pages
1,002 rows where body = "RecreationandParkCommission" sorted by text
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
date (date) >30 ✖
- 2019-09-12 78
- 2021-03-11 47
- 2017-12-14 24
- 2019-12-12 21
- 2019-02-14 15
- 2019-10-08 15
- 2021-01-14 14
- 2014-01-09 12
- 2020-11-12 11
- 2022-03-10 11
- 2005-01-13 10
- 2005-06-09 10
- 2018-04-12 10
- 2017-10-12 9
- 2018-02-08 9
- 2018-05-10 9
- 2018-09-13 9
- 2019-05-09 9
- 2021-04-08 9
- 2005-04-14 8
- 2006-01-12 8
- 2009-09-10 8
- 2011-10-13 8
- 2021-06-10 8
- 2005-02-10 7
- 2007-02-08 7
- 2009-10-05 7
- 2010-01-14 7
- 2010-02-11 7
- 2012-10-11 7
- …
Link | body | date | page | text ▼ | path |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-05-13.pdf,6 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-05-13 | 6 | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-05-13.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2020-11-12.pdf,7 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2020-11-12 | 7 | RecreationandParkCommission/2020-11-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,78 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 78 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,8 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 8 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,14 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 14 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,15 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 15 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,16 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 16 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,17 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 17 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,18 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 18 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,21 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 21 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,22 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 22 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,25 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 25 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,26 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 26 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,28 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 28 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,29 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 29 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,30 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 30 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,31 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 31 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,32 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 32 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,33 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 33 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,35 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 35 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,36 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 36 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,37 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 37 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,38 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 38 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,44 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 44 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,46 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 46 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf,52 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-09-12 | 52 | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-09-12.pdf | |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-06-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-06-12 | 2 | "That ARPD staff write a letter to the Police Department and ask for assistance in the parks on the weekends. The Commission would like to have APD check permits and make sure there is no alcohol is being consumed in the parks." 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Review and Discussion of Lincoln Park Field Renovation Plans - (Information Item) PM McDonald reviewed with the Commission the Lincoln Park Field Renovation Plans. The plans call for new irrigation, new turf, and the ball field will remain in the same location, dirt area will be leveled where another field used to be in the southeast corner, and some regrading will be done. Commissioner Restagno asked if there will be a grass infield. PM McDonald stated there is an alternate bid for a grass infield. Having a grass infield may be a good idea because the infield mix is getting very expensive and it needs to be trucked in, etc. Also some of the homes are very close to the field, and as much as everyone tries to water the field the dust still ends up on the homes. It would not eliminate all the dirt problems, but would help alleviate the dust problem. Commissioner Cooper asked how the field is used. PM McDonald stated that it is strictly used for hardball play. The only issue is if there are enough funds to do a grass infield. Commissioner Kahuanui asked how the project will be funded. PM McDonald stated that funds for the project will come from the General Fund. Commissioner Sonneman asked for clarification regarding the Rittler Park renovation being put on hold. PM McDonald stated that the Rittler Park Field Renovation was recently put out to bid and is scheduled to begin on July 7, 2008. Commissioner Cooper stated that he thought the City was going to start the Harrison Center first. PM McDonald stated that the building renovation was postponed at a Council Meeting and Council moved the field renovation up. PM McDonald also stated that the City has received notice from EBMUD about water rationing and it is impossible to keep up a new turf with t… | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-06-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-02-10 | 4 | "That the per player fee be tabled until alternatives are reviewed. " Approved (5): Ingram, Kahuanui, Johnson, Oliver, Reeves M/S/C REEVES/KAHUANUI (Approved) That the 2005 fee increases listed below is approved: BASKETBALL Adult $610.00 Resident Team Fee $660.00 Non-Resident Team Fee SOFTBALL Adult $620.00 Resident Team Fee $670.00 Non-Resident Team Fee FLAG FOOTBALL Adult $598.00 Resident Team Fee $615.00 Non-Resident Team Fee SWIM LESSONS $ 5.00 each 1/2 hr. lesson - Resident ($50 for two-week session) $ 6.00 each 1/2 hr. Lesson - Non-Resident ($60 for two-week session) SWIM TEAMS USE FEE Hourly Rate: $5/hr./youth & adult (currently) $11/hr./youth (beginning January 2006) $12/hr./adult (beginning January 2006) $12/hr./youth (beginning January 2006) $13/hr. adult (beginning January 2006) TENNIS Adult Group Lessons $ 11/hour Junior Group Lessons $ 11/hour Private Lessons $ 42/hour YOUTH Day Camp $120/week - Hidden Cove $135/week - Trails End $ 60/week - Hidden Cove Extended Care $ 50/week - Trails End Extended Care Preschool $ 4/hour YOUTH SPORTS Fall, Winter, Spring 4 Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes Thursday, February 10, 2005 Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2007-03-08.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2007-03-08 | 4 | "That the request from Alameda Girls Softball to install a storage container in Krusi Park be approved." (Storage container will go where an existing container exists at this time. This is next to field number three down the first baseline.) 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See March 6, 2007 Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See March 6, 2007 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See March 6, 2007 Activity Report. D. Other Reports and Announcments - Status Report on Transportation Master Plan Committee (Commissioner Johnson) No report at this time. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL Commissioner Johnson stated that she would like to recommend some improvements to the small dog park in Washington Park. Recommendations are possibly planting a tree to provide shade to patrons using the facility, possibly mowing along the fence to allow owners of dogs to exercise around the perimeter of the park while their dogs are using it, and fixing the ADA entrance into the small dog park and making it level. Director Lillard suggested trying to procure donations to have an arbor put in, like the one in the center of Mastick Senior Center. Manager McDonald stated that there are parachute type shades that cover a good size picnic area that cost approximately $15,000. Director Lillard stated that staff will look at the grading of the dirt at the entrance to the site. 9. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA 10. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING April 12, 2007 11. ADJOURNMENT - -4 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - Thursday, March 8, 2007 | RecreationandParkCommission/2007-03-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-01-14.pdf,9 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-01-14 | 9 | "The Missing Link" of Alameda Shoreline Park On Harbor Bay the San Francisco Bay Trail is incorporated into the Shoreline Park Shoreline Park . includes both grassy areas and paths for both pedestrians and bicyclists to safely access the views and fresh air. Hundreds of residents and Harbor Bay Business Park workers walk and bike these paths. During the pandemic use has greatly increased, which is vital to physical and mental health. This photo shows a wide section of the Shoreline Park concrete path that ends abruptly, narrowing into a ragged, asphalt path. | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-01-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2016-11-10.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2016-11-10 | 4 | $20,000.00 to support parks and health and wellness programs. The Bike for the Parks was also successful with 531 riders and positive comments from participants. Alameda Rotary gave a lot of support along with ARPD staff who were the backbone of the event. There were 5 major sponsors that stepped up and donated to cover the costs and $20,000 was secured from the event. C. Recreation and Parks Director Report Parks: Ball Field Renovation at Krusi Park, fence repair and pruning completed over at Tillman, fence repaired for access at Sweeney Park, two additional Memorial Benches were installed at Franklin and Shoreline Parks. Recreation: Mayor's Tree Lighting will take place on December 3 at City Hall, sign-ups for Breakfast with Santa is on December 10 and Santa Home Visits are underway, TGIF and Non School Day Programs coming up for the Holiday week, Bike for the Parks was extremely successful. A big shout out to the Gene Oh who was the driving force behind the event, the committee and Friends of the Park Foundation for raising over $20,000.00 for funding that will go to the Park programs. Women's Softball league has begun on Friday nights at lower Washington. Mastick Senior Center: Mastick's annual Halloween dance was held in the social hall on October 27th at 1:00 PM with an attendance of 92 Mastick members which was the highest in the past three years. Teens Teaching Technology is a very popular joint program held by Mastick Senior Center and the Underground Teen Center where middle school and high school students help seniors with questions they have about their electronic devices. The Ukulele Jam and Sing-Along was another popular class with 20 members participating. Heavenly Hair at 50 was held by Brandon Stanford and his staff at Compliments Salon who gave demonstration and tips on how to care for aging hair. The workshop was successful with an attendance of 40 people and a waitlist of 20. Projects: There will be a public meeting at Woodstock Center on December 1st at 6:00 PM to review the three design conc… | RecreationandParkCommission/2016-11-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2017-12-14.pdf,8 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2017-12-14 | 8 | (Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011) 2-12.4 - Duties of Commission. It shall be the duty of the Recreation and Park Commission to: a. Advise the Director of Recreation and Parks, the City Council and the Board of Education on all matters pertaining to the establishment and operation of community recreation programs, activities and facilities. b. Hold hearings and do all things necessary to inform itself with respect to the promotion and successful operation of City recreational activities. C. Establish necessary or proper regulations and rules to carry out the provisions of this section including, but not limited to, the recommendation of rates, fees, and charges in connection with the use of facilities or participation in recreational programs, which shall be included in the City's annual Master Fee Resolution for adoption by the City Council. (Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011) AMC Section 2-12.4c is directly on point. It clearly states that the Commission's duties, among other things are to make "recommendation of rates, fees and charges in connection with the use of facilities or participation in recreational programs. " Some confusion on this point has arisen from the language in the Bylaws in Chapter 1, Article 1, Section 2(2) which states: "The Recreation Commission has the responsibility for setting fees and charges." It is well within the authority of the Commission to adopt a set of Bylaws to help govern its activities. Such authority is granted in AMC Section 2-12.3(a). However, to the extent that the Bylaws have been interpreted to mean that the Commission sets the fees as opposed to making a recommendation to the City Council concerning rates and fees, then that interpretation is in error. The Commission cannot grant itself more authority that was delegated to it by the City Council. The City Council's delegation in AMC Section 2-12 gave the Commission the authority to make "recommendation of rates, fees and charges in connection with the use of facilities or participation in recreational programs. AM… | RecreationandParkCommission/2017-12-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-01-13 | 3 | - During deliberations the Commission will make the distinction between protecting park property and keeping it as an integral part of the community. - Service issues to the community. - Do not discount size or anything else in terms of evaluating what benefits non-park and recreation programs in the neighborhood. Neighborhoods should not be deprived of potential services just because of park size. Chair Ingram asked Mr. Phillips if he knew that Alameda is way underserved as far park acreage in the community, more so than a lot of other cities. Mr. Philips stated that he is very well aware. Chair Ingram asked Mr. Phillips the status of rebuilding the Boys and Girls Club. Mr. Phillips stated that they have prepared a proposal for the School District. Everything seems acceptable with the School District. The proposal needs to go before the School Board. B. Discussion and Selection of Joint Meeting Dates with City Council - (Discussion/Action Item) RSM Lillard stated that the staff and City Clerk are still trying to confirm a date for the Joint Meeting with Council. C. Discussion of Annual Commission Goals, Objectives, and Accomplishments Including Park Master Plan - (Discussion/Action Item) Chair Ingram stated that he would like to have the list of Goals, Objectives, and Accomplishments for the Joint Meeting with Council. Suggested list of accomplishments were: - Marina Waterfront Park - DeWitt Officers' Club has been fully utilized. Is booked six months to one year in advance. - Small Dog Park - Development of Small Dog Park Website/installation of bulletin board. - Dog Park Drainage - Creation of Sport Advisory Committee - Use of Coast Guard park field easing shortage of athletic fields. - Collaborated with Friends of Franklin Park for funding additional improvements to Franklin Park Playground Renovation. - Design and Renovation of Littlejohn and McKinley Park Play Areas as well as the Alameda Point Multi-Purpose Field. - Initiated discussion with the Peralta Community College District (PCCD) for use of the socc… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf,37 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-03-11 | 37 | - Full Name Zip code Signature LilyLeung 94502 Jackie Cungug COT seang fly 94502 geta Barbara Besions 94502 Chanya Bartel bysic14@ad Belisped 94601 chuangsakulde Byahae lir Karis Kim 94582 canskim207@gmail.com 22 Trinity Zhang 94502 trinityzhancy@live.com B Wesley Omi 94502 Wesley so 1106e Louisa Chew buisashewe egm Welfa 94502 Marie Fung 94502 mfungusl eyahooon Marie Favor Vicki Majhor 94501 rpmremeant.com Uniki mahn Randy Friedman 94502 randy-fnedman Rob Currier 94.500 citagehotmail.com Randy Freedman Refurtar Tommy Wong 94502 oh =tom Elizabeth Becht 94501 Nancy Gordon 94501 revn)o Santh 994542 bloss@gmail.com oriko 94502 sto20200@yahoo.com off blossack lawa Sumrall 94501 msmitchrolattnet summall Laura Mitchell Sumt 94501 Mitchcoblue@attric Mondall summal 94501 L | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-03-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-09-15.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-09-15 | 2 | - Letter from Miriam Sundheim, Alameda resident, regarding construction of cell phone towers at Krusi Park. - E-Mail from Carol Wallace regarding construction of cell phone towers at Krusi Park. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Washington Park Recreation Building Conceptual Drawing - (Discussion/Action Item) AD Lillard provided to the Commission the conceptual drawing for the new recreation Building at Washington Park. Several years ago the old recreation building burned down and a temporary building was installed. The temporary building has deteriorated and we are unable to run programs at the park. The new building will be funded with Prop 40 monies and will be a modular building. This is the first modular building to be built in the City. M/S/C REEVES/OLIVER (approved) "That the conceptual drawing for the new modular building at Washington Park be accepted." Approved (5): Ingram, Johnson, Kahuanui, Oliver, Reeves B. Request to Install Cingular Cell Tower in Krusi Park at the Tennis Courts - (Discussion/Action Item) Bruce Knopf, Redevelopment Manager, presented to the Commission plans for installing a Cingular Cell Tower in Krusi Park at the tennis courts. Approximately two years ago the tennis court lights on the left side of the court (facing the tennis courts from Otis Dr.) were replaced with new lights that have cell towers inside the new light poles. With this proposal, the three old tennis court lights on the right side of the tennis courts would also be replaced with additional cell towers inside the new light poles. Cingular is making this new proposal. Mr. Knopf provided the Commission with a map of Alameda showing other cell tower sites (e.g., Alameda Hospital, top of former Alameda Drug, College of Alameda, Christ Episcopal Church, Wood Middle School, Washington School, etc.) located in Alameda. There are a lot of other places that do not go through the process that the City does for City owned property and do not go through the City-wide public notification process that the City uses. The City has collected appro… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-09-15.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-01-13 | 4 | - Made significant progress in cost recovery. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division Alameda Point Gymnasium: Community use of the gymnasium by Alameda sponsored organizations has increased 20 percent this year. Beginning in January, Encinal High School and St. Joseph Notre Dame High School will share court time after school for basketball practices through March. FUTSAL (indoor soccer) will begin its 5th season at the gym commencing in January. Approximately 40 teams participate in this league. All games are scheduled on weekends and are open to the public. Also, the Golden State Warriors will be holding a basketball camp at the gymnasium from December 20-23, for boys and girls between the ages of 8-16. The focus of this camp is individual skill development, learning proper fundamental skills, and development of a healthy team attitude. This camp will also feature appearances by current and former Warriors players and coaches. Franklin Park: Friends of Franklin Park purchased three beautiful Victorian picnic tables with benches which have been installed. The Park Division staff worked with the Recreation Division and Friends of Franklin Park to find the best location for the tables. Also, a new driveway was installed at the entrance to Franklin Park. This work has enhanced the appearance as well as the safety of the location. Veteran's Building: Meetings are continuing between a local Veteran's Committee and City staff to develop plans to renovate the kitchen. Staff has been informed by the Alameda County Health Department that a commercial kitchen will be required and an onsite meeting with the Health Department is scheduled for Thursday, December 16. This project will be financed by the Veteran's Committee, who plan to hold fundraising events and obtain donations from local businesses. Leydecker Playground Renovation: A Request for Proposal (RFP) for the relocation of the Leydecker Playground was recently completed and is being reviewed. This project will includ… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-11-13.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-11-13 | 2 | - October 9, 2008 Recreation and Park Commission Meeting M/S/C KAHUANUI/MARIANI (approved) "That the October 9, 2008 Recreation and Park Commission Meeting Minutes be approved." Approved (4): Brown, Kahuanui, Mariani, Sonneman Abstention (2): Cooper, Restagno Absent (1): Ogden 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) None. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 6. NEW BUSINESS None. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Review and Discussion of Drought Field Use Policy - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard and PM McDonald provided an update on the conditions of the fields during the drought restriction. Staff is recommending that the Drought Field Use Policy stay in effect until February 2009 when EBMUD will have their water readings. PM McDonald stated that when the restrictions are lifted, we need to be careful because the requests from outside leagues to use our fields have drastically increased. Outside/non-resident single groups are not as much of a concern as the outside/non- resident league field users/requests. M/S/C SONNEMAN/MARIANI (approved) "That the Drought Field Use Policy continues until February 2009. In February 2009 the policy will be reviewed again." Approved (6): Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui, Mariani, Sonneman Absent (1): Ogden - 2 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - Thursday, November 13, 2008 | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-11-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf,5 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-02-10 | 5 | - Football $ 75/Season (additional $10 Non-Resident Fee) - Basketball $ 65/Season (additional $10 Non-Resident Fee) - Soccer $ 60/Season (additional $10 Non-Resident Fee) 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Continued Discussion and Consideration of Request from Mayor and City Council to Develop a Park Use Policy - (Discussion Item) RSM Lillard reviewed the draft proposal that was included in the Commission packet. Commissioner Johnson commented that the document was very well done and addressed the items that the Commission had identified. Commissioner Ingram stated that the document was good but added that he wanted to make sure that the finished product included wording similar to #4 in the City of Seattle example regarding recovery of associated costs. RSM Lillard agreed to incorporate the item and to bring the next revision back to the Commission in April. B. Discussion and Selection of Joint Meeting Dates with City Council - (Discussion/Action Item) RSM Lillard informed the Commission that the City Clerk's Office had contacted staff with regard to scheduling the Annual Joint Meeting with Council. It was originally proposed to meet on a Wednesday evening in March, but the Council is unable to attend any of those dates. The Clerk's office is now attempting to schedule a date in April. C. Discussion of Annual Commission Goals, Objectives, and Accomplishments Including Park Master Plan - (Discussion/Action Item) RSM Lillard reviewed the draft copy of the Commission Goals and Objectives with the Commission. After discussion the following items were included under Accomplishments and Goals: Accomplishments Completion of the Marina Water Front Park Renaming of the former Officers' Club in honor of former Vice-Mayor Albert H. Dewitt Approval of the Public Art pieces for the Library Project Inclusion of the Water Station in the Drainage Project at the Dog Park Opened discussions for use of Alameda Point fields by local youth organizations Continue growth towards increasing cost recovery through introduction of new Programs Goa… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2014-01-09.pdf,9 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2014-01-09 | 9 | 0 C Gazebo Restrooms Picnio Park Entry 60 parking spaces 40 parking spaces Great Lawn Nitdoor Classroom Main Plaza Landscape Natural Playground BMX Bike Park Pavilion Picnio 5 0 to Ctemel nt Plaza Train Depot Maintenance Yard Masterplan Diagram ALAMEDA JEAN SWEENEY OPEN SPACE PARK 5 | RecreationandParkCommission/2014-01-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2009-09-10.pdf,8 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2009-09-10 | 8 | 1,2010. Recreation and Park Commission discussed the Alameda Boys & Girls Club project and whether they felt it qualified to be on the list of Measure WW funded projects. Commissioner Brown suggested sending a letter to City Council with the Commission's recommendation. M/S/C KAHUANUI/RESTAGNO (approved) "That the Recreation and Park Commission will send a letter to Council stating that the Commission strongly urges the City Council to respect the directive of the voters who supported Measure WW. The voters approved (with their votes) the allocation of funds (through Measure WW) to maintain, acquire and improve the city's Recreation and Parks facilities and grounds." Approved (6): Ogden, Restagno , Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui, Sonneman Absent (1): Mariani 4. ADJOURNMENT Recreation & Park Commission Special Mtg. 5 Minutes - Thursday, September 10, 2009 | RecreationandParkCommission/2009-09-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-01-13.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-01-13 | 4 | 1. Restrict the use of the Premium Taxi Service and MRTIP to within Alameda County. Chair Restagno asked if they considered those who live on the outskirts of Alameda County and their doctor may be in the Contra Costa area closer to them. To have a 30 mile radius might make more sense. Ms. Payne stated that eligible participants are residents within the City of Alameda. People in the City of Alameda have doctors that are within the City of Alameda or Oakland area. This will not affect too many people. 2. Limit the use of MRTIP to five vouchers per month for each eligible resident. Ms. Payne stated that currently people are allowed to use this service an unlimited amount of times. Most people visit their doctor a few times a month and those are the individuals that we are targeting. Vice Chair Brown stated that there are instances where someone may have an immediate/emergency and need to go for six weeks, once per week, will that qualify. Ms. Payne stated yes. Participants can accumulate vouchers. They will get five vouchers per month and if they plan ahead can accumulate the vouchers needed. 3. Require the City of Alameda Paratransit Transportation providers to install taxi meters in their lift-equipped vans. Ms. Payne stated that when individuals use a taxi there is always a meter. Those that use a lift-equipped van, the vans do not have meters which have made it difficult to calculate the fare. Director Lillard asked how the vans were charging now. Ms. Payne stated that they charge $2.60 per mile. The user has to trust the driver and whatever is on the speedometer. Commissioner Mariani stated that there may be an issue because if the company is charging the minute they are using the lift then they are actually charging them for lifting into the van and lifting out of the van. This could be discriminatory because you are charging a person more because you are charging when the lift goes up/in and when the lift goes off as opposed to a person who is ambulatory. That may be a City Attorney question. Ms. Payne said… | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-01-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-04-14.pdf,8 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-04-14 | 8 | 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA - Housing Authority Request to include additional parking by Using Part of Neptune Park. - Discussion about $1 Million Designated for Open Space. - Follow Up on Ballena Bay. 11. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING Thursday, May 12, 2005 12. ADJOURNMENT 8 Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes Thursday, April 14, 2005 Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-04-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-04-13.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-04-13 | 4 | 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA 11. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING May 11, 2006 at the DeWitt O' Club 12. ADJOURNMENT - -4- - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes Thursday, April 13, 2006 | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-04-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-06-09.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-06-09 | 4 | 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA 11. SET NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, September 8, 2011 Recreation & Park Commission decided not to meet in July or August unless it was deemed necessary. 12. ADJOURNMENT Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. 4 Minutes - Thursday, June 9, 2011 | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-06-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf,6 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-05-12 | 6 | 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA AD Lillard stated that the following would be on the next agenda: - Bayport Park and Community Building Plans. - A request to place a mobile coffee dispensing business at Lower Washington Park. 11. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING Thursday, June 9, 2005 12. ADJOURNMENT 9:40 p.m. 6 Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes Thursday, May 12, 2005 Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-10-09.pdf,5 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-10-09 | 5 | 10. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING Thursday, November 13, 2008 11. ADJOURNMENT -5 - - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - Thursday, October 9, 2008 | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-10-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2009-06-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2009-06-11 | 2 | 11. SET NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, July 9, 2009 12. ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to request an interpreter. Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant. Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available. Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print! Audio Tapes of the meeting are availáble upon request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue. during normal business hours. | RecreationandParkCommission/2009-06-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-07-14.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-07-14 | 2 | 12. ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to request an interpreter. Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant. Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available. Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print. Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours. | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-07-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-08-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-08-11 | 2 | 12. ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to request an interpreter. Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant. Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available. Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print. Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours. | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-08-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-09-08.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-09-08 | 2 | 12. ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to request an interpreter. Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant. Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available. Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print. Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours. | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-09-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-05-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-05-12 | 2 | 12. ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL NEEDS SERVICES Sign language interpreters will be available on request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to request an interpreter. Equipment for the hearing impaired is available for public use. For assistance, please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant. Accessible seating for persons with disabilities, including those using wheelchairs, is available. Minutes of the meeting available in enlarged print. Audio Tapes of the meeting are available upon request. Please contact the Recreation and Parks Executive Assistant at 747-7529 or TDD/TTY number 522-7538 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to request agenda materials in an alternative format, or any other reasonable accommodation that may be necessary to participate in and enjoy the benefits of the meeting. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Commission after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Alameda Recreation and Park Department, 2226 Santa Clara Avenue, during normal business hours. | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-05-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,21 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 21 | 191210 Alameda De-Pave Park Support As described above, the project would have a significant impact on climate change. Every year that goes by without increasing our wetlands contributes to climate change and poses more risks to wildlife and people while raising the price tag of doing what is needed. We urge the Commission to recommend to the Council that the planning and development of De- Pave Park be given the highest priority. GOLDEN GATE AUDUBON SOCIETY Leora Feeney Linda Carloni Leora Feeney Linda Carloni Co-Chair, Friends of the Alameda Wildlife Reserve President, Board of Directors GOLDEN GATE AUDUBON SOCIETY 2530 San Pablo Avenue, Suite G, Berkeley, CA 94702 phone 510.843.2222 web www.goldengateaudubon.org email ggas@goldengateaudubon.org | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2017-12-14.pdf,14 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2017-12-14 | 14 | 2-12 - RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSION.° Footnotes: --- (7) Editor's note- Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, adopted April 5, 2011, amended 2-12 in its entirety and enacted new provisions as set out herein. The former 2-12 pertained to Housing Commission and derived from Ord. No. 2387 N.S.; and Ord. No. 2533, § 14. 2-12.1 - Commission Created; Purpose. There is hereby created a commission which shall be known as the Recreation and Park Commission, whose purpose shall be to advise, coordinate and give guidance to the acquisition, development, maintenance and operation of parks, playgrounds, and other recreational facilities in the City of Alameda for the promotion of a sound program of community recreation and vocational activities, using to the greatest practicable extent the land, equipment and personnel of the City of Alameda and the Alameda Unified School District. (Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011) 2-12.2 - Membership; Appointment; Term of Office; Removal; Vacancies. a. The Commission shall consist of five (5) members, all of whom shall, at the time of their appointment and continuously during their incumbency, be residents of the City. b. Upon nomination of the Mayor, the City Council shall appoint, between May 1 and July 1. of each year, such members as are necessary to maintain a full Commission, for terms commencing on the first day of July following such appointment and continuing for four (4) years thereafter until the successor of such member is appointed and qualified. C. No person shall be eligible for the office held by that person for two (2) consecutive terms immediately prior to the term for which the person seeks appointment. d. A member of the Commission may be removed by the vote of a majority of the Council. A vacancy in the office of a member shall be filled for the unexpired term by nomination and appointment by the Mayor and the City Council, respectively, for the duration of the unexpired term of office. (Ord. No. 3029 N.S., § 1, 4-5-2011; Ord. No. 3050N.S., § 1, 7-5-2012) 2-12.3 - Meetings; Offic… | RecreationandParkCommission/2017-12-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2009-09-10.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2009-09-10 | 2 | 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) None. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Review of FY 2009-10 Budget for the Alameda Recreation & Park Department- (Discussion Item Only) Director Lillard provided an overview of the FY 2009-10 Budget for the Recreation & Park Department. This new budget is in a different format. Budget is much more detailed/clear by breaking out all of the budget categories. This will be a much more effective tool to monitor the budget. Budget has been approved by City Council. Pat Bail, Alameda resident, asked if there will be any more loss of staff. Director Lillard stated not at this time. We will have to see what the State does for FY 2010-11. Planning for FY 2010-11 will begin soon. B. Status of East Bay Regional Park District Measure WW monies - (Discussion Item Only) Director Lillard provided the Commission information on the request from the Alameda Boys & Girls Club for $2 million of the Measure WW monies for the construction of their new facility. This item went to the City Council at their meeting on September 1, 2009. There were a number of speakers and questions that came out of that meeting. There are a number of questions regarding the eligibility of the project, cost, etc. Council has asked staff (Interim City Manager & ARPD Director) to meet with East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) and the Alameda Boys and Girls Club and come back to Council on September 15, 2009 with answers to some of their questions. This item will be on the September 15, 2009 City Council Meeting Agenda. There will be EBRPD representatives at the meeting to answer any additional questions. The Interim City Manager will provide answers to the original questions that the Council asked at their meeting on September 1, 2009. Discussion will be opened and then Council will take whatever action they choose. Commissioner Kahuanui as… | RecreationandParkCommission/2009-09-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-09-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-09-11 | 2 | 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) None 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - Complimentary letters of summer recreation programs. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation by SunCal on Update of Sports Complex Master Plan - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Mr. Kosla and Mr. Chavez, SunCal Representatives, who provided a presentation to the Recreation and Park Commission regarding the Update of the Sports Complex Master Plan. Comments that came from the public meetings were: - Having some kind of BMX Bike trail. - Having a football field with a soccer field overlay. - Have 5 soccer fields (6 fields were in original plan) with a soccer warm up area and would leave room for additional parking. - Have a softball complex - Have one or two baseball fields. - Have covered pool for year-round use. Once all comments are received a new draft plan will be brought back to the Commission. In late October, early November SunCal will come back with a more final product and possibly have costs associated with the complex. SunCal representatives asked for comments from the Commission. Chair Ogden asked what turf would be used. Mr. Kosla stated that would depend on requests/comments. Commissioner Cooper stated that there is a huge need for soccer fields. All the stakeholders need to sit down and figure out what really is needed. Director Lillard stated that everything that can be lighted should be. Also, the total of tennis courts could be 2 or 3 instead of 6. Commissioner Restagno asked if money generated from the batting cages is feasible or had been discussed. Mr. Kosla stated it may be something that can be looked at. Linda Gilchrist, Alameda resident, stated that the pool should be an indoor pool. The weather out there is very cold. Also, it would be a better revenue generator for the City. The pool could then be used year-round. Margaret McNamara, Alameda reside… | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-09-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-02-10 | 2 | 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) None. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Annual Review and Adjustment of Fees for Recreation and Parks - (Discussion/Action Item) RSM Lillard provided the 2005 Fee Schedule and Surveys for the Recreation and Park Commission's review. Ron Matthews, Alameda Little League, Alameda Babe Ruth, and Alameda High School representative stated that the groups he represents donate a lot of time and materials to help keep the fields that they use in good condition. Charging a per player charge may influence the Boards of the different organizations as far as how much they will be willing to donate. He commented that what extent will the Boards be willing to invest grant monies, if they are paying the per player charge. The Commission needs to keep their registration fees in mind. Nino Borsoni, Alameda Soccer representative, stated that Alameda Soccer has invested over $350,000 to date. Conceptually the group understands what is driving the fee, but feels that the Sports Advisory Committee needs more information and better research. Questions raised were: What is the operating budget? What are the groups bringing in? And, how does that offset the budget? A lot of the youth play multiple sports. Will they be charged multiple times for the different sports they are playing? Conceptually the group understands the fee and is not opposed to it, but want to make sure that there is equity consideration. They groups would like to see more research done before the fee is implemented. Commissioner Reeves stated that between soccer groups represented by Mr. Borsoni and baseball teams represented by Mr. Matthews that is approximately 98 percent use of the fields. So assuming Mr. Reeves wanted to go out and play baseball with a group of friends, he would not be able to because the fields would be in use by these groups. These … | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-02-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-03-10.pdf,6 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-03-10 | 6 | 3. Status Report on Transportation Master Plan Committee (Commissioner Johnson) No report at this time. 8. STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS None. 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL Acting Director Lillard stated that the Alameda Point Multi-Use Field is now open for play. 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA 11. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING Thursday, April 14, 2005 12. ADJOURNMENT 9:40 p.m. 6 Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes Thursday, March 10, 2005 Dedicated to Excellence, Committed to Service | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-03-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-06-09.pdf,7 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-06-09 | 7 | 3. There will be a $3 per player fee assessed per organization. The minimum fee will be $500 per group. 4. For organizations with memberships larger than the $500 minimum, there will be an additional $3 per player fee assessed. 5. Groups will have the option to work off their assessment by completing field improvements or providing goods or services equal to their assessment. The value of such improvements will be determined by the Park Manager. 6. Groups failing to either submit payment or completing work projects will not be issued permits for future seasons until the assessment is cleared. All groups (Alameda Soccer, High Schools, Little League, Babe Ruth, Football, newer leagues) agreed to support the proposed Field Use Fee. AD Lillard stated that he felt that the organizations who traditionally do a lot of work will work off the debt and smaller organizations will pay. Commissioner Kahuanui asked if that included schools. AD Lillard stated yes that includes the schools. Chair Ingram stated that he received a call from Nino Borsoni, Alameda Soccer representative. Mr. Borsoni had some questions with regard to the fee. Questions were as follows: - Will this be a once per year fee, or once per season? AD Lillard stated it would be per season. Will kids that participate in multiples sports (e.g., soccer, baseball, football, etc.) be expected to pay the fee for each sport in which they are registered. AD Lillard stated yes, because they would be using the field for each sport they participate in. Will youth organizations that have already done projects be given credit for what has already been done? If so, will there be a deferred start date given upon credit already received? AD Lillard stated no, it would be starting from today. It would not be feasible to try and credit items from prior years. How will the collected fee be applied to field maintenance? Will certain fields be given priority? If so, on what basis and terms? AD Lillard stated that it would be determined based on need. We could generate a yearly li… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-06-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2017-03-09.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2017-03-09 | 2 | 4-B Report on Child & Youth Services from Christina Bailey, Recreation Services Specialist Christina Bailey, Recreation Services Specialist, gave a report on the ARPD child and youth services. Christina gave information about the 6 months to Pre K programs which include Wee Play, Preschool Programs, and Summer Camps; the Kindergarten through 5th grade Recreation Afterschool Program, (RAP), the Parks and Playgrounds Program and the non-school day programs, TGIF & Days in the Park; the Kindergarten through 5th grade summer programs that include Day Camp, Parks and Playgrounds, field trips, and World of Wonder, (WOW). Christina also gave information about special events she is responsible for such as the February Dance Party for girls and their fathers or other role models, April Splash into Spring Egg Scramble and the December Breakfast with Santa. Christina shared the follow up success of the Godfrey Playground renovation that was done in 2016 in which Vice Chair Delaney cut the ribbon in June on the Grand Opening. The park has become busier as the kids are enjoying the new play structure. The new fence is now up with the Friends of the Park sign on the fence. Commissioner Limoges was impressed with Christina's work and said her ability to balance all the programs at once is absolutely wonderful. He asked about the scholarship program and requested a copy of the information for the scholarship program that ARPD offers for Commissioner Carter and himself. Commissioner Carter said great presentation and asked Christina how she has seen it change over the last 10 years and going forward what is Christina's vision or dream for the programs she runs? Christina said the Rap program has grown and that is exciting. She also noticed there is not as many young people applying for jobs which makes staffing a challenge. Christina said that her wish is that everybody who comes through our programs would have a great time and tell another person. Chair Tilos said he has watched the ARPD events grow and become better and it make… | RecreationandParkCommission/2017-03-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2009-01-08.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2009-01-08 | 2 | 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) Director Lillard reminded the Commission that Fees will be discussed and considered at next month's (February) meeting. Chair Ogden stated that she would suggest not having free park and playground programs during winter and spring break. The participation rate does not justify the expenditure. Commissioner Cooper suggested looking at the church group using the Veteran's Building and adjusting their fee for use of the facility. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 6. NEW BUSINESS None. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 8. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See January 2009 Activity Report. The renovation of Rittler Park Field is complete. Field will be open in February 2009. Director Lillard stated the first projects to be done with Measure WW monies are: Resurfacing of Washington Park Basketball Courts & Tennis Courts Renovation of Littlejohn Park Recreation Center Renovation of Woodstock Park Recreation Center Replacement of Krusi Park Recreation Center Renovation of Godfrey Park Play Area Commissioner Cooper wanted to state (for the record) that he will really miss the old Krusi Park Recreation Building and wished it could be preserved. B. Recreation Division See January 2009 Activity Report. - 2 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - Thursday, January 8, 2009 | RecreationandParkCommission/2009-01-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2007-11-08.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2007-11-08 | 2 | 4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) None. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Proposal from Alameda East Bay Miracle League to build Miracle League Park at existing Estuary Park on former Coast Guard Housing site. Director Lillard stated that at the ARRA meeting to be held on December 5, 2007, the City will be applying for a license to operate the Estuary Park fields. ARPD will also be asking for funding from ARRA leases to renovate the soccer field at that location. Staff will work with the Miracle group to build a field at that location. The license will only be for a year, but once land is conveyed to the City long-term leases can be completed. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Conceptual Drawing of Bayport Park Recreation Building - (Discussion Item) Director Lillard presented the conceptual drawing of the Bayport Park Recreation Building to the Recreation and Park Commission. A restriction on the building is that it needs to look like the school so there will not be a pitched roof. Also, the building needs to be within the same color scheme. Being presented tonight is the first rendition of the drawing. It was determined that there needs to be more color. A band two to three feet up around the building in a sun dried tomato color and making the door a solid door (sun dried tomato) will be added. Director Lillard stated that this building will be a little bigger then the new building at Upper Washington Park and will also be a modular building. The building should be installed and ready for summer 2008. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Selection of Pedestrian Task Force Representative - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard asked for a volunteer from the Recreation & Park Commission to serve on the Pedestrian Task Force. Bill Sonneman stated that he would serve on the Task Force. Jo Kahuanui stated that she could fill in when Mr. Sonneman cannot attend. - 2 - Re… | RecreationandParkCommission/2007-11-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-03-09.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-03-09 | 2 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - E-Mail from Public Works Department that is a Press Release listing the public meeting dates and locations for recommended CIP Projects. 5. NEW BUSINESS None. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Status Report on Veteran's Building - (Discussion Item Only) Chair Ingram stated that it is his perception that public/community buildings are not a priority within the City and with City staff. He feels that it started with the former Director putting money into the parks and portables within the parks and there is not a vision for a community center. Mr. Ingram feels that we should have a community center. He sees a lot of money going towards parks but does not see a lot of money going toward buildings which is potential revenue for the City. AD Lillard stated that State bond monies (Prop 12 & Prop 40) were allocated through the Recreation and Park Commission. The Commission's recommendations went to City Council who approved the allocation. Monies were allocated to renovate playgrounds because all of the playgrounds were out of safety compliance with ADA requirements. For instance the playground equipment at Washington Park was approximately 40 years old. We are almost done with playground renovations. Tillman and Godfrey still need to have work done. As far as buildings are concerned, staff is working on replacing the Washington Park recreation center. Chair Ingram asked how old the building was at Washington Park. AD Lillard stated that the portable was approximately 10 years old. The original building burned down in the early 1990's and it was replaced with the portable building. The Krusi Park recreation building will be the next building to be replaced. It is already allocated under Bond monies. A new facility will be built in the Bayport development but monies will be revenue generated through that project. Chair Ingram stated that this is why he is pushing for a Master Plan. Hopefully, that will come out in the Public Works CIP Project meetings. AD Lillard stated that is kind of the vision for … | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-03-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2010-02-11.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2010-02-11 | 4 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Franklin Elementary School Principal regarding their request for use of Franklin Park. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Franklin School's Request for Use of Franklin Park - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Lisa Zenner, Franklin School parent and Alameda resident, who provided the Commission with a preliminary plan of the request to use Franklin Park. She introduced Robert Shemwell, AUSD Interim CFO, in case the Commission has questions of AUSD and also stated that Chris Nelson (architect, Franklin School parent, and Alameda resident) provided a site plan for the proposed project area. The principal of Franklin Elementary School is requesting a shared use agreement between Franklin Park and Franklin Elementary School which will enable Franklin School students to use the park for recesses and P.E. classes. Ms. Zenner described the project to the Commission. The children would cross at San Antonio and the Franklin group proposes that a gate be placed between the north side of the recreation building and the wrought iron fence that comes to it so that the whole area could be supervised by a teacher who would be standing at the picnic tables in front of the recreation building. They could see everywhere in the area with the exception of the pathway around the corner to the recreation building which would be gated off. The second phase of the project would be to approach the Public Works Department to close San Antonio Avenue during school hours. This project phase is separate from this current request. This phase would be for safety reasons to get the children back and forth to the park safely. Commissioner Brown asked if the request to close San Antonio would be the entire street. Ms. Zenner stated that it would be the area right in front of the school. Ms. Zenner stated that the group has met with Matt Naclerio, Public Works Director, to pursue the street closure. Director Lillard stated that these types of agreements are very common. Most of the school sites… | RecreationandParkCommission/2010-02-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-01-13 | 2 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Pat Colburn, Alameda Arts Center President, requesting an amendment to Ordinance 2892 and encourage developers to provide aid to the established arts venues in Alameda. 5. NEW BUSINESS None. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Continued Discussion and Consideration of Request from Mayor and City Council to Develop a Park Use Policy - (Discussion Item) Discussion was held regarding what to include in the Park Use Policy. Kahuanui requested a listing of equipment (sheds, etc.) at the parks. So the Commission will know what is existing to begin the process of developing a policy. The list should be anything that is not ARPD's. Acreage for each park should also be included on the list. Oliver stated that individuals selling balloons and ice cream in the parks should have City of Alameda permits and a permit from ARPD. He also suggested not allowing demonstrations. RSM Lillard stated that if they are doing business in the City of Alameda they should have a City of Alameda Business License. Johnson suggested obtaining park use policies from other cities so that the Commission does not have to reinvent the wheel. The Commission could then apply points that are what Alameda needs. Ms. Johnson provided some copies of other cities (e.g., Midland, Portland) as examples. Chair Ingram stated that there are other cities that we can borrow from when generating the policy. RSM Lillard stated that some ideas from other cities could be used. Chair Ingram suggested not putting anything in a park when the park is less than three (3) acres. Councilmember Kerr's comment regarding incorporating traffic should also be considered. RSM Lillard stated that staff will put together a draft policy with the sample policies from other cities and recommendations by the Commission. George Phillips, Boys and Girls Club Executive Director, stated that he was at the meeting to be aware of the process. Mr. Phillips stated that he hopes the Commission will look at the following: 2 Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes T… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-01-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2007-07-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2007-07-12 | 2 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of East Bay Regional Park District's Alameda Point Bay Trail Project - (Discussion Only) Director Lillard stated that in fall 2006 the City was approached by the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) about developing a shoreline trail at Alameda Point. Subsequently the City has entered into a lease with EBRPD. Representatives from EBRPD were Anne Rockwell, EBRPD Park Supervisor, Ren Bates, EBRPD Sr. Park Designer, and Kim Fisher, EBRPD Project Manager / Landscape Architect. Ms. Fisher provided a presentation to the Recreation and Park Commission. A segment of the Bay Trail shall be constructed along approximately 2,600 feet of shoreline on land owned by the Navy and the City of Alameda, leased to EBRPD. The trail alignment primarily follows an existing access road with approximately 500 lineal feet of the trail along the Encinal Boat Ramp. The trail will be 10-feet-wide, ADA accessible with an asphalt paved surface, and 2-foot-wide aggregate base rock shoulders on both sides of the paved trail. Included in the project is the installation of signage, bollards, one and two rail wood fences at the east and west trail access points, and benches. The site will be cleared of miscellaneous surface debris and vegetation. As required by BCDC, 732 lineal feet of 6-foot-high, chain link fence will be removed to open views to the Bay. The fencing will be replaced with one and two rail wood fencing to direct circulation. This segment of the Alameda Point Bay Trail will provide linking to future segments of the Bay Trail. EBRPD will maintain all the improvements that they install. Commissioner Cooper stated that he thought it was great that EBRPD was putting a trail in that area. Commissioner Ingram asked what the anticipated cost would be of the project. Ms. Fisher stated approximately $450,000 without the clean up. Director Lillard asked if dogs would need to be leashed in the area. Ms. Rockwell stated yes. Commission thanked the EBRPD representatives for their p… | RecreationandParkCommission/2007-07-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-05-08.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-05-08 | 2 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Review and Discussion of Draft Pedestrian Plan - (Discussion/Action Item) Gail Payne, Transportation Coordinator for Public Works, provided review and discussion of the Draft Pedestrian Plan. The purpose of the Pedestrian Plan is to provide guidance to City staff, residents, developers, and decision makers on how we are prioritizing pedestrian projects. The Plan shows what the prioritized projects are and where they are located. Pedestrian Design Guidelines are also being developed which will show how projects should be constructed. Commissioner Restagno asked how Alameda compares to other cities in having pedestrian friendly access, etc. Ms. Payne stated that she has not made a comparison. We are lucky that Alameda was built during a time when walking was a pass time so every street has a sidewalk with the exception of a few minor areas. Commissioner Restagno asked if the Plan was likely to get funded within the next year. Ms. Payne stated that it is estimated that high priority projects would cost approximately $5 million. These projects are expected to be completed within five to ten years given the current levels of pedestrian-related funding. To fund medium-priority projects the City plans to aggressively pursue additional and untraditional funding sources. Low-priority projects are considered beyond the scope of the Pedestrian Plan. Insufficient funds do not make it possible to pursue these lower ranking projects. Once the plan is completed the City can be more aggressive in applying for funding sources (e.g., grants, etc.). The Pedestrian Plan will be incorporated into the Transportation Master Plan. Commissioner Kahuanui stated that in light of the financial climate, where we are not able to fund our own public schools, the plan is very expensive. The City does not need to spend $48 million. Commissioner Restagno stated that there are better ways to spend large sums of money then on enhancing the pedestrian experience, but if you look at what they are actu… | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-05-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-10-13.pdf,4 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-10-13 | 4 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion and Review of Krusi Park Renovation Plans - (Discussion Item) Director Lillard stated that there was a public/community meeting held on Thursday, September 29, 2011, at Otis School, to discuss Krusi Park Renovation Plans. There were three meetings held that day: 3:00 p.m. for school district staff, 5:00 p.m. for youth groups, and 7:00 p.m. for neighbors. Commissioner Delaney and Director Lillard attended the meeting and there were approximately 30 people in attendance at the evening meeting (7:00 p.m.). The architects took all of the comments from the meetings and met with ARPD staff on Monday, October 3, for additional details. They are refining a conceptual drawing that will be brought before the Recreation & Park Commission at the November meeting. Director Lillard stated that the recreation building is really nice with a concession stand included. It is all green; solar heated, catches rain water, etc. Access to the park has been accentuated. After the November meeting and the Commission has given their comments, staff will move forward and prepare the bid documents. We anticipate releasing bid documents after the first of the year. Bid documents must stay out for 30 days. After 30 days, bids will be opened and then the project will be awarded in early spring. It is hoped that the project will be completed by the beginning of the next school year (September 2012). Director Lillard stated that the fields will not be affected by the project. The tennis courts will be resurfaced as another project. Tennis courts will either be redone now (fall) or in the spring 2012 depending on weather. Chair Restagno asked if the project was being put together with the budget that we know we have now. Director Lillard stated yes. Commissioner Delaney asked if a small fence along Otis Drive will be included in the project. Director Lillard stated yes. ARPD had another $51,000 left over from State Grant (Prop 12 and Prop 40) money that will be applied to the project a… | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-10-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2010-11-10.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2010-11-10 | 2 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Possible Locations for Installation of a Synthetic Turf Field - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard stated that the Interim City Manager has identified one-time funds of approximately $3 million which have been designated for a capital improvement. The City has been in discussions with AUSD for approximately the last 18 months on entering into some type of interim joint use agreement for an all weather field. Discussions have been in general terms. The agreement would be very similar to the College of Alameda Hardball Field Agreement. AUSD would have priority use for their after school sports programs and the rest of the time ARPD would schedule for community groups. The field would be an artificial, full size football field that would be multi-use; you could play football, soccer, rugby, etc. Also, there would be a track and some renovations to the lighting. There are some broad cost estimates that cannot be finalized until the infrastructure, substructure, and drainage is inspected. There have been discussions with AUSD the location of the field. Two principal's thoughts discussed were Thompson Field (in its current configuration) and Encinal High School. After review the recommended location was Encinal High School. Due to the following: Less impact on a neighborhood. More parking. Noise would be less of a problem. Lights should not be a problem. The ideal situation would be to install artificial turf at both sites (Thompson Field and Encinal High School). With all of the other infrastructure and swim center needs, some of the money may go to those items. Director Lillard recommended that if only one is to be done then do the field at Encinal High School. No matter what AUSD does regarding future restructuring there is still plenty of space at that location. Even if AUSD closed that high school the field could still stay. The field would not go away just because the high school is closed. Discussion was held by Recreation Commission regardi… | RecreationandParkCommission/2010-11-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2011-06-09.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2011-06-09 | 2 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 5. NEW BUSINESS None. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Discussion of Draft Policy on the Hanging of Banners - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard stated that the Recreation & Park Department receives multiple requests from various non-profits to hang their banners in/on our facilities. We take requests on a case-by-case basis and try to limit their use, but banners pop up all over town. The groups do not remove them and the banners get weathered, torn, and do not look good. Director Lillard asked the Commission to review the draft Hanging of Banners Policy. Policy would be the following: 1. Only banners advertising the activities or events of Alameda based Non-profits (501 (c)3) will be considered. 2. Once approved by the Recreation, Parks & Golf Operations Director or designee banners will remain in place for a maximum of 30 days. 3. It will be the responsibility of the group to hang and remove banners. In the event they are not removed ARPD staff will take them down and the non-profit will then be billed for the staff time involved. 4. ARPD will not be responsible for any damage or loss to the banners. 5. Placement will occur in Krusi Park on the fence facing Otis Drive and in Upper Washington Park on the fence along Central Avenue. 6. Groups desiring to place a banner in a park must make the request a minimum of 10 working days prior to placement. Chair Restagno asked that Lincoln Park also be included for placement of banners. Commissioner Sonneman agreed with the Lincoln Park location as well. Chair Restagno also stated that Alameda schools should be added. M/S/C SONNEMAN/DELANEY (unanimously approved) "That the banner policy be approved with Lincoln Park added as a location and that Alameda schools also be added and allowed to hang banners in addition to the Alameda based non-profits." Approved (4): Restagno, Delaney, Mariani, Sonneman Absent (1): Brown Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. 2 Minutes - Thursday, June 9, 2011 | RecreationandParkCommission/2011-06-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-02-13.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-02-13 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Annual Review and Adjustment of Fees for Recreation and Parks - (Discussion/Action Item) Discussion was held regarding the review and adjustment of Recreation and Park fees. Commissioner Kahuanui recommended that the Sports Field Use fee for AUSD and sports leagues/groups of $500 should be included on the fee schedule. Director Lillard stated that most of the leagues/groups do not pay the fee. Most groups/leagues (e.g., softball, little leagues, etc.) use the services in lieu of fees option. Soccer Leagues do pay the fees. Commissioner Sonneman stated that he would prefer that AUSD not pay fees to use a public field. It often becomes a fundraiser for the coach to be able to use the field. Commissioner Cooper asked what the fee was for the Church to use the Veteran's Building. Director Lillard stated that he would have to look for the information. Commissioner Cooper stated that he would like to go on record as suggesting that the fees for the Church to use the Veteran's Building be substantially raised. Chair Ogden asked staff to provide a list of who is using the Veteran's Building and the fees that are being paid by the various groups. Director Lillard and RS Russi stated that they would provide the information to the Commission. M/S/C SONNEMAN/KAHUANUI (unanimously approved) "That the following fee increases be approved: Adult Softball - Men's League $715 Resident Team Fee (10 games) $765 Non-Resident Team Fee (10 games) $765 Resident Team Fee (12 games) $815 Non-Resident Team Fee (12 games) Aquatics - Swim Lessons $25 for 1/2 hour Private Lessons - Public Swim - Youth Resident $2 - Youth Non-Resident $3 - Adult Resident $4 - Adult Non-Resident $4.5 - Swim Team Use Fee $13/hr/Youth $14/hr/Adult 2- Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - -Wednesday, February 13, 2008 | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-02-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-02-09.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-02-09 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Consideration of Possible Names for the Park in Bayport Development - (Discussion Item Only) AD Lillard stated that, per direction from the City Council, each Board or Commission is responsible for recommending any names for new facilities within their realm (e.g., Golf Commission responsible for golf facilities, Library Board responsible for Library facilities, etc.). The Commissioner's are in receipt of two letters (from Alameda Architectural Preservation Society and Mr. Carvalho, Baldwin & Pell House) asking that the new park in the Bayport Development be named in honor of Andy Pagano. The Commission needs to decide how they would like to go about picking a name for the facility. The Commission can solicit names from the public, generate your own list, accept letters of recommendation, etc. Also, there is a list of potential names on the Street Naming List that could be used. Something could also be put on the ARPD website. The only formal request that has been received is for Andy Pagano. Chair Ingram stated that the Commission has enough history that they could possibly come up with some names tonight. Commissioner Reeves stated that Chuck Corica's name came up but he already has the Golf Complex named after him. AD Lillard stated that J.C. Shirriel's, former Recreation Commissioner, name has been suggested for the list. No formal request has been received. Commissioner Ogden asked about Win Currier. Ad Lillard stated that the Commission has already approved naming the ball field at Leydecker Park in Win Currier's honor. Chair Ingram recommended Bea Rowney. Commissioner Cooper recommended Don Grant who was a long-time coach at Encinal High School for track and football. Commissioner Reeves stated that he personally felt that Pagano was a superb choice. Commissioner Johnson agreed. Commissioner Cooper stated that it would be good to let the community have some input. Names that come to his mind are Andy Pagano, Bea Rowney, Don Grant, and Nick Cabral. Suggested names to put on a list are: Ni… | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-02-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2007-03-08.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2007-03-08 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Consideration of Request from Alameda Babe Ruth and Alameda High School to Install a Scoreboard at Bartell Field - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard provided information to the Commission regarding Alameda Babe Ruth and Alameda High School's request to install a scoreboard at Bartell Field and introduced Ron Matthews, Alameda Babe Ruth representative. Mr. Matthews stated that Babe Ruth and Alameda High School would like to install a scoreboard at Bartell Field. The scoreboard is four feet by nine feet in dimension. It will be attached to the last telephone pole on the northeast corner of the park and will face toward the stands. This is purposely positioned away from any residents so they will not see the face of the scoreboard. The support system is designed by Diamond Tool & Die of Oakland and is made of galvanized steel and all bolts will be approved for heavy use and will be galvanized. The design calls for the scoreboard to be 15 feet up from the ground and weighs 200 pounds. Commissioner Restagno clarified that the supports could hold up to ten times the weight. Mr. Matthews stated yes. The whole display is not a heavy item. This is why the support system is galvanized steel. Director Lillard stated that if the Commission approves the request this item would still need to go through the Permit process. Commissioner Reeves asked if the neighbors had been notified. Director Lillard stated yes. Commissioner Reeves asked if the scoreboard was manual or electric. Mr. Matthews stated that it is electric. A ditch will need to be dug and electricity would be hooked up underground. Barbara Jollife, Lincoln Park neighbor, stated that her feeling was that the neighbors across the park (with the backs of their houses to the central area of the park) would have an obstructed view. Rich Sherman, Lincoln Park neighbor, stated that his parents will be seeing the backside of the scoreboard. Mr. Sherman asked if the park would see more activity and more games then what are already held at the park.… | RecreationandParkCommission/2007-03-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-04-10.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-04-10 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Alameda High School's Request to Use Lincoln Park for Baseball Playoffs - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard stated that this item was put on the Recreation and Park Commission agenda per their request. There were numerous representatives from Alameda High School in attendance to request using Lincoln Park for the North Coast Section Play Offs in the event that they qualify. Coach Ken Arnerich addressed the Commission. Chair Ogden asked Coach Arnerich when they would find out if they go to finals or not. Coach Arnerich stated that they would find out at the North Coast Meeting on Sunday, May 19, 2008. Director Lillard asked if at the most there would be two games hosted. Coach Arnerich stated that it could be three. Lil Arnerich stated that it was his understanding that this item was put on the Commission agenda per their request. Mr. Arnerich asked for what purpose. Commissioner Sonneman stated that last year he was working at the AUSD Office and received complaint calls regarding the game at Lincoln Park. Mr. Sonneman stated that now that he is a Commissioner, he felt that the City should prepare if games are played at that site. Commissioner Sonneman wanted to be prepared and alleviate any issues that there may be this year. Commissioner Kahuanui stated that because Lincoln Park is a public park, the Recreation and Park Department holds programs in the park at the same time, and the pool is also being used, and people who use the park have no idea that the event is going on. The Commission wanted to see how the groups could work together to eliminate any problems that may occur. Coach Arnerich stated that last year arrangements were made with the pool group. AHS set up a gate at the Fernside driveway and a gate was set up at the High Street side. Patrons did not have to pay to watch the game until they got to the bleachers. So from the High Street side there was access to the park and recreation center. As far as people walking through the park, the people that were mann… | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-04-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2010-03-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2010-03-11 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Request for Placement of Equipment Shed at Lincoln Park for Alameda High School - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Ron Matthews representing Alameda High Baseball and Alameda Babe Ruth to present their request for placement of an additional storage shed in Lincoln Park. Mr. Matthews reviewed the features of the unit as well as some potential sites for placement. Following extensive discussions as to the merits and problems with each location the Commission voted to appoint a sub-committee of Chair Ogden and Commissioner Sonneman to meet with the group along with John McDonald, Park Manager, to reach consensus on the exact location. M/S/C SONNEMAN/RESTAGNO (unanimously approved) "That a sub-committee of Chair Ogden, Commissioner Sonneman, and Park Manager McDonald be formed to determine placement of the shed at Lincoln Park." Approved (7): Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Delaney, Mariani, Sonneman Sub-Committee will meet at Lincoln Park on Monday, March 15. Sub-Committee will make final decision on placement. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See March 10, 2010 Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See March 10, 2010 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See March 10, 2010 Activity Report. D. Other Reports and Announcements None. 8. STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS None. Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. 2 Minutes - Thursday, March 11, 2010 | RecreationandParkCommission/2010-03-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-05-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-05-11 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Fourth of July Activities - (Discussion Item) AD Lillard stated that the last Mayor's Fourth of July Parade Committee meeting it was decided to coordinate the various groups' Fourth of July activities. All events will be listed on all promotional material and groups will work cooperatively to support all events. A sub-committee of the Parade Committee will hold a barbecue to be held at Rittler Park during the Fourth of July Jubilee and will be open to the public in appreciation of the U.S. Coast Guard. Free tickets will be given to Coast Guard members and tickets will be available for purchase by other patrons. Sometime during the course of the afternoon there will be a recognition/presentation by the Mayor. Commissioner Reeves stated that the joint effort by all groups was the Mayor's concept. It should be a good event. Great American Barbecue will be the caterer and approximately 400 Coast Guard people should be in attendance. There will also be at least one Admiral and two Captains at the event and there will be Coast Guard vessels coming in from all over. B. Small Dog Park - (Discussion Item) Commissioner Johnson stated that the Small Dog Park group had made a request through her to have their website linked with the City's. AD Lillard stated that staff checked with the City's IT Department and the request was denied. There would be too many non-profits that would want to link to the site and there would be no control over site content. Commissioners can visit the small dog website at www.alamedasmalldogs.org to see the pictures. Chair Ingram stated that he has been asked by a few people about where to go to allow dogs to swim in the water. AD Lillard stated that the only place he knows of is the Dog Run in San Leandro, but did not know if letting your dog play in the water was allowed. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Review of Alameda Point Gym Allocation Policy and Procedures (Discussion/Action Item) AD Lillard stated that the Recreation and Park Commission asked staff to have the user groups w… | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-05-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-12-14.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-12-14 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of Appreciation to Watertight Restoration - (Discussion Item) Director Lillard stated that Watertight Restoration, Inc. was supposed to be at the meeting to accept the plaque of appreciation but was called out of town at the last minute. Watertight Restoration, Inc. contributed approximately $8,000 worth of work to repair some major roof leaks at the Meyers House and Garden Museum. In addition to presenting the company with a plaque of appreciation, we will also write a thank you letter. Director Lillard recommended scheduling a tour of the facility for the Commission at a later time. B. Discussion of Recreation and Park Commission Protocol and Procedural Guidelines - (Discussion Item) Director Lillard provided to the Recreation & Park Commission a copy of the User's Guide to the Ralph M. Brown Act for their perusal. This guide will help remind the Commissioner's of the various rules/regulations with regard to meetings, etc. All Commissioners should have full access to all decisions made and all decisions formally made are made as a group. Chair Ogden stated that she did not want letters, e-mails, etc., going out without all of the Commission being involved and included in the decision making process. She does not want one individual sending anything out without it going through the rest of the Commission. Vice Chair Kahuanui stated that if she is speaking somewhere and she is introduced as being on the Recreation and Park Commission then it is assumed that she is speaking on behalf of the Commission. Ms. Kahuanui stated that to be safe and practice due diligence on their part as individuals the Commission, if they are going to speak, should state that it is their personal opinion, it is not the opinion of the Recreation and Park Commission. Chair Ogden stated that for instance when she received a call from the newspaper regarding the vandalism at the Skate Park, she referred the caller back to Director Lillard who had all of the information. Director Lillard stated that if the Cou… | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-12-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-03-10.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-03-10 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of Cross Alameda Trail Project - (Discussion Item) Barry Bergman, Program Specialist for Public Works Department, gave a presentation on the Cross Alameda Trail Project. In December 2003, the Association of Bay Area Governments awarded the City of Alameda a grant of $53,000 to conduct a feasibility study for the Cross Alameda Trail. The proposed trail extends from the intersection of Appezzato Memorial Parkway to Tilden Way a distance of approximately 3.5 miles. Mr. Bergman presented a detailed summary of the project and answered questions from the Commission. Mr. Bergman explained that the Public Works Department is soliciting input from a variety of City boards and commissions and any comments they may have could be directed to him at the Public Works Department. Chair Ingram thanked Mr. Bergman for his informative presentation. B. Presentation on West End Improvement Project - (Discussion Item) Carol Beaver, Community Development Division Manager, and Michael Smiley, BMS Design Group, provided to the Recreation and Park Commission a presentation on the West End Improvement Project. The West Alameda Neighborhood Improvement Project was funded by the City Council as part of the FY 2003-04 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Plan in July 2003. The boundaries of Census Tract 4276 define the neighborhood, which was selected based on census data indicating the greatest number of low-income households in the City, observations of blighting physical conditions, and continuing efforts to improve the physical and social environment in the area through various community partnerships and the Harbor Island Task Force. Pending acceptance of the Plan by the City Council at its April 19, 2005 meeting, the Plan will provide a conceptual frame work for public improvements in the neighborhood over the next five or more years. Some of the improvements will need to be refined to meet technical requirement and changing conditions over time. Approximately $400,000 in CDBG Funds is availabl… | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-03-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2005-05-12 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of Facility Photos/Inventory - (Information Only Item) Justine Highsmith, Senior at Clayton Valley High School, as a senior she needed to do a community project for school and she chose Alameda because she thinks it's a charming City. She worked with the Recreation and Park Department and took pictures of its various facilities. Ms. Highsmith took approximately 1,000 photos and narrowed it down to 300 pictures that were put on a CD and presented to the Commission. Ms. Highsmith provided a Power Point presentation of the photos to the Recreation and Park Commission. B. Proposed Recommendation to Provide Additional Parking (Neptune Park) for Independence Plaza Residents - (Discussion/Action Item) Mike Pucci, Housing Authority Executive Director, requested additional parking for Independence Plaza residents by using part of Neptune Park. The area that will be used will have little impact on Neptune Park. Neptune is not a well used park. It is a gateway to the City and any parking built there will have minimal impact on the visibility of the parking lot. There will be berms around the parking lot with extra landscaping to hide the cars. The Federal Government placed a deed restriction on Neptune Park when it was transferred to the City. The deed restriction limits the use of the land to parkland, but the governemnt will lift the restriction if additional parkland of equal value is put in its place. The Board of Commissioners (who are City Council) recommend that the deed restriction transfer to the EBMUD property adjacent to Towata Park. The funds would come from the Open Space fund. AD Lillard stated that the EBMUD property, in its current condition, is not actual usable park space. Mr. Pucci stated that it is being proposed that the deed restriction be place on the Parrot Mini-Park. The Housing Authority would continue to maintain the park. Commissioner Reeves asked if the parking would be strictly for Housing Authority and Housing Authority employees. Mr. Pucci stated that it would … | RecreationandParkCommission/2005-05-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2009-11-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2009-11-12 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Request from Alameda Aero-O-Nuts for a Long-Term Park Use Permit to Place a Locked Storage Container at the Osborne Model Airfield - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Duane Roach, Aer-O-Nuts Flying Club representative, who presented their request for a Long-Term Park Use Permit to place a locked storage container at the Osborne Model Airfield to the Commission. The purpose of the container is to secure storage for the Aer-O-Nuts and the Recreation & Park Department which would specifically store a light utility trailer which contains a model Navy Aircraft carrier deck. The trailer and deck are used at the field for organized control line Navy Carrier contest as sanctioned by the Academy of Model Aeronautics (and developed in conjunction with the U.S. Navy). Chair Ogden asked if there were any prerequisites to their installing the container. Director Lillard stated that the group would be responsible for: - Painting the container if there is any graffiti. - Ongoing painting as needed. - If the container is ever to be removed the City would give the group 30-day notice. - Container would be removed at the groups cost. A written letter with the conditions will be sent to the group if approved. M/S/C SONNEMAN/RESTAGNO (approved) "That the request for installation of the container at the Osborne Model Airfield be approved with the usual stipulations that are required from the Recreation & Park Department." Approved (4): Ogden, Mariani, Restagno, Sonneman Absent (3): Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See November 9, 2009 Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See November 9, 2009 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See November 9, 2009 Activity Report. Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. 2 Minutes - Thursday, November 12, 2009 | RecreationandParkCommission/2009-11-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2007-09-13.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2007-09-13 | 2 | 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Review of Proposed Open Space Plan for Alameda Landing Development - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager from the Planning Department, who provided the Recreation and Park Commission with the proposed plan for Open Space at the Alameda Landing Development. Catellus is proposing an amendment to the Waterfront Promenade Development Plan that will: Provide similar or equivalent public benefits and spaces to the plan approved in May. Maintain the financial feasibity of the Alameda Landing Project as the project was envisioned in the Bayport/Alameda Landing Project Master Plan. Maintain the Clif Bar headquarters project in its current location. Provide the improvements necessary to ensure the seismic stability of the waterfront embankment (currently uder the wharf). Reduce the size of the wharf where possible to reduce the number of piers that will need to be retrofited or replaced to ensure the structural stability of the wharf. Meet all the requirements of the approved Bayport/Alameda Landing Project Master Plan. Staff is in support of the revised Waterfront Promenade Development Plan because the revised plan: Is consistent with the Bayport-Alameda Landing Master Plan. Provides a variety of waterfront open spaces and promenades that will be a long term benefit and enjoyment to the citizens of Alameda and future generations of Alamedans. The revisions of the plan are necessary to address the structural, geotechnical, and financial constraints that must be overcome to provide public waterfront access in this area of the City that has been historicaly off-limits to the public. Mr. Thomas is recommending tha the Recreation and Park Commission review and comment on the revised Waterfront Promenade Development Plan. All of the Recreation and Park Commission's comments will be forwarded to the Planning Board to inform them of their review and decision on the revised plan. Mr. Thomas introduced Mr. Aidan Barry, Catellus Vice President for Northern … | RecreationandParkCommission/2007-09-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2010-08-12.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2010-08-12 | 2 | 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Recreation Commission Meeting Attendance - (Discussion Item) Director Lillard stated that there will be a lot of important issues (e.g., Measure WW Projects, etc.) coming before the Recreation Commission and wants to make sure that the Commission knows and understands the importance of attending meetings. Chair Restagno stated that he felt it was important that if a Commissioner is not going to make a meeting to let the ARPD Director know as soon as possible. Director Lillard stated that if we are notified ahead of time a special meeting could be held on a different night. With the special projects coming up, they will have to be dealt with in a timely manner and if we miss a month we will not be able to make it up. Director Lillard also stated that he had really wanted the agreement with the Alameda Boys & Girls Club to be reviewed by the Commission, but now the agreement has been done and completed without the Commission's review. Also, the Boat Works project has been approved. Vice Chair Brown asked if a meeting reminder notice can be sent a week before the Commission meetings. Commissioner Sonneman stated that it would be better if a reminder was sent out the Monday before the scheduled meeting. Chair Restagno stated that with a Commission of seven people there needs to be four Commissioners need to be in attendance to make a quorum. Mr. Restagno clarified that there was a vacant position on the Commission with Director Lillard. Director Lillard stated that the City Manager's Office will be reviewing all Boards and Commissions. The reason the Commission was increased from five members to seven is due to the Golf Commission having seven members. There may be some consolidation or reduction of commissions and/or boards. Commissioner Mariani asked if the Mayor was currently considering appointing anyone to the Recreation Commission to fill the vacancy. Director Lillard stated that he has not asked. The City Clerk accepts applications all of the tim… | RecreationandParkCommission/2010-08-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,16 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 16 | 6 -B - Exhibit 3 a.s Great Blue Heron gathering nesting material on west side of Seaplane Lagoon where ecological park is proposed. Blusger: To: Alameda Recreation and Parks Commission Item 6-B, Review and Recommend Park and Recreation Facilities Project Priorities Commission meeting date: December 12, 2019 Members of the Commission: I urge you to place DePave Park at the top of your priority list. DePave Park is unlike other parks projects in that its primary goal is adapting a portion of the Alameda Point shoreline for rising sea level. While there will be a recreational component in the form of public access on trails, its standout feature will be restoration of a tidal ecosystem. It is ideally suited for conversion to a wetland ecology, since it is directly adjacent to an existing wetland on federal property and will create a synergistic upscaling of this wetland zone on the Bay. Furthermore, the vision for DePave Park includes floating wetlands in the Seaplane Lagoon. Floating wetlands will make this project a leading edge adaptation project on San Francisco Bay. While all of the projects on the list are worthy of support, the DePave Park project, as a shoreline restoration project, will not be competing against other City projects on the list for funding. And funding is always the big hurdle for parks projects. For DePave Park, there are many potential sources of funding to conduct the planning and permitting process, as well as the construction phase. Below is a list of potential sources of funding for DePave Park. Base Reuse Fund - City of Alameda Funds accumulated in the Base Reuse Fund from the sale and lease of property at Alameda Point can be utilized for project planning purposes at Alameda Point. | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,10 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 10 | 6-A Exhibit 2 12-12-2019 Comment on staff report from Ani Dimusheva, anidimusheva@gmail.com, 510-387- 4084 Please include in public record and on the city's website. Comments in red font below. Approve Tree and Asphalt Replacement Plan for Jackson Park To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Recreation and Park Commission From: Amy Wooldridge, Recreation and Parks Director Re: Approve Tree and Asphalt Replacement Plan for Jackson Park BACKGROUND On September, 12, 2019, the Recreation and Parks Commission discussed a play area at Jackson Park and also directed staff to bring back a maintenance plan for Jackson Park that addressed the asphalt pathways and trees. This report provides information and location of the existing trees, a plan and options for replacing trees and the proposed areas of asphalt pathway to be replaced in 2020 (Exhibit 1). There is no specific plan and options for replacing trees in the staff report. For example, if you remove all sycamores around the perimeter of the park, what species will replace them? The discussion is general and premature considering the upcoming MSTP update. See below. DISCUSSION Pathway Asphalt Replacement The Alameda Recreation and Parks Department (ARPD) is allocating $80,000 toward asphalt replacement this fiscal year for Jackson Park. The areas noted in red on Exhibit 1 highlight which pathway locations will be replaced with this funding allocation. The asphalt replacement will occur in 2020 and specific locations may vary slightly based on field conditions. The areas being replaced are the most degraded areas and pose the highest safety risk. It includes a large portion of the asphalt pathways on the southern portion of the park and approximately half of the pathways in the northern half between San Jose Avenue and Encinal Avenue. ARPD will allocate additional funding in the next two fiscal years to complete the asphalt replacement at Jackson Park. Trees The sycamore trees along the streets where there are no sidewalks are under Public Works' responsibility. Any tr… | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,8 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 8 | 6-A Exhibit 2 From: Amy LaThanh To: Amy Wooldridge Cc: Robert LaThanh; Misha David Chellam; J.J. Navarro Subject: Re: Jackson Park tree and asphalt maintenance plan on Rec and Parks Commission meeting tonight Date: Thursday, December 12, 2019 11:33:23 AM CAUTION: This email message is coming from a non-City email address. Do not click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. Please contact the Help Desk with any questions. *** Hi Amy, Thanks for sending the agenda and plans over. I have a few comments that I'd like to make sure are included in the discussion tonight since I won't be able to attend in person. Regarding the asphalt: I am excited that this is happening! Yay! I would like to mention though that all of the asphalt around the 1100 block of the park is really bad - so much so that it's not really safe for kids to ride their bikes. I would advocate for the entrity of it to be replaced if possible. I would also advocate for not removing the asphalt near the Dumb Friends bench -- many folks use those ramps to get to the other side of the street. If it's a safety concern, perhaps simply adding crosswalks there to slow traffic might be good (and cheaper)? Regarding the landscape playground location: The two options suggested are good. I would also suggest looking at the far end of the park by the Dumb Friends bench. Reason being is that there are a bunch of apartment buildings right there, many with children residents (and therefore it will be less likely that people will be offended by the location) In order of placement, my preference would be: 1. In front of the KFC near Encinal; dead area anyways, closer to business district overflow, can't be worse than a KFC 2. In front of the Dumb Friends bench; many apartments with children 3. Middle of the park in front of 1232/1236; fine but doesn't need to be center piece of the park Thanks so much for all of the city's work on this! I'm excited we'll soon have more to offer at Jackson Park! Cheers, Amy On Thu, Dec 12, 20… | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,7 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 7 | 6-A Exhibit Z From: Gary Cates To: Amy Wooldridge Cc: bmathieson@aol.com Subject: Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting, Dec 12, 2019 Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 6:09:49 PM *** CAUTION: This email message is coming from a non-City email address. Do not click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. Please contact the Help Desk with any questions. *** Dear Ms. Wooldridge, We will not be able to attend the next commission meeting where the Jackson Park improvement plan is on the agenda. However, we would like to express our preference for items contained in Exbit 1 of the Staff Report. 1. That the landscape play area, if approved, be located in the southern most spot indicated in the report. For your reference this would be directly across from 1236 Park Ave. We believe the northern spot is too close to Encinal Ave and would expose children to health hazards associated with automobile noise, traffic and pollution. 2. That a redwood or palm tree be considered for one of those circles that previously had trees as two mature magnolia trees already exist near Encinal Ave. Would you please share these thoughts with members of the commission? Thank you for your consideration. Gary can Mary Ann Cates 1250 Park Ave | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-05-13.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-05-13 | 3 | 6-A MOTION Vice Chair Robbins motion to accept the Recreation and Parks Department FY 2021-23 Budget as proposed and approve that Commissioner Navarro speak on behalf of the Recreation and Park Commission at the City Council meeting in support of the budget. M/S Vice Chair Robbins / Commissioner Navarro Chair Alexander proposed a friendly amendment to the motion to request that the City Council funds the additional projects and look into other revenue sources such as a bond. Vice Chair Robbins and Commissioner Navarro accepted the proposed friendly amendment. All present in favor with 5 ayes via roll call vote. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA: Presentation on projects for the Peralta Colleges, specifically College of Alameda Interpretive Signage Design for Chochenyo Park Review and Discuss Proposal of BMX Park at Alameda Point Reimagine Community Events Partnerships with AUSD JUAs Which teams use what facilities Shared blacktops and playgrounds SET NEXT MEETING DATE: June 10, 2021 ADJOURNMENT Motion to adjourn M/S Commissioner Jones / Commissioner Nguyen Motion carried by the following voice vote: All in favor with a 5 ayes via roll call vote. Chair Alexander adjourned the meeting at 9:15 PM 3 | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-05-13.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2021-07-08.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2021-07-08 | 3 | 6-A Public Comments - No public comments 6-A Commissioner Comments Chair Alexander: The work that FOTP does is appreciated and it is important that we work together. Vice Chair Robbins: Volunteered to be the liaison between the Recreation and Park Commission and FOTP by attending their board meetings. 6-B Pulled off the agenda, not heard 6-C Review and Provide Feedback on the Draft Vision Zero Action Plan to Eliminate Traffic Fatalities and Severe Injuries by 2040 Lisa Foster, City of Alameda Transportation Planner, gave a presentation which included information about the importance, vision and goals of Vision Zero in Alameda, traffic safety, making our streets safer and performance measures. 6-C Public Comments - No Public Comments 6-C Commissioner Comments Vice Chair Robbins: The flashing lights on the crosswalks are helpful for stopping drivers and would be great to put them in all the high danger corridors areas. Commissioner Navarro: Has noticed the safety improvement with the daylighting on Broadway and Central. What are the issues in putting crosswalks with lights near Chochenyo Park? Lisa Foster: Cal Trans is planning to do improvements and reconfigure the Encinal Corridor to slow down traffic and put in flashing lights at the crosswalks. Chair Alexander: The red lines on the curbs are wonderful and would be great to see them on Otis to Grand street. Loves the traffic lights with the yellow squares and agrees that anywhere the flashing lights can be put are helpful. 6-D Review and Recommend Bay Bridge BMX Park Concept Plan Cassandra Caron, former BMX racer gave presentation which included information about BMX parks, the proposed partnership with the City, proposed location, benefits, layout, components, funding, revenue and marketing. The next step would be to secure at least $25,000 and hire a civil engineer to determine location and condition of existing utilities. 6-D Public Comments - No Public Comments 6-D Commissioner Comments Vice Chair Robbins: Fantastic presentation. Would like to see the BMX im… | RecreationandParkCommission/2021-07-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,20 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 20 | 6-B COLOEN and 100 Exhibit 3 ears To: Honorable Chair and Members of the Alameda Recreation and Park Commission RE: Recreation and Parks Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019, Item 6B Date: December 10, 2019 Ladies and Gentlemen: We are writing to request that the Commission assign the highest priority to the planning and development of the proposed Shoreline Ecological Park on the west side of Seaplane Lagoon at Alameda Point, commonly known as De-Pave Park. We believe that it's time, in fact past time, to move forward on De-Pave Park. The park concept was included in the 2014 Alameda Point Town and Waterfront Precise Plan and is highlighted as "A Case Study in Adaptive Land Use and Shoreline Management" in Alameda's 2019 Climate Action Plan (pages 124 and 125). But De-Pave Park can't give us any of its critical projected benefits while it is still only on paper. Seaplane Lagoon and its surrounding area around provides rare and precious habitat for wildlife, including a nesting pair of Ospreys, as well as nesting herons and other resident and migrating shore and water birds. As the city increases the commercial and transportation uses at Alameda Point, it is critical to consider the needs of the wildlife that are being compromised by that development. The additional wildlife area planned in De-Pave Park will be particularly valuable because it will enhance and support the Veteran's Administration's adjacent wildlife area. Many birds such as the Great Blue Herons, Least Terns, Caspian Terns and more that nest on the VA properties rely on the protected waters of the Seaplane Lagoon to forage. It is especially important during storms creating high winds and rough waters on the open SF Bay. In addition, tidal marsh reduces a major cause of climate change, carbon dioxide, and mitigates the effects of sea level rise by buffering waves and absorbing storm surges. Marshes operate as "carbon sinks" because of the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed through photosynthesis by the prolific wetland vegetation. These sinks are … | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,13 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 13 | 6-B Exhibit - From: johnsen cyndy To: Amy Wooldridge Subject: Comment on Item 6-B for Park Commission Meeting Tonight Date: Thursday, December 12, 2019 9:58:06 AM CAUTION: This email message is coming from a non-City email address. Do not click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. Please contact the Help Desk with any questions. *** RE: 6-B - Review and Recommend Park and Recreation Facilities Project Priorities Dear Commissioners, In your discussion tonight around prioritizing parks, I hope that priority is given to parks that can do the most for Alameda's various goals - not only to provide access, recreation, and learning opportunities for people to connect with nature, but also, if possible, to help our unique island environment by addressing key environmental goals. Chief among those goals is confronting the critical threat of sea level rise through design. From what I understand, DePave Park seeks to do that. Therefore, I hope you support the next steps for that project, and apply that kind of thinking to all parks being considered. If there's a matrix of factors, design for future sea level rise and habitat protection seem like good points to include. Thanks for your consideration, -Cyndy Johnsen P.S. Please post this under the "Correspondence" exhibit for public consumption. | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,14 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 14 | 6-B Exhibit 3 From: Patricia Lamborn To: Amy Wooldridge Subject: Dec. 12, 2019 Item 6 B Park Priorities Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 8:11:45 AM CAUTION: This email message is coming from a non-City email address. Do not click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. Please contact the Help Desk with any questions. Dear Ms. Wooldridge and Recreation and Parks Commissioners, As some of you know I am passionate about defending Shoreline Parks and maintaining open space and natural habitats for wildlife, public access on the Bay, and resiliancy in the face of sea level rise. I write in support of focusing on our Shoreline Parks: DePave and Enterprise-- as we face the challenge of climate adaptation. I appreciate the incredible job our Recreation and Parks Department does in maintaining our historic parks, and building parks such as Jean Sweeney. The programs run by ARPD are terrific, I am so grateful for the work you all do. The Priority List you present tonite reflects the difficult choices you will have to make in serving the complex needs of our island city. I am writing to ask that you recommend moving forward with the steps to make DePave Park and Enterprise Park a reality. On March 26, the City Council of Alameda voted 5-0 to pass a historic resolution declaring a climate emergency. Our City also spent thousands of dollars and time on consultants to develop the Climate Action and Resiliancy Plan. (CARP) Now it's time for action. One definite recommended action from the CARP has been taken ---- the passage of the stormwater drain parcel tax- a smart step to fund the infrastructure needed to deal with flooding and sea level rise due to climate change. DePave Park is an accepted smart action, already a part of the City's plan. It should be next in line to achieve climate change adaptation-- restore wetlands where it is possible. I appreciate that the Recreation and Parks Department and Commission are facing a long list of priorities for parks to develop and are seek… | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf,19 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2019-12-12 | 19 | 6-B - Exhibit 3 December 11, 2019 Honorable Chair and Members of the Recreation and Parks Commission Dear Chair and Members: of the Recreation and Parks Commission. On December 12 your Commission will make an important decision regarding the future of DePave Park I strongly encourage you to prioritize moving forward and asking the City to start the process. De-Pave Park calls for removing concrete along the western shore of Seaplane Lagoon for a natural shoreline and wetlands development. This concept was included in the 2014 Alameda Point Town and Waterfront Precise Plan and is highlighted in Alameda's 2019 Climate Action Plan. However, the plan won't move forward unless the City sends out a Request for Proposal to find out the costs and details of creating this shoreline park. In addition to providing a wonderful waterfront park for all to enjoy, this newly created marsh will create habitat for the wildlife who make their home there and depend on it for their very survival It also fits into the city's climate action plan because wetlands and marshes can help mitigate rising ocean levels by helping to absorb and contain rising water. Please do the right thing and ask the city to give this issue the highest priority. Thank you. Patricia M. Gannon 1019 Tobago Lane Alameda, CA 94502 Pg3187@gmail.com | RecreationandParkCommission/2019-12-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2022-03-10.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2022-03-10 | 3 | 6-B Public Comments - none 6-B Commissioner Comments Commissioner Navarro: Favorites include Whale Park, Alameda Whale Point Park and Ohlone Park and Humpback Commons Park. Commissioner Nguyen: Favorites include Whale Park and Allie Park. Also suggested to keep the names short with two to three names as it is easier to reference a park. Vice Chair Robbins: Favorite is Little Whale Park. Chair Alexander: Favorites include Allie's Annex, Allies Cove Park, Allie at the Point, Navy Veterans Park, Rosie the Riveter Park, Rear Admiral Evelyn Fields Park and Midway Park. The Commissioners' final list for Alameda Point Neighborhood Park: Whale Park Alameda Whale Park Little Whale Park Alameda Whale Point Park Allie at the Point Allie's Humpback Park Navy Veteran's Park Rosie the Riveter Park Midway Park Rear Admiral Evelyn Fields Park 6-B Motion Commissioner Nguyen motioned to approve final list recommendations for Alameda Point Neighborhood Park. M/S Commissioner Nguyen / Vice Chair Robbins All present in favor with 4 ayes via roll call vote. Director Wooldridge informed Commissioners that Rear Admiral Evelyn Fields is still alive and therefore does not meet the naming criteria. The Commissioners' revised final list for Alameda Point Neighborhood Park: Whale Park Alameda Whale Park Little Whale Park Alameda Whale Point Park Allie at the Point Allie's Humpback Park Navy Veteran's Park Rosie the Riveter Park Midway Park 3 | RecreationandParkCommission/2022-03-10.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2020-01-09.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2020-01-09 | 2 | 6-B Review and Recommend the Layout Design for the Alameda Point Gymnasium Restroom ARPD Director Amy Wooldridge gave presentation which included background information and 2 layout options with the primary difference being all 8 stalls in option 2 are gender neutral. MOTION Motion by Vice Chair Robbins to approve option 2 layout design for the Alameda Point Gymnasium Restroom as recommended by the Recreation and Park Director. M/S / Vice Chair Robbins / Commissioner Navarro Motion carried by a 4 - 0 voice vote: All present in favor. 6-C Review and Recommend a Staffing Plan for Alameda Park and Recreation Department Project Management. ARPD Director Amy Wooldridge gave presentation. MOTION Motion by Commissioner Limoges to recommend the staffing plan for ARPD Project Management that supports hiring of a Senior Management Analyst as described. Furthermore, in order to ensure the effective and efficient operation of these tasks we further recommend that an Executive Assistant be added to the Recreation and Parks Department if funding is available. M/S / Commissioner Limoges / Vice Chair Robbins Motion carried by a 4 - 0 voice vote: All present in favor. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA: Presentation by Transportation Staff on bike/ped safety plans and projects Review and Recommend on General Plan - Open Space, Recreation & Parks Element SET NEXT MEETING DATE: Thursday, February 13, 2020. ADJOURNMENT M/S Commissioner Navarro / Vice Chair Robbins Motion carried by the following voice vote: All in favor with a 4 - 0. Chair Alexander adjourned the meeting at 8:35 PM. 2 | RecreationandParkCommission/2020-01-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2009-02-12.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2009-02-12 | 3 | 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Annual Review and Adjustment of Fees for Recreation and Parks - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard stated that staff has provided surveys/charts, etc. regarding this year's recommended fee information. Fee increases include: Swim Lessons increase by 50 cents Swim Team Hourly Rate increase of 50 cents Picnic Rentals increase by $5 Field Only Rentals increase by $15 Sports Field Use Fee increase by $2 Alameda Point Gym Rental Deposit increase to $500/resident, $750/non-resident Tennis Lessons increase by $1 for Adult groups and Junior groups Vice Chair Restagno stated that the AP Gym Rental fees are very inexpensive and asked if there is room to increase the fees. Director Lillard stated yes. M/S/C Sonneman/Kahuanui (approved) "That a $5 increase be charged to resident and non-resident 1 court/Gym. Non- Profits would stay the same." Approved (6): Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Kahuanui, Sonneman Absent (1): Mariani Director Lillard brought to the attention of the Commission that there is one new fee to be added. It is the rental of the Bocce Ball Courts in Lincoln Park. Proposed fee would be $10/hr resident, $30/hr non-resident (weekends only - Friday 5 p.m. thru Sunday 8 p.m.). Vice Chair Restagno stated that the Italian/American League (IAL) does a lot of work on the court and also have work parties to clean up the area and make improvements. He would suggest that the IAL not be charged to use the courts. Director Lillard stated that staff will apply the same rules that are applied to field charges. Chair Ogden suggested that a $50 key deposit be charged. Jack Stevens, representative of the church league that plays at Krusi Park on Sundays, stated that their group does not have a lot of money to be able to pay the increased fees. Director Lillard stated that staff could work with the group to slowly bring the group in line with the fee structure and other groups. Commissioner Sonneman suggested that staff work with the group and bring the issue back to the Commission at a later date. M/… | RecreationandParkCommission/2009-02-12.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2008-12-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2008-12-11 | 2 | 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Possible Projects for East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) Measure WW Funds - (Discussion) Director Lillard stated that the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) Measure WW was passed by voters in November 2008. Since the Measure passed it is anticipated that the City will receive approximately $3 million to fund park improvements. The City will have 10 years to spend the funds. Some restrictions are as follows: - Funds cannot be a partial payment for completion of a project. Project must be completed. - City must own the property to be improved/developed. Although the City could acquire property with the funds. Possible project list with estimated costs is as follows: Highest Priority 1. Resurfacing of Washington Park Basketball Courts $100,000 2. Renovation of Littlejohn Park Recreation Center $250,000 3. Renovation of Woodstock Park Recreation Center $500,000 Additional Projects 4. Replacement of Krusi Park Recreation Center $750,000 5. Renovation of Godfrey Park Play Area $100,000 6. Resurface Washington Park Tennis Courts $350,000 7. Renovation of Field Lighting (Washington, Woodstock & Leydecker) $1,000,000 8. AP Gym Renovations $750,000 9. Improvements to DeWitt O' Club $500,000 10. Renovation of Field in Coast Guard Housing $750,000 11. Acquisition of Collins Property (Estuary Park) $3-5 million Commissioner Brown asked when the City can start applying for the WW Funds. Director Lillard stated that the City can start applying next year (2009). Commissioner Sonneman asked how much the City had received from the EBRPD Measure AA funds. Director Lillard stated approximately $2.1 million. Those projects completed were the building of Tillman Park and Harrington Field, renovation of Lincoln Park playground, and some work was done at Krusi Park. Commissioner Sonneman asked if monies could be combined to complete a project. Director Lillard stated that as long as the Measure WW funds complete the project, combining funds can be done. Chair Ogden asked if the Lincoln Park Rec… | RecreationandParkCommission/2008-12-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-02-09.pdf,5 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-02-09 | 5 | 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Final Review of Long-Term Park Use Policy - (Discussion Item Only) Commission reviewed the minor changes to the Long-Term Park Use Policy. The changes do not significantly change the policy, but rather make it easier to both understand and implement. Small changes were: Added a pre-application clause. - Eliminated trying to cover every specific contingency (e.g. ice creams trucks, Girl Scouts cookie sales, etc.). This item was originally scheduled to go before Council sometime in March, but the City Manager's Office has requested that the item go before Council on February 21, 2006. Commissioners Reeves and Kahuanui recommended that staff forward the Policy on to Council. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See attached February 1-28,2006 - Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See attached February 1- - 28, 2006 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See attached February 1- - 28, 2006 Activity Report. D. Other Reports and Announcments Status Report on Transportation Master Plan Committee (Commissioner Johnson) No report at this time. 8. STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS The Washington Park Recreation Building has been demolished in preparation for installation of the new building. Plans will go to the Planning Commission at 5 Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes Thursday, February 9, 2006 | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-02-09.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2007-02-08.pdf,5 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2007-02-08 | 5 | 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Presentation by representatives of Catellus regarding their proposal for open space within the Alameda Landing Project (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Bruce Knopf, Catellus Development Group Vice President, to further discuss the proposal for open space within the Alameda Landing Project. For clarification Mr. Knopf stated that the plan is specifically for the promenade within the Alameda Landing Project, not the whole Alameda Landing Project per se. The residential piece of the project would come back at a later date. It is a conceptual plan only. The total area will be developed in three phases. At the last Commission meeting there were several issues raised: - Height of the office bulding. Comment: There are no plans at this time, we do not know the height at this time. - Size of the park in the future residential area. Comment: This plan will be submitted seperately at a later time. Basketball was a priority. Comment: A number of areas were expanded that could be dedicated to basketball courts even though the developer is not at that level of detail at this time. Need for an athletic field. Comment: The Commission stated that the ball field needed to be larger than the 120 feet from home plate to outfield distance that was shown on the plan at the last meeting. The field has been enlarged to accommodate Little League play. It is the smallest size softball field that can accommodate softball. The waterfront green area struck the Commission as a passive recreational area. Comment: The waterfront area is a passive recreational area, but can also be used for pick-up soccer play and is sized to accommodate that type of play. Mr. Knopf stated that their group has signed a letter of intent with the Miracle League. In talking with the Miracle League representative the developer decided to make the outfield fence movable/portable so that it can accommodate Little League. Commissioner Ingram asked what kind of turf would be used. Mr. Mariani, Miracle League representative,… | RecreationandParkCommission/2007-02-08.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2006-12-14.pdf,3 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2006-12-14 | 3 | 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Review of Assembly Bill 1234 - Ethics Training - (Discussion Item) Director Lillard reminded the Commission that their Ethics Training Certificates are due to City Clerk by December 31, 2006. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See December 1-31, 2006 Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See December 1-31, 2006 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See December 1-31, 2006 Activity Report. D. Other Reports and Announcments - Status Report on Transportation Master Plan Committee (Commissioner Johnson) No report at this time. Next meeting is in January 2007. 8. STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS Washington Park Recreation Building - The construction of the new building is underway. All irrigation and main water lines have been relocated that were originally under the footprint of the new building. Once this work was completed a contractor ran a new water line and utilities. The site has been graded and is now ready for foundation work. The building is scheduled to be in place by February 2007. 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL Discussion was held regarding orientation materials provided to new Commissioner Restagno. Copies will be given to the rest of the Commissioners. 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA 11. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING January 11, 2007 12. ADJOURNMENT - 3 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes Wednesday, December 14, 2006 | RecreationandParkCommission/2006-12-14.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2014-09-11.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2014-09-11 | 2 | 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. Jean Sweeney Open Space Park Update Director Wooldridge provided an update on the Alameda Community Garden. Two volunteers compiled a report on fungus options for cleaning the soil. She will hear about grant opportunities in the near future. Mr. Jim Sweeney spoke and reported that the Jean Sweeney Open Space Park Fund has obtained their 503(c) status and looks forward to working closely with the Commission to raise funds for the park. Commissioner Tilos asked about corporate logos being on items or in parks and how the public feels about it. Director Wooldridge responded that the Under Armor logo on Leydecker Park's Curry Court was the first and was well received. It passed through this Commission and City Council. Discussion regarding what corporate funding signage could look like. Chair Delaney suggested in the future forming a subcommittee for leveraging funds. B. Estuary Park Update Director Wooldridge reported that on September 2nd. the conceptual design was reviewed by City Council. There is still approximately $1 million to raise of the anticipated $3.5 million budget for Phase 1. Subsequently, there is no timeline yet for going out to bid. She reported the Challenger League is through the Little League and is starting this Fall. Commissioner Mariano asked about the synthetic turf requirement for accessibility on the Challenger field. Director Wooldridge discussed different field types of rubberized versus synthetic turf and their accessibility. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION & PARK DIRECTOR A. Recreation Commission Reports: None at this time. B. Friends of the Park Report (FOTP): Chair Delaney reported the annual golf tournament is Monday and looks like they have over 90 members signed up to play. Friday night is the last Starlight movie in Leydecker Park, along with a skateboard give-away. Vice Chair Brown reported that the Mastick annual drive for new members is underway, and they have already had a great turnout. Mastick will have many new Fall programs … | RecreationandParkCommission/2014-09-11.pdf |
RecreationandParkCommission/2015-05-14.pdf,2 | RecreationandParkCommission | 2015-05-14 | 2 | 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A. Review and Recommend the Revised Skate Park Mural Design and Location Ms. Patty Harding did a presentation on the Skate View Park renovation and planned improvements. These included: concrete work, painting railings, painting over graffiti, adding a main shade structure, adding picnic benches and a BBQ. The work is and will be completed thru the generosity of volunteers and the ARPD maintenance staff. A mural in memory of Clay Harding was proposed in a new location on the west side of the Skate View Park. The artist and friend of Clay, Sam Norton, proposed a graffiti- like design with personal elements that represent Clay and his skate boarding passion. The mural will be sealed with anti-graffiti sealant and new location will help to minimize future graffiti. This is the first major aesthetic improvement to the Skate View Park since 1999 and has begun to make a positive change. Approval of the recommendations for the revised skate park mural design and location. M/S Vice-Chair Brown, Commissioner Cooke and all in favor. 7. REPORTS A. Mastick Senior Center, Introduction and Annual Report Jackie Krause, Senior Services Manager introduced Ed Kallas as the Recreation Services Specialist dedicated to the Mastick Senior Center. Ed is excited to be working in Alameda, as he is also the current President of California Park and Recreation Society (CPRS), District 3. Ed is very interested in bringing active new programs to the senior population. Jackie presented the Mastick Annual Report. The Mastick Senior Center provides a well-rounded education, social and recreation programs for adults 50 years and older. The Center offers a variety of quality programs and services in the areas of health, education and recreation. There are presently 3,400 members. Support Services include consumer presentations, health insurance counseling, information and referrals, legal assistance, dental and podiatry consults, tax assistant and transportation services. B. Recreation Commission Reports: Commissioner Tilos… | RecreationandParkCommission/2015-05-14.pdf |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "pages" ( [body] TEXT, [date] TEXT, [page] INTEGER, [text] TEXT, [path] TEXT, PRIMARY KEY ([path], [page]) );