pages: CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf, 33
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 33 | Councilmember Oddie stated that he could support doing so if there are not three votes in favor of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Daysog stated the fair thing is to start off the process by tying the benefit to length of tenancy; however, in several years, there should be a set amount; expressed concern over a tenant being eligible to receive four months' rent after not being there very long. Mayor Spencer stated the tenant would receive four months' notice so they have more time to find alternative housing or receive money; the issue is really providing longer notice beyond the required 30 and 60 day notices. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the ordinance requires tenants to receive one month rent for each year; expressed concern over landlords paying four months' rent for a tenant who has only lived there one year; stated that she would like to see longer term tenancy encouraged; landlords like good tenants to stay because there is a cost to prepare the unit and find new tenants. Mayor Spencer requested staff to clarify the matter. The Community Development Director stated the ordinance includes that the relocation benefit is equal to the value of the tenant's month rent up to a maximum of four months' rent; tenants can exchange the monetary compensation for staying in the unit longer; for example, a 10 year tenant would qualify for a cash equivalent of four months' rent; the tenant could opt to stay two additional months and receive payment for two months, plus $1,500 for moving expenses; time can be traded for money up to a maximum of four months; staff tied the benefit to the length of tenancy. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the landlord could offer additional time instead of money. The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the decision is the tenant's choice. Mayor Spencer suggested that mom and pop landlords be able to choose whether to offer time or money in response to Councilmember Daysog's concern; stated the tenant could choose if under corporate ownership; the relocation assistance could be treated differently based upon ownership. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft noted doing so would treat tenants differently; stated that she would not support doing so. Councilmember Oddie stated defining mom and pop landlords would be difficult; noted some larger complexes are not owned by corporations. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 33 January 5, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |