pages: AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2006-11-01.pdf, 1
This data as json
| body | date | page | text | path |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2006-11-01 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday. November 1, 2006 The meeting convened at 7:19 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding. 2-A 1. ROLL CALL Present: Marie Gilmore, Boardmember, City of Alameda Doug deHaan, Boardmember, City of Alameda Frank Matarrese, Boardmember, City of Alameda Tony Daysog, Boardmember, City of Alameda Absent: Beverly Johnson, Chair of Alameda 2. CONSENT CALENDAR 2-A. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 4, 2006. Member Daysog pulled Item 2-A to articulate what he meant when he referenced certain letters regarding the ARRA's No-Cost EDC with the Navy. He reiterated his point that if we could return to the original understanding of the housing units that could be built-out per the documents agreed to by the ARRA and the Navy, perhaps we would not have to pay the $108,000 million the navy is now requiring. Member Daysog wanted to make sure this point was captured in this evening's meeting, since it was missed in the Minutes of October 4th. 2-B was motioned by Member Daysog, seconded by Member deHaan and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes - 3; Noes - 0; Abstentions - 1 (Member Gilmore was not present at the 10-4-06 ARRA meeting). 2-B. Recommendation to approve consultant agreement with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers for Pier Condition Analysis at Alameda Point in an amount not to exceed $170,226 Approval of 2-B was motioned by Member Daysog, seconded by Member deHaan and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes - 4; Noes - 0; Abstentions - 0. 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 3-A. Alameda Point Project Update Debbie Potter, Acting Alameda Point Project Manager, gave an overview on the Master Developer RFQ process. At the direction of the Board, the RFQ was issued on October 19th with a mandatory bidder's conference on Monday, October 30th. There were 20 firms that attended the bidder's conference. All due diligence documents were provided on a CD and an FTP site available for all interested firms, and a comprehensive download of the land planning, the environmental issues, the public trust, summary of term sheet; and an opportunity for those present to ask questions. One-on-one meetings were also offered with the firms intending to respond, with nine firms signed up. Responses are due December 4, 2006 and need to be | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2006-11-01.pdf |