pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf, 5
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 5 | Valerie Ruma, 1610 Willow St., spoke in opposition of the project. She would like an Environmental Impact Report done. She read into the record a statement by Woody Minor opposing the bulk and massing of the proposed project. Rayla Graber spoke in opposition of the size of the project. The present plan is an improvement to the original design but it is still too large. Scott Brady, 1812 Encinal Ave., spoke on behalf of AAPS and briefly reviewed a November 1, 2005 letter from AAPS to the City Council, which was distributed to this Board in their meeting packet. He stated that his main concerns are with the size of the project, and that it is not compatible with the surrounding area. The north wall of the parking structure has not been addressed adequately. He would like to see a physical model done and be required as part of the approval process. This would allow for a better understanding of the size and scope of the project with regards to the surrounding area. Chris Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Ave., spoke on behalf of AAPS and further reviewed the above mentioned letter. He stated that AAPS feels that although the new design is an improvement, they still have concerns with the 20-inch projection of the Cineplex. He stated that the projection is adding too much bulk and is not sure why it is necessary. He also stated that the upward angle of the bay windows of the second floor lobby should be increased, and a more vertical mullion pattern be used for the mezzanine windows. Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Ave., agreed with Chris Buckley that the 20-inch projection should be eliminated. He reviewed the drawing that was attached to the letter submitted by AAPS. He stated that a more substantial material should be used for the tile on base of the storefronts. AAPS would like to review materials and color samples when they become available. Leslie Fishback, 1334 Burbank St., spoke in opposition of the project. She does not feel that the historic theatre is being restored. She is also concerned with the size of the Cineplex and feels the parking garage has too few spaces. Susan Batailia, 1351 Burbank St., stated that the size and scope are too large. The majority of citizens agree that the historic theatre should be preserved. The Twin Towers church will not be visible if this is built. There will be more traffic problems. The alternative has been brought to the City, by contracting with existing parking lots. She is not as concerned with the color as much as the size. Russ Button, 2711 San Jose Ave., is opposed the size and scale of the project. He stated that traffic would be increased on Park Street. The rents will go up and the "mom and pop" businesses such as Ole's, La Pinata, and Tuckers Ice Cream would disappear. This will change Alameda in a major way. He stated that this Board's job is too keep Alameda the way it is. Rosemary McNally, 2145 San Antonio Ave., also opposed the size of the project. She would also like to see a model. She urged the Board to inform the City Council that the size of the Cineplex and parking garage will ruin the historic character of Park Street. Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |