pages: CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf, 32
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 32 | could be utilized, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether Councilmember Tam modified her motion to include starting discussions earlier. Councilmember Tam responded that she has not modified her original motion; under advisement from the Mayor, the Subcommittee would have the option of starting discussions earlier than 2011 if schedules work out; that she thinks it would be very hard pressed for Councilmember Gilmore and her to find time to work with the departments because of going dark in August, having a full schedule in September, October being the election season, and the election is in November; however, every effort will made to do so. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (10-394 CC) Melody Marr, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, stated that she was present to wish the Council farewell. COUNCIL REFERRALS (10-395 CC) Consider Directing the Interim City Manager to Prioritize an Alternative Process and Plan for Alameda Point. Councilmember Matarrese gave a brief presentation. Speakers: Jon Spangler, Alameda; and Pat Keliher, SSC Alameda. Mayor Johnson stated that the item is Councilmember Matarrese's referral, not something that comes from staff. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he always looks for alternatives; he submitted the Council Referral on July 21, 2010 as a proposal for where to go next; new elements have arisen, particularly, taking a look at the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, which is a good place to start; the City would always work with the Navy, Veteran's Administration, and State Tidelands Trust; that he wants a specific plan on how the City will move forward post the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA). Mayor Johnson stated some items [on the Council Referral] have already been done; that her preference would be to have staff come back with options; Council would need to talk about a process; a broader look needs to be taken before specific direction is given. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 32 and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission July 27, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |