pages: CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf, 33
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 33 | CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATION (10-306 CC/ARRA/10-44 CIC) Semimonthly Update on SunCal Negotiations The Deputy City Manager - Development Services provided a handout and gave a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether Stan Brown, SunCal, was here to speak or answer questions, to which Mr. Brown responded to answer questions. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated a lot of people would like to see the former Naval Base cleaned up; inquired whether SunCal is phone banking. Mr. Brown responded in the affirmative; stated SunCal has been contacting supporters; SunCal is urging supporters to let the Council/Board Members/Commissioners know that there is broad support. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether SunCal is intending to clean up the former Naval Base. Mr. Brown responded in the negative; stated the intent of the communication is for supporters to express continued support. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the communication is coming from SunCal staff, to which Mr. Brown responded the communication is coming from a consultant hired by SunCal. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired what is the name of the consultant, to which Mr. Brown responded he does not know. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the transcript and consultant's name could be provided, to which Mr. Brown responded in the affirmative. Speakers: Jon Spangler, Alameda; William Smith, Alameda. (10-307 CC/ARRA/10-45 CIC) Status Report of Finalized Navy Term Sheet Mandatory Milestone pursuant to Exclusive Negotiating Agreement Section 4.2.2. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated $108 million would have provided the Navy with profit participation when the housing market was hot and was calculated based upon far less units than what is in the Optional Entitlement Agreement (OEA); requested that future analysis project 5,000 units instead of 1,700 units. Regular Meeting Alameda Public Financing Authority June 15, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |