pages_fts: 11
This data as json
rowid | text |
---|---|
11 | Board Member Teague said he understood that some of the units may be run by the Housing Authority and not be for sale market rate. Mr. Hilke said they are in discussions with the Housing Authority about how best to fulfill the affordable housing requirements for the project. He said one option would be to sell a finished building to the Housing Authority that they would then manage. Board Member Teague said the retail section was glossed over and asked for more information. Mr. Hilke said they currently envision a single story retail only building with frontage onto the Waterfront Plaza and the east-west roadway. Board Member Teague asked if the potential pedestrian and bike bridge has caused them to reduce the number of housing units. Mr. Hilke said the placement of the bridge within the view corridor means it is not a problem unless the location changed. Board Member Teague asked if the change in the AMP access on the east side of the project side would be a problem. Staff Member Thomas said that they will work with AMP and make sure there is sufficient access. Board Member Teague asked why the bike connection to the Tri Pointe property is listed only as potential. Mr. Hilke said that they could build a connection, but that they do not control access to the Tri Pointe property. Board Member Cavanaugh asked why the project is being built before a bridge is constructed. Staff Member Thomas said that the bridge planning is a complicated long term project. He said they do not want to stop all housing development while they work on a bridge solution. Board Member Cavanaugh asked what the plan would be for noise abatement with all of the marine services happening to the west of the project site. Mr. Hilke said that they will have to do sound studies and mitigation, but that they will absolutely have to also do disclosure to potential residents about impacts of noise at the site. Approved Planning Board Minutes Page 6 of 9 June 10, 2019 |