pages: AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-04-19.pdf, 1
This data as json
| body | date | page | text | path |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2005-04-19 | 1 | APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Tuesday, April 19, 2005 The meeting convened at 6:11 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding. 2-A 1. ROLL CALL Present: Beverly Johnson, Chair, City of Alameda Tony Daysog, Boardmember, City of Alameda Doug DeHaan, Boardmember, City of Alameda Frank Matarrese, Boardmember, City of Alameda Marie Gilmore, Boardmember, City of Alameda 2. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items Only. There were no speaker slips. 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 3-A. Study Session of the FY 2005-06 ARRA Budget Acting Executive Director, Bill Norton, gave a brief overview about the work session on the ARRA Budget and introduced Development Services Director, Leslie Little, who introduced staff : Nanette Banks, Jennifer Ott, and Stephen Proud. Leslie Little gave a powerpoint presentation on the Budget Planning for Alameda Point. The presentation focused on transition planning and preparation for the development of Alameda Point. The information presented expresses the existing conditions in the current ARRA budget and also the implications of some of the decisions that have been made during current negotiations. Ms. Little discussed two options to consider: 1) how to transition in the event that the developer (APCP) elects to proceed with the development of Alameda Point and, 2) how to transition if APCP chooses NOT to proceed. Ms. Little discussed the first scenarios (APCP proceeding), including the Alameda Point Bond, and that the activities that are currently being paid from it would transfer as direct cost to the developer; approximately 18 months. Other responsibilities would also shift to the developer, leasing and property maintenance activities, other financials responsibilities like project related tax increments, and current debt obligation. The second option was discussed (APCP electing not to proceed). Ms Little noted that this issue is a "structural deficiency" in the ARRA Budget. She stated that there are expenditures that are greater than the revenues at this point. She explained that if the developer doesn't elect to proceed, the key issues moving forward are: the Alameda Point Bond will be 1 | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-04-19.pdf |