such as building construction and certain professional services, cannot be staffed by City employees. Mayor Johnson stated the section seems to address "how tos" and does not need to be included. Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue could be discussed in work programs and project budgeting. The Interim Finance Director stated the thought about core day-to- day services being provided by employees translates into a good front-end principle. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired where the policies were before. The Interim Finance Director responded that she developed the policies ; stated a principle could be written to address Special Meeting Alameda City Council 14 February 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-17 | 14 | meeting. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he does not want to micromanage but would like to expand the communication level. (09-082 - ) Discussion and direction on the 90-day working capital fund balance for operating reserves in Special Revenue Funds. Mayor Johnson stated Council needs to be clear on direction given; a financial policy should be established immediately. The City Manager stated the Special Revenue Funds (SRF) could be brought back for discussion; there was no discussion about which funds are in compliance and which are not. Mayor Johnson stated Council could give direction on a general policy and bring the matter back for adoption at the next Council meeting; direction should be given to maintain a 90-day working capital. The City Manager stated the matter could be brought back to identify impacts. Mayor Johnson stated adopting a policy now is important, not six months from now. The City Manager stated some funds have restrictions; the issue would be brought back. Mayor Johnson stated AMP might need to review the matter first. Councilmember Matarrese stated information should come back to Council because AMP is part of the City; the same financial principles apply; having a specified working capital fund is universal and is a good, prudent practice regardless of the number of days. Mayor Johnson stated that she wants AMP to have a policy. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council needs to decide what needs to be done if less permits are coming to the Planning and Building Department and the department is overstaffed; information needs to be provided on whether the fund balance is being spent down, and, if so, for how long; numbers need to be provided. Vice Mayor deHaan stated too often the focus is on the General Fund only; the SRF need to be reviewed; Council needs to decide what to Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 February 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-03-03 | 14 | Councilmember Tam stated Councilmember Matarrese's motion is formulated around a seven foot set back that is legal but is based on an appeal of a Major Design Review that is incorporated as part of the 30% alteration that was before the HAB; inquired whether a porch would be feasible without a seven foot encroachment. Counci lmember Matarrese stated that he is thinking of a side porch. Mayor Johnson inquired why the porch needs to extend beyond the front of the house. Mr. Combs responded the intent is to provide cover for the entry steps. Mayor Johnson stated side porches were deliberate. Mr. Mackensen stated the design is actually a trellis over a patio; the French doors would provide light and ventilation and need to go out somewhere; the pillars would disappear into the shrubbery and would not impose on the lawn. Councilmember Tam stated that she cannot support the motion; the Planning Board approved the seven foot legal requirement; the Encinal Avenue situation is not the same; the Bay Street homes are not exactly the same and create a nicely landscaped corridor which can still be preserved with the proposed energy efficient improvements. Mayor Johnson seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 2. Noes: ouncilmember Tam - 1. Abstentions: Vice Mayor deHaan and Councilmember Gilmore - 2. The City Attorney stated three votes are required in order to take action; two Councilmembers announced conflict on the matter the lower [HAB] decision will stand. (09-097) Resolution No. 14312, "Revising the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Alameda Police Officers Association and the City of Alameda for the Period Commencing January 6, 2008 and Ending January 2, 2010. Adopted. *** Mayor Johnson called a recess at 11:27 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 11:31 p.m. *** Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 March 3, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-03-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-03-17 | 14 | District but alarms need to be kept in good working order. The Fire Marshall stated the School District's maintenance division was not aware of all of the false alarms some of the fees have been waived for Ruby Bridges; other schools have chronic alarm problems; the State mandates fire inspections for school districts; an invoice is sent and is charged against lease payments that the City makes to the School District. the City is able to recoup costs for repeated false alarms; false alarm fees are much less expensive than reoccurring calls for service. Mayor Johnson stated the City needs to inform the School District that there would not be a charge if alarms are maintained and there is communication with staff. The City Attorney stated the false alarm ordinance would need to be amended to exempt the School District and is not on the agenda tonight. Mayor Johnson stated tonight's agenda is dealing with the use of emergency services in non-emergency situations; repeated false alarms from the School District are not emergency situations. The Fire Marshall stated that staff is working with the School District. Councilmember Tam inquired whether the hospital could be included [in the exemption]. Vice Mayor deHaan stated senior citizens have certain needs inquired who is the tiebreaker in the decision making, to which the Fire Marshall responded he is. Vice Mayor deHaan stated individual concerns need to be heard. Mayor Johnson stated the education process is important; staff needs to go to Mastick Senior Center and business and homeowner associations; a lot of residential calls come from apartment structures; plumbing leaks should be directed to the building manager instead of the Fire Department. Vice Mayor deHaan stated education is important; part of the training needs to address how to turn off the water. Mayor Johnson people need to be informed that a plumber should be called if they chose not to learn how to turn off their water; people need to know what type of situations are non-emergency and when calling 911… | CityCouncil/2009-03-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-04-21 | 14 | review against some standard. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether Councilmember Tam wants to start with the informational portion. Councilmember Tam responded that she would like the ordinance to be foundational Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of bringing the matter back in thirty days. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (09 - 166) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Youth Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated McCaulay J. Singer-Milnes for appointment to the Youth Commission. (09-167) Councilmember Tam stated that she attended the Legislative Action Day with the Deputy City Manager last week; having the State protect any raids from city funds is not guaranteed; the State has approximately $4 billion available to borrow; efforts are being made to ensure Assembly Members have an opportunity to look at what redevelopment funds do in Alameda; the Governor appreciates the League's support for Propositions 1A through 1F; the thinking is to establish a spending cap under Proposition 1A so that any extra money would go into reserves ; opponents believe programs would be hurt by forcing funding into a reserve fund because the State would need to live within a certain spending limit; the State has 31 million people; the water infrastructure is built for 18 million; the Governor is hoping to have a bond measure on water infrastructure in June; the Governor would like to focus on health care reform before leaving office; another session discussed potential solutions, including a constitutional convention to deal with State budget issues, how government performs at the State level, looking at term limits, reforming the initiative process, and looking at a two-thirds versus majority vote on the budget. Mayor Johnson noted that Senator Loni Hancock suggested that the City implement requiring that initiatives include a financing mechanism. The Interim City Manager stated that the matter is an opportunity for Alameda in the futur… | CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-05-05 | 14 | The Interim City Manager stated the repayment schedule was established on what the CIC could do; many funds operate in the negative; the key is determining whether there is a negative or positive at the end of the day; April is the biggest revenue month for the General Fund revenue and expense projections reflect what is on the books through April; the key is to look at the far right column which shows where the City will be at the end of the year; many funds have come down in fund balance and cash; continued with the presentation. Councilmember Matarrese thanked the Interim City Manager for the walk through; stated the sewer system is no different than the Library system; the sewer system is a functioning public health system. The Interim City Manager stated the sewer system is broken down by operational and infrastructure programs. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether assets have not been depreciated, to which the Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Tam stated Alameda is in better shape than a lot of cities; inquired whether the City could call on the three notes and pay for some catastrophic event; further inquired whether the City is married to the five-year repayment schedule. The Interim City Manager responded the AMP note is not collectable at this time; stated the two agency notes are owed from two different funds. Councilmember Tam stated the State feels that it has a better legal standing to raid redevelopment funds; inquired whether the established formula would be less if the notes are repaid. The Interim City Manager responded the City would have less risk of having funds raided. Councilmember Tam stated a large amount of the $39 million CIC fund balance seems to be locked up. The Interim City Manager stated the $39 million is a subtotal of all special revenue funds; the CIC funds are part of the special revenue fund group; subtotaling would be provided next time. Councilmember Gilmore stated there have been discussions about cities that do not have redevelopment money havi… | CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-05-19.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-05-19 | 14 | Licenses ; what happens in the future will depend upon what happens between now and June, 2010 when the issue will be addressed during the course of the moratorium. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: louncilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Tam - 4. Abstentions Mayor Johnson - 1. (09-209) Resolution No. 14337, "Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Apply for Regional Measure 1 Bridge Toll Funds, Including Five Percent Unrestricted State Funds and Two Percent Bridge Toll Reserve Funds for the Operating Subsidy and Capital Projects for the City of Alameda Ferry Services, and to Enter into All Agreements Necessary to Secure These Funds for Fiscal Year 2009-10". Adopted; (09-209A) Recommendation to authorize the Interim City Manager to execute a fourth amendment to the amended and restated Ferry Services Agreement with the Port of Oakland to extend the term for one additional year at a cost of $70,6491 (09-209B) Recommendation to authorize the Interim City Manager to execute a one-year extension of the Sixth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement for the Alameda Harbor Bay Ferry and adopt associated budgets and (09-209C) Recommendation to authorize the Interim City Manager to execute an amendment to the Agreement to extend the term for one additional year of the Blue & Gold Fleet Operating Agreement with the Alameda/Oakland Ferry Service and adopted associated budgets. The Public Works Director and Ferry Services Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether WETA has seen the proposed amendment language, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired what is WETA's response. The Ferry Services Manager stated WETA is interested in meeting with the Port of Oakland to see what can be done in the event of significant expenses. WETA is interested in the Port of Oakland's timeline; the Port of Oakland will hire a consultant to perform a thorough analysis of the barge and make recommendations about what n… | CityCouncil/2009-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-06-02.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-06-02 | 14 | The Assistant City Manager responded drainage improvements would take the property out of the floodplain area. The Public Works Director stated various options include filling in the area and elevating the area above the base flood elevation; building is allowed in the floodway but there are specific construction requirements to ensure that the lowest, finished floor is above the base flood elevation. Vice Mayor deHaan stated retail could be within the floodplain at the FISC property. The Assistant City Manager stated linear strips between the warehouses are in the floodplain. Councilmember Tam moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (09-227) Receive a Report on Sunshine Community Task Force Referral. The Deputy City Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Tam stated that she appreciates staff's efforts in expediently moving forward on the matter; that she did not intend to limit herself to the five issues articulated in the staff report. the community should be engaged in public access discussions currently, there are practical pressures on staff; that she does not intend to create a burden on staff; suggested involving one of the good government advocacy groups, such as the League of Woman Voters, to help facilitate the dialogue; that her tendency is not to support the staff recommendation and to postpone the formation of a Sunshine Community Task Force toward the beginning of next year so that issues raised by the Fiscal Sustainability Committee and budget situation can be addressed. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether campaign reform discussions would be appropriate at this time stated most cities have implemented guidelines on limits for individuals, political committees, and in-kind contributions; the matter could be parallel to Santa Ana's Code of Ethics and Conduct. Councilmember Tam stated Santa Ana's Code of Ethics and Conduct deals with putting ethical principles together and is not geared toward looking at cam… | CityCouncil/2009-06-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-06-16 | 14 | Vice Mayor deHaan stated transportation funds are becoming a concerning factor. Councilmember Tam echoed the grimness; stated that she appreciates the Deputy City Manager attending. Regular Meeting 14 Alameda City Council June 16, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-07-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-07-07 | 14 | timeline clarifications, the Development Services Director stated debt timelines and caps remain the same; the West End Community Improvement Project (WECIP) timeline ends 2026; the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project (BWIP) timeline ends 2032. louncilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of closing the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 8:09 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission July 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-07-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-07-21.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-07-21 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -JULY 21, 2009- -6:00 P. .M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:15 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. [Note: Councilmember Tam was present via teleconference from the National Emergency Training Center, 16825 S. Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, MD] Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (09-285) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations : All Bargaining Units. (09-286) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (54956.8) ; Property 1855 N. Loop Road and 1 Clubhouse Memorial Drive; Negotiating parties City Manager and Harbor Bay Isle Associates; Under negotiation Price and terms. Mayor Johnson called a recess to hold the Regular Council Meeting at 7:20 p.m. and reconvened the Closed Session at 10:00 p.m. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators; no action was taken; and regarding Property, the matter was not continued to a later date. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 10:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council July 21, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-08-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-08-03 | 14 | research on the matter; stated there is confusion about what would happen if the City cannot use the facility because of lack of parking. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam stated the Golf Fund balance started with a fund balance of $748,430 in Fiscal Year 2009; the Fiscal Year 2010 projected balance is $275,590; potentially, reserves could be drained before Fiscal Year 2010 is over; Golf Course operating expenditures are exceeding revenues by almost $500,000. The Interim City Manager stated Kemper Sports has slowed the draw down; decisions need to be made this year. In response to Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan's inquiry, the Interim Finance Director stated that the Teen Program personnel services expenditure includes part-time personnel. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan stated all part- time personnel should be included [in the personnel summary] The Interim City Manager stated that she could not come up with a formula base or standard format that would work; a footnote could be added stating that part-time wages are included. The Interim City Manager continued the presentation. In response to Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan's inquiry, the Interim City Manager stated the Assistant City Manager's position is budgeted 50% in Community Development and 50% in Economic Development. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the Economic Development Department is responsible for commercial leasing at the former Base; there should be a discussion regarding past direction and whether direction is still applicable in the current or future environment. The Interim City Manager stated the matter is scheduled for the September 1 City Council meeting. louncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam inquired what needs to happen to ensure that there will be enough Fire personnel to staff current equipment further inquired whether an apparatus would be browned out if staffing falls below 24. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse… | CityCouncil/2009-08-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-09-01 | 14 | to be on hand; the City should be prepared to function longer than ninety-six hours; the City needs to be diligent. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the regular meeting at 12:09 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 1, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-09-15.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-09-15 | 14 | to R-2-PD, Two Family Residence Planned Development District Zoning Regulation; 1.9 Acres Located at 1913 Sherman Street, APN 074-0906- 031-08, from M-1-PD, - Intermediate Industrial (Manufacturing) Planned Development District to R-2-PD, Two Family Residence Planned Development District Zoning Designation; 2.1 Acres 1590/1616 Fortmann Way, APN 072-0381-018-00 from M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing District to R-4-PD, Neighborhood Residential Planned Development District Zoning Designation to Bring Zoning Designations for Six Properties into Conformance with the General Plan and Housing Element. Applicant City of Alameda. The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Speakers Tom Dailey, owner of 1913 Sherman Street; former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Following Mr. Dailey's comments, the Planning Services Manager stated the self storage use at 1913 Sherman Street would be considered a legal, non-conforming use as long as the property is not vacant for more than a year and not more than 75% is destroyed in the event of a fire or act of nature. In response to Mr. Dailey's inquiry, the City Attorney stated the Planning Services Manager's explanation is correct. Following former Councilmember Kerr's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff is in agreement that the Beltline Property outline is incorrect and that the Sherman Street entrance was decided by the Northern Waterfront Specific Plan Committee. The Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative stated the map would be corrected for the second reading of the ordinance. Vice Mayor deHaan moved introduction of the ordinances. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (09-364) Recommendation to Accept the Report of the Economic Development Commission's Business Retention Subcommittee. Continued. (09-365) Recommendation to Accept the Estua… | CityCouncil/2009-09-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-06.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-06 | 14 | to challenge the issue further inquired whether someone would need to hire an attorney and file a lawsuit. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the City Attorney's office cannot provide legal support services to the general community. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (09-394) - Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Commission on Disability Issues, Library Board and Recreation and Park Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated Nielsen Tam for the Commission on Disability Issues; Suzanne Whyte for the Library Board; and Michael B. Cooper and Terri Bertero Ogden for the Recreation and Park Commission. (09-395) Councilmember Tam stated that she attended the League of California Cities Annual Conference along with Vice Mayor deHaan and Councilmember Gilmore; the voting delegates passed three resolutions; one dealt with encouraging local jurisdictions to enact ordinances or policies that would hold the host responsible for under aged drinking that occurs at property under the host's possession, control, or authority; the voting delegates also passed a resolution that requests the League to put forth a ballot measure for the November 2010 election that would clean up the loopholes of Proposition 1A; the League conducted a poll in May 2009 that showed the level of public confidence with the State Legislature and Governor declined to a historic low; it is the right time to demand reforms. Mayor Johnson stated that she is glad people are paying attention to what the State is doing. Councilmember Tam stated the League is eliciting the help of the local officials to try to gather at least 100 signatures from each City. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember Tam would get signature forms. Councilmember Tam responded in the affirmative; stated City resources cannot be used for political activity; further stated the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council October 6, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-10-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 14 | The Interim City Manager stated three [affirmative] votes are needed in order to schedule a joint meeting with the School District; that she wants to ensure that the City is not placed at risk with disclosure. Councilmember Tam stated Council seems to be very supportive of the Mayor's desire to have the community informed about what is in the initiative; the community needs the full context of issues Council has identified; that she would like the City Attorney to interpret Section 14-A (2) that addresses an amendment to the initiative if an agreement is reached with SunCal. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City Attorney's analysis could be made public. The City Attorney responded the City Attorney's office would provide the analysis and make it public if possible. Councilmember Tam moved approval of providing direction for staff to return with a presentation to Council [that includes: 1) the election reports; 2) a summary of the status of negotiation issues between SunCal and the City; and 3) a report on working with SunCal to release more information that the City has, but which was not included in the Election Reports; also, requested that the City Attorney's office make public the opinion on what can and cannot be negotiated; lastly, the motion included Councilmember Matarrese': request to update the City's financial report on the project with recent economic assumptions related to the impending loss of redevelopment money . Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants the motion to be clear that information would be updated and financials would be measured in today's environment in order to reasonably predict the costs associated with figures identified in the public domain, not just the initiative. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (09-416) Consider Supporting Proposed AC Transit Board Resolution 09 - -51 Setting Policy for Buying American Goods. Councilmember Matarrese stated AC Transit Board Member E… | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-11-03.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-11-03 | 14 | Needle, Protect the Point Marc Kasky, Green Century Institute, (submitted handout) ; Ashley Jones, Protect the Point; Elizabeth Greene, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society Irene Dieter Rosemary McNally, Alameda, (submitted handout) ; Brian Schumacher, Alameda: Gretchen Lipow, Alameda, statement read by Shayn Loshafroff; Nancy Gordon, Alameda; Jim Ross, Protect the Point; Karen Bay, Alameda; Bob Sikora, Alameda; Rose Ferro, Alameda; Michael John Torrey, Alameda; Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association; Former Councilmember "Lil" Arnerich, Alameda. Councilmember Tam stated the initiative is very complex and a lot of issues need to be vetted on both sides that she feels it is worth looking at the Elections Code and interpreting it in a way that provides the flexibility to save the taxpayers a significant amount of money in tough economic times. Councilmember Tam moved approval of setting the election to be consolidated with the June 8, 2010 election. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Gilmore stated the City Attorney stated that the Elections Code does not provide guidance for a hybrid initiative; the matter has been about Measure A since the beginning; the matter would be a moot point in terms of the General Plan amendment if there were no exemption to Measure A; that she agrees with a lot of the comments that people made tonight; the absentee ballot issue did not occur to her; the initiative is very complex and everyone needs to read the initiative and be well informed before casting a vote; that she cannot agree to spend money on an initiative when the cost would be so much less in June. Mayor Johnson stated Council has received an opinion from the City Attorney ; the matter is a legal issue and Council should be following the City Attorney's opinion. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there is flexibility to put off making a decision tonight. The City Clerk responded according to Elections Code 9214 and 9215 on the night that the certification of the peti… | CityCouncil/2009-11-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-11-17 | 14 | minutes in a cardiovascular event in most situations, the Fire Department will not be at the scene within said time. The Fire Chief stated the Fire Department, at best, would just be arriving five and a half to six minutes into the call; patient outcome depends on the degree of arrest; if there is full arrest at mark zero and the Fire Department arrives at six minutes chances of survival are 50-50; survival would have deprivation. Vice Mayor deHaan stated hopefully, said event does not happen often. The Fire Chief stated statistic would be provided; the Fire Department needs to partner with the public; more public buildings are equipped with defibrillators; the public needs to be educated in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) . Councilmember Tam stated usually communities want to have neighborhood fire stations; inquired whether location is reflected in the response time for cardiovascular events or is just an average from any station. The Fire Chief responded averaging is from stations; stated the earlier intervention, the better chance of survival engines are often preserved and trucks are cut because 85% of calls are medical. Councilmember Matarrese stated the average is meaningless by itself; the range is important. The Fire Chief stated someone in full cardiac arrest for eight minutes could not be revived; the person could be saved with limited disability if the department arrives on the scene in four minutes; the longer past four minutes, there is more chance of disability if the person recovers; continued the presentation. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether three engines would respond to a boat fire no matter what, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired what is the response to flooding. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 November 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-12-01.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2009-12-01 | 14 | The Police Chief stated staff is stepping up and doing the job. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (09-491) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Housing Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated Ian M. Couwenberg for appointment to the Housing Commission. (09-492) Councilmember Tam announced that she attended the League of California Cities Leadership workshop the League has forged a coalition with the California Alliance for Jobs and the California Transit Association to secure authorization from the Attorney General to place two measures on the November 2010 ballot to start to collect one million signatures; the tentative title of the measure is Local Taxpayer Public Safety and Transportation Protection Act of 2010; the proposed initiative would close the loopholes to prevent the State from borrowing public transit money, Proposition 1A money, and redevelopment funds the California Forward Group is a government reform organization that is putting two measures on the ballot in November; one measure would lower the voting threshold to a simple majority; the other measure would institute a new countywide sales tax; Repair California is also putting initiatives on the November ballot that would implement a voter called Constitutional Convention: the League leadership has encouraged cities to hold off on taking a position on the other initiatives until the issue can be vetted through policy committees and legislative analysts. In response to Mayor Johnson's inquiry, Councilmember Tam stated the League is involved with the Local Taxpayer Public Safety and Transportation Protection Act of 2020; the League's first and top priority is to focus on protecting local revenues and getting a million signatures. Mayor Johnson stated the California Forward group is not talking about restructuring the tax system. Councilmember Tam stated the State legislature and Governor signed Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 December 1, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-12-01.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );