pages: CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2007-11-06 | 14 | never provided with the compromise plan; stated the matter could be remanded back to the Planning Board. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board requested sidewalks on both sides, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether issue is loss of parking. The Planning Services Manager responded the Master Plan established the maximum amount of parking; stated all plans are well within the Master Plan. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. In favor of remanding to the Planning Board Jon Spangler, Alameda; and Karen Bey, Alameda. Aidan Berry, Catellus, outlined the project; stated Catellus concurs with the staff recommendations; the appeal was filed without animosity because philosophical differences were reached; Catellus likes the suggestion to create raised crosswalks and will discuss the matter with its engineers; Catellus supports taking the parking plan back to the Planning Board. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of: 1) sending the compromise plan back to the Planning Board for review; 2) [ adoption of the resolution) incorporating staff recommendations 1 and 2 regarding the Master Demolition, Grading, Infrastructure and Phasing Plan (MDGIP) and the driveway; and 3) adding additional language [to the resolution] to incorporate the language regarding the Stargell driveway right-hand turn condition. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the entire matter should be remanded to the Planning Board since the matter has evolved. The Planning Services Manager responded there is new information regarding the plan, which is why staff thought the matter should be remanded to the Planning Board; stated there is not new information on the MDGIP and driveway. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board was concerned about said two items [MDGIP and driveway] The Planning Services Manager responded the Board's concern was Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 November 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf |