pages: CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf, 14
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2008-03-18 | 14 | The Planning Services Manager stated a Conditional Use Permit would be required for anything over 30,000 square feet i suggested layering Livermore's provision on top of said requirement ; inquired whether there would be an exception for historic buildings. Councilmember Matarrese responded historic buildings could have a large retailer; stated anything bigger than 90,000 square feet would not be allowed to have more than 10% non-taxable items. The Planning Services Manager stated the Del Monte Building would be limited to approximately 12,000 square feet of non-taxable retail under the proposal. Councilmember Gilmore stated the issue runs up against the desire to preserve historic buildings. Mayor Johnson stated the proposal is directed at a large retailer that has 10% of non-taxable within the one retail establishment The Planning Services Manager stated he thinks that would prevent the Del Monte project from moving forward. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she is bothered by the fact that language could be crafted which might have unintended consequences for historic buildings the matter should be sent back to the Planning Board along with an explanation of Council's concept. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance with direction to have the Planning Board review superstore language along with consideration for large historic buildings, including, but not be limited to, the Alameda Landing warehouses, Alameda Point hangers, and the Del Monte Building; stated that he is dismayed that the matter was not addressed. Councilmember deHaan requested that the City Attorney review wages and health benefit issues for retailers who have over one hundred employees. Mayor Johnson stated said issue is not a Planning issue. On the call for the question, by consensus, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Gilmore stated that everyone talks about Alameda not having enough shopping the staff report states "Bringing additional retail opportunities to Alameda would be expected to result in shorter vehicle trips. Traffic levels on regional Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 March 18, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf |