pages
18,746 rows sorted by page descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
date (date) >30 ✖
- 2019-12-18 45
- 2018-07-10 38
- 2017-07-05 37
- 2017-07-18 36
- 2012-06-06 35
- 2018-05-09 35
- 2019-09-12 35
- 2020-07-21 35
- 2021-03-11 35
- 2021-03-16 35
- 2021-07-06 35
- 2021-09-07 35
- 2021-11-16 35
- 2005-05-17 34
- 2006-12-05 34
- 2007-01-02 34
- 2010-06-15 34
- 2010-07-27 34
- 2016-01-05 34
- 2016-02-16 34
- 2017-11-07 34
- 2018-06-05 34
- 2021-07-20 34
- 2005-07-19 33
- 2020-05-19 33
- 2007-12-04 32
- 2009-10-20 32
- 2010-04-20 32
- 2016-02-02 32
- 2016-03-01 32
- …
Link | body | date | page ▲ | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,35 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 35 | Council. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated signatures must be gathered by 6:00 p.m. tomorrow; inquired whether the subcommittee thought of any community signers or assumed it would be the Councilmembers. Councilmember Matarrese responded since the issue is about good government, he was hoping to have the entire Council sign the argument; stated it does not matter which side of the question you are on; Ordinance 3148 has things that are impossibly wrong to put in the Charter and require an election to fix; as State law changes, the City has to adapt. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft suggested Laura Thomas be the fifth signer. Councilmember Matarrese suggested the argument be left in the Clerk's office for anyone to sign. The Clerk stated there is a limit of five signers. *** Mayor Spencer called a recess at 9:11 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:22 p.m. The City Clerk outlined the options to determine who will sign: defer the decision to the subcommittee; have only four Councilmembers sign; have four Councilmembers sign and one other person sign, which would require Council to decide how to select the other person. Councilmember Oddie stated that he is happy to let the subcommittee decide who they want as the fifth person or if they even want a fifth person. Councilmember Matarrese stated said suggestion is fine with him. Vice Mayor Vella stated the subcommittee's preference was to have the Council sign; she is open to hearing other Councilmember's preferences. Mayor Spencer stated Councilmember Oddie suggested having the subcommittee discuss whether or not to have a fifth person sign. Councilmember Oddie stated four Councilmembers will sign and the subcommittee can decide whether or not a fifth person would sign and who that would be. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Vella expressed support. Councilmember Oddie moved approval [of having the four Councilmembers sign and the subcommittee decide about a fifth signature]. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 3 July 10, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,35 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 35 | Councilmember Daysog expressed support for a process which actively notices and engages the public. Vice Mayor Knox White stated direction and non-action is being asked of Council; that he does not support the current direction. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to see what the proposed process yields. Councilmember Oddie expressed support for the proposed process. (20-544) Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether the next item would be continued. The City Manager responded Council should decide an alternate date to continue the item; the meeting Saturday is set to be seven hours long; expressed concern for adding more time to the discussion. *** (20-545) Councilmember Vella moved approval of continuing the meeting until 12:40 a.m. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** Following a brief discussion about timing, Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of continuing the special 7:02 p.m. meeting to Tuesday, July 28th at 5:00 p.m. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** ADJOURNMENT (20-546) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 12:38 a.m. in memory of Congressman John Lewis. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 13 July 21, 2020 | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,35 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 35 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC) TUESDAY--MARCH 16, 2021-6:59 - P.M. Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:02 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner Herrera Spencer led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Knox White moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*21-151 CC/21-06 SACIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission (SACIC) Meeting Held on February 2, 2021. Approved. (*21- CC/21-07 SACIC) Recommendation to Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2020. Accepted. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 1 to the Community Improvement Commission March 16, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,35 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 35 | the mainland in an earthquake should destroy Alameda's bridges and tubes; and 3) Transportation & Infrastructure: Alameda is an island with limited ingress and egress and water supply transported from pipelines on the mainland. Unlike many East Bay cities, Alameda lacks direct access to BART within their borders. Councilmember Daysog stated that his friendly amendment to ground 1 is to place a comma at the end while adding: recognizing that the City of Alameda has adopted the Density Bonus law and the multi-family housing overlay to meet State law regarding multi-family housing and RHNA obligations." Councilmember Knox White stated Density Bonus should be omitted as it is not allowed to be used in the RHNA determinations; mentioning the matter in the appeal will only confuse things and appear like the City does not know what it is doing. Councilmember Daysog stated Density Bonus law is at the heart of modifying Measure A; the Density Bonus has two components, one of which is regulatory and allows a project to be free from Measure A, and the second is a quantitative formula; the Density Bonus allows projects to be free from Measure A. Councilmember Knox White stated Council adopted a multi-family overlay to get around the State regulations; the Density Bonus law allows the City to go above the multi-family overlay; RHNA and Housing Element law do not allow the City to use the Density Bonus to achieve RHNA numbers; the letter appealing the allocation is not going to look sincere or authoritative when including things which show that the law is not understood. Councilmember Daysog stated every time a project proponent wants to build multi- family housing project, a Density Bonus trigger must first be pulled; the part of the Density Bonus trigger being pulled speaks to getting relief from the regulatory local regimes which constrict affordable housing; the second part consists of a mathematical formula which can increase the number of units; the Density Bonus law is a critical part of the City meeting the affordable … | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,35 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 35 | can be attractive and will be a great example; it is important for the City to practice what it preaches; the City should be voluntarily conserving water; she supports the City Manager's recommendation; inquired how much input the Historic Advisory Board (HAB) should have in putting in drought-friendly landscaping; stated that she is having trouble understanding the need for input from HAB if staff is running up against a deadline to apply for funds; she understands landscaping can be part of a historic property's character; expressed concern over delays since it is a time-sensitive matter. The Public Works Director responded that she has consulted with HAB staff in the Planning, Building and Transportation Department; stated staff recommended the matter be heard by HAB; staff would like more direction on whether Council desires one or many sites to be selected; there is value in hiring a single design contractor to design multiple sites and provide the same EBMUD application; staff can move forward with the design and return to Council to appropriate funds for design; by the construction is ready to move forward, staff can return to Council by mid-year for approval of construction on all or some sites. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the proposed approach allows staff to still apply for the $15,000 per project. The Public Works Director responded staff will have to work with EBMUD partners; should staff have designs and applications in by the end of the rebate, EBMUD will likely be able to work with the City. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for more information being provided in relation to the role played by HAB in the matter; inquired whether a vote from Council is needed or whether direction to staff is sufficient. The Public Works Director responded direction to staff is sufficient; stated staff will move forward with the design for the lawn conversions; inquired whether Councilmembers are on board for the smart irrigation products as well; stated the products will include a budget amendment in or… | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,35 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 35 | Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 16, 2021 24 | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,35 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 35 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,35 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 35 | Preserve Courts 1-6 at Fairfield Tennis Complex We the undersagned call on the City of Alameda and ARPD to drop the consideration to converting court #4 or any of the tennio courts at WAPA Kruni or Leydecket park courts into pickle ball courts unce the Longlellow courts are atready home to piokie ball We request the city and AAPD look into other solutions for the picide ball derrand und we also requent logking into meeting the higher demand for tennis courts thut has algn occurted this year The ward times to play ternis at WAPA, Knust 1 eydecker are excessive during the after 4pm and on all weekends The existing tevinus courts are not enough to ment this demand for tennut courto currentiy in Alameda Tonnic courts currently net AIS FHS College of Alameda Navel base courts Full name Postcode Email address Signature Nathan ket 94501 Nather Kest Giacomo ratesic 94501 gjacomocratesic.com m Noah Walters 94501 noahmwalters@gmail.com brdele Erdene Zohaya 94501 Zolco.uso@gmail.com 2.30uro IREEDHI Enottuushin 94501 TREED4E@gmail.com say Mike Mar tm 94502 mmlhomeey@gmail.com vitate Kevin Kanungulk 94502 Kit. - 8c chatarill her SHE KZ WAI SLAGOL Kenzluid Yahov.com B May 1 ee 94602 maylee882@yahoo.com MS. Claia Lai 94706 cls Christia Velasquez 50312 quitinav5@gmail.com a G RICH KRINKS 94502 Rist. Rella Teshare Diluly 94618 takay Published and promoted by the Alameda Happy Tennis Group al Faurbeld Tennis Comptex When complete. péease retum to The Alarbeda Happy Group at Faurfield Complex email directly to beth ARPD@alamedaca gov For more info plesar nut Facebook Group whw year - - was result for come what | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 34 | resolution and give direction to staff to continue negotiations, to which Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative. The Development Services Director stated staff would continue to talk to the owner about acquiring the property; staff has attempted to talk to the owner and has not had success. Chair Johnson stated it appears the owner is now willing to talk and the City should enter into discussions if the owner is willing. The Development Services Director stated the City has been working on the project for many years; a Request for Proposals (RFP ) for redevelopment of the project was sent to the owner in December 2000; the owner sent a letter in January 2001 which thanked the City for sending the RFP and stated: "the owner's desire is to wholeheartedly endorse the City's effort to locate a developer to redevelop the Alameda Theatre; staff has been proceeding on said basis for sometime; the DDA does not pre-commit the condemnation action; staff has always intended and hoped to acquire the property amicably; noted the property owner did not object at the CEQA hearings or DDA adoption. Commissioner Matarrese requested staff to comment on the claim of defects in the appraisal. Legal Counsel responded the Commission's action is not predicated on the joint appraisal; staff has full faith and confidence in the appraisal upon which the action is being based. Commissioner Matarrese stated the project is important; the City has an opportunity to save the Alameda Theatre; the City should continue negotiating with the owner. Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Chair Johnson inquired whether Commissioner Matarrese would amend the motion to include approval of direction to continue negotiations. Commissioner Matarrese agreed to amend the motion to include direction to continue to negotiate [with Mr. Cocores]. Chair Johnson stated negotiations should continue if the owner is willing the owner has indicated a willingness to continue to negotiate; the City hopes to resolve the matter by agreement ; hopef… | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 34 | the Executive Director to Enter Into a New Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation for the Sale and Development of Certain Real Property at the FISC.' Adopted. Commissioner Daysog moved adoption of the resolution incorporating amendments made prior to the meeting. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-076B CIC) Recommendation to approve a Memorandum of Agreement regarding sources of repayment by and among the CIC, Palmtree Acquisition Development Corporation and FOCIL-BP, LLC documenting the sources of repayment to FOCIL pursuant to the Bayport DD. Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the Memorandum of Understanding. Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 1:07 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 23 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission December 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 34 | The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated that she would apply the formula specified in the draft Navy term sheet to the project to see what the land payment would be. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether the base project is the Measure A compliant plan and whether the density bonus option is higher; further inquired whether the two ranges would be analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded project alternatives have not been analyzed, but staff is close to finalizing a project description; stated the project description includes the base project and density bonus option; staff is studying two build-out scenarios. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated one hybrid project is being analyzed; inquired whether the base project and hybrid project would be analyzed when the Navy term sheet is developed in accordance with the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded staff has not started negotiations on the modified OEA; stated staff has significant concerns with the project pro forma, and does not want to enter into land payment negotiations with the Navy; that she assumes that final term sheet negotiations would be based upon the density bonus option project because SunCal wants to build said project. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated that she recalls receiving an email inviting Council, the Interim City Manager, and the Deputy City Manager - Development Services to some type of outreach with the Navy; subsequently, the Interim City Manager sent an email reminding Council that a Council subcommittee was formed; inquired whether the subcommittee ever met with the Navy and the Pentagon is unclear; inquired whether the staff report asserts that SunCal may be in breach of the Agreement because of what may have been a meeting with the Department of Defense that included the Navy. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the… | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 34 | Councilmember Gilmore stated staff should take a reasonable amount of time; that she would like to see a full blown discussion on the full range of options and include the public; she has heard options that include a public land trust which seems to be diametrically opposed to things discussed tonight; that she does not want to give specific direction to start down one path and limit options. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Preliminary Development Concept (PDC) and SunCal plans have had commonalities; the core is very common and could be developed; the marketplace should be reviewed. Councilmember Tam stated that her preference is to give direction on finding a funding stream and getting a project that is fundable as opposed to trying to decide the project direction. Vice Mayor deHaan stated funding streams are extremely important; developing large parcels could create funding streams; understanding the overall project is important. Councilmember Tam stated the City had a master developer, Alameda Point Community Partners, who lost financing; another developer has looked at a potential maximum build out of over 4,000 units; staff came back with negative rates of return; inquired whether Vice Mayor deHaan thinks there is some magic fundable project, to which Vice Mayor deHaan responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated Council couldn't provide specific direction tonight; options need to be reviewed; giving specific direction on component parts would be a mistake. The Interim City Manager inquired whether the direction is to include Council Referral items, but not limit the options, to which Mayor Johnson responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese stated staff should consider the items and come back in September or October. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he does not see anything revolutionary in the Council Referral. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants the broadest possible point as long as the Council Referral items are included. Councilmember Gilmore stated nobody wants financial analysis; … | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 34 | the landlord about whether to provide time versus money or a combination. Councilmember Daysog stated that his suggestion is an exemption. Mayor Spencer inquired where the Council is on length of tenancy. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded that she likes what the ordinance says. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he is afraid that tying the benefit to length of tenancy will encourage landlords to get rid of tenants sooner. Mayor Spencer concurred. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the suggestion is to have a flat amount for everybody, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the amount of time would be four months, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 34 January 5, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 34 | The Community Development Director listed the factors that have been called out to be considered by the RRAC. Councilmember Daysog stated a question has been raised by small mom and pop landlords about the inability to distribute costs in similar ways to larger apartments. The Community Development Director stated economies of scale would be an appropriate factor for the RRAC to consider; the property owner could state they have a limited number of units across which they could spread their costs. Councilmember Daysog inquired how costs are treated, in particular, whether the treatment of relocation costs is fixed or scalable; inquired whether Section 6-58.150 Required Payment of Relocation Fee has a scalability to it in which the RRAC can adjust accordingly. The Community Development Director responded the RRAC only deals with rent increases; stated the RRAC does not deal with the amount of relocation benefits to be paid which is a separate issue; the formula is tied to the tenants' length of tenure. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the person who provides the arbitrator would decide how much relocation benefits the tenant receives. The Community Development Director responded that the hearing officer and RRAC only deal with rent increases, not evictions and relocation benefits; stated the recommendation sets the relocation benefits which will not need to be interpreted by anyone; the amount is tied to the tenure of the tenant and spelled out in the ordinance. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether no one who would scale the relocation benefits separate from the formula that is in place in Section 6-58.150; stated what brought the City to this point has been the egregious acts of larger apartments; in the last two years, of the 40 cases that have come before the RRAC, 33 are large apartments. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of exempting rental units of 5 units or less from the relocation benefits requirements; having a relocation benefits assistance formula for 6 to 10 units, and lowering relocation assi… | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 34 | Mayor Spencer stated she toured the facility and encouraged the Center to participate in a run to benefit Midway Shelter. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:32 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 33 July 5, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 34 | together on the water taxi service; she would like Catellus to join the Citywide TMA; she will support the project. *** Mayor Spencer called a recess at 2:25 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 2:41 a.m. Mr. Marshall stated the deal will not close until the end of the year due to some due diligence items that need to be cleaned up; Catellus can commit to the maritime component. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether part of the ordinance can read: "there will be no building permits issued for residential until the commercial component is consummated." Mr. Marshall responded he would like the word consummated defined. Councilmember Matarrese stated consummated means purchased and guaranteed. Mr. Marshall stated there can be no guarantee after the purchase. The City Manager responded the attorneys are trying to draft language for the ordinance first reading tonight; she would like the language to be very clear before the vote at the second reading. Margo Bradish, Catellus Legal Counsel, read the language: "No building permit for residential use in the residential subarea shall be issued until the maritime commercial land is conveyed to a developer or user for use consistent with the permitted uses authorized in the maritime commercial subarea of the maritime commercial residential variant of the Master Plan." Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance amending the Bayport Alameda Landing Master Plan as amended. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consent to Partial Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) - Waterfront); and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Operating Memorandum for the Development Agreement consistent with the Term Sheet. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which car… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 34 | The City Clerk inquired whether the request is to post the standard language to allow Council to attend, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer requested that the Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) be included. (17-681) Councilmember Oddie stated the Alameda Hospital has settled with one insurance company. Mayor Spencer noted another insurance still is not being accepted. (17-682) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination to the Planning Board. Mayor Spencer nominated Sylvia Gibson for appointment to the Planning Board. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 3:19 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 34 November 7, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 34 | Mayor Spencer stated that she does not plan on hearing her referrals as a professional courtesy to the Vice Mayor who is in a time zone three hours later; both matters would come back at the next Council meeting. (18-349) Consider Directing Staff to Prioritize Efforts to Increase Safety and Reduce Crime. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer) COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (18-350) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Civil Service Board (CSB), Commission on Disabilities (CD), Golf Commission (GC), Historical Advisory Board (HAB), Housing Authority Board of Commissioners (HABOC), Library Board (LB), Planning Board (PB), Public Utilities Board (PUB), Recreation and Parks Commission (RPC), Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB) and Transportation Commission (TC). Mayor Spencer nominated Robert Barde and Marguerite Malloy for appointment to the CSB; Elizabeth Kenny and Leslie Morrison to the CD; Edward Downing to the GC; Alvin Lau to the HAB; Bachi Hadid, Sandra Kay, and Stuart Rickard to the (HABOC); Amber Bales to the LB; and Audrey Hyman and Sherice Youngblood to the SSHRB. (18-351) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding a community discussion on guns; noted that everyone did well with the timing system. (18-352) Councilmember Oddie announced that he and the Mayor participated in a gun violence rally at Lincoln Middle School. (18-353) Councilmember Matarrese made an announcement regarding attending the Association of Bay Area Government general assembly. Mayor Spencer noted that she was also in attendance. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 11:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 34 June 5, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 34 | the Charter amendment came shortly after: Eric Strimling, Alameda Renters Coalition. Councilmember Oddie stated the authors did a great job. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Aschraft's inquiry regarding changing the word, Councilmember Matarrese stated the word "fixes" is easily understood and was chosen because it is universally understood; the ordinance needs administrative changes, which is a fix; he thinks the word should stand. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she was trying to limit the number of syllables per word and keep sentences short and concise. Councilmember Oddie moved approval [of the argument language]. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated that she should not vote on the argument since she is not going to be one of the signatories. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Abstain. Ayes: 4. Abstention: 1. The City Clerk stated the next decision is who is going to sign the argument. Vice Mayor Vella inquired why Mayor Spencer is not going to sign the argument. Mayor Spencer responded at this point, she does not plan to oppose it; she does not support this part, so she is abstaining. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Mayor Spencer wants the ordinance in the Charter, to which Mayor Spencer responded that she has not decided; stated at this point, she does not plan to take a position; she may end up supporting putting the ordinance in the Charter; she continues to support the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC); she believes the Council did very good work on the ordinance; her concern is three Councilmembers could seriously change the work that was done. Vice Mayor Vella stated putting the ordinance in the Charter makes it harder to make minor changes; the Council has spent a tremendous amount of time trying to address the needs of the community. Mayor Spencer stated that she would be h… | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 34 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING NEDNESDAY--DECEMBEI - - 18, 2019--4:00 P.M. (19-719) The special closed session meeting was cancelled. Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 18, 2019 | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 34 | Vice Mayor Knox White expressed concern about the subcommittee not being a Brown Act body; stated there is an exception to noticing; committees can have subcommittees without violating the Brown Act; setting up a process, which is intended to be public and transparent, allows the ability to bring the entire community in; it should not be set up to have meetings that are unclear without notice; the process is problematic; expressed concern about the delay in creating a subcommittee, community objectives and goals and a work plan; stated the process does not seem to be moving forward; expressed concern about recommendations being received before the budget presentation in October; stated the steering committee process will take time; Council needs to be clear about direction provided and the scope of work; the matter is related to policing, not systemic racism in the entire community; expressed support for Council providing specific guidelines, expectations and timelines; questioned the dynamic of the September check-in; stated that he would like a commitment to the steering committee; the process feels like it is starting over and he will not be able to support it without a commitment to an open and transparent process. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated one of the subcommittees will address systemic and community racism and anti-racism. Councilmember Vella outlined resources which go into publicly agendized meetings; stated the intent is not to have a non-transparent process; the process will quickly fall apart if the City ends up with a process that does not include publicly agendized meetings, opportunities for community input and information is not clear; Council always has the ability to agendize items; noted the discussion centers around the selection process; expressed support for Council not dictating the goal; stated it is important for the community to goal-set and allow for a transparent process with the most meetings possible; many other jurisdictions have had informal meetings to receive input; the City must … | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 34 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY--MARCH 16, 2021-6:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 6:02 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (21-150) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9); Number of Cases: One (As Defendant - City Exposure to Legal Action); Claim Number: (2021- 0009/GHC0033180) Potential Plaintiffs: Greenway Golf Associates, Inc. Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that regarding Anticipated Litigation, staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 3. Noes: 2; the case involves a claim filed by Greenway contending that the lack of an events center at the Corica Park Golf Course has/will produce damages to Greenway in the range of $15 million to $50 million; the City has contended that plain wording of the contracts at the Park, both Greenway's and Jim's, do not provide for third party beneficiaries, thus Greenway has no right to assert such a claim against the City; nonetheless, in the interest of avoiding unnecessary litigation and to support a negotiated solution by Greenway and Jim's on the Course, the Council authorized the City Attorney to settle the pending claim by obtaining full releases for the City in exchange for the City's future consent of Jim's relinquishing and transferring certain food and beverage service rights at Corica Park to Greenway. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine… | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 34 | staff time will be spent on the matter; she does not like taking frivolous actions however, she understands the need for clarity. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not support an appeal; she appreciates the uniqueness of the City being an island, however, the "uniqueness club" is not an exclusive one, and there are cities up and down the state arguing a different uniqueness; the reason HCD has rules put forth is due to cities not meeting obligations to provide housing; the housing crisis continues to worsen; outlined housing project delays and expenses; she would prefer Council look for solutions; HCD will not let the housing allocations slide; HCD will take the unused portion of housing allocation and place it upon another city; allocation appeals can be made from other cities onto Alameda and can cause a slippery slope; the grounds for an appeal are not strong; outlined previous arguments presented by other cities; she is surprised and disappointed in the majority support for filing an appeal. Councilmember Herrera Spencer questioned whether Councilmember Knox White included portions of the City being infilled by the San Francisco Bay and are more vulnerable to seismic events and liquefaction. Councilmember Daysog stated the appeal will be strengthened with a number included for the allocation; the last few allocations have been set at roughly 1,730 units; the new allocation is set at roughly 5,300; expressed support for splitting the difference and setting the units at 2,650 which is substantially above previous the 1,733 allocation; expressed support for the allocation appeal request being set at 2,650. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the remaining units will be sent to a named- specific city. Councilmember Daysog responded the remaining units are not his responsibility; stated the state will be responsible for finding where the remaining units will go; his responsibility is to specify a number of units which Alameda can bear; proposed a friendly amendment to the motion of setting the allocation a… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 34 | Not heard. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Not heard. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-510) Consider Adoption of Resolution Supporting the Goal of Reaching 100% Zero Emission Vehicle Sales in California by 2030. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft) Not heard. (21-511) Considering Having an Introduction and Update from the New Police Chief regarding Strategies to Address Crimes. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-512) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-513) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-514) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Not heard. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 20, 2021 27 | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 34 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the information related to savings and changes; stated that she supports the smart irrigation at $100,000, which pays for itself in a short amount of time; she has concerns over the $2.3 million budget request. Councilmember Daysog inquired the location of the 36,000 square feet of lawn being replaced at Washington Park. The Recreation and Parks Director responded the area is a smattering of smaller locations; stated the areas are landscaped areas not generally used by the public; small areas near the front by the park sign, on Central Avenue, lower Washington near the tennis courts and a mix of other decorative areas, which are mostly close to the street. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the reason Lincoln and Franklin Parks are not included in the installation of rain sensitive smart irrigation clocks is due to already having the existing technology. The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated any parks not listed for the rain sensitive clocks already have the clocks installed; staff has tried to install a couple clocks each year in various parks. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she wants to make sure any vote or discussion related to Washington Park occurs separately in order to allow for her recusal; she is happy to see the matter come forward; the City has gone through several droughts in her time as Councilmember; it is important for the City to do its part; expressed support for the City Hall proposal; stated there is an opportunity for the City to do its part and lead by example; the money is out there and the City has a lot it can do; she would like to ensure the City is taking on only things that it can handle and not over-exerting itself in order to meet the end-of-year deadline; the issue will be ongoing; she is sure funding will continue; expressed support. Councilmember Knox White inquired the reason for waiting on the matter until now; stated Council about the drought in March; the drought will be continuing; expressed… | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 34 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-762) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-763) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-764) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-765) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints Limiting Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. (21-766) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023- 2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. (21-767) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing. (Councilmembers Herrera Spencer and Daysog) Not heard. (21-768) Consider Reviewing and Updating the Previous City Council's Priorities at a Regular City Council Meeting. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (21-769) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed an upcoming community Thanksgiving dinner at Christ Church. (21-770) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended the 80th anniversary of the Flying Tigers at the USS Hornet. (21-771) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a briefing on the Howard Terminal ballpark proposal; stated that she attended a ribbon cutting for the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) mobile adoption center; discussed a Veterans Day Commemoration event; announced door-to- door vaccine outreach by Alameda High School's leadership class; discussed Scouting for Food, Starbucks grand opening and Signal Coffee Roasters ribbon cutting events. ADJOURNMENT (21-772) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeti… | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,34 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 34 | e - 200 - - - sa - - - - no - ta - - - - - - - - - DE a | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,34 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 34 | Jasty 71411 to Len SAnches 94611 hin Janchas@Gmail to 100 kunio NAHK 94506 KNAHBO@Gmail.com 4 Luu ASTARY 94566 bsa Claire Rubin 94611 clauresnobin@gmail.com SR John Ruben 94611 John-rusin@ Comcastine TR | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 33 | appraiser, Mike Dunn, was jointly retained by the City and Cocores and came up with a value of $3.7 million; the appraisal the City is using is over a year old; for a jointly hired appraiser to come up with $3. 7 million and the City to disregard the offer and use a year old appraisal that is less than half of the jointly appraised value is fundamentally flawed; secondly, the City has not followed the adopted owner participation rules required by law; the rules specify that the City will give preference to property owners within the project area, which has not occurred; the City allowed Cocores to jointly pay for an appraisal and took half of the $25,000 price for a feasibility study in 1996 that has been shelved; the City has been willing to take Cocores's money in partnership, but has not continued to follow through with any owner participation rules; the third problem is that the City claims the justification for the public use of the project is remediation of blight the area is not blighted; the blight findings are unfounded and not supported by the evidence; additionally, there is evidence that the outcome of the hearing is predetermined; news articles indicate the City has commissioned construction reports and studies and committed itself contractually towards the condemnation and project; the City is conducting a sham hearing and is committed to going forward with the project; requested adoption of the resolution be delayed for a couple of meetings to allow the City to re-engage Mr. Cocores on the fair market value issue; stated City staff offered $2.5 million to Mr. Cocores at one point and even offered $3 million if structured as $2 million upfront and $1 million over a period of years; similar negotiations could continue if the resolution is delayed; if not, the City will face a right to take challenge; good faith negotiations seem to have terminated but could be restarted; additional evidence of predetermination is the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) that has been entered into with a develo… | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 33 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -JULY 19, 2005- -6:55 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Joint Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-341/05-035CIC ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, and City of Alameda V. Alameda Belt Line. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Council/Commission obtained briefing from the City Attorney/Legal Counsel. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 7:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 33 | Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote 5. (06-599G CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Development Agreement DA-06-004 By and Between the City of Alameda and the Palmtree Acquisition Corporation Governing the Development of Up To 300 Housing Units. Introduced. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance incorporating amendments made at the meeting. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote. ( 106-599H CC) Resolution No. 14050, "Approving and Authorizing Execution of (1) an Amendment of the Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus Development Corporation) FOCIL-BP, LLC and Bayport Alameda Associates, LLC for the Sale and Development of Certain Real Property at the Fleet Industrial Supply Center ("FISC" ) and the East Housing Portion of the Naval Air Station; and (2) a New Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus Development Corporation) FOCIL-BP, LLC and Bayport Alameda Associates, LLC for the Sale and Development of Certain Real Property at the FISC. Adopted. Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution incorporating amendments made prior to the meeting. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-076A CIC) Resolution No. 06-149, "Approving a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project and 1) Adopting Findings of Fact Regarding Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, 2) Adopting Findings of Fact Concerning Alternatives, 3) Adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, 4) Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, 5) Authorizing the Executive Director to Amend the Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to the Catellus Development Corporation) FOCIL-BP, LLC and Bayport Alameda Associates, LLC for … | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 33 | CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATION (10-306 CC/ARRA/10-44 CIC) Semimonthly Update on SunCal Negotiations The Deputy City Manager - Development Services provided a handout and gave a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether Stan Brown, SunCal, was here to speak or answer questions, to which Mr. Brown responded to answer questions. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated a lot of people would like to see the former Naval Base cleaned up; inquired whether SunCal is phone banking. Mr. Brown responded in the affirmative; stated SunCal has been contacting supporters; SunCal is urging supporters to let the Council/Board Members/Commissioners know that there is broad support. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether SunCal is intending to clean up the former Naval Base. Mr. Brown responded in the negative; stated the intent of the communication is for supporters to express continued support. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the communication is coming from SunCal staff, to which Mr. Brown responded the communication is coming from a consultant hired by SunCal. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired what is the name of the consultant, to which Mr. Brown responded he does not know. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the transcript and consultant's name could be provided, to which Mr. Brown responded in the affirmative. Speakers: Jon Spangler, Alameda; William Smith, Alameda. (10-307 CC/ARRA/10-45 CIC) Status Report of Finalized Navy Term Sheet Mandatory Milestone pursuant to Exclusive Negotiating Agreement Section 4.2.2. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated $108 million would have provided the Navy with profit participation when the housing market was hot and was calculated based upon far less units than what is in the Optional Entitlement Agreement (OEA); requested that future analysis project 5,000 units i… | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 33 | Councilmember Gilmore stated that she agrees with a lot of the points made tonight; Council needs to take a deep breath; staff should look at a broad set of options and bring the matter back to Council for discussion so the public can come forward and provide ideas; that she has heard several different ideas from the public; some of the ideas do not include jobs or housing; Council should be very deliberate and listen to the public; encouraged the public to contact Council or staff with preferred options. Councilmember Tam stated that she concurs with Councilmember Gilmore's and Mayor Johnson's comments; she feels that the wheel has been reinvented right after the wheel seemed not to be working; everything listed on Councilmember Matarrese's referral has been evaluated in the course of getting to a Master Plan; redeveloping Alameda Point is important, is a goal in the budget, but is not as important as developing a project that can be supported by the community and is financially and environmentally sustainable; the financial part is a big deal; the federal government does not think the world revolves around her and Alameda; having funding to get the project going is important; that she thinks providing direction is premature until the City can identify a funding source for conveyance of the property. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he is appalled that people are accusing Council of having secret plans; Councilmember Matarrese's Council Referral is logical; local, non- profit development corporations have been used; Councilmember Matarrese is suggesting looking into the matter and nothing more than that; everyone has different thoughts; Councilmember Matarrese has set a baseline; a lot of caveats need to be included to provide leeway in order to put the issue in property context; Council and staff are not starting at square one. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not want staff to be limited what options are brought to Council. Councilmember Matarrese stated limiting options is not the point; the first point would … | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 33 | Councilmember Oddie stated that he could support doing so if there are not three votes in favor of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Daysog stated the fair thing is to start off the process by tying the benefit to length of tenancy; however, in several years, there should be a set amount; expressed concern over a tenant being eligible to receive four months' rent after not being there very long. Mayor Spencer stated the tenant would receive four months' notice so they have more time to find alternative housing or receive money; the issue is really providing longer notice beyond the required 30 and 60 day notices. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the ordinance requires tenants to receive one month rent for each year; expressed concern over landlords paying four months' rent for a tenant who has only lived there one year; stated that she would like to see longer term tenancy encouraged; landlords like good tenants to stay because there is a cost to prepare the unit and find new tenants. Mayor Spencer requested staff to clarify the matter. The Community Development Director stated the ordinance includes that the relocation benefit is equal to the value of the tenant's month rent up to a maximum of four months' rent; tenants can exchange the monetary compensation for staying in the unit longer; for example, a 10 year tenant would qualify for a cash equivalent of four months' rent; the tenant could opt to stay two additional months and receive payment for two months, plus $1,500 for moving expenses; time can be traded for money up to a maximum of four months; staff tied the benefit to the length of tenancy. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the landlord could offer additional time instead of money. The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the decision is the tenant's choice. Mayor Spencer suggested that mom and pop landlords be able to choose whether to offer time or money in response to Councilmember Daysog's concern; stated the tenant could choose if under corporate ownership; the re… | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 33 | Vice Mayor Matarrese stated what is proposed has a number of good protections for renters; there are provisions in the ordinance that he cannot support; he is concerned the cost will make rent rise even more. Councilmember Oddie stated the issue is not being rushed; the process has been 18 months; the ordinance has some very strong tenant protections; he would like to have a model lease used in the future; he would also like to have more discussion on two issues: semi-private mediation and eviction mediation; there should be translation services; people should be educated about the ordinance to prevent landlords from making mistakes and so tenants understand their rights; there is a housing shortage in the Bay Area; a bill was introduced today to be able to use Boomerang funds for affordable housing; his goal is to bring peace, calmness and stability to the City. Councilmember Daysog stated the data in the preemptory clause trends rent of 50 units or more apartments; inquired whether there is data for different classes; inquired why there is an absence of data for less than 5 or 6-10 units. The Community Development Director responded the data was taken from the BAE Urban Economics Study; stated there is a lack of available data from reliable sources; data is not available for smaller units like it is for larger units. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there is data that combines Alameda renter's income trends and rent to income ratio. The Community Development Director responded the income data comes from BAE Urban Economics community survey from 2013; stated there no way to correlate the data from the census about income with the census about rising rents. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether staff has data from ACS that has the standard monthly rent payment to income. The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated there is data on renter income and data on the rate at which rent is rising, but they are not correlated. Councilmember Daysog stated that he is concerned about the mom and… | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 33 | The City Manager responded anyone is interested in purchasing a pin can contact the City Manager's Office. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated she is grateful the U.S. Coast Guard renewed their commitment to be a Coast Guard city for another 5 years. (17-442) Vice Mayor Vella stated that she attended the Alameda County Lead Abatement Joint Powers Authority (JPA) meeting as the delegate from the City of Alameda; East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) has lead contamination in some of its pipes and in Lafayette; EBMUD is currently trying to remediate that the lead; the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has publicized that there is lead contamination in baby food; the FDA will not release names of companies; Gerber is fighting the release of the names; the City is partnering with food banks and other groups to request release of the information and for more transparency with the test results; June was lead prevention awareness month; she would like to have a presentation done by the Lead Abatement Executive Director Larry Brooks to discuss work that the JPA is doing. (17-443) Councilmember Oddie thanked Barbara Price and the parade committee for a great parade; stated that he attended a press conference last week; there is an effort to move all arraignments to Dublin; if moved, it would make it hard for defendants and people in custody in Alameda and their families; he would like Council to weigh in with a letter to the presiding judge. Vice Mayor Vella stated moving the arraignments to Dublin would also affect staff's travel time. (17-444) Mayor Spencer stated that she attended the Relay for Life and the League of California Cities in Monterey; one item that was raised was timing Councilmembers, not just the public speakers. Councilmember Matarrese stated that a 3 minute time limit is already in the City. Mayor Spencer stated maybe it should be implemented. Councilmember Matarrese stated the time limit is already implemented; Council does not follow it. (17-445) Mayor Spencer stated a delegate from the Sister … | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 33 | The Community Development Director responded in the negative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese's suggestion to ensure that the 50% of the commercial industrial actually happens within a certain timeframe can be required. The City Manager responded in the affirmative. The Community Development Director stated if Council would like to move forward with requiring the project take place in a certain timeframe, the concept should be negotiated and included in the Operating Memorandum. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not want to see the process go forward with no commercial development in the end. The Community Development Director responded Catellus understands the concern and is prepared to do the commercial construction within a certain timeframe. Councilmember Matarrese stated his request is within a certain time or the amendment will be void. The Community Development Director responded the current Master Plan amendment includes a variant for existing entitlements. The City Attorney stated Council may need to take a short recess to allow staff to discuss Councilmember Matarrese's request; she is concerned with putting the request in an Operating Memorandum. Councilmember Matarrese stated his goal is to ensure the commercial construction is completed; Site A is an example where the commercial is in jeopardy because it is harder to do than housing. Councilmember Oddie stated if there is a way to satisfy Councilmember Matarrese's concern without destroying the deal, he would like staff to address the issue. The City Attorney stated that she would like a chance to discuss the issue with her colleagues and Catellus' attorney. Councilmember Oddie stated that he is excited about the commercial aspect of the project; easements for the additional crossings are important; the project is a good step in improving housing needs; he plans on supporting the project. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is excited about the maritime jobs being created and the strengthening of the wat… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 33 | Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie stated that he is concerned with tying the hands of future Councils; he is in favor of setting aside 50% of the surplus. Mayor Spencer stated that she will not support the motion. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated she does not believe future Council's hands will be tied. On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following voice vote: Ayes: - 2 Councilmember's Ezzy Ashcraft and Matarrese. Noes - 3: Councilmember Oddie, Mayor Spencer and Vice Mayor Vella. (17-674) Recommendation to Receive the Information Technology Strategic Plan (ITSP). Not heard. (17-675) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Third Amendment to the Long Term Sublease between the City of Alameda and the US Department of Transportation Maritime Administration. Not heard. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (17-676) Update on Tracking of Council Direction through the Referral Process. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (17-677) Bob Priebe, Town of Moraga City Manager, expressed his support for the City Manager (17-678) Bob Nader, SAWW, gave a Power Point presentation on boat yards and yacht clubs. COUNCIL REFERRALS (17-679) Consider Directing Staff to Provide a Public Update on Crime within the City. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (17-680) Vice Mayor Vella requested that the Council subcommittee meetings be agendized to allow Councilmembers to attend. Mayor Spencer stated the meetings that Councilmembers are on can be added. The City Clerk inquired whether Vice Mayor Vella is requesting the subcommittees only, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded the sub liaison committees. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 7, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 33 | provided assistance with drafting the resolution; the wording is different than others. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the language could be changed from "could include" to "include," to which Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the negative. Mayor Spencer's inquired whether release time means the employees would get paid, to which the Acting City Manager and Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the number of union leaders, the Human Resources Director stated release time for union leaders is done now for union leaders to go meet with employees; IBEW has two and the Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA) has three. Mayor Spencer inquired how release time is determine, to which the Human Resources Director responded there are certain items that allow release time, such as meet and confer, time to negotiate. Mayor Spencer inquired whether release time is already allowed under the current contract, to which the Human Resources Director responded the contract is probably a little more specific and the resolution is broader; stated staff works with labor to mitigate impacts. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the resolution changes what is currently done; stated that she is concerned the City Manager or Human Resources Director would normally work out the matter with labor without direction from Council. The City Attorney stated the language "which could include" does not specifically direct that it has to happen and gives the flexibility. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of calling the question. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Aye. Ayes: 5. On the call for the original motion, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and … | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 33 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY- -JULY 10, 2018- 7:01 P.M. Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 8:55 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor/Chair Spencer - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella was present via teleconference from the Hilton Minneapolis, 1001 Marquette Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403] Absent: None. AGENDA ITEM (18-414) Recommendation to Review Ballot Argument Against the Initiative Measure that Proposes to Amend the City Charter by Incorporating into the Charter, Ordinance 3148 Rent Stabilization and Limitations on Evictions, with Certain Modifications, on the November 6, 2018 Ballot. The City Clerk gave a brief presentation. In response to Councilmember Oddie's inquiry regarding the word count, the City Clerk stated the limit is 300 words. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Councilmember Matarrese and Vice Mayor Vella did a very nice job; suggested changing the word "fixes" to "modifications" in the fourth paragraph. Stated the Alameda Just Alliance (AJA) is comprised of the Alameda Progressives, Alamedans for Black Lives, the Buena Vista United Methodist Church, Filipino Advocates for Justice, the Alameda County Central Labor Council, the Alameda Firefighters Local 689 and Renewed Hope Housing Advocates; the groups have recently joined forces to work for a just and livable community for all Alamedans, especially those who have struggled the hardest; AJA is prepared to defend the town against real estate speculation that is set to banish more people and threatens the sovereignty of the City government; the initiative to put Ordinance 3148 into the Charter is a powerful weapon against local control over housing affordability; it attempts to smash the ability of the elected Council to pass the laws necessary to maintain affordability; the law benefits and protects landlords, limited liability corporations, hedge funds, private equity funds and financial predators in the Charter; discussed the Blackstone Gro… | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 33 | City Council Workshop Workshop Report Management Partners Attachment B - Workshop Evaluation At the end of the workshop participants were asked to complete a workshop evaluation form. The following responses are a compilation of answers from five of the workshop participants. Overall usefulness of the workshop (4.7 average score) Not Useful Very Useful 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the workshop (4.5 average score) Poor Quality High Quality 1 2 3 4 5 The best thing about this workshop was. Having uninterrupted dialogue about our priorities. Discussion of effectice practices for elected officials and establishing City Council norms. Letting Council talk. Well planned and organized. Open and honest dialouge. Ability to talk through priorities. Some things that could have been better. More time for communications discussion. Room temperature. Regarding establishing priorities, questionnaire may have had some redundancies. A warmer room! Other Comments Need to do these two times a year. 27 | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2020-05-19 | 33 | On the call for the question, the motion passed by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 24 May 19, 2020 | CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 33 | and collaboration; the recommendations received would then be put in an unfiltered, formal report to Council; outlined the Brown Act provisions of a committee; stated the proposed process would allow more flexibility for committee members to meet informally, but still contain a formal, public process to get recommendations back to Council. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the task force will take community input or only discuss amongst themselves. The City Manager responded the steering committee will need to discuss the best way to involve the community; the process is still evolving; the committee is not envisioned to only meet amongst themselves; the committee will receive community input, but the method has yet to be determined. Vice Mayor Knox White inquired who has informed the process. Councilmember Vella stated that she has spoken to Rasheed Shabazz, Robbie Wilson and Shalom; she can provide emails and comments which have helped inform the process; she has not had specific conversations about who will serve on different committees; she has recommended people email to participate. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she met with the Alameda Youth Activists; she urged members to apply to the subcommittee; she has read about the need for representation of underrepresented people; Al Mance has expressed interest in guiding the process along with Jolene Wright. *** (20-543) Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of waiving Council speaking time. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Christine Chilcot has expressed interest in the steering committee; when she forwards emails expressing interest about being on the steering committee to the City Manager; those following the matter are natural constituents; expressed support for doing something that has not been done before. Councilmember Oddie stated that it is not up to him to dec… | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 33 | MINUTES OF THE CONTINUED MARCH 9, 2021 SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- MARCH 16, 2021-5:59 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 6:01 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (21-149) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8); Property: Alameda Point, Site A, Alameda, CA; City Negotiators: Eric Levitt, City Manager; Lisa Maxwell, Interim Community Development Director; and Debbie Potter, Special Project Analyst; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and Alameda Point Partners, LLC; Under Negotiation: Price and Terms. [Continued from February 16, 2021 to March 2, 2021 to March 9, 2021]. Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that staff provided information and Council provided direction; the first motion failed by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Abstain; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No; Ayes: 2. Noes: 2; Abstention: 1; the second motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Continued March 9, 2021 Special Meeting Alameda City Council March 16, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 33 | to be appealed. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a grounds for the appeal is typically provided; requested clarification for the process. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated a stronger appeal provides a recommended number; there is a very low chance of success in the appeal; staff is looking for direction toward [appeal] arguments to make and the particular allocation number desired; staff has a couple days to put together the appeal on behalf of Council. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether an alternative RHNA number around 3,300 exists to which the Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded in the negative. Councilmember Knox White stated that he plans to support the appeal; he does not plan to support the resolution as-written; requested a friendly amendment to the motion in listing the following three reasons for the basis of the appeal: 1) 60% of voters recently voted to uphold the adopted Charter provision which prohibits multi-family housing from being built making the RHNA allocation thwarting the will of the Alameda voters, 2) Alameda's uniqueness as an island of the San Francisco Bay is subject to sea-level and emerging groundwater issues, liquefaction and loss of access to the mainland should an earthquake destroy bridges and [access] tube, and 3) the City's transportation and infrastructure constraints; the City is an island with limited ingress, egress and water supply transported by pipelines on the mainland; unlike many East Bay cities, Alameda lacks direct access to Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) within its borders; the reasons mirror the comments received from the community in requests for an appeal. Councilmember Herrera Spencer accepted the friendly amendment; stated she is happy to include the reasons listed; questioned whether the reasons listed include the significant geological seismic issues; the language listed in her resolution is broader and includes more points and reasons; she is happy to provide a number for the allocation. Councilmember Knox White state… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 33 | shall authorize expenditures from the public art fund consistent with the purpose of this article, except that the City Manager shall be authorized to approve expenditures within the City Manager spending authority. All requisitions and purchases shall be authorized consistent with approval authorizations in the City of Alameda purchasing policy. The City Manager shall notify the Council of any expenditure approved by the City Manager, for any new artwork or project. Any two Councilmembers may call the City Manager's decision for review within ten days of the City Manager's notification. If no Call for Review is timely perfected, the City Manager's decision shall become final and effective.' In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the City Attorney stated the timing is 10 days after the City Manager's notification. Councilmember Knox White made a substitute motion approving introduction of the ordinance with the proposed amended language. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the substitute motion. Councilmember Daysog stated that he dislikes giving up Council prerogative in approving public art. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. (21-509) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code, Including Article VIII (Sunshine Ordinance) of Chapter Il (Administration) to Clarify Enforcement Provisions and Provide for Other Updates and Enhancements to the Sunshine Ordinance. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of continuing the matter to September 7, 2021 at 6:59 p.m. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 20, 2021 26 | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 33 | Drought and Provide Direction on Further City of Alameda Water Reduction Efforts. The Public Works Director gave a Power Point presentation. (21-558) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of providing an additional minute for the presentation. Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. The Public Works Director completed the presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how many projects are needed to qualify for the $15,000 rebate from East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). The Public Works Director responded each individual meter onsite is eligible for the $15,000 rebate; staff can pursue all nine sites; the rebate is currently only valid through the end of the calendar year; she does not know whether EBMUD will be extending the program. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the projects have to be completed by the end of the calendar year. The Public Works Director responded that she has not been able to get clarification from EBMUD. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will forward information from the EBMUD Manager of Water Conservation; she hopes an application submitted by the end of the year will suffice. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired where the $2.3 million will come from, to which the Public Works Director responded staff is currently looking at the General Fund. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the matter will be placed ahead of other requests for General Fund. The Public Works Director responded the matter of funding is up for discussion; stated staff is recommending Council input on a standalone budget item; Council can consider waiting until mid-year in order to consider multiple budget requests; the process is imperfect; staff is seeking direction on whether to move forward with the matter and return with a standalone budget amendment. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 7, 2021 25 | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,33 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 33 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she understands APD is agreeable to the transfer of responsibility to Public Works; inquired whether there are reasons APD supports the transfer. The Police Captain responded APD supports the transfer; stated APD is happy to help successfully transfer the program; APD has training outlines and programs which can be provided to Public Works; APD has experienced difficulty hiring for the positions in the past; transferring the program to Public Works will hopefully provide more success in staffing. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she plans to support the staff recommendation. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she supports the matter; noted the program is a better utilization of resources. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. *** (21-758) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Tuesday November 30th at 5:00 p.m. works for Councilmembers to hold a special meeting; whether the Housing Element [paragraph no. 21- and the General Plan [paragraph no. 21- ] will be the matters continued for discussion, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for limiting the special meeting to the Housing Element and the General Plan; stated that she would like staff to alert the public of the meeting start time. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of scheduling a special meeting for November 30th at 5:00 p.m. to hear the Housing Element and General Plan. Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** (21-759) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Add and Revise Recreation and Park Fees for Calendar Year 2022. Continued to December 7, 2… | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,33 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 33 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,33 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 33 | Full Name Zip code Email Signature Amanda Hunton 94501 daun2681@gmail.com and but Erik Swanson 95563 faura Shen 94705 JAS ANOUSA KHAJVANDI 94501 kashwandi@yahoo.com A FIREZ tarks 94561 for Princess Alejandria 94066 princessty5@yahoo.com P Jake Havvid 14001 8 David Paraly guson of Jumelphilo 94501 James Pressh Hoaz 94501 Hour EVA VU 94501 ve Lanson Paurl 9450 UP Jossie Pavid 94501 JP T. PAWID 44501 An Yen LIM 94611 Rached Brown eye 94501 rachalbrown.edua @gmail M Raj Aurora 9450 McAnn Jillianne White 94501 Pala word | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 32 | Commissioner/Board Member Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-028CIC) Resolution No. 05-136, "Resolution of Necessity to Acquire Property by Eminent Domain for Redevelopment Purposes Authorizing Commencement of Litigation to Acquire Property and for Order of Possession; Code of Civil Procedure Section 1245.235 et seq. (APN 071-0203-014 and APN 071-0203-015; 2315-2323 Central Avenue, Alameda, California - Alameda Theatre/Cineplex and Parking Structure. Adopted. Lester Cabral, Tenant, stated that a lot of information has just been received; that he opposes the resolution until the tenants are notified about what is going on; that he understands an eviction notice might be forthcoming. Chair Johnson requested staff to meet with Mr. Cabral to answer his questions. In response to Commissioner deHaan's question about the property Mr. Cabral is concerned about, Mr. Cabral responded Hair Shapers at 2321 Central Avenue. Lars Hansson, Park Street Business Association (PSBA) Board President, stated the PSBA Board supports the staff recommendation and urges adoption of the resolution; the resolution will springboard negotiations with the owner to allow reaching a fair market value within a short period of time. Duane Watson, PSBA Board Vice President, urged moving forward with the project. Robb Ratto, PSBA Executive Director, stated the project is important for PSBA and all of Alameda; the restoration of the historic theatre was identified as the number one priority in the downtown vision process; urged support of the staff recommendation stated Video Maniacs has been successfully relocated with the assistance of Development Services. Daniel A. Muller, Attorney for Cocores Development Company submitted a letter; stated the letter submitted includes five categories of objections to the Resolution of Necessity and right to take the property; the offer of $1.5 million recently submitted is less than half of the value that a qualified, MAI [Masters of the Appraisal Institute] appraiser p… | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 32 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -JULY 19, 2005- -6:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (05-339) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Title: City Attorney (05-340) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case: Miraglia Enterprises V. City of Alameda. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Public Employee Evaluation, the Council discussed the performance of the City Attorney; regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, the Council gave instructions to the City Attorney. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 32 | General Plan Land Use Diagram to Change the Designation of Approximately 74 Acres of the Catellus Mixed Use Development Project Site from Business Park to Specified Mixed Use Area, and (B) Amend Sections 2.2, 2.3, 2.6 and Associated Tables of the Land Use Element to Reflect the New Specified Mixed Use Area. Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599D CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Master Plan Amendment MPA-06-001 Substituting Office, Retail, Health Club, Residential and/or Mixed Uses for Approximately 77 Acres of Previously Entitled Office/Research and Development Uses. Introduced. Councilmember deHaan moved introduction of the ordinance incorporating amendments made at the meeting. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599E CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Development Agreement Amendment DA-06-0002 to the Development Agreement By and Between the City of Alameda and Catellus Development Corporation, Dated June 6, 2000, as Amended. Introduced. Councilmember Daysog moved introduction of the ordinance incorporating amendments made at the meeting. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599F CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Development Agreement DA-06-0003 By and Between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus Development Corporation) Governing the Development of Up To 400,000 Square Feet of Office Space; a 20,000 Square Foot Health Club; Up To 300 Residential Units; and 300,000 Square Feet of Retail Space or 50,000 Square Feet of Retail Space and 370,000 Square Feet of Research and Development Space. Introduced. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved introduction of the ordinance incorporating amendments made at the meeting. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 21 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commi… | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 32 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -JANUARY 2, 2007 - -6:45 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:55 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-001) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, Management and Confidential Employees Association and Police Association Non-Sworn. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators regarding the status of negotiations with employee organizations; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lana Stoker Acting City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 32 January 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 32 | The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 18 and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Commission December 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 32 | Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:13 a.m. in memory of former Councilmember Tony Daysog's father, Ricardo Daysog. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, CIC Agenda for meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission October 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 32 | Manager/Executive Director's time is being billed; timecards show otherwise; SunCal requested clarification. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated responses should be received before addressing issues in public in order to avoid confusion. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated hopefully, there has been no misappropriation of funds; inquired how the Interim City Manager/Executive Director's charges are spread out to accounts. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded staff is fully funded wherever allocated; that her salary is split: a little bit in redevelopment and a little bit in the General Fund; stated staff time is budgeted to programs; staff's hours are charged to the SunCal account; that her salary and the City Attorney/Legal Counsel's salary are not spread to individual projects. (10-183 CC/ARRA/10-23 CIC) City Web Page - SunCal Updates and Repository The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation. (10-184 CC/ARRA/10-24 CIC) City Response to SunCal's Modified Optional Entitlement Application The Interim City Manager/Executive Director gave a brief presentation; stated a letter requesting further qualification and clarification of the application will go out tomorrow; the City Attorney/Legal Council will send out a letter with respect to reservation of rights tomorrow. Speakers: Nancy Gordon, Alameda; and Gretchen Lipow, Alameda. AGENDA ITEMS None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 11:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk Secretary, CIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 12 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission April 20, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 32 | June 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 32 | could be utilized, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether Councilmember Tam modified her motion to include starting discussions earlier. Councilmember Tam responded that she has not modified her original motion; under advisement from the Mayor, the Subcommittee would have the option of starting discussions earlier than 2011 if schedules work out; that she thinks it would be very hard pressed for Councilmember Gilmore and her to find time to work with the departments because of going dark in August, having a full schedule in September, October being the election season, and the election is in November; however, every effort will made to do so. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (10-394 CC) Melody Marr, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, stated that she was present to wish the Council farewell. COUNCIL REFERRALS (10-395 CC) Consider Directing the Interim City Manager to Prioritize an Alternative Process and Plan for Alameda Point. Councilmember Matarrese gave a brief presentation. Speakers: Jon Spangler, Alameda; and Pat Keliher, SSC Alameda. Mayor Johnson stated that the item is Councilmember Matarrese's referral, not something that comes from staff. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he always looks for alternatives; he submitted the Council Referral on July 21, 2010 as a proposal for where to go next; new elements have arisen, particularly, taking a look at the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, which is a good place to start; the City would always work with the Navy, Veteran's Administration, and State Tidelands Trust; that he wants a specific plan on how the City will move forward post the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA). Mayor Johnson stated some items [on the Council Referral] have already been done; that her preference would be to have staff come back with options; Council would need to talk about a process; a broader look needs to be taken before specific direction is given. Special Joint Me… | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 32 | Mayor Spencer inquired whether everyone agrees. Councilmember Daysog responded that he is fine with 25%; stated staff should really scrub the figure to ensure it is correct. Councilmember Oddie noted buildings with one to four units would only be able to evict one unit per year. The Community Development Director stated relocation benefits are the last component; staff has not heard whether there is support for the proposed ordinance or the Mayor's suggestion that there not be a sliding scale based on the length of tenure. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like to account for smaller landlords; figuring out the correct relocation assistance should take smaller landlords into account. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he supports extending the time period; any other benefit should be a matter of mediation. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Vice Mayor Matarrese would not tie the benefit to length of tenancy, to which Vice Mayor Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Daysog stated when the matter returns, the staff report should address how staff proposes to deal with the issue of small mom and pop landlords paying the relocation benefit; a conclusion might be that not much could be done, but he wants to see that staff thought about the issue. Councilmember Oddie stated that he is against any special exceptions. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Oddie wants the benefit tied to length of tenancy. Councilmember Oddie responded if there are not three votes in favor of the staff proposal, but there are three votes of the Mayor's proposal, he would support it; that he does not want any exceptions. Mayor Spencer stated that she is fine with having no exceptions; she does not want to tie the benefit to length of tenancy and Vice Mayor Matarrese concurred. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is in favor of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Oddie stated that he could go either way. Mayor Spencer stated tying the benefit to length of tenancy discourages long term tenants because it … | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-02 | 32 | Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of the proposal. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (16-059) Considering Endorsing the San Francisco Bay Clean Water, Pollution Prevention, and Habitat Restoration Program Measure, which will be on the June 7, , 2016 Ballot. (Councilmember Oddie). Continued to February 24, 2016. Councilmember Oddie suggested the referral be continued to the Special Meeting on February 24th COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 2:36 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 31 February 2, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 32 | Councilmember Oddie clarified the point is to not have attorney's coming in arguing for the large corporations. The Community Development Director stated the owner would need to request a reasonable accommodation, which would need to be approved by staff. Mayor Spencer stated ideally, it would have to be someone with ownership interest; in her experience with RRAC hearings the property managers say no to everything, she would like someone who is not being paid to show up and be a placeholder; she would like a meaningful mediation. The Community Development Director stated staff could leave the language as is and deal with the idea of a reasonable accommodation as part of the administrative regulations. Mayor Spencer stated all five Councilmembers are in agreeance with doing so. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the staff report indicates the RRAC mediation process allows consideration of numerous factors; she would like stronger language, such as must instead of may; she would like to specify the type of documentation that would be acceptable in the bullet points. The Community Development Director stated that the proposed changes would be in the RRAC checklist. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated it is very important to have specific information gathered by the RRAC and specific materials considered; inquired why the RRAC would not be required to consider the same factors that the arbitrator would consider. The Assistant City Attorney responded staff tried to outline the form the RRAC would use; stated the extra items are listed for the arbitrator because it is more complex and would be used by a hearing officer, not the RRAC. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she agrees with the extra documentation being given to a hearing officer; they will have the ability to analyze documents. The Assistant City Attorney stated staff did not want to turn the RRAC into a hearing process; the form requires a certain amount of information that should be ample for the Committee to render a reasonable decision. Councilmembe… | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2017-06-06 | 32 | There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:32 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk and Secretary SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 6 to the Community Improvement Commission June 6, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 32 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not want a first reading on an ordinance just yet; the survey and polling are critical to understand the community's opinion; he would like to understand how to gauge the revenue and other things that go along with a cash economy. Mayor Spencer moved approval of the referral, incorporating the comments from all Councilmembers. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion as written in the referral. Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council has given staff a lot of direction and she does not see what a vote tonight will accomplish. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (17-439) Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Conference. Mayor Spencer inquired who are the current delegates. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded she is the delegate and Vice Mayor Vella is the alternate. Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to decide the delegates for the League of California Cities Annual Conference. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of designating Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft as the delegate and Vice Mayor Vella as the alternate. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (17-440) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Commission on Disability Issues, Historical Advisory Board (HAB), Planning Board and Public Art Commission (PAC). Mayor Spencer nominated Thomas Mills for the Commission on Disability Issues and Ruben Tilos and Steven Goertler for the Planning Board; stated she will make nominations for the HAB and PAC at a future meeting. (17-441) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she attended the League of California Cities in Monterey; the Fourth of July parade was great; the Coast Guard has pins for sale that show Alameda scenes, inquired whether community members could buy one. Regular M… | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 32 | The Community Development Director responded the proposed project has a 15% universal design requirement; Catellus has committed to adding the accessible shower to ensure that the 15% of the units will be universal design. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Mayor Spencer is requesting higher than 15%. The Community Development Director responded 15% was negotiated with Catellus; Council can ask about increasing the universal design requirement. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Council can require 30% universal design. The Community Development Director responded there is an existing Development Agreement (DA); Catellus does not have to comply with subsequent changes. Mayor Spencer stated Catellus is asking for an amendment. The Community Development Director responded Catellus is asking for an amendment to the Master Plan; stated staff negotiated 15% universal design units. Mayor Spencer inquired since whether staff could have required 30% universal design since Catellus is asking for an additional 400 homes. The Community Development Director responded staff negotiated and the proposal is the end result. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Catellus is refusing to do the 100% visit-ability and 30% universal design, which is what the Commission on Disability Issues is requesting. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Tom Marshall, Catellus, responded Catellus has to make the project feasible. Mayor Spencer stated serving the disabled in the community is important. Mr. Marshall stated the developer is aware of the question and cannot support the request. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the developer is going to set a price range on the units. The Community Development Director responded the 10% affordable by design would not be deed restricted; stated staff is not recommending the units be deed restricted. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the developer is willing to commit to the non-single family homes being limited to 55 and over. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 18, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 32 | debt process. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to follow staff's recommendation. Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern with the $2 million going into PARS because the $2 million is not going into a Section 115 Trust. The Finance Director stated the Section 115 Trust and PARS is one in the same. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the $2 million is going towards the retirement and not towards the OPEB, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative; stated the City is contributing $3 million to OPEB and contributions are done biweekly through payroll. In response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry regarding the total amount going into OPEB, the Finance Director stated $10.7 million in the OPEB account. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she would support the recommendation provided there is something that ensures the City is continuing the obligations relative to the OPEB contribution; inquired where the $2 million is in the current budget. The City Manager responded the $2 million would added to the budget going forward. Vice Mayor Vella stated the City is in the middle of a two year budget cycle. The City Manager responded that Council has a choice to add the $2 million to the 2018-19 budget at mid-cycle or with the biannual 2020-22 budget. Vice Mayor Vella inquired where the $2 million is going to come from in the current budget; stated that she would prefer the 50/50 hybrid; she would like to discuss the matter further at budget time. Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to bifurcate the two requests. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she agrees with the City Treasurer and the Finance Director. Mayor Spencer moved approval of the first recommendation [$6 million pay down]. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote - 5. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the second recommendation [$2 million on going pay down]. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 32 November 7, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 32 | so original motion failed due to a lack of second. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution with modifying the language to: "that the Alameda City Council urges the Acting City Manager and appropriate staff to work with the public sector unions at the City of Alameda post a Janus V. AFSCME Supreme Court case decision by cooperating to mitigate impacts and by engaging in good faith discussions, which could include implementing membership cards and release time for rank and file union leaders to explain the implications of a Janus decision," which is a little less specific direction and leave open the possibility that there could be more items that could be addressed. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion and in response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated by changing the language, the Council is not providing specific direction to staff, but is suggesting the topics; there could be other issues that have not been contemplated because the decision has not been seen. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the intent is include the specific things, to which Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the word negative was removed, to which Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded that she did not mean to remove the word negative. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the language could be changed to "which could include, but not be limited to stated that she is trying to understand the intent. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded that is the intent. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the City Attorney stated that she prefers the language in the motion because it is not as directive and leaves the door open to other things that will support the unions' position. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated her motion stands. Mayor Spencer inquired whether saying "could include" means it does not have to include the specific items listed, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative; sta… | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 32 | None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (18-412) Consider Drafting a Letter to Federal Representatives Supporting Congressional Bill S. 3036, the "Keep Families Together Act. (Councilmember Oddie) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (18-413) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Historical Advisory Board, Planning Board, Public Utilities Board (PUB), Recreation and Parks Commission, Social Service Human Relations Board and Transportation Commission (TC). Mayor Spencer nominated Jeffery Gould to the PUB and Michael Hans, David Johnson, Alysha Nachtigall, and Sharon Nearn to the TC. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:20 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 24 July 10, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 32 | City Council Workshop Workshop Report Management Partners reasonable steps have been taken to avoid a forced transition and recognizing a parting based on "irreconcilable differences" is always better than an "ugly, contested divorce" (in an "ugly divorce,' both parties end up looking bad), keep the following in mind: - Keep it professional. - Don't unnecessarily damage the manager's reputation- it is not needed to make a change. - Provide a reasonable period of time for the manager to find another position or provide reasonable severance-it takes time to find a manager's job. - Remember, how you handle the transition of the current manager will have an impact on the quality of the candidate pool for the next manager. Summary/Conduding Thoughts: An unstable council/manager relationship has negative consequences for the city council, the manager, the organization and the community. A positive and mutually supportive relationship will increase the odds of having a high-performing and successful city. Councilmembers and the manager need to make creating, supporting and sustaining the relationship a high priority. If made a high priority, the odds of success are great. Remember that your service on the city council is a unique honor that has been bestowed on you by your fellow citizens. While it is often a challenge, with inherent difficulties, someone needs to do it and your community has selected you for that responsibility. You have been selected to serve in a professional and honorable manner, during good times and bad. Your service on the city council will be over soon enough. Conduct yourself in a manner that will allow you to look back with pride-not only for what you accomplished, but also the way in which you conducted yourself (which will likely be remembered the longest). January 2017 - 12- 26 | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2020-03-03 | 32 | Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 3, 2020 29 | CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2020-05-19 | 32 | Councilmember Oddie stated Council should go big on the item; noted other cities are providing the program; residents will go somewhere else should Alameda not participate; expressed support for closing Park Street from Buena Vista Avenue to San Jose Avenue every Friday and Saturday night and Webster Street from Buena Vista Avenue to Central Avenue; stated that he supports closing parking lots across the City where restaurants are near, such as South Shore and Alameda Landing; stated California Alcohol and Beverage Control (ABC) released an updated regulation allowing restaurants and bars to serve customers on sidewalks, parking lots, and streets; Alameda should not miss out on the program; expressed concern about eating next to vehicle exhaust. Councilmember Daysog stated residents are enthusiastic about the program; expressed support for the program; stated the program will help many businesses in commercial areas; expressed support for closing side streets such as Alameda Avenue between Park Street and Oak Street and Webb Avenue between Everett Street and Park Street. Councilmember Vella stated there are several street fairs scheduled during the summer on both Park Street and Webster Street; noted the events will not happen with regulations in place; expressed support for some form of special event street closure opportunity with closed off street sections for several days to allow for outdoor dining and safe foot traffic; stated there are opportunities in July or August; safe and clean bike parking and corrals will be needed; outdoor parking lots should be considered for Webster Street to allow business use. Vice Mayor Knox White the program should be implemented as fast as possible. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the program; expressed concern about closing Park Street and Webster Street on Friday and Saturday due to bus routes; stated those who rely on public transit need to be considered; the City can work with transit partners to see what can be done related to rerouting; expressed support for … | CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 32 | Councilmember Oddie inquired whether Council is able to answer some of the questions raised by public comments; expressed concern about voices not having the opportunity to participate. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff should respond to inquiries made. (20-542) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is needed to continue past 12:00 a.m. Councilmember Oddie moved approval of continuing the discussion to 12:30 a.m. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** Councilmember Vella stated three Councilmembers have requested clarification about the selection process; questioned whether it would be helpful to hear from staff about how community members can be engaged. Councilmember Oddie expressed support for clarification to the extent possible by staff. The City Manager stated should the committee be City Manager appointed, there will be three to five steering committee members, with appointments made within the week; the committee would not have designated people representing entities; people would represent themselves; marginalized individuals are encouraged to join in order to represent individual views and a more community-based approach; the steering committee or subcommittee will be relied on to make decisions about the 5 to 6 areas for task forces; people may be added to task forces mid-process, if needed; that he has included his e-mail address in the Zoom chat feature; noted people can contact anyone within the City Manager's office; Councilmembers may be contacted and forward information; a more inclusive process is being looked into; the Assistant City Manager has provided a general time-frame, which is consistent and a little more aggressive than Oakland's time frame. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether information may be provided to additional platforms such as social media, to encounter interest, to which the Assistant City Manager responded in the aff… | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 32 | Pursuant to the Public Records Act, and 3) What is Privileged and How to Waive Privilege. Not heard. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) (21-181) Consider Addressing the Process for Potential Changes to the Jean Sweeney Open Space Park Design Development Plan, including Public Input. Not heard. (Councilmembers Herrera Spencer and Daysog) COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (21-182) Mayor's Nominations for Appointments to the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and Recreation and Park Commission. Not heard. ADJOURNMENT (21-183) The City Council discussed the date to continue the meeting. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of continuing the meeting to March 30, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. At 11:58 p.m., the meeting was continued to March 30, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 32 March 16, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 32 | Discussed California's water shortage; questioned how to solve the water problem for the entire state; whether California has enough resources for everyone to live in the state; urged Council file for the appeal; stated California cannot accommodate everyone: Rosalinda Fortuna, Alameda. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Council should first have a discussion and vote on whether or not to file an appeal of the RHNA allocation. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated staff recommends discussing the appeal first due to time sensitivity. Councilmember Daysog expressed support for Council discussion time set for fifteen minutes; stated there are three to four incredible and meaty topics which could each be agenda items of their own; each topic should have an in-depth analysis; nine minutes is not enough speaking time. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is willing to see how far Council can get on the first discussion topic; she is willing to consider a motion to extend time when the need arises; Councilmember Herrera Spencer's resolution is titled: "Resolution of Intent to Appeal.. questioned whether a motion is desired. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of filing an appeal of the prescribed RHNA numbers. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White inquired whether the appeal will provide direction to staff as to what is being appealed and how. Councilmember Herrera Spencer responded page two of the resolution lists reasons related to land mass size. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the previously approved projects resulting in construction of approximately 1,522 housing units should suffice as the RHNA allocation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer responded in the negative; stated the language had been pulled from the original resolution; she kept as much of the original resolution, as- supported and added new language. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Councilmember Herrera Spencer is proposing any RHNA allocation for Alameda. Councilmember He… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 32 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the language. Councilmember Daysog stated the proposed language includes change orders; inquired whether Council still has authority over everything else, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Daysog moved introduction of the ordinance with the amended language. Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Vella stated that she understood the proposal was to include a Call for Review; inquired whether the Call for Review is for one provision. The City Manager responded his recommended change remains consistent with the terms provided by the City Attorney. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the ordinance is being amended to add the proposed language. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the language will be added in Subsection f. of Section 30-98.10. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification that the motion is to remove change orders from Council approval. The City Attorney stated the motion changes the original paragraph completely; noted the language shall read: "The Alameda City Council shall authorize expenditures from the Alameda public art fund consistent with the purpose of this article, except that the City Manager shall be authorized to approve change orders within the City Manager spending authority. All requisitions and purchases shall be authorized consistent with approval authorizations in the City of Alameda purchasing policy. The City Manager shall notify the Council of any expenditure approved by the City Manager on any change order. Any two Councilmembers may call the City Manager's decision for review within 10 days of the City Manager's notification. If no Call for Review is timely perfected, the City Manager's decision shall become final and effective." Councilmember Knox White stated that he is unsure whether to support the proposed language; the proposed language is the opposite of what he would like; expressed support for Council being notified of art projects, … | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 32 | Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White stated plans do not require the removal of the building for DePave Park; noted the building exists on the maps for DePave Park; he would like to clarify that no decision has been made that the building will go away. (21-555) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is needed to consider new items after 11:00 p.m.; stated that she is willing to continue the meeting until 12:00 a.m. Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for continuing the meeting in order to hear the Small Size Big Minds lease [paragraph no. 21- 1 and the contract for Legal Notices [paragraph no. 21- ; however, she would not like to include the water conservation measures [paragraph no. 21- 1 in the discussion; stated the matter is not time sensitive and could take a while to hear; expressed support for continuing all Council Referrals to the next meeting. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will not support a motion that does not finish the regular agenda items. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of Council working through as much of the agenda, in order until 12:00 a.m. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. (21-556) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to the Lease with Small Size Big Mind, Inc., a California Corporation, Substantially in the Form of Exhibit 4, to Extend the Term for One Year with One 12- Month Extension Option for Building 35, Located at 2450 Pan Am Way in the Main Street Neighborhood at Alameda Point. Introduced. The Management Analyst gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Knox White seconded t… | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 32 | Consulting and develop a program manual with general and specific training in order to target issues of altercations while issuing a ticket. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the City's plan for active parking meter hours going forward. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded staff has not gotten to that level of detail; stated there are no plans to change the details in the immediate future. The Public Works Director stated the immediate priority will be enforcement. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether Council is being asked to approve paid parking at the ferry terminals, to which the Planning, Building and Transportation and Public Works Director both responded in the negative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated Council is being asked to approve the transfer of services to Public Works from APD and a program budget; inquired how much the program will cost the City. The Public Works Director responded Council is voting on the establishment of a new, umbrella, single parking fund; the fund will include three divisions; the program is intended to be self- sufficient and will not have money infused; the program will take time to constitute; the program will generate sufficient revenue and will eventually provide excess revenue; a Council policy will address excess revenue; any amount above and beyond operational expenses will be considered excess revenue; staff is seeking direction that the recommendation is acceptable for Council; there is more work in detailing the total cost of the program; staff anticipates needing additional vehicles; however, staff will present a mid-year budget appropriation request. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether current parking rates will change, to which the Public Works Director responded staff is currently not recommending any changes to meter rates. Councilmember Knox White stated that he plans to support the matter; he wants to encourage staff to put together the work program and think about how the City can use parking control of… | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,32 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 32 | sign program; discussed improvements to the City's bicycle network; announced an APD swearing in ceremony and Boards and Commissions openings. In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer, the Interim City Manager stated his last day will be after the May 17th Council meeting. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (22-319) Consider Having the City Council Address the Zoning of the Harbor Bay Club. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (22-320) Consider Having the City Council Review Recreation and Parks Department Community Events. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (22-321) Consider Directing Staff to Develop an Ordinance Setting Fines for Injury- Collisions Involving Non-Commercial Vehicles that Do Not Meet Federal Design Standards or Have Been Lifted/Altered in a Manner that Increases the Likelihood of Severe Injury or Death in Collisions with Pedestrians and Bicyclists. (Councilmember Knox White) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (22-322) Councilmember Herrera Spencer announced a webinar on the Grand Street project. (22-323) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the Oakland Police Academy graduation; announced Board and Commission openings and encouraged residents to apply. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council May 3, 2022 28 | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf,32 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-05-09 | 32 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MUTES OF Wednesday May 9, 2018 6:30 p.m. no longer with the commission, if anyone else is interested in joining that subcommittee, there is space available for one more person. So I think that is all the announcements that I have. Anyone else like to make an announcement? Otherwise, I'm going to move that we adjourn. All in favor? Jennifer Roloff: I'll second that. 8. ADJOURNMENT Beth Kenny: Great. We're adjourned. Thanks for a great meeting, guys. 05/30/18 Page 32 of 32 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf,32 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-11-28 | 32 | ITEM 2-A COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, November 28, 2018, 6:30 PM second? Arnold Brillinger: Second. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: All in favor? All: Aye. 03/13/19 Page 32 of 32 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,32 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 32 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,32 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 32 | Full Name Zip code Email Signature Eve Gilbert 94502 eve.mj.gillert@gmail.com Ere Albut Bya Cardenes 94004 Baritis@Hotmail.com of 78 94611 jerre@jumption ty yion thie 9450 het ga th Yang the 94501 huayangwo@gmail.com C.com you Han Jane 94105 for 94011 saishfore H yrs (Yang , Wong) 9450 yangewanger@gmail com y Patrick Momoson 94501 volleymastery SIMON RE-NOLNS 94617 (It tomcastinal Smith Alan Zorno 94589450 alan.zeinn@gmail.com All Genn Sultivan M704 glennsb@utexy a Margaret Lyclon 94704 yydon, margant @gmail.com ML Any Pan 8/10/10 Anj NINA the 94801 Tray X1 94502 trankx188@gyahoo com an Alex Kim 94568 Alexforsf2@@gmail.com Mrs Jesy Jung 94131 ds2dsket1@gmail.com com 8 Caleb Brounice 94502 Cbrownlec/do@gmail.com - | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 31 | TUESDAY- - -MAY 17, 2005- - -7:25 P.I M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint meeting at 7:35 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner/Board Member deHaan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : louncilmembers / Commissioners / Board Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-226CC/05-024CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting of May 3, 2005. Approved. (05-025CIC) Recommendation to approve an Amended Contract with Michael Stanton Architecture (MSA) by increasing the Contract amount an additional $40,000 for design review services for the proposed Civic Center Parking Garage Project. Accepted. ( 05-026CIC) Recommendation to receive and file revised Alameda West Strategic Retail Implementation recommendations. Received and filed. AGENDA ITEMS ( 05-027CIC) Recommendation to approve a First Amendment to an Acquisition Agreement by which the Community Improvement Commission acquired an Affordable Housing Covenant from the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority for thirty units of very low income housing at the Bachelor Officers' Quarters located within the Alameda Point Improvement Project. Commissioner/Board Member deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 31 | the establishment of seventeen movie theaters in town. (05-370) David Kirwin, Alameda, expressed concern about the megaplex theatre and parking structure project and funding; questioned whether there would be a $1,000 parcel tax; stated parking lots adjacent to businesses are sufficient; there is a need for increased public awareness regarding the project. Mayor Johnson responded there is not a parcel tax; requested staff to inform Mr. Kirwin where he should go for information. The Acting City Manager stated Mr. Kirwin, and others, could meet with staff in the City Manager's Office or Development Services Department. Mayor Johnson stated information could also be mailed or e-mailed, if preferred. (05-371) Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, stated people opposed to the [theater and parking structure) project have been providing misinformation; stated PSBA would have opposed the project if a $1,000 parcel tax were involved; noted the Downtown Vision plan from May, 2000 indicated that informal talks about a mutli-screen - theater were underway COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-372) - Councilmember deHaan stated that he visited the Bayport site; the transit shelter on Tinker Avenue is less than adequate; the size of the sidewalks at Bayport are extremely narrow, do not match other sidewalks in Alameda, and are not pedestrian friendly; said matters should be considered when other developments are built. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 11:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 31 July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 31 | and Development Agreement Amendment and a new Disposition and Development Agreement to replace 1,300,000 square feet of approved, but not yet constructed, office and research and development uses with 400,000 square feet of a Health Club and up to 300 residential units in the Catellus Mixed Use Development. Continued to November 21, 2006. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lana Stoker, Acting City Clerk Acting Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 2 Community Improvement Commission October 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 31 | Mr. Marshall stated said development was Pacific Commons. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner deHaan stated some of the Planning Board members visited the site and expressed a deep concern about project direction; inquired whether Council and the CIC could be assured that the same direction would not be taken. Mr. Marshall responded the nature of the project dictates tenant quality; stated 50,000 square feet of retail would be at the waterfront portion of the project, which leaves 250,000 square feet for core retail; big footprint buildings would be limited; the strategy would be followed. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog stated the nature of the project is pedestrian-oriented and well designed, which results in a certain elf-selection; work is still required to get the type of desired tenants. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that she appreciates Catellus's hard work to nail down Miracle League commitments. (06-599A CC) Resolution No. 14047, "Certifying the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Revised Catellus Mixed Use Development (State Clearinghouse #2006012091) . " Adopted. Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599B CC) Resolution No. 14048, "Making Findings Regarding Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Making Findings Concerning Alternatives, Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project (State Clearinghouse #2006012091. Adopted. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution incorporating amendments made prior to the meeting. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-599C CC) Resolution No. 14049, "Approving General Plan Amendment, GPA-06-01: General Plan Amendments to: (A) Amend the Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Counc… | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 31 | also the first African American Councilmember on the Oakland City Council ; extended condolences to the entire Gilmore family; adjourned the meeting in a moment of silence for the loss of former President Gerald Ford and Carter Gilmore. Respectfully submitted, Lana Stoker Acting City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 31 January 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 31 | Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the golf course had more of a shortfall than was anticipated; inquired how much is left in the golf course fund, to which the Finance Director responded $1.9 million. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the golf course fund is burning through approximately $60,000 per month. louncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated the $15.5 million [reserve] is pretty well obligated; he believes that staff has the skills in getting requirements in order; having an outside review process would be a shame; actions have to be weighed; AP&T and the golf course are other concerns. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether a 1.5% reduction is aggressive enough for the next six or seven months. The City Manager/Executive Director responded the 1.5% reduction is a beginning; stated the matter will be monitored; she believes that the reduction fits at this point; direction can be changed if necessary. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated Council needs to consider how cuts are made. The City Manager/Executive Director stated the matter would be brought back to Council mid year. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the first quarter financial report and requested recommended appropriations. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 11:41 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 17 and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Commission December 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 31 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 5:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 31 February 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 31 | The Planning Services Manager responded possibly; stated the initiative is a community plan; community plans differ under the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) and call for a single EIR upfront i all future phases can rely on the first EIR. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated have mitigation be in conflict with the language of the initiative would be possible; a dispute could occur on how to resolve the issue. The Planning Services Manager stated the Disposition and Development Agreement could be used to resolve the conflict. Councilmember/Board Member Matarrese stated a draft would be presented in August; the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) ends in July; inquired what would happen if the City does not finish and the ENA terminates. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded the developer could stop at any point. Councilmember/Board Member Tam inquired whether Environmental Science Associates understands the issue, to which the Planning Services Manager responded definitely. Speaker Helen Sause, Home Ownership Makes Economic Sense (Homes) . Vice Mayor/Board Member deHaan stated the EIR could have been kicked off eight months ago and would have been good business. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated Oakland Chinatown and the City have an agreement that the City and developer would move forward with an EIR at the time the initiative qualified. Vice Mayor/Board Member deHaan stated a specific plan has not been approved; the ballot initiative was surprising. Councilmember/Board Member Tam stated the plan took two years of public meetings to develop. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the EIR would be consistent with the established timeline, to which the Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded in the affirmative. ADJOURNMENT (09-425 CC/ARRA/09-47 CIC) There being no further business Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission October 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 31 | Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commission deHaan inquired whether an executive summary would be included. Mr. Faye responded that he is not sure whether an executive summary is required but would be happy to provide one. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated an update could be provided under City Manager Communications. The Interim City Manager/Interim Executive Director responded information would be provided at the April 6 Council Meeting. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the document would be public when submitted on March 22nd The Interim City Manager/Interim Executive Director requested that Mr. Faye introduce new team members. Mr. Faye stated Robert Hertzberg has joined SunCal and will provide an additional set of eyes; that he [Mr. Faye] is a partner and will be at every hearing; that he withdraws the request for the 60-day tolling period; a project would be submitted by the deadline; stated SunCal would lift confidentiality requirements in the ENA with exceptions. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 2:54 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 6 Community Improvement Commission March 16, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 31 | Vice Mayor/Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether Mr. Faye is referring to the flood plane, which was identified in the Preliminary Development Concept. Mr. Faye stated there were a number of physical changes to the real property and there continue to be a number of changes to the condition of the real property; new information continues to come forward which affects costs; cost affects the need for revenue; costs and revenue are what derive project profit and internal rate of return. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether SunCal would release information regarding infrastructure, public amenities and the cap, which SunCal documents ran up to $700 million. Mr. Faye responded all information would be released; stated the cost cap was removed two months before the election. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese noted even though SunCal lifted the cap two months before, the cap was in the initiative; if it had passed, the initiative would have been the law of the land. (10-182 CC/ARRA/10-22 CIC) Election Costs and Request for Reimbursement The Interim City Manager/Executive Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether half of the Interim City Manager/Executive Director's salary has been paid by SunCal, to which the Interim City Manager/Executive Director responded that she does not charge anything to SunCal. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese requested future clarification of the matter; stated the matter should be sorted out and posted. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the actual draws need to be posted. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated SunCal needs to understand what they are paying for. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated that she is willing to disclose everything but the City cannot go as fast as SunCal; continued the presentation. Mr. Faye stated that he is not disputing the budget; the Deputy City Manager - Development Services indicated that the City Attorney/Legal … | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 31 | Adjournment There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:23 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 31 | on whether binding interest arbitration is a mandatory, permissive subject of bargaining; both the Public Employment Relations Board and District Court of Appeal found interest arbitration is a permissive, non-mandatory subject of bargaining and expressly held that meeting and conferring with the union first is not necessary prior to putting the matter on the ballot. The City Clerk restated Councilmember Tam's motion: to move approval to reconstitute the Charter Subcommittee in preparation for the November 2011 election. Councilmember Tam stated that her motion includes beginning discussion in 2011. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there is a March election next year. The City Clerk responded elections are held in March in odd numbered years and in June and November every year. Councilmember Matarrese stated the three proposed amendments are critical and need to be put before the public because of serious budget implications and good government. Councilmember Tam stated that her motion remains the same; in all fairness to the proposed fire fighter initiative, it should be juxtaposed against each other and should not separately preempt the measure. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the matter would not be discussed until November. Councilmember Tam stated that her motion is to have discussions starting in 2011 in preparation for the November 2011 election and to reconstitute the Council Charter Subcommittee because the Subcommittee might change after the November 2010 election. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Subcommittee could start working on the matter before January, 2011; stated the start time should be flexible so that the current Council Subcommittee could start working on the matter sooner. Councilmember Tam stated under the Mayor's advisement, the Subcommittee would have the option to work on the matter sooner rather than later. Mayor Johnson stated the Subcommittee should start earlier because more cleanup language might be needed. Councilmember Gilmore stated the same process should be… | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 31 | The Community Development Director stated Council will have an opportunity to review the components of the plan. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated there has to be some evidence that substantial work is going to occur; inquired whether staff does not mean every capital plan would be approved by Council. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated Council would approve the program requirements; provided examples; stated the number of no cause evictions allowed in one year could have a cap to prevent mass evictions; the ordinance includes a sliding scale; concern has been raised about staff's proposed 50% cap; inquired whether the cap should be changed to 25%. Councilmember Daysog responded definitely. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired in the case of mass evictions, would landlords be able to raise rents not at all or by the allowable cap, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City is trying to prevent clearing out buildings unless something such as soft story work has to be done. The Community Development Director stated tenants could be temporarily relocated while work is completed. The City Attorney inquired whether or not allowing a rent increase after major capital improvements allows for a fair return on investment. The Assistant City Attorney responded the capital plan would allow the housing provider to recover costs over a period of time. The City Attorney clarified there could be a rent increase. Councilmember Oddie stated there could be an increase in the case of capital improvements, which would be an exception. The Community Development Director clarified no fault evictions are being addressed, not just cause evictions, which include capital improvements; stated the concern is landlords might find mass evictions more streamlined or cheaper than going through a capital improvement plan. Mayor Spencer noted tenants will have difficulty relocating while vacancy rates are very low; inquired whether Councilmem… | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-02 | 31 | CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (16-057) The Interim City Manager stated the City of Alameda has an advertisement in the San Francisco Examiner, Big Game Guide; staff would like to organize a driving tour of the northern waterfront. Mayor Spencer stated there were no objections. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (16-058) Consider Directing the City Manager to Prepare Analysis and Recommendations Regarding Reviving the Airport Operations Committee. (Councilmembers Daysog and Oddie). Councilmember Daysog stated the impact of the altered flight plan are a concern to residents; Alameda needs its own entity to address airport issues. Councilmember Oddie stated it would be a short term Committee; he would like to make sure Alameda has a say in this issue. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City pays a Federal lobbyist in Washington, D.C.; inquired what could be done to lobby the Federal Government. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated he would like an analysis and recommendation to reinstate the Committee. Councilmember Daysog stated the City could work with the lobbyists and others to get some ideas on how to proceed effectively. Mayor Spencer stated that she supports the proposal; requested information on the dormant Airport Operations Committee and how it was formatted. The Interim City Manager stated the City now monitors 6 Committee's on airport noise, which is very time intensive for staff; the City would need to rely heavily on the citizens that have the expertise and connect them with the lobbyists to assist staff. Mayor Spencer stated the Mayor of San Leandro is connecting with the FAA and is trying to set up a phone conference. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is strength in numbers, so the City should connect with other cities to move forward. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 30 February 2, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 31 | Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is nothing preventing the parties from working out an agreement between themselves. Mayor Spencer stated the language is just clarification and is not a substantive change. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft Section 6.58-90D on parties failure to appear for the hearing; should allow an agent or a designee to attend the hearing; many of the smaller landlords are elderly or live out of town; someone with authority should attend the RRAC meeting to bind the owner to what the RRAC recommends. Mayor Spencer stated that she wants someone with ownership interest. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council agreed to change the requirement; the penalty would be if someone attends with no authority to make a decision, then the rent increase is null and void. Mayor Spencer stated the decision was to have someone with ownership interest; if there is a hardship, then someone else could attend; the default is that it be someone with ownership interest. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated if something prevents the person with ownership interest from attending, they must send someone who has the authority to act. Mayor Spencer agreed; stated the default is someone with ownership interest. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a property owner could attend who has no knowledge of the day to day operations of the property; questioned what is gained by requiring the owner attend. Councilmember Oddie stated the intent is to have larger corporation landlords, who want the 20% rent increases attend the hearing. Mayor Spencer agreed; stated she is fine with leaving ownership interest. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated to be fair and balanced for both sides, making someone get on a plane for a 6% rent increase is not justified. Councilmember Oddie stated the corporate landlords who want to increase the rent should come justify it; an elderly mom and pop landlord wanting to send their child to represent them is understandable. Mayor Spencer stated that she agrees; if the landlords are elderly or have an issue, it … | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-06-06 | 31 | the amortization schedule and how much the City would save in the CalPers contribution each year; more is saved in the long term than the short term; all options will be brought to Council. Mayor/Chair Spencer stated that she would like money allocated for the Jean Sweeney Open Park space parcels; she believes the public safety contracts are not fiscally sustainable; she would like more money to go towards parks and other items important to the community. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella requested an update on the costs of the parcels and a progress report whether grants are available; stated if Council is asking employees to pay a portion of benefits or pensions, she would like to review the benefits that Council receives. Mayor/Chair Spencer stated Council's pay rate should be reviewed. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the City Council/SACIC Budget resolutions. Councilmember/Commissioner Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Vella, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor/Chair Spencer - 1. Councilmember/Commissioner Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of workforce change resolution. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie moved approval of amending the Pension Rate Stabilization Program and Other Post-Employment Benefits Funding Policy. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Vella, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Chair Spencer - 1. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella moved approval of directing the City Manager, or designee, to deposit $6,043,000 of Committed General Fund. Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice votes: Ayes: Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Vella, Matarrese and Oddie - 4. Noes: Chair Spencer - 1. ADJOURNMENT Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 5 to the Community Im… | CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 31 | Councilmember Oddie stated when staff comes back, he would like to see options and examples of what other cities are doing with regards to zoning. Mayor Spencer stated her referral is very specific regarding including options like preferences for owner operators who currently live in Alameda, conditional zoning regulations and limiting the number of dispensaries; she would like the support of Council to give further directions and have staff provide specific options on September 5th and return by September 19th; she would like the process to move faster and not wait until January. The City Manager responded that January is when the State regulations will take effect and recreational use becomes legal. Mayor Spencer stated the City should be able to do the ordinance now and be prepared to go forward with recreational use in January; she does not want to wait until January to go forward with medical use; she would like to expedite the process. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Mayor Spencer is asking to have medical dispensaries before January 2018. Mayor Spencer responded that is what the City Manager stated. The City Manager responded she understood Mayor Spencer is requesting medical dispensaries to come in before recreational use. Mayor Spencer stated medical dispensaries are currently legal within the State; medical marijuana is available at dispensaries in other cities and not in Alameda; she does not want to wait until 2018 to discuss medical dispensaries; it is important to move forward with the medical portion now. Vice Mayor Vella inquired what is Mayor Spencer's timeline; stated the referral addresses other options; she does not see anything in the language of the referral that prioritizes medical dispensaries. Mayor Spencer responded since medical use is now legal, she would like to focus on proceeding with the medical aspect now. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether a draft ordinance would be presented September 5th meeting; stated that he would like to have language for the Council to review. The City… | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,31 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 31 | ordinance. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the site will be very attractive to uses that need to be on the water. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding the water taxi commitment and hours, the Assistant Community Development Director stated the Master Plan commitment is that there will be a public water shuttle facility dock constructed; phasing needs to be approved before being constructed; the Transportation Management Association (TMA) will ultimately make the determination. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a commitment to have a water shuttle. Sean Whiskeman, Catellus, responded the hard work is building the infrastructure for the water shuttle; stated the actual service will fall to the TMA to generate the funds to operate the shuttle. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the City is going to have a water shuttle or only a dock. Mr. Whiskeman responded the City will receive the dock and the vessel,; stated the operating funds will be generated by the TMA; additional revenue will be allocated to the TMA from the new housing. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Catellus has had discussions with WETA. Mr. Whiskeman responded in the negative; stated Catellus plans on speaking with WETA. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the TMA will make the final decisions on the water shuttle. Mr. Whiskeman responded in the affirmative; stated the TMA board is made up of a representative of Catellus, TriPointe, the shopping center and the City. Mayor Spencer inquired whether TMA would have public meetings; and whether the public be notified of the meetings and be a part of the dialogue, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer stated the shuttle would need to be very accessible to be a part of the traffic solution; she does not want to end up with a shuttle sitting at a dock not being used; inquired whether the project will be 100% visit-ability, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer inquired whether every project can be required to… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );