pages: CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf, 11
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-02-07 | 11 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- - -FEBRUARY 7, 2006- -7:27 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:45 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Resolution Amending Resolution No. 98-78 [paragraph no. 06-002CIC] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissione: Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] ( *06-056CC/06-001CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Community Improvement Commission Meeting held on December 20, 2005. Approved. (06-002CIC) Resolution No. 06-139, "Amending Resolution No. 98-78 Regarding Commission Bylaws Article II, Section 12 Regarding the Powers and Authority of the General Counsel. Adopted; and (06-002A CIC) Recommendation to Approve Policy Regarding Hiring Procedures for Special Legal Counsel. Chair Johnson stated that the changes made to the Bylaws were fine the policy and resolution have inconsistencies; the policy states that General Counsel is authorized spend up to $35,000 per matter; the resolution states that matters estimated to cost more than $35,000 must be brought to the CIC. Commissioner Daysog inquired whether the policy question was that a matter should still come to the CIC if the matter costs $25,000 as opposed to $35,000. Chair Johnson responded in the negative; stated the policy states that the General Counsel is authorized to spend up to $35,000 on any matter and then come to the CIC, whether the matter costs Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and 1 Community Improvement Commission February 7, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-02-07.pdf |