pages: CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 14 | Counci Imember/Authorit; Member deHaan seconded the motion with the caveat that principle would be pushed out. Under discussion, Mayor/Chair Johnson stated refinancing makes sense because the interest rate would be lower and over $300,000 would be saved. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-277B CC) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14223, "Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191. " Adopted. The Assistant City Manager provided a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the prior fire inspection fee. Mayor Johnson stated a chart showing fee comparisons would have helped. In response to Councilmember deHaan's inquiry, the Fire Marshall stated fire inspection fees are based on an hourly rate and do not have 100% cost recovery; currently, a business fire inspection fee is $77.50; full cost recovery would be approximately $148. Mayor Johnson questioned whether Building staff should perform inspections instead of firefighters; stated business owners have complained about inspection fees; the proposed increase would result in more complaints. The Fire Marshall stated the Fire Department uses civilian inspectors, which lowers the expense. Mayor Johnson questioned what the cost would be if Building staff performed inspections. The Fire Marshall stated Fire Department civilian inspectors have the same salary as the Building Inspectors. Councilmember Gilmore stated Building inspectors are busy already new personnel would need to be added. The Fire Marshall stated that fire and storm water inspectors are very specialized and require additional training. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and 4 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 17, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |