pages
18,746 rows sorted by date descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body, date (date)
Link | body | date ▲ | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf,1 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES OF THE MAYOR'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY PANEL REGULAR MEETING OF THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2019 CONFERENCE ROOM 391, CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 6:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson David Mik called the meeting to order at approximately 6:03pm. 1-A. Roll Call Present: Gia Schneider, Tim Karas, Mike Rose, David Mik, Adam Elsesser, Debi Stebbins, Brock Grunt, Madlen Saddik (via teleconference), Warren DeSouza. Absent: Remy Monteko (excused). Lois Butler (secretary) and Eric Fonstein are present as staff to the Commission. 1-B. Panel Introductions and Introduction of City Manager Tim Karas - President at College of Alameda, Gia Schneider - President and CEO of Natel Energy, David Mik - Power Engineering Construction, Adam Elsesser - Chairman and CEO at Penumbra, Brock Grunt - Operations Manager for McGuire and Hester, Debi Stebbins - Executive Director of City of Alameda Health Care District, Madlen Saddik - President and CEO of Alameda Chamber of Commerce, Michael Rose - "Mad Scientist" at Semifreddi's Bakery, Warren DeSouza - CFO at Sila Nanotechnologies, Eric Levitt - City Manager. 1-C. Welcome to New Members and Brief Review of Panel History and Purpose. Key points: purpose is to improve business climate, and provide strategic policy and tactical advice for business attraction and retention, ambassadors to potential businesses, network, advise on policy issues, and to report key issues and support special projects/requests from City Council for a variety of industries. Meets 1-2x/yr as needed. Members serve a two-year term. 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC None. 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 4-A. 2019-7520 Discuss and Provide Guidance for a Citywide Economic Development Branding Campaign Staff Member Butler presented staff report on developing a Citywide Economic Development Branding campaign. Key points: logo outdated; need for cohesive overall branding messages; requesting input on important points for branding RFP to be submitted to City Council; business parks … | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf,2 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 2 | Minutes of the Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel Regular Meeting Thursday, December 5, 2019 business districts), request that Panel advise on general city branding vs. economic development-focused branding. Speaker Joe Ernst with Harbor Bay Business Park. Key points: history of park; rebranding process included identifying target market (STEM, hard-tech, S.SFO companies), location's key amenities, capturing key message (interviewed tenants) "in an important place doing important work"; redeveloping logo, aim to produce focused 12-mo campaign, and correct challenges of park (transportation). Clarifying questions: focus of campaign - brokers and CEOs (facilitators and decision makers). Demonstrate key assets - space, modern facilities, and improved transportation. Speakers Dan McGill and David Ferrell with Marina Village. Key Points: rebranding to focus on research, Life-Science and innovation, collaborative "University feel"; transportation challenges (identifying and supporting alternatives to tunnel); rebranding aims are to focus on plentiful space, collaborating w/ other businesses, increasing container amenities (food/coffee like Bay Meadows), and invest in tenant base engagement and retention (kayaks, gym, mixers, etc). Discussion. Key points: Branding purpose to represent business parks, municipality, tourism, small business and retail businesses in scope of branding; RFP Ideas/Suggestions: develop tags/key words for RFP so that RFP proposals can be properly assessed and to guide branding process, include in branding RFP (duration of contract, be specific in type of branding consultants/agencies- - general vs. specialized, clarify scope of RFP (overall city vs. variety of specific segments), specify who target audience is (branding for business, hospitality, and community all very different); good branding consultant will evoke key words; specify branding focus (living, working, hospitality/tourism, etc); identify metrics for quantifying successful branding, identify channels of distribution (broch… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf,3 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 3 | Minutes of the Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel Regular Meeting Thursday, December 5, 2019 Naval Base feel - authenticity that is attractive, approachability of community, ribbon cuttings for new businesses, and assistance w/ maintenance issues. Logo: anchor perceived as logo although not, Logo ideas - variety of icons with shared theme (i.e. color) allowing for departmental differentiation but shared overall brand. Staff Member Butler summary: Harbor Bay Business Park rebranding appealing: inspiration for City's branding process, RFP must have good metrics to measure successful branding, where innovation meets tradition, "come to work, stay to live", can have foundational/overall (business, residents, visitors = overall branding) idea with separate ideas branching off (like economic development), and full concierge service. 4-B. 2019-7521 Progress Report on the Implementation of the Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) Staff Member Fonstein presented staff report addressing the progress report on items identified in the 5-10 yr roadmap for business attraction/retention/workforce development to support Life Sciences, Clean/Green/High Tech, Blue Tech/Marine, Tourism/Hospitality, Artists/Small Manufacturers, Transportation, Housing, Workforce Development, City Services/Policy. Commissioners had no clarifying questions. Discussion: pedestrian and bicycle bridge between Alameda and Oakland (Jack London) still in conceptual phase; the City's Vision-Zero pedestrian and bicyclist safety initiative, the benefits of small business Saturday, City Manager Eric Levitt highlighted unique challenges of small businesses and restaurants adjusting to the increase in minimum wage and requested input from EDAP on how to support businesses (to be agendized for next meeting), Madlen advised EDAP of small business networking event, Cocktails and Commerce, on April 30, and of Junior Chamber activities where businesses are invited to participate. 4-C. 2019-7522 Election of Officers Staff Member Butler asked for nominati… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf,4 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 4 | Minutes of the Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel Regular Meeting Thursday, December 5, 2019 7. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Mik adjourned the meeting at approximately 8:08pm. Respectfully submitted, Lois Butler, Economic Development Manager Secretary Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel 4 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2019-12-05.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,1 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 1 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY PANEL WEDNESDAY JULY 20, 2016 1. CALL TO ORDER: 6:13 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Chubb, Elsesser, Grunt, Laguerre (arrived at 6:17), Mik, Monteko, Winters. Absent: Panlasigui, Sorensen 2. MINUTES: City of Alameda's Development Manager, Eric Fonstein, stated that this is the initial meeting of the panel. There are no minutes of previous meetings. 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS--PUBLIC: None 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None 5. NEW BUSINESS ITEMS: 5-A. Welcome and Introductions Mayor Trish Herrera Spencer welcomed the Advisory Panel to its first meeting. Each Panel member made introductions. Erik Chubb, representing high-tech industries, works for Makani Power/Google X, which builds a new kind of wind turbine. He formerly worked for Ford Motor Company. Adam Elsesser, CEO and President of Penumbra, a medical device company in Harbor Bay, with approximately 1,400 employee. Brock Grunt, Area Manager for McGuire and Hester, a civic engineering contractor. McGuire and Hester are about to move into its recently built offices in Harbor Bay. Jowel Laguerre, Chancellor at Peralta Community College District. He oversees the entire district, which includes four community colleges. The District started a new unit for workforce development to partner directly with businesses to ensure that the colleges provide the right kind of support for career development. David Mik, co-owner of Power Engineering, a contractor in the marine construction industry, located at Alameda Point. Remy Monteko, asset manager for Jamestown Properties, which owns the South Shore Shopping Center. She has a background in urban planning and worked in real estate economics consulting before joining Jamestown. Lance Winters, owner of St. George Spirits, at Alameda Point, anchor for Spirits Alley Draft Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 9 July 20, 2016 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,2 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 2 | 5-B Overview of Economic Development Advisory Panel's Proposed Role and Activities. Economic Development Manager Lois Butler provided a brief overview. The purpose of the Advisory Panel is to advise the City Council and staff on important economic development issues and initiatives. The City may ask individual panel members to help with specific, high-leve business attraction or retention activities related to his or her industry sector. This may include such activities as talking with an important business considering relocating to Alameda. 5-C Review Rules and Procedures Ms. Butler introduced the item. The staff report and attachment can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2781414&GUID=15CD7565- C4B1-4F4F-85D9-31ADDEBA4138&Options=&Search= Ms. Butler recommended proceeding with the rest of the agenda and after the Chair and Vice Chair are elected, revisit the draft Rules and Procedures, consider any revisions, and formally adopt the Rules and Procedures. Panel member Laguerre asked for clarification of which sector he represents. Ms. Butler said workforce development. Panel member Monteko asked about the frequency of the meetings. Ms. Butler said normally the Panel will meet at least once per year. However, this year the City will be asking the Panel to have two or three additional meetings to assist with the preparation of the citywide Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP). 5-D City Attorney's Office to Provide Instructions on Compliance with the Brown Act and the Sunshine Ordinance - Senior Assistant City Attorney Farimah Brown gave a briefing on the Brown Act and the Sunshine Ordinance. Panel member Mik asked for clarification regarding the prohibition on emailing one another about the business that they are doing. Ms. Brown answered that outside of the public meeting, if a majority of the panel emails one another, they are essentially conducting a meeting, which is prohibited by the Brown Act. Panel member Grunt asked if this is prohibited even if the email gets forwarde… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,3 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 3 | Ms. Brown said yes, even if there was no intention for this to happen. The intention is irrelevant. It is easy to lose control of the email. Panel member Winters inquired if these prohibitions are also for looking for information from other board members and not planning to discuss any ongoing strategy or issue before the Panel. Ms. Brown answer yes, this is a problem area. Panel member Winters commented that this is going to be a slow process. Ms. Brown agreed that it is slow, but the intent is for the public to be part of the process. The greater benefit is public participation. Panel member Elsesser brought up the subject of telephone conversations. Ms. Brown stated that a quorum cannot be part of a conference call. Also, if one member calls the next person and shares information from the previous call, this is a serial conversation and is prohibited. Panel member Elsesser asked even if the Panel member is just looking for information? Ms. Brown said yes. Mr. Fonstein asked if they can direct their information request to staff, who can email a response to the entire Panel. Ms. Brown answered that this may be the way to do it, or the item can be agendized for a future meeting. Panel member Elsesser raised the scenario of running into each other by chance, and economic development issues come up during casual conversation. Ms. Brown responded that small talk and social gatherings are okay. The problem is a majority discussing City business, such as if five Panel members happen to be at Peet's and discuss last night's meeting. Panel member Elsesser asked for some clarification. He mentioned that the topic of this panel is business. Having a conversation with another Panel member about his or her specific business is fine. But if the conversation steers to what this Panel is doing, such as what do you think about the strategic plan, that is a different topic. Ms. Brown said yes, she meant City business. Panel member Monteko asked if emails to City staff are sunshine-able. Draft Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 9 July 20,… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,4 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 4 | Ms. Brown said that this is a good question, and that they haven't covered the Public Records Act, which is the California version of the federal Freedom of Information Act. Staff will need to decide about issuing City email addresses to Panel members, which is done for City Council and some boards and commissions. If we get a request for emails of public officials, their emails get sent to the public. Staff will discuss this and get back to the Advisory Panel. Panel member Laguerre wondered about using blind copy on emails. Ms. Brown answered that this is tricky because it depends on the content of the email. It is best to stay away. Panel member Winters commented that this will force the Panel to keep tighter notes to bring topics up in a public forum. The Brown Act and the Sunshine Ordinance make a lot of sense for transparent government and keep people engaged in local democracy. From a business sense, it is tough to swallow. Panel member Grunt added if we are meeting only two or three times a year and this is the only time we can brainstorm, it doesn't seem really productive. Ms. Butler pointed out that the Panel can meet as often as they want. Panel member Laguerre asked if it is okay if only three members got together to talk. Ms. Brown answered yes, but this also is a slippery slope: if one of the three then goes and talks with another Panel member about the same subject it could be a violation of the Brown Act. Panel member Mik suggested talking in subgroups (e.g. Alameda Point) that report back to the panel in a public forum. That way the Panel can continue as it is used to doing in the private sector while still complying with the law. Is that fair? Ms. Brown said other bodies have successfully used ad hoc subcommittees. Still, there are some precautions, but she can work with the Panel to set something up. Mr. Grunt brought up socializing events to get to know one another, though there would be a tendency to discuss Alameda. Ms. Brown said socializing is fine, but advised that the panel members keep i… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,5 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 5 | 5-E Provide Direction for the Preparation of a Citywide Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) - Mr. Fonstein made the staff presentation. The staff report and attachment can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2781416&GUID=0D44D571-29E3- 4C96-B700-7294F6D6337F&Options=&Search= Mr. Fonstein introduced Sujata Srivastava and Derek Braun of Strategic Economics to guide the discussion. Ms. Srivastava suggested starting with questions about the perception of the community in the business world and from a resident's perspective. Panel member Chubb talked about some of the assets at Alameda Point, particularly space. It's edgy and weird. Panel member Winters pointed out that this is also one of the biggest challenges for Alameda Point, because as it gets developed, it runs the risk of this edginess going away. The land represents a lot of opportunity, but the there is a risk of turning it into a homogenous every-town. We want to keep populating the island with unique businesses, which maintains a reason for coming to Alameda. Panel member Elsesser remarked that from the other end of the City (Harbor Bay Business Park), for a lot of folks who run businesses in San Francisco, and uniformly over the years, the biggest reaction to Alameda is, where? Alameda is as close as you can be to San Francisco, and people have no idea. There is a lack of awareness of where Alameda is and how to get there. For more traditional businesses, they have found it remarkable because there is easy access, lots of space, space is cheaper, and there are great expansion opportunities. Mr. Elsesser said he is not sure if he wants people to know, because it will mean more competition for space. Panel member Monteko added on the flip side, there are a lot of success stories of Alameda being a destination: Trader Joe's, the Antique Fair, and Spirits Alley. There could be better story telling about the destination factor that already exists. People don't know what a strong market this is. Panel member Mik consider… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,6 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 6 | Alameda and he hopes that history continues, at least in some parts of the island. The waterfront is commercially a very valuable product. The Navy gifted us with large hangars and piers. It's a capital good; no one today would want to build all that infrastructure. People don't appreciate where we are until they are on the island and look back at San Francisco. Panel member Chubb asked where are marine industries going? What are the big industries in marine that we could attract? Panel member Mik responded that Alameda has a maritime industry. The constant challenge is truck access. All of the maritime industries agree that one of the difficulties is the success of the island. It is crowded and there's a lot of traffic for large scale trucks getting on and off the island. Panel member Chubb then asked if a small port in Alameda is needed to support the industry. Panel member Mik said possibly, or perhaps a dedicated trucking lane. What is needed, he said, is a recognition that this is a requirement to keep these industries going. Panel member Grunt remarked that access is always going to be a problem. He thinks the future is more about niche maritime industries, that don't necessarily rely on moving large amounts of things onto or off of the island. The maritime history is really important to preserve in some manner and to build on economies around that or to enhance existing economies that are meaningful. He also pointed out that Alameda probably has the most private marina slips in the Bay Area. People who own slips come to Alameda from all over the place. The island is one of the few places you can keep a boat in the Bay Area, and consequently has more of a draw than it otherwise would. Panel member Monteko said that there is a lot of underutilized land that can take some of the commercial load. Rather than competing directly with industry, we should focus on growing commercial on other locations. In answering the question of what key issues we would like to see the EDSP address, two come to mind: 1) under-ut… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,7 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 7 | Panel member Grunt agreed. They chose to build their new office on Harbor Bay, after an initial decision to grow in Pleasanton. They rethought the decision during the recession, when Alameda become more competitive in price. Harbor Bay makes sense to pull employees from a lot of directions in the Bay Area. Alameda Point has a lot of potential to offer the same thing. Panel member Laguerre commented as a non-islander, the island has a very nice friendly feel, which can be attractive to some businesses. One does not hear of crime and the schools are considered good. There is an excellent community college, which has land to grow. The faculty and staff of Alameda are different from other faculties-in that they care a lot about Alameda and what happens on Alameda. There is a sense of family, when looking at Alameda from a distance. The college draws from the region to a certain extent and draws other people to Alameda. The recruiters go out of the way to draw people from outside the island. The college has a workforce development center in partnership with the County Workforce Development Board. They have training centers that could be attractive to industries, such as automotive, maritime, and other industries. They work with Bay Ship & Yacht. Ms. Srivastava asked the Panel, what are the key priorities or pressing concerns that the EDSP should address? Panel member Chubb answered that he is interested in living and working in close proximity. Also, Alameda is a very bikeable community. The City just put in a beautiful bike path down by the beach. Panel member Elsesser said that the concept of living in Alameda is pretty magical. There are very few communities left that have the same current feel (warm, welcoming small town, quirky beach town feel) that the residential part of Alameda has. As you add businesses, it is critical to add them in a way that doesn't mess this part up. At the same time, we want a thriving business environment, and that brings with it the challenges of getting people on and off the island. A… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,8 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 8 | Panel member Laguerre remarked from an education standpoint, it would be great to have businesses getting together to discuss their workforce and training needs through the college. This would provide greater numbers to build programs around. The community college is here to meet the needs of the community. Panel member Mik reflected that maybe we're going back in time to where people lived near where they worked. We do need to address the balance of employment and residential. The uniqueness of Alameda is its character. It would be a tragedy to lose that. The EDSP should be a discussion about the types of businesses the City wants that would also support the ability to live and work here. More of our employees are moving closer to Alameda. But not everyone is going to live here. We should also talk about a mass transit or transportation solution. We are going to be talking about the types of businesses the City wants, where to put them, and the transportation solutions. Those are the things I would want to see in the EDSP. Panel member Monteko echoed the need to address the job-housing balance. The South Shore Shopping Center is a large employer. Many of the people who work there would like to live on the island but can't. They would love to see more housing near their center. Also, retail leakage is part of the scope of work. It is a story that can be told. All these people are leaving the island to shop, when those dollars can be spent here. It would be really great to understand where people are going instead of Alameda and how to capture that sales leakage. Underutilized land is an issue in other parts of the City besides Alameda Point, such as neighborhood and community shopping centers. Permit time for small businesses is challenging everywhere. Making it as easy as possible will bring more business to Alameda. Panel member Winters said that awareness is a big problem. Alameda Point is a great area of opportunity to create other things that are unique to draw people and get them talking about Alameda. On t… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,9 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 9 | https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=2781417&GUID=16211D8D-2D63- 4E9A-8531-6366B3DB8COD&Options=&Search= Panel member Grunt asked about the ferry terminal. Ms. Ott said that the new Seaplane Lagoon terminal will be right in the heart of the development in the Enterprise District. This is the number one issue for developers: when is the ferry terminal coming? It will operate as a joint consolidated service with the Main Street Terminal. Most likely, the Seaplane Terminal will be the commute ferry with Main Street/Oakland supplying mid-day and weekend service. We did look at the relocating the Main Street Terminal, but it would undermine the Oakland service. The Oakland line cannot sustain itself and depends on Alameda ridership. Panel member Mik commented that Main Street is the most popular ferry terminal and is at capacity. They are selling out their boats. They are really adding capacity with the new terminal. Ms. Ott added that ferry ridership has grown 60 percent since 2012, which is unheard of for public transit. Panel member Chubb asked about the maker space cluster. Ms. Ott said that the buildings are being redeveloped by master developers. They will subdivide them into smaller spaces for specialty manufacturing, artist spaces and some office. One floor will most likely become work/live, with tight restrictions on the residential component. Panel member Monteko asked who pays for the infrastructure in Site B. Ms. Ott said the developer or end user through a negotiated land deal with the City. Alameda Point's infrastructure costs are approximately $600 million, or $1 million per acre. Panel member Elsesser asked about the square footage of entitled space and height limits. Ms. Ott answered that there is approximately 5.5 million square feet for all of Alameda Point, which is a lot of entitlement. We do not want low intensity development; we want jobs or catalyst benefit. The height limit is 100 feet. It is a very permissive, a big envelope to create a lot of flexibility. We do not know w… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,10 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 10 | John McManus of Cushman Wakefield, said, historically, companies that have grown up like Genentech or Facebook start very small, incubate and then expand somewhere else. In the last cycle, companies like Sun and Cisco moved out and tried to get geographic diversity, grow as much in the South Bay and then buy another campus in Pleasanton. We are not seeing that now. Many companies want to stay together in one place, like Apple. Google X is an exception. We had hoped to see users that wanted that diversity of locations, but it has not happened that way in this cycle. We believe that there will be companies wanting to expand. In this awareness phase of the marketing, in addition to contacting these companies directly, we are going around to brokerage houses in San Francisco and on the peninsula that represent these companies. Cushman's message in the weekly and monthly meetings is when you have a large campus requirement that cannot go into an adaptive, existing building-typically bio-tech that requires building from the ground up-we have 82 acres, through CEQA, you just need site plan, elevations, and a design that works. The CEQA process is all done. We could also take incubators, much like TheraSense in Harbor Bay that became Abbott Diabetes Care. They started at 5,000 square feet and has expanded to nearby buildings. So when the technology hits, they go. Panel member Monteko inquired why no one is biting now. Mr. McManus said that there is no infrastructure; plus the City is picky. You can have a warehouse distribution center now. Interest from warehouse users in short term, but they are high traffic and low intensity. There is precedence with VF Outdoor. They moved from San Leandro and picked up more land as they grew. As we get the infrastructure in place with 9 to 15 acre projects that make it feasible, we can go down to four acre parcels and start to look at Semifreddi's and Peet's Coffee that have come out of Emeryville and Berkeley to Harbor Bay. It is not practical now to leapfrog Site A. 5-G Elect Chair … | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf,11 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 11 | 5-I Next Meeting Mr. Fonstein said that the next meeting is anticipated to be in September to report on the initial research for the EDSP. 6. Written Communications: None. 7. Oral Communications - Panel Members and Staff: None. 8. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Draft Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 9 July 20, 2016 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2016-07-20.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2020-05-14.pdf,1 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 1 | MINUTES OF THE MAYOR'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY PANEL SPECIAL MEETING OF THURSDAY, May 14, 2020 VIRTUAL MEETING VIA ZOOM 6:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL President David Mik called the meeting to order at approximately 6:03pm. Roll Call Attendance: Gia Schneider, Tim Karas, David Mik, Adam Elsesser, Debi Stebbins, Brock Grunt, Madlen Saddik, Remy Monteko, and Warren DeSouza. Absent: Mike Rose. City Staff: Lois Butler (secretary), Eric Fonstein, and Amanda Gehrke. Honored Guests: Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft and City Councilmembers Jim Oddie, Malia Vella, and John Knox White. 2. MINUTES 2-A. 2020-7939 Review and Approve Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel Minutes from December 5, 2019 A motion to approve the December 5, 2019 minutes was made by Panel member Stebbins, and seconded by Panel member Schneider. Ayes: President Mik, Vice President Schneider, Panel Members Karas, Elsesser, Stebbins, Grunt, Saddik, and Monteko (NOTE: DeSouza vote was not recorded due to muted mic). Nays: none. The motion passed 8-0. 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PUBLIC None. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS City branding has been put on hold. Discussions were tabled for a future meeting. 5. NEW BUSINESS 5-A. 2020-7940 Provide Direction for Creating a COVID-19 Economic Recovery Task Force; and Recommendation to the City Manager regarding which Economic Development Advisory Panel members, and business/business association representatives, should sit on the Task Force Staff Member Fonstein presented a report on the creation of an Economic Recovery Task Force. City staff sought input on proposed task force objectives and goals for short- term, mid-term, and long-term recovery, and recommendations on Task Force composition including business sectors/key stakeholders, and for EDAP members who are interested in participating in the Task Force. Fonstein welcomed comments and answered clarifying questions. Panel members discussed and provided input on the presented topics. In addition to supporting the proposed goals, objectives and timeline, P… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2020-05-14.pdf |
Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2020-05-14.pdf,2 | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | EconomicRecoveryTaskForce | 2 | Minutes of the Mayor's Economic Development Advisory Panel Special Meeting Thursday, May 14, 2020 encourage employee safety and reassure customers. Additionally, members recommended the task force develop or synthesize materials that help businesses pivot and adapt to the current situation, to serve as a starting point for businesses in their resiliency plans. Suggested task force nominees included Panel Member Saddik, Downtown Alameda Business Association Executive Director Kathy Weber, West Alameda Business Association Executive Director Linda Asbury, Giuseppe Naccarelli of Trabocco Restaurant, Dhruv Patel of Ridgemont Hospitality, and representatives from Merlon Geier or Bank of Marin. Panel Members suggested representation from restaurant/beverage, public health, urban planning, academia, county health, hospitality, property owners, real estate, non-profit, childcare, business associations, retail, and finance on the task force. Members recommended the task force be limited to 8-10 members. President Mik made a motion to approve a recommendation to develop a task force composed of 8-10 representatives from identified key sectors (restaurant/beverage, retail/property owners, public health/academia, city planning, childcare, banking, hospitality, and Alameda Business Associations), and put forward several names mentioned above to the City Manager as suggested task force members. Seconded by Panel Member Grunt. Ayes: President Mik, Vice President Schneider, Panel Members Karas, Elsesser, Stebbins, Grunt, Saddik, DeSouza, and Monteko. Nays: none. The motion passed 9-0. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - PANEL MEMBERS AND STAFF Panel Member Saddik informed the panel of the Alameda Strong Community Grant fund, a collaborative effort between the Downtown Alameda Business Association, the West Alameda Business Association, The Chamber of Commerce, and the City, with an aim of fundraising $200,000 plus to provide relief funding to Small Businesses, Sole Proprietors, and other Alamedans who have b… | Mayor'sEconomicDevelopmentAdvisoryPanel/EconomicRecoveryTaskForce/2020-05-14.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf,1 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-06-27 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC ART COMMISSION (PAC) SPECIAL MEETING Monday, June 27, 2022 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Adam Gillitt called the meeting to order at 6:03pm and because the recording was not started, staff started the recording, and Chairperson Gillitt started the meeting over and called the meeting to order at 6:06 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Adam Gillitt, Vice Chairperson Liz Rush, Commissioners Jennifer Hoffecker, Peter Platzgummer, and Robert Ferguson. Absent: none. Lois Butler and Walker Toma present as staff to the Commission. 3. MINUTES 2022-2158 Review and Approve Draft May 16, 2022 PAC Minutes Chairperson Gillitt requested a motion to approve the minutes. After discussion the motion was postponed to the next meeting to allow additional time for commissioners to review the draft minutes. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. 2022-2159 Presentation by Forecast Public Art on Public Art Master Plan Process Staff member Walker Toma welcomed Forecast Public Art (Forecast), a consultant firm hired through an RFP process to produce Alameda's Public Art Master Plan and explained to the Commission and the public that there would be multiple opportunities for public comment during the presentation. Jen Krava, Director of Programming and New Initiatives at Forecast, shared Forecast's mission to activate, inspire, and advocate for public art that advance justice, health and human dignity by 1) supporting, funding, and training artists who work in the public realm, 2) partnering and consulting on public art and creative placemaking projects, and 3) building local capacity, gathering stories, and sharing research. The Forecast team members facilitating the Public Art Master Plan process for the City of Alameda introduced themselves as: | PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf,2 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-06-27 | 2 | Minutes of the Public Art Commission Monday, June 27, 2022 Jen Krava, Director of Programming Mark Salinas, Senior Project Manager Yarlyn Rosario, Project Manager Mallory Rukhsana Nezam, Consultant Yolanda Cotton Turner, Local Artist Consultant Rukhsana Nezam explained the Group Agreements for the evening's facilitation process, and shared Forecast's Master Plan timeline and engagement plan. After defining Public Art in general, including common locations, sample funding models, and a presentation of the wide variety of existing public art, Forecast facilitated an exercise to gather input for the definition of Public Art specific to the process of developing the Public Art Master plan for the City of Alameda. Questions and a summary of responses are as follows: Where should Public Art be located (concentrated or spread out)? Throughout Alameda; very publicly accessible; the diversity of opportunities within a variety of neighborhoods; art is missing from shoreline and other high-traffic key destination areas: difficult to locate existing public art; continue to expand artwork beyond nautical-theme; historical challenges has been finding sites and working with City to get approval for public art sites; and the importance of equitable distribution. How long should Public Art be installed? Program should support both performance and temporary physical art (temporary) as well as permanent pieces like sculpture (permanent); allow artwork to be deaccessioned so that artwork can represent a diversity of artists instead of the historical precedent of white male artists; increased cost of maintaining long term art pieces takes funding away from new artwork; temporary art can be placed in more locations; set term limits for art which allows a living-gallery feel and fresh art; civic buildings and garages might be a good fit for murals or light installations; Alameda has had no audio installations; and keep art permanently, but move art from key places to allow new art. Should the aesthetics and content of public art be mor… | PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf,3 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-06-27 | 3 | Minutes of the Public Art Commission Monday, June 27, 2022 To what extent should the public art be static or interactive? Important to have some art that can be experienced by all senses and allows people to be involved in the art; Alameda has too much static art; interactive art is more memorable, permanent interactive installations can have higher maintenance expenses depending on the material. Should the artwork be created by local or global artists? Currently preference is given to local artists, however certain sites would be best served by artists outside of the area; miss talent of regional/national/global artists if only supporting local artists; local cost of living prohibits many artists from living locally; the rich diversity of artists attempting to stay local should be supported; has been difficult to reach all local artists with RFP information as well as inform public about public art; private art galleries support regional/national/globa artist of notoriety - save Public Art funds for local artists, however preference to ex-local artists too; multiple factors (like artists availability, marketing of RFP/RFQ, cost of materials, site specific needs) contribute to which artist might best fit - so it's a balance of attracting artists from outside the area and supporting local artists. Staff member Toma opened the floor for public comment: Resident Pat Atkinson offered that location does not need to be either completely spread out or totally concentrated, temporary art allows more community involvement, a sculpture garden by the Seaplane Lagoon ferry terminal would welcome visitors, popup art installations could be placed throughout the city and in public parks, Rhythmix Cultural Works has been very successful at producing art experiences that are a combination of visual and performing arts, mapping existing public art would be helpful in driving the Public Art Master Plan. Tina Blaine, Executive Director of Rhythimix Cultural Works, made the suggestion to perform a survey of existing public art curate… | PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf,4 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-06-27 | 4 | Minutes of the Public Art Commission Monday, June 27, 2022 equity that fits the community of Alameda; and that demonstrates that art is Alameda's long-term priority. Forecast shared next steps, including planned surveys, community engagement pop-ups, presentations, one-on-one interviews, focus groups, and facilitated workshops, with the goal of creating an visionary plan that contains actionable, immediately implementable, and modifiable processes, and includes creative input from the a diversity of voices within the larger community. Local artist and consultant with Forecast, Yolanda Cotton Turner, informed the PAC and public that she will be facilitating the first pop-up event at the Alameda Summer Art Fair, on July 3, 2022 from 11am-3pm. More information is available at www.alamedaartfair.com. Ms. Krava shared that the one-on-one interviews are designed to focus on understanding and improving City processes for public art approval, and Mr. Salinas shared that the focus groups aim to gather insight from those within the arts and culture community as well as the larger community. Chairperson Gillitt expressed his appreciation for Forecast's presentation. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Staff member Toma provided the following updates: the Alameda Marina LandSea Homes recently fulfilled their contribution to Public Art via an approximately $250,000 in lieu contribution to the Public Art Fund; fabrication has been completed for the "Beken" sculpture, with an estimated installation of August 2022 at the Waterfront Park sculpture; and the July PAC Special Meeting will be postponed to allow time to prepare and present RFP Cultural Art applications to the PAC. Chairperson Gillett asked how many submissions have been received to date. Secretary Butler advised that sharing submission information before the close of the RFP may not be allowed, and offered to research and provide clarification on this at the next PAC meeting. 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 8. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Chairperson Gillett shared tha… | PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf,5 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-06-27 | 5 | Minutes of the Public Art Commission Monday, June 27, 2022 Commissioner Ferguson asked for clarification about receiving requests from the public to notify the PAC and public about upcoming public art, which Ms. Butler offered to provide. 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. 10. ADJOURNMENT: Chairperson Gillitt adjourned the meeting at 8:12p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lois Butler Economic Development Manager Secretary, Public Art Commission 5 | PublicArtCommission/2022-06-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -JUNE 7, 2022- -5:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:05 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella arrived at 5:28 p.m. The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (22-361) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9); Case Name: Unspecified to Protect Service of Process; Court: Superior Court of the County of Alameda; Case Number: Unspecified to Protect Service of Process; Number of Cases: 2 (22-362) Conference with Legal Counsel Workers' Compensation Claim (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.95); Claimant: Employee - Fire Department; Claims: 149550063, 1895500067, 0695500047; Agency Claimed Against: City of Alameda (22-363) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section: 54957.6); City Negotiators: Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director; Nico Procos, General Manager, Alameda Municipal Power; Jessica Romeo, Human Resources Manager; and Steve Woo, Senior Human Resources Analyst; Employee Organizations: Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA); Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA); Electric Utility Professionals Association (EUPA); International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW); Alameda Police Officers Non-Sworn (PANS); Alameda Municipal Power Unrepresented Employees (AMPU); Alameda Police Management Association (APMA); Under Negotiation: Salaries, Employee Benefits and Terms of Employment (22-364) Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957); Position Evaluated: City Attorney - Yibin Shen Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that regarding the Workers' Compensation, the case involves three workers' compensation claims by a former employee with the Fire Department; Applicant sustained injuries to his knee,… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 2 | provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 3. Noes: 2; and regarding Labor Negotiators, staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following two roll call votes: Vote 1: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. Noes: 1 and Vote 2: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. *** Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 6:59 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m. Following the closed session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced regarding Performance Evaluation, Council conducted the City Attorney performance evaluation and gave direction to staff by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 5. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 7, 2022 | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 3 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - JUNE 7, 2022--7:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:13 p.m. Councilmember Herrera Spencer led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was conducted via Zoom.] Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (22-365) Proclamation Declaring June 11, 2022 as Doug Siden Day. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read the proclamation. (22-366) Proclamation Declaring June 2022 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer or Questioning Pride Month. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read the proclamation. (22-367) Proclamation Declaring June 19, 2022 as Juneteenth Day. (22-368) Proclamation Declaring June 2022 as Elder Abuse Awareness Month. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. CONSENT CALENDAR The City Clerk announced the Public Hearing [paragraph no. 22-378 and called for speakers. Councilmember Daysog recorded a no vote on the teleconference findings [paragraph no. 22- 371] and the CSI Mini Storage lease [paragraph no. 22-377]. . Councilmember Herrera Spencer recoded a no vote on the teleconference findings [paragraph no. 22-371]. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the Home Together Plan [paragraph no. 22-375 be withdrawn from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council June 7, 2022 1 | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 4 | Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*22-369) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting Held on April 28, 2022 and the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 3, 2022. Approved. (*22-370) Ratified bills in the amount of $5,812,822.49. (22-371) Recommendation to Approve Findings to Allow City Meetings to be Conducted via Teleconference. Accepted. Since Councilmembers Daysog and Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. (*22-372) Resolution No. 15910, "Approving the City of Alameda Climate Adaptation and Hazard Mitigation Plan as the City's Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Including Incorporation into the City of Alameda General Plan Safety Element by References and Adopting a General Plan Amendment Amending the Health and Safety Element and Conservation and Climate Action Element of the Alameda General Plan 2040 to Align with the Climate Adaptation and Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2022." Adopted. (*22-373) Resolution No. 15911, "(a) Amending Resolution No. 9460 to Reflect Current Positions and Entities to be Included in the City of Alameda's Conflict of Interest Code and (b) Rescinding Resolution No. 15661.' Adopted. (*22-374) Resolution No. 15912, "Amending the Salary Schedule for Part-Time Classifications Effective June 5, 2022 to Reflect Changes to the City of Alameda Minimum Wage and to Maintain Adequate Differentials Between Part-Time Job Categories.' Adopted. (22-375) Resolution No. 15913, "Endorse the Alameda County Home Together 2026 Community Plan: A 5-Year Strategic Framework Centering Racial Equity to End Homelessness in Alameda County." Adopted. The Homelessness Area Ma… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 5 | (*22-376) Ordinance No. 3322, "Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter Four to Comply with Assembly Bill 1276 Regarding Single Use Foodware Accessories and Standard Condiments." Finally passed. (22-377) Ordinance No. 3323, "Ordinance Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute a Lease with Rhoads Property Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, dba CSI Mini Storage for Thirty Six Months for Buildings 338, 608, and 608A C, Located at 50 and 51 West Hornet Avenue, at Alameda Point.' Finally passed. Since Councilmembers Daysog recorded a no vote, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. (*22-378) Public Hearing to Consider Collecting of the Water Quality and Flood Protection Fees on the Property Tax Bills; and (*22-378A) Resolution No. 15914, "Finding [No] Majority Protest and Approving the Continuation and Collection of the Existing 2019 Water Quality and Flood Protection Fee on the Property Tax Bills for Fiscal Year 2022-23." Adopted. CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS None. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (22-379) Recommendation to Authorize City Attorney to Effectuate the Transition for the Administration of the Rent Program from the Alameda Housing Authority, who Currently Acts as the City's Contract Program Administrator, Back In-house to the City of Alameda's City Attorney's Office; and (22-379A) Resolution No. 15915, "Amending the Salary Schedule for: the Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA) to Reinstate the Classification of Housing Specialist Il and Approving Workforce Changes in the City Attorney's Office to Add Six New Positions: Three Housing Specialists, One Administrative Management Analyst, One Administrative Technician Il Position, and One Director of Rent Program; and Authorize the City Attorney to Fill the Six New Positions Consistent with All Applicable Laws and Regulations." Adopted. The City Attorney gave a brief presentation. Expressed support for the timing… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 6 | for the program being moved to the City Attorney's office; stated the switch will be clean: Laura Woodard, Alameda Renters Coalition. Councilmember Daysog stated the rent program should be under the AHA; the program subject matter is a natural fit for AHA; he is confident that the City Attorney's office will perform well; however, he feels AHA is a better fit for the rent program. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption of the resolution]. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she has concerns about moving the program from AHA; noted that she is a renter; inquired whether the City staff handling the program will be located at City Hall West. The City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated there is not enough space to house the program and staff at City Hall. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the hours of business for City Hall West. The City Attorney responded that his intent is to have the rent program staff operate on Friday's for critical matters; stated that he will work with the Human Resources Director to ensure intake opportunities on Fridays. Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for services being offered on Fridays; expressed concern about the process being adversarial since attorneys will be involved; stated moving away from mediation will be more adversarial between tenants and landlords; the City Attorney currently takes action against landlords; inquired whether the City Attorney offers serves both sides, representing landlords and tenants. The City Attorney responded that he does not represent landlords or tenants; stated enforcement actions are on behalf of the State of California; the City Attorney's office represents the people of the State of California; mediation services have been taken over from Centro Legal de la Raza at half the cost; staff is engaging in mediation and question and answer sessions; staff looks forward to expanding the area of work in collaborati… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 7 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the employees are currently employed by AHA, to which the Human Resources Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there will be any negative effects on pensions. The Human Resources Director responded the employees are members of California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS); stated there is reciprocity; the change will not impact pensions; staff will receive the same benefit under the City. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City Attorney's office has taken proactive steps towards education; requested staff to provide information on mediation and education. The City Attorney stated since taking over operations from Centro Legal in January, staff has provided counselling to 227 different landlords and tenants; staff has completed 10 mediations and conducted two remote conferences in coordination with fair housing month; both conferences were well-attended; staff is looking forward to engaging with landlords and tenants in order to educate, mediate and inform. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. (22-380) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of the Community Development Block Grant/HOME Investment Partnerships Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 Action Plan; Authorize the Interim City Manager to Use Affordable Housing Unit Fee and Permanent Local Housing Allocation Funds; and Authorize the Interim City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Related Documents, Agreements, and Modifications at Funding Levels Approved by Congress. The Program Manager gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether any of the funding will go towards bottle parcel housing or transitional homes at Alameda Point. The Program Manager responded the proposed funds for the upcoming fiscal year will not go towards the bottle parcel or transitional housing;… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 8 | need; the well-being of the community is important to the City; encouraged Council approval: Katherine Schwartz, Alameda Family Services. Expressed support for the funding; stated the partnership is critical to support programs for older adults, such as legal services, Medicare counseling and education: James Treggiari, Legal Assistance for Seniors. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the grants are critical and go towards services which are otherwise unfunded; the programs cover a breadth of services; the City will see more need for services in the future; expressed support for using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for mental health programs. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. (22-381) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 15916, "Summarily Vacate an Excess Portion of Everett Street Approximately 116-feet Northeasterly of Blanding Avenue in the City of Alameda Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code, Sections 8330, et seq.' Adopted. The Deputy Public Works Director gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Daysog inquired who owns the right-of-way of the parcel being vacated. The Deputy Public Works Director responded the two parcels are owned by the same corporation; stated that he has been working with Ross Stackhouse of Tidewater Capital. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the owners of the parcel were allowed to close off access to the street. The Deputy Public Works Director responded the gate was in place prior to ownership. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there is requirement for the gate to be open as a public right-of-way. The Deputy Public Works Director responded during when the parking lot was constructed, a soil cap remediation project was completed; stated the City gave the owner the option to either relocate the gate or prepare… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 9 | the resolution]. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired why the gate was in place and why the City waited until now to decide to take action. The Deputy Public Works Director responded the actions were triggered by the permit pulled for soil remediation; stated the condition had been present for a long time. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the owner could make a formal request to remove the gate and roadway if the right-of-way continues. The Deputy Public Works Director responded after Council takes action, the gate will be part of the property; stated the owners will be responsible for maintenance of the gates and roadway area; the City will still be allowed to access the area if maintenance needs arise. Councilmember Daysog inquired the current General Plan designation for the site. The Deputy Public Works Director responded there are no changes to the General Maritime zoning. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (22-382) The Interim City Manager made brief comments on his background. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (22-383) Consider Having the City Council Address the Zoning of the Harbor Bay Club. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Councilmember Herrera Spencer gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of having the referral come back to Council for discussion. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White stated that he will not support the referral; noted after the referral was filed, Council discussed the issue and provided direction to staff to address the issue as part of the Housing Element and zoning changes happening across the City; he does not see a reason to re-hash the previous Council discussion; the matter is problematic to Regular Meeting Alameda Cit… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 10 | reconsider since an application has been filed. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there are a series of public forums where people can hear from the Planning, Building and Transportation Director; stated forums have been well attended and discussions have been robust; discussed upcoming forums. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she has been able to attend meetings and hear comments from members of the public; having hundreds of people attend meetings supports having a separate hearing for zoning to give Council the opportunity to clarify and take actions separate from the Housing Element. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: No; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3. (22-384) Consider Having the City Council Review Recreation and Parks Department Community Events. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Councilmember Herrera Spencer gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of bringing the matter back for Council discussion on the regular agenda. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the amount of meetings a referral has been on can be seen on the agenda; pending Council referrals could have been heard at the Council priority workshop. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the Council workshop was not a regular meeting where normal business was heard; expressed concern about Council referrals and lack of public comment at the workshop; stated referrals should be heard at regular Council meetings; discussed public comment. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Knox White expressed concern about statements made related to public comment; stated that he will not support the motion. Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed members of the public attending Council meetings; expressed support for hybrid meetings. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox Whi… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 11 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the referenced letter falls under the legislative agenda. Councilmember Knox White responded the letter is not a part of the referral; stated the letter aligns with the City's Vision Zero safety legislation. The City Attorney stated Council may provide brief direction for staff to look at its legislative policy and consider whether or not to act with existing Council authority without debating whether or not to provide staff direction. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about the content of the letter of support. Councilmember Knox White stated the letter addresses safe vehicle design; vehicles are being designed for higher speeds than legal on City streets; the letter is three pages long. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the letter will be directed at auto manufacturers or federal law makers. Councilmember Knox White responded the letter will be submitted as part of the rule-making call for comments, which closes tomorrow; the letter will go directly to the National Highway Safety Transportation Agency. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Council is being asked to develop a City ordinance versus supporting State or federal legislation; how the process works due to federal preemption for commercial vehicles not meeting federal design standards; stated that she would like to know where the City fits into the matter. The City Attorney responded there are a number of preemption concerns; stated staff will need to perform significant legal analysis to see whether there is a way to get around the preemptions; staff will devote significant effort if Council so directs. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she will not be supporting the referral; the matter is preemptive and there are more pressing City issues for Council to address. Vice Mayor Vella stated the matter is worth looking into; expressed support for staff looking into legislation or other options; stated the City is preempted from taking actions; Council can direct staff to perform brief lega… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 12 | Washington, D.C. found a way to take action on the issue. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the situation in Washington, D.C. is unique. Vice Mayor Vella stated Council can have staff review whatever Washington, D.C. passes and raise the issue with lobbyists. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the proposed request would require significant staff research; questioned whether staff can look into actions taken by Washington, D.C. The City Attorney stated staff is happy to follow Council direction; the Washington, D.C. law involves vehicle registration; Washington, D.C. acts as a State, similar to the State of California, which could impose registration regulations on vehicles of certain sizes and weights; the authority does not lie with local jurisdictions; staff is happy to look further if Council desires; Washington, D.C. has significantly more authority acting as a State than local jurisdiction. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Council referral. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the motion includes direction to have ACTC and lobbyists look into the matter at the State and federal level, to which Councilmember Knox White responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Vella stated the matter is part of the City's legislative package; Washington, D.C. newly passed regulations; bringing the matter to ACTC is worthwhile; she would like to raise the issue with State elected representatives. Councilmember Daysog stated the referral could be unnecessary; the Municipal Code has standards related to vehicle types; the standards cover the type of vehicles raised by the referral; the matter is duplicative; expressed concern about the City not enforcing the standards in Municipal Code Section 8-6.1; stated the City would be enforcing the standard on many vehicles; many vehicles come to Alameda from off-Island; questioned whether the vehicles will be tracked and fined; stated the matter is handled at a higher level in order to create consistency across localities; there is virtue in working with State and federal leaders; the City… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 13 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the Council referral. Councilmember Knox White seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would prefer to see the matter continued and return to Council with the Bill language. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the language quoted in the staff report comes from the Bill; the referral process is to have the matter return to Council on a future agenda for discussion; inquired whether the letter of support can be submitted without returning to Council. The City Attorney responded Council rules and process for referrals include directing staff to have the matter return for further Council discussion. The Interim City Manager stated that staff should check for any relevant amendments to the Bill due to the amount of time the matter has been agendized; staff can check with lobbyists and return to Council if approved. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would support the matter returning; the report can return with basic analysis; requested clarification about process from the City Clerk. The City Clerk stated the one exception to not returning for further Council discussion is any urgent or time-sensitive matter; this matter was not presented as time-sensitive or urgent and returning for further Council discussion would be the route to follow. Vice Mayor Vella expressed concern over RHNA reform; stated that she values analysis; noted one of the supporters of the Bill is the Alameda Citizens Task Force. Councilmember Knox White stated support should be registered without waiting a month for a staff report; Council has taken action on legislation; expressed support for moving the matter forward. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the referral includes the terms "urgent" and "important;" the language is clear; the matter has been on the agenda for a while; the Bill could have been looked up. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for attaching Bill language; inquired the actions to be taken if the referral is approved, to which the City Cl… | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2022-06-07 | 14 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for a substitute motion. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated her motion is to proceed with the letter of support from Council; the language is provided in the Council referral. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (22-387) Councilmember Daysog expressed concern about towing fees. (22-388) Councilmember Herrera Spencer made announcements regarding a free paper shredding event, a walk, the sand castle contest, a fundraiser at the skate park, and the dedication of the Doug Siden Visitors' Center; discussed the Memorial Day celebration at Veterans Park. (22-389) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed her time in Washington, D.C.; announced Alameda County received $25 million for rail safety programs; discussed a Zoom meeting with the United States Coast Guard and a meeting with Veterans Affairs (VA); stated the VA Medical Clinic and Columbarium at Alameda Point is fully funded; discussed the "Everyone Belongs Here" poster and poetry contest, the Asian American Pacific Islander heritage celebration, the Memorial Day celebration, the Change of Command ceremony and a press conference with Congresswoman Barbara Lee about funding brought to the district; announced the upcoming graduation for Alameda Unified School District. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 9:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council June 7, 2022 12 | CityCouncil/2022-06-07.pdf |
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf,1 | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard | 2022-05-26 | 1 | City of Alameda, California SOCIAL SERVICE HUMAN RELATIONS BOARD THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2022 APPROVED MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER President Sarah Lewis called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: President Sarah Lewis, Vice President Kristin Furuichi Fong, Board members Dianne Yamashiro-Omi, Samantha Green, Scott Means and Priya Jagannathan. City staff: Eric Fonstein, Lois Butler, Veronika Cole, and Marcie Johnson 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3-A Review and Approve April 28, 2022 Draft Minutes A motion to approve the minutes of April 28, 2022 was made by Board member Green and seconded by Board member Yamashiro-Omi. Ayes: President S. Lewis, Vice President Furuichi Fong, Board members Yamashiro-Omi, Jagannathan, Green, and Means. Nays: none. Motion passed 6-0. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. AGENDA ITEMS 5-A Continued Discussion of the Development and Implementation of the 2022 Community Needs Assessment President Lewis introduced Angela Irvine, consultant, president of CERES Policy Research. Ms. Irvine shared her background and goals for working with the City on the upcoming focus groups. Board member Green and Jagannathan presented the list of indicators. SSHRB reviewed the spreadsheet, and discussed suggested indicators. The following is a summary of discussion points and questions: Board member Yamashiro-Omi asked if the indicators would reflect disaggregated data. Board member Jagannathan clarified that the indicators will be listed tables, and not interactive. Staff member Butler mentioned that the reported population for the City of Alameda may not be accurate, as the Census count was cut off early. Board member Green mentioned an adjusted Census population count, which did not include Alameda. Staff member Butler confirmed she will look into this. Board member Green modified the source for population. | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf |
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf,2 | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard | 2022-05-26 | 2 | Ms. Irvine stated that there is a lack of data from COVID-19 years, and wanted to know if SSHRB has experienced the same. Board Member Green confirmed that she has run into the same issue and plans to use the most recent data available. Ms. Irvine responded to Board member Yamashiro-Omi concern surrounding the immigration population, stating it is difficult to get data past 2018. She will share available data on Alameda County, which lists country of origin. Board member Means said that the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) indicator may be problematic, as the number of children is merely a total, and does not account for the severity of each learning disability. Board member Yamashiro-Omi asked if there is a data source for number of minority-owned, woman-owned businesses. Stating it will be difficult to have a conversation/develop a strategy about inequity without having relevant data. Board member Green stated that SSHRB will be looking to the City to assist with this indicator. President Lewis stated that she is hesitant to remove indicators as they are all important, and tell their own story. Emphasizing that SSHRB is setting the stage and the overall goal is to understand the context. President Lewis suggested replacing the officer per capita with another indicator regarding overall safety. Board member Means suggested consolidating some of the homeless information and adding accessible housing stock availability. President Lewis asked the Board if there was anything missing. Board member Yamashiro-Omi highlighted the community concern surround transportation and asked if there is a data source which would help show the lack of public transit. Board member Green shared some of the reports which provide transportation data and agreed it would be an essential indicator to add. Board member Yamashiro-Omi mentioned her concern regarding the lack of indicators within the social connection category. Board member Green stated there is a very little data available and suggests this is a topic for the focus groups… | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf |
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf,3 | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard | 2022-05-26 | 3 | Vice President Furuichi Fong and Board member Yamashiro-Omi support the idea of highlighting community members and their lived experiences, specifically around their interactions with social service providers. Board members discussed a community press release and kick-off event with shared stories from the community. Possible collaboration with the College of Alameda, high school students and Shaun Daniels with Castaway. Board member Yamashiro-Omi suggested mirroring some of the material presented by Alameda Point Collaborative. President Lewis summarized SSHRB consensus, confirming that it will remain on the agenda for next month's SSHRB meeting. 5-C Workgroup Reports Domestic Violence (DV) Task Force (Furuichi Fong): Board member Furuichi Fong attended the May 19 meeting. Discussion included, DV Awareness Month (October) and the need to provide additional resources to the public prior to. With the assistance of DABA & WABA, the Task Force plans to post resource flyers around Alameda, specifically in restrooms at bars and restaurants. Alamedans Together Against Hate (Yamashiro-Omi, Furuichi Fong): Board member Yamashiro-Omi confirmed they are still reviewing consultant proposals. Infrastructure Workgroup (Lewis, Means): President Lewis shared that they will present four (4) options/recommendations for the Community Service Awards, at next month's SSHRB meeting. 5-D Presentation on City of Alameda's Funding for Social Service Initiatives and Activities Staff member Butler presented a detailed spreadsheet of the funding sources for Social Services. The following six (6) sources, fund a total amount of $2,080,054: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Alameda County Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) General Fund Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Permanent Local Housing Assistance (PLHA) Board member Jagannathan asked what percentage of the General Fund is spent on social services; how much is being invested into social services? Staff member Butler said she did not know the exact percentage,… | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf |
SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf,4 | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard | 2022-05-26 | 4 | 6-A Status Report on Homeless Services Staff member Johnson provided the following update: Winter Warming Shelter: Services have concluded. Dine and Connect: Hosted a volunteer appreciation event, which was well attended. Emergency Housing at Alameda Point: City Council passed the rehab/outfitting of three homes. Approval of Site A: City Council passed the building of 600 housing units (market & BMR mixed). Homeless Encampments: Monthly clean-up with Planning & Building and Alameda Police Department are happening on second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. Village of Love: Currently looking for a new location. 7. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. 9. ADJOURNMENT President Lewis adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Eric Fonstein, Board Secretary | SocialServiceHumanRelationsBoard/2022-05-26.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - MAY 17, 2022--7:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:06 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella arrived at 7:18 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Zoom.] Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES (22-334) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that City Manager Communications would be heard next. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (22-335) The Interim City Manager discussed the Fourth of July parade and pre-parade 5K benefitting the Midway Shelter; announced new parking enforcement service starting on May 23 and National Public Works Week; noted the COVID-19 case numbers are increasing; urged people to wear high quality masks; expressed his appreciation for the ability to serve Alameda. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (22-336) Proclamation Declaring May 2022 as Jewish American Heritage Month. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read the proclamation. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (22-337) Paul Foreman, Alameda, expressed concerns over the draft Housing Element (HE) document; discussed Assembly Bill (AB) 215's requirement for Council consideration of all public comment before submission of the draft HE. (22-338) Zac Bowling, Alameda, expressed support for the HE work being done. CONSENT CALENDAR Expressed concern about the proposed Interim City Manager: Erin Fraser, Alameda. Expressed concern about the proposed Interim City Manager: Marilyn Rothman, Alameda. The Human Resources director stated the comments were not identified during background process. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether anyone from the public reached out with concerns, to which the Human Resources Director responded in the negative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council May 17, 2022 1 | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 2 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer recorded a no vote on the teleconference findings [paragraph no. 22-341 and the resolution continuing the emergency declaration [paragraph no. 22-349 and requested the Interim City Manager contract [paragraph no. 22-342], homeless housing assistance and prevention grant [paragraph no. 22-350 and Metropolitan Transportation Commission grant [paragraph no. 22-351 be withdrawn for discussion. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog recorded a no vote on the teleconference findings. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*22-339) Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting and the Continued April 5, 2022 Meeting Held on April 12, 2022, and the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on April 19, 2022. Approved. (*22-340) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,647,168.48. (22-341) Recommendation to Approve Findings to Allow City Meetings to be Conducted via Teleconference. Note: Since Councilmembers Daysog and Herrera Spencer recorded note votes, the matter carried by the following vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. (22-342) Recommendation to Approve Agreement Appointing Dirk Brazil as Interim City Manager for a Term of No More Than 960 Hours in a Fiscal Year at a Salary of $133.85 Hourly, Commencing on May 23, 2022, and Authorize the Mayor to Sign the Agreement on Behalf of the City. The City Attorney briefly announced and summarized the terms and employment agreement. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like guidance on appropriate public discussion topics. The City Attorney stated Council is able to speak a… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 3 | Councilmember Daysog stated his vote on the matter does not reflect the candidate; the City should have had a number of candidates and more time should be spent on finding more candidates; expressed concern over the process. Councilmember Knox White stated that he is uncomfortable with starting a dialogue with the proposed Interim City Manager in a public forum; allegations have been brought forth which have not yet been a part of any discussion; expressed support for the proposed Interim City Manager being able to address the issue which has been raised; stated that it is unfair to ask open up an additional discussion with the candidate. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Knox White; stated that she finds it troubling for individuals to come forward with unsubstantiated allegations; expressed support for allowing an opportunity to address allegations. To allow time, Council addressed other pulled Consent Calendar items. (*22-343) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Accept the Work of G & G Builders, Inc. for Godfrey Park Recreation Building Renovations, No. P.W. 02-21-08. Accepted. (*22-344) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Accept the Work of G & G Builders, Inc. for the Maintenance Service Center Interior Improvements, No. P.W. 02-21-10. Accepted. (*22-345) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Partially Accept the Improvements Completed by Alameda Point Partners for Tract 8336, Site A, Phase 1, at Alameda Point. Accepted. (*22-346) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Suarez & Munoz Construction Inc. for Alameda City Hall Lawn Conversion, Project No. P.W. 02-22-05, for a Not to Exceed Amount of $204,445. Accepted. (*22-347) Resolution No. 15904, "Preliminarily Approving the Annual Report Declaring the City of Alameda's Intention to Order the Levy and Collection of Assessments and Providing for Notice of Public Hearing on June 21, 2022 - Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove).' Ad… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,19 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 19 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like to know the number of units; people in the community use the facility for storage; expressed concern about where current customers will store items after the three year term is up; inquired whether staff will be offering storage space at another facility. The Management Analyst responded currently, staff does not plans to do so; stated the timeline has not been determined; staff can take direction from Council to consider alternatives. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would have liked to know how many Alamedans are being impacted and the plan for the future; there is a need for storage facilities; expressed concern about terminating the tenancy; stated some customers might have been renting storage space for almost 20 years. The Interim City Manager stated the matter is a lease extension recommendation; the use has been in place since 2005; staff is providing additional time; redevelopment at Alameda Point comes with twists and turns; staff would like to preserve flexibility as the landlord; the intent is not to terminate the tenancy, but to extend the term by three years. Vice Mayor Vella stated a new storage facility is being constructed not far from the facility; the units could be factored into the nearby, new, storage facility; Council tries to grapple with job creation and building adequate housing; neither job creation or adequate housing are accomplished with using the space as a storage facility; expressed support for direction being provided, while keeping larger goals in mind. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the new storage facility is near Mariner's Square, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council balances many interests and desires to ensure properties have the highest and best use; the area is currently suitable for storage; however, the lease extension has been structured to allow for another use when the opportunity arises; the storage facility nearby is a larger, multi-leve… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,20 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 20 | staff for clarification; inquired whether Councilmembers can reach out to staff for additional clarifying information. The Interim City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated staff is available to answer questions and will typically review the agenda with Councilmembers the week of the meeting; not every Councilmember has the availability for a briefing prior to each meeting. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the matter requires four affirmative votes; expressed support for Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry about unit amounts being answered prior to approval. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded Councilmember Herrera Spencer has indicated that she will vote in favor of the lease extension. Councilmember Knox White stated the matter has been agendized for almost a month and questions could have been made prior to the meeting; Council can request a briefing prior to the meeting. Councilmember Knox White moved introduction of the ordinance. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Vella stated Council has been discussing the Enterprise District for some time; the City needs to make the most of the property and not displace tenants while the City is working on the Enterprise District plan; she will support the motion. Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested clarification about whether the matter needs three or four affirmative votes. The City Attorney stated the lease requires four affirmative votes. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired what would happen to the tenant if the matter does not pass. The Management Analyst responded the existing lease has expired; stated the tenant is being held over on a month-to-month tenancy; if the lease is not passed, staff will continue the month- to-month tenancy and could renegotiate further if Council desires; if renegotiation do not occur, staff would make considerations to remove the tenant. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the tenant is paying the lower rent amount during month- to-month tenancy. The Community Development Director resp… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,21 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 21 | Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the holdover amount is more than amount proposed in the lease amendment. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the holdover amount is double the existing rent as opposed to a 10% increase. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether Council could have met in closed session to discuss options for extending the lease and finding and alternate location. The City Attorney responded the matter is a real property transaction and Council could direct staff to agendize a closed session item at a future meeting in order to discuss price and terms. The Interim City Manager stated agendas have become congested; staff is trying to move matters through; closed session agendas have been lengthy due to labor negotiations; the lease extension is relatively straight forward; there is opportunity to see lease extensions in closed session; the approach creates a backlog since the City owns a lot of land and has many tenants; expressed support for clear Council direction on which matters staff should bring to closed session versus open session; stated the extension provides continued flexibility; the Enterprise District is not ready to be built yet; the lease language provides flexibility for the City in the future. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she is not supportive of having every lease extension come before Council for consideration; the City should not negotiate alternative space for the tenant; stated that she would like to be reasonable and go with the staff recommendation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the lease is an extension as well as a termination; the tenant has three years at most; the termination aspect is different from other lease extensions which often include multiple options; she plans to support the extension to keep the tenant as long as possible; expressed support for consideration of alternate locations. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: Ay… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,22 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 22 | Lifted/Altered in a Manner that Increases the Likelihood of Severe Injury or Death in Collisions with Pedestrians and Bicyclists. (Councilmember Knox White) Not heard. (22-360) Consider Supporting Assembly Bill 1445. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Not heard. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council May 17, 2022 22 | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,23 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 23 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - MAY 17, 2022- -5:15 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:16 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Note: Councilmember Daysog was absent. The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. Consent Calendar Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.] (22-329) Recommendation to Approve Lisa Maxwell, Community Development Director, Len Aslanian, Assistant City Attorney, and Nanette Mocanu, Assistant Community Development Director, as Real Property Negotiators for 950 West Tower Avenue, Alameda, CA. Accepted. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (22-330) Conference with Real Property Negotiators (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8); Property: 950 West Tower Avenue (Building 39, Alameda Point, Alameda, CA; City Negotiators: Community Development Director Lisa Maxwell, Assistant Community Development Director Nanette Mocanu, and Assistant City Attorney Len Aslanian. (22-331) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6); City Negotiators: Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director, Nico Procos, General Manager Alameda Municipal Power, Jessica Romeo, Human Resources Manager, and Steve Woo, Senior Human Resources Analyst; Employee Organizations: Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA), Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA), Electric Utility Professionals Association (EUPA), International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Alameda Police Officers Non-Sworn (PANS), Alameda Municipal Power Unrepresented Employees (AMPU), Alameda Police Management Association (APMA); Under Negotiation: Salaries, Employee Benefits and Terms of Employment. (22-332) Public Employee Appointment/Hiring (P… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,24 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 24 | Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that regarding the Labor Negotiators, staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.]; regarding Property Negotiators, staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1]; regarding Employee Appointment/Hiring staff provided information and Council provided direction, including forming a subcommittee of Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft and Vide Mayor Vella with no vote taken. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 17, 2022 | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,25 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 25 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC) TUESDAY-MAY 17, 2022- -6:59 P.M. Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:04 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella - 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Knox White moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember/Commissioner Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Aye; and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. [Absent: Vice Mayor Vella - 1.] [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*22-07 SACIC) Minutes of the Joint City Council and SACIC Meeting Held on May 3, 2022. Approved. (*22-333 CC/22-08 SACIC) Recommendation to Accept the Investment Transactions Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2022. Accepted. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency 1 to the Community Improvement Commission May 17, 2022 | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 4 | (22-350) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a $285,767 Grant Agreement with Alameda County for Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Grant, and Authorize the City Manager, in the Future, to Extend the Term of the Contract up to December 31, 2023; and (22-350 A) Resolution No. 15907, "Amending the Grants Fund (222) Budget to Appropriate $285,767 for the Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention Grant Project." Adopted. The Economic Development made brief comments. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated some of the funds requested were not approved; the County has not approved using funds to support outreach, mental health support or flexible funds; inquired how much funding is needed or whether alternate funding can be allocated. The Economic Development Manager responded $50,000 is for the flexible funds; stated $85,000 is for the mental health funds; staff has put all funding towards the overnight day center; staff is able to house the unhoused for a longer period of time. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the City could consider alternate funding for the programs; inquired the cost for outreach. The Economic Development Director responded the $50,000 for flexible funds includes outreach. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the discussion remains within the agendized parameters. The City Attorney responded that he believes Councilmember Herrera Spencer is trying to establish whether or not the grant should move forward; stated the wisdom of the underlying action is not being debated; members of Council may ask questions in order to understand whether or not a grant should be pursued. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Council is not currently directing staff to explore other funding opportunities, to which the Economic Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated her inquiry appropriately falls under the grant; discussed using parking spaces for the overnight day center; inquired how many parking spaces are being used. The Economic … | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 5 | Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he voted against the matter in 2019; he is willing to be flexible and will support the matter; however, putting people in cars is not the best idea; if the City combats homelessness, available funding should be used to find shelter. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. (22-351) Resolution No. 15908, "Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Submit a Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of $126,618 in Fiscal Year 2022- 23 for Two Grand Street Transportation Safety Projects per Transportation Development Act Article 3 for Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding, and to Execute All Necessary Documents." Adopted. The Senior Transportation Coordinator gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the matter includes two projects; the Grand Street bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements have not come to Council for approval yet; inquired whether the matter will be heard by the Transportation Commission later in May. The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated there have been two public workshops on the project. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the funds will be flexible to meet needs; inquired whether other approved projects could have been submitted. The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded staff considered other projects; stated the scope has expanded as the project has moved forward; originally, the project was solely for paving; rectangular flashing beacons have been added. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she is happy to support the first project, but not the second project until it has been approved. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of bifurcating the two projects to allow her to support the first project. Councilmember Knox White made a substitute motion to approve the staff recommendation … | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 6 | On the call for the question, Councilmember Herrera Spencer's motion failed by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: No; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption of the resolution]. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated there is virtue in understanding the plan; it is possible that the Shoreline Drive project will be fine; however, it is good to know the details and understand the public first; noted that he will abstain from the vote. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she feels Council will have ample time to weigh in on the two proposed projects; expressed support for the proposed motion. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the second project could be changed entirely; inquired whether the motion is to fund the Grand Street bicycle project. The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated approval would go towards the $2.5 million that has already been allocated to the project; the project has an $827,000 grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) as well as local paving funds; approval will supplement the project. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there is a reason the project could not have been brought to Council after being approved by the Planning Board. The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded the grant application must be submitted to the County in June prior to the next Council meeting. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she will not support the motion; expressed concern about the motion not being bifurcated. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Abstain; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 1. Abstentions: 1. (22-342 CONTINUED) Recommendation to Approve Agreement Appointing Dirk Brazil as Interim City Manager f… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 7 | Police Oversight Operation, Auditor and Commission; the switch was made quickly once concerns arose. In response to Councilmember Knox White's inquiry, Mr. Brazil stated the City of Davis has an excellent Police Chief; he relied on the Police Chief in selecting the initial investigator. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether changing course would be a problem if an issue or cause for concern is raised. Mr. Brazil responded in the negative; stated the investigator had been recommended by the Police Chief who is still working with the City of Davis and is highly respected; the recommendation was the wrong call. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the hiring would have still occurred if the concerning comments had been known. Mr. Brazil responded in the negative; stated the field is specialized; he relied on law enforcement for recommendations; staff quickly figured the recommendation was not proper; staff brought in a credible replacement to produce the report. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about the allegations being made; expressed support for the clarification provided. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she does not plan to support the matter; expressed support for the public comments. Councilmember Knox White discussed a link to an op-ed being shared with select Councilmembers; stated mistakes made were quickly identified and corrected. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the contract as presented. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. (*22-352) Ordinance No. 3321, Concerning Rent Control and Limitations on Evictions Applicable to Maritime Residential Tenancies including Floating Homes. Finally passed. CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS None. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (22-353) Recommendation to Approve Proposed Term Sheet for Development of Alameda Point Site A and Direct Staff to Negotiate a Sixth Amendment to the Disposition and Development … | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 8 | Councilmember Knox White stated the plan proposes a significant increase in the number of townhomes; inquired the percentage of units, which are visitability and universal design compliant. The Planning Building and Transportation Director responded staff has been discussing the plan with APP; stated City ordinances require 30% of every project to have universally designed units where someone with a disability could live; 100% of the units must be visitable where someone with disabilities can comfortably visit the units; City ordinances recognize the requirement and establishes a process by which Council and the City can grant waivers; townhomes are particularly difficult and are a product type that does not lend itself to universal design or visitability due to the amount of stairs; there are ways to modify townhome units to meet the visitability standard; Site A has a lot of multi-family housing that is elevator served and is doing well with universal design standards; APP will be able to meet and exceed the universal design standard by 100%; Site A has almost doubled the requirement for universal design; the visitability standard has been a problem for every project with a large number of townhomes; APP believes a 70% compliance rate can be reached by modifying the townhome design; Council may choose to include terms in the Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA). Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how Council will know the affordable housing will be built; and whether the cost for affordable housing is significantly higher than $50,000. The Community Development Director responded one of the milestone schedule requires is that the affordable housing provider has to be identified fairly early in the planning process; the provider will be able to work with the development partner to plan for the affordable housing project; $50,000 will be paid by APP incrementally throughout the project and will not be paid as a lump sum; the incremental payments help assure investment in the affordable housing project;… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 9 | cost gap can be reduced to roughly $300,000. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated except for the affordable housing, the units being built are not rentals; the market rate units are for sale; inquired about the rental income. The Community Development Director responded a final determination has not yet been made; stated the units for sale and for rent will be established by the market condition at the time the units come online; the developer is committed to putting a condominium map on every parcel to allow for either option; a final determination will be made as the market shows itself. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the determination contradicts an earlier meeting held with staff; rentals would be provided for affordable housing units and market rate units would be available for purchase. The Community Development Director stated that she was referring to the market rate units; the affordable housing units are planned to be for rent. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether all market rate units will be for sale and not for rent, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the plan could change; discussed rental income from affordable housing; inquired the financial guarantee for the affordable housing to be built. The Community Development Director responded there is not a guarantee; stated the terms set a pot of money to supplement associated costs; Phase 1 project has the affordable housing on Block 8 come online first; an experienced developer will be selected with enough time to secure funds; the free land and $50,000 will provide enough to get the project started. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there is a reason the proceeds from the market rate units will not be put into a trust that can be used for affordable housing. The Project Manager stated the developer contributed approximately $30,000 per unit for the first phase; $50,000 per unit is an increase from past contributions; the expectation is the construc… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 10 | successfully built 128 units of affordable housing with the partner and a lower subsidy per unit; staff is confident the City has been set up to meet the 25% affordable housing requirement; APP will not be building the affordable housing units; an affordable housing developer will be brought in to partner with the City and APP to build the affordable housing; the term sheet has a high likelihood of success; the 25% affordable housing units is a City requirement; staff cannot guarantee the success; however, the term sheet puts the City in the best possible position to meet the requirement. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired why the City does not put money from the sale of market rate units into a trust until the affordable housing units are built; expressed support for covering 15%. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded the investors for the project need to invest millions of dollars to make the project move forward and build infrastructure to prepare the property for vertical developers; investors need to have a return; if the City requires a trust, the project will no longer be financially viable. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether for sale units might end up being rentals. The Community Development Director responded the determination has not yet been made; stated a mix of market rate and affordable housing units is the current plan; the developer could reconsider if there is a dramatic shift in the market. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the for sale market rate units could end up being market rate units for rent. The Community Development Director responded that the approach is not the current plan. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the matter provides a sixth amendment to the DDA; inquired the reason the developer has been unable to perform the prior amendments. Karen Tiedemann, Goldfarb and Lipman, responded it is not accurate to state the developer has been unable to perform the various amendments; stated the developer has performed on most of the am… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 11 | Mr. Doezema responded staff pursued the concept with the developer and was met with strong concerns; stated tethering the units would result in the inability to finance the project; the developer is investing millions into infrastructure; tethering the affordable housing to an uncontrollable aspect would prevent financing of the larger project due to unpredictability. The Interim City Manager requested staff to expand on the complications associated with financing affordable housing projects and tethering concepts. Mr. Doezema stated getting funding for affordable housing projects is a process; tax credits must be obtained; there are different layers of funding from the County, State or other opportunities; time is needed to make the project work. The Interim City Manager stated the market is competitive; many projects in different jurisdictions are competing for the same affordable housing funding; the competitiveness adds to the uncertainty; projects must be competitive; affordable housing is tricky; tethering in the current environment becomes challenging; staff is recommending the amendment since seeding the project with $50,000 will allow the affordable housing developer to move forward. The Project Manager stated the goal is to have the developer identify a potential affordable housing developer to work with and begin the process of finding affordable housing project funding. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the current market rate housing units for purchase are up to 3,300 square feet; expensive monthly rentals exist; inquired whether market rate prices are similar and the proposed square footage. The Community Development responded APP indicated the current proposal is in the 1,900 to 2,200 square foot range; 2,200 square foot units would be the universal design townhomes. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired if staff has an idea of the purchase price. The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated the price will vary based on the unit's finishes and details; the price will be … | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 12 | of adaptive reuse for commercial purposes in existing warehouses; a 2018 amendment included the remaining commercial and 128 housing units; the amendment replaced commercial with housing to support the Housing Element. Stated that he is proud of the work the APP team has achieved; the partnership with the City has achieved progress around a comprehensive scope and $90 million investment; a lot has been delivered to-date; decisions for the proposal are critical to maintain momentum and complete Site A: Joe Ernst, APP. Stated Eden Housing has worked with APP to deliver the Starling and Corsair flats; many units are rented at affordable rates; expressed support for the proposed term sheet; stated Eden Housing considers APP a great partner; urged Council approve the term sheet: Louis Liss, Eden Housing. Stated that he has championed a performing arts center at Alameda Point for many years; expressed support for the new phase of the project and the performing arts center; stated putting in the infrastructure will help; discussed parking and traffic concerns: Christopher Seiwald, Alameda. Stated MidPen Housing is working with partners to expand existing supportive housing at Alameda Point; expressed support for Council approving the proposed term sheet: Sarah Mclntire, MidPen Housing. Expressed support for the amended term sheet; stated the additional units will be vital for Alameda to meet the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA); discussed access to new transit; expressed concern over the maximum amount of parking spaces; discussed impacts on low-income residents: Zac Bowling, East Bay YIMBY. Discussed difficulties hosting the first Animate Dance Festival (ADF) event; stated the recent ADF event was fantastic and successful due to infrastructure and density brought by construction; supporting the project continues the development and potential for performing arts: Tara Pilbrow, West End Arts District. Urged Council to approve the term sheet; stated that she has been working towards a performing arts center in the… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 13 | Council to support the Site A project and approve the term sheet: Madlen Saddik, Chamber of Commerce. Expressed support for the Phase 1B and Phase 2 proposals; stated the work has been impressive; the proposed phases will build on the success to-date and infrastructure will be expanded; the affordable housing requirements across the site will be met; noted the units will aid the City's RHNA; urged Council to approve the term sheet: Bill Pai, Alameda. Stated the developments made to-date have provided a vastly improved quality of life for Alameda Point residents; expressed support for Waterfront Park being a resource for refugees; discussed access to transportation and parks; stated infrastructure remains the biggest threat; expressed support for the completion of West Tower Avenue infrastructure: Doug Biggs, Alameda Point Collaborative. Expressed support for the proposal and for keeping momentum; stated the proposed housing units are key to the City meeting its RHNA numbers; urged Council to move ahead with the proposal: Drew Dara-Abrams, Alameda. Stated approving Site A is important for positive economic growth; urged Council to approve the proposal for Site A; discussed infrastructure further supporting master developments; expressed support for continuing the reuse of Alameda Point: Joann Guitarte, Café Jolie, Alameda. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry about universal design, the Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated the matter relates to a term sheet which sets forth the basic parameters upon which the City will negotiate a final DDA; the DDA will come before Council for approval at a later date; staff is laying out a road map; staff understands the project will require waivers; it is important to bring the discussion early and create awareness; the project will need to go to the Commission on Persons with Disabilities for input prior to staff returning to Council for any final approvals; if Council moves forward with the term sheet, staff will have a lot of work to do with APP to n… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 14 | worked through details to provide a good deal for Alameda. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Vella stated the City has worked hard to get where it is today; the City has gone through several renditions of the DDA and has had to amend it over the years in order to adjust to changing conditions and the market; expressed support for the work that has brought the project to its current state; stated that she will be supporting the matter. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she supported the project in 2015; expressed concern about the project building units for the middle class to purchase; stated the possibility continues not to occur; affordable housing units being offered are rentals, not for purchase; housing units for sale are very expensive; homes will cost over $1 million and will not provide housing for the middle; discussed the cost of rental units at Alameda Point; stated inflation is the highest it has been in 40 years; Council is being asked to trust that staff will confirm affordable housing units will be built since the units are not being tethered to market rate or requiring a financial investment; the approach is wrong; expressed concern about aspects of the project; stated members of the armed forces will not be able to afford the housing units; the middle class will not be able to rent or purchase at Alameda Point; affordability is a problem; the City needs to offer housing for the middle to purchase; expressed concern about the units lacking rent control; stated rents will increase; the City continues to leave the middle behind, which is a problem; expressed support for a public arts center; stated the matter is related to finding ways to house the middle; she will not continue to support the matter. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed the former Alameda NAS being active, operating military base; stated people who were not active military did not visit the base; Alameda Point did not feel like… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,15 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 15 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the recommendation is to serve 150 low income households; inquired how many low income households exist in Alameda. The Development Manager responded the amount depends on the definition of low income; stated staff has performed preliminary estimates based on median area income; the amount is considerable. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like a range of information provided in order to define low income. The Development Manager stated that he does not currently have the numbers, but can provide them after public comment. Urged enactment of a pilot Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) program; stated pilot program test groups of single mothers with school aged children have been performed elsewhere: Marilyn Rothman, Alameda. Expressed support for the proposed program; stated GBI is an important step in a transition the City can make towards justice and meeting basic needs; GBI ensures the City makes a commitment to high quality and standards of living for everyone; urged Council to approve the program: Savanna Cheer, Alameda. Discussed her Native American Tribe's basic income program; stated the pilot program will be a great start in providing for basic needs; the program can change people's lives; urged Council to follow through with the program and fund it as fully as possible; expressed support for a higher distribution amount: Jenice Anderson, Alameda. Expressed support for the proposed program; stated GBI works and moves beyond old patterns of paternalism and outdated anti-poverty programs; the program provides autonomy to people to meet their needs and have stability; urged Council to pursue the program and staff recommendations: Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda. Stated the program is a wonderful idea; the goal is for people to sustain themselves; the program could mean self-sufficiency; urged Council to approve the program: Melodye Montgomery, Alameda. The Development Manager stated based on data from 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) approximately 11,000 households in A… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,16 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 16 | pandemic; expressed support for the staff recommendation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated there is a lot of work still to be done; expressed concern about offering aid to 150 homes when 11,000 homes qualify under the identified criteria; inquired how the 150 homes will be chosen. The Development Manager responded staff will work with a research partner to develop a lottery or pool; staff will promote and publicize the program and allocation process. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she does not plan to support the matter; she has concerns; the program helps 1.5% of eligible people; she would be comfortable providing less funding to more people in order to help people get to and from work; $1,000 per month for 150 people is not the type of program that meets the needs of Alamedans; expressed concern about the program funding not continuing in the future; stated the City would never have the money to serve 11,000 people at the proposed rate; the pool will need to be changed; the funds could be used better; expressed support for funding being put towards mental health services; expressed concern about serving only 1.5% of the eligible population; stated it is important for Council to come up with a better way to serve people with needs; mental health and other needs matter as well; the City can go farther with the amount of funding to serve more people than the proposed 150 people. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification about the program process and research components. The Development Manager stated the pilot program will allow impacts to be felt locally; the findings from the research component will help support policy design and implementation. The Development Manager stated the research also provides a narrative which illustrates how the programs work and impact people's lives in providing resources; the program is developing and changing the narrative of how to fund poverty. Councilmember Daysog stated it is not proper for City Hall to throw $4.6 million at a limited handful of 150 households… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,17 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 17 | Vice Mayor Vella stated that she supports the matter; a number of cities are piloting GBI for good reason; the cost of living is extremely high; child care facilities have closed during the pandemic; child care and living costs are increasing; the amount is an investment in members of the community to ensure that people are able to stay in Alameda and meet rising costs. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated tax payer dollars come from the same families; the 11,000 low income households struggle and have to buy necessities, which include sales tax; taxes have been placed on homes that are rented; low income households pay taxes; it is inappropriate to ask people paying taxes to give funding to 150 people out of 11,000; the funding may be transformational to the 150; however, many people do not have money for necessities; she is saddened that the City will be taking money from other families to provide money to 150 households; many families are struggling and will be left behind. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she has been excited about the concept of GBI since the City of Stockton's Mayor spoke at an Alameda County Mayor's conference; staff has put together an excellent report; expressed support for the program having a chance to make a direct impact on people's lives; stated the program can be leveraged to provide more or similar benefits to more people; there is a time to be bold and transformative; expressed support for doing something that creates happiness for other people; stated GBI allows people opportunities; Alameda has been moving forward with a lot of transformative programs; inquired whether the proposed timeline is realistic; stated the program has been discussed with Alameda Housing Authority (AHA); expressed support for AHA residents being eligible to participate in the program; the program is new to Alameda, but not new to the state; discussed GBI programs in Canada being long-standing with positive results. The Community Development Director stated staff is juggling quite a bit; the Development M… | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf,18 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-17 | 18 | The Program Specialist gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether an establishment can provide items without penalty if a customer makes the request, to which the Program Specialist responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the establishment can advertise the provision. The Program Specialist responded in the affirmative; stated the law allows food facilities to put items out on a counter in a single use dispenser so customers can have access without having to make a request. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether online orders can have a check box to request single use items, to which the Program Specialist responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Herrera Spencer further inquired whether enforcement would occur only due to complaints. The Program Specialist responded in the affirmative; stated the City currently enforces the disposable food serve law via complaints; staff recommends utilizing the same strategy. Councilmember Herrera Spencer noted complaints should not be made against an establishment if a person has requested the permitted items. Expressed support for amending the City's foodware ordinance; stated the business districts' support for the ordinance; compliance has been delayed due to COVID-19; stated communities in the area are beginning to comply; expressed support for SeeClickFix being used for compliance; discussed reasonable foodware projects: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda. Councilmember Knox White moved introduction of the ordinance. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. (22-356) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute a Lease with Rhoads Property Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, dba CSI Mini- Storage for Thirty-Six Months for Buildings 338, 608, and 608A-C, Located at 50 and … | CityCouncil/2022-05-17.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,1 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2022-05-16 | 1 | ALAMEDA RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSION MINUTES FOR SPECIAL MEETING DATE: Monday, May 16, 2022 TIME: 7:00 p.m. Called to Order PLACE: City Hall Council Chambers A video recording of the meeting may be viewed at https:llalameda.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx The following are action minutes in keeping with the Sunshine Ordinance 2-91.17. ROLL CALL Present: (Teleconference via Zoom), Vice Chair Robbins, Commissioner Navarro and Commissioner Jones Absent: Chair Alexander and Commissioner Nguyen Staff: (Teleconference via Zoom) Alameda Recreation and Park Department (ARPD) Director Amy Wooldridge APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vice Chair Robbins moved to accept the minutes of April 14, 2022 Regular Meeting as presented. M/S Commissioner Navarro / Commissioner Jones. All present in favor with 3 ayes via roll call vote. WRITTEN AND ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (For topics not on the agenda) Written Communication - Director Wooldridge read an email from Leslie Ooi regarding the tennis court lights at Leydecker Park. See Exhibit 1. Oral Communication - none REPORT FROM THE RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR - ARPD Director Amy Wooldridge gave the report. See Exhibit 2. REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Navarro: Visited Tillman Park and Godfrey Park said the upgrades and repairs look fantastic. Saw a glimpse of the Alameda Landing Waterfront Park's playground and said it looks great; her children are looking forward to playing on it when the park is open. Excited to hear the public's choice for park names at the next meeting. Commissioner Jones: Planning to volunteer to help ARPD with the 4th of July Parade. Visited Krusi Park for a softball playoff and said the backstops on field 1 and 2 need to be repaired. Vice Chair Robbins: Happy to hear more shade structures are going up in parks and will be included in the new park plans. Gave accolades the ARPD staff for the successful Spring Shindig event as it was a lot of fun. AGENDA ITEMS 6-A Solar Walk panel and cost review and approval Ryan Liu, Eagle Scout Troop 2 gave presentation which included t… | RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2022-05-16 | 2 | and Community outreach. The total estimated project cost is $5,700. Ryan has presently has raised $3,000. The installation work will be done by troop members and Ryan's father who is a structural engineer. Public Comments - none Commissioner Comments Commissioner Jones: What are the stands and signs made of? Answer by Ryan Liu: Both sign and post are made of aluminum. Commissioner Navarro: Great project. Asked if there could be a marker on each sign showing the distance in miles between signs. Answer by Director Wooldridge: It is a possibility to stencil the mileage on each sign. Vice Chair Robbins: Project looks fantastic. Asked what the inspiration for the project was. Answer by Ryan Liu: Inspired by a similar project at a park in Utah and his passion of the outdoors as he hopes it would get a few more people outdoors. 6-A Motion Commissioner Navarro motioned to approve the plan as submitted. M/S Commissioner Navarro / Commissioner Jones. All present in favor with 3 ayes via roll call vote. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA Dog Park, Park names in June and Commissioner tour of the parks in July. SET NEXT MEETING DATE: June 9, 2022 - Regular RPC Meeting ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn M/S Commissioner Navarro / Commissioner Jones. Motion carried by the following voice vote: All in favor with a 3 ayes via roll call vote. Vice Chair Robbins adjourned the meeting at 7:50 PM. 2 | RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2022-05-16 | 3 | EXHIBIT 1 From: Matt Nowlen To: Amy Wooldridge Subject: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] Re: Leydecker tennis court light time adjustment Date: Monday, May 2, 2022 2:02:19 PM Amy please see attached for next Recreation commison. Thanks Matt From: Leslie Ooi <leslieooienglee@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022, 12:29 PM To: Matt Nowlen <MNowlen@alamedaca.gov> Cc: Eric Vlnar <evlnar@alamedaca.gov> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Leydecker tennis court light time adjustment Hello Matt, Here's the message for the Recreation commission. Thanks. To the Alameda Recreation Commission, We had been enjoying the health benefits of being able to play tennis in the night hours at Leydecker Park until 10.40. This allows for a few parents and older folks to enjoy their favorite exercise sport, as this is the only hour that is workable for some working people. Recently the shut off time for the lights have been reduced to 10 p.m. This severely cuts our time on the court, and we are asking that the time be brought back to what it used to be, which is 10.40 p.m. The lights are on auto off, and therefore are not a waste of electrical use when no one is using the court. Also, there is no observed public disturbance brought on by the courts being on till 10.40. p.m. We hope that this request can be answered, as it is definitely a good health benefit for the residents who utilize the courts at this time. Thank you very much for your consideration. Best, Leslie Ooi | RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2022-05-16 | 4 | EXHIBIT 2 05/16/2022 ARPD Director's Report Presented by Recreation and Park Director Amy Wooldridge Recreation Services Registration for the next school year (2022-23) is available soon: a. Recreation After School Program (RAP) on June 22 at 10:00am b. Tiny Tots on July 6 Still in need of more people to apply as Recreation Leaders. We have been doing significant outreach at the high schools and elsewhere. We have an ongoing staffing issue in after school and need more staff for summer programs. Registration is open for the Fourth of July Parade entries. We are also seeking volunteers to be drivers for the VIPs, particularly convertibles. Adult basketball league starting this summer This is the 70th year of our free Summer Park Baseball League (T-Shirt League), sponsored by Alameda Elk's Lodge #1015, available for all kids who have completed Kindergarten through 5th grade. The 54th Annual Sand Castle and Sand Sculpture Contest will take place on Saturday, June 11 at Robert Crown Memorial State Beach Park. Registration begins at 9 am and last until 11 am. Building will take place from 9 to 12 Noon and judging will take place between 12 and 1 pm. There are three divisions in each category: Under 12, 13 & over, and Family. We are dealing with issues at the O'Club due to both old pipes and security problems. Working on solutions. Mastick Senior Center The Mastick Organic Garden irrigation replacement project was completed on April 27th, 2022. We are committed to planting fruits, vegetables, and herbs in the next few weeks. Mastick Senior Center is continuing to see growth in the following groups: Creative Writing, Hula, Chair Yoga, Line Dancing, Zumba, and Table Tennis. On May 13th, 2022 Mastick collaborated with Seaplane Lagoon Kayaking Tours to offer 10 of our members a wonderful experience on the water. The AARP tax program began on January 27 and ended on April 26, 2022. The AARP volunteers logged 1,303 hours and assisted 491 taxpayers with the free tax preparation service. SPARKL reusable containers: The reusabl… | RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,5 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2022-05-16 | 5 | Placed logs from the two downed oak trees throughout Lincoln Park Re-installed the merry-go-round at Franklin Park Held a volunteer tree planting at Tillman Park and planted 20 trees We have hired three new full-time Gardeners Continuing to improve sports field maintenance such as pitching mounds, aeration, top dressing, and re-seeding We installed three picnic tables at Bayport Park with a shade structure to follow. Benches were installed inside the playground fenced area. Godfrey Recreation Center renovation is now complete and open to the public Administration/Projects Co-sponsored the Alameda Unified School District End of Year BBQ for Families of Color on Sun, May 15 at Washington Park. Many thanks also to Fire Chief Luby and firefighters who took care of doing the BBQ and handing out food. Update on Recreation Facilities approved project list: Starting resurfacing project soon and will do Lincoln Park pickleball courts first. Starting design work for shade structures, such as at the Sweeney Park sand area, with a goal toward developing a standard that can easily be permitted and adapted to different park areas. At the FY 22-23 Budget Workshop, City Council approved all recommended ARPD budget items including $250,000 for asphalt pathway paving in parks and adding the Recreation Services Manager. Final approval is at a June City Council meeting. City Council also directed staff to identify $7.5 million to fund 50% of the Alameda High School (Emma Hood) Swim Center renovation and include it in the final budget presented to City Council in June. Staff is also working with Alameda Unified School District staff on the Joint Use Agreement for operation and maintenance of both Alameda and Encinal High School swim centers. High level points regarding the AHS renovation will be included in this agreement. Anticipate bringing it to City Council in June or July. | RecreationandParkCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,1 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-05-16 | 1 | FINAL MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC ART COMMISSION (PAC) MEETING Monday, May 16, 2022 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Adam Gillitt called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chairperson Adam Gillitt, Vice Chairperson Liz Rush, Commissioners Jennifer Hoffecker, Peter Platzgummer, and Robert Ferguson. Absent: none. Lois Butler and Walker Toma present as staff to the Commission. 3. MINUTES 2022-2012 Review and Approve Draft April 18, 2022 PAC Minutes A motion to approve the minutes was made by Vice Chairperson Rush and seconded by Commissioner Ferguson. Ayes: Chairperson Gillitt, Vice Chairperson Rush, Commissioners Hoffecker, Platzgummer and Ferguson. Nays: none. Motion carried 5-0. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A. 2022-2014 Rhythmix Cultural Works Presentation of Island City Waterways Jennifer Radakovich, Associate Director, and Janet Koike, Artistic Director and Founder at Rhythmix Cultural Works, presented information for an upcoming cultural art event that is funded, in part, through the Public Art Fund. The event, "Island City Waterways," is taking place on May 21-23 at Alameda Point's West Mall. Ms. Radakovich and Ms. Koike shared two video clips of previous performances of this site-specific, immersive art event, described recent production challenges resulting from COVID and road closure permit issues, and invited PAC members and members of the public to register to attend this free event by going to www.rhythmix.org. There were no public comments. Chairperson Gillitt expressed his appreciation for the presentation. | PublicArtCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,2 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-05-16 | 2 | Minutes of the Public Art Commission Monday, May 16, 2022 5-B. 2022-2013 Recommendation to Approve the Attached Resolution and Conditions Approving the Revised "Neptune Beach Roller Coaster" Public Art Proposal for Subpar Miniature Golf at 1600 Park Street Staff member Toma presented the revised public art proposal for the new Subpar Miniature Golf project, located at 1600 Park Street, titled "Neptune Beach Roller Coaster." In response to feedback from the PAC, illumination lighting, signage, and information tags, and a descriptive plackard have been added to the proposal to better showcase and describe the artwork to the public. Staff find the proposed artwork meets the Public Art requirement evaluation criteria, and recommends the proposal for approval. From last minutes: Mr. Toma introduced artist Jon Altemus and project applicant Michael Taft. Artist Jon Altemus who answered clarifying questions. There were no public comments. Commissioners discussed the proposal, and determined that the revised public art proposal meets all criteria, and expressed appreciation for the additional lighting and signage in response to the PAC's recommendations. A motion to approve the attached resolution and conditions approving the revised "Neptune Beach Roller Coaster" public art proposal was made by Chairperson Gillitt and seconded by Vice Chairperson Rush. Ayes: Chairperson Gillitt, Vice Chairperson Rush, Commissioners Hoffecker, Platzgummer, and Ferguson. Nays: none. The motion carried 5-0. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Staff member Toma provided the following updates: a Cultural Art and Arts Programming RFP was issued on March 10, 2022. An orientation session will be held on March 24 at 5pm; and the June 20 PAC meeting will be a working session for the Public Art Master Plan facilitated by the consultant Forecast Public Art. 7. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 8. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Commissioner Hoffecker asked if arts organizations can apply for Cultural Arts and Arts Programming grants if a member of the PAC se… | PublicArtCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2022-05-16.pdf,3 | PublicArtCommission | 2022-05-16 | 3 | Minutes of the Public Art Commission Monday, May 16, 2022 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. 10. ADJOURNMENT Chairperson Gillitt adjourned the meeting at 6:51 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lois Butler Economic Development Manager Secretary, Public Art Commission 3 | PublicArtCommission/2022-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-12.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-12 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY--MAY 12, 2022--6:00 P.M. (22-328) The special meeting was cancelled. Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 12, 2022 | CityCouncil/2022-05-12.pdf |
LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf,1 | LibraryBoard | 2022-05-11 | 1 | CITY OF of TERRA MINUTES OF THE ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 2022 The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 6:03 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Amber Bales, President Joyce McConeghey Vice President Dimple Kanji, Board Member Kathleen Kearney, Board Member Sara Strickler, Board Member Absent: None Staff: Jane Chisaki, Library Director Lori Amaya, Recording Secretary ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Public Comment) Lisa Foster, Senior Transportation Coordinator for the City of Alameda, informed the board that a new parking enforcement service will begin on May 23, 2022. This service includes improved parking enforcement at the meters and of time limits in the Park Street and Webster Street areas, which includes Oak Street near the Main Library. Once the program is expanded, enforcement of time limits in the Main Library parking lot will be included. Director Chisaki asked Lisa for the name of the of the appropriate contact in the Public Works Department to inquire about the size of parking spaces in the main library parking lot. Lisa responded that Alan Ta is appropriate contact. CONSENT CALENDAR An asterisk indicates items so enacted or approved on the Consent Calendar *A. Report from the Library Director Highlighting Activities for the Months of March and April, 2022. *B. Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board Meeting of March 9, 2022. *C. Modified Library Services Report for the Months of February and March, 2022. *D. Financial Report Reflecting FY21/22 Expenditures by Fund for March and April, 2022. *E. Bills for Ratification for the Months of March and April, 2022. | LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf |
LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf,2 | LibraryBoard | 2022-05-11 | 2 | Page 2 of 4 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board May 11, 2022 Meeting Director Chisaki reported that Assistant City Manager, Gerry Beaudin, was appointed Acting City Manager on May 2, 2022 and will be leaving on May 17, 2022 to become the City Manager for the City of Pleasanton. City Council will discuss in closed session on May 17, a contract for Dirk Brazil to become Interim City Manager. If approved, he will start on May 23, 2022. The budget workshop went well. The library asked to add a full-time position, but it was not recommended to move forward, although increases for contracts, supplies, and services were approved. A request to add a full-time position will be made in the next round. The Peeps Diorama contest brought in more entries than expected which is believed to be due to the Library providing free kits. The Hot Spot program is going well with 22 of 30 being checked out. Karen Butter, President of the Friends of the Library, spoke at the budget workshop and thanked the City Council for giving the Library some of the federal money received to launch the Hot Spot program, and requested if there is any more money to give, it should be given to the library to expand the program. The State Library and the California State Parks gave the Library free day use vehicle passes to use at California State Parks. They can be checked out for three weeks. The Library may receive another six passes in the next two weeks because the program is going so well. The historical marker project is inching forward. The first unveiling of one of the markers is hoped to be held before Council member John Knox White's term ends as he was one of the driving forces to move the project forward. The digital history project is coming along. Some of the library's information is now live on Densho's digital repository. The library has asked for a one year extension on the project, but may not need that long. The City completed a survey to test the community's temperature for revenue generating measures that may be added to the b… | LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf |
LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf,3 | LibraryBoard | 2022-05-11 | 3 | Page 3 of 4 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board May 11, 2022 Meeting UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Current and On-Going Library Activities (J. Chisaki) Director Chisaki presented the new proposed schedule of library hours with 5 additional hours. This would allow for more children's programing in the morning, and for staff to have a dedicated time for committee meetings. The new schedule would add only an additional $600 per month in staff time. The new schedule will be implemented with the start of the new fiscal year in July. The Library Board will be voting for the positions of President and Vice President at the July meeting. NEW BUSINESS A. Friends of the Library (J. Chisaki) The Friends are working on a formal grand opening plan for their bookstore. The Café is now open five days per week. Friends are hoping for the concert series to be held in September, October and November, but they are waiting for room occupancy limits to be lifted. Virtual programs continue to be very successful. With permission, the recordings are uploaded to the Friends YouTube channel. There are more views on the YouTube channel than the number of attendees of virtual programs. The book sale at the O'Club will be held on October 21, 22, and 23. B. Patron Suggestions/Comments (Speak-Outs) and Library Director's Response A patron complained that the Library's bathrooms do not have accessible door buttons. Director Chisaki was informed by the City Attorney's office that restroom doors do not require automatic doors to open the restroom for access and the director will reply as such. A patron complained that the parking spaces in the Library parking lot are too small and suggested removing one space to make each space 6" wider. Director Chisaki explained that the spaces are of legal size and there are a required number of spaces to comply with the grant used when the library was being built. Director Chisaki will pass the information along to the patron. Director Chisaki informed the board that yesterday morning there was a small fire wa… | LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf |
LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf,4 | LibraryBoard | 2022-05-11 | 4 | Page 4 of 4 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board May 11, 2022 Meeting challenge in many years. There is a collection development policy which includes requests to remove materials from the collection. If someone objects to an item, they can submit a request for reconsideration. The policy can be found on the library's website. Board Member Kearney asked what started the Lucy Day collection. Director Chisaki responded that Rosemary Van Lare, Senior Librarian, loved the idea when she was in San Jose and volunteered to start and maintain the collection. Board Member Kearney added that she has been working at the Friends' bookstore and at the last two pop-up book sales. President Bales will be joining the Friends' virtual program as soon as the Library Board meeting ends. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA GENERAL None. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane Chisaki, Library Director and Secretary to the Alameda Free Library Board | LibraryBoard/2022-05-11.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY-MAY 10, 2022--6:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 8:20 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Note: The meeting was conducted via Zoom.] Absent: None. WORKSHOP (22-327) Budget Workshop for Fiscal Year 2022-23 Mid-Cycle Budget Update to Provide Direction on Funding Changes that will be Incorporated into Budget Adoption Hearing Materials for City Council Consideration in June 2022. The Principal Financial Analyst gave a Power Point presentation. The Interim City Manager responded to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry regarding the Librarian position. Expressed support for reliable broadband on the Island; suggested that Council consider expanding the pilot program in the Library with any remaining funding from the federal government: Karen Butter, Friends of the Alameda Library. Discussed racial equity, people struggling to pay a parking ticket or overdue library fines, the Police Lieutenant position and the CARE Team; expressed support for the budget changes: Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Library Director discussed the Library not collecting fines. The Interim City Manager suggested Council approve the following budget proposals: Finance, Human Resources, Library, Information Technology, Planning Building and Transportation, and City Clerk. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Interim City Manager's suggestion. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmembers Daysog and Herrera Spencer made brief comments expressed opposition. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. The City Attorney's budget was reviewed. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 10, 2022 1 | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 2 | Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the City Attorney budget proposal. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, the City Attorney responded to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiries regarding the Prosecutor position and unit. Councilmember Daysog made comments expressing his support. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the City Manager budget proposal. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Community Development budget proposal. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Interim City Manager and Community Development Director responded to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry regarding the Program Manager position. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Fire budget proposal. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Interim City Manager and Finance Director responded to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry regarding the Fireboat. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. The Interim City Manager and Police Chief made brief comments on the Police Department budget. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Police budget proposal. Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 3 | The Public Works Director made brief comments regarding the Public Works Budget. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Public Works budget proposal. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Interim City Manager responded to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry regarding parking garage and Councilmember Herrera Spencer requested information. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the Recreation and Parks proposal with direction for staff to come back in June with a solution for Emma Hood. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed interest in directing staff to look at its own pool, Council discussed the funding amount and the motion was discussed. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of staff returning to Council with information on a City pool. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Recreation and Parks Director noted the matter would return in July and Council discussed the matter. On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: No; Vella: No; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: No. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3. The Interim City Manager made brief comments regarding interdepartmental changes. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the interdepartmental changes. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Interim City Manager outlined the changes in response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's and Daysog's inquiries. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 4 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - MAY 10, 2022- -5:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:03 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom. Absent: None. (22-324) Conference with Labor Negotiators (Government Code Section 54957.6); City Negotiators: Gerry Beaudin, Interim City Manager; Nancy Bronstein, Human Resources Director; Nico Procos, General Manager Alameda Municipal Power; Jessica Romeo, Human Resources Manager; and Steve Woo, Senior Human Resources Analyst; Employee Organizations: Alameda City Employees Association (ACEA); Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA); Electric Utility Professionals Association (EUPA); International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW); Alameda Police Officers Non-Sworn (PANS); Alameda Municipal Power Unrepresented Employees (AMPU); Alameda Police Management Association (APMA); Under Negotiation: Salaries, Employee Benefits and Terms of Employment Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following two roll call votes: Vote 1: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 5; Vote 2: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 5:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 10, 2022 | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 5 | Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the workforce changes. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. The Interim City Manager discussed the options to balance the General Fund budget. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of the using funds that would have been set aside for pension. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, the Interim City Manager responded to Councilmember Daysog's inquiry and the pension reserve transfer policy and specific amount was discussed. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:14 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 10, 2022 4 | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,6 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 6 | MINUTES OF THE CONTINUED MAY 3, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -MAY 10, 2022- -5:59 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 6:15 p.m. Councilmember Herrera Spencer led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Note: The meeting was conducted via Zoom.] Absent: None. CONTINUED ITEM (22-325) Recommendation to Provide Direction on Potential Revenue Measures to Submit to Voters for the November 8, 2022 Election. The Interim City Manager, Miranda Everitt, FM3, and Jeremy Hauser, TBWTH Props & Measures, gave a Power Point presentation. (22-326) Councilmember Knox White moved approval of allowing 5 more minutes for the presentation. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Ayes; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. *** Mr. Hauser and the Public Works Coordinator completed the presentation. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed her experience working on a library parcel tax measure; inquired about concern over the polling for the infrastructure bond. Ms. Everitt responded a two-thirds threshold is very challenging; stated from February to now it has become even more challenging due to war abroad and concern about gas prices and cost of living; the approach is conservative so the City does not go to the ballot with something the voters would ultimately reject; negatives would come from Facebook, Nextdoor and the whisper network of communities; a two-thirds measures is tough in any kind of environment, let alone, one where cost of living is such a concern. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a sliding scale of the bond amount was tested. Ms. Everitt responded numbers had to be picked and stuck with since it was a 20 minute survey; stated more time could be spent flushing out amounts with a narrower set of mechanisms. Continued May 3, 2022 Meeting Alameda City Council May 10, 2022 1 | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,7 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 7 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how much money FM3 received to do the survey. The Interim City Manager responded the $37,000 contract amount was approved by Council and includes the polling, analysis, summary and presentation. In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry regarding the questions, the Interim City Manager stated Council received a summary of all of the questions; the specific, detailed question language was not attached to the staff report. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether it is possible to get a complete copy of the survey questions and responses. The Interim City Manager responded it is not considered best practice; stated it is typical to summarize survey questions and provide the analysis; the document can be provide if Council desires. Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired is it public information. The Interim City Manager responded staff has not published the survey in detail; it is not proprietary; standard questions were asked so it would not be a privacy issue. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she requested the survey at the beginning of May and did not receive it; she would like to know if the questions and answers are public information. Ms. Everitt stated it can be shared, but the context provided by the consultant team is really important in interpreting the results; an opposition campaign could use the information; ultimately, the decision is up to legal counsel. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like to hear from the City Attorney. The City Attorney stated the survey is not subject to attorney client privilege; in some ways, up to Council discretion; two potential Public Records Act exceptions could be used; one is a balancing test whether public interest in disclosure is outweighed by other considerations; it might also qualify for deliberative process. Councilmember Herrera Spencer noted some pages have truncated questions. Ms. Everitt stated that was a formatting mistake. Councilmember Herrera Spencer noted demographic dat… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,8 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 8 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated she thinks the data should be provided. Ms. Everitt noted the data includes party registration, location in the City, age, gender and other demographic information. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would be interested in the demographic data being shared. In response to Vice Mayor Vella's inquiry, Ms. Everitt reviewed the infrastructure bond responses; stated the highest priorities were response times, bridge upgrades and flood prevention; some questions were regarding housing and some were general purpose. In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiries, the Interim City Manager reviewed the survey results, revenue generation, two-thirds voting threshold and affordable housing. In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer's inquiry, Ms. Everitt reviewed the various yes percentages needed to meet the two-third threshold. Mr. Hauser noted the percentages fall within the margin of error. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the survey was done in February; inquired whether inflation going up would have an impact. Ms. Everitt responded her conservative assumption would be that the numbers would be lower with increased concerns about cost of living. The Interim City Manager stated if Council is interested in in pursuing the infrastructure bond, more detailed questions could be asked; there could be a deeper conversation with voters about infrastructure things that matter, such as sea level rise. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed her library bond experience and the importance of the ballot measure giving voters what they want; expressed support for taking a deeper dive. Urged Council not to move forward with the cannabis tax; discussed jobs and taxation of cannabis businesses: Steven Chow, Stiiizy Alameda. Expressed opposition to the cannabis tax and business tax; stated businesses are just recovering from the pandemic; infrastructure funding is needed: Ron Mooney, Downtown Alameda Business Association. Discussed his cannabis business; urged Council not to move fo… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,9 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 9 | Outlined his cannabis company's formation and plans to move the headquarters to Alameda; stated the proposed tax would put the plans in doubt; urged the Council to vote no on the tax proposal: Scott Palmer, Kiva Confections. Stated that she took the survey and was fairly cautious in what she would and would not support because she was not sure where the information was going; the emphasis seemed to be on the funding mechanism; she is a values voter; showing things will help with sea level rise and climate change is critical; encouraged more community engagement: Jennifer Rakowski, Alameda. Stated that she was priced out of Alameda; discussed the market collapse in the cannabis industry; stated the industry cannot absorb an additional tax; the tax would be paid by patients and consumers: encouraged having stakeholder lead process and a voluntary tax agreement: Nara Dahlbacka. Stated agencies throughout California are currently reducing or eliminating local excise cannabis taxes, including Humboldt, Lake, Monterey and Sonoma counties and the cities of Bellflower, Berkeley, Desert Hot Springs, Long Beach, Oakland, Palm Springs, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose and many others; the tax being proposed would only further harm the viability of cannabis businesses and drive more people to the black market; discussed his business: Aaron Kraw, Park Social. Stated that he is a cannabis union worker and opposes the cannabis tax; discussed jobs being jeopardized: Zachery Gilmore, United Food and Commercial Workers Union. Councilmember Knox White stated that he is very unsupportive of the cannabis tax, which would be problematic at this point in time; after the cannabis industry has matured and stabilized, some form of tax can be considered, but it probably will not be in the next five years; the research is pretty clear; there would be a negative impact on businesses; the business license tax is similar with everything businesses are going through; the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is probably a little premature given that … | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,10 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 10 | is less than surrounding communities, including San Leandro, Oakland and Emeryville; there is no reason the City should not at least be equal to said cities. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she is interested in exploring both the TOT and infrastructure bond; Alameda has huge infrastructure needs; the influx of federal funding also requires local investment; the Climate Action Resiliency Plan (CARP) and traffic safety response times need to be prioritized; the infrastructure bond has been put off for many, many years; more detailed questions should be asked; the timeline is quick; since it is the greatest need, exploring an infrastructure bond would be of interest; the bond would only cover a fraction of the overall need; she has zero interest in cannabis or business license taxes; the cannabis tax is incredibly regressive; a fledgling industry is competing against the black market; the business license tax should not be increased coming out COVID when the City had to help businesses. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she strongly opposes the cannabis tax; discussed cannabis being sold on the black market; stated it is not the time to increase the business license tax. Councilmember Daysog stated when it comes to infrastructure, the issue is not a revenue problem; the problem comes down to spending priorities; in the past five years, $46 million has been spent because of the unfunded liabilities policy; all of the City's leggs have gone into one basket with regard to excess reserves; before going after new revenues, the City needs fiscal priorities and does not deserve to ask taxpayers to shore up inadequacies; he does not see how $95 million can be figured out in two months; the wiser course of action is to spend more time researching needs; since the problem lies with prioritizing revenue, he would oppose the measure. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she agrees with Vice Mayor Vella in regards to cannabis; she strongly supports businesses; continued support is critical; requested the TOT information be displ… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,11 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 11 | Councilmember Daysog stated that he brought up the TOT years ago; Union City has a range with the amount determined by the City Council. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Councilmember Daysog is in favor of staff looking into the TOT. Councilmember Daysog responded in the affirmative; stated it probably only results in $200,000 to $300,000, which is better than nothing; visitors pays the tax, not local residents. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated people pay a higher TOT in neighboring cities; it is time to address climate change; bond funds could be leveraged to get even more money; federal grants are available, but require some matching funds; she would like staff to bring back a more detailed plan for further polling on the infrastructure bond. Councilmember Knox White stated that he would not necessarily want to move forward with the infrastructure bond if there are two very hard noes since four votes are required to put a bond measure on the ballot. The Interim City Manager confirm the infrastructure bond requires four votes; stated other items, such as TOT, have a three vote threshold. Councilmember Knox White suggested the motion be bifurcated. Councilmember Knox White moved approval of exploration of a TOT tax, including direction to staff to do additional outreach to identify what hotel owners see as a potential impacts. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. Noes: 1. Councilmember Knox White stated that he would only move approval of giving direction to do additional exploration on the infrastructure bond if there are four votes; he does not want staff to spend time on something that would not get four votes in the future. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated perhaps, with additional information, some might take a different position. Councilmember Knox White stated two Councilmember expressed that they ideologically have a problem with moving forward; he… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,12 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 12 | The Interim City Manager stated if there is an openness to gathering more information, staff is willing to do the work; a significant amount of infrastructure needs to be addressed. Vice Mayor Vella stated being one vote short of putting the measure before the people of Alameda is disappointing; allowing voters to make a decision is direct democracy; while Councilmembers may individually disagree philosophically, she would hope that her colleagues would put it to a vote of the people. Councilmember Daysog stated his grave concern is the reserve policy that has been in place since 2017 without the vote of the people; $46 million has been spent on unfunded liabilities; the policy needs to be fixed, as well as other spending priorities. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred the policy needs to be revisited, which the Interim City Manager indicated would be done; Alameda has an existential climate change threat; more information is need. Councilmember Knox White stated there is a commitment to bring back and revise the reserve policy; infrastructure funding will not be fixed from said discussion; the issues are separate; addressing concerns about the reserve policy will not fix the infrastructure problem; the City will still have an unfunded infrastructure need as well; inquired whether Councilmember Daysog is open to having a conversation with staff in the next four weeks; stated the conversation would not be committing to support a measure going on the ballot, but would be to see if there might be pieces of a supportable infrastructure bond; he understands nothing will change Councilmember Spencer's opinion. Councilmember Daysog stated that he does not see how a $95 million infrastructure bond could be addressed between now and late July; educating people previously for the library bond required a lot of legwork; doing a $95 million infrastructure bond between now and August is not practical; the City should revisit the matter in 2024; for philosophical and practical reasons, he does not see it. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquire… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,13 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 13 | Councilmember Daysog stated that he opposes putting a measure on the ballot because the City has the wrong reserve policy in place; a lot of money that that has gone towards pensions could have gone towards infrastructure. Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would have liked more survey information; the full questions and demographic data was not provided; she has serious concerns that bonds do not have opt outs for people on fixed incomes, seniors or those who are disabled, which can be done with a parcel tax. Vice Mayor Vella stated unfunded liabilities need to be funded one way or another; infrastructure needs are not being met; the matter should be put to a vote of the people; climate change and sea level rise are real and are happening; emergency services response times impact lives; many Armenians live in a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone and are paying thousands of dollars extra in insurance. The Interim City Manager stated the pension policy conversation came up as part of the midyear budget; a revision to the policy will be coming to Council in June; discussed the Capital Improvement Program; stated the City is trying to keep up with deferred maintenance, sea level rise, climate change and redevelopment of Alameda Point. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft, Mr. Hauser stated the first step would be additional targeted polling to zero in on one specific proposal; at a two thirds level, it is really important to test the 75 word question and specific projects; the second step would be public information outreach on behalf of the City, including outlining the infrastructure needs and how a bond might be able to address the needs; additional feedback would come from a voter opinion survey of 500 residents; once a measure is placed on the ballot, the City cannot advocate for or against its passage; an independent campaign committee would have to be formed in order to advocate either for or against the measure. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft questioned whether there is a motion to go forwar… | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf,14 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-10 | 14 | Councilmember Knox White stated that he does not think the consultant should be asked to go and do polling; it is not about finding out what happens when voters are educated; he will not support the motion; the City has a lot of work to do; he does not support directing staff to go do additional work with consultants and spend funding on consultants for an item that has no path to actual enactment. On the call for the question, the motion failed by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: No; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 2. Noes: 3. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 8:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Continued May 3, 2022 Meeting Alameda City Council May 10, 2022 9 | CityCouncil/2022-05-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,1 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- MAY 3, 2022--5:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:04 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella arrived at 5:19 p.m. and left at 6:50 p.m. The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. Public Comment Read into the Record: Expressed support for Greenway Golf: Chris Iglesias, Unity Council; Mark Swartz, Alameda; Nick Wolf, Alameda High School; and Christ Tam, All Good Living Foundation. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (22-285) Conference With Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation, Initiation of Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, subsection (d)(4)); Number of Cases: One (As Plaintiff - City Initiating Legal Action); Potential Defendant(s): Greenway Golf Associates, Inc. (22-286) Public Employee Appointment/Hiring (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957); Title/Description of Positions to be Filled: City Manager (22-287) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9); Case Name: Mario Gonzalez et. al. V. City of Alameda et. al.; Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California; Case Number: 4:21- CV-09733-DMR; and Case Name: Edith Arenales V. City of Alameda et. al.; Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California; Case Number: e 4:22-cv- 00718. Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that regarding the Potential Litigation, staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 5; regarding Employee Appointment/Hiring, Council provided direction to staff to return with an Interim City Manager agreement at the next regular Council Meeting on May 17, 2022 by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,2 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 2 | Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. 2 | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,3 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 3 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC) TUESDAY-MAY 3, 2022- -6:59 P.M. Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:15 p.m. Councilmember/Commissioner Herrera Spencer led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella - 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Knox White moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog: Aye; Knox White: Aye; Spencer: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*22-05 SACIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council/SACIC Meeting Held on March 1, 2022. Approved. AGENDA ITEM (22-06 SACIC) Adoption of Resolution Declaring That the Property Located at 2350 Fifth Street is Exempt Surplus Land Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(D); (22-06 SACIC A) Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Conveyance of the Property Located at 2350 Fifth Street to the City of Alameda in Accordance with the Terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City and the Successor Agency; and Authorizing the Interim City Manager, as Executive Director of the Successor Agency, to Execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement and to Take Other Actions Necessary to Complete Conveyance of the Property; (22-288 ( CC) Amending the General Fund Budget to Appropriate an Additional $250,000 for Purchase of 2350 Fifth Street; and (22-289 CC) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing Acceptance of the Property Located at 2350 Fifth Street from the Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission of City of Alameda in Accordance with the Terms of a Purchase and Sale Agreement Between the City and the Successor Agency; an… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,4 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 4 | and to Take Such Other Actions Necessary to Complete the Conveyance of the Property. Not heard. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission 2 May 3, 2022 | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,5 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 5 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - - MAY 3, 2022--7:00 - P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:16 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Vella arrived at 7:29 p.m. and left the meeting at 11:39 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Zoom.] Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (22-290) Proclamation in Support of the People of Ukraine. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read the proclamation. (22-291) Proclamation Declaring May 2022 as Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft read the proclamation. (22-292) Proclamation Declaring May 2022 as East Bay Affordable Housing Month. (22-293) Proclamation Declaring May 2022 as Older American's Month. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (22-294) Zac Bowling, Alameda Democratic Club, made an announcement regarding an upcoming meeting. (22-295) Josh Altieri, Alameda Housing Authority, provided an update on the Housing Authority. (22-296) Rosalinda Fortuna Corvi, Alameda, expressed concern over the Maritime Marine Officers Training Center being pulled from the State Historical Resources Commission agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Regular Meeting Alameda City Council May 3, 2022 1 | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,24 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 24 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the term by right is used multiple times throughout the HE, including low barrier navigation centers; inquired whether the City's legal counsel believes Council is required to include low barrier navigation centers. The Assistant City Attorney responded State law requires the City to identify locations for low barrier navigation centers; stated staff has identified various locations. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director stated every place shown by right is required by State law; the only exception to the requirement is the R-5 district; the requirement is unclear due to how the R-5 district is structured. Councilmember Knox White stated all projects have used density bonus due to the City's zoning; inquired whether density bonus is not something that can be automatically granted, must be requested and a case has to be made. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded in the affirmative; stated State density bonus is structured if a developer voluntarily offers to provide a certain amount of affordable housing, the developer is eligible for a density bonus and waivers; since the City's existing zoning has a multi-family prohibition, the only way to produce more than two units in a building is by offering additional affordable housing; the offer creates eligibility for waivers to the multi-family prohibition. Councilmember Knox White inquired whether the requirement to have developers show a financial reason for the density bonus has been removed from density bonus law. The Planning, Building and Transportation Director responded State density bonus law has been amended over the years; stated the law has become more lenient over the years; there are two aspects to the law; one is the waiver of things, such as height limits; a more rigid requirement used to relate to financial incentives; a developer had to show the financial unviability in order to qualify for a waiver; the burden now falls on the City. Urged Council be respectful of the will of th… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,25 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 25 | residential and commercial zones; urged the matter be seriously considered: Dolores Kelleher, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS). Stated her neighborhood is dense and diverse; discussed the capability for more units in existing areas; expressed concern about building heights taller than three stories; stated the HE has more than enough places to provide housing throughout the City; urged Council to decide where new housing should go; questioned why the Bridgeside Shopping Center is off the list: Betsy Mathison, Alameda. Discussed RHNA numbers; stated any buffer is unnecessary; urged Council to focus on the 5,353 housing units; the amount is attainable through the current Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) process; there is no need to upzone R-2 through R-6 areas; urged Council to build to the requirement: Matt Reid, Alameda. Expressed support for height limits; stated that she supports smaller units in transit areas and the request to remove unnecessary blanket upzoning across residential neighborhoods; she disagrees with the proposal to include either Lum School or Thompson Field for future housing; urged Council to consider continuing public hearings: Carmen Reid, Alameda. Discussed the HCD letter attached to the staff report; stated the letter provides for a compliant HE which meets the RHNA obligation and fair housing without upzoning the R-2 through R-6 areas; questioned whether deletion of upzoning is not in compliance with fair housing law; stated upzoning all districts is overkill and manipulates the HE without voter approval: Paul Foreman, Alameda. Questioned why staff was not directed to =object to the RHNA numbers while 70 other cities submitted letters of objection; expressed support for an initiative prohibiting out of State developers from funding campaigns and building new infrastructure before RHNA units; discussed a bike and car bridge and spending State funds on infrastructure: Rosalinda Fortuna Corvi, Alameda. Urged Council to upzone Central Avenue and Webster Street; stated Webster S… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf,26 | CityCouncil | 2022-05-03 | 26 | methodology being out of date: Donna Fletcher, Alameda. Discussed collective knowledge on the HE being shared; stated many people believe the HE is moving in the right direction and the City is being set up for success; expressed concern about correspondence; stated the City cannot risk entertaining the proposed concerns; the State will go after noncompliant cities: Zac Bowling, Alameda. Expressed support for the work being done on the HE; stated the City needs the numbers and distribution of housing units across the Island; Article 26 stands out like a sore thumb; cities have tried to get out of requirements; doubling down on Article 26 will likely not be effective: Josh Geyer, Alameda. Expressed support for a good faith effort in submitting a compliant HE; questioned how R-1 through R-6 zones can contribute more; urged Council to modify base zoning; expressed support for tall, modern buildings on Park and Webster Streets: Drew Dara- Abrams, Alameda. *** (22-315) Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of continuing the current item and not hearing any more items. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated a motion is not needed to hear the current item. Councilmember Herrera Spencer withdrew her motion. Councilmember Knox White noted Council has two budget hearings in next week; questioned whether the revenue measures matter [paragraph no 22- ] can be continued to the budget session; expressed concern about discussing another item. Councilmember Knox White moved approval the revenue measures matter beginning continued to the May 10th budget session meeting. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the required vote to move the matter, to which the City Clerk responded three affirmative votes are needed. In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry the City Clerk stated the Rules require a vote to consider new matters after 11:00 p.m.; Council can complete the current discussion and address the agenda sections, including Oral Communications, City Manager Communications, and Council Communications without a vote; there is no time limit… | CityCouncil/2022-05-03.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );