pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf, 8
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 8 | Chair Anderson feels that the Board should have been notified in the beginning of this process. This is something that the Board seriously needs to look at with staff and reiterate the Boards' purpose. She spoke in favor of the five-year stay, would like the owner to submit a landscaping plan as stated in the notice sent to him from Code Enforcement. Although she concurs with the neighbors regarding the blight of a vacant lot for five years, she does not approve of waiving the 5 year stay in development. Board Member Miller stated he has difficulty with the term "dismantled" He stated the demolished house does not resemble the new house at all. He was on the Board when they worked on 5 year stay, and feels if not enforced in this case, then it will send the wrong message to the public. Board Member Lynch concurred with Board Member Miller's statement. Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |