pages
57 rows where page = 29
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body
date (date) 57 ✖
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2005-08-16 1
- 2006-06-20 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-06-19 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2008-06-17 1
- 2008-10-07 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2014-07-15 1
- 2015-02-02 1
- 2015-10-20 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2016-11-01 1
- 2017-04-12 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-04-17 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-07-11 1
- 2018-07-24 1
- 2018-10-16 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2019-03-19 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-12-18 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-06-02 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-06-15 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-09-21 1
- 2021-10-19 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2022-02-01 1
- 2022-05-03 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 29 | ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the regular meeting at 12:19 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 29 May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 29 | The City Attorney stated said matter could be included in the resolution. Mayor Johnson and Councilmember Matarrese stated Council should discuss the matter first. Mayor Johnson suggested the resolution discussed tonight be brought back and a separate discussion be held on delegating AP&T's legal counsel. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired as to the difference between acting by resolution and by motion. Mayor Johnson stated resolutions are easier for City staff to track. The City Clerk noted resolutions are permanent records of the City Council. Councilmember deHaan stated the proposal includes quarterly reporting requirements; that he would prefer monthly reporting. Mayor Johnson stated that monthly reporting was acceptable to her, including the current budget on the status of the overall litigation contingency budget for not only Risk Management, but also AP&T. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the Council needs all of the numbers for all of the different entities that are part of legal budget the Council appropriated. Councilmember Daysog stated the City Attorney's office has always delivered; the challenge is there is a desire to have more involvement in oversight. Vice Mayor Gilmore concurred; stated that the action is not due to a deficiency in the City Attorney's office, rather it is the Council following what the Charter sets out as its role and bringing practices in line. Mayor Johnson concurred; inquired whether the matter could return at the next Council meeting. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 29 July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-16 | 29 | would allow Catellus to explore a change in the current DDA. The Development Services Director responded that the amendment would allow Catellus to explore re-entitlement of the existing property. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether there would be a public process that would allow people to comment, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Matarrese stated that he wanted people to be aware that the matter would be publicly noticed and that Catellus would be given a year to provide more information. Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Commissioners Daysog, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 4. Abstentions Commissioner deHaan - 1. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 2:45 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 August 16, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-20 | 29 | Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner inquired whether the Risk Management Analyst position would be brought back to Council with more detail, to which the City Manager/Executive Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired how many employees are in the City Attorney's office, to which the City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded seven. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether all seven employees are full time, to which the City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the City Attorney's office had any part-time staff, to which the City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded a law clerk. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the seven employees include the attorney starting in July. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded the new attorney would bring staffing up to eight tonight's authorization will bring the City Attorney and Risk Management staffing level to nine. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese requested that an organizational chart be provided when the matter returns to Council. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 15 and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 20, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 29 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -OCTOBER 17, 2006- -6:40 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:50 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider (06-509) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, Executive Management Group, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Management and Confidential Employees Association, and Police Association Non- Sworn. (06-510) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Collins V. City of Alameda. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received an update and gave direction to its Labor Negotiators; regarding Existing Litigation, Council received a litigation status update from Legal Counsel and no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lana Stoker Acting City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council October 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 29 | packed. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether limiting the largest building to 50,000 square feet would be considered. Mayor/Chair Johnson responded said limit would be contrary to what WABA requested. louncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog stated some retail stores would require more than 50,000 square feet. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the retail size does not matter; what matters is whether the tenant mix meets the requirements. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether there was a cap in the Citywide Retail Strategic Plan. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded in the negative; stated the focus has been on the quality of the tenants and design. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog stated typical Kohls stores are 75,000 square feet; 50,000 square feet might not work for Kohls; good parameters need to be set regarding the 300,000 square feet; quality retail would be needed to recoup investments made. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated the direction is that Council and the CIC would like to have the retail tenants evaluated against the table in Chapter 3 and that the matter would be brought to Council if there is deviation in the retail strategy. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese clarified that notification should be given whether or not there is deviation from the tenanting strategy. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager further stated the direction is to: 1) add the TDM Program goals, including trip reduction and a matrix to evaluate the success of the program, 2) attach the WABA MOU to the DDA, 3) discuss how to augment the TDM Program if Tinker Avenue infeasibility is declared and there is a lag; 4) tighten the language to be very clear that the process is an interactive processi 5) incorporate language designating AP&T as Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 18 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission December… | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 29 | Counci lmember deHaan stated public transportation options would be available if the project becomes all-successful. Vice Mayor Tam stated she has concerns with terms such as "being wildly successful"; transportation plans are tied to some type of trip generation or mitigation measure; inquired whether there is some way to project the development eventually have the option of spreading the impact to other development projects. The Supervising Planner responded no commitments are made in the environmental documents. Vice Mayor Tam stated her issue is nexus; linkage needs to be established between what is required of the development project and what is attributable. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated a legal nexus is not required as long as there is a contractual agreement that has been negotiated; the criteria of performance that exceeds the Performa would be more precise when staff comes back in two weeks. Mr. Marshall stated the harder part would be to define the performance standard to the TDM Program. Councilmember deHaan inquired about the measurement criteria. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the DA would reference the fact that the evaluation criteria would be developed by the Transportation Commission and Planning Board as part of the approval of the TDM Program that would be presented as part of the first development plan. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of postponing the final passage for DA 06-0003 with direction to staff to develop alternatives on modifying the development agreement to reflect discussions regarding tying the TDM Program measures to some performance objectives in terms of the pace in which the development proceeds. Mayor Johnson stated three options would come back to Council; requested that the TDM Program Coordinator make a recommendation to Council each year on the TDM Program and budget. Councilmember Matarrese requested Vice Mayor Tam to confirm that the motion is to amend DA-06-0003 to include three options to increase the TDM Program a… | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-19 | 29 | forgotten. Mayor Johnson stated the responsibility for the Meyers House was given to the Recreation and Park Department budget without funding. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Development Services could support some of the funding and training [for the Cultural Arts Program since the issue is related to economic development activity; requested staff to review the matteri further stated a shuttle service was discussed for the Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) property; it is important to set up the dynamics within the City to be able to transport individuals, particularly seniors, to shopping centers; the matter should be addressed in future development agreements, such as Alameda Point and the Northern Waterfront; he would like to have a commitment from the FISC property developer stated San Leandro's program was initiated with Measure B funding; requested that staff review San Leandro' program. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 11:31 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 18 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 19, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 29 | expenses the other way is to not fund infrastructure, as was done in the past; Council decided that the City could no longer do that [not fund infrastructurel; tough choices will need to be made. Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated that he is not overly concerned with replenishing the reserves; the reserve was built partially on the PERS bonanza that occurred in the dot. . com boom. The Finance Director stated two years had a zero percent contribution; the money was allowed to flow back into the fund balance rather than setting the money aside to be used in the future for payments. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated that his biggest concern is balancing the budget and delivering essential services; the big difference between 2002 and today is that there was not $10 billion a month of tax dollars flowing out of the economy at the federal level; tonight's discussion sets the stage for what will be a very tough fiscal environment for the foreseeable future; it is important to put on the brakes now. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired how department heads cut budgets when there are already built in increases. The Finance Department responded salary and benefits are contracted; a position can be left vacant. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated department heads are being asked to cut budgets by 1.5%; however, budgets are increasing more than 1. .5% because of fixed increases. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated Contracts are tied to salaries; the salaries are paid to people; the blunt end is either not filling the position or lay offs. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired how long the City had the 25% reserve. The Finance Director responded Council was presented with a policy for adoption in late 1997 or early 1998. Councilmember/BoardMember/Commissioner Matarrese requested a copy of said policy. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated Alameda is one of Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 15 and Redevelopment Authority and… | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 29 | possible; the crises is here. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the public is starting to understand the challenges. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions with direction provided tonight; stated that he would not reiterate all points, but summarized the following direction: 1) supplement the $300,000 [from fees) in Fire Department overtime funds with the reinstatement of the ] Golf ROI and surcharge; 2) require matching funds [of $3,800] for the Museum subsidy [and reduce the allocation by $7,500]; 3) use grants or savings to re-adjust the Tree Maintenance Program so that young trees are pruned and trees are replaced; 4) bring back information for putting aside a seed amount for the Trust Fund for Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) ; 5) bring back operational plans for sustaining services long-term; 6) look for funding to light the tennis court [proposed to be turned off]; 7) bring back the Vehicle Replacement Plan, including potential reduction in the fleet 8) bring back an analysis of increasing fire staff by two to three per shift; stated the motion includes approving the numbers presented to Council [including changes outlined in the staff report : allocation of $93,340 to the Police Department for crossing guards; use of $25,000 in Meyers Housing funding for a Recreation Leader] and adoption of resolution Establishing Guidelines for Reimbursement of Per Diem Allowance for City of Alameda Business Travel Vice Mayor/Boar Member/Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint City Council, APFA and ARRA Meeting and Annual CIC Meeting at 12:55 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk APFA and CIC Secretary The agenda for meeting this was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and 19 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commis… | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-07 | 29 | provide their comments, all of which will feed into the Draft Master Plan due on Nov 19th. Member Gilmore asked if the Nov. 19th deadline was enough time. Ms. Potter acknowledged it is aggressive time frame. Mr. Keliher said that the purpose of the public meetings was to listen and receive, and SunCal hopes to receive a number of different comments from all of the different groups, and needs to time to analyze, make changes so that these comments can be considered in developing the draft master plan. He said they are committed to 11/19 date. Member Gilmore was concerned that it's not enough time and asked if the Board and staff was opposed to an extension? Mr. Brandt supported the extension because it would mean receiving a better product. Ms. Potter agreed and requested that the mandatory milestone be modified to extend the submission of the draft master plan to Dec. 19th, 2008. Ms. Freilich requested that language should be added to protect their interest; that as long as negotiations with the Navy continue and are fruitful, SunCal would not be in default. Mr. Brandt, and stated that the City should be included as a party in the same language. Ms. Potter wanted to note that there will be a correction made to an oversight in a sentence included in the ENA, per Senior Assistant City Attorney, Donna Mooney. Chair Johnson acknowledged the notation. There were several speakers on this item: Philip Tribuzio, Alameda, spoke regarding cleanup of Alameda Point scheduled for completion in 2011, which is beyond the deadline for conveyance of the property. Arthur Lipow, Alameda, was concerned about, and against the partnership between DE Shaw and SunCal. He discussed an alternative and would like to see a public trust situation like at the Presidio. Gretchen Lipow, Alameda, discussed health and safety codes, traffic issues, and clean-up of the Alameda Point and would like more transparency in General Plan and Business Plan. Joel Ramland, Alameda, was not in favor of the agreement between SunCal & DE Shaw and discussed its … | CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 29 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that he likes the idea because it forces discipline; the City Treasurer and FSC have mentioned an obligation bond [for OPEB]; he would like an explanation if the Interim Finance Director is not comfortable with it [OPEB bond ] ; he would like to see the figures presented today compared side by side with an OPEB bond. Mayor Johnson stated other options that were explored should also be addressed when the matter returns to Council. The Interim Finance Director stated financing $75 million could be an issue. Councilmember Tam commended staff for coming up with the creative idea of leveraging the 1079/1082 plans; that she is not comfortable with the idea of a $75 million bond, which is a huge debt during a difficult time; she would urge Council to direct staff to do parallel vetting: 1) going through the validation process in the court system; and 2) going through the FSC and showing the two options [1079/1082 bond versus OPEB bond]. Mayor Johnson inquired whether said direction is acceptable. Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative; stated that he would like to see whether the risk of carrying the larger debt has benefits that might be worth considering. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she concurs with her colleagues the financing scheme takes care of the current debt; when new employees are hired, the budget would include salary and OPEB funds upfront to keep from adding to the liability. Mayor Johnson stated Council should be very clear that it has no intention of leaving the benefit the way it is now, which is not sustainable. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether $75,000 would go into the OPEB savings account when new employees are hired, to which the Interim Finance Director responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he would like to see the final projections; he has reservations there are options encouraged the Interim Finance Director to play with the numbers. Mayor Johnson stated the numbers need to be run out to see if there are big payments in… | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 29 | redevelopment areas; questioned whether all redevelopment areas would be treated the same; stated that she needs better context. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the housing allocation does not just apply to affordable units, but all allocations; the City met some allocations with Alameda Point because of job generation; the Association of Bay Area Governments did not agree with said argument. Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan stated the project in the 2600 block of Clement Avenue took a lot of liberty with the current ordinance; the building is four stories high. The Planning Services Manager stated the project is a commercial project with one housing unit within a manufacturing zone height limit; the entire area is being rezoned. (09-423 CC/ARRA) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager/Interir Executive Director to Negotiate and Execute a Contract with Environmental Science Associates for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for Alameda Point Redevelopment Project in an Amount Not to Exceed $2 Million. *** (09-424 CC / ARRA / 09-46 CIC) Councilmember / Authority Member / Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of continuing the meeting past midnight. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. *** The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated moving forward on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is important because Oakland Chinatown organizations are worried that the City is not moving forward. Councilmember/Board Member Matarrese inquired whether the City would own the EIR even though the cost of the EIR would be reimbursed by SunCal, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember/Board Member Tam stated Oakland Chinatown is urging the City to move forward with the EIR; knowing the type of project would be helpful the Council received a letter from the same group [Oakland Chinatown] asking the City not place the initiative on the Special Joint Meeting A… | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 29 | Mr. Faye stated that SunCal came to tonight's meeting in good faith and is trying to create positives; the ENA term runs through July; SunCal's intent is to move forward in a positive, transparent manner; SunCal has entered into a project labor agreement with organized labor; SunCal had hoped to use the tolling period to continue to expand the outreach of support; SunCal is prepared to lift the confidentiality under the ENA and believes that transparency is a good idea; SunCal will submit the OEA on time and will send a letter of reservation with the application; the deadline will be met; that he withdraws the request for the 60-day tolling period because Council wants to review the plan; SunCal has spent over $100,000 in order to meet the deadline to submit a meaningful application; SunCal had hoped to submit the application without a reservation letter; SunCal looks forward to a completely transparent process Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired when transparency would start and what type of documents would be released. Mr. Faye responded confidentiality provisions would be lifted immediately; stated the only exception would be business terms between SunCal and D. E. Shaw, which are proprietary and SunCal's underwriting, which is proprietary; all information going into creating the project performa would be transparent. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated residents had many questions regarding the financials and whether or not things would pencil out; that she would like to start with releasing the financials so that the public can pour through information and draw conclusions. Mr. Faye stated SunCal is committed to the transparent process; SunCal loaned an underwriter to the City for stress models; SunCal has nothing to hide; the information flow was imperfect; that he withdraws the request for the 60-day tolling period so that no action is needed tonight; the Council/Board Members/Commissioners should meet with SunCal as soon as OEA corrections are submitted; SunCal has … | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 29 | The City Attorney/Legal Counsel stated the City had one application for density bonus under State law before the City had an ordinance on the books. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated that she does not think Council thought passing the density bonus ordinance changed Measure A. Mr. Faye stated the ordinance in mid-December specifically allows a developer to submit an application that not only increases density with providing affordable housing but also grounds Council the ability to consider a waiver of Measure A, which was new. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the record needs to be very clear that the State density bonus law would have allowed the same thing; changing Measure A is not necessary; Council did not do anything in December that is different than State density bonus law; Council did not amend Measure A; amending Measure A is not necessary to use the density bonus ordinance; the State density bonus law has been in place for many years and could have been used by SunCal at any time with the same affect essentially as the City's density bonus ordinance passed in December which only reflected a few changes for Alameda. Mr. Faye stated bringing back the ordinance at the next meeting might be appropriate; that he thinks there was material changes. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the question is whether SunCal had the ability to use the density bonus ordinance before December and the answer is yes. Mr. Faye stated the answer to the question, as to whether SunCal was able to get a waiver to Measure A under the Code absent a vote of the people, changed in mid December. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the question is whether SunCal was able to get an effective change to Measure A under State density bonus law; the City Attorney/Legal Counsel would say yes; inquired whether said statement is correct. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative; stated Council would have had the obligation under State density bonus law to consider a request for a waiver of the multi-family configuration rest… | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 29 | Following the Closed Session, Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that regarding Anticipated Litigation, Council received a briefing on a matter of anticipated litigation and provided direction to Legal Counsel; and regarding Real Property, the Council and Commission received a briefing from its real property negotiator regarding potential sale of City-owned property to Warmington Homes. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 2:10 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, CIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission June 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 29 | administratively; tonight, no policy action would be taken on any of the resolutions; Council would be letting voters decide. Councilmember Gilmore stated not having the Subcommittee meet ahead of time should not have prevented staff from coming forward with the ideas prior to the eleventh hour; staff is requesting Council to take an action tonight at the last possible minute to allow the matter to go forward on the November election; staff could have brought the matter forward administratively a month or two ago; that she is not imputing any bad motive by staff; however, from a public policy standpoint, the matter appears rushed and ill-considered to be brought up at the eleventh hour. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired when would be the next window of opportunity [to address the issues]. The City Clerk responded for a General Election, two years; stated the issues could be consolidated with countywide elections. Councilmember Tam inquired whether the fire fighter initiative was relegated to November 2011. The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated the election would not be a General City election. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether putting more issues on the ballot would help cost-wise. The City Clerk responded costs would not be significantly more; stated the City would already be bearing the cost of the election. The Interim City Manager stated the only new resolution is regarding delaying the effective date of any ordinance that would require an expenditure of funds until funds are identified; the issue is something that the City should consider because initiatives spring up left and right. Councilmember Tam stated the binding arbitration resolution is new to her; the issue was not brought up when she served on the Charter Subcommittee. The Interim City Manager stated the issue has been a major discussion as long as she has been Interim City Manager; the City has an opportunity to move forward on something that would reflect the Fiscal Sustainability Committee's theme, which would allow voters to decide… | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2014-07-15.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2014-07-15 | 29 | Attachment to July 15, 2014 Regular City Council Minutes | CityCouncil/2014-07-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2015-10-20.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2015-10-20 | 29 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -OCTOBER 20, 2015- -6:00 P.M. Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5. Absent: None. Public Comment Former Councilmember Doug deHaan, Alameda, discussed the Council's recent Harbor Bay decision, which he believes will be the subject of litigation; urged the City Council not to buckle under pressure of litigation. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (15-605) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (54956.8); Property: Tidelands at Encinal Terminal, 1521 Buena Vista, Alameda, CA; City Negotiator: Andrew Thomas; Organizations Represented: State of California; Issue Under Negotiation: Real Property Negotiations Price and Terms of Payment (15-606) Conference with Labor Negotiators (54957.6); City Negotiator: Elizabeth D. Warmerdam; Employee Organizations: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local1245 (IBEW), Electric Utility Professional Association of Alameda (EUPA), Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA), Alameda Police Officers Association, Non-Sworn (PANS), Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA); Under Negotiation: Salaries and terms of employment Following the Closed Session the meeting was reconvened and the City Attorney announced that regarding Real Property, before the discussion, Vice Mayor Matarrese objected to hearing the matter in closed session; the matter was heard and direction was given to staff; and regarding Labor, direction was given to staff. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 6:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council October 20, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 29 | The Assistant City Attorney stated Costa Hawkins is silent about whether or not a cap can be done on the amount a landlord can increase the rent for a new tenant. Mayor Spencer stated the landlord representative indicated Civil Code Section 1946 prevents a new tenant from being charged more than the previous tenant. The Assistant City Attorney stated there seems to be disagreement about the Civil Code section. Mayor Spencer stated the landlords made the offer; questioned why the City would not do so. The Assistant City Attorney stated the representative's application of the section is broader than what he feels comfortable with. Councilmember Daysog stated the matter should be further researched; the City's legal expert needs to feel comfortable. The Assistant City Attorney stated there are no cases on the issue; since the matter will be coming back, there can be further discussion about whether or not there needs to be a cap for new tenants. Mayor Spencer stated that she wants something. Councilmember Oddie stated there has to be something. Mayor Spencer stated preventing an increase is a deterrent; no cause evictions cannot be used to double rent for the new tenant. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the matter is the root of the problem. The Community Development Director inquired whether Council wants to allow no cause evictions but require the rent for the new tenant to be exactly the equivalent of the existing tenant. Mayor Spencer responded the landlord representative stated rent would not be more than the prior tenant's rent. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry whether the amount would be the rent paid by the prior tenant plus the allowable maximum, the City Attorney stated the City does not have an allowable maximum at this point. Mayor Spencer questioned why the City would not leave the amount the same as the prior tenant. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 29 January 5, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-02 | 29 | The Assistant City Attorney responded the current way the ordinance is written is the tenants can exchange staying a month for a month less in relocation assistance. The Community Development Director stated direction from Council is needed if there would be an exemption for mom and pop landlords. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that tenants need cash to relocate; to leave it up to tenants and landlords to work out on their own is not fair; she agrees with the staff recommendation. Mayor Spencer inquired if Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft is requesting to leave it the tenant's choice, which is what the ordinance currently states, to which Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie stated if a landlord is willing to give up the income by taking the unit off the market, they can afford to pay relocation fees; mom and pops violate the rules too and the City has to protect all tenants. Councilmember Daysog stated that most mom and pops are good landlords and the City should recognize that; he would like the small mom and pop landlords exempted from the relocation benefit or given consideration where time is given. Vice Mayor Matarrese concerned with Councilmember Daysog; stated the distinction of mom and pop landlords needs to be defined; the issue should be subject to mediation to allow for a combination of finance and time and worked out on a case by case basis. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council has heard that people are afraid to go to the RRAC; she would like to give the staff recommendation a year to see if it works. Mayor Spencer stated she, Councilmember Oddie, and Councilmember Ezzy Ashcarft are in agreement with staff's recommendation. The Community Development Director requested Council direction on the issue of no cap for rent increases; stated the cap was set for when a landlord has to initiate the RRAC process at 5%. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there was no discussion on the issue; she agrees the 5% threshold is reasonable. Councilmember Daysog inquired w… | CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 29 | Councilmember Oddie inquired whether decisions could be appealed to Council. The Assistant City Attorney responded there is a separate hearing officer process; the citation procedure will go to a hearing officer who will determine if the violation occurred and the hearing officer can use discretion when imposing a fine. Mayor Spencer stated that she agrees with staff's proposal. Councilmember Oddie stated that he agrees with staff's proposal. Mayor Spencer inquired what "garden cottage" refers to, to which the Community Development Director responded that it implies a smaller or second unit in someone's backyard. Mayor Spencer stated that she agrees with staff's recommendation; a means test would be a substantial change. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a means test would add further complications with administering the program; the amount of rent someone is paying for the unit they are living in is like a means test; the condition of the units is relative to what they pay. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of continuing the meeting to the next regular scheduled Council meeting. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog and Matarrese - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 3. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated it is important to address everyone's needs; she feels the ordinance addresses the needs of both groups; an annual review will be done that will provide valuable data and modifications can be made as needed; the City is not doing rent control; complaints about Victorian properties being expensive to maintain can be brought to the RRAC and the RRAC can review costs and possibly grant the request, so landlords should go to the RRAC to increase over 5%; landlords have been given no cause evictions with a provision to also protect tenants with the relocation benefits; sunset provision is fair; in 3 years, the City Council could come back and revisit the issue; read Section 6-58.85 regarding committee hearing and… | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-11-01.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2016-11-01 | 29 | Councilmember Oddie stated the matter can be addressed at the priority setting work session; the possible benefits to the community should be contemplated and discussed at the priority setting work session. Mayor Spencer requested clarification on the referral process; stated the referral is done to decide whether staff should review the matter; the priority setting work session is to determine where within the priorities the matter will be placed; her preference would be to vote on whether or not Council wants to hear the matter as a referral. Councilmember Oddie stated he is okay with reviewing the issue at the priority setting work session. Mayor Spencer moved approval of hearing the matter. Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether Councilmember Oddie would accept a friendly amendment to the referral to accept controls and regulations in residential areas. Councilmember Oddie responded in the affirmative, including the possible use of taxation. Mayor Spencer stated she assumed said matters would be included in the review. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he would not want the City of Alameda to rush into the issue; he would want to look at other cities to see how the issue could work in the City of Alameda. Vice Mayor Matarrese inquired whether the Council should wait to see if the proposition passes in the November election there could be the absence of regulation and law; inquired will the City be governed by what is in the State code. The City Attorney responded the City of Alameda protected itself to maintain control. Councilmember Oddie stated the underlying principle is to look at other cities to see what Alameda can do better. On the call for the question, motion carried by the following voice vote: Councilmember Oddie, Vice Mayor Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 3. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. Abstention: Councilmember Daysog - 1. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (16-581) Vice Mayor Matarrese pointed out highlights of the AC Transit/City of Alameda … | CityCouncil/2016-11-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2017-06-06 | 29 | The City Manager responded staff could go after grants and return mid-cycle or mid- year when money is set aside; the license plate readers at the bridges are also not included in the current budget and will be brought back to Council. Mayor/Chair Spencer inquired whether staff has a list of the items that will not be funded. The City Manager responded the list is not in the presentation. Mayor/Chair Spencer inquired whether there is a plan to purchase the license plate readers. The Police Chief responded the matter would proceed as soon as some budget savings are realized, which will most likely be in September or October. The City Manager noted savings would be from salary savings. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie requested clarification regarding the OPEB trust fund; inquired whether the $6.043 million transfer is included in the budget. The Finance Director responded $6.043 million is shown as a reserve; stated in the 2017-18 budget the amount is shown as appropriation so that the funds could be wired over to a trust depending on the allocation being proposed. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie inquired why the OPEB trust fund increased by so much and is projected to increase in the future. The Finance Director responded the public safety contracts include a provision that in January 2016 the City would contribute funds, plus employee contributions and estimated interest increase the amount. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie inquired what the expected amount will be in the combined OPEB/PARS trust accounts. The Finance Director responded for OPEB, there will be an additional $3 million contributed, plus normal contributions required by the contract. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie inquired whether the $3 million is coming from the $6 million set aside the previous year. The Finance Director responded $6 million was set aside in 2015. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie inquired whether $11.3 million will be set aside for OPEB. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 3 to the Community Impro… | CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 29 | Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there is commitment to have an analysis on September 5th; what would the steps be if the City decides it wants an ordinance to lift the ban on cannabis. The City Manager responded staff envisioned bringing questions to Council at the September 5th Council meeting to help draft an ordinance; Council needs to address issues regarding whether retail dispensaries will be separate from cultivation, setbacks from schools and zoning. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the ordinance could be drafted by October 3rd and the second reading by October 17th. The City Manager responded the timing depends on Council's direction on September 5th. stated taxation can only go on the November 5th, 2018 ballot; the City is already discussing the issue with consultants and testing the language for the November 2018 ballot; staff will have the information to Council in September. Councilmember Oddie stated his preference is to get the ordinance drafted as soon as possible; all options should be evaluated. The City Manager noted the original referral includes all the options; stated the current referral is more specific to dispensaries. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the request for the type of ownership could be part of the analysis that returns to Council; and whether the City could incentivize local ownership. The City Manager responded said option will be discussed on September 5th; stated an option could be to allow two permits on the Island and have a criteria process; Council can direct staff. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether staff will return with all of the questions that need to be addressed. The City Manager responded the questions will address future regulations. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether analysis could be done on onsite consumption. The City Manager responded onsite consumption is not on the list; stated she will add it. Councilmember Oddie stated revenue is an important factor. The City Manager stated there are two revenue sources: a cost recovery recouped from t… | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 29 | Stated that he supports the proposal because it supports the maritime industry: Dan Morrison, Starlight Marine Services. Stated Alameda Landing has created a lot of jobs for people in Alameda; the project will create a lot of jobs; urged Council to adopt the ordinance: Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative. Stated that she is concerned with the lack of universal design in the proposal: Beth Kenny, Alameda. Stated the housing can be a mix for families, seniors and single residents; the site creates unique opportunities for bike and pedestrian access; he would like to preserve surface space to have flexibility in the future; urged Council to approve the project: Brian McGuire, BikeWalk Alameda. Urged Council to approve the project: Rich Krinks, Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese stated he would like to ensure that the required 50% commercial/industrial use actually happens; the amendment should include language to require that Bay Ship & Yacht, or a maritime commercial occupant, occupies 50% in a limited period of time otherwise the amendment is void; a senior component should be included in the 400 housing units; stated affordable by design is meaningless. Vice Mayor Vella stated there is a public benefit to constructing housing; the easements in the project provide a substantial benefit to alleviate traffic; requested clarification about whether the easements include surface streets. The Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Vella suggested working with the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA) on the water taxi; stated that she has concerns about the universal design aspect; she would like the units to be 100% universal design; visit-ability issues should be worked on; there should be conversations with the Committee on Disability Issues to ensure it is behind the project; inquired where Bay Ship & Yacht currently stands. Alan Cameron, Bay Ship & Yacht, responded they have funding, are ready to go, and are waiting for the property to close. Mayor Spencer inqu… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 29 | The City Manager made brief comments. Mike Meyer and Craig Hill, NHA Advisors, reviewed the recommendation in the Power Point. Mayor Spencer inquired whether surplus means reserves. The City Manager responded the $2 million is a budget line item. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the $2 million being a budget line item means the $2 million will not end up in reserves but will be spent. The City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the City is reducing the cost, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated over time, there is a significant savings from not having to pay CalPERS. Mr. Meyer stated over 15 years, close to $60 million will be saved. Vice Mayor Vella inquired what will happen in the event of an economic downturn and there is not $2 million in reserves; will there be layoffs. The City Manager responded there is a mid-cycle and mid-year review of the budget; stated the Council could decide whether or not to include the $2 million in every budget. Vice Mayor Vella inquired if the ask will occur with each budget cycle or is there a proposal to draft a resolution to make the decision now. The City Manager responded the goal is to include the amount in the budget for Council consideration. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the recommendation would be made if there is a surplus. The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated prepaying saves twice as much long term. Vice Mayor Vella stated $8 million is going to retiree costs, which are $265 million; there is $100 million in Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB); she understood the trust was created to deal with both OPEB and retiree costs. Mr. Meyer responded in the affirmative; stated the $8 million is dedicated to pension costs. Councilmember Oddie inquired why the City decided not to put anything into OPEB. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 7, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-03-06.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2018-03-06 | 29 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC) TUESDAY--MARCH 6, 2018- -6:59 P.M. Mayor/Chair Spencer convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor/Chair Spencer - 5. Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Spencer announced the Financial Statements [paragraph no. 18-108 CC/18-06 SACIC was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*18-107 CC/18-05 SACIC) Minutes of the Joint City Council and SACIC Meeting Held on February 6, 2018. Approved. (18-108 CC/18-06 SACIC) Recommendation to Accept the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Audited Financial Statements and Compliance Reports. The City Auditor made comments regarding liabilities that will be in upcoming Financial Statements; urged caution on future budgets. Mayor/Chair Spencer requested clarification on the amount of the unfunded pension liabilities. The City Auditor responded the net pension liabilities is $227,324,871 Other Post- Employment Benefits (OPEB) is $39,668,326. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission March 6, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-03-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-04-17.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2018-04-17 | 29 | like to establish a protocol and practice for the review and have it be transparent. Vice Mayor Vella moved approval of directing staff to look at adopting the sample ordinance for a Sanctuary City contracting and investment ordinance and come back with an analysis of the proposed ordinance. Councilmember Member Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (18-242) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced she attended the League of California Cities Housing and Community Economic Development Statewide Policy Committee meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:05 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 25 April 17, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-04-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 29 | The Acting City Manager inquired what Mayor Spencer is asking for an end date. Mayor Spencer stated that she would prefer an end date or transparency by adding "in perpetuity." The Acting Assistant City Manager stated the language includes: "until ended by voters." Councilmember Matarrese stated said language is pretty clear to him. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of calling the question. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested discussion. Councilmember Matarrese stated there has been a call for the question and a second. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: No. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. On the call for the question on the original motion, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: No. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. Following Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's comments, Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmembers cannot continue speaking after a motion to call the question is approved. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the vote must be taken and Council has to move on. Mayor Spencer inquired what should be done and whether she should hit the gavel when a Councilmember continues to speak, to which the City Attorney responded the Mayor should do so. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (18-345) The Acting City Manager reviewed the list of Council's priorities from the work plan discussion held on May 18th; made an announcement regarding recent power outages, Alameda Municipal Power's (AMP's) new customer portal, AMP being recognized for its buy green program, and AMP cohosting a meeting on solar on June 13th Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 29 June 5, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 29 | seawall at some point. The Assistant Community Development Director responded there could be a massive failure from an earthquake, a broken water pipe generating pressure and tipping over the wall, or other scenarios. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, the Assistant Community Development Director reviewed the land owned by the City and outlined potential issues if the development is not approved, including access and funding improvements. Mayor Spencer inquired the cost of the needed improvements, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded $20 to $25 million; outlined improvements being done as part of the project phasing. Mayor Spencer inquired whether boaters might not be able to use the seawall at some point. The Assistant Community Development Director responded there is a serious problem if the developer does not fix the seawall; any failure would be the City's problem; the City would have to find the money to fix the seawall; if the seawall fails, having the marina continue would be extremely difficult. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to make a motion. Mayor Spencer stated that she agrees with Councilmember Matarrese regarding the green space and elimination of art studios in the commercial core; she wants to leave the 50/50 rental/homeowner split. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese would like to eliminate the industrial artist studios, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded he would clarify in the motion. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Master Plan [introduction of the ordinance], with the following: 1) amendments one through five listed on the handout provided by Planning staff dated July 10, 2018; 2) a policy that says in the maritime commercial core only maritime commercial activities will be permitted; and Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to specifically exclude Councilmember Matarrese continued the motion: to specifically exclude the two items that were flagged on page 48; and 3) re-designate the 1,900 squa… | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-24.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-24 | 29 | Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (18-451) Michael Moon, CCA East Bay, discussed diversity and suggested there be greater diversity on Boards and Commissions. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (18-452) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Historical Advisory Board, Planning Board, Public Utilities Board, Social Service Human Relations Board and Transportation Commission. Mayor Spencer nominated Jennifer Wit for appointment to the HAB and Marsha Broquedis and Asheshh Saheba for appointment to the Planning Board. (18-453) Councilmember Oddie expressed concern over some of the reprehensible rhetoric being heard, which Councilmembers have a duty to denounce; no one asks him where he was born and how long he has lived here, which they ask Vice Mayor Vella; discussed micro-aggression, which is a sign of racism. Mayor Spencer stated that she is the first Hispanic Mayor of the City; googling her name comes up with derogatory comments; she supports the reduction of derogatory comments against all Councilmembers. (18-454) Councilmember Matarrese stated the Council has discussed other means of helping people stay housed; Kamala Harris has introduced a Rent Relief Act for Californians; hopefully, the City will follow up and provide support; someone paying more than 30% of their taxable income on rent, including utilities, would be eligible. Mayor Spencer stated the City might have already supported the Act. Councilmember Oddie stated if the matter does not fall under the legislative agenda, it should be brought back. ADJOURNMENT (18-455) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:24 a.m. in memory of Nia Wilson. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 25 July 24, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-07-24.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2018-10-16 | 29 | (18-593) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Library Board, Planning Board and Social Service Human Relations Board. Not heard. (18-594) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she participated in two walk-and-roll- to-school days at both Wood Middle School and Franklin Elementary School. Mayor Spencer stated she participated in one at Otis Elementary. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 11:22 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 26 October 16, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-03-19.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2019-03-19 | 29 | Vice Mayor Knox White made brief comments. Councilmember Vella inquired whether workshop A and B are able to be agendized to allow other Councilmembers to attend. The Interim City Attorney responded a member of Council may attend, but not participate in a subcommittee meeting. Councilmember Vella inquired whether she would be able to ask questions. The Interim City Attorney responded in the negative; stated if a Councilmember would like to participate, the meeting should be noticed in a timely manner to be properly agendized. The City Clerk stated a 7-day notice is required to allow the entire Council to attend and speak. Councilmember Oddie stated there are many items that Councilmembers would like to weigh-in on; expressed concern about attending a workshop without proper preparation. Vice Mayor Knox White stated the goal of bringing the item is to gain input on topics of interest and the process. Councilmember Oddie stated mid-April is only 3 weeks away, and may not be enough time to produce changes that can be vetted by the community. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that her direction was to go through the City Charter in detail; discussed items that are not currently included in the Charter. Councilmember Daysog stated the items he has suggested have political legitimacy; limiting the topics was not discussed; outlined his priorities for Charter updates. Councilmember Vella stated there should be more discussion about topics; suggested the item be continued to a future meeting. The City Clerk noted Elections Code 1415 prohibits employment issues from being on the March election and the City would have to pay to participate in the election. Councilmember Oddie discussed the Charter provision deemed to be vague and unclear. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if the item may be continued to April 2, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative. (19-182) February 2019 Topic Brief on Climate Action and Embodied Emissions. [Informational Only] (Councilmember Oddie) Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 25 March 19, 20… | CityCouncil/2019-03-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2019-07-16 | 29 | Councilmember Oddie expressed support for the higher range fee and being above 50%; stated a backup plan is needed; the fund is essentially depleted; the Climate Emergency cannot be delayed. Vice Mayor Knox White stated Councilmember Oddie makes a compelling argument for why Council should ask for the higher end of the range. Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation with the $78 fee. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated 250 responses were gathered from roughly 2,900; usually 600 responses are needed for 90-95% certainty; expressed concern over the margin of error. The Public Works Director stated the surveys were mailed to nearly 12,000 people; 2,200 responses were received; discussed tenants who are registered voters, having a lower response rate with a higher margin of error. Councilmember Daysog outlined Census American Community Survey (ACS) procedure; expressed concern for the higher range fee; expressed support for the smaller $45 fee; stated specific apartment complexes only pay $289 for the entire parcel for hospital tax, which is unfair. Councilmember Vella expressed support for the higher fee and putting a vote forward; stated every voter matters regardless if they own property or not. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes: Councilmember Daysog - 1. (19-448) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-2.B (Zoning Regulations) to Define "Animal Shelter" and Section 30-4.10 (Zoning Regulations) to Add Animal Shelter and Supervised Outdoor Animal Runs as Uses Requiring a Use Permit within the C-M (Commercial Manufacturing) Zoning District. Introduced. Councilmember Vella moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether a public hearing must be opened. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired … | CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 29 | City Council Workshop Workshop Report Management Partners Disagree with the recommendation/don't attack the "messenger": When dealing with a difficult issue at a council meeting, it can be tempting to not only disagree with the recommendation being presented, but also to challenge/ discredit the manager or staff member presenting the recommendation. The best practice is to focus your comments on the recommendation, not the individual Having a policy discussion devolve into a personal attack is uncomfortable and embarrassing to everyone involved. Even if you are frustrated by the recommendation, it is poor form to attack the presenter. If you do have concerns regarding how a recommendation was developed or presented, that should be provided privately to the manager. P.S.: Don't play "stump the staff" by trying to ask questions at the meeting that you think staff will have difficulty answering on the spot. It doesn't really make you look smarter, nor is it helpful to the deliberations to ask a question that cannot be answered. While staff members should work diligently to anticipate questions, it is not possible to anticipate all possible questions. If you really want the answer, get the question answered before the meeting or provide a heads up regarding what you will be asking. Conduct yourself at council meetings in a professional/businesslike manner: Even on very controversial topics with greatly varying opinions, the council deliberation can be and should be "businesslike" and professional. While it may be more entertaining (possibly from a reality TV perspective) to see councilmembers and citizens yelling and having temper tantrums, it gets in the way of thoughtful deliberations and only tends to lower the respect for the council and city in the eyes of your constituents. Consider the use of council team-building and goal-setting workshops: Recognizing the importance of both effective councilmember/councilmember and council/city manager working relationships, often an investment of time in team- building work… | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2020-03-03 | 29 | questioned funding for other projects; stated the cost of the project is unknown; the project could be cost prohibitive. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the direction to hire a consultant could be postponed until the mid-cycle budget. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would like staff to draft an RFP requiring minor modifications; the cost of a consultant may be within the approval of the City Manager. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern for taking items outside of the budget process. Councilmember Oddie expressed concern for the delay in DePave Park development. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the July timeline included the consultant completing work or being selected Councilmember Oddie responded selected; stated the consultant will issue and RFP, respondents will return with proposals and a selection will be made by Council. The City Manager requested clarification on RFP timing and budget. The Recreation and Parks Director stated that she does not know the budget for a consultant; the consultant cost for the pool master plan was roughly $68,000; the project could have a similar cost; she is unclear on the requested timeframe; City staff typically issues the RFP; funding is identified prior to issuing an RFP; the RFP process will require the correct kind of consultant; an RFP responded are due in about a month; an interview panel is selected and a contract must be drafted; the process is roughly three months long. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether September would be a reasonable time to return with bids and a budget request. The City Manager stated that the Recreation and Parks Director can include the request in the mid-cycle budget for consideration. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would like the RFP issued. Councilmember Vella expressed concern about delaying DePave Park. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated direction to staff can include the consultant cost in the mid- cycle budget for consideration; noted that the timeline for the project is tight. Councilmember Oddie expressed support for an RFP deadline… | CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2020-05-19 | 29 | (20-343) Councilmember Oddie moved approval of hearing the remaining items on the regular agenda without a time-limit; stated that he does not know the amount of public comment on remaining items. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to complete the current item and move to the regular meeting agenda including the consent calendar and regular agenda items. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for hearing the entire regular meeting agenda. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is not willing to go past midnight; requested a friendly amendment to hear the balance of the agenda and finish by midnight. Councilmember Daysog expressed support for hearing the agenda and finishing the meeting by midnight; stated there have been previous issues about late meetings; questioned whether the public is served by Council making decisions at 12:15 a.m. Councilmember Oddie stated that he will do his best to speak briefly. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will not support a motion unless the meeting ends at midnight. Councilmember Daysog expressed support. Councilmember Oddie stated Council speaking time should be cut from 9 to 3 minutes. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the current item requires more than 3 minutes. Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for the motion amendment with the commitment to complete the West Midway Project team selection item [paragraph no. 20-334 on the regular agenda; stated should the time reach midnight and team selection item is not complete, the expectation is to complete the item. Councilmember Vella noted the Council Referral was cut off during a previous Council Communication; stated the item is timely; expressed concern about further delaying the item; stated the item should be short. Councilmember Oddie made a substitute motion to approve hearing all items, speaking quickly, finishing by midnight and any items not finished will be continued to tomorrow's 7:00 p.m. meeting continuation. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the mo… | CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-06-02.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2020-06-02 | 29 | The Chief Assistant City Attorney stated staff can either have the discussion with the OGC first or staff can bring proposed language back to Council to address Councilmember Vella's concerns. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the allotted time for Council discussion has passed. Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of continuing the matter to the next Council meeting. Councilmember Oddie expressed support for the item being placed at the beginning of the next meeting. Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a Council Referral may be placed at the beginning of an agenda. The City Attorney stated Council may continue the item to 6:59 p.m. at the next Council meeting. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 12:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 16 June 2, 2020 | CityCouncil/2020-06-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 29 | Councilmember Daysog inquired whether Greenway is amenable to card check should it be requested. The City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Vella moved approval of the staff recommendation, provided the two provisions of COVID-19 and card check neutrality language are added to the agreement. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft recessed the special meeting at 10:20 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 11:19 p.m. *** (20-541) Recommendation to: 1) Accept the City Manager's Report on Plans to Appoint a Steering Committee and; 2) Provide Further Feedback and Input on Staff's Work to Engage the Community in the Development of Options on the Future of Policing in the City of Alameda and Developing Work Plans to Address the Following Topics: A. Unbundling Services Currently Delivered by the Police Department; B. a Review of Police Department Policies and Practices; C. Police Department Accountability and Oversight; D. A Review of Laws that Criminalize Survival; and E. Systemic and Community Racism/Anti-Racism The Assistant City Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Vella stated there has been much deliberation on committee structure and concern about the committee selection process; stated it is difficult to figure out who is involved or the outcomes; Council must surrender to the community-led process and allow for as much input as possible; expressed support for individuals who are not always leading conversations to be framing the conversations. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to see a robust ability to email City management and indicate interest; expressed support for the selection being made by people of Color as opposed to staff advising City management; expressed support for new involvement in the process. Vice Mayor Knox White stated the key aspect of Brown Act bodies is notification and e… | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 29 | with a policy that focuses on safety related citations. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated citations are given out for street cleaning violations; blocking driveways or parking in front of fire hydrants; there is also not paying the meter; she would like to hear back from staff; if the City is going to have meters, people need to park far or pay; she would not want to ask the Police not to enforce the law; she would like clarification; a clear message should be sent to the Police Department; there should be opportunities on ways to address penalties or an educational component. Councilmember Knox White stated the motion was for traffic enforcement, not parking enforcement; parking citations are issued by separate employees; he does not see parking enforcement as part of the conversation; he agrees with writing citations for parking problems. The City Clerk stated the motion is to direct staff to identify traffic enforcement policy focusing on safety related and diversion issues and working with the Transportation Commission; reporting back on UBI, catalytic converters and anything else to avoid crimes; while the Review Committee will take time, staff can review some other implementation; and one addition. Councilmember Knox White stated the addition was legislation for catalytic converters; regarding the Review Committee, staff should bring back a report to Council on how they would proposed to move forward. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the Interim Police Chief would be part of the staff looking into matters, to which Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Councilmember Knox White responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Daysog stated the first part of the motion is really about traffic; he and Councilmember Herrera Spencer were addressing vehicles whether moving or not, he would like to amend the motion to state vehicles, not just traffic; the City has ordinances implicated in the topic of criminalization of poverty that are vehicle related; it … | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-06-15 | 29 | Not heard. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-431) Consider Adoption of Resolution Supporting the Goal of Reaching 100% Zero Emission Vehicle Sales in California by 2030. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft) Not heard. (21-432) Considering Having an Introduction and Update from the New Police Chief regarding Strategies to Address Crimes. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-433) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-434) Consider Directing Staff to Publically Share Information on Parking Recreational Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-435) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate Regular Meeting Alameda City Council June 15, 2021 20 | CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 29 | Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, All Zones." Adopted. Councilmember Daysog recused himself and left the dais. The Management Analyst gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.] (21-457) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution of Intent to Prepare a Housing Element Update for the Period 2023-2031 that Maximizes the Use of City- Owned Land at Alameda Point and Encinal Terminals and Rezones Certain Sites and Districts to Permit Multifamily Housing and Residential Densities of at Least 30 Units per Acre Contrary to City Charter Article 26. Not adopted; and (21-457 A) Consider Directing Staff to File an Appeal of the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation. The Planning, Building, and Transportation Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Knox White inquired whether there is a policy for adopting the plan to use Multi-Family (MF) overlay zoning or whether the use is enforced by statement. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded staff understands that the MF overlay must be used in order to comply with state law; stated staff would like to know whether Council would not like to pursue the strategy of using MF overlay, as used in the past two Housing Elements; staff cannot wait to adjust the strategy; staff would like to ensure Council understands and agrees that staff should pursue the same approach as the previous two cycles. Councilmember Knox White stated that he is not sure he sees the breakdown provided by staff in the resolution provided by Councilmember Herrera Spencer. Councilmember Daysog stated the City already has an MF overlay; the approach is not new in terms of meeting State obligations; inquired whether the City is contemplating a new zoning code or category; he underst… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 29 | reading of the ordinance, including the minor adjustment; stated including the direction is clearer than hoping the direction is remembered. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the proposed change will still constitute a first reading. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the language should be captured properly; recommended modified language be included under Subsection f. of 30-98.10; the section discusses City Manager expenditures; staff can add language to reflect the Council be notified of any City Manager expenditure approvals. Councilmember Knox White inquired whether the expenditure is made as soon as it is approved by the City Manager; noted that his interest is future Councilmembers have the ability to Call for Review any potentially offensive installations prior to expenditure and installation; inquired whether there is a section prior to City Manager approval where the language can be placed or whether a waiting period of five to 10 days post- approval can be added. The City Manager responded that he has included a similar structure for matters other than public art; stated that he can inform Council 10 days prior to approving the purchase; the notice will state the City Manager intends to approve a purchase; if Council wishes to appeal the approval, an appeal can be provided within the 10 day time period; if an appeal be received within the ten day period, the expenditure will not be approved and the matter will be brought to Council. Councilmember Knox White expressed support for the City Manager recommendation. The Economic Development Manager inquired whether Council would like to be informed of any minor changes or expenditures. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about Councilmember Knox White's proposal; inquired whether the goal is to have Council be informed of art installations and be apprised of any concerns raised by neighbors. Councilmember Knox White responded the matter might become too complicated to compile a list of things to review; stated Council should b… | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 29 | some point. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the benefit is offered to all employees of the City of Alameda, to which the Human Resources Director responded the benefit has been negotiated and offered to Public Safety employees. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she has concerns about the proposal at the policy level; bringing outside people in for the highest level positions, which works for other agencies, chips away and somehow reduces the benefit of long-term employees; the lifetime medical benefit is only offered to public safety and is extremely expensive; there is a significant amount of other post-employment benefits (OPEB), which the medical coverage falls under; she will not be supporting the matter; most people do not receive lifetime medical benefits; continuing to lower the bar of who the benefit is offered to is a problem. Councilmember Daysog stated that he can understand making changes for the head positions; he is not convinced the changes should be for the Assistant or Deputy positions; the City should be encouraging people to grow through the ranks, rather than slotting people from outside into the higher positions; he understands why the packages are needed in order to recruit for top positions. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the matter is for the Fire Chief. The Human Resources Director responded in the affirmative; stated the matter provides service credit for someone being hired at the top position; the benefit only applies to someone coming from the outside to be the Fire or Police Chief in order to provide credit for time served in another agency as an Assistant or Deputy. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the position would need to be equivalent, not lateral and is a move up in position. The City Manager stated the resolution needs to be changed in order to reflect the recommendation of the credit only being provided if the employee had a similar type of benefits from another agency; the City Manager recommendation includes the employee only receiving credit if they … | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-21.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-21 | 29 | (21-601) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-602) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints Limiting Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. (21-603) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023-2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (21-604) Councilmember Knox White discussed City Council and School Board Subcommittee meeting; stated the School District has been meeting with Alameda County about pushing back closing Emma Hood pool due to COVID-19; the current closure is set for January; it is unclear whether the County is receptive; Encinal High School is looking to put up flood lights to have backup nighttime use of the Encinal High School pool; there is forward motion on the shared use agreement that allows the City to use Encinal High School pool for community swimming during the day; the matter should come before Council by the end of the year; announced a $290 million bond being placed on the ballot in June; discussed an AFS contract with the School District; announced 73% of students are vaccinated as of the previous week. (21-605) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement about a ribbon cutting for a new apartment building at Alameda Point; stated the units are all market rate and are helping to fund the 25% affordable units; discussed the last of the "Starlight Movies in the Park" event put on by the Recreation and Parks Department; stated that she attended a beach cleanup at South Shore Beach. ADJOURNMENT (21-606) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 12:03 a.m. in memory of Nick Bianchi. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City… | CityCouncil/2021-09-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-10-19.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-10-19 | 29 | Subcommittee. (21-672) Councilmember Daysog noted AC Transit will have cameras and be able to issue fines for cars parked in bus stops; announced that he attended the First Tee event at the Chuck Corica Golf Course. (21-673) Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she attended the Italian Heritage Festival parade in San Francisco; announced an upcoming Airport Noise Forum meeting; expressed concern about the letter to the County supporting the Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District [paragraph no. 21-660 being added to the agenda. (21-674) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended Walk and Roll to School Day at Wood Middle School and the Fire Chief swearing in ceremony. Councilmember Herrera Spencer announced that she also attended both the Walk and Roll to School Day and the Fire Chief swearing in ceremony. ADJOURNMENT (21-675) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 28 October 19, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-10-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 29 | believes that he has found shortcomings in the contract presented; he is putting trust in City staff listening to Council comments and concerns in order to strengthen the contract; the opportunity is rare and will quickly address the homeless crisis; the City is able to do something it was unable to previously do by using ARPA funds; however, the contract must be strengthened; expressed support for the matter; stated Alameda Point will be better in having a mixed community. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she will not be supporting the motion; it is unfortunate that the City is not providing public outreach in advance of approving the program; the community is already mixed; legitimate concerns have been raised; neighbors needed to have been involved in the process before the matter came to Council. Vice Mayor Vella restated her motion to approve moving forward with the staff recommendation [including adoption of the resolution] with direction to staff to change the contract language and have more than one community meeting; amended her motion to include removal of funding for the vehicle. Councilmember Daysog accepted the amendment to the motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. (21-755) Workshop to Review and Comment on the Draft Housing Element Update to Accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the Period 2023-2031 in Compliance with State Law. Continued to November 30, 2021. (21-756) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report, and Adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Measures and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the General Plan Amendment to Update the Alameda General Plan; and (21-756 A) Adoption of Resolution Adopting Alameda General Plan 2040. Continued to November 30, 2021. (21-757) Recommendation … | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2022-02-01 | 29 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 18, 2022- -5:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:02 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella arrived at 5:34 p.m. The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. Consent Calendar: (22-037) Recommendation to approve Eric Levitt, City Manager, Nico Procos, Alameda Municipal Power General Manager, Erin Smith, Public Works Director, Alan Cohen, Assistant City Attorney, and Alan Harbottle, Senior Energy Resources Analyst, as Designated Negotiators with NextEra Energy Resources Related to Doolittle Landfill. Not heard. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (22-038) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code 54956.8); Property: 11-Acre Portion of the 33.2-Acre Doolittle Landfill Sire Located Northwest of the Intersection of Doolittle Drive and Harbor Bay Parkway. Not heard. (22-039) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9); Case Name: City of Alameda V. All Persons Interested in the Matter of the Issuance and Sale of One or More Series of Pension Obligation Bonds to Refinance Outstanding Obligations of the City of Alameda to the California Public Employees' Retirement Law, and All Proceedings Leading Thereto, Including the Adoption of a Resolution and Sale of Such Bonds, Alameda County Taxpayers' Association, Steve Slauson, and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association; Court: Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case Number: 21CV001157. (22-040) Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation, Initiation of Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, subsection (d)(4)); Number of Cases: One (As Plaintiff - City Initiating Legal Action); Potential Defendant(s): Alameda Point Partners, LLC. (22-041) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8); Property: Alameda Point, Site A, Al… | CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,29 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 29 | but outcomes; stated that he would like to add direction to staff to develop a memorandum that outlines the meaning and specifics of AFFH in Alameda; many southern California cities HE were not certified in the first or second round; the bar is set high; expressed support for the City submitting a certified HE; stated the City can point to what is being done to AFFH, rather than forcing HCD and the community to read through the document and try to pick up what is being done to address fair housing and historical inequities; many people do not want to leave their home; if failed housing policies continue in California, people who cannot afford to live in the area will be pushed into other States; people who have grown up in California and have California values do not necessarily want to live under more stringent and conservative regimes which do not recognize and honor people the same as California; policy makers are responsible if cities lose people due to unaffordability; the City needs to be looking towards the future, not just at the economy and climate, but in caring for each other and making sure future generations can live in the area. Councilmember Daysog stated each Councilmember must do their best to represent the values and visions which are best for the City and its residents; he believes the City must do the minimum amount necessary to meet the State requirements; the City can continue to do so within the framework of City Charter Article 26 by following through and continuing the housing overlay strategy signed off on by HCD in the previous HE; he suspects HCD will sign off on the strategy once again; there are new concerns related to AFFH; however, the City should figure out how to meet the requirements within the context of Measure A; discussed the 2020 election results; stated the message put forth was understood by Alamedans; Alameda is an Island and has limited infrastructure; it is difficult to meet the RHNA requirement of 5,300 units; he would rather not be required to produce so many units; … | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2017-04-12.pdf,29 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2017-04-12 | 29 | ITEM 2-B COMMISSION ON DISABILITY ISSUES MEETING MINUTES OF Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:30 p.m. Beth Kenny: Are there any other announcements? Then I move that we adjourn. Jenny Linton: Second. Beth Kenny: I think everybody seconded that. [laughter] We're all in favor. The meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kerry Parker City Staff Liaison Commission on Disability Issues 05/24/17 Page 29 of 29 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2017-04-12.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf,29 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-05-09 | 29 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MUTES OF Wednesday May 9, 2018 6:30 p.m. contact me or Victoria. I think just contact me and I'll make sure that you get all the details so that you can be on there. The other thing is, we did all this work to move the schedule to the odd months of the year, not knowing that the Transportation Commission, which normally has their meeting on the fourth Wednesday of the month, doesn't like to do that in November because it interferes with Thanksgiving. So they moved it to the second Wednesday of the month, before we got it. And when I pointed that out, they said, "You're going to have to move yours." So you need to think about when you want to have it in November. And you can't act on it now because it's not an agenda item. But take a look at your calendars and see if you want to have it on the first or third Wednesday of the month for November, or just skip it, because we will have had enough meetings. So just keep that in mind for. Do you want me to put it on agenda item for next month? Beth Kenny: Yes. We can vote about that. Thank you very much. Lisa Hall: I just want to say something as far as Paratransit, I forgot. I guess it was Victoria that gave us the pink application for Paratransit and her business cards. So we had a whole pile that we gave out on Tuesday at the food bank. And I only put one at a time because many of the people come and just take one. But this made the people ask and it was wonderful. I said, "It's open to everyone that is a senior or disabled," and boom, it was like, "Oh, my dad, or my mom, or me," and it was like, "There you go". And I was like, "This is Here you go." So getting the word out again, a little more for people, so it was good. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS Beth Kenny: Okay, that actually brings us to agenda item number seven, announcements. Commissioner Brillinger. Arnold Brillinger: Okay. Lisa, were those the schedules that you had? Lisa Hall: No, they were the actual applications. We have the schedules too, but the actual pink application that they h… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-07-11.pdf,29 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-07-11 | 29 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday July 11, 2018 6:30 p.m. I sent an email asking about if facade moneys could be used to make entrances more accessible, and they said, no. It's got to be used for making it look more beautiful. I'm sorry, but we might be able to find some other grants, so that we could push for ADA grants to make entrances more accessible. Chair Beth Kenny: Thank you, Laurie. I spoke with Linda Asberry, who is head of the West Alameda Business Association, and she's actually on that Facade Grants Program. She's part of the people who approve who gets the facade grants. So she might be a good person to just figure out how they got the facade grants going in the first place, and instead of facade grants, we can have accessibility grants. Vice Chair Jenn Barrett: Yes, that's a great idea. Chair Beth Kenny: And she is also very interested in the program that you're putting together. Vice Chair Jenn Barrett: Great. Do you have our email? Chair Beth Kenny: I do. Vice Chair Jenn Barrett: Okay, that'll be great. Chair Beth Kenny: I'll shoot that over to you. Vice Chair Jenn Barrett: Thank you so much. Chair Beth Kenny: Sure. Laurie Kozisek: Okay, That's all I had. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chair Beth Kenny: Thank you very much. If there are no other announcements 8. ADJOURNMENT Chair Beth Kenny: I'd like to adjourn our meeting. 09/12/18 Page 29 of 29 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-07-11.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf,29 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-11-28 | 29 | ITEM 2-A COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, November 28, 2018, 6:30 PM Arnold Brillinger: Now see, I'm going to have to go back and find out because I don't remember where it was that I saw it. Laurie Kozisek: Okay, do take a look at it again. There should be a number on it or something, so that you can see who the issuing person was, and their CASp number. Arnold Brillinger: I don't think it was signed, or that it had anything on there. Well, let me find out. I'll give you a call and let you check it out. Because I thought it was kind of interesting because I thought, "Oh, the group is working on this and here's somebody's order, or whatever. " But I don't think it looked like that. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Right. No, so that's something that you can pay for to have a certified accessibility inspector come in and look into your facility. Separate, more intensive than this program. This is more of a free encouragement. That's more of a compliance-based. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Okay. We'll move on to number six, staff communications. Laurie Kozisek: Thank you, Madam Chairman. The only thing I have to present is that I got an email today from someone who was ejected out of a restaurant because she had a service animal, which rather surprised her. So you might want to consider looking into service animals and educating people on what's a service animal as opposed to an emotional support animal or therapy animal or whatever, and add that to your education of businesses. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Right. Yeah, that's a huge item. Thank you for bringing that up, and I think that's something that we should definitely look into. You see it on the news a lot recently, and it's definitely illegal to eject someone who has a service animal. So it's sad to hear that that's happening in Alameda if that was the case. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Item seven, any announcements? Commissioner Brillinger? Arnold Brillinger: The other day I was going down Park Street again,… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf |
OpenGovernmentCommission/2015-02-02.pdf,29 | OpenGovernmentCommission | 2015-02-02 | 29 | Commissioner Dieter stated the Commission was provided a full copy of the Sunshine Ordinance; having the complete Sunshine Ordinance include redlines would be easier to follow versus going back and forth; when there is a redline suggested including a notation, such as moved to versus deleted in its entirety; the City Council would also really appreciate knowing what has been deleted and what has just been rearranged. In response to Commissioner Bonta's inquiry regarding the meeting date, the City Clerk responded the meeting could be held May 4th Commissioner Bonta inquired whether the meeting have to be held on the first Monday, to which the City Clerk responded the Council Chambers are available the first Monday; that she could check availability for other dates. The Commission agreed to hold the next meeting March 30th. Commissioner Dieter addressed the minutes; inquired whether new agenda items could be on a new line; stated it was extremely difficult to read a new line item at the end of the previous line on the current minutes; if the Commission is discussing a particular Section, have it start on a new line; even the agenda item itself could be listed; in this particular one, there was no explanation for potential revisions; in the future, suggested copying and pasting from the agenda into the minutes so the public would know what the actual agenda item was. The City Clerk inquired whether Commission Dieter is asking for example: "3-C Potential Revisions to the City Sunshine Ordinance," to which Commissioner Dieter responded in the affirmative. The City Clerk stated it [the agenda title] is always carried over. Commissioner Dieter stated on the minutes we just approved they were not there. The City Clerk responded it was there. Commissioner Dieter stated that she would show the City Clerk after the meeting. Vice Chair Foreman inquired how Commissioners can add things to the agenda; inquired who does the agenda. The City Clerk responded the City Attorney's Office and City Clerk's office staff the Commission … | OpenGovernmentCommission/2015-02-02.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,29 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 29 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,29 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 29 | Pri Courte 1-6 at Coine: Lonnia Camalo pickle We, the ball undersigned. coll on the City of Alameda and APPD Leydecker pars courts looking into courts since the Longfellow courts are already home to picide ball. We request the city and ARPD loak into other solutions for the picide ball demand and we also request to drop the consider ation to converting court 14 or any of the tennie courts at WAPA. Krusi or into alter Apm and moeting an all the higher demand for tennis courts that has also occurred this year. The wait timer to play tennis at WAPA, Krusi, Leydecker are excessive during the weeiddays College of Alameda, Navel weokende. base The courte, existing tennis courts are not enough to meet this demand for tennis courts currently in Alameda Tennis courts currently not being used: AHS EHS Full name Postcode Email address Signature Afroakhan 94536 atroz Khann segnal Pathan sero Zom after Larry Carter 94602 Bill Griffith 94501 bebopbillehotmail.com By Kern hey 94607 Kevmnoame@yahoo.com Ve Ken Fegel 94501 Ken@katad.com KotutAde 9450) the Permany Trink 94557 phining trink 9 wait con pl Due TIEN NOUVEN 94501 ticnusa65@gmail.com here GREa SORRELL 94501 Tazal Hannah Miller 94501 hwbanana@mi.com like Olesia Kruglov 94501 Olesia Krugloregualican or hard 94602 laurenblauchardampe A grail MarineTam 94602 wash.ingtan883@gmail.com am MT Robillin 94501 rob.currton1@gmail.com pll Published and promoted by the Alameda Happy Tennis Group at Fairfield Tennis Complex When completo, please return to: The Alamada Happy Tenns Group at Tennis Complex or enall directly to For mare nio plense jein tur Fanabook Group to - which or share invith | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );