pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-08-04 | 3 | 2. CA05-0010, 1815 Sherman Street, Applicant: Jules Garabaldi. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the historic structure, located at the above address, for the purposes of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located at 1815 Sherman Street, within an R-2, Two Family Residence Zoning District. (EP) (re-hearing from 7-7-05 mtg.) Ms. Pudell, Planner II, briefly reviewed the staff report as presented. On July 7, 2005 the HAB denied this application, in part, because they did not like the design of the new construction. Per the City Attorney Office, the Historical Advisory Board does not have purview over the design of new construction; however, the Board may provide their comments to staff to consider during the Design Review approval process. Ms. Pudell informed the Board that the original plans have been revised to maintain the first fifteen feet of the building. Although this structure does have some local significance, it does not warrant its inclusion on the State Historic Research Inventory. Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Approval for the partial demolition of a single family residence located at 1815 Sherman St. with conditions as stated in the draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the Pubic Hearing. Jeff Hamon, contractor, informed the Board that the design has been revised according to the comments made at the July hearing. Christopher Buckley - AAPS, spoke in favor of the revised design. He stated that AAPS would like to submit comments during the design review process. There were no speakers opposing this project. Chair Anderson opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch stated that it is important for this Board to see what is being proposed in order to make an informative decision whether the historical character of the building will be altered, and the new development will be harmonious with existing buildings and neighborhoods. Board Member Miller stated that he understands that design issues are not the purview of this Board, but feels without the knowledge of what is being proposed, he would most likely deny any application for demolition. Ms. Pudell stated that currently staff is working with the City Attorney's office on possible revisions of the Historical Preservation Ordinance, which will be on a future agenda. The Board may provide any comments on the proposed design to staff for consideration in the Design Review approval process. Minutes of August 4, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-08-04.pdf |