pages: SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf, 2
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard | 2013-07-24 | 2 | have satellite parking with a shuttle to the pool if adequate acreage is not available. The Subcommittee clarified that the pool at Alameda High School is on school district property and does not belong to the City. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of locating a pool on the former naval base and the difficulties in transporting/shuttling students for physical education classes. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of hosting meets, noting that parking will be an issue when considering at least 2 spectators per swimmer at such events. The Subcommittee discussed the possibility of building a small hotel to accommodate out-of-area swimmers and families 2. Discussion of Alameda Little League donation to City of Alameda and Alameda Unified School District to install lights at Rittler and Wood Baseball fields. The Subcommittee noted interest in Kofman Auditorium is a separate issue and not part of the pools discussion. The Subcommittee noted that in the event of a major earthquake, only the Kofman lobby and auditorium have been retrofitted aside from the student classrooms. District staff has been directed to look for interim space for the District Office but vacating the site will require fencing around the area. The Board plans to hold larger public meetings to discuss the cost of retrofitting VS. tear down costs. A member of the public noted that a single swim center would have to figure out how to accommodate students at both comprehensive public high schools. Report on Redevelopment With the dismantling of redevelopment agencies, the Subcommittee discussed the City as a successor entity with 80% economic development and 20% affordable housing with the Housing Authority serving as a separate entity. The City will be putting together an oversight Board of 7 members. The Subcommittee noted the school board has nominated Board Member McMahon to serve on the oversight Board. The District and the City will discuss two agreements - Mastick and the pass through ($4M) before the oversight Board meetings. Staff will meet at the end of the month to discuss these issues further and are working jointly on a resolution. Tidelands, Eagle Avenue, Next Steps The Subcommittee noted the redevelopment agreement between the City and the District is an unusual one and required more engagement and discussion of options. | SubcommitteeoftheCityCouncilandSchoolBoard/2013-07-24.pdf |