pages
487 rows where body = "HistoricalAdvisoryBoard"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date, page, path
date (date) 103 ✖
- 2021-03-04 12
- 2021-05-06 12
- 2005-08-04 11
- 2007-12-06 11
- 2005-04-07 9
- 2006-01-05 9
- 2006-08-03 9
- 2005-06-02 8
- 2007-06-07 8
- 2009-02-05 8
- 2012-02-02 8
- 2021-12-02 8
- 2005-09-01 7
- 2005-10-06 7
- 2019-09-05 7
- 2005-02-03 6
- 2006-03-02 6
- 2006-04-06 6
- 2006-09-07 6
- 2006-11-02 6
- 2007-03-01 6
- 2008-01-03 6
- 2008-08-07 6
- 2008-09-04 6
- 2008-11-20 6
- 2011-12-01 6
- 2012-03-01 6
- 2015-02-05 6
- 2017-04-06 6
- 2017-12-07 6
- 2019-12-05 6
- 2006-07-07 5
- 2008-06-05 5
- 2008-10-02 5
- 2009-11-05 5
- 2010-02-04 5
- 2011-10-06 5
- 2012-01-05 5
- 2012-04-05 5
- 2015-09-03 5
- 2016-01-07 5
- 2017-02-02 5
- 2017-05-04 5
- 2017-06-01 5
- 2018-10-04 5
- 2018-12-06 5
- 2019-03-07 5
- 2019-04-04 5
- 2019-08-01 5
- 2021-01-07 5
- 2021-11-04 5
- 2005-01-06 4
- 2005-11-03 4
- 2006-05-04 4
- 2006-10-05 4
- 2007-11-01 4
- 2009-04-02 4
- 2011-02-03 4
- 2011-04-07 4
- 2011-05-05 4
- 2011-06-02 4
- 2012-07-05 4
- 2012-09-06 4
- 2015-05-07 4
- 2018-06-07 4
- 2019-11-07 4
- 2021-09-02 4
- 2022-02-03 4
- 2005-03-10 3
- 2006-07-06 3
- 2007-01-04 3
- 2007-02-01 3
- 2007-05-03 3
- 2007-09-06 3
- 2007-10-04 3
- 2008-02-07 3
- 2008-12-04 3
- 2009-03-05 3
- 2010-05-06 3
- 2010-06-03 3
- 2010-08-05 3
- 2010-11-04 3
- 2011-03-03 3
- 2011-07-07 3
- 2011-09-01 3
- 2016-03-03 3
- 2016-05-05 3
- 2016-09-01 3
- 2017-10-05 3
- 2008-03-06 2
- 2008-04-03 2
- 2008-05-01 2
- 2008-07-03 2
- 2009-08-06 2
- 2010-03-04 2
- 2010-04-01 2
- 2010-10-07 2
- 2011-01-06 2
- 2011-08-04 2
- 2018-05-03 2
- 2019-01-10 2
- 2009-12-03 1
- 2015-11-05 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-01-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 6, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Vice Chair McPherson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Secretary Altschuler called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Board Members McPherson, Anderson, Lynch, & Tilos MEMBERS ABSENT: Board member Miller arrived at 7:20 p.m. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Altschuler, Elizabeth Johnson, Development Services Department, Recording Secretary Debbie Gremminger. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Staff is requesting Item #2 be continued to a future meeting. Approval of minutes and Election of Officers will move to the end of the Agenda when full Board is present. MINUTES: Moved to the end of the Agenda. (see Agenda Changes and Discussions). ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Moved to the end of the Agenda (see Agenda Changes and Discussions). WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action) 1. Adoption of 2005 Historical Advisory Board Calendar. M/S to adopt the 2005 Historical Advisory Board Calendar. Anderson/Lynch 4-0-1.. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1 (Miller); Motion carries. ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action) 2. Certificate of Approval CA04-0013- Helena Liang - 1104 Oak Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for an unauthorized demolition of a one-story residential structure built prior to 1942. A two-story residence in the same style was approved by Design Minutes of January 6, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-01-06 | 2 | Review (DR04-0003). The site is located within the R-5, General Residence District. (continued from 9-9-04) Applicant & staff request a continuance to future meeting. M/S (Anderson/Tilos) to continue this item to a future meeting. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1 (Miller); Motion carries. Boardmember Miller arrived. 3. Alameda Point Update. Presentation of the ongoing planning process for Alameda Point. Elizabeth Johnson, Development Services Department, summarized the information provided in the staff report. Ms. Johnson indicated that there had been two community workshops and that there will be three more. Staff will give the Board regular up-dates of the planning process after each Community Workshop. The next workshop will be held on March 3, 2005 which will be hosted by the Planning Board. Staff would also like the Board to consider co-hosting one of the remaining Community Workshops with the Alameda Point Advisory Committee. Melissa Gaudreau and Chris VerPlanck from Page and Turnbull gave a presentation giving a brief history of the site, and outlined the Historcal District at NAS. Mr. Plank stated that the buildings and structures within Alameda Point reflect three distinct periods of development: Pre- war, War and Post-war. Most of the Pre-war buildings were constructed during 1940-1941 of reinforced concrete in a styling typical of commercial and industrial design from the 1930's. This style is known as "Moderne". A comprehensive inventory of pre-1946 buildings and structures was done in 1992 by S.B. Woodbridge, which focused on determining whether any buildings at Alameda Point qualified for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The report concluded that while no individual building qualified for listing in the NRHP, an area in the Civic Core sub-area appeared to qualify for listing as a historic district. The identified area includes 87 buildings and structures that contribute to the area's historic significance, 35 non-contributing major buildings and many temporary or minor b… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-01-06 | 3 | Ms. Altschuler asked the Board if they would be interested in hosting a community workshop? There will be more opportunities in the future for the Board to give their comments. This will be a standing agenda item, so staff can give the Board updates and also allow the public to have access to the Board if they have any questions. The next community workshop is scheduled for March 3, 2005. Staff will reschedule the Regular March meeting so the Board may attend the workshop. Staff will provide the Board with a copy of the Historical Architectural Resources Inventory for NAS, and the Guide to Preserving the Character of the Naval Air Station Alameda Historic District. MINUTES Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 28, 2004. (continued from 12-02-04). M/S (Tilos/Anderson) to approve minutes as corrected; 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2 (Lynch, Miller); Motion carries. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 2, 2004. M/S (Tilos/Miller) to approve minutes as corrected; 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Abstain: 2 (Anderson,Lynch); Motion carries ELECTION OF OFFICERS: M/S (Lynch/Anderson) to nominate Vice-Chair McPherson as Chair. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0.; Motion carries. M/S (Lynch/Miller) to nominate Boardmember Anderson as Vice-Chair. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0.; Motion carries. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Rosemary McNally asked why Item 2, 1104 Oak was continued. She also thanked the Board and Staff for all of their hard work on this item. Ms. Altschuler advised that staff was continuing to work with property owner to resolve issues. Boardmember Tilos will be on vacation until March 17, 2005. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Altschuler informed the Board that the Planning & Building Director has resigned. Staff is not certain when that position will be filled but will update the Board as needed. Ms. Altschuler Minutes of January 6, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-01-06 | 4 | also stated that she would be training another member of staff to take over her position as Secretary. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Judith Altschuler, Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.04\12-2-04 MIN.doc Minutes of January 6, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-01-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-02-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Vice Chair McPherson called the meeting to order at 7:08 pm. Secretary Altschuler called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair McPherson, Boardmembers Miller & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice-Chair Anderson, Boardmember Tilos. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Altschuler, Leslie Little Development Services Director, Recording Secretary Debbie Gremminger. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Remove Item 1 from agenda per the City Attorney's office. (see below.) MINUTES: M/S (Miller, Lynch) to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 6, 2005 with corrections. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. (Anderson, Tilos.) Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action) 1. Certificate of Approval CA04-0013- Helena Liang - 1104 Oak Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for an unauthorized demolition of a one-story residential structure built prior to 1942. A two-story residence in the same style was approved by Design Review (DR04-0003). The site is located within the R-5, General Residence District. (continued from 9-9-04) Ms. Altschuler advised the Board that the City Attorney's office contacted the State Historic Preservation Office for guidance regarding the listing of the property and procedure of processing the Certificate of Approval. We were advised that it was inappropriate for the Historical Advisory Board to list the site on the Historical Building Study List, or consider a Certificate of Approval for demolition because the building was already demolished and no longer meets any of the criteria for being considered as a historic resource. Thus, rather than being a historical preservation issue for Historical Advisory Board consideration, the scope of work permitted under the issued building permit is in question. Staff requests that the Board remove this item from the agenda. Minutes of February 3, 2005 Regular His… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-02-03 | 2 | M/S (Miller, Lynch) to remove this item from the agenda. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. (Anderson, Tilos.) Motion carries. 2. Study Session for a proposal to rehabilitate the Alameda Theatre and construct a new 7 screen Cineplex and 350 space parking structure on the Video Maniac site. This site is located at 2305 Central Avenue within the CC - CCPD, Community Commercial and Special Planned Development Districts. Leslie Little, Development Services Director, informed the Board that Staff would like direction from the Board regarding the proposed rehabilitation and construction of the 2 story multiplex and the 352 space parking structure. She expects the project should be ready for a Planning Board public hearing in mid March. Michael Stanton, consultant, gave a presentation which included a brief history of the theater and showed the Board what is proposed. He informed the Board that the lobby and auditorium of the Alameda Theater will be restored to look as it did in 1939 when it opened for the first time. The second floor of the lobby, will also be restored. The balcony area is not included in this first phase. The marquee will be restored as well. In designing the new Cineplex, it is noted that, according to the guidelines from the Secretary of Interior, new construction should be clearly differentiated from the existing historic building. There will be retail on the street level corner of Central Ave. and Oak Street. There are four theaters proposed on the second level and three theaters proposed for the ground floor. The proposed 352-parking garage will not only serve the Theater, but all of Park St. It is designed so that it can be easily expanded in the future. Chair McPherson opened the floor for public comment. Richard Rutter, AAPS, felt that the design should emphasize a vertical articulation, not horizontal. The materials used should be high quality such as pressed brick or terra cotta. The parking garage should not look like a parking garage. AAPS felt that the previous parking garage proposal pr… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-02-03 | 3 | Leslie Little stated that the DDA would be ready for hearing sometime in March. The City Council has taken action to allow staff to purchase the Video Maniac's parcel. Ms. Altschuler informed the Board a request for Certificate of Approval for the structural alterations relating to the seismic strenghthening of the front façade, the new openings between the theatre and the new Cineplex, and the new opening for the concession stand. Ms. Altschuler also noted that the community would also have chance to speak at the Planning Board hearings. The Board thanked Leslie Little and her team for a nice presentation and they all look forward for this project to begin. REPORTS: 3. Review and consider possible modifications of Section 30-15 of the Alameda Municipal Code regulating Work Live Studios. Ms. Altschuler informed the Board that the City Council directed staff to agenize a review of the Work/Live Ordinance by the Planning Board, the Historical Advisory Board and the Economic Development Commission. The Council asks the Historical Advisory Board to review the Ordinance in general, with specific focus on whether the ordinance protects historic buildings, and whether the Ordinance should be changed to expand the geographic limitations on work/live studios to include other portions of the City such as the Park Street or Webster Street Commercial Districts, more of the Northern Waterfront area, or Alameda Point. Chair McPherson opened the floor for public comment. Dick Rutter, AAPS, feels that the Ordinance should state that the kitchens should not be located near the work area. He feels that this Ordinance is a good tool in preserving Historical Buildings, and that it should be extended to include the former Navy Base. He also stated that Measure A is an issue that the community should be educated on. Chair McPherson closed the floor for public comment and opened Board discussion. Boardmember Miller feels that the Work/Live Ordinance is not a threat to Measure A, and has no problem expanding this to Alameda Point. Chair… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-02-03 | 4 | Board member Lynch asked staff to find out how much the Work/Live permit would cost, how the permit would be enforced and would the occupant be advised of any limitations. Ms. Altschuler informed the Board that the Work/Live permit fee has not yet been determined. There would be an individual use permit required for each project, as well as a business license for each use. A deed restriction would also be required. If an applicant is in violation of the conditions of their use permit, it can be revoked by the Planning Board. M/S to continue this item to a future meeting for further discussion. (Miller/Lynch) 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion carries. 4. Consideration and possible recommendation to the City Council to revise the definition of demolition in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Ms. Altschuler began by informing the Board that it has become more difficult for Staff to determine whether a project meets the Historic Preservation Ordinance's definition of demolition which states that demolition occurs when 30% of the value of the building is removed. This definition has been challenging to administer because the meaning of "value of the building" can have many interpretations, thus there is no clear indication when a proposal includes a demolition and when it does not. For example, if the value of the building is based upon assessed value, two identical buildings could have a different assessed value (depending upon when it was last sold or whether it has Proposition 13 protection), and a larger portion of a building with a higher assessment could be removed before a demolition would occur. If value was dependent upon the cost of the work or materials, then more of a well-maintained, well- constructed property could be removed than a deteriorated one before the removal would meet the definition of demolition. Staff has reviewed the definition of demolition for a number of jurisdictions. Most have language similar to that for the City of Davis which states: "Demolition" means for the purpose of … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-02-03 | 5 | Staff has prepared two Alternatives for the Board to consider. Ms. Altschuler informed the Board that this would require a recommendation to City Council to change to the Historic Preservation Ordinance Allen Tai, Planner II, presented two different examples of projects for the Board to review and determine which they feel should be considered a demolition under the current definition. Chair McPherson wished to remind the community that this Board is not saying no to all demolitions, but would like applications to come before the Board so they can have the chance to look at it prior to demolition. Chair McPherson opened the floor to public comment. Birgitt Evans, AAPS, stated that she feels that as a result of 1025 Fair Oaks and 1104 Oak St; the 30% (of the value) rule is not fair to anyone involved. 30% of a home worth $800,000.00 is $240,000.00 which could be a huge demolition. She is in favor of Alternative #1. Rosemary McNally stated that she is leaning more towards more that 5% of the front of the building. She also stated that it should be determined on a case-by-case basis. Francie Farinet. AAPS, is in favor of Alternative #2. She is not sure what the solution should be. Chuck Miller stated that it is obvious that there needs to be clear guidelines. He feels that the front should be separate percentage from the rest of the house. In most houses the front façade is only around 20% of the house. He also feels that the roof is very important architecturally and should be taken seriously. Chair McPherson closed public comment and opened Board discussion. Board member Miller asked which alternative would be best for staff. Ms. Altschuler stated that the purpose of either alternative is to have a better discussion with the applicant regarding if a demolition permit is necessary. Chair McPherson stated she is leaning towards Alternative #1 but would like staff to add verbiage to include roof removal as part of the definition. M/S (Miller/Lynch) to continue this item to a future meeting for further discussion. 3-0… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-02-03 | 6 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Boardmember Lynch informed the Board that she received an e-mail from Elizabeth Johnson regarding the Alameda Point Community Workshop that will be held on March 3, 2005, which is the same time as the Regular HAB meeting. Ms. Altschuler informed the Board that this meeting will be hosted by the Planning Board and that Staff will look for an available night to hold a Special HAB meeting. Chair McPherson stated that she spoke to Bill Norton, Interim City Manager, regarding specific interests that the Historical Advisory Board might have. She would also like to staff to agenize permit fee'e relating to Historic Preservation for a future meeting. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Altschuler informed the Board that her last official meeting as their Secretary would be April 7, 2005. She also stated that we are currently in the process of interviewing for the Planner III position and hopes that it will be filled prior to her leaving. Ms. Altschuler will be devoting most of her remaining time to working on the Development Code revisions and completing the Guide to Residential Design. Ms. Altschuler also thanked AAPS for helping with the graphics for the Guide. She stated that Allen Tai would most likely be the "Interim" Secretary to this Board until the Supervising Planner position is filled. ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Lynch/Miller) to adjourn the meeting at 10:48 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Judith Altschuler, Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05/2-3-05 MIN.doc Minutes of February 3, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-02-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-03-10 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD SPECIAL MEETING OF THURSDAY, MARCH 10, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Vice Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Secretary Altschuler called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chair Anderson, Boardmembers Miller & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair McPherson, Boardmember Tilos. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Altschuler, Allen Tai, Planner III, Recording Secretary Debbie Gremminger. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 3, 2005 with corrections. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action 1. CA05-0003 320 Pacific Avenue - The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to removal a Coast Live Oak tree. The tree has a 24" diameter and large low-angled trunks that extend across the property line. The application also includes a request to partially demolish an existing 622 square-foot, pre-1942 building as part of a new proposal to construct a single-family residence on the property. The site is located at 320 Pacific Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Allen Tai, Planner III, was present and briefly reviewed the staff report as presented. He informed the Board that the property owner is requesting a Certificate of Approval for two items. The first is to allow the removal of a Coast Live Oak tree that is located along the western edge of the property. The second request involves the partial demolition of the existing single-family dwelling. Minutes of March 10, 2005 Special Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-03-10 | 2 | Mr. Tai stated that the applicants are proposing to raise the existing structure in order to integrate a new single-family dwelling into the existing structure. The construction will involve removal of the existing front façade of the building as well as the front portion of the roof. This matter is brought before this Board because it involves partial demolition of a structure built prior to 1942. Staff feels that there is no evidence that the structure exhibits any architectural or historical merit and that the proposed project will be more consistent with the adjacent homes than the existing building. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Board approve the Certificate of Approval as stated in the draft Resolution. Vice Chair Anderson opened the floor for public comment. Ivan Chiu, Architect, stated that the tree should be removed because one trunk is leaning over the fence toward the adjacent property while another is leaning toward the existing structure. At the recommendation of the arborist, the applicant wishes to remove the existing Oak in order to eliminate the possibility of the tree causing damage to the neighboring property. Mr. Wong also informed the Board that the proposed design intends to keep the Craftsman style appearance and to preserve salvageable portions of the existing building by incorporating the structure into the rear of the new building. Vice Chair Anderson closed public comment and opened Board discussion. Boardmember Lynch stated that she visited the property and feels that the tree does look sick. She also feels that the existing structure should not be considered a historic resource. She also feels that this structure should not be referred to as a "craftsman" style because there are no "craftsman" style elements on the existing or proposed structure. Vice Chair Anderson asked if the old house is structurally sound enough to support the proposed new house. Mr. Chiu stated that the detail of the design has not yet been looked into. He does not anticipate any problems. Mr. Tai stated … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-03-10 | 3 | Mr. Tai explained to the Board that the reason for replacing one Oak tree with two Oak trees is that most likely only one will survive. Ms. Altschuler added that the requirement of two Oak trees was a decision of this Board many years ago. Not every tree will survive. This just ensures that each tree that is removed will be replaced. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the Certificate of Approval, for the removal of one Coast Live Oak Tree as stated in the draft Resolution. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the Certificate of Approval, for the partial demolition of an existing 622 sq. ft. residence at 320 Pacific as stated in the draft Resolution. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. REPORTS: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Boardmember Lynch attended the Special Planning Board workshop on March 3rd regarding Alameda Point and she is concerned that the Flight Tower is not included in the Historic District and would like staff to agendize this for a future meeting. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Lynch/Miller) to adjourn the meeting at 7:53 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Justice Judith Altschuler, Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGHHAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05/2-3-05 MIN.doc Minutes of March 10, 2005 Special Historical Advisory Board Meeting 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Vice Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:10 pm. Secretary Altschuler called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Boardmembers Lynch, Miller & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair McPherson, Vice-Chair Anderson. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Altschuler, Recording Secretary Debbie Gremminger. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Miller) to continue the minutes of the Special meeting of March 10, 2005 due to lack of quorum. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Staff requested that Item 4 be heard 1st prior to items 1, 7 2, & 3. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to hear Item 4 first. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Secretary Altschuler informed the Board of the Historical Preservation Conference in Riverside. ACTIONITEMS (Discussion/Action) 4. Transportation Master Plan Policies - Review and comment on the draft TMP policies, and recommend a set of final draft policies to the City Council for approval. Barry Bergman, Public Works Department, stated that in 2004, the City Council approved the development of a citywide Transportation Master Plan Minutes of April 7, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 2 | The TMP will consist of six individual plans: 1) multimodal circulation, 2) motor vehicle, 3) transit, 4) bicycle, 5) pedestrian, and 6) transportation system management/ transportation demand management. A subcommittee was established to oversee the development of circulation policies for the TMP These polices were to address all transportation modes on a general level, while policies for the mode-specific plans (e.g. the bicycle plan and transit plan) will include more detail. Staff would like the Board to review the Draft Policies and give comments, and recommend a set of final draft policies to the City Council for approval. The Draft Policies were not included in the packet. Staff will forward a copy of this document to the Board and they can submit their comments via e-mail. 1. Adoption of Resolution Commending Judith Altschuler, Secretary for the Historical Advisory Board, for her Contributions to the City of Alameda. Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary, read the Resolution and presented it to Ms. Altschuler. Board member Tilos opened the floor to public comment. Scott Brady, former president of HAB, would like to thank Judith for all of her time and effort she has put in over the time of his tenure on the Board. Mr. Brady feels they got a lot of things accomplished in terms of advancing preservation here in Alameda. And Judith did a lot of the behind the scenes work. We have very good amendments to our Preservation Ordinance largely due to her efforts. Rosemary McNally, would like to encourage the Board to pass this resolution. Board member Tilos closed the floor to public comment and opcned Board discussion. Board member Tilos would also like to thank Judith for her work on this Board. She has been very helpful. M/S (Miller/Lynch) to approve the Resolution as presented. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. Ms. Altschuler thanked the Board and the members of the community. Minutes of April 7, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 3 | 2. Review of the Landscaping Plan for planting two Coast Live Oak trees (Quercus agrifolia) on the vacant property at 301 Spruce Street. The submittal of a Landscaping Plan (as part of new development proposals on the site) was required as a Condition of Approval by the Historical Advisory Board under Resolution HAB 01-08, which approved the removal of one Coast Live Oak tree in 2001, The site is located within an R-4 Neighborhood Residential District. Ms. Altschuler gave a brief history of the project. In 1988, the previous owner damaged an Oak tree through extensive trimming. The owners were required to preserve the tree despite it being severely pruned. In 2001 the tree showed signs of deteriorating health, and the Board approved a new owner's request to remove the damaged tree in order to allow a proposed residential development, with the condition that two new oak trees be planted on the property. The Board also required the submittal of a landscaping plan for review and approval by the Board when new construction is proposed on the site. The Board's approval was subsequently appealed to the City Council, where the Board's decision was upheld upon the Council's finding that there was no merit to the appeal. The applicants have secured the services of a Landscape Architect as required by the Board in 2001 to prepare a landscaping plan and recommendations for the location of the two new trees. The applicants have also secured services of a certified arborist who has provided recommendations for protecting the existing trees during construction. Board member Tilos opened the floor for public comment. Patrick Lynch, 305 Spruce St., spoke in opposition of this project. He has several issues with this application. He stated that the Board should be aware that the conditions contained in CA-01-08 have not been complied with and his requests to the City for enforcement have been ignored. In 2002 a grading permit was issued for the development project at the site without requiring replacement trees. He is concerned w… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 4 | 1. Mr. Lynch's concern with the issuance of the grading permit does not fall under the prevue of the Historical Advisory Board. 2. To resolve Mr. Lynch's concern regarding the size of the trunk diameters of the replacement trees, the Board can extend the landscaping maintenance agreement to five years and require the replacement tree to be larger than 10" diameter. 3. His issue with staff's decision that this project is exempt from CEQA guidelines do not fall under the prevue of this Board and should be addressed during the design review process. 4. According to city records, the Certificate of Approval CA01-08 was valid on the day the tree was removed. The Board approved the request with the condition that two new oak trees be planted on the property. The Board also required the submittal of a landscaping plan for review and approval when new construction is proposed. The current owners have submitted a proposal to construct a single-family residence on the site. A landscaping plan for the planning of two new Oak trees has been prepared in conformance with Resolution HAB-01- 08. The plans for the new construction are currently under review by Design Review staff. Conditions of approval for the Design Review will require protection of the existing trees per the arborist and landscape architect's recommendations, as well as the recordation of a Landscape Maintenance Agreement to ensure maintenance of the oak trees on the property. Staff understands that Mr. Lynch has enjoyed living next to a vacant lot, but the owner is entitled to develop his lot. Ms. Altschuler advised the Board that the decision before this Board tonight is to approve the location of the replacement trees as stated in the Landscaping Maintenance plan. Board member Tilos opened the floor to Board discussion. Board member Miller is in favor of extending the Landscaping Plan to 5 years. He is also in favor of requiring the replacement trees to be bigger than a 10" diameter. The Certified Arborist, Chris Bowen was present. He suggested that the rep… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 5 | Jennifer Ott, DSD, informed the Board that this project consists of three parts: the rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre; the construction of a seven screen, two story Cineplex with retail at the ground floor; and the construction of a 352 space, 60+ foot high parking structure. Tonight staff would like the Board to provide comments on the parking structure and Cineplex. CINEPLEX: The Henry Architects Inc, design team gave a presentation on the proposed Cineplex and proposed parking structure. The presentation included various pictures of the proposed Cineplex from different views of Central Ave. to address the concern that the Cineplex would block the view of the Twin Towers Church. Mr. Henry concluded that in order to see both towers of the church, over half of the upper levels of the new Cineplex would need to be eliminated. Another concern Mr. Henry spoke of is the 20 ft. overhang element on Central Ave and Oak St. Mr. Henry stated that in order to provide a viable Cineplex it is critical to have the proposed overhang. Without this overhang auditorium #7 would suffer greatly, losing 28 seats and reducing the screen size significantly. This will have a severe impact on the quality of the presentation and reduce the ability to compete effectively with Jack London Square. In addition to the severe economic impacts, deletion of the overhang. would be detrimental to the architecture. The overhang provides a clear separation of stories and materials thus reducing uninterrupted wall would create. The last concern Mr. Henry addressed was the corner element. Mr. Henry stated that this design included a great deal of surface articulation to eliminate the box like effect. Vertical recesses continuing the line of the columns from the ground level have been added to the upper sections at the auditoriums along with the horizontal elements to reduce the tallness of the building. They have also rounded the corner "tower" on Oak St. and Central Ave. to match the curved corners of the historic theater and the Starbuck buildi… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 6 | Ann Rutter stated she likes the new proposed design. She would like to see the Oak St. elevation. She feels this project has been forced on the community. She would like to see more handicap parking spaces closer to the elevators for easier wheelchair access. David Baker, 939 Taylor Ave., feels that the new proposal is not compatible with the historical qualities of Alameda. He stated that the art deco is missing. Richard Knight, 1372 Versailles Ave., feels that the primary goal of this project is for the Historic Alameda Theatre to be back in operation. He is concerned with what would happen if this Cineplex went out of business in the future. John Sargent, 3105 El Paseo, stated he was concerned when he saw the proposed design in the Alameda Sun. He feels that the parking lot should be located on the corner of Oak St. and Santa Clara Ave. The parking garage should include more art deco style and not look so much like a parking garage. He stated that housing should be included on the upper two stories of the parking garage. Scott Brady, AAPS, feels that in general the design is good. He feels that the vertical elements should be stressed more. The proposed design has impressions of columns, but does not read very strong. This is a very good start. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., stated that the proposed design still feels to "boxie" looking. He stated that he feels that Oak St. is too narrow to support such a huge Theatre and Parking Garage. He does not currently go to movie theaters. He would prefer to rent a movie or download from computer. These days modern technology may prevent huge Multi- plex Theatres to be successful. Doreen Soto, DSD, responded to some of the comments made tonight as follows: 1. Currently Long's Drugs is not willing to participate in this project. The City has to move forward with this project. 2. The City has hired the best economist to work on this project. He has determined that based on the population and demographics, this project will succeed. The parking structure will attract… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 7 | PARKING STRUCTURE: Mr. Michael Stanton, architect, gave a brief summary of what was presented to the Planning Board on March 28, 2005. Mr. Stanton informed the HAB of the comments they received from the Planning Board. The Planning Board preferred the lighter color brick, simplify the lines (on top) of Cineplex behind Longs, more lighting on the disabled bike access of parking garage, stair tower should either be all open or have the same openings as the parking garage, eliminate the on-street parking on Oak St. to extend the sidewalk and add street trees. Board member Tilos opened the floor to Public comment. Don Cunningham, Twin Towers Church, is in favor of the lighting and the color. He stated that Twin Towers was built long before automobiles were in use. Not in favor of losing the on-street parking on Oak St. He is concerned with the travel pattern. Chuck Millar, 2829 San Jose Ave., stated that for safety reasons the on-street parking should be eliminated. All construction should fit in to the surrounding area. He would like to know what the HAB's role in this project is? In response to Mr. Millar question, Ms. Altschuler stated, there are three items that require approval from the HAB. First, Certificate of Approval for the structural alterations relating to the seismic strengthening of the front façade, second, the new openings between the theatre and the new Cineplex, and third, the new opening for the concession stand. The Planning Board will give final design approval for the Cineplex and Parking Garage. Staff is just asking for comments from the HAB. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., is not in favor of the exterior design He feels it is out of place with surrounding buildings. Don Sargent, is not in favor of façade. He feels the open banks can be treated architecturally. He feels that it might be necessary to take away the on-street parking on the opposite side of the street as well. Richard Knight is not in favor of design. He feels there are no historical elements. Is not compatible with surroundi… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 8 | Scott Brady, AAPS, feels the Oak St. façade looks to jumbled. The lower level does not tie in with the upper levels. Stair tower should have more glazing. Arches should be increased. He is in favor of the buff colored brick. More attention should be placed on the blank wall facing Long's Rob Ratto, PSBA, is in favor of project. He likes the idea of a mural on the blank wall facing Long's He likes the new proposed design for the Cineplex. The loss of on-street parking spaces will make it more pedestrian friendly. There will be metered parking spaces in the parking garage. Five-hour time limit Monday - Saturday, 9 am - 5 pm, free on Sundays. He stated that this project has limited funds. There will have to be some compromises. It is hard to hide the fact that this is a parking garage. M/S (Miller, Lynch) to extend the meeting to 10:30 pm. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2: Motion carries. Boardmember Tilos closed floor for public comment and opened Board discussion. Boardmember Miller is in favor of the poster boxes because he feels that there will be a maintenance issue with the planting of vines. He is in favor of the glazing on the tower, and is not in favor of the canopy. Boardmember Lynch does not feel this design is compatible but understands this project needs to move forward. She is in favor of the buff color and prefers the posters to the vines. She likes the idea of free parking on Sundays and is in favor of the mural. Boardmember Tilos stated that the columns above the main entrance do not blend together. He is in favor of the design for the Cineplex. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to continue only the Cineplex portion of this item for comments to a Special Meeting. (date to be announced.) 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2: Motion carries. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Boardmember Lynch stated that representatives from Alameda Point will be meeting with AAPS on April 19, 2005 to address the Historic Preservation concerns. Boardmember Lynch would like to be a representative for the Historical Advisory Board if a committee … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf,9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-04-07 | 9 | STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Altschuler introduced Doug Garrison, Planner III. There will also be another new planner starting on Monday, April 11, 2005. ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Miller, Lynch) to adjourn meeting at 10:38 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Jerry Cormack, Interim Planning & Building Director G:PLANNINGHHAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\4-7-05 MINUTES_HAB.doc Minutes of April 7, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-04-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair McPherson called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair McPherson; Vice-Chair Anderson; Boardmembers Lynch and Miller MEMBERS ABSENT: Boardmember Tilos (arrived at 7:30 p.m.) STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Acting Recording Secretary Rosemary Valeska MINUTES: Consensus by Chair and Boardmembers to continue minutes of the Special Meeting of March 10, 2005 to the next meeting in order to allow more time for review. Consensus by Chair and Boardmembers to continue minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 7, 2005 due to the lack of a quorum present for these minutes. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None ELECTION OF OFFICERS: M/S (Lynch/Miller) to elect Vice-Chair Anderson as Chair. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. M/S (McPherson/Anderson) to elect Boardmember Miller as Vice-Chair. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. ACTION ITEMS (Discussion/Action) 1. Consideration of Independent Consultant's Findings and Issuance of Certificate of Approval CA-05-0012 - City of Alameda (DSD) - Alameda Theatre- 2317 Central Avenue. Jennifer Ott of Development Services gave an overview of this item and introduced Naomi Miroglio of Architectural Resources Group (ARG), who gave a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Historic Alameda Theatre Rehabilitation. Minutes of June 2, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 2 | * Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Planning & Building Department, at 510.747.6850 or 510.522.7538 (TDD number) at least 72 hours before the meeting to request an interpreter. * Accessible seating for persons with disabilities (including those using wheelchairs) is available. Minutes of the meeting are available in enlarged print. Audiotapes of the meeting are available upon request. Please contact the Planning & Building Department at 510.747.6850 or 510.522.7538 (TDD number) at least 48 hours before the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\09-01-05 draft Agenda. HAB.doc | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 3 | Chair McPherson opened the floor to public comment. Richard W. Rutter commended Bruce Anderson's Section 106 Findings Report. He explained that there was a process called "jacketing" that could be used to make the window columns appear smaller. He stated that he would like to see more detail on the proposed automatic movie ticket dispensing machines - wants to be sure that they don't look like BART ticket machines. He also noted that there are companies back East that specialize in salvaging vitolight from old buildings. Ani Dimusheva stated concern that the Historic Theatre Rehabilitation portion of the project could bear the burden of a budget shortfall. Christopher Buckley stated that he was speaking for himself and not on behalf of the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society. He recommended the HAB approve the Certificate of Approval with the conditions that the details of the storefront, ticket booth and concession stand are brought back for further review and that the HAB should request material and color samples. Birgitt Evans criticized the design of the cinema multiplex. She commended Bruce Anderson's Section 106 Findings report and agreed with the finding recommending redesign of the ticket booth for the Historic Theatre. Secretary Eliason noted that the ticket booth would be redesigned. Chair McPherson closed public comments and opened the floor to Boardmember comments. Vice-Chair Anderson stated that even though the HAB could not turn its back on the Theatre's historic status, we need to move forward on retrofitting for seismic safety. Automatic ticket booths are the wave of the future but these will need to be redesigned. The concession stand is OK to be in the center of the lobby but should have architectural features with Art Deco elements. Chair McPherson stated her concurrence with Vice-Chair Anderson. Vice Chair Anderson summarized the need for the HAB to see: 1) material samples, 2) storefront details, 3) material colors, and 4) further detail regarding the ticket booths. Boardmember Miller … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 4 | Secretary Eliason noted that staff would craft into the conditions of the Resolution: 1) final design of ticket machines and 2) return with storefront window details, including finished samples and materials. M/S (Tilos, Miller) to approve per the staff recommendation with conditions as noted. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. 2. Review and Comment on Independent Consultant's Findings regarding Proposed Cineplex - City of Alameda (DSD) - 2305 Central Avenue. Secretary Eliason stated that the HAB's purview was to provide comments for the Planning Board's Final Design approval. Ms. Ott addressed the Board and noted that the City does not agree with the consultant's findings regarding aluminum door and window systems. Chair McPherson opened the floor to public comment. Richard W. Rutter noted that the consultant was only referring to the aluminum color. Alcoves for the recessed entry doors should be required. Consistency of column treatments would unify the building façade. Ani Dimusheva stated that the proposed new buildings "bully" the surrounding historic buildings and were examples of "disposable architecture." Kevin Frederick stated that the original vision of the multiplex has been blown out of proportion. This is not what Alamedans expect. The Planning Board was pressured by the developer. Christopher Buckley stated that he was representing the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society. He gave an overview of AAPS comments to the Planning Board regarding Section 106 and read from Item 2, page 9 of the consultant's report. Mr. Buckley stated that he endorsed the consultant's recommendations. The Chair granted Mr. Buckley additional public speaker time in order for him to show samples of other architecture on the projector. One of the examples shown was a theater in Livermore designed by Rob Henry, the architect for the cineplex. Chair McPherson closed public comments and opened the floor to Boardmember comments to recommend to the Planning Board regarding exterior design elements of the cine… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 5 | Vice-Chair Anderson stated that there was too much of a difference between the Historic Theatre and the proposed cineplex and parking structure - not compatible with historic standards. A stronger connection is needed - cited the Livermore example. Secretary Eliason stated that the Planning Boards May 9 preliminary design approval was to provide consistency for the Section 106 findings study. Boardmember Tilos stated that the vertical elements needed work. Chair McPherson suggested making a recommendation requiring clear anodized aluminum. Vice-Chair Anderson would like to ask the architect to design an alternate façade. Chair McPherson stated that the Oak Street façade needs to be looked at. Boardmember Miller stated that it would be a good idea to "Send it back to the drawing board. " Chair McPherson stated that she did not think it was awful but it could be reworked. Boardmember Lynch stated that we began with the preliminary massing design that was a building with a refrigerator box at the corner and now we are presented with a building with a grain silo on the corner. It is still not compatible. She recommended telling Rob Henry to take a look at his design for Livermore. Chair McPherson stated that greater design detail on the façade was needed and the vertical elements needed to be more consistent. Boardmember Lynch stated that true Art Deco moldings and details could be introduced and cited the example of the apartment building on the corner of Shattuck and Haste in Berkeley. Chair McPherson summarized as follows: 1) more attention to the Oak Street façade; 2) use elements like Livermore; 3) use clear anodized aluminum framing; 4) more attention to vertical elements; 5) more Art Deco details; 6) the architect needs to revisit the Livermore project elements for an alternative design. Ms. Ott noted that the Livermore project had been brought up at a previous Planning Board meeting. Mr. Henry had cited the Alameda projects' site constraints compared to Livermore. Chair McPherson noted that Art Deco elements … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 6 | Boardmember Tilos stated concern with the horizontality of lobby windows. Secretary Eliason noted that the Planning Board wants the mezzanine "punch out." Vice-Chair Anderson stated that the architect should revisit the design and incorporate elements from the Livermore theatre. Secretary Eliason stated that the Board had provided quite a bit of direction. 3. Review and Comment on the Independent Consultant's Findings regarding Proposed Civic Center Parking Garage - City of Alameda (DSD) - 1416 Oak Street. Secretary Eliason stated that the HAB's purview was to provide comments for the Planning Board's Final Design approval. Ms. Ott gave an overview to the Board. Chair McPherson opened the floor to public comment. Kevin Frederick stated that he was concerned about potential traffic and circulation problems along Oak Street and stated that the garage would have been better sited on the Elks property. He also stated that the garage drawing did not look proportional. Richard W. Rutter stated that he supposed that the reason there were no architect's comments in the Section 106 Findings report was due to the garage being a design/build project. He agrees with the recommendations regarding lighting and signage in the 106 Report, but with a caveat that there should be an emphasis on the lights being easily accessible for effective maintenance. He also agrees with the recommendation for a graphics consultant. Christopher Buckley stated that he was representing the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society. He stated that he had made a recommendation to the Planning Board to "dress things up a bit." The design looks massive - maybe moldings would help. It is obvious that there are budget concerns with this project. Ani Dimusheva stated concerns with traffic issues - ingress and egress on Oak Street. Asked if the drawing proportions were correct - the height to width ratio did not look right. Chair McPherson closed public comments and opened the floor to Boardmember comments to the Planning Board regarding exterior design… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 7 | Ms. Ott noted that if the façade did change, the project would be required to go back to the Planning Board. Chair McPherson stated that more needs to be done on the street level - They can do better than four movie posters. Secretary Eliason noted that the Planning Board did require additional framing around the posters. Chair McPherson asked about landscaping. Secretary Eliason stated that there would be street trees along Oak St. Ms. Ott noted that landscape design would be required as part of the design/build and that sidewalks would be widened. Chair McPherson stated that the detailing on the façade needs revisiting - too vanilla, not consistent with the architecture in the area. The whole thing needs revisiting with special emphasis on the public walkway. Boardmember Tilos asked how HAB's previous comments would be incorporated. Ms. Ott stated that at this meeting, HAB was being requested to comment only as it related to the Section 106 Findings. Secretary Eliason stated that a recommendation could be made for a signage and lighting program to go back to the Planning Board for approval and this condition could be added to the cineplex recommendations, also. REPORTS: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Boardmember Miller asked about the status of the code enforcement action against the house demolition at 616 Pacific Avenue. Secretary Eliason took this opportunity to introduce Emily Pudell, a new member of the Planning Staff. Ms. Pudell stated that she is preparing the agenda report for this item. The property owner is appealing the five-year stay imposed by Code Enforcement. The owner states that he intends to re-use architectural elements from the original structure. Chair McPherson directed that discussion of 616 Pacific Avenue be agendized for the next HAB meeting. Vice-Chair Anderson thanked Chair McPherson for her service to the HAB. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Lynch/Miller) to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Minutes of June 2, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-06-02 | 8 | Respectfully submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGUHAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\06-02-05 minutes.do Minutes of June 2, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-06-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, AUGUST 4, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. Secretary. Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Member Tilos. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Andrew Thomas, Supervising Planner, Allen Tai, Planner III, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Jennifer Ott, DSD, Recording Secretary Debbie Gremminger. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of the Special meeting of March 10, 2005. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. M/S (Lynch/Miller) to continue the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2005. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to continue the minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 7, 2005 due to lack of quorum. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 2 | ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action) 1. CA05-0008, 1305-1311 Park Street, Applicant: Italo Calpestri for Anita Ng. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval for demolition of previous additions, including an un-reinforced masonry addition, at the rear of an existing one and two story commercial building. The demolition is part of a proposal to replace the previous additions with a new two- story rear addition. The proposed demolition exceeds 30% of the value of the structure and requires a Certificate of Approval pursuant to AMC Subsection 13-21.7. The building is listed as a Contributing Structure in the Park Street C-C, Community Commercial Zoning District. (AT) (continued from 7-7-05 mtg.) Allen Tai, Planner III, briefly reviewed staff report as presented. At the request of the Board at the last meeting staff conducted further research regarding the addition. Staff found no evidence that the addition located at the rear of 1311 Park St. was associated with any significant events in Alameda History. The appearance of the addition does not contribute to the character of the streetscape nor does it possess unique visual characteristics to be considered an important part of the Park Street Historic District. Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Approval to demolish two additions, including an un-reinforced brick addition at the rear of the property as stated in draft Resolution. There are no speaker slips submitted for this item. Chair Anderson opened Board communications. In response to Chair Anderson's question if there would be any changes to the Park St. façade, Mr. Tai answered no. In response to Chair Anderson's question if the tenants and storefronts will remain as is, Mr. Tai answered in the affirmative. Board Member Lynch complimented staff for the additional information provided in the staff report. In response to Board Member Lynch's question if the parking spaces in the rear remain, Mr. Tai answered in the affirmative. In response to Board Member Lynch's question of what is proposed at t… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 3 | 2. CA05-0010, 1815 Sherman Street, Applicant: Jules Garabaldi. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the historic structure, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located at 1815 Sherman Street, within an R-2, Two Family Residence Zoning District. (EP) (re-hearing from 7-7-05 mtg.) Ms. Pudell, Planner II, briefly reviewed the staff report as presented. On July 7, 2005 the HAB denied this application, in part, because they did not like the design of the new construction. Per the City Attorney Office, the Historical Advisory Board does not have purview over the design of new construction; however, the Board may provide their comments to staff to consider during the Design Review approval process. Ms. Pudell informed the Board that the original plans have been revised to maintain the first fifteen feet of the building. Although this structure does have some local significance, it does not warrant its inclusion on the State Historic Research Inventory. Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Approval for the partial demolition of a single family residence located at 1815 Sherman St. with conditions as stated in the draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the Pubic Hearing. Jeff Hamon, contractor, informed the Board that the design has been revised according to the comments made at the July hearing. Christopher Buckley - AAPS, spoke in favor of the revised design. He stated that AAPS would like to submit comments during the design review process. There were no speakers opposing this project. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch stated that it is important for this Board to see what is being proposed in order to make an informative decision whether the historical character of the building will be altered, and the new development will be harmonious with existing buildings and neighborhoods. Board Member Miller stated that he understands that design … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 4 | Board Member Lynch responded by stating that she would prefer to submit her comments during a public hearing so it can be part of the public record. Chair Anderson stated she visited the site and is concerned that the structure will be altered more that thirty percent. Ms. Pudell stated that there would be very little change to the overall appearance of the existing dwelling. The demolition and addition will occur at the rear of building. The front façade will not be changed, and the visibility of the additions would be minimal. M/S (Miller, Lynch) to approve the Certificate of Approval for the partial demolition of an existing single family dwelling at 1815 Sherman St with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 3. CA05-0015, 862 Cedar Street, Applicant: Donald & Nancy Olney. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for the removal of a Coast Live Oak Tree (Quercus Agrifolia) deemed to be an imminent hazard by a Certified Arborist. The site is located at 862 Cedar St. within the R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Ms. Pudell briefly reviewed staff report as presented. Staff has confirmed that the tree has already been removed. A Certified Arborist report was submitted and determined that the subject tree was in close proximity to human activities and items of value and should be considered an imminent hazard. Staff recommends that although the tree has already been removed, the Board should still require the standard conditions of approval as stated in draft Resolution. Chair Anderson read a letter submitted to the Board from Mr. Lou Baca, neighbor, in opposition of removing the tree. There are no speaker slips submitted for this item. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch visited the site, and learned that the tree had fallen down prior to this hearing. She would like the Board to be advised of when and where the replacement trees have been planted. She would also like information on what happens to t… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 5 | 4. CA05-0016, 1501 Buena Vista Avenue, Applicant: Encinal Real Estate. Certificate of Approval for structural alterations to be made as part of the rehabilitation of the Del Monte Building. Review and comment on findings regarding the consistency of the proposed alterations with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration). The Del Monte Building is located at 1501 Buena Vista Avenue within the M-2 General Industrial District. (AT) Andrew Thomas, Supervising Planner, briefly reviewed staff report as presented. The applicant and building owner, Mr. Peter Wang, is requesting a Certificate of Approval for repairs and alterations to the building to facilitate adaptive reuse of the structure. The building is currently being used as a warehouse and trucking facility. Mr. Wang is proposing to modify the building to accommodate a variety of retail, commercial and office uses, consistent with the existing zoning regulations for the site and consistent with the proposed Northern Waterfront General Plan Amendment for the area. In June 2002, the HAB reviewed Mr. Wang's preliminary proposal for the renovation of the Del Monte building located at 1501 Buena Vista. At that time the HAB was very positive about the project and encouraged Mr. Wang to move forward. The current proposal differs from the 2002 proposal in that the work/live component has been eliminated from the project, a large exterior addition for a restaurant has been eliminated from the proposal, and a proposal to open up the roof for an interior "open air" passageway through the building has been eliminated. Given the extremely large size of the building and the high commercial vacancy rates currently in the Bay Area, Mr. Wang is anticipating that the building will transition from warehouse/trucking to retail/commercial/office in stages over a period of several years. The pace at which the transition occurs will be determined by the demand for space within the building and Mr. Wang's ability to attract tenants. To facilitate the reha… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 6 | Lil Arnerich, Elizabeth Krause, Birgitt Evans and Dick Rutter spoke in favor of project. The main concern was the removal of the canopies. There were no public speakers opposing project. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened Board comments. In response to the concerns of the public and the Board Members with removing the canopies, Peter Wang, owner, stated that the canopies were not part of original building. He feels that the removal of the canopies will not alter the historical character of the building. In response to Board Member Lynch's question regarding timeline of this project, Mr. Wang stated he intends to start as soon as they receive approval from this Board. The entire project should be completed by 2008. Board Member Lynch stated that she is in favor of this project moving forward. She feels that due to the historical significance of this building, this Board should be advised of the progress of this project periodically. Chair Anderson stated that it is their duty as a Board to preserve the Historical integrity of all listed resources. She stated that the removal of the canopies, opening in every bay, and leveling the loading platform will change the historical character of this building. Not in favor of approving a "blanket" Certificate of Approval She would like this project to come back before this Board for all exterior changes. Board Member Miller feels that the three foot gap between the canopies will disappear when you look at the entire building. Feels for safety reasons the leveling of the loading dock makes sense. He would also like periodic updates on this project. Mr. Thomas explained to the Board the "blanket" Certificate of Approval makes it easier for the applicant to get financing for this project. This building is a Historical Monument so any changes made would have to comply with the Secretary of Interior's standards. If Staff has any questions regarding any changes proposed in the future they will come before this Board for guidance. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve th… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 7 | (Following the meeting, Staff reviewed the HAB by-laws in the City Charter Sec. 28-6.-B which states: Three (3) members shall constitute a quorum and a decision of the Board shall be determined by a majority vote of those members present at the meeting.) Staff informed the Board that the Certificate of Approval CA05-0016, for 1501 Buena Vista is approved by a majority vote. 5. Consideration of penalties for unauthorized demolition at 616 Pacific Avenue. Emily Pudell briefly reviewed staff report as presented. Ms. Pudell stated that an application for Major Design Review was approved in 2004. The description of work that was provided on application stated that the scope of work would affect a significant portion of the existing structure; however demolition of the structure was not specifically called out in the project description. The applicant felt that he had obtained all necessary permits to "dismantle" the house. Staff feels that there was a miscommunication with the applicant. Although this building was listed on the Historical Building Study List with an (H) designation, which means that it may have Historical importance because of it's age or location or similarity to other buildings done by important architects or builders, staff was unable to find any historical significance to warrant the inclusion of 616 Pacific Ave. on the list. Staff has received several letters from the neighbors opposing the 5-year stay in development. Staff is recommending waiving the 5-year stay in development with conditions stated in draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. Birgitt Evans, Kevin Frederick, Nancy Hird, spoke in opposition of waiving the 5-year stay in development. Bill Smith spoke on penalties of unauthorized demolition occurring in the City of Alameda. Paul Rezucha, spoke in favor of waiving the 5-year development stay. There were no more speakers. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board discussion. Ms. Pudell informed the Board that staff is currently undergoing revisions to the Historical … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 8 | Chair Anderson feels that the Board should have been notified in the beginning of this process. This is something that the Board seriously needs to look at with staff and reiterate the Boards' purpose. She spoke in favor of the five-year stay, would like the owner to submit a landscaping plan as stated in the notice sent to him from Code Enforcement. Although she concurs with the neighbors regarding the blight of a vacant lot for five years, she does not approve of waiving the 5 year stay in development. Board Member Miller stated he has difficulty with the term "dismantled" He stated the demolished house does not resemble the new house at all. He was on the Board when they worked on 5 year stay, and feels if not enforced in this case, then it will send the wrong message to the public. Board Member Lynch concurred with Board Member Miller's statement. Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 9 | In response to Board Member Lynch's question regarding why the landscaping plan has not been submitted, Ms. Pudell stated that once staff receives direction from this Board, they will know how to proceed. M/S (Miller, Lynch) to waive the five year stay in development for the unauthorized demolition at 616 Pacific Ave. as stated in the draft Resolution. 0-3-1. Ayes: 0; Noes: 3; Absent: 1. Application is denied. REPORTS: 6. Review and comment on the final design of the storefront as part of the rehabilitation of the historic Alameda Theatre including review of a color and materials board. The historic Alameda Theatre is located at 2315 to 2323 Central Avenue within the C-C-T (Community Commercial Theater Combining) District. Jennifer Ott, Development Services Department, reviewed staff report as presented. She informed the Board that the plans for rehabilitation have been submitted for permits to the Planning & Building Department on August 3, 2004. There has been inspections done on the marquee and it is in very good shape. In response to the HAB June 2, 2005 conditions of approval, the City's architect for the rehabilitation of the Alameda Theatre, Architectural Resources Group (ARG), has provided a detailed submittal of the proposed storefront designs for the Historic Theatre for the Board to review. Sample materials and color boards were also provided to the Board for review. Ms. Ott began the presentation by responding to a number of issues raised at the June 2, 2005 meeting. In response to the HAB's concern regarding why spandrel glass was used in lieu of Vitrolite, Ms. Ott stated that there is a very limited supply of this historic material available. In response to the HAB's concern regarding the visibility of the new structural supports in the replaced storefronts of the Theatre, the design team has opted to add visual interest to void these areas by furring out the walls in from of the piers and introducing movie poster cases in these locations. In response to the public's concern regarding the idea of "c… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,10 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 10 | Dick Rutter, AAPS, brought a picture of a 1943 storefront in San Rafael. He pointed out the detail on the floor and the ceiling and the use of Vitrolite. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board discussion. Chair Anderson would like to have more information on the restoration of the ceiling. Ms. Ott stated she was not sure of the extent of the restoration of the ceiling. Board Member Lynch spoke in favor of the materials and colors shown tonight. She would like the storefront doors to be recessed. Board Member Miller had no comment. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: AAPS has submitted a written request to add Naval Air Station Resources to the Historical Building Study List. The letter lists several resources which merit consideration for their historical significance and associations before they are affected by the proposed redevelopment the Alameda Point or by any other project. The purpose for listing these resources is to give the HAB and the public an opportunity for future consideration of preservation before the buildings are proposed for demolition or alteration. In addition, they further request that the City begin proceedings to add these resources to the City Monument designation of NAS Historic District. Birgitt Evans, AAPS, reviewed the letter that was provided to the Board in their packet which included a picture and brief description of each resource M/S (Miller/Lynch) to agenize this item for a future meeting. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch would like the Board to consider placing two train station sidewalk markers on the Historical Sign list. She would also like the Board to consider recommending the nomination of 2320 Lincoln Ave. be considered a Historic Monument. Staff is aware of the request and has begun research. This will be on a future agenda. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting was adjourned at 10:30 pm Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 10 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf,11 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 11 | Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGIHAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\8-4-05 HAB minutes.doc Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 11 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Vice-Chair Miller called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Lynch & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Anderson. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Dennis Brighton, Planner II, Recording Secretary, Debbie Gremminger. MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2005. (continued from the 8-4-05 mtg.) M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of June 2, 2005. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 7, 2005. (continued from the 8-4-05 mtg.) M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of July 7, 2005. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 4, 2005. A quorum to consider these minutes was not present. They will be considered at the next meeting. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. Minutes of September 1, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 2 | ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action) 1. Appointment of a Historical Advisory Board member to the Transportation Subcommittee. -- M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to continue this item until there is a full board. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 2. Certificate of Approval CA05-0024 - Applicant: Mark Haskett - 1715 Encinal Avenue. (DB). The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for demolition of more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure built prior to 1942, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Mr. Brighton presented staff report. He informed the Board that this structure is not listed on the Historical Building Study List, but was built prior to 1942, so a Certificate of Approval for demolition is required. The building consisted of several different architectural styles and had been severely altered over the years. None of the alterations appear to have improved the architectural characteristics of the structure. Mr. Brighton also stated that on February 23, 2005, the applicant had received Major Design Review approval. This application received extensive coordination with members of AAPS throughout the review process including a public meeting with the architect, neighbors, members of AAPS, and City Staff. Plans were submitted to the Planning and Building Department that incorporated the requested design alterations from the January 11, 2005 public meeting. Mr. Brighton concluded by stating that the structure did not represent the work of a master or possesses high artistic values. There are no events or persons of historical interest associated with the property. Therefore, staff recommends the Board approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions stated in draft Resolution. In response to a question from Board Member Tilos, Ms. Eliason stated that since this is a pre- 1942 structure, that is not on the study list, the Board can either approv… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 3 | Bill Smith spoke about the demolition process and the fact that the public is unaware of the penalties stated in the Ordinance. Peter McDonald spoke on behalf on applicant. He informed the Board that the applicant was unaware of the requirement for a Certificate of Approval. He informed the Board of the steps the Hasketts went through to obtain the permit. Dave Teeters, architect, spoke in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. He reviewed the pictures of 1715 Encinal Ave, which were provided to the Board in their packet. There were no more speaker slips. Vice-Chair Miller closed the public hearing and opened the floor to board discussion. Board Member Lynch stated that the entire process should be amended. She would like to deny this Certificate of Approval so it will get up to City Council level. She also stated her concerns with the staff report regarding maintaining the historical integrity of the building. Board Member Tilos is in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. Currently, there are too many requirements involved with getting an approval. Vice-Chair Miller stated that the applicant should have had the proper permits prior to demolishing the structure. M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve Certificate of Approval CA05-0024, for the partial demolition of an existing residence at 1715 Encinal Avenue as stated in draft Resolution. 1-2-1. Ayes: 1; Noes: 2; Absent: 1; Motion is denied. 3. CA05-0018, 812 Paru Street, Applicant: John Miller/Kathleen Egan (EP). The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to remove a Coast Live Oak tree (Quercus Agrifolia) located at the rear of the property. The tree is greater than 24" in diameter and is only 5' from the main building. Per an Arborist, the tree is in poor health and has structural flaws. The site is located at 812 Paru Street, within an R-1, One Family Residence Zoning District. Ms. Pudell presented staff report. The applicant is requesting removal of an Oak Tree to eliminate the potential damage the tree may cause to the site and neighboring p… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 4 | Board Member Lynch feels that tree is in poor health and should be removed. M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve the Certificate of Approval CA05-0018, for the removal of one Coast Live Oak tree at 812 Paru Street with conditions stated in draft Resolution. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 4. CA05-0020, 1415 Union Street, Applicant: Julie Cowell (EP). The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for the removal of a Coast Live Oak tree (Quercus Agrifolia) that was located along the left side of the driveway. The tree was promoting hazardous conditions due to its proximity to the leaves of the building. The site is located at 1415 Union Street, within an R-5, General Residential Zoning District. Ms. Pudell presented staff report. The tree was removed in July 2005 because it posed a health and safety hazard to the apartment building located on the property. A six foot tall portion of the stump still remains. Typically staff would require two replacement trees be planted, but a landscape plan was submitted by the applicant indicating that there does not appear to be a suitable location for the replacement trees. Staff is requesting that the applicant pay fees equal to the cost of the two replacement trees to be collected by the Recreation and Parks Department. There were no speaker slips submitted for this item. Vice-Chair Miller opened the floor to Board discussion. Vice-Chair Miller is in favor of approval, but would like staff to notify the Board when the fees are collected. Board Member Tilos feels there should be a penalty for removing an oak tree without proper approval. Ms. Eliason informed the Board that Staff is currently working on revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance and can include a section on penalties for removing Oak trees without a permit. As it is now, the only way to impose penalties would be if the application came in as a code enforcement complaint, then investigative fees would apply. M/S (Tilos, Lynch) to approve Certificate of Approval CA05-0020 for the removal o… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 5 | 5. CA05-0021, 1705 Eagle Avenue, Applicant: Gregory & Anna Sanford (EP). The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for the removal of a Coast Live Oak tree (Quercus Agrifolia) that was located on the property. The tree was promoting hazardous conditions due to its proximity to utility wires and the roof of the building at 1705 Eagle Avenue. The site is located at 1705 Eagle Avenue, within an R-2, Two Family Residence Zoning District. Ms. Pudell presented staff report. A large Coast Live Oak tree that was located between the property line and the back of the sidewalk in front of 1707 Eagle Avenue was removed in late July 2005. According to the applicant, the tree posed a hazard to the house and the utility lines. It is unclear whether the applicant knew the tree was located on City property. Given that this tree was not removed from the applicant's property, staff is recommending that fees, equal to the cost of two replacement trees be collected from the Recreation and Parks Department. Staff recommends approval of CA05-0021, with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. Vice-Chair Miller opened the public hearing. John Miller, 812 Paru St., stated that the current Ordinance should be rewritten. There should be penalties imposed when an Oak tree is removed without a permit. Greg Sanford, applicant, informed the Board that he did have permission from the adjacent property owner. He was not aware that Oak trees were protected. Vice-Chair Miller closed the public hearing. M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve the Certificate of Approval CA05-0021, for the removal of one Coast Live Oak tree at 1707 Eagle Ave with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 6. CA05-0022 and CA05-0023, 818 and 1706 Lincoln Avenue, Applicant: City of Alameda (EP). Review proposal to designate two signs as historical signs. The signs, completed in 1891, were cast into the concrete to mark the locations of the train station waiting rooms. These sites are located in the sidewalk in front of … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 6 | M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve Certificate of Approval CA05-0022, for the designation of two Historic Train Station Waiting Room signs at 818 and 1706 Lincoln Avenue as stated in draft resolution. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. REPORTS: 7. Replacement of Historic Entrance Lights at the Posey Tube. Ms. Pudell presented staff report. Staff is asking that the Board review the photographs and specifications, and give their comments. Staff will forward the comments to the Public Works Department. Vice-Chair Miller opened the public hearing. Richard Rutter & Chris Buckley spoke in favor of restoring the lights to look like the original fixtures. Vice-Chair Miller closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. The Board submitted the following comments to staff: 1. Caltrans should restore the lights to the original style. 2. Caltrans should investigate recasting as an economic option. One suggested company was the "Spring Company". 3. Caltrans should consider to piggyback with other communities such as San Leandro and Oakland on replacement lighting. 4. The new lights should be adequate to meet lighting needs. 5. The cobra heads should be removed. 6. HAB requested to see the final design. Ms. Eliason stated that this is a Caltrans project, but staff will request them to return the final design to the HAB for final approval. Staff noted the Board's comments and will forward them to the Public Works Department. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Ms. Eliason noted an Off-Agenda report and Resolution approving handicapped ramp addition to 351 Corpus Christi Road, Alameda Point. Minutes of September 1, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-09-01 | 7 | STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Eliason informed the Board that the City Council will hear the appeal of 616 Pacific on September 6, 2005. Ms. Eliason informed the Board that all pre-1942 plans submitted to the Planning & Building Department will be stamped in big red letters that says: NOTE: BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO 1942 SHALL NOT HAVE MORE THAT 30% OF THE VALUE OF THE BUILDINGS REMOVED OR DEMOLISHED WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF ALAMEDA'S HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD. Staff feels that this should help control any future unauthorized demolitions. Ms. Pudell informed the Board that staff has not received an application for 500 Central Ave. She has been in contact with the applicant and hopes to have something for the October meeting. ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to adjourn meeting at 8:58 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\8-4-05 HAB minutes.doc Minutes of September 1, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 6, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Lynch & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Andrew Thomas, Supervising Planner, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Elizabeth Johnson, DSD, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 4, 2005. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Abstain: 1 (Tilos); Motion carries. M/S (Tilos,Lynch) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of September 1, 2005. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1 (Anderson); Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS 1. Appointment of a Historical Advisory Board member to the Transportation Subcommittee. (Continued from the 9-1-05 mtg.) This item will be continued to the November 3, 2005 meeting when a full Board is present. 2. CA05-0027 - Certificate of Approval - 2255 Clinton Avenue -Applicant: Dan Thebeau - The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the historic structure, located at the above address, for the purposes of converting the existing tri- plex to a single-family dwelling. The site is located at 2255 Clinton Ave. within the R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Emily Pudell presented staff report. She informed the Board that the applicant received Design Review approval on August 17, 2005 and building permits have been issued. During the Minutes of October 6, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 2 | construction process, dry-rot was discovered in the front bay window. The siding and trim boards were removed and set aside. Because the repair of the bay window was not specifically identified in the Design Review application or building permits, and because the project was approaching the 30% threshold for demolition, staff informed the applicant he must stop-work and apply for a Certificate of Approval. The applicant has also identified that the front staircase would also be repaired "in-kind". Staff recommends the Board approve the Certificate of Approval CA05-0027, for the partial demolition of an existing dwelling at 2255 Clinton Ave with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Norman Sanchez, architect, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He informed the Board that the goal is to convert the existing triplex to a single-family residence while preserving the architecture character of the house. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the Public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch is in favor of approving the project, but has concerns with the replacement of front stairs. Chair Anderson is also in favor of approving the project, with the added condition that the posts and handrails be replaced with materials that are reminiscent of the building's original architecture. In response to Board Member Tilos question if the Housing Authority has any objections to changing a triplex to a single family dwelling, Ms. Eliason stated that the Housing Authority does not have jurisdiction over non-public housing properties and that the triplex was not legal. M/S (Tilos, Lynch) to approve Certificate of Approval CA05-0027 for the partial demolition of an existing dwelling at 2255 Clinton Avenue with conditions as stated in the draft Resolution, with the added condition that the front staircase, including the handrails, balusters, and newel posts, shall be replaced with materials that are reminiscent of the building's original archit… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 3 | Elizabeth Johnson, Development Services, presented staff report. She informed the Board of the two public processes currently underway that involve historic properties at Alameda Point. First is the development of the City's Preliminary Development Concept (PDC), which informs the public of potential trade-offs between historic preservation and viable redevelopment of the former Naval Air Station. The second process is the re-initiation of consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act between the Navy, the Advisory Council for Historic Preservation, and the State Historic Preservation Officer. There have been a total of six community meetings to gain input from residents of Alameda. Historic preservation was identified as a critical issue for discussion at each meeting. One of the major items the Navy is responsible for under the MOA is the nomination of the NAS Historic District to the National Register. The Navy is currently contracting a qualified consultant to complete this task. The Navy anticipates that preparing the nomination and submitting it through the Secretary of the Interior's process will take up to two years. The HAB will then have a chance to review the Navy's nomination. After reviewing the information and studies conducted by the Navy, and National Register's nomination, the Board may consider whether any additional structures that have not been determined to be eligible for the National Register, are eligible for listing on the City of Alameda Historic Building Study List or Historic Monument List. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Elizabeth Krase, AAPS, expressed her concern with waiting two years. She stated that AAPS has already met and discussed this issue with the Navy and they have no objections to the City listing any structures on the Study List prior to their National Register nomination. Birgitt Evans, AAPS, is also not in favor of waiting to list the structures. She would like to reiterate that AAPS has already done research on these buildings and … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 4 | Ms. Eliason stated that currently there aren't any individual buildings located at Alameda Point listed on our study list. Alameda Point is designated as a Historic District with contributing structures. Vice-Chair Miller approves of Staff's recommendations. Board Member Tilos stated that since the City does not own the property yet, it would be a waste of time to list any structures. Chair Anderson recommended that the Board accept the staff recommendations, but with the revision that we not wait to add the structures the Board feels are eligible for listing on the City's Historical Building Study List. She would like to enlist the services of AAPS to help staff with the research needed. Ms. Eliason stated that Staff can provide Board updates as they move forward, but due to current work loads in the Planning and Building Department, staff cannot commit to a date certain. M/S (Lynch, Anderson) to accept staff's first two recommendations and amend the third by proceeding with listing eligible buildings to the City Historical Building Study List. (3-1-0). Ayes: 3; Noes: 1 (Miller); Absent: 0; Motion carries. 4. Workshop on possible changes to the Historical Preservation Ordinance. Ms. Eliason presented staff report. In 2002, the Historical Advisory Board held several workshops and public hearings regarding revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance, which primarily focused on the Interim Review Section of the Ordinance. The HAB recommended that any building built prior to 1942 must first obtain a Certificate of Approval from the HAB prior to demolishing more than 30% of the structure. The City Council adopted the recommended revisions made by the HAB in 2003. Since that time, implementation of the Ordinance has resulted in identifying a few areas of concern, particularly relating to penalties and enforcement sections. Staff would like direction from the Board on several sections of the Ordinance. First area of concern is the definition of demolition. Currently the Ordinance reads: "Demolition shall mean th… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 5 | demolition that was first assessed at less than 30% of value may unintentionally grow into a larger demolition without knowledge that additional approvals are required. There are also areas of concern in the Penalties section of the Ordinance. In the recent months there have been several unauthorized demolitions that have come before this Board. Currently the Ordinance only provides one remedy for each type of unauthorized demolitions. For example, pre-1942 unauthorized demolitions are only a violation of the Alameda Municipal Code, which would result in the issuance of an administrative citation or fine. This inflexibility regarding penalties provides no administrative relief nor does it allow for extenuating circumstances regarding individual situations. In some cases, the penalty may be too harsh and in other cases it may not be enough. Other areas of concern are the section on Historic signs and the penalty, or lack there of, for unauthorized removal of protected Oak trees. Staff is requesting the Board review the options provided by in the staff report and submit their comments and recommendations. Staff will then create a revised ordinance and seek HAB recommendations to the City Council for approval around the first of the year. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Birgitt Evans, AAPS, spoke in favor of revising the Ordinance. She stated the current Ordinance limits the Board's ability to impose conditions of approval on Certificates of Approval. Also the penalties are too limited. She agrees with Board Member Miller statement at the previous hearing regarding 616 Pacific Ave. "Why do we have a moratorium, if it is not imposed." She agrees with AAPS's recommendations regarding different penalty options Nancy Hird, AAPS, is concerned with the 5 year stay of building permits. What would happen if the property changes ownership within those five years? Dick Rutter, AAPS, stated his concerns that once dry rot is discovered, the initial scope of work can change. Staff should provide better documentation to… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 6 | Chair Anderson recommended that the HAB be informed of all permits issued on pre-1942 buildings, not just the demolitions. Too many applications are coming before this Board "after- the-fact". She stated that there is a disconnect between the design review process and the Certificate of Approval process. Vice-Chair Miller stated that previously they were informed by the City Attorney's office that design was not the purview of the HAB. Board Member Lynch stated that in the AMC it states that they are able to look at proposed design of new buildings as well as historic ones, to determine whether the proposed new design is compatible with the surrounding areas. She would also like to see a better definition of demolition. In response to Board Member Tilos question regarding who determines if demolition is exceeding 30%, Ms. Eliason responded that the Building Official makes the determination. Chair Anderson would like to be informed of all application submittals, prior to any permits issued on pre-1942 structures, so that the HAB may look at the scope of work, such as window replacements. The HAB needs to be in the loop early on. She would like staff to provide the Board a list on a regular basis of all project submittals. Staff has noted the Boards recommendations. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Staff has provided the Board with a copy of Resolution HAB-05-27. Staff also provided a copy of an Off-Agenda report from the City Manager regarding a Community Needs Survey for their information. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch would like certain districts of Alameda designated as Historic Districts beginning with LeonardaVille, followed by Park Ave.Station, Bay Station, and Burbank-Portola Station Staff noted her request. Board Member Miller asked Staff what would have happened to the approved Design Review permit if the City Council denied the appeal of 616 Pacific Ave. Ms. Eliason stated that the applicant would of had to submit a landscape plan to the Planning & Building Director. After the five yea… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-10-06 | 7 | ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to adjourn meeting at 8:35 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board ::\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\8-4-05 HAB minutes.doc Minutes of October 6, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Member Tilos. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. Chair Anderson welcomed new Board Member Janet Iverson to the Historical Advisory Board. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October 6, 2005 with corrections. 3-0-1-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Abstain: 1 (Iverson): Absent: 1 (Tilos); Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS 1. Appointment of a Historical Advisory Board member to the Transportation Subcommittee. (Continued from the 10-6-05 mtg.) At this time, the Board has declined the invitation to serve on the Transportation Subcommittee. Ms. Eliason will inform the Board of any upcoming information that would be of interest to this Board. Minutes of November 3, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 2 | 2. Certificate of Approval, 500 Central Avenue, Applicant: Tony Wong. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for the unauthorized removal of more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of the historic structure, located at the above address. According to AMC Section 13-21, removal of more than 30% of the value of the structure, is defined as demolition. Without prior approval of a Certificate of Approval, the property is subject to a five year stay in the issuance of any building or construction-related permit. The site is located at 500 Central Ave. within the R-5, General Residential Zoning District. (Applicant is requesting this item be continued to the December 1, 2005 mtg). Ms. Eliason informed the Board that the applicant has requested a continuance to the December 1, 2005 meeting. Mr. Wong is currently working with Staff to develop a compliance plan to resolve the outstanding historic preservation issues that are associated with this site. Board Member Lynch fears the structure will continue to deteriorate if left untouched for another month. Ms. Eliason advised the Board that staff is currently working with the applicant to stabilize the building to prevent any further deterioration M/S (Miller, Anderson) to continue this item to the December 1, 2005 meeting. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; (Tilos). Motion carries. REPORTS: 3. Historical Advisory Board's consideration of whether to recommend to the City Council that it designate the structure at 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a Historical Monument. (EP). Emily Pudell presented the staff report. This item is before the Board at the request of Board Member Lynch. In 2003 a historical evaluation of 2320 & 2322 Lincoln Avenue was performed by the Architectural Resources Group (ARG). The report concluded that neither building maintains all aspects of integrity as set forth by the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, this property has also been evaluated in the New Alameda Free Library Project Property Acquisition for Parking EIR, and r… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 3 | designate their property a Monument due to a lack of financial incentive and delays in the public hearing process for the proposed structural alterations they have planned. Based on the conclusion of the ARG report, the existing demolition controls, and the owner's opposition, Staff cannot support the recommendation to designate the property at 2320 Lincoln Avenue a Historical Monument. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. Jeffrey Ow, spoke in favor of the recommendation and has done further research on the property which he included in a letter submitted to the Board. Kevin Frederick, AAPS, spoke in favor of the recommendation. Board Member Lynch read an article by Woody Minor, which indicates that the structure located at 2320 Lincoln Avenue, formally known as the "Encinal Saloon", was erected in the late 1860's and is oldest and most intact surviving commercial building. In response to Chair Anderson inquiry about whether the proposed project plans would come before this Board for approval, Ms Eliason stated that a Certificate of Approval from this Board will be required for the proposed demolition of more than 30% of the structure. The application is tentatively scheduled for the January 5, 2006 meeting. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's inquiry regarding the level of protection for a monument, Ms Eliason stated that the HAB has purview over any structural modifications for all designated monuments. There are also stricter penalties for any unauthorized demolition. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's question regarding whether the owner's consent is needed recommendation, Ms. Eliason answered in the affirmative. Board Member Iverson advised the Board that she would like more time to consider this. She asked that the Board continue this item to a future meeting. M/S (Iverson, Miller) to continue this item until the January meeting for further consideration. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Invitation to the Webster Renaissance Completion Celebration to be held on… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 4 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch would like to place Andy Pagano name on the City's street naming list. Staff noted her request. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Eliason informed the Board that comments and review for the Section 106 report for the new design of the Cineplex and Parking Garage is scheduled for the December 1, 2005 agenda. ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Miller, Lynch) to adjourn meeting at 7:36 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\11-03-05 min Minutes of November 3, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 5, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, Lynch & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Jennifer Ott, Development Services Department, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: A motion and a second was made to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of December 1, 2005 with corrections. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Historical Advisory Board's consideration of whether to recommend to the City Council that it designate the structure at 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a Historical Monument. (EP). (Continued from the 11-03-05 meeting). Emily Pudell presented staff report. This item was before this Board on November 3, 2005 at the request of Board member Lynch. In November, the Board continued the discussion to allow more time for Board member Iverson to become familiar with the history of this building. Staff does not support the recommendation to nominate 2320 Lincoln Avenue a historic monument. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline Street, spoke in favor of recommendation. There were no more speaker slips submitted. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing, and opened the floor to Board discussion. Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 2 | Board member Lynch requested that this item be tabled to a future meeting to allow time for the property owner to complete the proposed renovations to the building. M/S (Iverson, Lynch) to table this item until the proposed work has been completed. 2-3-0. Ayes: 2 (Iverson, Lynch); Noes: 3 (Anderson, Miller, Tilos); Absent: 0; Motion failed. M/S (Miller, Anderson) to accept Staff's recommendation not to recommend the designation of 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a historic monument. 3-2-0. Ayes: 3 (Anderson, Miller, Tilos); Noes: 2 (Iverson, Lynch); Absent: 0; Motion carries. 2. CA05-0035 - 2320 Lincoln Avenue - Applicant: Li-Sheng Fu for Jim Hom. Applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent of the value of a historically designated commercial structure. The proposed work includes a new foundation and restoration of the existing siding and windows, where possible, and reconfiguration of the interior spaces for the purposes of establishing a new commercial use. The site is located at 2320 Lincoln Avenue within an C-C-T Community Commercial Theater Zoning District. (EP) Emily Pudell presented the staff report. On July 15, 2005, an application for Minor Design Review was received by the Planning and Building Department to restore the building at to commercial/office use. The plans propose to restore the interior and exterior of the building, including a new foundation, interior staircase, and restoration of the building's existing siding and windows. A Certificate of Approval is required from this Board because the interior and exterior modifications to the building exceed the 30% threshold for demolition. Staff is recommending that the Board approve the Certificate of Approval for removal of more than 30% of the value of the structure with the conditions stated in draft Resolution. There were no speaker slips submitted. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. The Board had several questions regarding the plans. Ms. Pudell stated that she has not be… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 3 | Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. 3. CA05-0033 - 2708 Lincoln Avenue - Applicant: Minxi Liu for Alvin and Lai Wong. Applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent of the value of a historically designated single family residence. The proposed work includes the addition of approximately 1,100 square feet first story and new second story, removal of 2/3 of the exterior rear and side walls, and removal of the roof. The site is located at 2708 Lincoln Avenue within an R-1, One Family Residence Zoning District. (EP) Emily Pudell presented staff report. She informed the Board that this project has already received design review approval by the Planning Board on August 8, 2005, with the condition that prior to approval of the final plans for the building permit; the property owner shall apply for and obtain approval for a demolition permit from the Historical Advisory Board. According to available resources, the small, cottage-style dwelling was constructed in 1906. The building, however, is not listed on the Historic Building Study List. The approved plans indicate that the modifications would not only change the architectural style of the building, but would add approximately 1,100 square feet to the existing building and change the location of the front entry and staircase. The approved Design Review indicates that similar siding and window materials will be utilized for the new additions and remodel. Staff is recommending the Board approve the Certificate of Approval, with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Lili Rollins, 1607 Pearl St., spoke in favor of this project. Minxi Liu, architect, was present and available for any questions the Board may have. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing. Vice-chair Miller commented on the fact that after this project is complete, there won't be any of the original house remaining. Chair Anderson spoke in favor of the proposed project, however requested … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 4 | REPORTS: 4. Review and Comment on Section 106 Findings Regarding Revised Designs for the 350- Space Parking Garage and Cineplex at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue within the C-C T (Community Commercial Theater) Zoning District. (JO). (Continued from 12-01-05 meeting). Jennifer Ott, Development Services presented the staff report. She informed the Board that the City has retained a new architect, Komorous-Towey Architects (KTA) to develop revised designs for both the Cineplex and parking garage based on direction from the City Council on August 16, 2005. Revisions to the façades include reduction of scale and bulk, greater evocation of Art Deco style, additional vertical articulation, greater design consistency and symmetry, as well as greater articulation of blank surfaces. The City Council accepted and authorized Section 106 review of the revised designs on November 1, 2005. Mr. Bruce Anderson, the City's Section 106 consultant, has reviewed the revised designs for compliance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration and has prepared a supplemental report to his initial Section 106 Report, considered by this Board on June 2, 2006. Staff requests that the Board review and comment on the revised design and supplemental Section 106 report. Staff will forward the Board's comments along with the draft minutes from this meeting to the City Council to consider before taking a final approval action on the revised design. Chair Anderson opened the Public hearing. Susan Denault, 1416 Willow St., spoke in opposition to the new design. She stated that it is still too big for the proposed location. The proposed design does not fit into the neighborhood. Nina Rosen, 1045 Island Dr., spoke in opposition of the size of the building. Monica Penya, 1361 Regent St., stated the report does not address the size and scale of this project and does not think it will be compatible with the surrounding buildings. She believes there is a better alternative. Nancy Hird, 1519 East Shore Drive.… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 5 | Valerie Ruma, 1610 Willow St., spoke in opposition of the project. She would like an Environmental Impact Report done. She read into the record a statement by Woody Minor opposing the bulk and massing of the proposed project. Rayla Graber spoke in opposition of the size of the project. The present plan is an improvement to the original design but it is still too large. Scott Brady, 1812 Encinal Ave., spoke on behalf of AAPS and briefly reviewed a November 1, 2005 letter from AAPS to the City Council, which was distributed to this Board in their meeting packet. He stated that his main concerns are with the size of the project, and that it is not compatible with the surrounding area. The north wall of the parking structure has not been addressed adequately. He would like to see a physical model done and be required as part of the approval process. This would allow for a better understanding of the size and scope of the project with regards to the surrounding area. Chris Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Ave., spoke on behalf of AAPS and further reviewed the above mentioned letter. He stated that AAPS feels that although the new design is an improvement, they still have concerns with the 20-inch projection of the Cineplex. He stated that the projection is adding too much bulk and is not sure why it is necessary. He also stated that the upward angle of the bay windows of the second floor lobby should be increased, and a more vertical mullion pattern be used for the mezzanine windows. Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Ave., agreed with Chris Buckley that the 20-inch projection should be eliminated. He reviewed the drawing that was attached to the letter submitted by AAPS. He stated that a more substantial material should be used for the tile on base of the storefronts. AAPS would like to review materials and color samples when they become available. Leslie Fishback, 1334 Burbank St., spoke in opposition of the project. She does not feel that the historic theatre is being restored. She is also concerned with the size of the Cineplex a… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 6 | Irene Deeter stated her main concern is the location of the parking garage. The Elk's site would be a much better location and it would allow for the height and bulk of the Cineplex to be scaled down. The people of Alameda want a fully restored historic Theatre. She would like an agreement from the developer that he will completely restore the Historic Theatre. Charles Kasdorf stated that the proposed structure is too large. He would also like to see the historic Theatre completely restored. Paula Rainy, 556 Palace Ct., agreed that the size and scope of the project will have a detrimental effect on the neighborhood and the quality of life in Alameda. She would also like to see a model. Kristianne Koenen, 1360 Pearl Street, spoke in opposition of project. The thing that attracted her to Alameda was its uniqueness. She wants Alameda to hold the unique charm that draws people to it. She agreed that the garage is misplaced. She has joined the group Citizens for a Mega- Plex Free Alameda (CFMFA), who have worked hard to come up with an alternative plan. They have come up with ideas that would allow this area of Alameda to be a Civic Center. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., spoke against the project as proposed. He would like to have more of a setback on the corner of Oak St. and Central Ave. He agrees that a model should be done. He stated the Elks Lodge would be a better location for the parking garage, and added that this suggestion has been ignored by City staff. The people should have a say, and have taken a lot of abuse. He would like an Environmental Impact Report done. Rob Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), would like to address a comment made by one of the previous speakers who indicated that the project would raise rents on Park Street and run out "mom and pop" businesses. He would like to say for the record that the owners of Oles', Tuckers, and La Pinata support this project as do most of the businesses on Park St. Robert Wood stated that his primary objections to this project have been scal… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 7 | narrow for the entrance to the parking garage and it would be very unsafe. This Board should preserve the historic quality of Alameda. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board member Lynch stated how difficult this is. She feels the Board is being pressured to push this project through. A year ago this Board was shown a design that looked like a "refrigerator box" that was too big. The new design has improved, but it is still too big. She was not aware that there could have been an alternative location for the parking garage. She stated that she would like a three dimensional model made so she would have a better idea of the size and scale of the new Cineplex and parking garage. Board member Tilos agreed that the parking garage should be built on an alternate site and thinks the Council should further consider the Elk's parking lot as a possible site. He agrees with Board Member Lynch that the Cineplex is too large for its current location. Vice Chair Miller stated that he has always said that this project is too large, as well as his fellow Board members. He stated that the City Council has ignored the community. He agreed that there should be a model to better visualize the size and scale of the project. He stated that AAPS has good suggestions. The colors for the garage should have less contrast. Board member Iverson acknowledged the amount of work put into the presentations. She stated that the size and scale is incompatible to the area. She is interested to learn more about the different parking locations. She stated that the comments submitted by AAPS are good. The mechanical enclosure at top of the building is too high. The 70-ft. wall should be more detailed. This would be a good opportunity for public art. She would also like to see a model of the Civic Center. The detailing at the street level of the Cineplex is not keeping with the style of the parking garage. Chair Anderson would like to reiterate what the people are say… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 8 | AAPS submitted a letter regarding their request to list several buildings located at Alameda Point on the Historical Building Study List. Ms. Eliason stated that the ARRA has directed Staff to present them with language that will be added to the preferred development concept. Board member Lynch asked staff if there the City is still planning to create a committee regarding the future plans for Alameda Point. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Ani Dimusheva, 2911 Calhoun St., thanked the Board for their comments on Item 4. Irene Dieter, thanked the Board for their comments on Item 4. She also informed the Board of the 2002 Park Street Streetscape Plan, which indicated there should be no traffic on Oak Street. Ms. Eliason stated that this document was the basis for the grants that the City has received for the Park Street Streetscape. Staff will provide the Board with a copy. Chris Buckley, AAPS, would like to clarify what the ARRA Board requested. He stated that they were concerns that the plans were not set in stone before all of the historic buildings be identified. They asked staff to put together a schedule of how the various steps of dealing with historic buildings would occur. Staff was supposed to return to ARRA with the schedule in February 2006. Board member Lynch would like information on 500 Central Ave. Ms. Eliason stated that the applicants were required to weatherize the building and will be ready for public hearing in February. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Staff would like to remind the Board of the open house for the new Planning & Building director, hosted by the Planning & Building Department on Monday, January 9th ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 9:32 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING|HAB\AGENMIN\Agenmin.06/01-05-06 min.doc Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 9 | Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-03-02 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MARCH 2, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Acting Chair Tilos called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Board Members Iverson, Lynch & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, George Carder, Supervising Building Inspector, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Stefanie Hom, Planning Intern, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S (Iverson, Lynch) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 5, 2006 with corrections. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: The Secretary of the Historical Advisory Board requests that Report #4, 500 Central Avenue be considered first. M/S to consider Report #4, 500 Central prior to Action Items. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. REPORTS: 4. Preliminary Restoration Review; Applicant: Duane P. Jensen for Tony Wong - 500 Central Avenue. The applicants are seeking comments regarding the design for the proposed restoration of 500 Central Avenue. Emily Pudell reviewed staff report as presented. Staff is requesting comments on the preliminary plans submitted for the restoration of 500 Central Ave. Staff will then work to ensure that the Board's comments are incorporated into the plans for final major design review. No action will be taken tonight. Acting Chair Tilos opened the public hearing. Minutes of March 2, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-03-02 | 2 | Chris Buckley, AAPS submitted a letter to the Board with AAPS comments. Mr. Buckley reviewed the comments stated in the letter and said that he is looking forward to the restoration of the building. His main concern is with the front elevation on the proposed design. AAPS would like the storefronts and front elevation to be retained as it was originally. They would also like the wood shingles retained on the front elevation. He would like the restoration to include the reconstruction of the sloped window hood over the east side entry to match the hood shown in the 1979 photo. He would like staff to be aware of the inconsistency in plans. The proposed plans do not show original stairway and existing historic storefronts. The plans should note what is existing and what is proposed. Dick Rutter, AAPS, stated the building should be restored to look as it did in the 1979 photo. The shingles are important because that was the way buildings were modernized in 1908. Colleen Leong, 478 Central Ave., reviewed an article dated October 22, 1993 about the 5th Street station and gave a brief history of the building. As a neighbor she has been concerned about preserving certain elements for her tenants. Mr. Wong began construction on this property in 2004 when he purchased the property. He began demolition without receiving the proper permits. As result of this demolition, the rear cottage has since collapsed. She has made several complaints with the City, but feels that they have done very little to stop Mr. Wong from continuing this illegal construction and demolition. She also has concerns with amount of debris left from the collapsed rear cottage. There were no more speaker slips. Acting Chair Tilos closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Applicant, Duane Jensen of City Shapers and Architect Richard Vaterlaus, AIA were present representing the owner, Mr. Wong. Mr. Jensen informed the Board that his team is seeking guidance from this Board and the community for the best possible restoration plan. … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-03-02 | 3 | Board member Lynch does not feel that they have had enough time to review the plans. She would like to see this item before this Board one more time, so they may comment on the final plans. Ms. Pudell stated that staff will be proceeding with design review process with the recommendations given by this Board tonight. The Board is welcome to submit further comments during the 10-day public notice period during the Design Review process. Ms. Eliason stated that if applicant agrees, this item can be brought back before this Board. The Brown Act prohibits any private conversations with the applicant and the Board members. Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, expressed staff's concern with delaying this project any further. She informed the Board that staff does understand the importance of restoring the building to match the original and will take the comments of this Board very seriously when reviewing the final Design Review plans. Mr. Jensen stated that he would like to see this project move forward. He does not want to leave the building exposed to the weather any longer. Board Lynch stated that she would like to continue this item, until there is a full Board present. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to continue this item to April 6, 2006 meeting for review of revised plans that incorporate the Board's comments made tonight. (Lynch, Iverson) 3-0-2 Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval, CA06-0006, Applicant: Buttrick Wong for Donald Ousterhout, 1511 Gibbons Drive. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for demolition of more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure built prior to 1942, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located within an R-1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. Stefani Hom reviewed the staff report as presented. Staff has determined that demolishing 30% of the structure is a necessary step of the overall renovation and would not affect the basic arch… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-03-02 | 4 | Mr. Wong, architect, also spoke in favor of this project. There were no more speaker slips. Acting Chair Tilos closed the public hearing and opened the floor for Board discussion. Board member Lynch confirmed that the front façade would not be changed. M/S (Iverson, Lynch) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0006, with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion carries. 2. Certificate of Approval; CA06-0001; Applicant: Scott Brady for Douglas and Maria Love - 2253 San Antonio Avenue. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated structure, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling a single-family dwelling. The site is located at 2253 San Antonio Avenue, within the R-5, General Residential Zoning District. Stefanie Hom reviewed the staff report as presented. Staff has determined that the proposed addition and modifications, which were approved as part of Major Design Review DR05-0120, will not affect the historic significance of the existing structure. All proposed construction will be limited to the rear and interior of the building with the existing exterior features of the front façade to remain unaltered. The proposed addition will use materials that will match the existing architectural details. Staff recommends approval of Certificate of Approval with conditions as stated in draft Resolutions. Acting Chair Tilos opened the public hearing. Mr. Dileo, AAPS, spoke in favor of the Certificate of Approval. Scott Brady, architect, spoke in favor of approval. There was no more speaker slips. Acting Chair Tilos closed the public hearing and opened the floor for Board discussion. Board member Lynch commended staff on a very thorough staff report and packet. The Board had no further questions on this application. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0001, with conditions as stated in the draft Resolution. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Moti… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-03-02 | 5 | 3. Certificate of Approval, CA06-0002; Applicant: Frank Do for Alice Young - 1813 St. Charles Street. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated residential duplex, located at the above address for the purposes of legalization of remodeling work. The site is located at 1813 St. Charles Street within an R-2, Two-Family Residence Zoning District. Emily Pudell presented the staff report. She informed the Board that this structure is not listed on the Historical Building Study List; however, it is before this Board because it was built prior to 1942. Staff found that the proposed "Colonial Revival Cottage" design of the remodeled home would be more characteristic of and compatible with the other homes in the neighborhood. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval, CA06-0002, with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. Acting Chair Tilos opened the public hearing. Chris Buckley stated that the plans are inconsistent, which has been an ongoing problem. He feels that this building has craftsman elements, not colonial revival as the staff report states. There were no more speaker slips. Acting Chair Tilos closed the public hearing. Board member Iverson does not feel that the bay window or the columns have any historic style. In response to Board member Lynch's question regarding the handrails, Ms. Pudell stated that the Major Design Review process has not been completed. A letter of incompleteness which addressed the issues which have been brought up tonight has been mailed to the applicant. Board member Lynch feels that the proposed design is an improvement. She would also like to make sure that the Oak tree will be protected as a condition of approval. Acting Chair Tilos approves of the proposed design. Ms. Eliason stated that the Board's comments will be considered in the design review process. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0002 with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. 3-0-2.… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-03-02 | 6 | Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Staff has provided the Board with a resolution for a garage demolition approved by the Secretary for 1831 Nason St. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board member Lynch invited the Board members and staff to the Alameda Museum lecture series. Board member Lynch requests further information regarding their comments given on the Posey Tube entry lights. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Staff gave the Board information on upcoming workshops and conferences. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 8:32 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cirllis Eleaser Cynthia Eliason, Secretary Historical Advisory Board :\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agenmin.06\approved minutes03-02-06approved min.doc Minutes of March 2, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-03-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson and Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board member Lynch. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S to continue the March 2, 2006 minutes to the May 4, 2006 meeting due to a lack of a quorum. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. ACTION ITEMS: None. REPORTS: 1. Preliminary Restoration Review - Applicant: Dwane P. Jensen for Tony Wong - 500 Central Avenue. The applicants are seeking comments regarding the design for the proposed restoration of 500 Central Avenue. (Item continued from 3-02-06 meeting). This item was continued from the March 2, 2006 meeting per the Board's request. The applicant has incorporated the Board's comments received at the March 2, 2006 meeting and has submitted a revised set of drawings for review. Staff is seeking comments from this Board to assist in the Design Review approval. Chair Anderson opened the pubic hearing. Chris Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS), submitted their comments in a letter which was distributed to the Board. Minutes of April 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 2 | There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board member Tilos is in favor of the new design. Chair Anderson is in favor of staff's conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Additionally, she would like an investigation of the rear addition, and would like staff to require the applicant to apply for a lot line adjustment. She does not agree that the windscreen on the side elevation is original as AAPS has suggested; therefore it should not be a condition of approval. Vice-Chair Miller would like to incorporate AAPS recommendations with the comments made by the Board tonight, with the exception of the windscreen. Board member Iverson agreed that the windscreen was not original and is not necessary. 2. Review and Comment on Proposed Revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance. (Continued from the March 2, 2006 meeting). Staff has made several revisions to various sections of the Historical Preservation Ordinance. Staff would like the Board to review the proposed revisions, and submit comments. Staff will then incorporate the comments made by the Board and from the public and bring this item back for final review and recommendation to the City Council. Definition of Demolition: Staff proposes that the definition of demolition be easier for property owners and staff to calculate and should be equal to all properties. The Board did not have any comments regarding this section. Protected Trees: Ms. Eliason stated that staff is proposing stricter penalties for the unauthorized demolitions of protected trees. Chair Anderson stated that a landscape plan should only be required when replacement trees are located on the property. She would also like the ordinance to be clear that the applicant is responsible for the payment of the arborist. Ms. Woodbury stated that staff will revise the language to read that when only one tree is being replaced, the applicant may submit a site plan in lieu of the landscape plan. In response to Vice-Chair… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 3 | appraised value of the original tree which will be determined by the Planning and Building Director. The Board had no further comments. Historic Signs: Ms. Eliason reviewed the proposed revisions to the Historic Signs and designation process. The Board did not have any comments regarding this section. New Application Process: Ms. Eliason reviewed the proposed revisions to New Application Process. To prevent further unauthorized demolitions, the requirements for Certificate of Approvals should be very clear. Chair Anderson stated that section (a) should be revised. A structural report can only be prepared by a structural engineer, not an architect. Staff concurred and will make the revision. The Board had no further comments. Penalties: Ms Eliason reviewed the proposed revisions to the Penalties section. She informed the Board that the revisions to this section are important due to the recent problem of several unauthorized demolition of listed buildings and buildings built prior to 1942. The present ordinance only provides one remedy for each situation. For properties listed on the Historic Building Study List, unauthorized demolition is subject to a five (5) year stay in the issuance of any building permit or construction-related permit for any new construction at the site previously occupied by the historic resource. For pre-1942 unauthorized demolitions, the applicable penalty reads: "Any violation of this section or failure to comply with a condition of approval of any certificate of approval or permit issued pursuant to this section constitutes a violation of the Alameda Municipal Code." This inflexibility regarding penalties provides no administrative relief nor does it allow for extenuating circumstances regarding individual situations. Staff has proposed new language that provides additional flexibility for handling demolitions of Historical Monuments, structures on the Historical Building Study List and Pre-1942 dwellings, as well as Protected Trees. The proposed revision strengthens the overall penalty … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 4 | Vice-Chair Miller would like the penalties to be very clear that it is not ok to demolish historical structures. He would like Alameda to set the standard for strict penalties. He would like staff to consult with the City Attorney's office regarding charging as a misdemeanor offense. Chair Anderson would like to see guidelines within the Ordinance stating who is responsible for overseeing that the property is maintained in the event of the five year moratorium. Board member Iverson inquired if the monetary penalties could be assessed periodically though non-compliance, possibly on a quarterly basis. Board member Iverson also would like to see an additional penalty imposed if the property is sold within a certain amount of time after the illegal demolition. The Board had no further comments. Appeals and Call for Review: Staff has proposed the standard language used for all Boards regarding Appeals and Call for Review. The Board did not have any comments regarding this section. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Rosemary McNally, 2145 San Antonio, would like to see very strict penalties for unauthorized demolitions. Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Avenue, stated that the entire structure should be considered in the demolition process, not only the front façade. He stated that the fine should start at $10,000. Denise Brady, president of AAPS, stated the current ordinance does not give enough penalty options. She also feels the $500.00 penalty is too low. She would like to see the contractors who are doing the unauthorized demolitions be penalized as well as the homeowners. Chris Buckley, AAPS, reviewed the comments submitted in a letter from AAPS. He would like more time to consider all of the different options and scenarios which might occur. He would like the HAB to have more authority over the proposed design and construction plans. On tree provisions, with regards to trees, the International arborist formula is appropriate. Chuck Millar, 2829 San Jose, read the letter to the Board from Birgitt Evans. He stated … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 5 | revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance to the Council at the same time. He supports the recommendations made by AAPS. There should be various scales of penalties. He concurs with Denise Brady's comment to penalize the contractor. Item 3 under new application process, issuance should lie with the general contractor's role, not the architect. Elizbeth Krase, 2520 Chester St, would like to see stricter penalties. She stated that a $500.00 fine will not be very effective. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing. The floor was opened again for additional Board comments. Chair Anderson would like this item to be continued to allow further discussion and to give the Board more time to review. She would also like staff to provide the entire ordinance rather than just the revised pieces. Chair Anderson requested that a review of the Historical Building Study List be on a future agenda. M/S to continue this item to a future meeting for further discussion. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 3. Discussion and recommendation to City Council regarding support for National Historic Preservation Month. Ms. Woodbury informed the Board that each year the National Trust for Historic Preservation promotes preservation efforts across the country by designating May as National Preservation Month. Thousands of communities showcase their unique historic buildings and landscapes and honor their local heritage through a variety of activities that increase the public's awareness and appreciation of protecting the nation's rich history. National Preservation Month provides an excellent opportunity to celebrate historic preservation in Alameda. Staff has provided several activities suggested by The National Trust to celebrate National Preservation Month. Staff recommends that the Historical Advisory Board recommend that the City Council proclaim May 2006 as National Preservation Month at the May 2, 2006 City Council meeting. Chair Anderson has agreed to attend the City Council m… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 6 | June 4, 2006 AAPS will be giving out preservation awards. He stated the more publicity the better. M/S to recommend to the City Council to proclaim May 2006 as National Preservation month. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Correspondence addressed to Rick Jones, PM Realty Group, from Leslie Little, Development Services Director, clarifying the process regarding proposed exterior alterations to buildings within the Naval Air Station Alameda Historic District at Alameda Point. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner. G:\PLANNING|HAB\AGENMIN)Agenmin.06/04-06-06/04-06-06 DRAFT min 1.doc Minutes of April 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-05-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MAY 4, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Recording Secretary Gremminger called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson and Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board member Tilos. STAFF PRESENT: Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Miriam Delegrange, Development Services (DSD), Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S to approve the April 6, 2006 minutes as presented. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0007 - Applicant: The New Zealander - 1400 Webster Street. The applicants request approval to relocate the historically designated Croll's sign by lifting it approximately 12-inches. The sign is being raised to accommodate the addition of the tenant's business signage. The site is located at 1400 Webster Street within a C-C, Community commercial Zoning District. Emily Pudell summarized the staff report. Ms. Pudell informed the Board that he applicant has informed staff that he is not proposing to restore the existing sign as it states on the application for the Certificate of Approval. He has discovered that doing so could possibly damage the historic sign and would be too expensive. Staff is recommending approval of the Certificate of Approval. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Sherri Steig, WABA spoke in favor of the Certificate of Approval. Nolan Steig spoke in favor of the Certificate of Approval. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the Minutes of May 4, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-05-04 | 2 | floor to Board discussion. In response to Board Member Lynch's inquiry regarding if a historic sign survey has ever been done, Ms. Pudell stated no. Ms. Pudell stated that the proposal to raise the existing Croll's 12-inches from its current position so that the new tenant signage can meet the current height requirements. M/S (Miller, Lynch) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0007, for the alteration of a historically designated sign at 1400 Webster Street. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1. Motion carries. 2. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0008 - Applicant: Dan Adams for Dale and Kay Emerson - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated residential building located at the above address for the purpose of remodeling a 1970's addition. The site is located at 1150 Bay Street within an R-1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. (EP) Item 2 Ms. Pudell summarized staff report. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval, CA06-0008, with conditions as stated in the draft resolution. There were no speaker slips. Chair Anderson opened the floor for board discussion. The Board is in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval with the following revised conditions: 1. Revise the proposed roofline above the dwelling's main entrance to a style that is more compatible with the building's architectural style, subject to review and approval by planning staff as part of the Major Design Review process. 2. Revise the plans for the second-story rear deck to include supporting posts, columns, or decorative brackets to establish a more substantial feeling to its appearance, subject to review and approval by Planning staff as part of the Major Design Review process. 3. Revise your plans to use a more appropriate material and design for the front landing, including the guardrail, handrail, and balustrade, subject to review and approval by planning staff as part of the Major Design Review process. M/S (Lynch, … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-05-04 | 3 | 3. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0009 - Applicant: Mohamed Elhashash - 1530 & 153 2 Ninth Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of three historically designated single-family homes, located at the above addresses for the purposes of remodeling and restoring the buildings. The site is located at 1530 and 1532 Ninth Street within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. (EP) Ms. Pudell summarized staff report. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval CA06-0009, with conditions as stated in draft resolution. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing Li-Shung Fu, Architect, spoke in favor of the Certificate of Approval. Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Ave., stated that the golden mean has not been properly applied. He is not in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. Birgitt Evans, AAPS, concurs with Dick Rutter. She is not in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., is not in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson opened the floor to board discussion. Board Member Lynch stated that there should be more detail around the windows to match other Victorian cottages built around the same time. She would like the new siding to match the existing. She is not in favor of approving this application. Vice-Chair Miller stated that if this was a restoration, then they should restore it back to original. He stated that raising the house would drastically change the appearance of the building. He is not in favor of approving this application. Board Member Iverson is not in favor of approving the application. Chair Anderson would like all windows replacements to be wood. She agrees with the Board and is not in favor of approving this project. Ms. Woodbury requested the Board re-open the public hearing to allow Miriam Delegrange, DSD, to speak. M/S to re-open the public hearing. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1. Motion carries. Minu… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-05-04 | 4 | Ms. Delegrange, project manager, informed the Board that this project will be providing much needed affordable housing. She also stated that the reason for raising the house is to provide ADA access. The reason why they are proposing vinyl windows on the sides of the house is so they can be energy efficient, however she does not have a problem with changing them all to wood. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing. M/S to approve the Certificate of Approval, CA06-0009, to alter more than thirty percent (30 %) of the value of three historically designated single-family homes at 1530, 1532 and 1532 1/2 9th Street. 0-4-1. Ayes: 0; Noes: 4; Absent: 1. Motion denied. REPORTS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch would like to invite the Board to the Alameda Legacy Home Tour. Also, docents are needed. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Woodbury informed the Board that staff would like to schedule a study session to review the Design Guidelines. On May 2, 2006 the City Council proclaimed May 2006 as National Preservation Month. Staff has hired a consultant to assist with the revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cathy Woodbury Planning & Building Director G:\PLANNING|HAB\AGENMIN\Agenmin.06/04-06-06/04-06-06 DRAFT min 1.doc Minutes of May 4, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-05-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JULY 6, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Recording Secretary Gremminger called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Irons and Iverson MEMBERS ABSENT: Board member Lynch STAFF PRESENT: Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, Doug Vu, Planner III, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S (Miller, Iverson) to approve the May 4, 2006 minutes as presented. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: This item will be continued to the next meeting a full board is present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0011 - 2629 Central Ave. Applicant: Hwan Kim. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for the removal of two coast live oak trees (Quercus agrifolia) that are located along the right side of the property. The trees are causing a potentially hazardous condition due to their proximity to the eave of the house. The site is located at 2629 Central Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, introduced Doug Vu, Planner III, who was recently hired to the Planning & Building Department. Staff member Doug Vu briefly summarized the staff report. Mr. Vu stated that both the applicant and Elite Tree Service, Inc. are concerned about the location of the trees and their potential to cause damage to the foundation of the two homes located at 2629 and 2633 Central Ave. AMC Section 13-21.7(c) requires that any protected oak tree that is removed shall be replaced with a minimum of two oak trees of ten gallon size or larger. Since there is a lack of sufficient space on the applicant's property to replace these trees, the Planning & Building Director recommends that a $375.00 fee, equal to the cost of three fifteen gallon trees, be Minutes of July 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-06 | 2 | collected on behalf of the Recreation & Parks Department for the purchase and planting of these trees in a City park. Staff recommends approval of CA06-0011, with conditions as stated in draft resolution. There were no speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Vice-Chair Miller stated that he agrees with the staff recommendation. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's question regarding why an arborist report was not submitted with this application, Mr. Vu stated that according to the Ordinance, a report from a certified arborist is required only if the health of the tree is in question. Chair Anderson stated that the Board should discuss this section of the Ordinance when the revisions to the Ordinance are reviewed by the Board in the near future. Board Member Irons stated that he agrees with staff recommendation. Board Member Iverson stated that she appreciates that this is being brought before the Board prior to removing the trees. M/S (Iverson, Miller) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0011, at 2629 Central Avenue with conditions as stated in draft resolution. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 2. Proposed Addition to the Official Naming List for City Facilities and Streets. Request by the City Council to add the name "Willie Stargell" to the City's Official Naming List for Facilities and Streets. Staff member Doug Vu summarized the staff report and informed the Board that the the City Council has inquired about the possibility of renaming a west-end street to honor Willie Stargell pursuant to requests from the Encinal High School Alumni Association. The Street Naming Policy currently states that the Historical Advisory Board must approve additions or deletions to the List based on written documentation of the historic importance of the name in Alameda history. As a prominent sports figure in Alameda's history, Staff has determined that Willie Stargell is eligible to be added to the List. M/S (Iverson, Miller) to approve the addition … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-06 | 3 | REPORTS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) The following Written Communications were distributed to the Board. No action was taken. Letter dated June 29, 2006 from Dian Coler-Dark, President, Alameda Museum, to the Mayor and Council Members regarding the Carnegie Library Building. Updated Historical Advisory Board Member phone number list. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Ciplin Eleaser Cynthia Eliason, Secretary Historical Advisory Board S:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agenmin.06\approved minutes07-06-06 approved min.doc Minutes of July 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JULY 7, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Vice Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:07 pm. Vice-Chair Miller called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chair Miller, Boardmembers Lynch & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Anderson. STAFF PRESENT: Acting Planning & Building Director Greg McFann, Allen Tai, Planner III, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Recording Secretary Debbie Gremminger. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to continue the minutes of the Special meeting of March 10, 2005 due to lack of quorum. 3-0-1, Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: l; Motion carries. M/S (Tilos/Lynch) to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 7, 2005 with corrections. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. M/S (Lynch/Tilos) to continue the minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2005 due to lack of quorum. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Boardmember Lynch has provided additional information regarding the constructions dates and historicial significance of the projects to be heard tonight for the Board's review. Minutes of July 7, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-07 | 2 | ACTION ITEMS: (Discussion/Action) 1. CA05-0008, 1305-1311 Park Street, Applicant: Italo Calpestri for Anita Ng. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval for demolition of previous additions, including an un-reinforced masonry addition, at the rear of an existing one and two story commercial building. The demolition is part of a proposal to replace the previous additions with a new two- story rear addition. The proposed demolition exceeds 30% of the value of the structure and requires a Certificate of Approval pursuant to AMC Subsection 13-21.7. The building is listed as a Contributing Structure in the Park Street C-C, Community Commercial Zoning District. Allen Tai, Planner III, briefly reviewed staff report as presented. Mr. Tai stated that the proposed demolition is part of a project to build a new two-story addition that will replace the two existing additions at the rear of the property. No changes are proposed to the façade or sides of the main building; the historical fabric will not be disturbed. In order for these additions to be considered historical resources, they must possess and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources. There is no evidence that these structures exhibit any architectural or historical merit. Furthermore, these additions are incompatible with the design of the existing main building. Staff recommends that the Board approve the Certificate of Approval as stated in draft Resolution. Vice-Chair Miller opened the floor to public comment. Chris Buckley, 1017 San Antonio stated that a state historic resources inventory form was done for this property. The property as a whole including the addition is part of the Park Street National Register District. The reference period extends from the late 1800's to 1900. The brick addition does have historical significance. He stated that staff has been applying the National Register Criteria to all of the properties before the Board tonight. This criteria should only be used if it is de… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-07 | 3 | Boardmember Lynch would like clarification on the Environmental Determination in staff report. Allen Tai stated that staff determined this project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption because the portion of the building to be demolished is an accessory structure and is not historically significant therefore, this project qualifies for a Catorgial Exemption from CEQA Guidelines per Section 15301 (1)(3). Boardmember Lynch asked Mr Calpestri if any thought was given to saving the structure? Mr. Calpestri responded by stating that the existing rear building was constructed with unreinforced masonry and does not blend with the front of the building. He also stated the the current space is unsuitable for tenant use and would not be financially viable to keep. Vice-Chair Miller closed public comments and opened Board discussion. Boardmember Lynch would like staff to revise the draft resolution so it is clear that it refers only to the two rear accessory buildings and not the front façade. Staff noted the revision. Boardmember Tilos feels the accessory structures are as historically significant as the main building and does meet the criteria to be a historic resource. Motion (Lynch) to approve Certicate of Approval CA05-0008, as stated in draft resolution with the correction that staff revise the language so it is clear that this applies only the accessory buildings in the rear of the building. Motion failed due to lack of a second. M/S (Tilos, Lynch) to continue this item until such time there is a full Board. 3-0-1, Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 2. CA05-0011, 1013 Fair Oaks Avenue, Applicant: Derwin Cheung/David Deng. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to remove a Coast Live Oak tree (Quercus Agrifolia) located along the western edge of the property. The tree has a 24" diameter and is only 30" from the main building's brick foundation. Per an Arborist, the tree is interfering with the proposed foundation reconstruction and would become unstable as part of that process. The site is located … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-07 | 4 | Vice-Chair Miller stated there where no speaker slips submitted, and opened the floor for Board discussion. Boardmember Lynch informed the Board she visited the property. The tree appears to be in bad shape and is in favor of removing the tree for health and safety reasons. Vice-Chair Miller is also in favor of removing the tree. Staff informed the Board that the Recreation & Park Department has been accepting fees in lui of replacement trees. They have not found locations for the replacement trees as of yet. Staff will notify the Board when and where a replacement tree has been planted. M/S (Tilos, Lynch) to approve Certificate of Approval CA05-0011, to remove a Coast Live Oak tree (Quercus Agrifolia) located along the western edge of the property at 1013 Fair Oaks as stated in in draft Resolution. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 3. CA04-0006, 826 Lincoln Avenue, Applicant: Cindy Li. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to demolish the existing single-family dwelling, located at the above address, for the purposes of clearing a dilapidated structure from the site and constructing a new residential duplex. The site is located at 826 Lincoln Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Emily Pudell, Planner II, briefly reviewed staff report as presented. Applicant wishes to completely demolish a single-family dwelling. This building is not listed on the Historical Building Study List but was built prior to 1942. The condition of the existing building is poor according to a building inspection report letter prepared in 2004. Permit records indicate the building has been significantly altered over time. Staff feels the existing building is not historically significant and does not meet the criteria to be considered a historical resource. Staff recommends approval of CA04-0006. Vice-Chair Miller opened the floor for Public comment. Ivan Chiu, designer with Bill Wong Engineers, who spoke on behalf of the applicant informed the Board that they are ready to procee… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-07 | 5 | should not be applying the National Register Criteria. In the Ordinance, the National Register Criteria is sited in the definition, Sec 13-21-2, as part of the definition as Historical Monument. It is not referenced in the definition of a Historical Building. Study List. Currently there is no specific criteria in the Ordinance stating what is or what isn't eligible for the Study List. He feels this should be addressed in a future meeting. However, he feels the building does not meet the criteria of the study list. He also stated that he feels that the design quality of the replacement structure should be of the same quality of what it is replacing. He is in favor of the proposed design, with minor changes. Staff noted his changes, and informed Mr. Buckley that he may submit his comments during the design review process. Vice-Chair Miller opened the floor to Board discussion. Boardmember Lynch stated this building does not have any historic value, but would like staff to work closely with the applicant on the design of the proposed project. M/S (Lynch, Tilos) to approve Certificate of Approval,CA04-000 to approve the demolition of an existing residence at 826 Lincoln Ave. as stated in draft Resolution. 3-0-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 4. CA05-0010, 1815 Sherman Street, Applicant: Jules Garabaldi. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the historic structure, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located at 1815 Sherman Street, within an R-2, Two Family Residence Zoning District. Emily Purdell reviewed staff report as presented. She would like the Board to omit paragraph 2 of Section III due to a staff error. The demolition plan that was submitted shows retention of the majority of the dwelling's exterior walls; including all of the first-floor front elevations and the majority of the first-floor side and rear elevations. The proposal does not include any changes to th… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, AUGUST 3, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Lynch, Irons and Iverson. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Doug Garrison, Planner III, Doug Vu, Planner III, Miriam Delegrange, Development Services, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 2, 2006. M/S and unanimous to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 2, 2006 as presented. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion carries. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 6, 2006. M/S and unanimous to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 2, 2006 as presented. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: (Item continued from the July 6, 2006 Meeting). Board Member Lynch nominated and the Board voted unanimously to re-elect Nancy Anderson as Chair and Randall Miller as Vice-Chair. Minutes of August 3, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 2 | ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval - CA06-00012 - 1530 & 1532 Ninth Street. Applicant: Mohamed Elhashash. The applicant is requesting a new Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of three historically designated single-family homes. The site is located at 1530 and 1532 Ninth Street within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, presented staff report. On May 4, 2006, the Historical Advisory Board acted to deny a Certificate of Approval CA06-0009. The applicant has since been working with Staff and representatives of the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS) to revise plans to address design concerns raised at the May HAB meeting. Staff is recommending the Board approve the Certificate of Approval CA06-0012, with conditions as stated in the draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Miriam Delagrange, Project Manager, Development Services, spoke in favor of the revised design. Dick Rutter, AAPS, reviewed a letter submitted by AAPS and is in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. Li-Sheng Fu, architect, spoke in favor of revised design. He informed the Board that he is willing to incorporate AAPS's suggestions into the plans. He informed the Board that the plans for the rear building have not changed and that all the exterior doors will match the existing doors. Chris Buckley, AAPS, spoke in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval with the conditions stated in letter submitted by AAPS. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St. spoke in opposition of the revised design. There were no further speaker slips, Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch thanked the applicant for his attempt to incorporate the Board's suggestions into the revised plan. She feels that the revised plans do not include enough of the original design details. She would like to see the details match a photograph of a similar house built around the same time w… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 3 | Ms. Eliason stated that the Board should only be considering the partial demolition of the existing structure, not the proposed design. Board Member Lynch disagreed with staff and read from the Municipal Code that the HAB is charged with the responsibility "to encourage new building and developments that will be harmonious with existing buildings and neighborhoods" Board Member Lynch added that the Board can't encourage harmonious designs if it doesn't see those designs. Vice-Chair Miller is not in favor of approving the Certificate of Approval. He feels this project would create parking issues in the neighborhood. Board Member Iverson also thanked the architect for revising the plans. She would like to see the front detail match an existing house which is located down the street. M/S (Irons, Miller) to approve Certificate of Approval CA06-0012, to alter more than thirty percent of the value of three historically designated single-family homes located at 1530 & 1532 1/2 Ninth Street. 1-4-0. Ayes: 1 (Irons); Noes: 4; Absent: 0; Motion failed. Item deemed denied. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) and unanimous to continue this item to a future meeting to allow the applicant to incorporate the Board's comments into the plans. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion carries. Secretary Eliason stated that staff will inform the Board if the applicant chooses to revise the plans. 2. a. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0017 - 2020 Oak Street. Applicant: Richard Hornberger. Applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to move an existing, pre-1909 dwelling from its existing site to the corner of Oak Street and Blanding Avenue. Both sites are within the M-2, General Industrial Zoning District. and; b. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0018 - 2319 Clement Avenue. Applicant: Richard Hornberger Applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to permit the demolition of a vacant pre-1909 industrial building. The site is located within the M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) Zoning District. Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner presented the… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 4 | Chair Anderson opened the Public hearing. Ken Carvallo and Christopher Buckley, AAPS, spoke in favor of approving both Certificates of Approvals. There were no further speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. The Board had no concerns with either proposal. M/S (Iverson, Lynch) and unanimous to approve CA06-0017, to move an existing, pre-1909 dwelling from its existing site to the corner of Oak Street and Blanding Ave. and CA06-0018, to permit the demolition of a vacant pre-1909 industrial building located at 2319 Clement Ave. with conditions as stated in draft resolutions. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. 3. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0015 - Applicant: Phong T. & Lieu Dinh - 1343 Fernside Blvd. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent of the value of a pre-1942 single family residence. The proposed work includes the addition of approximately 1,450 square feet first story and new second story for an attached garage and living space, removal/replacement of the exterior siding, windows, interior walls and roof. The site is located at 1343 Fernside Blvd. within an R-1, One Family Residence Zoning District. Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, presented the staff report. In 2006, the applicant received several permit approvals for repair and replacement work to the structure, which cumulatively have resulted in exceeding the thirty percent (30%) removal provisions within a five (5) year period. In addition, the applicant is requesting further demolition to the roof system as well as a new addition to the structure to add a two-car garage and additional second-story living area. Staff is recommending that the Board 1) include 1343 Fernside Blvd. on the Historical Building Study List as an "H" designation, 2) deny the portion of the Certificate of Approval for demolition associated with the proposed addition of a two-car garage and living area and 3) approve the portion of the Certificate of Approva… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 5 | Richard Rutter, AAPS, spoke in favor of staff's recommendation to deny the Certificate of Approval for the addition. Gary Longoria, 3292 Briggs, opposes the proposed addition. He stated that it will block his windows in living room dining room and bedroom. He is also concerned with the dead oak tree on the rear of the property. Tom Pavao, 1337 Fernside, spoke in favor of staff's recommendation to deny the addition. Chris Buckley, AAPS, commended staff on their report. He reviewed comments submitted by AAPS and would like them incorporated into the draft Resolution. Betsy Matheson, 1185 Park Ave., is not in favor of proposed addition. She would like to see this property included on the Historic Building Study List. Phong Dinh, applicant/owner, informed the Board that prior to purchasing the property, he was told by Staff that the addition would be approved. Once construction began, he discovered additional damage done by a previous fire. He noted that he has tried to comply with all of staff's requests. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., commended staff on their report. He is not in favor of the proposed addition. There were no further speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Irons commended staff on their report. He noted that as a contractor, he understands the cost of restoring this building would be very high. Board Member Iverson also commended staff on their report. She would like the building restored to the way it looked in the 1979 photo. Vice-Chair Miller spoke in favor of staff's recommendations. He would also like to see the house restored to the way it looked in the 1979 photo. Board Member Lynch spoke in favor of including the property on the Historic Building Study list. She would like a 1979 photo be provided to all property owners of listed houses. She noted that she is not in favor of the proposed addition. She pointed out that the staff report mentioned the shutters as a signature detail of the Craftsman style. However those … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 6 | In response to Board Member Irons inquiry regarding whether the proposed addition is within the purview of this Board, Ms. Eliason stated that the demolition of the side walls for the proposed addition is under the purview of this Board because the applicant has exceeded 30 % over a period of five years. Board Member Irons noted that if this Board requires the applicant to restore this back to the way it looked in 1979, then the applicant may again apply for an addition, without coming before this Board. That would be very costly to the property owner, and he is within his rights to build an addition on his property. After separately reviewing each condition, the Board approved staffs recommendation for conditions one and three. The Board would like conditions two, four, five and six be revised to incorporate AAPS's comments. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) and unanimous to include 1343 Fernside Blvd. to the Historic Building Study List as an H designation. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. M/S (Irons, Miller) to approve the portion of the Certificate of Approval CA06-0015, associated with window and siding replacements with revised conditions submitted by AAPS. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. M/S (Miller, Lynch) and unanimous to deny the partial demolition associated with the proposed addition of an existing dwelling at 1343 Fernside. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. Board member Lynch stated that she would like staff to give updates on this project as it moves forward. Chair Anderson called a 10 minute recess. Chair Anderson reconvened the meeting. 4. Certificate of Approval CA06-0014 - Applicant: Sebastian Martinez for Raul Reyes Tapia, 1534 Buena Vista Avenue. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for demolition of the remainder of a residential structure built prior to 1942, located at the above address, for the purposes of constructing a new single-family dwelling. The site is located within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Doug … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 7 | of a residential structure at 1534 Buena Vista Avenue that was destroyed by two fires. The building was constructed in 1909, but is not listed on the Historical Building Study List. Mr. Vu stated that the proposed project is brought before the Board because it involves partial demolition of a structure built prior to 1942. Given the amount of damage already sustained to the building, the applicants are proposing to remove the remaining garage and three storage rooms on the ground floor in order to construct a new single-family dwelling. Staff will continue to work with the applicants to ensure the new residence is consistent with the intended design approach and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval, CA06-0014, to allow the demolition of the remainder of the structure at 1534 Buena Vista Ave., with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. In response to Board Member Lynch's inquiry regarding the proposed new single-family dwelling, Mr. Vu stated that staff will consider any comments made by this Board tonight during the Design Review process. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., requested that the owner try to salvage any of the historic materials during the demolition. Sebastian Martinez, architect, stated that he will make every effort to match original house. There were no further speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. The Board thanked the applicant for reviewing the plans for the new single-family dwelling. M/S (Irons, Lynch) and unanimous to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0014, for the demolition of the remainder of an existing dwelling at 1534 Buena Vista Ave. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. 5. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0022 - Applicant: Fargo Farnesi Inc. - 2427 Clement Ave. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to demolish more than thirty percent (30%) of a commercial structure, portions of which … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 8 | Mr. Garrison stated that staff along with the applicant, held a neighborhood meeting and redesigned the original proposal to meet the concerns of the neighbors. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval CA06-0022, for the demolition of a commercial structure, located at 2427 Clement Ave. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Dick Rutter, AAPS, is not in favor of this project because of the 100 ft height limit. He would like to see the community try to lower the height limit. Shawn Smith, architect for the owner, spoke in favor of project. In response to Chair Anderson inquiry regarding the use of the new structure, Mr. Smith stated that currently this property houses a commercial wood cabinet shop. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., is also concerned with the height limit. There were no further speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Chair Anderson is in favor of approving this project, with the exception of the height and the clapboard siding. M/S and unanimous to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m. 5-0-0. Board Member Iverson spoke in favor of rebuilding the front façade to match original storefront. She also noted that the proposed height will be too large for the surrounding area. Board Member Irons spoke in favor of staff's recommendation to grant the Certificate of Approval for the demolition. In response to Board Member Iron's inquiry regarding whether the height limit and proposed design of the new building falls under this Board's purview, Ms. Eliason stated that this Board should only be considering the demolition of the existing structure. Ms. Eliason stated that staff would consider their comments during the Design Review process. Board Member Lynch does not think the front façade should remain. She would like Condition 3 be removed from the draft Resolution. She also stated that the proposed project is too big for the surrounding area. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve Certificate of Approval CA06-0022, for the demolition of… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );