pages
3 rows where "date" is on date 2008-01-09 and page = 2
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: date (date)
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CivilServiceBoard/2008-01-09.pdf,2 | CivilServiceBoard | 2008-01-09 | 2 | City of Alameda Page 2 Civil Service Board Agenda Regular Meeting of January 9, 2008 Construction Inspector & Survey Supervisor 6/9/2006 206-22PR Customer Service Representative 7/20/2006 206-09 Firefighter 7/2/2007 207-37 Maintenance Worker I 7/25/2007 207-26 Planner I 7/18/2006 206-38 Program Spec I/II (Integrated Waste Mgmt Prog) 1/25/2007 206-63 Transportation Coordinator 1/5/2007 206-71 4C. ELIGIBLE LIST EXPIREDICANCELLEDI DATE ESTABLISHED EXAM NO. EXHAUSTED Assistant City Attorney I/II 5/17/2006 206-16 Admin Mgmt Analyst (Human Resources Analyst) 7/31/2007 207-43 Information Technology Manager 8/5/2007 207-40PR System Dispatcher 6/20/2007 207-25 5. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 5-A Activity Report - Period of December 1, 2007 - February 31, 2008 Board President Michael Rich asked whether or not there had been any non-voluntary separations. Executive Secretary Willis stated that there had not been any. 5-B Article VII. Eligible Lists Chris Low shared that Human Resources staff met regarding continuous eligible lists. A decision was made based on a suggestion from the Civil Service Board. He explained that one eligible list will be used, and based on test scores candidate names will be merged onto this list. Subsequent names will be added as continuous testing occurs. Board Member Peeler asked when the list would expire. Chris Low explained that names would be placed on the eligible list for six months and would then be extended individually if the candidate was still being considered after the initial six month period. Board President Rich asked how many times someone could be extended. Jill Kovacs explained that a name can be certified for up to two years in six month increments. Chris Low also shared that the Police Department is currently two candidates away from being fully staffed, but that there are seven or eight more retirements expected within the coming year. Board President Rich asked whether Section 4 of the Civil Service Rules would need to be amended. He stated that Section 1 would need to be changed as… | CivilServiceBoard/2008-01-09.pdf |
LibraryBoard/2008-01-09.pdf,2 | LibraryBoard | 2008-01-09 | 2 | Page 2 of 5 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board Meeting January 9, 2008 Director Chisaki described how the "Paws to Read" program works, which will be coming to the Library once a week for a three-month period, starting at the end of January. Vice President Butter pointed out that the November Library Services Report reflected the new Main being open a full year now, and mentioned the declining door count at the West End branch. Director Chisaki said they were still holding their own at this point. President Krongold asked for a motion to accept the Consent Calendar as presented. Member Mitchell so moved; Vice President Butter seconded the motion which carried by a 5-0 vote. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS. NON-AGENDA (Public Comment) Audience member Marc Lambert wondered what the status of the Schrader estate was. Director Chisaki speculated the total payout would be around $200,000, but was far from being settled, so there was no news to share. Audience member Li Volin was concerned that the public comment section of the meeting had been moved up on the agenda. She indicated it might not give the public a chance to comment on something that could transpire later on in the meeting. Vice President Butter indicated that she had asked for the agenda change, but would be in favor of hearing what the public had to say even after their designated opportunity had passed. At this point, Director Chisaki asked President Krongold if the Board would consider going out of order on the agenda, skipping down to NEW BUSINESS, Item B. Community Reads Presentation by Supervising Librarian, Annemarie Meyer. President Krongold agreed to the change, and Ms. Meyer proceeded to speak about the program and events surrounding it. There will be book discussions and movie programs for families. 150 copies of each book, Bee Season for adults, and The View from Saturday for children, have arrived and are being processed right now. Informational bookmarks are being produced that will list all the events planned surrounding the program that runs f… | LibraryBoard/2008-01-09.pdf |
PublicArtCommission/2008-01-09.pdf,2 | PublicArtCommission | 2008-01-09 | 2 | departmental imperative, something that was important to her. It prevented the commission from engaging in the appropriate discussion, which is this appropriate for this commission, is the money appropriate based on the ordinance they are serving. Ms. Rosenberg said that if the answer is no and it doesn't follow the guidelines, then it is up to City Council to create a proper grants committee or a set of guidelines. She said that they need guidance from Council to assure that there is enough direction. Mr. Wolfe stated that the mission of the commission is to advise City Council. He moved that their understanding of their mission is that the grants authoring is outside the scope of the public art commission. Ms. Huston added that the use of the PAC funds for grants is in violation of the ordinance. She restated the movement that the Cultural Arts Grants are outside the scope of the Commission and that the use of the funds for these grants is in violation of the uses outlined by the ordinance. Ms. Rosenberg seconded the motion. All were in favor. Ms. Rosenberg said that they would like to continue as an advisory commission and suggested that the City create a separate grants commission. Ms. Huston replied by saying that She would have been willing to pursue the concern of the grants had there not been such a confusion of authority between the commission and staff. If there was a desire to craft a program, they would have been willing to do it. Ms. Rosenberg said that they are there to serve the public and feels that it dishonors what a public commission does and feels that it disrespects their time. Ms. Huston thinks the big issue was not being able to bring a draft to the commission, to be prevented from doing that made it clear that it wasn't their project. Ms. Lee wanted to remind everyone that the commission is there for public art, art in public places, not art for the public. Ms. Huston brought up another topic, which was the public art project. She feels that it isn't thriving. She is confused about their r… | PublicArtCommission/2008-01-09.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );