alameda_minutes
body | date | page | text | path |
---|---|---|---|---|
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 1 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- -MAY 16, 2006- - -7:30 P. .M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 7:54 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (06-253 ) Presentation by Alameda Architectural Preservation Society of a Historic Preservation Award for the storefront rehabilitation of the Oddfellows Building at 1501 Park Street using a City façade grant. Denise Brady, President of the Alameda Architectural Preservation Society, presented the award to the Mayor. Mayor Johnson thanked Ms. Brady for the award; acknowledged the efforts of the Business Development Division Coordinator and Development Services Director; stated the community realizes the importance of preserving and restoring historic structures. (06-254) Proclamation declaring May 18, 2006 as Bike to Work Day. Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Lucy Gigli and John McNulty with Bike Alameda. Ms. Gigli thanked the Council for the proclamation; stated the Alameda Association of Realtors has done a great job to encourage biking. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to approve a Contract with EIP Associates [paragraph no. 06-258], and Resolution of Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment [paragraph no. 06-262] were removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 2 | Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. . ] (*06-255) - Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on May 2, 2006, and the Special City Council Meetings held on May 3, 2006. Approved. ( *06-256) Ratified bills in the amount of $8,292,392.81 ( *06-257) Recommendation to accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period Ending March 31, 2006. Accepted. (06-258) Recommendation to approve a Contract with EIP Associates, Inc. in the amount of $173,075 for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for Harbor Bay Associates, Inc. The Planning and Building Director provided a brief oral report. Councilmember deHaan stated that the environmental review procedure is standard and is available to any individual. Mayor Johnson stated the staff recommendation is to approve having the Environmental Impact Report prepared and is not project approval. The Planning and Building Director stated that the Contract ensures that the applicant pays for the services. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the City was the owner of the Contract, to which the Planning and Building Director responded in the affirmative. David Kirwin, Alameda, stated past newspaper articles have indicated that the City could build several thousand homes on Bay Farm Island because of the reverse commute; the review is the fifth one that has been performed; the demand to provide public services and community facilities would increase the tax burden on the City. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the referenced article addressed a proposal to build several thousand homes at Harbor Bay. Mr. Kirwin responded the article noted that building several thousand homes was possible; the proposed lot size is not the family neighborhood quality and style of Alameda. Councilmember Matarrese noted the City does not plan to build Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 3 | homes ; an application to build homes was submitted by the property owner. The City Attorney stated the process is long; studies would be conducted to provide adequate information to the Planning Board to consider the application. Mayor Johnson stated the process is in the early stages the City is involved because the City wants to have the consultant perform the work for the City. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated an application for 104 homes does not mean that 104 homes would be built; 104 homes are the maximum but less could be built; the project may never be built because of community and City concerns. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would abstain on the matter he is concerned with on-going negotiations with the Port of Oakland. building additional homes at Harbor Bay could injure the City's position regarding airport expansion; information is needed to make an informed decision. Councilmember Matarrese stated he supports the recommendation in order to provide current information to the Planning Board. Councilmember deHaan stated hopefully the report will provide needed information; the recommendation does not commit the City to the project; concerns will be aired. Councilmember Matarrese stated the staff recommendation commits the City to engage the appropriate firm to conduct the study. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese and Mayor Johnson - 4. Abstentions Councilmember Daysog - 1. (*06-259) Recommendation to appropriate $16,000 from the Curbside Recycling Fund and award a Contract in the amount of $72,582, including contingencies, to AJW Construction for installation of Rubberized Sidewalks, No. P.W. 02-06-05. Accepted. (*06-260) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $436,000, including contingencies to SpenCon Construction, Inc. for the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Repair of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway and Minor Street Patching, No. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 4 | Routes to School) No. P.W. 11-02-15. Adopted. (06-262) Resolution No. 13953, "Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Alameda Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for FY 2006-07 and to Set a Public Hearing for June 6, 2006. " Adopted. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the annual assessment is only for Park Street. The Development Services Director responded the assessment is for Park Street and Webster Street the levy rates are different; the fee is collected along with the business license fee. Councilmember DeHaan inquired whether businesses have other assessment. The Development Services Director responded a City Lighting and Landscape District is used for maintenance and trash collection smaller areas also have individual Lighting and Landscape District areas. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there is a vote for the assessment. The Development Services Director responded the assessment was voted in a long time ago but is not renewed annually the self- taxing improvement assessments have an annual review process. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Webster Street has a Lighting and Landscape District. The Public Works Director responded the City has Landscaping and Lighting Districts throughout the City, including Webster Street, Park Street and Bay Street the fees are set annually; the fees are used for maintenance, litter collection, and electricity. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City provides the service, to which the Public Works Director responded the service is provided by a contractor. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 5 | Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City manages the Contract. The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated he was unsure whether the City managed the Contract for trash pickup on Webster Street. The Development Services Director stated Webster Street has two zones for the Lighting and Landscaping District; the levy is $35,000 per year; Park Street has one zone for $61,000 per year ; the Greater Alameda Business Area (GABA) has one zone for approximately $4,800 per year. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City provides other funding streams from improvement funds. The Development Services Director responded in the negative; stated the City provides support to Webster Street and Park Street through the Community Improvement Commission. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the matter would be addressed in the budget process. The Development Services Director responded in the affirmative; stated the current budget provides $74,000 for Webster Street and $94,000 for Park Street next year's budget would provide $94,000 for each. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether any funding is given to GABA. The Development Services Director responded that GABA has not requested any funding since she has worked for the City; a nominal amount was provided approximately four years ago. Councilmember deHaan moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ( *06-263) Resolution No. 13954, "Ordering Vacation of an Abandoned 15 Foot Storm Drain Easement within Assessor Parcel No. 074-1360- - Portion of 24, 25, 27, 29, 125 and 152 and Authorize Recordation of Quitclaim Deed [ID No. 16]. Adopted; and (*06-263A) Resolution No. 13955, "Ordering Vacation of Abandoned 10 Foot Sanitary Sewer Easement within Assessor Parcel No. 074-1356- Portion of 12 and 13, and Authorize Recordation of Quitclaim Deed [ID No. 17] (Catellus/Bayport Residential Project) " Adopted. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 6 | ( *06-264) Resolution No. 13956, "Amending the Management and Confidential Employees Association (MCEA) Salary Schedule by Establishing the Salary Range for the Classification of Web Technical Producer. " Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS ( 06-265) Resolution No. 13957, "Appointing Jeanette L. Copperwaite as a member of the Film Commission. (Historic Experience Seat) Adopted; (06-265A) Resolution No. 13958, "Appointing Kenneth I. Dorrance as a member of the Film Commission. Realty/Property Management Professional Seat) Adopted; (06-265B) Resolution No. 13959, "Appointing David J. Duffin as a member of the Film Commission. " (Film/Video Industry Seat) Adopted (06-265C) Resolution No. 13960, "Appointing Liam Gray as a member of the Film Commission. (Arts/Cultural Seat) Adopted; (06-265D) Resolution No. 13961, "Appointing Orin D. Green as a member of the Film Commission. " (Film/Video Industry Seat) Adopted (06-265E) Resolution No. 13962, "Appointing Patricia A. Grey and a member of the Film Commission. (Film/Video Industry Seat) Adopted; ( 06-265F Resolution No. 13963, "Appointing Tamar Lowell as a member of the Film Commission. (Water/Marina Based Experience Seat) Adopted; and (06-265G) Resolution No. 13964, "Appointing Theatte (Teddy) B. Tabor as a member of the Film Commission. (Community-at-Large Seat) Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath and presented certificates of appointment to Film Commission members. Mayor Johnson announced that Allison Bliss is the Chamber of Commerce representative, Tricia Collins-Levi is the West Alameda Business Association representative, and Robb Ratto is the Park Street Business Association representative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 7 | The Finance Director stated property owners are billed even though the Municipal Code states that the property owner is responsible for applying and paying for a business license; an annual renewal is sent out in April once a business license is on file. collection is attempted through July 31, at which time the business license becomes delinquent delinquent notices are sent out again in March; parcels with unpaid business licenses as of June 30 are placed on the tax roll; Public Hearing notices are also sent. Mayor Johnson stated the total amount of uncollected license fees is $5,629.28, $9,536.77 with late charges; efforts are made to work with the business community; the City appreciates what businesses do for the community. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 7 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 8 | Councilmember Daysog suggested researching adding "Important Notice" in the top five languages to the notification. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether most of the people on the list have paid business licenses in the past. The Finance Director responded some are continuing business; the majority took out a business license in 2004 but did not renew in 2005. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the notification indicates that the owner needs to advise the City when the business ceases, to which the Finance Director responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the Hearing. Rupert Davis, Oregon, stated he disagrees with the March 15 letter he received; his mother-in-law had a business license [for 720 Lincoln Avenue] until 1997; rent stopped for the upper unit in 1997 because of renovation; his mother-in-lav was advised by the Finance Department that a business license is not required if only one unit is rented; his mother-in-law passed away in 2001, and he and his wife took ownership; the Finance Department personally informed him that a business license is not required if only one unit is rented; an $84 late fee is ridiculous when he was told that he did not need a business license; only one unit was rented in 1997, 1998, and 1999, and he did not own the property at that time; no units were rented from 2000 to 2003; rent started in February 2004. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the Hearing. Mayor Johnson requested that Mr. Davis's case be referred to the Finance Department to determine whether the fee is valid. The Finance Director stated she would work with Mr. Davis. Councilmember Matarrese stated conclusions would be made based upon the supporting documentation. Councilmember Daysog moved approval of staff recommendation with direction to review and determine the validity of Mr. Davis's complaints and research adding "Important Notice" in the top five languages to the notification. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 9 | (06-268 ) Recommendation to award Contract in the amount of $1,050,505.00 to McGuire and Hester, and allocate a 10% contingency in the amount of $105,100.00 for the construction of the Bayport 4- acre park. The Redevelopment Manager provided a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the original bidder or challenger resubmitted a bid, to which the Redevelopment Manager responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the bids were lower. The Redevelopment Manager responded the bids for the park were lower; stated the community building bids were higher than the engineer's estimate; staff will recommend rejecting the bids at the June 20 City Council Meeting. The Acting Recreation and Park Director stated he has contacted the School District to arrange for facilities to run the After School Playground Program in the fall; field use will be rotated; renovation of Godfrey Park will start after Bayport Park is opened. Mayor Johnson inquired when the construction of the community building would be completed. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the community building would be re-bid in the fall. Mayor Johnson inquired whether construction could be done during the school year, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded in the affirmative. The Redevelopment Manager stated the community building is on school property and is subject to the Department of State Architect standards, which are higher the original lowest bid was $730,000 the re-bid was $850,000; the engineer's estimate was in the $600,000 range. Vice Mayor Gilmore moved approval of the staff recommendation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the renovations for Godfrey Park would start in September, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded hopefully. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 10 | Mayor Johnson inquired when renovations for Woodstock Park would start. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded the City has until 2012 to spend the grant money; stated Ritler Park would be renovated after Godfrey Park; Woodstock Park would be renovated next; the Woodstock Park design is more involved because of drainage problems in the neighborhood. louncilmember Matarrese inquired why renovation for Ritler Park would be before Woodstock Park. The Acting Recreation and Park Director responded renovation for Ritler Park would be quicker; stated renovation for Woodstock Park would start next year in late summer or early fall. Mayor Johnson stated starting renovation next year makes sense; Woodstock Park would not be open for the baseball season if work started next spring. Councilmember deHaan inquired when the park and facility naming policy would be brought to Council, to which the Acting Recreation and Park Director responded June 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (06-269) Vice Mayor Gilmore stated there have been various lobbying efforts to allow triple tractor trailers on California highways ; California currently bans triple tractor trailers; shipping companies are attempting to get the legislation through the State; the Governor has indicated some interest last time the issue was proposed; a subcommittee vote lost by a margin of eight to five; requested that the matter be placed on the agenda; stated citizen safety is a concern; there is potential for jackknifing and major wear and tear on local roads. Mayor Johnson concurred with Vice Mayor Gilmore; inquired whether triple tractor-trailers could be restricted in Alameda. The City Attorney responded probably not; stated there may be State and Federal preemptions; a number of Alameda streets are considered State highways. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the matter should be placed on Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 11 | the agenda. Councilmember deHaan stated eleven states allow triple tractor- trailers, the Federal government does not. Mayor Johnson inquired whether double tractor-trailers - are permitted in California and not Oregon, to which Councilmember deHaan responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the matter could be placed on the agenda sooner rather than later, to which the City Manager responded the matter would be placed on the June 6 City Council agenda. (06-270) Councilmember deHaan stated that the City has easement rights for streetscaping along Appezzato Way even though negotiations are being conducted with the Alameda Beltline; requested an Off Agenda Report on the matter; stated the City is missing an opportunity to bring the community together; landscaping should be done sooner rather than later; the Summer House, previously Harbor Island Apartments and Buena Vista Apartments, is one of the highest density areas in Alameda, with 41 homes per acre, and lends itself to a transportation node; the matter should be brought to the Transportation Commission. (06-271) Mayor Johnson requested that the City Council or Planning Board review office/business conversions in residential areas; stated the Council set a precedent on the issue several years ago [June 6, 2000] when a request was made to convert a residential structure into a law office beyond a business area [2058 Central Avenue] ; she would like to formalize the precedent previously the Council stated that no residential conversions would be allowed in the area. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that the Planning Board denied the request because parking requirements could not be met and a variance was requested. Mayor Johnson stated the City should be clear on the matter so that people do not purchase residential property with the intent to convert the property to commercial. The City Manager stated that the matter would be brought back to Council, including past Council action. (06-272) Councilmember deHaan stated the Miracle League provides an opportunity to establish a baseball field for individuals with limitations; the School Board reviewed possible fields; endorsement Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 12 | has been received from the Recreation and Parks Commission; the City provides full range sport opportunities; providing baseball fields for the Miracle League fills the one gap; encouraged the City to lend a kind ear to the opportunity and move forward. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 9:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 13 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY- - -MAY 16, 2006- -5:30 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 5:40 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (06-018) Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property: Fleet Industrial Supply Center; Negotiating parties: Community Improvement Commission and ProLogis; Under negotiation: Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Chair Johnson announced that the Commission obtained a briefing from real property negotiators and provided direction on negotiation parameters. Adjournment There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 14 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -MAY 16, 2006- - -5:31 P. M. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:50 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmember deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider : (06-250) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Campos-Marquez V. City of Alameda. (06-251) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency negotiators: Marie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee City Attorney. (06-253) Public Employment. Title: City Attorney. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, Council received a briefing from Legal Counsel regarding Conference with Labor Negotiators, Council discussed the City Attorney ; regarding Public Employment, Council discussed City Attorney employment. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 15 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, AND HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING TUESDAY- -MAY 16, 2006 - -7:31 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 9:01 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers / Board Members / Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese/Commissioner Torrey, and Mayor/ Chair Johnson - 6. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the recommendation to approve Amended Contract with Komorous-Towey [paragraph no. 06-020CIC] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [ Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] (*06-273CC/*06-019CIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority and Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meeting held on May 2, 2006; and the Special CIC Meeting held on May 3, 2006. Approved. (06-020 CIC) Recommendation to approve Amended Contract with Komorous-Towey Architects, Inc. by increasing the Contract by $27,200 to provide additional Architectural and Construction Administration Services for the Civic Center Parking Garage. David Kirwin, Alameda, stated the City already spent $1.8 million on project planning lawsuit results are unknown; further expenditures should be held off until issues are settled. Chair Johnson inquired whether architectural changes are the result of community input. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 1 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 16 | The Development Services Director stated the amendment would cover the balance of the project the City was requested to retain the architect through construction by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and Section 106 processi the architect would be on board to verify construction administration; the money would not be spent until there is activity. Commissioner Matarrese stated he sees no problem with the staff recommendation since the money would not be spent until services are needed. Commissioner deHaan inquired how the $27,200 was determined. The Development Services Director responded the amount was already in the Contract; stated the money was used for the final response to the SHPO changes the Contract was exhausted; the amount would carry through the range of services needed from the architect. Commissioner deHaan stated bids are back and are being evaluated inquired whether the extra service is needed for the review process. The Development Services Director responded in the negative; stated the service would be needed if the bid is awarded for the parking structure; money is not spent on services until a project is approved by the Council. Commissioner deHaan inquired when the review process would be completed. The Development Services Director responded options should be presented by June 6. Commissioner deHaan inquired when the physical massing model would be available for the public, to which the Development Services Director responded June 20. Commissioner deHaan stated he would prefer to hold off on the matter until after the June 20 discussion. Commissioner Matarrese stated he does not see any reason to hold off on the matter; the money would not being spent; preparatory action can be taken now; the Council should move forward with the staff recommendation. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 2 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 17 | Chair Johnson stated the same action would be recommended at the next meeting; the matter should be taken off the table so that focus of [the next meeting] can be the bid issues. Commissioner Gilmore inquired whether voting on the matter tonight versus the next meeting would impact getting on the architect' S schedule. The Development Services Director responded she would need to discuss the matter with the architect. Commissioner Gilmore stated that she would like to have the architect on board if and when the project is ready to goi it is harder to get people on board to meet a schedule without notice. Commissioner Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion. Under discussion, Commissioner Daysog stated logistically the matter should be dealt with together; he would abstain from voting on the matter. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes : Commissioners Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 3. Noes : Commissioner deHaan - 1. Abstentions : Commissioner Daysog - 1. AGENDA ITEMS (06-274 CC/06-021 CIC) Resolution No. 13966 and 06-142, "Adopting Policy of City Council, Community Improvement Commission, Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority for Expense Reimbursement, Compensation, and Ethics Training for Elected Officials and Legislative Body Members. " Adopted. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the policy would apply to the Industrial Development Authority (IDA) The City Attorney responded IDA reimbursements or expenditures have not occurred; stated the matter would be brought back if reimbursements and expenditures occur. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 3 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |
CityCouncil | 2006-05-16 | 18 | Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 6. (06-275 CC/06-022 CIC) Discussion of City Attorney/General Counsel Legal Services and staffing options. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the majority of the agenda item could be continued; direction can be given to hire one Deputy City Attorney. . The City Attorney/Legal Counsel stated the hiring would be for one Assistant City Attorney. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the motion would be to hire one Assistant City Attorney. . Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner Matarrese responded in the affirmative; stated the background is that David Brandt [Assistant City Attorney ] moved from the City Attorney's office to the City Manager's office. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the hiring process has started; approval could be given to hire one Assistant City Attorney. Vice Mayor/Board Member/Commissioner Gilmore moved approval to hire one Assistant City Attorney. Councilmember/Board Member/Commissioner deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 6. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the remainder of the agenda item would be continued. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chail Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Alameda 4 Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, Community Improvement Commission, and Housing Authority Board of Commissioners May 16, 2006 | CityCouncil/2006-05-16.pdf |