pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf, 6
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 6 | Lil Arnerich, Elizabeth Krause, Birgitt Evans and Dick Rutter spoke in favor of project. The main concern was the removal of the canopies. There were no public speakers opposing project. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened Board comments. In response to the concerns of the public and the Board Members with removing the canopies, Peter Wang, owner, stated that the canopies were not part of original building. He feels that the removal of the canopies will not alter the historical character of the building. In response to Board Member Lynch's question regarding timeline of this project, Mr. Wang stated he intends to start as soon as they receive approval from this Board. The entire project should be completed by 2008. Board Member Lynch stated that she is in favor of this project moving forward. She feels that due to the historical significance of this building, this Board should be advised of the progress of this project periodically. Chair Anderson stated that it is their duty as a Board to preserve the Historical integrity of all listed resources. She stated that the removal of the canopies, opening in every bay, and leveling the loading platform will change the historical character of this building. Not in favor of approving a "blanket" Certificate of Approval She would like this project to come back before this Board for all exterior changes. Board Member Miller feels that the three foot gap between the canopies will disappear when you look at the entire building. Feels for safety reasons the leveling of the loading dock makes sense. He would also like periodic updates on this project. Mr. Thomas explained to the Board the "blanket" Certificate of Approval makes it easier for the applicant to get financing for this project. This building is a Historical Monument so any changes made would have to comply with the Secretary of Interior's standards. If Staff has any questions regarding any changes proposed in the future they will come before this Board for guidance. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the Certificate of Approval with the additional condition that staff returns for a periodic review so the Board may be advised of the progress of renovations and be able to provide their comments on such things as replacement window materials, storefront colors and materials, lighting, signage & landscaping. 2-1-1. Ayes: 2; Noes: 1; Absent: 1. Application denied. Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |