pages: HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf, 3
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
HistoricalAdvisoryBoard | 2008-06-05 | 3 | The Board agreed that sandblasting would not be done on any brick, masonry, and porous or sensitive surfaces. The Board also wanted to be clear that this approval is only good for the first phase of the construction project and any future approvals would have to come before the Historical Advisory Board. Board Member Lynch expressed concern with the grammatical errors in the conditions of approval. She said that the line that reads "Planning Director or their designate" should be "Planning Director or his or her designate". Board Member Iverson expressed concern that if the project does not proceed as planned, there is no language that obligates the architect to make the building watertight and wanted to include that in the conditions of approval. Mr. Rockhold offered to return to the Historical Advisory Board periodically to update the board on the progress of the construction of the project. Motion (Irons)/ Second (Iverson) to approve the Certificate of Approval with conditions. Ayes: 4; Noes 0; Absent: Chair Anderson (7-C) Certificate of Approval - PLN08-0156 - 970 Pearl Street. The Applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of more than thirty percent (30%) of the value of a single-family residence built in 1937. Exterior alterations including additions and window replacement are also proposed. The site is located within and R- 1, One-Family Residence Zoning District. (LA) Mr. Jon Biggs presented the staff report for a Certificate of Approval for 970 Pearl Street. He gave a brief summary of the project. Staff recommends approval of the application with conditions. Mr. Tim Banuelos spoke to the project and gave a brief history of the current status of the project. He mentioned the condition of the house and pointed out the need for repairs due to dry rot and upgrades from outdated materials to more modern, efficient materials. Board Member Lynch expressed concern with condition number 4 and wanted clarification regarding the replacement of the windows. She also asked about the awning and what was going to happen with it. Mr. Christopher Buckley addressed the windows and the muntins. His concern was with the projection of the muntins and that it should project out 3/8 of an inch from the glass surface and it was difficult to tell if it did, and stated that it should be consistent with the design review guidelines. Minutes of June 5, 2008 3 Regular Historical Advisory Board Meeting | HistoricalAdvisoryBoard/2008-06-05.pdf |