pages_fts: 18731
This data as json
rowid | text |
---|---|
18731 | Henry Dong, Planner III, also discussed the records the City had on file, including a DPR- 523 form that documented the historical character of the primary house. The accessory structure was not described as one of the character-defining features of the property. Chair Saxby opened public comment. There were no public speakers. Chair Saxby closed public comment and opened board discussion. Chair Saxby believed that accessory structures can add some integrity to a site but in this case, it appeared to be altered too many times from its original design. He was leaning toward approval. Board Member Sanchez agreed especially since it was not mentioned in the original property survey documentation. Also, he noted that the structure was not a street-facing structure or had any visual impact on the character of the home or the neighborhood. He was also leaning toward approval. Vice-Chair Jones noted that the building is one of the more visually appealing accessory structures that had come before the board and that it had a lot of charm. She discussed the criteria they looked at when discussing the demolition of accessory structures. However, she was also leaning toward allowing the demolition due to the issues mentioned. Board Member Alvin Lau wanted to know more about the plans for the space after the demolition. Ms. Herrera said there were no plans for a new additional structure. They would be adding some landscaping and a fence. Sarah Rodebaugh, Interior Designer of Henry & Mae, representing the applicant, discussed how the owners had tried to save the structure. Chair Saxby made a motion to approve the demolition of the accessory structure and Vice-Chair Jones seconded the motion. A vote was taken by a raise of hands and the motion passed 5-0. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Chair Saxby discussed an "eyesore", an incredible historic property at 1617 Central Ave. It was abandoned and some work had started on it but had stopped. He wanted to know what the City could do to help this historic property. Historical Advisory Board Meeting Minutes February 3, 2022 Page 3 of 4 |