pages_fts: 76
This data as json
rowid | text |
---|---|
76 | Mr. Banta stated that he understands project has been here before and he believes that last time they had a bona-fide partner and vision that was not approved by the Board. He stated that they have every intention to move forward, but are only one of numerous players, and he can't account for unforeseen delays outside of their purview. The motion was made to approve a recommendation to the City Council for a one year extension to Tentative Map 8060 or until July 19, 2016. Motion passed 6-0 7-B Proposed Text Amendments to the City of Alameda Zoning Ordinance (AMC Chapter 30) regarding permit streamlining for residential property improvements and other miscellaneous administrative, technical, and clarifying amendments. Public hearing to consider zoning text amendments that would streamline permitting for residential property improvements and other minor administrative, technical and clarifying amendments to improve usability of the zoning regulations. The proposed amendments are categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, Minor Alterations to Land Use Limitations. Mr. Tai presented the staff report and described the primary goal of the amendment is to help homeowners and the staff in the Permit Center by streamlining the process and simplifying the requirements by codifying existing interpretations and procedural alignments. The proposals include streamlining for chimney modifications, front yard fences 3 feet tall and minor improvements approved by Harbor Bay Isle Homeowners Association. He mentioned that Alameda Architectural Preservation Society (AAPS) wrote a letter with concerns about the proliferation of front yard fences. He stated that there are more code enforcement cases on front yard fences then permits for front yard fences, because of convoluted rules and process. Staff recommends approval of the text amendments to chapter 30. Additional amendments will be brought forward during the fall and will be presented to the City Council as one package of amendments. Vice President Alvarez asked for clarification regarding parking in front yard setback. Mr. Tai stated that the driveway can't currently be consider required off-street parking space part of required off-street if it is in the front setback. Vice President Alvarez asked if the concern over growing houses and that's why parking requirement is in. Mr. Tai stated that the amendment would allow homeowners to use a long driveway to count toward their off-street parking requirements. Page 4 of 7 Approved Minutes July 27, 2015 Planning Board Meeting |