pages
724 rows where page = 9
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
date (date) 719 ✖
- 2008-04-01 2
- 2012-06-06 2
- 2016-06-27 2
- 2019-12-18 2
- 2005-01-04 1
- 2005-01-10 1
- 2005-01-13 1
- 2005-01-18 1
- 2005-01-24 1
- 2005-01-31 1
- 2005-02-01 1
- 2005-02-14 1
- 2005-02-15 1
- 2005-02-28 1
- 2005-03-01 1
- 2005-03-14 1
- 2005-03-15 1
- 2005-03-28 1
- 2005-04-05 1
- 2005-04-07 1
- 2005-04-11 1
- 2005-04-19 1
- 2005-04-25 1
- 2005-05-03 1
- 2005-05-09 1
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-05-23 1
- 2005-06-07 1
- 2005-06-09 1
- 2005-06-13 1
- 2005-06-21 1
- 2005-06-27 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2005-07-25 1
- 2005-08-02 1
- 2005-08-04 1
- 2005-08-08 1
- 2005-08-16 1
- 2005-08-22 1
- 2005-09-06 1
- 2005-09-12 1
- 2005-09-20 1
- 2005-09-26 1
- 2005-09-29 1
- 2005-10-10 1
- 2005-10-18 1
- 2005-10-24 1
- 2005-11-01 1
- 2005-11-14 1
- 2005-11-15 1
- 2005-12-06 1
- 2005-12-20 1
- 2006-01-03 1
- 2006-01-05 1
- 2006-01-09 1
- 2006-01-23 1
- 2006-02-07 1
- 2006-02-13 1
- 2006-02-21 1
- 2006-02-27 1
- 2006-03-07 1
- 2006-03-21 1
- 2006-04-04 1
- 2006-04-10 1
- 2006-04-18 1
- 2006-04-24 1
- 2006-05-02 1
- 2006-05-08 1
- 2006-05-16 1
- 2006-05-22 1
- 2006-06-06 1
- 2006-06-07 1
- 2006-06-20 1
- 2006-07-05 1
- 2006-07-10 1
- 2006-07-18 1
- 2006-07-24 1
- 2006-07-26 1
- 2006-08-03 1
- 2006-08-14 1
- 2006-09-05 1
- 2006-09-19 1
- 2006-09-25 1
- 2006-09-27 1
- 2006-10-03 1
- 2006-10-09 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-10-23 1
- 2006-10-25 1
- 2006-11-13 1
- 2006-11-21 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2006-12-11 1
- 2006-12-13 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-01-08 1
- 2007-01-16 1
- 2007-01-31 1
- 2007-02-06 1
- 2007-02-12 1
- 2007-02-20 1
- 2007-02-26 1
- 2007-02-28 1
- 2007-03-06 1
- 2007-03-12 1
- 2007-03-20 1
- 2007-03-26 1
- 2007-03-28 1
- 2007-04-03 1
- 2007-04-17 1
- 2007-04-18 1
- 2007-04-23 1
- 2007-04-25 1
- 2007-05-01 1
- 2007-05-14 1
- 2007-05-15 1
- 2007-05-23 1
- 2007-05-29 1
- 2007-06-05 1
- 2007-06-11 1
- 2007-06-19 1
- 2007-06-25 1
- 2007-07-03 1
- 2007-07-09 1
- 2007-07-17 1
- 2007-07-23 1
- 2007-07-25 1
- 2007-08-07 1
- 2007-08-21 1
- 2007-08-27 1
- 2007-09-04 1
- 2007-09-11 1
- 2007-09-18 1
- 2007-09-19 1
- 2007-09-24 1
- 2007-09-26 1
- 2007-10-02 1
- 2007-10-08 1
- 2007-10-16 1
- 2007-10-22 1
- 2007-10-24 1
- 2007-11-06 1
- 2007-11-13 1
- 2007-11-20 1
- 2007-11-26 1
- 2007-11-29 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2007-12-06 1
- 2007-12-10 1
- 2007-12-12 1
- 2007-12-18 1
- 2008-01-02 1
- 2008-01-14 1
- 2008-01-15 1
- 2008-01-28 1
- 2008-02-05 1
- 2008-02-11 1
- 2008-02-19 1
- 2008-02-25 1
- 2008-02-27 1
- 2008-03-04 1
- 2008-03-18 1
- 2008-04-15 1
- 2008-04-23 1
- 2008-04-28 1
- 2008-05-06 1
- 2008-05-12 1
- 2008-05-20 1
- 2008-05-28 1
- 2008-06-03 1
- 2008-06-17 1
- 2008-06-23 1
- 2008-06-25 1
- 2008-07-01 1
- 2008-07-14 1
- 2008-07-15 1
- 2008-07-23 1
- 2008-08-05 1
- 2008-08-11 1
- 2008-08-19 1
- 2008-08-25 1
- 2008-09-02 1
- 2008-09-16 1
- 2008-09-22 1
- 2008-10-07 1
- 2008-10-21 1
- 2008-11-06 1
- 2008-11-18 1
- 2008-11-24 1
- 2008-12-02 1
- 2008-12-08 1
- 2008-12-10 1
- 2008-12-16 1
- 2009-01-06 1
- 2009-01-20 1
- 2009-01-26 1
- 2009-01-28 1
- 2009-02-03 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-02-09 1
- 2009-02-17 1
- 2009-02-25 1
- 2009-03-03 1
- 2009-03-09 1
- 2009-03-17 1
- 2009-03-23 1
- 2009-04-07 1
- 2009-04-21 1
- 2009-04-22 1
- 2009-04-27 1
- 2009-05-05 1
- 2009-05-19 1
- 2009-05-27 1
- 2009-06-02 1
- 2009-06-16 1
- 2009-07-07 1
- 2009-07-21 1
- 2009-08-03 1
- 2009-08-24 1
- 2009-09-01 1
- 2009-09-15 1
- 2009-10-06 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2009-11-03 1
- 2009-11-17 1
- 2009-12-01 1
- 2009-12-02 1
- 2009-12-15 1
- 2010-01-05 1
- 2010-01-06 1
- 2010-01-11 1
- 2010-01-26 1
- 2010-02-03 1
- 2010-02-16 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-06 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-05-04 1
- 2010-05-18 1
- 2010-06-01 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-06-24 1
- 2010-07-06 1
- 2010-07-07 1
- 2010-07-20 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2010-09-07 1
- 2010-09-21 1
- 2010-09-25 1
- 2010-10-05 1
- 2010-10-19 1
- 2010-11-03 1
- 2010-11-16 1
- 2010-12-07 1
- 2010-12-15 1
- 2011-01-04 1
- 2011-01-18 1
- 2011-01-25 1
- 2011-02-01 1
- 2011-02-15 1
- 2011-02-23 1
- 2011-03-01 1
- 2011-03-14 1
- 2011-03-15 1
- 2011-03-28 1
- 2011-03-29 1
- 2011-04-05 1
- 2011-04-12 1
- 2011-05-03 1
- 2011-05-17 1
- 2011-06-07 1
- 2011-06-21 1
- 2011-06-28 1
- 2011-07-05 1
- 2011-07-12 1
- 2011-07-19 1
- 2011-09-06 1
- 2011-09-20 1
- 2011-10-10 1
- 2011-10-18 1
- 2011-11-01 1
- 2011-11-15 1
- 2011-11-28 1
- 2011-12-12 1
- 2011-12-14 1
- 2011-12-20 1
- 2012-01-04 1
- 2012-01-09 1
- 2012-01-25 1
- 2012-02-07 1
- 2012-02-13 1
- 2012-02-21 1
- 2012-02-27 1
- 2012-03-06 1
- 2012-03-07 1
- 2012-03-12 1
- 2012-03-20 1
- 2012-03-28 1
- 2012-04-03 1
- 2012-04-17 1
- 2012-04-25 1
- 2012-05-01 1
- 2012-05-08 1
- 2012-05-14 1
- 2012-05-15 1
- 2012-05-30 1
- 2012-06-11 1
- 2012-06-19 1
- 2012-06-27 1
- 2012-07-03 1
- 2012-07-17 1
- 2012-07-23 1
- 2012-07-24 1
- 2012-07-25 1
- 2012-08-27 1
- 2012-08-28 1
- 2012-09-04 1
- 2012-09-26 1
- 2012-10-02 1
- 2012-10-10 1
- 2012-10-16 1
- 2012-11-07 1
- 2012-11-28 1
- 2012-12-10 1
- 2013-01-02 1
- 2013-01-23 1
- 2013-02-05 1
- 2013-02-19 1
- 2013-03-05 1
- 2013-03-19 1
- 2013-04-02 1
- 2013-04-16 1
- 2013-05-07 1
- 2013-05-13 1
- 2013-05-21 1
- 2013-06-18 1
- 2013-06-26 1
- 2013-07-02 1
- 2013-07-22 1
- 2013-07-23 1
- 2013-07-24 1
- 2013-09-17 1
- 2013-09-25 1
- 2013-09-30 1
- 2013-10-01 1
- 2013-10-15 1
- 2013-10-23 1
- 2013-11-05 1
- 2013-11-19 1
- 2013-12-03 1
- 2013-12-11 1
- 2013-12-17 1
- 2014-01-09 1
- 2014-01-21 1
- 2014-02-04 1
- 2014-02-19 1
- 2014-03-18 1
- 2014-03-26 1
- 2014-04-15 1
- 2014-04-28 1
- 2014-05-06 1
- 2014-05-20 1
- 2014-06-03 1
- 2014-06-17 1
- 2014-06-23 1
- 2014-07-01 1
- 2014-07-02 1
- 2014-07-15 1
- 2014-07-29 1
- 2014-07-30 1
- 2014-09-02 1
- 2014-09-16 1
- 2014-10-21 1
- 2014-10-27 1
- 2014-11-18 1
- 2014-12-02 1
- 2014-12-16 1
- 2015-01-06 1
- 2015-01-20 1
- 2015-01-21 1
- 2015-01-28 1
- 2015-02-02 1
- 2015-02-03 1
- 2015-02-17 1
- 2015-02-23 1
- 2015-02-25 1
- 2015-03-03 1
- 2015-03-09 1
- 2015-03-10 1
- 2015-03-17 1
- 2015-03-25 1
- 2015-03-30 1
- 2015-04-01 1
- 2015-04-07 1
- 2015-04-13 1
- 2015-04-21 1
- 2015-04-29 1
- 2015-05-05 1
- 2015-05-11 1
- 2015-05-19 1
- 2015-05-27 1
- 2015-06-02 1
- 2015-06-08 1
- 2015-06-11 1
- 2015-06-16 1
- 2015-07-01 1
- 2015-07-07 1
- 2015-07-13 1
- 2015-07-21 1
- 2015-07-22 1
- 2015-09-01 1
- 2015-09-14 1
- 2015-09-15 1
- 2015-09-28 1
- 2015-10-06 1
- 2015-10-12 1
- 2015-10-20 1
- 2015-11-03 1
- 2015-11-04 1
- 2015-11-17 1
- 2015-11-18 1
- 2015-12-01 1
- 2015-12-15 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-01-11 1
- 2016-01-19 1
- 2016-01-25 1
- 2016-01-27 1
- 2016-02-01 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2016-02-24 1
- 2016-02-29 1
- 2016-03-01 1
- 2016-03-15 1
- 2016-03-23 1
- 2016-04-05 1
- 2016-04-19 1
- 2016-05-03 1
- 2016-05-09 1
- 2016-05-17 1
- 2016-05-23 1
- 2016-05-25 1
- 2016-06-07 1
- 2016-06-08 1
- 2016-06-21 1
- 2016-06-22 1
- 2016-07-05 1
- 2016-07-19 1
- 2016-07-25 1
- 2016-08-08 1
- 2016-09-06 1
- 2016-09-20 1
- 2016-09-28 1
- 2016-10-04 1
- 2016-10-05 1
- 2016-10-10 1
- 2016-10-12 1
- 2016-10-18 1
- 2016-10-24 1
- 2016-11-01 1
- 2016-11-14 1
- 2016-11-15 1
- 2016-11-16 1
- 2016-12-06 1
- 2016-12-12 1
- 2016-12-14 1
- 2016-12-20 1
- 2017-01-03 1
- 2017-01-17 1
- 2017-01-23 1
- 2017-02-07 1
- 2017-02-08 1
- 2017-02-13 1
- 2017-02-17 1
- 2017-02-21 1
- 2017-02-23 1
- 2017-02-27 1
- 2017-03-06 1
- 2017-03-07 1
- 2017-03-21 1
- 2017-03-22 1
- 2017-04-04 1
- 2017-04-07 1
- 2017-04-10 1
- 2017-04-12 1
- 2017-04-18 1
- 2017-05-01 1
- 2017-05-02 1
- 2017-05-08 1
- 2017-05-16 1
- 2017-05-22 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-06-12 1
- 2017-06-14 1
- 2017-06-20 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-17 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-07-24 1
- 2017-07-25 1
- 2017-09-05 1
- 2017-09-11 1
- 2017-09-19 1
- 2017-10-03 1
- 2017-10-11 1
- 2017-10-12 1
- 2017-10-17 1
- 2017-10-21 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2017-11-13 1
- 2017-11-21 1
- 2017-12-05 1
- 2017-12-13 1
- 2017-12-14 1
- 2017-12-19 1
- 2018-01-02 1
- 2018-01-16 1
- 2018-02-05 1
- 2018-02-06 1
- 2018-02-08 1
- 2018-02-14 1
- 2018-02-15 1
- 2018-02-20 1
- 2018-03-05 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-03-20 1
- 2018-04-03 1
- 2018-04-04 1
- 2018-04-11 1
- 2018-04-12 1
- 2018-04-17 1
- 2018-05-01 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-05-10 1
- 2018-05-14 1
- 2018-05-15 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-06-19 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-07-11 1
- 2018-07-24 1
- 2018-08-29 1
- 2018-09-04 1
- 2018-09-10 1
- 2018-09-12 1
- 2018-09-13 1
- 2018-09-18 1
- 2018-10-02 1
- 2018-10-08 1
- 2018-10-16 1
- 2018-11-07 1
- 2018-11-14 1
- 2018-11-27 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2018-12-04 1
- 2018-12-18 1
- 2019-01-02 1
- 2019-01-15 1
- 2019-01-16 1
- 2019-01-23 1
- 2019-01-29 1
- 2019-02-04 1
- 2019-02-05 1
- 2019-02-14 1
- 2019-02-19 1
- 2019-02-25 1
- 2019-03-05 1
- 2019-03-11 1
- 2019-03-13 1
- 2019-03-16 1
- 2019-03-19 1
- 2019-04-02 1
- 2019-04-16 1
- 2019-05-07 1
- 2019-05-09 1
- 2019-05-21 1
- 2019-05-22 1
- 2019-05-28 1
- 2019-06-04 1
- 2019-06-10 1
- 2019-06-18 1
- 2019-06-24 1
- 2019-07-02 1
- 2019-07-08 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-07-22 1
- 2019-07-24 1
- 2019-09-03 1
- 2019-09-09 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-09-17 1
- 2019-09-25 1
- 2019-10-01 1
- 2019-10-08 1
- 2019-10-14 1
- 2019-10-15 1
- 2019-11-05 1
- 2019-11-19 1
- 2019-12-03 1
- 2019-12-12 1
- 2019-12-17 1
- 2020-01-07 1
- 2020-01-21 1
- 2020-02-04 1
- 2020-02-18 1
- 2020-02-26 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-03-17 1
- 2020-04-07 1
- 2020-04-21 1
- 2020-04-22 1
- 2020-05-05 1
- 2020-05-11 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-05-20 1
- 2020-06-02 1
- 2020-06-16 1
- 2020-06-17 1
- 2020-06-24 1
- 2020-06-29 1
- 2020-07-07 1
- 2020-07-14 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2020-07-22 1
- 2020-07-25 1
- 2020-07-28 1
- 2020-08-17 1
- 2020-09-01 1
- 2020-09-14 1
- 2020-09-15 1
- 2020-09-23 1
- 2020-10-06 1
- 2020-10-20 1
- 2020-10-26 1
- 2020-11-04 1
- 2020-11-12 1
- 2020-11-16 1
- 2020-11-17 1
- 2020-11-18 1
- 2020-11-23 1
- 2020-12-01 1
- 2021-01-05 1
- 2021-01-14 1
- 2021-01-19 1
- 2021-01-25 1
- 2021-01-27 1
- 2021-02-01 1
- 2021-02-02 1
- 2021-02-16 1
- 2021-02-22 1
- 2021-03-01 1
- 2021-03-02 1
- 2021-03-04 1
- 2021-03-08 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-03-22 1
- 2021-03-24 1
- 2021-03-30 1
- 2021-04-05 1
- 2021-04-06 1
- 2021-04-08 1
- 2021-04-20 1
- 2021-04-26 1
- 2021-05-03 1
- 2021-05-04 1
- 2021-05-06 1
- 2021-05-08 1
- 2021-05-10 1
- 2021-05-18 1
- 2021-05-24 1
- 2021-05-26 1
- 2021-06-01 1
- 2021-06-14 1
- 2021-06-15 1
- 2021-06-28 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-12 1
- 2021-07-19 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-07-26 1
- 2021-07-28 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-09-13 1
- 2021-09-20 1
- 2021-09-21 1
- 2021-09-22 1
- 2021-09-27 1
- 2021-10-04 1
- 2021-10-05 1
- 2021-10-19 1
- 2021-10-27 1
- 2021-11-01 1
- 2021-11-02 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2021-11-30 1
- 2021-12-06 1
- 2021-12-07 1
- 2021-12-13 1
- 2021-12-21 1
- 2022-01-04 1
- 2022-01-11 1
- 2022-01-18 1
- 2022-02-01 1
- 2022-02-07 1
- 2022-02-14 1
- 2022-02-15 1
- 2022-03-01 1
- 2022-03-10 1
- 2022-03-15 1
- 2022-04-05 1
- 2022-04-11 1
- 2022-04-12 1
- 2022-04-19 1
- 2022-05-03 1
- 2022-05-10 1
- 2022-05-17 1
- 2022-06-07 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf,9 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2012-01-04 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) MEETING WEDNESDAY- -JANUARY 4, 2012--7:01 P.M. Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:49 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Boaro Members Bonta, deHaan, Johnson, Tam and Mayor/Chair Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmembers/Board Member Johnson moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Board Member Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (12-016 CC) Resolution No. 14642, "Appropriating $379,000 in Federal HOME Funds and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Necessary Documents to Complete the Loan to the Alameda Point Collaborative for Acquisition of 240 Corpus Christi, 230 Corpus Christi, 2471 Orion, 2451 Orion, 201 Stardust, 251 Stardust, and 271 Stardust ("Property").' Adopted; and (12-008 ARRA) Recommendation to Approve Financing on the Property in the Amount of $2,279,000. Accepted. AGENDA ITEM None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority January 4, 2012 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2012-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 9 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Appellant asked the neighbors before putting up the sheet metal, to which the Appellant responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson inquired what would happen if the variances are denied, to which the Supervising Planner responded that two things could happen; the Appellant could work with staff for a solution that would allow a garage and deck that is either fully in compliance or would require a more modest variance or the Appellant could file a lawsuit against the City. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Appellant has paid fines, to which the Supervising Planner responded investigative fees and fees for working without the proper planning permits have been charged. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the Hearing. Councilmember Daysog moved adoption of the resolution upholding the Planning Board's decision and denying the Appeal. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated there was only one decision that the Planning Board could have made given the circumstances; encouraged the owner to work with the Planning Department to salvage the intent of the project within the requirements of the Code. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that she assumes that the Appellants had the best of intentions; the Code clearly specifies detached garage and addition requirements; the project is attempting to be both an addition to the house and a garage stated future owners could convert the garage into a living space. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-019) - Discussion regarding assistance for tenants at Harbor Island Apartments. Mayor Johnson stated that rent control issues are not on the agenda tonight but that the public is free to speak under Oral Communications The Housing Authority Executive Director gave a brief presentation regarding the assistance provided to the Harbor Island Apartment Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 9 | revenues through the end of December and should be addressed at the first or second meeting in February. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Acting Mayor Gilmore adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:02 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 9 | (06-043) Brien Burroughs, Glass Eye Media, stated that he is producing an independently financed television pilot at City Hall on Thursday and Friday barriers sometimes come up when filming at government sites; all his contacts in Alameda have been great ; stated he appreciates the support. (06-044) Patrick Lynch, Alameda, stated there is corruption in the Planning Department a resolution was passed by the Council on June 21, , 2005 which required the owner of a vacant lot adjacent to his home to conduct a specific soil test prior to receiving design review; the testing was submitted; the design review was approved and has been appealed to the Planning Board; he is unable to get a fair hearing with the Planning Board; staff refuses to provide accurate information; the City denies using the wrong section of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in approving the development; he received a $100 invoice to file a new form with the State; he received a $1600 invoice, which includes over five hours to discuss the project with City Attorney's office; the facts are undisputable; urged members of the Council to appeal the decision of the Planning Board. Mayor Johnson stated that Mr. Lynch should communicate his concerns with the City Manager. Mr. Lynch stated that he spoke with the Acting Assistant City Manager on Thursday and has not received a reply. The Acting Assistant City Manager stated that he spoke to Mr. Lynch, the Planning Department staff, and City Attorney's office last week; he still has one more person to contact; he will get back to Mr. Lynch. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (06-045 - ) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Economic Development Commission. Continued. (06-046) Councilmember deHaan stated streetscape funding was discussed at the last Council meeting he hopes that electrical provisions have been included to allow for embedded pedestrian lights [ on Park Street] between Central Avenue and Santa Clara Avenue when funding is available. ( (06-047) Councilmember deHaan stated … | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 9 | other than an ordinance that speaks to short notice mass evictions and voluntary relocation assistance. Mayor Johnson requested staff to determine how local and State statutes could be put to better use; stated the maintenance and quality of life issues at the Harbor Island Apartments could have been handled better. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he has not met one person who has defended the 15 Asset Management Group's action; requested staff to review whether there is a hole in the condominium conversion ordinance and whether there is an attempt to circumvent the ordinance; the proposed ordinance does not address the impact of not providing a reasonable, fair amount of public notice for vacating the complex completely; the Alameda Unified School District is trying to close a gap of over a million dollars ; perhaps the 15 Asset Management Group should pay an impact fee; the Harbor Island Apartment issue will not be resolved soon; encouraged investment and improvement in the West End; stated process should include social impacts. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the goal should be preventing a Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again; the question is how to go about it; the City needs to work to enforce current laws the former residents suffered greatly; West End residents need to know that they are just as important as residents in other sections of the City; landlords have stated that the proposed ordinance will not work from their standpoint i challenged the landlords to work with the City and the residents and come up with a way of preventing the situation from happening again; stated steps need to be put in place to have it happen sooner rather than later. Councilmember deHaan stated that redeveloping the West End will cause displacement; a good social eye is needed for what is occurring the City knew that something was going astray; a wedge has been driven between the landlords and tenants; the size of the Harbor Island Apartments makes it difficult to manage; the property cannot afford to be ke… | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 9 | 9 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-01 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -MARCH 1, 2005--7:27P.M. Chair Johnson convened the meeting at 8:02 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (05-009) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meetings of January 18, 2005; the Special Joint City Council, CIC and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of February 1, 2005; and the Special Joint City Council and CIC Meeting of February 15, 2005. Approved. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Note: Chair Johnson abstained from voting on the January 18 Minutes. ] AGENDA ITEM (05-010) Recommendation to award a grant in an amount not to exceed $5,000 from Business and Waterfront Improvement Project tax increment funds for the purchase of a used vehicle to tow the Green Machine operated by the West Alameda Business Association for the cleaning of the public sidewalk and to authorize the Executive Director to execute a standard grant agreement. Chair Johnson stated that Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA) requested that she convey that PSBA is in full support of the staff recommendation. Sherri Stieg, West Alameda Business Association (WABA) , urged support of the staff recommendation; stated that additional areas would be cleaned; noted there will be a Farmer's Market every Thursday from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. starting June 8, 2005. Chair Johnson congratulated WABA for the success of the streetscape project. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by Special Meeting Community Improvement commission March 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-03-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-15 | 9 | The Development Services Director responded that the developer would start with conceptual plans, submit an application to the Planning Department, and the design review process would begin; she is not expecting multiple concepts to be submitted. Mayor Johnson noted that Melody Marr, Chamber of Commerce, submitted a letter stating that the Chamber is in favor of the Theatre Design Guidelines. Richard W. Rutter, Alameda, stated that it appears there will be a traffic impact on Oak Street; suggested considering making Oak Street be increased to 60 feet wide. Nick Petrulakis, Alameda, urged moving forward with the guidelines. Scott Brady, Alameda, stated that he was concerned that the guidelines are overly specific in terms of architectural design elements. Christopher Buckley, AAPS, stated that the preliminary review is a good idea; outlined AAPS's suggested changes to the guidelines. Chuck Millar, Alameda, stated that he was concerned with the proposed contemporary design. Mayor Johnson requested the Development Services Director to respond to the design issue. The Development Services Director stated the design was done by an environmental group to study the mass and make a judgment about whether or not it fits within the contexts and is consistent with the Secretary of Interior standards; stated there has been a lot of community concern because of the image the environmental planner created to do basic evaluation. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether a review by the State was required to determine impacts on surrounding historical areas. The Development Services Director responded a review would not be needed if Federal funding were not used. Councilmember Daysog stated the Historical Advisory Board and other interested groups should have input. Elizabeth Krase, AAPS, submitted a handout ; stated that she welcomes the rehabilitation of the historic theatre with reservations. ; she is concerned with the projected overhangs. Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council March 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-05 | 9 | if the two office space units return to rented units, to which Mr. Hartney responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the intent to upgrade the electrical and plumbing. The Project Architect responded that drawings for improvements need to be submitted for a building permit; stated the drawings would be reviewed to ensure conformance with the conditions of approval and agreements that were negotiated through the Design Review processi noted that interior upgrade permits have already been submitted. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the elevators, to which the Project Architect responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese requested a review on the process of safety issues prior to occupancy and clarification on lead and asbestos abatement. inquired how the sewer issues are connected with the process of upgrading the exteriors of the buildings and whether sprinklers would be required in the building. The Acting City Manager responded lead and asbestos abatement and sewer problems are not addressed as part of the exterior review but would take place in the ministerial part of the building permits noted a qualified contractor would need to perform the lead and asbestos abatement work; stated that the sewer issue would probably not be triggered but should be addressed. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the sewer work would be required to be done, to which the Acting City Manager stated that the sewer work should be reviewed. The Project Architect stated that the sewer work is a condition of approval i noted that some of the work has already been done and presented to the Public Works Department. The Acting City Manager stated that there are parts of the project which would require sprinklers. The Project Architect stated that public hallways and common areas would be protected with a fire sprinkler system and the fire alarm system would be upgraded; stated that reports from the Applicants are required as part of the demolition permitting process; noted testing has been done for l… | CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-19 | 9 | generation of remediation intruding into the existing field area. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the School District staff is presenting a plan to the School Board on April 26. The Acting City Manager stated that the meeting may be sooner than April 26 and that he would verify the date. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the plan intrudes into the field area, to which the Acting City Manager responded that the plan goes partially into the field area and basketball paved area. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how the plan would effect putting in a full size regulation soccer field, to which the Acting City Manager responded the matter would be addressed at the meeting and City staff would bring back information. Mayor Johnson stated that she has informed a couple of School Board members and the Superintendent that she is concerned about taking away field space; noted that the basketball courts are not just used by the school. (05-184) Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the window display ordinance came back to Council, to which the Acting City Manager responded that there is 30-day implementation period to allow people time to adjust before enforcement. (05-185) Mayor Johnson requested that increasing the size of the Recreation and Park Commission be placed on the next agenda. (05-186) Mayor Johnson stated the Finance Director is working on a more aggressive policy to buy in Alameda; noted that the check registers indicate how much the City spends outside of Alameda and are very disturbing stated that sales tax revenue is being given to other cities a purchasing position might be needed to coordinate better prices and ensure that purchasing is done in Alameda as much as possible. (05-187) - Mayor Johnson stated the Council should consider a Business Recruiter position in the next budget. Councilmember deHaan stated that every Economic Development Commission study indicated a Business Recruiter as a top priority; noted that buying in Alameda is important. (05-188 - ) Councilmember Matarrese stated important projects are … | CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-03 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -MAY 3, 2005- -5:30 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:45 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (05-190) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Title: City Attorney (05-191) - Worker's Compensation Claim; Claimant : James MacKey Agency Claimed Against City of Alameda. (05-192) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators Human Resources Director and Craig Jory; Employee Organizations : International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ( IBEW) and Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) . Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Public Employee Performance Evaluation, the Council discussed the City Attorney's performance; regarding Worker's Compensation Claim, the Council gave instructions to Legal Counsel: and regarding Conference with Labor Negotiators, the Council gave instructions to Labor Negotiators. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 3, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 9 | officers begin enforcement in the area immediately to slow down traffic while analysis is being completed. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the speed board [radar trailer] retains data, to which the Public Works Director responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the equipment has the capacity to retain information, to which the Public Works Director responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson stated Oakland's equipment has messages, such as : "please drive slowly this our neighborhood" or "children at play; suggested use of the radar trailer and, if effective, the purchase of additional radar trailers. Councilmember deHaan stated other cities have permanent speed display devices. The Public Works Director stated staff applied for grants and may have received funding for a smaller device showing traveling speed on Lincoln Avenue; suggested staff be authorized to proceed with putting up pedestrian and speed limit signs, along with the enforcement and radar trailer. Mayor Johnson stated that Council would not object to staff taking said actions; drivers forget everywhere in Alameda is someone's neighborhood. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( *05-236) Resolution No. 13941, "Authorizing the use of Measure B Countywide Discretionary Fund Grant from Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority (ACTIA) and Matching Funds from the City's Local Measure B Allocation to Complete a Citywide Pedestrian Plan. Adopted. (*05-237) Resolution No. 13942, "Extending Period for Providing Low and Moderate Income Housing Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33334.16 for 30 Units Within the Bachelor Officers' Quarters at Alameda Point. Adopted. ( *05-238) Resolution No. 13943, "Resolution of Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for FY 2005-06 and Set a Public Hearing for June 7, 2005 " Adopted. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-07 | 9 | Mayor Johnson inquired who would decide on the wording and size of the plaques. The Library Director responded that there would be different sizes for different donation levels; the donor and the Foundation will work together to finalize wording and ensure appropriateness. Mayor Johnson stated the size and approved wording should be established; inquired whether there would be a provision to not accept a donation. The Library Director stated that the final bullet in Exhibit A of the staff report states that final approval rests with the City Council; inquired whether the Council would like to review the policy again. Mayor Johnson responded that the Council would like to review the policy when the finer details are in place. The Library Director stated that the named gift list is not final. Councilmember Daysog stated that the Council might want to move slower and get more public input. The Library Director stated that there has been a public process. Councilmember Daysog stated the Library is public space and almost becomes a quazi-privatized space with all the donation recognition markings it is important to have balance. Councilmember Matarrese stated the criteria regarding the ability to refuse a contribution, prohibiting corporate logos, and appropriate recognition should be spelled out. Mayor Johnson stated criteria for appropriate wording should also be included. The Library Director stated some suggested wording could be "Gift from" or "In honor of. " Mayor Johnson inquired whether a wall of recognition was considered instead of plaques on objects throughout the Library. The Library Director responded the wall recognition was also intended. Mayor Johnson inquired whether it was necessary to have both the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 June 7, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-21 | 9 | Mayor Johnson inquired where the fuel was bought, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded that the fuel for the Alameda/Oakland Ferry is purchased through Blue and Gold Fleet, bought in bulk volume, and stored at Pier 39; AHBFS has a contract with a fuel provider and is fueled at Pier 48. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the fuel rates were comparable, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded there is a difference between 18 and 20 cents per gallon. Mayor Johnson inquired whether HBM could fuel at Pier 39, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded that there have been discussions with Blue and Gold Fleet regarding fueling at Pier 39; insurance requirements make the possibility difficult and costs would offset any benefit; there have been discussions with the WTA regarding bulk purchases. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether gas could be purchased ahead of time and locked in at lower prices, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded that HBM does not purchase ahead of time but that Blue and Gold Fleet does. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether purchasing gas ahead of time would be a possibility for HBM, to which the Ferry Services Manager responded there is a question of fuel storage capability; relocating to Alameda Point is being reviewed. Michael Torrey, Alameda, encouraged the Council to accept the staff recommendation. Scott Hennigh, Alameda, urged acceptance of the staff recommendation; stated eliminating the 7:30 p.m. run is short sighted and will decrease ridership; suggested capital reserve funds be used to cover the cost of the 7:30 p.m. run and that the Council consider a temporary reallocation of the Measure B Funds toward advertising costs. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there was any way to avoid eliminating the 7:30 p.m. run. The Acting City Manager responded there would be approximately 11 to 15 riders lost with the elimination of the 7:30 p.m. run; increased ridership through marketing efforts should result in breaking even; reducing what is set aside for capital reserves Regula… | CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 9 | The Supervising Planner responded as long as the height limit is not exceeded. Councilmember deHaan stated that closing down the roof pitch to stay within the height limit creates architectural problems. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. Proponent : Ken Carvalho, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the Public portion of the Hearing. Councilmember deHaan moved introduction of the ordinance with the direction to review roof pitch and window issues. Councilmember Daysog requested to have a separate vote on second story setbacks. Councilmember deHaan amended his motion to exclude second story setbacks. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved introduction of the ordinance provisions on second story setbacks. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Noes : Councilmember Daysog - 1. (05-362) Public hearing to consider Zoning Text Amendment ( ZA05 - 0002) , amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 30-4.8(c) to add "Boutique Theater" as an allowable use in the C-1 zoning district, subject to Use Permit approval. Applicant : Alameda Theatre Project Inc. Address All Neighborhood Business Districts (C-1) ; (05-362A) Resolution No. 13881, "Adopting a Negative Declaration for ZA05-0002. " Adopted; and (05-362B) Introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Declaring Boutique Theaters to be Uses Permitted by Use Permit within the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District of Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) . Introduced. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 July 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-02 | 9 | Counci lember deHaan noted that reducing the number of districts still needed to be reviewed. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote Ayes : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions Vice Mayor Gilmore - 1. (05-389) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board approval of Parking Garage Use Permit (UP05-0008) and Design (DR05-0028) - ; and adoption of related resolution. Continued to August 16, 2005. (05-390) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Planning Board approval of Cineplex Design (DR05-0041) ; and adoption of related resolution. Continued to August 16, 2005. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-391) Richard Scrindy, Alameda, stated that he is selling his house in Alameda inquired why past permits have not been honored and why criminal charges were filed against him; invited the Council to come to his home thanked Mayor Johnson, Councilmember Matarrese and Councilmember deHaan for trying to help. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-392) - Written communication from the League of California Cities requesting designation of Voting Delegate for the League's 2005 Annual Conference. Mayor Johnson suggested that Councilmember Daysog be the City's delegate and Vice Mayor Gilmore be the alternate. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of Councilmember Daysog serving as the City's delegate and Vice Mayor Gilmore serving as the alternate. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-393) Discussion regarding the placement of proposed federal legislation that would amend the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to limit casino expansion on the August 16, 2005 City Council agenda for formal action. Mayor Johnson stated proposed federal legislation regarding gaming might be helpful to communities such as Alameda the matter would Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 August 2, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-16 | 9 | objective was to have the most efficient, least expensive project, with an eye on speed; the exterior design of the project needs to be known before moving forward, otherwise an intolerable budget situation could be created; design/build should reduce the number of changes later and create a more controlled process for bidding the project and getting the best price and product for the community. Councilmember deHaan stated that one of the first tasks was to review alternate parking areas in 1999 during the visioning process; inquired what were the alternate areas. The Development Services Director responded she does not know what the alternate parking areas were in 1999; subsequent parking analysis identified alternative sites, including the Elks Club, Video Maniacs and the Long's site. Councilmember deHaan stated that he did not recall Video Maniacs being one of the sites. Councilmember Matarrese stated that Video Maniacs was included as an option in the 2000 Downtown Vision Report. The Development Manager stated that six studies reviewed different sites since 1972; all studies considered Video Maniacs as one of the top sites. Councilmember deHaan stated the 2000 parking analysis indicated that 498 parking spaces were needed for 1,500 theater seats; inquired whether the Development Services Director was aware of the analysis. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the analysis was fairly speculative. Councilmember deHaan stated the analysis indicated that a certain number would park in the lot and some patrons would park in other areas; Park Street as been so successful in recent years that the 200 spaces [in other areas) that were going to be used to support the theater are being utilized now. The Development Services Director stated the environmental assessment included completion of a new traffic and parking assessment to update the information and confirm that there would be opportunities for shared parking the commercial district setting of the project means people will have … | CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-06 | 9 | versus interior walls. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there was any guidance being given now to prevent misinterpretation. The Acting Planning and Building Director responded that there are no new guidelines i staff would be looking more closely. Mayor Johnson stated that the Council needs to know that the intent of the ordinance will be carried out; the drawings do not show any resemblance to the original house. Councilmember deHaan stated 30% is hard to interpreti inquired whether the percentage should be more. The Acting Planning and Building Director responded a method other than percentage should be defined. Mayor Johnson stated that there is no need to wait for an ordinance revision to carry out the intent noted that a defacto demolition of a historic structure will not be allowed because of a badly drafted ordinance. The Acting Planning and Building Director stated that the matter is being addressed; there should not be any similar issues in the future. The City Manager stated that there have been many internal discussions regarding the lack of direction in some parts of the ordinance; inconsistencies need to be address guidelines would be handled internally. Mayor Johnson inquired whether deconstruction and reconstruction would be addressed, to which the Acting Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. The City Manager stated that HAB input would be sought. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated some structures have the potential for historic designation but have not been certified; home owners should not have to jump through hoops if the house is not truly historic; many houses are old, but not historic; she does not want to preserve old, non-historic houses inquired how the issue could be balanced. Mayor Johnson stated that owners could apply to have their houses removed from the historic study list. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 6, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-20 | 9 | could happen at the same property in 5 or 10 years with the new property owner; there are buildings in Alameda that are beautifully maintained and others are not; the Task Force felt there should be a more proactive approach when two or three complaints are received; the Code currently allows people to complain to the City; the City determines whether the property is in compliance; the Code does not allow the City to go onto private property and force an inspection unless there is probable cause. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was any evidence that a Harbor Island Apartment type situation exists. Mr. Norton responded that he was not aware of any large complex problems; stated the Acting Planning and Building Director would know better. Councilmember deHaan stated that there was critism that the City was the last to know about the Harbor Island Apartment situation; the City needs to be the first to know about problems so that action can be taken. The Acting Planning and Building Director stated that there are no major complexes that have anywhere near the number of complaints as the Harbor Island Apartments. Councilmember deHaan stated that ensuring the situation does not reoccur is important; mechanisms addressed tonight would provide reassurance. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing. Speakers : Steve Edrington, Rental Housing Association of Northern Alameda (submitted handout) ; *Lorraine Lilley, Housing Task Force (submitted handout) i Barbara Kerr, Northside Association (submitted handout) ; Gretchen Lipow, Alameda; Thomas Cook, Bonanza Apartments, LLC; *Lynette Lee, Renewed Hope *Joel Rubenzahl; *Delores Wells Guyton, Buena Vista Community Association; *Eve Bach, Arc Ecology (submitted handout) i Bill Smith, Alameda; Carol Martino, Realty World Martino Associates; *Modessa Henderson, Harbor Island Tenant Association; Don Grappo, Alameda; *Tom Matthews, Renewed Hope ; Bruce Carnes, Alameda; Michael John Torrey, Alameda; Michael Yoshi, Housing Task Force (submitted handout) Spoke … | CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-10-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-10-18 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -OCTOBER 18, 2005 - -6:40 P.M. (05-495 - ) Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property: 2900 Main Street ; Negotiating Parties : City of Alameda and Alameda Gateway, Ltd; Under Negotiation: Price and terms. Not heard. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council October 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-10-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-11-01 | 9 | home. parking supply is not just public parking. Councilmember deHaan stated there is no entitlement to private parking. *** Councilmember Daysog moved that the Regular Meeting be continued to past midnight. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether private parking could be used if there was an agreement with the owners. The Development Services Director responded that covenants are not sought from owners for parking access. Councilmember deHaan stated that a parking structure would not be needed according to information provided in a 2000 study; the study noted that 204 spaces were available on Saturday evenings; inquired how impacts from the Masonic Temple, high school, Kaufman Auditorium and Elks Club were calculated. The Development Services Director responded that the analysis did not assume anything other than normal activity seasonable events overwork a parking supply and change the normal scenario; the analysis reviews typical peak times and does not focus on the unusual. Councilmember deHaan inquired why the 70-foot parking structure was not included in the September 29, 2005 staff report. The Development Services Director responded the report was prior to the new project. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the 70-foot parking structure was equivalent to the Alameda Theater sign and the Twin Tower spiral. The Development Services Director responded the 70-foot parking structure was the interior of the mechanical system elevator penthouse on the parking structure only; stated the Oak Street façade of the parking structure has now dropped to 48 feet; the final ramp roof of the sixth story goes up to just below 70 feet. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there were always seven levels to which the Development Services Director responded the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 November 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-11-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-11-15 | 9 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council 2 November 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-11-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-06 | 9 | redirected, 3) review possible new sources of revenue, and 4) provide a report on the process of exploring an adjustment to the transfer tax. Mayor Johnson stated there has been a lot of discussion on streets, sidewalks, trees, and sewers; there is significant deferred maintenance in the parks the parks and recreation facilities are very valuable parts of the community; the parks are being addressed in the staff recommendation Councilmember deHaan requested that the motion be amended to include reviewing the other assessment districts and the establishment of landscaping and lighting districts. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like the motion to include an analysis of the Henry Gardner Plan. Mayor Johnson stated that she did not want to go into more debt unless it was necessary. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Henry Gardner Plan was a separate issue. Mayor Johnson stated that staff should not spend a lot of time exploring the matter; suggested discussing whether debt was something the Council would like to review as a solution to the deferred maintenance when the item was brought back. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether reviewing the matter in an Off-Agenda Report would be satisfactory to Councilmember Daysog. Councilmember Daysog responded an Off-Agenda Report seems to be the same as his request for analysis. Councilmember deHaan concurred with Councilmember Daysog; stated that determining how much time would be spent on the matter should be determined; that he does not understand the Plan completely and would not be able to vote on the matter tonight. Councilmember Daysog stated that he was requesting an analysis of the Plan. Mayor Johnson requested a brief Off-Agenda Report describing the Henry Gardner Plan. Councilmember Matarrese stated he would mend the motion to include an Off-Agenda - Report on the Plan piling debt on top of a deficit of deferred maintenance was not a priority for him. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 December 6, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-20 | 9 | Mayor Johnson agreed that the Council was looking for a commitment on the matter. Mark Allen, Alameda County Lead Poisoning Prevention Program Board stated the will of the Authority was to establish the requirement in the Contract. Mayor Johnson requested Mr. Allen to describe which Alameda programs would be facing funding reductions and which programs would be funded by the potential fee increase. Mr. Allen stated cuts have already been implemented which would have a negative impact on Alameda: free risk assessments have been cut; the assessments were provided to the Housing Authority and Development Services Department for free over the past five years but now the City has to budget for the service; additional services at risk are: technical assistance to property owners with an identified lead poisoned child, free home renovation classes, reduction in the number of lead safe painting kits, and elimination of a one-day lead safe work practice workshop stated the survey would indicate what fee the property owners or the general electorate would be willing to bear; a $10 to $15 increase might provide the cities with risk assessments. Councilmember deHaan inquired what amount was being requested as Alameda's share. Mr. Allen responded $5,000; stated the City of Berkeley's share was $10,000 and the City of Oakland's share was $14,9991 Alameda County and SEIU Local 616 contributed $11,000 each; the City of Emeryville contributed $3,000. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the consultant has been selected, to which Mr. Allen responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the County would go forward with the survey without the City's contribution. Mr. Allen responded not necessarily; further discussion would be needed if one of the cities chose not to contribute; stated a Contract has not been signed. Mayor Johnson inquired who would approve the Contract, to which Mr. Allen responded the Board of Directors. Councilmember deHaan stated there was concern regarding the use of the data and whether t… | CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-01-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-01-03 | 9 | COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (06-013) - Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Recreation and Park Commission and Social Services Human Relations Board. Mayor Johnson nominated Michael B. Cooper for appointment to the Recreation and Park Commission and Dora J. Dome to the Social Services and Human Relations Board. (06-014) - Vice Mayor Gilmore congratulated the Public Works Department staff for doing a terrific job in maintaining the storm drains; stated that Alameda did not face flooding situations in the wake of the recent storms. 06-015) ouncilmember Daysog stated that members of the Encinal High School Alumni Association inquired into the possibility of renaming a west-end street to honor Willie Stargel he would like to review the history of naming Tinker Avenue and the possibility of renaming Tinker Avenue to Willie Stargel Boulevard; Mr. Stargel grew up near Tinker Avenue. Mayor Johnson stated that the City's street naming policy should be reviewed and updated. Councilmember Daysog stated that the Encinal High School Alumni Association also had concerns about how the road and streets in the Bayport development were named. Councilmember deHaan noted the City experienced minor incidences with the storms a three-hour power outage occurred; stated Third Street and Poggie Avenue reappear with different names in the Bayport development. Mayor Johnson stated the matter could be corrected. ouncilmember deHaan stated Willie Stargel spent most of his youth in west-end projects; consideration should be given to renaming Tinker Avenue or Mosley Avenue. (06-016 - ) Councilmember deHaan stated that the Del Monte property was under the oversight of the Planning Board for three years and was scheduled to come back to various committees and boards but has noti 550 housing units are scheduled for the northern waterfront area along with substantial retail operations; he would like to have a status report provided shortly. (06-017) Councilmember Matarrese stated that his heart goes out to Regular Meeting Alameda… | CityCouncil/2006-01-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-07 | 9 | Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of placing the matter on the next agenda. Counci Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: 4 by consensus/Absent: Councilmember deHaan - 1. (06-070) Councilmember Matarrese stated a number of signs throughout the City may violate the sign ordinance; requested staff to investigate the matter. The City Manager inquired whether the signs were temporary. Councilmember Matarrese responded that some of the signs are more permanent than temporary. ADJOURNMENT (06-071) There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 10:43 p.m. in a moment of silence for Former Mayor Chuck Corica and Coretta Scott King. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 February 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-21 | 9 | Councils such as Berkeley, San Francisco, and Santa Monica; Alameda is a middle-of-the-road City; words need to be chosen wisely and carefully; the resolution goes beyond withdrawing the California National Guard from Iraq but also references certain politicos distain for President Bush and contributes to the vitriol between the far left and far right; politics should not drive how Alameda engages in discussions; the Council must serve all of Alameda and not just those most angered by President Bush; the Council should express appreciation for the armed services' work, sacrifices, and commitment and pray for a safe and speedy return; everyone believes that having the troops back sooner and safer is best for all; Alameda has an opportunity to contribute in a way that is stripped of the far left and far right rhetoric. Vice Mayor Gilmore thanked everyone for having a calm discussion on a very difficult issue; stated some people will be dissatisfied regardless of tonight's outcome; she would not like to have tonight's discussion construed as not supporting the troops in Iraq; the troops deserve support and thanks; the troops are paying the ultimate price for the country's ideals; concurred with Mayor Johnson regarding there not being a consensus within the community on the resolution; she has been persuaded by the eloquent speakers who spoke of how the City would need the National Guard, Coast Guard and reservists in case of an earthquake, natural disaster, or terrorist attack; the City Council has a responsibility to plan for disasters and ensure that everything is done to protect the citizens; she does not believe that the Council needs a consensus from the community to support a resolution to call the California National Guard home; she has a difficult time with the concept of the City Council passing a resolution calling for withdrawal of all troops from Iraq; she does not believe there is a consensus from the community to speak on the issue; she is trying to keep her personal opinion separate from her responsib… | CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-07 | 9 | Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any parking problems would be encountered with the 10% live-aboards. The Marina Harbor Master Manager responded parking was not an issue in the past when there were 75 live-aboards. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved adoption of resolutions. Councilmember Daysog thanked Mr. Parker for the work he has done for Alameda and for transforming Marina Village. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated that Mr. Parker was the first ARRA Executive Officer; learning the conversion and development ropes was an exciting opportunity; Marina Village turned into a great development; the City owes a debt of gratitude to Mr. Parker for his persistence. Mr. Parker thanked the Council for recognizing the Marina Village accomplishmentsi stated tonight will be the last time he would be speaking before the City Council; he has been in front of 5 Mayors over the last 27 years; the experience has been wonderful. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions: Councilmember Matarrese - 1. [Note Councilmember Matarrese recused himself due to owning property within 300 feet of Marina Village. ] (06-121) Resolution No. 13934, "Establishing a Long-Term Park Use Policy. " Adopted. The Acting Recreation and Park Director provided a brief report. Councilmember Daysog inquired who was contacted at the Swim Association, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the President. Councilmember Matarrese thanked the Recreation and Park Commission and Acting Recreation and Park Director for a job well done. Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 March 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-21 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- -MARCH 21, 2006- -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 8:03 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : louncilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. [Note: Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog arrived at 9:05 p.m. ] Absent : None. MINUTES (06-157CC/06-009CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on March 7, 2006. Approved. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Commissione deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog - 1. ] AGENDA ITEM (06-158CC/06-010CIC) Recommendation to review Section 106 Findings and approve revised designs of the 350-space parking garage and Cineplex at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue within the C-C T Community Commercial Theater) zoning district; (06-158A/CC) Resolution No. 13937, "Approving Amended Final Designs for Design Review DR05-0041 for the Proposed Cineplex at 2305 Central Avenue and DR05-0028 for the Proposed Parking Garage at 1416 Oak Street. Adopted; (06-158B/CC) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for the Rehabilitation of the Historic Alameda Theatre; and (06-158C/CC) Recommendation to adopt Conceptual Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Design-Build of the Civic Center Parking Garage, CIP No. 90-19. The Development Services Director provided a brief presentation. The Architect gave a brief presentation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission March 21, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-04-04 | 9 | The Redevelopment Manager stated that the word "altered" is not correct; a clarification was submitted for the sub-contractor omissions. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the list of sub-contractors changed after the bid opening, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is concerned with the contractor's ability to put the necessary attention into the detail of the project. Mayor Johnson stated that the matter is a legal issue. Councilmember Matarrese stated contractors might bid higher if the City has a bad reputation. Mayor Johnson stated contractors might not bid at all; she is uncomfortable with rejecting bids if the bidding process complies with all legal requirements everyone's numbers have been exposed. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Redevelopment Manager would like to review any legal aspects and how a delay would affect the schedule. The Redevelopment Manager responded the schedule is tight; substantial completion is anticipated by the end of July. *** The City Council addressed other agenda items and resumed discussion in the middle of the Report on AC Transit [paragraph no. 06-187] . *** The City Attorney announced that the staff recommendation would be changed to reject all bids. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the revised staff recommendatior to reject all bids and requested that the bidding process be expedited. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Daysog inquired what are the reasons for rejecting the bids. The City Attorney stated that attempts were unsuccessful to Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 April 4, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-04-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-04-18 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -APRIL 18, 2006- - -5:30 P.M. Agenda: (06-197) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases: One. Not held. Mayor Johnson announced that the Council did not discuss the matter. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council April 18, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-04-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-02 | 9 | have a line item for equipment replacement. The City Manager responded that a separate page would be provided which would summarize all the recommended equipment to be replacement. Councilmember Daysog stated the Police and Fire Departments have specialized vehicles. The Public Works Director responded that Public Works would work directly with the Police and Fire Departments to identify special vehicle needs. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether bio-diesel fuel is possible with the existing fleet. The Public Works Director responded he has not looked into the matter; electric and hybrid vehicles seem to be viable; hydrogen fuel is being investigated. Councilmember Daysog requested that bio-diesel fuel alternatives be reviewed. The Finance Director stated bio-diesel fuel was considered for the standby generators at Alameda Point; the engine needs to be diesel all of the rubber has to be retrofitted to not ruin the engine. Councilmember deHaan stated the funding stream becomes very important with expensive vehicles such as a fire truck; obtaining the Navy vehicles helped in some areas; a purchasing procedure is needed; replacement criteria has been established with the Police Department. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he appreciates the Resolution the Resolution defines how to get a handle on fleet management ; suggested that additional language be added to the Resolution; alternative fuel vehicles need to be identified; the first choice should be electric; the next choice should be hybrid, if electric is not practical alternative fuel vehicles would be the next choice; the last choice would be status quoi choices need to be spelled out so that there is a decision tree; boats are not on the list; the City has two ferry boats and a fire and police boat. Mayor Johnson stated the City also has a Trident ship. Councilmember Matarrese stated a watercraft inventory is needed. The Public Works Director stated the Police and Fire Department Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 May 2, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 9 | (06-268 ) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $1,050,505.00 to McGuire and Hester, and allocate a 10% contingency in the amount of $105,100.00 for the construction of the Bayport 4- acre park. The Redevelopment Manager provided a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the original bidder or challenger resubmitted a bid, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the bids were lower. The Redevelopment Manager responded the bids for the park were lower; stated the community building bids were higher than the engineer's estimate; staff will recommend rejecting the bids at the June 20 City Council Meeting. The Acting Recreation and Park Director stated he has contacted the School District to arrange for facilities to run the After School Playground Program in the fall; field use will be rotated; renovation of Godfrey Park will start after Bayport Park is opened. Mayor Johnson inquired when the construction of the community building would be completed. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the community building would be re-bid in the fall. Mayor Johnson inquired whether construction could be done during the school year, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative. The Redevelopment Manager stated the community building is on school property and is subject to the Department of State Architect standards, which are higher the original lowest bid was $730,000 the re-bid was $850,000; the engineer's estimate was in the $600,000 range. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the renovations for Godfrey Park would start in September, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded hopefully. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-06 | 9 | straightened out before the open season street naming is becoming more clear; she is unclear on how facilities are named; inquired how the process was established for naming facilities within parks with different names than the park. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the process was recommended by the community at the time. The City Manager stated staff would provide recommendations to Council in the next couple of meetings. Councilmember Matarrese requested that flow charts be provided. Councilmember deHaan stated Council should discuss how far the naming policy should extend. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there should be consistency between commissions. The City Manager stated a policy would be provided to Council while moving forward with adding Willie Stargell to the current street naming list. Councilmember Daysog noted an Alameda resident mentioned naming the Dog Park after a resident who was instrumental in getting the Dog Park up and running. (06-296) Resolution No. 13971, "Opposing State Legislation to Permit the Towing of Triple Tractor Trailers on State Highways in California. " Adopted. The Assistant to the City Manager gave a brief presentation. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated previously the City Attorney pointed out that some roads in Alameda are designated as State Highways ; potentially triple tractor trailers could move within the City limits; the City would have no jurisdiction or authority to regulate or ban the triple tractor trailers if the legislation passes. Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated his position on the matter is neutral suggested Council ensure that adoption of the resolution does not curtail progress in Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese stated he would prefer to see the industry remove tractor trailers from the streets and onto rails; he supports the resolution. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 June 6, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-07 | 9 | quickly. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation to reject the bid and negotiate for 60 days with the caveat that options for the current configuration of the project be outlined in parallel to allow the City to reach the end of the 60 days with a full pallet of information; the two months would not be lost if the results are not favorable. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Commissioners Gilmore, Matarrese and Chair Johnson - 3. Noes: Commissioners Daysog and deHaan - 2. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 9 June 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-20 | 9 | (06-330 - ) Written communication from the League of California Cities requesting designation of Voting Delegate for the League's 2006 Annual Conference. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would be happy to serve as the City's representative. Vice Mayor Gilmore noted that she could not serve as the alternate. Councilmember deHaan stated that he would serve as the alternate. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of Councilmember Daysog serving as the City's delegate and Councilmember deHaan serving as the alternate. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-331) Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Civil Service Board, Commission on Disability Issues, Economic Development Commission, Historical Advisory Board, Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board, Housing Commission, Library Board, Planning Board, Public Utilities Board, Social Service Human Relations Board, and Transportation Commission. Mayor Johnson nominated: Roberto Rocha for reappointment to the Civil Service Board; Michael E. Soderberg for appointment to the Civil Service Board; DuWayne A. Crone and Paulina Kirola for appointment to the Commission on disability Issues; Judith A. Lynch for reappointment to the Historical Advisory Board - Community-at-Large Seat; Mark Irons for appointment to the Historical Advisory Board - Contractor Seat; Jeff Cambra for reappointment to the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board; Harold J. Holmes for appointment to the Housing and Building Code Hearing and Appeals Board; Billie Trujiilo for reappointment to the Housing Commission; Karen A. Butter for reappointment to the Library Board; Anne Cook and Andrew J. Cunningham for reappointment to the Planning Board; Ann McCormick for reappointment to the Public Utilities Board - Engineer Seat; Michael J. Krueger and Robert L. McFarland for reappointment to the Transportation Commission. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 June 20, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-05 | 9 | Management Analyst would be more appropriate; he realizes there is a deficit. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated there should be a review on whether Risk Management should be in the City Attorney's office. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated there is an immediate need; an organizational chart was requested; inquired whether the matter could be held over for one more meeting. The City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative; stated the position is in the recommended budget i the matter could be held over, and no action would be taken. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan stated holding the matter over would provide an opportunity for additional review. Mayor/Chair Johnson requested an explanation of the position's duties and a review on how other cities handle workers' compensation. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan concurred with Mayor/Chair Johnson. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore noted the staff report states that the position is not a General Fund position; inquired whether the position actually would be a General Fund position because other departments funded by the General Fund would pay for the position, to which the City Attorney/Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative. The City Manager/Executive Director stated a portion comes from other funds as well. Mayor/Chair Johnson and Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese suggested continuing the matter. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan concurred with Mayor/Chair Johnson and Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese with the caveat that the position not be excluded from the budget. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated on-going, strategic review is needed. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese stated the Council/Commission needs to be provided with an organization chart, Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 2 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission July 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-18 | 9 | which probably would not be feasible South San Francisco and Berkeley are new ferry services. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether existing service is a focus of the WTA. Mr. Castleberry responded the WTA does not have any authority over Alameda services; the WTA's only legislative mandate is on new services. Councilmember deHaan stated there are benefits and disadvantages in being first with a new service; inquired whether schedules are the WTA's forte. Mr. Castleberry responded the WTA looks at schedules as low fruit; schedules can be done at a fairly low cost to make the mode better for the riders. Councilmember deHaan stated he appreciates the WTA's efforts to help market the City's ferry services i inquired whether the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) would always be a player for the WTA's funding stream. Mr. Castleberry responded MTC administers Regional Measure 2 funds MTC would touch 90% of the WTA's operating funds. Councilmember deHaan inquired how the WTA would be better at working with MTC for farebox relief. Mr. Castleberry responded MTC reviews and evaluates services separately; MTC does not evaluate bus companies on a route-by-route basis; the WTA believes marketing is not just for one route, but for both. Councilmember deHaan stated he thinks the City could do the same thing as the WTA. Mr. Castleberry stated that the WTA would put all resources in the farebox relief because the farebox ratio is unfair. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated she thinks that staff does a wonderful job of running the ferry services; she needs incentives from the WTA, such as having more access to funds and having the opportunity to improve the ferry services, before considering turning the ferry service over; she does not see any reason to turn the ferry service over to the WTA; inquired whether route timing would be systemized; stated that she is interested in having ferry connections to buses and trains for the South San Francisco and Redwood City ferry Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 July 18, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-26.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-26 | 9 | The Development Services Director stated concerns need to be reiterated regarding a smaller project; ground rent and revenue would be reduced. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the project cost could be reduced by $3 million to $4 million with a five-screen theater and a five-level parking garage the equation would be changed minimally; stated Councilmember/Commissior Daysog requested that options be reviewed. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore stated the City would not need to contribute approximately $2 million if an operator would not operate the Historic Theater and provide the maintenance; the maintenance cost would come out of the General Fund and would have no cap. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese stated that he looks at the alternatives as fall backs; he is pleased that the theater has been acquired; concurred with Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog regarding restoring the Historic Theater as much as possible; stated the Historic Theater is a civic treasure; he is nervous about construction in a historic building and the contingency dropping from 15% to 13%; he has some comfort in that the value engineering process lessens the risk of the 2% contingency reduction; he is interested in what other funds might be available to provide more comfort; the main cost of the project is the Historic Theater; he is willing to support the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore stated the City does not own the Elks' parking garage or the U.S. Bank parking site; the City has not discussed acquiring either site with the property owners. parcel costs go up once the City expresses interest in purchasing a parcel; construction costs are escalating the City would be running the risk of not having dollars in place to acquire the property, going through the design review process, and building a parking structure on either site. Mayor/Chai: Johnson stated other funding sources should be reviewed in the event that extra costs are incurred; concurred with louncilmembers/Commissioners Daysog and Matarrese rega… | CityCouncil/2006-07-26.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-05 | 9 | The Planner III stated the existing self-storage and RV storage facility is proposing expansion; most of the land is zoned Commercial Manufacturing Planned Development like the rest of the business park; however, the over one acre area was never rezoned ; the Planning Board approved all entitlements and recommends approval of the rezoning. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the entire amount of the addition, to which the Planner III responded five acres. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the gun range used to be located on the site, to which the Planner III responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the site is clean. The Planner III responded there was discussion of lead radiation; he could review the record. Councilmember deHaan stated the area is a gateway furthering the use of a storage yard does not improve eye appeal; he is concerned about contamination. The Planner III stated paving over lead in the dirt would contain contamination Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board addressed the matter; to which the Planner III responded the Planning Board did not discuss lead contamination, but did discuss the area as a gateway, landscaping requirements, adjacent landscaping and paths. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the property was transferred as open space with the assumption it would remain open space. Mayor Johnson responded the assumption was not that the property would remain open space; the tradeoff was that a small, not very useful open space parcel would be exchanged for $1 million that would be designated to buy open space or support more useable open space projects; the intent was always to allow commercial use. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated some of the proceeds went towards the purchase of land adjacent to Towata Park. Mayor Johnson stated the money was a proposed local match for an Estuary Park grant that the City did not receive; the City is now considering using the money to purchase the Beltline. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 5, … | CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-19 | 9 | the Table is broken down by occupancy group and by construction type and provides a cost per square foot to determine what the construction costs would be for the building; the factor is multiplied by the building square footage which gives the current building value; the retrofit trigger point would be 25% of the current building value. Mayor Johnson inquired whether current value would be market value, to which the Fire Marshal responded the value of the building would be based on replacement construction costs. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the calculation was typical for the type of ordinance. The Fire Marshal responded not all jurisdictions use the method. Mayor Johnson stated construction costs are not reflective of current value; inquired whether calculations would be based on the entire square footage of an apartment building if work was done on a portion of the building, to which the Fire Marshal responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing. Proponent (In favor of ordinance) : Kathy Moehring, WABA. Opponents (Not in favor of ordinance) : Barbara Kerr, Alameda; Steve Edringon, Rental Housing Owners of Northern Alameda County; David Kirwin, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the Hearing. Following Mr. Edrington's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired whether the intent is to bring more properties into the requirement by changing the calculation from assessed value to square footage. The Fire Marshal responded the intent is to create an even playing field for the community by having a standard threshold for retrofitting. Mayor Johnson stated a kitchen remodel could qualify. Councilmember deHaan stated the assessed value could be in the millions for recently bought properties; inquired how long the current ordinance has been in place, to which the Fire Marshal responded seven or eight years. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 19, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-03 | 9 | member of the Economic Development Commission (Banking/Finance Seat. " Adopted. The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of appointment. Mr. Bonta thanked Council for the opportunity to serve. (06-503) Public Hearing to consider Adoption of Resolution Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Revise and Streamline the Planning and Building, Public Works and Fire Departments Fee Schedules. The Building Official gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Daysog inquired when the current $125 pre-build conference fee was established. The Fire Marshal responded the fee was adjusted from $95 to $125 three years ago. Councilmember Matarrese stated he liked the idea of going to a time/cost fee versus a project evaluation fee; the office-tenant improvement fees almost doubled; he does not see a good rational for doing so; businesses might be discouraged from improving and reusing empty space; inquired why the fee almost doubled. The Building Official responded all fees were established by reviewing the various plan check and inspection components ; stated tenant improvement inspections and plan checks tend to be fairly complex. Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue comes back to the rational of reducing fees below cost recovery when a project is for the City's general benefit; doubling the fee might not be for the general benefit because of the large vacancy rate in commercial spaces. The Building Official responded the issue could be reviewed; stated public benefit discussions involved special events for non-profit groups such as sidewalk permits for homeowners, not necessarily a property owner developing property the theory was that property owners should bear the fee when performing work on their property. Councilmember Matarrese stated the logic was not used on seismic retrofit projects. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 October 3, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 9 | residential units; stated the City accepts applications and regulates development ; the proposed development is not a City project he is inclined to deny the request for a General Plan Amendment because the General Plan Amendment preserves the chance to have an Estuary Park and indicates that there are approximately three sites that would allow up to 300 dwelling units. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of denying the request for the General Plan Amendment. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Matarrese stated R-4 zoning is too high; the zoning should be R-2 to match what exists in the area; the level of development [R-2] also matches the intent of the General Plan to spread [units] across the three parcels. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there was a motion on the zoning. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how many dwelling units there would be if the 4.8 acres were rezoned to R-2 and 600 square feet was considered for open space, to which the Supervising Planner responded 80 to 100 units. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is a comparable project, to which the Supervising Planner responded the Marina Cove Project. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is a comparable open space project. The Supervising Planner stated that the Marina Cove Project is not a good example because of the private open space yards within each unit and the Project has a 1.5-acre park. Councilmember Daysog stated numbers need to be nailed down; the 4.81 acres equals 3.84 acres when streets and sidewalks, etc. are extracted; 3.84 acres translates to 167,618 square feet; 167,618 square feet divided by 2,000 is 83 units; 83 units divided by the gross acres equals 17 units per acre. The Supervising Planner stated his previous number [80 to 100 units) is wrong; the high end would be closer to 83 units the low end would be lower than 83 units. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated she is more interested in the high end, and that is the number she wants nailed down. Regular Meeting Alameda City Counci… | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-11-21 | 9 | (*06-557) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,446,282.87. ( *06-558) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the period ending June 30, 2006. Accepted. (*06-559) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Investment Report for the period ending September 30, 2006. Accepted. ( *06-560) Recommendation to execute a Five Year Contract in the amount of $200,609.04 to John Deere, Inc. for the lease of two greens mowers, two reel mowers, one tractor and five electric utility vehicles. Accepted. (*06-561) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Citywide Sewer Mains and Laterals Video Inspection, No. P.W. 10-06-21. Accepted. (*06-562) Resolution No. 14036, "Approving Parcel Map No. 8891 (2201 Harbor Bay Parkway) . " Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (06-563) Resolution No. 14037, "Appointing Margaret A. Hakanson as a Member of the Commission on Disability Issues. " Adopted; (06-563A) Resolution No. 14038, "Appointing Joy Pratt as a Member of the Housing Commission. Adopted; (06-563B) Resolution No. 14039, "Appointing Joseph S. Restagno as a Member of the Recreation and Park Commission. " Adopted; (06-563C) Resolution No. 14040, "Appointing Jonathan D. Soglin as a Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board. Adopted; (06-563D) Resolution No. 14041, "Appointing Srikant Subramaniam as a Member of the Transportation Commission. Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath to Markaret A. Hakanson, Joy Pratt, Jonathan D. Soglin and Arikant Subramaniam and presented certificates of appointment. (06-564) Recommendation to appropriate $107,200 in Measure B Paratransit Funds to renew the Holiday Shuttle and purchase Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 November 21, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 9 | The Finance and Administration Division Manager responded the referenced area is Hornet Field. Councilmember Daysog moved passage of the urgency ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated the area is not just a strip of asphalt along the Bay but is an empty half a million-dollar park development. Councilmember Daysog stated the project was one of the first he worked on outside of City Council; tremendous strides have been made with the East Bay Regional Park District. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. *** Mayor Johnson called a recess at 9:13 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 1:07 a.m. *** ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (06-595 ) Jean Sweeney stated she called CalTrans to see if the City would be able to adopt Webster Street; CalTrans advised her that Kiwanis adopted the land; Kiwanis advised her that probably the Webster Street Tube and entrance would be cleaned up; she did not follow up on the matter. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS ( 06 - 596 ) louncilmember Matarrese stated it has been a pleasure serving with ouncilmember Daysog; noted he first met Councilmember Daysog on the Economic Development Commission ten years ago. Councilmember Daysog stated it has been a pleasure working with the past and present Council. Vice Mayor Gilmore thanked Councilmember Daysog for his dedication. Mayor Johnson stated Council will miss having Councilmember Daysog on the Council; Councilmember Daysog's historical prospective is appreciated. Councilmember Daysog has seen the City go through many trying times. Councilmember Daysog stated times were tough when he first got involved in 1994; people were selling homes below value because the Naval Air Station was closing and the economy was not great. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 December 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 9 | she is very confident that all of the 2003 Planning Board conditions will be met and adhered to in the future. Councilmember Gilmore inquired when an overall shopping center design would be presented to the Planning Board. Randy Kyte, Harsch Investment, responded the design theme is complete; stated some buildings are yet to be designed; the Mervyns lease is up in 2008; building upgrades would be a condition for renewal entry configurations and tower elements are not known at this point; the Planning Board did not deny the application; Harsch did not feel thee same group of people reviewed the responses the project's urgency is what has driven the need to get major tenants lined up for approval ; no Eucalyptus trees have been planted; the east/west sidewalk condition called for ten-foot drive lanes and a four-foot sidewalk; said configurations would require cars to turn out of drive isles in a less than sufficient turning radius and prompted the north/south orientation of multiple sidewalks; a commitment has been made to revisit the issue; a review is being done to see what portions of the sidewalk can be installed now and what portions cannot; Building 300 and Building 500 design review is what is being requested this evening. Mayor Johnson inquired why there is a time issue. Mr. Kyte responded the timing issue has to do with the leases; stated the leases are for a very specific timeframe; construction should have started three or four weeks ago to hit one of the opening periods in the fall; schedules have been reviewed to see if extra shifts could be worked; there are time limitations; approval is imperative in order not to push the stores into 2008 at which time tenants would have a right to walk away. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board offered to have a special meeting to make sure all members were in attendance, to which Mr. Kyte responded not in his presence. Councilmember deHaan stated that he understood that the Planning Board was willing to meet before Christmas. The Planner III sta… | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-16 | 9 | used at Bridgeside; staff needs to review material consistency; inquired whether common areas are part of 2,000 square-foot lots, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the project is contrary to Measure A. The Supervising Planner responded the project is consistent with Measure A, the City Charter, and the General Plan; stated every parcel is at least 2,000 square feet; all forty parcels have some form of public access easement; the overall project is well within Measure A density requirements. Councilmember deHaan stated the project is breaking new ground. The Supervising Planner stated the project design is intended to maximize public open space; the tradeoff is smaller lots. Councilmember deHaan stated the paseos work because of lot configurations but is not something he would highly recommend. The Supervising Planner stated the project provides an opportunity to try a small lot subdivision; the project was completely redesigned after the Planning Board study sessions. Councilmember deHaan inquired why palm trees are planned for Hibbard Street instead of full trees. The Supervising Planner responded palm trees need to be removed; stated the plan is to reuse the trees and align Hibbard Street to eventually come through the Pennzoil site and connect with the Marina Cove development. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the plan for the rest of the street. The Supervising Planner stated the trees can be extended down Hibbard Street; a decision would need to be made about whether or not to continue the palm trees to the Pennzoil site. Councilmember deHaan stated past Planning Board discussions have addressed palm trees not providing enough shade; he would prefer not to have palm trees. Councilmember Gilmore stated she would like to have staff review how the houses front Grand Street; staff and the Applicant should ensure the design is detailed, not bland. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-06 | 9 | Commission's decision to install new bus stops on Otis Drive at Pond Isle, and authorization to install new bus stops at Otis Drive and Sandcreek Way, and Otis Drive and Willow Street. Continued to March 6, 2007. (07-059 - ) Recommendation to accept comprehensive Sidewalk Repair Program and adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 repair of Portland Cement Concrete sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway and minor street patching, No. P. W. 08-06-18. The Associate Civil Engineer provided a Power Point Presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired who filled in the areas around the Shoreline Drive trees with concrete, to which the Associate Civil Engineer responded that he was not sure. Mayor Johnson suggested looking into an ordinance that would prevent homeowners from filling in the area around trees. The Associate Civil Engineer stated staff would look into the matter. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether staff is proactively encouraging homeowners to use drought tolerant plants; further inquired whether drought tolerate trees are being considered for the Master Tree Plan. The Associate Civil Engineer responded information could be provided to homeowners through the City's website or leaflets. Vice Mayor Tam stated an ordinance would be better. Councilmember deHaan stated the Bayport planting strips are very small; trees are very aggressive; sidewalks are being replaced every five to ten years; inquired whether repair would be less often if the staff recommendations are followed. The Associate Civil Engineer responded repair should be less often; stated branch trimming has not been done in the last few years but would be incorporated into the Master Tree Plan. Councilmember deHaan stated many deteriorated sidewalks are not the result of tree issues; inquired whether the matter has been reviewed. The Associate Civil Engineer responded concrete will deteriorate in eighty years; stated the homeowner is responsible for repairing the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 February 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-20 | 9 | (*07-087) Ordinance No. 2963, "Repeal the Existing Time Limit for Incurring Debt in the Business and Waterfront Improvement Project. " Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (07-088) Resolution No. 14072, "Appointing Walter Schlueter as a member of the Housing Commission. Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented a certificate of appointment to Mr. Walter Schlueter. Mr. Schlueter stated that he looks forward to serving on the Housing Commission. (07-089) Public Hearing to consider Parcel Map No. 9286, (1900, 1910, 1920, 1930, 1950, 1960, and 1980 North Loop Road) to merge six existing parcels into five parcels with each parcel accommodating new flexible use building (warehouse, distribution, light manufacturing and administrative office) The site is located within the Harbor Bay Business Park in the C-M-PD, Commercial Manufacturing, Planned Development Zoning District; and (07-089A) Resolution No. 14073, "Approving Parcel Map 9286 (TM 06- 0005) for the Purpose of Establishing Five Commercial Lots Located at 1900-1980 North Loop Road. Adopted. The Planning and Building Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese stated good progress has been made; he looks forward to having commercial, non-retail development since the Quarterly Sales Tax report shows a decrease in business-to-business taxes. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the area is parceled out. The Planning and Building Director responded the Ferry Terminal area is still undeveloped. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 February 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-03-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-03-06 | 9 | stop; he recommends that the matter go back to the Transportation Commission to review Otis Drive alternatives other than Pond Isle or Sandcreek Way and rerouting the 63-line back down to Shoreline Drive as the preferred alternative. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she is not in favor of putting a bus stop at Pond Isle because it might not be the correct way to route the bus; a major distraction would occur by putting a bus stop with a crosswalk at Pond Isle because people look ahead to the Lum School crosswalk; the City has a Transit Plan that encourages ridership; the City demanded that a Transit Plan be in place for the Alameda Point and Alameda Landing development on day one the number one complaint is traffic and congestion which can be reduced by having more conveniently located public transit; the City has to be proactive in working on the Transit Plan; she is not ready to recommend putting bus stops on Otis Drive tonight; the City needs to work with AC Transit; the process is not driven by citizen requests. Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Councilmember Gilmore; stated traffic congestion is the number one complaint; buses are the best way to eliminate the continual use of single occupancy vehicles; tonight is not the night to decide on bus stop locations too many questions are unanswered; he does not want a bus stop at Sandcreek Way and Otis Drive; he recommends that the matter go back to the Transportation Commission and staff work with AC Transit on finding an alternative stop on Otis Drive or a reroute that would help pick up ridership as well as mitigate the issue that has occurred between Sandcreek Way and Willow Street and Whitehall Place. Mayor Johnson stated cars are a hazard around schools, not bus drivers; traffic is a big concern; traffic problems are not solved by taking out bus stops; concurred that options need to be reviewed; people will complain regardless of where bus stops are placed; the matter should go back to the Transportation Commission. Vice Mayor Tam stated transit option… | CityCouncil/2007-03-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-03-20 | 9 | The Interim Golf Manager gave a brief presentation. Bob Wood, Golf Commission Chair, gave a brief report. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the new fee schedule is in the middle of the pack; inquired how the golf course compares in terms of condition and age. Mr. Wood responded the golf course is an older course stated the Earl Fry Course will celebrate its 80th anniversary in May i course conditions vary with seasons; drainage is a problem; recycled water is used, which results in salt buildup; traditionally fees have been low. Vice Mayor Tam stated the proposed weekend rates are $40/$36; inquired whether other golf courses have made significant improvements and how the higher fees are warranted. Mr. Wood responded Metropolitan Golf Course is completely rebuilt; stated Monarch Bay had a complete upgrade five or six years agoi Harding Park has been completely rebuilt; expensive improvements need to be recouped through fees. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the golf courses are City run. Mr. Wood responded Metropolitan Golf Course is owned by the City of Oakland; stated Monarch Bay is owned by the City of San Leandro; Harding Park is owned by the City of San Francisco. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the golf courses are operated by outside professionals, to which Mr. Wood responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Metropolitan and Monarch Bay are privately operated, but Harding Park is operated by the City of San Francisco. Mr. Wood responded he would be surprised if Harding Park was operated by the City of San Francisco. Mayor Johnson called the speakers. Jon Hasegawa, Alameda, stated he opposes any fee increase. Robb Ratto, Alameda, stated Friday rates should be weekday rates ; encouraged marketing and maintenance. George Humphreys, Chuck Corica Senior Golf Club, stated setting a Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 March 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-04-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-04-03 | 9 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether the matter is on a fast timeframe. The City Manager responded that there would be a [State] budget revision in May Mayor Johnson requested that Council be consider a resolution at the next meeting. (07-164) Mayor Johnson requested a status report on Mount Trashmore; stated methane pipes are still present. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he received information from the Public works Director on the matter; venting is needed for ten to fifteen more years. (07-165 - ) Councilmember Gilmore stated Public Works provided a report outlining ways to make the Webster Tube crossing easier for bicyclists; requested an update on whether the space between the Tube is a feasible option. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 April 3, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-04-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-04-17 | 9 | boat is not sitting low in the water; sailboats are never sitting low in the water and do not create a wake. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese requested an evaluation report after six months of patrol. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion with the caveat that an activity briefing be provided. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (07-181) Recommendation to receive the Report "EveryOne Home, the Alameda Countywide Homelessness and Special Needs Housing Plan. Mayor Johnson stated that the City has a long history of supporting homeless services, starting with the creation of the Homeless Task Force and the Midway Shelter back in the late 1980' s; the City has also funded other homeless prevention or safety-net service programs through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, including the Alameda Red Cross ACCESS Program, the Alameda Food Bank, Domestic Violence Counseling programs, and Housing Counseling services; the City has funded and supported the creation of supportive housing projects, including the Alameda Point Collaborative units, the Housing Job Linkage program, and the 52 and 39 unit rental housing units; the City has long supported the efforts of the Alameda County Continuum of Care Homeless Council and other efforts to confront homelessness at a regional level in addition to participating in the development of the EveryOne Home Plan; the City would like to affirm its support for regional efforts to combat homelessness through the Alameda Countywide Homeless and Special Needs Housing Plan. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager introduced Linda Gardner, Director of Alameda County Housing and Community Development. Ms. Gardner provided a brief Power Point presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired what is the definition of homelessness for the Everyone Home Plan. Ms. Gardener responded a community-based and Housing and Urban Development (HUD) definition was used; the HUD de… | CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-05-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-05-01 | 9 | Appeal being filed and then the Appellant dropped the Appeal ; further stated both a Call for Review and an Appeal were requested and should be processed as one item; discussion of the process should be placed on an agenda to ensure the process is clear; just because an Appeal has been filed does not mean the Call for Review should be dropped because the Appeal could be dropped and the matter would not move forward. ( (07-212) Councilmember Gilmore stated that a resident informed her that the Alameda Town Centre bottle recycling center has been removed; inquired whether Harbor Bay had a recycling center. Councilmember deHaan responded in the affirmative stated retailers should be obligated to set up a recycling center if there is a high glass and plastic bottle usage. Mayor Johnson stated Marina Village used to have a recycling center. Councilmember deHaan stated the Alameda Towne Center recycling center is not a nice facility but is a necessity. The City Manager inquired whether information on alternative recycling centers is being requested, to which Councilmember Gilmore responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated adequate recycling facilities are needed. Councilmember Gilmore stated the resident informed her that Harsch Development did not shut down the recycling center; the entity that runs the recycling center was downsizing. ( 07-213 ) Councilmember Gilmore stated Buena Vista Avenue between Constitution Way and Grand Street needs crack sealing. (07-214) Vice Mayor Tam stated she attended the East Bay Division of the League of California Cities dinner meeting a couple of weeks ago; Lisa Vorderbrueggen, Contra Costa Times Political Reporter, was the key speaker and gave prognostications on some emerging legislation and initiatives. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 May 1, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-05-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-05-15 | 9 | independent; having the discussion is timely and must be done. Vice Mayor Tam stated the formation of a committee to plan a public forum has raised the concern that there may be a group that is headed in the direction of amending Measure A; Measure A permeates through the City's land use planning and affects the quality of life as it pertains to dealing with traffic through the Tube, saving open space, and public transit ridership; both sides agreed that institutional knowledge could be conveyed through a public forum that is fair, honest, balanced, realistic and helps define the future, particularly with the Alameda Point development; there is a concern that the committee may not be able to fulfill some of the expectations of the fair, open, transparent debate; therefore, she suggests that the committee be expanded to include three members from the seven Appellants. Councilmember Gilmore thanked the members of the public for participating in the discussion; stated people mentioned that Measure A came to be when there was concern about a large development at one end of town and people were worried about what the density and traffic would do to the rest of the town; now, there will be another very large development at one end of town; the City is facing a situation very similar to the situation that spawned Measure A and there is a lot of discussion about the pros and cons of Measure A; concerns raised at the Planning Board meeting were legitimate; including Appellants on the committee is a good idea; that she was going to suggest that the structure formed by the committee return to the Planning Board for full debate; the committee might come up with a structure that does not include any Planning Board members; a method might be to choose members of the public. Mayor Johnson stated there is a perception that the City is advocating ; having no members of the Planning Board might be good the Council appoints other committees that do not involve members of boards, commissions or Council. Councilmember Gilmore stated … | CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-05 | 9 | expenses would be reduced with the new Cummins engines the engines would be under warranty. Councilmember deHaan stated Harbor Bay Business Park requested a reduction also. The Ferry Manager stated the Harbor Bay Business Park contribution is not noted in the Tables because the contribution is not part of the public funding. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Harbor Bay Business Park would be requesting a reduction, to which the Ferry Manager responded that he did not know. Councilmember deHaan stated that Oakland benefits from having the ferry service. The Ferry Manager stated Oakland contributes 53% of the ridership the riders pay the walk-on rate. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Oakland's share has increased over the years. The Ferry Manager responded he does not recall whether the level has fallen below 50 - 50. Councilmember deHaan stated the Port of Oakland seems to be defaulting on the agreement ; every year another five percent reduction is requested; inquired what would happen if the reduction were not accepted. The Ferry Manager stated that he will be meeting with the Port of Oakland Commercial Real Estate Committee tomorrow to discuss the proposal he can pursue the issue if Council requests. The Public Works Director stated staff has negotiated hard with the Port of Oakland; the City relies heavily on passengers paying full fare at Oakland; staff is requesting a 25 cent fare increase for riders who buy a ticket book; a 50 cent fare increase is requested for excursion riders. Councilmember deHaan inquired what type of legal position the City would be in if the reduction was not accepted. The Public Works Director responded the City has a year-to-year agreement; requested that Council approve the fare increase; stated staff can negotiate with the Port of Oakland to see whether the contribution could be increased. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 June 5, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-19 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -JUNE 19, 2007- 7:25 - P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Annual Meeting at 7:38 p.m. Commissioner Tam led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (07-020) Update on the Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project. The Redevelopment Manager gave a brief presentation. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the project was on budget, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. Commissioner deHaan inquired what is the total budget for the arts portion of the project. The Redevelopment Manager responded the Development Agreement states that the restoration budget would meet the overall Public Arts requirement, which is close to $2 million; stated a budget is being developed for the panels and would come to Council in July; the range is approximately $15,000 to $20,000 and includes panel reproduction, design fees, and installation. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether staff had the opportunity to discuss light efficiencies with Alameda Power and Telecom (AP&T) . The Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative; stated staff would discuss the issue with AP&T before July. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the concession partition was discussed. The Redevelopment Manager responded staff discussed the matter with the preservation architect; stated concession visibility is important from the developer's standpoint; food and beverage revenues comprise approximately 50% of the project revenue; a blocked area would not be economically feasible; staff is working with the developer on color schemes the State Historic Preservation Officer reviewed the drawings, including the Annual Meeting Community Improvement Commission 1 June 19, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-03 | 9 | Vice Mayor Tam moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Bill Smith, Alameda, stated that he has been interested in the property for the last few years. Mayor Johnson stated that possible development was considered for the remaining parcel; the remaining parcel is not part of the lease; the City is not aware of any development of the parcel at this point. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-322A) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Approving Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessments, Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, Zones 2 and 3. Not adopted. The Assistant City Attorney stated the ballots have been tabulated; Zones 2 and 3 failed; a vote is not needed for the resolution. Mayor Johnson inquired currently how much WABA pays. The Public Works Coordinator responded approximately $35,000 per year; stated one district pays approximately $18,000, the other pays approximately $16,000; stated there was a majority protest of the votes returned. Mayor Johnson inquired when was the last time the amount was raised, to which the Public Works Coordinator responded 1992. Mayor Johnson stated the streetscaping requires more maintenance; property owners have benefited from the streetscaping hopefully, the property owners will recognize the need to contribute. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether another plan is in place to protect the City's investment; stated he wants to make sure that there is not a gap that would cause the streetscape to deteriorate and lose value. The Assistant City Attorney stated thirty-six ballots were mailed to each zone; eleven ballots were returned from Zone 2; fifteen ballots were returned from Zone 3. Mayor Johnson stated the vote is weighted; she is disappointed that Webster Street property owners were not willing to increase Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council July 3, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-17 | 9 | three amendments outlined by the Planning Services Manager regarding parking, height limits, and uses along the truck routes, which would be placed in the guiding policy or appropriate sections that apply to the entire Northern Waterfront, not specific projects. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Gilmore requested that Work/Live parking regulations and general parking regulations be brought back to Council for discussion. The Planning Service Manager stated staff is working on commercial parking requirements with the Development Services Department; the matter is scheduled to come to the Planning Board the first meeting of September and would then come to Council. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the Rolling Ten rule would be addressed. The Planning Services Manager responded the Rolling Ten analysis would be addressed when the commercial parking recommendations are presented to the Planning Board. Mayor Johnson stated caution must be taken when addressing policy for the downtown areas; changes do not have to be made everywhere; downtown and other appropriate areas could be excluded. Councilmember deHaan stated that he hopes that opportunities would be available to discuss shuttle services as larger developments come forward; hopefully, the Transportation Commission would start working on the issue. (07-347) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14137, "Authorizing the Collection of Delinquent Integrated Waste Management Accounts by Means of the Property Tax Bills. Adopted. Councilmember Gilmore stated a letter was received from a lady who could not attend the Council meeting due to medical reasons; inquired whether the lady would be exempt. Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council July 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-07 | 9 | Councilmember deHaan inquired whether one of the mitigating factors was to signal the intersection. The Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative; stated a traffic signal would be installed at the Trader Joe's driveway into the shopping center; the exit would be right turn only from the gas station onto Otis Drive; a mitigation measure requires monitoring of traffic flow for three to five years; the Applicant would need to turn traffic into a one-way flow through the gas station from the shopping center and back out to Otis Drive if there is a problem with cars backing out into Otis Drive and interfering with traffic; Omni Means felt that the driveway would flow fine without vehicles cueing out into Otis Drive. Councilmember deHaan inquired what would be the cost for a signal at the intersection, to which the Supervising Planner responded approximately $300,000 to $350,000. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Safeway would be contributing to the funding. The Supervising Planner responded Safeway's contribution would be based on the pro-rated share of traffic going through the intersection; stated the amount would depend on build out. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether said contribution is in the agreement. The Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the pro rated contribution is approximately 10% of the total trips at the intersection. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the rest [of the funding] would be contributed by the shopping center. The Supervising Planner responded the shopping center is not required to contribute anything at this point; stated Safeway would contribute to the traffic signal cost if expansion is approved. *** Vice Mayor Tam left the dais at 9:02 p.m. and returned at 9:04 p. m. Mayor Johnson inquired whether allocations were set. The Supervising Planner responded a new traffic signal was required Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council August 7, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-21 | 9 | to change the course. On the call of the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07 -406 - ) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of a Planning Board denial of Use Permit UP06-0010 to extend the hours of operation for fuel sales at the Alameda Valero Gas Station located at 1310 Central Avenue within the R-4 Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Appellant: L. Zektser and N. Saidian. The Planner III gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Use Permit was for the auto repair; inquired whether the need for the Use Permit would go away if the auto repair goes away. The Planning Services Manager responded the Use Permit was for auto repair and restrictions on hours of operation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents ( In favor or Appeal) : Del Blaylock, Alameda; Albert Vierra, San Leandro; Hadi Monsef, Alameda Susan Battaglia, Alameda; Charles Dempsy, Alameda; Karen Green, Alameda; Leslie Fishbach, Alameda; David Bringman, Pastor of Trinity Lutheran Church; Martin Collins, Trinity Lutheran Church; Eric Scheuermann, Alameda; Joseph Zadick, Appellent (submitted handout) ; Allen Michaan, Alameda. Opponents (Not in favor of appeal) : Philip Gravem, Alameda; Tim Underwood, Alameda; Gordon Newell, Alameda; Patricia Kinzel, Alameda; Mariusz Krubnik, Alameda; Donna Gravem, Alameda; Dorota Krubnik, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Mayor Johnson requested that staff review the timing of the signals at the intersection; stated the requested hours are reasonable; the owners are offering to close the repair shop on Saturdays the trade is reasonable; parking is made available to people on Sundays; the gas station has a service component which was lost with the closing of the Weber Chevron gas station on Otis Drive. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she recalls a discussion regarding Public Works and CalTrans working together with Franklin Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council August 21, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-04 | 9 | from the Coral Reef Hotel on Park Street for a long period of time police officers patrolled the area and trucks no longer park at the site. Councilmember Matarrese stated an immediate public health issue exists; there are indications that people are staying over night without facilities; requested that exact locations be provided and that the Police Department investigate the matter. The City Manager requested that Mr. Neal provide the Deputy City Manager with the exact location. Mayor Johnson stated that trucks idle for hours in West Oakland. Mr. Neal stated traffic should be controlled at certain times when there are other demands on the roads. Councilmember deHaan stated Encinal Terminals is in the process of changing entitlements. (07 7-430 - ) David Howard, Alameda, stated California cities are setting up reciprocal sales tax agreements with neighboring cities; suggested reviewing the matter; stated retail will not solve all sales tax problems encouraged the Council to look at business to business opportunities. (07-431) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed housing. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (07-432) Report on City Priority-Setting Project. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-11 | 9 | City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop - September 11, 2007 Objective 4: Draft: Develop or update and implement land use, transportation, and environment sustainability planning strategies, tools, and documents. Modification: Develop or update and implement land use, transportation/traffic, and environment sustainability planning strategies, tools, and documents. Objective 5: Draft: Provide quality youth and senior programs and services. Modification: Provide quality youth and senior programs, services, and facilities. Objective 6: Draft: Recruit, retain, and develop a skilled and responsive workforce. Council Comments: Include in the work plan tasks related to educating the community about City jobs and career opportunities in order to develop a local workforce. Objective 7: Draft: Continuously improve internal operations and systems. Council Comments: Communications with the public, customer service, and user- friendliness are important; improving and updating systems for communicating with the public; delivering services with the customer/residents in mind Modification: Continuously improve internal operations, systems, and management practices in order to provide high-quality customer service. Mission In addition, during the discussions, an overarching objective was suggested pertaining to "enhancing and promoting the qualify of life for the community." For a City government, all of the objectives stated above are methods of achieving that overarching statement, which could be considered the mission of the City. A suggestion would be to create a mission statement that provides the context for the Citywide objectives. A draft mission statement, intended as a starting point for discussion with the Council and Executive Management Team at the November workshop, could be the following: The City of Alameda focuses its workforce and resources on providing services that enhance the quality of life for its residents and promote the prosperity of its business community. Management Partners, Inc. 5 | CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-18 | 9 | (07-456A) Resolution No. 14146, "Approving General Plan Amendment (GPA07-0003 to Amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram to Change the Designation of Approximately 10.77 Acres Located North of Singleton and Mosley Avenues at 201 Mosley Avenue, from Medium Density Residential to Parks and Public Open Space. Adopted; and (07-456B) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Approximately 10.77 Acres Located North of Singleton and Mosley Avenues at 201 Mosley Avenue, from R-4-G, Neighborhood Residential (Special Government) to Open Space Zoning Designation. Introduced. The Planner III gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing. Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed housing. There being no further speakers, Major Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Matarrese stated that rezoning is a great move to protect the park; he hopes that the same can be done to protect open space areas at the former Base. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution and introduction of ordinance. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated that the site has been a park for a long time; the park is one of the more recently renovated parks in Alameda and will be a major asset; the site has two soccer fields, a baseball field, and basketball courts. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (07-457) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed mold. (07-458) Stevon Schwartz, Alameda, suggested making the nine-hole golf course an eighteen-hole putting course. Mayor Johnson suggested that Mr. Schwartz attend the Golf Commission meeting tomorrow night. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 18, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-02 | 9 | Mayor Johnson stated the City and WTA were following the legislation very closely; a lot of late changes were made. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he attended a meeting that presented some dramatic scenarios on what would happen when the big one hits the Bay Area; he is surprised that the legislation happened so quicklyi WTA came to the City a year agoi serious momentum is behind the legislation; the City needs to ensure that 1) current service is not lost, 2) Alameda receives the benefit of having the boats, 3) the Mayor is on the [WETA] Board, and 4) the City is reimbursed for any money that the City could have invested in infrastructure other than the ferry. Vice Mayor Tam stated that there is a presumption that SB976 is a foregone conclusion; the Bill requires workshops be scheduled to inform and educate the community regarding the transition plan; she is unclear on whether there are any opportunities to include amendments before the Governor signs the Bill. The City Manager stated that the City has the opportunity to be involved with cleanup legislation. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether there are any commitments from the Senators or Legislature to sponsor the cleanup legislation. Mayor Johnson responded that the legislation has so many loose ends and cannot move forward without cleanup legislation; inquired whether discussions will begin in January. The Deputy City Manager responded the Legislature will reconvene in December to conduct housekeeping business; stated the real work will start in January; Senator Perata's staff discussed the need for cleanup legislation; there is not an opportunity to make changes to SB976; amendment opportunities will come up in the next Legislative session. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Governor either has to sign, not sign, or veto the bill; inquired whether there is any sense of which way the Governor is leaning. The Deputy City Manager responded in the negative; stated a lot of Republicans voted no on the Bill; the Department of Finance will recommend a no vote since… | CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-16 | 9 | Fuente's efforts. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the City could contact another agency regarding environmental review rather than piggybacking on Oakland's coattails since railroads are governed by federal law. The City Engineer responded the Surface Transportation Board (STB) handles environmental reviews; the question is whether a change on a spur line is under STP's jurisdiction anymore. Councilmember Gilmore stated coordinating with Oakland is good but she does not like the idea of leaving the City's fate in another city's hands. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council requested that the City Attorney's office review the issue initially; requested a report on the matter. The City Attorney stated she would provide a report in Closed Session. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is happy the City of Alameda is working with the City of Oakland; the City has not been as active as it should have been on some other projects. Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (07-507) Dave Needle, Fernside Home Owners Association/CLASS Board Member; submitted handout; stated that he is disappointed in Council's actions regarding the Harbor Bay Isle Association settlement agreement Council was fully aware of the significant community interest in the development; Council pushed through a quick, barely legally noticeable settlement meeting. (07-508) David Howard, Alameda; provided handout ; stated KitchenDemocracy.org announced its expansion into Alameda with a forum on the question of whether development plans for Alameda Point should be decided exclusively by Alameda residents and politicians; residents and politicians are invited to learn about and provide feedback on the controversial issue by going to www.kitchendemocracy.org ; Kitchen Democracy is intended to augment the traditional ways that residents and elected officials interact; Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 October 16, … | CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-06 | 9 | Park Street Business District; parking would not be in demand if said district was not successful; the Park Street District is generating an income stream to help with the parking issues; the same logic would apply in the event that the Webster Street District faced the same parking demands in the future. Mayor Johnson suggested separating out the issue and considering what to do with the revenue at a later point if Council agrees to move forward with the suggested changes in the meter fees. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she feels that business owners supported the increase because the revenue would go back into the District; PSBA needs to be advised if this is not the case. Mayor Johnson stated the meter rates should be changed even if PSBA said that the meter rates should not be changed. Mr. Ratto stated PSBA was told about the incremental revenue being kept in the Park Street District; he speculates that the vote would not have been 7 to 2 if said issue was not the plan; however, the PSBA Board probably still would have approved the plan. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he is curious to know what the parking study shows in final form; rates have not been raised since 1994; parking space costs and meter maintenance have not gone down; inquired whether anyone looked into the possibility of raising the rate across the City and keeping the garage the same; raising rates versus revenue spending are separate issues. Councilmember deHaan stated that everyone agrees that rates need to be raised because of comparisons with other cities; he feels that rates should be raised across the board. Councilmember Matarrese suggested reviewing the parking study to see if the study examines raising the rates across the City; decoupling the increase from the expenditure is a good idea because the City already has an ordinance that addresses how parking meter revenue is expended. The Development Services Director stated that the preliminary work done by WSA talks about demand areas; other areas throughout the City do not ha… | CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-13.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-13 | 9 | City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop - November 13, 2007 City Manager needs to clarify or provide input if what is involved to fulfill a request is more than was expected or is not feasible (i.e., cruise line research too many hours of work, impacting other priorities). Give Council the information needed to make an informed decision about whether the request is important enough to pursue. Use the "reasonableness test." Staff asks that the Council be clear about the direction; staff does not feel comfortable asking if all other Councilmembers are interested in pursuing something (seems disrespectful), and assume if a Council member requested it then staff must do it. This is the reason for a need for a clear procedure so everyone understands the request and what is involved. New Council Referral Process A consensus of all 5 council members resulted in the following process: 1. Apply "One Hour" Rule, but expand the timeframe to a few hours (does not refer to constituent complaints or routine operations; only special requests) 2. Use Fremont Model of "Council Referrals." Councilmembers agendize information requests or new assignments for Council consideration and staff inform as to what will be involved in responding and impacts on other work. 3. If changes in priorities or information requests come out at Council meetings, Council will give specific direction to staff, and staff will seek clarification when needed, as well as providing information on impacts. 4. If no clear direction is given, then it's not direction from the Council. Clarify direction at end of an item-with consensus (through the City Clerk) 5. If more time is needed, the item has to go back to Council for direction: Use the Council referral process (agendize) Requests first go through City Manager or Assistant City Manager Issue Bin During the course of the workshop, various items were raised to be handled at another time and place. Those items were: Would like to have a 2nd discussion of priorities - will be placed on a Council … | CityCouncil/2007-11-13.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-20 | 9 | The Police Chief responded three years; maintenance costs could be offset by other grants in three years. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether other departments have evaluated and bought into the system. The Police Chief responded Alameda County and the City of Oakland have bought the system; the court system has signed off that the system meets their specifications and requirements. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( (*07-550) Ordinance No. 2975, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) by Repealing Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) in Its Entirety and Adding a New Article I (Uniform Codes Relating to Building, Housing and Technical Codes) to Adopt the 2007 California Building Code, the 2007 California Historical Building Code, the 2007 California Electrical Code, the 2007 California Plumbing Code, the 2007 California Mechanical Code, the 2007 California Energy Code, the 1997 Uniform Housing Code, and the 1997 Edition of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, and by Amending Chapter XV (Fire Prevention) by Repealing Section 15-1 in Its Entirety and by Adding a New Section 15-1 to Adopt the 2007 California Fire Code. Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (07-551) Recommendation to accept the improvements and release the Subdivision Bond for Tract 7170 (Marina Cove) subject to receiving a Maintenance Bond for improvements and landscaping and authorize the City Manager to execute an Amendment to the Annual Landscape Maintenance Contract in the amount of $24,000 to maintain the parking strip within the Marina Cove development. The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Maintenance Assessment District amount can be adjusted to cover the actual maintenance costs. The Public Works Director responded Council adopts a budget each year; stated the amount is adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase. Councilmember… | CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 9 | vote; requested the record be reviewed. The City Attorney stated there can be a vote if the matter is placed on the agenda. Councilmember deHaan stated the matter was raised by the public. Mayor Johnson stated that the matter was on the agenda. The City Manager stated a title was placed on the agenda under Council Communications; Council Referral would be the proper place for such an item. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how one Councilmember directing the City Manager to place an item on an agenda tests against the Charter's provision that the Council provides direction to the City Manager. The City Attorney stated under the Charter, the City Manager is responsible for operations and implementing the policy decisions of the majority of Council: a majority of Council is required to direct the City Manager to take an implementing action or to implement anything within the realm of operations. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether that includes putting the agenda together. The City Attorney responded putting the agenda together is part of operations; the City Manager controls the agenda. Mayor Johnson inquired whether one Councilmember directing a matter be placed on the agenda is a Charter violation. The City Attorney responded making a request is not a Charter violation; it is up to the City Manager to put something on the agenda if she determines that it is an operational matter that comes under her authority under the Charter; it does not matter that one Councilmember may have suggested it; however, no Councilmember individually has the authority to direct the City Manager to do a certain thing a certain way if it is under operations; a cleaner way is to try to find a way to seek consensus. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she cannot recall a Councilmember raising something under Council Communications that he or she wanted placed on the agenda and there not being a consensus or that the matter did not come up later as an agenda item; Councilmembers are very generous with each other and pretty much put eve… | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-18 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -DECEMBER 18, 2007 -6:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:15 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-580) Public Employee Performance Evaluation (54957) ; Title: City Attorney Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council met with the City Attorney for the annual performance evaluation. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 18, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-02 | 9 | dwindle; the fund needs to be preserved to every extent possible. Councilmember Gilmore inquired what would be the timeframe for an RFP, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded nine months to a year. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether Council would have approximately nine months to explore other options if a two-track approach was considered, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how much an RFP would cost, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded approximately $15,000 to $20,000 according to the NGF . Councilmember Gilmore inquired how much a Master Plan would cost. The Recreation and Park Director responded a Master Plan was investigated for the Recreation and Park Department four years ago; stated the cost was approximately $50,000 to $100,000. Councilmember deHaan stated an RFP would be a learning process and would help set priorities inquired when the PILOT was put into place, to which the Recreation and Park Director responded approximately three years ago. Councilmember deHaan inquired when the ROI was put into place, to which the City Manager responded the ROI was implemented in 2004 and was reduced during the budget process. Councilmember deHaan stated additional burdens were placed on the PILOT and ROI within the last couple of years in order to balance some budget shortfalls within the General Fund. The City Manager clarified that the PILOT has been in place since 1993. Councilmember deHaan stated that the issue should be brought back into proper context i cost allocation is a percentage of operation and support; an expert would be needed to oversee a contract if the Golf Course was leased. Mayor Johnson stated Golf Course administrative expenses have increased substantially over the last ten years because of added positions the matter needs to be reviewed; a bloated bureaucracy is being funded at the Golf Course. Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council January 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-15 | 9 | applied across the board; requested that HAB review and tighten up standards the structure does not qualify as a historical structure based upon the finding and pictorial evidence. Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution allowing the Applicant to proceed with demolition. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Matarrese directed the Applicant and staff to go through the guidelines so that Council would not need to hear a design review appeal. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-029) Recommendation to accept report on the Government Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45 on accounting for other post employment benefits. John Bartel with Bartel Associates, LLC gave a Power Point presentation. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not understand why numbers are presented when CalPERS will not project out more than two years. Mr. Bartel stated that an actuarial evaluation requires that he make a best guess on healthcare costs. Mayor Johnson stated that 7.75% does not seem like a realistic number. Mr. Bartel inquired whether the percentage seems too high, to which Mayor Johnson responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired what the return has been over the last ten years, to which Mr. Bartel responded 9%. Mayor Johnson inquired what the returns have been over the last three years. Mr. Bartel responded 12% to 13%; stated returns were 18% at the end of 2007. the short history is extremely good; the 7.75% is treated with conservatism; he believes 7.75% is an appropriate assumption. Mayor Johnson stated that everyone hopes that the federal government will do something about medical inflation; inquired what Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-05 | 9 | The Deputy City Manager stated the General Principles allow expansion of the document and state that local control and protection of local revenue is important. Mayor Johnson suggested that issues be placed under Council Communications if a Councilmember needs to add an item; cities need to advocate and take positions on State and federal issues. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Program is excellent; periodic updates are important; the School District crisis demands a place on the list; the Governor's current budget addresses suspending Proposition 98; the health of the School District is imperative to the health of the City; the funding stream needs to be maintained; requested that a resolution requesting the Governor to remove the matter from the budget be placed on the next City Council agenda. Councilmember deHaan stated that items the City has taken a position on should be highlighted; he does not want to take any power away from the Mayor many times issues need to be responded to immediately. Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember deHaan. Councilmember deHaan stated the City has not made a strong stand on some of the items. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Councilmember deHaan was referring to a particular item. Councilmember deHaan responded E C-commerce and Spay/Neuter Laws. Councilmember Gilmore stated Proposition 1A did not provide protection for redevelopment money; she would like Council to take a strong stance on the matter. The Deputy City Manager stated the League of California Cities has argued that redevelopment funding is protected under Proposition 1A; the matter can be added to the Program. Proponents: Michele Lagana, Oakland; Kristie Phelps, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation with the caveat not to take away the Mayor's ability to act on spur of the moment issues. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion with direction to add a Regular Meeting Alameda City Council Meeting 9 February 5, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-19 | 9 | The Police Chief responded the suggestion could be reviewed; the policies and procedures are available at the Shelter; all volunteers that have gone through the training will have reviewed the manual, have access to it and will be held accountable to the practices in place; a kiosk will be placed in the Library to help with adoptions and further information sharing. Mayor Johnson stated more information should be on the website. inquired whether pictures of lost animals would be posted on a website. The Police Chief responded pictures are on a website now. Vice Mayor Tam stated private donations were received to install a closed circuit television system which will increase security and site monitoring; inquired whether the kiosk at the library would tie into the closed circuit system to allow people to see animals at the shelter in real time. The Police Chief responded in the negative; stated the security system is for staff to monitor volunteer activities and help with break ins; the kiosk at the Library is a marketing tool to allow people to see animals that are available. Vice Mayor Tam inquired about the management software, to which the Police Chief responded the software would automate management and reporting, which was previously done via card file. Councilmember deHaan stated the dog walking issue became more important inquired whether hiring the volunteer coordinator has brought the appropriate level recommended by the Humane Society; inquired whether dogs are being walked on a daily basis. The Police Chief responded more volunteers are always being sought ; dogs are being walked regularly; there are a number of issues, such as quarantined dogs cannot be walked: dogs available to walk have been walked all but three days this year. Councilmember deHaan stated the review makes a better overall operation. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of accepting the report. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote - 5. (08-083) - Resolution No. 14185, "Opposing the Governor's Pr… | CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-04 | 9 | Mayor Johnson questioned whether the City should have an insurance policy if claims are not made; inquired what is the loss limit on the policy. The Senior Assistant City Attorney responded she does not know the limit; stated the deductible is $10,000. Mayor Johnson stated the City should use the policy or not have one; inquired when was the last time the City made a claim, to which the Senior Assistant City Attorney responded that she did not know. Councilmember Gilmore stated the subcommittee and City Attorney's office would discuss the matter with the Risk Manager and provide more information to Council. Vice Mayor Tam stated that the Charter stipulates that the City has performance bonds ; the recommendation is to have some type of insurance policy instead. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the bond is intended to cover theft, to which the Senior Assistant City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore stated Councilmember Matarrese submitted a proposed revision to Article VII that would require the appointment of department heads to be on the advice and consent of Council the subcommittee noted that the proposal would need to be harmonized with Article VII, Section 3, which prohibits Council from interfering with the execution of the City Manager's powers or duties the proposal would substantially change the form of government. Councilmember Matarrese stated the proposed revision would provide for more accountability. Vice Mayor Tam stated that the Charter is based upon a strong City Manager form of government; the City of Oakland passed a strong Mayor initiative that allows the Mayor to be more deeply involved in the City's management and operations. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the matter needs extensive discussion. Mayor Johnson suggested looking at the City of Berkeley's form of government. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the matter should go straight to Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 March 4, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-18 | 9 | priority local retail or service need; and will not have a significant long-term deleterious effect on existing retail areas and/or the local economy"; stated staff wants to provide an articulated policy that supports and supplements existing retail areas but does not compete. Councilmember deHaan stated sales leakage has not changed sales leakage becomes all-important. - The Planning Services Manager stated that staff did not lose sight of sales leakage being the driving force. Councilmember deHaan stated Policy 2.5.b addresses revitalization of Alameda's historic Main Street business districts on Park Street and Webster Street while maintaining small-city scale and character; inquired why the policy is silent on new shopping centers. The Planning Services Manager responded said policy is designed to just deal with Park Street and Webster Street; stated Alameda Towne Center is addressed in Policy 2.5.f. Councilmember deHaan stated Policy 2.5.n [to maintain the historic urban form and character of Park Street and Webster Street business districts, limit building heights on Park Street and Webster Street to three stories above grade, measuring 35 to 40 feet, depending on roof configuration. Parking structures are to be limited by height only, regardless of the number of parking levels] is silent on shopping centers; inquired whether the policy should address height for shopping center buildings. The Planning Services Manager responded Policy 2.5.t contains eleven design criteria. Councilmember deHaan inquired why said policy does not include size and scale. The Planning Services Manager responded historic urban form is the guide on the issue of design, height, and physical form on Park Street and Webster Street stated Alameda Towne Center, Bridgeside, and Alameda Landing were developed under Planned Development zoning which allows for the establishment of setbacks and height standards for the project; heights might vary from one shopping center to another; shopping centers are designed as complexes; height is addr… | CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-01 | 9 | costs needs to be made; the steps needed to pay for the desired level of service needs to be drawn out for everyone to understand questioned what it costs to reach the goal of a safe and clean city with good schools, libraries, parks and an efficient government ; and how reaching the goals would be paid for. Ms. Perkins stated Council is looking to establish a template to look at the various objectives and projects. Councilmember Matarrese stated Microsoft Project is a great tool; hiring someone to create project diagrams would be worthwhile; Microsoft Project includes the resources, timeline and key decision points; there would be a nice graphic representation when decisions need to be made due to constraints; Council can be presented with choices; there is accountability because there would be a timeline; if the timeline is slipping, Council could be informed and decide whether or not to allow the delay from a policy standpoint. The City Manager stated Councilmember Matarrese is describing something very similar to the work plans. Councilmember Matarrese stated the work plans are great documents because they show what is happening and the status; having the graphic makes it easier to make a decision when there is a problem. The City Manager inquired whether Council is expressing interest in ranking the policy objectives. Mayor Johnson responded in the negative; stated the fiscal policy should be the overriding, umbrella policy. The City Manager stated everything else would be underneath said policy. Councilmember Matarrese stated the goal is to deliver a set of services and know the cost. Mayor Johnson stated fiscal impacts need to be considered when anything is done. Councilmember Gilmore stated Council had a realization that the complete financial impacts were not always understood when decisions were made in the past; Council wants to know the financial impacts when decisions are made. Ms. Perkins inquired whether Council wants the overarching value or framework to be that the financial capacity of the City … | CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-15 | 9 | it necessary The Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the proposed condition is in conformance with the California Department of Fish and Game guidelines and criteria. Councilmember Matarrese stated the site renderings do not show any trees between the walking and gravel paths and water; currently, trees are between the path and the water; inquired whether the trees would be removed. The Applicant responded in the negative; stated the public area is maintained by the Business Park; the only Shoreline Park changes would be path repaving and adding benches. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the Police Department look into speeding and running stop signs in the area; providing shuttle service to the Ferry Terminal through the neighborhoods should be explored; requested that the issue be addressed at the next AC Transit liaison committee meeting. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the access road would be closed. The Applicant responded in the negative; stated the road is required to remain open; the access road would be built to a minimum twenty-five foot width. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any Home Owner Associations signed agreements. The Applicant responded dialogue was initiated with Home Owner Association managers in October; Bay Colony and Freeport Board representatives informed him that notices were placed in respective newsletters to advise people about the meetings; tonight's issues were not brought up at the meetings. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Home Owner Associations signed off on approving the conditions with caveats. The Applicant responded said Associations advised that the conditions were acceptable through email acknowledgements. Councilmember deHaan stated the property is very unique and the access road is not conducive to traffic flow; the Ferry is very important; parking is approximately 90% full at the Ferry Terminal ; the Ferry capacity is only at 50%; shuttle service is very important he would have liked to have the Transportation Commission's … | CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-06 | 9 | everything else regarding the PUB. The City Attorney responded that she could not answer tonight. Councilmember deHaan stated the issue is a little more involved; that he is concerned about having the City Manager sit on the PUB. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a Charter provision could state that the PUB recommends a budget to Council for approval. The City Attorney responded the matter could be reviewed; stated the question is how soon the Council wants the analysis and whether it would fit into the July 15 timeline. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the eight provisions require other work to get the items on the ballot. The City Attorney responded each ballot measure needs a description of five hundred words or less. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to have his proposed Charter amendment discussed at the workshop. Councilmember deHaan stated a decision could be made tonight on Sec. 2-11; the language could be deleted or made consistent by adding Commissions. The City Attorney stated presently there are twenty-six Boards and Commissions; only four are Charter Boards the issue is a significant alteration; language has been drafted already it is possible to prepare a description of Councilmember deHaan's intent ; the matter would be a stand alone measure. Councilmember deHaan stated the idea is to strike the Section and defer to State law. The Senior Assistant Attorney stated Section 2-11 is more restrictive than State law; the change would be substantive. Mayor Johnson inquired whether said issue would need to be a separate item, to which the Senior Assistant Attorney responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese's item would be separate item. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated an analysis has not been done to see if changing the Charter in one specific Regular Meeting 9 Alameda City Council May 6, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-20 | 9 | $504,334 including contingencies, to Redgwick Construction for Fernside Boulevard bike path and street improvements, San Jose Avenue to north of Otis Drive, No. P.W. 03-08-10. Accepted. ( *08-219) Recommendation to set a Public Hearing for delinquent integrated Waste Management charges for June 17, 2008. Accepted. (08-220) Resolution No. 14210, "Approving an Amendment to Memorandum of Understanding between the Management and Confidential Employees Association and the City of Alameda for the Period Commencing January 1, 2005 and Ending December 20, 2008. " Adopted. The Human Resources Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson stated Council is very happy that the Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) consented to enter into an agreement to extend the existing Memorandum of Understanding for one year; requested that the Building Official advise who is in MCEA; stated MCEA came forward before negotiations started. The Building Official stated MCEA consists of approximately 130 membersi the MCEA is fully aware of the City's revenue issues and thought that it was important to make the offer to the City; 80% of the membership was in favor of the recommendation. Mayor Johnson requested that the Building Official pass on Council's appreciation. The Building Official stated that he would be happy to do so. Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*08-221) Resolution No. 14211, "Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 and Set a Public Hearing for June 3, 2008. " Adopted. ( *08-222 - ) Ordinance No. 2981, "Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Chapter XIII (Building and Housing) by Creating a Civic Green Building Ordinance. Finally passed. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM (08-223 - ) Resolution No. 14212, "Implementing the National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the Official Regulatory Guidance for Regula… | CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-03 | 9 | Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-248) - Recommendatior to allocate $99,218 in Measure B - Transbay Ferry Funds, and approve a Second Amendment to the Contract in the amount of $99,218 to Marine Express, Inc. for the Main Street Ferry Terminal Barge Maintenance Project. The Ferry Services Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the additional work would bring the Main Street Ferry Terminal Barge up to a satisfactory standard; further inquired whether staff anticipates any further corrections to the barge. The Ferry Services Manager responded no further work is required stated the final work would include lifting up the west end of the 70-foot gangway approximately six inches. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-249 ) Recommendation to establish a Fiscal Sustainability Committee. The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese stated a ten-year plus horizon should be considered; the City of Vallejo is comparable to Alameda and provides a good, real life case study large and small business expertise is valuable because said businesses have real experience in managing budgets someone with some actuarial experience could fill the financial seat; the six-month period is aggressive, is meant to start after budget approval and anticipates that the State budget will not be approved in June; the committee would make recommendations regarding the pros and cons of deferring payment and long-term obligations to retirees. Councilmember deHaan stated the committee would provide a golden opportunity to have highly skilled individuals look at best business practices; the ten-year budget model can be a good tool; good direction would be provided to build on policy; the City Auditor and City Treasurer picked up the challenge; a financially experienced facilitator could be brought in to bring the committe… | CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 9 | Teddy B. Tabor for reappointment to the Film Commission; Aiesha P. Balde and Arthur A. Kurrasch for reappointment to the Housing Commission; Gail A. Wetzork for appointment to the Library Board; Patrick Lynch for reappointment to the Planning Board; Elizabeth A. Candelario and Eric Ibsen IV for appointment to the Public Art Commission; Peter W. Holmes for reappointment to the Public Utilities Board; Regional L. James for reappointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board; and Kathy L. Moehring for appointment to the Transportation Commission (Business District Seat) . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 June 17, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-01 | 9 | costs for the next two years. The Ferry Services Manager responded using additional Measure B reserves might be necessary. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the City should formally oppose having the gas tax windfall go to the State's General Fund, and request that the money be directed to public transportation. Mayor Johnson stated transit agencies may want to do the same thing. Councilmember Matarrese stated the matter should be brought up at the AC Transit Liaison Meeting tomorrow. (08-291) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14240, "Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessments, Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, All Zones. " Adopted. The Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vice vote - 5. (08-292) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14241, "Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering Levy of Assessments, Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove) " Adopted. The Public Works Coordinator gave a brief presentation. Vice Mayor Tam moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-293) Recommendation to approve the membership of the Fiscal Sustainability Committee. Mayor Johnson read the names of the Committee members. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 July 1, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-15 | 9 | the fund balance and refinancing bonds ; that she is surprised to hear that the Alameda Association of Realtors would actively oppose any increase. Mr. Platt stated that the Alameda Association of Realtors opposes a $12.00 or $14.00 rate; there is an overwhelming opposition to any increase given the current state of the economy. Mayor Johnson stated that cuts would need to be made if revenue is not increased; it would be helpful to know what the Alameda Association of Realtors would oppose or support. Mr. Platt stated that he is not in a position to provide said information; he would guess that opposition would be less vigorous if the increase was lower. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she is sympathetic to Mr. Platt's position, but the membership should be concerned that potential buyers would be faced with the possibility of closed parks, decreased library hours, and possible fire station brown-outs. Councilmember deHaan stated Council has been working through the budget for quite a while; Council had discussions with the real estate community in the past and needs go through an education process regarding the current crisis. Mr. Platt stated the City Manager spoke to the Alameda Association of Realtors last week; the Association did not have much time to discuss the matter. Councilmember deHaan stated that he apologizes for the short notice. Mayor Johnson stated budget problems have been discussed at many public meetings. Councilmember deHaan stated the media reported that the City has a balance budget, which is not the case. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council was very clear [regarding the budget) ; funds are available for three months of Fire Department overtime before possible brown-outs; closing all of the libraries and parks would not balance unfunded liabilities ADA compliance requirements total $29 million. Mayor Johnson stated Council was not happy with a band-aid approach to balance the budget and wanted to explore options for revenue Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 July 15, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-05 | 9 | Remodeling; and Bay-Friendly Landscape Guidelines, and Recommending Their Use in the City of Alameda. " Adopted. The Supervising Planner gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese inquired when the municipal code would be changed to make green building requirements mandatory. The Supervising Planner responded the requirements have been adopted for municipal projects; stated the Chief Building Official is reviewing the State green building code to determine if the City can adopt it early; otherwise, the City might follow Alameda County's checklist process; the matter should come to Council before the end of the year. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to ensure there is a due date for when binding code changes would be implemented; that he would like the changes to be adopted fairly soon; the climate would not get any better the longer the City waits; there were comments at Peet's LEED gold certification award ceremony that meeting the requirements did not contribute that much cost and was not that difficult to do; the City should be more aggressive; there should be a target date for adopting binding code changes. Mayor Johnson stated the matter is especially important for new construction; perhaps existing buildings and remodeling could be separate from new construction; the City should be able to move forward with new construction on a shorter timeframe any new construction in Alameda should be subject to the new ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese stated there are LEED items that need to be done out of necessity now, such as diverting renovation or site clearing materials from landfill and using renewed and reused materials. there is a distinction between new construction and renovation; binding, not optional, code provisions need to be put in place. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there are new requirements that move toward LEED compliance. The Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the City has a debris ordinance that requires 50% diversion; the goal amount was in… | CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-19 | 9 | The Interim Golf Manager stated fees were increased in 2004 and 2007. Councilmember deHaan stated that anticipating more play with increased fees does not wash. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not like the idea of raising rates and neither does the Golf Commission; she is relying on the Golf Commission's recommendation because they are much more involved; she is concerned that the proposed fee increases might cause a decline in play; the matter would come back to Council in October; the City cannot keep operating at the current deficit and save the Golf Course. Councilmember deHaan stated Council was aware of the problem three years ago and should have addressed the issue then; he does not think that the proposed fee increases are the salvation to the problem. Mayor Johnson stated Council and the Golf Commission have not been in a state of inaction over the Golf Course; a golf fee study was done several years ago; there has been a substantial change in personnel in the last two years; the change has been positive; the golf environment gets worse and worse as time goes on. Councilmember Gilmore inquired how the City's fees compare to the closest competitor. The Interim Golf Manager responded the City's fees are lower by a substantial amount; stated other courses are completely renovated, have newer amenities, and better drainage. Vice Mayor Tam inquired what is the differential between resident and non-resident fees at other golf courses. Ms. Sullwold responded resident discounts are more substantial. Mayor Johnson stated there should be a greater difference in resident and non-resident rates; the Golf Course is in a crisis mode; inquired what would happen if the proposed fee increases are not adopted. Ms. Sullwold stated the Golf Commission anticipated that the new fees would cause as much as a 10% decline in every category, but would still generate approximately $163,000; the Golf Commission cannot think of anything else to do to balance revenues against expenses ; expenses have been cut as close to the bone … | CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-09-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-09-02 | 9 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC), , AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (HABOC) MEETING TUESDAY- - - -SEPTEMBER 2, 2008- - -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:55 p.m. Commissioner Torrey led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present Councilmembers/Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, Commissioner Torrey and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 6. Absent : None. AGENDA ITEM (08-47CIC) Recommendation to approve a long-term Lease of the Esperanza public housing complex from the Housing Authority of the City of Alameda to the Community Improvement Commission (08-47A CIC) Recommendation to approve the Housing Authority to enter into a Management Agreement with the CIC to manage Esperanza: (HABOC) Resolution No. 803, "Regarding Disposition of Public Housing. Adopted; and ( 08-363CC) Recommendation to authorize the Mayor to Sign a Letter in support of the disposition of the Esperanza public housing complex to the CIC through a long-term lease arrangement. The Housing Authority Executive Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired how long Esperanza has been operating in a deficit, to which the Housing Authority Executive Director responded three years. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether deferred maintenance is the result of the on-going deficit. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the affirmative; stated several kitchen cabinets need to be replaced as well as tub surrounds. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether deferred maintenance would continue if the recommendation were not approved. The Housing Authority Executive Director responded in the affirmative; stated nationwide, $25 billion is needed in capital improvements for all public housing. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Public Utilities Board September 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-09-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-09-16 | 9 | the thirty-foot height limit she is concerned that staff made changes after the fact and did not involve Applicant input. Mr. Buckley stated that the Guide to Residential Design states : "In order for a design review application to be approved, finding must be made that the project conforms to the Guide to Residential Design.' Councilmember Matarrese stated the elevation is less busy than what would be for the right side elevation. Councilmember deHaan stated the driveway is a concerning factor ; old architecture allowed driveways slops down into the basement; level driveways have a nicer feel. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether staff advised the Applicant that they could raise the building twelve inches with a thirty feet limit in height, to which the Applicant responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the Applicant questioned what happened to the extra three inches. The Planning Manager stated the three inches are a compromise. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she is trying to get to the point of blending form and function; inquired whether the twelve inches would allow sufficient room for handicap accessibility. The Planning Manager responded in the affirmative stated the garage roof layer would be raised to the height the Applicant would need; adjustments would be made to the peak of the roof. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she does not understand what is so bad about raising the structure by fifteen inches. The Planning Manager stated that staff developed a compromise between what was originally proposed which is not raising the building height at all and what the Planning Board approved, which is not allowing a building more than thirty feet. Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff recommends changing the slope of the roof. The Planning Manager responded the Applicant would need to change the upper slope to either achieve what staff recommends or what the Planning Board approved. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 September 16, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-07 | 9 | Mr. Galloway responded all calculations reflect correct lane geometries stated Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM 2000) methodology was used and is very sensitive to signal cycling and lane designations. Councilmember deHaan inquired how the occupied square footage is taken into consideration. Mr. Galloway responded the amount of occupied space is provided. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the amount of occupied space, to which Mr. Galloway responded 545,000 square feet. Vice Mayor Tam stated Omni-Means' traffic study was peer reviewed by Dowling Associates; the traffic study looked at trips generated for 545,000 square feet in addition to 706,650 full build out trip generation; an impact comparison was made for the increased trip generation; the peer review noted that projected intersection traffic levels were up to 40% higher than expected; inquired whether the increase was a result of projections made. Mr. Galloway responded the Public Works Department wanted to use a one-half percentage per year [increase] and added in the northern waterfront plan trips. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether there would be less traffic in reality in need of mitigation as a result of using a more conservative estimate, to which Mr. Galloway responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired how incidental travel counts are done. Mr. Galloway responded incidental travel is difficult to calculate. incidental travel is included in existing counts. Mayor Johnson inquired whether information provided by Omni-Means - is within reasonable professional standards. Mr. Galloway responded that the information is very reasonable and has been reviewed numerous times by the Public Works Department and Dowling Associates. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether [traffic count ] research was not performed to determine the baseline's validity, to which Mr. Galloway responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore inquired how the City's noise ordinance Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 October 7, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-21 | 9 | and 1082 Plans; Council is dealing with the consequences. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Michael D'Orazi, IAFF 689, stated the Police and Fire Associations did not get off to a good start when the City was approached for transferring the 1082 Plan to PERS; the ball was set in motion through a meeting with Former Mayor Chuck Corica; actuarial assumptions were obtained from PERS which showed that the City would save 13% on employer costs for pensions and there would be $3 million left over after the conclusion of transfer of funds; public retiree healthcare benefit discussions were limited because everyone felt that life expectancy for public safety employees was shorter discussions continued for adding spouses to the benefit; the 13% could have been used to help pre-fund pension costs; pre- funding is an important option to consider urged Council to be cautious; stated only two people are left in the 1082 Plan; the 1079 Plan unfunded liability will decrease substantially over the next few years. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. The Interim Finance Director noted that the City would have more than an additional $700,000 shortfall if the ARRA obligation repayment was not included in the current budget and 2009-2010 budget. Councilmember Gilmore thanked the Interim Finance Director and Fiscal Sustainability Committee for the report; stated that she knew there was an OPEB liability, but she did not know what target the City needed to shoot for to start paying for the obligation. Mr. Kennedy stated that the Fiscal Sustainability Committee would not provide a final report in January. Councilmember Matarrese thanked the Fiscal Sustainability Committee for input and the Interim Finance Director for a clear presentation; stated that no one anticipated the rise in healthcare costs; the 1079 and 1082 Plans are in sunset and provide an opportunity for some ramping up; that he would like staff to come back with a hybrid approach which would includ… | CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-06 | 9 | first ninety days; notification would be given to any remaining employees prior to the end of 2009. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Human Resources Director is comfortable with the projected costs. The Human Resources Director responded the projected costs seem reasonable; stated medical benefit costs are fairly close; the Golden Handshake cost for an ACEA member is approximately $30,000 and approximately $40,000 for a MCEA member. Mayor Johnson inquired whether employees who are being offered the Golden Handshake are already eligible for retirement under PERS, to which the Human Resources Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated the Golden Handshake is usually offered to employees who have fifteen to twenty years of service so that an employee with less years of service can be retained; inquired how many years of service eligible employees have. The Human Resources Director responded eligible employees have nineteen to thirty plus years of service. Mayor Johnson stated lack of medical benefits is an issue for some employees that are eligible for retirement; the City's contribution for medical benefits for the eligible employees will be going up to $90 per month. The Human Resources Director stated the increase would be a little more than $90 per month; the City is required to pay the minimum employer contribution; the cost will be increased by the cost of living amount. Mayor Johnson stated some employees would need to cover medical costs for a number of years. The Human Resources Director stated that current economic times have caused concern regarding the possibility of retirement. Mayor Johnson stated that employees could get coverage through PERS, which is very expensive. The Human Resources Director stated the rates are the same as what the City currently pays for employees; employees can enroll in a Medicare supplement when they reach Medicare age; the rates are slightly lower but not significantly. Mayor Johnson stated that some less expensive plans might be Adjourned R… | CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-18 | 9 | requirements for projects moving forward. Mayor Johnson suggested that staff check the conditions of the approval to see if the City has any leverage. The Planning and Building Director stated the Planned Development is a zone change which stands by itself; the issue is some General Plan policies not being broad enough and dealing with the actual square footage; zoning should address square footage. Mayor Johnson stated there was a General Plan amendment for the property that allocated the square footage; a different process is needed. Councilmember Matarrese restated the motion to move approval of granting the appeal and additional square footage necessary to implement the change of use of the former Chevy's building. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion; stated that he has concerns about being consistent. The City Manager stated Council has been provided with a resolution that would overturn the Planning Board's denial of a General Plan Amendment for the MU2 Marina Square specific mixed use area and approve the General Plan Amendment that would make the appropriate findings. On the call of the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember Matarrese directed that the Planning Board and Economic Development Commission: 1) examine whether the current set of overlays and restrictions are appropriate in the Mariner Square area and points east connecting up to the northern waterfront; 2) review the issue of entitlement and expiration of same and 3) review the connection of the Mariner Square area to what is going on at Alameda Landing and points west. Councilmember deHaan stated Alameda Landing would be the focal point for restaurants. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the Planning Board and Economic Development Commission send Council a formal recommendation with an actual vote taken on the matter. (08-489 - ) Recommendation to approve the Alameda Theater Community Use Policy and Fee Schedule. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 November 18, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-02 | 9 | order to show cause for a business license revocation hearing pursuant to the Municipal Code. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents (In favor of Ordinance: Dion Evans, Chosen Vessel Christian Church; Kathy Moehring, West Alameda Business Association, submitted handout ; Robb Ratto, PSBA. (Opponent (Not in favor of Ordinance Scot Candell, Americans for Safe Access. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember deHaan moved passage of Ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-517) Public Hearing to consider Introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 24-10 (Cost Recovery for False or Non-Emergency Response) to Chapter XXIV (Public Health) . Continued. Mayor Johnson stated the report was well done except there needs to be more clarity on what the City will charge for and associated fees; inquired what the cost would be for three firefighters and an apparatus for a half an hour. The Fire Marshall responded $210; stated the cost is $420 per hour for a Captain, Apparatus Operator, and Firefighter. Mayor Johnson inquired whether hourly rates are calculated on full costs. The Fire Marshall responded in the affirmative stated costs include full benefits. Mayor Johnson stated that the numbers need to be checked; charges need to be provided as well as who is responsible for payment; language needs to be clarified; building owners need to be responsible for commercial building calls; the Fire Department should not respond to repeated calls at the Laundromat on Park Street. The Fire Marshall stated language could be added. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 December 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-16 | 9 | Alameda Hospital i Alameda is a lot better off than other cities triage levels need to be identified before dipping into the fund balance. Mayor Johnson stated the current economic situation is long term; Council needs to discuss long-term changes now; that she does not think a hiring freeze is the best way to deal with a budget shortfall Council does not want to leave Police Officers off the streets; all supervisory positions are filled. The Interim Finance Director stated policies would be discussed in January service and programming decisions cannot be made until costs are known; the goal is to have everything done by June 30, 2009 so that the City has a strategic, sustainable Citywide plan. Councilmember Matarrese requested that Council consider directing staff to analyze flattening the organization; stated analysis should include eliminating top positions where consolidation and efficiencies could be made at management levels versus individuals delivering services. The Interim Finance Director stated analysis would include flattening the organization and span of control in relationship to service levels versus line services. Mayor Johnson stated supervisory and management positions need to be reviewed to ensure that employees in said positions supervise. Councilmember Tam stated the organization seems very lean in terms of top management; the proposed cost center budget would help in understanding how management positions impact the General Fund; a number of management positions have not been filled. The City Manager stated structural changes have been made since February because of economic changes; the hiring freeze is not a long-term solution; State and federal funding issues need to be reviewed. Mayor Johnson requested a more detailed report on how the budget would be balanced through the end of the current fiscal year. The City Manager stated that a report would be provided outlining mechanisms and generated savings. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a briefing has been scheduled for PERS issues. The Inter… | CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-06 | 9 | departments or the cash reserves ; cash reserves should not be used because there are too many unknowns and using reserves would go against financial policies; the funding deficit will not go away until the City has more discretionary resources in the General Fund. Mayor Johnson stated the current situation could continue for 36 months and how bad it could get is not known; that she does not believe that the City is okay for this year; questioned why staff says the City will be okay for this year just because a budget has been adopted. The Interim Finance Director responded staff is saying the City will survive this year with what Council appropriated as long as the plan is followed and everyone is diligent about staying under budget; drastic cuts were already made. The City Manager stated Mayor Johnson is pointing out that the issue is on going. Mayor Johnson stated perhaps more money should be saved this year so that cuts next year would not need to be as big. The Interim Finance Director stated that she does not see a way to save any more in the current budget; the budget is a very tight. Mayor Johnson questioned why expenditures are not being dealt with more; stated revenues and expenditures do not really balance because the City is choosing not to pay some obligations, like OPEB and the workers compensation reserve. The Interim Finance Director stated said items would be dealt with in Fiscal Year 2009-10; the last budget cycle was difficult and involved lay offs; staff is trying to survive this year and come up with a more comprehensive plan for next year; direction could be given to start making some changes now. Vice Mayor deHaan stated there is no choice but to start addressing the issues now; finding out the budget is $4 million short does not happen overnight, which has been done continually; the focus should be on making it through the next three to four years, rather than making it through this year; there is nothing on the horizon. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether one person was laid off in t… | CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-20 | 9 | Vice Mayor deHaan opened the public portion of the hearing. Speakers Michael J. Torrey, Alameda; John Knox-White, Transportation Commission Chair; Michael Krueger, Transportation Commission Vice Chair (submitted handout) i Audrey Lord-Hausman, Pedestrian Friendly Alameda; David Kirwin, Alameda; Jon Spangler, Alameda; Lucy Gigli, Bike Alameda. There being no further speakers, Vice Mayor deHaan closed the public portion of the hearing. Vice Mayor deHaan noted that the Pedestrian Plan would be addressed first. Councilmember Matarrese stated the report is comprehensive. inquired whether there are ways to increase the reasons why people walk. The Transportation Coordinator responded the City's streets are considered to be pedestrian friendly; stated one goal is to increase the number of trips, especially for utilitarian purposes educational programs target people who want to change from the automobile to another mode of transportation Councilmember Matarrese stated that he would like to consider spending the $1 million for the estuary crossing project) in ways that would serve more people; the City might benefit more by taking 300 children out of a car between Amelia Earhart Elementary School and Lincoln Middle School. The Transportation Coordinator stated school trips are within the Island; the estuary crossing project would relieve congestion for trips going on and off the Island. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council should consider whether $1 million should be spent on something that will never happen and would benefit a few people; reducing Bay Farm Island car traffic would have a greater impact that he would like the matter to be considered and studied. Vice Mayor deHaan stated approximately $250,000 has already been spent on the estuary crossing; that he is not sure what point the estuary crossing should not be in the equation. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 20, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-03 | 9 | projects are in the future budget cycle. The Recreation and Parks Director responded the projects are identified but not funded. Councilmember Tam stated the City would front the money and then seek up to $3. 4 million in reimbursements from the Park District i inquired whether the City has enough funding within the cycle to front the money. The Recreation and Parks Director responded the City would not front the entire amount at once. Councilmember Matarrese stated the construction environment is very favorable now; some projects could be funded out of reserves. ; the City would be reimbursed; the City should take advantage of favorable conditions. Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff is confident that the City would have funds for the Alameda Point gym project, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore stated each project would come back to Council; Council would be in a position to authorize the use of Measure WW funds; Council would address fronting more money out of the General Fund based upon the Interim Finance Director': recommendations. Councilmember Matarrese stated the City does not own the Alameda Point gym building which is not part of the reuse plan; Council should take a look at what the City owns first. Mayor Johnson stated that she agrees with Councilmember Matarrese; however, the Alameda Point gym is an important asset; inquired whether there is any possibility of working with the federal government to carve out conveying the building to the City. The Assistant City Manager responded the gym would be the first property conveyed from the Navy once certified as clean. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council would then decide whether to keep the building or not. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Coast Guard housing would come to the City also. The Assistant City Manager stated part of the Coast Guard housing would come to the City. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 February 3, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 9 | discussion could be held on human resource policies. Vice Mayor deHaan suggested the policy be amended to: "The City shall deliver service in the most cost effective and efficient manner. Bob Sikora, Alameda, stated many people are concerned that not enough attention is being paid to biological and geophysical sustainability suggested a policy be inserted. Vice Mayor deHaan stated it [environmental sustainability] should be included in the definitions. The Interim Finance Director gave an overview of Section II, Budget Development and Adoption. Mayor Johnson inquired about the intent of Policy 3 under Balanced Budget [II.G.3]; stated fund balance spent should be identified as fund balance draws. The Interim Finance Director stated Council has to authorize spending from the fund balance. Mayor Johnson inquired whether money from the fund balance cannot Special Meeting Alameda City Council 9 February 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-17 | 9 | to use the field; the Mif Albright Course has activity all day i youth sports utilize fields after school and on weekends ; the Course provides an activity for seniors. Mayor Johnson suggested that the matter be brought back at the next meeting to allow Councilmembers Gilmore and Tam to comment. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants some direction to be given; playing fields are in bad shape; the Woodstock field becomes a pool because there is no drainage; the City is short on fields ; the City needs to take every opportunity to get the highest and best use; Council should give direction to get input from the Recreation and Golf Commissions and Kemper Sports; stated that he wants to ensure that the contractor is not squeezing every dollar at the expense of the Course. The Interim Golf Manager stated Kemper Sports does not have any financial interest in the Course. Councilmember Matarrese stated Kemper Sports' interest is in getting a long-term contract; rules need to be clear the Recreation and Golf Commissions and Kemper Sports need to provide input on possible uses before the matter comes back to Council. Mayor Johnson stated that she does not want to limit Kemper Sports to look at the Mif Albright Course as the only way to provide a nine hole course; the matter should come back at the next Council meeting; Councilmember Gilmore raised the issue and should be allowed to comment on the matter. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he concurs with direction given; tonight Council was to have a Closed Session regarding the price and terms of Village VI and Mif Albright Course; the matter was pulled; that he does not want to see the matter come back to Council until there has been dialogue; the Closed Session was premature. Mayor Johnson stated that she would like to review include looking at the Village VI issue. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he received a phone call regarding a football field option; inquired whether a football field would be considered. The Interim Golf Manager stated the all weather soccer field… | CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );