pages: CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf, 15
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2007-02-20 | 15 | Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the Architect is comfortable with different canopies, to which the Architect responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the north elevation could be corrected; stated the original design is better. The Architect responded keeping all facades level is expensive. Commissioner Matarrese inquired what the cost would be, to which the Architect responded at least $50,000. Commissioner Matarrese inquired what would be left in the contingency fund by putting the sheer wall back or spending $50,000 to fix the wall. The Architect responded combining the two sheer walls into one wall saved a lot of money i stated a false sheer wall would cost between $80,000 and $90,000. Commissioner Matarrese inquired what would be the remaining contingency, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded approximately $260,000. Commissioner Matarrese requested staff to investigate options to mitigate the parking garage north wall sloping appearance; stated the Oak Street presentation is nice. The Redevelopment Manager stated options would be explored. Commissioner Gilmore inquired what is the final date to make decisions. The Architect responded decisions could be made later because the issue is not structural. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the timeline is being held to November. The Redevelopment Manager responded the timeline is subject to schedules noted in the Contract. Commissioner deHaan stated great progress has been made with the historic theater and parking garage; inquired whether the Cineplex would dovetail with the historic theater and parking garage completion. The Redevelopment Manager responded the Cineplex would take less Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 3 February 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf |