pages: CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf, 9
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2005-11-01 | 9 | home. parking supply is not just public parking. Councilmember deHaan stated there is no entitlement to private parking. *** Councilmember Daysog moved that the Regular Meeting be continued to past midnight. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether private parking could be used if there was an agreement with the owners. The Development Services Director responded that covenants are not sought from owners for parking access. Councilmember deHaan stated that a parking structure would not be needed according to information provided in a 2000 study; the study noted that 204 spaces were available on Saturday evenings; inquired how impacts from the Masonic Temple, high school, Kaufman Auditorium and Elks Club were calculated. The Development Services Director responded that the analysis did not assume anything other than normal activity seasonable events overwork a parking supply and change the normal scenario; the analysis reviews typical peak times and does not focus on the unusual. Councilmember deHaan inquired why the 70-foot parking structure was not included in the September 29, 2005 staff report. The Development Services Director responded the report was prior to the new project. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the 70-foot parking structure was equivalent to the Alameda Theater sign and the Twin Tower spiral. The Development Services Director responded the 70-foot parking structure was the interior of the mechanical system elevator penthouse on the parking structure only; stated the Oak Street façade of the parking structure has now dropped to 48 feet; the final ramp roof of the sixth story goes up to just below 70 feet. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there were always seven levels to which the Development Services Director responded the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 November 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf |