pages
487 rows where body = "HistoricalAdvisoryBoard" sorted by body
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: page, date (date)
Link | body ▼ | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2018-10-04 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, OCTOBER 4, 2018 1. CONVENE Chair Saxby called meeting to order at 7:03pm. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Saxby, Board Members Jones (arrived 7:08pm), Lau, Sanchez, Wit. Absent: None. 3. MINUTES 3-A 2018-6057 Draft Meeting Minutes - May 3, 2018 Board Member Sanchez made a motion to approve the minutes. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 3-B 2018-6058 Draft Meeting Minutes - June 7, 2017 Board Member Sanchez made a motion to approve the minutes. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION Staff requested to move staff communications up in the agenda for the resolution honoring former member Piziali. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION *None* 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2018-6053 Board Elections Board Member Sanchez made a motion to nominate Board Member Saxby as chair. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. Board Member Jones nominated Board Member Sanchez to be Vice Chair. Board Member Saxby seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. *** Staff Communications*** Staff Member Dong introduced a board resolution honoring former member Piziali for his service on the Historical Advisory Board. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 October 4, 2018 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2018-10-04 | 2 | Chair Saxby read the resolution. 7-B 2018-6054 PLN18-0331 - Certificate of Approval - 1447 1/2 Eighth Street - Applicant: James Snider. Public hearing to consider a Certificate of Approval to allow a 447 square foot single story addition at the rear of an existing 497 square foot detached single family house which will require demolition of more than 30% of the structure's current value, as determined by the Building Official. The property is not listed on the City's Historic Building Study List. The project site is located in the R-5 (General Residential) Zoning District. Staff Member Sablan gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https:/lalameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3688748&GUID=70670E94- 2DAE-45D6-87CF-5F194EFEF805&FullText=1 Board Member Sanchez asked if the windows in the front of the house were being replaced. He also asked if the shingles (siding) were being replaced. Staff Member Sablan said that the windows were being replaced and the shingles would be replaced with redwood shingles. Board Member Wit asked what the procedure was for researching the building history and significance of whomever built it. Staff Member Sablan said they use building documents, internet research, and the Alameda Museum as resources. Chair Saxby asked what the final square footage would be. Staff Member Sablan said it would be 944 square feet. Board Member Sanchez asked if the applicant would use Milgard windows. The applicant said he is unsure. He said he wants it to look period and could use wood or vinyl, if allowed. Board Member Sanchez offered some suggestions for avoiding the undesirable look of vinyl windows on a historic home. Board Member Wit asked if the addition would trigger any additional parking requirements. Staff Member Sablan said it would not trigger any parking requirements. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 5 October 4, 2018 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2018-10-04 | 3 | Chair Saxby said the massing looks appropriate. He said he has the same preference not to use vinyl windows. Chair Saxby opened and closed the public hearing. Board Member Sanchez made a motion to approve the project with the condition that the applicant submit documentation regarding the windows at the time of design review and that vinyl windows be avoided. Chair Saxby asked that the character of the windows match the existing windows. Board Member Sanchez agreed and said that as long as the windows match the designs in the application, they should be sufficient. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 7-C 2018-6055 PLN18-0341 - Certificate of Approval - 2301 Santa Clara Avenue - Applicant: Carolyn C. Fong on Behalf of Lily Angela Chun 1991 Living Trust. Public hearing to consider a Certificate of Approval for the disassembly and removal of a gas station kiosk and canopy to enable ground soil cleanup required by state regulatory agencies. The gas station kiosk will be reassembled once the soil remediation is completed, which is anticipated to take 18-24 months. The subject property is a Contributing Structure to the Park Street Historic District. Per Alameda Municipal Code (AMC) Section 13-21.5 the project requires a Certificate of Approval by the Historical Advisory Board. The property is located in the C- C-T (Community Commercial, Theatre Combining) Zoning District. The project is Categorically Exempt from additional environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Sections 15301 - Existing Facilities, 15304 - Minor Alterations to Land, 15330 - Minor Actions to Prevent, Minimize, Stabilize, Mitigate or Eliminate the Release or Threat of Release of Hazardous Waste or Hazardous Substances, and 15331 - Historic Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation. Staff Member Sablan gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3688749&GUID=69B80DC0 8B63-45CF-95E8-818657CEA138&FullText=… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2018-10-04 | 4 | for many years. Ted Chun said he worked at that station since he was ten years old. He said they want to clean the property up. He said they are not the type of people to walk away. Ronald Chun said this has been a family business and he knows this is an important historical part of Alameda. Chair Saxby closed the public hearing. Board Member Sanchez asked what would happen if they started cleanup and had to do cleanup beneath the flower shop structure. <Response not given into microphone/inaudible> Board Member Sanchez asked whether if during excavation and remediation they needed to do something that affected the structure of the flower shop. Staff Member Sablan said the flower shop is a contributing structure and would require the same certificate of approval. Board Member Wit asked what would happen if the canopy structure did not fit in the garage where it would be stored. Clarence Peterson, the applicant's contractor, said they have room inside and on top of the garage. Chair Saxby asked if anyone has considered moving the structure in its entirety to a new site. Mr. Peterson said the building was old and brittle and they had not considered that option. Board Member Saxby said disassembling an old structure like that may be difficult to put back together is fraught with problems. Board Member Lau asked if there was a plan to deal with pedestrian traffic on and around the site during the lengthy construction. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 5 October 4, 2018 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2018-10-04 | 5 | Mr. Peterson said they planned to reinstall a fence around the site during work. Board Member Jones expressed concern that leaving elements on top of the garage, exposed to the elements could cause damage. Board Member Sanchez said there is a reasonable plan in place. He said leaving the brittle, fragile cladding on top of the garage could render the material useless. He said a detailed photographic inventory is going to be critical. Chair Saxby said there should be a detailed drawing and a plan to tag all the pieces before it is disassembled. He said he is concerned that the building will not go back together. Board Member Wit asked Mr. Peterson had taken a structure this old apart and put it back together. Mr. Peterson said he had done something similar before. He said they have a plan to catalogue where all the pieces go. Board Member Saxby said any items stored outside need to be properly protected. He listed possible conditions: storage, record keeping, as built drawings, inventory of components. He said that if there were any alterations in the reconstruction, he would like it to come back for review. Chair Saxby made a motion to approve the item with condition that staff review the owner's as built drawings and inventory, tagging of the site conditions and gas station elements, that the components are stored in a secure and weathertight manner, and that any significant changes during reconstruction come back to the board for approval. Board Member Sanchez seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS *None* 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS *None* 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Saxby adjourned the meeting at 8:07pm. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 5 October 4, 2018 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2018-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-01-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Recording Secretary Ebster called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member lrons, Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Tony Ebster, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Board Members lrons and Iverson came during the minutes discussion. Some Board members are unidentified. Mr. Rutter's and Ms. Evan's name are misspelled. Alternates for Ad HOC committee were clarified. Chris Buckley with AAPS had changes to add. Minutes will be corrected and resubmitted at the regular meeting of February 1, 2007 for approval. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 4-A. Adoption of 2007 Historical Advisory Board Calendar Motion(Anderson)/second(Lynch) to accept 2007 meeting calendar. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion Carries 4-B Certificate of Approval CA06-0031- - Sally Harman - 433 Taylor Ave. In regards to a demo of more than 30% of a residential structure built prior to 1942 but is not on the Historic Building study list. Staff requested a continuance to a date to be determined. lotion(Lynch)/second(Anderson) to continue to date to be determined. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion carries 4-C. Proposed addition to the Official Naming List for City Facilities and Streets Minutes of January 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-01-04 | 2 | Recommendation to add the name 'Don Grant' to the City's Official Naming List for facilities and streets. A request to rename a portion of 3rd Street to 'Don Grant' is not possible since street names cannot change across intersections according to City ordinance. It is staff's recommendation that the Board approve the addition of the name 'Don Grant' to the Official Naming list for future consideration for facilities or street names. Motion(Anderson)/second(Miller) to add 'Don Grant' to Official Naming List Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion Carries An oral status report regarding the Historic Advisory Board Ad HOC Committee was given. After many emails, a meeting time was agreed upon for January 16th Ms. Woodbury stated that a chair needs to be elected and roles and responsibilities need to be determined. Some ideas need to be developed for preservation month. Board member Lynch (inaudible) Chair Anderson suggested that all HAB members should be part of the email listing regarding the Ad HOC committee and its plans. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) The certified local government annual report was brought to the attention of the Board. Ms. Woodbury wanted to make the Board aware of this annual report. Chair Anderson requested a copy for each Board member. This report captures all that was done by the City for historic preservation over the past year as well as the Board's activities. A copy will be distributed at the February 1, 2007 meeting. Board member Lynch (inaudible) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Woodbury asked Board members about the progress of the Ethics training. Ms. Woodbury brought up the Carnegie building and mentioned the Council's appropriation of funds for a feasibility study. Board member Lynch (inaudible) Minutes of January 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-01-04 | 3 | Ms. Woodbury mentioned that a tour of the Carnegie Building for Board members will be arranged when possible. Board Member Lynch (inaudible) Asked about reports from the Alameda theater project(?) Board member lrons asked about the seismic work done to the Carnegie building and the funds for the feasibility study for potential uses. Board member Lynch (inaudible) asked about a tour of the Carnegie building(?) Board member Iverson brought up the historical and art combination for plaques and distributed the list of San Francisco's art monuments. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cathy Woodbury, Secretary Historical Advisory Board :PLANNING\HABVAGENMIN\Agenmin.07/01-04-07/1-4-07 HAB Draft Minutes.doc Minutes of January 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2005 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Member Tilos. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. Chair Anderson welcomed new Board Member Janet Iverson to the Historical Advisory Board. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of October 6, 2005 with corrections. 3-0-1-1. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Abstain: 1 (Iverson): Absent: 1 (Tilos); Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS 1. Appointment of a Historical Advisory Board member to the Transportation Subcommittee. (Continued from the 10-6-05 mtg.) At this time, the Board has declined the invitation to serve on the Transportation Subcommittee. Ms. Eliason will inform the Board of any upcoming information that would be of interest to this Board. Minutes of November 3, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 2 | 2. Certificate of Approval, 500 Central Avenue, Applicant: Tony Wong. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for the unauthorized removal of more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of the historic structure, located at the above address. According to AMC Section 13-21, removal of more than 30% of the value of the structure, is defined as demolition. Without prior approval of a Certificate of Approval, the property is subject to a five year stay in the issuance of any building or construction-related permit. The site is located at 500 Central Ave. within the R-5, General Residential Zoning District. (Applicant is requesting this item be continued to the December 1, 2005 mtg). Ms. Eliason informed the Board that the applicant has requested a continuance to the December 1, 2005 meeting. Mr. Wong is currently working with Staff to develop a compliance plan to resolve the outstanding historic preservation issues that are associated with this site. Board Member Lynch fears the structure will continue to deteriorate if left untouched for another month. Ms. Eliason advised the Board that staff is currently working with the applicant to stabilize the building to prevent any further deterioration M/S (Miller, Anderson) to continue this item to the December 1, 2005 meeting. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; (Tilos). Motion carries. REPORTS: 3. Historical Advisory Board's consideration of whether to recommend to the City Council that it designate the structure at 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a Historical Monument. (EP). Emily Pudell presented the staff report. This item is before the Board at the request of Board Member Lynch. In 2003 a historical evaluation of 2320 & 2322 Lincoln Avenue was performed by the Architectural Resources Group (ARG). The report concluded that neither building maintains all aspects of integrity as set forth by the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, this property has also been evaluated in the New Alameda Free Library Project Property Acquisition for Parking EIR, and r… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 3 | designate their property a Monument due to a lack of financial incentive and delays in the public hearing process for the proposed structural alterations they have planned. Based on the conclusion of the ARG report, the existing demolition controls, and the owner's opposition, Staff cannot support the recommendation to designate the property at 2320 Lincoln Avenue a Historical Monument. Chair Anderson opened the Public Hearing. Jeffrey Ow, spoke in favor of the recommendation and has done further research on the property which he included in a letter submitted to the Board. Kevin Frederick, AAPS, spoke in favor of the recommendation. Board Member Lynch read an article by Woody Minor, which indicates that the structure located at 2320 Lincoln Avenue, formally known as the "Encinal Saloon", was erected in the late 1860's and is oldest and most intact surviving commercial building. In response to Chair Anderson inquiry about whether the proposed project plans would come before this Board for approval, Ms Eliason stated that a Certificate of Approval from this Board will be required for the proposed demolition of more than 30% of the structure. The application is tentatively scheduled for the January 5, 2006 meeting. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's inquiry regarding the level of protection for a monument, Ms Eliason stated that the HAB has purview over any structural modifications for all designated monuments. There are also stricter penalties for any unauthorized demolition. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's question regarding whether the owner's consent is needed recommendation, Ms. Eliason answered in the affirmative. Board Member Iverson advised the Board that she would like more time to consider this. She asked that the Board continue this item to a future meeting. M/S (Iverson, Miller) to continue this item until the January meeting for further consideration. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Invitation to the Webster Renaissance Completion Celebration to be held on… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2005-11-03 | 4 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch would like to place Andy Pagano name on the City's street naming list. Staff noted her request. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Eliason informed the Board that comments and review for the Section 106 report for the new design of the Cineplex and Parking Garage is scheduled for the December 1, 2005 agenda. ADJOURNMENT: M/S (Miller, Lynch) to adjourn meeting at 7:36 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agemin.05\11-03-05 min Minutes of November 3, 2005 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2005-11-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2015-09-03 | 1 | FINAL MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 1. CONVENE: 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Chair Owens, and Board Members Chan, Piziali, and Vella. Absent: Vice Chair Rauk was absent. 3. MINUTES: 2015-1984 Draft Meeting Minutes-May 7, 2015 Minutes approved 4-0. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: 6-A 2015-1999 Programmatic Agreement Compliance Report to the State Historic Preservation Officer for the Administration of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Funded Activities by the City of Alameda Chair Owens asked about the purpose of this report and whether Board action was required. Allen Tai, Secretary to the Board, explained that this is an annual compliance report submitted to the State by the Housing Authority. The report is being provided to the Board as information only, so no action is necessary. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 7-A 2015-1995 Certificate of Approval - PLN15-0136- Saikley Architects - 1732 Union Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for a second story addition to an existing pre-1942 single family residence that will result in the removal of more than 30% of the value of the existing structure. The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities - minor alterations of existing private structures. Henry Dong, Planner I, provided a staff report. Page 1 of 5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2015-09-03 | 2 | Board member Vella asked about the proposed window treatments and materials and whether they meet City requirements. Mr. Dong advises that the window details conform to the City's residential design guidelines. Board member Vella asked the project architect to explain the choice of windows for the new addition. Alexandra Saikley, project architect, explained that wood windows were the preference, but the home owners elected to go with fiberglass. Board member Vella asked about the purpose of the bay window, and Ms. Saikley explained that the bay window adds articulation to the front elevation as recommended by staff. Chair Owens asked about the basis for Certificate of Approval. Mr. Tai explained the project requires a Certificate of Approval because building the addition would require demolition of more than 30% of the value of the existing structure, which is determined by the Building Official. The Board opened the floor to public comments. John Watkins, a neighbor, was not in favor of the proposal. He believes the addition would block his view of the sky. Mr. Watkins thinks the project would remove an affordable housing unit from the City by making it larger. Stacy Kaplan, a neighbor, commented that the project is incompatible with the scale and character of the block, as most homes on the block are modest small homes and not two- story homes. She expressed concern over replacing the small, affordable home with a larger, more expensive home. Ms. Kaplan also cited concerns over parking. Peter Slote, a neighbor, commented on the impacts of the addition to neighboring houses. He described this block of Union Street as historically a place for small housing stock and should be a historic resource due to affordability and scale. He believes a big boxy second story addition on this lot is inconsistent with the neighborhood. He also noted that a three-bed, two-bath house is inconsistent with the property size and asked the Board to deny the request. Meredith Levins, property owner, commented on her family's decision… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2015-09-03 | 3 | project design conforms to the City's design guidelines and that City rules allow modifying the house while preserving the historical character. Chris Buckley, representing the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society, commented on the design of the project. He noted that the configuration of the roof is inconsistent with the Guide to Residential Design. He recommended the use of a side facing gable to envelope the second story into the roof of the first level or bring elements of the first level into the second level. Mr. Buckley suggested deleting the bay window in order to deemphasize the second level. He commented on the various forms of window treatment and recommended the windows show muntins. Mr. Buckley also recommended adding a belly band on the second floor to transition with the shingles, and address privacy impacts by raising the window sills to eye level. He asked for clarity from staff on the application of the Secretary's Standards for properties on the study list. Mr. Tai noted that the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for treatment of historic properties sometimes conflict with the City's residential design guidelines. The primary example being the Secretary's Standards call for differentiating new construction from the existing while the City's guidelines suggest merging new construction into the existing building as if it were part of the original design. Ms. Saikley described the intent behind the design and indicated exploring examples similar to Chris Buckley's suggestions. She described the front facing gable as the best approach to maintain the original bungalow facade while adding a second story. She noted that a side-facing gable on the second story would need to be much steeper, higher and inconsistent with the original rooflines. Furthermore, this type of roof form could not achieve the interior livable space that is desired. Ms. Saikley added that the proposed design preserves the front porch and sets back the second floor. She noted that other minor details could be added to w… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2015-09-03 | 4 | Board member Vella concurred with the overall comments made earlier by Christopher Buckley, and she agreed that the bay window on the front elevation should be eliminated. She suggested the architect look closely at the illustration provided by Mr. Buckley as a basis for design revisions. Chair Owens asked whether there is a maximum floor area ratio in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Tai replied no, but that the development standards provide a maximum height limit of two-stories and 35-feet. The development standards are further supplemented by the design guidelines. Chair Owens asked whether the Board can add the building to the historic buildings study list. Mr. Tai explained that it would be an action that was not noticed for this meeting. Furthermore, a survey or historical context assessment would need to be prepared for the property to determine if it meets criteria for designation as a historic resource. The criteria is generally related to the property having distinctive architectural character or some significant historical association with local persons or events. Mr. Tai noted that this property is highly unlikely to qualify as a historic resource. Board member Piziali commented that most of the Design Review issues are subject to Planning Board purview. The item before the Board is a Certificate of Approval for the demolition work that is proposed as part of the addition. He asked the Board to go along with the staff recommendation. Chair Owens asked staff whether the project will go before the Planning Board. Mr. Tai responded that the Design Review for this project would be acted on at the staff level, and it would only go before the Planning Board upon an appeal or a Call for Review by members of the Planning Board. Otherwise, there will be no public hearing. Chair Owens commented that he cannot find justifications for the property to qualify for the study list, and he reminded the Board that the vote before them is to approve or not approve the Certificate of Approval. He also disagrees with Mr. Buckley… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2015-09-03 | 5 | 7-B 2015-1996 Certificate of Approval - PLN15-0277 - 763 Buena Vista Ave - Applicant: Italo Calpestri on behalf of Wei Lin Zhao. Applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to allow for the demolition of a single-family residence built prior to 1942. The property is not listed on the City's Historic Building Study List. The project site has two residential structures on-site, of which the building at the front, a single family residence, will be demolished and the building at the rear, a two-family residence, will remain. The project is intended to allow future subdivision of the property into three lots. The project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - demolition and removal of a single-family residence. Mr. Tai noted that the applicant has requested the item be continued to the future public hearing that would be renoticed. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: None 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: 9-A 2015-1997 Certificate of Approvals Recent Actions and Decisions Mr. Tai gave an overview of the recent actions by staff. 9-B 2015-1998 Update on 1605 Park Street Mr. Tai provided an update on the status of the fire damaged building at 1605 Park Street. He noted that work is in progress by the property owner to determine whether the existing building can be salvaged and whether there is any historical integrity remaining in the fire damaged structure. Chair Owens inquired about the status of the retail space below China House restaurant. Mr. Tai replied that a renovation is pending building permits to convert the space into a tavern. The project was previously reviewed by the board. 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 11. ADJOURNMENT: Adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Page 5 of 5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2015-09-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2021 1. CONVENE Chair Thomas Saxby called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, codified at Government Code Section 54953, Historical Advisory Board members can attend the meeting via teleconference. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Saxby, Board Members Jones, Lau, Sanchez, Wit. Absent: None. 3. MINUTES None 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION None 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION None 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2021-1531 PLN21-0468/PLN21-0469 - Certificates of Approval - 2263 Santa Clara Avenue/950 West Mall Square - Applicant: City of Alameda. Public hearing to consider Certificate of Approval applications to allow the conversion of lawn to drought-tolerant landscaping at the grounds of City Hall and City Hall West. Pursuant to Alameda Municipal Code Section 13-21.5 a Certificate of Approval by the Historical Advisory Board is required for alterations to Historic Monuments including trees and plantings. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15304(b) - Minor Alterations to Land, which consists of new gardening or landscaping, including the replacement of existing landscaping with water-efficient landscaping Erin Smith, Director of Public Works, introduced this item. She also introduced Todd Ainsworth, Senior Associate with Gates & Associates, who gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at HAB Meeting Minutes December 2, 2021 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 2 | https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5257047&GUID=CDE2C8D2- FE6F-4C1A-B097-E61E8B0664B5&FullText=1. Allen Tai, City Planner, explained the board's role in approving this item. Chair Saxby opened the board clarifying questions. Chair Saxby asked if there was any historic information regarding the character-defining features of the landscape for City Hall. He knew there was such information for City Hall West. Staff Member Tai said unfortunately not and discussed the history of City Hall. Chair Saxby wanted to know how this new landscaping would conform to the well- manicured character-defining feature described in the report. Staff Member Tai explained the Cultural Landscape Report and how staff interpreted it. He also discussed other landscaping in Alameda. Mr. Ainsworth also discussed what "well-manicured" meant and the thought process behind plant choices. Board Member Norman Sanchez asked what thought was behind the pathways. He wanted to see the formality to be maintained. Mr. Ainsworth answered how they could accentuate the existing paths so they could be defined in a more traditional manner. He also discussed other ways to bring in a more geometric and linear look. Director Smith added that none of the hardscapes at either site would be changing, so pathways would remain in their existing form. Board Member Alvin Lau asked about using historical benches and lighting. Director Smith said this project would not be dealing with lighting. For benches, they had only thought that they should have seating and not about the overall decor. Mr. Ainsworth said that the next phase would address historically accurate seating. Vice-Chair Lynn Jones asked about upkeep. Director Smith said since Public Works would be maintaining everything they would be very familiar with what needed to be done. HAB Meeting Minutes December 2, 2021 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 3 | Mr. Ainsworth said they would provide a Maintenance Manual. Board Member Jen Wit asked about the durability of the plants. City Hall is a place for gatherings such as protests and people might walk or stand on plants and grass. Mr. Ainsworth discussed options he had thought about. Chair Saxby opened public comment. Betsy Mathison discussed different ways to get the word out about the landscaping changes and why it was happening. She thought it looked great but noted that when something similar happened in the past the citizens of Alameda were very concerned. Chair Saxby closed public comment and opened board discussion. Chair Saxby liked the idea to modify the design to make more room for standing/gathering and having places for people to sit was important. He was more concerned for City Hall West due to the historical relevance of the area. He wanted to see a sense of belonging with the surrounding buildings. Vice-Chair Jones was happy that there would be documentation to help with maintenance and upkeep. City Hall East and West represent Alameda and this would be a legacy to leave for the future. Board Member Sanchez thought this was a wonderful project and looked forward to the new tone and direction that City Hall West would receive. He also believed that conserving water was a great aim. Board Member Wit asked about the surrounding areas at City Hall West. Director Smith and Staff Member Tai discussed what areas were owned by the city and what development plans had been discussed. Board Member Lau also was excited to see the final project. Staff Member Tai explained the next steps in the design process and how the board would like to stay involved. Director Smith explained the Public Works's timeline. There was a discussion on what was needed for City Hall and how to address the area around City Hall West. HAB Meeting Minutes December 2, 2021 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 4 | Chair Saxby made a motion to approve the landscaping for City Hall to be converted to drought-tolerant per the design as was presented tonight with the amendments to make more standing room around the entry plaza, consider additional sitting in the landscape, and for it to be maintained properly. Board Member Lau seconded the motion, a vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0. *For City Hall West the board wanted to see a development of the design to get a better idea of how the design would work with this very important historic site. 7-B 2021-1532 PLN21-0527 - Certificate of Approval - Citywide - Applicant: City of Alameda. Public hearing to consider a Certificate of Approval to allow rehabilitation and retrofit of historic streetlights throughout the City. This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15331 - Historic Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation, which applies to maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction of historical resources in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. Director Smith introduced the item and gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5257048&GUID=9E7A137F 4FF4-4DED-A143-A4AD39CD054C&FullText=1. Chair Saxby opened the board clarifying questions. Board Member Sanchez asked about design choices to achieve the historic look. Director Smith said they had created this design specifically for that purpose, there was no off-the-shelf option that worked. Vice-Chair Jones asked about the color choice to mimic the historical green color. Director Smith discussed what information had been available from AMP (Alameda Munciple Power). Staff Member Tai discussed the historical color choices. Board Member Lau asked if they would ever paint them to color match. Director Smith explained that the streetlights were powder coated and would never be painted. Chair Saxby opened public comment. HAB Meeting Minu… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 5 | There were no public speakers. Chair Saxby closed public comment and opened board discussion and comment. Vice-Chair Jones was excited to see the streetlights changed to be more energy-efficient and appreciated the historical appearance and charm of these streetlights. She did wish the wires attached to the poles were not there. Board Member Lau wanted to see consistency among the lights especially since the new ones would be LED lights. Director Smith discussed the plan for replacing the older lights bulbs. Chair Saxby wanted to know if any of the historic streetlights being replaced could be preserved and adapted. Director Smith explained how the LED light project had worked and how many of the lights were beyond repair. They would only be replacing the ones that required replacement. Chair Saxby made a motion to approve this resolution with the additional condition that there be documentation of the damage to the streetlights showing that they were damaged beyond repair and there needed to be every attempt to preserve the existing streetlights. Vice-Chair Jones seconded the motion, a vote was taken, and the motion passed 5-0. 7-C 2021-1533 A Public Workshop to Review and Comment on the Draft Housing Element Update to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for the Period 2023-2031 in Compliance with State Law. Staff Member Tai introduced the item and gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5257049&GUID=85489B65 AF6-4293-B394-9ED1EF4440AC&FullText=1. Chair Saxby opened the board clarifying questions. Board Member Wit wanted to know more about how the housing allocation numbers were determined. Staff Member Tai explained the RHNA (Reginal Housing Needs Allocation) Methodology and models that ABAG (Association of Bay Area Governments) used. HAB Meeting Minutes December 2, 2021 5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 6 | Board Member Lau wanted to know if the RHNA also had requirements on the size of the housing or how many rooms and bedrooms a home had. Staff Member Tai answered that the Housing Element would not get that specific but they would look at the analysis and see what type of housing was the most needed. He agreed that they would need to create housing for all types of needs. Board Member Sanchez asked about zoning changes and what was allowed under the R1 changes and SB-9. Staff Member Tai explained the R1 zoning changes under SB-9 and what California State Law would allow. Board Member Sanchez asked other technical questions pertaining to lot size under SB- 9. He also wanted to know more about how SB-9 would impact how the board would make rulings. Staff Member Tai explained SB-9 in detail and gave different examples of what was allowed. He discussed how SB-9 would affect neighborhood character, how everything would come down to design, and when designs would need to come before the historical board. Chair Saxby asked if SB-9 established a minimum lot coverage. Staff Member Tai believed that SB-9 would defer to local jurisdictions to set lot coverage standards. He also discussed what was already allowed under the ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit) Law. He added the importance of setting design standards that would help with the increase in additional units in neighborhoods. Henry Dong, Planner III, also gave information on unit size and setbacks. Board Member Lau wanted to know if there was a limit to the ADUs someone could have. Staff Member Tai answered that staff was putting together a draft that would have four at the maximum. That would be four including ADUs, Jr. ADUs, or units under SB-9. Chair Saxby opened public comment. Betsy Mathieson summarized comments from her November 16, 2021 letter to the City Council that were pertinent to historic buildings. She said she believed that all of the neighborhoods in Alameda needed to accommodate new neighbors, including the ones built in compliance with Article 26. She agr… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 7 | increasing our carbon footprint and converting alameda to any town USA. She stated that without carefully crafted specifications, upzoning will provide an incentive for demolition, and found it concerning that the purpose of the annual review of the Design Review Ordinance is to confirm the standards do not constrain the development of housing. She felt developers will use that to argue that existing buildings themselves constrain the development of housing. And felt this logic will result in displacement of low income residents and may also result in the loss of the very buildings shown in the "Spotlights.' She points out that the Housing Element gives what amounts to density bonuses for the rehabilitation and adaptation of existing buildings with no increase in floor area. She then suggests that "no increase in floor area" be changed to say "no change to the building envelope.' She concludes this change will allow new finished floor area in basements and attics to accommodate more dwelling units in addition to the existing residents. She said she looks forward to following the progress of the Housing Element. Chris Buckley, AAPS, discussed a letter the society had sent. AAPS was very concerned about the massive proposed upzoning, the society believed this was overkill. He discussed what these changes meant for each zoning and suggested different strategies for upzoning. Chair Saxby closed public comment and opened board discussion. Board Member Sanchez wanted to know about the increase and demand for ADUs. Staff Member Tai believed it was still too early to establish a trend and then discussed how they had established the average based on the last 4 years. He did note that 2021 had the most ADU applications. Board Member Sanchez discussed his concerns about relying on ADUs, such as homeowners buildings ADUs with no intention of renting them out. He wanted to know how many of the completed AUDs were actually being used as rental properties. Chair Saxby asked if that was something the state would want to be verif… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2021-12-02 | 8 | Webster Street. He felt that there needed to be more conversation in the Housing Element about protecting the historic older neighborhoods. Board Member Sanchez asked if student housing counted toward the RHNA. He also asked about focusing housing on vacant properties and wanted an idea of the open parcels in the R zone. Staff Member Tai said it was a need but those would be addressed on a case by case basis. He then discussed what open parcels had potential development. Board Member Sanchez felt that most residential neighborhoods had the potential for more housing and mixed-use spaces. He discussed the importance of finding balance for the R1 neighborhoods. Board Member Lau discussed the potential of Lincoln Ave and if the zoning would change. Staff Member Tai discussed what had been discussed. Board Member Witt asked about the Golf Course. Staff Member Tai clarified that it was owned by the city and was designated as Public Open Space. Chair Saxby took a moment to clarify what the primary purpose of the Mills Act was for and thought the section about it needed to be reworded or struck entirely. Staff Member Tai said that portion had been flagged. He then discussed all the notes he had received and thanked the board for their input. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS None 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS None 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None 11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Saxby adjourned the meeting at 9:38 pm. HAB Meeting Minutes December 2, 2021 8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2021-12-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-12-07 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2017 1. CONVENE Chair Piziali called meeting to order at 7:00pm. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Piziali, Board Members Chan, Sanchez, Saxby. Absent: Board Member Jones. Staff Member Tai pointed out that Board Member Jones is absent after delivering a baby last month. 3. MINUTES 3-A 2017-5007 Draft Meeting Minutes - July 6, 2017 Chair Piziali asked if Board Member Sanchez could vote on the minutes even though he had to recuse himself for an item. Staff Member Tai said that he could vote on the minutes. Board Member Saxby made a motion to approve the minutes. Board Member Sanchez seconded the motion. Staff Member Tai asked if there was a vote on the motion. Chair Piziali confirmed a 4-0 vote to approve the minutes. 3-B 2017-5008 Draft Meeting Minutes - October 5, 2017 Chair Piziali said there were only two members present tonight that attended the October meeting. Staff Member Tai said that unless one of the other members had watched the recording of the meeting, they would need to continue the minutes. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION *None* Approved Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 6 December 7, 2017 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-12-07 | 2 | 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Staff Member Tai said there were two letters from Christopher Buckley of AAPS, one relating to the item 7-A and the other letter on item 7-B. 6-A 2017-5001 Certified Local Government Annual Report 2016-2017 Staff Member Tai described the Certified Local Government program and the reporting requirements for the item. The report can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3268625&GUID=F1EFF104 64D1-4F26-9EE3-BBEF96F075DC Chair Piziali asked what the most critical planning issues are and asked for an update on the electrification of records. Staff Member Tai said many cities are struggling with record keeping. He said they are trying to develop a database system, staff resources permitting. Board Member Saxby asked about the current status of the Alameda Marina property as it relates to the study list. Staff Member Tai said the draft EIR would be released soon that would identify the historic district and contributing buildings that would be added to the study list. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2017-5003 Certificate of Approval - PLN17-0447 - Jack Backus Architects - 3278 Garfield Avenue. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for a second story addition to an existing single-family residence, built prior to 1942, that will result in the removal of more than 30% of the value of the existing structure. The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities- minor alterations of existing private structures. Staff Member Dong gave a presentation. The staff report can be found at: tps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3268626&GUID=563519A5- A931-4208-AFC3-F1175B7FE43A&FullText=1 Chair Piziali opened public hearing. Steve Aced said the second story gables should be side facing. He said the horizontal siding is not necessary to distinguish the addition from the original building. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 6 December 7, 2017 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-12-07 | 3 | Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society, referenced their letters commenting on the project. He offered several comments to try and make the project blend in more effectively and minimize the impact on the streetscape. Jack Backus, representing the applicant, said the narrow lot made the side gables not be the desired design choice. He said they would be open, and perhaps prefer, to have the same siding on the second floor as the original. Board Member Sanchez asked if the intention is for the first story to be cement board siding. Mr. Backus responded that they are likely to use cement board siding. Board Member Sanchez asked what the condition of the existing shingle siding is. Mr. Backus responded that the existing siding is in poor condition and will need to be repaired or replaced. Board Member Saxby asked how the nearby house with a second story addition differed from the proposal. Mr. Backus responded that the design steps back twice and would hopefully reduce the dominance of the addition. Board Member Sanchez asked for information about the accessory building being removed. Staff Member Dong responded that the building was built in 2009. Mr. Backus added that the structure was likely older than that but there was an unpermitted second story addition to the structure for which the work was red tagged by the Building Official. Board Member Saxby said that the single story character of this house and its neighbors makes him tend to favor side facing gables in order to downplay the presence of the second story. He said he would also like to consider reducing the plate height. Board Member Sanchez said that turning the gable sideways without reducing the plate height would not reduce the massing significantly. He noted that turning the gable sideways would allow reducing the pitch of the roof in a way that could not be accomplished with front facing gables. Staff Member Tai said that the board could condition its approval on changing the gable design and plate height. He said staff cou… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-12-07 | 4 | Board Member Saxby made a motion to approve the draft resolution with conditions that the applicant work with city staff to reduce the massing by reducing the plate height and turning front facing gables to the side. Board Member Sanchez said he would like to add that the siding on the upper story have a historically appropriate look. Board Member Saxby accepted the suggestion as a friendly amendment. Board Member Sanchez seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0. 7-B 2017-5006 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Secretary to the Board to act on Certificate of Approvals for projects that result in the removal of more than 30% of the value of a structure built prior to 1942, pursuant to Alameda Municipal Code Section 13-21.7, but do not involve resources, currently listed or eligible to be included, on the Historical Buildings Study List. The adoption of this resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(3) and 15378(b)(5) because the activity approved by this resolution neither commits the City to implement any specific project nor will it result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment Staff Member Tai gave a presentation. He explained that the preservation ordinance currently requires all Certificate of Approval applications come before the Board at a public hearing, other than tree removals and accessory structures, which had been previously delegated to staff level review. Staff proposes delegating those applications involving buildings not on the Historical Building Study List to staff level in order to streamline costs and processing time. The staff report and attachments can be found at: ps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3268628&GUID=4EE67EB2- 109-4CDO-AE99-5B51853EC3DE&FullText=1 Board Member Sanchez asked how the timing of the decisions would be shared with the HAB members. Staff Member Tai said decisions would be made in batches mirroring the process for Design Review applications unde… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-12-07 | 5 | Christopher Buckley, AAPS, said they sent a letter encouraging the process be left as is. He said there are many buildings that could be on the Study List which are not. He said they worry that projects may fall through the cracks if they are only reviewed at the staff level. He suggested several recommendations for the process if the board decides to move forward with this process. Board Member Sanchez said he has always found the 30% demolition threshold vague. Staff Member Tai said the demolition criteria is defined in the ordinance. He said the board could set criteria for what types of Certificate of Approval applications require a public hearing. He explained the workload placed on Planning staff and additional cost to Alameda homeowners for requiring fairly routine projects to go for a public hearing. Chair Piziali says he does not see any reason to not try it. He suggested putting a time limit on the change and then reviewing how the change is working. He said any time they can save residents time and money while still providing proper public notice is worth doing. Board Member Saxby said he believes the savings would be fairly minor. Staff Member Tai said that some of the AAPS recommendations are reasonable, but some would be extraordinary. He said he worries about the standards for restoration if the City has to presume that every building that was altered over time has historic integrity hidden underneath its current appearance. Board Member Sanchez said he would be receptive of doing this on a trial basis. Board Member Saxby said he is concerned things will be missed and favors the current process. Chair Piziali made a motion to approve the staff recommendation. The motion failed for lack of a second. 7-C 2017-5004 Historical Advisory Board Meeting Schedule 2018 The schedule can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3268628&GUID=4EE67EB2- C109-4CDO-AE99-5B51853EC3DE&FullText=1 Board Member Sanchez made a motion to approve the calendar. Board Member Saxby seconded the moti… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-12-07 | 6 | 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Staff Member Tai said there was one Certificate of Approval application approved at staff level for a removing a dilapidated garage at 1520 Morton Avenue. 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Piziali adjourned the meeting at 9:04pm. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 6 December 7, 2017 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-12-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 5, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, Lynch & Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Jennifer Ott, Development Services Department, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: A motion and a second was made to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of December 1, 2005 with corrections. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Historical Advisory Board's consideration of whether to recommend to the City Council that it designate the structure at 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a Historical Monument. (EP). (Continued from the 11-03-05 meeting). Emily Pudell presented staff report. This item was before this Board on November 3, 2005 at the request of Board member Lynch. In November, the Board continued the discussion to allow more time for Board member Iverson to become familiar with the history of this building. Staff does not support the recommendation to nominate 2320 Lincoln Avenue a historic monument. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline Street, spoke in favor of recommendation. There were no more speaker slips submitted. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing, and opened the floor to Board discussion. Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 2 | Board member Lynch requested that this item be tabled to a future meeting to allow time for the property owner to complete the proposed renovations to the building. M/S (Iverson, Lynch) to table this item until the proposed work has been completed. 2-3-0. Ayes: 2 (Iverson, Lynch); Noes: 3 (Anderson, Miller, Tilos); Absent: 0; Motion failed. M/S (Miller, Anderson) to accept Staff's recommendation not to recommend the designation of 2320 Lincoln Avenue as a historic monument. 3-2-0. Ayes: 3 (Anderson, Miller, Tilos); Noes: 2 (Iverson, Lynch); Absent: 0; Motion carries. 2. CA05-0035 - 2320 Lincoln Avenue - Applicant: Li-Sheng Fu for Jim Hom. Applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent of the value of a historically designated commercial structure. The proposed work includes a new foundation and restoration of the existing siding and windows, where possible, and reconfiguration of the interior spaces for the purposes of establishing a new commercial use. The site is located at 2320 Lincoln Avenue within an C-C-T Community Commercial Theater Zoning District. (EP) Emily Pudell presented the staff report. On July 15, 2005, an application for Minor Design Review was received by the Planning and Building Department to restore the building at to commercial/office use. The plans propose to restore the interior and exterior of the building, including a new foundation, interior staircase, and restoration of the building's existing siding and windows. A Certificate of Approval is required from this Board because the interior and exterior modifications to the building exceed the 30% threshold for demolition. Staff is recommending that the Board approve the Certificate of Approval for removal of more than 30% of the value of the structure with the conditions stated in draft Resolution. There were no speaker slips submitted. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. The Board had several questions regarding the plans. Ms. Pudell stated that she has not be… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 3 | Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. 3. CA05-0033 - 2708 Lincoln Avenue - Applicant: Minxi Liu for Alvin and Lai Wong. Applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent of the value of a historically designated single family residence. The proposed work includes the addition of approximately 1,100 square feet first story and new second story, removal of 2/3 of the exterior rear and side walls, and removal of the roof. The site is located at 2708 Lincoln Avenue within an R-1, One Family Residence Zoning District. (EP) Emily Pudell presented staff report. She informed the Board that this project has already received design review approval by the Planning Board on August 8, 2005, with the condition that prior to approval of the final plans for the building permit; the property owner shall apply for and obtain approval for a demolition permit from the Historical Advisory Board. According to available resources, the small, cottage-style dwelling was constructed in 1906. The building, however, is not listed on the Historic Building Study List. The approved plans indicate that the modifications would not only change the architectural style of the building, but would add approximately 1,100 square feet to the existing building and change the location of the front entry and staircase. The approved Design Review indicates that similar siding and window materials will be utilized for the new additions and remodel. Staff is recommending the Board approve the Certificate of Approval, with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Lili Rollins, 1607 Pearl St., spoke in favor of this project. Minxi Liu, architect, was present and available for any questions the Board may have. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing. Vice-chair Miller commented on the fact that after this project is complete, there won't be any of the original house remaining. Chair Anderson spoke in favor of the proposed project, however requested … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 4 | REPORTS: 4. Review and Comment on Section 106 Findings Regarding Revised Designs for the 350- Space Parking Garage and Cineplex at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue within the C-C T (Community Commercial Theater) Zoning District. (JO). (Continued from 12-01-05 meeting). Jennifer Ott, Development Services presented the staff report. She informed the Board that the City has retained a new architect, Komorous-Towey Architects (KTA) to develop revised designs for both the Cineplex and parking garage based on direction from the City Council on August 16, 2005. Revisions to the façades include reduction of scale and bulk, greater evocation of Art Deco style, additional vertical articulation, greater design consistency and symmetry, as well as greater articulation of blank surfaces. The City Council accepted and authorized Section 106 review of the revised designs on November 1, 2005. Mr. Bruce Anderson, the City's Section 106 consultant, has reviewed the revised designs for compliance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration and has prepared a supplemental report to his initial Section 106 Report, considered by this Board on June 2, 2006. Staff requests that the Board review and comment on the revised design and supplemental Section 106 report. Staff will forward the Board's comments along with the draft minutes from this meeting to the City Council to consider before taking a final approval action on the revised design. Chair Anderson opened the Public hearing. Susan Denault, 1416 Willow St., spoke in opposition to the new design. She stated that it is still too big for the proposed location. The proposed design does not fit into the neighborhood. Nina Rosen, 1045 Island Dr., spoke in opposition of the size of the building. Monica Penya, 1361 Regent St., stated the report does not address the size and scale of this project and does not think it will be compatible with the surrounding buildings. She believes there is a better alternative. Nancy Hird, 1519 East Shore Drive.… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 5 | Valerie Ruma, 1610 Willow St., spoke in opposition of the project. She would like an Environmental Impact Report done. She read into the record a statement by Woody Minor opposing the bulk and massing of the proposed project. Rayla Graber spoke in opposition of the size of the project. The present plan is an improvement to the original design but it is still too large. Scott Brady, 1812 Encinal Ave., spoke on behalf of AAPS and briefly reviewed a November 1, 2005 letter from AAPS to the City Council, which was distributed to this Board in their meeting packet. He stated that his main concerns are with the size of the project, and that it is not compatible with the surrounding area. The north wall of the parking structure has not been addressed adequately. He would like to see a physical model done and be required as part of the approval process. This would allow for a better understanding of the size and scope of the project with regards to the surrounding area. Chris Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Ave., spoke on behalf of AAPS and further reviewed the above mentioned letter. He stated that AAPS feels that although the new design is an improvement, they still have concerns with the 20-inch projection of the Cineplex. He stated that the projection is adding too much bulk and is not sure why it is necessary. He also stated that the upward angle of the bay windows of the second floor lobby should be increased, and a more vertical mullion pattern be used for the mezzanine windows. Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Ave., agreed with Chris Buckley that the 20-inch projection should be eliminated. He reviewed the drawing that was attached to the letter submitted by AAPS. He stated that a more substantial material should be used for the tile on base of the storefronts. AAPS would like to review materials and color samples when they become available. Leslie Fishback, 1334 Burbank St., spoke in opposition of the project. She does not feel that the historic theatre is being restored. She is also concerned with the size of the Cineplex a… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 6 | Irene Deeter stated her main concern is the location of the parking garage. The Elk's site would be a much better location and it would allow for the height and bulk of the Cineplex to be scaled down. The people of Alameda want a fully restored historic Theatre. She would like an agreement from the developer that he will completely restore the Historic Theatre. Charles Kasdorf stated that the proposed structure is too large. He would also like to see the historic Theatre completely restored. Paula Rainy, 556 Palace Ct., agreed that the size and scope of the project will have a detrimental effect on the neighborhood and the quality of life in Alameda. She would also like to see a model. Kristianne Koenen, 1360 Pearl Street, spoke in opposition of project. The thing that attracted her to Alameda was its uniqueness. She wants Alameda to hold the unique charm that draws people to it. She agreed that the garage is misplaced. She has joined the group Citizens for a Mega- Plex Free Alameda (CFMFA), who have worked hard to come up with an alternative plan. They have come up with ideas that would allow this area of Alameda to be a Civic Center. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline St., spoke against the project as proposed. He would like to have more of a setback on the corner of Oak St. and Central Ave. He agrees that a model should be done. He stated the Elks Lodge would be a better location for the parking garage, and added that this suggestion has been ignored by City staff. The people should have a say, and have taken a lot of abuse. He would like an Environmental Impact Report done. Rob Ratto, Park Street Business Association (PSBA), would like to address a comment made by one of the previous speakers who indicated that the project would raise rents on Park Street and run out "mom and pop" businesses. He would like to say for the record that the owners of Oles', Tuckers, and La Pinata support this project as do most of the businesses on Park St. Robert Wood stated that his primary objections to this project have been scal… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 7 | narrow for the entrance to the parking garage and it would be very unsafe. This Board should preserve the historic quality of Alameda. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board member Lynch stated how difficult this is. She feels the Board is being pressured to push this project through. A year ago this Board was shown a design that looked like a "refrigerator box" that was too big. The new design has improved, but it is still too big. She was not aware that there could have been an alternative location for the parking garage. She stated that she would like a three dimensional model made so she would have a better idea of the size and scale of the new Cineplex and parking garage. Board member Tilos agreed that the parking garage should be built on an alternate site and thinks the Council should further consider the Elk's parking lot as a possible site. He agrees with Board Member Lynch that the Cineplex is too large for its current location. Vice Chair Miller stated that he has always said that this project is too large, as well as his fellow Board members. He stated that the City Council has ignored the community. He agreed that there should be a model to better visualize the size and scale of the project. He stated that AAPS has good suggestions. The colors for the garage should have less contrast. Board member Iverson acknowledged the amount of work put into the presentations. She stated that the size and scale is incompatible to the area. She is interested to learn more about the different parking locations. She stated that the comments submitted by AAPS are good. The mechanical enclosure at top of the building is too high. The 70-ft. wall should be more detailed. This would be a good opportunity for public art. She would also like to see a model of the Civic Center. The detailing at the street level of the Cineplex is not keeping with the style of the parking garage. Chair Anderson would like to reiterate what the people are say… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 8 | AAPS submitted a letter regarding their request to list several buildings located at Alameda Point on the Historical Building Study List. Ms. Eliason stated that the ARRA has directed Staff to present them with language that will be added to the preferred development concept. Board member Lynch asked staff if there the City is still planning to create a committee regarding the future plans for Alameda Point. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Ani Dimusheva, 2911 Calhoun St., thanked the Board for their comments on Item 4. Irene Dieter, thanked the Board for their comments on Item 4. She also informed the Board of the 2002 Park Street Streetscape Plan, which indicated there should be no traffic on Oak Street. Ms. Eliason stated that this document was the basis for the grants that the City has received for the Park Street Streetscape. Staff will provide the Board with a copy. Chris Buckley, AAPS, would like to clarify what the ARRA Board requested. He stated that they were concerns that the plans were not set in stone before all of the historic buildings be identified. They asked staff to put together a schedule of how the various steps of dealing with historic buildings would occur. Staff was supposed to return to ARRA with the schedule in February 2006. Board member Lynch would like information on 500 Central Ave. Ms. Eliason stated that the applicants were required to weatherize the building and will be ready for public hearing in February. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Staff would like to remind the Board of the open house for the new Planning & Building director, hosted by the Planning & Building Department on Monday, January 9th ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 9:32 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING|HAB\AGENMIN\Agenmin.06/01-05-06 min.doc Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf,9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-01-05 | 9 | Minutes of January 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-01-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-10-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-10-05 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2017 1. CONVENE Chair Piziali called meeting to order at 7:05pm. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Piziali, Board Members Jones, Saxby. Absent: Board Members Chan (family emergency), Sanchez. 3. MINUTES *None* 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION *None* 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS *None* 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2017-4794 Certificate of Approval - PLN17-0396 - 63 Garden Rd - Applicant: Nikitas & Jaimie Orfanos. Hold a public hearing to consider a residential building addition that will result in the removal of more than 30% the current value of a structure built prior to 1942. The proposed addition will require the removal of a large portion of the side exterior wall and the entirety of the roof. The existing single-story residence was built in 1924 and is located within in the R-1 (One-Family Residence) zoning district. The project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - demolition and removal of a single-family residence. Staff Member Tai introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be found at: ttps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3165354&GUID=13E13EF6- F459-4FA3-8CCB-58131F8067EF&FullText=1 Board Member Saxby said the findings from the city make it an easy determination. Board Member Jones said that she agreed. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3 October 5, 2017 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-10-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-10-05 | 2 | There were no public speakers. Board Member Saxby made a motion to approve the staff recommendation. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. 7-B 2017-4797 PLN17-0465 - Building 8 Rooftop Addition - Applicant: Alameda Point Redevelopers, LLC. The proposed addition requires Historical Advisory Board approval of an amendment to a previously approved Certificate of Approval to modify a contributing structure to the Naval Air Station Alameda Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The proposed addition also requires Planning Board approval of an amendment to a previously Development Plan and Design Review. The City of Alameda certified the Alameda Point Final EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 201312043), which evaluated the environmental impacts of redevelopment and reuse of the lands at Alameda Point. No further environmental review is required for this project Staff Member Tai gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3165355&GUID=12BB1BF3- 5F65-439E-8842-436E479FF6C1&FullText= The applicant, Jonah Hendrickson and the project architect gave a presentation on the progress and proposed changes to the project. Board Member Saxby asked about the height of the condensing units. The project architect said that they were about 30" and would not stick up beyond the parapet. Chair Piziali opened the public hearing. Rick Browning said it is really nice to see the activity going on at the old base. Chair Piziali closed the public hearing. Board Member Jones asked the applicant to speak to the goal of making the new structure subordinate to the historic structure. The project architect explained the window and materials features that echo the original building while still being clearly different. He said they think they have achieved a balance. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 October 5, 2017 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-10-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-10-05 | 3 | Board Member Jones asked how the adjacent building 5 was used to influence the choice of the gabled roof on the addition. Staff Member Tai said that they looked for nearby designs to influence what elements to include in the addition. Chair Piziali said it is exciting to see these changes happening at the base after all these years. Board Member Saxby said he was happy to see the height of the addition not exceed the towers and that the setbacks are appreciated. He said they have done a good job making a structure that is differentiated and subordinate to the historic structure. Board Member Jones said she is totally comfortable with the design. Board Member Saxby made a motion to approve the draft resolution. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS *None* 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Staff Member Tai said staff reviewed a garage demolition and an oak tree removal. Board Member Saxby said an oak tree was removed at 9th and Santa Clara. Chair Piziali asked why projects that lack historic merit and are not on the study list are required to come before the Board. Staff member Tai noted that all work involving the removal of 30% of the value of a building that was built prior to 1942 requires a Certificate of Approval. He said he would review the requirements and report back to the Board. 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Piziali adjourned the meeting at 8:04pm. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 October 5, 2017 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-08-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-08-04 | 1 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, AUGUST 4, 2011 7:00 p.m. 1. CONVENE: 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Chair Owens, Board Members Hoffman, and Jasper Absent: Vice-Chair Rauk and Board Member Lynch 3. MINUTES: Meeting of May 5, 2011 (postponed due to lack of quorum) Meeting of July 7, 2011 (postponed due to lack of quorum) 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 7-A Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0172 - 3009 Marina Drive - Richard Vaterlaus The applicant requests approval for the demolition of more than 30% of the value of a single-family dwelling included on the Historical Building Study List. Ms Laura Ajello, Planner II, presented the scope of the project. Chair Owens opened the public comment period. Ms Elizabeth Green, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society representative, noted that the architect was a renowned modernistic architect, Anshen & Allen, and noted that the front siding should not be changed and the recessed door was a design feature that should not be pulled forward. The architect said that the property owner would like to see the door pulled forward to the façade. Chair Owens asked about the door recess and supports the changes in siding. Board members Jasper and Hoffman supported the project. Ms Anne Wallace, resident, spoke against the project (portions inaudible). HAB Final Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 2 8/4/2011 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-08-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-08-04 | 2 | Board member Jasper moved to approve the project as amended, seconded by board member Hoffman. Motion passed 3-0 (Rauk and Lynch absent). 7-B Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0212 - 1238 Versailles Ave - Ron Gong. The applicant proposes to alter the exterior of a City of Alameda Historic Monument. The changes include partial removal of an existing rear deck and new construction of a side door landing and stairs, as well as an installation of an electric scooter lift. Ms Simone Wolter, Planner II, presented the proposed alterations to the structure, including an overview of unpermitted work to be removed. Board member Jasper asked for clarification on the use of siding and lattice materials. Ms Barbara Coperland, neighbor, is supportive of the removal of unpermitted work and supports retaining the deck as is was built facing her property. She was concerned about privacy concerns, but was interested in working with the neighbors to find a good replacement for the lattice work. Chair Owens was supportive of the project, but was concerned about the look of a replacement door for the kitchen. He was also concerned that the excessive use of the lattice was not congruent with the Historic Monument. He would like to see a replacement that is more compatible. Chair Owens clarified which sections of the unpermitted work would be removed from the residence, and which would be legalized, and the replacement of railing with a more open railing system. [Tape inaudible.] Motion to approve the project as amended and subject to further staff review, made by board member Hoffman and seconded by board member Jasper. Motion passed 3-0. (Rauk and Lynch absent). 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS The board discussed development potential in Alameda and the Board's opportunities to provide comments to Planning Staff. The board agreed that as individuals they would provide comments, but as a Board they would only provide comments on projects coming before the board. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff announced the efforts of the Alameda Architectural P… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-08-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Recording Secretary Gremminger called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member lrons, Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Doug Garrison, Supervising Planner, Dennis Brighton, Planner III, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 7, 2006. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of September 7, 2006 as amended. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0027 - 2445 Encinal Avenue. - Applicant: Emerson Brown - The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure on the Historical Building Study List, for the purpose of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located at 2445 Encinal Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Dennis Brighton, Planner III, presented the staff report. On June 7, 2006, staff approved an application for Major Design Review. The action was conditioned upon the approval of the Certificate of Approval by the Historical Advisory Board. The building is identified as a Background (B) resource in the Historical Building Study List. The demolition involves the removal of later, non-contributory additions to the residence. Therefore, the portion of the structure that would be demolished is not original to the structure and does not represent the work of a master or possess high Minutes of October 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 2 | artistic values. There are also no events associated with this property that make a significant contribution to the history or cultural heritage of local or regional history. Finally, the property is not associated with persons important to local, state or national history. Staff is recommending approval of CA06-0027. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Emerson Brown, property owner, informed the Board that he was present if the Board had any questions for him. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Chair Anderson requested to see a copy of the plans for the new addition. She stated that in order for this Board to make an informed decision on the demolition Certificate of Approval, the Board has to see what is being proposed. Board Member Lynch concurred. Chair Anderson stated that to approve a Certificate of Approval for demolition, the Historical Advisory Board must find that the portion of the house that is proposed to be demolished has no historical merit. But they may impose conditions of approval, which pertain to the proposed new addition, which is why it is necessary to review the plans. Mr. Garrison stated that if the Historical Advisory Board determines that the portion of the structure, which is proposed for, does not have any historic merit, then you may approve a Certificate of Demolition. If you do make the finding that the portion of the structure proposed for demolition does have historical significance, then it may be appropriate to impose conditions regarding the design review. Chair Anderson advised the Board that this matter can be further discussed when the revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance is before them. M/S (Miller, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0027, for the demolition of more than 30% of an existing dwelling at 2445 Encinal Avenue with the conditions stated in draft resolution. 2-3-0. Ayes: 2; (Miller, lrons); Noes: 3; (Anderson, Iverson, Lynch); Absent: 0; Motion is d… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 3 | 1. Details should be consistent with the original style of the building. 2. Rafter tails need not be exposed. However the applicant wishes to handle the gutters will be acceptable. 3. Hip roof on garage, 4. All windows that are visible from the street should be visually consistent to the original structure. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. Mr. Garrison stated the Board's suggestions will be presented to the owner and if the owner agrees he will incorporate their suggestions into the final design. 2. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0030 - Grand Marina - Corner of Grand Street and Fortman Way contained within Tract 7723 - Applicant: David Day for Warmington Homes, California. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for 100% demolition of eight existing pre-1942 accessory buildings. The site is located within an M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District. Chair Anderson would like to recuse herself from this item due to a conflict of interest with her employer. Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report. Ms. Wolter informed the Board that the 3.51-acre site of the proposed demolition is part of a larger 8.36-acre area that would be covered by a new Master Plan encompassing the entirety of the Grand Marina facility. The review of city records shows that only two out of eight structures have obtained building permits. It is reasonable to assume that all buildings were constructed prior to 1942. During a site visit to the property, staff noted that the structures at 2041-2051 Grand Street are severely dilapidated and other than 2051 Grand Street, none of the structures appeared to be in active use. Staff has determined that these structures lack integrity and would not qualify for local, state or national registers. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval CA06-0030, for the demolition of eight existing pre-1942 accessory buildings located at Grand Marina, Tract 7723. Vice-Chair Miller opened the public hearing. Andy McKinley, 2219 Grand St., spoke in favor of projec… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 4 | There were no more speaker slips. Vice-Chair Miller closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's inquiry regarding the number of homes that are proposed, Ms. Woltter informed the Board that there are approximately 40 homes proposed for this site. The Board agreed with the staff report that none of the buildings have any historical significance. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval CA06-0030, to demolish eight commercial buildings built prior to 1942, located at Grand Marina. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 1; Abstain: 1 (Anderson); Motion carries. REPORTS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Discussion only) Board member Lynch would like the Historical Monument page on the City website updated. She has written articles telling the history of each Monument and would like the articles linked to the Monument list. She is requesting the Board's input, and would like to see this on a future agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: STAFF COMMUNICATION: Mr. Garrison introduced Zach Seal, Planner I. ADJOURNMENT: 7:55 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Secrétary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGIHABIAGENMIN\Agenmin.06/10-05-06/10-05-06 FINAL min.doc Minutes of October 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:05 ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Vice Chair Miller, Board Members lrons and Lynch ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Doug Garrison, Supervising Planner; Doug Vu, Planner III; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician I/Recording Secretary MINUTES: None AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Board Member lrons suggested changing the order of the agenda to avoid making members of the public wait to hear the Bay Street item. The Board agreed to switch items. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None CONSENT ITEMS: (7-A.) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0390 - 1356 Broadway. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for the removal of one Coast live oak tree (Quercus agrifolia) located in the rear side yard of the property. The tree is promoting hazardous conditions due to its proximity to the house. The site is located within an R- 4, Neighborhood Residential District. (DV) Motion (Lynch)Second (Irons) to approve the Certificate of Approval. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0 Motion passes. Minutes of September 4, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 2 | REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: (8-B.) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0035 - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated residential building for the purpose of remodeling a previous addition and adding a front porch. (DV) Continued from the meeting of August 7, 2008. Mr. Doug Vu presented the staff report. Board Member Lynch asked if the new drawing could be explained for clarification. Mr. Jon Biggs pointed out that two letters were received the day of the meeting. Mr. Craig Coombs stated that he was available to answer any questions regarding the project at 1150 Bay Street. Board Member Lynch asked about how the pergola was designed and how the drawings were supposed to be looked at. Mr. Coombs clarified the drawings and recapped part of the discussion from the previous meeting. He also clarified that the design was altered to meet the proper requirements for preservation and construction. He clarified elements of the design that were in question. Mr. Bob Woolley addressed the board. He submitted copies of documents from the Secretary of Interior's website for the treatment of historic structures. He read from the sections of the guidelines that address the setting, emphasizing the setbacks. Ms. Sally Damsen addressed the board. She read a letter on her neighbor's behalf. While the letter talked about several aspects of the project, one aspect, the front porch, will extend out past the property line as will its roof. This may cause access problems for emergency responders such as fire and police. Ms. Dee Keltner addressed the board. She wanted to clear up a point of confusion, which was that the neighbors had not met with the applicants. The applicants had an open house for the neighbors to review the design and plans. The neighbors encouraged the applicants to reduce the porch extension so it does not protrude as far into the front yard. She then read from her letter, which was signed by several neighbors. The lette… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 3 | Mr. Jerry Wilkins responded by saying that the Sanborn map that Mr. Buckley submitted was over 60 years old and may not be entirely accurate. He clarified that he was the contractor for the Emerson project. Ms. Keltner asked if the applicants had any documentation that would help the neighbors get a better idea of the property lines and measurements. Board Member Lynch asked some questions about the design. She mentioned some of the conversation from the previous meeting. She wanted to see what they were currently looking at and how it compared to what was being reviewed at the last meeting. She wondered if the neighbors had seen the updated plans and designs. She also complimented the people who were commenting on the standards. Board Member lrons pointed out the protrusion of the roof and wanted to know what the minimum setback was for front yards. Board Member Lynch asked about the porch and why they replaced the porch with a pergola instead of getting rid of it all together. She also asked if they had more accurate information regarding the Sanborn map. Mr. Coombs replied by saying that the porch is in an integral part of making the design work as a whole. He also had pictures that he hoped would clarify the design and setting of the neighborhood. He stated that their measurements to property lines were more accurate than the Sanborn maps and gave a more realistic interpretation of the setting. Acting Chair Miller expressed some concerns with the project. He stated that one of the problems is that the house was designed without a front porch and the protrusion of the roof changes the streetscape and sets a dangerous precedent. It changes the "setting" of the property. He feels that the porch is not a necessary part of the house. Board Member Lynch agreed with Mr. Miller in that she feels that setting a precedent is not a good by-product of approval of the project. Board Member lrons stated that he felt that there was more to the project than just the design. There were issues regarding the history of the stru… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 4 | Mr. lrons brought up the side set back of 5 feet. His understanding of the ordinance was that it negates the need for a variance. Mr. Vu clarified that the ordinance only applies to walled additions. This porch is not considered a "walled" addition. Mr. Biggs pointed out that the board had alternatives to denying the project. Mr. Coombs said that they are looking for guidance and are willing to compromise to get the board to approve the project. He asked for a continuance. The board discussed the other options to denying the project. The board agreed to refer the project back to the applicant for further revisions to the front porch. Motion (lrons)/Second (Lynch) to continue the application for the Certificate of Approval for 1150 Bay Street to the meeting of October 2, 2008. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0 Motion carries (8-A.) Park Street North of Lincoln Strategic Plan. The Historical Advisory Board will be reviewing and commenting on the Park Street North of Lincoln Strategic Plan. The Plan area includes Park Street from Lincoln Avenue to the Park Street Bridge and one block on either side of Park Street. The Park Street commercial district, north of Lincoln Avenue, is an area in transition due to the recent loss of two car dealerships and the imminent loss of a third dealership. The Plan includes preliminary urban design concepts for this district and strategies for redeveloping the district. The Plan will provide a basis for future actions by the City of Alameda, which may include zoning and General Plan amendments, and establishing design standards for this area. (DG) Mr. Doug Garrison presented the Park Street North of Lincoln Strategic Plan. The plan includes several ideas and proposals for the area of Park Street from Lincoln Avenue to the estuary and one block in either direction from Park Street. The proposals include redevelopment of many of the sites located within the area. This is a broad vision of the future and potential for the "Gateway" area. The plan includes strategies, visions, projections and potential u… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 5 | needed on the area's buildings; residential character needs to be maintained; lower the height limit of new buildings. Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the board. He reminded the board of a letter that was sent by the AAPS. He suggested that some of the language in the plan be changed. He referred to one of the structures on Park Street and suggested that it could be preserved, as it's an opportunity. Mr. Charles Howell addressed the board. He agrees with the recommendations made by Mr. Buckley and Mr. Rutter. Board Member Lynch asked about previous comments and how they will know what they are and if they have been included. Mr. Eric Fonstein replied by saying that all comments will be included in the report that is to be presented to the Planning Board and City Council in future meetings. Board Member Lynch mentioned that the list of historic buildings is incomplete and needs to be updated. Mr. Biggs clarified that they are not to be making corrections to the plan, simply providing comments and suggestions. Board Member Lynch expressed appreciation for all the work that has been done and wanted to make sure that many of the historic buildings are protected. She also expressed concern with the 100-foot height limit and feels that the zoning regulations should be revisited to lower the height limit. (8-C.) PLN08-0400 - 2264 Santa Clara Avenue, (Carnegie Library) and 1429 Oak Street (Foster House). Applicant is proposing the rehabilitation, exterior alterations, and an addition that will connect the Carnegie Library to the Foster House. The addition will contain an elevator plus ramps and stairs that provide access to the floor levels of the two buildings. The proposal includes moving the Foster House to provide the necessary space for the proposed addition. Approval requires a finding that the project is Categorically Exempt from State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15331 - Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation - Rehabilitation projects consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatme… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 6 | Mr. Richard Rutter addressed the board. He expressed concern about the glass floors and the link between the two buildings. He feels that it is trying to hard and needs to be simplified; the architecture should be softened down a bit. Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the board. He stated that he is excited about the project and thinks that the design is good. He expressed concern with the resolution and that it has no conditions requiring the use of certain materials or colors. He also expressed concern about the librarian stairway and feels it should be kept and feels that the pipe rails be revisited. He liked the interior layout and likes that the old librarian desk is going to be preserved. The board expressed that they like the design and appreciate that the architect seems to be creating the design with the historical aspects in mind. They like the link between the two buildings and feel that it is more of a connector instead of a new structure. They also said that they would like to see a sample board, lighting fixtures, urn design, and included as a condition that the colors and materials come before the board for review and approval. Motion (Lynch)/ Second (Miller) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions Ayes: 3; Noes: 0 Motion carries. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: None STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs informed the board about the Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA) meeting that was scheduled. ADJOURNMENT: 10:12 Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary Historical Advisory Board Minutes of September 4, 2008 6 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-02-02 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 2017 1. CONVENE Chair Piziali called meeting to order at 7:03pm. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Piziali, Board Members Jones, Sanchez, Saxby. Absent: Board Member Chan. Board Member Sanchez introduced himself to the board. 3. MINUTES *None* 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION Nancy Hird, AAPS, spoke about adding buildings at the Alameda Marina to the Historic Study List. She said the collection of the buildings as a whole, and their WWII history, are worthy of inclusion on the list and asked the board to initiate the process. Woody Minor gave a history of the study list and explained how the buildings at Alameda Marina fit in the historic study list. Christopher Buckley, AAPS, repeated the request to initiate the process for including the buildings in the historic study list. Staff Member Tai explained to the board the nature of AAPS's request to add the buildings at Alameda Marina to the study list. He said they originally received a request in March, 2016. He said the property owner has submitted a master plan application and the historic resources are studied as part of the Environmental Impact Report. He said Mr Minor was able to comment on their administrative draft and they are taking his comments into consideration for the EIR. He said the process will be transparent. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Staff Member Tai said they received written communications from AAPS and the League of Women Voters. Approved Minutes Page 1 of 5 Historical Advisory Board February 2, 2017 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-02-02 | 2 | 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2017-3847 Certificate of Approval - PLN16-0606 - 2307 Clinton Avenue - Applicant: David Kuoppamaki. Applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for a two story rear addition to an existing two story single-family residence. Although the proposed rear addition is designed to match the existing architectural features, the project requires a Certificate of Approval because it involves the removal of the existing one-story rear addition, which is equivalent to more than 30% of the value of the existing structure. The addition will continue the existing roofline to maintain the existing building height. The project also involves demolishing an existing detached garage and replacing it with a new garage with a similar design. The property is listed on the City's Historical Buildings Study List with an S designation. The property is located in the R-5 (General Residential) zoning district. The project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - demolition and removal of a single-family residence. Staff Member Barrera gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2946715&GUID=C9A2D770- 5914-4B95-854D-AF978EF969FC&FullText=1 Board Member Saxby said the design seems to try and make it impossible to tell the old from the new, and that the standards say they should be differentiated. He asked how that would be addressed. Staff Member Barrera said there is a discrepancy between the City's design guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior's standards. Staff Member Tai said that in most established neighborhoods the preference seems to be to integrate the design of new construction as much as possible. Board Member Saxby said he hoped that for a more significant structure that the standard for differentiation would be upheld. He said he supports the removal of the existing addition and demolition and replacement of the existing garage. He said he … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-02-02 | 3 | Board Member Sanchez asked if the building height was staying the same. Staff Member Barrera said that is was staying the same height. Staff Member Tai said that the board could condition the approval on differentiating the addition from the original structure if they wished. He said that would give staff direction to more strictly follow that standard for future projects. He said one treatment they could use is to add a vertical trim separating the addition visually. Board Member Saxby said that changes to the roof line could be made to delineate the addition. He said a setback in the wall would also be an option. He said a third option would be a change in materials used on the addition. Board Member Sanchez asked what the size of the new garage was compared to the original. Staff Member Barrera said that it was the same size as the original and would accommodate two cars. Chair Piziali opened the public hearing. Ronan Kennedy, neighbor, said the character of the original structure is not being maintained. He said the added mass of the design makes it appear much larger from the street and adjacent properties. He said the design does not meet the standards of preserving the form of the existing structure. He said the suggestion of stepping back the walls would meet the standards. Chair Piziali closed the public hearing. Board Member Saxby made a motion to approve the application with the condition that staff work with the applicant to provide more differentiation between the addition and the original structure, considering stepping down of the roof, creating a setback in the wall of the addition, and/or simplifying the details of the facades. Board Member Sanchez seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0. 7-B 2017-3848 Review and Comment on the Historic District Principles and Infill Guidelines Section of the Draft Main Street Specific Plan at Alameda Point Staff Member Giles gave the staff presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: ps://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=29467… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-02-02 | 4 | Board Member Sanchez asked for information on what makes a structure in the beehive neighborhood a contributing structure or not. Ruth Todd, from Page & Turnbull, said there is a process for nominating and determining which structures contribute to a historic district. She said it is based solely on their historic relevance and not based on a structure's condition, design, etc. Board Member Saxby asked if any of the structures in question were significant in any other way. Ms. Todd said they were not determined to be individually significant. Board Member Sanchez asked if the NCO quarters would be removed. Ms. Todd said new construction could be desired, but there is not necessarily a plan for demolition. She said the city wanted flexibility. Chair Piziali asked if the recently demolished buildings are where the APC residents would be relocated to in the future. Staff Member Ott said it would be sited where the old PX was located. She said the first phase of building where the units were demolished would help facilitate the construction of the new APC units. Board Member Jones asked how they planned to bring all of the Collaborating Partners' units together. Staff Member Ott said that they three supportive housing providers are spread out over a large footprint right now and that bringing them together around common amenities and services they can be more successful at delivering services. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Board Member Saxby said it sounded like there were several reports from the 80s and 90s that did not make it onto the study list, which has not been updated since the late 70s. Staff Member Tai said they maintain the list on a case by case basis, triggered by project proposals. He said they have expanded the list to include Alameda Point. He said there is an opportunity for the city to improve its record keeping. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS 9-A 2017-3849 Introduction to Design Review and Certificates of Approval Approved Minutes Page 4 of 5 Historical Advisory Board February 2, 2017 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2017-02-02 | 5 | Staff Member Barrera gave a presentation on planning and permit staff work flows. Board Member Sanchez asked if the design review notices went out at the same time as the certificate notices. Staff Member Barrera said that sometimes they happen simultaneously and sometimes they are staggered. Board Member Saxby asked what follow up there is to ensure projects do not demolish more than 30% without going through the process. Staff Member Tai said there are several steps in the process to check the plans and attain revisions to the permit when there is extra demolition work. 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Christopher Buckley said that AAPS was asking the board to initiate placing buildings on the historic study list. 11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Piziali adjourned the meeting at 8:45pm. Approved Minutes Page 5 of 5 Historical Advisory Board February 2, 2017 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2017-02-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, APRIL 6, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson and Tilos. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board member Lynch. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Eliason, Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Emily Pudell, Planner II, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S to continue the March 2, 2006 minutes to the May 4, 2006 meeting due to a lack of a quorum. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. ACTION ITEMS: None. REPORTS: 1. Preliminary Restoration Review - Applicant: Dwane P. Jensen for Tony Wong - 500 Central Avenue. The applicants are seeking comments regarding the design for the proposed restoration of 500 Central Avenue. (Item continued from 3-02-06 meeting). This item was continued from the March 2, 2006 meeting per the Board's request. The applicant has incorporated the Board's comments received at the March 2, 2006 meeting and has submitted a revised set of drawings for review. Staff is seeking comments from this Board to assist in the Design Review approval. Chair Anderson opened the pubic hearing. Chris Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS), submitted their comments in a letter which was distributed to the Board. Minutes of April 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 2 | There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board member Tilos is in favor of the new design. Chair Anderson is in favor of staff's conditions of approval noted in the staff report. Additionally, she would like an investigation of the rear addition, and would like staff to require the applicant to apply for a lot line adjustment. She does not agree that the windscreen on the side elevation is original as AAPS has suggested; therefore it should not be a condition of approval. Vice-Chair Miller would like to incorporate AAPS recommendations with the comments made by the Board tonight, with the exception of the windscreen. Board member Iverson agreed that the windscreen was not original and is not necessary. 2. Review and Comment on Proposed Revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance. (Continued from the March 2, 2006 meeting). Staff has made several revisions to various sections of the Historical Preservation Ordinance. Staff would like the Board to review the proposed revisions, and submit comments. Staff will then incorporate the comments made by the Board and from the public and bring this item back for final review and recommendation to the City Council. Definition of Demolition: Staff proposes that the definition of demolition be easier for property owners and staff to calculate and should be equal to all properties. The Board did not have any comments regarding this section. Protected Trees: Ms. Eliason stated that staff is proposing stricter penalties for the unauthorized demolitions of protected trees. Chair Anderson stated that a landscape plan should only be required when replacement trees are located on the property. She would also like the ordinance to be clear that the applicant is responsible for the payment of the arborist. Ms. Woodbury stated that staff will revise the language to read that when only one tree is being replaced, the applicant may submit a site plan in lieu of the landscape plan. In response to Vice-Chair… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 3 | appraised value of the original tree which will be determined by the Planning and Building Director. The Board had no further comments. Historic Signs: Ms. Eliason reviewed the proposed revisions to the Historic Signs and designation process. The Board did not have any comments regarding this section. New Application Process: Ms. Eliason reviewed the proposed revisions to New Application Process. To prevent further unauthorized demolitions, the requirements for Certificate of Approvals should be very clear. Chair Anderson stated that section (a) should be revised. A structural report can only be prepared by a structural engineer, not an architect. Staff concurred and will make the revision. The Board had no further comments. Penalties: Ms Eliason reviewed the proposed revisions to the Penalties section. She informed the Board that the revisions to this section are important due to the recent problem of several unauthorized demolition of listed buildings and buildings built prior to 1942. The present ordinance only provides one remedy for each situation. For properties listed on the Historic Building Study List, unauthorized demolition is subject to a five (5) year stay in the issuance of any building permit or construction-related permit for any new construction at the site previously occupied by the historic resource. For pre-1942 unauthorized demolitions, the applicable penalty reads: "Any violation of this section or failure to comply with a condition of approval of any certificate of approval or permit issued pursuant to this section constitutes a violation of the Alameda Municipal Code." This inflexibility regarding penalties provides no administrative relief nor does it allow for extenuating circumstances regarding individual situations. Staff has proposed new language that provides additional flexibility for handling demolitions of Historical Monuments, structures on the Historical Building Study List and Pre-1942 dwellings, as well as Protected Trees. The proposed revision strengthens the overall penalty … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 4 | Vice-Chair Miller would like the penalties to be very clear that it is not ok to demolish historical structures. He would like Alameda to set the standard for strict penalties. He would like staff to consult with the City Attorney's office regarding charging as a misdemeanor offense. Chair Anderson would like to see guidelines within the Ordinance stating who is responsible for overseeing that the property is maintained in the event of the five year moratorium. Board member Iverson inquired if the monetary penalties could be assessed periodically though non-compliance, possibly on a quarterly basis. Board member Iverson also would like to see an additional penalty imposed if the property is sold within a certain amount of time after the illegal demolition. The Board had no further comments. Appeals and Call for Review: Staff has proposed the standard language used for all Boards regarding Appeals and Call for Review. The Board did not have any comments regarding this section. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Rosemary McNally, 2145 San Antonio, would like to see very strict penalties for unauthorized demolitions. Dick Rutter, 2205 Clinton Avenue, stated that the entire structure should be considered in the demolition process, not only the front façade. He stated that the fine should start at $10,000. Denise Brady, president of AAPS, stated the current ordinance does not give enough penalty options. She also feels the $500.00 penalty is too low. She would like to see the contractors who are doing the unauthorized demolitions be penalized as well as the homeowners. Chris Buckley, AAPS, reviewed the comments submitted in a letter from AAPS. He would like more time to consider all of the different options and scenarios which might occur. He would like the HAB to have more authority over the proposed design and construction plans. On tree provisions, with regards to trees, the International arborist formula is appropriate. Chuck Millar, 2829 San Jose, read the letter to the Board from Birgitt Evans. He stated … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 5 | revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance to the Council at the same time. He supports the recommendations made by AAPS. There should be various scales of penalties. He concurs with Denise Brady's comment to penalize the contractor. Item 3 under new application process, issuance should lie with the general contractor's role, not the architect. Elizbeth Krase, 2520 Chester St, would like to see stricter penalties. She stated that a $500.00 fine will not be very effective. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing. The floor was opened again for additional Board comments. Chair Anderson would like this item to be continued to allow further discussion and to give the Board more time to review. She would also like staff to provide the entire ordinance rather than just the revised pieces. Chair Anderson requested that a review of the Historical Building Study List be on a future agenda. M/S to continue this item to a future meeting for further discussion. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 3. Discussion and recommendation to City Council regarding support for National Historic Preservation Month. Ms. Woodbury informed the Board that each year the National Trust for Historic Preservation promotes preservation efforts across the country by designating May as National Preservation Month. Thousands of communities showcase their unique historic buildings and landscapes and honor their local heritage through a variety of activities that increase the public's awareness and appreciation of protecting the nation's rich history. National Preservation Month provides an excellent opportunity to celebrate historic preservation in Alameda. Staff has provided several activities suggested by The National Trust to celebrate National Preservation Month. Staff recommends that the Historical Advisory Board recommend that the City Council proclaim May 2006 as National Preservation Month at the May 2, 2006 City Council meeting. Chair Anderson has agreed to attend the City Council m… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-04-06 | 6 | June 4, 2006 AAPS will be giving out preservation awards. He stated the more publicity the better. M/S to recommend to the City Council to proclaim May 2006 as National Preservation month. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Correspondence addressed to Rick Jones, PM Realty Group, from Leslie Little, Development Services Director, clarifying the process regarding proposed exterior alterations to buildings within the Naval Air Station Alameda Historic District at Alameda Point. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. The meeting was adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner. G:\PLANNING|HAB\AGENMIN)Agenmin.06/04-06-06/04-06-06 DRAFT min 1.doc Minutes of April 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-04-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, Lynch and lrons. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner; Simone Wolter, Planner I; Shana Nero, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Anderson) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting for October 4, 2007 with corrections. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Abstain: 1; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None SPECIAL REPORTS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: The Board received a letter from the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society regarding Item 7-A and a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of an accessory structure at 152 Maitland Drive. WORKSHOP: N/A ACTION ITEMS: 7-A. Certificate of Approval CA07-0017; Applicant: Alameda Power & Telecom - 2000 Grand Street. (DV) The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to replace 40 Minutes of November 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 2 | to 60 deteriorated decorative streetlights along sections of Lincoln, Buena Vista, and Encinal Avenues with new decorative streetlights. The streetlights are listed as significant streetlights in Appendix A of the Historic Building Study List. Staff requested a continuation to the meeting of November 1, 2007. Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report to the Board. Juan Ulloa of Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) responded to questions regarding the replacement program, the survey of existing lights, and the cost of new poles. Chair Anderson opened the item for public comment. Christopher Buckley discussed the specifications, standards and maintenance of the streetlights. Richard Rutter discussed material options for streetlights and stated that cast iron was the best replacement option for the streetlights. Woody Minor provided input regarding the historical aspect of the streetlights, noting that the focus should be more on the retention. Kevin Frederick stated that he opposed the use of fiberglass. Birgit Evans commented that there should be some way to reuse the old streetlights, rather than selling the parts for scrap metal. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor for public discussion. Board Member Lynch expressed concern that staff did not understand that the streetlights were historical monuments and was very concerned that Alameda Power & Telecom had gone ahead and changed 20 of the streetlights without any authorization. The Board requested a complete cost comparison from Alameda Power & Telecom for different casting companies including the use of different materials and a complete listing for Phase 1 and Phase 2 for repair and replacement of existing streetlights. In addition, the Board requested information on how to correct the existing 20 streetlights that have been replaced to date. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to continue the item to the February 7, 2008 regular meeting. M/S (Miller/Lynch) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Motion carries. Minute… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 3 | 7-B. Certificate of Approval; CA07-0020; Applicant: Frank Ardourel - 1455 Fourth Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for a more than thirty percent (30%) demolition of a residential structure that was built prior to 1942, but is not on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located at 1445 Fourth Street within an R-1, One Family Residential Zoning District. Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report to the Board. She noted that the recommendation was for denial of the Certificate of Approval. The Board opened the item for public comment. Marsha Broquedis provided input on her design work at 1445 Fourth Street and her concerns regarding the condition of the property. Frank Ardourel expressed to the Board how detrimental the present condition is for his family and requested he be allowed to move forward with repairs to his property. There was no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor for Board discussion. The Board discussed the important design features and requested the applicant to redesign the addition keeping in mind the following concerns: larger casings on the windows, the roof over the bay window on the first floor and the reconsideration of the "pop out" on the 2nd floor. The Board also suggested looking at the proportions of the building and to consider another material - either lap siding or maybe shingle for the front façade. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to continue the item to the January 3, 2008 regular meeting. M/S (Miller/Iverson) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion carries. 7-C. Certificate of Approval, CA07-0008; Applicant: Yong Liang - 1611 Walnut Street St. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure that is listed as a historical resource on the Historic Building Study List. The proposed work includes additions to the first and second stories, the replacement of windows and doors, and the replacement of the foundation and basement. The site is locat… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 4 | Staff requested a continuation of the item to the meeting of December 6, 2007 regular meeting. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to continue the item to the December 6, 2007 meeting. M/S (Miller/Iverson) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion carries. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board member Lynch discussed a presentation given by Phil Tagami regarding Alameda Point. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff gave the Board information on upcoming workshops and conferences. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of November 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-10-06 | 1 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, October 6, 2011 1. CONVENE: 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Chair Owens, Board Members Hoffman, Jasper, and Lynch Absent: Vice-Chair Rauk 3. MINUTES: Meeting of May 5, 2011 Board member Lynch moved, seconded by Chair Owens, to approve the meeting minutes as amended. Motion passes 3-0. (Board member Hoffman abstained) Meeting of July 7, 2011 Board member Hoffman moved, seconded by board member Lynch, to approve the meeting minutes as amended. Motion passes 4-0. Meeting of August 4, 2011 Board member Hoffman moved, seconded by board member Jasper, to approve the meeting minutes as amended. Motion passes 4-0. Meeting of September 1, 2011 Board member Lynch moved, seconded by board member Jasper, to approve the meeting minutes as amended. Motion passes 4-0. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Chris Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society representative, requested that the draft historic preservation ordinance be released ahead of time, to allow sufficient review time by the public. Simone Wolter, HAB Secretary, announced that the draft would be released in 10 days. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: None. Approved Meeting Minutes 10/6/2011 Page 1 of 5 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-10-06 | 2 | 7-A Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0247 - 1505 & 1507 Park Street - Dick Rutter. The applicant is requesting to add an awning, reface the bulkhead, install terrazzo tile on the floor, and refurbish existing materials. Ms Wolter provided a brief overview of the project. Dick Rutter, project architect, described elements of the project. Rob Ratto, Executive Director of the Park Street Business Association, spoke in favor of the project. Motion made by Hoffman, seconded by Chair Owens, to approve the project. Motion passes 4-0. 7-B Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0272 - 1518 Park Street - Italo Calpestri. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to reconfigure the storefront of a contributor in the Park Street Historic Commercial District and remove the recessed corner entry and square off the building with removable window panels on both facades. Ms Wolter provided a brief overview of the project. Board member Lynch asked whether historic pictures exist for this project. Staff discussed stated that there were no historic pictures on file except the picture earlier than 1979. Italo Calpestri, project architect, discussed options to address concerns noted in the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society letter dated submitted prior to the meeting. He noted that the bulkheads may contain marble. He suggested that, upon approval by the property owner, the remaining marble be consolidated and applied to the center window on the Park Street façade. In order to address ADA requirements, he noted that the tile and some interior concrete would need to be removed. He suggested that a replica be included here in lieu of the tile. He stated that the bottom rail of the window come in common sizes, so that the bottom rail could not be raised. Also, he noted, that the ceiling would not be altered much, only to include the rails for the windows. Board member Lynch asked for clarification on the location of the doors. Approved Meeting Minutes 10/6/2011 Page 2 of 5 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-10-06 | 3 | Staff explained the location of the person doors on the corner elevations. Chair Owens asked if the current doors have sufficient clearance between door and strikeside. Italo Calpestri stated that the project, in its current iteration, meets ADA requirements. Chair Owens asked whether wood doors had been considered for this project. Italo Calpestri stated that the property owner had selected metal doors for its sturdyness. Rob Ratto, Executive Director of the Park Street Business Association, spoke in favor of the project. Chris Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society representative, discussed the comments submitted to the Board in a letter dated October 4, 2011. He showed pictures of existing conditions to demonstrate the importance of maintaining important historic features. Betsy Mathieson, Alameda resident, spoke against altering the recessed entryway as it would alter the historic composition of the historic structure. Kevin Frederick, Alameda resident, welcomed the opportunity to speak on the façade alteration projects in the Park Street Historic Commercial District. He did not favor the proposal to alter the existing recessed entryway and asked that the entry way be retained. Woody Minor, Alameda resident, supported the al fresco window design, however, he proposed that the existing configuration be retained. He questioned whether the scoring of the corner would add significant space. He favored retaining the existing bulkhead in its current configuration and adding movable windows with louvered treatments. Board member Hoffman favored louvered windows, but wants to see the existing entryway retained in its current configuration. He stated that the feel of that corner adds to the historical uniqueness. Board member Jasper did not favor accordion windows. He asked whether the windows would allow for spill-over onto the sidewalk. While he understood the need to allow for overflow dining, he could not support the proposal in its current form. He suggested that a bulkhead with operable windows woul… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-10-06 | 4 | historic storefront or removal of the tile, which are character-defining features, could not be supported in light of these standards. If removal of historic elements was required, it should be retained or replicated in a suitable fashion. Staff asked whether the applicant would be able return to the property owner and consider other alternatives. She recommended that the project be continued to a date specific. Motion made by board member Lynch, seconded by board member Hoffman to continue the project to the December 1, 2011 hearing, to allow the architect and property owner time to revise the project. 7-C Certificate of Approval - PLN11-027 - 1419 Park Street - Italo Calpestri. The applicant is proposing to replace the storefront windows with a new fixed storefront window and door system of a contributor in the Park Street Historic Commercial District. Staff provided a brief overview of the project. Italo Calpestri, project architect, described the project with more detail and explained the intent to develop several retail spaces. Chair Owens asked whether one tenant would retain the main space abutting the street. Italo Calpestri stated that this is correct. There have been several interested tenants, but no potential tenant has made a formal commitment for this space. Rob Ratto, Executive Director of the Park Street Business Association, spoke in favor of the project. Debbie George, property owner and business operator at this site, described the architectural details that would be refurbished on the façade, the color scheme, and the intent to develop several retail spaces. She stated that originally this building was used by Long's Drugstore, which will inspire the future signage with neon and channel letters. She intends to call the new retail spaces "Park Street Plaza". Chair Owens was supportive of the separate awnings identifying the separate retail spaces that front on Park Street. Debbie George stated that the proposal calls for one continuous awning with an art deco color-inspired awning. Board member… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-10-06 | 5 | Chair Owens also supports the project and requested that the design changes be attached to the resolution. Board member Hoffman moved, seconded by board member Lynch, to approve the project with the addition that the design renderings be attached to the proposal. Motion passes 4- 0. 7-D Public Workshop - PLN08-0463 - City of Alameda The City of Alameda and Historical Advisory Board Sub-Committee will hold a workshop to introduce the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance to the full Board and the public. A brief overview will be presented to highlight new aspects of the ordinance and receive public input. As a workshop, input will be gathered, but no actions will be made at this meeting. Staff is requesting a continuance to a future date. Board member Hoffman moved, seconded by Chair Owens, to approve continuance of the agenda item to the December 1st, 2011 hearing date. Motion passes 4-0. st 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS : None. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Simone Wolter explained that the City Manager had issued a press release stating that the property owner for the Boatworks project at 2223 Blanding Avenue was required to demolish the structures on site within 90 days. She then elaborated on the steps required before the demolition permits would be issued by the City and that the Board would be informed of the status of the mitigation measures (i.e. photographic inventory) as the project continues. Chair Owens stated that he had attended an industrial archeology presentation and expressed an interest that the memory of the industrial Boatworks complex may be documented through a video that also included oral traditions and memories as expressed by people who worked there. Board member Lynch stated that that would be wonderful project for local organizations to document the history of Boatworks. She would like to see this incorporated in the documentation for the public displays. Simone Wolter announced that she was resigning from her position as Planner and HAB Secretary effective October 13th 2011 and thanked the Board… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-10-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-11-20 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD SPECIAL MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2008 CONFERENCE ROOM 360, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Acting Chair Miller, Board Members lrons, Lynch and Owens ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician I/Recording Secretary MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of September 4, 2008 Minutes from the meeting of October 2, 2008 Motion (Lynch)/Second (Irons) to accept the minutes with corrections Ayes: 4; Noes: 0 Motion Carries AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: (7-A.) 2009 Meeting Calendar Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report. He clarified that the meeting of January 1, 2009 needs to be scheduled for a different day due to the New Years Day holiday. 1 Minutes of November 20, 2008 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-11-20 | 2 | Motion (Lynch)/Second (Miller) to accept the 2009 Historical Advisory Board Meeting Calendar Ayes: 4; Noes: 0 Motion Passes (7-B.) PLN08-0211 - 2413 Buena Vista Avenue. The Applicant requests approval to remove the structure located at 2413 Buena Vista Avenue from the Alameda Historical Building Study List. Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report. He pointed out several aspects of the property and how things have changed over time including alterations to the structure, lack of maintenance, changes in the surrounding properties, and uses of the area as a business district. Acting Chair Miller asked if the project would have to come back before the Board for a Certificate of Approval for demolition if the structure is taken off the Historical Building Study List. Board Member Lynch asked what sections of the Municipal Code regulated Certificates of Approval. Board Member lrons asked why buildings must come before the Board if they are not on the list. Board Member Lynch pointed out that the pre-1942 requirement was changed due to a project that was to be demolished and because of public response. City Council amended the ordinance to require that any structure built prior to 1942 must go before the Historical Advisory Board for a Certificate of Approval. Ms. Cara Bertron of Page and Turnbull, Historic Preservation Consultant, was available to answer questions of the Board. Mr. Miller asked about the criteria used to create the report that says the house is not a valuable historic resource. Mr. Owens asked for clarification about some of the terminology used in the report to describe the house. Ms. Bertron replied by saying that the terminology she used was in the guidelines. Mr. Owens asked if the evaluation was compared to the National Park rating system or the City's guidelines. Ms. Bertron said that the evaluation was compared to both the City's guidelines and the National Park rating system. Acting Chair Miller pointed out that because the architect or designer is unknown, that is not a valid reason to remove… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-11-20 | 3 | Public comment was opened Ms. Betsy Matheson gave a short presentation on the possibilities of restoration. She made comparisons to a house she and her husband purchased and restored in San Jose and the structure at 2413 Buena Vista Avenue, noting it could be restored if desired. She also showed some pictures that illustrate the context of the neighborhood. Mr. Woody Minor helped clarify what had happened in the neighborhood that the project structure is located in. He provided information regarding the character of the neighborhood and how the structure at 2413 Buena Vista is an integral part of keeping the character of the neighborhood intact. He disagreed with the consultant's report on how the "setting' of the neighborhood is defined. He expressed concern with setting a precedent by removing the structure from the study list. Mr. Richard Rutter addressed the Board and stated he wants to see the structure kept on the study list. He expressed concern that the building was looked at from a standpoint of modern construction regarding the structural integrity and should have been looked at from the perspective of being an older, historic structure. Ms. Debbie George addressed the Board. She spoke to the North of Lincoln revitalization project and the Cavanaugh building. She supports removing the structure from the study list and would like to see the project move forward. She suggested moving the house or selling pieces from the house to be used in the preservation of other houses. Ms. Valerie Turpen addressed the Board. She also submitted some pictures that show the streetscape. The pictures showed how the neighborhood would look if the structure was moved to the parking lot to the Southeast of 2413 Buena Vista. She feels that the whole block is an important part of Alameda. She is worried that if the structure is removed from the study list, it will be demolished. Mr. Ross Dileau addressed the Board. He talked about the restoration he has done to his own house and that complete restoration of the subject structu… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-11-20 | 4 | Mr. Kevin Fredrick addressed the Board. He wants to see the structure stay on the study list and urged the Board to deny any proposed demolition. He supports moving the house to a different location. Ms. Barbara Price was available to answer any questions. Board Member Lynch asked about efforts to move the house. Ms. Price replied by saying that after further evaluation of the structure, it was not economically feasible to restore the house for use in the new development and the owner is looking to give the house away for relocation. Other options are to use parts of the house for the restoration of other houses. Acting Chair Miller asked if the house is taken off the list if it will still have to come before the Board if it is to be relocated. Mr. Biggs clarified that if the building is on the list, a request for relocation will have to come back to the Board. Board Member lrons asked about the Cavanaugh project and what it entails. He also wanted clarification of the uses of the buildings in the area. He talked about some of the houses in his neighborhood and made some comparisons to those and the structure at 2413 Buena Vista and also expressed appreciation for the woodwork inside the building. He is concerned that the house will deteriorate further if it continues to be neglected. He also expressed concern with the Page and Turnbull report. Board Member Owens pointed out that despite the requirements of modern commercial structures, the historic building code could be applied to the project structure. Mr. Minor asked if the owner's intention was to keep the structure upon purchase or to demolish it. Ms. Price replied by saying that the owner intended to incorporate the structure into the new project but once the evaluation was complete, it would not be economically feasible to restore and reuse the structure. Board Member Owens pointed out that the issue before the Board was whether or not to remove the structure from the list. They were not deciding on the future use of the structure. The Board expressed con… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-11-20 | 5 | Mr. Biggs said that upon interpretation of the ordinance by the City Attorney, the Board may still see the project if it were to be relocated or demolished. Board Member Lynch would like to see a good faith effort to give the house away to someone who would have it relocated and preserved. The developer has said he is sincerely interested in finding a new owner and a new home for the building. Board Member Lynch motioned to continue the matter until the March 2009 HAB meeting so they have a period of 90 days to show good faith effort in the terms of the Oakland ordinance. All these efforts would continue for at least 90 days. Each would include the statement that such listing was required by the City of Alameda and would include both a phone number and an email address of someone in the Planning Department who would keep track of any inquiries and answer questions. Such efforts would include: 1. Posting availability signs on the front sized at least 3' X 6' in a large and legible font. 2. Placing advertisements in Bay Area print and broadcast media as well as websites. This kind of story could bring positive publicity to the developers and secure good will for the new project. 3. Enlisting the Bay Area, State and national historic preservation communities by sending releases they can run in their newsletters and on their websites and asking them to email the availability of this building to their membership, with the understanding that the structure would remain on the Island. 4. Planning staff to maintain a log of all inquiries and their disposition, document the maintenance of the structure through periodic photographs and make such documentation available at all HAB meetings between December and March so we can track the progress of the preservation efforts 5. Preventing further depredation of the building by weatherproofing the place, sealing off the fence and eliminating the use of the property for parking, plus a good faith effort at security to safeguard the historic resource 6. The Craigslist posting stat… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-11-20 | 6 | There was consensus among Board Members that an opinion from the City Attorney regarding the need for a Certificate of Approval if removed from the list would be helpful in their consideration of the request. Motion (Lynch)Second (Owens) to continue the item to December 4, 2008 Ayes: 4; Noes 0 Motion Passes BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch reminded the Board of the upcoming 2009 Historic Preservation Season. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs updated the Board on the Del Monte Project. ADJOURNMENT: 9:05 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary Historical Advisory Board 6 Minutes of November 20, 2008 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-11-20.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2009-03-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2009-03-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2009 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Acting Chair Miller, Board Members lrons, Lynch, Owens and Talbot ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of March 5, 2009; Board member Lynch was in attendance at the 3/5/09 meeting. Her name should be listed., On page 3 the word not was left off of Mr. Garfinckle's statement. On page 4 last paragraph the word fell should be fallen. Motion (Miller)/Secono (Irons) to accept the minutes with corrections. Ayes:5; Noes: 0; Absent: None AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None CONSENT ITEMS: 7-A. Certificate of Approval - PLN09-0033 - 1118 Bay Street. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to allow removal of a Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia). The tree is in poor condition and presents a hazard to the single-family dwelling. The property is located within an R-1, One-Family Residence District. (SW) Minutes of March 5, 2009 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2009-03-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2009-03-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2009-03-05 | 2 | Motion to approve all items on the consent calendar subject to recommended findings and conditions in agenda report. Motion (lrons)/Second (Owens) Ayes: 5 Noes:0 Motion Carries REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 8-A. Historic Preservation Season Proclamation. Board Member Lynch discussed support for the Historic Preservation Season Proclamation. Acting Chair Miller stated that the City Council would be presenting the proclamation at the April 21, 2009 meeting. Motion to Recommend that the City Council proclaim a Historic Preservation Season for the City of Alameda Motion (Lynch)/ Second (Talbot) Ayes: 5 Noes:0 Motion Carries BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch pointed out that the memorandum of agreement from the City Manager setting up the North of Lincoln planning process did not include the Historical Advisory Board. Board Member Lynch asked that the Historical Advisory Board be added to meetings because a large part of the project has to do with historic buildings. Board Member Lynch provided an update on the status of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Board Member lrons expressed concern that the term form-based code is confusing. Acting Chair Miller stated he will have the consultants or staff give a presentation on form-based codes. A board discussion ensued regarding the City Council's action on the property located at 2413 Buena Vista. Board Member Talbot requested that a discussion on the Mills Act be agendized for next meeting. Minutes of March 5, 2009 2 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2009-03-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2009-03-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2009-03-05 | 3 | STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff reported that an amendment to the Alameda Charter requires three votes in support of a motion in order for the motion to carry. Staff reported that the City Council introduced new second unit regulations and provided some information regarding the new standards for second units. ADJOURNMENT: 8:06 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary Historical Advisory Board Minutes of March 5, 2009 3 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2009-03-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-09-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-09-01 | 1 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 7:00 p.m. 1. CONVENE: 7:08 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Chair Owens, Vice-Chair Rauk, Board Members Hoffman, Jasper, and Lynch 3. MINUTES: Meeting of August 4, 2011 (postponed) 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Ms. Elizabeth Greene, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society member, asked the board about the status of the addition of Naval Air Station buildings and appurtenances to the City Study List. The board informed her that all structures as proposed had been listed on the Alameda Study List. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 7-A Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0247 - 1505 & 1507 Park Street - Dick Rutter. The applicant is requesting to reface the bulkhead, install terrazzo tile on the floor, and refurbish existing materials. Staff requested a continuation to the October 6, 2011 meeting for additional noticing. 7-B Scoping Session-2900 Main Street-Todd Shipyard Crane Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR)-Notice of Preparation. Mary Bean, the Public Works consultant for this project, presented the draft environmental impact report process to the board. Board member Lynch corrected the consultants' statement regarding the shipyard being solely listed on the Study List, not as a historic district. She then questioned who had made the decision that the crane should be taken down. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Planning Services Manager, elaborated on the decision making process that led to the conclusion that it would be taken down for safety and financial reasons. | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-09-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-09-01 | 2 | Board member Lynch asked who currently owns this crane and who should have maintained it. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch explained that the crane was likely owned by the Navy at some time, but since the land surrounding this location had been transferred it to the City. She offered to check on this. Chair Owens asked who was paying for the EIR and the crane removal. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch and the consultant clarified that the Draft/Final EIR study would be conducted for approximately $70,000 and the removal would be covered by the Public Works Department. Chair Owens asked whether there would be other opportunities to speak on this issue. The consultant and Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch explained that the Draft and Final EIR would return to the HAB, as well as the City Council. Board member Lynch asked what kind of mitigation measures would be proposed for this crane demolition. The consultant explained that several mitigation measures, such as reevaluating the district for eligibility for inclusion on the National or California Register, or prepare archival large- formal photographs, develop historic structures report, or an oral history project, a public history and interpretive display. The impact would remain unavoidable, therefore a EIR is required. Board member Hoffman asked whether the structure itself was historic, or whether it was a contributing structure. The consultant confirmed that the crane was a contributing structure to the district. Chair Owens asked whether the crane track was also deemed hazardous. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch proposed to include this question in the EIR scope. Board member Hoffman asked when the crane was built. The consultant stated that it was likely constructed during WWII. Chair Owens stated that it seemed like there were three options regarding the crane: 1) remove the crane, 2) move the crane down the tracks to eliminate the hazard to WETA, or 3) move the ferry terminal. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch pointed out that the ferry terminal no longer is under City of | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-09-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2011-09-01 | 3 | Alameda jurisdiction. She stated that the crane is likely a liability regardless of where it stands, but that this should be included as an alternative in the EIR. Chair Owens stated that he would like the Draft EIR, and if the Historic Report is made public, see both return to the HAB for comments. 7-C Public Workshop - PLN08-0463 - City of Alameda The City of Alameda and Historical Advisory Board Sub-Committee will hold a workshop to introduce the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance to the full Board and the public. A brief overview will be presented to highlight new aspects of the ordinance and receive public input. As a workshop, input will be gathered, but no actions will be made at this meeting. This workshop was continued to the HAB hearing on October 6, 2011. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board member Lynch announced that the Alameda Home Tour would be on September 25th, 2011 and would benefit the Alameda Museum and the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch announced that Lori Taylor is the new Community Development Director and started on August 22, 2011. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch announced that Judith Altschueler is helping the department sort through files for archiving. 10. ADJOURNMENT 8:20 p.m. | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2011-09-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2012-09-06 | 1 | Approved Meeting Minutes City of Alameda Historical Advisory Board Thursday, September 6, 2012 7:00 p.m. 1. CONVENE 2. ROLL CALL- - Present: Chair Owens, Vice Chair Rauk, Board Members, Jasper, and Lynch Absent: Board member Hoffman 3. MINUTES Minutes from the March 1, 2012 Meeting Vice Chair Rauk motioned to approve minutes as amended. Board member Lynch seconded the motion Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions Minutes from the April 5, 2012 Meeting Board member Lynch motioned to approve minutes as amended Vice Chair Rauk seconded the motion Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions Minutes from the July 5, 2012 meeting Vice Chair Rauk motioned to approved minutes as amended Chair Owens seconded the motion Motion carried, 3-0; 1 abstentions, Vice Chair Rauk 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS Staff requested that Item 9, staff communications move to the top of the Agenda. Andrew Thomas, Acting City Planner, stated that the representative from Alameda High School will not be able to attend the public hearing and asked the board if they would prefer to continue the item to the meeting of October 4, 2012. Chair Owens stated that the public hearing is not an action item and discussion will most likely be continued to the following meeting; he suggested that any people who desire to speak may comment during Oral Communications, and he clarified with staff that Item 7- C (Report on Alameda Historic High School Retrofit) will be continued to next month's meeting. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Thomas introduced Barbara Meerjans who is a new part time staff member and will focus on the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Trish Spencer, resident, speaking as an individual, asked if it would have been more appropriate for the School Board to work with the Historical Advisory Board prior to the Approved Minutes 9/6/2012 Page 1 of 4 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2012-09-06 | 2 | installation of the fence surrounding the high school. She requested clarification of the process and how both boards could have worked together. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Chair Owens, shared an email from Christopher Buckley representing AAPS addressing the ceiling soffit at Habana's restaurant. He disclosed that the Board received communication from the Veterans Affairs Office, he stated that the subject matter is not pertinent to the current meeting and requested that board members read it in due time. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7.A. Certificate of Approval for 1417 Park Street Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, gave brief presentation. Betty Lee, applicant, stated that she tried to design the new sign to match the old. Peter Beck, landlord, stated that there is no use for the old sign and the new tenant should have every opportunity to have her own sign. Staff clarified that there is not a clear plan for what to do with the old sign and is open to board suggestions. Chair Owens asked if the old letters could be used in the new sign which would match the old sign exactly. Mr. Beck responded that the material may be different. Board member Lynch stated that the letter substitution would break up the historical sign and the new sign would have to be changed to match the historical lettering. She clarified that the old sign is made of wood and the new sign is made of aluminum. Chair Owens commented that the thickness of the lettering should be narrower and the spacing between the words should be increased. Board member Lynch stated that her first preference is to the see the sign saved and moved to a different location. Her second alternative would be to use as much of the old sign as possible. Chair Owens inquired as to whether the museum could store the individual letters. Vice Chair Rauk expressed concern with reusing the old lettering and the effect that would have on the size of the current sign. Chair Owens opened public comment. Approved Minutes 9/6/2012 Page 2 of 4 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2012-09-06 | 3 | Dianne Hofmann Sasser, grandchild of the original business owner, requested that the sign be preserved in some manner and requested that she or her cousin be notified if/when the sign is removed or destroyed. She stated she will leave her contact information with staff. Chair Owens closed public comment Board member Lynch confirmed that she will discuss the storing of the sign with the Alameda Museum and will approach staff with Museum Board's decision. Chair Owens suggested that the certificate of approval be amended and state that the existing sign shall be salvaged, the lettering on the new sign shall be modified to match the stroke and width of the existing letter "e" old sign. Staff shall review and approve the revised shop drawings, and the paint coating shall be a Fluorocarbon base or the equivalent. Vice Rauk seconded the motion. Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions 7B. Certificate of Approval for 1532 Park Street Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, gave brief presentation Vice Chair Rauk clarified with the applicant that the existing tiles will be used. Vice Chair Rauk motioned to approve the staff resolution Board member Lynch seconded the motion Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions. 7C. Alameda High School Chair Owens motioned to continue the item until the next meeting, when the High School representative can be present. Board member Lynch seconded the motion. Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions 7-D. Update on Habanas Restaurant Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, gave brief presentation. Board member Lynch asked staff to clarify that building inspections are initiated by the project contractor. Board member Jasper clarified with staff that the project contractor has not requested any inspections, and the City has actually initiated inspections. Approved Minutes 9/6/2012 Page 3 of 4 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2012-09-06 | 4 | Chair Owens clarified with staff that there is a clear code violation from a safety issue and the City can start a citation process, which can ultimately lead to a court hearing. Staff stated that the citation process will be initiated if the owner chooses not to address the issue. He requested that staff advise the board if there are any actions that the board can pursue in regards to the violations of conditions of approval. Chair Owens opened public comment Christopher Buckley, AAPS, referenced an email he sent to the board. He presented a photograph of the ceiling that may assist the board's discussion. Chair Owens, stated that the soft ceiling is significantly lower and it appears that the original ceiling material is probably gone. He mentioned the height of the doors bottom panel requiring that the height being close to the height of the storefront bulk head. Staff confirmed that this item will be placed on the next agenda. 7E Historic Street Lights Vice Chair Rauk motioned to continue item to the next board meeting. Boad member Lynch seconded the motion Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Board member Lynch mentioned the Veterans Affairs Letter that the board received and requested that staff give a presentation to the board. 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE 11. ADJOURNMENT Board member Jasper motioned to adjourn. Vice Chair Rauk seconded the motion Motion carried, 4-0; no abstentions Approved Minutes 9/6/2012 Page 4 of 4 Historical Advisory Board | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2012-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JULY 6, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Recording Secretary Gremminger called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Irons and Iverson MEMBERS ABSENT: Board member Lynch STAFF PRESENT: Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, Doug Vu, Planner III, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S (Miller, Iverson) to approve the May 4, 2006 minutes as presented. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: This item will be continued to the next meeting a full board is present. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0011 - 2629 Central Ave. Applicant: Hwan Kim. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for the removal of two coast live oak trees (Quercus agrifolia) that are located along the right side of the property. The trees are causing a potentially hazardous condition due to their proximity to the eave of the house. The site is located at 2629 Central Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, introduced Doug Vu, Planner III, who was recently hired to the Planning & Building Department. Staff member Doug Vu briefly summarized the staff report. Mr. Vu stated that both the applicant and Elite Tree Service, Inc. are concerned about the location of the trees and their potential to cause damage to the foundation of the two homes located at 2629 and 2633 Central Ave. AMC Section 13-21.7(c) requires that any protected oak tree that is removed shall be replaced with a minimum of two oak trees of ten gallon size or larger. Since there is a lack of sufficient space on the applicant's property to replace these trees, the Planning & Building Director recommends that a $375.00 fee, equal to the cost of three fifteen gallon trees, be Minutes of July 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-06 | 2 | collected on behalf of the Recreation & Parks Department for the purchase and planting of these trees in a City park. Staff recommends approval of CA06-0011, with conditions as stated in draft resolution. There were no speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Vice-Chair Miller stated that he agrees with the staff recommendation. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's question regarding why an arborist report was not submitted with this application, Mr. Vu stated that according to the Ordinance, a report from a certified arborist is required only if the health of the tree is in question. Chair Anderson stated that the Board should discuss this section of the Ordinance when the revisions to the Ordinance are reviewed by the Board in the near future. Board Member Irons stated that he agrees with staff recommendation. Board Member Iverson stated that she appreciates that this is being brought before the Board prior to removing the trees. M/S (Iverson, Miller) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0011, at 2629 Central Avenue with conditions as stated in draft resolution. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: 1; Motion carries. 2. Proposed Addition to the Official Naming List for City Facilities and Streets. Request by the City Council to add the name "Willie Stargell" to the City's Official Naming List for Facilities and Streets. Staff member Doug Vu summarized the staff report and informed the Board that the the City Council has inquired about the possibility of renaming a west-end street to honor Willie Stargell pursuant to requests from the Encinal High School Alumni Association. The Street Naming Policy currently states that the Historical Advisory Board must approve additions or deletions to the List based on written documentation of the historic importance of the name in Alameda history. As a prominent sports figure in Alameda's history, Staff has determined that Willie Stargell is eligible to be added to the List. M/S (Iverson, Miller) to approve the addition … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-07-06 | 3 | REPORTS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) The following Written Communications were distributed to the Board. No action was taken. Letter dated June 29, 2006 from Dian Coler-Dark, President, Alameda Museum, to the Mayor and Council Members regarding the Carnegie Library Building. Updated Historical Advisory Board Member phone number list. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Ciplin Eleaser Cynthia Eliason, Secretary Historical Advisory Board S:\PLANNING\HAB\AGENMIN\Agenmin.06\approved minutes07-06-06 approved min.doc Minutes of July 6, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-07-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2016-05-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2016-05-05 | 1 | DRAFT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2016 1. CONVENE Chair Owens called meeting to order at 7:00pm. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Owens, Board Members Chan, Vella. Absent: Vice Chair Rauk, Board Member Piziali. Chair Owens stated that Vice Chair Rauk had resigned from the board. 3. MINUTES 3-A 2016-2863 Draft Meeting Minutes - March 3, 2016 No action taken. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION Mike O'Hara, Tim Lewis Communities, gave an update on the Del Monte project's progress. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS *None* 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2016-2642 PLN16-0115/PLN16-0116 -- Certificates of Approval -- 651 & 707 W. Tower Avenue, Applicant: SRM Ernst. Certificates of approval for the minor exterior modifications to 651 & 707 W. Tower Avenue (Buildings 91 and 9), which are contributing structures within the NAS Alameda Historic District. At 651 W. Tower Ave. the applicant proposes demolishing a recent and non-contributing awning, installing shade overhangs along the building, removing existing windows, constructing new exterior doors, replacing loading bay doors, and repainting the building according to the previously approved Alameda Point color scheme. At 707 W. Tower Ave. the applicant proposes installing a new row of second story transom windows, installing new pedestrian doors, removing and replacing several loading bay doors and windows, adding a second story within the existing interior space, and repainting the building according to the previously 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2016-05-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2016-05-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2016-05-05 | 2 | approved Alameda Point color scheme. The environmental effects of the proposed project were considered in the Alameda Point Environmental Impact Report. No further environmental review is required. Staff Member Sablan gave the staff presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2703692&GUID=E51559B9- C5FB-4EAE-A424-35E29F278DA6&FullText=1 Chair Owens pointed out that the control tower was a contributing structure and the boundary in the presentation should reflect that. Board Member Chan said that there appeared to be very little exterior changes to the buildings. Chair Owens asked if the developer would be applying for tax credits. Joe Ernst said they are not planning to apply for tax credits because they are post 1936 buildings. Chair Owens said he believed that buildings contributing to a historic district could be eligible for a tax credit even if the buildings are not listed. He asked staff to look into it further and make sure they are giving proper advice to potential developers. He asked what they planned to do with the glass. Mr. Ernst said the glass on the south side of Building 9 has a film that would be replaced with one that allows vision through but mitigates heat gain. Chair Owens said that in the future he would like the board to receive clearer drawings showing existing conditions and demolition plans. Board Member Vella asked if they had considered where bike storage would be placed. Mr. Ernst said they would meet the requirements of the Town Center Plan and have a combination of exterior parking for visitors and internal bike storage for tenants. Staff Member Tai said the next step would be design review and use permit at Planning Board, where things like bike parking would be addressed. Chair Owens confirmed that there was no historic landscape around either building. There were no public speakers. Board Member Vella said the changes were all minor, and that she liked the improvements to the building. 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2016-05-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2016-05-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2016-05-05 | 3 | Chair Owens asked if they needed two separate actions. Staff Member Tai said they may take action on both items at once. Board Member Vella made a motion to approve the staff recommendations. Board Member Chan seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Chair Owens said he will be termed out in a month and that this might be his last meeting. He said the Vice Chair resigned and has moved to Idaho. Staff Member Tai explained that Chair Owens could stay in his current position until the Mayor successfully appoints a replacement. 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS 9-A 2016-2865 Certificate of Approvals Recent Actions and Decisions Staff Member Tai explained recent actions on Block 11 at Alameda Point. Mr. Ernst, Alameda Point Partners, gave an update on progress at Site A. Staff Member Tai gave an update on a remodel at Santa Clara and Park St. He said the City is also reinstating its facade grant program. He said the first round is funded for $125,000. 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 11. ADJOURNMENT Board Member Chan made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Board Member Vella seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:32pm. 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2016-05-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-08-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2019-08-01 | 1 | MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2019 1. CONVENE Board Member Saxby called meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Saxby, Board Members Jones, Lau, Sanchez, and Wit. Absent: None. 3. MINUTES 3-A 2019-7111 Draft Meeting Minutes - March 7, , 2019 Chair Saxby moved approval of the minutes. Board Member Sanchez seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 3-B 2019-7112 Draft Meeting Minutes - April 4, 2019 Board Member Sanchez noted that under "Roll Call," it should be Board Member Sanchez recusing, not Saxby. Board Member Sanchez moved approval of the minutes as corrected. Board Member Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION *None* 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Chair Saxby noted a letter was received from the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society regarding item 7-A. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2019-6751 PLN18-0405 - Certificate of Approval and Historic Sign Designation2070 Lincoln Ave - Applicant: Bill Wong on behalf of OYH LLC. Public hearing to consider: 1) Certificate of Approval, pursuant to Alameda Municipal Code (AMC) Section 13-21.7, for demolition of more than 30% of the value of a one-story, pre-1942 commercial building to construct a Draft Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 5 August 1, 2019 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-08-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-08-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2019-08-01 | 2 | second floor addition; and 2) Evaluation of the existing "Lincoln Market Liquors" sign according to criteria for historic sign designation pursuant to AMC Section 13-21.6. The property is not listed on the Historical Buildings Study List. The project is located in the C- 1 (Neighborhood Business) Zoning District. This project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(e) - Additions to Existing Structures, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (projects consistent with General Plan and Zoning). David Sablan, Planner II, gave a presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4071850&GUID=3EB2C7FA- 1CB4-47D1-A7DD-DC22BD640041&FullText=1 Chair Saxby asked if anyone has thought about taking away some of the stucco to see what is underneath. Staff Member Sablan said the applicant would address the Chair's question in his presentation. Chair Saxby asked if we knew when the building was treated with stucco. Staff Member Sablan said staff believes it was done in 1958. Bill Wong, applicant, said they cut four holes into the Willow frontage and they did not find anything. Chair Saxby said he thinks it would be helpful to see more of what is behind the stucco where the transom windows would be. He said there appears to be a lot of the original framing materials left below the stucco. He said he would like to be careful to see if there is an opportunity to preserve historic fabric. Allen Tai, City Planner, said the board could add a condition of approval to coordinate with staff to do exploratory demolition before proceeding. Chair Saxby opened the public hearing. William Silva said he has no argument about the sign one way or the other. He said his concerns are what will happen to the Acapulco restaurant operations during construction. He said the demolition and construction of this building would negatively impact the restaurant. He said parking is already a problem in the area and … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-08-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-08-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2019-08-01 | 3 | Christopher Buckley, AAPS, said they strongly support preservation and restoration of the sign. He asked if a façade grant could assist in paying for the restoration of the sign and any restoration work. He said they support fully exploring the chance to discover and restore the historic fabric of the building. He said doing investigations on historic buildings should be standard procedure when there has been remodeling. He said minimizing the second floor parapet and/or pushing the second floor back could minimize the impact of the second floor. Steve King said they own the adjacent building and are supportive of the project, but would like to see as much preservation as possible. He said they may be selling the building and may not be the party to sign any agreement about making changes to their cornice in order to solve the air space encroachment that exists now and would impact the remodel. Michael Harvey said Lincoln Market is part of the neighborhood's history. He said he supports the historical value of the store. He said adding apartments raises concerns about parking impacts in the neighborhood. Staff Member Tai noted that the proposal includes four off street parking spaces for the two units being proposed. Board Member Sanchez asked if there would be any parking for the commercial spaces. Staff Member Tai said the existing condition for the commercial is that there is no parking and that it would not change with the application. Board Member Wit said that the power lines appear to pass very close to what would be the second floor addition and asked if there were plans to deal with that. Staff Member Tai said that AMP has long term undergrounding plans, but there are no plans to connect the project to any undergrounding requirements. Chair Saxby said he agreed with the recommendation to designate the sign as historic and have it refurbished and properly mounted. He added that restoring the electronics of the sign is not necessary. Board Member Wit said she agreed, noting that the sign is a marker for th… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2019-08-01.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );