pages
20 rows where page = 34
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: body
date (date) 20 ✖
- 2005-05-17 1
- 2006-12-05 1
- 2010-06-15 1
- 2010-07-27 1
- 2016-01-05 1
- 2016-02-16 1
- 2017-07-05 1
- 2017-07-18 1
- 2017-11-07 1
- 2018-06-05 1
- 2018-07-10 1
- 2019-09-12 1
- 2019-12-18 1
- 2020-07-21 1
- 2021-03-11 1
- 2021-03-16 1
- 2021-07-06 1
- 2021-07-20 1
- 2021-09-07 1
- 2021-11-16 1
Link | body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2005-05-17 | 34 | resolution and give direction to staff to continue negotiations, to which Legal Counsel responded in the affirmative. The Development Services Director stated staff would continue to talk to the owner about acquiring the property; staff has attempted to talk to the owner and has not had success. Chair Johnson stated it appears the owner is now willing to talk and the City should enter into discussions if the owner is willing. The Development Services Director stated the City has been working on the project for many years; a Request for Proposals (RFP ) for redevelopment of the project was sent to the owner in December 2000; the owner sent a letter in January 2001 which thanked the City for sending the RFP and stated: "the owner's desire is to wholeheartedly endorse the City's effort to locate a developer to redevelop the Alameda Theatre; staff has been proceeding on said basis for sometime; the DDA does not pre-commit the condemnation action; staff has always intended and hoped to acquire the property amicably; noted the property owner did not object at the CEQA hearings or DDA adoption. Commissioner Matarrese requested staff to comment on the claim of defects in the appraisal. Legal Counsel responded the Commission's action is not predicated on the joint appraisal; staff has full faith and confidence in the appraisal upon which the action is being based. Commissioner Matarrese stated the project is important; the City has an opportunity to save the Alameda Theatre; the City should continue negotiating with the owner. Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolution. Chair Johnson inquired whether Commissioner Matarrese would amend the motion to include approval of direction to continue negotiations. Commissioner Matarrese agreed to amend the motion to include direction to continue to negotiate [with Mr. Cocores]. Chair Johnson stated negotiations should continue if the owner is willing the owner has indicated a willingness to continue to negotiate; the City hopes to resolve the matter by agreement ; hopef… | CityCouncil/2005-05-17.pdf |
CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2006-12-05 | 34 | the Executive Director to Enter Into a New Disposition and Development Agreement with Palmtree Acquisition Corporation for the Sale and Development of Certain Real Property at the FISC.' Adopted. Commissioner Daysog moved adoption of the resolution incorporating amendments made prior to the meeting. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (06-076B CIC) Recommendation to approve a Memorandum of Agreement regarding sources of repayment by and among the CIC, Palmtree Acquisition Development Corporation and FOCIL-BP, LLC documenting the sources of repayment to FOCIL pursuant to the Bayport DD. Commissioner Daysog moved approval of the Memorandum of Understanding. Commissioner Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 1:07 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda Reuse and 23 Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission December 5, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-12-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2010-06-15 | 34 | The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated that she would apply the formula specified in the draft Navy term sheet to the project to see what the land payment would be. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam inquired whether the base project is the Measure A compliant plan and whether the density bonus option is higher; further inquired whether the two ranges would be analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded project alternatives have not been analyzed, but staff is close to finalizing a project description; stated the project description includes the base project and density bonus option; staff is studying two build-out scenarios. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated one hybrid project is being analyzed; inquired whether the base project and hybrid project would be analyzed when the Navy term sheet is developed in accordance with the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded staff has not started negotiations on the modified OEA; stated staff has significant concerns with the project pro forma, and does not want to enter into land payment negotiations with the Navy; that she assumes that final term sheet negotiations would be based upon the density bonus option project because SunCal wants to build said project. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Tam stated that she recalls receiving an email inviting Council, the Interim City Manager, and the Deputy City Manager - Development Services to some type of outreach with the Navy; subsequently, the Interim City Manager sent an email reminding Council that a Council subcommittee was formed; inquired whether the subcommittee ever met with the Navy and the Pentagon is unclear; inquired whether the staff report asserts that SunCal may be in breach of the Agreement because of what may have been a meeting with the Department of Defense that included the Navy. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the… | CityCouncil/2010-06-15.pdf |
CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2010-07-27 | 34 | Councilmember Gilmore stated staff should take a reasonable amount of time; that she would like to see a full blown discussion on the full range of options and include the public; she has heard options that include a public land trust which seems to be diametrically opposed to things discussed tonight; that she does not want to give specific direction to start down one path and limit options. Vice Mayor deHaan stated the Preliminary Development Concept (PDC) and SunCal plans have had commonalities; the core is very common and could be developed; the marketplace should be reviewed. Councilmember Tam stated that her preference is to give direction on finding a funding stream and getting a project that is fundable as opposed to trying to decide the project direction. Vice Mayor deHaan stated funding streams are extremely important; developing large parcels could create funding streams; understanding the overall project is important. Councilmember Tam stated the City had a master developer, Alameda Point Community Partners, who lost financing; another developer has looked at a potential maximum build out of over 4,000 units; staff came back with negative rates of return; inquired whether Vice Mayor deHaan thinks there is some magic fundable project, to which Vice Mayor deHaan responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson stated Council couldn't provide specific direction tonight; options need to be reviewed; giving specific direction on component parts would be a mistake. The Interim City Manager inquired whether the direction is to include Council Referral items, but not limit the options, to which Mayor Johnson responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese stated staff should consider the items and come back in September or October. Vice Mayor deHaan stated that he does not see anything revolutionary in the Council Referral. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he wants the broadest possible point as long as the Council Referral items are included. Councilmember Gilmore stated nobody wants financial analysis; … | CityCouncil/2010-07-27.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2016-01-05 | 34 | the landlord about whether to provide time versus money or a combination. Councilmember Daysog stated that his suggestion is an exemption. Mayor Spencer inquired where the Council is on length of tenancy. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft responded that she likes what the ordinance says. Vice Mayor Matarrese stated that he is afraid that tying the benefit to length of tenancy will encourage landlords to get rid of tenants sooner. Mayor Spencer concurred. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the suggestion is to have a flat amount for everybody, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the amount of time would be four months, to which Mayor Spencer responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 34 January 5, 2016 | CityCouncil/2016-01-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2016-02-16 | 34 | The Community Development Director listed the factors that have been called out to be considered by the RRAC. Councilmember Daysog stated a question has been raised by small mom and pop landlords about the inability to distribute costs in similar ways to larger apartments. The Community Development Director stated economies of scale would be an appropriate factor for the RRAC to consider; the property owner could state they have a limited number of units across which they could spread their costs. Councilmember Daysog inquired how costs are treated, in particular, whether the treatment of relocation costs is fixed or scalable; inquired whether Section 6-58.150 Required Payment of Relocation Fee has a scalability to it in which the RRAC can adjust accordingly. The Community Development Director responded the RRAC only deals with rent increases; stated the RRAC does not deal with the amount of relocation benefits to be paid which is a separate issue; the formula is tied to the tenants' length of tenure. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the person who provides the arbitrator would decide how much relocation benefits the tenant receives. The Community Development Director responded that the hearing officer and RRAC only deal with rent increases, not evictions and relocation benefits; stated the recommendation sets the relocation benefits which will not need to be interpreted by anyone; the amount is tied to the tenure of the tenant and spelled out in the ordinance. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether no one who would scale the relocation benefits separate from the formula that is in place in Section 6-58.150; stated what brought the City to this point has been the egregious acts of larger apartments; in the last two years, of the 40 cases that have come before the RRAC, 33 are large apartments. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of exempting rental units of 5 units or less from the relocation benefits requirements; having a relocation benefits assistance formula for 6 to 10 units, and lowering relocation assi… | CityCouncil/2016-02-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-05 | 34 | Mayor Spencer stated she toured the facility and encouraged the Center to participate in a run to benefit Midway Shelter. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 12:32 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 33 July 5, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-07-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2017-07-18 | 34 | together on the water taxi service; she would like Catellus to join the Citywide TMA; she will support the project. *** Mayor Spencer called a recess at 2:25 a.m. and reconvened the meeting at 2:41 a.m. Mr. Marshall stated the deal will not close until the end of the year due to some due diligence items that need to be cleaned up; Catellus can commit to the maritime component. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether part of the ordinance can read: "there will be no building permits issued for residential until the commercial component is consummated." Mr. Marshall responded he would like the word consummated defined. Councilmember Matarrese stated consummated means purchased and guaranteed. Mr. Marshall stated there can be no guarantee after the purchase. The City Manager responded the attorneys are trying to draft language for the ordinance first reading tonight; she would like the language to be very clear before the vote at the second reading. Margo Bradish, Catellus Legal Counsel, read the language: "No building permit for residential use in the residential subarea shall be issued until the maritime commercial land is conveyed to a developer or user for use consistent with the permitted uses authorized in the maritime commercial subarea of the maritime commercial residential variant of the Master Plan." Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance amending the Bayport Alameda Landing Master Plan as amended. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consent to Partial Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Development Agreement (Alameda Landing Mixed Use Commercial Project) - Waterfront); and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Operating Memorandum for the Development Agreement consistent with the Term Sheet. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which car… | CityCouncil/2017-07-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2017-11-07 | 34 | The City Clerk inquired whether the request is to post the standard language to allow Council to attend, to which Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. Mayor Spencer requested that the Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) be included. (17-681) Councilmember Oddie stated the Alameda Hospital has settled with one insurance company. Mayor Spencer noted another insurance still is not being accepted. (17-682) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination to the Planning Board. Mayor Spencer nominated Sylvia Gibson for appointment to the Planning Board. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 3:19 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 34 November 7, 2017 | CityCouncil/2017-11-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2018-06-05 | 34 | Mayor Spencer stated that she does not plan on hearing her referrals as a professional courtesy to the Vice Mayor who is in a time zone three hours later; both matters would come back at the next Council meeting. (18-349) Consider Directing Staff to Prioritize Efforts to Increase Safety and Reduce Crime. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer) COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (18-350) Consideration of Mayor's Nomination for Appointment to the Civil Service Board (CSB), Commission on Disabilities (CD), Golf Commission (GC), Historical Advisory Board (HAB), Housing Authority Board of Commissioners (HABOC), Library Board (LB), Planning Board (PB), Public Utilities Board (PUB), Recreation and Parks Commission (RPC), Social Service Human Relations Board (SSHRB) and Transportation Commission (TC). Mayor Spencer nominated Robert Barde and Marguerite Malloy for appointment to the CSB; Elizabeth Kenny and Leslie Morrison to the CD; Edward Downing to the GC; Alvin Lau to the HAB; Bachi Hadid, Sandra Kay, and Stuart Rickard to the (HABOC); Amber Bales to the LB; and Audrey Hyman and Sherice Youngblood to the SSHRB. (18-351) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft made an announcement regarding a community discussion on guns; noted that everyone did well with the timing system. (18-352) Councilmember Oddie announced that he and the Mayor participated in a gun violence rally at Lincoln Middle School. (18-353) Councilmember Matarrese made an announcement regarding attending the Association of Bay Area Government general assembly. Mayor Spencer noted that she was also in attendance. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 11:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 34 June 5, 2018 | CityCouncil/2018-06-05.pdf |
CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2018-07-10 | 34 | the Charter amendment came shortly after: Eric Strimling, Alameda Renters Coalition. Councilmember Oddie stated the authors did a great job. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Aschraft's inquiry regarding changing the word, Councilmember Matarrese stated the word "fixes" is easily understood and was chosen because it is universally understood; the ordinance needs administrative changes, which is a fix; he thinks the word should stand. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she was trying to limit the number of syllables per word and keep sentences short and concise. Councilmember Oddie moved approval [of the argument language]. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Spencer stated that she should not vote on the argument since she is not going to be one of the signatories. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Councilmember Matarrese: Aye; Councilmember Oddie: Aye; Vice Mayor Vella: Aye; and Mayor Spencer: Abstain. Ayes: 4. Abstention: 1. The City Clerk stated the next decision is who is going to sign the argument. Vice Mayor Vella inquired why Mayor Spencer is not going to sign the argument. Mayor Spencer responded at this point, she does not plan to oppose it; she does not support this part, so she is abstaining. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether Mayor Spencer wants the ordinance in the Charter, to which Mayor Spencer responded that she has not decided; stated at this point, she does not plan to take a position; she may end up supporting putting the ordinance in the Charter; she continues to support the Rent Review Advisory Committee (RRAC); she believes the Council did very good work on the ordinance; her concern is three Councilmembers could seriously change the work that was done. Vice Mayor Vella stated putting the ordinance in the Charter makes it harder to make minor changes; the Council has spent a tremendous amount of time trying to address the needs of the community. Mayor Spencer stated that she would be h… | CityCouncil/2018-07-10.pdf |
CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2019-12-18 | 34 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING NEDNESDAY--DECEMBEI - - 18, 2019--4:00 P.M. (19-719) The special closed session meeting was cancelled. Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 18, 2019 | CityCouncil/2019-12-18.pdf |
CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2020-07-21 | 34 | Vice Mayor Knox White expressed concern about the subcommittee not being a Brown Act body; stated there is an exception to noticing; committees can have subcommittees without violating the Brown Act; setting up a process, which is intended to be public and transparent, allows the ability to bring the entire community in; it should not be set up to have meetings that are unclear without notice; the process is problematic; expressed concern about the delay in creating a subcommittee, community objectives and goals and a work plan; stated the process does not seem to be moving forward; expressed concern about recommendations being received before the budget presentation in October; stated the steering committee process will take time; Council needs to be clear about direction provided and the scope of work; the matter is related to policing, not systemic racism in the entire community; expressed support for Council providing specific guidelines, expectations and timelines; questioned the dynamic of the September check-in; stated that he would like a commitment to the steering committee; the process feels like it is starting over and he will not be able to support it without a commitment to an open and transparent process. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated one of the subcommittees will address systemic and community racism and anti-racism. Councilmember Vella outlined resources which go into publicly agendized meetings; stated the intent is not to have a non-transparent process; the process will quickly fall apart if the City ends up with a process that does not include publicly agendized meetings, opportunities for community input and information is not clear; Council always has the ability to agendize items; noted the discussion centers around the selection process; expressed support for Council not dictating the goal; stated it is important for the community to goal-set and allow for a transparent process with the most meetings possible; many other jurisdictions have had informal meetings to receive input; the City must … | CityCouncil/2020-07-21.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-03-16 | 34 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY--MARCH 16, 2021-6:00 P.M. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 6:02 p.m. Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Knox White, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: The meeting was held via Zoom.] Absent: None. The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (21-150) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9); Number of Cases: One (As Defendant - City Exposure to Legal Action); Claim Number: (2021- 0009/GHC0033180) Potential Plaintiffs: Greenway Golf Associates, Inc. Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that regarding Anticipated Litigation, staff provided information and Council provided direction by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Knox White: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye; Ayes: 3. Noes: 2; the case involves a claim filed by Greenway contending that the lack of an events center at the Corica Park Golf Course has/will produce damages to Greenway in the range of $15 million to $50 million; the City has contended that plain wording of the contracts at the Park, both Greenway's and Jim's, do not provide for third party beneficiaries, thus Greenway has no right to assert such a claim against the City; nonetheless, in the interest of avoiding unnecessary litigation and to support a negotiated solution by Greenway and Jim's on the Course, the Council authorized the City Attorney to settle the pending claim by obtaining full releases for the City in exchange for the City's future consent of Jim's relinquishing and transferring certain food and beverage service rights at Corica Park to Greenway. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine… | CityCouncil/2021-03-16.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-06 | 34 | staff time will be spent on the matter; she does not like taking frivolous actions however, she understands the need for clarity. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not support an appeal; she appreciates the uniqueness of the City being an island, however, the "uniqueness club" is not an exclusive one, and there are cities up and down the state arguing a different uniqueness; the reason HCD has rules put forth is due to cities not meeting obligations to provide housing; the housing crisis continues to worsen; outlined housing project delays and expenses; she would prefer Council look for solutions; HCD will not let the housing allocations slide; HCD will take the unused portion of housing allocation and place it upon another city; allocation appeals can be made from other cities onto Alameda and can cause a slippery slope; the grounds for an appeal are not strong; outlined previous arguments presented by other cities; she is surprised and disappointed in the majority support for filing an appeal. Councilmember Herrera Spencer questioned whether Councilmember Knox White included portions of the City being infilled by the San Francisco Bay and are more vulnerable to seismic events and liquefaction. Councilmember Daysog stated the appeal will be strengthened with a number included for the allocation; the last few allocations have been set at roughly 1,730 units; the new allocation is set at roughly 5,300; expressed support for splitting the difference and setting the units at 2,650 which is substantially above previous the 1,733 allocation; expressed support for the allocation appeal request being set at 2,650. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the remaining units will be sent to a named- specific city. Councilmember Daysog responded the remaining units are not his responsibility; stated the state will be responsible for finding where the remaining units will go; his responsibility is to specify a number of units which Alameda can bear; proposed a friendly amendment to the motion of setting the allocation a… | CityCouncil/2021-07-06.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-07-20 | 34 | Not heard. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA Not heard. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-510) Consider Adoption of Resolution Supporting the Goal of Reaching 100% Zero Emission Vehicle Sales in California by 2030. (Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft) Not heard. (21-511) Considering Having an Introduction and Update from the New Police Chief regarding Strategies to Address Crimes. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-512) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-513) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-514) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS Not heard. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council July 20, 2021 27 | CityCouncil/2021-07-20.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-09-07 | 34 | Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the information related to savings and changes; stated that she supports the smart irrigation at $100,000, which pays for itself in a short amount of time; she has concerns over the $2.3 million budget request. Councilmember Daysog inquired the location of the 36,000 square feet of lawn being replaced at Washington Park. The Recreation and Parks Director responded the area is a smattering of smaller locations; stated the areas are landscaped areas not generally used by the public; small areas near the front by the park sign, on Central Avenue, lower Washington near the tennis courts and a mix of other decorative areas, which are mostly close to the street. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the reason Lincoln and Franklin Parks are not included in the installation of rain sensitive smart irrigation clocks is due to already having the existing technology. The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated any parks not listed for the rain sensitive clocks already have the clocks installed; staff has tried to install a couple clocks each year in various parks. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she wants to make sure any vote or discussion related to Washington Park occurs separately in order to allow for her recusal; she is happy to see the matter come forward; the City has gone through several droughts in her time as Councilmember; it is important for the City to do its part; expressed support for the City Hall proposal; stated there is an opportunity for the City to do its part and lead by example; the money is out there and the City has a lot it can do; she would like to ensure the City is taking on only things that it can handle and not over-exerting itself in order to meet the end-of-year deadline; the issue will be ongoing; she is sure funding will continue; expressed support. Councilmember Knox White inquired the reason for waiting on the matter until now; stated Council about the drought in March; the drought will be continuing; expressed… | CityCouncil/2021-09-07.pdf |
CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf,34 | CityCouncil | 2021-11-16 | 34 | ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (21-762) Considering Directing Staff to Provide an Update on License Plate Readers. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-763) Consider Directing Staff to Publicly Share Information on Parking Recreational Vehicles. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-764) Consider Directing Staff to Address Representation for Below Market Rate Homeowners on Homeowner Association (HOA) Boards and with Property Management. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. (21-765) Consider Directing Staff to Support Removal of the US Navy Constraints Limiting Housing Development at Alameda Point. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer and Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. (21-766) Consider Directing Staff to Address Identifying New Areas at Alameda Point to Develop a Number of Housing Units Above the Originally-Agreed Upon Numbers of the 2023- 2031 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). (Councilmember Daysog) Not heard. (21-767) Consider Directing Staff to Move Jean Sweeney Park Fencing. (Councilmembers Herrera Spencer and Daysog) Not heard. (21-768) Consider Reviewing and Updating the Previous City Council's Priorities at a Regular City Council Meeting. (Councilmember Herrera Spencer) Not heard. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (21-769) Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed an upcoming community Thanksgiving dinner at Christ Church. (21-770) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended the 80th anniversary of the Flying Tigers at the USS Hornet. (21-771) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a briefing on the Howard Terminal ballpark proposal; stated that she attended a ribbon cutting for the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter (FAAS) mobile adoption center; discussed a Veterans Day Commemoration event; announced door-to- door vaccine outreach by Alameda High School's leadership class; discussed Scouting for Food, Starbucks grand opening and Signal Coffee Roasters ribbon cutting events. ADJOURNMENT (21-772) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeti… | CityCouncil/2021-11-16.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,34 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 34 | e - 200 - - - sa - - - - no - ta - - - - - - - - - DE a | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,34 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 34 | Jasty 71411 to Len SAnches 94611 hin Janchas@Gmail to 100 kunio NAHK 94506 KNAHBO@Gmail.com 4 Luu ASTARY 94566 bsa Claire Rubin 94611 clauresnobin@gmail.com SR John Ruben 94611 John-rusin@ Comcastine TR | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );