pages
19 rows where "date" is on date 2011-02-23
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body, page, path
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,1 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 1 | ALAMEDA GOLF COMMISSION MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING Wednesday, February 23, 2011 1 CALL TO ORDER Chair Jane Sullwold called the regular meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. at the Chuck Corica Golf Complex, Ladies Lounge, 1 Clubhouse Memorial Road, Alameda, CA 94502 1-A ROLL CALL Present: Chair Jane Sullwold, Commissioner Ray Gaul, Commissioner Betsy Gammell, and Secretary Jeff Wood Absent: Vice Chair Bill Schmitz Staff: Matt Wisely, Superintendent, and Mike Winkenbach, Marketing Director Also Present: Lisa Goldman, Acting City Manager, and Dale Lillard, Director of Park and Recreation 1-B APPROVAL OF MINUTES The Minutes of January 19, 2011 were approved unanimously 1-C ADOPTION OF AGENDA The Commission unanimously adopted the agenda. 2 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. 3 COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS None. 4 WRITTEN/ORAL REPORTS 4-A Golf Shop, Driving Range and Maintenance activities written report by John Vest Written report was submitted by John Vest (attached) and summarized by Mike Winkenbach and Matt Wisely. 1 Golf Commission Minutes - Wednesday, February 23, 2011 | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,2 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 2 | Mike Winkenbach: "In January, we had a great tournament month exceeding prior year by over 100 rounds and $2,000 in revenue. We created a 10 play pass which generated $13,800 in revenue in the month of January. The 10 ride cart pass generated $1,360 in revenue. We booked $16,132 in future tournament revenue in January. We sold 52 monthly passes, and we sold 9 annual passes for a total of $13,500. Our 12:00 twilight special generated $9,575 from 383 rounds and our 2:00 twilight special generated $3,080 from 154 rounds. Our Chuck Corica/Men's Club challenge event generated $980 from 28 rounds. We did have a President's Day Special which was $35 including cart after 11:00 and that generated $2,450 in revenue." Chair Sullwold: "We need to congratulate you because John has given you all the credit all these months for tournaments, so thank you very much for increasing tournament play and booking future tournaments." Commissioner Gammell: "Mike, I know John was really happy with the play cart passes that they were using them up quickly. Is that still happening?' Mike Winkenbach: "Yes, and the theory is when we run a promotion like that is that you gain revenue at that time.' Chair Sullwold: "I imagine that you're not having such great rounds and revenue this month with the weather. Did you have any play at all during the week of rain?" Mike Winkenbach: "On Monday, President's Day, we had the promotion, it wasn't extremely busy for a holiday, but it was busy compared to a regular Monday. I do have some figures from last year's February up to this time if you would like that." Chair Sullwold: "That's all right, we'll get that next month. Since the rain did hit, have you had the same kind of problem we had in December, or is it draining a little better?" Matt Wisely: "It's pretty even." Chair Sullwold: "How about security concerns, have there been any problems where we're stopping the people trying to sneak on?" Mike Winkenbach: "No, not that I'm aware of. A lot of times things happen later in the day." Norma Arnerich: "W… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,3 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 3 | Matt Wisely: "We've had some rain. Year to date, or for the season to date, we're at 14 inches. I put together a little report last week, and were at 21.5 inches of rain and we're at 2.18 inches of rain for February. The weekend was little hectic, we're expecting some more rain starting tomorrow afternoon including snow. l'll believe it when I see it, but everyone keeps saying it's going to happen. They're saying the storm is moving in faster than they anticipated." Chair Sullwold asked: "Is there, in your opinion, anything that can be done with the sloughs and the drainage system without major capital improvements that would improve the drainage off the course?" Matt Wisely: "In my opinion, no. We've done some work in the sloughs ourselves, taking the back hoe out and clearing the drain openings, which has helped actually quite a bit this year compared to last year. I think what we're experiencing this year compared to last year, last year we got eight inches in five days and we had six inches in December and basically we had all of January to dry out. Now we've gotten three more inches in February and the drainage is actually working, it's just working very slowly, and the month of January really helped us out by not having much rain and two weeks of temperatures in the 80's and lots of wind so we dried out pretty quickly. The drainage sloughs are doing what they're supposed to do to a certain extent. We're also experiencing some areas where the course is settling. In fact, number three fairway on the South Course, right around 200 yards, is a giant cavern that just appeared." Chair Sullwold: "Do you fill that in with dirt, what do you do?" Matt Wisely responded: "Yes, essentially, it's still not to the point that it's like the Grand Canyon, but it's sloped off enough to where it's very noticeable now. It almost looks like it's supposed to be there. It is even all the way through the fairway, and then you get to the bunker and it's gone. I don't know if number three is part of the landfill, I don't know what's … | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,4 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 4 | Chair Sullwold asked: "Do you know if Public Works is supposed to do this for us, or do we get charged if they come out and do this? I've never quite understood what the Public Works Slough Runoff project budget item is all about." Dale Lillard: "They maintain and they control the perimeter and the water that goes out of five.' Matt Wisely: "They maintain the pumping system on the pond on five. Everything else is us." Chair Sullwold: "And that's the main collection pond for the drainage?' Matt Wisely: "And they have full control over that, so when I call them, they come out and drain it.' Matt Wisely: "We're continuing our in-house tree trimming and skirting. We finished the tee project on 13; it should be ready and open by the end of the first week in March. Right now we're training the grass down to get it to tee height. We took some of that sod that we took off the tee and filled the bunker on five fairway south, so now it's a grass bunker in the fairway. We also repaired some portions of two fairway on the north with some excess sod where grass was not growing. No major trees have come down except the one left of 18 north. Future maintenance activies will include semi-annual aerification of greens on the north on March 15th and 16th As far as staff, we lost our mechanic. He had a friend that was also a mechanic, so we hired him for less than we were paying him. We had them both on property for two weeks, so Jason could train Matt on reels and things like that. Matt stepped right in and is continuing to keep us going on equipment." Chair Sullwold: "Tell me about the decision the build the new tee on 13, because it came as a real surprise to everybody that all of a sudden you were building a new tee. Why was that picked and what was the reason for it?" Matt Wisely: "We chose 13 tee because initially it's an area that's always been settling. There was a bare area right in the middle of it where we tried to grow grass, but couldn't. We had a couple of weeks in January when the weather was nice and we had an oppor… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,5 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 5 | involved in the ordering of the benches, but the material they are made out of is pretty durable.' 4-C Golf Complex Restaurant Report, Jim's on the Course None 5 AGENDA ITEMS 5-A Status Report on Long Term Lease and Mif Albright Negotiations including Golf Commission recommendations Acting City Manager Lisa Goldman stated: "A couple of weeks ago, I was on a conference call with Kemper and one of the Council members, and was surprised that the financing option that Ann Marie had discussed with Kemper was not something that I was going to pursue. She told them one thing that I just can't do, you all know that. I'm not going to tie the general fund up; I can't do it. It's just not a good idea. The Kemper folks are going back and reviewing options on their end, to perfect financing of some kind. They promised to get back to me sooner rather than later. I expect to get something either the end of this week or early next week. If I don't hear back from them by early next week, I will give them a call and see how it's coming along. I did check, just to make sure I really understood it all. I relied upon counsel and checked with underwriters to see if there was any way we could pull off what Ann Marie had talked about, and it just doesn't work. So, I do believe Kemper will come up with some good options, and as soon as we know what that is, we'll be sharing that information. I am not scheduling the special Council meeting until I have something back, and we've had a chance to understand it. So that's where we are right now, in the middle of a holding pattern." Commissioner Gammell: "What if another company is interested?" Lisa Goldman responded: "I did receive letters from two other golf companies. Right now my direction is still what Council voted on last March 16, which is go forth with Kemper. So, I'm giving Kemper the opportunity the see what they can do. If they can't do anything, then l'll go back to Council and ask them if they want to change their direction or not. Until they give me different orders, this is wha… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,6 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 6 | letting that happen, I believe I should get something back relatively soon, and once I have that I can decide whether it's time to see if this isn't going to work and go to the Council, or it is going to work and it's time to go to Council and give them the new information. I can go to Council and say here's Kemper's new information, this is what they want to do, and they can say, thanks but no thanks, we want you to do something different, but I do need to respect that prospect that allows them to come back and give me whatever they're going to give me. That's where we are." Chair Sullwold: "I just want to point out that the RFP that Ann Marie drafted specifically states that the successful proposer will provide it's own financing which I'm sure you knew when you made your statements to Council on January 26." Lisa Goldman: "You all know I wasn't involved in the discussions that she had, and Dale wasn't involved in a lot of those discussions that she had, so he didn't hear anything and I didn't hear any of it, so I don't know what they said way back when, and then she said "I have a better idea". I have no idea. It's kind of water under the bridge at this point. The reality is they were chosen by Council, right or wrong, they were chosen, that's the direction I have. I'm letting them come back and give me something solid. If it's not solid, or even if it is solid, either way I'm going to have to go back to the Council and say, this is what I have, what do you want to do? It's their decision ultimately.' Chair Sullwold: "The concern, of course, is that by having language in the RFP set up exactly what the bidding company was supposed to do, you only got two responses, and you pick one of them, and then it turns out that one of them makes a secret deal with Ann Marie for something that wasn't in the RFP at all to begin with. And many companies, I have learned, were turned off by the RFP, including the various statements, such as put all your own money to do the improvements. And had it been something different, we… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,7 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 7 | them. I will present them with the information I have at that time and let them decide what they want to do." Bob Sullwold: "Is it true that there is no exclusive negotiating agreement with Kemper?" Lisa Goldman: "There's no signed document in the sense that we had a signed document with Sun Cal, known as an exclusive negotiation agreement. We are exclusively negotiating with Kemper because that is the direction that the City Manager received on March 16, 2010. There's no signed document.' Bob Sullwold: "Secondly, if you were to explore other options, is it a requirement of City law, that you have to go through the formal RFQ-RFP process, or could you, for example, write a one page letter to one of those 65 companies, to whom the original RFP was sent, saying here's what we want, we want a 36-hole golf course, we want to know if you want to do a long term lease or a management contract and want to know if you'll put any dough into the deal. Would that be lawful?" Lisa Goldman: "I don't know the answer to that question, but let me answer it this way, that I believe that this current Council is interested in having open and competitive processes, so I would imagine they would direct Staff to open it up via the RFQ-RFP process rather than sending a letter. But, I don't know the exact answer to your question about whether we could do a one page or not.' Bob Sullwold: "Third question, you probably won't want to answer, if you are aware, we know you not only have to speak truthfully, but that you have to disclose all material facts necessary to make the statements that you do make not misleading. In your view did Kemper's presentation to the City Council comply with that?" Lisa Goldman: "I believe that they believe that the way the deal was going to be structured, and Ann Marie did discuss with them, that the City floated the bond but they were responsible for paying the bond via their money or whatever revenue they made at the golf course. They thought we were all on board and knew what the deal was that Ann Marie dis… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,8 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 8 | Bob Sullwold: "Can I ask Mr. Lillard whether he knew?" Dale Lillard: "The only discussion I had with Kemper was about who was guaranteeing the payment, not who was issuing the bond." Bob Sullwold: "And who was guaranteeing the payment?" Dale Lillard: "Kemper was guaranteeing the payment from revenue generated at the course. There wasn't any signed deal, there wasn't any offer, we didn't get that far.' Chair Sullwold: "Did you understand, Dale, that they would be guaranteeing the payments whether or not the revenue was sufficient?" Dale Lillard: "Yes, they said that in the meeting. If revenues were not enough, Kemper would have to write a check to cover the debt service. They were obligated to cover the debt service whether revenues fell or number of rounds continued to fall. He did say that at the meeting.' Chair Sullwold: "On the other hand, their projection was that the debt service could be entirely met with the revenues from the 27-hole complex that they envisioned, so that their projection was that they weren't going to have to reach into their pockets for one dime.' Bob Sullwold: "My point is this, I'm not trying to point fingers at anyone, I'm not intending to refer this to the Securities and Exchange Commission for possible violation of the Securities and Exchange Act, but to the extent that you have said you understand your direction to be to exclusively negotiate, despite the lack of an ENA, with one company, if that company's prior performance has demonstrated reason to doubt its credibility, I think that's a relevant factor to be considered.' Chair Sullwold: "I have to say I agree with that. I'm very disturbed at how Kemper handled that." Lisa Goldman: "I understand. I get it. I'm still going by the direction that I have, and if the City Council wants to take that direction, by all means. I don't have a dog in it. I'm trying to fix the golf course and save the golf course. I don't care. I'm going to do my darndest to get it done. That's all I can offer you.' Chair Sullwold: "I'm going to throw this ou… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,9 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 9 | Lisa Goldman: "We had several meetings with the representatives for the Mif, Joe VanWinkle, Tony Corica, Bill Wehr and Jane was at one, we were discussing various items on their term sheet, we had little monkey wrench thrown into it all, because some of what they would like to happen are subject to who the ultimate operator is. So, we haven't met since the meeting that Jane you were at. l'd like to see what's going to happen with Kemper, because that really does inform how things progress with the Mif. You all heard it on December 7, the Council said yes, go forth, we want the Mif to be successful with a non profit operator, we'll give you $100,000, they have not changed direction on that, they want it to work. There's going to be some issues to be ironed out, some things they want that we're not able to provide and visa versa. That's going to be subject to negotiations, but it's still moving forward to the extent it can not knowing who's going to occupy the rest of the property." Bob Sullwold: "The Mayor was quoted in the Island today telling the Chamber of Commerce that the Mif lease to the non profit was a done deal. Is that wrong?" Lisa Goldman: "I think she meant it was a done deal that we're moving forward with the Mif, we haven't actually signed anything, but the Council's opinion is that this is going to happen, so in that sense I think that's what she meant. It's going to happen.' Bob Sullwold: "Joe VanWinkle will tell you that he believes that, in June of last year, the term sheet had been presented and all outstanding issues had been addressed. What issues have come up since then?" Lisa Goldman: "Well, nothing was ever signed, so until you actually have a signed document, I don't think you can say that everything was agreed to. I imagine Ann Marie looked at the term sheet and said OK, but not I'm signing this. Again, I did not sit in on those meetings, so I can't say exactly what happened. But, until we have a signed document, and we've negotiated an actual contract, there are issues. I know that the f… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,10 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 10 | Bob Sullwold: "Who is negotiating in favor of the City, you or Mr. Lillard?" Lisa Goldman: "Probably our golf consultant." Bob Sullwold: "That's Mr. Sams." Lisa Goldman: "That's correct." Chair Sullwold: "Is Mr. Sams also participating in the Kemper negotiations?" Lisa Goldman: "He will, we haven't really gotten to the negotiations, because we have to figure out if we have a plan to move forward.' Bob Sullwold: "Do you know to date how much the Golf Enterprise Fund has been charged for his services?" Mr. Lillard: "I don't want to quote numbers, I want to remember it was locked into the entire length of the contract, including the reports he did on the non profit; it was $10,000." Chair Sullwold: "In investigating some of the financial reports, as Bob will point out, Kemper is far over their budget for this year, at this point, the budget that they set, somewhat over it. In any event, Joe got some indication from papers, and I'm not sure where, Kemper has hired consultants to do various things in the last few months." Mr. Lillard: "They did an environmental report of the property which was approved by the previous City Manager, because they needed to know if there were any environmental concerns before they moved forward through the negotiations." Bob Sullwold: "Who paid for that?" Mr. Lillard: "We did, we agreed to." Chair Sullwold: "From the Golf Enterprise Fund?" Mr. Lillard: "Correct." Bob Sullwold: "Kemper needed to know this information because it affected the City?" Mr. Lillard: "Anybody we went to would want to have this information available before they came in and did renovations to make sure the foundation is sound." Lisa Goldman: "Is that a report that we own or Kemper owns." Mr. Lillard: "We do." Chair Sullwold: "Do you know how much it cost?" Mr. Lillard: "It went on for two or three months, I'm guessing right around that $10,000 figure, anytime you do an environmental thing like that, because it covered wildlife, it covered the sloughs, and it covered ground contamination. I know some of the informa… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,11 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 11 | numbers still show a decline over last period. City financial reports show good numbers but because of the way the City makes its cash and accrual accounting, in a way that I don't understand, I didn't pay much attention to that. Looking at the year to date numbers, operating income is at $264,000, cash flow from operations at $390,000, transfer to City $447,000, and the draw from the Enterprise Fund, the cash balance is shown at $674,000, and this time, for the first time, there's another line item called available cash balance which is $524,000. When Jane inquired about this, Ms. Goldman explained that the available cash balance deducted from the cash balance funds that have been committed for payments to vendors and future redemption of previously issued gift certificates. While I'm sure that's right, it's a little unusual that this is a balance sheet item. But, one issue that I did want to talk about, and Joe is focused on this, is the budgetary comparisons, and especially the infamous services category. As I have previously discussed at these meetings, the City divides expenses into five categories, one of which is called services, and for months, if not years, I have been trying to find out exactly what expenses are in that category. When Ms. Gallant was here, six months or so ago, she said that was the payment to Kemper. If that's right, we have an issue, because if you look at the seven month financials, comparing actual to budget, you see that the services category exceeds budget by $220,000, 14% over seven months. How come, if Ms. Gallant could be believed, that would suggest Kemper is over-running the budgeted expenses by $220,000. And if that's so, I think we are entitled to ask Kemper, how come you're spending more money than you said you were going to spend? But, I'm not sure that is so. I'm not sure I can credit what Ms. Gallant said, because if you look, for example, at Kemper reports that you're now getting every month, and they do it on a calendar year, not a fiscal year basis, they say that the… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,12 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 12 | Chair Sullwold: "Off the top of your head, Dale, do you have an idea why services are exceeded by over $220,000?" Mr. Lillard: "Part of it is expenses that we incurred to repair the retaining wall that runs along Island Drive between Bay Fairway and down the second fairway. That was directed from the Risk Manager as a hazard, and the City Manager approved repairing that. The new cart batteries were in there as an expenditure that wasn't accounted for so the carts could be run twice a day instead of once a day. There was some work on one of the big pumps on the south side that was about $20,000. There was some repairs on the driving range fence that the City Manager asked to be done. There was the cart barn upgrade and the alarm system also. The cart barn alone was about $25,000 to $30,000, which included the alarm system, upgrading the chargers and bought batteries. I know the pump was a huge item, but if you don't have irrigation, you're not going to have a golf course. All of them were approved by the City." Commissioner Gaul: "Dale, the damage to the wall, wasn't that a vehicle that hit that wall?" Mr. Lillard: "There had been two different instances that cars did it and we did collect insurance money from them. That wasn't this portion. The longest portion was about halfway down the second fairway, all the way to Bay Fairway, where it was actually leaning onto the sidewalk. Chair Sullwold: "One more question. As you know, Dale, three years ago the City booked the entire four year lease expense for the golf carts and pulled it out, that was an extraordinary expense, the year that we entered into a new lease on July 1, 2007. Do you know if payments, monthly payments to EZ-Go have been made from whatever fund that was created by pulling that money out of the Enterprise Fund?" Mr. Lillard: "I'm not sure that will show up on the report, it should have because it was a GASB calculation for government accounting. To my knowledge it has, but I can't report that it did happen that way." Bob Sullwold: "The issue is tha… | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,13 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 13 | you're fertilizing so many times, you would be able to do that from one year to the next, but when a $25,000 pump breaks down and you add $20,000 to the cart barn, so you have over $100,000 with no money budgeted to do that, it's just more deferred maintenance is what it is." Lisa Goldman: "The cart barn allows you to make more in revenue, right?" Mr. Lillard: "Right, because you can send the carts out twice." Bob Sullwold: "In evaluating getting into a 30-year lease with Kemper, there are responsiblities here. Number one, why is there this over budget number? The other possibility is they are not operating as efficiently as they promised they would. The expenses are higher because they're doing a bad job managing the enterprise. You need to know the answer to that before you decide to do business with that enterprise." 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment) None 7. OLD BUSINESS None 8. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Included in the Commission packet was a memorandum to the Finance Department showing a surcharge payment for January 2011 of $5,749. The year-to-date total to the General Fund is $58,562 for FY 2010/2011. 9. ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING'S AGENDA Status Report on Long Term Lease and Mif Albright Negotiations including Golf Commission recommendations, if any Update on Golf Complex Finances 10. ANNOUNCEMENTSIADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:46 p.m. The agenda for the meeting was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. 13 Golf Commission Minutes-Wednesday, February 23, 2011 | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,14 | GolfCommission | 2011-02-23 | 14 | GolfCommission/2011-02-23.pdf | |
TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,1 | TransportationCommission | 2011-02-23 | 1 | Transportation Commission Minutes February 23, 2011 Kathy Moehring called the Transportation Commission to order at 7:31 p.m. 1. Roll Call The roll was called and the following was recorded: Members Present: Philip Tribuzio Thomas G. Bertken Jesus Vargas Kathy Moehring Kirsten Zazo- absent Staff Present: Obaid Khan, Supervising Civil Engineer Gail Payne, Transportation Coordinator Daraja Wagner, Administrative Assistant 2. Minutes Commissioner Moehring moved approval of the minutes for the January 26, 2011 meeting. Commissioner Bertken seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0. 3. Oral Communications - Non-Agenda None. 4. New Business 4A. Alameda Employee Survey Results Staff Payne summarized the staff report. Open public hearing. Commissioner Moehring asked Staff Payne out of the surveys that were sent out, how many responses were received and also if she was satisfied with the results of the survey. Moehring also expressed her concern about if the respondents really represented enough commuter employees. Page 1 of 5 | TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,2 | TransportationCommission | 2011-02-23 | 2 | Staff Payne responded that she was satisfied with the results of the survey. Payne stated that according to Dowling Associates, who are the experts in surveying, the results were good and just about met their target of 1,000 responses. Staff Khan responded that it was not a scientific survey, but it did capture the different work locations of main employment areas around the city like Towne Centre and Harbor Bay. Staff Payne stated that she did have that information and invited people to come to the stakeholder meeting on March 10, 2011 for more information. Commissioner Vargas asked if there would be any benefit to finding out what the youth thought. He stated that if youth were walking or taking the bus then they would have less of a dependency on their parents. Staff Payne responded that they did capture some youth responses yet the focus was on employees, which tend to have an age cluster corresponding with the baby boomers. Commissioner Bertken asked what the total employment in Alameda is. Bertken stated that he wanted to make sure that the survey got answers from the appropriate employees according to geographic area. Staff Payne responded that the next step will be to look at the answers from the specific areas to see how the people responded and see what will best meet their needs. Payne stated that she would follow up with this topic at the next meeting. Commissioner Bertken asked how the plan ultimately would be used. What will it address? Staff Khan responded that the plan will be used to reduce single driver vehicles and also will create a list of strategies to help reduce traffic. Commissioner Bertken stated that people who have cars available to drive are not going to want to stop using their cars especially since 95 percent of the people who work in Alameda receive free parking. Staff Khan responded that a better alternative must be provided and that people must be able to see the advantages of it. Commissioner Tribuzio asked if there was anything that asked people who commuted on bikes how often … | TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,3 | TransportationCommission | 2011-02-23 | 3 | Staff Payne answered yes, that there was a question asking if they biked more than once a week. Commissioner Vargas asked if Staff Payne could elaborate on why there were 29 comments under bike related to the Posey Tube. Staff Payne responded that these comments were from bicyclists traveling between Oakland and Alameda on the west end of the city. The Posey Tube has a narrow path and buses only have two slots for bikes on the racks. The City will begin a shuttle between the College of Alameda and Laney College to address this issue starting this summer. Close public hearing. No action was taken. 4B. "Going Forward" Community Planning Strategy for Alameda Point Staff Khan explained the "Going Forward" effort and assisted the Commission members in completing the transportation and access section of the workbook. Open public hearing. Commissioner Tribuzio stated that bicyclists want a bridge across the estuary and it would be very important for future planning. Due to the future building on Alameda Point, there will be more traffic. However, the bridge is a conflict with the relocation of the Coast Guard. Jon Spangler - as a charter Transportation Member - stated that he has a problem with the zero sum ranking order. It is clear that if all ten elements with high density housing units are implemented then it will have a significant impact on traffic; however, if one is missing then the whole thing will go up in smoke. However, all ten elements can reduce Alameda's carbon emissions. All the elements are critical. He also stated that he hoped that it would not exclude development to Alameda Point. Jim Straelo stated that he valued the "additional comments" section the most. He liked that he could add additional comments. He found fault that it was not possible to rank others additional comments. He wants everyone to come up with comments that are outside the box like: Circulator Systems that would allow buses to go around Alameda Point and bring them to the buses on Webster Street More pedestrian walkways through the… | TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,4 | TransportationCommission | 2011-02-23 | 4 | He also thought that it was not smart to not have parking for townhomes. Even if residents did not need it, their guests might. Jim restated to not just limit ideas to the workbook. Commissioner Tribuzio responded that the design is to get people out of their cars. Building townhomes where people cannot park does not make sense due to the high prices for the homes and the fact that people have cars and will drive them. Tribuzio also stated that the ranking order did not make sense. Staff Khan responded that he just wanted to encourage the community participation to see where priorities lie. Khan reassured them that all written comments will be taken in consideration and will not be ignored. Commissioner Bertken agreed with Spangler that it is not consistent, and it is not good to have trade offs. Commissioner Vargas asked that the youth be considered and wanted to make sure to accommodate skateboarders. Since the average age is growing higher, it is important to have ADA standards. Commissioner Moehring stated that the intention is not to pick one and solve the problem, but to create alternatives. Commissioner Bertken asked how will the trade offs be done. Staff Khan gave an example that the BRT forum thought it was a good idea for the BRT to go to 12th Street BART but BRT to Fruitvale BART did not come up as a higher priority. Commissioner Moehring stated that the City cannot develop it all at once. It is a matter of gauging the impact and figuring out where to start. Moehring stated that it all had to be done at some point. Close public hearing. 5. Staff Communications Request to Start Transportation Commission Meetings at 7:00 PM Commissioner Vargas moved to recommend that the meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. Commissioner Tribuzio seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0. 511 SchoolPool RideMatch (https://www.schoolpool.511.org Staff Payne explained the new program. Page 4 of 5 | TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf,5 | TransportationCommission | 2011-02-23 | 5 | Future Meeting Agenda Items Staff Payne stated that future meeting agenda items for the March meeting look to be as follows: Countywide Transportation Plan/Transportation Expenditure Plan Quarterly Report TSM/TDM Plan - Preliminary Alternative Strategies 6. Announcements Jon Spangler stated that $5,000 was in the budget for new bicycle parking. It would be an excellent use to install new bike racks. Spangler suggested that the staff and community take it into consideration. Commissioner Moehring stated that Webster Street has more bike racks. With more awareness, more will come. Jim Straehlo stated that some bike racks are preferred over other types depending on how many can be parked at a time. 7. Adjournment 8:45 PM Page 5 of 5 | TransportationCommission/2011-02-23.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );