pages
8 rows where body = "SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard" and page = 2
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2011-11-28.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2011-11-28 | 2 | Joint Use Agreements - Pools Update The pools are still open, with the current agreement set to expire in June. District staff noted there have been conversations with community members interested in some kind of long-term conversation regarding pool facilities in Alameda. Staff also has to consider lead abatement at Emma Hood with an estimated cost of $120K. The District is looking at our facilities plan and will be evaluating all of our school facilities. City staff noted interest in perhaps acquiring land somewhere central in Alameda in order to build a City Swim Center. Another option would be the use of a hangar on the former naval base for a private, for-profit swim center concept. Alameda City Emergency Readiness City Evacuation Sites/School Facilities/Student Management: District staff asked if the Board should expect to take a role as part of emergency readiness measures, and commended City emergency services staff for the joint drill held at Alameda High School. City staff clarified that Board Members have no specifically defined roles, but would be providing copies of the City's Disaster Plan to the District Office and would invite the Board Members to future disaster preparedness training. Subcommittee Members noted that in the event of a real emergency, both entities would work together to reassure and communicate to parents with a singular message. City staff noted they would be seeking feedback from the Principal about the drill in general and to solicit staff and student feedback. Both entities agreed that a refresher course at the beginning of every school year would be helpful for new principals and staff. NEW BUSINESS None at this time. Adjournment President Mooney and Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 10:06 AM. | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2011-11-28.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-03-19.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2012-03-19 | 2 | Vacant Building HAHS The Subcommittee noted interest in Kofman Auditorium is a separate issue and not part of the pools discussion. The Subcommittee noted that in the event of a major earthquake, only the Kofman lobby and auditorium have been retrofitted aside from the student classrooms. District staff has been directed to look for interim space for the District Office but vacating the site will require fencing around the area. The Board plans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of retrofitting vs. tear down costs. A member of the public noted that a single swim center would have to figure out how to accommodate students at both comprehensive public high schools. Report on Redevelopment With the dismantling of redevelopment agencies, the Subcommittee discussed the City as a successor entity with 80% economic development and 20% affordable housing with the Housing Authority serving as a separate entity. The City will be putting together an oversight Board of 7 members. The Subcommittee noted the school board has nominated Board Member McMahon to serve on the oversight Board. The District and the City will discuss two agreements - Mastick and the pass through ($4M) before the oversight Board meetings. Staff will meet at the end of the month to discuss these issues further and are working jointly on a resolution. Tidelands, Eagle Avenue, Next Steps The Subcommittee noted the redevelopment agreement between the City and the District is an unusual one and required more engagement and discussion of options. A member of the public asked about the proposed Project Leaf community garden idea for the former Island High School site on Eagle Avenue. The Subcommittee noted staff is waiting to hear back from the state regarding a $2.5M grant to develop the property. The Subcommittee noted that the District must follow the law in terms of how surplus property is disposed of and the District has little control over who owns the property and no discretion to prefer one project over another. Alameda Point Next Step… | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-03-19.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-06-27.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2012-06-27 | 2 | Pros/cons have to be laid out regarding flexibility and generation rates currently show at 4800. There would be a need for elementary, middle, and high school seats availability but it may be an investment property if the District determines we don't need a school. If it is determined to be surplus property, the District is required to offer it first to certain entities and any purchase would be obligated to pay fair market value. Although specific needs have not been identified at this time, the District would like to be flexible. City Staff clarified that currently the Base plan shows 1400 housing units at the Point with an additional 700 outside. The District requested that City staff work with District staff to discuss and agree upon generation rates because developers often have different numbers. Swimming Pools The Subcommittee discussed the continuance of the pools through this fiscal year, but noted in 2013/14 and beyond things may change. City staff noted the City Manager had met with members of the swimming pool community this week and some expressed an interest in taking over the management of the pools. The Subcommittee further discussed the importance of District input and the newspaper noting that the City intends to end the pools agreement with the District next June. Mayor Gilmore noted the City has not definitely agreed or decided what to do, but the potential to not renew the agreement exists. Board Members noted it would be most helpful to start figuring out a solution in January rather than waiting until May for a final decision. Redevelopment Pass Through Agreement Staff will work through potential solutions. Tax increment funds are allocated as an enforceable obligation. The County auditor and controller is in "hold" mode at this point but City Staff will keep District staff abreast of any developments. District staff reminded everyone that the Board would need to take public action to allow the District to negotiate this item. Adjournment President Sherratt and Mayor Gilmore adjourned the m… | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2012-06-27.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2013-07-24 | 2 | have satellite parking with a shuttle to the pool if adequate acreage is not available. The Subcommittee clarified that the pool at Alameda High School is on school district property and does not belong to the City. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of locating a pool on the former naval base and the difficulties in transporting/shuttling students for physical education classes. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of hosting meets, noting that parking will be an issue when considering at least 2 spectators per swimmer at such events. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of building a small hotel to accommodate out-of-area swimmers and families 2. Discussion of Alameda Little League donation to City of Alameda and Alameda Unified School District to install lights at Rittler and Wood Baseball fields. The Subcommittee noted interest in Kofman Auditorium is a separate issue and not part of the pools discussion. The Subcommittee noted that in the event of a major earthquake, only the Kofman lobby and auditorium have been retrofitted aside from the student classrooms. District staff has been directed to look for interim space for the District Office but vacating the site will require fencing around the area. The Board plans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of retrofitting VS. tear down costs. A member of the public noted that a single swim center would have to figure out how to accommodate students at both comprehensive public high schools. Report on Redevelopment With the dismantling of redevelopment agencies, the Subcommittee discussed the City as a successor entity with 80% economic development and 20% affordable housing with the Housing Authority serving as a separate entity. The City will be putting together an oversight Board of 7 members. The Subcommittee noted the school board has nominated Board Member McMahon to serve on the oversight Board. The District and the City will discuss two agreements - Mastick and the pass through ($4M) before the oversight Board meetings. St… | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2014-03-04.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2014-03-04 | 2 | C. REVIEW AND DISCUSS: 1. Discussion and Update on the Proposed Negotiated Agreement among the City of Alameda, Alameda Unified School District, and the Alameda Housing Authority. The Subcommittee discussed the exchange agreement amongst the City of Alameda, Alameda Unified School District and the Alameda Housing Authority. The Subcommittee clarified that the pool at Alameda High School is on school district property and does not belong to the City. The Subcommittee discussed how the city and school district had been able to work together on the transition. The Subcommittee noted interest in resolving all pools concerns. The Board announced plans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of retrofitting vs. tear down costs. A member of the public, Dick Rutter, suggested ted that the City Council and the Board should provide the public with appraisal information for all the land swap properties. The Subcommittee noted that the District must follow the law in terms of how surplus property is disposed of and the District has little control over who owns the property and no discretion to prefer one project over another. A member of the public, Doug DeHaan, sugessted that the City Council and the Board should provide the public with full disclosure of all negotiated agreements, because most discussions were held in closed session meetings. A member of the public noted that the City Council and the Board should review developer fees, especially the impact on the boating docks. D. NEW BUSINESS: The City Council and the Board discussed dates for bringing the final negotiated agreements before the City of Alameda, Alameda Unified School District, and the Alameda Housing Authority. Adjournment Mayor Gilmore adjourned the meeting at 11:25 a.m. THIS MEETING WAS NOT VIDEO RECORDED AND NO AUDIO IS AVAILABLE | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2014-03-04.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2015-09-16.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2015-09-16 | 2 | C. REVIEW AND DISCUSS: 1. Traffic Impacts on Bay Farm Island and Lincoln Bell Schedule The Subcommittee discussed the traffic on Bay Farm Island's bridge between the hours of 7:20am - 9:00am and the possibility of working together on a transportation study. The study could include A.C. Transit route number 631. The Subcommittee discussed Lincoln Middle School's and Earhart Elementary School's supervised and non-supervised morning drop-off timeframes. The members expressed support for the Transportation Commission reaching out to AUSD parents, bargaining units, and for the formation of school bike groups. The Subcommittee reviewed traffic pattern reports from zip codes 94502 traveling through 94501. 