pages_fts: 3
This data as json
rowid | text |
---|---|
3 | the North Course, and she wants it clear that there will be total agreement between Greenway and Jim's that improvements will not look funny. Ms. Wooldridge stated that the City does not want it to look funny, and that Greenway gets to take the lead as to what the improvements look like, and she recommends that they are presented to the golf commission, and Jim's would follow the tile choice and color schemes chosen. Commissioner Downing asked what would happen if Jim's chose not to agree to the color choices made by Greenway, and Ms. Wooldridge stated that per the agreement, he has to match design colors and style. Discussion ensued regarding several specific design items, and Ms. Wooldridge asked that they table this as the purpose of this meeting is to move forward with the recommendation for the Concessionaire agreement, and specifics can come back to the Golf Commission at a later date. The Concessionaire agreement is going before the City Council tonight for approval, and if approved, it moves forward, and if not approved, a couple of scenarios are they can make particular amendments to it and would still move forward or they could simply say no. If they say no, Greenway has first right of refusal in the existing agreement with the City, and she would then begin negotiations with Greenway, and if that failed at City Council level, then a formal Request for Proposal would be initiated, as well as if Greenway chose to waive their right of refusal. Commission Downing asked if all the major renovations would require approval of the Golf Commission, and Ms. Wooldridge stated that currently the agreement states that it requires Golf Commission approval for the enclosed patio, but if the Golf Commission wants approval of all interior renovations, that would have to be a recommendation to the City Council, and they could approve the agreement with that amendment. Chair Blatt asked Mr. Geanekos if there was somebody to fulfill the obligations of the agreement in the case of his retirement, and Mr. Geanekos responded that their goal is to remain a family business, but if this were to change, he could sign over to a City approved concessionaire. Ken Campbell of Greenway Golf stated that the relationship between Greenway and Jim's has been positive, but they are looking for clarity within the agreement, for instance, having a breakdown of the cost estimates that Greenway had to provide, would be advisable. Mr. Campbell stated that, originally, Greenway endorsed the idea of the patio wrapping around the front, but after they saw the conceptual drawing, they would like to discuss further how it is going to look. Mr. Campbell stated that there was nothing about golf course services, including the North Course snack bar and the beverage cart, and also inquired about snack services at the practice facility. Mr. Campbell asked about maintenance of the common area, as the agreement states that Jim's is not responsible for any exterior landscaping. Greenway would also like clarity on the interior design of the restaurant. Mr. Campbell also would like the opportunity for Greenway's attorneys look at the possibility of a cross indemnity clause regarding any injuries that might occur on the property. 3 Golf Commission Minutes - -Tuesday, March 1, 2016 |