pages
577 rows where page = 11
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body, date, text
date (date) 574 ✖
- 2012-06-06 2
- 2019-12-18 2
- 2005-01-04 1
- 2005-01-10 1
- 2005-01-18 1
- 2005-01-24 1
- 2005-01-31 1
- 2005-02-01 1
- 2005-02-14 1
- 2005-02-15 1
- 2005-02-28 1
- 2005-03-15 1
- 2005-03-28 1
- 2005-04-05 1
- 2005-04-11 1
- 2005-04-19 1
- 2005-04-25 1
- 2005-05-03 1
- 2005-05-09 1
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2005-05-23 1
- 2005-06-07 1
- 2005-06-13 1
- 2005-06-21 1
- 2005-06-27 1
- 2005-07-19 1
- 2005-08-02 1
- 2005-08-04 1
- 2005-08-16 1
- 2005-08-22 1
- 2005-09-06 1
- 2005-09-12 1
- 2005-09-20 1
- 2005-09-29 1
- 2005-10-18 1
- 2005-10-24 1
- 2005-11-01 1
- 2005-11-14 1
- 2005-11-15 1
- 2005-12-06 1
- 2005-12-20 1
- 2006-01-03 1
- 2006-01-09 1
- 2006-02-07 1
- 2006-02-21 1
- 2006-02-27 1
- 2006-03-07 1
- 2006-03-21 1
- 2006-04-04 1
- 2006-04-10 1
- 2006-04-18 1
- 2006-04-24 1
- 2006-05-02 1
- 2006-05-08 1
- 2006-05-16 1
- 2006-05-22 1
- 2006-06-06 1
- 2006-06-20 1
- 2006-07-05 1
- 2006-07-10 1
- 2006-07-18 1
- 2006-07-24 1
- 2006-07-26 1
- 2006-09-05 1
- 2006-09-19 1
- 2006-09-25 1
- 2006-09-27 1
- 2006-10-03 1
- 2006-10-09 1
- 2006-10-17 1
- 2006-10-23 1
- 2006-11-13 1
- 2006-11-21 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2006-12-11 1
- 2006-12-13 1
- 2007-01-02 1
- 2007-01-08 1
- 2007-01-16 1
- 2007-01-31 1
- 2007-02-06 1
- 2007-02-12 1
- 2007-02-20 1
- 2007-02-26 1
- 2007-03-06 1
- 2007-03-12 1
- 2007-03-20 1
- 2007-03-26 1
- 2007-03-28 1
- 2007-04-03 1
- 2007-04-17 1
- 2007-04-23 1
- 2007-04-25 1
- 2007-05-01 1
- 2007-05-14 1
- 2007-05-15 1
- 2007-05-23 1
- 2007-05-29 1
- 2007-06-05 1
- 2007-06-11 1
- 2007-06-19 1
- 2007-06-25 1
- 2007-07-03 1
- 2007-07-09 1
- 2007-07-17 1
- 2007-08-07 1
- 2007-08-21 1
- 2007-08-27 1
- 2007-09-04 1
- 2007-09-11 1
- 2007-09-18 1
- 2007-09-24 1
- 2007-10-02 1
- 2007-10-08 1
- 2007-10-16 1
- 2007-10-22 1
- 2007-10-24 1
- 2007-11-06 1
- 2007-11-13 1
- 2007-11-20 1
- 2007-12-04 1
- 2007-12-06 1
- 2007-12-10 1
- 2008-01-02 1
- 2008-01-14 1
- 2008-01-15 1
- 2008-01-28 1
- 2008-02-05 1
- 2008-02-11 1
- 2008-02-19 1
- 2008-02-25 1
- 2008-02-27 1
- 2008-03-04 1
- 2008-03-18 1
- 2008-04-01 1
- 2008-04-15 1
- 2008-04-23 1
- 2008-04-28 1
- 2008-05-06 1
- 2008-05-12 1
- 2008-05-20 1
- 2008-05-28 1
- 2008-06-03 1
- 2008-06-17 1
- 2008-06-23 1
- 2008-06-25 1
- 2008-07-01 1
- 2008-07-14 1
- 2008-07-15 1
- 2008-07-23 1
- 2008-08-05 1
- 2008-08-11 1
- 2008-08-19 1
- 2008-09-16 1
- 2008-10-07 1
- 2008-10-21 1
- 2008-11-06 1
- 2008-11-18 1
- 2008-11-24 1
- 2008-12-02 1
- 2008-12-08 1
- 2008-12-10 1
- 2008-12-16 1
- 2009-01-06 1
- 2009-01-20 1
- 2009-02-03 1
- 2009-02-07 1
- 2009-02-17 1
- 2009-02-25 1
- 2009-03-03 1
- 2009-03-09 1
- 2009-03-17 1
- 2009-03-23 1
- 2009-04-07 1
- 2009-04-21 1
- 2009-04-22 1
- 2009-05-05 1
- 2009-05-19 1
- 2009-06-02 1
- 2009-06-16 1
- 2009-07-07 1
- 2009-07-21 1
- 2009-08-03 1
- 2009-08-24 1
- 2009-09-01 1
- 2009-09-15 1
- 2009-10-06 1
- 2009-10-20 1
- 2009-11-03 1
- 2009-11-17 1
- 2009-12-01 1
- 2009-12-02 1
- 2009-12-15 1
- 2010-01-05 1
- 2010-01-06 1
- 2010-01-26 1
- 2010-02-16 1
- 2010-03-16 1
- 2010-04-06 1
- 2010-04-20 1
- 2010-05-04 1
- 2010-05-18 1
- 2010-06-01 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-06-24 1
- 2010-07-06 1
- 2010-07-07 1
- 2010-07-20 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2010-09-07 1
- 2010-09-21 1
- 2010-09-25 1
- 2010-10-05 1
- 2010-10-19 1
- 2010-11-03 1
- 2010-11-16 1
- 2010-12-07 1
- 2011-01-04 1
- 2011-01-18 1
- 2011-01-25 1
- 2011-02-01 1
- 2011-02-15 1
- 2011-02-23 1
- 2011-03-15 1
- 2011-03-29 1
- 2011-04-05 1
- 2011-04-12 1
- 2011-05-03 1
- 2011-05-17 1
- 2011-06-21 1
- 2011-06-28 1
- 2011-07-05 1
- 2011-07-12 1
- 2011-07-19 1
- 2011-09-20 1
- 2011-10-10 1
- 2011-10-18 1
- 2011-11-01 1
- 2011-11-15 1
- 2011-11-28 1
- 2011-12-12 1
- 2011-12-20 1
- 2012-01-09 1
- 2012-01-25 1
- 2012-02-07 1
- 2012-02-13 1
- 2012-02-21 1
- 2012-02-27 1
- 2012-03-06 1
- 2012-03-07 1
- 2012-03-12 1
- 2012-03-20 1
- 2012-03-28 1
- 2012-04-03 1
- 2012-04-17 1
- 2012-04-25 1
- 2012-05-01 1
- 2012-05-08 1
- 2012-05-14 1
- 2012-05-15 1
- 2012-05-30 1
- 2012-06-19 1
- 2012-07-03 1
- 2012-07-17 1
- 2012-07-24 1
- 2012-07-25 1
- 2012-08-27 1
- 2012-10-02 1
- 2012-10-16 1
- 2012-11-07 1
- 2012-11-28 1
- 2012-12-10 1
- 2013-01-23 1
- 2013-02-19 1
- 2013-03-05 1
- 2013-04-02 1
- 2013-04-16 1
- 2013-05-07 1
- 2013-06-18 1
- 2013-06-26 1
- 2013-07-22 1
- 2013-07-23 1
- 2013-09-17 1
- 2013-09-25 1
- 2013-09-30 1
- 2013-10-15 1
- 2013-10-23 1
- 2013-11-05 1
- 2013-11-19 1
- 2013-12-03 1
- 2013-12-17 1
- 2014-01-09 1
- 2014-02-04 1
- 2014-03-18 1
- 2014-03-26 1
- 2014-04-15 1
- 2014-05-06 1
- 2014-05-20 1
- 2014-06-03 1
- 2014-06-17 1
- 2014-07-01 1
- 2014-07-15 1
- 2014-07-29 1
- 2014-09-02 1
- 2014-09-16 1
- 2014-10-27 1
- 2014-11-18 1
- 2014-12-02 1
- 2015-01-06 1
- 2015-01-20 1
- 2015-01-21 1
- 2015-02-02 1
- 2015-02-03 1
- 2015-02-17 1
- 2015-03-03 1
- 2015-03-10 1
- 2015-03-17 1
- 2015-03-25 1
- 2015-03-30 1
- 2015-04-07 1
- 2015-04-21 1
- 2015-04-29 1
- 2015-05-05 1
- 2015-05-19 1
- 2015-05-27 1
- 2015-06-02 1
- 2015-06-11 1
- 2015-07-07 1
- 2015-07-13 1
- 2015-07-21 1
- 2015-07-22 1
- 2015-09-01 1
- 2015-09-15 1
- 2015-10-06 1
- 2015-10-20 1
- 2015-11-03 1
- 2015-11-04 1
- 2015-11-18 1
- 2015-12-01 1
- 2015-12-15 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-01-27 1
- 2016-02-01 1
- 2016-02-02 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2016-02-24 1
- 2016-03-01 1
- 2016-03-15 1
- 2016-03-23 1
- 2016-04-05 1
- 2016-04-19 1
- 2016-05-03 1
- 2016-05-09 1
- 2016-05-17 1
- 2016-05-25 1
- 2016-06-07 1
- 2016-06-08 1
- 2016-06-21 1
- 2016-06-27 1
- 2016-07-05 1
- 2016-07-19 1
- 2016-07-25 1
- 2016-09-06 1
- 2016-09-20 1
- 2016-10-04 1
- 2016-10-12 1
- 2016-10-18 1
- 2016-11-01 1
- 2016-11-15 1
- 2016-12-06 1
- 2016-12-12 1
- 2016-12-14 1
- 2016-12-20 1
- 2017-01-03 1
- 2017-01-17 1
- 2017-01-23 1
- 2017-02-07 1
- 2017-02-08 1
- 2017-02-17 1
- 2017-02-21 1
- 2017-02-23 1
- 2017-03-06 1
- 2017-03-07 1
- 2017-03-21 1
- 2017-03-22 1
- 2017-04-04 1
- 2017-04-07 1
- 2017-04-12 1
- 2017-04-18 1
- 2017-05-01 1
- 2017-05-02 1
- 2017-05-16 1
- 2017-06-06 1
- 2017-06-14 1
- 2017-06-20 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-07-25 1
- 2017-09-05 1
- 2017-09-19 1
- 2017-10-03 1
- 2017-10-11 1
- 2017-10-17 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2017-11-13 1
- 2017-11-21 1
- 2017-12-05 1
- 2017-12-14 1
- 2017-12-19 1
- 2018-01-02 1
- 2018-01-16 1
- 2018-02-05 1
- 2018-02-06 1
- 2018-02-14 1
- 2018-02-15 1
- 2018-02-20 1
- 2018-03-05 1
- 2018-03-06 1
- 2018-03-20 1
- 2018-04-03 1
- 2018-04-11 1
- 2018-04-17 1
- 2018-05-01 1
- 2018-05-09 1
- 2018-05-15 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-06-19 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2018-07-11 1
- 2018-07-24 1
- 2018-09-04 1
- 2018-09-12 1
- 2018-09-18 1
- 2018-10-02 1
- 2018-10-08 1
- 2018-10-16 1
- 2018-11-07 1
- 2018-11-27 1
- 2018-11-28 1
- 2018-12-04 1
- 2018-12-18 1
- 2019-01-02 1
- 2019-01-15 1
- 2019-01-16 1
- 2019-01-23 1
- 2019-01-29 1
- 2019-02-05 1
- 2019-02-14 1
- 2019-02-19 1
- 2019-02-25 1
- 2019-03-05 1
- 2019-03-13 1
- 2019-03-16 1
- 2019-03-19 1
- 2019-04-02 1
- 2019-04-16 1
- 2019-05-07 1
- 2019-05-21 1
- 2019-05-28 1
- 2019-06-04 1
- 2019-06-18 1
- 2019-07-02 1
- 2019-07-16 1
- 2019-07-22 1
- 2019-09-03 1
- 2019-09-09 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-09-17 1
- 2019-10-01 1
- 2019-10-08 1
- 2019-10-15 1
- 2019-11-05 1
- 2019-11-19 1
- 2019-12-03 1
- 2019-12-12 1
- 2019-12-17 1
- 2020-01-07 1
- 2020-01-21 1
- 2020-02-04 1
- 2020-02-18 1
- 2020-03-03 1
- 2020-03-17 1
- 2020-04-07 1
- 2020-04-21 1
- 2020-04-22 1
- 2020-05-05 1
- 2020-05-19 1
- 2020-05-20 1
- 2020-06-02 1
- 2020-06-16 1
- 2020-06-17 1
- 2020-06-24 1
- 2020-06-29 1
- 2020-07-07 1
- 2020-07-14 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2020-07-22 1
- 2020-07-25 1
- 2020-08-17 1
- 2020-09-01 1
- 2020-09-15 1
- 2020-10-06 1
- 2020-10-20 1
- 2020-11-04 1
- 2020-11-12 1
- 2020-11-16 1
- 2020-11-17 1
- 2020-11-23 1
- 2020-12-01 1
- 2021-01-05 1
- 2021-01-14 1
- 2021-01-19 1
- 2021-01-27 1
- 2021-02-01 1
- 2021-02-02 1
- 2021-02-16 1
- 2021-02-22 1
- 2021-03-01 1
- 2021-03-02 1
- 2021-03-04 1
- 2021-03-08 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-03-24 1
- 2021-03-30 1
- 2021-04-05 1
- 2021-04-06 1
- 2021-04-20 1
- 2021-04-26 1
- 2021-05-03 1
- 2021-05-04 1
- 2021-05-06 1
- 2021-05-08 1
- 2021-05-10 1
- 2021-05-18 1
- 2021-05-24 1
- 2021-05-26 1
- 2021-06-01 1
- 2021-06-14 1
- 2021-06-15 1
- 2021-06-28 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-12 1
- 2021-07-19 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-07-26 1
- 2021-07-28 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-09-20 1
- 2021-09-21 1
- 2021-10-04 1
- 2021-10-05 1
- 2021-10-19 1
- 2021-11-01 1
- 2021-11-02 1
- 2021-11-16 1
- 2021-11-30 1
- 2021-12-06 1
- 2021-12-07 1
- 2021-12-21 1
- 2022-01-04 1
- 2022-01-18 1
- 2022-02-01 1
- 2022-02-15 1
- 2022-03-01 1
- 2022-03-10 1
- 2022-03-15 1
- 2022-04-05 1
- 2022-04-12 1
- 2022-04-19 1
- 2022-05-03 1
- 2022-05-10 1
- 2022-05-17 1
- 2022-06-07 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-04 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there was a way to work with the Apartment Owners' Association to help the remaining tenants. The Community Development Manager responded there could be some coordination for specific interventions that may help the tenants the cash to provide deposits is a longer-term consideration and might be more difficult without reprogramming of funds. Mayor Johnson requested staff to review loan possibilities. The City Manager stated that he would work with staff to find solutions. Councilmember Matarrese stated aggressive action is needed to help the remaining tenants. Councilmember Daysog stated that most families would like to remain at the Harbor Island Apartments but the courts have ruled otherwise and they must move; the City needs to see what can be done to facilitate the situation in a manner that dignifies the tenants. the Council needs to pursue the best policy that prevents the Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-020 - ) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated that the Webster Street construction has posed a danger to bus passengers at the bus stops. The Assistant City Manager stated that the construction work has been delayed because of the rain; stated he would discuss the situation with the Public Works Director. (05-021) Reginald James, Alameda, encouraged the reappointment of Mary Rudge as Alameda's Poet Laureat; stated that he was concerned about a sign stating that there may be a possible reproductive harmful environment at the Harbor Island Apartments ; stated that there should be another meeting of the Harbor Island Task Force. (05-022) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed earthquakes. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-023) Councilmember Matarrese welcomed Interim City Manager, Bill Norton. Mayor Johnson welcomed the Interim City Manager to his first Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 4, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-18 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - JANUARY 18, 2005 - - - 6:55 P. M. Acting Chair Gilmore convened the Special Meeting at 7:15 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, and Acting Chair Gilmore - 4. Absent : Chair Johnson - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-002) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 54956.91 Number of cases: One. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Acting Chair Gilmore announced that the Commission obtained briefing from staff. Adjournment There being no further business, Acting Chair Gilmore adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission January 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-01-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-01-31 | 11 | ADJOURNMENT (06-051) - There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:40 p.m. in a moment of silence for City Employee Matt Plumlee's family loss. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2005-01-31.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-01 | 11 | Counci lember Matarrese clarified that the motion was to direct staff to: 1) provide a compilation of indicators relating to crime, Code Enforcement, and Housing Authority Section 8 de-certification which would enable the Council to develop a policy on how to react, and 2) provide a framework for a committee which would include defining what happened at the Harbor Island Apartments and how to prevent the situation from happening again. Mayor Johnson stated Councilmember Daysog's voluntary relocation assistance draft should be included. Counci lmember Daysog stated the proposed committee could review his suggestion. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-061) Former Councilmember Barbara Kerr, Alameda, stated the City Attorney received a copy of the State law on rentals two years agoi noted Committees, except those she has chaired, often do not sunset on time; stated landlords would get together to respond to Councilmember Gilmore's challenge [to come up with a something to prevent a Harbor Island Apartment situation from happening again] . (05-062) Judge Richard Bartalini, Alameda, thanked Councilmember Daysog for returning property he left in the Chambers at a previous meeting. (05-063) Steve Edrington, Rental Housing Association, stated that he could provide Council with copies of the rental housing laws. (05-064) Arch Woodliff, Alameda, noted that he chaired the committee which dealt with rent in 1974 and first founded the Rent Review Advisory Committee. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-065) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board. [Partial term expiring June 30, 2007] Mayor Johnson nominated Dennis Hanna for appointment to the SSHRB. (05-066) - ) Vice Mayor Gilmore request staff to provide information on the cost for filing an appeal; stated Mr. Barni indicated his Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-02-15 | 11 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-084) - Michael John Torrey, Alameda, noted a Calgrant workshop would be held February 22 and a community meeting would be held February 23 to discuss extraordinary maintenance projects around the West End. (05-085) Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, encouraged residents and workers in Alameda to shop in Alameda stated sales tax revenues need to increase. (05-086) Reginald James, West Alameda Teen Club, invited everyone to attend the West Alameda Teen Club black history basketball event February 24 from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. at Chipman Middle School. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-087) Acting Mayor Gilmore stated an Association of Bay Area Governments meeting on April 28 in San Francisco is about Casinos on the Bay Area Landscape; suggested that a Councilmember attend the meeting or staff attend, if a Councilmember cannot, to listen to the discussion. (05-088 ) Councilmember Daysog stated the last representative to the League of California Cities was Barbara Kerr; that he has been involved in the East Bay Division employer subcommittee; that he would be willing to be the City's representative. Acting Mayor Gilmore stated the matter would have to be placed on a future agenda. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Acting Mayor Gilmore adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-02-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-03-15 | 11 | the developer's operation. The Development Services Director responded that there are two projects: 1) the potential historic restoration project conducted by the City, and 2) the multiplex and retail stores, which would be constructed and owned by the developer; the developer would own and lease the retail spaces. Councilmember deHaan stated the mass must remain for the theatre; inquired whether there would be the ability to design without the protrusions by removing retail square footage. The Acting City Manager responded that staff would need to review the matter and return to Council. Councilmember deHaan stated that he does not believe that there is any need for signage other than the renovated marquee noted that vertical accent latitude should be left to the architect. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the community and staff have taken their best shot at the design guidelines; design guidelines are not going to be perfect, especially in the abstract. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation with removing the word "contemporary" from the Theatre Design Guidelines. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he sees the design guidelines as a platform that allows more discussions involving members of the Historical Advisory Board; the guidelines do not lock the City into bad design; there is a major challenge ahead in trying to have an economically viable theatre which minimizes the projection problem at the same time. Mayor Johnson stated that the Council has been working on the theatre project for years and has been very supportive; thanked staff for all of their work. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Vice Mayor Gilmore requested that the Transportation Commission review traffic issues on Oak Street and provide Council with recommendations as soon as possible. Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council March 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-03-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-05 | 11 | Operation Dignity; that he welcomes help from the City Council or private businesses. (05-149) Deborah James, Alameda, stated that Redding Property Management Group is trying to evict tenants without going through due process. (05-150) Reginald James, Alameda, stated that there are reoccurring fires from a malfunctioning dryer at the Esperanza Community Center; noted problems should be addressed. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-151) Selection of Councilmember and alternate to serve as the Association of Bay Area Governments representative. Councilmember Matarrese moved that Vice Mayor Gilmore serve as the Association of Bay Area Governments representative and Councilmember deHaan serve as the alternate. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (05-152) Mayor Johnson read the names of the members of the newly formed Task Force: Vice Mayor Gilmore, an Alameda Unified School District Board Member, Acting City Manager Bill Norton or designee, Lorraine Lilley, Tom Matthews, Kendra Holloway, Steve Edrington, Hadi Monsef and Carol Martino. Councilmember Matarrese inquired what was the timeframe for providing findings, to which the Acting City Manager responded 60 days. Councilmember Matarrese inquired about the goal of the Task Force, to which the Acting City Manager responded preventing future mass evictions and creating more affordable housing. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the focus would be centric to the surrounding Harbor Island Apartments or to a broader area. The Acting City Manager responded there is more opportunity in the West End but possibilities should not be limited. Mayor Johnson noted that information is not coordinated enough ; staff in different departments reviewed building code violations and fire code violations in the Harbor Island Apartments staff should review the issue of coordinating that information. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 April 5, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-04-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-04-19 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- - -APRIL 19, 2005- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:56 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None MINUTES (05-157CC/05-016CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on April 5, 2005. Approved. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS (05-158CC/05-017CIC) Recommendation to approve the Annual Operating and Capital Budget for the Bayport Project. The Acting City Manager stated the budget scenario is considerably better based upon the profit participation section that allows participation in some of the developer's profit. The Development Services Director gave a brief report on the project. ouncilmember/Commissioner Daysog inquired whether bond issuance is not required because revenue generated would cover public improvements and still provide an $800,000 profit. The Development Services Director responded that one bond was issued early in the project; the project's bottom line does not require using any other bonds to finish the project. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether bond capacity is freed up for other potential uses in the future. The Development Services Director responded in the negative; stated the existing agreement does not just contemplate the current phase the obligations of the projects are linked; any project proceeds Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission April 19, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-04-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-03 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - - - MAY 3, 2005 - - - 7:25 P.M. . Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint meeting at 8:08 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (05-193CC/05-020CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on April 19, 2005. Approved. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS (05-194CC/05-021CIC) Joint Public Hearing to consider authorizing the City Manager/Executive Director to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement with Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P. , approval of the 33433 Report, and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Alameda Theater, Cineplex and Parking Structure Project (State Clearinghouse #2004-122-042) ; (05-194A/CC) Resolution No. 13834, "Approving and Authorizing Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., and Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. Adopted; and (05-021A/CIC) Resolution No. 05-134, "Approving and Authorizing Execution of a Disposition and Development Agreement Between the Community Improvement Commission and Alameda Entertainment Associates, L.P., Approving Certain Mitigation Measures for the Project, and Adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Program. " Adopted. The Business Development Division Manager gave a Power Point presentation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission May 3, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the motion was to exclude SOS Urethane Foam Roofing, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the matter would come back to Council if additional action was necessary, to which staff responded in the affirmative (05-243) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the Historical Advisory Board's approval of a Landscaping Plan for planting two Coast Live Oak trees on the vacant property at 301 Spruce Street. The submittal of a Landscaping Plan, as part of new development proposals, was required by the Historical Advisory Board as a condition for the removal of one Coast Live Oak tree in 2001; and adoption of related resolution. The site is located at 301 Spruce Street within the R-4 Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Applicant Bill Wong for Hai Ky Lam. Appellant: Patrick Lynch and Jeanne Nader. Mayor Johnson opened the Public Hearing. Proponents (In Favor of Appeal) : Patrick Lynch, Appellant; Jeanne Nader, Appellant. Opponents (Opposed to Appeal) : Ivan Chiu, representing Applicant. There being no further speakers Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Following the Appellant's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired why there has been uncertainty about whether there was a Code violation. The Supervising Planner responded the Police were called when removal of the oak tree began; the officer was not aware Coast Live Oaks are protected; Planning staff was very clear that there was a violation when contacted about the tree. Mayor Johnson requested the Appellants to provide staff with a copy of a letter from former City Manager Jim Flint. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 May 17, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-07 | 11 | The Business Development Division Manager responded she is talking to an owner. Councilmember deHaan stated parking accommodations are all important for any business and retail area. Councilmember Daysog encouraged doing an analysis on the demand for parking spaces. The Business Development Division Manager stated that the report addresses the need to review parking in the entire area; when new businesses try to existing buildings to a new use, meeting the parking requirements is difficult; there is a need to look at a parking policy for the area which would met the parking demand. Councilmember Daysog stated that quantifying is important; there are pros and cons; some neighbors might not want parking structures while businesses would. Councilmember deHaan stated the Council gave direction to purchase an existing parking area that was previously rented. Sherri Stieg, West Alameda Business Association (WABA) , expressed her appreciation for the support that WABA has received from the Council and City staff; stated WABA supports the goals of the Strategic Plan and urges implementation as soon as possible; WABA does not want the Plan to close off viewpoints for other opportunities; the funding for Goal #5 [Small Business Assistant Program] has been eliminated because of reduced funding; there is continued funding for the Façade Grant Program and some funding for a recruiter; noted the analysis of opportunity sites was limited to vacant land on Webster Street; there are other opportunities WABA will address the need for long- and short-term parking solutions; stated she receives daily calls regarding parking issues; parking will bring in additional business. Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the staff recommendation Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-281) The following speakers spoke in opposition to the proposed theatre multiplex and parking structure: Deborah Overgfield, Alameda Jay Levine, Alameda; Robert Gavrich, Alameda; Rich… | CityCouncil/2005-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-06-21 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether having the 7:30 p.m. run would be better for marketing. Ms. Zuppan responded that added features attract users. Councilmember Matarrese stated that time is needed to allow the marketing to work and be assessed. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there would be more people on the 7:30 p.m. run now if the run was a desired feature; missing the target would require putting in a lot of money or not meeting the 40% fare box requirement and losing the entire ferry operation. Councilmember Daysog inquired what the break even number of riders would be for the 7:30 p.m. run, to which Ms. Zuppan responded 22 riders. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Executive Director of the WTA had any thoughts on the matter. Steve Castleburry, WTA Chief Executive Officer, stated there is uncertainty in marketing; information obtained in surveys is highly unreliable. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there is any information on the impacts of cuts elsewhere. Mr. Castleburry responded that the City of Larkspur did not lose as many riders as anticipated; stated ferry ridership is up compared to other services. The Acting City Manager stated that part of the increased ferry ridership is because the economy is starting to get a little better having the trial period in the summer might not be good because people are on vacation. Mayor Johnson inquired about lost ridership last summer. The Acting City Manager stated that last summer would not be a good comparison because the ferry was down for four months. The Public Works Director corrected the break even number of riders for the 7:30 p.m. run to 36. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 June 21, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-06-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-07-19 | 11 | issue would be corrected. Mr. MacDonald, the Applicant's attorney, responded that the Applicant has all materials ready to be submitted tomorrow; the Building Official cannot accept the application until after the zoning change is approved. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated the Planning Board does not have the authority to enact zoning changes and only makes recommendations to the Council therefore, the matter had to come before Council the matter before the Council is not approving the Central Cinema; the change will affect seventeen zones in the City; other people might consider a similar business if Mr. Haskett is successful; the approval is not for just one theater in one location; that she is concerned that there could be more than one boutique theater in a neighborhood. Mayor Johnson stated that she is interested in just rezoning the one C-1 district [at Central Avenue and 9th Street] noted the Council was not approving just Mr. Haskett's operation; stated Mr. Haskett could sell the business and neighbors might not like the new owner or the types of movies the new owner shows; the Rocky Horror Picture Show could be shown three times a day seven days a week; the City can only regulate adult movies; the approval would allow other cinemas in other areas with other operators; inquired whether there could be a restriction that if Mr. Haskett sold his operation, the Use Permit would not go to the next operator. Mr. MacDonald stated that he was asked to respond publicly as to whether they would consent to the request; the rule is that a Use Permit runs with the land and cannot be personalized the general rule is that there are considerations built into the Use Permit to allow the Use Permit to be revoked if things happen which are not consistent with the Use Permit. Mayor Johnson stated the City can only regulate adult movies; there might be another type of operator that would want to take over the business; the neighbors like Mr. Haskett and like what he is doing; her concern is that he might sell the business. Mr. MacDo… | CityCouncil/2005-07-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-02 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - - -AUGUST 2, 2005- - -5:30 P.M. ( (05-373) - ) A Special Meeting was called to allow the Council to attend an electric bus demonstration. Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council August 2, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-08-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-08-16 | 11 | hours; the theater peak time is later. The Development Services Director stated the parking studies included a desire for a much bigger parking structure; a 508 space parking garage was contemplated when the Long's parking lot was discussed; a long-term parking plan is still needed. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that existing tax increment covers the bonds that have already been issued; requested staff to address how the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) loan would be paid back, the developer's buying and selling options, and how much capital the developer is investing in the project; stated that there has been a lot of discussion regarding scaling down the theater or just doing three screens the number one goal of the Downtown Vision Plan was to restore the historic theater for first run movies. The Development Services Director stated all except $3.5 million of public investment in the project would go to the historic theater and parking garage the developer will provide his own furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E) in the historic theater; the developer will bring $5. 3 million in equity and bank financing; the developer has met financing commitments outlined in the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) ; the bank financing includes an SBA (Small Business Administration portion, which has additional control and rigor because of the examination SBA completes; the developer would build the Cineplex; the City will own the land under the Cineplex and own the historic theater and land; the City will lease the historic theater and the ground under the Cineplex to the developer ; a $700,000 grant will pay for vertical elements, such as the elevator, ramps, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) exiting and life safety exiting; the Cineplex entrance will be used to meet ADA requirements; there are two methods for repaying the $2.8 million loan in the DDA; $1. 4 million will begin to be repaid in the seventh year after the developer's FF&E financing would be retired; the other $1.4 million will be paid in a perc… | CityCouncil/2005-08-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-06 | 11 | determinations will be made based upon the circumstances of the building. Mayor Johnson inquired whether hold harmless clauses are standard on planning and building resolutions. The City Attorney responded the clause is not standard; the clause is requested to be included in certain cases. Councilmember deHaan stated that much of tonight's discussion is based upon interpretation; stated that he is comfortable with the staff's recommendation based upon what has been provided. The Acting Planning and Building Director stated that the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS) is very active. AAPS regularly advises him when there is any hint of activity. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether residents are advised about the process to have their houses de-listed; some ambiguity could be cleared. The Acting Planning and Building Director responded there is not a current process. Councilmember Daysog stated many issues suggest the need to strengthening the ordinance with regard to demolition/deconstruction of historic properties the project should move forward; the Appellant was working in good faith; there appears to be strong reasons for moving forward with the project while the ordinance is improved. Councilmember Daysog moved to approval of the staff recommendation. [Adoption of the resolution Granting the Appeal and directing the City Manager to review provisions of Section 13-21 of the Alameda Municipal Code related to the demolition of historic structures and develop, with input from the community and HAB, recommended amendments and penalty options. ] Mayor Johnson inquired whether the design issue could be re- - examined. The Supervising Planner stated that the design review has already been approved; the Appellant has been acting under the approval. Mayor Johnson stated that 3,400 square feet is too much for the neighborhood. The Supervising Planner stated that the Appellant could be Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 September 6, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-09-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-09-20 | 11 | Mr. Norton stated ideas were presented at each meeting; the ideas were incorporated in the report if the majority of the Task Force agreed; the Task Force had to weigh the value of more changes versus providing a report to the Council within a certain period of time; the Minority Report ideas were not presented to the Task Force and could not be incorporated in the report. Mr. Yoshi stated that there was discussion on whether there would be a Minority Report because there was not a consensus. Councilmember deHaan stated that one of the missions of the Task Force was to develop potential strategies that may be considered in the areas of code compliance, legislation, education, and new initiatives to provide affordable housing the Task Force covered the issues well; background information is important, particularly in talks with Kennedy Wilson; the Task Force provided what was requested. Councilmember Daysog thanked Vice Mayor Gilmore for representing the Council on the Task Force as well as the Task Force Committee members; stated the bullet points regarding the health and safety compliance and code enforcement are good he questions whether bullet point #1 [ Increased Code Compliance and Enforcement activities was meant to be open-ended or was meant to be targeted towards instances as they arise on a case-by-case basis; requested clarification; stated having rules in place and enforced at either the State or local level is important someone needs to be held accountable for the rules; questioned what needs to be done to make the Council more accountable to ensure that a Harbor Island Apartment situation does not occur again; stated housing issues in Alameda are broken off into different areas such as the Rent Review Advisory Committee, Housing Authority, Alameda Development Corporation, and Code Compliance; bringing the areas together under one roof to ensure that issues raised by one area are not overlooked by others should be reviewed; the Council should be more involved; improving the system of accountability is… | CityCouncil/2005-09-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-10-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-10-18 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - OCTOBER 18, 2005 - - - 7:25 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 8:30 p.m. Junior Girl Scout Troop #2512 led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. . ] ( 05-047) - Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of September 20, 2005. Approved. (*05-048 - ) Recommendation to approve a Predevelopment Agreement with the Alameda Unified School District for Affordable Housing at the Island High School site. Accepted. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission October 18, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-10-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-11-01 | 11 | million in 2002-2003. The Development Services Director responded that $10.5 was bonded for the parking structure and $7.5 million was bonded for the historic theater. Councilmember deHaan stated the November 2004 estimate was $24. 7 million and now there was an estimate of $26.8 million. The Development Services Director stated that the construction contingency was gone; adding a 15% construction contingency was requested for the historic theater. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether $28 million would consume all the dollars for the project, to which the Development Services Director responded very close. Councilmember deHaan stated that the project might have to be value engineered. The Development Services Director responded that there is no place to value engineer the historic theater. Councilmember Matarrese requested a recap of the Planning Board conditions regarding 3:00 am late night screenings. The Development Services Director stated that the two primary conditions are: 1) the operator must submit an operation plan which the Police Department and the City reviews for appropriateness, and 2) the Use Permit would be reviewed by the Planning Board (after a year) to decide whether additional conditions are needed. The Redevelopment Manager stated that the 3:00 am use is restricted to 24 times per year in the bottom four screens. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether there would only be first- run movies at the late night screenings. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the requirement was part of the Development Agreement. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there would be contract Police overtime when the theater is in operation past midnight, to which the Development Services Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Police Department would be notified a week before the special event. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 November 1, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-11-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-11-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-11-15 | 11 | augment the testing performed by the Navy; the sampling would be the first step in determining strategies and solutions. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether additional remediation was needed for the present commercial use of the property and whether the Navy was obligated for cleanup. The Base Reuse and Redevelopment Division Manager responded the Navy's responsibilities were concluded at the site; additional cleanup was not required for commercial uses. Commissioner deHaan inquired who performed and paid for the testing, to which the Base Reuse and Redevelopment Division Manager responded the Navy. Commissioner deHaan inquired why the City would pay the entire cost and not have Catellus share in the expense. The Base Reuse and Redevelopment Division Manager responded that the Community Improvement Commission (CIC) has taken on the obligation as the property owner; a range of land use options would be available to pursue as a property owner. Commissioner deHaan inquired who would pay for additional remediation costs. The Base Reuse and Redevelopment Division Manager responded the CIC may decide to pay the costs or pass the costs on to a future developer staff would bring the matter to the CIC for a decision. Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary Agenda for meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 November 15, 2005 | CityCouncil/2005-11-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-06 | 11 | for delayed viewing i requested investigating how the process is done. (05-569) Councilmember deHaan stated concerns over parking spaces arose recently; at a Planning Board meeting, Development Services indicated an in depth parking analysis would be completed for the Park Street and Webster Street business areas; that he would like the study to address buyout of parking space requirements; $6500 is the current price; costs are closer to $20,000 per parking space; potential owners should not be discouraged from establishing retail and being able to buy out, however the study should review costs, including ways to handle costs and defer costs; $6500 is not a good price anymore; once a lot has been established, the area should not be used for infill at a later time; recently a parking area was bought out in order to allow construction; the policy should be reviewed in the parking study. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember deHaan is suggesting the in lieu fee be raised. Councilmember deHaan responded the fee may need to be higher and might need to be able to be deferred as well; further stated if an established parking lot has been used to meet requirements, the owners should not be able to buy themselves out to establish retail at the site and put the burden back on the City. Mayor Johnson inquired where said case occurred, to which Councilmember deHaan responded the Knowles property. Mayor Johnson stated the issue should be reviewed in the larger context of parking structures for the downtown areas having half of every lot dedicated to parking is not the best downtown planning; parking in the downtown areas should be reviewed more strategically. money going towards parking structures could be emphasized, rather than requiring parking on every lot. (05-570) Mayor Johnson stated that the weather was great for the tree lighting. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Dancing Trees were great. Councilmember deHaan stated that the ice skating rink was well received. Mayor Johnson inquired when the lower light… | CityCouncil/2005-12-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2005-12-20 | 11 | Mr. Allen responded the survey would determine the type of election; stated that Oakland paid $125,000 to conduct a Fire Prevention Assessment District election; the election covered 25,000 households and was a mail ballot to the property owners ; a countywide election would cost approximately $1 per voter. Mayor Johnson inquired how many households would be included in an election covering the existing households only, to which Mr. Allen responded considerably more than 25,000. Mayor Johnson stated the cost is big for the Authority; inquired whether anything would prevent the Authority from legally paying for the election. Mr. Allen responded in the negative; stated the survey would determine whether there is interest in entertaining a more in-depth discussion and strategy. Councilmember Daysog stated that the report provided is very thin on JPA's budget problem; funding for supplementary services has been lost; services are cut when funding is lost; remaining funding is used to provide core services people in Alameda feel overtaxed; more information should be given. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember Daysog wanted more information on the cuts. Councilmember Daysog responded that he would like more information on what happened to precipitate the need for money. Mr. Allen stated that the County has gone through three budget processes identifying problems. Councilmember deHaan inquired what voice Alameda would have after the survey has been conducted. Mayor Johnson responded there are four member cities have voting representatives; the County has non-voting representatives; people in the County area are not part of the program. Mr. Allen stated that property owners in the County of Alameda': unincorporated area do not receive any of the services ; the JPA passes the budget for the program on an annual basis. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was a way to satisfy Councilmember Daysog's concerns. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like to know what Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 D… | CityCouncil/2005-12-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-01-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-01-03 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese stated that the matter should be brought back as an agenda item. Mayor Johnson concurred with Councilmember Matarrese; requested that the City Manager provide recommendations regarding the use of outside services and what should be done. Councilmember deHaan stated consistency needs to be established; issues are looked at harder during the budget processi employment groups have inequities; efforts are being made to standardize the employment groups; other cities' practices should be reviewed. (06-022) - Councilmember deHaan stated the Navy League recognized the Marine Corp unit's deployment to Iraq; concurred with Councilmember Matarrese regarding support to the troops and their families. Mayor Johnson stated that approximately 1500 soldiers are being deployed. (06-023) Councilmember deHaan thanked the Assistant City Manager for his open, fair, and honest approach. Mayor Johnson stated that tonight is also the Assistant to the City Manager's last meeting; congratulated the Assistant City Manager and Assistant to the City Manager stated the Assistant to the City Manager was leaving to become the Assistant City Manager in Windsor after eight years with Alameda. ADJOURNMENT (06-024) There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:03 p.m. in a moment of silence for the Alameda Marine Corp unit deployed to Iraq. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 3, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-01-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-07 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- - -FEBRUARY 7, 2006- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:45 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Resolution Amending Resolution No. 98-78 [paragraph no. 06-002CIC] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissione: Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] ( *06-056CC/06-001CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on December 20, 2005. Approved. (06-002CIC) Resolution No. 06-139, "Amending Resolution No. 98-78 Regarding Commission Bylaws Article II, Section 12 Regarding the Powers and Authority of the General Counsel. Adopted; and (06-002A CIC) Recommendation to Approve Policy Regarding Hiring Procedures for Special Legal Counsel. Chair Johnson stated that the changes made to the Bylaws were fine the policy and resolution have inconsistencies; the policy states that General Counsel is authorized spend up to $35,000 per matter; the resolution states that matters estimated to cost more than $35,000 must be brought to the CIC. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the policy question was that a matter should still come to the CIC if the matter costs $25,000 as opposed to $35,000. Chair Johnson responded in the negative; stated the policy states that the General Counsel is authorized to spend up to $35,000 on any matter and then come to the CIC, whether the matter costs Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission February 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-02-21 | 11 | Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Councilmember deHaan stated that some Councilmembers have endorsed some of the State resolutions; he has some major concerns with moving one step forward at the local level. On the call for the question, the MOTION FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes: louncilmembers Daysog and deHaan - 2. Noes: Councilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 3. Mayor Johnson CONCURRED with Vice Mayor Gilmore's comments regarding the Council not being misconstrued as not supporting the troops; stated a resolution should ask for something. Councilmember Matarrese stated that a past Council made a more controversial resolution supporting a nulti-lateral versus unilateral approach to Iraq three years ago; a fiscal disaster exists which is as real as a natural disaster. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution striking references to Congressman Murtha and Assembly Member Hancock. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the language "immediate stops to establish a date and timetable to withdraw U.S. troops" would remain in the resolution, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated the MOTION FAILED due to lack of a second. Mayor Johnson expressed her appreciation to everyone attending the meeting and to Councilmember Matarrese for bringing the issue to the community for discussion. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether a second would be given to his motion if the language " withdraw U.S. troops" was deleted. Vice Mayor Gilmore responded in the affirmative stated she is comfortable in requesting that the California National Guard return home; national level discussions are more difficult. Councilmember Matarrese amended his motion to adopt the resolution striking references to Congressman Murtha and Assembly Member Hancock; keeping the focus on the California National Guard, and replacing " withdraw U.S. troops" with " withdraw California National Guard troops.' Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion. Regular Meeting Alameda Cit… | CityCouncil/2006-02-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-07 | 11 | (06-130) - Councilmember Matarrese stated that Long's is working with the Planning Department on some renovations; suggested using creativity for the corner across from City Hall, such a mini-park. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the red windows were historic or could be removed from the Long's site. (06-131) - Mayor Johnson inquired whether the speed [pole-mounted radar ] signs were mobile, to which the City Manager responded some signs are pole-mounted and others are mobile. Councilmember Matarrese stated he would like to have a permanent speed sign at Lincoln Avenue curve area. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a sign was located on Buena Vista Avenue. The City Manager stated that a report on locations would be provided to the Council. Mayor Johnson requested a temporary or permanent speed sign be located on Buena Vista Avenue. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the signs' effectiveness could be measured. Mayor Johnson inquired whether speeds could be monitored, to which the City Manager responded that she would check. Councilmember deHaan stated a decrease in the number of tickets issued would be a good measure of the signs' effectiveness. (06-132) Councilmember Daysog stated that he attended a briefing co-sponsored - by the League of California Cities East Bay, North Bay, and Peninsula Divisions; a representative from the Governor' S office addressed the upcoming infrastructure bond plan; Friday is the deadline for the Governor and legislature to place something on the June ballot. ( 06-133 - ) Mayor Johnson thanked the Recreation and Park Department for providing information on the City facilities naming process ; stated she would like to have the policy come back to Council for discussion along with the street naming policy. (06-134) Mayor Johnson welcomed David Brandt to his first City Council meeting as Assistant City Manager. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 March 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-03-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-03-21 | 11 | The Development Services Director responded that a number of printed articles have suggested that the City has not responded to the General Plan requirement for a Civic Center specific plan; stated the Planning Board extensively discussed the matter. The Supervising Planner stated the General Plan had a policy for a specific Civic Center plan; the General Plan was adopted in 1991 to in vogue specific plans which have associated financing mechanisms ; the Civic Center plan was not mandatory. The Development Services Director stated that the General Plan also has a number of great ideas such as building affordable housing and buying Estuary Park; a prioritization process goes along with the General Plan; stated a massing model was done initially to address size and scale; a model would cost between $16,000 to $18,000. a model would take four to six months to prepare; the budget has escalated 3% since November 2004. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired whether four to six months was a reasonable amount of time to prepare a model. The Development Services Director responded a site and building model would take about four to six months; stated a survey would be needed; an expanded area model would take two to three times more. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan inquired what was the date of the marketing study. The Development Services Director responded all decisions have been based upon the economic analyses completed within the last year. ncilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated discussions have suggested that the market has changed. The Development Services Director stated updates have been made regarding the competition; the Jack London Cinema is at capacity. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated he understood that the marketing study and subsequent economic development profile indicated that Oakland was considering adding more screens he was not sure whether the marketing study addressed the issue. The Development Services Director responded the marketing study did not set numbers for Jack London or specul… | CityCouncil/2006-03-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-04-04 | 11 | Director; a meeting could be scheduled to discuss the matter. Ms. Dimusheva inquired whether the invoice would be taken out of collection until the matter is resolved. Mayor Johnson responded that the matter could be discussed with the City Manager. (06-184) - Valerie Ruma, Alameda, submitted her comments ; stated that the [appeal fee] charges are unwarranted because the charges were not identified prior to filing the appeal; the charges are a hindrance to the democratic processi urged the Council to rescind the fees and change the appeal fee resolution. (06-185) Patrick Lynch, Alameda, requested that his appeal fees be returned; stated the City entered into a landscape maintenance agreement with the property owner adjacent to his property; the agreement requires the property owner to maintain the property in a weed-free condition; the property owner has not complied. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (06-186) - Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Film Commission. Continued to April 18, 2006. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether applications are still being accepted. The City Clerk responded that applications are always accepted; applicants are advised that applications submitted after the deadline might not be considered. Mayor Johnson stated the interest level is very high. Vice-Mayor Gilmore stated applicants' experience is mind-boggling. (06-187) Report on AC Transit Inter-agency Liaison Committee meeting and discussion of AC Transit's use of the High Street Bridge. Councilmember Matarrese stated deadhead buses are using the High Street Bridge to bring empty buses to the AC Transit yard or San Francisco; the deadhead buses make a loud noise when crossing the [High Street Bridge span; the situation was brought to AC Transit's attention at the March 22 inter-agency Liaison Committee meeting; AC Transit made a trip to see if additional time would be required to run the buses back to the yard from the end of the line on Bayfarm Island over to Doolittle Drive or back to San Francisco Regular Meeting Ala… | CityCouncil/2006-04-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-04-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-04-18 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING TUESDAY- -APRIL 18, 2006- - -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 9:27 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Matarrese, Commissioner Torrey, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore - 1. MINUTES (06-214CC/06-12CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on March 21, 2006. Approved. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent : Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore - 1] AGENDA ITEM (06-215CC/06-13CIC) Discussion of City Attorney/General Counsel Legal Services and staffing options. The City Attorney provided a brief presentation on staffing options. Burney Matthews, Alameda, stated that he does not see how two attorneys can handle all of the issues facing the City; the Police Department's relationship with the City Attorney saved the City thousands of dollars over the years; outsourcing will not keep litigation costs at a minimum. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that the Council/Board lembers/Commissioners are not suggesting outsourcing; outsourcing is only one option. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, 1 Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners April 18, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-04-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-02 | 11 | requirements. Councilmember deHaan stated that he was not sure about the proposed priorities i natural gas conversion is one of the methods discussed ; approximately one-third of the City's fleet is industrial type vehicles. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether establishing the overall fleet inventory issue would be included, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the electric vehicles would be purchased with the Transportation for Clean Air money The Public Works Director responded the Transportation for Clean Air money provides only 20% funding; the funding was changed to Congestion Management Air Quality money which covers 90% funding and has a lower threshold for air emissions. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (06-237) ) Duane Rutledge, Dublin, stated that he was selected in the Bayport housing lottery; the process has been unclear ; the selection, points and evaluation have changed over time he has been involved in the process for two years; he was told his lottery number is being changed because now the selection committee does not recognize volunteer work in the City as legitimate work; his application was stalled due to staffing problems ; he is not receiving clear answers or information on the appeal process. The Assistant City Manager stated applications were processed by the Alameda Development Corporation which had staff turnover ; the City is aware of Mr. Rutledge's situation and will ensure the process is clearly explained and understood. Councilmember Daysog requested the Council be kept informed. Vice Mayor Gilmore requested Mr. Rutledge be provided contact information. The Assistant City Manager stated the Development Services Housing Development Manager is responsible. Councilmember deHaan requested the City Manager's office be the point of contact. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 May 2, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 11 | the agenda. Councilmember deHaan stated eleven states allow triple tractor- trailers, the Federal government does not. Mayor Johnson inquired whether double tractor-trailers - are permitted in California and not Oregon, to which Councilmember deHaan responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the matter could be placed on the agenda sooner rather than later, to which the City Manager responded the matter would be placed on the June 6 City Council agenda. (06-270) Councilmember deHaan stated that the City has easement rights for streetscaping along Appezzato Way even though negotiations are being conducted with the Alameda Beltline; requested an Off Agenda Report on the matter; stated the City is missing an opportunity to bring the community together; landscaping should be done sooner rather than later; the Summer House, previously Harbor Island Apartments and Buena Vista Apartments, is one of the highest density areas in Alameda, with 41 homes per acre, and lends itself to a transportation node; the matter should be brought to the Transportation Commission. (06-271) Mayor Johnson requested that the City Council or Planning Board review office/business conversions in residential areas; stated the Council set a precedent on the issue several years ago [June 6, 2000] when a request was made to convert a residential structure into a law office beyond a business area [2058 Central Avenue] ; she would like to formalize the precedent previously the Council stated that no residential conversions would be allowed in the area. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the Planning Board denied the request because parking requirements could not be met and a variance was requested. Mayor Johnson stated the City should be clear on the matter so that people do not purchase residential property with the intent to convert the property to commercial. The City Manager stated that the matter would be brought back to Council, including past Council action. (06-272) Councilmember deHaan stated the Miracle League provides a… | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-06 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese stated many things have been done for the sake of economy in the past; the language sets a stake in the ground, addresses concerns regarding size and potential damage, and forces innovative change. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, louncilmember deHaan stated that triple tractor trailers probably would not be seen in Alameda: hopefully other means of transportation would be used to move goods. Councilmember Daysog stated triple tractor trailers are a potential hazard that needs to be nipped in the bud; the resolution should be more specific to the problem, not broad and opened-ended; he would abstain from voting on the matter. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote Ayes Councilmembers deHaan, Matarrese, and Vice Mayor Gilmore - 3. Abstentions Councilmember Daysog - 1. [Absent: Mayor Johnson - 1. ] ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (06-297) Jennifer Soloman, Alameda, stated that on January 28, 2006, her daughter and husband were struck by a motorist in the crosswalk at the intersection of Park Street and Otis Drive; it took twenty minutes for the Police to arrive; the officer asked if she wanted a police report; the paramedic got lost on the way to Children's Hospital today's Alameda Journal stated that a three year old was struck on Webster Street; drivers were not cited in either case. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there are reasons for the 25 mile per hour speed limit; the Public Works Department recently installed solar speed limit signs; the Chief of Police and the City Manager will review the matter speeders will be more diligently pursued. Ms. Solomon stated that the driver was not speeding but was making a right-hand turn from Otis Drive onto Park Street. Councilmember Matarrese stated the loop needs to be closed on the matter every ambulance driver should know hospital locations off the island; he is concerned with a twenty minute response time requested a review of the twenty minute response time and protocol when a pedestr… | CityCouncil/2006-06-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-06-20 | 11 | Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director ; Employee Organizations Alameda City Employees Association, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, and Management and Special Joint Meeting 1 Alameda City Council, Community Improvement Commission, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners June 20, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-06-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-05 | 11 | meetings would be scheduled. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore requested an explanation for the loss in Golf revenue in Fiscal Year 1996-1997; stated that she is concerned with redoing the Clubhouse; money has been made in only five of the past ten years Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan commended staff for putting the budget together in a good, orderly manner stated all golf courses have had a steady down trend; coming out of construction and into operation is an important phase for Alameda Power and Telecom; competitiveness makes it more difficult to break even; enterprise areas have been successful in the past; the Greater Alameda Business Association (GABA) would like to request funding as part of the mid-year budget review; GABA has extended membership to Harbor Bay; the ten-year forecast is extremely important to ensure key elements are addressed; requested that the ten-year forecast tool come to the Council in the next month or two; the ten-year forecast does not need to be completely refined; suggested reviewing possible funding streams for a $20,000 to $30,000 initial analysis of the auxiliary pumping system; further stated: that he is looking forward to sidewalk and tree discussions by mid-year review; programs should be put in the needed state of repair if additional funding materializes; he appreciates the Police and Fire Department's attrition concerns i he would like to have a better understanding of attrition taking place over the next two or three years, including forecasting. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore requested information on how the City has been impacted by the Metropolitan Golf Course in terms of playing and the banquet facility. Mayor/Chair Johnson responded the banquet facility is very small. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore stated the banquet facility is being expanded to accommodate 200 people. Councilmember/Boaro Member/Commissioner deHaan stated that San Leandro's banquet facility is very small; the good news is that the rainy season… | CityCouncil/2006-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-18 | 11 | responded marketing and customer relations. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City is going to be in a healthy financial position to replace boats in five years. The Public Works Director responded that he is not sure that the City would be able to expand the services based on current or projected funding there is a significant decrease in the funding Oakland has given the City; there is no indication that additional funding would be provided; Oakland could opt out; if so, the majority of the farebox recovery for the Alameda/Oakland Ferry Service would go away. Councilmember deHaan stated that he is concerned with being the first one in the water; pieces have been put together to keep things flowing; he is concerned that the WTA does not have the complete wherewithal to make the transfer a priority; the issue is a tough decision; concurred with Councilmember Matarrese regarding deciding whether to negotiate. The Public Works Director stated staff brought the matter to Council because of a previous Council's request. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether other ferry systems are being requested to joint the WTA, to which the Public Works Director responded in the negative. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there are competitive grants that the City could apply for to bridge the funding gap; stated Council discussed the concept of hiring a grant writer in the past. The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated the City receives a bulk of Regional Measure 1 funding; the City is not a transit agency transit agencies receive federal money; the WTA has access to Regional Measure 2 funds. Mr. Castleberry stated that Regional Measure 2 funds set aside $6 million per year for operating costs and some capital for the Alameda/Oakland ferry service. Councilmember Matarrese stated it is odd that the City does not have access to money to expand its services. requested reasons in bullet point format for entertaining the possible transfer of the City's ferry services to the WTA; requested an explanation on… | CityCouncil/2006-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-07-26.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-07-26 | 11 | Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the City is doing the project to revitalize Park Street; the theater would bring more retail activity in the Park Street area and would help generate revenue. ; revenue does not have to come directly from the theater project. The Development Services Director stated she would hope that tax increment would be received. Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated the catalyst project would generate a tax funding stream. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese concurred with louncilmember/Commissioner deHaan regarding the theater project revitalizing Park Street; stated the theater project revitalizes the whole City, puts money into the tax increment pool, and captures a lot of the money that goes off the island; the theater project is the best, real bonafide option to reopen the building as a theater, revitalize the historic business district, and keep a lot of discretionary dollars in the City. Councilmember/Commissione: Matarrese approval of the staff recommendations [including the Development Services Director's recommendation that $200,000 come from the Development Services operating fund salaries] and adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember/Commissioner deHaan stated that he would not vote in favor of ouncilmember/Commissioner Matarrese' motion; the project is now in a situation where the massing and the scale is disproportionate; Oak Street traffic would be impacted; he does not mean to infer that he does not support the Historic Theater, the Cineplex and parking garage in some form; the project got larger than life on a postage stamp piece of property; the wheelchair lift elimination should be reconsidered; said elimination would be the death for twelve public uses of the theater per year. Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese requested staff to provide wheelchair lift rental costs so that the public can be assured that a wheelchair lift would be provided for public use of the theater. The Development… | CityCouncil/2006-07-26.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-05 | 11 | been reached on three of the four items, with the exception of the walkway; there is also agreement on the items in the most recent letter AAPS submitted. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the walkway is a Design Review item that is not within the purview of the Historical Advisory Board (HAB) . The Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative; stated the HAB'S purview is alteration of historic structures. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether Design Review would be completed at the staff level, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired what is the current square footage of each structure. The Reconstruction Specialist II responded 1530 and 1532 Ninth Street are 1100 square feet and would be increased to 3106 square feet; 1532 1/2 Ninth Street is 1066 and would be increased to 2632 square feet. Councilmember Daysog requested an explanation of the "Golden Mean. " The Supervising Planner responded the Golden Mean was accepted by Council as part of the residential design guidelines and creates a proportion for Victorians with the upper level larger than the lower level; the upper level has to be 60%. Councilmember deHaan inquired how long the Golden Mean has been in place, to which the Supervising Planner responded less than two years. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the site would be re-graded to comply with the Golden Mean, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired what would be the level of the walkways, to which the Supervising Planner responded the walkways would be level with the entry; retaining walls would be used. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether soil would be higher [than the walkways], to which Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the [grading] approach has been used before, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 September 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-09-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-09-19 | 11 | the 25% threshold and take a deeper look at the data for replacing the whole building as the valuation to see where the range of other comparables sit and what people are doing within the range; using the assessed value is not fair. Mayor Johnson stated an owner could spend less than 25% and still fall within the requirement because of the assessed value or square footage of the entire structure. The Fire Marshal stated the value of the work being done is calculated using the same table to determine the building value. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated she is in favor of ordinances that save lives; however, the proposed ordinance would pass on a serious cost to property owners; most of the Fire Department's calls are medical and not fire related. Councilmember Matarrese stated two buildings in town were damaged by fire; inquired whether the damage would have occurred if sprinkler systems were installed; stated that he is looking for a cost benefit; questioned whether fire sprinklers provide an insurance break. The Fire Marshal responded damage would not have occurred. Councilmember deHaan stated fire carries up Victorian walls without a problem; older homes are prone to extensive fires; sprinklers would not have suppressed the referenced fires. The Fire Marshall stated fire sprinklers are designed to help occupants get out of the building; fires are extinguished with one sprinkler head activation 95% of the time; smoke alarms are important, but sprinklers allow time for the occupants to exit the building. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired how many structure fires occur in Alameda. The Fire Marshall responded fifty-five structure fires, two fatalities, eight injuries and over $11 million in damage occurred in 2003; twenty-two of the fifty-five were in single and two family dwellings; twenty-three structure fires were in multi-family dwellings and ten were in commercial buildings; forty-two fires, one fatality, two injuries and $1.5 million in damage occurred in 2004; eighteen of the structure fires were in single or two family … | CityCouncil/2006-09-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-03 | 11 | The Fire Marshal responded false alarm fees are not included in Council action tonight and would be presented at a later date. Councilmember deHaan inquired how Alameda compares to other cities. The Building Official responded Alameda is in the middle; the proposed fees would put Alameda closer to the top. Councilmember deHaan stated the best test would be to implement the proposed fees; inquired whether feedback was received under the current distorted fees. The Building Official responded pros and cons were received; stated contractors compare Alameda favorably with other cities. Councilmember deHaan stated fees can be raised but service delivery becomes the key issue; fees do not become a concerning factor if a contractor can expedite the processi inquired whether higher service would be anticipated with the higher fees. The Building Official responded service would continue to be maintained at a high level; stated anticipated staffing levels were cross checked with the cost estimates. Mayor Johnson inquired whether an overall fee collection increase is anticipated or whether the increase is more of a refinement. The Building Official responded the fee increases are more of a refinement ; stated currently $3 million is collected; $3.2 million would be collected with the new fees. Mayor Johnson inquired whether an overall, collective fee comparison has been made. The Building Official responded an overall fee comparison is difficult to make with different cities. Mayor Johnson stated the former Assistant City Manager intended to review whether the fees were reasonable when added all together ; suggested reviewing the issue. Councilmember Daysog stated the affordable housing fee was changed several years ago to take inflation into account affordable housing fees started in the early 1990's under former Mayor Withrow; a framework was instituted to address inflation; inquired whether the same process should be done for all the other fees. The Building Official responded fees are assessed upwards every Regular Meet… | CityCouncil/2006-10-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-10-17 | 11 | of Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) requirements. Mr. Harper responded the BCDC requirement is to provide maximum feasible public access. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the setback on the waterfront conceptual drawing. Mr. Harper stated the Corp of Engineers owns property between the waterfront and the water line; the setback is between 10 and 12 feet in addition to the Corp property. Mayor Johnson inquired how many housing units could be in the three MU-5 areas, if zoned R-1 or R-2. The Supervising Planner responded 300 units, if zoned R-2 or R-3, and less than half [of 300 units] if zoned R-1. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether there is a high range of 80 to 83 units in the 4.8 acres under R-2 zoning with leaving the PD out, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired when rezoning would be done for the other parcels not included tonight. The Supervising Planner responded a time has not been scheduled stated tonight's portion has been expedited because the applicant has been insistent. Mayor Johnson stated the rezoning should be brought back to Council for the other parcels. Councilmember deHaan stated there seems to be a higher percentage sought [ for the park area] north of Clement Avenue; inquired why the same percentage would not be sought all the way through. The Supervising Planner responded the General Plan vision is a ten acre park with a minimum of 300 feet along the waterfront. Mr. Dutra's property has a long frontage and is not very deep; the City would acquire almost all of the Dutra property if the City proceeds with the acquisition of property for a park; the City would acquire only half of the Fox-Collins' property. Councilmember deHaan stated 300 feet [along the Estuary results in ten acres; the Dutra property is no longer 300 feet, but is deeper. The Supervising Planner stated the parcel maps shows the 300-foot ban picks up almost all of the Dutra property. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 October 17, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-10-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-11-21 | 11 | across the Tube on a Tuesday from 6:00 a.m to 7:00 p.m; five times as many bicyclists and pedestrians rode across the Park Street Bridge. Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (06-566) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, wished everyone a happy Thanksgiving. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (06-567) Councilmember deHaan requested staff to review the possibility of establishing emails for various Boards and Commissions, especially the Recreation and Park Commission, Economic Development Commission and Planning Board, so that there is a means of communication with the community. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 November 21, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-11-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -DECEMBER 5, 2006- -6:00 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (06-575) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee organizations : Alameda City Employees Association, Management and Confidential Employees Association, and Police Association Non-Sworn. (06-576) Public Employee Performance Evaluation; Title: City Manager. Following the Closed session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Labor, Council received a briefing from its labor negotiators regarding the status of on- going negotiations; regarding Public Employee Performance Evaluation, Council voted to extend the City Manager Contract for one year and granted performance bonus pursuant to the existing Contract; the Contract will be brought back to Council for formal amendment in January, 2007. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-02 | 11 | east/west sidewalk. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is a way to fix the Safeway loading dock; stated the design is improper the dock is the staging area for the on-line service. The Planning and Building Director responded staff can work with the developer on the issue; Code Enforcement staff may need to get involved. Councilmember deHaan stated Code Enforcement would not help the situation; the design needs to be different. Mr. Kyte stated lease provisions can be invoked Safeway is in breach of the lease; the loading area was designed for the on-line business with roll up doors and adequate room for pull out but is not being used correctly; the sidewalk would bes continuous when the Center is designed and Borders is pulled out to the same façade as Safeway; a small section for loading dock access would provide a better level of control. Councilmember deHaan stated Safeway has not changed any operation as of 4:00 p.m. today. Mr. Kyte stated the developer has the right to have Safeway cease the operation. Councilmember Matarrese stated the designs have matured; a number of comments have been worked into the current design of the buildings; he is concerned with the lack of organization to make sure commitments and conditions are met. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of designs for Building 300 and 500 and adoption of resolutions amending the condition on occupancy to require that the east/west sidewalk issue go back to the Planning Board for public hearing and deliberation to appropriately resolve the matter. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Johnson inquired whether Eucalyptus trees could be taken off the illustrative site plan. Councilmember deHaan stated something is lost when design is taken out the processi he would not vote for approval. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Applicant stated the shopping center deign is pretty much set in stone; the tweaks that happen Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-01-16 | 11 | Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents ( In favor of appeal) : Robert Matz, The Directly Affected Homeowners, Don Patterson, Alameda. Betty Snider, Alameda and Charles Moneder, Alameda (time yielded to Mr. Matz) . Opponent (Not in favor of appeal) : Karen Stern, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Gilmore inquired how many units are affected by the eight trees, to which Mr. Matz responded twenty. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the units are two-story. Mr. Matz responded in the affirmative; stated the entrance is on the second story the bedrooms are downstairs. Councilmember deHaan stated Shoreline Drive has a variety of trees; some Grand Street trees have been replaced by the homeowners; inquired whether the replanted trees are proper. The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated he has been working with the City Attorney's office on drafting a letter to the homeowners. Councilmember deHaan inquired what type of trees would be planted. The Public Works Director responded the Tree Master Plan allows for three different types; stated the New Zealand Christmas Tree is the preferred tree. Councilmember deHaan stated the trees vary in height and fullness; inquired whether the Tree Trimming Program is in force. The Public Works Director responded the Tree Trimming Program allows for tree pruning every five years when funding is available; stated recently Council restored the funding; catch-up needs to be done; residents are required to get tree trimming permits; not all residents obtained permits; enforcement is difficult. Councilmember deHaan stated some of the Shoreline Drive trees have been pruned severely. The Public Works Director stated the New Zealand Christmas Tree is very hardy and comes back rapidly. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-01-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-06 | 11 | Proponents ( In favor of staff recommendation) : Dave Needle, Fernside Homeowners Association; Jon Spangler, Alameda; Ron Bishop, Oakland (submitted handout) ; Rob Ratto, PSBA; Michael J. Torrey, Alameda; Christopher Buckley, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Mayor Johnson thanked Mr. Buckley for his personal interest in City trees. Councilmember Matarrese applauded staff for the presentation; stated he likes the approach given to signature trees; inquired whether the scope would be for City trees in general, not just street trees. The City Engineer responded the plan is to look at trees that fit within the neighborhood; stated the focus is on the landscape strip. Councilmember Matarrese stated people are excited about sidewalk repair; the staff recommendation is solid; he likes the idea of updating the Master Tree Plan; stated a different tree was planted on Gibbons Drive. Mayor Johnson inquired whether attention would be given to planting the same type tree on major streets; stated the replanted Gibbons Drive tree is different. The City Engineer responded a Red Oak was planted on Gibbons Drive stated Liquid Ambers require a wider base; a larger base would require encroaching on private property; the Red Oak is similar to Liquid Ambers. Mayor Johnson stated major street trees should be consistent; Palm Streets should be replanted on Eighth Street and Burbank Avenue. suggested looking at the Eucalyptus tree on Encinal Avenue between Fernside Boulevard and High Street stated houses would be damaged if the tree fell; requested that staff take a look at the tree to ensure sturdiness. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Climate Protection Campaign Task Force should review the Master Tree Plan; biomass should be increased; the cost is worth the price; payback is not only in looks but also in sequestering carbon dioxide. Counci lmember deHaan stated Sycamore Trees do not displace Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-02-20 | 11 | removal of the bins. ADJOURNMEN'T There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-02-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-03-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-03-06 | 11 | Transit ] 2003 budget cuts. (07-113) Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed the environment. (07-114) Jon Spangler, Alameda, stated many people are unaware that the Farmers' Market is open again. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (07-115) Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether updates would be provided on the Climate Protection Task Force; further inquired whether the Committee would provide recommendations on control or elimination of styrofoam containers in the City. The City Manager responded staff would provide an update on the work plan; styrofoam was to be added to the work plan. Councilmember Matarrese requested that styrofoam containers be addressed as a priority; stated other cities have ordinances. (07-116) Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Arts Commission would be involved in Cultural Art Center discussions. The City Manager responded the matter would be addressed at the next Arts Commission Meeting. (07-117) Councilmember Matarrese stated communications were received from Asuchio, El Salvador a translated report will be provided to the City Clerk for distribution to Council. (07-118) - Vice Mayor Tam thanked staff for the Off Agenda Report on the library; stated the Library Construction and Renovation Bond, SB 156, was introduced in the State Senate recently; the $4 billion bond measure is expected to go on the primary ballot in 2008; inquired whether Council could take a supportive position on the bill. The City Manager responded an update would be provided on where the issue stands in the process. Councilmember deHaan stated a joint committee was established eight months ago between Councils of Alameda and Oakland to discuss build out and how impacts on each other; major build out is occurring in Oakland; inquired whether the committee has met. Councilmember Matarrese responded in the negative. Councilmember deHaan requested that the Planning Department provide Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 March 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-03-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-03-20 | 11 | discouraged with increased fees; stated the non-resident monthly pass fee is a big jump; he agrees with the Monday through Friday fee; marketing is key; golfing is a good experience at a fair price in Alameda. Bill Schmitz, Golf Commissioner, stated the tournament fee includes a cart. Mayor Johnson stated a non-resident senior monthly pass could be considered. Councilmember Matarrese stated he likes the idea of making Friday a weekday again; fee increases can be disassociated from the operational audit; inquired whether fees were part of the RFP . The Assistant City Manager responded the RFP was general and includes a review of all operational revenues. Councilmember Matarrese stated he is inclined to make some fee adjustments now with the understanding that fee adjustments are precluded in the future. The City Manager stated that she would recommend that any future increases would not be taken lightly rather than precluded. Mr. Wood inquired whether the Monday through Friday weekday rate would be for everyone except monthly pass holders, to which Mayor Johnson responded in the affirmative. Mr. Wood stated the Golf Commission has scheduled a meeting tomorrow night at 6:30 p.m. in Room 361 to discuss policy changes; encouraged attendance. Mayor Johnson inquired whether fee policy changes would come back to Council. The City Manager responded some policies would come back to Council; stated the Golf Commission may have the authority to move forward with other policies. Mayor Johnson requested clarification on whether juniors would be allowed to play on the Earl Fry Course on Monday through Friday after 12:00 p.m. and on the Jack Clark Course at any time, to which Mr. Wood responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired when juniors would be able to play on weekends. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 March 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-03-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-04-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-04-03 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -APRIL 3, 2007- -7:27 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 8:00 p.m. Commissioner Gilmore led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] ( *07-009) Minutes of the Community Improvement Commission meeting held on March 20, 2007. Approved. ( *07-010) Recommendation to authorize the Executive Director to execute an amendment to the Master Consulting Agreement with Harris & Associates for Engineering and Construction Support Services for the final phase of the Bayport Project by extending the term six months and adding additional budget authority in an amount not to exceed $232,000. Accepted. AGENDA ITEMS None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission April 3, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-04-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-04-17 | 11 | Jim Franz, Social Services Human Relations Board (SSHRB) , stated the homelessness definition was left up to the respondent in the survey most people consider themselves homeless when they have no place to stay. . Vice Mayor Tam inquired what are the specific needs within the homeless community. Mr. Franz responded people are making less money than is needed to fill basic needs; stated different choices are made every month; the Food Bank provides seven food packages per month; AP&T provides utility assistance; a good safety net is provided but does not keep everyone from becoming homeless; homelessness is a County-wide issue; a County-wide strategy is needed; the Plan provides an opportunity to work in partnership with the County over a ten-year period; encouraged Council to support the Plan. Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative, stated the Collaborative is very excited about the Plan; the Plan would bring more resources together and provide a prospect for additional, permanent, supportive housing and seamless entry into services; encouraged Council to support the Plan. Mayor Johnson requested staff to comment on the recommendation. The City Manager stated staff is recommending that Council receive the report and affirm support for regional efforts to combat homelessness. Councilmember Matarrese inquired what is the staff's assessment of the delta between endorsing or adopting the report and receiving the report with regard to the City's obligations. Mayor Johnson stated that goals have been addressed; inquired whether there is a final plan that has been adopted. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated Council has been provided with the plan that outlines the goals. Mayor Johnson stated that the staff report addresses the goals and not the actual Plan. Ms. Gardener stated the Plan is final; a new copy could be provided; the content is the same as what was provided to Council. Mayor Johnson inquired whether staff reviewed the Plan. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 April 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-04-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-05-01.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-05-01 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -MAY 1, 2007- - -6:35 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:40 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Absent : Councilmember Matarrese - 1. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-186) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director Employee Organizations : All City Bargaining Units. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that Council received a briefing from its Labor Negotiators on the status of negotiations with City Bargaining Units and provided negotiation parameters. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 1, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-05-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-05-15 | 11 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether Mr. Arnerich would support the Council adding him, former Councilmember Barbara Kerr and Woody Minor to the committee. Mr. Arnerich responded that he did not want to serve; stated Golf Commissioner Bob Wood would be good. Councilmember deHaan stated Woody Minor should give a presentation [at the forum] ; actual Appellants should be added to the committee. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Appellants could select three designees. Mr. Arnerich responded many excellent people could serve; going to people outside the Planning Board to carry out the Council's wishes is the most appropriate way to go. Mayor Johnson stated there is a perception that the subcommittee members have a preference. Councilmember Gilmore stated the three subcommittee members along with three the Appellants, selected by the Appellants, could get together and come up with structure for going forward with the Measure A discussion; inquired whether putting more people on the subcommittee means that the meetings would have to be noticed stated the group would meet to set up a forum; the six people should be able to meet and bring a recommendation back to the City Council or Planning Board at which time the public could comment on the structure. The City Attorney stated the Planning Board set up a subcommittee composed of less than a quorum of the Board; the Council is entertaining the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee, which is slightly different meeting outside a noticed, public hearing would be permissible since the officials involved are still less than a quorum of the legislative body because no action will be taken; the group would have to return to the Planning Board or City Council and report on its findings and recommendations the Planning Board or Council would make a decision on the context of the forum after the public has an opportunity to provide input. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Council could give direction to notice the meetings, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Counc… | CityCouncil/2007-05-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-05 | 11 | Councilmember deHaan stated it would be worthwhile to see what efforts are being made to bring new residents on board, such as offering EcoPass; the Joint Council Task Force might be a starting point for dialogue with the Oakland Council; inquired what position Alameda would be in if the Port of Oakland did not want to pay. The City Attorney responded the agreement would expire if not renewed or amended. Councilmember deHaan stated that Alameda could be out $79,000. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Alameda/Oakland Ferry would be restricted from docking at Jack London Square. The Ferry Manager responded the Port of Oakland could restrict Alameda from coming into Oakland or could require a landing fee. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the City cannot let the matter lapse; the ferry service takes 400,000 people off the freeway; the fare increase should be approved; staff should request that the Port of Oakland restore the cut because the airport revenue loss is a not a legitimate reason; staff should also request the Port of Oakland to produce a campaign to get ridership from the new Oakland development. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendations and adoption of the resolution with direction to have staff negotiate with the Port of Oakland and the City of Oakland to request a restoration of cuts made and to provide a marketing plan for new Oakland residents south of Highway 880. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the Harbor Bay one-year extension would be included, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the $79,159 additional year cost would be pending negotiations with Oakland, to which Councilmember Matarrese responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson stated the amount would be accepted now; staff would continue to negotiate. Councilmember deHaan requested that the matter be addressed when the Alameda/Oakland City Council subcommittee meets. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular M… | CityCouncil/2007-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-06-19 | 11 | Commissioner Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEMS None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COMMISSION COMMUNICATIONS None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Annual Meeting at 7:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Annual Meeting Community Improvement Commission 3 June 19, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-06-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-03 | 11 | Mayor Johnson stated ACI does the recycling for Alameda. garbage goes to the transfer station. Mr. McCauley stated the Davis Street facility is a transfer station; the recycling area is going to be shut down. Mayor Johnson stated that Waste Management has its own recycling and sorting facility at the transfer station; ACI has its own in a different city; Council will receive a report on the matter. (07-327) Shannon O'Keeffe, Teamsters Local 70, provided a brief background on the Waste Management dispute; requested Council support to get families back to work. (07-328) - Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed recycling. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (07-329) Discussion regarding a resolution calling upon steps to withdraw our Reservists, Coast Guard Units and members of the California National Guard troops from Iraq. [660-50] Councilmember Matarrese stated that Council passed a resolution four years ago encouraging a multi-national diplomatic approach; now the nation is in the middle of a civil, religious war; the cost directly affects Alameda; he suggested National Guard withdrawals as a safety measure for California a year agoi the matter is a City issue because the City is paying the bills; the City is deprived of things because money is going out the other end and is not worth the benefit. he would like Council to discuss the issue. Proponents (In favor of resolution) : Ashley Jones, Alameda; Herb Behrstock, United Nations Association, East Bay; Mi'Chelle Fredrick, Alameda. Opponents (Not in favor of resolution) : Eddie M. Abbey, District 10, Department of California, the American Legion; Richard W. Rutter, Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he appreciates people coming out to speak; he is disappointed that more people did not come to the meeting; thanked Mr. Abbey for standing up for his service to the country; read the second "WHEREAS" of the draft resolution; stated said language is the same support shown in 2003; calling someone who disputes the war a traitor is contrary to the Constitution; the draft resolutio… | CityCouncil/2007-07-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-07-17 | 11 | Mayor Johnson stated the numbers [delinquent charges ] are declining from four to five years ago. The Public Works Director stated there were 73 delinquent accounts in 2006 and 52 delinquent accounts in 2006. Mayor Johnson stated everyone needs to pay their garbage bills; ACI and City staff work to resolve legitimate disputes; the City has to be very careful not to send the message that property owners can complain to ACI and bills will be cut in half. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the $2,275 administrative fee goes to the City. The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the fee is meant to cover staff costs. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the fee is adequate, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired what is Craig Anderson's main issue. The Public Works Director responded Mr. Anderson states that he was receiving service and then ACI stopped collecting garbage. Mayor Johnson stated sometimes her garbage is not collected; ACI collects the garbage when she calls. The Public Works Director stated the franchise agreement requires that garbage be collected within twenty-four hours of receiving a call. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether staff would be responding to the three letters received. The Public Works Director responded staff would work with Mr. and Mrs. Otto, Mr. and Mrs. Anderson, and Mr. Baird. Vice Mayor Tam inquired about Jeffrey Allen. The Public Works Director responded Mr. Allen is not on the list; stated Mr. Allen requested to be advised of any delinquency ahead of time; the property owner and tenant are notified when a bill is sixty days late. Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council July 17, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-07-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-07 | 11 | Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam stated that she is very comfortable with the Planning Board's and community's thorough vetting of conditions placed on the project ; the gas station would be an asset to the neighborhood; the City Council received a petition with 3,000 signatures supporting the replacement of a gas station in 2002 and 2003. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Councilmember Matarrese, Vice Mayor Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 3. Abstentions: Councilmember deHaan - 1. (Absent : Councilmember Gilmore - 1. (07-374) Recommendation to approve the second amendment to the Contract for the use of HOME Funds between Alameda Development Corporation and the City of Alameda for Buena Vista Commons. The Development Services Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a construction schedule has been developed. The Development Services Director responded construction would start within two weeks. Mayor Johnson inquired when completion would be anticipated. The Development Services Director responded twelve months. stated Alameda Development Corporation's (ADC's) portion would be completed sooner. Mayor Johnson inquired whether milestones have been established for the sweat equity portion. The Development Services Director responded Habitat for Humanities has screened the property owners; stated announcements would be sent out to engage the community's help to build the homes. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Bob Haun would be managing the schedule for Habitat for Humanities and ADC. The Development Services Director responded the general contractor is Habitat for Humanities; stated Mr. Haun would help in overseeing the project. Councilmember deHaan inquired when the land was acquired. Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council August 7, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-08-21 | 11 | operation would be an expansion of use. Councilmember deHaan stated that auto repair is a different use. Councilmember Gilmore stated that restrictions were enacted [or put in place] because the auto repair service was considered to be noisier and more intensive. Councilmember deHaan stated that equations have changed drastically with gas stations; additional hours would be beneficial to the business; the gas station has grown. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the gas station had no repair service between 1974 and 1992. The Planning Services Manager responded he did not know . Counci Matarrese stated business conditions have changed; he would be concerned if the gas station closed; inquired whether diesel sales would be eliminated; further inquired how many diesel pumps are at the station. Mayor Johnson stated the Appellants would not have been given a Use Permit if the gas station were not a permitted use in R-4. The Planning Services Manager stated all gas stations in Alameda have Use Permits. In response to Councilmember Matarrese inquiry, the Appellant responded the gas station has four diesel pumps; stated all four pumps would be eliminated. Council lmember deHaan inquired whether the diesel pumps have been a major volume of the gas station's business, to which the Appellant responded the diesel pumps provide approximately 20% of the business. Councilmember deHaan inquired how often trucks come in to fill the diesel pumps. The Appellant responded the same trucks fill the pumps for gas and diesel. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the likelihood of the gas station becoming a discount gas station. The Appellant responded the gas station is already a discount Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council August 21, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-08-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-04 | 11 | (07-433) Consideration of Mayor's nomination for appointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board. Mayor Johnson nominated Regional James for appointment to the Social Service Human Relations Board. (07-434) Mayor Johnson inquired whether four-way stops signs have been installed near St. Philip Neri School. Councilmember Matarrese responded the signs were installed recently. (07-435) Councilmember deHaan questioned when Big Box ordinance discussions would come to Council; stated that he anticipates that the matter could come to Council within the next month; further stated the priority planning process should not preclude Big Box ordinance discussions; Council was to review other cities' ordinances and discuss adopting a similar ordinance. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Big Box Ordinance was to address super stores that have more than a specific percentage of non- taxable items. Mayor Johnson stated Livermore and Dublin have adopted Big Box Ordinances. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council also had discussions on a styrofoam ordinance. Mayor Johnson stated Council would have an opportunity to discuss a Green Building ordinance on Tuesday. (07-436) Councilmember deHaan stated that he is hearing repercussions from neighbors regarding parking concerns related to closing off the street at St. Joseph Notre Dame High School; requested the City Attorney to provide information about whether there is a review process; stated another wing has been established. Mayor Johnson stated the area used to have all single-family homes; many of the homes are now subdivided; residents do not have adequate off-street parking. Councilmember deHaan stated dialog needs to take place between neighbors and the school. (07-437) Vice Mayor Tam requested an update on the progress that Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 September 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-09-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-11 | 11 | City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop - September 11, 2007 Department Projec Priority Planning & Building Transportation Element Update (General Plan) 6 points (3 highest) Objective 4: Develop or update and implement land use, transportation/traffic, and environment sustainability planning strategies, tools, and documents. Planning & Building Customer Service Improvement Committee work items 6 points (project ADD) (3 highest) Objective 3: Take measures to improve and promote the community's economic health. Public Works Transportation/Traffic Planning (Transportation master 5 points plan; pedestrian plan) (2 highest 1 high) Objective 4: Develop or update and implement land use, transportation/traffic, and environment sustainability planning strategies, tools, and documents. Public Safety Disaster Preparedness/Update Disaster Mitigation Plan 5 points and the EOC Plan (1 highest 3 high) Objective 2: Identify funding and develop master plans for providing and maintaining infrastructure improvements. Objective 3: Take measures to improve and promote the community's economic health. Planning & Building Soft-story seismic retrofit incentive program 4 points (1 highest Objective 3: Take measures to improve and promote the 2 high) community's economic health. Recreation, Parks Prepare and implement comprehensive operation review 3 points and Golf of Golf Course operations (3 high) Objective 7: Continuously improve internal operations, systems, and management practices in order to provide high- quality customer service. Issue Bin During the course of the workshop, various items were raised to be handled at another time and place. Those items were: Environmental scan follow-up: "Other" category of General Fund - explain what this is; show department allocations within other and enterprise (i.e., Library allocation) Split out sources of the utility users tax Split property tax revenue between residential and non-residential if County can make the data available Identify the assessed value of Harsch Investment… | CityCouncil/2007-09-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-09-18 | 11 | Counci lmember deHaan responded $1 million was donated; stated a developer brought in a funding stream that provided loan capabilities of up to $5 million. Mayor Johnson stated Alameda museums should learn from the example [Air Museum]. . (07-462) Councilmember deHaan stated the City has its first green parking lot at Blanding Avenue and Oak Street. (07-463) Mayor Johnson requested an update on the status of the Bay Trail plans. (07-464) Mayor Johnson stated that she met with the City of Vallejo and Water Transit Authority (WTA) representatives this morning; Vallejo has the other ferry system most affected by recent legislation; Alameda has always been interested in protecting service and fares and needs to have a guaranteed level of service and representation if the system merges regionally; Vallejo has indicated that there is no intent to purchase the assets; there are a lot of unanswered questions right now. Councilmember deHaan stated the city needs to see that the WTA has the wherewithal to be able to operate a ferry service; Alameda has been very successful. Mayor Johnson stated that the regional system participation would not be voluntary. Councilmember Matarrese requested an official staff report summarizing the details of this morning's meeting; further requested that proceedings be resurrected from previous Council meetings when the WTA made a presentation; stated information is needed from State representatives. the public needs to know what has transpired and what the future may bring; he would like to have the matter placed on the next agenda for discussion. Mayor Johnson stated everything is moving quickly; people need to be kept informed. (07-465) Mayor Johnson stated that she attended a joint presentation with the Public Works Department and Supervisor Lai- Bitker regarding the Broadway/Jackson interchange and Tube lighting; the Bay Farm Island Bridge is a CalTrans bridge; there was discussion about having CalTrans use its resources to bring the bridge to lifeline level rather than depleting Count… | CityCouncil/2007-09-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-02 | 11 | Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam thanked the Transportation Commission for taking Council's comments to heart at the Joint Meeting in May. Mayor Johnson stated the changes are good; she was an original member of the Public Transit Committee which evolved into the Transportation Commissioni the past system was odd; the proposed changes make the process clearer. Councilmember deHaan stated that he was involved with an issue brought to the Transportation Advisory Board and took exception because the decision seemed like a done deal. the proposed ordinance would establish the proper process. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (07-485) - Clyde Ryan, Alameda, (submitted a letter) ; stated that the Island Drive and McCartney Road four-way stop is not working four accidents have occurred between September 2006 and January 31, 2007; the intersection is dangerous. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Mr. Ryan was the only crossing guard at the intersection, to which Mr. Ryan responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated the intersection is very wide and is a large area for one crossing guard to cover. Councilmember Matarrese suggested that the Public Works Director review the matter. Councilmember deHaan stated that the matter was initially addressed in March 2006; Mr. Ryan's letter provides an update on the matter. Mr. Ryan stated that two crossing guards should be assigned to the intersection. (07-486) Lisa Schmeiser, Alameda, stated that hours have been cut back for the volunteers at the Alameda Animal Shelter; the animals are not getting the same treatment as in the past; suggested forming a committee that would look into the feasibility of setting up a shelter as a separate City agency with an independent animal Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 October 2, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-10-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-10-16 | 11 | has indicated that he would like to continue; a representative from the Planning Board has missed a couple of meetings. Councilmember Matarrese stated the person appointed to the Oakland Chinatown Advisory Committee needs to report back to Council. The Assistant City Manager stated the Planning Board selected a member to serve; said member is charged to report back to the Planning Board regarding activities of the committee. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff could be tasked to provide a summary, to which the Assistant City Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese stated the development of Alameda Point depends on the understanding of the settlement with Chinatown. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 October 16, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-10-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-06 | 11 | [Note: Refer to Resolution to Increase On-Street Parking Meter Rates [paragraph no. 07-526] for Council discussion. Richard Neveln, Alameda, stated the increase changes from parking regulation into revenue generation and will keep people of lower economic status from going to Park Street. Mayor Johnson stated increased fines would be used to recover costs, not generate revenue. Robb Ratto, PSBA, stated the PSBA Board supports the increase; there has been a lack of resources in enforcement ; raising meter rates and fines as well as having parking enforcement in the district Monday through Saturday should be effective. Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed public transit. Jon Spangler, Alameda, stated that he is in favor of increasing parking fines; it is the appropriate time to approve the increase. Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the Resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam noted the median rate for parking in a disabled zone is $275; she would like the rate increased from $250 to $275. Councilmembers Gilmore and deHaan agreed to amend the motion to change the fine for parking in a disabled zone to $275. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-528) Public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning Board's decision to approve the First Addendum to the Catellus Alameda Landing Mixed Use Development Project Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, the revised Waterfront Promenade Development Plan, and the second amendment to the Site-wide Master Landscape Plan; and adoption of related resolution. Withdrawn at the Appellant's request. (07-529) Public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning Board's decision to approve Design Review DR07-0003 - at Tract 7884 (Alameda Landing Retail Center) ; and (07-529A) Resolution No. 14158, " Upholding the Planning Board Approval of Design Review, DR07-0003, at Tract 7884 (Retail Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 November 6, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-13.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-13 | 11 | City of Alameda Summary of Priority Setting Workshop - November 13, 2007 ecar Departmer Proter 12. Development Services Former Navy property development - Conduct 1 highest homeless/PBC screening for Coast Guard 1 high Housing and related Community Reuse Plan amendment. Includes lease of ball field/park area and coast guard housing 13. Administrative/Support Review web hosting, design and maintenance 1 highest Services services and conduct needs assessment of 1 high current contributors 14. Administrative/Support Review compensation system (broadened to 1 highest Services include review of full system) 1 high 15. Planning & Building Prepare Local Action Plan for Climate Protection 1 highest 1 high Environmental Protection Public Works 1 high [Note: two projects were combined into one] 16. Public Works Continuous improvement of systems (Street tree 1 highest master plan; sewer master plan; storm drainage 1 high master plan) 17. Administrative/Support Explore options to generate revenue for 1 highest Services infrastructure improvements 18. Administrative/Support Budget review and tracking (project ADD) 1 highest Services 19. Planning & Building Land Use Element - Retail and Business 1 highest Services Section Update (General Plan) 20. Planning & Building Develop a Facilities Master Plan: identify 1 highest funding and prepare master plans for building infrastructure improvements 21. Library Provide facility and service improvements to 2 high both Bay Farm Island and West End Libraries 22. AP&T Enhance Energy/Environmental Sustainability - 2 high evaluate alternatives for reducing carbon footprint 23. Administrative/Support Develop Succession Planning and Workforce 2 high Services Strategy (including youth outreach component) [Note: "and Workforce Strategy" was added to this project] 24. Public Works Transportation planning 2 high 25. Fire Conduct Fire Station 3 feasibility study 1 high 26. Development Services CDBG-funded project to implement the "West 1 high Alameda: Woodstock to Webster Neighborhood Improvement … | CityCouncil/2007-11-13.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-11-20 | 11 | very difficult; due to the location of sheer walls, the only alternative would be an exit out of the east side, which would go down to the ground. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the exit would be similar to the Council Chambers exit. Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative; stated the exit would not look too great from the street. Mr. Dreyfus stated exterior and interior building impacts were reviewed; the interior is important, but the exterior is as well; the [balcony ] proposal appeared to have the least impact on the historic fabric. Mayor Johnson stated that she appreciates the lighting issue information. the building has a lot of windows, which she had considered when reviewing different uses. Ms. Muller stated museums tend to find preserving artifacts more important than seeing buildings. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the building is not the ideal type of building for a museum. Ms. Muller responded that she is reluctantly coming to said conclusion; stated thirty years ago museums were okay with daylight research has led to curators being more careful with artifacts; visiting exhibits will not allow paintings to be displayed if there is too much light. Councilmember Matarrese inquired how the art exhibit area [in the proposed Community Arts/Planning and Building Center] could be justified if people are concerned about paintings. Ms. Muller responded that she discussed the matter with artists and they were not concerned about art for sale being displayed for two to three months as long as the windows have film to keep out most of the ultraviolet light. Mayor Johnson inquired whether oil paintings have different lighting tolerance than wood or leather. Ms. Muller responded in the affirmative; stated the most light sensitive items are drawings on paper, watercolors and fabric, such as old costumes. Mayor Johnson inquired whether special art exhibits require Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 November 20, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-11-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2007-12-04 | 11 | discussion and a potential action from the entire Council with full public notification, in full public view with a published version of what is going to be discussed; inquired whether he understands correctly. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated if anything the proposal is a way of ensuring that matters of interest to individual Councilmembers get on the agenda because Council would not be dealing with just City Manager discretion. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Vice Mayor Tam has information about other cities practices. Vice Mayor Tam responded the City of Palo Alto adopted a similar protocol as one way to address openness and public transparency regarding discussions between an individual Councilmember and the City Manager. Councilmember deHaan stated the City's current procedure brings it out in the open. Vice Mayor Tam stated the procedure allows Council to formalize it [ the procedure] On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote Ayes Councilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 4. Noes: Councilmember deHaan - 1. Councilmember Gilmore noted that the matter would return in six months and [staff report] item 1 was deleted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (07-570) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the period ending June 30, 2007. The Finance Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the next report could provide the sales tax percentage in other cities budgets, to which the Finance Director responded possibly. Vice Mayor Tam stated that Page 2 notes that construction sales posted the largest increase related to building materials and wholesale. Alameda does not have a Home Depot. The Finance Director stated Alameda has other businesses in town that are classified as being part of the construction and wholesale Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council December 4, 2007 | CityCouncil/2007-12-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-02 | 11 | options should be explored and dollar values established; she is not sure whether ideas should be implemented before a report is received. Councilmember Gilmore amended the motion to move approval of allocating money to start a Master Plan for the Golf Course as soon as possible and exploring the Golf Commission options and any other ideas, with the assistance of the NGF . Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Johnson stated that she would like to include looking at the issue of tightening up the budget she does not want to put everything on hold for a year and deplete the reserve fund every month because of the unwillingness to review what needs to be done in the interim; she would like to direct staff to look at staffing, particularly administrative to see whether cuts can be made to help balance the budget so that the reserve fund is not depleted on a month-by-month basis. Councilmember Matarrese amended the motion to include directing staff to look at balancing the budget, particularly the administrative area. Councilmember deHaan concurred with Mayor Johnson; stated cost savings is a concerning factor. inquired whether a contractor would be able to service a debt such as the banquet facility; further inquired whether a contractor would encumber any City property. Mr. Getherall responded that the banquet facility would be encumbered by the contractor Mr. Singer responded a contractor would not be able to encumber against any City property. Vice Mayor Tam inquired what a private lessee would bring in terms of resources that the City could not. Mr. Singer responded capital stated operation funds have been depleted. Vice Mayor Tam stated a private vendor would try to recoup the capital through management. Councilmember Gilmore inquired how long it would take a contractor to recoup said costs, to which Mr. Singer responded ten years and perhaps longer. Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council January 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-01-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-01-15 | 11 | money can be set aside if the budget turns around. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether phasing-in will be the most likely method. Mr. Bartel responded very few agencies pay the ARC right awayi stated a few agencies started setting money aside, allocating internal service funds, and transferring money into an irrevocable trust; the majority of agencies will either phase into paying the full ARC or intend to phase into the full ARC over a five or ten year period; new strategies include Pay-As-You-Go plus normal costs; normal costs are the value of benefits being earned during the year by active employees. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether bond rating might become the real factor in pushing municipalities. Mr. Bartel responded that he is not a bond rating expert; stated he had two clients that set money aside in an internal service fund; both were going through a bond rating for a capital improvement project; both expressed a strong interest in pre-funding, paying the full ARC, and moving the money into a irrevocable trust; both agencies had an upgrade in bond rating because they were addressing the unfounded liability; a bond rating might not change but may be downgraded if not addressed. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether anyone has ever borrowed to pay. Mr. Bartel responded two agencies in the State have done so; stated Peralta College is one; CalPERS premiums can be 50% one year and 5% the next volatility in actuarial liability is created if changes happen when an evaluation is done; he is reluctant to advise agencies to bond for the entire amount ; he would be cautious about paying off the entire unfunded liability. Mayor Johnson stated that it is important for people to look at the charts on page 3 and 5 of the report; the cheapest option is Pay- As-You-Go the ten year payout projections increase from $1,861 million for 2007-2008 to $4,342 million for 2016-1017; the better options are more expensive; the cost comes out of the General Fund. The City Manager stated that the cost comes out of the General… | CityCouncil/2008-01-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-05 | 11 | Authority Town Hall Meeting; individuals had minor concerns; staff was straight forward in responding to issues. (08-062) - Vice Mayor Tam stated that she, Councilmember deHaan, the City Manager and Alameda Development Corporation members participated in building and framing homes for Habitat for Humanity at the Buena Vista Commons. Councilmembe: deHaan stated AmeriCorps volunteers led the work party. Mayor Johnson stated that she attended a meeting with Habitat for Humanity yesterday; volunteering is a great experience; interested parties can sign up on the internet the City's website has a link to Habitat for Humanity; further stated that Habitat for Humanity is building eight units [four duplexes] at Webster Street and Buena Vista Avenue. Vice Mayor Tam stated that approximately fifty volunteers participated in the event. Councilmember deHaan stated that families who will reside in the home need to contribute 400 hours of labor. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council Meeting 11 February 5, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-02-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-02-19 | 11 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA ( 08-084) Bill Smith discussed smoking regulations. (08-085) - Ken Peterson, Alameda, submitted a letter; discussed issues facing the world. COUNCIL REFERRALS None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (08-086) - Consideration of Mayor's nominations for appointment to the Recreation and Park Commission. Continued. (08-087) Councilmember Gilmore stated that she and Vice Mayor Tam attended a memorial service for Ikhinkhorloo "Iko" Bayarsaikhan yesterday at Washington Park; a number of Police Officers and various City Department Heads attended the ceremony; a token of the family's gratitude was presented. Vice Mayor Tam stated the ceremony was for a bench dedication and plaque presentation in celebration of Iko's sixteenth birthday. Councilmember Gilmore and Vice Mayor Tam unveiled the art. Mayor Johnson requested that the City prepare a plaque explaining the art. (08-088) - Councilmember Matarrese noted the passing of Lois Hanna stated Ms. Hanna was a staunch believer in the new Main Library ADJOURNMENT (08-089 - ) There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 10:41 p.m. in a moment of silence in honor of Lois Hanna. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 19, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-02-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-04 | 11 | Vice Mayor Tam stated the issue is a compatibility of office. The City Attorney concurred with Vice Mayor Tam. Vice Mayor Tam stated a person serving on the Hospital Board could serve on the Economic Development Commission because the Commission is an advisory body, but could not serve on the Planning Board because there would be potential conflict of land issues. Councilmember Gilmore suggested that the discussion be held when Councilmember deHaan is present. Mayor Johnson stated that there is no restriction on a person serving on more than one board or commission, but is a practice. Councilmember Gilmore stated the City Manager proposes to amend Section 22-8 to provide flexibility to close offices, such as during winter holidays. Mayor Johnson stated that opening and closing times should not be in the Charter the matter should be covered by ordinance or resolution. The City Manager stated that she sees the issue as being similar to setting of Council meetings in order to provide flexibility. Mayor Johnson stated the issue is a cleanup item. Councilmember Gilmore stated Councilmember deHaan wants Councilmembers to have the ability to nominate members of boards and commissions, not just the Mayor; the matter should be brought back to Council for further discussion. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he appreciates the job that the subcommittee has done; issues are sifting down to be presented to voters; inquired whether the subcommittee is requesting approval of the resolution for non-substantive revisions along with additional cleanup items. Vice Mayor Tam responded that issues have been bifurcated; stated the subcommittee is seeking Council approval of non-substantive revisions, as well as what Council considered to be additional cleanup items; adoption of a formal resolution is not needed until the July 15 City Council Meeting; items that were brought up after the December workshop can be tabled and discussed separately. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the item requiring contracts to be Regular Meeting Alameda… | CityCouncil/2008-03-04.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-03-18 | 11 | certain General Plan elements are updated on a periodic basis, others are not. The Planning Services Manager stated the Transportation Element update would be the next major element update. Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the requirement to have five off-street parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of new retail space is a zoning requirement; stated things have been done differently in the last couple of developments; further inquired whether any leeway has been given to dropping down the number of required spaces. The Planning Services Manager responded the in-lieu fee process has been used; stated staff is working on parking ordinance revisions; more innovated parking approaches will be considered in the Alameda Landing Master Plan. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the parking exception process has been used, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff is comfortable with using said process. The Planning Services Manager responded the process was designed to be an interim approach until new requirements are in place. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion with direction to include additional language for maintaining commercial/retail uses within residential neighborhoods. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-123) Public Hearing to consider Introduction of Ordinance Amending Various Sections of the Alameda Municipal Code Contained in Article I, (Zoning Districts and Regulations) Chapter XXX, (Development Regulations), Pertaining to Retail and Commercial Uses. Introduced. The Supervising Planner provided a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Planning Board reviewed the proposed Ordinance and unanimously supports the staff recommendation, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 March 18, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-03-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-01 | 11 | City is required to do and will require a lot of resourcesi the Housing Element might not be completed because of the resources if there is something else that Council is interested in staff doing. Councilmember Matarrese stated the important thing is that Council needs to be informed, and then Council can make a policy decision about putting something before a mandated project. The City Manager stated that is part of the processi the work plans identify all the things that staff is working on. Vice Mayor Tam and Mayor Johnson stated that they did not select items required by law when setting the priorities because they knew the items had to be completed. The City Manager stated there are limited resources; staff is sharing where resources are being applied and having Council provide feedback on what it sees as priorities. Councilmember deHaan stated that he has not seen tasks causing major displacements some things, like the environmental issue, have been refocused and brought up to a higher priority. The City Manager stated staff had to evaluate other programs and bring the matter to the top; other items might have been extended; staff is informing Council of the projects underway, getting feedback on priorities and developing a method for reporting back. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff is seeking a tenth priority. Ms. Perkins stated there are nine priority tasks and a tenth has been proposed by Councilmember Matarrese. Councilmember Matarrese stated every project is to be evaluated against the budget standard; the same thing has to be said for the City's environmental initiatives; every project and function of every department should be evaluated against the recommendations on how to protect the environment, whether it is the green building ordinance or the vehicle use policy; this is not a whim, but is a clear direction of the Council. Mayor Johnson stated there needs to be a process to involve community stakeholders in developing an economic sustainability strategy that includes outreach to resid… | CityCouncil/2008-04-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-04-15 | 11 | the buildings look, i.e., color and material composition; the chapter is closed on density and building height issues. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether building setbacks are already determined by the Agreement, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Council has the ability to change the 100-foot building height limit, to which The Planning Services Manager responded in the negative. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the building setbacks could be moved back, to which the Planning Services Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Gilmore stated the project is subject to a past Development Agreement the City wants to be known as an entity that keeps its word, just as the City would hold a developer to the letter of an agreement; bringing jobs and tax revenue to the City is good; both sides will not be completely happy because of competing interests such as setbacks, access road, and building materials; the Ferry Terminal parking is an issue whether or not the development is built; she is not sure why the Ferry Terminal parking problem should be off-loaded on the developer. Councilmember Matarrese suggested having a second directive to review restriping the Ferry Terminal parking lot; stated Bay Farm Island was designed as a fully integrated community when developed into Harbor Bay; the area was designed with bike paths and with the intention to have the area built all the way as business: the benefits provide employment of a low intensity around the edge of the Business Park; the parcel is buffered by a lagoon and trees the houses to the west are buffered by the Ferry Terminal. the design is compatible with the other buildings in the Business Park; the closest building has the same motif; the objective is to produce an environmentally friendly construction approach that reduces carbon footprint and benefits the City; the City also benefits from diversifying the tax base; the benefits outweigh the concerns ; the area has been enjoyed as open sp… | CityCouncil/2008-04-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-06 | 11 | discussed at the first workshop; stated the City Attorney's office would have additional time to frame and research Charter consistency of the other items raised and place the items on a subsequent workshop before July 15. Mayor Johnson, Councilmember Matarrese, and Councilmember deHaan concurred with Vice Mayor Tam's suggestion. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she would like to have the ability to preview Council on what will be presented at the second workshop if there is enough time between the first and second workshop. Councilmember Matarrese stated there is consensus that the clean up language and the other seven items will be on the November ballot. Vice Mayor Tam noted that the City Manager is having budget workshops in the next few months. Mayor Johnson stated there might be an Alameda Power and Telecom item for the November 2008 ballot. Vice Mayor Tam stated it is important that the voters do not get fatigued. Mayor Johnson stated that she would not be surprised if a third round of Charter amendments was needed. (08-195) Recommendation to consider Call for Review of Transportation Commission's decision regarding proposed parking restrictions along Central Avenue to improve traffic circulation and emergency access. The Supervising Civil Engineer gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson stated the Transportation Commission did not vote to deny the staff recommendation; there were not enough votes to accept the recommendation; a motion to deny the staff recommendation was not made. The Supervising Civil Engineer stated the final vote was five to two not to support the staff recommendation. Mayor Johnson stated it is important to be clear on what is consensus and what is direction; expressions are not direction. Councilmember Gilmore stated the environmental document notes that there will be half a block queing in 2020; inquired whether said Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council May 6, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-05-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-05-20 | 11 | issue was simply to use the Incident Command System (ICS) ; stated members have been trained to work in the EOP Center; the second step would be to adopt NIMS. Councilmember deHaan inquired when the County adopted NIMS, to which the Disaster Preparedness Officer responded last fall. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any changes have taken place. The Disaster Preparedness Officer responded in the negative; stated resource tracking is one new element of NIMS. Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (08-224) - Consideration of establishing an Economic Sustainability Committee. Councilmember Matarrese stated establishing an Economic Sustainability Committee is time critical because of the budget path layout; the State budget will not be adopted at the same time as the City's budget the City's budget will need to be adjusted, depending upon what the State does; recovery is a long way off; time should be used now to establish a Task Force or committee to discuss retirements benefits, revenue versus expenses, and the true costs of services. Mayor Johnson stated Councilmember deHaan previously mentioned a Blue Ribbon committee that would consist of people familiar with the issues and who would be available to advise management and Council about long-term budget issues. Councilmember deHaan stated the City Treasurer and Auditor should be included. Mayor Johnson stated community members should be included: there needs to be an opportunity to educate people. Councilmember Matarrese stated that starting the process for establishing a committee is imperative so that there is a committee Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 May 20, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-05-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-03 | 11 | of the General Fund budget i the Climate Protection Task Force meetings were open to the public. Councilmember Matarrese stated the committee meetings would be public and noticed. Mayor Johnson stated educating the public is one of the purposes of the committee; concerted efforts should be made to let the public know about the committee. Councilmember Gilmore thanked the sub-committee and staff; suggested having someone from the real estate community serve on the committee or be used as a consultant. Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Councilmember Gilmore. Councilmember deHaan stated that heavy financial expertise is needed; tax experts could provide briefings. Councilmember Gilmore stated that the real estate representative would not have to be on the committee, but could be a consultant. Councilmember Matarrese stated a real estate representative could be used from a financial standpoint. Mayor Johnson stated looking longer than ten years is important. Councilmember Matarrese stated the committee would look at a long horizon, which would not be less than ten years. Mayor Johnson suggested membership be placed on the next Council agenda. The Development Services Director stated that she is not sure whether the matter could be brought to Council that fast. Mayor Johnson stated recommendations could be brought to Council at the first meeting in July and voted on at the same meeting. Councilmember deHaan stated that Council would hand select the members. Bill Smith, Alameda, discussed involvement in the community. Kevin Kennedy, City Treasurer, stated the proposed committee is a good idea; times are tough right now; distinguishing between formal and informal members is important ; encouraged Council to keep the committee small and nimble so that things can be accomplished. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 June 3, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-06-17 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (APFA) AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ARRA) MEETING AND ANNUAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (CIC) MEETING TUESDAY- -JUNE 17, 2008 - - -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint City Council, APFA and ARRA Meeting and Annual CIC Meeting at 8:53 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Authority Members / Board Members / Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor/ Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (08-276CC/08-03 APFA/08-35 CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on June 3, 2008. and the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on June 4, 2008. Approved. Councilmember/Authority Member/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the minutes. Councilmember/Authority Member/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. AGENDA ITEM (08-277CC/08-04APFA) Public Hearing and related actions regarding the Fiscal Year 2008-09 Budget : (08-277A CC) Resolution No. 14222, "Authorizing and Directing the Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease Financing Documents, Authorizing the Preparation and Distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement in Connection with the Offering and Sale of Certificates of Participation Relating Thereto, and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions with Respect Thereto. Adopted; and (08-04A APFA) Resolution No. 08-17, "Approving, Authorizing and Directing Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease Financing Documents and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions with Respect Thereto. Adopted. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Public Financing Authority, Alameda Reuse and 1 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission June 17, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-06-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-01 | 11 | Lorre Zupan thanked the Council for the opportunity to be on the committee; stated the issue is important. Former Councilmember Tony Daysog stated that he looks forward to being involved. Councilmember deHaan stated that he appreciates staff efforts throughout the budget cycle; budget information will be helpful. The City Treasurer stated the goal is to have the first meeting at the end of the month; he assumes that staff will advise committee members of the meeting location and dates. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (08-294) Resolution No. 14242, "Updating the City of Alameda Emergency Operations Plan by Adding the Required National Incident Management System (NIMS) Components and Including Functional Annexes and Supporting Appendices. " Adopted. The Acting Division Chief/Disaster Preparedness Coordinator gave a Power Point Presentation and provided a handout. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the Fire Department would be the document keeper, provide updates, and whether controlled copies would be provided. The Acting Division Chief/Disaster Preparedness Coordinator responded the Disaster Preparedness Coordinator would be responsible for the document; stated virtual copies would be on the City's network; hard copies would be kept at the Fire Department and Police Department Communication Center. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether City Hall would have a copy, to which the Acting Division Chief/Disaster Preparedness Coordinator responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired how outreach is done throughout the community. The Acting Division Chief/Disaster Preparedness Coordinator responded training includes Personal Preparedness and Community Emergency Response Team Programs stated a Personal Preparedness Guide is provided to citizens. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 July 1, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-07-01.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-07-15 | 11 | increasing the real property transaction tax to $10.00 would generate $3.5 million; all sales tax for the next fifteen years would not equal said amount. Mayor Johnson stated increased sales tax is not a viable solution to the problem; residents are contributing money to other cities. Councilmember Matarrese stated the real property transaction tax is a sales tax on house sales; people need to know that the proposed tax would go for public safety services the proposed tax has not been raised since 1993 and is due; employee medical cost benefits have risen by 600% since he was on Council a couple of years agoi the approved budget was a three month budget because that is when Fire Department overtime funds run out and brown-outs may occuri Alameda is comparable to the City of Vallejo; people were very generous on voting for Measure H; house values decline when services deteriorate. Mayor Johnson stated the proposed real property transaction tax amount needs to be discussed. Councilmember Gilmore moved adoption of resolution with an amendment to change the real property transfer tax rate to $12.00 per $1,000 of value; requested that a Plan B be established prior to the election in case the measure does not pass. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated that he would prefer a $10.00 tax rate; homes sold for approximately $120,000 in 1993; homes sell for approximately $600,000 today. Mayor Johnson stated that she would prefer no increase, but an amount needs to be determined to help the budget situation. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she supports the motion; that she cautions against lower amounts because some assumptions are built in regarding volume of home sales; depressed home sales would decrease revenue. Councilmember Matarrese stated Alameda Point activity needs to be factored in as well. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether the motion needs to include direction regarding preparation of ballot arguments. The City Manager responded separate motions can be made; stated a … | CityCouncil/2008-07-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-05 | 11 | The Supervising Planner responded in the negative; stated StopWaste does not have anything mandatory, but has the voluntary standards that are being considered tonight. Mayor Johnson inquired how the State code and StopWaste's model of voluntary guidelines differ. The Supervising Planner responded the State code looks at building efficiency; stated currently, Title 24 requires certain energy standards to be met; the new regulations increase Title 24; LEED and Build It Green are checklist approaches that look at the entire site, including landscaping and transit as well as construction; 15% above Title 24 is one requirement, however, the approach is more holistic. Mayor Johnson stated the Council could set a timeframe for a report back from the Building Official. Councilmember Matarrese stated the report should include an estimated date for implementation. Mayor Johnson inquired what timeframe should be set. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Building Official should have a month to conduct a review; the review should tell Council the differences between the State's standards and the City's standards and the target date for going from optional to mandatory. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the direction is the motion. Councilmember Matarrese responded the direction is the motion along with adoption of the resolution. Mayor Johnson stated the direction should include prioritizing new construction. Councilmember Matarrese agreed to include said direction in the motion. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether a month is adequate time. The Acting City Manager responded a month is an adequate amount of time for the Building Official to inform Council how long the full review would take; stated the full review might be completed in a month. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council should be informed if there is difference. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 August 5, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-08-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-08-19 | 11 | Councilmember Gilmore stated Council has not reached that point yet; contracting out would insulate the City from the risk of losing the Golf Course. Councilmember Matarrese stated the proposed increases would be closer to the real cost of providing a round; many decisions would have to follow. Councilmember Matarrese reintroduced the motion to approve the increases presented by the Golf Commission and staff with direction to review the outcome at the second City Council Meeting in October. Mayor Johnson stated the proposed increases would not solve the Golf Course problems, but would slow the bleeding. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam stated adoption of the proposed fees is a band aid that hopefully will stop some of the bleeding . Councilmember Gilmore stated saving golf for the City is important ; saving or padlocking the Golf Course are the two choices; that she supports the motion. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Noes Councilmember deHaan - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (08 - 358 ) Joe McNiff, Alameda Police Officers Association, stated the Association has been in negotiations since November 2007, which is the longest negotiation process the Association has participated in; outlined services provided. COUNCIL REFERRALS (08-359) Report on Fire and Police Department calls. The Police and Fire Chiefs provided a brief report. Councilmember Gilmore inquired what type of services are grouped into the Public Service Assistance category. The Fire Chief responded services include cutting a ring off, or a child getting caught in playground equipment. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 August 19, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-08-19.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-09-16 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese stated the requested report should include some analysis of the root cause; he wants to be convinced that the correction matches the cause; delays cost the Applicant and City money. Mayor Johnson stated that delays cost staff time also. *** Mayor Johnson called a recess at 9:57 p.m. and reconvened the Regular City Council meeting at 10:11 p.m. *** (08-399) Public Hearing to consider an Appeal of the July 14, 2008, Planning Board Approval of Major Design Review PLN08-0090, Allowing the Reconstruction of Building 1000, located in the Alameda Towne Centre at 2230 South Shore Center; and (08-399A) Resolution No. 14268, "Upholding the Planning Board's Approval of Major Design Review PLN08-0090, Allowing the Reconstruction of Building 1000, Located in the Alameda Towne Centre, at 2230 South Shore Center. Adopted. The Supervising Planner gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Gilmore inquired what type of process Orchard Supply Hardware (OSH) would have to go through if they decided to take the building "as is"; further inquired how long the process would take. The Supervising Planner responded OSH would need to get a business license; a permit would be needed if OSH wanted a sign; stated the process could be completed in a morning. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether OSH could go in as a matter of course if exterior changes were not being proposed. The Supervising Planner responded a hardware store is a permitted use in the zoning district stated there would be no discretionary entitlement. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the City has the legal right to exclude OSH from the permitted use within the Center, to which the City Attorney responded in the negative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the City could prohibit another coffee shop in the Center if other coffee shop merchants said no. The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated the tenant does Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 September 16, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-09-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-07 | 11 | Ms. Gordon responded shopping center use goes go up and down ; changes occur; keeping analyses as conservative as possible leaves some wiggle room. Councilmember deHaan inquired how much wiggle room is put into a study, to which Ms. Gordon responded 20% to 25%. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the shopping center vacancy rate. The Supervising Planner responded the vacancy rate is irrelevant because a conservative position has been taken which overstates the impacts. Randy Kyte, Harsch Investments, stated attempts have been made to address neighbor concerns and subsequent conditions have been added; mechanisms have been put in place to mitigate hours when certain things can occur around the shopping center Park Street would be the only truck entrance; truck route analysis was staff's responsibility; suggesting that all of the ills on Broadway are the result of the shopping center is nonsensical. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the prior truck delivery time. The Supervising Planner responded 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a Use Permit allowed extended hours; stated Safeway and Walgreen's have Use Permits; staff does not anticipate any additional Use Permits in the future if Council approves extending hours to midnight. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the EIR has been certified; he has no problem with signage he is trying to figure out the rationale of giving a blanket change of hours versus a Use Permit; Use Permits provide a controlling mechanism; that he does not have a problem with some businesses staying open until midnight; a Use Permit should be required; that he sees the EIR information as a snap shot in time; Council has a good idea of the impact the impact does not approve any expansion; there is a complete picture of what the impacts would be with a 706,000 square foot shopping center; measurements should be made on incremental occupancy of some of the current, bigger projects; real time traffic counts should be taken when Kohl's is up and running observations need to be taken when the gas… | CityCouncil/2008-10-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-10-21 | 11 | the 13% savings went that the City incurred as a result of the conversion from the 1079 and 1082 Plans; stated that she wants to avoid repeating past mistakes. Mayor Johnson stated actuarial numbers need to be reviewed in order to ensure that payments are adequate. Councilmember Matarrese stated dramatically increased healthcare costs and participant fluctuation need to be considered. Councilmember deHaan stated today has to be the worst of all times to pay but might be the best in terms of securing a bond. Mr. Kennedy stated markets have been frozen; IBM borrowed money at 250 basis points over Treasury, which is ridiculous. The Interim Finance Director stated that the last quarter statistics indicated that the Municipal Bond market was 25% less than demand timing is the issue; updated actuarial assumptions are needed; real numbers are needed. Councilmember Matarrese stated accurate information is needed, but he does not want the matter pushed aside. (08-452) Report on the impact of the Chuck Corica Golf Complex Fee Increases. The Interim Golf Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan stated rounds have increased, but cart rentals have decreased. The Interim Golf Manager stated golfers are making careful spending decisions. Mayor Johnson stated one month's data is not enough to track impacts. Jim Strehlow, Alameda, stated fewer people will play golf because of the current economic conditions; Council should not rely on short-term impacts. Jane Sullwold, Alameda Golf Commission, stated September 2008 only had four weekends and did not include Labor Day weekend, which was included in September 2007 statistics; revenue increased by approximately $24,000; the first month was a very positive experience under the new rate structure; the Interim Finance Director has been extremely helpful in providing information to the Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council October 21, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-10-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-06 | 11 | Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff would come back with a cost analysis for the second part of the motion. The City Manager responded the proposed changes require a MOU amendment stated the amendment would be prepared and presented for consideration along with identifying cost estimates based upon a better understanding of who would accept the Golden Handshake. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the cost analysis would come back to Council for review. Vice Mayor Tam responded in the negative; stated that she would like to direct the City Manager to make the necessary amendment in the MOU; stated the MOU would help provide some definition on specific savings and would come back to Council. inquired whether a report could be provided on the savings. The City Manager responded the MOU amendment staff report would identify the changes as well as identify the savings. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he has some concerns ; Kemper Sports' staffing levels are lower than the City's staffing level; that he does not have a solid feel for City staffing levels questioned whether the staffing level is necessary to maintain the Golf Course; stated the budget is projected with a 10% decline in play, but play is increasing; the one year hit for golf carts should be spread over three years; that he would like to have an evaluation of capital improvement funding paid for through a PILOT, surcharge, and ROI having a Golf Director who's core profession, vocation, and expertise is running a golf course is a very good idea; that he would like to discuss hiring a Golf Director on a performance bonus basis first; Kemper Sports has a great reputation; the Chabot Golf Course was contracted out and the story is not pretty. Councilmember deHaan stated staffing levels are a concerning factor; that he was hoping to hear that ACEA would be bringing staffing levels down. Mayor Johnson stated that she hopes affected Golf employees who do not take the Golden Handshake during the next year will have an opportunity … | CityCouncil/2008-11-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-11-18 | 11 | The Redevelopment Manager stated a rental fee would not be charged. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the total security deposit would be $2,500; further inquired whether the deposit could be refunded entirely other than the $25 processing fee and cleaning costs. The Redevelopment Manager responded details have not been ironed out. Councilmember Gilmore stated the cleaning fees would be $48 per hour for one staff person up to a maximum of six hours; there would be $2,500 security deposit and a maximum $500 clean up fee; a lot of the money could be refundable. Councilmember Matarrese stated a $1 million insurance policy would be bought a lot of tax dollars were invested in the restoration project, which needs to be protected; staff has done a great job in putting together a fair, detailed policy. Vice Mayor Tam stated the event sponsor would get the deposit back if the facility is left in pre-use condition; the total deposit would be forfeited and the event would be cancelled if staff deems that the situation is uncontrollable and must call for police intervention; the event sponsor incurs the cost when Oakland's Police Department is called to provide crowd control and security; inquired whether the City has a similar policy. The Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the applicant would pay for associated costs through the permit process. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the fee would be separate from the security deposit, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether fees would need to be deposited within a certain time of the event. The Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative; stated $500 would be required at the time of reservation; the remaining $2,000 would need to be deposited within three weeks of the event. Councilmember Gilmore requested that staff provide an Off Agenda report regarding the number of calls and bookings within six months after the fees go into affect. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 November 18, 20… | CityCouncil/2008-11-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-02 | 11 | The Fire Marshall stated the Fire Department makes sure that there is no lint accumulation when inspections are done at laundromats. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether inspections have full cost recovery, to which the Fire Marshall responded in the negative. Vice Mayor Tam inquired how much full cost recovery would cost, to which the Fire Marshall responded that he would provide the information. Mayor Johnson stated the minimum could be set at one hour instead of a half an hour; inquired how commercial elevator calls are handled. The Fire Marshall responded many times the Fire Department responds to elevator calls and finds no one in the elevator. Mayor Johnson stated building owners could be allowed one free call per year; other calls could be charged a one-hour minimum. Councilmember deHaan stated the hourly rate seems low. Mayor Johnson stated fees need to be high enough that people do not have the incentive to call the Fire Department. Councilmember deHaan stated Council is trying to put together a realistic cost recovery fee. The Fire Marshall stated that he would take Council's comments back and provide a revised report. Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association, urged Council to consider one free non-emergency call for commercial business owners. Councilmember Matarrese stated the problem is not just cost recoveryi the Fire Department needs to be used for emergencies only; times are tight. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of continuing the item and bringing the item back with suggested changes. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent Vice Mayor Tam - 1. ( 08-518 - ) Recommendation to accept the monitoring findings and Regular Meeting 11 Alameda City Council December 2, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-12-02.pdf |
CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2008-12-16 | 11 | None. . ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Regular Meeting was adjourned at 11:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 December 16, 2008 | CityCouncil/2008-12-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-06 | 11 | cardiac patients, the engine needs to get there quickly with the defibrillator transport is not as important because the patient can be treated at the scene; getting an ambulance there quickly might be more important for internal injuries statistically, only 15 out of the 36 delayed calls would be critical incidents. Councilmember Matarrese inquired what is the $100,000 for training and contingency. The Fire Chief stated $30,000 is for paramedic training; $20,000 is for a recruit academy; the other $50,000 is to deal with major incidents and fire fighter call backs for fires; the overtime savings comes from lowering daily staffing of stations; some money is needed for call back for major incidents and other activities. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired during what period of time did the $413,000 State reimbursement accumulate, to which the Fire Chief responded the amount is for the current fiscal year. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired what percentage of the overtime is used for mutual aid. The Fire Chief responded the amount of time varies; stated the money should be fully recovered. Vice Mayor deHaan stated mutual aid agreements are a substantial portion of overtime and cannot be neglected. The Fire Chief stated a Statewide agreement requires the City to respond if able; the City uses resources from other communities, too. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the first response is an engine with a paramedic, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the City ever had four ambulances, to which the Fire Chief responded in the negative. Councilmember Tam stated the total overtime allocation for the 2008-09 Fiscal Year was $1.013 million; $978,000 was used at the end of last year to maintain the minimum staffing level of 27, 33 people are required to be available; inquired whether the overtime charges are primarily due to lack of staff from people out on injury, people on leave, or various combinations. The Fire Chief responded it is a little bit of all; stated the general rule of thu… | CityCouncil/2009-01-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-01-20 | 11 | Vice Mayor deHaan questioned whether Council wants to limit the flexibility of the Planning Department for a small opportunity; stated that he does not want to create four lane roads; infrastructure is built out except for the West End. Councilmember Matarrese stated that flexibility would not be limited; an exemption can be made if a project warrants a drastic measure; a worthy, high priority project would need an EIR that has defined timeframes; the problem is on the other side of the Tube. Councilmember Gilmore stated traffic is the number one complaint; adding capacity would add traffic; adding capacity should only be done for a good project; inquired whether a worthy project needing an EIR could be simultaneously processed with a GPA; further inquired whether the process would be slowed down. The Planning and Building Director responded a draft EIR would be needed in some cases to determine whether lane widening is needed. Vice Mayor deHaan stated congestion already exists when trying to make a left-hand turn onto Park Street at Otis Drive; traffic cannot move down Otis Drive; the area has parking spaces that are not used; traffic backs up two or three blocks on Otis Drive; the choke point has not encouraged people to walk, ride bikes, or take a bus to the shopping center. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Council and community have been adamant about having mitigation measures to accommodate traffic from new development; softening the policy does not give a clear picture of what Council wants to do. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the process is awkward or something that staff could live with. The Public Works Director responded the concern is having some flexibility to look at potential operational issues; stated a GPA could be done; there would be a time issue and cost to the developer; the Planning Board recommendation allows the Transportation Commission, Planning Board and City Council to hear pros and cons for providing a right-turn lane; the public would be involved in the discussion; the develop… | CityCouncil/2009-01-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-03 | 11 | The City Attorney stated the ordinance could be done two ways; one way would be to characterize billable responses; the standard would be property negligence; another way would be to have a list of reoccurring events. Mayor Johnson stated the simplest way is to have a list of billable situations. Mayor Johnson stated most people are offended that people call the Fire Department for maintenance problems; community training should be done. Speakers : Bill Klump, Alameda Firefighters Local 689; Deborah James, Urban Habitat; Robb Ratto, Park Street Business Association; Jeff DelBono, Alameda Firefighter; Jon Spangler, Alameda. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the six-month period could be extended to one year; inquired whether listing billable events could be done. The Fire Marshall responded a detailed list becomes limiting; stated that he would prefer a list that is not hard and fast. Mayor Johnson stated "property due to owner neglect" should be taken out and the list could be open-ended. The City Attorney stated more certainty would be created if specific events trigger a charge; a catchall category could be created; a standard is needed. Councilmember Matarrese stated there could be a list and conditions due to property owner negligence; a six-month period is too short that he would prefer one year. Mayor Johnson inquired about having a trigger for a building inspection. The Fire Marshall responded the issue is part of the process. Mayor Johnson stated having a trigger point should be part of the ordinance; the Building Department should be required to follow up on the matter. The Fire Marshall stated Fire Inspectors would refer building code violations to the proper department. The City Manager stated a modified ordinance would be brought back to Council. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 3, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-07 | 11 | Councilmember Matarrese stated enterprise funds should be defined; there is an artificial notion that the sewer fund makes money; further stated that he would like AMP included in Section VI. In response to the Interim Finance Director's comments regarding a chart of accounts, Councilmember Gilmore stated having a chart of all funds is a great idea; the Development Services and Planning and Building Departments' budgets should include restrictions about how revenues can be spent. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired why the ferry should be removed from the enterprise fund. The Interim Finance Director responded an enterprise fund should have fees that pay for the service, be self-sustaining and have assets and liabilities akin to a private sector "for profit" operation. The Public Works Director stated many funds are used for the ferry, which does not pay for itself. The Interim Finance Director stated the matter could be added to the issue bin; perhaps the ferry could be moved into a special revenue fund. Mayor Johnson stated, under golf, the City needs to avoid having management spend down reserve funds to pay for operating costs; suggested language be added; further stated the definition of operating costs should include maintenance. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether an option could be provided to get rid of the term "enterprise fund;" stated none are really self sustaining unless every sewer were up to date, there is an artificial expectation that it is a true enterprise; said situation was discovered with golf and telecom; the City is not in business to make a profit. The Interim Finance Director stated the funds are enterprise under Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) rules; gave a brief review of Section VII, Revenue Distribution. Councilmember Tam stated the policy should be explicit that General Fund revenue is not earmarked; inquired whether or not funds could be dedicated for fire when the City sought revenue enhancement with Measure P. The Interim Finance Director responded the Jarvis family o… | CityCouncil/2009-02-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-02-17 | 11 | Vice Mayor deHaan stated setting the Vehicle Reserve Fund aside was a healthy move; taking money out now is not a good now; a question was raised Saturday regarding the spending history over the last five years; retirement expenses are outstanding; discussions involved bonds against the debti direction was given to review other options. The City Manager stated the Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB) financing options would be shared with the Fiscal Sustainability Committee. Councilmember Matarrese stated the issue needs to move rapidly; a drop-dead date is needed if the Fiscal Sustainability Committee wants input; the original direction was that the OPEB issue would be addressed this year. The City Manager stated the Interim Finance Director is working on the [bond] validation suit with the City Attorney's office. Councilmember Matarrese stated a specific date needs to be set for discussion; direction was given in June; time is slipping away. Mayor Johnson stated Council could address the matter at the second meeting in March. The City Manager inquired whether Council is requesting that the matter come back for action. Mayor Johnson stated Council is requesting that the matter come back with a final plan. Vice Mayor deHaan stated financing during this year is a concern; the news was concerning to Council; adjustments need to be made this year. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the $2.1 million workers' compensation expense includes this year. The City Manager responded $2. 1 million is a projection through June 2009. Vice Mayor deHaan stated a report should be provided on what was accumulated this year. The City Attorney stated the City has a $2.1 million loss reserve fund this year for medical payments; $961,000 has been spent, which is different from the deficit. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 February 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-02-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-03-03 | 11 | Proponents ( In favor of appeal) : Robert Wooley, Appellant, (submitted handout) i Robert Ramos, Alameda; John Gaskill, Alameda; Sally Damson, Alameda; Dee Keltner, Alameda. Opponents (Not in favor of appeal) : Robert Mackensen, Yuba City, (submitted letter) i Mark Irons, Alameda; Tricia Emerson, Alameda; Karen Thompson, Alameda; Jerry Wilkins, Custom Kitchens Linda McKenna, Custom Kitchens, Inc. i Craig Combs, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Mayor Johnson requested clarification on the HAB process. The Planner III stated there were two vacancies when the project went before the HAB; there were only three sitting members the first time the project went to the HAB, the HAB voted two to one to deny the Certificate of Occupancy ; the second time the HAB voted two to one denying the Applicant's request for Certificate of Approval the third time the HAB voted two to one in favor of granting the Applicant Certificate of Approval. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a minimum of three votes was needed or whether a majority of those present was needed, to which the Planner III responded a majority of those present. Mayor Johnson inquired why the project was brought back so many times. The Planner III responded the project was brought back a third time because after the HAB denied the Certificate of Approval, the Applicant was directed to redesign the porch and return the following month with a new design. The Planning Services Manager stated the HAB voted to continue the item to a future meeting to allow the Applicant to go back and redesign the project. Councilmember Matarrese stated the matter sounds like a Design Review issue, which would be handled by the Planning Board; inquired why the matter went to the HAB. The Planner III responded the project went to the HAB because the Applicant was proposing to alter more than 30% of the building; the City's Historical Preservation Ordinance requires that the Applicant receive a Certificate of Approval from the HAB … | CityCouncil/2009-03-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-03-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-03-17 | 11 | Counci lmember Gilmore requested that a report be provided regarding how fees are working out within six months to a year. The Planning and Building Director inquired whether the report could be provided within a year, to which Councilmember Gilmore responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Tam inquired whether staff would still need to use some other fees to off set costs if the proposed fees do not recover costs, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson suggested that staff time be limited. The Planning and Building Director stated that she welcomes said direction; the process would be streamlined; boards and commissions would be informed. Mayor Johnson stated parties need to be informed also; parties need to try and mediate the matter before coming to a board or commission. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor deHaan stated the track record shows that one-third of the appeals were withdrawn; that he would support a flat rate. Mayor Johnson requested that Council be notified earlier if there are issues. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Louncilmembers Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 4. Noes: Vice Mayor deHaan - 1. (09-122) Public Hearing to consider introduction of an Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Adding Section 24-10 (Cost Recovery for Recurring Calls for Service to Respond to and/or Abate Properties Due to Specified Conditions or Owner Neglect) to Chapter XXIV (Public Health) Introduced; and (09-122A) Resolution No. 14318, "Amending Master Fee Resolution No. 12191 to Revise and Add Various New Fees. Adopted. The Fire Marshall gave brief presentation. Mayor Johnson inquired what would be considered structural leakage. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 March 17, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-03-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-04-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-04-07 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -APRIL 7, 2009- -7:00 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7:15 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (09-126) Workers' Compensation Claim (54956.95) ; Claimant: Corey Merrick; Agency claimed against City of Alameda. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that the City Council received a briefing from the Risk Manager and Legal Council and gave direction regarding settlement of a Workers' Compensation Claim. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council April 7, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-04-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-04-21 | 11 | needed. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether SunCal deliverables have been reviewed by hired consultants, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the process has been reviewed, not the initiative. The tedevelopment Manager stated outside counsel has been supportive in all efforts; staff always checks with the City Attorney and outside legal counsel if there are questions. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the Interim City Manager has ever seen such a far-reaching initiative, to which the Interim City Manager responded not in her travels. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that legal counsel needs to compare other petitions. The Interim City Manager stated Council did not direct staff to write the initiative; the goal is to make the initiative transparent and as easily understood as possible. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the staff recommendation is all encompassing and would put things in proper perspective, to which the Interim City Manager stated the two-stage approach would. Vice Mayor deHaan inquired whether the initiative could be corrected if something is missing and whether SunCal would need to start the process over again. The City Attorney responded SunCal would need to start the process over again if an error is found. Councilmember Matarrese stated Council's job is to have an independent analysis so that information can be offered to dispel misconceptions. ouncilmember Matarrese moved approval of staff's two Phase recommendation with following direction: 1) ARRA pays for the study 2) specific components be addressed in additional to Items 1 through 8 ; 3) an explanation of control mechanisms that would remain should the initiative pass, including zoning, DDA, and process of identifying the developer; 4) the report is to address environmental concerns regarding what the Navy would be responsible for under the soil and what the developer/eventual landowner would be responsible for above the soil 5) before launch, a finer Regular Meeting Alameda City Counc… | CityCouncil/2009-04-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2009-05-05 | 11 | is up in July. The Interim City Manager responded the Contract is up in December; stated staff is moving along a parallel track for a long-term solution. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the [ Power Point ] charts are good; inquired whether the charts and a narrative could be posted on the website, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative. (09-185) - Public Hearing to consider adoption of the Fiscal Year 2009 - 2010 Community Development Block Grant Action Plan and authorize the Interim City Manager to negotiate and execute related documents, agreements, and modifications. The Community Development Program Manager gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Tam stated funding shifted to Echo Housing and the Food Bank because the Red Cross Executive Director retired; inquired whether more funding could be secured because of the shift. The Community Development Program Manager responded staff is assisting the Food Bank in hiring a part-time Fundraiser stated Echo Housing is a direct assistance program; the City funds a certain amount administratively. Councilmember Tam inquired how many soft story buildings would qualify for the 51% low-income occupancy criteria. The Community Development Program Manager responded that staff has not been able to identify an exact number; stated large properties located on the West side would most likely qualify. Proponents (In favor of the staff recommendation) : Cyndy Wasko, Social Services Human Relations Board (SSHRB) ; Liz Varela, Building Futures with Women and Children; Cathy Nielson, SSHRB, Peter Simon, College of Alameda; Patricia Murillo; Ciana Presco; Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative; Paul Russell, Alameda Food Bank; Huong Le, Asian Health Services. Following Ms. Nielson's comments, Mayor Johnson inquired whether 6,000 Alameda residents have no medical and dental insurance. Ms. Nielson responded in the affirmative; stated most likely, the figure will increase because of today's economy . Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 May 5, 2009 | CityCouncil/2009-05-05.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );