pages: CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf, 34
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 34 | The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated that she would apply the formula specified in the draft Navy term sheet to the project to see what the land payment would be. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether the base project is the Measure A compliant plan and whether the density bonus option is higher; further inquired whether the two ranges would be analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded project alternatives have not been analyzed, but staff is close to finalizing a project description; stated the project description includes the base project and density bonus option; staff is studying two build-out scenarios. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated one hybrid project is being analyzed; inquired whether the base project and hybrid project would be analyzed when the Navy term sheet is developed in accordance with the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded staff has not started negotiations on the modified OEA; stated staff has significant concerns with the project pro forma, and does not want to enter into land payment negotiations with the Navy; that she assumes that final term sheet negotiations would be based upon the density bonus option project because SunCal wants to build said project. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated that she recalls receiving an email inviting Council, the Interim City Manager, and the Deputy City Manager - Development Services to some type of outreach with the Navy; subsequently, the Interim City Manager sent an email reminding Council that a Council subcommittee was formed; inquired whether the subcommittee ever met with the Navy and the Pentagon is unclear; inquired whether the staff report asserts that SunCal may be in breach of the Agreement because of what may have been a meeting with the Department of Defense that included the Navy. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the affirmative; stated that she was on a conference call with SunCal in which SunCal notified both the City and Navy that they would like to set up a meeting with the Department of the Navy in Washington, D.C.; that she and the Base Realignment and Closures (BRAC) Office in San Diego requested to be invited; several times, the BRAC Office asked when the meeting might occur; she and the BRAC Office were never notified. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether the Deputy City Manager - Development Services knows what the meeting was about. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded the BRAC Office informed her that the meeting did occur; stated conveyance term details were not Regular Meeting Alameda Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |