pages: CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf, 26
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2010-03-16 | 26 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY--MARCH - 16, 2010- 7:01 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the meeting at 1:44 a.m. on March 17, 2010. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent: None. MINUTES (10-13 CIC) Minutes of the Special CIC Meeting Held on March 3, 2010. Approved. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEM (10-129 CC/ARRA/10-14 CIC) Consider SunCal's Requests for 60-Day Tolling Period regarding Notice of Default Issued by Alameda on February 4, 2010. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired what section of the Executive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) explicitly uses the terms "Measure A" and "Measure A Compliant". The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded no such terms are used; stated an interpretation suggests the terms; under the ENA, the developer had a chance to submit an initiative for a non-Measure A compliant plan; the initiative failed; under the terms of the ENA, SunCal is permitted to submit an Optional Entitlement Application (OEA) which complies with existing law, which in this case is Measure A; regardless of the fact that the ENA does not say "Measure A", that is the interpretation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated the City found SunCal in default because the OEA is not consistent with existing law; requested an interpretation of Section 3.2.5.1 of the ENA. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and 1 Community Improvement Commission March 16, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-03-16.pdf |