2. Disaster Preparedness: Care and Shelter Coordination / Emergency Operations Center Representation The Subcommittee discussed the importance of all facilities becoming certified by FEMA (i.e. all gyms at high schools, Boys & Girls Club, St. Joseph Notre Dame High School; Chinese Christian School). Each site will have requirements of maintaining identification services. FEMA certification includes accessibility to national databases and emergency generator distribution guarantees within 48hours. The Subcommittee selected Robbie Lyng, Director of Maintenance, Operations, and Facilities (MOF), as the Emergency Operations Center Representation from AUSD to the City. Completion of training courses and training modules are required by FEMA. The Emergency Operations Center implementation will occur within the next year. AUSD will follow City lead towards implementation. 3. Swim Center Improvements Update and Ongoing Maintenance The Subcommittee discussed the twenty percent (20%) completion status of the swim center improvement project. Compliance with all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements are pending approval with the Division of the State Architect. The Subcommittee expressed support for partnership fees for all required sidewalk ADA compliance upgrades. The City will meet and confer with the City Attorney… | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2015-09-16.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-02-10.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2016-02-10 | 2 | C. REVIEW AND DISCUSS: 1. Traffic concerns around Otis School (Otis/Mound intersection and Court/Calhoun drop off) and signage at Earhart Elementary drop off The Subcommittee discussed the traffic impacts at Otis School. Mayor Spencer expressed her concerns of parent parking and gridlock including the loading zone areas. President Henneberry recommended to observe the morning drop-off at 8am. There are three regular parking stalls and one handicapped parking stall. Mayor Spencer expressed concerns for more disabled parking stalls. The Subcommittee discussed extending the white zone areas. Bob Haun stated that he will perform traffic counts and analysis for Otis/Mound intersection and Court/Calhoun corners. Signage will be up in 30 days for Earhart Elementary school. 2. City Presentation on Development Plans The Subcommittee discussed upcoming development plans and the necessity of the City and the District to work together regarding negotiations with the developer to ensure the capacity of new students are being met as a result of new development projects. Shariq Khan discussed a developer fee analysis performed yearly. 1) Alameda Landing: 300 housing units, phases 1 & 2 completed, phase 3 complete in 2016, Stargell Commons (32 units of affordable rental housing) under construction, 300,000 sq. ft. commercial, 400,000 sq. ft. office, 8-Acre Waterfront Park. Project to be completed in 2016. 2) Marina Shores: 89 townhome units (including 16 affordable units), 50 SF, 39 MF townhomes. Project was completed in 2016, and homes are just beginning to be sold. 3) 2100 Clement: 2.78 acres, 52 units (seven affordable), construction 2016-17. Superintendent McPhetridge requested Food Services Warehouse located at 2130 Clement Avenue (Mulberry/Clement) to be clearly zoned as a mixed-use zone. Debbie Potter will review and analyze the zoning codes and the general plan for Food Services Warehouse located at 2130 Clement Avenue. Bob Haun stated that the City may potentially give back the Mulberry easement to the District. Robbie … | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-02-10.pdf |
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf,2 | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2016-06-27 | 2 | B. AUSD and City Coordination with Developers to Address Potential Impacts Shariq Khan gave a brief presentation. The AUSD will be sending a formal request the District be included in the CEQA process, so that Environmental Impact Reports are received by the District in a formal notice. Gray Harris inquired whether there has been discussion on where students would be attending school, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the negative. Shariq Khan stated AUSD has been receiving information from the Development Review Team (DRT) meetings on a regular basis. The AUSD also has a demographer to generate student generation rates to determine which schools they will attend. Mayor Spencer stated the information is usually provided after the City approves the project; the AUSD should provide input sooner; expressed concern that the schools are full and lotteries may be needed. In response to Gray Harris' inquiry, Shariq Khan stated there are schools that have room, including Paden which can accommodate 300 more students, Ruby Bridges can take 70 more, and Maya Lin can take 300 more. Mayor Spencer inquired about Middle and High School vacancies, to which Shariq Khan responded Encinal High School, including Junior Jets (middle school), can accommodate approximately 300 more students. The Superintendent stated student enrollment can increase with the development of Alameda High School, which will create more spaces at Encinal High School. There will be an opportunity to right-size schools that are under-enrolled. Shariq Khan stated formalizing the relationship with the Navy and CEQA will allow the District to get the CEQA documents ahead of time to evaluate any impacts and notify the City in a timely manner. The Subcommittee discussed concerns regarding school-placement issues other Cities are facing. The Superintendent stated the law does not provide any way for the District to guarantee any particular school placement. The Base Reuse Director stated department staff coordinated the EIR for Alameda Point very closely with th… | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2016-06-27.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );