home / alameda_minutes / pages

pages: AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-07-14.pdf, 2

This data as json

body date page text path
AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority 2005-07-14 2 all the other members of APAC contributed toward the planning efforts of Alameda Point. Members Daysog, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson (who just arrived at this point) also expressed their gratitude. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR 5-A. Approval of the minutes of the Regular meeting of March 2, 2005. 5-B. Approval of the minutes of the Special meeting of April 6, 2005. 5-C. Approval of an Amendment to Agreement with Russell Resources extending the term for 90- days and adding $54,000 to the budget for environmental consulting services. 5-D. Report from the Acting Executive Director recommending the approval of Subleases at Alameda Point. 5-E. Recommendation to amend the approved FY 2005-2006 ARRA Budget to include $225,000 for repairs to the Al Dewitt O'Club. Member Gilmore motioned to approve the Consent Calendar. The motion was seconded by Member Matarrese and passed by the following voice vote: Ayes - 5; Noes - 0; Abstentions - 0. 6. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 6-A. Presentation of the Preliminary Development Concept (PDC) for Alameda Point establishing land use goals, transportation strategy and historic preservation strategy. Steven Proud, Alameda Point Project Manager, discussed the updates on the Conveyance process with the Navy and the status of the budget. The key topic discussed was the progress with planning efforts regarding the PDC and introduced the document to the Board for their review. Mr. Proud advised that there are continuing discussions with the Navy on disposal strategies and constraints with the property; and that we're moving forward with the Navy regarding a conveyance agreement. He discussed the community meetings and the success in each of the workshops to tackle specific topics that helped produce this draft document (the PDC). He further discussed issues at Alameda Point (AP) about Navy conveyance and the land planning process. Andrew Thomas, Supervising Planner, focused on the Community Reuse Plan and the draft PDC. He discussed what the community's expectations for the development of AP and what the real priorities are. He advised that the PDC was an integration of "new" with the "old" (Community Reuse Plan). Mr. Thomas explained the several Appendices of the PDC, which included the Transportation Strategy, specifically the Broadway/Jackson feasibility study; and the Historic Preservation element. 2 AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-07-14.pdf
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 0.686ms