pages: CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-09-05 | 14 | stretched the envelope; the project drops 18 inches to get into the lower level; there has to be another wayi he is concerned with mass and the eight-foot driveway the Fire Department should review the driveway. Councilmember Matarrese requested staff to clarify whether the eight-foot driveway meets code. The Supervising Planner stated the existing driveway can be retained; further stated the minimum code for driveways now is eight and a half feet. Councilmember Matarrese stated relation to other houses in the neighborhood is a planning and design issue. Mayor Johnson stated more work needs to be done; size is relevant to the historic character of the house; approving the demolition is an extraordinary act and historic preservation should be expected in return; the duplexes are going to be larger than some houses in Alameda; limiting the size and requesting more details would preserve the historic character. Councilmember Matarrese moved that the matter be sent back to the HAB to review the impact of the expansion on the historic nature of the structures and review additional detail to bring the structures closer to original form. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, with the caveat that one of the structures could be moved closer to the property line, which could change the opportunity of making the project work and change access points. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there are examples of remodels that have gone wrong; the project meets Code but no one likes the look; questioned when the Code would be changed stated people trying to do projects should have a better idea about what is acceptable. Councilmember Matarrese stated the big issue is the 30% [demolition] or else the project should go forward. Councilmember deHaan noted the City should be vigilant i City funding is going into the project. The Supervising Planner noted that the houses are covered in asbestos shingles and the detail would not be known until the shingles are removed; therefore, the drawing is devoid of some details; the shadow line would be found to determine trim detail. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 September 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf |