pages: CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-07-05 | 15 | affirmative. Chair Johnson inquired whether 1999 figures were being used, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded the figures were revised. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the $840,000 figure was submitted in 1999. The Redevelopment Manager responded the figure was close to $840,000; Public Works decided to complete only 65% or 75% of the design drawings because of budget problems at the time Public Works reduced the scope of work. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the scope of work was reduced then or now, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded then. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the scope of work had been increased, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. Chair Johnson stated re-bidding is a matter of fairness. The Public Works Director stated Bellecci and Associates is the most knowledgeable firm; another engineering firm would need to become familiar with the design. Chair Johnson stated the issue is a matter of compliance with the competitive bidding process. The Public Works Director stated staff is trying to expedite the project; timelines are tied to another project. Chair Johnson stated the City is obligated to be fair and comply with the bidding process. Commissioner Daysog noted the City put the project on hold. Commissioner Gilmore stated the City approved the Contract in 1999, the project was put on hold in 2002; the project restarted in 2005; inquired why the Contract did not come back to the Commission in 2005. The Public Works Director responded there still was money in the Contract. The Redevelopment Manager stated the City has a Contract with Bellecci and Associates for the project report but does not have a Contract for plans, specifications, and engineering. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 July 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf |