pages: PlanningBoard/2005-01-10.pdf, 1
This data as json
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
PlanningBoard | 2005-01-10 | 1 | Minutes of the Regular Planning Board Meeting Monday, January 10, 2005 - 7:00 p.m. 1. CONVENE: 7:08 p.m. 2. FLAG SALUTE: Mr. Lynch 3. ROLL CALL: President Cunningham, Cook, Lynch, Kohlstrand, McNamara and Piziali. Board Member Mariani was not present for roll call, and arrived during Item 9-A. Also present were Planning & Building Director Greg Fuz, Development Review Manager Jerry Cormack, Deputy City Attorney Julie Harryman, Supervising Planner Judith Altschuler, Planner II Dennis Brighton. 4. MINUTES: Minutes for the meeting of December 13, 2004. Vice President Cook noted that page 14, paragraph 2, should be changed to read: "She noted that in past site visits to walled-off developments, that the-play yards were was deserted, which she believed was unsafe for anyone who did use the area." Vice President Cook noted that page 14, paragraph 5, should be changed to read: " showers for use after swimming, and should open onto the pool area. She believed that the multitude of angular pathways of the landscape plan seemed very frenetic to her. She did not believe there was a sense of continuity and flow with respect to the landscaping and circulation plan." Ms. Kohlstrand advised that page 12, paragraph 7, should be changed to read: "She was disappointed to see a wall along across-Appezzato Parkway. " Ms. Kohlstrand advised that pages 17-18 did not indicate the details of the discussion about the reflectivity of the glass, and noted that she inquired as to whether the reflective glass was required functionally for the project; the project sponsor indicated that it was not required. In addition, the conditions of approval included a recommendation that there would be no reflective glass on the building. President Cunningham advised that on page 1, the roll call should indicate "President Cunningham," rather than President Piziali. President Cunningham advised that page 15, paragraph 5, should be changed to reflect that he urged the developer to respond to the comments made by the Planning Board in an effort to clarify their position and stance on the critical elements for success of the project. He believed that Allen Tai's letter communicated the Planning Department's point of view. Planning Board Minutes Page 1 January 10, 2005 | PlanningBoard/2005-01-10.pdf |