pages: CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2005-08-02 | 14 | The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated that a construction management contract would be presented at the August 16 CIC Meeting. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the construction manager would be a contractor. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the construction manager would also manage the parking garage project. Commissioner deHaan inquired what the (construction management) Contract would cost, to which the Development Services Director responded approximately $1 million. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether there would be additional oversight, to which the Development Services Director responded not unless a problem arose with the historic property. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether there was a budget for oversight of architecture and engineering for the parking structure, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Morgan, Citizens for a Megaplex Free Alameda, urged that the Commission continue the matter until after a decision has been rendered on the project. Commissioner Daysog inquired what services Architectural Resources Group, Inc. (ARG) was providing and why another layer of consultants was providing advice. The Development Services Director responded that construction projects involving the rehabilitation of a historic structure involve changes and modifications architects are needed to draft up solutions to gray areas. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether said level of services was always contemplated, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Daysog stated that he has a sense of sticker shock with the increased amount of the Contract; that he understands that there is a level of complexity in dealing with a historic structure. The Development Services Director stated that the construction Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 August 2, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf |