pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-03-10 | 2 | Mr. Tai stated that the applicants are proposing to raise the existing structure in order to integrate a new single-family dwelling into the existing structure. The construction will involve removal of the existing front façade of the building as well as the front portion of the roof. This matter is brought before this Board because it involves partial demolition of a structure built prior to 1942. Staff feels that there is no evidence that the structure exhibits any architectural or historical merit and that the proposed project will be more consistent with the adjacent homes than the existing building. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Board approve the Certificate of Approval as stated in the draft Resolution. Vice Chair Anderson opened the floor for public comment. Ivan Chiu, Architect, stated that the tree should be removed because one trunk is leaning over the fence toward the adjacent property while another is leaning toward the existing structure. At the recommendation of the arborist, the applicant wishes to remove the existing Oak in order to eliminate the possibility of the tree causing damage to the neighboring property. Mr. Wong also informed the Board that the proposed design intends to keep the Craftsman style appearance and to preserve salvageable portions of the existing building by incorporating the structure into the rear of the new building. Vice Chair Anderson closed public comment and opened Board discussion. Boardmember Lynch stated that she visited the property and feels that the tree does look sick. She also feels that the existing structure should not be considered a historic resource. She also feels that this structure should not be referred to as a "craftsman" style because there are no "craftsman" style elements on the existing or proposed structure. Vice Chair Anderson asked if the old house is structurally sound enough to support the proposed new house. Mr. Chiu stated that the detail of the design has not yet been looked into. He does not anticipate any problems. Mr. Tai stated that lifting and moving the house is considered necessary to comply with setback standards. If the house were completely demolished then several variances would be required. Mr. Miller asked if the neighbors were ok with this project. Mr. Tai stated that there were no comments as of yet. Vice-Chair Anderson stated that one of the conditions of the Resolution states that the applicant must replace the removed tree with two new trees. She is concerned that the lot cannot support two 15 gallon Oak trees. Would it be possible for the Board to require the applicant plant one Oak tree and another type of tree? Minutes of March 10, 2005 Special Historical Advisory Board Meeting 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-03-10.pdf |