pages
403 rows where page = 15
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
date (date) 402 ✖
- 2012-06-06 2
- 2005-01-10 1
- 2005-01-24 1
- 2005-01-31 1
- 2005-02-01 1
- 2005-02-14 1
- 2005-02-28 1
- 2005-03-15 1
- 2005-04-05 1
- 2005-05-03 1
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-05-23 1
- 2005-06-07 1
- 2005-06-13 1
- 2005-06-21 1
- 2005-06-27 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2005-08-02 1
- 2005-08-16 1
- 2005-08-22 1
- 2005-09-06 1
- 2005-09-20 1
- 2005-09-29 1
- 2005-11-01 1
- 2005-12-06 1
- 2005-12-20 1
- 2006-02-07 1
- 2006-02-21 1
- 2006-02-27 1
- 2006-03-07 1
- 2006-03-21 1
- 2006-04-04 1
- 2006-04-24 1
- 2006-05-02 1
- 2006-05-16 1
- 2006-06-06 1
- 2006-06-20 1
- 2006-07-05 1
- 2006-07-18 1
- 2006-07-24 1
- 2006-09-05 1
- 2006-09-19 1
- 2006-09-25 1
- 2006-10-03 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-10-23 1
- 2006-11-13 1
- 2006-11-21 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2006-12-11 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-01-08 1
- 2007-01-16 1
- 2007-02-06 1
- 2007-02-20 1
- 2007-02-26 1
- 2007-03-12 1
- 2007-03-20 1
- 2007-03-26 1
- 2007-04-17 1
- 2007-05-15 1
- 2007-05-29 1
- 2007-06-05 1
- 2007-06-19 1
- 2007-07-03 1
- 2007-07-17 1
- 2007-08-07 1
- 2007-08-21 1
- 2007-09-11 1
- 2007-09-18 1
- 2007-09-24 1
- 2007-10-02 1
- 2007-10-16 1
- 2007-10-24 1
- 2007-11-06 1
- 2007-11-20 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2008-01-02 1
- 2008-01-15 1
- 2008-01-28 1
- 2008-02-05 1
- 2008-02-19 1
- 2008-02-25 1
- 2008-03-04 1
- 2008-03-18 1
- 2008-04-01 1
- 2008-04-15 1
- 2008-04-23 1
- 2008-04-28 1
- 2008-05-06 1
- 2008-05-12 1
- 2008-05-20 1
- 2008-06-03 1
- 2008-06-17 1
- 2008-06-23 1
- 2008-07-01 1
- 2008-07-15 1
- 2008-08-05 1
- 2008-08-11 1
- 2008-08-19 1
- 2008-09-16 1
- 2008-10-07 1
- 2008-10-21 1
- 2008-11-06 1
- 2008-11-18 1
- 2008-12-02 1
- 2008-12-08 1
- 2008-12-16 1
- 2009-01-06 1
- 2009-01-20 1
- 2009-02-03 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-02-17 1
- 2009-03-03 1
- 2009-03-17 1
- 2009-04-21 1
- 2009-04-22 1
- 2009-05-05 1
- 2009-05-19 1
- 2009-06-02 1
- 2009-06-16 1
- 2009-07-21 1
- 2009-08-03 1
- 2009-09-01 1
- 2009-09-15 1
- 2009-10-06 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2009-11-03 1
- 2009-11-17 1
- 2009-12-01 1
- 2009-12-02 1
- 2009-12-15 1
- 2010-01-06 1
- 2010-01-26 1
- 2010-02-16 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-06 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-05-04 1
- 2010-05-18 1
- 2010-06-01 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-06-24 1
- 2010-07-06 1
- 2010-07-07 1
- 2010-07-20 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2010-09-07 1
- 2010-09-21 1
- 2010-10-05 1
- 2010-11-03 1
- 2010-11-16 1
- 2010-12-07 1
- 2011-01-04 1
- 2011-01-25 1
- 2011-02-15 1
- 2011-03-29 1
- 2011-04-05 1
- 2011-06-21 1
- 2011-07-19 1
- 2012-02-07 1
- 2012-02-13 1
- 2012-02-21 1
- 2012-02-27 1
- 2012-03-12 1
- 2012-03-20 1
- 2012-04-17 1
- 2012-05-08 1
- 2012-05-15 1
- 2012-06-19 1
- 2012-07-17 1
- 2012-11-28 1
- 2013-04-02 1
- 2013-04-16 1
- 2013-05-07 1
- 2013-06-18 1
- 2013-06-26 1
- 2013-07-23 1
- 2013-09-17 1
- 2013-09-25 1
- 2013-10-15 1
- 2013-10-23 1
- 2013-11-05 1
- 2014-03-18 1
- 2014-04-15 1
- 2014-05-06 1
- 2014-05-20 1
- 2014-06-03 1
- 2014-06-17 1
- 2014-07-01 1
- 2014-07-15 1
- 2014-09-16 1
- 2014-11-18 1
- 2014-12-02 1
- 2015-01-06 1
- 2015-01-20 1
- 2015-01-21 1
- 2015-02-02 1
- 2015-02-17 1
- 2015-03-03 1
- 2015-03-17 1
- 2015-04-07 1
- 2015-04-21 1
- 2015-05-05 1
- 2015-05-19 1
- 2015-06-02 1
- 2015-07-21 1
- 2015-09-01 1
- 2015-09-15 1
- 2015-10-06 1
- 2015-10-20 1
- 2015-11-03 1
- 2015-11-04 1
- 2015-11-18 1
- 2015-12-15 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-01-27 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2016-02-24 1
- 2016-03-01 1
- 2016-03-15 1
- 2016-04-05 1
- 2016-04-19 1
- 2016-05-17 1
- 2016-05-25 1
- 2016-06-07 1
- 2016-06-08 1
- 2016-06-21 1
- 2016-06-27 1
- 2016-07-05 1
- 2016-07-19 1
- 2016-09-06 1
- 2016-09-20 1
- 2016-10-04 1
- 2016-10-12 1
- 2016-10-18 1
- 2016-11-01 1
- 2016-12-06 1
- 2016-12-14 1
- 2016-12-20 1
- 2017-01-03 1
- 2017-01-17 1
- 2017-01-23 1
- 2017-02-08 1
- 2017-02-21 1
- 2017-02-23 1
- 2017-03-07 1
- 2017-03-21 1
- 2017-04-04 1
- 2017-04-07 1
- 2017-04-12 1
- 2017-04-18 1
- 2017-05-02 1
- 2017-05-16 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-06-14 1
- 2017-06-20 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-09-05 1
- 2017-09-19 1
- 2017-10-03 1
- 2017-10-11 1
- 2017-10-17 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2017-11-21 1
- 2017-12-05 1
- 2017-12-14 1
- 2017-12-19 1
- 2018-01-02 1
- 2018-01-16 1
- 2018-02-06 1
- 2018-02-14 1
- 2018-02-15 1
- 2018-02-20 1
- 2018-03-05 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-03-20 1
- 2018-04-11 1
- 2018-04-17 1
- 2018-05-01 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-05-15 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-06-19 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-07-11 1
- 2018-07-24 1
- 2018-09-04 1
- 2018-09-12 1
- 2018-10-02 1
- 2018-10-16 1
- 2018-11-07 1
- 2018-11-27 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2018-12-04 1
- 2019-01-02 1
- 2019-01-15 1
- 2019-01-16 1
- 2019-01-29 1
- 2019-02-05 1
- 2019-02-14 1
- 2019-02-19 1
- 2019-03-05 1
- 2019-03-13 1
- 2019-03-16 1
- 2019-03-19 1
- 2019-04-02 1
- 2019-04-16 1
- 2019-05-07 1
- 2019-06-18 1
- 2019-07-02 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-09-03 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-09-17 1
- 2019-10-01 1
- 2019-10-08 1
- 2019-10-15 1
- 2019-11-05 1
- 2019-11-19 1
- 2019-12-03 1
- 2019-12-12 1
- 2019-12-17 1
- 2019-12-18 1
- 2020-01-07 1
- 2020-01-21 1
- 2020-02-04 1
- 2020-02-18 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-03-17 1
- 2020-04-07 1
- 2020-04-21 1
- 2020-05-05 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-05-20 1
- 2020-06-02 1
- 2020-06-16 1
- 2020-06-17 1
- 2020-06-24 1
- 2020-06-29 1
- 2020-07-07 1
- 2020-07-14 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2020-07-25 1
- 2020-09-01 1
- 2020-09-15 1
- 2020-10-06 1
- 2020-10-20 1
- 2020-11-17 1
- 2020-11-23 1
- 2020-12-01 1
- 2021-01-05 1
- 2021-01-19 1
- 2021-02-01 1
- 2021-02-02 1
- 2021-02-16 1
- 2021-03-01 1
- 2021-03-02 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-03-30 1
- 2021-04-05 1
- 2021-04-06 1
- 2021-04-20 1
- 2021-04-26 1
- 2021-05-03 1
- 2021-05-04 1
- 2021-05-08 1
- 2021-05-18 1
- 2021-06-01 1
- 2021-06-15 1
- 2021-06-28 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-12 1
- 2021-07-19 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-07-26 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-09-21 1
- 2021-10-04 1
- 2021-10-05 1
- 2021-10-19 1
- 2021-11-01 1
- 2021-11-02 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2021-11-30 1
- 2021-12-06 1
- 2021-12-07 1
- 2021-12-21 1
- 2022-01-04 1
- 2022-01-18 1
- 2022-02-01 1
- 2022-02-15 1
- 2022-03-01 1
- 2022-03-15 1
- 2022-04-05 1
- 2022-04-12 1
- 2022-04-19 1
- 2022-05-03 1
- 2022-05-17 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 15 | The Public Works Director stated the entire length of the seawall has been inspected; the interim repair would take care of significant deterioration; the intent is to beat the high tides forecasted for the end of the month. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether erosion occurred in other areas. The Public Works Director responded the $500,000 should cover all areas that need repair. Mayor Johnson inquired whether periodic inspections are conducted. The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated future periodic inspections are being considered. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Governor added Alameda County to the disaster list; inquired whether funding would be available for the repairs. The Public Works Director responded that staff was working with the County and Office of Emergency Services (OES) to secure Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the deterioration was standard or the result of circumstances. The Public Works Director responded that the current situation is extremely accelerated; a resident raised the issue in March; staff examined the area in April and determined that immediate attention was not needed. Councilmember deHaan stated hopefully budget issues would not prevent performing a temporary fix if the City witnessed some deterioration. Mayor Johnson stated that issues should be called to the Council's attention if something similar arises. Councilmember deHaan thanked the Public Works Director for planting trees in front of Alameda College on Appezzato Parkway. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 2 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 15 | Councilmember/Commissioner/BoardMember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION ACTION: 05-006CIC) Resolution #05-133, "Approving and Authorizing Execution of an Assigment and Assumption Agreement and First Amendment to Exclusive Negotiation Agreement between MovieTECS, Inc. and the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda. (2305 Central Avenue, Video Maniacs) Adopted. Lars Hanson, President of the Park Street Business Association (PSBA), stated that PSBA supports the resolution; adoption of the resolution would be the first step toward restoring the historic Alameda theatre. Duane Watson encouraged building the parking structure. Debbie George, Alameda, urged adoption of the resolution. Robb Ratto, PSBA, thanked the Council for taking a historic step in moving forward with the parking structure, the restoration of the Alameda theatre, and the new theatre complex. Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Commissioner deHaan stated that the theatre project has been a long time coming. Chair Johnson stated that many people still do not believe that the theatre project is moving forward; affirmative steps need to be taken to let people know that the theatre is going to reopen. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the special meeting at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 2 Improvement Commission and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-15 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -MARCH 15, 2005- -7:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7:00 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-108) Conference with Real Property Negotiator - Property: 2900 Main Street; Negotiating Parties City of Alameda and Alameda Gateway, Ltd; Under Negotiation Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that the Council obtained briefing and instructions were given to Real Property negotiators. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council March 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-05 | 15 | APRIL 5, 2005 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MINUTES PLACEHOLDER The April 5, 2005 CIC Minutes have not been approved by the Commission. | CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-03 | 15 | felt that he should not be responsible for making all the improvements to the intersection; traffic modeling shows that there are other background projects not yet developed, but approved, which would also impact the intersection; the negotiation used the actual number of trips coming off the project and the impact on the intersection. Councilmember/Commission deHaan stated that there might be further requirements for further entitlements; inquired what the affect would be on the traffic remediation. The Development Services Director responded that the entitlements received for the project anticipate 112,000 square feet of new retail square footage at the South Shore Shopping Center and would likely increase; circulation issues related to the gas station would need to be examined independently additional improvements can always be made; a need for further improvements is anticipated by 2020. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated that he was concerned that the same [ redevelopment funds are being used for many issues. inquired whether there is a detailed breakdown of where redevelopment funding stands. The Development Services Director responded that there are sufficient funds; anticipated improvements can be made with existing tax increments and not bonds. The Acting City Manager stated that at the next meeting staff would provide a Community Improvement Commission multi-year budget to show how much money remains. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated the project is very important the rationale and logic fits into the true meaning of redevelopment that he defends the approach of taking redevelopment funds for the Library project; his motion to adopt the resolutions stands. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated the investment is necessary if the money means that the City would have stores such as Borders or Chicos. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that the City needs to be frugal with redevelopment money but also needs to use the money wisely; moving forward with projects that help continue the redevelopment… | CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 15 | strapped to branches when construction commences protecting the root system is the most important action; that he recommends placing a thin layer of compost, wood chips, and plywood to protect the root system. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired when Mr. Bowen last visited the sight, to which Mr. Bowen responded about a month ago, on April 7. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Mr. Bowen has visited the site to witness the activity. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Mr. Bowen has seen the exposed root system, to which Mr. Bowen responded in the negative. Councilmember deHaan noted the fenced off area is only five feet. Mayor Johnson stated Mr. Bowen should conduct further analysis and determine whether restoration is needed before other measures are implemented. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated Mr. Bowen visited the site a month ago and created a plan for protection of the tree; apparently the plan was ignored; that she is not convinced a plan will be followed; that she understands the neighbors' concern; inquired whether the City could require the owners to post a bond for the security of the trees. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; noted the resolution states: "prior to issuance of building permits for the development on the site, the Applicants shall sign and record with the County Recorder's Office a Landscape Maintenance Agreement with the City to ensure maintenance of the Coast Live Oak Trees on the property. The Landscape Maintenance Agreement shall be in effect for five years from the date of the recording; Council is discussing having specific terms and conditions as part of the recorded Agreement that runs with the land and any violations can be enforced through Code Enforcement; the terms and conditions could include posting of a bond to ensure protection. Councilmember Daysog noted that the City Council has certain powers under the City Charter with regard to compelling testimony; inquired when the arborist heard about the disturbance at the site. Mr. Bowen responded tonight; the last time he spoke… | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-07 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JUNE 7, 2005- - -5:30 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:30 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (05-254) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Title: City Manager. ( (05-255) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : McGee V. City of Alameda. (05-256) Conference with Labor Negotiators Agency Negotiators: Human Resources Director and Craig Jory Employee Organizations : International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ( IBEW) and Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) . Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Public Employee Performance Evaluation, the Council discussed the performance of the Acting City Manager; regarding Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, the Council obtained briefing from Legal Counsel: and regarding Conference with Labor Negotiators, the Council obtained briefing from the Human Resources Director. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 7, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-21 | 15 | for reappointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the regular meeting at 10:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The Agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 June 21, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 15 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether name plaques would be placed on shelves, to which the Library Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the names would remain on shelves forever; stated $100 does not seem high enough for having a name remain forever. The Library Director stated the names remain for the life of the item, not the life of the library; the name would not remain if a shelf is replaced. Mayor Johnson stated $100 does not seem like a large amount. The Library Director stated setting a reasonable amount could raise a lot of money; $1 million was raised mostly from $100 shelves in another library. Councilmember Matarrese noted shelves, which only cost $100, might last longer than chairs, which are $500; stated that the policy is a good way to raise money. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is maintenance involved with the plaques. The Library Director responded possibly, but problems with plaques are minimal. Councilmember deHaan stated plastic plaques could be damaged. The Library Director stated an inexpensive, but durable and attractive, shelf tag would be used. Dr. Jeptha Boone, Alameda Free Library Foundation President, stated the foundation was formed 6¹/² years ago to raise money for the library; the foundation has raised $65,000 and is trying to raise $600,000 for art, branches and collections; urged approval of the policy. Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-364) Consideration of waiving attorney client privilege of September 12, 2003 and April 10, 2001 legal opinions regarding vehicle allowance for City Manager and City Attorney. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-02 | 15 | administration cost is well within industry standards. Commissioner Daysog stated that the project should move forward; expert advice is needed because of the project's historic nature. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether ARG would provide services for the theatre and not the parking structure, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Matarrese stated that expert restoration and preservation advice is needed when restoring and rehabilitating an old building. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the Contract would have any impact on the Cineplex, to which the Development Services Director responded in the negative. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether there were extraordinary circumstances involving the Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the original HVAC system exceeded noise levels. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether construction administration would be initiated when bids are in hand to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:23 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 3 August 2, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-16 | 15 | Councilmember deHaan inquired how many seats the historic theater had on the main floor, to which the Development Manager responded 2,000 seats. Councilmember deHaan inquired how many seats would be accommodated now, to which the Development Manager responded 484 seats. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether all the space would be utilized. Mr. Conner responded old seats were spaced 32 inches apart; new seats will be spaced 45 inches apart. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the 484 seats would utilize all the space. Mr. Conner responded in the affirmative; noted old seating areas underneath the balcony would be used for offices and concessions. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the historic theater lobby area would be adequate for a concession stand, to which Mr. Conner responded in the negative. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether rent was compared with other cities or facilities. Mr. Kelly responded one integrated business is being run in two buildings rent was run against total gross and was around 15%; the calculations were run on gross, rather than per square foot; the rent is based upon the estimated volume of business. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the industry reviews rents on a square-foot basis. Mr. Kelly responded typical rent would be $1.35 to $1.85 per square foot in a suburban area; Alameda's situation is unique; the rent was based on estimated gross sales to be fair to both sides. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there was a blended figure for both the new Cineplex and the historic theater, to which Mr. Kelly responded that the developer is building the Cineplex building. Mayor Johnson stated one of the project goals was to save the historic theater; theaters built today are not like the historic theater ; the developer is taking on a lot of space that would not be taken on for a modern theater; the project would be a lot easier if preserving the historic theater were not a goal; there are Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 August 16, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-06 | 15 | Operation Plan is very comprehensive and outlines who is in charge and the responsibilities of each individual; the Mayor and the Council are the policy makers; the City Manager is in charge of the Emergency Operations Center ( EOC ; the City Manager would provide information on key decision points to the Council; EOC staff would work 12-hour shifts throughout the duration of a disaster; the City has a siren and warning system to effectively alert the community in an emergency; the system keys the community to tune into Channel 15 or 1280 AM on the radio; there are over 100 people trained through the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) ; some teams have been organized in specific areas; there will be a series of table top exercises in October and a functional exercise in November the EOC would be activated during the table top exercises; the City Manager and staff would be present and would be given a complex scenario; logistical issues such as shelter, lost power and water, and accesses to the City are addressed; the emergency responders would work through a City-based scenario during the functional exercise, while the Council would be making policy decisions. Mayor Johnson stated that it would be good for Councilmembers to attend the exercises; part of the exercise should address which issues are policy orientated; Councilmembers need to know where to report and what their responsibilities are when a disaster occurs; the phones and cable channels might not work during a disaster. The Fire Chief stated that the Council would report to the Chambers. Mayor Johnson stated that she was not sure that the Council should report to the Chambers if the electricity and cable are not working; the issue needs to be addressed. The Fire Chief stated that the first process would be for the Council to report to the Chambers; another building would be specified if the equipment in the Chambers was not working. Mayor Johnson stated that she would like to better understand the intent of having the Council report to the Chambe… | CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-20 | 15 | proposed athletic facilities at Bayport prior to finalizing the agreement with the school district. The City Manager stated that the matter would be brought back to the Council. Mayor Johnson stated the information should be provided in conjunction with all field allocations and should address how the process works, facility location, and the greatest needs. (05-473) Mayor Johnson stated that the City of Modesto's cable channel provides a lot of information such as employment opportunities, City programs, and history; suggested that the information scrolling on the City's cable channel be expanded to provide more information to the public. (05-474) Mayor Johnson stated that she would like staff to review Oakland and San Leandro's Emergency Operation Plan; requested that staff review the City's Emergency Operation Plan prior to the workshop to see whether the Plan needs improvement. The City Manager stated that staff is in the process of updating the Plan; there have been some organizational changes staff will review other cities' plans. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 11:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 September 20, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-11-01 | 15 | Counci lmember Daysog stated that he previously requested a summary report on Oakland developments that need to be reviewed; requested a follow up to his request. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the regular meeting at 12:37 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 November 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-06 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING TUESDAY- - - -DECEMBER 6 , 2006- - -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:43 p.m. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/ Commissioners/ Authority Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Transmittal of City of Alameda Comprehensive Annual Financial Report [paragraph no. 05- 551CC/056CIC] was moved to the Regular Agenda. Councilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number . ] (*05-054CIC) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of November 15, 2005 Approved. (*05-055CIC) Recommendation to approve the Amended Contract with Komorous-Towey Architects, Inc. by increasing the Contract amount by $68,200 to provide additional architectural and construction administration services for the Civic Center parking garage. Accepted. *** Mayor/Chair Johnson called a recess to hold the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:45 p.m. and reconvened the Special Joint Meeting at 8:03 p.m. *** Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-20 | 15 | Councilmember deHaan stated that $4.3 to $5.6 million is spent at Target stores; the community is questioning the impacts; the Council needs to ensure that the community's concerns and questions are answered with an impartial consultant. Mayor Johnson stated the matter would need to be placed on an agenda in order for Council to give direction. The City Manager stated that the matter would be brought back to Council in terms of an analysis and could be placed on an agenda if Council action is needed. Councilmember Daysog stated multiplying 900,000 trips against the $50 transaction comes within the envelope that Target expects in terms of store sales; the Board of Equalization's website provides a breakdown on the typical per capita for sales of general merchandise, which is $1200. (05-590) Mayor Johnson stated that a lot has been accomplished in the past year; wished everyone a happy holiday and happy New Year. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 December 20, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-07 | 15 | Councilmember Matarrese stated the Council is not changing the reserve limit policy but is requesting to pull money out of the reserves today because the infrastructure is accruing debt faster than the reserves are accruing benefit; every dollar should be tied to an infrastructure repair; spending money on Fire Station 3 also qualifies because the station is a crumbling asset; money spent on a study is not appropriate; suggested looking for funding in the ARRA planning budget. Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember Matarrese regarding not changing the reserve limit policy; stated money is being allocated to pay for needed projects. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the City has known about fire station issues; there is no immediate urgency except for Fire Station 3; the next budget process can review appropriating money for the study; there are deeper problems if $20,000 cannot be found in the normal budget processi the reserve reduction should be considered a one-time occurrence; the goal will be to continue to build reserves back up to 25%. Councilmember Daysog stated that the reserves were built up by not investing in the infrastructure over the years; now is the time to invest back into the sidewalks and streets; inquired what the affect will be on the undesignated reserves. The Finance Director responded that there are no undesignated reserves the policy sets a 25% target for economic uncertainties; some portions of the reserves have been loaned to other funds and the cash is not available; $6 million out of $18 million has been loaned out; the remaining funds would allow sufficient time to make decisions on how to proceed. The City Treasurer stated that $380,000 remains in the pool for planning and acquisition costs after the $20,000 for the study questioned why $380,000 should be taken out of reserves today to put the money into an interest-bearing account for future acquisition. Councilmember Matarrese stated the funds should be held in abeyance [designated reserve] for Fire Station 3; money would not be… | CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-21 | 15 | (06-095) Mayor Johnson stated that a Councilmember Reporting section should be added to the agenda to allow Councilmembers to report on conferences and meetings. Councilmember deHaan stated that the section could be added under Communications and could include the City Manager. Mayor Johnson stated that other Department Heads should be included also. (06-096) Mayor Johnson stated that she recently attended the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Washington, D.C. ; the Conference includes cities with populations higher than 40,000; power, Base, and Housing Authority issues are very impacted by federal statues and policies; the federal government is trying to turn over franchising telecommunications to the State rather than local governments; stated that she is on the Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee as well as Electric Power Subcommittee. ADJOURNMENT (06-097) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:52 p.m. in a moment of silence with thoughts and prayers that all service members in Iraq are safe and come home as soon as possible. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 February 21, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-07 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -MARCH 7, 2006- -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL- Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (06-104CC-06-007CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting held on February 21, 2006. Approved. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the minutes. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEM (06-008CIC) Resolution No. 06-140, "Authorizing and Directing the Execution of Loan Agreement Relating to the Issuance of Certain Bonds by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Approving Official Statement Relating to Such Bonds and Authorizing and Approving Other Matters Relating Thereto. " Adopted. (06-008A/CIC) Resolution No. 06-141, "Approving Authorizing and Directing Execution of an Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Statewide Communities Development Authority. Adopted. (06-105/CC) Resolution No. 13928, "Approving the Borrowing of Funds by the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda from California Statewide Communities Development Authority and Providing Other Matters Relating Thereto. Adopted. The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission Meeting March 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-21 | 15 | be maintained by the City under the ground lease and the City would receive all of the rental income; the Grand Lake Theater had all improvements and investments made years ago; the City has a healthy box office/concession profit participation starting at 17% above a performance measure once the developer reaches a certain return profit participation is through the life of the project; the community should not be responsible for the long-term maintenance. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated the information is very helpful, but the fact remains that there is a huge spread between 40 cents per-square foot and the market rate; the City should collect 60 to 80 cents per-square foot the developer would still receive a substantial, below market rent; he believes 40 cents per- square foot is significantly south of where the City should be. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated parking was the most important issue in the Downtown Vision Plan; the theater was considered a nicety but not a necessity two redevelopment areas were merged to develop a funding stream; approximately $26 million was left from the $47 million after pay offs; the majority of the money was spent on Park Street; approximately $1.2 million was spent in the Webster Street area; the majority of revenue came from Marina Village; alternative sites were considered to gain additional parking; the parking analysis indicates a shortage of 19 spaces during peak times; the theater uses the vast majority of the parking capacity parking spaces have been lost with the street renovation; parking spaces were bought out with the Knowles project i the proposed parking structure was initially was six levels; seven levels were needed because of the setback; the seventh level is not serviced by the staircase or elevators; the new parking is not 350 spaces because there was existing parking at the Video Maniacs; 280 additional spaces would cost approximately $40,000 per parking space; if all parking spaces are counted, the amount gets down to about $32,000 per spa… | CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-04-04 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -APRIL 4, 2006- -5:20 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:30 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Absent : Councilmember Daysog - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (06-159) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees Association. (06-160) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators: Lisa Mills; Employee City Manager. (06-161) Conference with Real Property Negotiator; Property : 1041 W. Midway and Various Easements in Alameda, California; Negotiating parties: City of Alameda and Alameda Power and Telecom; Under negotiation: Price and terms. (06-162) Conference with Real Property Negotiatori Property: Ballena Isle Marina; Negotiating parties City of Alameda and Ballena Isle Marina LLP; Under negotiation : Price and terms. (06-163) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation - Name of case : Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alameda, City of Alameda V. Alameda Belt Line. (06-164) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case ; Citizens for a Megaplex-Free Alameda V. City of Alameda, Community Improvement Commission, Planning Board, and City Council. Following the Closed Session, the Special Council meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees Association, the Council obtained briefing from labor negotiators; regarding the City Manager, the Council gave direction; regarding 1041 W. Midway, the Council obtained briefing; regarding Ballena Isle Marina, the Council obtained briefing and gave directions; regarding Alameda Belt Line V. City of Alam… | CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-02 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -MAY 2, 2006- -5:30 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:45 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson -5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (06-216) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9. Number of cases : One. (06-217) Public Employment; Title: City Attorney. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, the Council received a briefing from Legal Counsel and gave directions to Legal Counsel; and regarding Public Employment, the Council discussed hiring of a new City Attorney. adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 2, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING TUESDAY- -MAY 16, 2006 - -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 9:01 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese/Commissioner Torrey, and Mayor/ Chair Johnson - 6. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the recommendation to approve Amended Contract with Komorous-Towey [paragraph no. 06-020CIC] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*06-273CC/*06-019CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meeting held on May 2, 2006; and the Special CIC Meeting held on May 3, 2006. Approved. (06-020 CIC) Recommendation to approve Amended Contract with Komorous-Towey Architects, Inc. by increasing the Contract by $27,200 to provide additional Architectural and Construction Administration Services for the Civic Center Parking Garage. David Kirwin, Alameda, stated the City already spent $1.8 million on project planning lawsuit results are unknown; further expenditures should be held off until issues are settled. Chair Johnson inquired whether architectural changes are the result of community input. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 1 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-06 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- - -JUNE 6, 2006- -7:31 P. .M. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore convened the Special Joint Meeting at 9:41 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers, Board Members, Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, and Matarrese 4. Absent : Mayor/Chair Johnson - 1. MINUTES (06-302CC/06-023CIC) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meeting, and the Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, CIC and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting held on May 16, 2006. Approved. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Mayor/Chair Johnson - 1. ] AGENDA ITEM (06-303CC/06-024CIC) Discussion of City Attorney/General Counsel Legal Services and staffing options. Continued. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of continuing the item. louncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent Mayor/Chair Johnson - 1. ] ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 9:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission Agenda for meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 6, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-20 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- - -JUNE 20, 2006- -7:31 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 9:42 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (06-336CC/06-035CIC) Minutes of the Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on June 6, 2006. Approved. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote : Ayes : Councilmembers/Boar Members/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, and Matarrese - -4. Abstentions Mayor/Chair Johnson - 1. AGENDA ITEMS (06-337CC/06-036CIC) Discussion of Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 Citywide budget and City Council Resolution No. 13981, ARRA Resolution No. 38 and CIC Resolution No. 06-144, "Approving Interim Expenditures Prior to Adoption of the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2006-2007. Adopted. Vice Mayor Gilmore/Board Member/Commissioner moved adoption of the resolutions. louncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. John Oldham, Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) President, stated MCEA has been without a salary increase for thirty months negotiations have been going on for over eighteen months with very little movement; the budget has improved by underfunding PERS contributions from 1996 to 2003; Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 1 and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 20, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-05 | 15 | affirmative. Chair Johnson inquired whether 1999 figures were being used, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded the figures were revised. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the $840,000 figure was submitted in 1999. The Redevelopment Manager responded the figure was close to $840,000; Public Works decided to complete only 65% or 75% of the design drawings because of budget problems at the time Public Works reduced the scope of work. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the scope of work was reduced then or now, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded then. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the scope of work had been increased, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. Chair Johnson stated re-bidding is a matter of fairness. The Public Works Director stated Bellecci and Associates is the most knowledgeable firm; another engineering firm would need to become familiar with the design. Chair Johnson stated the issue is a matter of compliance with the competitive bidding process. The Public Works Director stated staff is trying to expedite the project; timelines are tied to another project. Chair Johnson stated the City is obligated to be fair and comply with the bidding process. Commissioner Daysog noted the City put the project on hold. Commissioner Gilmore stated the City approved the Contract in 1999, the project was put on hold in 2002; the project restarted in 2005; inquired why the Contract did not come back to the Commission in 2005. The Public Works Director responded there still was money in the Contract. The Redevelopment Manager stated the City has a Contract with Bellecci and Associates for the project report but does not have a Contract for plans, specifications, and engineering. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 July 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-18 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -JULY 18, 2006- -5:30 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:35 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (06-362) Conference with Labor Negotiators: Agency negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Management and Confidential Employees Association. (06-363) Conference with Real Property Negotiators Property: 2900 Main Street ; Negotiating parties : City of Alameda and Alameda Gateway, Ltd; Under negotiation: Price and terms. (06-364) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases: Two. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Conference With Labor Negotiators, Council received a briefing from Labor Negotiators on the status of contract negotiations and gave direction; regarding Conference With Real Property Negotiators, Council received a briefing from legal counsel and gave direction regarding Conference With Legal Counsel, the matter was continued to July 27, 2006. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council July 18, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-05 | 15 | Mayor Johnson stated that she did not notice a provision that requires restoration of trim detail. The Supervising Planner stated a condition requires the project be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Director. Mayor Johnson stated trim might help; hopefully something else can be done to the side of the buildings. Councilmember Matarrese clarified the intent of the motion is to have the HAB come up with a solution and not send the matter back to Council; requested staff to convey that the HAB should work with the architect and owner to come up with a solution and address the issues of: mass relative to the historic proportions of the buildings and visual appearance from the street to ensure the buildings are rehabilitated to look like Victorians, not something else. Mayor Johnson stated size is important to her; duplexes, with each unit bigger than many homes in Alameda, are not needed. Ms. Fitzgerald noted the average house size on Mastic Court is 850 square feet. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Council would be pleased with something short of complete restoration if the matter were sent back to the HAB. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not expect complete restoration and does not mind some increase in size. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants something to work; the buildings are not attractive, are deteriorating and need to be upgraded in a timely manner requested the matter be placed on the next HAB Meeting agenda. Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to see how the Golden Mean could be met without the grading option; all alternatives should be exercised; the grading option might work without handicap access. The Planning and Building Director stated staff would work with the architect and AAPS; since the buildings are not on the historic list, the HAB review is only whether the building can be altered, not all the details of restoration. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 September 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-19 | 15 | established along the Harbor Bay Parkway and Maitland Drive frontages. Landscaping shall provide vell-designed transition zone and buffer between the project and surrounding land uses. Perimeter landscaping along the eight-foot - high vinyl clad chain link fence shall be of a density and appropriate height (typically two feet above fence) to screen the tops of recreational vehicles from public viewing areas. The landscaping plan is subject to final approval by the Planning and Building Director..." Mayor Johnson stated the condition is good. Councilmember Matarrese stated the final decision on the actual green screen is approved by the Planning and Building Director requested a report back from the Planning and Building Director on the matter. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated Parcel 109-4 and 109- 2 total 1.2 acres; inquired whether the property is clean. The Planner III responded in the affirmative; stated one portion is under Maitland Drive; the other part is the corporate yard for the Golf Course and was not part of the Gun Club; a Phase 1 and Phase 2 assessment was performed on the original 5 acre facility; a cleanup plan was implemented by the County Health Department; the site has been remediated. Councilmember deHaan stated the City only received $45,000 for the property; more of a set back would have been prudent. On the call for the question, the motioned carried by the following voice vote: Ayes Councilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 3. Noes: Councilmembers Daysog and deHaan - 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (06-475) David Kirwin, Alameda, discussed Article 25 of the City Charter. Mayor Johnson requested the City Attorney to provide Mr. Kirwin with additional information on the specific program addressed in Article 25. (06-476) Pat Colburn, Alameda, provided handout ; discussed banning gas blowers. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Ms. Colburn is suggesting banning Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 September 19, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-03 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) , AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (HABOC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -OCTOBER 3, 2006- - - 7:25 P. M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:35 p.m. Commissioner Torrey led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmember/Commissioners/BoardMembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Commisioner Torrey, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 6. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Board Member Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Board Member deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 6. (HABOC) Minutes of the Special Board of Commissioner meeting held August 15, 2006. Approved. (HABOC) Minutes of the Special Board of Commissioner meeting held September 5, 2006. Approved. (HABOC) Budget Review. Approved the proposed budget revision; and Resolution No. 786, "Revising the Budget for the Conventional Low- Rent Housing Program No. CA-062 (Esperanza) " Adopted. AGENDA (06-061 CIC) Recommendation to authorize conveyance by Quitclaim Deed of 2.51 acres at the former Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) site for construction of 39 units of affordable rental housing to the Housing Authority of the City of Alameda; (HABOC) Recommendation to accept a 2.51-acre site at the former FISC Site for 39 units of affordable rental housing via a Quitclaim Deed from the Community Improvement Commission; (HABOC) Recommendation to authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute a 75-Year Ground Lease with Resources for Community Development (RCD) for construction and management of 39 units of Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners October 3, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 15 | purchasing a particular product. The Public Works Director responded that he has done a lot of research on electric vehicles; stated staff feels eight vendors would be able to provide proposals. Councilmember deHaan stated charging station locations are a concern; inquired whether the majority would be in the City Hall area. The Public Works Director responded the charging stations would be scattered throughout the City stated there are some charging stations in the City already; there are two stations at the Lincoln Avenue parking lot which can charge four vehicles; Alameda Power and Telcom has a charging station that can charge one vehicle and has two in storage; one charging station would be needed at City Hall West; another charging station would be in the City Hall parking lot; the Police Department parking enforcement officers use electric vehicles; locations are still being reviewed. Councilmember deHaan stated the staff recommendation is the first effort in converting a lot of the City vehicles to electric; the Master Plan needs to address charging station locations. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Request for Proposals is a great step and is a long time coming; he appreciates all the work that has been done and is ready to move forward. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-522) Recommendation to appropriate $100,000 in Measure B funds to update the City's Traffic Model, authorize preparation of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to the Transportation Element, and direct staff to include the proposed transportation policies recommended by the Transportation Commission in the GPA. The City Engineer provided a brief presentation. Councilmember Daysog stated that he likes Transportation Policy No. 1 through 6; he is a little concerned with Transportation Policy No. 7; he interprets Transportation Policy No. 7 to state it is okay if the Atlantic Avenue and Webster Street traffic has a bad level… | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-11-21 | 15 | Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether Mr. Wang is indicating that the School District does not have a legitimate right to property within the area. Mr. Wang responded that he does not know of the school district having a legitimate right; stated the City never officially transferred the leasehold to the School District. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the School District agrees with Mr. Wang, to which Mr. Wang responded that he does not know. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the issue must be resolved before the Council/Commission considers anything on the property. Mr. Wang outlined the amount he has spent on studies; urged moving toward a solution. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that she concurs with Vice Mayor/ Commissioner Gilmore that the matter seems to be coming in the wrong order; the developer is requesting a subsidy; the developer needs to bring forward a project, not a concept, before subsidy is discussed; the Concept Plan does not appear to be compliant with Measure A; she is concerned that the project would have priority over other projects and is not convinced the City should commit to do so; she concurs with Vice Mayor Gilmore questioning why the matter should be addressed prior to completion of the NWSP. louncilmember/Commissioner Daysog stated a letter from a member of the public raised the concern that there would only be two public hearings on the matter; there needs to be a commitment to more public hearings if the project happens at all: the public should be involved through the Planning Board or a processi City Hall has to be prepared to juggle a lot of balls the NWSP is coming forward; City staff can deal with the School District issues; everything can happen on parallel tracks a commitment for greater public involvement is needed; the Concept Plan needs to be flexible; the NWSP might have ideas on the use and access of public space, which might differ from the Concept Plan; the NWSP would take priority over the Concept Plan. Mr. Wang stated the Concept Plan is based upon the NWSP. uncilmember/Co… | CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 15 | obligation to pay for the predevelopment demolition, backbone Infrastructure, and CEQA mitigation under the existing DDA; the new DDA caps the obligation; the developer is fronting the entire project cost and the CIC is not required to borrow money as outlined in the existing deal. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese requested an explanation of the profit participation. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated there is a set per lot land price for the Bayport project in addition to a profit participation formula in the existing DDA that states the CIC would share in the upside if the deal turned out to be better than originally contemplated; the project participation is being generated now and is being used to pay for the backbone infrastructure, demolition and other Bayport obligations; the maximum proceeds of $5 million would be pledged to the Alameda Landing project when all of the shortfall loans and predevelopment obligations are paid off; the obligation is identical to the existing deal. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the cash contribution is the property tax increment that is generated from developer improvements. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the proposal is to have funds raised via bond sales versus annual tax increment allocations; the bonds would be secured with the tax increment, not by money tied to the General Fund. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore requested an explanation of the land value. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated Catellus is estimating a $60.3 million land value once all improvements are constructed. the land has minimal value now; Catellus needs to invest $103 million in the project to yield the $60.3 million land value; Catellus would complete the property improvements; the land would be contributed to the project in exchange for the property investment; the CIC would not be contributing cash to the project; Catellus woul… | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 15 | budget. The City Manager responded the Finance Department has the money set aside and identified for a Capital project related to the Planning Department; stated the money is coming out of the General Fund. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the budget was approved with the project in mind. The City Manager responded the Carnegie Building was not identified as a funded Capital project. Councilmember Matarrese stated public discussions have not taken place on what the fate of the Carnegie Building should be; questioned allocating over $1 million when the first feasibility study has not been done; suggested allocating $75,000 for a feasibility study to see if using the Carnegie Building would be possible. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the funds are in the budget for a Planning Department capital improvement and not necessarily for a One-Stop Permit Center. The Planning and Building Director responded the funds have been collected for a One-top Permit Center. Mayor Johnson inquired how the funds have been collected. The City Manager responded the funds have been collected from permit fees and have to be spent on staff or capital projects related to the Planning Department; anything in excess of what is spent on operations has to be put aside. Councilmember Matarrese stated he hears complaints about the permit process taking too long, not about going from office to office; inquired whether the money could be spent on hiring a few more planners. The City Manager responded a report would be provided on where the money has been collected from over the years and how the money can be spent. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the money could be spent on staff and/or facilities. The City Manager responded revenues collected for the permit fees can be spent on staffing and anything above that amount needs to be set aside for something related to the Planning Department. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 January 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-16 | 15 | The City Manager stated the Development Services Director is in the process of re-evaluating the budget opportunities do not exist to fund the study in the current fiscal year. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Towne Center, Alameda Landing or Alameda Point funds are available; stated said areas are relevant to the big box study. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether money could be taken from the Planning Department impact fees. The City Manager responded money was not budgeted for the study. Councilmember Matarrese stated the question is not whether money was budgeted; the question is whether $50,000 can be taken from another source. The Business Development Manager responded the issue would need to be reviewed; stated the proposed study would not be just for Alameda Point, but the whole Island; a portion might be appropriate, but not one hundred percent. Councilmember Matarrese stated funds must have been budgeted to support the projects. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated the City has full cost recovery for the Alameda Landing project; all staff salaries are paid by the developer ; the developer funded a retail impact analysis as part of the entitlement process for approximately $35,000; the study led to the retail mix recommendations Mayor Johnson inquired whether a retail impact study is required for proposals, to which the Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a retail impact study is different from a big box study; stated she is surprised by the cost. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded some goals and objections may be captured; stated the measurement would address whether the proposed project competes with or is compatible with existing retail. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a retail study would include other impacts, to which the Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 January 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-06 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -FEBRUARY 6, 2007- 7-00 - p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7:10 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-045 ) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators: Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations : Alameda City Employees Association and Police Association Non- Sworn. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council February 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-20 | 15 | Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the Architect is comfortable with different canopies, to which the Architect responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the north elevation could be corrected; stated the original design is better. The Architect responded keeping all facades level is expensive. Commissioner Matarrese inquired what the cost would be, to which the Architect responded at least $50,000. Commissioner Matarrese inquired what would be left in the contingency fund by putting the sheer wall back or spending $50,000 to fix the wall. The Architect responded combining the two sheer walls into one wall saved a lot of money i stated a false sheer wall would cost between $80,000 and $90,000. Commissioner Matarrese inquired what would be the remaining contingency, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded approximately $260,000. Commissioner Matarrese requested staff to investigate options to mitigate the parking garage north wall sloping appearance; stated the Oak Street presentation is nice. The Redevelopment Manager stated options would be explored. Commissioner Gilmore inquired what is the final date to make decisions. The Architect responded decisions could be made later because the issue is not structural. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the timeline is being held to November. The Redevelopment Manager responded the timeline is subject to schedules noted in the Contract. Commissioner deHaan stated great progress has been made with the historic theater and parking garage; inquired whether the Cineplex would dovetail with the historic theater and parking garage completion. The Redevelopment Manager responded the Cineplex would take less Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 3 February 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-03-20 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -MARCH 20, 2007- - -6:00 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:40 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (07-121) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9 Number of cases One. (07-122) - Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators: Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations : All City Bargaining Units. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Anticipated Litigation, Council authorized settlement of an employment dispute; regarding Labor, Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators on the status of negotiations with the Police Association Non-Sworn bargaining unit; no action was taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council March 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-04-17 | 15 | outcome technically, the owners would not have to wait, but they are trying to work with the neighborhood. Eunice Wong, Alameda, stated two-story homes are out of character for the neighborhood; the homes are very close together limited sunlight is an issue. Ann Quintell, Alameda, stated she would like to clarify that Peach Street is not included. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the houses fronting on Peach Street are included. Ms. Quintell responded in the negative; stated 82 houses are involved, not 118. David McCarver, Alameda, stated the goal is to protect the neighborhood; encouraged Council to support the zoning amendment. Mayor Johnson stated the proposed zoning amendment could be a model for other neighborhoods and is fair to current owners and prospective buyers; everyone would be under the same rules buyers would know that there are additional restrictions prior to buying a home. Councilmember deHaan stated that the proposed zoning amendment would enhance the capabilities of the Planning Department and Planning Board; he looks forward to initiating the rezoning. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of initiating the rezoning with special development standards with the amendment not to include Peach Street. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Gilmore stated that the rezoning amendment should move forward; she is comforted that there will be more public discussion opportunities within the neighborhood, Planning Department, and Planning Board; she is concerned with the twenty-foot height limit because she is not sure whether a two- story gabled roof would be possible under the twenty-foot limit; staff should review the matter carefully. Vice Mayor Tam concurred with Councilmember Gilmore stated that she has concerns with including only part of Peach Street ; she would like to understand that the line is not an arbitrary boundary. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 April 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-05-15 | 15 | not think it needs to be stated as part [of the motion]. Councilmember deHaan stated that he thinks it does. Mayor Johnson stated people need to understand that Measure A can only be changed by the voters. Councilmember Gilmore requested clarification [to the motion] of whether the three additional Ad Hoc Committee members selected by the Appellants would be Appellants or designees; stated that she would prefer the actual signed Appellants, not designees. Mayor Johnson concurred that three of the Appellants should be selected. Councilmember deHaan noted that there was also a clarification [to the motion] that the meetings would be posted in some way. Mayor Johnson inquired whether everyone was clear. Hearing no objection, on the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (07-237) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated dead bees are inside the Fort Knox building on Webster Street. Mayor Johnson stated City Hall had a bee problem; the beehive was removed and transplanted: requested that information be provided to Fort Knox. (07-238) David Howard, Alameda, stated that he hopes Council stays focused on job creation and job preservation when working with Sun Cal [Alameda Point developer] questioned whether the three person sub-committee meeting referenced by Ms. Ezzy Ashcraft [under the Public Hearing, paragraph no. 07-236] constituted a Brown Act violation. (07-239) Jon Spangler, Alameda, urged everyone to ride bikes on Bike to Work Day (07-240) Barbara Kerr, Alameda, stated a newspaper article noted that the new Work/Live building would draw 50,000 cars; the Work/Live ordinance prohibits any impacts on the surrounding area; parking is not available on Blanding Avenue except the shopping center area; urged Council to direct the City Manager to investigate whether a use permit or variance was issued; stated the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 May 15, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-05 | 15 | Planning Board's action to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Safeway Gas Station Project located at 2234 Otis Drive. [PDA05-001, DR05-0010, UP06-003, UP06-0010, UP06-0013]. The Planning Services Manager provided a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents (In favor of Call for Review) : Eugenie Thomson, Alameda (provided handout ; David Howard, Action Alameda; Dorothy Reid, Alameda: Len Grzanka, Alameda; Debra Banks, Alameda (provided handout) Opponents (Not in favor of Call for Review) : Debbie Kartiganer, Cassity, Shimko, Dawson & Kawakami; Chris Ferko, Safeway Consultant. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the project plans are different from the proposed plans the largest change is the number of pumping stations questioned whether tonight's discussion is premature because the Planning Board has not seen the site plans ; stated staff has stated that Council's position on the environmental document tonight would not be linked to the Alameda Towne Centre environmental document. requested legal clarification before going forward; stated the matter should be adjourned to the correct order if tonight is not the right time and place. The Planning Services Manager stated typically the Planning Board or Council addresses the adequacy of the environmental document and then makes a decision on the project the same evening; the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that the decision needs to be made on the environmental document first; the Planning Board requested that the number of pumps be reduced from eighteen to twelve and that the project provides driveways and a raised sidewalk; the changes are very minor relative to the environmental affects. The City Attorney stated an action on the mitigated negative declaration would not tie the legislative body's hands regarding a future action on an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Alameda Towne Centre expans… | CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-19 | 15 | Plan; inquired whether adequate resources are available to continue the Plan, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded another five sites are scheduled for Fiscal Year 207-2008. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the parks look great. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore thanked the Interim Golf Complex General Manager, staff and Golf Commission for all the hard work in turning around the Golf budget stated she looks forward to reading the Consultant's report. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated unfunded capital projects would need to be address in the next year or two at the Golf Complex. The Interim Golf Complex General Manager stated staff will be reviewing the matter at mid-year. louncilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether a date has been set for unfunded projects. The City Manager/Executive Director stated staff continues to look into funding sources and grants. Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the budget is very clear requested the City Manager/Executive Director to comment on whether staffing is adequate for Police Sworn Officers, Firefighters, and the Library. The City Manager/Executive Director outlined the approved workforce changes on page seven of the budget report stated safety services are being monitored; the Library has been provided with $60,000 for part-time employees. louncilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated the Library has adequate staffing for the size of the building; Council was hoping to look at ways to extend hours. The City Manager/Executive Director stated Library hours have not increased. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether more staff would be needed if hours were increased, to which the City Manager/Executive Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated she would Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 4 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 19, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-03 | 15 | addressed prior to the next school year. (07-333 ) Mayor Johnson suggested stated Mount Trashmore be used to grow trees for the City tree inventory. The City Manager stated there is a time limit that needs to be met. (07-334) Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City has an ordinance requiring that paint be contained when buildings are sand blasted or water blasted; stated there are some clean water run off laws ; suggested something more direct to require prevent contamination. (07-335) Councilmember deHaan stated Coast Guard Estuary Park is under the Coast Guard's jurisdiction; the Park was remediated and is dormant suggested reviewing ways to use the Park. The City Manager stated she would look into the matter the Coast Guard gave the City permission to use the area for soccer before; now there is a process to get permission from the Navy. (07-336) Councilmember deHaan stated the Alameda Landing design was brought to the Planning Board; the notification was not done in the best interest the report stated people were notified within 300 feet of the area; the project should be notified properly; notification was not adequate. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember deHaan was referring to notice for an upcoming meeting. Councilmember deHaan responded the meeting already took place. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember deHaan was requesting staff to confirm that proper noticing was done. Councilmember deHaan responded in the affirmative; stated the public should be notified in a good, earnest manner for large projects. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Planning Board discussed notification issues when a project affects the City at large; there are different noticing rules; requested that the matter be reviewed. Mayor Johnson stated the noticing requirements were expanded; requested that staff confirm that the noticing requirements were followed. (07-337) Councilmember deHaan stated there have been concerns with Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council July 3, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-17 | 15 | adjacent buildings if the building is larger than 300 square feet; an appeal process is available to property owners to request the requirement be waived. Mayor Johnson stated it would not be expensive to install a sprinkler system in a garage. Councilmember deHaan stated sprinkler systems need a bigger water head. The Fire Marshall stated a 3/4" service would serve a Group U Occupancy Bayport homes are 3,500 to 4,000 square feet; a one- inch service is sufficient. Vice Mayor Tam moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (07-349) - David Kirwin, Alameda, stated that he is disappointed that trees have been cut at Godfrey Park; the vast, open field offers no shade or wind protection; staff was unable to furnish him with Park plans; he does not understand why dirt is being brought in if plans are to re-grade and re-sod. Mayor Johnson requested that staff provide Mr. Kirwin with a copy of the plans. (07-350) Pat Bail, Alameda, stated that the Estuary Park grass is dying; the Coast Guard gave the Park back to the Navy; the Navy told the Coast Guard to turn the water off. the Recreation and Park Director wrote a letter to the liaison between the Navy and the City; suggested that the Fire Department hook up to one of the fire hydrants and water the grass; stated more park space is needed; urged Council to address the issue; further stated the Measure A Ad Hoc Committee was unable to reach a consensus on the forum; Council direction was clear; Woody Miner was to provide a history of Measure A; educational speakers were to address how Measure A affects housing and transportation in Alameda; the forum would provide an opportunity for public input; negotiations broke down on July 13; Appellants requested to select speakers and follow the format that was agreed to on June 7; the Planning Board members indicated the agreement could Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council July 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-07 | 15 | Mayor Johnson stated that the issue should be broadened to provide the public with other recycling opportunities. staff should not be limited to just looking at shopping centers for recycling. Councilmember deHaan stated recycling is being discouraged. Vice Mayor Tam stated recycled material can be placed in the blue bins provided by Alameda County Industries (ACI). Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda is not doing what should be done [to provide recycling centers] Mayor Johnson stated staff should not limit where to look [ for recycling center opportunities] (07-390 - ) Mayor Johnson requested that the Police Chief address the animal shelter issue. The Police Chief stated a number of inquiries have been received regarding the animal shelter; animal welfare is the utmost priority; opportunities have come up to review practices; a report will be provided to Council within a month; a volunteer coordinator has been instituted. Mayor Johnson requested that the report include information on listing animals on different pet adoption websites and walking hours. Vice Mayor Tam inquired what is the volunteer to dog ratio. The Police Chief responded four dogs were involved at the time of the animal shelter situation. Vice Mayor Tam stated at one point the shelter had forty-three volunteers for eight dogs. Mayor Johnson stated a lot of animals were at the shelter when the Naval Air Station closed; inquired whether the shelter has experienced a significant decline in the number of animals at the shelter. The Police Chief responded information is still being gathered. Mayor Johnson inquired whether said information would be included in the report, to which the Police Chief responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council August 7, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-21 | 15 | Councilmember deHaan inquired what other delegations would be participating, to which Mr. Chen responded he would provide a list. The Community Development Program Manager stated the recommendation is to accept the invitation and allow the SSHRB to determine the official delegation and permit the SSHRB to finalize the trip details. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of accepting the invitation and authorizing the SSHRB to determine the delegation. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Council needs to accept the invitation to exempt the cost of the trip from being subject to disclosure under the Fair Political Practices Commission. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated some of the trip related costs are being funded by the Wuxi government ; attendees would not need to claim the trip costs on the Form 700 as long as Council takes an official action to accept the invitation and takes some action to identify who would attend. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (07-409) Councilmember deHaan stated that more than 800 units are being built at the Gateway Project on the Oakland side of the estuary near the Park Street corridor; most of Alameda's intersections are at F condition during peak hours; said build out needs to be addressed. ( (07-410) Mayor Johnson stated that Vice Mayor Tam requested a Charter review at the last Council meeting; requested that a Council sub-committee be formed and appointments be brought back for consideration at the next Council meeting. Councilmember Matarrese stated that a Charter review is most appropriately directed to the City Attorney; suggested that said matter be assigned to the City Attorney and City Clerk. Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council August 21, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-11 | 15 | City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop - September 11, 2007 ATTACHMENT B - ENVIRONMENTAL SCAN The environmental scan prepared by the City is attached. Management Partners, Inc. 11 | CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-18 | 15 | [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] ( *07-444 CC/*07-034 CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission meeting held on August 7, 2007. Approved. [Note: Councilmember/Commissioner Gilmore abstained from voting on the minutes. ] (*07-035 CIC) Recommendation to approve the amended Contract with Komorous-Towey - Architects, Inc. by increasing the Contract amount by $15,000 to provide additional Construction Administration Services for the Civic Center Parking Garage. Accepted. (*07-036 CIC) Recommendation to increase maximum loan amounts for City of Alameda Down Payment Program. Accepted. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 8:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 2 Community Improvement Commission September 18, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-02 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -OCTOBER 2, 2007- - -7:25 P. .M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:54 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Board Members/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*07-470CC/*07-038CIC ) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting of September 18, 2007. Approved. ( *07-471CC/*07-039CIC) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Financial Report for the period ending June 30, 2007. Accepted. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting October 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-16 | 15 | extent of the art; stated banner options range from $20,000 to $50,000. Chair Johnson stated that the contingency might be needed for something else between now and completion; art can be installed at any time. Commissioner deHaan inquired when the grand opening is anticipated, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded March. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*07-494CC/*07-041CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission meeting and the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission meeting held on October 2, 2007. Approved. AGENDA ITEMS (07-495CC/07-042CIC) Public Hearing to consider approval of a first addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed-use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, first amendment to the Development Agreement, and first amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement for the Alameda Landing Mixed Use Project to modify the Public Waterfront Promenade; 107-495A CC) Adoption of Resolution Certifying the Addendum to the Alameda Landing Mixed-Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report; (07-495B CC) Adoption of Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution of a First Amendment to a Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus Development Corporation) for the Sale and Development of Certain Real Property at the Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) ; 07-042A CIC) Adoption of Resolution Approving an Addendum to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Alameda Landing Mixed-Use Development Project Authorizing the Executive Director to Amend the Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Cou… | CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-06 | 15 | very small regarding the MDGIP; the Board did not want the driveway closed; the additional sentence addresses how to resolve the issue. Vice Mayor Tam requested clarification on remanding the matter to the Planning Board. The Planning Services Manager stated the site plan would be remanded with direction to reconsider the decision in light of the new information. Mayor Johnson inquired whether it might not be procedurally correct to send the other two items [MDGIP and driveway ] back to the Planning Board. The Planning Services Manager responded the matters could be sent back. Mayor Johnson stated taking the two items off the table might make sense. Councilmember Matarrese restated the motion approval of staff recommendations 1 and 2 [regarding the MDGIP and driveway and sending site plan 4 back to the Planning Board for review, comment and approval. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the motion included the additional sentence regarding the right turn lane, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the motion included direction to have the Planning Board review raised crosswalks, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember deHaan stated that he has seen the project design and has concerns regarding the size and mass of Buildings A and B; the Planning Board wants to take a second look at the matter; Building A is 67 feet tall and only houses one story. Mayor Johnson inquired whether said matter is part of the agenda item and should be discussed. The City Attorney stated the agenda item is specific to the appeal and the three items in the appeal, which should be the Council' S Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 November 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-20 | 15 | but would be used for more than just office space. Ms. Muller noted office space includes conference rooms, storage and other items that take up additional space. Councilmember Gilmore stated Planning currently occupies about 6,000 square feet; 6,000 square feet of office space in City Hall would be available if Planning moved into the Carnegie building inquired which department could move into the space, perhaps Public Works or Development Services; stated the goal is to try to centralize services. The City Manager stated bringing Public Works back into City Hall was reviewed during the processi Information Technology could be moved back as well if there is enough space; Development Services is a little larger. Councilmember deHaan questioned whether Development Services could fit in the former Children's library. The City Manager stated having staff together increases efficiency having Public Works move back was reviewed because the department is involved with the Permit Center. Councilmember deHaan stated all of the possibilities should be reviewed; the City might have to be out of Building 1 at some point. The City Manager stated a Facilities Mater Plan is on the work plan; since funding is available and the Carnegie building is not occupied, there is an opportunity to move Planning and Building into the space, restore the building, provide better customer service in the Planning and Building Department and return another department or two back to City Hall; staff does not anticipate there is enough room for Public Works, Information Technology and Development Services staff would look for other opportunities in the future. Mayor Johnson stated the former Children's library should be reviewed; inquired whether there is extra space in the building occupied by the Recreation and Parks Department; stated that she understands the department does not utilize the whole building. The City Manager responded said issues would all be included in the analysis. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned about the a… | CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA, AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -DECEMBER 4, 2007- - -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 8:57 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Board Members/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the recommendation to authorize the use of up to $50,000 [paragraph no. 07-051CIC], and the recommendation to approve a $300,000 loan [paragraph no. 07-052 CIC] were removed for discussion. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*07-050 CIC) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of November 20, 2007. Approved. (07-051 CIC) Recommendation to authorize the use of up to $50,000 in interest earnings to complete the enclosure of the Historic Alameda Theater Balcony Access Corridor and related improvements. Commissioner deHaan stated that the Commission discussed bringing back value engineering items if money became available; inquired whether other worthy items should be considered. The Development Services Director responded the CIC would not be required to make other significant, hard construction improvements to the Historic Theater in the future; stated decorative or restoration items could be considered; the mezzanine balcony rehabilitation and restoration is the last hard construction item left unfinished; the Historic Theater is required to have certain fire and life safety exiting paths as well as American with Disabilities (ADA) access; the proposed platform is part of the Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 1 and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Com… | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-02 | 15 | variety of options. Mayor Johnson stated the RFP should indicate that Council's preference is not to lease out the entire facility. The City Manager stated the RFP would include a facility Master Plan; staff would get back to Council regarding scope, cost, and timing. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether not wanting to lease out the whole operation would cause problems with candidates. Mr. Singer responded the issue is a big unknown; stated the NGF could work with the City to craft what Council wants. Councilmember deHaan stated contracting out the management portion was reviewed and did not pencil out; inquired why the other portion would pencil out. The City Manager stated that the other portion did not pencil out on a short-term - basis. Councilmember Matarrese stated long-term management was never explored. Mr. Singer stated a lot would be learned from an RFP . Ms. Sullwold inquired whether the motion included having the NGF help cost out some of the Golf Commission's recommendations, to which Councilmember Gilmore responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Gilmore thanked the Golf Commission and members of the golfing public for coming tonight i encouraged everyone to play more rounds of golf. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (08-013) - Ricardo Lopez and Diana Wong discussed the Homeowner and Bank Protection Act. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council January 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-15 | 15 | there was a $20 million deficit; Alameda had four cross island buses; Alameda had to give up one of the lines; residents desired to have a route that went across the entire Island; AC Transit is not so desperate now; that matter can be reviewed. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Transportation Commission recommended other places. Mr. Bruzzone responded the Transportation Commission thought the bus could be used better someplace else; stated a huge schedule analysis was done on the 51 bus line; two afternoon buses were added to the schedule; a run time analysis showed that the buses were running early; two buses were wasted. Councilmember deHaan stated multiple devises have been installed at the Lum School crossing and getting across is still a chore; adding to the confusion does not make sense; buses travel at approximately 35 miles per hour with children present; safety needs to be first and ridership second; two light controlled intersections would be lost by going down Shoreline Drive to Eighth Street Wood School students are the vast majority of Grand Street and Otis Drive bus riders; Whitehall Place is almost the same distance to the hospital as a secondary stop proposed in front of Willow Street. more traffic congestion would be created; run time was not addressed before, only adding two stops; Alameda Point is concerning. The Program Specialist II stated currently Encinal Avenue does not have a route; Santa Clara Avenue would be the nearest parallel route if the route extended along Shoreline Drive to Westline Drive. Councilmember deHaan stated 500 people signed a petition not to have a bus stop at Grand Street and Otis Drive; the rule is to run buses where there is density. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how the scenario would work if the bus stop dropped at Shoreline Drive and traveled up Grand Street, ran by Encinal High School during school hours and cut out the Monarch Street end. The Program Specialist II responded staff estimated that the Encinal High School and Alameda Point adjustments w… | CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-05 | 15 | been considered. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded housing units would only be for the homeless or formerly homeless stated seniors would need to be homeless or formerly homeless. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether another type of conveyance allows senior housing. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded homeless housing can be done under the McKinney Act; a Public Benefit Conveyance can also occur, but would need to be for self-help housing. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether there is a way to use the site as an opportunity to provide senior housing also. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded the Navy could auction the surplus property off to a private developer under the McKinney Act; stated the developer would be required to do exclusionary housing, which could be for seniors. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam stated that she received a briefing from APC and Building Futures for Women and Children in the past; the housing need surpasses the current supply; inquired whether sufficient proportions are available. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded APC has approximately 600 families on the waiting list stated Building Futures for Women and Children houses approximately 250 families per year; approximately 80 to 120 units would be needed; smaller units are in higher demand. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam inquired what portion of the residents are seniors, to which The Housing Authority Executive Director responded that he did not know. Counci lmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the Housing Authority would be able to tear down and rebuild the units to non-Measure A compliance: the existing ordinance would allow replacement of the units; the existing housing was upgraded by the Coast Guard recently; inquired whether there is any interest in using the units as is, to which The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the negative. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated upgrades were made approximately five years ago. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Counci… | CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-19 | 15 | available funding for such things as the northern elevation and planting at the end of the fiscal year. The Redevelopment Manager responded she would like to wait until the Theater project is closed out and all liabilities have been addressed stated the money might be needed for outstanding litigation. Commissioner Tam inquired whether redevelopment funds specifically earmarked for projects cannot be used for the General Fund, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the Theater roofing is in fairly good condition. The Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the leaking is from cracks in the sidewall; water tests have been done on the roof; flashing was added. Chair Johnson inquired whether the western elevation has any leaks. The Redevelopment Manager responded the western elevation has no visible leaks; stated conditions may arise in the future; reserves are being set aside to address issues that may arise in the next three to five years. Chair Johnson stated the matter could be reviewed if contingency is left over. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether Theater funds and any remaining funds are not General Fund or revenue sources but are restricted by law to use on redevelopment projects. The Development Services Director responded the majority of the Historic Theater funding was all bond money and must go to the project along with interest. Section 108 money was used for most of the garage construction; the land was bought with redevelopment money; Section 108 interest income cannot be used for a non-HUD eligible economic development project. MINUTES (08-11 - CIC) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of January 15, 2008. Approved. Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the minutes. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 3 and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission February 19, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-04 | 15 | going to carry the economic health of the City. Mayor Johnson inquired whether yacht sales generate sales tax. The Development Services Director responded yacht sales are approximately 9% of the City's sales tax revenue; stated the percentage is cyclical because yachts are a luxury item; boat shows are not a point of sale trigger brokers report into the County where the business is registered; local businesses report at the point of origin; she will provide more information on the impacts of boat shows; a Revenue Enhancement Committee has been created to review different revenue enhancement ideas the Committee could review the matter and see whether priority time should be spent on the matter currently, the Development Services Department has staffing issues and is slow in providing detailed information on the matter. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the matter warrants some study boat shows are not for sales tax but are for bringing people into an area to show case marine facilities the constant flow of goods that go into keeping a boat are a hidden source of revenue. Mayor Johnson stated that the matter could come back to Council after Committee review; inquired whether the sales tax trigger could be requiring a business license, to which the Development Services Director responded that she would check. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to receive feedback from the Revenue Enhancement Committee; the health of the City's economy depends on being as diverse as possible. The Development Services Director stated job creation is a possibility. Councilmember Matarrese stated business license contributions are also a factor. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (08-107) Vice Mayor Tam stated that she has been attending the Alameda Education Foundation strategy sessions regarding the School District's funding crises; Councilmember Matarrese and Councilmember Gilmore also attended a meeting on February 28; discussions involved reviewing BWIP redevelopment funds accrued and managed by the City to see if there are op… | CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-18 | 15 | roadways and total vehicle emissions would be expected to decline due to the shorter trips required to shop locally; however, there may be an increase in local traffic, particularly on streets near major retail centers in Alameda"; stated that people need to realize that more retail will result in more local traffic. (08-124) Public Hearing to consider Adoption of Resolution Approving Master Plan Amendment, PLN07-0122, to Allow the Marina Village Shopping Center to Permit up to 25% Office Use (A Maximum of 31,070 Square Feet) and to Allow the Future Addition of a 5,000 Square Foot Building Pad, an 800 Square Foot Kiosk, and a 500 Square Foot Kiosk. The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would recuse himself because he lives within 300 feet of the project. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the Planning Board requested that the current amount of landscaping be preserved; inquired whether "current" means the current configuration or whether the current amount of landscaping could be reconfigured somewhere else on the site. The Planning Services Manager responded the landscaping could be reconfigured. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there would be an opportunity to add landscaping to the parking lot. The Planning Services Manager responded absolutely; noted that the applicant concurs. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the 6,300 square foot area is grass area. The Planning Services Manager responded in the negative; stated the area looks like a building pad. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the area is a perfect spot for office space. Mayor Johnson stated the proposed amendment is to allow increased office space; the location can shift over time. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the occupancy rate at the shopping center. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 March 18, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-01 | 15 | ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 12:05 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council April 1, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-15 | 15 | gather data in the fall because school will be out and data would be skewed; data to analyze the re-routing decision will not be available until November or December. (08-169) Vice Mayor Tam stated that she has an ILC question related to Item 5-C; inquired whether AC Transit is looking at increasing ridership at Harbor Bay; stated having a shuttle system when AC Transit already goes to the ferry terminal seems duplicative. Councilmember Matarrese stated the City needs to talk to AC Transit about the matter; the Emery-Go-Round directly conflicted with Line 6; there was a tug-of-war that ended with AC Transit withdrawing some service from Emeryville. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese plans to bring up the issue at an ILC meeting, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated the shuttle is already in the commercial area, which is to the City's benefit. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 1:04 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council April 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-06 | 15 | Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam stated that she will not support the motion; the 2005 traffic and parking study did not identify an access issue; a change is being proposed with the idea of waiting to see if the change is problematic; the process seems a little backwards ; she does not understand why the Police and Fire Departments went to the Transportation Commission rather than Council; there was not enough time to have a full discussion to provide strategic alternatives that would make sense for everyone. Mayor Johnson stated the Transportation Commission did not make a recommendation that she does not think the Police Department's recommendation should be portrayed as wait and see; the Police Department is recommending what they believe is safe. Councilmember Matarrese stated that his motion is not intended to be a wait-and-see approach and includes having Police Department representatives at the intersection at peak times to provide information, direct traffic, and provide enforcement as needed; he does not support putting in hard construction measures without additional data. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she is in favor of the commercial and passenger loading zones; she is concerned about the extra red curbing on the corner because of people pulling out around cars making left turns, the defacto right-turn lane, and pedestrians crossing the street; she would not want to put in hard construction measures but would be in favor of putting in some planters to prevent the defacto right turn lane; she will not support the motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Councilmembers deHaan, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 3. Noes Councilmembers Gilmore and Tam - -2. ( 08 - 196 ) Public Hearing to consider Green Building Requirements for City building projects, Capital Improvement Projects, and public-private partnerships and adoption of a 75% waste diversion goal; ( 08-196A) Resolution No. 14207, "Establishing a Goal of 75% Reduction of Waste Going to Landfills … | CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-20 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- -MAY 20, 2008- - - -7:31 P. M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 9:30 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Boaro Members/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT Vice Mayor/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] ( *08-225CC/*08-28CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting of May 6, 2008. Approved. (*08-226CC/*08-29CIC) Recommendation to accept the Fiscal Year Third Quarter Financial Report and budget adjustments. Accepted. AGENDA ITEM (ARRA/08-30CIC) Workshop on FY 2008-09 ARRA and CIC Budgets. The Development Services Director gave a Power Point presentation on the CIC and ARRA budgets. The ARRA budget discussion is included in the ARRA Minutes record. Following the ARRA discussion, Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the budget includes any funds that are obligated to another entity, such as the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) The Development Services Director responded staff nets out all obligations; the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project (BWIP) and West End Community Improvement Project (WECIP) unrestricted cash flow shows that staff nets out all obligations; the line which reads pass through to taxing entities includes AUSD; an audit was Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse 1 and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission May 20, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-03 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (APFA) AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- -JUNE 3, 2008- - -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:47 p.m. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Authority Members / Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to enter into Contracts [paragraph no. 08-33 CIC] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*08-230 CC/08-32 CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and CIC Meeting, and the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and CIC Meeting held on May 20, 2008. Approved. (08-33 - CIC) Recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to enter into Contracts with the Park Street Business Association, and the West Alameda Business Association for Fiscal Year 2008-2009. The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation. Chair Johnson stated that the Greater Alameda Business Association (GABA) Contract is a small amount; Park Street Business Association (PSBA) and West Alameda Business Association (WABA) members pay fees; understanding how GABA works is important. The Development Services Director stated GABA does general Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public 1 Financing Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting June 3, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 15 | Counci lmember Matarrese stated an 80% increase is stiff; inquired whether building fees could be raised by a very small amount over inflation in order to subsidize fire inspection fees. The Assistant City Manager responded fees cannot be over 100% cost recovery for any service. Councilmember deHaan stated many inspections are a one hour minimum and cost $215; inquired how often inspections occur, to which the Fire Marshall responded annually. Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA) stated increased inspection fees would put an undue burden on small businesses. Alan Elnick, Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA). stated ACEA feels that Council should not pass a blanket resolution for a no fee increase for the Golf Course. Mayor Johnson inquired what is the collection rate on ambulance service. Councilmember Matarrese responded the report notes the collection rate was 51% in 2007 and excludes Medicare and Medi-Cal write offs. Councilmember Gilmore inquired when was the last time ambulance fees were raised. The City Manager responded rates were restructured by the County last year. Mayor Johnson stated Council needs to know the cost recovery for ambulance service. The Fire Chief stated the collection rate is approximately 85% if Medicare and Medi-Cal are taken out as non-collectibles new revenue anticipates a 50% collection rate. Mayor Johnson inquired what is the cost to provide ambulance service and how much revenue is received, to which the City Manager responded information would be provided. Vice Mayor Tam stated Page 8 shows that $1,297 is the base rate for the ambulance fee; inquired whether said fee is a significant portion of the City's cost for providing the service. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and 5 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 17, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-01 | 15 | Councilmember deHaan stated the original proposal was along the design of what the Golf Commission requested. Mr. Getherall stated initially, NGF was told that the City could fund a banquet center under the self-operation scenario. Mr. Richardson stated reusing the existing building is not a sensible use of money. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there would be a demand for mixing a 9-hole course and 18-hole course. Mr. Richardson responded the 18-hole course could be a stand-alone course; the 9-hole course could be used when needed to provide a 27-hole course; stated flexibility would be added. Mr. Singer stated that weak demand is not the problem with the Mif Albright Course, but overall cost benefit and maintenance costs; the proposed plan's flexibility would allow a choice to play a regulation championship course, a shorter executive-type 18-hole course, a full-length regulation 9-hole course, or a shorter Mif Albright 9-hole course. Councilmember deHaan stated some of the choices are already available, but not in good condition; inquired whether the north course is a concern because of the limited length. Mr. Singer responded that he does not see the north course as a concern, but may limit marketing to some degree; stated the proposed plan allows for a wide variety of lengths. Councilmember deHaan inquired what percentage of golfers play longer length courses. Mr. Singer responded nationally, approximately eight to ten percent; stated locally, the percentage is lower. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the golf course would be designed to cater to eight percent of golfers. Mr. Singer responded in the negative; stated the golf course would be designed to be sufficient for people willing to pay a higher fee, but would also be sufficient for people wanting to play the current length or shorter. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the meeting. Speakers : Ron Salsig, Alameda; Robert Wood, Alameda; Jane Sullwold, Golf Commission Chair: James D. Leach, Alameda; Bill Smith, Regular Meeting Alameda Ci… | CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-15 | 15 | (08-315) - Bill Hudson, Recreation and Parks Department employee, stated that the City's well-trained - workers would be sacrificed by contracting out services at the Golf Course. COUNCIL REFERRALS (08-316) ICLEI update with specific auto use and congestion issues highlighted. Councilmember Matarrese stated cuts made to the tree program were almost directly counter to what was approved in the Climate Protection Plan; requested a status report on 1) the City Vehicle Use Policy; 2) Eco-pass for City employees, including alternatives; and 3) biodiesel use in City vehicles; directed the Youth Commission and Transportation Commission work on an automobile trip reduction plan for various schools in time for the 2008-2009 school year; stated Island Drive and Central Avenue and Oak Street have no traffic problems during the summer; traffic problems come back when school resumes the City discussed the matter at a joint meeting with the School District in March 2007; Lincoln Middle School, Alameda High School, and Chipman Elementary School were recognized as areas that needed attention. Mayor Johnson stated that Amelia Earhart Elementary School should be added. Councilmember Matarrese stated said school is tied to Lincoln Middle School. Mayor Johnson stated the Lincoln Middle School Parent Association performed surveys and have encouraged students to ride bicycles and carpool. Councilmember Matarrese stated the ICLEI Plan is to be evaluated bi-annually. The City Manager stated an update is scheduled for August ; she is not sure whether anything could be accomplished before the beginning of the school year. Mayor Johnson stated School Board student representatives could meet with Youth Commission members to start putting things in place to work on in the fall. Councilmember deHaan stated the City Vehicle Use policy would be coming back to Council. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 July 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-05 | 15 | should the Agreement move forward. The Development Services Director responded Warmington would respond to community input, follow the normal process, and work toward a project that the School Board and Planning Board would be comfortable with; if Warmington does not build on the site, the CIC, working with School District, would go through the same public processi if the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) and the CIC do the project, there would be less opportunity to construct moderate income units on the site because both the CIC and AUSD money and tax credits support low and very low income, but not moderate units; the Guyton Agreement restricts both AUSD's housing dollars and most of the CIC's housing dollars. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether approval of a project is not before the Council/Commission tonight, but that the Agreement, which does not give any entitlements to any particular project, is being considered. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the City had an Agreement with Warmington for Veteran's housing; inquired how many units were constructed. The Development Services Director responded the 39 units at Operation Dignity were part of the Catellus project. louncilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired how much money Catellus put into the project. The Development Services Director responded Catellus was not obligated to money into the project; stated the project was an obligation of the CIC under the Development Agreement. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired where the funding came from. The Development Services Director responded the deal was leveraged with Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) funds and tax credits stated about 20% of the equity contribution came from the CIC; the CIC removed the units and was obligated to replace the units under the law; the entire transaction assigned certain costs to the public; Catellus loaned funds to the CIC. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired how much Warmington would invest… | CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-19 | 15 | Councilmember Matarrese stated the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is a reporting requirement; a commitment has been made to fund retirement and the City needs to pay for it. The Interim Finance Director stated the obligation is to demonstrate that the City can financially handle the payment, not necessarily fund it. Councilmember Matarrese stated that showing the ability to pay for OPEB and paying for it are two different things that he does not want to push off the liability onto another Council. Councilmember Gilmore stated choosing the ordinance route might be premature given the fact that the Interim Finance Director will come back with alternatives she would like to hear the alternatives and then choose the appropriate mechanism with the understanding that the City would start doing something. Councilmember Matarrese stated payment has to start this year; the longer the City waits, the higher the liability becomes; the City needs to start putting money in the bank by December 2008. Mayor Johnson stated that she wants to ensure that a minimum amount of money would go to pay for the obligations. Councilmember deHaan stated that he does not see a problem with establishing an ordinance now. Mayor Johnson stated that Councilmember Matarrese is suggesting a parallel process. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she appreciates trying to be aggressive; she would like to have a full vetting regarding an ordinance versus a policy restricting the City's future negotiation ability. Councilmember Matarrese stated the matter could be discussed with the ordinance; that he would like to have formal Council direction. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of directing staff to move forward on the matter. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. The City Manager stated that staff would meet with the Fiscal Sustainability Committee on August 26; staff would provide Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 August 19, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-09-16 | 15 | Councilmember Gilmore stated Council discussed the type of retail desired for the Bridgeside Shopping Center the City did not get the upscale retail desired; the developer showed her pages of failed attempts to get upscale tenants; incentives can be provided, but the free market allows a business to calculate whether money can be made in Alameda. Mayor Johnson stated that she met with the Appellants and Alameda Towne Centre representatives; OSH is not her first choice. Alameda Towne Centre representatives tried to get other tenants, including electronic retailers; the City is not the property owner and cannot select the tenants; the City is very supportive of small businesses and has invested a lot of money in streetscapes, Theater renovation, and façade grants South Shore continued to decline over the last forty-five years the City cannot buy or take over the lease; small businesses can compete. Councilmember Matarrese stated the City has a certain amount of control over what comes into the business districts; the EDC and Planning Board need to review whether permitted uses should be adjusted because times have changed; the 2003 Planning Board resolution is a complex document and sets the context for what would happen when the project came forward; OSH is a permitted use and the project should be approved. Mayor Johnson stated the City of Vallejo was fighting over what should go into the City; retailers decided to relocate across the border of Vallejo. Alameda does not have enough sales and property tax revenue ; Measure P is being placed on the ballot reluctantly; the voters will decide whether to support Measure P or have very significant cuts made to the City budget. Councilmember deHaan stated Target had an exclusive agreement twice with Alameda Towne Center, Enterprise Landing, and Alameda Landing; Target is a good fit at Alameda Landing OSH could be a better fit at Alameda Landing; putting OSH in the center of the City would create a major impact. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the fol… | CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-07 | 15 | Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, with direction for staff to provide Council with real time data for Kohl's, the gas station, and OSH occupancy. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese is asking for monitoring requirements, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. The Supervising Planner stated the gas station had its own mitigated declaration with certain monitoring requirements; impacts would not occur until cumulative conditions occur in 2020. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants data collected once the aforementioned occupancy occurs to test the projections before the next step is taken. The Supervising Planner stated current plans for Kohl's and OSH do not increase the square footage of the shopping center a substantial change in the square footage would occur if the Planning Board approves a second story expansion at Kohl's. Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue would increase number of cars and delivery trucks. The Planning and Building Director stated Council could add the monitoring as an additional mitigation measure when Kohl's, the gas station, and OSH are occupied. Councilmember deHaan stated that he would like to have monitoring performed now and when Kohl's and OSH open for comparison purposes. The Supervising Planner stated State law requires that the baseline used is based on the date that the City released a notice of preparation for the EIR. Patricia Curtin, Harsch Development, stated the EIR certification is an action stating that the EIR is adequate for the impacts of 706,000 square feet. Mayor Johnson stated requesting a traffic baseline is separate from the EIR. Ms. Curtin inquired what is the point for monitoring; stated either the EIR is adequate for 706,000 square feet or not. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 October 7, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-21 | 15 | COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (08-456) - Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Social Services Human Relations Board. Mayor Johnson nominated Douglas Biggs. (08-457 ) Councilmember deHaan stated that gas prices are down ; ferry fees were raised; inquired whether the increase should be revisited. The City Manager responded that she would check with the Public Works Department. Mayor Johnson stated that fees could possibly be reduced. (08-458 - ) Councilmember Matarrese stated that he attended the AC Transit Interagency Liaison Committee Meeting; he requested that Council receive a report on the meeting because discussions included casual carpooling and line 63; the line 63 route changes only saved two minutes. Mayor Johnson inquired what were the thoughts on casual carpooling. Councilmember Matarrese responded points of discussion included: 1) casual carpooling is bad for the bus system; 2) the City should place a sign for a designated casual carpooling zone; and 3) casual carpooling should be moved to a ride share location; stated the matter is a question of policy. Councilmember deHaan stated concerns involved sheriff's issuing tickets. Councilmember Matarrese stated tickets are issued if someone pulls up to a red zone that is a bus stop. (08-459) Vice Mayor Tam stated that she attended the League of California Cities East Bay Division meeting last Thursday PG&E made a presentation; PG&E is trying to reduce its carbon footprint ; Berkeley, Albany, and Emeryville are trying to create a municipal public power entity; studies show that rates would be 10% higher because of PG&E's broad base; that she has been elected to the Executive Board which requires reviewing legislation on local control for the Light Brown Apple Moth issue. Mayor Johnson inquired what is PG&E's renewable portion of their portfolio. Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council October 21, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-06 | 15 | Mr. Weaver stated all public safety bargaining groups need to have some level of participation in the decision making and educating the community. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not expect any decisions to be made; public safety participation is important; a road map needs to be created. Councilmember deHaan stated the Fiscal Sustainability Committee has a pretty full agenda; the Committee is scheduled to report back to Council in February or March; that he does not feel the Committee is the right vehicle to initiate discussion. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not see the Committee finishing their job in February because of the current economic times. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Committee will need the output from an education effort in order to make a judgment on the sustainability of the City; that he took the list of potential cuts to Mastick Senior Center and Cardinal Point; people stepped up to the plate once service costs were explained. Vice Mayor Tam stated that the community still needs a lot of education; a lot of budget cuts have been made; the City Manager commissioned a study that reviewed service levels and statistics based on the number of calls; that she would like to get some information on timing to allow for a public forum involving public safety bargaining units. The City Manager stated the consultant should be providing information by the end of December or beginning of January. Mr. Weaver stated that the report he handled out at the last Council Meeting is a graphic interface study outlining response time and deployment. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether there is any opportunity to branch out and have a subcommittee that deals with public safety sustainability. Councilmember Matarrese responded that he would need to discuss the matter with the City Treasurer and City Auditor. Councilmember deHaan stated the finished product is to have a public effort to be able to inform the public in layman's terms. Adjourned Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 November 6, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-18 | 15 | The AP&T General Manager responded in the affirmative stated the presentation was provided to the public at a workshop last Wednesday. Vice Mayor/Authority Member Tam inquired what the projected net loss would be after repaying loans, transaction costs, and the employee severance agreement; stated that she is trying to understand potential impacts on electric rates. The AP&T General Manager responded the $44 million interfund transfer would be written off and carried as an asset on the electric books and a debt on the telecom books : electric assets would be reduced by approximately $40 million for a total of $120 million; rating agencies look at AP&T as a cash flow business; asset value is a factor, but not a primary factor; the main concern is whether the electric business would have telecom interfund transfers in the future; the sale would remove said possibility; telecom interfund transfers are a negative; the positive side is having a powerful portfolio, which is mostly renewable power; most utilities need to buy additional renewable power; the impact will most likely be positive. louncilmember/Authority Member deHaan requested information on the $2.2 million transfer from the General Fund. The AP&T General Manager stated the $2.2 million is part of the litigation; that he will need to defer comment until litigation is complete; the $2.1 million was advanced to AP&T from the General Fund as part of the financing for system construction. Councilmember/Authority Member deHaan inquired whether the $2.2 million would not expire because of the proposed transaction. The AP&T General Manager responded the issue would be discussed with the external auditors and would be influenced by pending litigation. Councilmember/Authority Member deHaan requested information on litigation exposure. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel stated that she would provide information in a confidential, attorney-clien privileged memo ; currently, there are two lawsuits; the City has been sued by Vectren who was the original partner; Vectren s… | CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-02 | 15 | negative; citations were issued for U-turns, turning left out of the garage onto Oak Street, running a red light; and seat belt violations. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the 25 citations were issued in the block between Park Street and Oak Street on Central Avenue, to which the Police Lieutenant responded citations were issued in each direction from the intersection [ on Central Avenue and Oak Street 1. . Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the bulb out and bike oasis issues were vetted through interest groups such as Bike Alameda and Transportation Commission. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded staff responded to Bike Alameda concernsi stated issues were presented to the Transportation Commission; Exhibit 1 outlines actions taken on the Monitoring Plan. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the bulb outs and redesign were presented to the Transportation Commission. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded in the affirmative; stated comments are noted on Page 2 of the staff report. Councilmember deHaan stated that he has the same thoughts as Vice Mayor Tam; inquired about the Lot C exit. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded in the affirmative; stated one exit would be for a left turn, and another exit would be for a right turn. Councilmember deHaan stated Council has an overload of information: questioned whether the entire area is needed for drop offs. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded all nine spaces are not needed; stated staff feels that the drop off zone could be reduced to four or five spaces. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the cost for embedded lights, to which the Supervising Civil Engineer responded $70,000. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the crosswalk idea is to address jaywalkers. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded in the affirmative; stated another issue is bike parking. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 December 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-16 | 15 | Councilmember/Commissioner Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember/Commissioner Tam stated mandated reports are required before the City can receive funding for a lot of its capital projects; funding can be delayed if the reports are not done correctly and on time. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated the audits include redevelopment. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-548 CC/ARRA/08-57 CIC) Recommendation to accept transmittal of the : 1) Auditor's Agreed Upon Procedures Report on compliance with Vehicle Code Section 40200.3 Parking Citation Processing; 2) Agreed Upon Procedures Report on compliance with the Proposition 111 21005-06 Appropriations Limit Increment; 3 Police and Fire Retirement System Pension Plans 1079 and 1092 Audit Report for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2008; 4) Metropolitan Transportation Commission Grant Programs Financial Statements for Year ended June 30, 2008 ; 5) Community Improvement Commission Basic Component Unit Financial Statements for the Year ended June 30, 2008; and 6) Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Basic Component Unit Financial Statements for the Year ended June 30, 2008. Accepted. (08-549 CC/08-58 CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, ARRA and CIC Meetings of October 7, 2008 and October 21, 2008. Approved. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 11:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 2 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission December 16, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-06 | 15 | The Interim Finance Director stated the mid-year report would be in the same format as the year-end report; the actual revenue for each source would be extrapolated or projected out to provide a good estimate of fund balances; the information will indicate whether or not there is wiggle room. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is a possibility that the overtime in the Fire Department is increasing because of the normal course of business, such as retirements and injuries and that has been projected out for the remainder of the fiscal year. The Interim Finance Director stated the overtime amount projected out under the two scenarios did not include projection of additional retirements or injuries. Mayor Johnson stated nine firefighters were hired in the spring of 2008; inquired whether the City has the ability to hire additional firefighters this fiscal year if there are retirements. The City Manager stated there is a hiring freeze. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is money to hire firefighters, but the hire freeze is preventing hiring. The Interim Finance Director stated there might be a vacancy in deployment if someone is on leave, but the person is still paid. The City Manager stated there are budgeted positions in order to have 27 people on duty, some are filled through overtime. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the budget covers the authorized positions. The City Manager responded in the affirmative; requested the Fire Chief to address whether there are vacancies due to retirements. The Fire Chief stated there are two vacancies due to retirements. Mayor Johnson inquired whether all the positions are funded even if there are vacancies. The City Manager stated using the Police Department for example, 99 positions are funded and five are vacant. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City has the money to hire officers since the positions are funded. The City Manager stated positions are being left vacant in order to Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 January 6, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-20 | 15 | to Council for discussion; staff was directed to work with the vendor and Bike Alameda. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the issues are important and should be discussed. The City Manager stated an Off Agenda update could be provided on the implementation of bike parking on Central Avenue between Oak and Park Streets; staff is moving forward on the matter following Council direction; the consideration of bike crossing using the Fruitvale Bridge and associated bike lanes is not on a current work plan; the City works with the County on the matter. The Public Works Director stated the County was contacted by Bike Alameda; the County discussed the possibility of restriping the Fruitvale Bridge to allow a bike lane with City staff; a three foot bike lane would be feasible; the minimum is four feet; five feet is encouraged. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he does not want to get into discussion tonight. Councilmember Gilmore stated Council had a long, involved discussion on Items 1 and 3; suggested that staff provide an Off Agenda report; placing the matter on an agenda is premature. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired about Item 2. Councilmember Gilmore responded staff could pursue the matter and provide an Off Agenda report when ready; inquired whether the County started any work on the Fruitvale Bridge. The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated lifeline project funding is being pursued, which might include bike accommodations. Councilmember Matarrese stated there is consensus to preliminary review all three items and produce an Off Agenda Report that provides a path forward on Items 1 and 3 and options for Item 2, including removing a lane of car traffic. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether staff's workload would be impacted, to which the City Manager responded in the negative. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 January 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-03 | 15 | combined bicycle and pedestrian trips for the Park Street Bridge i no statistics are available for the High Street or Fruitvale bridges; the demand would increase to 2,000 to 3,000 trips per day for the proposed bridge future development at Alameda Point and Alameda Landing would increase bridge usage to approximately 4,000 trips per day. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the west side of the Tube has a walkway; inquired whether staff has reviewed use of the walkway. The Public Works Director responded that CalTrans would not support relocating the pipes [blocking the walkway 1; the air circulation area [between the tubes ] was rejected also. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the study could include a transit option. The Public Works Director responded the transit option could be added to the resolution; stated staff discussed the possibility of limiting the number of crossings for AC Transit. Mayor Johnson stated AC Transit deals with trains in Oakland. Councilmember Gilmore stated running shuttle buses to the 12th Street station in Oakland has been discussed; the shuttle buses could use the proposed bridge. Councilmember Matarrese stated the proposed bridge needs to be more than a bicycle/pedestrian bridge; the City would be encumbered with maintenance and operating costs if the bridge was only an Alameda bridge; obtaining geological information is good; that he does not want to be committed if maintenance and operation conditions are not met or the bridge is not feasible. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the study would include the multi- module option. The Public Works Director responded the option could be added to the resolution; stated staff could talk with the granting agency. Mayor Johnson stated the City does not have the tax base to operate and maintain a bridge people do not want a toll bridge in Alameda ; a condition should be added to require that the bridge would be a County bridge. Councilmember Gilmore moved approval of allocating $100,000 to perform the study noting that Council's preference is to do … | CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 15 | contracting out criteria. Councilmembe: Gilmore stated the suggestion makes sense; the policy could indicate that employees deliver the best services and provide guiding principles if there is an occasion to use outside contractors. Dorothy Freeman, Alameda, discussed the City's list of projects for federal stimulus funding. The Deputy City Manager provided an update. * * * Mayor Johnson called a recess at 12:40 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 1 :13 p.m. (09-063) Recommendation to accept Budget Program and Format for FY 2009-10. The Interim Finance Director gave a brief presentation. In response to Mayor Johnson's inquiry regarding the Fire Department's Advanced Life Support (ALS) program, the Fire Chief gave a brief overview. Mayor Johnson inquired whether ALS is just transport, to which the Fire Chief responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson stated breaking out transport would be really helpful. The Interim Finance Director stated the idea could be reviewed and would be added to the issue bin. Mayor Johnson stated the cost of running the Fire Academy should be identified. The Fire Chief stated the academy is included under training. The Interim Finance Director stated converting to the format is a processi there are activities within each program; the City needs to get everything under programs before breaking it down to the next level; activities could be addressed as part of the FY 2010-11 budget. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired what is in place now, to which the Interim Finance Director responded the current budget does not have Special Meeting Alameda City Council 15 February 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-17 | 15 | do when funds start disappearing. Councilmember Matarrese stated the ISF absorbed a deficit that should have been attributed to the General Fund; the real cash deficit was buried; that he wants to ensure that there is a broad approach for the entire City budget including AMP, Housing Authority, and Enterprise Funds and that root causes are determined when there is a problem. Vice Mayor deHaan stated more background is needed; taking $2. 1 from liquid reserves is a pretty good hit and cannot be taken lightly. Mayor Johnson stated operational reviews are being done for public safety; consideration should be given to performing operational reviews for the entire City. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired when the public safety review would come to Council, to which the City Manager responded the beginning of April. Councilmember Matarrese stated the operational review is relevant to the 90-day working capital fund balance for operating reserves in SRF; that he would like to receive numbers on the affect that the economic downturn has had on the Planning and Building Department in order to fix any problems and apply standards for SRF. The City Manager stated staff might not be able to provide information at the next Council meeting. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether staff knows how much money is coming in and going out; stated that he wants information on whether enough money is being brought in to cover operation and whether there is a draw down on the fund balance; that he wants the number now. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the economy has changed drastically; whether other operational activities are having a downturn needs to be understood; the economic ramp up could take three years. Mayor Johnson stated the City would be out of money in thirty months if everything stays status quo. Councilmember Matarrese stated property assessments have declined and the City potentially could have less revenue next year. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 February 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-03-03 | 15 | The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is pleased to have an agreement thanked the Police Officers Association for helping with the City's fiscal needs; expressed appreciation to the negotiating team. Councilmember Tam echoed Councilmember Matarrese's appreciation to the Police Officers Association and negotiating team. Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (09-098) Introduction of Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Subsection 30-4.1 (R-1, One-Family Residence Districts) of Section 30. 4 (District Uses and Regulations) of Article I (Zoning Districts and Regulations) Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) By Deleting Subsection 30-4.1 in Its Entirety and Replacing with a New Subsection 30-4.1 to Allow Ministerial Approval of Secondary Units on Sites Having a Single-family Dwelling and Meeting Specific Standards. Introduced. The Planning Services Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese requested clarification of the ownership provision and conformance with State law. The Planning Services Manager stated State law allows a city to require owner occupancy on site of a second unit; people want to see the requirement in the regulations in order to preserve the character of the single family neighborhood; an owner living on the site might be more responsive to any concerns. Councilmember Tam inquired whether there would be an exception if an owner had to relocate for a short period of time. The Planning Services Manager responded the Code provides an exception of two years. Councilmember Tam inquired how realistic it would be to monitor owner occupancy of the secondary unit; further inquired whether the matter would be monitored through complaints. The Planning Services Manager responded complaints would be one way to monitor; stated another way would be to send out annual certification letters. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 March… | CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-03-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-03-17 | 15 | Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance and adoption of the resolution. Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Absent: Councilmember Tam - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (09-123) Consideration of Mayor's appointments to the Rent Review Advisory Committee. Mayor Johnson appointed Henry Hernandez and Thuy T. Nguyen. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 10:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 March 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-03-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-04-21 | 15 | There being no further business, Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 11:51 p.m. . Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 April 21, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-05-05 | 15 | affirmative. Councilmember Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (09-188) - Councilmember Gilmore stated she attended the Association of Bay Area Governments meeting on April 23, 2009 in San Francisco; discussions involved SB375, which addresses reducing green house gas emissions through land use and transportation planning that she would leave material with the City Clerk to route to Council. (09-189) - Vice Mayor deHaan stated last week's Planning Board meeting discussed increasing Trader Joe's delivery time; reports show after hour activity at the Towne Centre; discussions involved who would be responsible for enforcing delivery hours; at the October 7, 2008 Council Meeting, Council discussed additional entitlements for Towne Centre; Council gave specific direction; that he is concerned that Council's guidance has not been followed. (09-190) Mayor Johnson stated that she attended the Northern California Power Agency Meeting in Washington, DC ; the City will be receiving Energy Efficiency Block Grant money; inquired what process would be used. The Deputy City Manager responded the City would receive $640,600 stated that she is working with AMP and the Public Works Department on a variety of options; options would be presented to Council at Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 May 5, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-05-19.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-05-19 | 15 | repaired. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the ferry would not stop at Jack London Square if the Port of Oakland withdrew funding stated Jack London Square passengers are a significant part of the fare revenue. The Ferry Services Manager responded the Port of Oakland contributed approximately 49% percent of all tickets purchased in 2008; stated most riders are excursion riders and do not take advantage of commuter discounts; more than 50% of fare box revenue comes from Oakland; hopefully, the Port of Oakland will move quickly. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the entire ferry service would be in jeopardy without the Jack London service, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is not willing to insert the proposed paragraph because the jump from not finding money and killing the service is very short; inquired whether tonight's action could be delayed. The Public Works Director responded the matter could come back to Council; stated one option would be to allow the Interim City Manager to negotiate and bring the matter back before finalization. The Ferry Services Manager stated perhaps the Blue & Gold Fleet Operating Agreement could be extended on a month-to-month basis; that he has concerns because getting on the Port of Commissioners calendar takes approximately two months; the Port of Oakland and Blue & Gold Agreements expire June 30, 2009. Mayor Johnson stated the Port of Oakland Agreement language needs to be reflected in the Blue & Gold Agreement. The Ferry Services Manager stated the Agreements already have language stating that the City can suspend the Contract if funding sources do not come through. Councilmember Gilmore stated Oakland's ability to fund dock side improvements is not technically the City's the funding source; language needs to be clear that if the Port of Oakland pulls out, it is tied to the existence of the ferry service in Oakland, not the funding source. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired where Oakland gets funding. Regular Meeting Al… | CityCouncil/2009-05-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-06-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-06-02 | 15 | recommended starting with a Sunshine Ordinance as a foundation to receive community input on best practices rather than dive into an ordinance without any parameters on what would be expected. Mayor Johnson stated Council should stick to what is on the agenda i further stated Councilmember Tam's research indicates the preferable approach is to take one step at a time. Vice Mayor deHaan stated campaign spending limits would be the second phase and should start to be reviewed. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how much staff time would be needed if the League of Women Voters oversees the matter. Mayor Johnson stated the City just had a 10% reduction in force; staff needs some breathing room. The Interim City Manager stated the Fiscal Sustainability Committee did a great deal of work on their own but could not get data and information without City staff; there could be a very small group of five people focused on collecting material available in other cities and doing the staff work of compiling; coming up with suggestions; and doing the leg work; there is an issue if Council appoints the group and they become subject to Brown Act issues, which require a whole lot of paperwork. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to get an idea of how big or small the issue is and whether the scope could be self driven external information gathering. Mayor Johnson inquired how Oakland proceeded. Councilmember Tam responded the Oakland model is not the one she envisions. Oakland went through three years of hearings and had to develop a ballot measure and ordinance because the matter was not just a policy for the City but became part of the City Charter that she does not find regurgitating State law helpful; public dialogue and input is useful to determine how the project should move forward; that she recognizes the reduction in force; the City has a lot of major priorities because of the State's fiscal crises. the matter could be postponed until the first of the year; advocacy groups could relieve the burden of staff. Co… | CityCouncil/2009-06-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-06-16 | 15 | ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting 15 Alameda City Council June 16, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-06-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-07-21.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-07-21 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - -JULY 21, 2009- -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Joint Meeting at 9:59 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 4. Absent : Councilmember/Commissioner Tam - 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent : Councilmember/Commissioner Tam - 1. ] [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*09-312 CC/*09-25 CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and CIC Meeting held on July 7, 2009. Approved. (*09-26 CIC) Recommendation to Approve First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., Relating to the Ground Lease and Historic Theatre Lease; Subordinatior Agreement Between the Community Improvement Commission of the City of Alameda, Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., and Bay Area Employment Development Company; and Authorize the Executive Director to Execute and Record a Memorandum of First Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement and Notice for Request of Default. Accepted. AGENDA ITEMS None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, CIC Agenda for meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Community Improvement Commission July 21, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-08-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-08-03 | 15 | The Fire Chief responded in the affirmative; stated approximately $550,000 is budgeted for overtime. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the Police Chief's monthly community newsletter is very good; the Fire Department should do the same. The Fire Chief stated the Fire Department has started a weekly newspaper article. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the Fire Department should do a monthly community newsletter because not everyone reads the newspaper 1 the Police Department posts the newsletter on the website; people need to be educated on when to call 911 and when to call a locksmith or plumber. The Fire Chief stated all avenues would be entertained. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam stated the community will be placed at risk if equipment is not staffed in the event of gas fires; inquired what needs to happen to ensure that equipment is staffed. The Fire Chief responded staffing levels could drop below 24 40% to 50% of the time based on July statistics. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated a trigger point is needed that looks at response time and impact so that Council can make a policy decision not to exceed a threshold that puts the community and staff at risk; the Fire and Police Departments have periods of intense activity that punctuate long periods of less activity that he wants to make sure that the public and personnel are not put at uninformed risk; trigger points are needed to ensure that the matter is brought back to Council if trends are going the wrong way. The Interim City Manager stated that she would work with the Fire and Police Chiefs on trigger points and standards and bring the matter back to Council on September 1; the Fire Department issue would be addressed first. Councilmember/Authority Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether now is an appropriate time for Council to discuss using the $400,000 discretionary reserves intended for Fire Station 3 in order to keep apparatus staffed through the end of the next fiscal year. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, A… | CityCouncil/2009-08-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-09-01 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- - - -SEPTEMBER 1, 2009- - -6:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the special joint meeting at 6:22 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The special joint meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (09-324 CC/ARRA/09-30 CIC) Conference with Real Property Negotiators i Property: Tideland Trust Properties; Negotiating parties : City of Alameda, ARRA, CIC and various leaseholders; Under negotiation: Price and terms (09-325 CC) Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property : 1855 N. Loop Road and 1 Clubhouse Memorial Drive; Negotiating parties City Manager and Harbor Bay Isle Associates; Under negotiation: Price and terms Speakers Robert Sullwold, Alameda: and Jane Sullwold, Golf Commission, discussed 1855 N. Loop Road. Following the Closed Session, the Special Joint meeting was reconvened and Mayor/Chair Johnson announced Tideland Trust Properties, the ouncil/Board/Commission provided instruction to the negotiatori and regarding 1855 N. Loop Road, the City Manager discussed issues of price and terms Council provided instruction. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint meeting at 7:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, CIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission September 1, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-09-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-09-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-09-15 | 15 | Alameda and Oakland would bear the incremental costs of adding a stop while maintaining the same level of service at other locations; costs would be significant. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the Posey Tube modification option would have a good funding stream. Mr. Eddy responded possibly; stated there is a process for modifying a CalTrans facility. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Posey tube modification would need to be done regardless. The Public Works Director stated CalTrans sat on the policy advisory committee; the first step would be to get concurrence from CalTrans that the project is important; the next step would be to pursue funding. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether staff considered having one-way pedestrian and bike access in the Webster Street Tube. The Supervising Civil Engineer responded there would be issues with the Oakland end connectivity. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the alternative is one of the cheapest. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 15, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-09-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-06 | 15 | last resolution passed by the voting delegates dealt specifically with Southern California Edison and requested sending a letter of opposition to their desire to place some equipment above ground in underground districts; some Southern California people are upset that Southern California Edison is requesting exemptions; Southern California Edison feels the exemptions are necessary for worker safety. Councilmember Matarrese stated it is important to ensure that the City does not have issues that might be parallel to what Southern California Edison is attempting to do; the City has a major underground effort the City has to ensure that workers are not put at risk and that the City does not run into the same problem. (09-396) Councilmember Gilmore stated that she attended an e- services session at the League Conference; the City of West Sacramento just instituted its first electronic service for citizens; Cupertino has approximately twenty plus e-services; the Cupertino technology person stated that instituting e-services is wonderfully convenient for residents and business people but does not take the place of the old fashion way of doing things; certain people will always like to interface with human beings versus computers. Mayor Johnson stated providing more information on the website is important; court documents can be obtained on the website. The City Clerk noted LaserFiche is now live on the website and the Municipal Code is completely searchable and will be kept current. (09-397) Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he attended a session regarding the economic situation at the League Conference; some municipalities will be flattening out in 2011; property taxes are a key element the news is not good. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 9:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council October 6, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-10-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-10-20 | 15 | Mayor Johnson stated a Hayward company manufactures and sends buses to all parts of the United States. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (09-417 ) Councilmember Gilmore stated that she attended the California Redevelopment Association briefing last week; the two major tops of discussion were potential actions the Association will take as a result of State takeaways; filing a lawsuit was discussed; another item addressed was revamping the Association in order to have a personal face present; the Association is trying to motivate and educate members to be a more effective lobbying tool; Mike Madrid, League of California Cities Public Affairs Director, will help guide the Redevelopment Association along the path. The Economic Development Director stated the lawsuit was filed today. (09-418 ) Councilmember Matarrese requested a Call for Review of the Planning Board decision last Monday regarding a convenience store Use Permit at 1623 Park Street. (09-419) Councilmember Tam stated that she attended the League of California Cities East Bay Division dinner; an update was provided regarding efforts to place a ballot initiative on the November 2010 election; the proposed ballot measure would be on track if each Councilmember within the 488 cities gets 100 signatures; Lisa Vorderbrueggen, Contra Costa Times Political Columnist, discussed how difficult times are in the news media; the Contra Costa Times will charge for on-line subscriptions. (09-420) Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he attended a Good Citizen recognition for Jim and Jean Sweeney given by the Alameda Public Affairs group; Senator Hancock, Assembly member Swanson, Congressman Stark, and Supervisor Lai-Bitker were present to recognize the Sweeney's for Alameda Beltline efforts; Council should do likewise. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 October 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-10-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-11-03.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-11-03 | 15 | The City Attorney responded in the negative because part of the initiative includes a Charter amendment. Vice Mayor deHaan stated many people are concerned about whether the public understands what the initiative is all about; that he is concerned with citizen groups being able to get messages out in such short order: SunCal has been peppering the community for the last six months the community now understands what is in the initiative; the initiative cannot be changed that he bows to the legal determination; the developer has $600,000 into the initiative already and will have over $1 million before the matter is over. Mayor Johnson stated it would cost a lot of money for community members to run a campaign through June. On the call for the question, the MOTION FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes Councilmembers Tam and Gilmore - 2. Noes Councilmembers deHaan, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 3. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether any other opinions have been sought. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated Elections Code experts have been consulted. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Elections Code experts concur [with the City Attorney], to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wishes he could support an alternative that saves the City money ; the law, as interpreted by the City Clerk and City Attorney, needs to be followed. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of resolution setting the election date of February 2, 2010. Vice Mayor deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor deHaan stated the community seems to be on board and understand the initiative. Councilmember Gilmore stated the decision is difficult; that she feels very strongly that a creative, legal way could have been found to avoid having to place the matter on the February ballot and save the City a lot of money; that she cannot vote to be fiscally irresponsible; that she will abstain from voting on the matter. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council Novem… | CityCouncil/2009-11-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-11-17 | 15 | The Fire Marshall responded a gas leak in a flooded basement would be treated as a natural gas leak which requires three engines, one truck, an ambulance and a Battalion Chief. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is a protocol for tube accidents. The EMS Director responded stated the Posey Tube is a dangerous environment to have an accident; injuries are hard to detect. resources are used to secure access and get staff in to make a determination; both Alameda and Oakland respond to tube incidents. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the new dispatch system would be able to determine whether injuries are involved. The EMS Director responded it depends on the quality of the reporting party. Mayor Johnson inquired whether people typically drive out of the tube [after accidents) and [are clear when] reporting stalled vehicles. The EMS Director responded there is not a typical Posey Tube call. Mayor Johnson stated the tube belongs to CalTrans; maybe CalTrans can give people instructions on what to do if there is an accident in the tube; that she noticed instructions on the freeway a couple of weeks ago. The Fire Chief stated that he would make the suggestion to CalTrans; continued with the Measuring Performance portion of the presentation. Councilmember Matarrese stated there have been seven months of brownouts in 2009; that he does not see a breakdown of the first four months and the last seven months ; the best comparisons would be before and after; it is important to have previous years to show trends. The Fire Chief stated data can be shown for any requested timeframe; staff looked at April 1 to October 31; brownouts started on January 26; the first few months were very eradicate; Station 5 closed on April 1; data for April 1 through October Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 November 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-11-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-12-01.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-12-01 | 15 | a water bond in the amount of $11. 4 billion that would be placed on the November 2010 ballot; the League's fiscal analysts have fundamental problems with the bond because a $21 billion budget deficit is projected for next year; adding more debt that would require a $700,000 payment per year would not be responsible because funding would be taken away from State mandated programs, especially at the local level. securitization was discussed; Alameda is one of 408 cities that participated in efforts to try and borrow back money that the State borrowed; the League and California State Association of Counties sponsored the Joint Powers Authority to help facilitate securitization; the plan is to get half of the money on January 15, 2010 and the remaining half on May 3, 2010. Mayor Johnson stated the State is borrowing money from people's paychecks by increasing tax withholding to 10%. Councilmember Gilmore stated the budget was passed using a number of accounting tricks. The Interim City Manager stated next year's deficit will be $20 billion. Councilmember Gilmore stated the State would look to local government to close the budget gap. Mayor Johnson stated the City has reduced the work force significantly; the State has only implemented furloughs. Councilmember Matarrese stated a balanced budget would take five to fifteen years; a furlough is a promise that things will get better and does not fix anything. The Interim City Manager stated no one has factored in the State cost for PERS, which is in the billions of dollars. Councilmember Tam stated the ballot measure is a top priority for the League the issue has polled positively at over 70%; lowering the voting threshold to a simple majority has not done as well. (09-493) Councilmember Tam stated that she and staff met some Lakewood, Washington City employees at the Emergency Management training in Emmitsburg last July; requested that the Police Department express Council's condolences and outrage with the recent assassination of four Lakewood Police Officers. The Poli… | CityCouncil/2009-12-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-12-02.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-12-02 | 15 | Councilmember/Board Member/Commission Tam made statements to understand and clarify the discussion. She stated that the issue of Bay Ship & Yacht and the revision of the guidelines are separate matters. She further stated that Councilmember/Board Member/ Commissioner Matarrese has submitted a request to revise the policies for leases at Alameda Point. The Interim City Manager suggested a fuller discussion at the next ARRA meeting be held to try to understand expectations and develop an asset management strategy. The Council/ARRA/CIC agreed with Councilmember/Board Member/ Commissioner Tam's statements and agreed with the Interim City Manager's recommendation to itemize the issue to discuss and create a working draft outline at the next ARRA meeting in February. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Joint Meeting at 11:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, CIC Irma Glidden Secretary, ARRA The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and 15 Community Improvement Commission December 2, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-12-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-12-15.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2009-12-15 | 15 | ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 11:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Public Utilities Board December 15, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-12-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-01-06.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2010-01-06 | 15 | Councilmember Gilmore stated the timeline would be May. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (10-018) Gloria Guerra, Alameda, discussed homelessness. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Ms. Guerra has contacted staff regarding the issue. Ms. Guerra responded that she would discuss the matter with the Economic Development Director. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 12:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 15 January 6, 2010 | CityCouncil/2010-01-06.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );