pages
487 rows where body = "HistoricalAdvisoryBoard"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
date (date) >30 ✖
- 2021-03-04 12
- 2021-05-06 12
- 2007-12-06 11
- 2007-06-07 8
- 2009-02-05 8
- 2012-02-02 8
- 2021-12-02 8
- 2019-09-05 7
- 2006-09-07 6
- 2006-11-02 6
- 2007-03-01 6
- 2008-01-03 6
- 2008-08-07 6
- 2008-09-04 6
- 2008-11-20 6
- 2011-12-01 6
- 2012-03-01 6
- 2015-02-05 6
- 2017-04-06 6
- 2017-12-07 6
- 2019-12-05 6
- 2008-06-05 5
- 2008-10-02 5
- 2009-11-05 5
- 2010-02-04 5
- 2011-10-06 5
- 2012-01-05 5
- 2012-04-05 5
- 2015-09-03 5
- 2016-01-07 5
- …
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf,9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-08-03 | 9 | Ayes: 4; Noes: 1; (Iverson); Absent: 0; Motion carries. REPORTS: 6. Review and Comment on Proposed Revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance. Staff is requesting this item be continued to the Regular meeting of September 7, 2006. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch presented the Board a copy of the book "Taking Care of Business, Historic Commercial Buildings of the Island City" by Woodruff Minor. STAFF COMMUNICATION: None. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING|HAB\AGENMIN)Agenmin.06/08-03-06/08-03-06 DRAFT min.doc Minutes of August 3, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-08-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-09-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:06 pm. Recording Secretary Gremminger called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member lrons. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Member Iverson, Board Member Lynch absent for Roll Call. She arrived to the meeting at 7:58 p.m. STAFF PRESENT: Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Terri Highsmith, City Attorney, Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, Vincent Marsh, Planner, Simone Wolter, Planner I, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 3, 2006 as corrected. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: None. REPORTS: 1. Review and Comment on Proposed Revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance. Staff is requesting this item be continued. 2. Overview of the Ralph M. Brown Act, presented by City Attorneys office. Terri Highsmith, City Attorney, gave a presentation on compliance with Brown Act, or Open Meeting Act. She began with a brief history of the concept behind the Brown act which is meetings should be held in public. The people have a right to speak at every meeting and to know what is on the agenda. There are four different kinds of meetings. Regular meetings, set by Resolution, with a specific starting time and ending time. Regular meeting agendas must be posted 72 hours prior to the meeting. Special meetings are any meeting that is not a regular meeting and require 24 hour posting prior Minutes of September 7, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-09-07 | 2 | to the meeting. An Emergency meeting, a situation of dire emergency in which the City Council can call as early as one hour notice. And finally a Dire Emergency meeting (terrorist attack) which does not need any notice. In response to Chair Anderson's inquiry regarding where closed sessions fall, Ms. Highsmith responded, that important exceptions to the open meeting act are done in closed session such as, real property negotiations. Another example of a closed session is a discussion with the City Attorney's office for matters which are already in litigation or threats of lawsuit or threats that have come to us. Labor negotiations are another exception. However closed sessions must be identified on the agenda with the topic and the government code that applies. Once the closed session meeting is adjourned, the Mayor must report action taken, if any. Once an item is completed, everything that was discussed in closed session, except attorney-client privileged information, must be disclosed to the public. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's inquiry regarding examples of Emergency meetings, Ms. Highsmith responded, earthquake, fire, city-wide emergency. The three basic principles (or purpose) of the agenda are getting the public to the meeting, (i.e., date, time, place), know what items will be discussed or required action, and encourage participation. For the Historical Advisory Board (HAB) Regular meetings must be posted 72 hours in advance. The agenda language should be stated such that anyone reading it will know what is being discussed. Anything that is not in their purview should not be on the agenda. For example, if a speaker comes before the Board and begins to speak to something that the local body can't do anything about such as a matter in a different city, the Chair should advise the speaker that they can't do anything but take the issue to the appropriate venue. Chair Anderson stated that the HAB is frequently told that they are discussing things that are not in their purview. Ms. Highsmith stated that th… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-09-07 | 3 | Chair Anderson inquired whether they, as a Board, have the right to refuse lengthy documents which are distributed at the hearing. She does not think it is fair to comment or use this in their deliberation if they don't have time to read it. Ms. Highsmith stated that yes, you do have to let it come into the record, what you can say is "Is there something you would like to say for the record, or you may state for the record that this was passed out at the meeting and are unable to take this in account when making my deliberations." What some jurisdictions do, is have rules as to at what point someone can walk a document in before it will not be taken into the record. This must be a policy change. Chair Anderson asked if that can be established in our Historical Ordinance. Ms. Highsmith stated she will look into that. Ms. Highsmith stated that a Legislative Body has to comply with the Brown Act. In Alameda, there are various citizens groups that work for the City Manager. A legislative body is created and appointed by the City Council. Any Legislative Body can form a Sub Committee of the Legislative Body, which must be less than a quorum, such as two members. A portion of the Legislative Body can create a sub-committee to do the research outside of the Legislative Body and not violate the Brown Act. The reason why this is o.k., is because they are going to report back to the Board. If they are not a decision making body, they usually meet prior to the decision making group. You may only create a sub-committee in a pubic hearing so the public will know that it has been created. They must have specific duties or be assigned to gather their data. The sub- committee cannot make any decisions. They must report back to the Board at a time that is noticed, and is on the agenda. A meeting is anytime a quorum gets together and talks about matters within their jurisdiction. All meetings have to be done in public with an agenda that has been posted 72 hours in advance. To take action on any item, there must be at least 3 memb… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-09-07 | 4 | The applicant is entitled to understand, and have it put into record how and why the Board made their decision, or what the findings were. If appealed then everything gets put into the record, for the City Council and if the City gets sued, then all discussions must be disclosed. There are statutory exemptions, such as social occasions that more than three board members may attend, as long as you don't talk about any items which fall under your jurisdiction. You may also attend conferences together and meetings held in other jurisdictions. Board Member Lynch arrived at 7:58 p.m. Chair Anderson stated that when a project is appealed to the City Council, are they (the HAB) allowed to become part of the public in making comments if all of them got up at individual times to reiterate what happens at their meeting? Ms. Highsmith stated that you should get up and identify yourself as a board member but are speaking as a citizen. You don't give up your right as a citizen by serving on a Board. Board Member lrons stated that he was asked by the City Council, when he went to a meeting and identified himself as an HAB member, but speaking as a citizen, what was said at the HAB meeting. Ms. Highsmith stated that it is perfectly ok to refer them to the minutes for a more accurate account. If you do go to another meeting and represent yourself as an HAB member, be careful that you are properly saying what actually occurred, because you are then speaking for the whole body. It is important to be really true to your board. When you violate the Brown Act, any action that was taken on that evening becomes void. Such as, if an item wasn't properly described on the agenda you must re-notice the public hearing. Another example is if the meeting was not properly advertised. If you refuse to re-do the meeting, then the person who is challenging may go to court for a civil injunction stating the Brown Act was violated and you will have to pay Court costs. It is better to just re-do the meeting within 30 days to be on the safe side. The… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-09-07 | 5 | When an application for a Certificate of Approval is before this Board, this board should be looking at is whether or not this application is consistent with the Secretary of Interior Standards and Adopted Design Guidelines. You must state the findings very clearly when approving or denying a Certificate of Approval. Board Member Lynch stated the HAB is also charged with the responsibility to encourage new buildings and developments that will be harmonious with the existing buildings and neighborhoods. Ms. Woodbury stated that it is the purpose of Chapter 13-21 of the Municipal Code to ensure that new buildings are harmonious with the existing buildings and neighborhoods. Approving the design details is not under the purview of the Historical Advisory Board. That is the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. Chair Anderson stated that if the purpose of this HAB is to maintain the historical character of the building, and there is no way of reviewing a design to see if those issues have been incorporated, then it becomes useless. Board Member lrons stated that for a Certificate of Approval for structures built prior to 1942 how can they determine if they are altering a historic structure if they don't know what is proposed. Ms. Woodbury stated that there is some guidance in the code as to what they may consider when making the decision. If the building is already designated a historic structure such as a monument, or listed on the Historical Building Study List, then the Board may review what is proposed, to determine that it meets the adopted criteria. For buildings (not designated as an Historical Monument) that were constructed prior to 1942, the Board is only looking at the building that is there to determine the value of that structure, for the purposes of demolition. The Board may not get into the detail of the proposed site plan or details. Ms. Woodbury informed the Board that it is very important to state the findings which support the Board's decision clearly for the record so it is clear how the Board came … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-09-07 | 6 | 5. Overview of the City of Alameda's responsibility as a Certified Local Government (CLG) and the specific responsibilities of the Historical Advisory Board under the CLG program. Ms. Woodbury introduced Vincent Marsh, who is a contract planner. He gave a brief history of his background in which he has extensive training in Historical Preservation. Mr. Marsh gave a presentation on the requirements for the CLG program. CLG's must comply with the five basic requirements as follows: Enforce appropriate state and local laws and regulation for the designation and protection of historic properties. Establish an historic preservation review commission by local ordinance. Maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic properties. Provide for public participation in the local preservation program. Satisfactorily perform responsibilities delegated to it by the state. Ms. Woodbury would like the Board to develop a work program for the rest of the year. Staff will agendize a workshop for a future meeting to discuss ideas. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch informed the Board of the upcoming Hometown Tour this month. She would also like to begin to collect data on each of our Historical Monuments, for posting on our City website. She will bring more information to the October meeting. Board Member lrons would like information and background on the Golden Mean. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Woodbury introduced Simone Wolter, Planner I. ADJOURNMENT: 9:17 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Éliason Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNING\HABVAGENMINVAgenmin.06\09-07-06\09-07-06 FINAL min.doc Minutes of September 7, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-09-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. Recording Secretary Gremminger called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member lrons, Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Doug Garrison, Supervising Planner, Dennis Brighton, Planner III, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 7, 2006. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of September 7, 2006 as amended. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0027 - 2445 Encinal Avenue. - Applicant: Emerson Brown - The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure on the Historical Building Study List, for the purpose of remodeling the existing single-family dwelling. The site is located at 2445 Encinal Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Dennis Brighton, Planner III, presented the staff report. On June 7, 2006, staff approved an application for Major Design Review. The action was conditioned upon the approval of the Certificate of Approval by the Historical Advisory Board. The building is identified as a Background (B) resource in the Historical Building Study List. The demolition involves the removal of later, non-contributory additions to the residence. Therefore, the portion of the structure that would be demolished is not original to the structure and does not represent the work of a master or possess high Minutes of October 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 2 | artistic values. There are also no events associated with this property that make a significant contribution to the history or cultural heritage of local or regional history. Finally, the property is not associated with persons important to local, state or national history. Staff is recommending approval of CA06-0027. Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Emerson Brown, property owner, informed the Board that he was present if the Board had any questions for him. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Chair Anderson requested to see a copy of the plans for the new addition. She stated that in order for this Board to make an informed decision on the demolition Certificate of Approval, the Board has to see what is being proposed. Board Member Lynch concurred. Chair Anderson stated that to approve a Certificate of Approval for demolition, the Historical Advisory Board must find that the portion of the house that is proposed to be demolished has no historical merit. But they may impose conditions of approval, which pertain to the proposed new addition, which is why it is necessary to review the plans. Mr. Garrison stated that if the Historical Advisory Board determines that the portion of the structure, which is proposed for, does not have any historic merit, then you may approve a Certificate of Demolition. If you do make the finding that the portion of the structure proposed for demolition does have historical significance, then it may be appropriate to impose conditions regarding the design review. Chair Anderson advised the Board that this matter can be further discussed when the revisions to the Historical Preservation Ordinance is before them. M/S (Miller, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval, CA06-0027, for the demolition of more than 30% of an existing dwelling at 2445 Encinal Avenue with the conditions stated in draft resolution. 2-3-0. Ayes: 2; (Miller, lrons); Noes: 3; (Anderson, Iverson, Lynch); Absent: 0; Motion is d… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 3 | 1. Details should be consistent with the original style of the building. 2. Rafter tails need not be exposed. However the applicant wishes to handle the gutters will be acceptable. 3. Hip roof on garage, 4. All windows that are visible from the street should be visually consistent to the original structure. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. Mr. Garrison stated the Board's suggestions will be presented to the owner and if the owner agrees he will incorporate their suggestions into the final design. 2. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0030 - Grand Marina - Corner of Grand Street and Fortman Way contained within Tract 7723 - Applicant: David Day for Warmington Homes, California. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for 100% demolition of eight existing pre-1942 accessory buildings. The site is located within an M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District. Chair Anderson would like to recuse herself from this item due to a conflict of interest with her employer. Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report. Ms. Wolter informed the Board that the 3.51-acre site of the proposed demolition is part of a larger 8.36-acre area that would be covered by a new Master Plan encompassing the entirety of the Grand Marina facility. The review of city records shows that only two out of eight structures have obtained building permits. It is reasonable to assume that all buildings were constructed prior to 1942. During a site visit to the property, staff noted that the structures at 2041-2051 Grand Street are severely dilapidated and other than 2051 Grand Street, none of the structures appeared to be in active use. Staff has determined that these structures lack integrity and would not qualify for local, state or national registers. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval CA06-0030, for the demolition of eight existing pre-1942 accessory buildings located at Grand Marina, Tract 7723. Vice-Chair Miller opened the public hearing. Andy McKinley, 2219 Grand St., spoke in favor of projec… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-10-05 | 4 | There were no more speaker slips. Vice-Chair Miller closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's inquiry regarding the number of homes that are proposed, Ms. Woltter informed the Board that there are approximately 40 homes proposed for this site. The Board agreed with the staff report that none of the buildings have any historical significance. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to approve Certificate of Approval CA06-0030, to demolish eight commercial buildings built prior to 1942, located at Grand Marina. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 1; Abstain: 1 (Anderson); Motion carries. REPORTS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (Discussion only) Board member Lynch would like the Historical Monument page on the City website updated. She has written articles telling the history of each Monument and would like the articles linked to the Monument list. She is requesting the Board's input, and would like to see this on a future agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: STAFF COMMUNICATION: Mr. Garrison introduced Zach Seal, Planner I. ADJOURNMENT: 7:55 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Secrétary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGIHABIAGENMIN\Agenmin.06/10-05-06/10-05-06 FINAL min.doc Minutes of October 5, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-10-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-11-02 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2006 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Secretary Eliason called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member lrons, Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Cynthia Eliason Supervising Planner, Douglas Vu, Planner III, Dennis Brighton Planner III, Latisha Jackson, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 5, 2006. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of October 5, 2006 with corrections. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Certificate of Approval CA06-00012 - Li-Sheng Fu for Mohamed Elhashash - 1532 1/2 (1534) 9th Street. The applicants are requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of one historically designated single- family home, located at the above addresses for the purposes of remodeling and rehabilitating the building. The site is located at 1532 1/2 (1534) Ninth Street within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff has found that despite the apparent age of the residence the building has no historical merit and should be considered to the Historical Building Study List. Staff is recommending approval of Certificate of Approval CA06-0012. Minutes of November 2, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-11-02 | 2 | Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. Thomas Towey, architect, spoke in favor of the project and made himself available to answer any questions the Board may have. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing, and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch spoke in favor of the new design. She commended the architect and Development Services for doing such a good job. Chair Anderson agreed with Board Member Lynch. M/S (Miller/Iverson) to approve the Certificate of Approval, CA06-0012, to alter more than thirty percent of the assessed value of 1532 1/2 (1534) Ninth Street with the conditions as stated in draft Resolution. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion carries. 2. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0029 - 1373 Mound Street - Applicant: Diane Bustos. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for the removal of one coast live oak tree (Quercus agrifolia) that is located in the front yard of the property. The tree is promoting hazardous conditions due to its proximity to the house. The site is located at 1373 Mound Street, within an R-1, One-Family Residence District. (DV) Doug Vu, Planner III, presented the staff report. Staff is recommending approval of CA06-0029. There were no speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Board Member Lynch asked about the fee that is charged for these applications and who keeps track of it. Ms. Woodbury stated that a fee of $250.00, equal to the cost of two replacement Coast live oak trees, must be submitted to the Planning & Building Department, on behalf of the Recreation and Parks Department for the purchase and planting of these trees in a City Park. Planning Division staff will advice the Historical Advisory Board, in writing when the fee has been paid. Chair Anderson was in favor of approving this application. M/S (Anderson, Iverson) to approve the Certificate of Approval, CA06-0029, for the removal of one Coast Live Oak tree at 1373, with conditions as stated in draft Resolution. 5-0-0. A… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-11-02 | 3 | 3. Certificate of Approval - CA06-0031 - 433 Taylor Ave. - Applicant: Sally Harman. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to demolish more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure that was built prior to 1942 but is not on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located at 433 Taylor Avenue within an R-3, Garden Residential Zoning District. (DB) Dennis Brighton, Planner III presented the staff report. Staff has received two letters regarding this application, which were included in the packet. Staff is recommending approval of CA06-0031. Board member Lynch provided a page from the George Gunn book, Buildings of the Edwardian Period, which stated that the building was constructed in 1906. Chair Anderson stated that the letter from the neighbor, which was included in their packet, refers to the concerns she has with the proposed plans, and questioned why there were no plans with the packet. How can this Board review the letter and listen to her concerns without reviewing the plans? Ms. Woodbury stated that according to the City Attorney, people who attend public hearings often want to speak about a number of different things, which are outside of the Boards purview. In this case, the Board may direct staff to take this information and use it in the consideration of the Design Review. Board Member Lynch stated that she had a different recollection of the conversation with the City Attorney. The Municipal Code states that the Historical Advisory Board charge is to ensure that new construction is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood. The Historical Advisory Board is being asked to allow this demolition, without even knowing what is being proposed. Chair Anderson stated that in order to make an intelligent decision, she would like to recommend that this item be continued until they receive more information. Ms. Woodbury stated that when there are changes to a potentially historic building, then the Board is looking at the rehabilitation to make sure it is consistent with the gu… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-11-02 | 4 | Belva Short, 439 Taylor Ave., is not in favor of this project. Her main concern is with the landscaping plan, and the location of the trees. In response to Vice-Chair Miller's question if she has concerns with the size of the proposed new structure, Ms. Short answered in the affirmative. Sally Harmon, was present, and informed the Board that the right side of the structure would have very minimal demolition. Because it is a redwood structure she would like to preserve as much of the wood as possible. She informed the Board that staff said it was 100% demolition, because there was nothing historically worth saving. Mr. Brighton stated that 100% demolition means that once the project is complete, nothing visible or recognizable will remain of the original house. In response to Board Member Lynch's inquiry regarding how much of the original house will remain, Mr. Brighton stated approximately 20% of the structural elements will remain. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor to Board discussion. Vice-Chair Miller stated that since it is a 1906 colonial revival the age makes it historic. He stated that this house is historically significant. Board Member Irons stated he is going to act within this Board's purview. He doesn't find any historical significance in this structure. Board Member Lynch stated that she does not have enough information to make a decision. Board Member Iverson stated that the house does have historic significance. She would like more information regarding what is proposed. Chair Anderson stated that it is a historically significant house. She would like to see it restored to look like the original. She would also like to have more information on what is proposed. Ms. Woodbury stated that the Board should have been provided the information that shows what would be remaining after the demolition. M/S (Lynch, Iverson) to continue the discussion on Certificate of Approval, CA06-0031, for the demolition of more that 30% of an existing dwelling at 433 Taylor Avenue to the Decemb… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-11-02 | 5 | REPORTS: 4. Discussion regarding updating the City's Historical Monument webpage. (Board Member Lynch). Board Member Lynch stated that one of the Board's responsibilities is to educate the public about the historic and architectural resources we have in Alameda. She has been writing articles for the Alameda Sun about the history of each of our Monuments and would like those articles, along with images linked to the Monument page on our City website. She has submitted two examples of her articles and is asking for the Board's input. Secretary Eliason stated that staff will look into linking her articles to the website and if there are any costs involved. Chair Anderson thanked Board Member Lynch for bringing this before the Board. She hopes that this will make more people aware of the importance of our neighborhoods. Chair Anderson would also like to see the Historical Building Study List updated. Secretary Eliason stated that staff is aware that the study list should be updated. This is a huge job, and would need to be outsourced. It is not in our funding right now. Once the revised Historical Preservation Ordinance is adopted, then we can work on additional preservation projects. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) Chair Anderson received a letter from Carlo Ramos regarding restoring or replacing the historic streetlights in Alameda. Secretary Eliason stated she would forward a copy of the letter to AP & T. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Chair Anderson would like to have the Historical Advisory Board consider restoring the station signs. Board Member lrons stated that we should not continue items because we don't agree with what is in our purview. He does not want the applicant to incur any additional costs on appeal fees and additional time. Chair Anderson stated that her concern was that she did not have adequate information in the packet and the owner stated that they were going to retain the structure but change the outer appearance and demolish the garage. She would like clarification of the design review proce… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2006-11-02 | 6 | design review approval, and some come after design review has already been approved. Chair Anderson would like to see a Historical Design Review Board established. STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Woodbury stated that the Historical Preservation Ordinance may be ready for the Board's review after the first of the year. Ms. Woodbury stated that she would like to agendize a work program to discuss how to increase the public's awareness of historical preservation in Alameda. Historic Preservation month is coming up and staff would like the Historical Advisory Board to be on the forefront of this. Ms. Woodbury reminded the Board that the Ethics training must be completed by the end of this year. The Certificate must be filed with the City Clerk's office. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthja Eliason Secretary Historical Advisory Board FINAL min.doc Minutes of November 2, 2006 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2006-11-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-01-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 4, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Recording Secretary Ebster called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Member lrons, Iverson & Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Cathy Woodbury, Planning & Building Director, Tony Ebster, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Board Members lrons and Iverson came during the minutes discussion. Some Board members are unidentified. Mr. Rutter's and Ms. Evan's name are misspelled. Alternates for Ad HOC committee were clarified. Chris Buckley with AAPS had changes to add. Minutes will be corrected and resubmitted at the regular meeting of February 1, 2007 for approval. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: 4-A. Adoption of 2007 Historical Advisory Board Calendar Motion(Anderson)/second(Lynch) to accept 2007 meeting calendar. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion Carries 4-B Certificate of Approval CA06-0031- - Sally Harman - 433 Taylor Ave. In regards to a demo of more than 30% of a residential structure built prior to 1942 but is not on the Historic Building study list. Staff requested a continuance to a date to be determined. lotion(Lynch)/second(Anderson) to continue to date to be determined. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion carries 4-C. Proposed addition to the Official Naming List for City Facilities and Streets Minutes of January 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-01-04 | 2 | Recommendation to add the name 'Don Grant' to the City's Official Naming List for facilities and streets. A request to rename a portion of 3rd Street to 'Don Grant' is not possible since street names cannot change across intersections according to City ordinance. It is staff's recommendation that the Board approve the addition of the name 'Don Grant' to the Official Naming list for future consideration for facilities or street names. Motion(Anderson)/second(Miller) to add 'Don Grant' to Official Naming List Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0; Motion Carries An oral status report regarding the Historic Advisory Board Ad HOC Committee was given. After many emails, a meeting time was agreed upon for January 16th Ms. Woodbury stated that a chair needs to be elected and roles and responsibilities need to be determined. Some ideas need to be developed for preservation month. Board member Lynch (inaudible) Chair Anderson suggested that all HAB members should be part of the email listing regarding the Ad HOC committee and its plans. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: (Discussion only) The certified local government annual report was brought to the attention of the Board. Ms. Woodbury wanted to make the Board aware of this annual report. Chair Anderson requested a copy for each Board member. This report captures all that was done by the City for historic preservation over the past year as well as the Board's activities. A copy will be distributed at the February 1, 2007 meeting. Board member Lynch (inaudible) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None STAFF COMMUNICATION: Ms. Woodbury asked Board members about the progress of the Ethics training. Ms. Woodbury brought up the Carnegie building and mentioned the Council's appropriation of funds for a feasibility study. Board member Lynch (inaudible) Minutes of January 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-01-04 | 3 | Ms. Woodbury mentioned that a tour of the Carnegie Building for Board members will be arranged when possible. Board Member Lynch (inaudible) Asked about reports from the Alameda theater project(?) Board member lrons asked about the seismic work done to the Carnegie building and the funds for the feasibility study for potential uses. Board member Lynch (inaudible) asked about a tour of the Carnegie building(?) Board member Iverson brought up the historical and art combination for plaques and distributed the list of San Francisco's art monuments. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cathy Woodbury, Secretary Historical Advisory Board :PLANNING\HABVAGENMIN\Agenmin.07/01-04-07/1-4-07 HAB Draft Minutes.doc Minutes of January 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-01-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-02-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-02-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. Recording Secretary Garcia called the roll. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members, Iverson, Irons & Lynch MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Members lrons and Lynch absent STAFF PRESENT: Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, Erin Garcia, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: Motion(Miller)/Second(Iverson) to accept minutes of December 7, 2006 Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons and Lynch Motion Carries Motion(Anderson)/Second(Miller) to accept minutes of January 4, 2007 Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons and Lynch Motion Carries AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Oral Status Report on Alameda Theater Restoration (Continued to Meeting March 1, 2007) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: ACTION ITEMS: Certificate of Approval CA07-0001 - Derek Pavlik for Hermelinda Blume and Selinda Antill - 2618 Lincoln Avenue. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a pre-1942 single-family residence. The proposed work includes additions to the first and second stories, new porch and trellis structures, relocation of garage doors and replacement of windows. The property is located within an R-1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. Minutes of February 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-02-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-02-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-02-01 | 2 | Mr. Zach Seal presented the staff report for 2618 Lincoln Ave. Chair Anderson asked about requirements for Design Review versus Historical Advisory Board approval. Ms. Eliason responded by stating that for regular design reviews that have a demolition of less than 30%, there is no requirement for a demolition plan. If the demolition is over 30%, a demolition plan is required. Chair Anderson asked if the wood shingles would be retained. Mr. Derick Pavlick responded by stating that due to aging the roof would be replaced if the budget allows. Chair Anderson commended Mr. Pavlick for the design. Board member Iverson thought it was a very well designed addition. Board member Miller concurred. Motion(Anderson)/Second(Miller) to approve Certificate of Approval with conditions. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons and Lynch Motion Carries. REPORTS: Ms. Eliason presented the draft certified local government annual report. Chair Anderson requested some factual corrections and wondered about term lengths and why some are different. Ms. Eliason will look into the term information. Chair Anderson questioned if the public is made aware of local incentives. Ms. Eliason stated that the City must endorse incentives for them to be allowed. In response to a question by Chair Anderson, Ms. Eliason provided information regarding the ad hoc committee. BOARD COMMENTS: In a response to a concern by Board Member Miller, Ms. Eliason responded with information regarding the Certificate of Approval for 2708 Lincoln. Minutes of February 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-02-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-02-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-02-01 | 3 | Board Member Miller brought up 717 Paru and was worried about the project and mentioned that the neighbors are concerned. Ms. Eliason responded by stating that she would relay additional concerns to Code Enforcement. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None STAFF COMMUNICATION: ADJOURNMENT: Motion(Miller)/Second(Iverson) to adjourn Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons and Lynch The meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGIHABVAGENMINVAgenmin.07/02-01-07/2-1-07 HAB FINAL Minutes.doc Minutes of February 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-02-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-03-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MARCH 1, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. 1. Roll Call: Present: Chair Anderson, Board Members, lrons and Lynch. Absent: Vice Chair Miller and Board Member Iverson. Also present were, Supervising Planner Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner Doug Garrison, Planner III Douglas Vu, Planner III Dennis Brighton, and Recording Secretary Latisha Jackson. 2. MINUTES: Motion (Miller)/Second (Iverson) to accept minutes of December 7, 2006 Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons and Lynch. Motion Carries Motion (Anderson)/Second (Miller) to accept minutes of January 4, 2007 Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons and Lynch. Motion Carries 3. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: 4. SPECIAL REPORT: a. Oral Status Report on Alameda Theater Restoration Ms. Jennifer Ott gave an update on the Alameda Theater. The contractor began in July 2006. They are preserving historic elements such as the chandelier other lighting fixtures, other features such as handrails and doors. A piece of the original carpet will be put back in. After historic elements were removed and/or protected demolition began. Non-historic storefronts were removed to allow for seismic upgrades. The first structural footings have been poured. Ms. Lynch asked who was working on the light fixtures. Minutes of March 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-03-01 | 2 | Ms. Lynch asked about a theater memorabilia café and where it would be. Ms. Ott responded by saying that the café will be in the mezzanine balcony and that it will have memorabilia. Ms. Lynch asked about and opening date for the theater. Ms. Ott said that the construction would go through the end of 2007, they are hoping for an early 2008 opening. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: 6. ACTION ITEMS: 6-A. Certificate of Approval CA07-0003 - Applicant: Simon Kwan for Kwan Li - 2006 Buena Vista Avenue (DV). The applicants request a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of a residential structure built prior to 1942 for the purpose of constructing a new single-family dwelling. The site is located within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Mr. Douglas Vu presented the staff report and recommended approval of this item. Chris Buckley spoke to the demolition of the structure and the AAPS had no objection to the proposal. He felt that the new structure would tie the buildings of the neighborhood together and maintain consistency. Member Lynch could not find any historical significance in the current structure. She wanted to make sure that the new structure would make a good contribution to the street and fit in with the neighborhood. Mr. Vu responded by saying that staff is working with the applicant to make sure the design is consistent with the City's residential guidelines. Motion (Anderson)/Second (Irons) Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2 (Miller and Iverson) Motion Carries 6-B. Certificate of Approval CA06-0034 - Applicant: David Deutsch - 2233 San Antonio Avenue (DB). The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to demolish more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure that is listed as a historical resource on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located within an R-5, General Residential Zoning District. Mr. Dennis Brighton summarized the staff report and recommended approval of this item. Minutes of March 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-03-01 | 3 | In a response to a question by Ms. Lynch, Mr. Brighton responded by saying that the pocket doors will be saved. Mr. lrons commented on the elevations and would like to have seen an existing elevation next to the new ones to compare. He expressed concern over the current stair configuration. Also, he mentioned the windows and wanted to make sure they present well from the street. Mr. Brighton responded by saying that the porch and staircase are not original. He said that the designer is trying to replace the stairs and front porch and use trim that is more consistent with the Queen Anne Style. Ms. Lynch was puzzled by the description. She was curious about the handrails and wondered where the information came from regarding the handrails and ballast. Mr. Norman Sanchez spoke on behalf of the property owner and was available for questions from the Board. He acknowledged Ms. Lynch's comments about how it was a strange remodel for 1954 and was not typically done. He stated that the goal was to make it as seamless as possible. He referred to AAPS' comments on the windows. He said that the smaller windows are meant to accentuate the bay window. They are going to try to salvage the front porch. Ms. Lynch asked about how the elevation meets the golden mean and how it meets the guidelines. Mr. Sanchez responded by saying that the lower floor has a taller ceiling than the upper floor. They wanted to maximize the height at the bottom to create a more even feel and avoid the home feeling top-heavy. Mr. Brighton added that the golden mean is associated where there is a stair where there is a high basement. It minimizes the mass created from a stair element. Mr. lrons stated that there is another house nearby that is an original two-story house. Ms. Anderson asked about why the bay wasn't continued at the study on the side. She feels it looks top-heavy. Mr. Sanchez responded by saying that it is a cantilevered bay and keeping it that way is more consistent with the home and it would require a variance because of its proximity … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-03-01 | 4 | Mr. Dick Rutter mentioned the porch and roof slope. He passed out a post card of a house. He also presented an architecture book. He feels that in demolition situations, there should be drawings of the existing conditions to compare to the new drawings. He mentioned that dimensions are not actual size. Wood is cut smaller than it indicates. Ms. Lynch stated that the project troubles her. She said that they are taking a small house and inflating it and to her it doesn't seem right. Also, She didn't see the porch work reflected in the drawings. She concurred with the comment regarding a before and after drawing. Ms. Anderson mentioned that the issue had been brought up at previous meetings. Mr. lrons concurred that it is good to have drawings. He again mentioned the two-story near by. Ms. Anderson has no problem with the design. She looked at the neighbors and she expressed that Mr. Sanchez did a good job with the design. She had two problems; the porch details were not in the drawings. She felt it had been well presented. She would condition the project to go back to the review board to clarify the details regarding the front porch. She researched the rating of the house. AAPS indicated that the proper forms were not included in the packet. The property is an 'S' designation. Ms. Anderson asked about AAPS' comments and if they are allowed. Ms. Eliason responded by saying that AAPS can write anything they want in their letters but staff or Planning Board makes final determination on design reviews. Motion (lrons)/Second (Anderson) to accept Certificate of Approval for more than 30% demolition of residential structure. Ayes: 2; Noes: 1; Absent: Miller and Iverson Motion Carries 6-C. Certificate of Approval CA05-0003 - Applicant: Bill Wong/Ivan Chiu for Tho A. Ly - 320 Pacific Avenue (DG). The applicants request a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of an existing 622 square-foot, pre-1942 residence as part of a proposal to construct a two story single-family residence. This is a resubmittal of an earlier appl… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-03-01 | 5 | percent demolition. The site is located at 320 Pacific Avenue, within an R-4, Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. Mr. Doug Garrison presented the project and summarized the history of the project. He recommended amending original certificate of approval from partial demolition to complete demolition. Ms. Lynch asked about the report on the tree. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Anderson) to amend original Certificate of Approval from 30% demolition to 100% demolition. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: Miller & Iverson Motion Passes 7. REPORTS: 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 9. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Ms. Lynch presented some reference material for historic preservation season. She mentioned the lectures and due to the museum flooding the lectures will be held upstairs. Ms. Lynch reminded everyone about the "Secret Spaces" tour with Mr. Rutter. 10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Ms. Eliason mentioned the Veterans building and its nomination to the National Register of Historic Buildings. She wanted to include the Board and will compose a letter to be signed by the chair of the Board endorsing and supporting the nomination. Ms. Lynch pointed out that some of the descriptions were not correct. Mr. Rutter spoke to the retrofit and remodel of the building. Ms. Eliason clarified that staff will write the letter to the state for the chair of the Board to sign for a national designation. Motion (Anderson)/Second (Lynch) to direct staff to compose a letter for a national designation of the Veterans building. Minutes of March 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-03-01 | 6 | Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: Miller & Iverson Motion passes 11. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:IPLANNINGIHAB\AGENMINIAgenmin.07/03-01-07/03-01-07 HAB FINAL Minutes.doc Minutes of March 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-03-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-05-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-05-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MAY 3, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. 1. Roll Call: Present: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, lrons and Lynch. Also present were, Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, Dennis Brighton, Planner III and Latisha Jackson, Recording Secretary. 2. MINUTES: Motion (Lynch)Second (Anderson) to accept minutes of March 1, 2007 Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Motion Carries 3. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: 4. SPECIAL REPORT: 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: 6. ACTION ITEMS: A. Certificate of Approval CA06-0031 - Sally Harmon - 433 Taylor Avenue. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for a complete (100%) demolition of a residential structure that was built prior to 1942 but is not on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located at 433 Taylor Avenue within an R-3, Garden Residential Zoning District. (DB) Mr. Dennis Brighton presented the request for the Certificate of Approval for a complete (100%) demolition. He summarized the staff report and stated that despite being built around 1906, the house has lost its historical value due to several devastating improvements. Staff recommends approving the request. This is a continued item from November 2006. The item was continued due to confusion regarding the amount of demolition. Board Member Lynch asked if there would be an architect and was wondering about the plans, specifically one of the drawings and was curious to know if the drawing was the current house or the new house. She feels the drawing is mislabeled. Ms. Elizabeth Krase spoke on behalf of the Alameda Architecture Preservation Society (AAPS). The plans were reviewed in November 2006 by the AAPS and they had no objection to the demolition as long as the new structure is compatible with the neighborhood. They feel that the Minutes of May 3, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-05-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-05-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-05-03 | 2 | revised drawings of the replacement structure are further removed from the styles of the neighborhood. They feel that a more successful plan would incorporate traditional design elements of the 20's and 30's and the interior architecture should be reflected in the exterior design. Ms. Krase feels that the approval should be contingent on approval of drawings of the new structure. Ms. Belva "Elaine" Short read a statement consisting of concerns regarding 433 Taylor Ave. Her statement cited concerns regarding the demolition such as privacy, noise, dust and possible hazardous materials becoming airborne. She is concerned about losing open space and sunlight and expressed concern regarding the proposed courtyard on the property line and the potential for noise problems. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened up board discussion. She expressed concern with the proposed structure and worries that it does not fit in with the styles of the neighborhood. She feels the drawing of the design of the exterior is not detailed enough. Board Member Lynch expressed concern regarding the open space and feels that they are trying to cram too much building into the property and that the open space requirements are met with balconies. She asked if staff is supposed to be working with the guidelines from the AAPS. Board Member Miller spoke to the historical value of the structure and feels that just because it was built in 1906 it is historically significant. He feels the house could be restored. He thinks the neighbors should be considered. Board Member Iverson agreed that the proposed structure doesn't fit in with the neighborhood cohesiveness. She feels that changes could be made that would be agreeable to the owners and still keep the fabric of the neighborhood. Board Member Irons agreed with staff that the building had been degraded and the loss of the existing house isn't the issue. He questioned where the Board's purview begins and ends. Ms. Eliason clarified that demolitions are in the Board's purview and not the … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-05-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-05-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-05-03 | 3 | 7. REPORTS: Ms. Eliason offered a tour of the Carnegie building. Board Members Miller, Lynch and Iverson toured the Carnegie with Mr. Dennis Brighton and Ms. Cynthia Eliason. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: 9. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch reported on Historic Preservation Season. They have received great response and reminded the board of the tour that Woody Minor will be hosting. She mentioned that they are working with Bike Alameda. She asked about posting stories about monuments. Board Member Miller stated that the he is involved with a remodel and understands why people do things without permits. He feels the process is unbelievable. 10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: 11. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:27 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Coollin Choson Eliason, Secretary Historical Advisory Board ::\PLANNINGIHABIAGENMINVAgenmin.07/05-03-07\5-03-07 HAB Final Minutes.doc Minutes of May 3, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-05-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 1. Roll Call: Present: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, lrons and Lynch. Also present were: Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, Dennis Brighton, Planner III, Simone Wolter, Planner I, Laura Ajello, Planner I. 2. MINUTES: Board Member Lynch noted that in the middle of page 2, she had asked if staff was working with the Residential Design guidelines, rather than the guidelines from AAPS. She also requested the citation from the City Attorney's opinion with respect to demolitions being included in the purview, but not the design of a new structure. Chair Anderson noted that it was Alameda Architectural Society rather than "Architecture" in paragraph 1 of page 2. Motion (Miller)/Second (Lynch) to accept minutes of May 3, 2007, as amended. 3. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Ms. Eliason advised that a revised agenda had been provided in order to add the report regarding the review and comment on the Veterans' Building under "Reports." 4. SPECIAL REPORT: None. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 6. ACTION ITEMS: A. Certificate of Approval CA06-0031 - Sally Harmon - 433 Taylor Avenue. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for a complete (100%) demolition of a residential structure that was built prior to1942 but is not on the Historical Building Study List. The site is located at 433 Taylor Avenue within an R-3, Garden Residential Zoning District (DB). Minutes of June 7, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 2 | Mr. Dennis Brighton presented the request for the Certificate of Approval for demolition. He noted at the last meeting that the Board chose to deny the Certificate of Approval, but did not provide the appropriate findings. The HAB needed to make any one of the three findings cited in the staff report to support the denial. Ms. Eliason advised that the public hearing for this item has already been held, and that staff wished to properly prepare the Resolution of Denial. Chair Anderson noted that this house had lost quite a few of its historical elements, but it was surrounded by homes that were eclectic in nature, and which provided the identifying fabric of the neighborhood. She denied the Certificate of Approval because she believed that surrounding homes had historical elements, and that there was potential for this house to have it as well. She did not believe that the house should be demolished so it may be replaced it with a very new building that would not blend with the rest of the neighborhood. Mr. Brighton noted that the findings provided by staff were consistent with previous findings. He recommended that the findings should be consistent. He suggested that the Board examine the definition in Section 13-21.2 and determine whether there was any other wording that could be utilized to make one of the three findings. Board Member Lynch inquired whether this house could be added to the Study List. Ms. Eliason replied that staff requested the findings for the denial of the Certificate of Approval; if the Board wished to add it to the Study List, that would be a separate action, and that the findings must still be made to provide justification in anticipation of an appeal. Vice Chair Miller confirmed his belief that this house embodied distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, although some of the detail had been removed. Board Member Lynch requested a photo of the subject house. Board Member Iverson agreed with the comments of the other Board members, and hoped that part of the house … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 3 | In response to an inquiry by Board Member lrons whether the Board should consider the proposed replacement in making its determination, Ms. Eliason confirmed that was not part of the process, and that the Design Review had not yet been approved. Staff was still working with the applicant on the design, and added that the Board had seen the working drawings. Chair Anderson believed that the existing property contributed to a cultural or historical fabric of the neighborhood, and that it could be brought up to a significant level of contribution to the neighborhood if the owners were to remodel or improve the exterior. It was the consensus of the four previously voting Board members that even though this residence does not show identifying marks, it should be saved as completing the fabric of the neighborhood. It is surrounded by homes that are eclectic by nature, and are historic. This house has potential to embody the characteristics of a historic home, and could be remodeled and returned to its original Colonial Revival style. Ayes: 4; Noes: ; Abstain: 1 (Irons) B. Certificate of Approval CA07-0006 - Lourdes and Thomas Hartrick - 131 Maitland Drive. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to demolish more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure that was built prior to 1942 but is not on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located at 131 Maitland Drive within an R-1, One-Family Zoning District. (SW) Ms. Simone Wolter summarized the staff report. Staff recommended approval of the Certificate of Demolition for this property. In response to an inquiry by Board Member Iverson where the date of 1924 came from, Ms. Wolter replied that staff recorded the building permit, which stated it was built in 1924, although that may be a typo. Board Member Iverson noted that she had never heard of a ranch-style house that early. Ms. Eliason advised that the Design Review for the additions to the residence had already been approved. The public hearing was opened. There were no speakers. The pub… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 4 | Chair Anderson noted that she would abstain from voting on this item because she felt the submittal was not complete. She believed the plans indicated what was existing, rather than what was approved for being added to the house. Ms. Wolter advised that the architectural design for the new building was very much in keeping of the existing building, and that it was slightly larger. Chair Anderson noted that the Board could not see that information. Board Member Iverson noted that one of the Board's goals was to encourage new building that is harmonious with its surroundings, and that they could not evaluate those criteria if they could not see the new design. Board Member Lynch agreed with the previous comments, but believed the request seemed reasonable. She was concerned that the Board did not have information about the new design. Ms. Wolter offered to show the plans to the Board. Chair Anderson noted that she wanted to review the plans beforehand. Board Member Lynch agreed with the Chair that more time was needed to evaluate the plans. She inquired whether it would be appropriate to continue this item. Ms. Eliason understood the Board's concerns, but noted that continuing the item because the findings could not be made would be unfair to the applicants and placed them in an awkward situation. Board Member Iverson believed that it would have been appropriate to include the plans in the Board packet. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to approve the Certificate of Approval for this project. Board Member lrons moved to approve the Certificate of Approval for 131 Maitland Drive. Board Member Miller seconded the motion. Ayes: 3; Noes: 1 (Lynch); Abstain: 1 (Anderson). Motion carries to approve. C. Certificate of Approval CA07-0007 - William and Rebecca Paden - 1239 Hawthorne Street. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for Demolition of more than 30 percent of a single-family residence built in 1939. Demotion consists of the removal of a single-story garden room that was added to the original stru… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 5 | Building materials will be consistent with original elements of the structure. This property is not listed on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located within an R-1, One-Family Zoning District. (LA) Ms. Laura Ajello summarized the staff report. Staff recommended approval of this project. The public hearing was opened. There were no speaker slips. In response to an inquiry by Board Member Lynch regarding the definition of a "ramada," Mr. Italo Calpestri, project architect, replied that it was a kind of covered porch. He noted that the second story provided an overhang to the porch. He detailed the background of this application, and noted that they suspected there was dry rot by the south wall near the entry. At that point, Mr. McFann suggested sending this application to the HAB. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to approve the Certificate of Approval for 1239 Hawthorne Street. Board Member Iverson seconded the motion. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Abstain: 0. Motion carries to approve. 7. REPORTS: Historic Preservation Commission Review and Comment on the Nomination of Alameda Veterans' Memorial Building to the National Register of Historic Places. Ms. Eliason provided the staff report, and noted that the Office of Historic Preservation has requested a second comment on this nomination. She noted that the Letter of Support could be reissued, or a new letter could be provided. Chair Anderson complimented staff on a thorough and informative report. Ms. Eliason noted that Ms. Jean Sweeney prepared the report. Board Member Lynch noted that this was a thrilling building, and wholeheartedly supported the application. Chair Anderson noted that there was a typo on the form, which read "be listed" instead of "by listed." Ms. Eliason took note of that correction. Minutes of June 7, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 6 | Chair Anderson believed the building was representative of the architectural mixture of styles in Alameda, in the Spanish Colonial Revival vernacular. She added that it was designed by a renowned Alameda architect. For those two reasons, she highly recommended that it be nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. Board Member Iverson noted that because of the prominence of the military in Alameda, this building holds a special status in Alameda for all those who served, and those who benefited. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 9. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch noted that she had made a booklet addressing the Rug Works (also known as the Clamp Swing Building) and distributed them to the Board. Board Member Lynch proposed that the sign on the Alameda Rug Works be added to the Historic Sign Ordinance. She noted that almost two years ago, the two station signs were added. She noted that the sign list had not been updated. Ms. Eliason noted that she would check that. Chair Anderson inquired about the status of 1343 Fernside Boulevard and mentioned it looked like a stucco house with three round arches at the front porch. She added that it had plywood attached all around the house, and that the top floor had been completely removed. Ms. Eliason advised that she would send out Code Enforcement because that house had to comply with a very specific design review that was extensively developed. She would request that a Stop Work Order be issued if necessary. Board Member Iverson inquired about the house on Broadway and Santa Clara. Ms. Eliason noted that was a bungalow where the stucco was removed down to the lathe; the lathe was subsequently removed and that area was sheathed in plywood. Vice Chair Miller noticed that house in each stage, and had thought it was an extensive termite job; he added there was a similar house with tapered columns on Central Avenue that was being rebuilt in kind. Ms. Eliason noted that she would check on that house. Chair Anderson noted that in October, staff had brought to th… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 7 | Chair Anderson inquired whether there was a way for the HAB to have more meaningful and effective responsibilities, either through ordinance or City Charter. She sometimes felt as though it was a waste of her time to review projects that had already gone through design review, and that the scope of the HAB's abilities was limited to stating whether a building could be torn down, or which portion of the building could be demolished. She did not feel that the HAB had any power or ruling over how a building could be preserved; she believed that the reason for the existence of the HAB was to state how buildings could be kept intact. Vice Chair Miller echoed Chair Anderson's comments, and noted that was the reason he joined the Board. Ms. Eliason noted that she could examine the HAB's charter, and that the City was working under the present ordinance. Staff will continue to examine revisions, most of which were related to penalty sections and dealing with properties such as 1343 Fernside and similar demolitions. She suggested bringing the concern to City Council, especially in defining where the HAB's authority stopped, and where the Planning Board's authority started. She acknowledged that tensions between the purviews of other Boards, such as the Economic Development Commission and the Transportation Commission, with the Planning Board in terms of authority. She noted that those questions are appropriately addressed by the community. Chair Anderson suggested that it may be appropriate to call in the HAB prior to the Design Review Board to review the actual design that would take place in a demolition and restoration of a building. She believed that there were several homes in Alameda that should be preserved without having to be historical monuments. She believed that in some instances, the Planning Board, Planning staff and City Council, as well as the other authorities in Alameda take the recommendations by the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society first over the recommendations of the HAB. She added that the… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-06-07 | 8 | available for the HAB members. Ms. Eliason replied that private tours could be arranged, or she could work with Jennifer Ott of Development Services to have a tour before the next meeting. She noted that staff may need to advertise the tour to comply with the Brown Act. The first choice would be July 5, 2007, and August 2, 2007, would be the second choice. 10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Ms. Eliason noted that the next meeting would be July 6, 2007. 11. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Anderson entertained a motion for adjournment. Vice Chair Miller moved to adjourn the meeting. Board member Iverson seconded the motion. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0. Motion carries to adjourn. The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Cynthis Ehara Secretary Historical Advisory Board HAB Final Minutes.doc Minutes of June 7, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-06-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-09-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-09-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:10 pm. 1. ROLL CALL:Present: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members lrons and Lynch. Iverson - Absent Also present were: Cathy Woodbury, Planning and Building Director, Laura Ajello, Planner I, Shana Nero, Administrative Assistant. 2. MINUTES: Motion (Anderson)/Second (Lynch) to approve minutes for May 3, 2007, regular meeting as amended. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Motion Carries 3. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None 4. SPECIAL REPORT: 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: The Board reviewed and discussed the Design Review Notice for 500 Central Ave. Planning and Building Director Woodbury informed the Board that the Major Design Review will be completed by staff and if anyone wishes to see the plans they should contact Cynthia Eliason on Friday. 6. ACTION ITEMS: A. Approval of the Historic Preservation Work Program and Dissolution of the Historic Preservation Work Program Ad Hoc Committee. Director Woodbury introduced the Draft Historic Preservation Work Program 2007- 2011 for the Board's review, input and approval. The Minutes of September 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-09-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-09-06 | 2 | Board was also asked to disband the Historic Preservation Work Program Ad Hoc committee. The Alameda Architectural Preservation Society submitted a letter of support and recommendation for the Work Program to be discussed and reviewed by the Board. Public Speaker - Chris Buckley, representing Alameda Architectural Preservation Society, discussed the letter from the AAPS and recommended that with Phase 1 being slightly overloaded the Historical Plague Program be moved from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and Board Members agreed with this recommendation. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to approve the draft of the Historical Preservation Work Program as amended; with the recommendation that the Historical Plaque Program be moved from Phase 1 to Phase 2 and separate the City's rehabilitation assistance program and the façade renovation grants program into two items, under Phase 4 also the dissolving of the Ad Hoc committee. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Miller) to approve the draft of the Historical Preservation Work Program as amended and the dissolving of the Ad Hoc committee. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Motion Carries 7. REPORTS: A. Presentation of Historic Plaque Program. Laura Ajello, Planner I presented a slide show presentation. Planner Ajello explain the different material that could be used to create the plaques and funding sources. There was also discussion on the basic that needed to be answered; application, standard design, set timelines and select vendor. The promotion of the program can be done by using a number of City and County website, the museum, The AAPS. The Board also discussed anti-theft for the plaques and ceremony suggestions. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Christopher Buckley, AAPS, stated that he would hope that the plaque program would be pro active with the older buildings. Mr. Buckley also discussed different types of material that could be used for the plaques and the best material to stand up to the weathering Minutes of September 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-09-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-09-06 | 3 | 9. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch asked if the Permit Manager would be available to come in and give a report to explain how the Building Official makes the determination on whether a building is over or under the 30% demolished. Director Woodbury stated that she would have Greg McFann, Building Official, give a presentation to the board at a later meeting. Board Member Lynch discussed 1815 Sherman St. and the Board's recommendations that were made for the building and questioned whether they were completely followed. in addition Member Lynch proposed that the 5 Board Members divide the island into 5 separate territories and each member volunteer to canvas that section on a regular basis. Director Woodbury suggested that Board members contact staff or come into the office to discuss questions or concerns about projects under construction and code enforcement issues. 10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: 11. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Secretary Historical Advisory Board G:\PLANNINGIHABVAGENMINIAgenmin.07/09-06-07/09-06 HAB Final Minutes. .doc Minutes of September 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-09-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-10-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-10-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY OCTOBER 4, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE- - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:08 pm. MEMBERS PRESENT: Present: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson and Lynch. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Member lrons STAFF PRESENT: Gregory McFann, Building Official, Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner, Zach Seal, Planner I, Shana Nero, Administrative Assistant. MINUTES: Motion (Lynch)/Second (Iverson) to approve minutes for September 6, 2007, with corrections. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. SPECIAL REPORT: Gregory McFann, Building Official, discussed the determining factors that are used to calculate the 30% demolition. Chair Anderson requested information for 2927 Marina and 3011 Marina as part of the record and would like staff to research the two addresses and respond to the Board by next week. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. WORKSHOP: 6-A. Study Session on the Carnegie Restoration and Preservation Project Applicant: 1 Minutes of October 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-10-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-10-04 | 2 | City of Alameda - 2264 Santa Clara Avenue & 1429 Oak Street (Former Children's Library) Review and comment on potential restoration elements alteration and additions to the Carnegie building and potential relocation of the former Children's Library. Alen Dreyfuss with Wiss, Janney Eistner Associates, Inc. and Rosemary Muller with Muller and Caulfield Architects presented a slide show. Ms. Muller explained the proposed designs for the interior of the building and different options for the renovations. Public Speaker - Chris Buckley, discussed the outside connection between the two buildings and the preliminary options for the original patterns and stacks. ACTION ITEMS: 7-A. Certificate of Approval CA07-0021 Applicant: Carmen Hall - 1244 Saint Charles Street. (DV). Cynthia Eliason, Planning Supervisor presented the Board with a report identifying the need for the removal of two mature Coast live oak trees (Quercus agrifolia). The Board reviewed the staff report and conditions. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Motion Carries Motion (Miller)/Second (Iverson) to approve with conditions as stated in the draft resolution. 7-B. Certificate of Approval CA07-0016 - Applicant: City of Alameda - 2515 Blanding Avenue (The Clamp-Swing Building.) (ZS) Zach Seal, Planner I presented a Power Point proposal to place the Alameda Rug Works sign at 2515 Blanding Avenue, also known as the Clamp-Swing Building, on the Historic Study Sign list. The Board discussed and reviewed the checklist to determine whether it would be put on the Historical Sign List. Board Member Lynch indicated that the there is no capitol M in the middle of Rythmics and the building should not be called the Clamp-Swing Building, but rather the Alameda Rug Works Building. This will be noted in the minutes. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Motion Carries Motion (Lynch/Second (Anderson) to approve as stated in the draft resolution 7-C. Certificate of Approval CA07-0017 Applicant: Alameda Power & Telecom - 2000 Grand Street. (DV) The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to replace 40-60 d… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-10-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-10-04 | 3 | Motion (Miller/Second (Anderson) to continue item to the November 1, 2007 meeting. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: None STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason Secretary Historical Advisory Board Meeting S:APLANNINGIHABIAGENMINAgenmin.07/10-04-07/10-04 HAB Final Minutes.doc 3 Minutes of October 4, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-10-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, Lynch and lrons. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Secretary Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner; Simone Wolter, Planner I; Shana Nero, Recording Secretary. MINUTES: M/S (Lynch, Anderson) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting for October 4, 2007 with corrections. 4-0-1. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Abstain: 1; Motion carries. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None SPECIAL REPORTS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: The Board received a letter from the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society regarding Item 7-A and a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of an accessory structure at 152 Maitland Drive. WORKSHOP: N/A ACTION ITEMS: 7-A. Certificate of Approval CA07-0017; Applicant: Alameda Power & Telecom - 2000 Grand Street. (DV) The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to replace 40 Minutes of November 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 2 | to 60 deteriorated decorative streetlights along sections of Lincoln, Buena Vista, and Encinal Avenues with new decorative streetlights. The streetlights are listed as significant streetlights in Appendix A of the Historic Building Study List. Staff requested a continuation to the meeting of November 1, 2007. Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report to the Board. Juan Ulloa of Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) responded to questions regarding the replacement program, the survey of existing lights, and the cost of new poles. Chair Anderson opened the item for public comment. Christopher Buckley discussed the specifications, standards and maintenance of the streetlights. Richard Rutter discussed material options for streetlights and stated that cast iron was the best replacement option for the streetlights. Woody Minor provided input regarding the historical aspect of the streetlights, noting that the focus should be more on the retention. Kevin Frederick stated that he opposed the use of fiberglass. Birgit Evans commented that there should be some way to reuse the old streetlights, rather than selling the parts for scrap metal. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor for public discussion. Board Member Lynch expressed concern that staff did not understand that the streetlights were historical monuments and was very concerned that Alameda Power & Telecom had gone ahead and changed 20 of the streetlights without any authorization. The Board requested a complete cost comparison from Alameda Power & Telecom for different casting companies including the use of different materials and a complete listing for Phase 1 and Phase 2 for repair and replacement of existing streetlights. In addition, the Board requested information on how to correct the existing 20 streetlights that have been replaced to date. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to continue the item to the February 7, 2008 regular meeting. M/S (Miller/Lynch) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Motion carries. Minute… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 3 | 7-B. Certificate of Approval; CA07-0020; Applicant: Frank Ardourel - 1455 Fourth Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for a more than thirty percent (30%) demolition of a residential structure that was built prior to 1942, but is not on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located at 1445 Fourth Street within an R-1, One Family Residential Zoning District. Simone Wolter, Planner I, presented the staff report to the Board. She noted that the recommendation was for denial of the Certificate of Approval. The Board opened the item for public comment. Marsha Broquedis provided input on her design work at 1445 Fourth Street and her concerns regarding the condition of the property. Frank Ardourel expressed to the Board how detrimental the present condition is for his family and requested he be allowed to move forward with repairs to his property. There was no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the floor for Board discussion. The Board discussed the important design features and requested the applicant to redesign the addition keeping in mind the following concerns: larger casings on the windows, the roof over the bay window on the first floor and the reconsideration of the "pop out" on the 2nd floor. The Board also suggested looking at the proportions of the building and to consider another material - either lap siding or maybe shingle for the front façade. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to continue the item to the January 3, 2008 regular meeting. M/S (Miller/Iverson) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion carries. 7-C. Certificate of Approval, CA07-0008; Applicant: Yong Liang - 1611 Walnut Street St. The applicants request a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure that is listed as a historical resource on the Historic Building Study List. The proposed work includes additions to the first and second stories, the replacement of windows and doors, and the replacement of the foundation and basement. The site is locat… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-11-01 | 4 | Staff requested a continuation of the item to the meeting of December 6, 2007 regular meeting. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to continue the item to the December 6, 2007 meeting. M/S (Miller/Iverson) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion carries. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board member Lynch discussed a presentation given by Phil Tagami regarding Alameda Point. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff gave the Board information on upcoming workshops and conferences. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 9:23 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of November 1, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-11-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2007 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:05 pm. 1. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, Lynch and lrons. MEMBERS ABSENT: None. STAFF PRESENT: Planning & Building Director Cathy Woodbury; Secretary Cynthia Eliason, Supervising Planner; Zach Seal, Planner I; Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager; Sue Russell, Development Services; Tony Ebster, Recording Secretary. 2. MINUTES: Board Member Lynch requested that staff review the audiotape for consideration of the minutes of September at the next meeting. Ms. Eliason noted that the meeting had not been taped, and because the minutes were produced from her notes, she suggested that Board Member Lynch provide any further detail that she recalled. She noted that the corrected minutes were put into the files when the Certified Local Government (CLG) Annual Report was presented. Board Member Iverson noted that Dick Rutter had made many interesting points about the materials for street lights and monuments, as well as their life expectancy and care. She believed that this was very important, and inquired whether Mr. Rutter could discuss those matters again since the meeting had not been taped. Ms. Eliason replied that she had requested that the item be continued to the February 2008 meeting, and suggested that Mr. Rutter discuss those matters at that time. Ms. Eliason noted that the issues addressed in February would be considered part of that meeting. She would add further detail about the monuments. Board Member Lynch did not believe the minutes of October 4, 2007, could be considered until the outstanding issues were resolved. The minutes for October 4, 2007 would be continued to the February 2008 meeting. M/S (Lynch, Miller) to approve the minutes of the regular meeting for November 1, 2007 with corrections. 5-0-0. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Abstain: 0; Motion carries. 3. AGENDA CHANGES AND DIS… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 2 | None 4. SPECIAL REPORTS: 4-A. Introductions of New Staff Planning & Building Director Cathy Woodbury introduced new staff member Jon Biggs, who came to Alameda from the City of Pacific Grove. He would staff the HAB meetings in the future, and brought considerable historic experience to the City from his previous post. She added that Ms. Eliason had been working with the Climate Protection Task Force for the past year, and that the plan will be ready to go to City Council; she will move into that realm in the near future. She noted that a new administrative staff member would be introduced at the next meeting. Mr. Biggs introduced himself and noted that he looked forward to helping the City achieve its historic goals. 4-B. 2007 CLG Annual Report - Presentation of the Certified Local Government (CLG) Annual Report for the reporting period of October 1, 2006, to September 3, 2007. (Code Enforcement) Ms. Eliason presented the staff report, and summarized the contents of the CLG Annual Report. She noted that some of the minutes were still in draft form, and would be finalized before being sent to the State. Board Member Lynch noted that she did not see the pre-1942 non-monument, non-study list buildings listed in Attachment 3 of the report. She noted that the section describing the goals for 2008 read, "Continuing the development of a plan for adoption for reuse of historic buildings." She did not know the City was involved in that plan. Ms. Eliason replied that was being undertaken by the Navy, assisted by the City with a new Section 106 consultation. Because of the timing between the initial plan and the new one, the Navy would like to review it. Chair Anderson noted that page 6, paragraph 2 of Attachment 3, should be corrected to read, "The City is took-has taken its first steps Chair Anderson noted that page 6, paragraph 3 of Attachment 3, read, "The City of Alameda has been able to successfully implement its guide to residential design which was adopted by the City Council in February 2005. She requested that if … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 3 | Chair Anderson wished to make a correction on "Members of the Historical Advisory Board," and noted that her information should reflect that she has practiced more than two years as an architect. M/S (Anderson, Miller) to accept the report. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion carries. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None. 6. WORKSHOP: None. 7. ACTION ITEMS: 7-A. Certificate of Approval CA07-0008; Applicant: Yong Liang - 1611 Walnut Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of a residential structure that is listed as a historical resource on the Historic Building Study List. The proposed work includes additions to the first and second stories, the replacement of windows and doors, and the replacement of the foundation and basement. The site is located within an R-5, General Residential Zoning District. Zack Seal, Planner I, presented the staff report to the Board. Staff recommended that the replacement windows be either wood, wood-clad or fiberglass, and that they must meet the City of Alameda Residential Review Guidelines. Chair Anderson noted that the Proposal Summary indicated that the living space would be expanded by 594 square feet, and that Mr. Seal had quoted figures between 1,500-2,100 square feet. The plan indicated that both units were increasing by a total of 1,156 square feet. She would like to confirm the correct figures. Mr. Seal replied that the numbers were accurate, and that the 1,156 square feet was not the net number. He noted that the square footage included all of the floor area as part of the two-story addition; the floor area of the existing first story rear addition would have to be subtracted. The total net gain in floor area would be approximately 650 square feet. He noted that he would confirm that the numbers were accurate. Board Member lrons did not believe the Board should micromanage the paint job, and noted that the front appeared radically different than the idea of somebody burning paint on the same property. He would like clarification, but … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 4 | railing treatment that would be more integrated to the historic feel, but he was not very familiar with what would have been typical in 1883. Mr. Seal noted that staff had not seen any plans indicating what the style of the new side rails would be, nor have they seen plans for the new sidewalls that would be installed on either side of the staircase. He noted that the review of these plans would be part of the design review that would occur after the certificate of approval is issued, if the application is approved. Member Lynch wanted to ensure the details of the five-sided bay windows and the collonettes were saved, and noted that the details did not appear on the drawings. Mr. Seal replied that the applicant had not proposed the elimination of those details, and noted that a condition of approval could be added directing that the details of the bay windows not be altered in any way. The Board opened the item for public comment. Richard Rutter, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS), believed that the proposed project would upgrade the neighborhood, and would be a good example of improvement. He agreed with staff's report, and believed the proper handling of the doors and transoms could make this building a jewel box. He submitted two photos of a East Lake Stick building on Waller Street in San Francisco, designed by John Gash, a prolific Victorian architect. He noted that the treatment of the double doors would be of interest with respect to this project. Elizabeth Krase, AAPS, requested clarification about the windows, and noted that page 2 of the staff report stated, "The removal of the existing wood windows, and replacement with IWC vinyl windows, could affect the integrity of the structure." Also, page 4, Item 5, read, "New/replacement windows shall be wood, wood-clad or fiberglass windows.' She believed there seemed to be a discrepancy in window materials. She suggested that the old windows slated for removal be rehabilitated if possible. She noted that an Italianate stairway railing with heavy… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 5 | Chair Anderson noted that a tall, vertical element was characteristic of the Italianate style, and she liked the idea of seeing what was underneath. She would like to see the vertical element strengthened in the front, and would like Condition F to be changed to include the installation of a transom so that it assumed its original proportions. Board Member Iverson requested clarification on the actual proposed material on the windows. Mr. Seal replied that the preferred material was the extruded vinyl window material of the homeowner. Staff recommended that the Board add as a condition of approval that the windows not be extruded vinyl, and that they be either wood, wood-clad or fiberglass, which was consistent with the residential design review guidelines for historic homes (Condition E). Board Member Iverson thanked Planning staff for a good, thorough job on this application, and emphasized that a quality job will enhance the appearance and add value to the property and to the neighborhood. A discussion of siding alignment techniques ensued. Board Member Iverson noted that it was possible to match the siding and that is the intention of the Code, and suggested that the old and new siding be interlocked if the dimensions were the same. She proposed that maintaining the overall aesthetic and integrity of the building be the goal, Board Member lrons suggested changing the wording from "exact match" to "a visual match." Board Member Lynch complimented staff on an excellent staff report, and inquired whether final inspections were performed to ensure the conditions of approval were followed. Mr. Seal replied that discussions had been held at the staff level to have the staff planner go out in the field, and performing a final inspection to ensure that the project as constructed was in line with what the Board or staff had required. Another layer of review would be triggered if that was not the case. Staff could include a condition stating that prior to the installation of the siding, staff would verify that the new … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 6 | A discussion of window materials ensued. Chair Anderson emphasized that she did not want to see a fiberglass window next to an existing wood window. Mr. Seal noted that the conditions stated that the windows must be a visual match. Vice Chair Miller noted that cost may be a factor for the owners, and if they could accomplish the visual match with fiberglass window, he believed it would be adequate to accomplish the design aesthetic. Board Member Lynch noted that the quality of the molding of the fiberglass windows was an important factor. In response to an inquiry by Ms. Eliason regarding the number of new windows, Mr. Seal noted that there would be three replacement windows, as well as eight new windows on the addition, for a total of 11 new windows. All the windows would be placed on the side, and the rear had no windows. The following conditions would be added: 1. The balcony to be consistent with the Italianate style, non-cantilevered, such as in the provided graphic material; 2. Side walls, new railing and posts are to be added to the front porch consistent with the Italianate style, in order to restore the design integrity of the front entry; 3. All existing windows shall remain with the exception of the two kitchen and bathroom windows on the north side, and the one second-story window on the south side; 4. The window trim, including drip sill, on all new windows shall match the style and dimensions of the window trim on the existing windows, excluding the bay window on the north right and south left sides of the structure; 5. Replacement windows shall provide a visual match. 6. The applicant will be encouraged to repair and maintain existing wood windows; 7. The replacement front doors shall be consistent with the Italianate style, add transoms or other trim to restore the original entry proportions; 8. The bay window shall not be altered. Chair Anderson entertained a motion to approve the Certificate of Approval with the conditions, stating each condition individually. M/S (Miller/Anderson) to accept Res… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,7 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 7 | A. The proposed railing and posts for the rear entry and second story balcony be made consistent with the Italianate style, non-cantilevered; B. Side walls and new railing and posts are to be added to the front porch, consistent with the Italianate style, in order to restore the design integrity of the front entry; C. All existing windows shall remain except the kitchen and bathroom windows on the north, right side of the structure, and one second-story window on the south, left side of the structure. Encourage the applicant to repair existing wood windows; D. The window trim, including drip sills on all new windows shall match the style and dimensions on the existing windows, excluding the bay window on the north, right and south, left sides of the structure; E. The new replacement windows shall be wood, wood-clad or fiberglass windows that provide a visual match to the existing original wood windows on the structure; F. The replacement front doors shall be consistent with the Italianate style, adding transom window or panel to restore the entry proportions; G. The new siding shall exactly match the material (wood) style, texture and dimensions of the existing siding. A sample of the proposed siding will be provided to staff prior to the issuance of building permits; H. The new roof shall exactly match the style and material of the existing roof; I. Distinctive materials, features, finishes and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize the Restoration period will be preserved; J. Materials, features, spaces and finishes that characterize time periods other than the historical period of the subject property will be documented prior to their alteration or removal, such as the concrete steps, stair railing, etc.; K. Deteriorated features from the Restoration period will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture and, where possible, materials; L. Replace… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,8 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 8 | 7-B. Certificate of Approval PLN07-0006; Applicant: Peter Yeh - 1222 Park Street (Bernardi Cleaners Historic Signs). The applicant requests approval to alter the three historically designated Bernardi Cleaners signs by replacing the words "Bernardi" with "Amazon"; "Cleaners" with "Tropical Fish"; and "Tailors" with "Supplies.' The applicant also proposes to change the color of the neon tubing from red to blue and pink, and add a tropical fish logo above the "Amazon" sign. The site is located within a C-C/T (Community Commercial/Theatre Combining) Zoning District. (ZS). Mr. Seal noted that Sue Russell from Development Services would answer questions for the Board. The Board opened the item for public comment. Sue Russell, Development Services, noted that the applicants were well aware of the historical significance of the building. She added that the owner received a Development Services grant to redo the glass in front of the building, which had been in very bad shape. She noted that the owner was very respectful of the sign, and valued the architecture of the building. She emphasized that the owner needed accurate signage for his business, and noted that he still has people bringing laundry and tailoring in to his business because of the inaccurate signage. Board Member Lynch noted that she was disturbed by this, and did not see it as respecting the design guidelines for the preservation of the signs. She had called Jerry Lynn of the sign company several days prior, and discussed her concerns with him. She had pointed out that the font was not the same, and she had been told that he would try to get a more similar font. Peter Yeh, Direct Sign Outlet, distributed a handout to the Board members, and pointed out that two fonts were similar to the letter forms currently on the sign. He described the noticeable differences between the two fonts, and noted that the current signage was based on the two fonts but that creative license had been taken when the sign was created. He noted that it would be impossible for the… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,9 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 9 | Board Member Lynch would like the font to be matched to the original sign as closely as possible aesthetically by the sign company. She also understood the need to be as descriptive of the business as possible. There were no more speaker slips. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened the Board discussion. Board Member Lynch wished to discuss the changes in the neon colors. Mr. Yeh noted that the fish was in blue neon, as would the word "Amazon"; "Tropical Fish and Supplies" would have either pink or red neon, depending on the appropriateness of the color. Vince Ng, owner, displayed a picture of the neon signage. Board Member Lynch would like the original colors to be used, as cited in the ordinance. Chair Anderson did not know whether the colors had changed over the course of time, and believed it would be overly restrictive by the ordinance to state that they must follow those colors. Vice Char Miller noted that he owned several neon signs, and had observed a change in the fluorescence over time; one white sign had changed to pink because of deterioration. Board Member Iverson suggested asking the applicant to return with a font that was more square. Chair Anderson suggested that since the original font could not be duplicated exactly, that the applicant be encouraged to match certain aspects of the font. Ms. Russell noted that the ordinance read, "Should it not be possible for any historic signs to be modified according to the requirements above, any changes to the signs must be reviewed and approved by the Historical Advisory Board.' In response to an inquiry by Chair Anderson, Mr. Yeh replied that the font was not available in the computer; also, it did not exist inside the Encyclopedia of Typefaces. Board Member lrons suggested that Condition 1 read, "The font for the new letters shall be Tourist Gothic of the same, size, placement " Mr. Yeh indicated that would not be a problem. Board Member Lynch inquired whether the neon fish on the sign could be animated. Mr. Yeh replied that he would like to… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,10 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 10 | M/S (Miller/Lynch) to accept Resolution No. HAB0720 as prepared by staff, with the following modifications to Condition 1: "The new letters shall be Tourist Gothic of the same shape, size, placement, color, material.. " Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Motion carries. 7-C. Certificate of Approval; CA06-0020; Steve Rynerson for Barry Hemphill and Judy Freed - 951 Pacific Avenue. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for demolition of more than 30 percent of an Italianate style single-family residence built in 1879. The demolition would result from the proposed removal of the façade and expansion of the entire structural footprint to fully encase the original building, changing the structure from a simple Italianate farmhouse to a more monumental mansion form. This property is listed on the Historic Building Study List as a historic resource distinguished by its architectural, historical, or environmental significance, eligible for inclusion in the State Historic Resources Inventory, and of secondary priority for inclusion on the list of Alameda Historical Monuments. The site is located within an R-2, Two-Family Residential Zoning District. (DB) Ms. Eliason indicated that this applicant has withdrawn their application. 7-D. 2008 Meeting Schedule. Chair Anderson proposed eliminating the July 3, 2008, meeting. Chair Anderson moved to accept the 2008 meeting schedule, with the deletion of the July meeting. M/S (Anderson/Lynch) Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion carries. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 9. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Chair Anderson noted that the Alameda Point Task Force meeting was cancelled in November. The next scheduled meeting will be December 13, 2008, at the O Club at 6:30 p.m. Board Member Lynch distributed a story she wrote for the Alameda Sun about signs. She also noted that Historic Preservation season was coming, and added that she had a draft of the various activities. Minutes of December 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 10 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf,11 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2007-12-06 | 11 | 10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs gave the Board information on upcoming workshops and conferences. Board Member Iverson inquired about the status of historic plaques. Mr. Biggs noted that he would report back to the Board with that information. Vice Chair Miller requested that staff provide a list of future projects coming before the HAB. 11. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Cynthia Eliason, Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of December 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 11 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2007-12-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-01-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. 1. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson, and lrons. MEMBERS ABSENT: Board Member Lynch STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Supervising Planner; Tony Ebster and Dora Mairena, Recording Secretaries. 2. MINUTES: January 3, 2008 3, AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Item 6-A canceled 4. SPECIAL REPORTS: None 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: The letter from AAPS is available to the public upon request 6. ACTION ITEMS: 6-A. Study Session on the Carnegie Restoration and Preservation Project, Applicant: City of Alameda - 2264 Santa Clara Avenue & 1429 Oak Street (Former Children's Library) - Review and Provide Feedback on a Proposed Design for the Connection between the Carnegie Library and the Children's Library. Continued to the meeting of February 7, 2008 6-B. Work Program Review and Discussion Mr. Biggs - I will like to bring forward the Work Program that the Board had worked in the pass. I looked at the comments of the AAPS and they do bring some things that aren't and should be included in the Work Program, such as categorizing, and numbering the items. We bring the Work Program to your attention to discuss and determine what accomplishment the Board is expecting in the future. Chair Anderson - A question raised by the AAPS, was that under additional recommendations to write a letter to the different departments. Has the letters being done yet? Mr. Biggs - Not to my knowledge. Minutes of January 3, 2008 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-01-03 | 2 | Board Member Iverson - I have a question regarding the plaques; do you know what happened? Mr. Biggs - I did a research and a follow-up, the Planner working in the project is Laura Ajello and she prepared the background information that was provided to you. I will give Laura directions in preparing a report for the Board Members on the next meeting, including the presentation on the September 2007 meeting. Board Member Iverson - How can we do a pamphlet on the process to request permits. Chair Anderson - There is a check list available, but does not include any information on historical building, pre-1942 or a list of buildings to alert the owners is additional steps are necessary. Mr. Biggs - The City Counsel and Planning Director are reviewing the processes and a way to improve customer service. We can add to the Work Program to advise the public if additional steps are needed. Boar Member lrons - When the public gets to the front desk and/or meet with the Planner a check list and specific information about Historical buildings should be given to them. Boar Member Iverson - People find out much further down the road that they have a historical building. Chair Anderson - In the Work Program draft, there aren't timeline. Mr. Biggs - The information provided by AAPS is breakdown by faces and priorities; that is an example of what we should include in the Work Program. Chair Anderson - The listing in Work Program of priorities is correct, but no the faces. If work need to be generated at the staff level, I would recommend to form a committee that include staff, board members and individuals from AAPS and go in groups and start categorizing properties in a volunteer bases, if we can't get funding. Boar Member Iverson - We can find volunteers with the Historical Society and local American Institute Architects (AIA), like students. Mr. Buckle - The recommendations are related to Alameda Point, item 1, 2, 5 and 6 should be priority in Face 1. In George Guns' book he has a comment "standing in 1880", the first step is t… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-01-03 | 3 | are not available; it's necessary to go to the title records. About 15 - 20 years ago an analysis was completed by a Title Company; need to get our hands on that research, the documents were in Oakland office and now the research is in Alameda County. 7. WORKSHOP: 7-A. Historical and Cultural Resources Ordinance Workshop Mr. Biggs - The updated Historical Preservation Ordinance with include your comments is dated September 2006. We propose that the Board appoint a sub- committed and start a process to review and modify the Historical Preservation Ordinance, in order to do a better job defining an inventory by conducting a survey and researching at records in the City Hall. Chair Anderson - The underlined revisions refer to other cities Ordinance; when we started this process we talk about other historical places; we set time line to be completed by June 2008. Once the sub-committed has a solid establishment we can bring it to a formal HAB mtg. Jon, do you have other staff members helping you? Mr. Biggs - Right know I'm considering doing it on my own, carrying forward the experience I have from the City of Pacific Grove. The biggest task is defining inventory in Alameda that we want to protect, once we locate this documents we will identify them and protect the right properties. Demolish and penalties are going to be very difficult to deal with; we need to be very careful at the time we look at the part of the Ordinance; because it can be very expensive for the legal and code enforcement divisions. Board Member lrons - We had looked very intense at the penalties. Chair Anderson - There are several option and we need to make decisions. The other concern is the timing of the workshop. Mr. Biggs - We can accommodate it to your schedule. Board Member Iverson - Is fundamental to alert the public if they have a historical building. Vice Chair Miller - Is there a disclosure law in real state? Boar Member Iverson - Generally, it is disclosed if you have a historical building. Boar Member lrons - In our books there is a cu… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-01-03 | 4 | Board Member Iverson - It is a general disclosed written by attorneys and it the same wording for everybody. Chair Anderson - It goes back to definition, what constitute demolition, renovation, historical? The AAPS wrote a letter addressing certain items that we should consider for review. Chris do you want to go thru does items? Mr. Buckley - The main comment is that AAPS request to participate in the sub- committee and discussions. As a group AAPS is not yet prepare to make recommendations in how this issue should be handle. AAPS thinks that the guide residential design approached it's fine and in some ways it's better. The item 2, it is a strait forward to handle. Item 3: Altered properties in a way need the most help and attention. The study list is excluding properties with significant alterations and that is a problem with the list. Penalties, AAPS' position is that penalties need to really hurt and strong enough to discourage alterations. Also, if a contractor is working with out permit in Alameda, this needs to be reported to the Contract Business Bureau or banish the contractor from working in Alameda, it is an effective remedy. Item 6-B: AAPS' concern is that HAB often hasn't being giving adequate authority to take a look at the properties after a certificate of approval is issued for demolition. Chair Anderson - I will like to explore the idea, lets start Judith and I, setting a preliminary meeting with the staff in the next two weeks and then review it with AAPS and HAB. Board Member Iverson - What I will like to do is to go back and find the resource person who reviews things. Someone who has a different view can bring a lot to the discussion. Board Member lrons - Should we include AAPS? Chair Anderson - Not initially. Board Member Iverson - I will like to encourage to review the results of the meeting it in advance. Chair Anderson - I will like to be able to communicate the conclusion of the meeting to the Board for review immediately. Mr. Biggs - I think we can place it on your regular monthly agen… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-01-03 | 5 | 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Buckley - We mentioned before that is possible to replace wood window and it is relatively cheaper. We did a price survey a couple years age and I will e-mail it to you for comparison. 9. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Iron - It a big deal with the Brown Act, I am not clear on what we are allow to tell people. I will prefer to make it visual list that are really strict but in terms of weighting the impact in an applicant to be able to execute, the applicant may not understand all available methods of material; but I think it will useful if we have some example of product to help people understand and retain the historical integrity. I hope in the future I may be able to draw some diagram. Chair Anderson - My concern is that there is not a manufacture that does make wood windows like the ones in the Italian A House. Mr. Biggs - There are option on windows and the public needs to take time to educate themselves and not take only what someone is tells. Board Member lrons - The Planning Department has stronger guidelines regarding window replacements. Mr. Biggs - We try to make sure the applicant install the windows that are appropriate to the architecture. Chair Anderson - On December 13, I attended the Alameda Task Force meeting with regards to the developer process for Alameda Point. About 200 + members of the community attended, and it was well received. Another item: I visited an open house on Broadway; I was surprised that is not on the resource inventory list, this house was build in 1893, and it has so much qualification of a Victorian house. Mr. Biggs - Every property build before 1943 gets review if the owner wants to demolish 30% or more; that gets caught there. What it is less clear is, were it fit in the list of historic resource that the city has; if deserve some form of designation? We need to make sure that the list is complete and have properties that should be in it. Chair Anderson - One of the items during the discussion of the Ordinance thru AAPS is a proposal for t… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-01-03 | 6 | Mr. Biggs - Will check with Cathy Board Member Iverson - Is there any update on 1343 Feirnside and 500 Central? Mr. Biggs - We can look into that and get back to you. 10. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs - Just as a reminder that the Preservation Season is coming up and we will have an item on the next agenda to get a proclamation from the City Counsel. We are looking at the opportunity for grand; I am doing some research to see if we are able to apply for a grand with the National Indiamen Humanities. We are working in to getting the most recent copy of the Alameda Residential Design. Chair Anderson - I have one dated March 2005, is that the most recent one Chris? Mr. Buckley - You can download it from the city website. Chair Anderson - I notice that the last HAB meeting on the website is January 2007. 11. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Manager Minutes of January 3, 2008 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-01-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-02-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-02-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice-Chair Miller, and Board Member Iverson, lrons and Lynch - 5 ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Douglas Garrison, Supervising Planner/Secretary to HAB; Dora Mairena Intermediate Clerk/Recording Secretary; Simon Wolter, Planner I. MINUTES: Minutes for the meeting of December 6, 2007. Motion (Anderson)/Second (Miller) to approve as amended. Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion passed unanimously. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. SPECIAL REPORT: (4-A): Alameda Point Preservation Presentation. Phil Tagami presented the qualifications of California Capital Group, to participate as a developer with Sun Cal on the Alameda Point Development. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: (6-A) Certificate of Approval PLN07-0087 Applicant: Buestad Construction, 2531 Clement Avenue. The applicant requests approval to demolish an addition to a structure built in 1874 and listed on the Alameda Historic Study List. They also propose to relocate the remaining building to the southwest corner of the site, and replace all vinyl windows with wood windows. The site is located within a M-2, General Industrial zoning district. Minutes of February 7, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-02-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-02-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-02-07 | 2 | Ms. Simone Wolter presented the staff report for the 2531 Clement Avenue. Mr. Ken Carvalho from Buestad Construction, stated the goal is to move the historical structure and renovate it back to its original state as a two-room house. Mr. Chris Buckley from the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS), expressed his concern that other residential houses will be affected by zoning. Mr. Adam Garfinkle, an interested member of the public, disagreed with the development of a business building, stating that it takes away from preserving historical properties. Chair Anderson closed the public hearing and opened up board discussion. Chair Anderson asked if the zoning of the property is M-2, General Industrial (manufacturing); which Mr. Garrison confirmed. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Irons) to approve Item 6-A Certificate of Approval PLN07-0087 as amended (the amendments to the findings are incorporated into Resolution No. HAB 08-02). Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion passed unanimously. (6-B) Work Program Review and Discussion Motion: (Iverson)/Second (Anderson) to continue item to the meeting of March 6, 2008 Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion passed unanimously. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Buckley commented that the City could be more proactive in getting the Alameda Point buildings leased. He suggested that the City revisit the zoning for areas M-2 and C-M (Commercial-Manufacturing) that have a high concentration of historical buildings to reduce the 100 ft height limit. Mr. Garrison extended an invitation to the community charrette meeting in mid-March regarding the Park Street Design Studio development in the area. BOARD COMMENTS: Board Member Lynch communicated that she and Chair Anderson have been meeting with Jon Biggs on a weekly basis to work on the definition of terms. Board Member Lynch distributed the Historic Preservation Season schedule and Proclamation. Minutes of February 7, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-02-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-02-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-02-07 | 3 | STAFF COMMUNICATION: Mr. Garrison stated that the City began a project that involves re-zoning the Ranch House neighborhood - East End/ Fernside (across from Lincoln school). ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Douglas Garrison Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of February 7, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-02-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-03-06.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-03-06 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MARCH 6, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: Acting Chair lrons called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Board Members lrons, Iverson and Lynch - 3 ABSENT: Chair Anderson and Vice Chair Miller - 2 STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Supervising Planner/Secretary to HAB; Dora Mairena Intermediate Clerk/Recording Secretary; Simone Wolter, Planner I MINUTES: None AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None. SPECIAL REPORTS: None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. ACTION ITEMS: (6-A) Certificate of Approval PLN08-0054 - Peter Braun - 2841 Marina Drive. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for demolition of more than 30-percent of a single-family residence built in 1939. Demolition consists of a partial roof removal and replacement of the foundation. The second story will be expanded to cover the whole house. Building materials will be consistent with original elements of the structure. This property is not listed on the Historic Building Study List. The site is located within an R-1, One Family Residential Zoning District. (SW) Ms. Simone Wolter presented the staff report for the 2841 Marina Drive. Board Member Lynch asked the applicant if he had heard any complaints from the neighbors. Minutes of March 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-03-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-03-06.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-03-06 | 2 | Mr. Tom Squire, the applicant, responded that only the neighbor to the west of the property asked for a copy of the plans. Motion (lrons)/Second (Iverson) to approve Item 6-A Certificate of Approval PLN08-0054. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion passed unanimously. (6-B) Proclamation of Historic Preservation Month. Jon Biggs requested that the Board ask the City Council to proclaim a Historic Preservation Season. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Iverson) to accept the Draft Proclamation of the Historic Preservation Season to be presented to the City Council as amended. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion passed unanimously. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. BOARD COMMENTS: Board Member Lynch commented on the following items: A question regarding the City's Work/Live ordinance A reminder to the Board members about the sacred spaces walk on May 10, 2008 Discussion regarding co-sponsorship for Historic Preservation Season Mention of a book that she is working on with historian Woody Minor STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs informed the Board that the minutes for all 2007 HAB meetings have been posted on the City's web site. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of March 6, 2007 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting Page 2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-03-06.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-04-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-04-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, APRIL 3, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: Chair Anderson called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice Chair Miller, Board Members Lynch, lrons and Iverson - 5 ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Tony Ebster, Intermediate Clerk/Recording Secretary MINUTES: None AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None SPECIAL REPORT: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None ACTION ITEMS: (6-A) Historic Preservation Work Program Mr. Richard Rutter addressed the Board. He stated that the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS) is willing to help the Board implement the Work Program by providing resources such as money or people. The Board discussed the work program and felt that some minor changes needed to be made. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Miller) to adopt the Historic Preservation Work Program with changes. Minutes of April 3, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-04-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-04-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-04-03 | 2 | Ayes: 5; Noes: 0; Absent: 0. Motion passed unanimously. WORKSHOP: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch reported on Historic Preservation issues of relevance to the Historical Advisory Board. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:45 pm Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/ Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of April 3, 2008 2 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-04-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-05-01.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-05-01 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, MAY 1, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Chair Anderson, Vice Chair Miller, Board Members lrons, Iverson and Lynch ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Tony Ebster, Intermediate Clerk/Recording Secretary MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of January 3, 2008 Motion (lrons)/Second (Anderson) to accept the minutes Ayes: 4; Noes: 0 Abstain: 1 (Lynch) Motion passes Minutes from the meeting of February 7, 2008 Motion (Miller)/Second (Iverson) to accept the minutes with corrections Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion passes Minutes from the meeting of March 6, 2008 Motion (lons)/Second (Miller) to accept the minutes Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion passes Minutes from the meeting of April 3, 2008 Motion (Anderson)/Second (Miller) to accept the minutes with corrections Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion Passes AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Staff requested that item 7-A and item 7-B be continued to the meeting of June 5, 2008 Motion (Lynch)/Second (Anderson) to continue items 7-A and 7-B to the meeting of June 5, 2008 Ayes: 5; Noes: 0 Motion passes ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Minutes of May 1, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-05-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-05-01.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-05-01 | 2 | Mr. Christopher Buckley spoke to the corrected minutes not appearing on the City's website. He also commented on the Oral Communications section of the agenda being moved and suggested it be moved back to the end of the agenda. Mr. Biggs replied by saying that the department is attempting to achieve consistency between the agendas of the boards and commissions staffed by the Planning and Building Department. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None REGULAR ITEMS: The Board continued Items 7-A and 7-B to the meeting of June 5, 2008. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch reiterated that Historic Preservation Season is in full swing. She also mentioned the Kids and Queen Victoria event, and that Mr. Richard Rutter is leading a Sacred Spaces walk. She noted that there are a limited number of tickets available for the walk. Board Member Lynch also mentioned lack of recent efforts toward historic preservation at Alameda Point. Finally, she noted that the findings from the North of Lincoln study are now available. Chair Anderson reported on her work in conjunction with Ms. Lynch and Mr. Biggs regarding the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Board Member Miller said that he would not be able to attend the meeting of June 5, 2008. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff reported. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 7:33 pm. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board Minutes of May 1, 2008 2 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-05-01.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-06-05 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Vice Chair Miller, Board Members lrons, Iverson, and Lynch ABSENT: Chair Anderson STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/ Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician I/ Recording Secretary MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of May 1, 2008 Motion (lrons)/Second (Iverson) to approve the minutes with corrections Ayes; 4: Noes; 0; Absent: Chair Anderson Motion Carries AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Brendan Meyer addressed the Board regarding the July 3, 2008 Historical Advisory Board Meeting. He requested that the Board honor the meeting schedule posted on the City's website and hold the meeting on July 3, 2008. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: (7-A) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0035 - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to demolish more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of an historically designated residential building for the purpose of remodeling a previous addition and adding a front porch. The site is located at 1150 Bay Street within an R-1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. (DV) Staff requests that this item be continued to the meeting of August 7, 2008. Minutes of June 5, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-06-05 | 2 | Motion (Lynch)/Second (Iverson) to continue Item 7-A to the meeting of August 7, 2008 Ayes: 4; Noes 0: Absent 0 Motion Carries (7-B) Certificate of Approval for Alterations to a Historical Monument - PLN08-0185 - 1501 Buena Vista Avenue. The Applicant is proposing structural alterations, including minor changes to the building's exterior, for the rehabilitation of the Del Monte Building. Review and comment on findings regarding the consistence of the proposed alterations with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Restoration. The Del Monte Building is located within an M-2, General Industrial District. (JB) Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report for 1501 Buena Vista Avenue for consideration of the Certificate of Approval for exterior alterations for future uses of the Del Monte Building, which is an historic monument. Staff recommends approval of the application. Vice Chair Miller invited the architect to speak to the item. Mr. Michael Rockhold addressed the board regarding the Certificate of Approval and reviewed the phases of the rehabilitation process and spoke to the first steps to be taken in the first phase of the construction. He briefly talked about the historical status of the Del Monte Building. The Board requested that all the windows be reinstalled by a certain date and that all openings be water tight to prevent weather damage. The Board also asked for clarification regarding the sandblasting of the existing brick. Mr. Christopher Buckley was happy to see the project moving forward. He was surprised that the Board would be presented with only one phase without a status of the overall project. He expressed concern that the Board is being asked to make a decision without knowing how the project will turn out as a whole. He was concerned that this would be an "open ended" approval and suggested that the board set a date as to when the windows would be reinstalled. Mr. Stuart Rickard asked about the roofing material and wanted clarification regarding the solar panels. He also exp… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-06-05 | 3 | The Board agreed that sandblasting would not be done on any brick, masonry, and porous or sensitive surfaces. The Board also wanted to be clear that this approval is only good for the first phase of the construction project and any future approvals would have to come before the Historical Advisory Board. Board Member Lynch expressed concern with the grammatical errors in the conditions of approval. She said that the line that reads "Planning Director or their designate" should be "Planning Director or his or her designate". Board Member Iverson expressed concern that if the project does not proceed as planned, there is no language that obligates the architect to make the building watertight and wanted to include that in the conditions of approval. Mr. Rockhold offered to return to the Historical Advisory Board periodically to update the board on the progress of the construction of the project. Motion (Irons)/ Second (Iverson) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions. Ayes: 4; Noes 0; Absent: Chair Anderson (7-C) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0156 - 970 Pearl Street. The Applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a single-family residence built in 1937. Exterior alterations including additions and window replacement are also proposed. The site is located within and R- 1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. (LA) Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report for a Certificate of Approval for 970 Pearl Street. He gave a brief summary of the project. Staff recommends approval of the application with conditions. Mr. Tim Banuelos spoke to the project and gave a brief history of the current status of the project. He mentioned the condition of the house and pointed out the need for repairs due to dry rot and upgrades from outdated materials to more modern, efficient materials. Board Member Lynch expressed concern with condition number 4 and wanted clarification regarding the replacement of the windows. She also asked about the awning … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-06-05 | 4 | Mr. Jon Biggs clarified that the window muntins should be closer to the requirement and are a little on the thin side. Motion (Iverson)/ Second (Lynch) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions. Ayes: 4; Noes: 0; Absent: Chair Anderson Motion Carries (7-D) Study Session on the Carnegie Restoration and Preservation Project, Applicant: City of Alameda - 2264 Santa Clara Avenue & 1429 Oak Street (Former Children's Library) - Review and provide feedback on a proposed design for the connection between the Carnegie Library and the Children's Library. Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report for the Carnegie Restoration and Preservation Project and introduced the architects for the project. Ms. Rosemary Muller presented her PowerPoint presentation to the Historical Advisory Board to illustrate how the structures are going to be used and went through the basic concepts of the design for the connection between the Carnegie building and the former Children's library. She also gave a brief history of the Carnegie structure and pointed out that the architectural firm had decided to focus on a specific time period of significance to base the new designs on. She spoke to various elements that will be recreated. She also talked about many of the design elements and some of the materials that will be used. The presentation included many pictures and drawings of the finished project. Mr. Christopher Buckley asked about the original furnishings and if there was an inventory. He also asked about the external materials and the framing for the glass wall. He noted option three that showed a treatment that was similar to what was presented. He wanted to see material samples to get an idea of how it was going to look. He also asked about the west side and what materials are going to be used and what colors for the interior walls and connector will be. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: The Board asked about what projects are required to go before the Historical Advisory Board and how it is determined. They also asked who is responsible… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-06-05 | 5 | Mr. Christopher Buckley spoke to the work Board Member Lynch did regarding the list and expressed appreciation. He mentioned that Alameda Architecture Preservation Society is willing to help create and maintain the database. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Jon Biggs reported on the project at 3327 Fernside and the Streetlights Project on Buena Vista Avenue between Grand Street and Sherman Street, Encinal Avenue between Post Street and Fernside Boulevard, and Lincoln Avenue between Fifth Street and Constitution Way. ADJOURNMENT: 9:58 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of June 5, 2008 5 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-07-03.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-07-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, JULY 3, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:12 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Vice Chair Miller, Board Members Iverson and Lynch ABSENT: Board Member lrons STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician/Recording Secretary; Laura Ajello, Planner I MINUTES: None AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: (7-A) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0244 - 1327 Sherman Street. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for demolition of more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a single-family residence built in 1905. Exterior alterations including a 123 square foot addition, roofline changes, and new and replacement windows are also proposed. The site is located within an R-1 One-Family Residence Zoning District. Ms. Laura Ajello presented the staff report and various aspects of the project. Staff recommended that the Board refer the project back to the architect for redesign. Mr. Jon Biggs provided an overview of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and how this project fit into that review process. He also explained how exemptions to Minutes of July 3, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-07-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-07-03.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-07-03 | 2 | CEQA review were considered and why the project as proposed, did not qualify for an exemption. The Board asked about the timeline of redesigning project and when it would be back in front of the Board. They also asked about the options for the project and how they should go about determining the outcome of the decision. Ms. Dorothy Frantz, property owner, addressed the Board. Mr. Brendan Meyer contractor for the project, addressed the Board. He gave a brief history of the permit process. The Board discussed the new drawings submitted by the applicant, but stated they needed more time to consider them. After discussing concerns with the design issues, they concluded that the project needed to be referred back to the designer for revisions. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Iverson) to refer the project back to the applicants/architect and continue the item to the meeting of August 7, 2008. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: lrons Motion Carries BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch reminded the board of the report she provided at the June 5, 2008 meeting. She noted that fifty buildings were not on the Historic Building Study List, but should be. Vice Chair Miller expressed concern regarding a project at 700 Paru Street and the removal of a roof and the addition of a 4th floor. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Staff reported on the upcoming National Preservation Conference, its date and location. ADJOURNMENT: 8:10 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary, Historical Advisory Board Minutes of July 3, 2008 2 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-07-03.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-08-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, AUGUST 7, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Vice Chair Miller, Board Members lrons and Lynch ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Doug Vu, Planner III; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician I/Recording Secretary MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of June 5, 2008 Motion (Lynch)/Second (Irons) to Approve with changes Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: None Motion Carries Minutes from the meeting of July 3, 2008 Motion (lrons)/Second (Lynch) to Approve with changes Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion Carries AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Stuart Ricard addressed the Board regarding the Del Monte building. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: (7-A) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0244 - 1327 Sherman Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for demolition of more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a single-family residence built in 1905. Exterior alterations including a 123 square foot addition, roofline changes, as well as new and replacement windows. Minutes of August 7, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-08-07 | 2 | Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report and noted the changes made to the project in response to Board comments. Board Member Lynch reminded the Board of the gable issue. Board Member lrons commended the designer and applicants for their flexibility. Motion (Lynch)/ Second (Miller) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion carries. (7-B) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0035 - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated residential building for the purpose of remodeling a previous addition and adding a front porch. Mr. Doug Vu presented the staff report. Board Member Lynch asked if there were any pictures from the 1979 survey indicating what the building looked like at the time. Board Member lrons asked about the front yard setback. Vice Chair Miller opened the public comment. Mr. Craig Coombs, representing the property owners, addressed the Board regarding the design and gave some history of the project and its progression. Mr. Jerry Wilkins, with Custom Kitchens, addressed the Board. He gave a brief history of the work his company has done and shared some of his experiences with remodeling homes around the Bay Area. Mr. Robert Ramos addressed the Board regarding the setback of the porch and stated that it goes beyond the seven feet allowed. He expressed concern regarding the view from his house and said it would be obstructed if the project is built as designed. Mr. Jeff Oster addressed the Board and said that he feels that the property owners should be able to do what they want with their properties. However, he felt that the preservation of this neighborhood block is necessary. He also stated that he feels this project may set an undesirable precedent. Mr. Christopher Buckley with the Alameda Architecture Preservation Society addressed the Board regarding the front setbacks and stated that he feels their uniformity is what makes the neighborhood unique. Minut… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-08-07 | 3 | Board Member Lynch said that it was an exciting proposal but was concerned about the precedent that would be set if the porch was built as proposed. She asked about alternatives to the design of the porch. Mr. Vu replied said that they had talked about alternative designs and could pursue a design that was similar to other houses in the neighborhood. Board Member lrons pointed out that there were drawings in the supplemental report that illustrate other options. He read from the report including the Secretary of Interior's standards regarding the construction of new additions. He also discussed the front yard setbacks. Vice Chair Miller expressed concern with the precedent that would be set if the project is built as proposed. Board Member lrons asked about the encroachment into the side yard and if there were zoning issues involved. Mr. Vu replied that the applicant would need a variance to allow the addition to encroach into the setback. Mr. Woody Minor asked how the changes were reviewed under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). He said as much information should be obtained as possible to make a sound judgment with regards to the remodel. Mr. Minor noted that out the building permit ledger book was available in the Planning & Building Department and that this book may contain more information on the structure. Mr. Biggs clarified CEQA review, and suggested that the Board could refer the project back to the applicants to obtain more information on the history of the structure and to redesign the project. Board Member Lynch stated that she believes there is not enough information to make a decision and that the design needs to be addressed. Motion (Lynch)/Second (Miller) to refer the project back to the applicant to restudy the design and allow staff to obtain more information on the history of the structure and continue the item to the meeting of September 4, 2008. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion carries. (7-C) PLN08-0185 - 1501 Buena Vista Avenue. The applicant proposes structural alterations,… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-08-07 | 4 | Mr. Biggs presented the staff report. Board Member Lynch inquired about the number of rooms the hotel would have. She also asked about material and color samples for the proposed alterations, and if they would go to the Board. Mr. Michael Rockhold, architect, presented the project to the Board. Board Member Lynch asked about the letters that Mr. Rockhold mentioned regarding the status of the property, including its listing as a federal historic monument. Mr. Steve O'Brien, architect, gave a presentation about the proposed structural modifications. Ms. Eliza Skaggs, historic preservation consultant, described some of the history of the Del Monte property. Ms. Erin McKlosky, historic preservation consultant, discussed some of the existing conditions and the preservation work that would be done. Mr. O'Brien talked about some of the interior elements of the design proposal. He also talked about the openings and the awning over the loading dock. Board Member Miller asked about the awning and the material that is being proposed. Mr. O'Brien offered to provide a sample of the awning material. Mr. Rockhold addressed the letters that Board Member Lynch asked about. He clarified the stages that the project must go through and noted that they are through the second stage. Board Member lrons asked about the solar panels and how they are integrated into the roof. He also expressed concern regarding the heating and cooling of the big, open space. Board Member Lynch asked if the Board could receive updates on the project and what they were drilling for. Mr. Rockhold said that he would be glad to update the Board as they wish. Mr. Woody Minor expressed his confusion regarding the certification process. He reiterated that this site is one of the last historic industrial buildings left in Alameda. He encouraged the Board to scrutinize the project as much as possible. Minutes of August 7, 2008 4 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-08-07 | 5 | Mr. Barbara Kerr expressed her concern with the project and stated that it does not conform to the Northern Waterfront General Plan Amendment. She also expressed concern with the landscaping, noting that it needs to conform to the City's General Plan. Mr. Christopher Buckley commended the project and expressed excitement that it is moving forward. He also addressed a few points in the letter the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society sent to the Board regarding elements of the design including: Retention of the corrugated metal canopies Maintenance of industrial sash look in new ground floor windows Recessing the ground floor windows Mr. Anthony Jones addressed the Board and expressed excitement about the building being rehabilitated. He asked about the supermarket and what kind of market it is going to be. He also asked if the hotel is going to be economically sustainable. Vice Chair Miller expressed his concern with how the windows would be installed. Ms. Barbara Kerr expressed her concern with the parking and the parcel on the corner of Buena Vista and Sherman and the ownership and transfer of the parcel. Mr. Jon Biggs clarified questions regarding the parcel The Board expressed some concerns with the design elements and how they would to be implemented. They asked questions concerning the new windows, glass awning and the maintenance of the awning. The Board asked how the developers had decided on the materials that they are proposing to use. The design team replied by saying that the decisions were made based on the practicality of the application and how it would be maintained. They were also given input by federal and state agencies on how to incorporate the new design elements. The Board clarified that they are supposed to look at the entire site and not just the building. They would like to see plans for signage, landscape, lighting and other aspects of the project, such as samples of the materials to be used. Board Member Lynch expressed her concern regarding how the renovation would affect the surr… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-08-07 | 6 | Motion (Irons)/ Second (Lynch) to approve the Certificate of Approval based on the findings suggested by staff and subject to the following special conditions in addition to the other conditions in the resolution of approval for this project: Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion Carries Special Conditions - Materials and features are to come back to the Historical Advisory Board for review and approval rather than staff. The project must be compliant with the Northern Waterfront General Plan. The landscape plan for the Del Monte Site must come back to the Historical Advisory Board for approval. The exterior lighting plan for the Del Monte Site must come back to the Historical Advisory Board for approval. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board Member Lynch mentioned there would be a lecture regarding the Del Monte building on Thursday, September 25, 2008 as part of the 2008 Alameda Museum Lecture Series. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs stated the Board had been provided a copy of their rules and procedures. He also mentioned that there will be workshop on heritage tourism in Monterey on September 19, 2008. ADJOURNMENT: 10:49 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary Historical Advisory Board Minutes of August 7, 2008 6 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-08-07.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:05 ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Vice Chair Miller, Board Members lrons and Lynch ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Doug Garrison, Supervising Planner; Doug Vu, Planner III; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician I/Recording Secretary MINUTES: None AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: Board Member lrons suggested changing the order of the agenda to avoid making members of the public wait to hear the Bay Street item. The Board agreed to switch items. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None CONSENT ITEMS: (7-A.) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0390 - 1356 Broadway. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval for the removal of one Coast live oak tree (Quercus agrifolia) located in the rear side yard of the property. The tree is promoting hazardous conditions due to its proximity to the house. The site is located within an R- 4, Neighborhood Residential District. (DV) Motion (Lynch)Second (Irons) to approve the Certificate of Approval. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0 Motion passes. Minutes of September 4, 2008 1 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 2 | REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: (8-B.) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0035 - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated residential building for the purpose of remodeling a previous addition and adding a front porch. (DV) Continued from the meeting of August 7, 2008. Mr. Doug Vu presented the staff report. Board Member Lynch asked if the new drawing could be explained for clarification. Mr. Jon Biggs pointed out that two letters were received the day of the meeting. Mr. Craig Coombs stated that he was available to answer any questions regarding the project at 1150 Bay Street. Board Member Lynch asked about how the pergola was designed and how the drawings were supposed to be looked at. Mr. Coombs clarified the drawings and recapped part of the discussion from the previous meeting. He also clarified that the design was altered to meet the proper requirements for preservation and construction. He clarified elements of the design that were in question. Mr. Bob Woolley addressed the board. He submitted copies of documents from the Secretary of Interior's website for the treatment of historic structures. He read from the sections of the guidelines that address the setting, emphasizing the setbacks. Ms. Sally Damsen addressed the board. She read a letter on her neighbor's behalf. While the letter talked about several aspects of the project, one aspect, the front porch, will extend out past the property line as will its roof. This may cause access problems for emergency responders such as fire and police. Ms. Dee Keltner addressed the board. She wanted to clear up a point of confusion, which was that the neighbors had not met with the applicants. The applicants had an open house for the neighbors to review the design and plans. The neighbors encouraged the applicants to reduce the porch extension so it does not protrude as far into the front yard. She then read from her letter, which was signed by several neighbors. The lette… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 3 | Mr. Jerry Wilkins responded by saying that the Sanborn map that Mr. Buckley submitted was over 60 years old and may not be entirely accurate. He clarified that he was the contractor for the Emerson project. Ms. Keltner asked if the applicants had any documentation that would help the neighbors get a better idea of the property lines and measurements. Board Member Lynch asked some questions about the design. She mentioned some of the conversation from the previous meeting. She wanted to see what they were currently looking at and how it compared to what was being reviewed at the last meeting. She wondered if the neighbors had seen the updated plans and designs. She also complimented the people who were commenting on the standards. Board Member lrons pointed out the protrusion of the roof and wanted to know what the minimum setback was for front yards. Board Member Lynch asked about the porch and why they replaced the porch with a pergola instead of getting rid of it all together. She also asked if they had more accurate information regarding the Sanborn map. Mr. Coombs replied by saying that the porch is in an integral part of making the design work as a whole. He also had pictures that he hoped would clarify the design and setting of the neighborhood. He stated that their measurements to property lines were more accurate than the Sanborn maps and gave a more realistic interpretation of the setting. Acting Chair Miller expressed some concerns with the project. He stated that one of the problems is that the house was designed without a front porch and the protrusion of the roof changes the streetscape and sets a dangerous precedent. It changes the "setting" of the property. He feels that the porch is not a necessary part of the house. Board Member Lynch agreed with Mr. Miller in that she feels that setting a precedent is not a good by-product of approval of the project. Board Member lrons stated that he felt that there was more to the project than just the design. There were issues regarding the history of the stru… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 4 | Mr. lrons brought up the side set back of 5 feet. His understanding of the ordinance was that it negates the need for a variance. Mr. Vu clarified that the ordinance only applies to walled additions. This porch is not considered a "walled" addition. Mr. Biggs pointed out that the board had alternatives to denying the project. Mr. Coombs said that they are looking for guidance and are willing to compromise to get the board to approve the project. He asked for a continuance. The board discussed the other options to denying the project. The board agreed to refer the project back to the applicant for further revisions to the front porch. Motion (lrons)/Second (Lynch) to continue the application for the Certificate of Approval for 1150 Bay Street to the meeting of October 2, 2008. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0 Motion carries (8-A.) Park Street North of Lincoln Strategic Plan. The Historical Advisory Board will be reviewing and commenting on the Park Street North of Lincoln Strategic Plan. The Plan area includes Park Street from Lincoln Avenue to the Park Street Bridge and one block on either side of Park Street. The Park Street commercial district, north of Lincoln Avenue, is an area in transition due to the recent loss of two car dealerships and the imminent loss of a third dealership. The Plan includes preliminary urban design concepts for this district and strategies for redeveloping the district. The Plan will provide a basis for future actions by the City of Alameda, which may include zoning and General Plan amendments, and establishing design standards for this area. (DG) Mr. Doug Garrison presented the Park Street North of Lincoln Strategic Plan. The plan includes several ideas and proposals for the area of Park Street from Lincoln Avenue to the estuary and one block in either direction from Park Street. The proposals include redevelopment of many of the sites located within the area. This is a broad vision of the future and potential for the "Gateway" area. The plan includes strategies, visions, projections and potential u… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 5 | needed on the area's buildings; residential character needs to be maintained; lower the height limit of new buildings. Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the board. He reminded the board of a letter that was sent by the AAPS. He suggested that some of the language in the plan be changed. He referred to one of the structures on Park Street and suggested that it could be preserved, as it's an opportunity. Mr. Charles Howell addressed the board. He agrees with the recommendations made by Mr. Buckley and Mr. Rutter. Board Member Lynch asked about previous comments and how they will know what they are and if they have been included. Mr. Eric Fonstein replied by saying that all comments will be included in the report that is to be presented to the Planning Board and City Council in future meetings. Board Member Lynch mentioned that the list of historic buildings is incomplete and needs to be updated. Mr. Biggs clarified that they are not to be making corrections to the plan, simply providing comments and suggestions. Board Member Lynch expressed appreciation for all the work that has been done and wanted to make sure that many of the historic buildings are protected. She also expressed concern with the 100-foot height limit and feels that the zoning regulations should be revisited to lower the height limit. (8-C.) PLN08-0400 - 2264 Santa Clara Avenue, (Carnegie Library) and 1429 Oak Street (Foster House). Applicant is proposing the rehabilitation, exterior alterations, and an addition that will connect the Carnegie Library to the Foster House. The addition will contain an elevator plus ramps and stairs that provide access to the floor levels of the two buildings. The proposal includes moving the Foster House to provide the necessary space for the proposed addition. Approval requires a finding that the project is Categorically Exempt from State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15331 - Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation - Rehabilitation projects consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatme… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf,6 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-09-04 | 6 | Mr. Richard Rutter addressed the board. He expressed concern about the glass floors and the link between the two buildings. He feels that it is trying to hard and needs to be simplified; the architecture should be softened down a bit. Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the board. He stated that he is excited about the project and thinks that the design is good. He expressed concern with the resolution and that it has no conditions requiring the use of certain materials or colors. He also expressed concern about the librarian stairway and feels it should be kept and feels that the pipe rails be revisited. He liked the interior layout and likes that the old librarian desk is going to be preserved. The board expressed that they like the design and appreciate that the architect seems to be creating the design with the historical aspects in mind. They like the link between the two buildings and feel that it is more of a connector instead of a new structure. They also said that they would like to see a sample board, lighting fixtures, urn design, and included as a condition that the colors and materials come before the board for review and approval. Motion (Lynch)/ Second (Miller) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions Ayes: 3; Noes: 0 Motion carries. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: None STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs informed the board about the Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA) meeting that was scheduled. ADJOURNMENT: 10:12 Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary Historical Advisory Board Minutes of September 4, 2008 6 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-09-04.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf,1 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-10-02 | 1 | MINUTES OF HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, OCTOBER 2, 2008 COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Acting Chair Miller, Board Members lrons and Lynch ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jon Biggs, Planning Services Manager/Secretary to the Historical Advisory Board; Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager; Doug Vu, Planner III; Tony Ebster, Permit Technician I/Recording Secretary MINUTES: Minutes from the meeting of August 7, 2008 Motion (Lynch)/Second (Miller) to approve the minutes with changes Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 0 Motion Carries Ms. Barbara Kerr addressed the board expressing concern that the minutes were not complete because they did not contain the added conditions of approval for the Del Monte restoration project that were created at the Historical Advisory Board meeting of September 4, 2008. She wanted to see the conditions added in the minutes for the record and wanted to verify that the conditions were entered in exactly as they were stated at the September 4, 2008 Historical Advisory Board meeting. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Ms. Barbara Kerr addressed the board regarding the transportation element and the Alameda Point Plan. She is concerned that the proposals will not address the potential transportation problems. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 1 Minutes of October 2, 2008 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf,2 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-10-02 | 2 | (7-A) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0035 - 1150 Bay Street. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to alter more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a historically designated residential building for the purpose of remodeling a previous addition and adding a front porch. (DV) (Continued from the meeting of September 4, 2008.) Mr. Doug Vu presented the staff report. Mr. Craig Coombs addressed the board. He reiterated the discussion from the Historical Advisory Board meeting of September 4, 2008 and that the design adheres to the Secretary of Interior's Guidelines. He also reminded the board that the project is going to restore the structure and its historical elements. Mr. Robert Mackenson addressed the board. He gave a brief history of his experience and stated that the design is in line with the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Guidelines. He pointed out several features in the neighborhood, such as the setbacks and the landscaping, and suggested the design of the front porch will not protrude excessively into the front yard setback relative to the other houses in the neighborhood. Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the board. He felt that this item has gone on too long and recommended that the board make a decision. He thinks that the board should either approve the project without the front porch or deny the project. Mr. Jerry Wilkins addressed the board. He stated that this project should be approved because it will benefit the neighborhood and the City. He also pointed out that the proposed work follows the guidelines and requirements of the City of Alameda and the Secretary of the Interior. Ms. Linda McKenna addressed the board. She mentioned some of the other projects she has worked on and stated that this project will restore the house to its original design and will be beneficial for the neighborhood. She also stated that it follows the guidelines and requirements. Ms. Dee Keltner addressed the board. She reviewed the plans with the applicants and wondered why the owners h… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf,3 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-10-02 | 3 | their homes instead of rehabilitating a structure or they do work without permits. She asked that the board approve the project. Mr. Eric Jackson addressed the board. He stated that the remodel will improve the structure, which ultimately helps the neighborhood. He also said that the rehabilitation will improve the house structurally and will prolong its useful life. The meeting was adjourned and reconvened in Council Chambers. The public comment was closed. Board Member Lynch had questions for Mr. Mackenson. She asked about the difference between a terrace and a porch. Mr. Mackenson replied by saying that the porch will be very narrow. Porches provide covering and trellises are more open allowing more sunlight to come into the area and structure. He also spoke to some of the windows and doors and that they were altered in a way that isn't in character with the structure. He pointed out that French doors are very common in modern remodels and the doors will be in character with the windows and house. Board Member Lynch feels that they have been struggling with this project but she understands it better. She is inclined to change her mind regarding the project. Board Member lrons pointed out that the building in the Architecture and Historic guide is similar to the project, which makes him feel more comfortable with the project. Mr. Biggs clarified that staff's recommendation is to approve the project after reviewing and discussing the revised plans and drawings. Acting Chair Miller likes the project except for the porch. He feels that the project still doesn't address some of the issues and still doesn't meet some of the standards and requirements. He is concerned with the proposed setback of the porch and its visual impact. He still objects to the porch and he feels that it goes way beyond restoration and is more of a modification to the house. Motion (Irons) / Second (Lynch) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions. Ayes: 2; Noes: 1 Motion Carries (7-B). Review and Comment on SunCal's Preliminary … | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf,4 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-10-02 | 4 | of a map and photos of some of the structures in the historic district of the former Navy base. He wished to thank SunCal for preserving some of the structures that were originally slated for demolition. Ms. Birgitt Evans addressed the board. She stated that the goal of the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society is to preserve enough of Alameda Point for future generations to be able to get an idea of Alameda's history. Mr. Richard Rutter addressed the board. He is worried that some of the historic buildings are unoccupied and are being neglected. He also expressed concern with vandalism issues. Ms. Elizabeth Krase addressed the board. She reminded the Board that the former naval air station is an historic place. She pointed out several buildings and how significant they are from an historical perspective. She also wants enough of the former base to be preserved to show how significant the City of Alameda's role was in World War II. Mr. Bill Smith addressed the board. He talked about various reuses and other possibilities for Alameda Point. He would like to see more businesses invest in the former naval station. Ms. Patty Jacobs addressed the board representing the Greater Alameda Business Association. She wanted to make sure that the Neptune Beach Museum would continue to have use of the building they are currently in. The public comment was closed. Board Member Lynch commented on Ms. Krase's point regarding some of the structures that were not on the list for preservation. Mr. Phil Tagami replied by saying that they might not agree on all the buildings that should be kept for reuse or preservation. However, they need to do what is best for the overall project and instead of considering each individual building, they need to keep the whole project moving forward on schedule so that it stays economically feasible. Mr. Tagami and Mr. Kelliher gave a PowerPoint presentation of their preliminary concept plan for Alameda Point. The presentation addressed several aspects of the development, such as housing, open s… | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf |
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf,5 | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-10-02 | 5 | Acting Chair Miller asked about Measure X on the upcoming ballot and where it came from. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Biggs reminded the board of the streetlight replacement project and that it would be scheduled for consideration at a future meeting. Acting Chair Miller asked if there had been any applicants for appointment to the Historical Advisory Board. ADJOURNMENT: 9:34 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by: Jon Biggs Planning Services Manager/Secretary, Historical Advisory Board 5 Minutes of October 2, 2008 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-10-02.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );