pages: AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-02-02.pdf, 2
This data as json
| body | date | page | text | path |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority | 2005-02-02 | 2 | On Saturday, Jan 22nd we had a tour with the Alameda Architectural Preservation. The group came out and we toured around the base, specifically focusing on historic preservation issues. We had an excellent turn out with well over 15 members attending, along with Page and Turnbull. Two upcoming community workshops: the first one is March 3rd with the planning board; at that one we will focus largely on land use options, a continuing dialogue of what's happening at our first two community workshops. The next would be on Mar 23rd with the transportation commission where we would focus more on transportation related issues obviously and specifically on some of the discussions that we had at our last workshop for estuary crossings. Our goal is take all of those transit options and try and funnel them down to a couple that we can really study in depth as we move forward thru the process. So this is the continuing dialogue on that issue with the transportation commission, again hosted with the APAC as well. Member DeHaan asked how we are planning to get feedback from the Historic Preservation Society on the tour and if they be part of the community workshop. Stephen Proud replied that they were invited to participate in those meetings as an opportunity to make sure their comments came through the workshop format and they were also invited to solicit and give us comments independent of those workshops. Member Matarrese requested minutes of that meeting to give us at least some indication of what they might have said. Stephen Proud began discussions on the ARRA led predevelopment budget: The ARRA has $3.5 million that is available to lead the predevelopment planning period. There was a slight increase on Navy conveyance and on the land use planning side. At this point through the process we've spent @ 45% of what we had budgeted and we' re about 12 mo. into an 18 mo. process. Councilmember DeHaan asked if we were anticipating any contract amendments. Stephen Proud replied that at this point, we don't expect there would be any contract amendments. We do have a couple of contracts that have expirations date that were set for Mar 31st but we don't see anything on the horizon that looks like it would result in one of our consultant contracts going up in any extraordinary way in the near future. Member DeHaan asked what the completion date is on the project. Stephen replied that this budget was programmed to take us thru June 30th of 2005 -- an 18 month ARRA led pre development period, from the beginning of 04 to the middle of 05. 4. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS None. 5. ORAL REPORTS 5-A. Oral report from APAC There were no representatives from APAC. Chair Johnson stated there were no representatives from APAC. Chair Johnson stated there was an APAC sub-committee meeting this evening therefore there were no members available for an oral report. 2 Y:\Comdev\Base Reuse& Redevp\ARRA\MINUTES\2005\02-02-05 Regular.ARRA minutes.doc | AlamedaReuseandRedevelopmentAuthority/2005-02-02.pdf |