pages
96 rows where page = 26
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body
date (date) 96 ✖
- 2005-02-28 1
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-06-07 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2005-08-16 1
- 2006-06-20 1
- 2006-09-05 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-06-19 1
- 2007-11-06 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2008-01-15 1
- 2008-06-03 1
- 2008-06-17 1
- 2008-10-07 1
- 2009-01-06 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2009-11-17 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-05-04 1
- 2010-06-01 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-07-20 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2010-09-07 1
- 2011-02-15 1
- 2012-06-19 1
- 2013-07-23 1
- 2014-07-15 1
- 2015-01-20 1
- 2015-01-21 1
- 2015-02-02 1
- 2015-09-15 1
- 2015-10-20 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2016-03-01 1
- 2016-09-20 1
- 2016-10-18 1
- 2016-11-01 1
- 2017-04-12 1
- 2017-04-18 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-10-17 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2018-02-15 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-04-17 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-07-11 1
- 2018-07-24 1
- 2018-09-04 1
- 2018-10-16 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2019-03-13 1
- 2019-03-19 1
- 2019-05-07 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-09-03 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-12-18 1
- 2020-02-18 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-05-05 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-06-02 1
- 2020-06-16 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2021-01-19 1
- 2021-02-02 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-04-20 1
- 2021-05-04 1
- 2021-06-15 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-09-21 1
- 2021-10-19 1
- 2021-11-02 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2022-01-04 1
- 2022-02-01 1
- 2022-02-15 1
- 2022-03-01 1
- 2022-05-03 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 26 | to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated priorities should be determined. The Public Works Director stated the department has had a reduction in staff; both the pothole and sidewalk crews had reductions and, as a result, were combined. Mayor Johnson inquired whether annual contracts included pothole and sidewalk repair. The Public Works Director responded an annual contractor is responsible for sidewalk repairs; Public Works employees are responsible for inspections, fillets, grinding and minor concrete replacement. In response to Mayor Johnson's inquiry regarding the contractor's duties, the Public Works Director stated the contractor completes the backlog of permanent concrete repair in 300 to 400 locations. Councilmember Daysog stated residents would understand budget shortfalls for capital projects, but would not understand the City failing to have a plan, timeline and priorities. Councilmember Matarrese noted that he would prefer areas be paved over, rather than installing manufactured turf. (05-248) - ) Councilmember Daysog moved approval of continuing the meeting past 12:00 midnight. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Daysog stated there is probably $8 million undesignated in General Fund reserve; the City should change course if the reserve was built up at the expense of sidewalks and streets; the Council should consider allocating above $300,000; there needs to be a plan; the Council should receive a report on how to proceed. Mayor Johnson stated the City is reaching the point where something has to be done; people are upset about the condition of sidewalks and streets. Councilmember Matarrese stated a structural change should be made ; spending money upfront will save money later. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 26 May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-07 | 26 | first and then get staffing recommendations. Councilmember Matarrese reiterated that the dollar amount of the reduction is small. that he likes the idea of contracting services; having a reduction in the processing of permits and review of plans costs the City and customer money in the long run; other budget issues are hard realities; stated City services cost a lot of money. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was $150 million in permits this year, to which the Building Official responded permits have totaled $138 million. Councilmember deHaan stated that there was not a budget for FY 2004-05 for nine months the ten-year plan will give better insight he is concerned with the future years; praised the efforts of all involved with the budget preparation; stated the information provided is good, hard data; it is important to have some balances in equity within pay structures and labor management agreements. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she was glad that the public was present at tonight's meeting; she hoped that more people attend when the ten-year budget is presented; the City's past commitments will pay a big role in the future. Councilmember Daysog stated that having a ten-year budget is great but it is important to have a strong hold on the budget situation for the next 6 to 18 months suggested devising a system to track spending and see how the budget is evolving every two weeks. The Acting City Manager stated that he always reviews the budget with the Finance Director. stated that said information can be passed on to Council. Councilmember Daysog requested an Off Agenda Report on grant models and payment options; stated he looked forward to the City Attorney's review on how to handle the budget issues regarding | CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 26 | can spend $35,000 without Council approval inquired whether the City Attorney would bring the matter to the City Council if the total estimate of the litigation expense is more than $35,000. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated a large case would have to go to Council; the proposal has a number of additional restrictions for a smaller case, such as a sidewalk trip and fall i that she could only pick from a pre-qualified panel; if there is a slip and fall with a cost estimate of $15,000, the City Attorney would review the matter and provide the Council notice, financial reports, and cost estimates; outside counsel would be selected from the panel. Mayor Johnson stated there are small cases that should be handled in house; the City has five attorneys and should not farm out a $15,000 trip and fall case; insurance adjustors handle said cases in the private sector; the City should not use outside counsel for little cases that should be handled in house; the City has five staff attorneys and spends a lot of money on outside counsel; the staffing level should be reviewed if every $15,000 trip and fall is farmed out. The City Attorney stated the proposal is to deal with one issue; there is a process in place for reviewing performance and management goals for the utilization of outside counsel going forward so that the Council establishes performance standards and expectations of the City Attorney's office; that she hears the Council; that the matter is a budget issue; the City Attorney's office will do more with less, try to do more litigation in house and work with the Council to establish the balance that the Council wants between five attorneys. Mayor Johnson stated that she did not want to address the balance and how it would be established; further stated that she would prefer $25,000 [as the threshold]. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether $35,000 is for each matter. Mayor Johnson responded in the affirmative; stated that [$35,000] is what the City Attorney is proposing. Councilmember deHaan inq… | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-16 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -AUGUST 16, 2005- - -6:10 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-395) Conference with Labor Negotiator - Agency Negotiator : Arthur Hartinger of Meyers, Nave, Riback Silver and Wilson; Employee: City Attorney. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that the Council discussed the City Attorney and no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council August 16, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-20 | 26 | The Public Works Director stated that the City borrowed the equipment i work was performed by City staff. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated he does not want to see crack sealing disappear. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated crack sealing needs to be funded. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated that he attended Alameda Power and Telecom's budget meeting; direction has been taken to lower the overall operating cost; management would like to reduce the operating cost even lower. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether or not other maintenance issues would be addressed. The City Manager/Executive Director responded the focus is to have a very comprehensive maintenance approach; stated staff is dedicated to applying funds to infrastructure. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated he eagerly looks forward to the sidewalk and tree program. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the tree portion is critical. The City Manager/Executive Director stated the budget would come back to Council for approval on July 5. (06-338CC/06-037CIC) Discussion of City Attorney/General Counsel Legal Services and staffing options. The City Attorney/Lega Counsel provided a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the analyst position for the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) update would have an end. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded the initial part of the project has an end; stated an on-going effort would continue to monitor meeting the ADA Transition Plan's goals. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired why the work could not be contracted out. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 12 and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 20, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-05 | 26 | Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of allowing the Rutledge's to attempt to provide documentation regarding Social Security employment status and to have staff perform an evaluation based upon projected income from March 2006 to March 2007 to determine whether or not the Rutledge's fit into the income category for a five-person household. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the Social Security Administration income would be frozen if there were no more overtime. Commissioner Gilmore responded the income would be for overtime earned up until September 30, 2006; overtime would be zero from October 1 though March if the Social Security Administration] letter were submitted. Chair Johnson inquired what happens if a letter is not received, to which Commissioner Gilmore responded the Rutledge's would not qualify. Commissioner deHaan requested a caveat be added to the motion requesting documentation on the added dependent; inquired whether the documentation is on record and validated. The Housing Development Manager responded the dependent has been accepted. Commissioner deHaan stated that he wants the dependent validated and the Social Security [letter regarding overtime) validated by the [Social Security] Finance Director. Commissioner Gilmore suggested that the requirement be that the letter comes from someone in authority. Mayor Johnson suggested that the language state "the appropriate person" and staff could get the information from said appropriate person. Legal Counsel stated real information is being requested; Peralta College income needs to be counted for the fall and into 2007; staff does not have said information. Chair Johnson requested that the motion include that the Rutledge's provide all necessary documentation to provide staff with actual information. Commissioner deHaan requested a caveat be added into the motion Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 7 September 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 26 | guide to a solution; initially, the policies would be run through the model on the way to a General Plan amendment and modified as needed; then, the policies would be used as interim guidance (with the exception of Policy No. 7, which needs some rework) with the qualification that the General Plan would prevail if there is a specific requirement in the General Plan that is contrary. Mayor Johnson stated it is important to make sure the requirement is really contrary. Councilmember Matarrese stated contrary means roadways would not be widened to create additional automobile travel lanes; contrary to the General Plan would be to widen "X' Street with additional travel lanes as specified. Councilmember deHaan stated a lot of evaluation would not be necessary; only certain intersections need to be mitigated; the issue is being considered bigger than it is. Mayor Johnson disagreed with Councilmember deHaan; stated the interpretation being reviewed is that the policies cannot be used as guidelines because the policies are inconsistent with the General Plan; the policies could be used as guidelines in the interim because the policies do not appear to be inconsistent with the General Plan; she feels that Councilmember Matarrese's motion deals with the issue. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of appropriating funds to start the study with direction that: 1) the results come back through the Transportation Commission and the Planning Board for a General Plan Amendment to the Council, 2) Policy No. 1 through 6 are applied as guidelines in the interim, with Policy No. 7 to be rewritten; and 3) the guidance would be used unless there was an explicit conflict stated in the General Plan requirement. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether other policies were reviewed and should be used as part of the test. The Transportation Commission Chair responded the Transportation Master Plan is a five-page document i stated the Transportation Element would be an entire revamp. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether everyone is using EM… | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 26 | The Assistant City Manager stated all the Tinker Avenue determinations have to be made before the project is started in the second and third phase. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated she is concerned about what to do with the existing phase of the project until the City figures out what to do with Tinker Avenue. ouncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog inquired whether there are processes and mechanisms in place to deal with referenced transportation questions. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the documents could be adopted as amended; stated the DDA provision could be expanded when the Tinker Avenue declaration of infeasibility comes to Council; the TDM could be augmented; the goals of the TDM Program could be articulated. The Assistant City Manager stated the DDA was designed to be as flexible as possible in order to respond to need; the developer is trying not to allow the City to come back with an unlimited tax for money to fix problems that might arise. louncilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Daysog stated he is comfortable that processes are in place to deal with issues that Council has raised; the process has been long; it is important to believe that trust has been built. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated approval could be given with direction to add language and provisions relating to issues discussed. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore requested clarification on the TDM inquired whether the TDM would be devised after specific approval of project phases and could go hand in hand. The Supervising Planner responded the Conditions of Approval require that a detailed TDM program describing the entire program for all phases be presented to the Transportation Commission and Planning Board; stated operations have been front loaded; Condition of Approval #11 states buses would be on the road and running at a minimum 30-minute headway for the first 100,000 square feet of nonresidential or first 150 housing units, whichever comes first; the project… | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 26 | currently, certain things can be changed by the TDM Program staff; annual reports would go to the Planning Board and the Transportation Commission for evaluation, feedback, and comment. Mayor Johnson stated Council might want the opportunity to have changes come to Council; the Planning Board is not a specialist in transportation; Council may want to have some input on readjusting dollars and determining how dollars are spent inquired whether there would be a commitment in the agreement with Clif Bar regarding the water taxi. Mr. Marshall responded the water taxi service is part of the negotiations with Clif Bar. Mayor Johnson stated a problem might arise if the water taxi is not doing well, but an obligation exists with Clif Bar. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated the day-one requirement stipulates that the water taxi feasibility study be completed and that the water taxi be instituted when deemed feasible and be in operation for one year. Mayor Johnson stated she was referring to the developer's agreement with Clif Bar. Mr. Marshall stated the developer is required to provide the water taxi service during the period of establishing retail outlets. Mayor Johnson stated the water taxi costs would come out of the TDM Program the first year; the developer and Clif Bar would have a separate commitment if there was a determination that the water taxi was not an effective use of the TDM Program money. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated the developer has to comply with the DDA requirements in the Master Plan conditions the developer will operate the water taxi for one year at minimum; the money can be reprogrammed if the TDM Program staff determines that the water taxi is not feasible and effective; Catellus could not veto the decision. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether scheduling would be impacted if the ordinances for DA-06-0002 and DA-06-0004 are finally passed and DA- 06-0003 was postponed for two weeks in order for staff and the Transportation Commission to address questions… | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-19 | 26 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that the accumulated Public Arts Fund can be for public art as well as for programs; the two-year budget cycle did not anticipate a 10% cut for the Museum subsidy the cycle can be finished out and $50,000 can be added for a Cultural Arts Program; $42,700 is already budgeted. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese is recommending adding $50,000 to what is being proposed tonight. Councilmember Matarrese responded that $8,000 is needed to fund a $50,000 Cultural Arts Program; $50,000 would be in the Museum fund; $46,000 is currently allocated for the Museum; $4,000 is the match for this cycle to close the Museum rent gap. The City Manager stated $7,500 was saved by not paying two months rent and could apply to the $8,000 needed [for the Cultural Arts Program]. Mayor Johnson inquired whether using the $42,000 [for the Cultural Arts Program] conflicts with the Public Arts Ordinance. The City Manager responded staff would come back to Council outlining obstacles funding sources would need to be identified. Mayor Johnson stated funding should be made available to other non- profits. Councilmember Matarrese stated a written agreement with the Museum should include all liability and insurance requirements and completion of a business and fundraising plan within a quarter. The City Manager clarified that the [Museum] grant would be for $46,000 with a total cap of $50,000 with matching donations. Mayor Johnson stated performance measures should be implemented. Vice Mayor Tam stated modified the recommendation should include that the Museum provide a annual performance report. Councilmember deHaan inquired why the $7,500 in unpaid rent would not be part of the over and above [funding for the Museum]. The City Manager responded the $7,500 would be applied to the matching grant for the other arts groups; stated the Museum would need to raise $4,000 as a match. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 15 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commi… | CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-06 | 26 | (07-516C CC) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a First Amendment to Development Agreement DA-06-003 By and Between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus Development Corporation) Continued to December 4, 2007. . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community 3 Improvement Commission November 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 26 | Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated that Proposition 1A did not provide any protection for the City's redevelopment fund; requested clarification on the issue. The Finance Director stated the last Educational Revenue Augmentation funds (ERAF) were $711,000 out of $5 million of property tax in the past years; the construction of a takeaway formula is unknown; redevelopment agencies are the most vulnerable. louncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated Council did not intend to use reserves for Beltline litigation costs; inquired what will be done in the future to prevent reoccurrence. The Finance Director responded any direction for use of funds needs to come from the City Manager to the Finance Department and needs to have discussions on funding. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated all money needs to be budgeted with approval of Council. The Finance Director stated that she understands that the money was approved for payment from the Risk Management Fund. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether audit practices and protocols are sufficient to catch any in the Finance Director's opinion; stated that authorization happened over a year agoi audits have been performed since that time; the matter is just coming to light now; inquired whether audit practices and protocols are sufficient. The Finance Director stated the only way that an auditor would be aware of the issue was if substantial information was available about the fact that the litigation was directed by Council; the direction would be in the form of information from the City Manager and the City Attorney to Finance. Councilmember/BoardMember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired how the issue was discovered. The Finance Director responded by review of the Risk Management Fund when the balance became a deficit. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the auditors look for deficits. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 12 and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvem… | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-15 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -JANUARY 15, 2008- - -7:25 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (08-03) Update on the Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project. The Redevelopment gave a brief presentation. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the interior restoration was damaged due to leaks, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative. Chair Johnson stated that she is glad the leaks were discovered now and not after the Theater opens. Commissioner deHaan stated restoration and parking garage costs are $16 million; inquired whether the overall project cost totals $37 million, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number . ] ( *08-04) - Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of January 2, 2008. Approved. ( *08-05) Recommendation to approve a Contract with City Design Collective in the amount of $74,925 for the North of Lincoln Strategic Plan for the Park Street Business District. Accepted. (*08-06) Resolution No. 08-152, "Authorizing the Substitution of a Surety Bond for the Cash Funded Reserve Account Relating to the Commission's $17,510,000 Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (Business and Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 1 January 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-03 | 26 | The Finance Director responded in 2002 refinancing was done for reconstruction of City Halli stated tax increment bonds were done for the CIC in 2003. Councilmember/Authority Member deHaan inquired whether refinancing was done for interest rates only. The Finance Director responded City Hall reconstruction bonds were refinanced in 2002 and were originally issued in 2000. Councilmember/Authority Member deHaan inquired what was the impact over the out years. The Finance Director responded the debt service was the same level every year; the prime motivation for the current proposal is not to get interest rate savings, but deferral. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the City needs to look long-term; the report only looks at short-term. The Finance Director stated staff reviewed the matter from a perspective that the proposal is not good for the long-term, but is what needs to be done in order to have budget capacity for the next two years. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated direction has been given to always look at long-term. Vice Mayor/Authority Member Tam stated it does not make sense to spend down the fund balance if the same interest is earned on the fund balance. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated it does not make sense to use the fund balance because the City has so many other things to pay for with the fund balance, such as deferred health care retirement costs; the City needs to be living within its means and not defer payments. Councilmember/Authority Member Gilmore stated the amount of money being deferred over the first two years is slightly under a million dollars; the extra money that would be spent over the life of the loan is $600,000. payments would be extended for two more years; she would like to hear from the City Auditor and City Treasurer. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired how much the payments are for the last Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public 12 Financing Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting June 3, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 26 | The Recreation and Park Director stated Trust representatives have not indicated that any additional funding would be available but are willing to review how current funds are invested. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the community gets more per dollar for funding Park Directors than the Meyer's House. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired how much the Fun Fair costs. The Recreation and Park Director responded the Fun Fair is funded through fees charged to participants; stated funding is also received through recycling grants; costs are a wash. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired what is the proposal regarding the Art in the Park. The City Manager/Executive Director responded the proposal is to use money from the Pubic Art fund. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the Art in the Park should be self- sustaining. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated major issues still exist regarding keeping current public safety levels; Council and the community want to have a safe community; she would rather buy more time for the Fire Department than the Golf Complex. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated a gap would still exist if revenue raising options are placed on the November ballot and revenues start coming in January. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated overtime needs to be monitored; the vehicle replacement policy also needs to be reviewed. Councilmember/BoardMember/Commissioner Gilmore stated the vehicle replacement policy is a mechanism to buy time. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the issue would be understood better when the vehicle replacement policy comes back; keeping vehicles longer might be possible. Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated a lot of phone calls and emails have been received regarding not cutting public safety and increasing staffing levels; maintaining current Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and 16 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 17, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-07 | 26 | business plan from SunCal. He expressed his concerns about calling the pile of data a business plan because there was no proposal, nor any conclusions drawn. Ms. Potter explained that SunCal did submit a draft business plan on September 19th, which was submitted in multiple parts, and do not exist together as one document. SunCal understands the Board's expectation of what the Business Plan document should entail and has promised that when they submit the final plan on November 19th, it will be bound in one single document with a narrative tying all the disparate pieces together as the Business Plan. Member Gilmore asked who gets to decide which party decides or determines when DE Shaw can remove SunCal as partner. Amy Freilich, Senior VP of SunCal, stated that as it's drafted currently, the Board would get notice from DE Shaw that would indicate that they have removed, for cause, SunCal as a partner. At that point, under the standard default provisions of the document, the ARRA would be entitled to declare default and specify the reasons for concerns and ask for a demonstration for what the cause was. If DE Shaw is unable to satisfy the ARRA with respect to that, it would be a default of the developer, and the ARRA would be entitled to terminate. DE Shaw would present their evidence that they were appropriately removing SunCal as partner. Member Gilmore further asked, under the operating agreement, SunCal can be removed for "member issues", would the process for determining default be the same? Ms. Freilich affirmed. Chair Johnson added that the only remedy would be to declare default and then terminate. Member Matarrese stated that the problem with this situation is, in layman's terms, it puts us back to square one where SunCal doesn't have any money without DE Shaw. He was concerned that DE Shaw knows nothing about developing Alameda Point, and that if we lose SunCal, we're at the end of the line -- we're stuck with a terminated agreement and no developer, and have to start the process all over again. Member G… | CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-06 | 26 | allocated on an as-needed basis. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of re-allocating funds for the Chun property and reprogramming remaining funds to projects that would provide an immediate return. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Commissioner deHaan stated that he supports planting vines. Commissioner Gilmore stated planting could always be an option in the future; moving an economic project forward is important. Commissioner deHaan stated planting would be an inexpensive option; the problem would be future maintenance. Chair Johnson inquired whether the façade grant program still has funding, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative. Chair Johnson inquired whether remaining the remaining funds could be used for the façade grant program. The Development Services Director responded the City had a couple of substantial façade improvement projects; stated that she would not advocate using the remaining money [ for the façade program] because prevailing wages do not go very far; the program has been funded with loans that have been repaid and other revenue sources which are not restricted by prevailing wages. Commissioner Tam stated that she concurs with Commissioner deHaan; times are tight, but the funds have been contemplated and dedicated for theatre and garage improvements; a promise has been made ; spending money on vegetation is a minimal cost; that she is grateful that the Chun property owners and staff reached an agreement; thanked PSBA for offering to provide planters and maintenance; that she is supportive of doing both [planting and Chun improvements). Chair Johnson stated planting can be done later; no commitment has been made to the community spending needs to be prioritized; high priority projects need to be addressed. Commissioner Matarrese stated planting options can be made in the | CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 26 | The Supervising Accountant responded two bases are used for the calculations : the actual pay out for workers' compensation claims and the department payroll. The City Treasurer inquired how much the department payroll is bumped up. The Interim Finance Director responded around 3 to 5% the exact number would be provided. The City Treasurer stated approximately $4 million could be needed in the next fiscal year. Mayor Johnson stated using present value [for equipment replacement ] does not make sense. The Interim Finance Director stated the model could be run using future value. The City Treasurer stated workers' compensation costs should be assigned to the source. In response to Vice Mayor deHaan's inquiry regarding the $4 million, the City Treasurer reviewed how he came up with his estimate. The City Manager concluded the discussion. * * * Mayor Johnson called a recess at 3:35 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 3:50 p.m. *** (09-065) Consider various financing and pre-funding options for Other Public Employee Benefit (OPEB) The City Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson requested staff to provide a breakdown of the amount owed; stated the Council received a report that the range was from $70 million to $140 million; inquired whether there is no longer a range and the amount is $75 million. The Interim Finance Director responded the amount required to be funded is the net present value of the unfunded liability, which is $75.6 million; stated the breakdown is: $34. 1 million for police, $34.2 million for fire, and $7.5 million for all others. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 26 February 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 26 | housing funds set aside could be used. Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether set aside funding would most likely be used. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel stated there is no requirement to use the funds or otherwise help or subsidize an applicant's affordable housing development. Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the funding has been used in the past. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded sometimes yes, sometimes no; stated the Grand Marina development inclusionary housing was provided with no subsidy from the City; one of the causes of action against the City in the Collin's lawsuit was the failure to have a density bonus ordinance; State law is not a model of clarity; staff has attempted to make the ordinance more user friendly. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that she does not have a problem with adopting a density bonus ordinance but ensuring that the ordinance works well is important inquired whether the State ordinance is used if the City does not adopt its own density bonus ordinance. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded State law requires the City to adopt the State's ordinance by reference. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the City is better off adopting a density bonus ordinance tailored to the community. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel reviewed the one hundred-unit scenario. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether a twenty-unit condominium could be built if the requested waiver relates to Measure A. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded the developer would need to request a waiver, not a concession or incentive; stated a Measure A waiver could not be granted unless the developer could prove that the project would be physically precluded from using the density bonus without the waiver. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether concessions and incentives have limits, but waivers do not, to the City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commissio… | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2009-11-17 | 26 | The Planning Services Manager stated the ordinance would return to the Council no later than the first meeting in February the desire seems to be to apply caps and limits on concessions and incentives to residential properties and not mixed used commercial properties; questioned whether the Council/Commissior would move forward on an ordinance tonight with language added to Section 30-17.9 that states "for commercially zoned or mixed use properties;" stated the Planning Board would review residential properties and staff would come back with an amendment to the density bonus regulations. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam stated the northern waterfront project included height limits; inquired how height limits would be reconciled if the density bonus ordinance includes height limits. The Planning Services Manager responded specific plan or planned development amendments would be required for modifications to projects with adopted regulations for specific sites. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated requirements for fire access should be reviewed if backyards are developed; that she is not sure if a fire truck could access the backyard of the monster house on Briggs Avenue. The Interim City Manager/Executive Director stated staff has some thoughts regarding the issue. Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether any new buildings are required to have sprinklers, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Counci lmember/Commissione: Matarrese stated residential caps should be technical, not arbitrary. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam moved introduction of the ordinance with the suggested modification on page 13. Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor/Chair Johnson clarified that the residential portion would go back to the Planning Board. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission November 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY--MARCH - 16, 2010- 7:01 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the meeting at 1:44 a.m. on March 17, 2010. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent: None. MINUTES (10-13 CIC) Minutes of the Special CIC Meeting Held on March 3, 2010. Approved. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEM (10-129 CC/ARRA/10-14 CIC) Consider SunCal's Requests for 60-Day Tolling Period regarding Notice of Default Issued by Alameda on February 4, 2010. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired what section of the Executive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) explicitly uses the terms "Measure A" and "Measure A Compliant". The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded no such terms are used; stated an interpretation suggests the terms; under the ENA, the developer had a chance to submit an initiative for a non-Measure A compliant plan; the initiative failed; under the terms of the ENA, SunCal is permitted to submit an Optional Entitlement Application (OEA) which complies with existing law, which in this case is Measure A; regardless of the fact that the ENA does not say "Measure A", that is the interpretation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the City found SunCal in default because the OEA is not consistent with existing law; requested an interpretation of Section 3.2.5.1 of the ENA. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 1 Community Improvement Commission March 16, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-04-20 | 26 | for at least twenty years; the City's ordinance complies with the State and restates the law in a more user friendly way; anyone could have asked for a density bonus even if the ordinance was not in place. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether anybody could have requested a density bonus under State law before the City adopted its ordinance, to which the City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative; stated one prior application did seek a density bonus. Mr. Faye stated specific changes were made to State law that allowed Charter cities to do things a little differently; particular changes to the Municipal Code would have rendered the Measure B election unnecessary; that he is not disputing the actual existence of a density bonus provision but the applicability to Charter cities and the way Charter cities can modify the Charter. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether Mr. Faye is stating that the City had not adopted a density bonus ordinance before because the City was exempt as a Charter city. Mr. Faye responded in the negative; stated that he is not disputing that density bonus provisions were in place; the issue is what Charter cities can and cannot do under the modified State law relative to density bonuses; it goes to the Council's new ability to modify its Charter without an election of the people which was not the case in Alameda prior to the adoption of the Code in the middle of December of last year. The City Attorney/Legal Council stated State density bonus ordinances have always pre-empted [City ordinances]; Charter cities are just as bound as General Law cities. Mr. Faye stated it is the way in which the City adopted implementing State law to address the City's Charter that deals with attached housing. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether Mr. Faye agrees that the State density bonus law applied in Alameda even before December. Mr. Faye responded the State density law applied; the State density law that allows Council to modify its Charter, as opposed to having an election of the people to modi… | CityCouncil/2010-04-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-05-04.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-05-04 | 26 | Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether SunCal can make a commitment [on numbers]. Mr. Brown responded that he will meet with staff tomorrow; stated an answer should be provided by Thursday or shortly thereafter; that he suspects the number will not total $9 million. (10-214 CC/ARRA/10-28 CIC) Staff Reimbursement Account The Deputy City Manager - Economic Development gave a brief presentation. (10-215 CC/ARRA/10-29 CIC) May 10th Project Scoping Meeting - Planning Board The Deputy City Manager - Economic Development gave a brief presentation. AGENDA ITEMS (10-216 CC/ARRA/10-30 CIC) Recommendation to Accept the Third Quarter Financial Report. Continued to May 18, 2010. ORAL REPORTS (ARRA) Oral report from Member Matarrese, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) representative - Highlights of April 1 Alameda Point RAB Meeting Member Matarrese stated the Board could read the summary from Peter Russell since he did not attend the meeting; RAB and ARRA meetings would be held on Thursday. ARRA BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (ARRA) The Interim Executive Director stated the California Redevelopment Association (CRA) received a less than favorable ruling; the City would be cutting a very large check in the amount of $4.4 million; the check is due to the County on Monday. Chair Johnson stated a copy of the check should be provided to the newspaper in addition to a press release. Board Member Gilmore stated a nasty letter should be sent along with the check. Board Member deHaan requested that staff research whether the redevelopment money [taken by the State] would go to the schools. The Interim Executive Director stated the total amount of redevelopment funds [from all cities] is barely $5 billion out of a $20 billion to $24 billion [State] deficit. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community 9 Improvement Commission May 4, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-05-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-01.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-01 | 26 | part of the equation. The Planning Services Manager responded commercial is not part of the density bonus plan; stated the density bonus ordinance would not govern where SunCal chooses to put densities. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated the red outline on page 4 shows high density residential and commercial; the blue line is the buffer zone; that he has never seen anything similar in Alameda. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the WRT Study also analyzed a high range in density that was closer to SunCal's plan. The Planning Services Manager stated the WRT Study looked at the PDC; the key to making the overall project work for the City is that the 4,200 unit project would have to develop and fund a very successful transportation plan that would work for the entire island; the only way to get people from the 4,200 housing units through the tube would be to have existing residents chose to participate [in a transportation program]. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether the WRT Study was commissioned by the City, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated that her comfort level would increase if she had more information before deciding what the date should be; inquired whether information could be provided by the next Council meeting, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated staff would come back on June 15th with updates on the completeness of the application, financial issues, and transit oriented develop aspects. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated an update should be provided on the concept of density bonus and density transfer and how it works in light of the transit oriented development. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 4. Abstention: Coun… | CityCouncil/2010-06-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 26 | designation of Voting Delegate for the League's 2010 Annual Conference. Councilmember Gilmore nominated Councilmember Tam as the designated Voting Delegate and Vice Mayor deHaan as the alternate. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote. (10-304) Councilmember Matarrese stated on June 3rd, there was a Joint City/School District meeting; the subcommittee recommends Council to direct the City Manager to negotiate a master Joint Use Agreement with Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) to manage, improve, and maintain playing fields including, but not limited to, Encinal and Alameda High School fields; the purpose of the agreement would be to provide fields for continued school use and additional community use at large; Board Member Spencer raised potential health concerns which may be related to synthetic turf fields; joint efforts will be made to research the issue; the subcommittee discussed potential City participation with the Everett Street site, the former Island High School campus, to assist AUSD in obtaining money so that AUSD would not need to develop housing; an item was tabled until the Youth Commission survey results are obtained; rumor is that Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) is going to apply commercial rates instead of municipal rates to school districts; the subcommittee is requesting that the City ensure continuation of the past policy regarding the School District getting municipal rates; the School District is having difficulty maintaining after school programs through a grant; having Recreation and Parks take the programs is a problem because of PERS requirements; the Interim City Manager has been requested to help with the issue; the subcommittee is recommending that the Council and School Board convene a meeting in the fall similar to the 2007 Joint Meeting; the next subcommittee meeting is tentatively scheduled for September 1st; provided a handout. Vice Mayor deHaan noted Councilmember Tam raised the issue of getting the School District to join in on wa… | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-20 | 26 | Closed Session was not held on the matter tonight because of a clerical error; that she does not have the benefit of her colleague's and legal team's thinking. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated no allegations have been directed toward her; she understands there have been claims and spins regarding the investigative reports. The City Attorney./Lega Council stated SunCal's attorneys have threatened to sue the City if the City does not do what SunCal wants; having a litigation defense briefing would not change the situation and would have no bearing on the Councilmembers/Board Members'/Commissioners' decision tonight; City staff, including a significant legal team of land use attorneys, CEQA attorneys, and litigators, have done a through analysis of the issues before the Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners tonight and have made a recommendation to the Councilmembers/Board Members/Commissioners; SunCal also says that it is entitled to the benefit of the deal that SunCal has made; the deal is the ENA; the ENA specifically states that damages would be limited to return of SunCal's $1 million deposit in the event of the City's breach of its obligation to negotiate diligently and in good faith. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether SunCal's damages would be limited to $1 million if SunCal sues the City and is successful. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the negative; stated the benefit of the bargain SunCal made set forth in black and white in the ENA specifically states SunCal's damages would be limited to a return of the $1 million deposit; that she does not believe tonight's forum is a good time to get into a legal issue debate with SunCal's attorneys. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the ENA expired yesterday; the City does not have a Navy term sheet; inquired whether the question on the agenda tonight is whether or not to accept the MOEA. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded the question on the agenda is whether or not to follow the staff recomm… | CityCouncil/2010-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 26 | Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (10-393 CC) Adoption of Resolution Calling a Consolidated Municipal Election in the City of Alameda on November 2, 2010, for the Purpose of Submitting to the Electors a Proposal to Amend the City of Alameda Charter by Repealing Article XXVII on Compulsory Arbitration for Firefighters; and Proposing Said Charter Amendment. Not adopted; (10-393A CC) Adoption of Resolution Calling a Consolidated Municipal Election in the City of Alameda on November 2, 2010, for the Purpose of Submitting to the Electors a Proposal to Amend the City of Alameda Charter by Adding Sections 3-20, 17-18 and 21-2 regarding Budget Authority of the City Manager and City Council; and Proposing Said Charter Amendments. Not adopted; and (10-393B CC) Adoption of Resolution Calling a Consolidated Municipal Election in the City of Alameda on November 2, 2010, for the Purpose of Submitting to the Electors a Proposal to Amend the City of Alameda Charter by Section 3-18 to Allow the City Clerk to Reject All Legal Advertising Bids; by Amending Section 10-3 to Add a Member to the Public Utilities Board and Convert the City Manager into a Nonvoting Member; By Amending Section 12-1(C) to Add Restrictions to Public Utilities Board Contracting; and By Repealing Section 22-8 Regarding the Hours of City Offices; and Proposing Said Charter Amendments. Not adopted. (City Attorney) The City Clerk and Interim City Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Tam stated that when she was on the Charter Subcommittee, thirty-two different amendments were on the 2008 election; one section relating to specified hours relegated that Council could adopt a schedule. The City Clerk stated there was a measure regarding the Council meeting. Councilmember Tam stated the measure also addressed to hours of operation because the Planning Department opens at 7:00 a.m. and the Library is open on Saturdays; Council did not wan… | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-09-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2010-09-07 | 26 | Shelter is not optimal for the animals; she wants a better facility. Commissioner Tam stated Mount Trashmore is not the right place. Commissioner deHaan stated past discussions have included taking in other districts to make the Animal Shelter profitable. The Interim Executive Director stated staff has looked at other options, including doing what Berkeley has done. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 12:03 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, CIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community 8 Improvement Commission September 7, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2011-02-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2011-02-15 | 26 | overtime for the first time in June. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the staff report notes the CIC is losing $4.4 million in redevelopment funds because of Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation (SERAF) and has a potential loss of $900,000 to $1 million this year; inquired whether Proposition 22 was suppose to help shelter the funds. The Acting City Manager/Executive Director responded the SERAF payments are a hold over from the budget a couple of years ago; stated the City is stuck with the second year SERAF payment regardless of Proposition 22. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the City will never get the money back; inquired why projections at June 30, 2011 are approximately $55 million for revenues and $69 million for expenditures. The Controller responded the Special Revenue Funds are project oriented; stated funds get built up and are spent when there is enough money; reserves are being used [for projects] this year; some years, Special Revenue Fund reserves go down. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether lumping the Alameda Point Going Forward Project with ARRA repairs would sacrifice one for the other; stated the ARRA fund balance is $7.5 million as of June 2010. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded $700,000 would be drawn down on the ARRA fund balance leaving a $6.2 million fund balance at the end of this fiscal year. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the Police and Fire Departments have provided worst case scenarios; an unanticipated $2 million FISC fire required drawing down on ARRA reserves; ARRA was not previously charged for using water consumption due to an opened bypass valve diverting water from East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD); there is a $407,000 charge; there are unpaid reimbursement costs associated with the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for maintenance of the Alameda Point water system between August 2005 and June 2009. The Public Works Director stated a year ago, EBMUD advised th… | CityCouncil/2011-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2012-06-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2012-06-19 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -JUNE 19, 2012- - 6:00 P.M. Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 6:01 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor Gilmore - 5. [Note: Councilmember Johnson arrived at 6:07 p.m. and Vice Mayor Bonta arrived at 6:10 p.m.] Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (12-300) Workers' Compensation Claim (54956.95); Claimant: David Ellis; Agency Claimed Against: City of Alameda (12-301) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; (54956.9) Name of Case: Robert Zack, Bernice Jolliff, The Estate of Raymond Zack VS. City of Alameda, County of Alameda, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive; Superior Court of California, Alameda County; Case No. RG12632015; this lawsuit stems from the tragic drowning of Raymond Zack at Crown Beach in May 2011. Family members are seeking un specified monetary damages. Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and Mayor Gilmore announced that regarding Workers' Compensation Claim, the Council gave direction to staff; and regarding Existing Litigation, Council gave direction to staff. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 19, 2012 | CityCouncil/2012-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2013-07-23.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2013-07-23 | 26 | (13-371) The City Manager announced an upcoming National Night Out would be held on August 2nd. addressed an article regarding Marina View Towers; stated eviction notice were given in order to complete a seismic retrofit; announced the Joint City Council and Planning Board meeting would be held on September 25th. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether an agenda would be posted, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. The City Manager stated Councilmembers would receive the agenda, which would also be sent to various regional agencies to ensure everyone sees what the City is doing. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (13-372) Consideration of Mayor's Appointment to the Rent Review Advisory Committee. Mayor Gilmore appointed Royl Roberts to the Rent Review Advisory Committee. (13-373) Councilmember Chen announced that he would be holding a National Night Out event at his home. (13-374) Councilmember Tam announced that she went to San Diego and was appointed to the Board of the League of California Cities. (13-375) Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended a ribbon cutting at the Alameda County Family Justice Center celebrating a new pop-up library. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:21 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 25 July 23, 2013 | CityCouncil/2013-07-23.pdf |
CityCouncil/2014-07-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2014-07-15 | 26 | agency serves many persons in Alameda (and receives some city funding to do so), I would just like to stress the need for having livable & affordable housing for those who do this kind of service work. I also volunteer my time for one of the City's Commissions and try to contribute to the community on a voluntary basis. I would hate to leave Alameda. Rent in Alameda is very cheap compared to the rest of the Bay Area. I'm a single mom. If there's another rent increase, I will have to move to a less safe city, further away from my job. We've lived here for 18 years. The rent increase has occurred, but the quality of service from the property manager and/or property owner has been inconsistent. I'm always worried I can no longer afford to rent in alameda and real estate pricing has sky rocketed so the idea of buying a home that I can live with my two kids remains that of a dream I will eventually have to move out of Alameda. Very concerned that our rent will go up by a lot after our one-year lease is up In comparison to other apartments in the same area, the amount is much higher. In addition, I pay an additional $80-90 per month for trash/sewage that is not included in the rent and based on the overall use of all tenants. I can't afford a $125 annual increase. In addition, I don't have normal amenities such as a microwave or dishwasher. Supposedly, the hike was in comparison to other comparable apartments in the area. Yet we don't have the amenities as other apartments in the area for the same price. There's other areas as well that have security for the same price. I've had my brand new car keyed in the very front of the building facing the street. The concern is that there seems to be no purpose to raise the rents other than across the board greed. I have no choice but to look to move out of the state of California seeing that my current rent for a one bedroom apartment is more than most mortgages for a 4 bedroom house outside California. I am throwing this money away instead of investing in my future. Landlord t… | CityCouncil/2014-07-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2015-01-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2015-01-20 | 26 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Spencer adjourned the meeting at 1:23 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission January 20, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-01-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2015-01-21.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2015-01-21 | 26 | extra meetings, such as an open house; suggested tackling the most important matters first. Discussed the election results and the prior Council; stated creating a welcoming atmosphere is important; that she would not suggest adhering to Roberts Rules of Order; stated meetings should not be scheduled with the public input at 11:00 p.m.: Elizabeth Tuckwell, Alameda. Mayor Spencer stated the meeting is achieving her goal; she loves having members of the public tell the Council what is working and not working and how the Council can best serve the public's needs; that she appreciates that Councilmembers can follow up with referrals and have an opportunity to work with staff more closely; it was not known that additional items would be continued to tonight when the special meeting was called; the meeting has gone beyond the intended time. Councilmember Oddie expressed concern over the meeting turning into a session to criticize the former Council; stated the City needs to move forward; the election is over; how meetings are run and speakers are called is the Mayor's prerogative; the Council could discuss the items in the report. Mayor Spencer stated the intent is being taken out of context; that she always welcomes public participation; the meeting has been very productive for her. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft provided an example of her daughter working with people from other countries risking their lives to participate in the democratic processes; read from the Sunshine Ordinance regarding access to government; stated the benefits of a democratic society are taken for granted; expressed concern over criticizing past Councils; stated Councilmembers are doing the people's business and should do so in the best way possible. Mayor Spencer stated it was not disrespectful to call the meeting; the meeting was called to discuss the items and that is what has occurred. Councilmember Daysog stated the intent of the workshop is right on; it is about letting people understand the way in which government works and opening the doo… | CityCouncil/2015-01-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2015-09-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2015-09-15 | 26 | a specific topic. The City Attorney stated the interpretation of the nomination process section of the Charter is directive, not mandatory; it has to be read as consistent with other provisions of the Charter; if it was read literally as has been suggested, it would mean if there was a vacancy during a year, then it could not be filled until July 1. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, Councilmember Daysog stated it would be cynical on his part to vote for the issue just to have conversation because he does not support the referral. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT (15-566) There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting in memory of Augusta Collins at 1:24 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 25 September 15, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-09-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2015-10-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2015-10-20 | 26 | In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry regarding Universal Studios, Mr. McManus stated space was rented for the Steve Jobs movie. Mayor Spencer stated that the City should broadcast and advertise wider than existing customers and Joe Ernst. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded Council selected Cushman and Wakefield and felt they were highly qualified. Mayor Spencer inquired if an RFP was done when they were selected, to which the Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer stated that she was not a part of Council at that time; she would like background information on how Cushman and Wakefield were selected, casting a wider net and how much money Cushman and Wakefield have been paid. The Chief Operating Officer - Alameda Point stated that she could have provided a better back story. Mayor Spencer stated there is not sufficient due diligence in committing to use Cushman and Wakefield for Site B. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of proceeding with the new development strategy for the Enterprise District at Alameda Point following the specifications set forth by Vice Mayor Matarrese. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion; stated bringing Wrightspeed to Alameda was a homerun; that he is confident with moving forward with Cushman and Wakefield. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he would like a measurement of the progress of the goals, which will answer some of the Mayor's questions; the number of new inquiries and commitments can be measured and will allow Council to judge performance. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, and Oddie - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1. (15-630) Report on Leasing at Alameda Point. The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation; outlined properties on a map. Ted Anderson, Cushman and Wakefield, gave a Power Point presentation. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 26 October 20, 2015 | CityCouncil/2015-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 26 | Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie agreed. Mayor Spencer stated that she also agrees. Councilmember Daysog stated that he also agrees. The Community Development Director stated one time only, existing tenants would be offered a one year lease the next time their rent is increased. Councilmember Oddie stated tenants do not have to accept. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated it is reasonable. Councilmember Daysog requested staff to explain the value. The Community Development Director stated the playing field would be level for new tenants and existing tenants; since the ordinance is just going into place, existing tenants would miss the one time opportunity to be offered a one year lease, which new tenants would receive. Mayor Spencer noted creating a lease has costs. Following a brief discussion of evictions, the Community Development Director clarified for in place tenants, the one-time offer of a lease would be done at the time of the first rent increase; noted landlords have indicated that they do not raise all tenants rent at the same time and do not like to have all leases expire at the same time. Mayor Spencer stated making the one year lease offer to new tenants is part of a new relationship; existing tenants on month-to-month leases being offered the option would tie up the property for a year; inquired why said action would not be a taking. The Community Development Director responded a landlord doing a rent increase indicates they are interested retaining the tenant; stated offering a one year lease would provide stability and the opportunity for a no cause eviction would be prevented for a year. Mayor Spencer inquired whether landlords would not do a rent increase if they did not plan on retaining the tenant for another year, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether rent increases would only be allowed one time per year. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated only allowing one increase per year is … | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-02 | 26 | the rent an unlimited amount. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is no cap on rent increases. The Community Development Director stated the 5% is a trigger that would require initiating the RRAC process. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the cap is for a new tenant's rent, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the point of the policy was to disincentivize evictions to raise rent, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilemmber Oddie stated increasing by 25% no disincentive. The Community Development Director stated which is why staff is requesting direction on a cap. Councilemmber Oddie stated Mayor Spencer's suggestion is if a tenant received a rent increase in the last 12 months, then the new tenant could not get a rent increase for 12 months; if the tenant was eligible for a 5% increase, then the increase should be 5%. Councilmember Daysog inquired what if the in place tenant is evicted; would the landlord have to pay relocation benefits and cap new tenant's rent. Mayor Spencer stated according to the Code section the next time the rent could be increased would be when the previous tenant would have been eligible. The Community Development Director requested clarification on the percentage cap. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft recommended 5%. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether such a clauses exists in other cities. The Community Development Director responded most other cities with rent stabilization do not allow no cause evictions; stated the City is accommodating the requests from landlords while including limitations to address the important issue of economic evictions. Councilmember Daysog stated the landlord would be penalized twice; the landlords would have to pay the relocation benefits plus not be able to impose a rent increase. The Community Development Director responded that Capital Improvement Plans (CIP's) would be different grounds for eviction; staff is requesting direction… | CityCouncil/2016-02-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 26 | Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft questioned how information could be reviewed. Mayor Spencer stated people could send emails or correspondence; she is concerned with how many staff members will have to be hired to run the program. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated data will be more useful and reliable if it is systematically collected. Mayor Spencer stated her relocation fee concern is how would the City enforce the tenant moving out if the half paid up front: a stipulated judgement or an irrevocable notice of termination; something enforceable is needed; a landlord cannot be expected to pay money then not have the tenant leave on a date certain. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there are repercussions for a tenant not leaving on a date certain, such as an unlawful detainer. Mayor Spencer stated an unlawful detainer takes a lot of money and time in court; stated maybe a requirement should be a part of the administrative regulation. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the first year of the program should be in good faith. Mayor Spencer stated a landlord paying relocation benefits should not also have to do an unlawful detainer to evict the tenant; inquired whether there is a solution; stated the landlord should pay the relocation fees as the tenant leaves, concurrently. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated there are costs to securing a new residence. Mayor Spencer stated there needs to be something in place to make sure the tenant leaves on the date certain. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated the RRAC should mediate eviction issues and the City should not codify a formula that says how much is paid whether it is time or money; working with the RRAC model is cleaner than trying to fit every case into a set of ordinance sections. Councilmember Daysog urged Council to continue the meeting to address the issues because the changes are too substantial. Councilmember Oddie stated paying 50% up front is fair; inquired if there is data of tenants that have defaulted after receiving 50% first. The Assistant City Attorney responded the… | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-03-01 | 26 | Mayor Spencer inquired whether staff could review whether some or all of the buildings are eligible for registration with the National Register of Historic Places, to which the Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the Packet Landing process was useful for the developer to have a sense of where the Council stood; there is no point of going down a road knowing there would not be approval; she would defer to the Attorneys regarding any legalities. Councilmember Daysog stated the review of mixed-used zoning in general is an important discussion for Alameda citizens to have; a discussion about the waterfront site is on the minds currently; the type of mixed-use for the area has been housing oriented. Councilmember Oddie stated that he has concerns about the marina but would like to move forward with a workshop which would include an explanation of the current zoning. Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of directing staff to return with a report in April to include the concerns brought up by the Council. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (16-118) Councilmember Oddie requested the Clerk to correct the minutes to reflect the votes on AB 210 as 46 instead of 43. (16-119) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended the East Bay League of California Cities Division Meeting on February 25th. (16-120) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended an Alameda County Industries (ACI) celebration of the one year anniversary of the recycling workers contract. (16-121) Councilmember Oddie announced that he was honored to judge the young kids history presentation at Bay Farm School. (16-122) Mayor Spencer announced she also attended the National History Day event at Bay Farm School. (16-123) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Commission on Disability Issues (CDI), the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners (HABOC) and the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC). Regular Meeting Alameda City… | CityCouncil/2016-03-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-09-20 | 26 | Beneficial Commercial Uses within Areas Zoned for Mixed Use. (Vice Mayor Matarrese) Not heard. (16-482) Consider Directing Staff to Review Enacting a Minimum Wage Increase in Alameda. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard. (16-483) Consider Directing Staff to Renegotiate the Terms of the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) Lease and Relocate/Modernize the Shelter Facility, including Addressing Funding. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:45 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 20, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-09-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-10-18.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-10-18 | 26 | Relations Board (SSHRB) Review City Policies and Procedures for Aiding Alameda's Homeless in Order to Make Recommendations to the City Council for Policy Revisions and Additions. (Vice Mayor Matarrese) Not heard. (16-546) Consider Directing the City Manager to Initiate Revisions to the Ordinances and Code Sections for Mixed-Use Zoning in the City of Alameda to Aid Retention of Beneficial Commercial Uses within Areas Zoned for Mixed Use. (Vice Mayor Matarrese) Not heard. (16-547) Consider Directing Staff to Review Enacting a Minimum Wage Increase in Alameda. (Mayor Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (16-548) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the League of California Cities conference and she was sworn in as the At-Large Representative for the Easy Bay division. (16-549) Councilmember Oddie stated that he attended the Alameda International Film Festival. (16-550) Mayor Spencer stated that she attended the League of California Cities Conference and she just returned from Yeongdong-gun District in South Korea exploring whether to have a Sister City in said location; she participated in a four day cultural festival. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 10:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council October 18, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-10-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-11-01.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2016-11-01 | 26 | (16-575) Vice Mayor Matarrese moved approval of continuing the meeting past 11:00 p.m. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes - Councilmember Oddie, Vice Mayor Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 3. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft and Councilmember Daysog - 2. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated meetings that go past 11:00 p.m. are not doing serving the public. *** (16-576) Consider Directing the City Manager to Immediately Hold a City Council Workshop on the Final Phase of the Bayport-Alameda Landing Disposition and Development Agreement DDA)\Development Plan. (Councilmember Daysog) Refer to the first referral on inclusionary housing [paragraph no. 16- for City Manager comments on all the referrals and public comment. Councilmember Daysog stated the developer has not complied with the vision for Alameda Landing and the developer should come to Council first. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of directing the City Manager to immediately hold a City Council workshop on the final phase of the Bayport-Alameda Landing DDA. Vice Mayor Matarrese seconded the motion with a friendly amendment to remove the word immediately Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog accepted the amendment to the motion. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the date is not specific. Councilmember Oddie made a friendly amendment to adopt the staff's proposal for the next steps. Councilmember Daysog accepted the amendment to the motion. Mayor Spencer stated there is a motion with two friendly amendment. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (16-577) Consider Directing the City Manager to Have the Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB) Review City Policies and Procedures for Aiding Alameda's Homeless in Order to Make Recommendations to the City Council for Policy Revisions and Additions. (Vice Mayor Matarrese) Refer to the first referral on inclusionary housing [paragraph no. 16- for City Manager comments on all the referrals. Regular Meeting Alameda City Co… | CityCouncil/2016-11-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-04-18.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2017-04-18 | 26 | issue is more important than the homelessness, mix used, and social development referrals, which he deems are frontline issues. Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. Mayor Spencer moved approval of adjourning the meeting and bringing back the remaining referrals. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of tabling the remaining referrals. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion for reconsideration should be made by a Councilmember who voted against it. The City Attorney stated a motion for reconsideration would need to come from a Councilmember who would be changing their position. In response to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry, the City Attorney stated if Council votes to table the remaining items, the agenda is finished and Council can adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council has kept the Housing Authority Executive Director waiting all evening; she would like Council to hear the Housing Authority item [paragraph no. 17-269]. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of hearing the Housing Authority referral [paragraph no. 17-269 and tabling the Climate Protection [paragraph no. 17-270 and Rules of Order [paragraph no. 17-271 referrals. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (17-269) Consider Directing Staff to Present the Steps for City Council to Return to Its Role as Board of Commissioners for the City of Alameda Housing Authority. Councilmember Matarrese made comments regarding the referral. The Housing Authority (HA) Executive Director made comments regarding the referral. Mayor Spencer inquired why the HA was initially separated from the City, to which the HA Executive Director responded the 2012 separation was done to put a fiscal and reputational firewall in place; stated the HA assets, which have large capital needs, could be dealt with solely by the HA and not impacted by the City const… | CityCouncil/2017-04-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2017-06-06 | 26 | Safe Cannabis Businesses in Alameda. Not heard. (17-361) Consider Directing Staff and the Transportation Commission to Analyze Traffic Calming Solutions at the Intersection of Santa Clara Avenue and Sherman Street. WITHDRAWN. (Vice Mayor Vella) COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (17-362) Councilmember Matarrese stated that he represented Alameda in the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) General Assembly; per the direction of Council, he cast a no vote against the current budget and work program; the work program did not meet the needs described in the staff report. Mayor Spencer thanked Councilmember Matarrese for representing Council. Councilmember Matarrese stated the ABAG Director indicated ABAG and MTC will be officially merged as of July 1st; the work plans will be going through another refinement. (17-363) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the Alameda County Lead Abatement Meeting. (17-364) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointment to the Commission on Disability Issues, Golf Commission, Historical Advisory Board, Library Board, Planning Board, Public Art Commission, Public Utilities Board (PUB), Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC), Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB) and Transportation Commission. Mayor Spencer nominated Ann McCormick for reappointment the PUB, Christopher Griffiths for reappointment to the RRAC, Sarah Murray for appointment to the RRAC, and Claudia Medina for appointment to the SSHRB. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:42 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 17 June 6, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 26 | 5. (17-436) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a 15-Year Lease with Three Five-Year Extension Options with Teleport Communications of America, LLC for Conduit Space for One Innerduct Containing Fiber from the Intersection of Grand Street and Fortmann Way Across the Oakland Estuary to Coast Guard Island [Requires Four Affirmative Votes]. Introduced. Councilmember Matarrese requested clarification for the audience. The City Manager stated the conduit goes from the Island to Coast Guard Island and it requires approval by Council. Councilmember Matarrese stated the item is essential for Coast Guard activity. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (17- CONTINUED) Recommendation to Award a Five Year Contract for an Amount Not to Exceed a Total Five Year Expenditure of $8,264,931.69 to West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Citywide Urban Forest Maintenance Services, No. P.W. 04-17-25. The City Engineer responded to Vice Mayor Vella's questions regarding funding for the golf course contract; stated the trees within the golf course are being managed by an outside entity called Greenway; the golf funds can be used to maintain the trees that are adjacent to the golf course; if the City Council wants to remove the funds from the contract, General Fund money would be used instead. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the amount is for the trees that are adjacent to the golf course. The City Engineer responded in the affirmative. In response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry regarding the amount, the City Engineer stated approximately $20,000. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of adopting the contract, with clarification that approximately $20,000 is allocated from golf fund to maintain trees adjacent to golf course. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 25 July 5, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 26 | Councilmember Matarrese stated there is other evidence and other notice that goes along with three public hearings and the documents generated with those hearings; the operator admitted that it is impossible to comply with the conditions of the UP; he will not support overturning the Planning Board's decision. Vice Mayor Vella stated the conditions are in place because the use restrictions are not in conformity with the area; parking is an issue for the area; she does not believe the conditions will be met by the prospective owner due to the fact that they will not be the actual operators; she supports upholding the Planning Board's decision. Mayor Spencer stated there is a lot to be learned moving forward; the conditions need to be clearly stated to the parties involved and staff needs to enforce the conditions sooner; property owners should ensure tenants following the UP conditions; requested that staff allow Council to weigh in to be able to make definitive decisions in the future, stated that she will support the Planning Board's decision. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes: Councilmember Oddie - 1. Mayor Spencer called a recess at 12:31 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 12:40 a.m. *** (17-484) Recommendation on City Council's Direction to Create a "Straws on Request" Ordinance and Review Ordinance No. 2977 to Address that "To Go" Food Ware, Including Straws, be Reusable, Compostable, or Recyclable. Stated that she supports the draft ordinance; the ordinance will provide a Citywide model for the Bay Area and the whole country: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA). Vice Mayor Vella moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (17-485) Public Hearing to Consider: 1) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Bayport… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-10-17.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2017-10-17 | 26 | event; stated in response to requests and concerns about air quality, the air matters app gives minute by minute air quality at airnow.gov. (17-640) Update on Tracking of Council Direction through the Referral Process. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (17-641) Councilmember Matarrese stated the Governor issued a state of emergency over an outbreak of Hepatitis A in San Diego from people living on the street. (17-642) Vice Mayor Vella inquired how lime bikes driven far of the Island will be retrieved; made an announcement regarding the upcoming Airport Noise Forum and AC Transit Inter-Agency Liaison Committee meeting. (17-643) Mayor Spencer expressed concern over lime bikes blocking sidewalks and traffic lanes; suggested staff put out information about where the bikes should be parked; announced the cannabis workshop will be held Saturday at 9:00 a.m.; noted a movie was screened at City Hall this past Saturday; outlined movies that have been shown. (17-644) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination to the Planning Board. Not heard. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:45 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council October 17, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 26 | Vice Mayor Vella stated her notes say there would be an option for a community benefit fund; stated other communities have had issues with the requirement not being enforceable. Councilmember Oddie stated that he is okay with leaving the language. The Community Development Director stated the language is in the ordinance for enforcement purposes; in the event someone volunteers to do something, it can be enforced. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the community benefit will be monitored and what the penalty will be if there is no follow through. The Assistant City Attorney responded the applicant's operator permit could be revoked. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she will not support the local ownership and local hire provision. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft would be amenable to adding the wording "if applicable." Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what does "if applicable" mean. The Assistant City Attorney responded "if applicable" means if the applicant does not submit a voluntary plan or if the RFP process does not include community benefit, it would not be applicable. The Community Development Director stated the sentence could be eliminated and included in the resolution adopting the policies and guidelines. Mayor Spencer inquired whether that would mean to keep the language in now. The Community Development Director stated the language can be deleted and the concept included in the resolution. Mayor Spencer stated her preference is to keep the language in because it is the only place which mentions local hire and local ownership. Vice Mayor Vella stated onsite consumption language allows the Community Development Department (CDD) to promulgate guidelines, procedures and regulations; inquired whether language can be added after to have the RFP regulations approved by Council and developed by the CDD. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the language does not satisfy her request. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether there is any language which would satisfy Regular … | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-03-06.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-03-06 | 26 | Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to have someone with knowledge of Alameda. (18-131) Adoption of Resolution Amending Resolution No. 15319 Calling an Election to be Consolidated with the Statewide Primary on November 6, 2018 and Submitting to the Voters at That Election a Measure that Proposes to Amend the City Charter by Incorporating into the Charter Ordinance 3148 (Rent Stabilization Ordinance), with Certain Modifications," by Amending Section 3 (Ballot Question). Not heard. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (18-132) INFORMATIONAL ONLY - Annual Update on the Alameda Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Submitted by the Fire Chief. The City Manager stated the report can be read or return at a different Council meeting. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of accepting the report. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote. Ayes - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (18-133) March 6, Update on Tracking of Council Direction through the Referral Process. (18-134) Consider Directing Staff to Provide Information on the Citywide Dockless Bike Sharing Program and Return to Council with Additional Safety Requirements. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer and Vice Mayor Vella) (18-135) Consider Banning Motorized Commercial Vehicles, Including Robotic Commercial Vehicles, from Sidewalks and Commercial Drone Aircraft Used for Deliveries. Not heard. (Councilmember Matarrese) (18-136) Consider Updating Housing Policy to Meet Current and Future Needs. Withdrawn. (Councilmember Matarrese) [Note: Under Agenda Changes, Councilmember Matarrese withdrew the referral.] COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (18-137) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Public Art Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 26 March 6, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-03-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-04-17.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-04-17 | 26 | timeline and a date certain as to when the item will come back to Council. Councilmember Oddie stated Scenario 2 is more palpable; he understands the comparison issue, but Alameda has to stay cognizant that neighboring cities are the competitors in terms of minimum wage jobs for residents; it is good to look at similar demographically-based cities; time is running short; concurred with Councilmember Matarrese to look at other ordinances. Mayor Spencer stated the bigger chain stores, such as Starbucks, do not have the ability to change what they pay employees and have to pay minimum wage; she would like to find out how the big stores would be impacted; she would also like to know the impact on Alameda's small businesses and whether locally-owned businesses could increase the pay themselves. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would not differentiate between youth; young people are working to help support their families; Council is putting a lot on staff's plate; she would like to increase the minimum wage across the board now instead of doing phasing. Vice Mayor Vella stated the issue is minimum wage, not a living wage; Alameda is still below the living wage; she would like to move ahead with something; she prefers Scenario 2 which is a ramp up; the City does not get a pass; both small and large businesses are being treated the same. Councilmember Matarrese stated time is precious; Council should choose an ordinance to review and model after, instead of constructing a new one to have a shorter timeframe and Council could voting on the matter in September. The Acting City Manager stated staff will work as quickly as possible on the issue but, needs time to do the work; the focus is on the workers but it is important to get input from WABA and DABA as well; another component that needs discussion is enforcement; there is no enforcement mechanism right now. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Councilmember Matarrese stated that he does not want to task staff with writing an ordinance; he agrees that commu… | CityCouncil/2018-04-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 26 | sufficient community discussion to reach two-thirds; the community demands specificity; provided a School District example; two-thirds is a high threshold; inquired whether the library bond required two-thirds vote. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the measure passed by 78.8%. Mayor Spencer stated the library measure is a great example of being very specific; she does not think there are sufficient meetings; inquired how much was spent on polling and mailers. The Public Works Director responded around $50,000 to $60,000 was spent; stated $25,000 was for the tracking survey; $25,000 was for financial calculations and legal analysis; mailers were around $10,000 or $15,000. Mayor Spencer stated that she did not get answers from the consultant the last time bond measure was presented; there should be real community meetings with discussions about community priorities; inquired about the polling for the $95 million. The Public Works Director stated the last tracking survey showed support in the 70% to 73% range. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the original polling for the library measure showed support was in the low 60s prior to any community education; the ballot measure was based on the priories from the poll; it is doable. Councilmember Oddie noted the County Measure A was polling in the 70s and is getting 63%. Vice Mayor Vella stated the polling was for different things than the new priorities being put forward; not fully funding projects is very different than a library bond; paving five miles of City streets is only a fraction of the miles of streets in the City; a lot of work needs to be done, including how the projects will be fully funded; the polling being used does not reflect what is being proposed now. On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: No; Vice Mayor Vella: No; and Mayor Sp… | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 26 | operator comes back. In response to Mayor Spencer's inquiry about the artist studio, Councilmember Matarrese stated regulations should be tightened up to get to the goal; purposeful adjustments can be made if needed. The Assistant Community Development Director stated there is also artist studio industrial, which is a makers type use. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the artist studios would be floating, to which the Assistant Community Development Director responded in the negative. Councilmember Matarrese stated the studios are in the maritime commercial area; the idea is to drive efforts to bring maritime commercial to the core; artist studios are distractions; an amendment should come back if it cannot be done. The Assistant Community Development Director stated there are three different zones; Councilmember Matarrese wants the maritime core to focus on maritime uses; allowing art studios in zoning areas is a policy decision; the use is permitted or conditionally permitted in the other zones. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would go along with the suggestion. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether artist studios could be a conditional use in the maritime core rather than requiring a Plan amendment, and whether the same review would be required. The Assistant Community Development Director responded the common approach is to make desired uses permitted by right; stated uses that may be acceptable are conditionally permitted and non-desirable uses are prohibited. The Acting City Manager stated a conditional use permit would go back to the Planning Board, not the Council, unless appealed or called for review. Vice Mayor Vella stated the goal is to prioritize maritime; allowing a conditional use would provide an option after efforts are made to get maritime. Councilmember Matarrese stated said approach is not a good incentive; his proposal sends a message; the Planning Board worked very hard and listened to the public's desire to maintain the working waterfront; wavering now and allowing a conditional use is… | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-24.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-24 | 26 | Vice Mayor Vella and Councilmembers Matarrese and Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for not changing the cap at this time. Mayor Spencer inquired whether staff is going to ask about deliveries. The Economic Development responded that she could do so; stated a delivery only dispensary, without a retail location, could be one of the two dispensaries. Vice Mayor Vella suggested that two delivery only licenses be allowed in addition to the two dispensaries, separate from the existing dispensary cap. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the dispersion requirement would not apply to delivery only, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated said suggestion is responsive to residents in need of medicinal marijuana who cannot get to dispensaries. Vice Mayor Vella stated allowing the use would attempt to get people to have a legal delivery service. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft is agreeable to have two delivery only businesses, to which Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese is agreeable, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the negative. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would be agreeable; he would also like the City to require a license for delivery services. Mayor Spencer stated four Councilmembers support two delivery only businesses; inquired whether delivery businesses outside the City should be required to get a license. The Economic Development Manager inquired whether Council is okay not having a dispersion requirement for the delivery only businesses, to which Mayor Spencer, Vice Mayor Vella, Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Oddie responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft suggested staff review having delivery only businesses located in a business park. Mayor Spencer stated the matter would be addressed when it returns to Council. The Economic Development Manager stated regarding delivery licenses, staff is looking into allowing anyone with a leg… | CityCouncil/2018-07-24.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-09-04.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-09-04 | 26 | Councilmember Matarrese stated the gathering of information is like running in place; Council should be informed with broader information; some statistics are good, but he would like to see the information coupled with Business License annual reporting. Councilmember Oddie inquired if any cases are handled outside the RRAC. The Assistant City Attorney responded part of the process is to have staff trained in mediation; stated landlords and tenants participate in mediation facilitated by staff that will sometimes result in a case being settled prior to the RRAC meeting. Councilmember Oddie inquired how many mediations occur and if outside parties facilitate mediation. The Assistant City Attorney responded there are not outside mediations; stated RRAC meetings are typically broken up into two pieces: first is mediation, and the second is a quasi-judiciary hearing where the RRAC hears testimony and makes a recommendation; the landlord and the tenant are encouraged to engage in mediation before the process begins to facilitate an agreement. Councilmember Oddie inquired if the number of mediations is known. The Assistant City Attorney responded the number was reported in the data. Councilmember Oddie inquired how many cases do not come to the RRAC because the City never receives notice. The Assistant City Attorney responded notice if filed for mediation that does happen; stated the ability to resolve the matter with a court action goes to a full hearing. Councilmember Oddie inquired if said instance occurs with or without a notice. The Community Development Director responded under the ordinance the landlord is required to notify the Housing Authority if the rent increase is higher than 5%; the Housing Authority received 188 notices of rent increases above 5%, and of those, 62%, or 85 cases, were settled with the assistance of staff. Councilmember Oddie inquired if mediation is occurring outside of the RRAC process before someone files a notice. The Community Development Director responded the program would not know s… | CityCouncil/2018-09-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2018-10-16 | 26 | The Economic Development Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the buffer zone would only apply to dispensaries; cultivation would be taken out; all other sensitive uses would have a 600 foot buffer. Councilmember Oddie inquired if there could just be the one potential nursery license, to which the Economic Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired about consideration of places of worship. Mayor Spencer stated places of worship would be considered by the Planning Board. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft suggested adding a definition to sensitive use. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the Planning Board could stipulate certain dates and times relevant to surrounding areas. The Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. The Economic Development Manager stated the C1 would be added to the zoning for cannabis activities, the CM would be added to the zoning for cannabis activities, and adult use would be added to the zoning for cannabis activities. Mayor Spencer moved introduction of the land use ordinance. The Economic Development Manager noted dispersion would be removed from the land use ordinance. Mayor Spencer inquired whether or not the dispersion removal is part of the approval, to which the Base Reuse and Economic Development Director responded the action is to vote on the land use ordinance and the dispersion requirement is not included. The Assistant City Attorney inquired if the potential changes from pending operators should be included as well, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative. The Assistant City Attorney presented language for review. Mayor Spencer included the language presented in her original motion. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft and Matarrese - 2. The Economic Development Manager stated Council voted to include dispersion, needs to specify how it will be modified. Mayor Spencer i… | CityCouncil/2018-10-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-03-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2019-03-19 | 26 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the reasoning for a two-year term for the Permit Tech III position. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded permits are up and the permit counter is busy; stated since the Planning department is fee-based, the position is limited to a two-year term; an assessment will be made to determine if more time is needed. Councilmember Vella inquired whether an accounting of time is being conducted on plan check and review. The Planning, Building and Transportation director responded even though permits are up, the overall number is down; stated streamline procedures are being implemented; design review exemptions to cut down steps and time, which has increased work at the counter, resulting in the new needed position. The Human Resources Director continued the presentation. Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether the focus of the new Transportation position will change. The Public Works Director responded the Supervising Civil Engineer will be a licensed transportation engineer and will improve the ability of the Transportation department as a whole. The Finance Director completed the presentation. Councilmember Oddie expressed concern over the previous five years of revenues being significantly higher than estimated, and expenses coming in lower than estimated; stated some of the increased assessed value is due to increased market value, but some can be attributed to City departments providing services; it is critical to keep services running in order to maintain high standards of living; stated that he will support the resolutions; he would like to see line items for festival and parade events sooner than later. The Recreation and Parks Director stated funding has been identified in the non- departmental contingency fund for the upcoming July 4th parade and has been provided for the next budget cycle. Councilmember Vella stated the mid-year budget comes several months into the year; that she would prefer the report be provided earlier in the year if possible; expressed su… | CityCouncil/2019-03-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-05-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2019-05-07 | 26 | Action Plan and Authorize the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements, and Modifications at Funding Levels Approved by Congress. Stated the importance of the funding cannot be understated; outlined the services funding will help provide: Dan Ashbrook, Legal Assistant for seniors. Discussed Eden I&R services, including 2-1-1, which connects people to health, housing and human services: Alison DeJung, Eden I&R. Discussed a new State grant that will be used to assist with housing matters and an in- house attorney service: Erin Scott, Family Violence Law Center. Stated the funding is core to keeping Building Futures running; discussed outreach services and the warming shelter: Liz Varela, Building Futures. Thanked the City for its support; outlined ECHO housing services: Angie Larson- Hajjem, ECHO Housing. Councilmember Oddie moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Ayes; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes - 5. (19-282) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15533, "Confirming the Park Street Business Improvement Area (BIA) Annual Assessment Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019-20, Changing the BIA Boundaries, and Levying an Annual Assessment on the Park Street BIA." Adopted. Vice Mayor Knox White moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White inquired the process the City is utilizing to take a position on City-owned property. The City Manager responded the discussion has occurred internally; outlined two voting options; stated if tenants express support, he is willing to cast the votes versus returning to Council to decide how to vote. Vice Mayor Knox White stated expressed support for allowing the City Manager to cast votes if there is tenant support. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification. The Assistant City Attorney stated that she has consulted with outside co… | CityCouncil/2019-05-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2019-07-16 | 26 | visit to Building 8 at Alameda Point with Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft; expressed support for Alameda Point Partners (APP) to get the job done. Councilmember Daysog stated the process worked; Jamestown fell by the wayside; APP is a developer that has proven itself; outlined APP's accomplishments; expressed support for moving forward with staff's recommendation in selecting APP. Vice Mayor Knox White stated two developers were chosen in January; expressed support for APP's ability to deliver. Councilmember Vella expressed concern for the response from APP to ensuring the affordable units are able to come online with no delays; for the timing of different units coming onto the market and the total number of units; inquired the number of units being delivered at a given time. Mr. Ernst responded there could be concern with too many of the same type of units being delivered at any given time; stated understanding Phases 1 and 2 of Site A will give the ability to manage the product type for West Midway and not cause competition which would jeopardize the project. Councilmember Vella inquired the plan for the number of units for West Midway. Mr. Dorfman responded there are 3 different product types in concept: rental community, townhomes and single family; stated the highest density multi-family component would be the largest, followed by townhomes and then single-family homes would be the fewest; the single-family homes will be sold off to third party developers; townhomes are being introduced to Trumark development; he is not concerned about cannibalizing. Councilmember Vella inquired whether Trumark will be working with APP on the project. Mr. Dorfman responded in the affirmative; stated Brookfield might as well. Mr. Ernst stated APP can manage the product types in order to prevent competition or jeopardize the two projects. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the applicants have experience with the infrastructure; outlined a groundbreaking event for the first residential construction of senior affordable housing at Alameda Point, wh… | CityCouncil/2019-07-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-09-03.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2019-09-03 | 26 | (19-491) Councilmember Daysog made an announcement regarding attending the East Bay Division meeting of the League of California Cities. (19-492) Councilmember Oddie stated Stopwaste is doing a Proposition 218 election to lower the hazardous waste recycling fee, whichwill be a mail-in only if opposed type of election; announced that he attended National Night Out. (19-493) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she and the City Manager toured the closed Alameda County Glenn Dyre jail, which is being considered as a proposal to shelter homeless persons. (19-494) Vice Mayor Knox White stated a link has been provided for the League of Women Voter's Charter workshops; discussed Estuary Park homeless encampment. ADJOURNMENT (19-495) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:58 p.m. with a moment of silence for the victims of the dive boat accident in Southern California, and a moment of remembrance for the victims of mass shootings Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 3, 2019 24 | CityCouncil/2019-09-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 26 | City Council Workshop Workshop Report Management Partners Don't fall into the trap of feeling you are VERY special: While being elected to a city council is an honor bestowed upon you by the voters, keep that "honor" in perspective. Citizens view electing you as showing trust in your judgment in representing their interests in community decision-making. They did not elect you because they felt you were personally deserving of special rights and privileges. Don't expect the city manager or staff to be able to assist you in ways outside your formal role on the city council. By and large, they will be required to treat you just the same as any other citizen on matters outside the realm of your official duties. Any compensation and "perks" of office should be visible and public. Professional city managers will not "play favorites": Professional city managers will strive to have a positive working relationship with all the members of the city council regardless of personality, philosophy or positions on specific issues. They will also not let personal likes or dislikes affect how he or she interacts with councilmembers, and you should not expect the manager to act otherwise. It is critical to city managers to have clear policy direction: The city manager and the city organization cannot carry out the policy direction of the city council if that direction is not clearly established. The clearer the direction, the more effectively the manager and staff can implement. Even when the council is split on an issue, the majority's will needs to be clearly stated. The manager should seek clarification from the city council when necessary. Be sensitive to the need for city managers to sometimes tell you "what you don't want to hear": One of the least favorite tasks for a city manager is to tell an individual council- member or the council as a whole something they don't want to hear. This could range from a mistake the organization has made to informing a councilmember that something they want done (or want to do) cannot be don… | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-02-18.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-02-18 | 26 | The City Manager stated the decision is before Council due to the item previously being brought to Council. Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether direction can be provided to refer concerns and have staff return. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's concerns about the work environment, Councilmember Vella stated any Human Resource issues, such as a hostile work environment claim, should have a process; expressed concern about artists; stated any changes should be implemented with notice. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff should provide input. Vice Mayor Knox White stated the boundaries for the program are fine; questioned whether the decision can be left with staff as opposed to bringing the item back to Council. Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of the program, the operational characteristics of the piece, so that staff can implement an Art in City Hall, including City Hall West, as they see fit. The Public Information Officer inquired whether there is direction about the upcoming exhibit in April. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff can look into the upcoming exhibit. Vice Mayor Knox White stated the PAC can look into the matter as well. The City Manager stated staff is not making decisions based on the art itself. The Public Information Officer stated the April exhibits will move forward as planned if the item is brought to the PAC. Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for keeping the art in the original place indicated. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the third floor is not the best place for art. Councilmember Vella stated any change in venue should be enacted in 2021 to keep commitments. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the artists can be contacted, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. The Public Information Officer stated an e-mail can be sent to the artist's interested parties list. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 24 February 18, 2020 | CityCouncil/2020-02-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-03-03 | 26 | Councilmember Oddie moved adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White stated the staff report is very thorough; expressed support for the sustainability and resiliency position. Councilmember Daysog stated that he supports the item; the presentation is ringing alarm bells to be wary about spending. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (20-137) Recommendation to Approve the Park and Recreation Facilities Project Priorities. The Recreation and Parks Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the court date established is in February 2021. The City Attorney responded these types of cases suffer from everything else in the court system taking extended periods of time. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the City Attorney responded everything is a lower priority to criminal cases. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether an eminent domain case would be heard before a criminal judge. The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated the court system distributes judges, judges have to staff criminal courts first before civil courts. The Recreation and Parks Director continued the presentation. *** (20-138) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is needed to consider the two referrals [paragraph nos. 20-140 and 20-141 after 11:00 p.m. Councilmember Oddie moved approval of considering the items. Councilmember Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether a timeline could imposed. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 3, 2020 23 | CityCouncil/2020-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-05-05.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-05-05 | 26 | whether a grant program can be opened for those in the three highest language categories; stated the outreach will be very useful; the grant application process does not work when applicants are submitting via Microsoft Edge; expressed support for adding language stating: "please do not use Microsoft Edge;" stated the response to the program has been tremendous. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the deadline is May 7th, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the City could work with a gofundme.com campaign; inquired whether the City should put money into WABA's gofundme.com campaign. Vice Mayor Knox White responded in the negative; stated there is interest in starting an Alameda Business gofundme.com campaign; should the City promote the campaign, with a list of 190 possible applicants, the following businesses would be considered to receive funding after the grant fund cutoff; noted little staff time would be used; stated work and fundraising would be from the private sector. Councilmember Vella expressed concern about changing the criteria; expressed support for changing the criteria if a second round of applications are done, prioritizing businesses that have taken a harder hit in the potential second round, and conducting a lottery; noted many financial issues for businesses are related to cash flow; expressed support for the City loaning money to the program, and pursuing public/private funds, which look at grants, non-profits and different donors; stated a gofundme.com campaign would be appropriate; she would like to consult with the City Attorney's office to further understand the legality of collecting and administering funds; expressed support for promoting the opportunity on social media and websites; noted individual gofundme.com campaigns have been successful; stated that she would like to get to businesses that may not have the same social media following as others; expressed support for looking at businesses with multiple locatio… | CityCouncil/2020-05-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-05-19 | 26 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for ensuring the City is helping those in need and not delaying the process. Councilmember Oddie moved approval of giving staff the authority to provide [tenants] a deferral of any three months and up to an additional three months deferral per tenant which will be converted into a promissory note; staff will return for further Council discussion related to potential abatement without a cap. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the motion. Vice Mayor Knox White inquired whether the motion includes staff returning in June with the proposed criteria for potential conversion to 50% grant for discussion. Councilmember Oddie responded June or July. Vice Mayor Knox White seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Knox White stated people need certainties; expressed support for the criteria to be provided sooner rather than later. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the item will return in June or after a few months. Vice Mayor Knox White responded June or July. The City Manager requested the motion be re-stated. The City Clerk stated the motion is to give staff authority to provide any three month deferral and up to an additional three months deferral per tenant which will be converted into a promissory note; staff will return for further Council discussion related to potential abatement without a cap with a discussion to return regarding potential conversion to 50% grant. Councilmember Oddie stated that he is also supportive of 100% due to complete lockdown. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the parameters can be left open since the item will return. The City Manager inquired whether the motion includes abatement while closed down, plus three month with an additional three months. Councilmember Oddie stated abatement has been deferred; the April, May and June deferral has the option to be taken in any three months if the deferral has not been taken in April, May or June; Council authorizes the City Manager to grant additional deferrals on a case-by-case basis of up to an addi… | CityCouncil/2020-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-06-02.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-06-02 | 26 | The City Clerk stated Council has provided previous direction to add the Mayor into the language related to Council interference. Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of placing the item on the 2020 ballot. Councilmember Oddie seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Vella inquired whether Councilmember Daysog's request for a discreet number on Council pay was been part of the motion or whether staff will provide alternatives. Vice Mayor Knox White responded staff may present alternatives. Councilmember Daysog stated that he will support the motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. The City Attorney requested direction be provided whether Council desires each ballot item to remain separate or combined specifically. *** (20-379) Vice Mayor Knox White moved approval of allowing 15 more minutes for discussion. Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Oddie: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for Section 7-3 and the City Prosecutor matters to stand alone as a ballot items. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of keeping the items separate on the ballot. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 13 June 2, 2020 | CityCouncil/2020-06-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-06-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-06-16 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY-JUNE 16,2020--6:59 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:09 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmember Daysog, Knox White, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was conducted via Zoom] Absent: None. AGENDA ITEMS (20-394) Consider Amending Sunshine Ordinance Section 2-91.4 (f) Pertaining to Special Meetings. (Counclimember Vella) Councilmember Vella questioned how notice of special meetings can be provided to make people aware; noted Council is aware of special meetings, but not everyone else; expressed support for the Open Government Commission (OGC) weighing-in on the matter and providing suggestions; stated that an option would be to have the special meeting agendized and noted on the regular agendas or announced 12 days in advance to give people sufficient time. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the OGC will review for Council consideration. Councilmember Vella responded that since the OGC is meeting soon, there will likely be input; stated since the Commission is already looking into the Sunshine Ordinance, now is a good time to review special meetings and have the matter return to Council. Vice Mayor Knox White expressed support for sending focused direction to the OGC on special meeting noticing and to consider how to deal with urgent [emergency] meetings; stated the OGC can provide recommendations in an expeditious manner. Councilmember Oddie expressed support for input from the OGC and for consideration of Mr. Foreman's suggestions. Vice Mayor Knox White stated that he would like recommendations on legal noticing requirements; expressed support for input from the OGC on notification guidelines, such as channels, which must be used for all meetings. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like the OGC to consider the reasons for calling special meetings; the reasons for special meetings can vary; noted a special meeting is being held June 17; stated enough time to allow input from the public and deliberation fr… | CityCouncil/2020-06-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 26 | Councilmember Vella responded in the affirmative; stated the motion includes removing the sign and organizing the community-led committee to provide input. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the denaming would be immediate. Councilmember Vella responded the addition of immediate can be added to the motion for clarification; stated going back to a generic original name is not in line with being anti-racist; there are few monuments named for BIPOC community members and women of Color; Council has an opportunity to do more than dename the park and to honor those who are typically not honored; expressed concern about the re-naming policy; stated there are issues with the naming policy; naming should be put to community-led committees; the matter is part of a larger conversation; expressed support for the matter returning prior to December; expressed concern about the Recreation and Parks Commission discussion; stated a process should be created where people can express interest in serving; there have been a number of people involved in the Rename Jackson Park movement who are from diverse communities and should be represented. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that Council is not being asked for recommendations about the new park name; expressed support for a committee outreach and selection process; stated that she is excited to hear new names. Councilmember Daysog stated Council must cast the net broadly when involving members of the community; this is an exciting and positive event for all of Alameda; expressed support for hearing the community-led committee process strategy including reaching out to Facebook and Nextdoor; the matter is something residents can turn back to view as an accomplishment during trying times. Councilmember Oddie stated the change is beyond time; expressed concern about renaming the park Alameda Park; expressed support for a name which reflects true and honest history; stated how stories and history are told needs changing; there are other places in Alameda that represent negatively; the matte… | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-01-19 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 19, 2020- 5:45 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:58 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Knox White, Spencer, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (21-023) Conference with Legal Counsel Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9); Case Name: City of Alameda V. Union Pacific (Sweeney); Court: Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case Number: RG18921261. Not heard. (21-024) Conference with Legal Counsel Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Friends of Crab Cove V. Vella et al.; Court: Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda; Case Number: RG18933140; Court: First District Court of Appeal; Case Numbers: A159140 and A159608. (21-025) Withdrawn - Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8); Property: Encinal Terminals, Located at 1521 Buena Vista Avenue (APN 072-0382-001,-002 and 72-0383-03), Alameda, CA; City Negotiators: Gerry Beaudin, Assistant City Manager, Andrew Thomas, Planning, Building and Transportation Director, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and North Waterfront Cove, LLC; Under Negotiation: Price and Terms. Not heard. (21-026) Conference with Legal Counsel Existing Litigation Requests for the City to Participate as Amicus in Pending Litigations (Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Apartment Association of Los Angeles County, Inc. V. City of Los Angeles et al; Court: The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Case Number: 20- 56251. (21-027) Conference with Legal Counsel Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9); Case Name: Abdul Nevarez and Priscilla Nevarez V. City of Alameda; Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California; Case Number: 20-c… | CityCouncil/2021-01-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-02-02.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-02-02 | 26 | matters. Councilmember Knox White expressed support for having a discussion of LPRs brought back; stated that he would like the matter to include information about proven effectiveness; many neighboring cities which have installed LPRs have seen increases in crime after installation; stated that he has not found any good, well-documented effectiveness studies on LPRs in California; expressed support for an getting a time estimate on the traffic analysis in the coming months; stated Council needs the information to guide conversations; outlined injuries and deaths by cars; stated the greatest harm to the community is coming from those being hit by drivers. (21-075) Recommendation to Provide Feedback on City Facility Naming Policy and Procedures. Not heard. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS Not heard. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Not heard. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-076) Consider Establishing a New Methodology by which the Number of Housing Units are Calculated for Parcels Zoned C-2-PD (Central Business District with Planned Development Overlay). (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. (21-077) Consider Directing Staff to Provide a Police Department Staffing and Crime Update. Not heard. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-078) Consider Directing Staff to Provide an Update on a Previously Approved Referral regarding Free Public WiFi throughout the City. Not heard. (Councilmember Spencer) Not heard. (21-079) Consider Directing Staff to Extend Webster Street Physical Improvements/ Beautification. Not heard. (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (21-080) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations for Appointments to the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners and Transportation Commission. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Randy Renschler. (21-081) Announcement of Mayor's Appointment to a Council Subcommittee to Review Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 21 February 2, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-02-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 26 | Councilmember Knox White restated the motion: [Steering Committee Item] 1: reaffirm the number of APD authorized Officers is 88, [Steering Committee Item] 3: create a Code of Conduct for sworn Officers as described, and [Steering Committee Item] 4: hire a Crime Analyst; and providing direction that if staff can find ways to support a Know Your Rights training within Alameda, Council would be supportive; and requesting a report back on how many Officers have been trained as part of the DA's training on detentions, which could be off agenda and does not have to be at a meeting. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether Council is asking for staff to come back to Council about how a Code of Conduct could be pursued, such as within the existing document or as the separate document the Committee discussed or as something else; inquired what is expected. Councilmember Knox White responded in the affirmative; stated as long as both models are consistent with the Steering Committee's recommendation; the Steering Committee is saying the community should have some say in what Code of Conduct looks like; a corporation based out of Texas should not just be sending updates and saying this is the Code of Conduct. Councilmember Daysog stated staff is going to filter the concerns raised by the Committee and try to put together a document that hopefully works. Councilmember Knox White concurred. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she agrees the Code of Conduct should not come out of Lexipol; she also believes members of the Police Department need to provide input; she does not want to create an adversarial process of us against the Police; we are all community partners; people doing the job need to be asked what they hold to be a high standard of conduct; she would welcome community and Council input as well; a group of civilians should not be telling Officers how to do their job. Councilmember Knox White stated the statements are 100% consistent with what he heard from the Steering Committee and the motion. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated i… | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-04-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-04-20 | 26 | Not heard. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (21-279) Mayor's Nominations for Appointments to the Golf Commission and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. Not heard. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 12:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 21 April 20, 2021 | CityCouncil/2021-04-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-05-04.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-05-04 | 26 | percentage of residential to commercial; there are a number of different factors covered extensively in previous Council meetings and also within the staff report; Council has expressed support for an ACI office in Alameda; expressed concern about cutting costs on the back of low wage workers; stated workers deserve a living wage and compensation that includes health care; she is not supportive if costs include a cost to switch vendors; Council has had an extensive conversation and she does not intend to change the direction at this point. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council is looking to provide many things with the service, including compliance with new State law; it is especially important for Alameda to do the kinds of things that reduce waste and are environmentally friendly; Alameda is an Island and needs to take global warming seriously; some of the matters are going to cost more money, such as the eventual conversion to electric vehicles for the fleet; the change requires infrastructure and start-up costs; the value of the change must be weighed for what is received; staff was able to negotiate decent rates due to the possibility of an open process; the City is getting increased services, including bulk pick-up at multi-family dwellings; there will be less couches on curbs; the numbers for customer satisfaction are good; no service provider is perfect; she receives complaints about bins not being picked up from time to time and an immediate response is typical when reaching out to ACI; she receives the similar comments from AMP customers; she thinks ACI has been a good provider and workers are treated well; expressed support. Councilmember Knox White stated the process has been over one year with multiple check- ins; he appreciates the comments; expressed support for the matter based on solid work by staff and consultants; stated Council has asked a lot of the questions raised through the process; he is confident that staff has negotiated a solid deal; costs have been increasing due to dealing with the inc… | CityCouncil/2021-05-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-06-15 | 26 | Oakland decided to go with the Fire Department due to social unrest and people not being satisfied with the options; the Felton Institute can provide the whole group of services; the Felton Institute already does all of the services, just not in a single program; outlined services and staff service providers. Councilmember Daysog provided a scenario of a woman yelling for 40 minutes at 1:15 a.m.; inquired how the Felton Institute would respond and interact with Police. Mr. Penn responded immediately building a rapport with the individual is important; stated information would be gathered; the goal is to immediately deescalate the situation; intake questions and an assessment would be done to create a plan of care with a clinician. Councilmember Daysog stated the scenario is 1:15 a.m. Mr. Penn stated the Felton Institute would have a clinician responding. Mr. Gilbert stated the Felton Institute is very data driven, stays in contact with all clients and has client profiles; the person would be directed to support services. Councilmember Daysog inquired what the Felton Institute would do if the Police also show up. Mr. Penn responded there are variables; everything is done on a case by case basis; law enforcement would be told: "We got it; the situations has been deescalated; the person is calm; law enforcement is no longer needed." Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the third bullet point for Option 1 says that until the Fire Department gets 5150 certification, the Police will still have to come out. The City Manager responded the Fire Department is currently working with Alameda County regarding the 5150 requirement; stated if the programs started tomorrow morning, both would require the Police Department to respond to a 5150 call because in Alameda County, only a Police Officer can make the 5150 determination. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Felton Institute is also working on the 5150 requirement, to which the City Manager responded the City would work towards it with either option; he does not know … | CityCouncil/2021-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 26 | Discussed the Amended Employment Agreement; stated that he would like the rules which have been applied to landlords to be the same as City employees: Jay Garfinkle, Alameda. The City Clerk announced the modifications to the City Attorney contract [paragraph no. 21-462] Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested the City Attorney contract be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*21-449) Minutes of the Special Meeting Held on May 20, 2021, the Continued May 18, 2021 Special Meeting Held on May 25, 2021, and the Regular Meeting Held on June 1, 2021. Approved. (*21-450) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,844,766.59. (*21-451) Recommendation to Modify Eligibility Requirements for Non-Profit Organizations Applying for Alameda Strong Community Relief Fund by Including Paycheck Protection Program Recipients and Adding a Requirement Related to the Maximum Number of Employees Employed by the Non-Profit Organization. Accepted. (*21-452) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Two-Year Agreement, Substantially in the Form of the Attached Agreement, with the Option of Three One-Year Extensions for a Total Five-Year Compensation Amount Not to Exceed $420,000 and No More than $90,000 in a Single Fiscal Year with HouseKeys to Provide Inclusionary Housing Program Management and Compliance Services to the City of Alameda. Accepted. (*21-453) Resolution No. 15793, "Approving a Final Map and Authorizing Execution of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Tract 8591, Bay 37, as a Condition to Final Map Approval (Alameda Landing Waterfront Development).' Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (21-454) Public Hearing to Consider Re… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 26 | needs. (21-504) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is needed to consider remaining items; suggested hearing the Police Policies [paragraph no. 21-505], Public Art Ordinance [paragraph no. 21-508 and Sunshine Ordinance Amendments [paragraph no. 21-509 with ending by 12:00 a.m. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Mayor's suggestion. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. The City Manager recommended staff bring back a program which contains a combination of Options 1 and 2; stated Council's focus is on housing; Option 1 has a focus on matters such as broadband and infrastructure; the revenue loss can be used towards the housing portion; staff can narrow the broadband portion to include some of the elements discussed by Council. Councilmember Knox White stated that he is supportive of the wireless hotspots; expressed concern about the broadband project being placed ahead of the Smart City Master Plan; stated that he would like to know more about the project as opposed to putting in broadband with the hopes of connecting street traffic lights; the broadband option is not what he has in mind for a big and impactful project. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether it is possible to obtain more information from staff related to the percentage of the population that does not have internet access; stated that she feels the matter is important and the need is great. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would prefer Council pursue the matter in the manner recommended by the City Manager; she is mindful of Councilmember Knox White's concerns about getting too far from the Smart City Master Plan; there are other ways to fund the project, including a possible upcoming infrastructure bill. Councilmember Knox White stated that he has been part of weekly meetings over the summer with AUSD; the numbers are not huge; the matter is not going to be solv… | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 26 | wireless hotspots for years in order to help people who do not have internet access; Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 7, 2021 18 | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-21.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-21 | 26 | seems great; the matter can always be put forth by a Councilmember; Council can provide direction to have the matter return one month prior to the execution of the one year extension. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she accepts all of the amendments made by Councilmember Knox White. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she has been persuaded on the matter; she has listened to many of the speakers over the year process and holds respect for the time, effort and passion put into the program; expressed support for the work of the Assistant City Manager; stated the process is iterative; thanked staff and AFS for further illustrating the program; expressed support for the pilot program; stated it is important to move forward with the program now; staff will take the discussion points made by Council into consideration when finalizing negotiations. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. (21-594) Resolution No. 15820, "To Apply for the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Measure AA Grant to Fund Planning and Design of De-Pave Park and Allocate $50,000 in Matching Funds, if Awarded.' Adopted. Expressed support for the work being done; stated many people have been instrumental in bringing the project to this point; DePave Park is an opportunity Alameda must take; the Park will be a unique resource for wildlife due to location, will have significant potential to sequester carbon and will be a beautiful place of respite and learning for all Alamedans; urged Council to vote in favor of the grant application and matching funding: Linda Carloni, Golden Gate Audubon Society. Expressed support for comments provided by the Gold Gate Audubon Society and for the matching funds; stated the matching funds will make a difference in the application; noted the City was previously unsuccessful in the attempt at grant funding for DePave Park; stated previous budget reques… | CityCouncil/2021-09-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-10-19.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-10-19 | 26 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired when the matter would return to Council next. The City Manager responded staff can hold a workshop in the following months to continue the educational period; staff will perform other steps during the four to six months in order to prepare Council to make a decision. Councilmember Knox White inquired whether the validation process included in the presentation is accurate, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Knox White noted sometime between now and next February, there will be a workshop; inquired whether the matter will come to many meetings in March and April and Council approval is set for May or June. Mr. Morales responded the assessment is correct. Councilmember Knox White stated that he has been doom and gloom on the economy for some time; he is happy to be proven wrong; if Council wishes to take advantage of the POB, the advantage should be taken earlier, rather than later; bond rates will likely only go up; every month of waiting is a month of increased rates; the concerns raised are reasonable; expressed support for Councilmember Daysog requesting UFI's staff bona fides; stated the City Auditor and Treasurer will provide input and recommendations; the City Auditor and Treasurer have both expressed support for moving forward to start the conversation. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption of the resolution] with direction to ensure there are two workshops, not Council meetings, between now and the first Council approval whereby the City can have Mr. Morales and City staff give a presentation and have a deep discussion with Council and the community. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Vella stated Council owes the City and constituents a conversation to explore the option; the experts have said now is the time to have the discussion based on bond ratings; other jurisdictions have done so at less opportune moments; she does not want to be in a situation where Counc… | CityCouncil/2021-10-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-02.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-02 | 26 | There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council November 2, 2021 23 | CityCouncil/2021-11-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 26 | efficiencies; the cost structure and impact must be reviewed. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the City can put together language related to notification threshold at the current meeting. The Community Development Director responded it is possible; stated completing the language will take time; staff can come up with language addressing problems; Community Development Department staff will need the assistance of the City Attorney's Office. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the non-compliance protocols section of the agreement lists the only reasons that may be used as a basis for discharge from a facility as possession of a weapon at the facility, as opposed to possession of a weapon not at the facility; the contract should require people not to possesses a weapon, illegal drugs, assault or violent behavior, theft, etc. outside of the facility; the contract should be modified prior to Council approving the matter; it is important for staff to hold the community meeting prior to Council approval of the program; she thinks rents could be higher than reported by staff. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of delaying the decision until the next Council meeting to allow for community outreach and input. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated it is unfortunate the matter was brought forth without outreach; it is always important to reach out to the community prior to approval and allow the public to be part of the process. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated the project is one that all can be proud of; 11 people per unit is a little too high; if the contract is tightened, he is willing to try; the housing crisis is present; staff should measure twice before cutting once and a delay until the next Council meeting would be in order to deal with the contract issues raised. Vice Mayor Vella stated as of the last point-in-time count, over 200 individuals do not have housing in Alameda; 200 people are being forced to sleep and shelter outdoors; Council has id… | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-01-04.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2022-01-04 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY--JANUARY 4, 2022- 5:45 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:47 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Councilmember Herrera Spencer arrived at 5:59 p.m. and Vice Mayor Vella arrived at 6:04 p.m. The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. Consent Calendar (22-001) Recommendation to approve Eric Levitt, City Manager, Lisa Maxwell, Community Development Director, Elizabeth Mackenzie, Chief Assistant City Attorney, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development Director, as Real Property Negotiators for Building 163, Located at 1800 Orion Street, Suite 100 and Building 414, Located at 1820 Orion Street, Alameda, CA. Not heard. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (22-002) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code 54956.8); Property: Alameda Point, Alameda, CA; City Negotiators: Eric Levitt, City Manager, Lisa Maxwell, Community Development Director, Elizabeth Mackenzie, Chief Assistant City Attorney, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development Director; Negotiating Parties: City of Alameda and Sustainable Technologies, 1800 Orion Street, Suite 101 (Building 163) and 1820 Orion Street Alameda Point (Building 414). Not heard. (22-003) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6); City Negotiators: Eric Levitt, City Manager, Gerry Beaudin, Assistant City Manager, and Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director; Employee Organization: Alameda Police Officers Association (APOA), Alameda Police Managers Association (APMA), and Alameda Fire Managers Association (AFMA); Under Negotiation: Salaries, Employee Benefits and Terms of Employment. Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that staff provided information and Council provided direction, by the following two roll call votes: Vote 1: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye;… | CityCouncil/2022-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2022-02-01 | 26 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the Council Priority Setting Workshop being held on a regular Council meeting date. Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion. (22-092) Councilmember Knox White moved approval of adding ten more minutes to the meeting in order to finish the discussion; stated that he is not ready to vote on the matter; if time is not extended, the matter should be continued to another meeting; he will not provide any additional dates for the priority setting workshop until the discussion occurs. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White stated that he was enthusiastic about trying to have regular Council workshops; he understands Councilmembers have refused to consider dates on the weekends or other times; he is a the point where now he does not see value in holding a workshop; the current priorities still represent the priorities of the majority of Council; it is disappointing that a time could not be found due to inflexibility; he does not see any point in holding a workshop eight months prior to an election; he will not support the matter and will no longer submit times for workshops; there will not be any benefit to holding a workshop. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she shares frustrations about the scheduling difficulties experienced; some members have refused to meet on weekends, which causes disadvantages for those working jobs during the day; noted having a date where only four out of five Councilmembers meet defeats the purpose of the workshop. Councilmember Knox White stated that he has agreed to all but two of the proposed dates presented and attempted to be as flexible as possible. Vice Mayor Vella expressed support for comments; stated Councilmembers are volunteers and are not full-time; it is difficult for those with jobs to meet during the day on a weekday; wo… | CityCouncil/2022-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-02-15.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2022-02-15 | 26 | The City Attorney responded staff can look into the requirements and provide response in writing; stated staff's position has been explained by the Recreation and Parks Director. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated parents have to be present with children for kindergarten swim; the hours are not always accessible for working parents; expressed support for staff returning with different options; stated the City has many good resources and should get more people involved. Councilmember Daysog stated that he learned to swim at the Encinal High School pool; swimming pools are a vital part of the social fabric; ASPA has been around for decades and has provided good work; discussed the desire for community pools starting in the 1930s and 1940s; stated the ASPA pool project was in the late 1940s to early 1950s; discussed racist histories related to pools; stated pools have provided an incredible service; good service should be rewarded; encouraged staff to work with ASPA to understand constraints; stated ASPA has operated for many years and understands what works best; expressed support for modifying areas which need collaboration, including the swimming times and parents being present; stated the City should work with ASPA within the current system to ensure vital services are provided; the City can show flexibility in the lifeguard matter and meet ASPA halfway; the fee system in place for ASPA should be discussed; expressed concern over stopping negotiations; stated the partnership should continue. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about the City showing flexibility on the lifeguard matter; stated staff should return with more specifics on the topic. Vice Mayor Vella stated the City must do its utmost to ensure that the minimum requirements are upheld and that a safe environment exists; she would like staff to return with the proposals presented in the staff report; expressed support for opening the matter up to include expanding the days and hours of access; stated pool information needs to be presented better and be more… | CityCouncil/2022-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-03-01.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2022-03-01 | 26 | (22-154) Consider Directing Staff to Bring the Rent Program "In-House" to the City Attorney's Office. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Vice Mayor Vella) Not heard. (22-155) Consider Adoption of Resolution Expressing Support for the "Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative" to Amend Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California to Make Zoning and Land Use Community Affairs, and Not of State Interest. Withdrawn and not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (22-156) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed the Point in Time Count. (22-157) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed the Point in Time Count, a Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) Enforcement Committee meeting discussion related to abandoned vessels in the estuary, a joint meeting of the Alameda County Mayors and the Board of Supervisors to address homelessness, an interview held with consultants working on the three year strategic plan for Alameda Health Systems and a meeting of the City Council and Alameda Health Care District subcommittee. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council March 1, 2022 24 | CityCouncil/2022-03-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 26 | methodology being out of date: Donna Fletcher, Alameda. Discussed collective knowledge on the HE being shared; stated many people believe the HE is moving in the right direction and the City is being set up for success; expressed concern about correspondence; stated the City cannot risk entertaining the proposed concerns; the State will go after noncompliant cities: Zac Bowling, Alameda. Expressed support for the work being done on the HE; stated the City needs the numbers and distribution of housing units across the Island; Article 26 stands out like a sore thumb; cities have tried to get out of requirements; doubling down on Article 26 will likely not be effective: Josh Geyer, Alameda. Expressed support for a good faith effort in submitting a compliant HE; questioned how R-1 through R-6 zones can contribute more; urged Council to modify base zoning; expressed support for tall, modern buildings on Park and Webster Streets: Drew Dara- Abrams, Alameda. *** (22-315) Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of continuing the current item and not hearing any more items. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is not needed to hear the current item. Councilmember Herrera Spencer withdrew her motion. Councilmember Knox White noted Council has two budget hearings in next week; questioned whether the revenue measures matter [paragraph no 22- ] can be continued to the budget session; expressed concern about discussing another item. Councilmember Knox White moved approval the revenue measures matter beginning continued to the May 10th budget session meeting. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the required vote to move the matter, to which the City Clerk responded three affirmative votes are needed. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry the City Clerk stated the Rules require a vote to consider new matters after 11:00 p.m.; Council can complete the current discussion and address the agenda sections, including Oral Communications, City Manager Communications, and Council Communications without a vote; there is no time limit… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2017-04-12.pdf,26 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2017-04-12 | 26 | ITEM 2-B COMMISSION ON DISABILITY ISSUES MEETING MINUTES OF Wednesday, April 12, 2017 6:30 p.m. Susan Deutsch: I just want to let the commission know that I am not going to be available for the Spring Festival because my son is graduating medical school so I'm going to be in Wisconsin that weekend. Sorry. I've been looking forward to this. S?: Congratulations. Beth Kenny: Let's move on to staff communications 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Kerry Parker: I keep interjecting with my staff communications so I think you've heard a lot from me tonight. The Public Works Department will assist this Commission in changing its name. As I say, it might take a while because I'm dedicated to other things for the next couple of months, but as I speak about it with my administrative staff, it's something that we could probably incorporate into our workload. I just wanted you to know that about urgency, I wish for you to not have an urgent feeling about it, but other than that, we can get it moving. I made the mention about Earth Day which is lovely, but I think that for any event planning if you need my assistance in getting a contact or something like that I'd be happy to get it for you. I am about to fill out applications for banners in the month of October for the CDI banner. We have two weeks that are open to us. I've got the Commission on those weeks, it's a week over on Webster and a week at Central and Oak. Park Street's totally taken for all of October. So I just wanted to mention that. But usually, I'm going to give you a contact and pass it off to you. So just be ready for that. I can make a quick list at times, but usually, I have to be pulled in another direction for the other work that I do. I had another thing I wanted to mention and I can't think of it. I'll forward it to the group when I remember what I was just about to say. 7. ANNOUNCEMENTS Beth Kenny: Thank you, Kerry. Now we move on to announcements. Does anyone have any announcements they would like to make? Why don't you do that? Jenny Linton: I'd just like to a… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2017-04-12.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf,26 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-05-09 | 26 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MUTES OF Wednesday May 9, 2018 6:30 p.m. they're having with the commission. So I hope that all works itself out. I know there are a couple spots open on the commission. If we know anyone who might be interested in actually being on that commission, who has an interest in people with disability in Alameda too, I think we could do some networking for that. But as far as the meeting I went to, they were doing some assignments on the city property and the different city gyms and who was allowed to use them. They do annually, the space is allocated, and if I had more time, I'd like to see some of the sports teams and groups that represent and have children with disabilities, if they are getting fair play in there, but being SO new, I just went and sit back and listened. Pay attention to them. And as I mentioned, there is a meeting tomorrow night. Beth Kenny: Great, thank you. Commissioner Deutsch, you mentioned that you had stuff Susan Deutsch: Yes, I do. I went to Salinas, and there's an accessible playground there that was built totally by community funds through fundraising. And it's called Tatum's Garden. It was started by a family who had a daughter with Spina bifida, and her name was Tatum. And this playground was amazing and I've taken a lot of photos and I've taken a few videos, and I was hoping at some point, I don't know what meeting, I could make a PowerPoint and present this to our committee. And I was also thinking of presenting it to Park and Rec. My last communication with them, they were saying how all the playgrounds in Alameda all need to be redone, one at a time, so that's a possibility. But I was also thinking that whole West End project, there's a lot of land out there. An opportunity. I'd have to go out and look around. A friend of mine actually told me to look at a specific spot. I have to check in with him again. Beth Kenny: Is this Jean Sweeney Park you're talking about? Susan Deutsch: No. He was just saying there's nothing there now and they're going to be pu… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-05-09.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-07-11.pdf,26 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-07-11 | 26 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday July 11, 2018 6:30 p.m. wheelchair. That's my second item. Anto Aghapekian: The third that I have is, there was a forum composed by the League of Women Voters here in Alameda, and during that forum, there were four or five people that talked, and, Thomas, the City Planner, was also there. And they talked about the new housing state laws that I was very curious about to find out what this new laws are. And it's not code. It does not impact wheelchair. It's not code related. It's all number of housing. Each city is required, not requested. It's required by law to provide. And cities have been bucking this for about two, three years, but the state is making it very clear that if a city does not comply by providing a certain percentage of housing, per income Anto Aghapekian: All the details, then the state will stop all funding with that city, and that's paralyzing. That's a very serious threat. And they can do it and cities cannot do anything about it. So, cities have been approving housing projects on many fronts, as much as they can. Alameda is one of them. And the thing that is ironic is, the developers have put in a lot of money, getting their plans prepared and approved by the city, it takes sometimes years. And after they receive their approval, their permits to go ahead with the construction, they find out that the banks are refusing to give them the money, because they're creating low-cost housing or market value housing, and the banks say, "The numbers don't jive. There is no way your income is going to be able to pay your loan, so we're not going to give you any money.' So, that's why some of the projects that have been approved that we know of, that's been advertised, or spoken of, written about in the papers, one of them being the brick building that used to be a factor - Del Monte. Anto Aghapekian: I think the guy had his approval, his permit about two or three years ago and it's still vacant. Nothing is going on and I saw a sign on it that says that it… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-07-11.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf,26 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2018-11-28 | 26 | ITEM 2-A COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, November 28, 2018, 6:30 PM Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: 10:00 to 2:00. Okay. So I would like to make an additional motion that we have the retreat on February 9th, from 10:00 to 2:00 PM. Can I have a Second? Susan Deutsch: I second. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Okay. All in favor? All: Aye. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Any abstain or nay? No? Okay. Okay, I believe we're all set now. 5. OLD BUSINESS 5-A Commission and Board Liaison Reports (All commissioners) Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Old Business Commission and Board Liaison Reports. Commissioner Brillinger? Arnold Brillinger: Yes, I've been going to various commissions on disability in Berkeley and also in Oakland. The ones in Oakland seem to have lot of meat to them, because they're doing all kinds of work. Not only worried about the paratransit in the East Bay, but they're also dealing with different matters of transportation and how things are being constructed in Oakland. And I also went to the different AC Transit meeting, and they're continuing on with the working on International Boulevard to make it where the buses have their own lanes and things. So it's going to be interesting to see that. Our transportation meeting here in Alameda is next week, so I'll tell us about it in January. So those are my things. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: Great, thank you. Commissioner Roloff? Jennifer Roloff: The only thing I wanted to follow up on is And I think, I don't know if we have a commission, but is it Jennifer, Jen and Anto, you were working on ADA for businesses, and we had suggested that the Facade grant that the city matches be extended into businesses doing ADA, and essentially, Laurie came back with a "No". And I'm wondering if there's a way we can push on that, if we could talk to someone in the city offices as to why or. Acting Chair Jenn Barrett: That would be great. Do we know who is in charge of issuing the grant, or different grants for the city? Jennifer Roloff: Like the Facade grant. Do you rememb… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2018-11-28.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2019-03-13.pdf,26 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2019-03-13 | 26 | ITEM 3-A COMMISSION ON DISABILITY MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, March 13, 2019, 6:30 PM Jennifer Roloff: It's fairly recent, yes. I saw it on Facebook. Leslie Morrison: March 5th. Jenn Barrett: Do you have the title of the article? Anto Aghapekian: Yes, it's called, "The program moved, no warning to parents". And a highlight from one of the parents is, "When our children are asked to move, it is often with almost no recognition, as if our children are invisible." There is one paragraph in here that touched me. It's from one of the parents. And I don't know if I should read it, but I think that the school district should pay more attention to what's going down with these kids and their parents. Jennifer Roloff: I would be happy to do some follow-up on that as the liaison to school board. I could even go for public announcements and maybe just do an outreach to one of the school board members, as an action item. I don't know if that's going to solve the problem or get exactly what we want to do, but I can start there. Jenn Barrett: Great. Definitely. Leslie Morrison: Can we write a letter? Jenn Barrett: I'm going to check with Laurie on that. Leslie Morrison: I'd be happy to draft the letter, and circulate it for the commission to take a look at. Jenn Barrett: Great. Leslie Morrison: I certainly have a lot more questions about it, so I need to read the article and understand what's exactly going on. Susan Deutsch: And I have a lot of questions too. Leslie Morrison: So, thank you. But I'd be happy to draft a letter. Jenn Barrett: Great, that'll be great. Leslie Morrison: And circulate it, once I learn more. Jenn Barrett: Right. I'm frustrated that our meetings are SO far apart. By the time we come up and discuss this, it's going to be two months later. So let me reach out to Laurie to see what else we can do. Leslie Morrison: So it sounds like what they did is they moved the designated special education classroom that had been at Lincoln, and they moved it to Wood. That's just the first paragraph, what 03/13/19 Page 26… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2019-03-13.pdf |
GolfCommission/2018-02-15.pdf,26 | GolfCommission | 2018-02-15 | 26 | Corica Golf 2018 PREVIEW Annual Plan Key Management Positions: Plans are in development to further elevate efforts on creating fun entertainment experiences at the Club. In support of this golf management positons are being restructured with additional new positions added. These include: Director of Fun (aka Dir. of Golf) - Position will serve as the senior onsite golf operations manager and ensure all services and products are delivered to expected standards while being a relentless promotor of fun. Event Director - A dedicated position is being created to focus on sales and service of outings and special events. This will be a full-time position to assist in the planning of all service clubs, outings & tournaments. Guest Services Manager - This position will serve as assistant to the Dir. of Fun and focus on guest service training with all staff and implementation of service standards and premiere packages. Marketing Manager - Will focus on social media & marketing of programs. 22 | GolfCommission/2018-02-15.pdf |
OpenGovernmentCommission/2015-02-02.pdf,26 | OpenGovernmentCommission | 2015-02-02 | 26 | Commissioner Tuazon stated it is still stored somewhere, just out of the website. Commissioner Dieter stated she is glad agendas and minutes are going to be removed; she also has a problem with EIR's, which can take up a lot of space because they are often big; however, when a project is still being built, people may want to go back to that, Alameda Point in particular, which was just passed last year; chances are the City will not move forward with building anything for a couple more years; in four years when the City is getting ready to start with one section, the EIR will already have been removed from the website; it makes more sense to remove it from the City's website once the project is final and has been built out. The City Clerk stated the Alameda Point EIR would be an exception and would be left up; people are going to be referring to it during all the phases; the Section is addressing the more typical EIR for a smaller project that would be completed within one year. Commissioner Dieter inquired could the language be that the EIR would be removed [from the website] when the project has been completed, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded staff can get terminology from Community Development to reflect the concept, which is a valid point. The Assistant City Attorney stated Section 12 on Public Records Index, struck language that was supposed to happen within 12 months from the enactment of the ordinance has been accomplished; there is no reason to keep it in the ordinance any longer; Section 13 on Matters of Public Concern, the attempt was to rework the language without changing the substance; the concern was it was not particularly clear; basically saying that an employee or policy board member can express an opinion as long as it does not materially misrepresent the position of the City or the department or the policy by which a member belongs. Commissioner Dieter inquired if it is similar to the one that the Commission tabled, to which the Assistant City Attorney responded it is similar but … | OpenGovernmentCommission/2015-02-02.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2005-02-28.pdf,26 | PlanningBoard | 2005-02-28 | 26 | These minutes were approved at the March 14, 2005, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was audio and video taped. Planning Board Minutes Page 26 February 28, 2005 | PlanningBoard/2005-02-28.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,26 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 26 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,26 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 26 | Full Name Zip code Email Signature Patricia Barrameda 94501 andj@mail.com pcks Phylis Call 99501 net call Anish Chopen 94606 anish29chop14@gmail.com Alexanda Gunnell 94501 alixdes@hotmail 1.com IN ALEY Rogann 24607 Daniel Kim 94619 danlagagmail Adam Bahta Anita wong 94501 claimenong862@gmail.com XIS 94501 adiamwehia Adlam hotmaticoluk Ricky Dusing 794501 ricky/dung@yahoo.com Riss Nathan Were 94501 nathandwon@yahoo.com not TRAUL 91,501 a.TRADREE Ture Mathew Yuen 94502 myny22@gmail.com Moos Thai in 94580 Hunta90@gmail.com Tair Tsenguon Gansukh 94610 tsumpson@gmail.com Anganag Sandag 94706 Anganag-sandernanton 4 Mortinac 94610 amort17@gmail.com HMP VLADIMIR NOVAK 94609 Muda COM TONG 94607 Jason.Jong@live. June Ogden 94502 Clus Dah | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );