pages
23 rows where "date" is on date 2006-07-24 sorted by page
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body, page, path
Link | body | date | page ▼ | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2006-07-24.pdf,1 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2006-07-24 | 1 | COMMISSION ON DISABILITY ISSUES MEETING MINUTES OF July 24, 2006 Present: Berger, Bunker, Chair Cooney, Fort, Longley-Cook, Lord-Hausman, Kirola, Vice-Chair Moore (left at 8:15) Absent/Excused: Crone, Steffens Guests: None MINUTES: The minutes of April 24, 2006 were approved with the following corrections: a) "were approved" not "where approved" in Minutes section. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None NEW BUSINESS: 1. Disability Awareness Month Activities. The commissioners discussed the proposed performance of Axis Dance Company, which is directed by Molly McFarlane, an Alameda resident. The group will be doing performances in San Francisco and Oakland, and has asked for a $500 stipend from those cities, but are willing to work with Alameda on an alternative amount. Concerns about the performance include the weather in October, what day to have it, ground surface for the dancers if out-of-doors, size of performance area (preferably 30 feet by 20 feet, but 20 feet by 20 feet would be OK), source of funding for stipend and other expenses, conflicting events such as Yom Kippur (October 1st), theme, banner proclaiming "Disability Awareness Month", if there should be speakers such as the Mayor as well, microphone and loudspeaker needs, Commissioner and Vice Chairman Moore and Commissioner Lord-Hausman will speak with Ms. McFarlane, the School District, Parks and Recreation, and Debbie Opperud, Special Olympics Coach, and will have a full proposal for decision making at the August meeting. In the interim, comments among commissioners will be circulated through Chair Cooney. Chair Cooney will speak with Ed Sommerauer to ensure that the proclamation by Council is requested in a timely manner. 2. Availability of Staff Reports Staff presented recommendations: Policy changes are the only comments that go directly to Council. Environmental document comments go to the Planning Department, to be taken under advisement for their staff comments to Council. Improvement plan comments go to Public Works Department, to be taken under advis… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,1 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 1 | Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting Monday, July 24, 2006 1. CONVENE: 7:07 p.m. 2. FLAG SALUTE: Member Mariani 3. ROLL CALL: President Cunningham, Vice-President Cook, Ezzy Ashcraft, Kohlstrand, Lynch, Mariani and McNamara. Also present were Assistant City Attorney Donna Mooney, Planning Services Manager Andrew Thomas, Planner III Douglas Garrison and Executive Assistant Latisha Jackson. 4. MINUTES: Minutes for the meeting of July 10, 2006 Member McNamara noted that in Oral Communications at the beginning of the meeting, the comments she made supporting a public forum to discuss the pros and cons of putting Measure A on the ballot were not referenced in the minutes. She would like to have those comments inserted in the minutes. Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that page 4, paragraph 3, should be changed to read, "Member Ezzy Ashcraft Kohlstrand-noted that the City Charter stated that the Planning Board may have power to investigate and recommend. " Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the Charter was more specific than that, and stated that the "Planning Board shall have such powers and duties. " Member Kohlstrand noted that page 11, paragraph 6, should be changed to read, "Member Kohlstrand commended staff and commended Catellus for their work, and believed the project was getting to the point where it was close to being a fairly good Measure A-compliant project for this site. This would be one of the best Measure A-compliant proposals Alameda had seen. Member Kohlstrand noted that page 11, paragraph 6, should be changed to read, "She believed this plan did not reflect reflected what the citizens of Alameda desired because it did not address the land use and density issues.' Member Kohlstrand noted that page 11, paragraph 6, should be changed to read, "She continued to advocate the alternative for the purposes of advancing the land use and parking discussion with respect to Measure A." Member Kohlstrand noted that page 12, paragraph 4, should be changed to read, "Member Kohlstrand noted that she preferred public … | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2006-07-24.pdf,2 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2006-07-24 | 2 | Commission on Disability Issues July 24, 2006 Minutes Page 2 of 3 to how to present the improvement projects in a way that is accessible to all members, especially those who cannot see the plan sets. Wooden models are highly appreciated. Sandpaper cutouts on paperboard are useful for simple drawings. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Accessibility Policy: Staff presented certain changes recommended to make the policy more specific. The changes were met with approval. Staff will make the changes, write up a staff report to accompany it, and then submit it to Council for their approval. Staff was directed to come up with a budget to implement the policy, and a source of funding. For example, there should be more extensive signage of what is available, such as assistive listening devices, in meeting halls. There should be a standardized statement on all agendas as to what is available at meetings and in advance of meetings. The agendas and announcements should be available in a variety of forms - not everyone has access to the city website, or can read the newspaper. There should be people with disabilities serving on other commissions. The Commissioners discussed the need to have an ADA expert in each department. Staff informed the Commission of the intent by Risk Management to hire an accessibility issues staff person, and the Commissioners expressed interest in being involved in the hiring process, budget, and accountability related to this new position. The Chair requested that staff provide a copy of the ADA and Title 24 in Braille, tape, or screen-readable format for himself, and Braille or tape format for Commissioner Fort. 2. Bayport Park: There is some concern that there may not be enough accessible toilets for women and children at Bayport Park. Staff will double check and report back. 3. Events Calendar: The next concert in Crab Cove is August 11th Commissioners Longley-Cook and Berger will again attend and offer information, including a flyer from the Transportation and Land Use Coalition entitled "Alameda for Seniors an… | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,2 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 2 | maintenance benefit to private streets, she still preferred the public streets." Vice President Cook noted that page 4, paragraph 2, should be changed to read, "Vice President Cook noted the Board discussed Measure A many times in relationship to projects before us, and believed that the issue was being brought forth by the citizens because City leadership was not discussing it at this time." M/S Ezzy Ashcraft/Kohlstrand to approve the minutes for the meeting of July 10, 2006, as amended. AYES - 6; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 1 (Mariani) 5. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION: President Cunningham advised that a speaker slip had been received for Item 8-B. M/S Cook/Ezzy Ashcraft and unanimous to move item 8-B to the regular agenda. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 2 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2006-07-24.pdf,3 | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities | 2006-07-24 | 3 | Commission on Disability Issues July 24, 2006 Minutes Page 3 of 3 2. The July 20th edition of the Alameda Sun, mentioned Commissioner Langly-Cook in the article "Where the Sidewalk Ends" 3. Commissioner Cooney stated that a policy on construction was passed last March and sent out to contractors, to the best of his knowledge. He would like staff to double check this. 4. The Miracle League Baseball group is partnering with Alameda Rotary. The local representative is Roberta Rockwell. This involves a modified, rubberized field that is accessible to players with disabilities. They have 300 eligible kids. Catellus has offered some land, and the Giants and A's are interested in participating. The construction date is planned for the Spring of 2008. The Commission would like a representative to speak at their next meeting. Commissioner Lord-Hausman will follow up, and request that Ms. Rockwell be allowed to speak as the first item of business. 5. Commissioner Steffans has not attended the last few meetings. Chair Cooney will ask for her resignation. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. The next scheduled meeting is Monday, August 28, 2006 in Room 360, City Hall. Sincerely, Matthew T. Naclerio Public Works Director Laurie Kozisek Associate Civil Engineer LK:lc G:\pubworks\LT\MCD Disability Committee/2006\724min.doc | CommissiononPersonswithDisabilities/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,3 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 3 | 6. ORAL COMMUNICATION: Mr. Michael Krueger, 2145 Santa Clara Avenue, Apt. E, spoke in reference to more affluent families using public transportation and provided statistical data gathered by National Resources Defense Council to prove that these families use public transportation if alternative modes were available. He hoped that with civil and thoughtful discussion would bring possible sensible modifications to Measure A and further exploration of improved development in the future may come about. Member Mariani noted that if the citizens of Alameda wanted Measure A to be placed on the ballot, there were procedures in place to reach that goal. Mr. Karen Butter, 1027 Foster Street, League of Women Voters, noted that the League had presented a letter, copying the Planning Board, requesting that Measure A be put on the ballot. She noted that the League had no position on whether Alameda Point should be exempt from Measure A, but believed that the public conversation regarding this issue should be encouraged. 7. 2006-2007 ELECTION OF PLANNING BOARD OFFICERS: M/S Cunningham/Ezzy Ashcraft and unanimous to nominate Member Lynch as President. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 M/S Lynch/Cunningham and unanimous to nominate Vice President Cook as Vice President. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: Planning Board Minutes Page 3 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,4 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 4 | 8-A Proposed Recommendation to Rename Tinker Avenue to Willie Stargell Avenue (DV). President Cunningham advised that a speaker slip in favor of Item 8-A had been received. The public hearing was opened. Ms. Diane Lichtenstein, 633 Sand Hook, spoke in support of renaming Tinker Avenue to Willie Stargell Avenue. She noted that streets available for renaming had been included in the staff report, and she suggested that in keeping with community street name conventions (flowers on Bay Farm Island, and bird names in Harbor Bay), the residential streets in the grid be considered to be renamed in a similar fashion. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. Member Ezzy Ashcraft believed that the Historical Advisory Board was responsible for street naming, rather than the Planning Board. Mr. Thau noted that the Historic Advisory Board could place street names on the list, and the Planning Board could recommend to City Council whether the name was appropriate for the street. M/S Cook/Ezzy Ashcraft and unanimous to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-06-24 to recommend to Council to rename Tinker Avenue to Willie Stargell Avenue. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 4 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,5 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 5 | 8-B. PD06-0001 and DR06-0054 - Habitat for Humanity - 626 Buena Vista Ave. (DG). The applicant requests approval of Planned Development and Major Design Review applications allowing the construction of eight new dwelling units consisting of four two-story duets on a lot previously used as a carwash. The project site is zoned R4-PD Neighborhood Residential District-Planned Development Zoning District. (Applicant requests continuance to the meeting of August 14, 2006). M/S Cook/Ezzy Ashcraft and unanimous to move item 8-B to the regular agenda. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Mr. Garrison summarized the staff report. The public hearing was opened. Ms. Jackie Keenan, 617 Pacific Avenue, noted that several neighbors had concerns about this project, and inquired about a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Garrison stated that he believed it would be held Monday, July 31, 2006. Ms. Keenan supported a neighborhood meeting so the neighbors may discuss their concerns. The public hearing was closed. Item continued to the meeting of August 14, 2006. Planning Board Minutes Page 5 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,6 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 6 | 9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 9-A. GPA06-01, MPA06-01, DP06-01, EIR06-01-Catellus Mixed Use Development (AT). The applicant requests approval of a General Plan, Master Plan and Development Agreement Amendments and certification of an EIR to replace 1,300,000 square feet of approved but not yet constructed office and research and development uses with 400,000 square feet of office use, 300,000 square feet of retail shopping use, 20,000 square feet of health club, and up to 300 residential units. The site is located in the MX (Mixed Use) Zoning District which is located south of the Oakland Alameda Estuary, north of the College of Alameda and the Bayport Residential Project, east of Coast Guard Housing, and west of Webster Street. Mr. Thomas summarized the staff report, thanked the Planning Board members for the edits and changes that they provided and recommended that the Planning Board hold a public hearing, review pertinent information and forward this item to the City Council. Ms. Karen Auschler, SMWM, design consultant, continued the presentation and discussed the amendments to the Master Plan. Mr. Marcus addressed the Board and thanked them for their time and impact and reiterated that the plan is Measure A-compliant and CEQA-compliant. He explained why a vote was needed at this Planning Board meeting. President Cunningham noted that more than five speaker slips had been received. M/S Kohlstrand/Lynch and unanimous to limit the speakers' time to three minutes. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 The public hearing was opened. Mr. John Knox White, Chair, Transportation Commission, distributed a document to the Board and summarized its contents. The memo requested that streets and intersections not be widened, that speed limits be limited to 25 mph, all EIRs include an analysis of the effects of the project on the City's transit, pedestrian and bicycle environment, including the surrounding areas. Mr. Thomas advised that the Public Works Department had submitted comments on the Transportation Commission's recommendation… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,7 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 7 | Plan and other agreements negotiated by the City with respect to the development of Alameda Landing. Mr. Sandip Jariwala, WABA, 1628 Webster Street, spoke in favor of this item, and believed the project provided good visibility for West Alameda. He believed it was critical that the terms that had been agreed to would be enforced in the future. Mr. Michael Krueger, 2145 Santa Clara Avenue, Apt. E, was pleased to see the Planning Board's recommendations included in the staffreport. He addressed the issue of the staff report (page 13, Part K, #4) regarding landscaping, and did not want the shade to be sacrificed. He noted that the larger long-term issue is consistency with Alameda Point transportation strategy and addressed the possibility of a lift bridge for pedestrians and bicyclist. Mr. Jermaine Garrett and Ronald (Luhar), Alameda Boys and Girls Club, both spoke in favor of this item, and noted that Alameda Landing would provide the opportunity for part-time jobs for students. He was in favor of being able to walk to work. Ms. Roberta Rockwell, Miracle League, 1322 Sherman Street, spoke in favor of this item, and described the Miracle League baseball team. She noted that Dan Marcus and Catellus had donated an acre of land for use by the Miracle League team that is near parking and the waterfront. She invited the Board to attend their opening day. Mr. George Phillips, Director, Alameda Boys and Girls Club, PO Box 1069, spoke in favor of this item, and suggested that the buildings have air conditioning. He noted that the original Boys and Girls Club had a presence in this area of Alameda Landing for many years. He noted that the Club members needed jobs within walking distance of the Club and encouraged the Board to keep that in mind going forward. He noted that he had a previous career in retail, and had a sense of the challenge faced by Catellus to nail down commitments from desirable retailers. Mr. Jim McPhee, Cushman & Wakefield, 924 Grosvenor, Oakland, representing Clif Bar, spoke in favor of this item. He no… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,8 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 8 | Mr. Jim Franz, 1320 Walnut, spoke in favor of this item. He believed this project would be a wonderful opportunity for the West End residents, both as a destination for Bay Area residents and for an opportunity for jobs in the retail sector. Ms. Alice Garvin, 1717 Dayton, spoke in favor of this item and was pleased to see the City and the Navy moving forward. Ms. Cathy Leong, 48 Kara Road, spoke in favor of this item and supported the previous speakers' statements. She noted that Catellus had been very responsive to the Planning Board's concerns throughout this project. She believed this project would attract new residents and shoppers to the West End, and should prevent further retail leakage. She noted that the waterfront as it currently stands is blighted, and believed this project would change that. Mr. Glen Schimelpeenig spoke in favor of this item, and believed this project would alleviate the current blight on the West End. Mr. Bill Garvine, 2828 Marina Drive, spoke in favor of this item as a resident. He thanked Catellus for the many opportunities he and his family had enjoyed to provide public input into this process and final design. He supported the opportunity for retail leakage to be reduced. As a youth baseball coach, he was particularly grateful for the inclusion of Miracle League. President Cunningham noted that his family members had been recipients of Mr. Garvine's coaching skills. Mr. Irv Hamilton, 420 Cola Ballena, spoke in favor of this item. He noted that Catellus was a public relations client of his, but was speaking on behalf of a friend, Victor Jin. Mr. Jin had submitted a letter to the Planning Board, which he read into the record: "To All Members of the Planning Board: Please support the proposed revisions to the Catellus Mixed Use development project known as Alameda Landing. The original plan was ideal for that time period and real estate market. However, the real estate market has changed dramatically, especially the demand for office space. The proposed revisions make more economic … | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,9 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 9 | Ms. Diane Lichtenstein, 633 Sand Hook, spoke in favor of this item, and applauded Catellus on its proposal. She echoed the other comments, and reminded the board of the Webster Street linkage, and of the West End's importance. Mr. Robb Ratto, Executive Director, Park Street Business Association, spoke in favor of this item. He described the background of this project, and supported moving forward with this process. Ms. Barbara Mooney, business owner, 1421 San Antonio, spoke in favor of this item and noted she was very impressed with Catellus' proposal. She believed Clif Bar was the kind of corporate citizen Alameda should be working with. Ms. Kathy Wagner, Mariner Square Athletic Club/Spotlight on the Square, business owner, 2227 Mariner Square Loop, spoke in favor of this item. She looked forward to being able to shop at Alameda Landing, and noted that she was looking forward to opening a new club at that location. She noted that Catellus had met nearly all of the City's requests. Ms. Diana Thomas, Acting General Manager Mariner Square Athletic Club, 2227 Mariner Square Loop, spoke in favor of this item, and noted that Catellus had treated them as a true partner. She supported Catellus' environmental responsibility. Ms. Sandy Berry, Cornish & Carey Commercial, 2804 Mission College Blvd. #120, Santa Clara, spoke in favor of this item and noted the were the leasing agent for this Catellus project. She noted that they were passionate about the vision of the proposed project and the retail activity; she believed this was a truly visionary project that the City could be proud of. She described the live/work/play nature of this mixed used project that would be a gathering place in Alameda. Ms. Gretchen Lipow, 2242 San Antonio, inquired about the buildings listed in the plan on Fifth and Moseley and wanted to make sure big structures weren't going in. She was quite concerned about the aesthetic impacts of that possibility, which only used the first floor for functionality. She was concerned about the traffic and aesthe… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,10 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 10 | Ms. Helen Sause, 816 Grand Street, spoke in favor of this project. She wished to address the circulation of the shuttle, and did not believe the shuttle should just bring people to bus stops; she believed the shuttle should run the length of Webster Street, which would enliven the retail shops. She hoped that the ongoing dialogue between the public, the Planning Board, the Developer and staff would continue for a project this size. Mr. Jon Spangler, 1037 San Antonio Avenue, spoke in favor of this item. He echoed the comments of Mr. Knox White, Mr. Krueger and Ms. Sause. He supported placing showers in each office building for those who bike to work. He inquired whether the TDM manager would be a full-time, permanent job. He inquired whether there would be wake control and protection for the waterfront plaza. He emphasized the importance of a zero net energy use design throughout the project for the LEED certification. Mr. Hadi Monsef, Alameda Association of Realtors, PO Box 1353, spoke in favor of this item and noted that the AAR unanimously endorsed this project. Mr. Walt Jacobs, 28 Balleybay, immediate past president of Alameda Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of this item, which he believed would be a great asset to the City. Ms. Anita Ng, 1529 Webster Street, spoke in favor of this item and hoped this project would bring more shoppers to the West End of Alameda. Ms. Melody Marr, CEO, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, 1416 Park Avenue, noted that the Chamber supported this project wholeheartedly. She appreciated the applicant's willingness to listen carefully to the residents and surrounding business owners. She noted that the Chamber of Commerce president could not attend, and she read the comments into the record: "Dear Members of the Planning Board, As a representative of the Alameda Chamber of Commerce, I would like to express our strong support for the Alameda Landing project in its current form. We believe this project offers tremendous benefits to the people of Alameda, as well as an attractive site for n… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,11 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 11 | She noted that she also had an email from Patty Jacobs, a member who could not be present at this meeting, who as a member of GABA wholeheartedly supported this project. She noted the names of other members who did not wish to speak: Bruce Reeves (Reeves & Seidler), Barbara Marchand (Marchand & Associates), Gale Wetlork, Allison Bliss (Allison Bliss Consulting), Renée Kellogg (RK Promotions) and Bernie Matthews (a retired police chief). She and the aforementioned people urged the Planning Board to certify the EIR and to grant all necessary approvals for this project in order to forward it to the City Council. Ms. Marilyn Schumacher, 1829 Clinton, spoke in favor of this item. She wished to bring the "freeway" of the Estuary to the Board's attention, and noted that an effective town dock, such as in Sausalito, could be an economic boon to the City. Ms. Barbara Price, PK Consultants, spoke in favor of this item, and noted that she worked with Catellus on this project. She read the following letter into the record in favor of this item: "Honorable Planning Board members: I am writing as a resident and homeowner in Alameda for the last five years. During this time, I have observed the tedious process required for some projects to receive approval, and speak with others through out governmental approval process. I would like to suggest that the degree of rigor with which projects are recommended and approved related to the factors independent of whether there is a community concern, and whether it fits into Alameda's plans and goals. I have just finished reading the draft EIR for the Alameda Landing project. The project has changed due to the market conditions, and the changes will generate more housing and commercial space, more recreation areas and additional revenues to Alameda through the sale of acreage to afford the additional housing. All projects respond to the best knowledge available for the future. If they did not, many more would fail. It appears consistent with the City's goals and additional housing, in p… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,12 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 12 | project your approval. Yours truly, Stanley M. Shipman Norwich Road" Ms. Price read the following letter into the record: "Ladies and gentlemen: I am a real estate broker who has worked in the Bay Area for almost 20 years. I have watched with interest these last few years the development of new retail in Alameda. In fact, Bruce Knopf invited me to be a speaker for a presentation on retail in Alameda citywide retail strategy a few years ago. I believed at the time, and still do, that Alameda can have it all. In our business there is a thing called synergy. Because of retail's organic nature, the synergy created within a shopping center and/or retail center is an important component in what makes shopping interesting and exciting. I urge the Planning Board and City Council to support Alameda Landing EIR. This will afford an opportunity for additional quality retail to be built in conjunction with the other shopping areas of Alameda will offer citizens a quality of life than can become the highlight of the Bay Area. Christine Furstenberg Metrovation Brokerage" Ms. Tracy Jensen, 3112 Gibbons Drive, spoke in favor of this item. She complimented the Board's oversight of this process, and Catellus on its responsiveness and commitment to green building standards. She believed this project would give children a good chance to see Alameda's heritage as an island city. Ms. Lorre Zuppan, 2986 Southwood Drive, spoke in favor of this item. She noted she was a member of the Economic Development Commission, and was also speaking as a private citizen. She had voted for this project as a member of the EDC, and lauded Catellus for the concessions it made on behalf of public spaces. She believed Clif Bar would be an excellent tenant, and did not wish to lose them to delays. Mr. David Kirwin, 1416 Seminary Avenue, spoke in opposition to this item. He expressed concern that the artist renderings would not resemble the project when built. He was hesitant about the classification of Mixed Use, and inquired why each area was not classifi… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,13 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 13 | Mr. Richard Lyons, Wordel Rosen Black & Dean on behalf of Clif Bar, 18 Shannon Circle, spoke in favor of this item. Clif Bar liked the concept of reusing a building, and that its LEED certification was an important aspect of the design. He noted that the Mixed Use zoning was a critical aspect of the project would give employees things to do before and after work. He appreciated the general community support, and added that it would be important to Clif Bar to move forward on this project. Mr. Seth Hamalian, 3333 Fernside Blvd., spoke in favor of this item. He complimented Catellus on their quality as a partner with the City as a result of partnerships in other cities that he has experienced. He acknowledged residents' concerns about moving forward before every detail has been finalized, and believed that Catellus has provided a great deal of interaction and positive reflection of residents' feedback in developing this project. Mr. Sam Koka, 802 Pacific, submitted a speaker slip, but was not in attendance to speak. Ms. Sherri Steig, Executive Director, West Alameda Business Association, PO Box 215, spoke in favor of this item. She asked that the WABA MOU with Catellus be integrated into the project. WABA believed that the BART shuttle should be included in the Master Plan. She noted that new retail should strengthen existing retail; that the City should strengthen the role of Alameda's main street districts as the City's concentration of specialty shops; and that new retail should not have significant long-term deleterious affects on existing retail. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. President Cunningham called a five-minute recess. President Cunningham wished to address certain questions and asked staff to address conditions of retail. He noted that it had been the City's preference not to have walled communities, and added that the walls in Bayport were required by an EIR. Mr. Thomas noted that there were no sound walls planned for the project. He noted that there was a limit on the total amoun… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,14 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 14 | She believed there was some retreat from the language requiring a mix of uses, and noted that page 9 should include "residential uses" along the water's edge. She would like "up to 50,000 square feet of additional waterfront retail uses in the commercial area" to read 'a minimum of 50,000 square feet of additional waterfront retail uses in the commercial area." Dan Marcus addressed Vice President Cook's concerns, and noted that they were concerned about making a specific commitment regarding specific numbers of residential uses along the waterfront. Based on working with their waterfront consultant, months of work within the community and with staff, and listening respectfully to Vice President Cook's request for a specific number of residential units on the waterfront, they believed that the Master Plan's language to allow residential on the waterfront in the future, but not require a specific number of units was the most appropriate compromise. President Cunningham suggested that the ability to permit residential should be included in the language. Member Lynch suggested adding the wording "commercial and residential" without specifying a certain number of residential units. Member Kohlstrand noted that she had been overwhelmed by the amount of documentation accompanying this project, and was impressed by the favorable public testimony. She expressed concern about the street cross sections, and hoped for an extension to the other streets. She would like to have a forum where the transportation issues in the Master Plan could be addressed in more detail. Member McNamara's expressed concern about the parking issue. She would like to see some sort of parking structure, or would like to make some open space as an option if the parking spaces were not required. She expressed concern about the circulation or transportation flow, and how it will integrate with current Webster Street traffic. Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that this was a very exciting project, but added that the project should not be rushed because of Cli… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,15 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 15 | Member Mariani noted that she was impressed with the support of this project by both the residents and the business organizations. She had long wanted to this kind of project to come to the West End to bring vibrance and life back to that area, and would like to see the blight in the area to be replaced with positive uses. Given the late hour, Member Lynch believed it would be detrimental to wordsmith the document, and that the larger issues should be addressed and resolved. President Cunningham noted that he had concerns about the heights of the buildings, and would like further information in that regard. He emphasized that this Master Plan was a framework, and that it was important to build flexibility into the plan. He would like to see some residential on the waterfront, but would like to know more about its implications. Member Mariani did not believe that the waterfront would be an appropriate place for residential, given the noise level from the Oakland ports. Member Ezzy Ashcraft believed that the language should be inclusive rather than exclusive, allowing the issues to be revisited at a later time. With respect to street cross-sections, Member Kohlstrand wanted to ensure the relationship between the transit and bike lanes were clarified. Member Lynch appreciated the work done by WABA, and appreciated Member Kohlstrand's comments. He believed care should be taken when specific numbers are mentioned, and that the overall goal should be kept in mind; he did not want the goals to compete, and for them to enhance each other. Mr. Thomas noted that the plan did not currently require parking structures. Member Ezzy Ashcraft noted that the location of the parking areas were not yet known, and that not every allotted space needs to be a structure. She noted that where the view mattered, she would prefer to see a parking structure rather than a parking lot. President Cunningham noted that the design requirement was to reduce the amount of asphalted area; he did not want to advocate parking structures to the exclu… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,16 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 16 | Master Plan regarding the street plans remain the same, but suggested conditions be added as follows: "these conditions are subject to refinements of the sidewalks or additional street parking based on further study. Member Lynch stated that the Board would like to explore the opportunity of putting housing above all retail, which he believed was a legitimate question, not a Measure A debate. He noted that it would change the look of the project dramatically, and would affect the required parking. Member Mariani agreed with Mr. Marcus' statement that some tenants may want only a one-story building, such as PF Chang's Member Kohlstrand appreciated what Vice President Cook was trying to achieve, but would feel more comfortable with more flexibility in the goals with respect to at least 50 percent second story mixed use. President Cunningham suggested that language be included to encourage as much mixed use as possible. M/S Lynch/Cook and unanimous to extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Mr. Thomas noted that with respect to the 100-foot height limit for waterfront buildings, it had been reduced to 85 feet. Mr. Marcus noted that the current Master Plan stated that buildings up to five stories could be built, and they had no intent to do more than that. The 85-foot limit was stated because some tenants may want to have a raised floor building. Member Kohlstrand believed it was important to frame the open space. With respect to R&D, Mr. Thomas noted that the Tinker Extension was crucial for the lower 250,000 square foot retail center. If the City could not complete the extension, Variant B would be explored, which would include plans for some retail and some R&D or a complete swap-out of R&D in that subarea. Mr. Thomas noted Vice President Cook's comments regarding the 50% requirement, and noted that it was always staff's intent that in the nodes, at least 50% of the buildings had second floor uses. He added that more could be added, but that the City wished to have a required minimum. Vice… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,17 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 17 | Amendments and certification of an EIR to replace 1,300,000 square feet of approved but not yet constructed office and research and development uses with 400,000 square feet of office use, 300,000 square feet of retail shopping use, 20,000 square feet of health club, and up to 300 residential units. AYES - 6; NOES - 1 (Cook); ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 17 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,18 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 18 | 9-B. R06-0001, FDP05-0005, UP05-0022 and DR - Harbor Bay, Storage LLC - 500 Maitland Drive (DG). The applicant requests approval of Rezoning, Final Development Plan, Use Permit and Major Design Review applications allowing the expansion of an existing recreational vehicle and self-storage facility. The existing facility includes 115 recreational vehicle parking spaces, 48,510 square feet of self-storage space and a 2,100 square foot office and manager's unit. The proposed expansion would add 4.41 acres and include 70 additional recreational vehicle parking spaces and 30,756 additional square feet of self-storage space. The entire project site is designated as Commercial Recreation on the City of Alameda General Plan. The existing facility is zoned CM-PD Commercial Manufacturing-Planned Development District. The expansion area is currently zoned O Open Space. The rezoning request to CM-PD Commercial Manufacturing-Planned Development District, is consistent with the General Plan and current land use patterns. Mr. Garrison summarized the staff report and recommended approval of this item. Member Lynch noted that this project was a good example of what the industrial lands were intended for, and added that he would have some difficulty in rezoning industrial land for residential purposes here. Member McNamara noted that she had concerns about screening of the site and noted that she did not want to see a lot of RVs and big parking lots, but aesthetically pleasing to the business park area. Member Mariani noted that she did not want to see a lot of RVs and parking areas. The public hearing was opened. David Kirwin, 1416 Seminary Avenue, noted that he did not want to see an RV park at the corner of the neighborhood. The public hearing was closed for Board discussion. Mr. Garrison noted that there were extensive setbacks: 50 feet from Harbor Bay Parkway and 20 feet from Maitland. The expansion area was inside of that area, and a landscaped eight-foot high fence would be built around the perimeter of the facility. Vice P… | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,19 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 19 | M/S Ezzy Ashcraft/Cook to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-06-31to approve the Rezoning, Final Development Plan, Use Permit and Major Design Review applications allowing the expansion of an existing recreational vehicle and self-storage facility. The existing facility includes 115 recreational vehicle parking spaces, 48,510 square feet of self-storage space and a 2, 100 square foot office and manager's unit. The proposed expansion would add 4.41 acres and include 70 additional recreational vehicle parking spaces and 30,756 additional square feet of self-storage space. The entire project site is designated as Commercial Recreation on the City of Alameda General Plan. AYES - 7; NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 19 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf,20 | PlanningBoard | 2006-07-24 | 20 | 10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION: This item was continued. 11. BOARD COMMUNICATION: a. Oral Status Report regarding potential future Planning Board Measure A Forum (President Cunningham). This item was continued. b. Oral Status Report regarding the Northern Waterfront Plan (Vice-President Cook). This item was continued. c. Oral Status Report regarding the Oakland/Chinatown Advisory Committee (Board Member Mariani). This item was continued. d. Oral Status Report regarding the Transportation subcommittee (Board Member Kohlstrand). This item was continued. 12. STAFF COMMUNICATION: This item was continued. 13. ADJOURNMENT: 11:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Caths Woodbury Cathy Woödbury, Secretary Planning & Building Department These minutes were approved at the August 14, 2006, Planning Board meeting. This meeting was audio and video taped. Planning Board Minutes Page 20 July 24, 2006 | PlanningBoard/2006-07-24.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );