pages_fts
18,746 rows
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Link | rowid ▼ | text | pages_fts | rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
201 | 201 | 7-E. DR04-0051, 616 Pacific Avenue, Applicant: Erwin Roxas (AT/EP). The proposal is an appeal of the code enforcement action which determined that the demolition of a single- family residence, located at the above address, is in violation of the AMC $13-21-10 b (removal or demolition of an historic structure without proper permits) and is, therefore, subject to the five (5) year stay that prevents the issuance of any building or construction- related permits for the property. The applicant had received Major Design Review approval in July 2004 for proposed 1st and 2nd story additions, enlargement of the detached garage, interior remodel, porch additions, etc. that would add approximately 1,562 square feet to the dwelling and 225 square feet to the garage and storage shed. The property is within the R-4, Neighborhood Residential District. (Continued from the meeting of June 13, 2005.) M/S Mariani/Piziali and unanimous to schedule this item for the City Council. AYES - 5 (Kohlstrand, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 7 June 27, , 2005 | 13006 | |
202 | 202 | 7-F. UP05-0012 - Regency Realty Group, Inc. 2523 Blanding Avenue (AT). Applicants request approval of an amendment to Use Permit UP03-0016 to allow operation of the Service Station between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. No changes are proposed to the car wash. The site is located within the C-2 PD, Central Business Planned Development District. This item was removed from the Consent Calendar and placed on the Regular Agenda. Mr. Tai summarized the staff report. He noted that the extension of hours would apply only to the service station, not the car wash, and added that there would be no alcoholic beverage sales associated with the gas station. Delivery trucks would be prohibited from idling their engines during delivery. Staff recommended approval of this item. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Jim Strehlow, 3122 Gibbons Street, spoke in opposition to this item, and noted that a service station was needed, but not on a 24-hour basis. He believed that Bridgeside should be a good neighbor to the Fernside homeowners. He would agree to hours from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Mr. Rich Bennett, Windsor Drive, spoke in opposition to this item, and believed a 24-hour operation could become an attractive nuisance. He expressed concern about automotive and noise pollution from cars with loud stereos. He was also concerned about loitering late at night, and did not want extra traffic in the neighborhoods at that time of night. He was very concerned about the potential for increased crime. Mr. Harold MacKenzie, 3263 Thompson Avenue, spoke in opposition to this item and expressed concern about noise, traffic and the potential for increased crime in their neighborhood. He opposed a 24-hour operation, but would support a moderated schedule. He suggested the use of a sound wall. Mr. Doug Wiele, applicant, noted that their existing conditions of approval allowed for a 24-hour operation for the supermarket, with a limitation on the car wash and gas station. He noted that this application was a request for modification for the operat… | 13006 | |
203 | 203 | change in hours, such as 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Mr. Tai advised that the applicant would be willing to set the hours from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. M/S Piziali/Cook and unanimous to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-05-26 to approve an amendment to Use Permit UP03-0016 to allow operation of the Service Station between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. No changes are proposed to the car wash. AYES - 5 (Kohlstrand, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 Planning Board Minutes Page 9 June 27, , 2005 | 13006 | |
204 | 204 | 8. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 8-A. DR05-0041 - Final Design Review of the Proposed New Cineplex - City of Alameda (CE/JO). Final design review, including consideration of Section 106 findings for the proposed Cineplex at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue, generally on the Video Maniacs site. This site is located at 2305 Central Avenue within the C-C and C-C-PD (Community Commercial and Community Commercial -- Planned Development) Districts. (Continued from the meeting of June 13, 2005.) Ms. Ott summarized the staff report. The changes proposed during public and Board comment were: 1. The dome element was eliminated; 2. The aluminum system was changed from clear to dark; and 3. The roof lines were set back as much as possible on the walls closest to the Alameda Theater. Ms. Ott noted that the dome element was eliminated, but that staff recommended that the clear aluminum system be retained. The project architect was able to set back the corner slightly at the joining of the Cineplex and the historic theater. She noted that the architect, Rob Henry, was not able to attend this meeting. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Kyle Connor, Alameda Entertainment Associates, displayed the revised plans for the proposed Cineplex on the overhead screen. President Cunningham advised that more than five speaker slips had been received. M/S Mariani/Piziali and unanimous to limit the speakers' time to three minutes. AYES - 5 (Kohlstrand, McNamara absent); NOES - 0; ABSTAIN - 0 The public hearing was opened. Mr. Wilbur Richards, 2235 Clement Street, spoke in support of this item. He noted that the island would continue to change, and that it could not return to the past. He noted that the parking lot would be difficult to change to another use, and hoped the proper street trees would be chosen. Mr. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline Street, spoke in opposition to this item. He believed this project was too massive for this corner and should be scaled down. He did not believe the Cineplex would be financially viable. Ms. Ani Dimus… | 13006 | |
205 | 205 | into the parking structure. She did not believe the Cineplex would be financially feasible in five years. Ms. Linda Hansen spoke in opposition to this item, and displayed photographs of the site with projected massing superimposed on the existing site. She noted that while the Twin Towers Church is taller than the proposed structure, the massing of the Cineplex overwhelmed them. She suggested building an open plaza at the Video Maniacs corner with a two-story retail space and a gathering place. She displayed her sketch, and noted this was more in line with contemporary design theory. She believed this would be more pedestrian-oriented. Ms. Debbie George, speaking as AN individual, not PSBA, spoke in support of this item. She noted that there had been at least ten public meetings on this subject, and noted that the designers had been responsive to public and Board requests. Mr. Jon Spangler, 1037 San Antonio, spoke in opposition to this item. He noted that he was a business owner and a member of the Chamber of Commerce. He did not believe this project belonged on this particular corner, and believed that the building was too massive. He noted that over 1,500 signatures had been gathered in opposition to this project. He believed that Alameda deserved a better fit than this design, and would like to see alternatives that fit Alameda's character better. Ms. Barbara Marchand, spoke in support of this item. She believed that no matter how many meetings are held, that there would not be 100 percent agreement on this project. She believed the retail establishments and the people of Alameda would benefit from this project. Mr. Christopher Buckley, Alameda Architectural Preservation Society, 1017 San Antonio Avenue, noted that AAPS has gone on record supporting the project concept, but had some concerns about the design. He read an excerpt of the report (page 9, item 2) written by the consultant, Bruce Anderson, expressing concerns about the design, and suggesting that refinements of the design should be made. He believed… | 13006 | |
206 | 206 | particularly to support police and fire services. Mr. Gene Oh, Alameda Bicycle, spoke in support of this item, and believed the parking structure was also necessary to create a viable and vibrant outdoor downtown. Ms. Deborah Overfield, spoke in opposition to this item, and noted that she had discussed her concerns with Mayor Johnson. She would like to see a two level parking structure, and only one screen instead of multiple screens. She realized this project had been going on for a long time, but did not believe the current design fit Alameda's character. She was very concerned that the new structure would block the Twin Towers Church, which had just installed new stained glass. She believed that more people should walk in town and not worry so much about parking. She did not like the design at all. Ms. Valerie Ruma, spoke in opposition to this item, and noted that she would speak on Items 8-A and 8-B simultaneously. She realized that a lot of work had gone into this project, and believed that many Alameda citizens were not aware of the reality of the designs. She noted that some of the recipients of the RFP were not in an appropriate position to do the work, and was not surprised that there were so few responses. She believed the height of the buildings were excessive, and while they did not exceed the decorative structures of the nearby buildings, the structure did overwhelm the main adjacent structures. She suggested that there be sensitive renovation of the Alameda Theater to its original three screens, elimination of the Cineplex building, which would allow for a more distributed parking solution, and public open spaces or smaller scale retail included in the design. Ms. Rosemary McNally, 2145 San Antonio, spoke in opposition to this item. She had attended or watched many HAB and Planning Board meetings, and believed that the general public had only recently understood what was happening. She opposed the 20-inch overhang, and to it being SO close to the street. She suggested building a big theater in Harbo… | 13006 | |
207 | 207 | from other communities. Mr. Don Grappo, spoke in opposition to this item. He did not oppose the concept of a theater and parking structure, and did not believe it was a good design. He suggested valet parking, and inquired whether the changing technology of movies would make this theater obsolete. He suggested a smaller and more aesthetically pleasing design. Mr. Harry Hartman, 1100 Peach Street, spoke in support of this application. He believed the design was a positive compromise, and noted that the City did not have the financial resources to fund an elaborate design at this time. He noted that the business district was set up to benefit from a draw such as this theater. He noted that 352 new spaces in the parking structure would take a lot of pressure off the downtown streets. He believed the cost-benefit analysis showed clearly that the benefits of the Cineplex far outweighed the detriments. Rose, P.O. Box 640353, San Francisco, noted that she was an Alameda resident. She supported the restoration of the theater, and believed that this type of theater could be a model for other specialized movie theaters. Mr. Rudy Rubago spoke in opposition to this item and noted that this was the first time he had seen this design, and inquired about what had happened to the South Shore movie theater. He expressed concern that this theater might not last very long, and what would happen to the building. He did not like the design. He believed the evolving movie technologies for in-home viewing may make theaters obsolete. He inquired whether the owners or employees of this theater live in Alameda. He expressed concern that the money generated from this use would be spent off the Island. He expressed concern about potential crime in the parking structure. He would like to see a cultural center for the performing arts in Alameda. Mr. Rich Tester, 2020 Pacific Avenue, noted that he was a Park Street business owner, and spoke in opposition to this item. He expressed concern about the size and shading of the structure; he inquire… | 13006 | |
208 | 208 | this building was grossly out of scale for the street, and did not believe anyone would want to renovate the proposed design in the future. Mr. Jim Strehlow, 3122 Gibbons Street, did not understand the pedestrian flow from the parking garage, which forced customers to walk outside before entering the theater. He did not see much detail for the historic theater portion, and would like to see more information. He wished to ensure the historic theater was not dwarfed. He would like to see live performances in that theater, and would like the Planning Board to plan accordingly. Mr. Robert Gavrich, 1517 Fountain, spoke in opposition to this item. He expressed concern about the design and the financial details of this project with respect to the developer. President Cunningham suggested that the financial questions be directed to the City Council, and that the design issues be addressed at this hearing. Mr. Gavrich noted that the elevation was drawn from a distance of 200 feet, and noted that perspective would not be available in reality. He was concerned about the canyon and wind effect on the street, as well as the noise from the cars driving in the parking garage. Mr. Richard Rutter noted that the staff report for the parking garage stated that the site survey raised questions regarding the property line along Oak Street and the associated width of the public right- of-way. He noted that there would be a ripple effect into the right-of-way or the building. He complimented historical consultant Bruce Anderson on a good and reasoned analysis. He believed the staff report was at odds with his findings. He would be hesitant to support this project at this point before such open issues were resolved. Mr. Jerrold Connors, 2531 San Jose Avenue, spoke in opposition to this item, but would favor a more modest three-screen theater like Piedmont Cinema or the Grand Lake. He would like a theater with more character befitting Alameda, and believed it should be scaled back. Ms. Judith Lynch, 1372 Versailles Avenue, noted that she… | 13006 | |
209 | 209 | communities. He noted this was a catalyst site, and believed the developer was trying to respond to the community's concerns as much as possible. He believed the parking structure was critical to the success of downtown businesses. Mr. Robb Ratto, Director, Park Street Business Association, spoke in support of this item. He noted that the Board of Directors voted unanimously in favor of the design, and that the majority of PSBA business owners support the design. He noted that this has been a difficult process, and commended the architect for his design and responsiveness to the comments received. Mr. Frank George, 1419 Park Street, spoke in support of this item. He noted that there was a 10- screen cinema in Twain Harte, a smaller town than Alameda, and that they had no problem filling it. He noted that economic diversity was a critical element of financial success, and that there had been eight theaters in Alameda that functioned at the same time. He noted that this was a centrally-located and oriented parking structure and theater, and that the crossover traffic would benefit the other businesses. He originally thought the building was too massive, but believed it would be a benefit to Alameda. Mr. Harvey Brook, 2515 Santa Clara Avenue, #208, spoke in support of this application, and noted that he was a Park Street business owner. He was aware of the petitions circulating against the project, with approximately 1,800 signatures, 2.4% of Alameda's 75,000 residents. He noted that there would be impacts on property tax revenues if this project did not go forward. He was very concerned that if this project were to be delayed, the City would no longer be able to afford the project. Mr. Walt Jacobs, President, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of this item. He noted that this project has been going on for a long time, and that there had been considerable public input. He believed that it was needed to make Alameda more vibrant and attractive to downtown businesses. He believed the design was acceptable, … | 13006 | |
210 | 210 | Mr. Piziali echoed Mr. Lynch's comment, and added that he was ready to move forward with the project. He supported the project at this point. Ms. Mariani noted that she rejected the design as it stands, and agreed with the HAB's opinion of starting again with the design. Vice President Cook noted that she would like to continue the discussion, and added that scale was one of the fundamental issues she heard from the public. She noted that City Hall, the new Library and the Twin Towers church were also large-scale projects. She believed it was time to make a final decision. She noted that someone would probably appeal the decision and to bring it to City Council, which would open up further dialogue about the details of the project. She strongly believed that the project should be sent forward with very clear design direction. She would have liked to have had the agreement with Long's, allowing a larger site. She encouraged the residents to revisit the Long's issue with City Council. President Cunningham agreed with Vice President Cook's comments, and believed the 106 findings should be reviewed to help improve the project. He believed the design of the project had progressed considerably, and noted that some projects can take many years to design. He requested staff's response to the 106 findings. Mr. Lynch agreed with the speakers who wanted the architect and owner to work with the HAB and PSBA to fill in some Art Deco features along the Central Avenue and Oak Street elevation. Vice President Cook expressed concern about including faux historic elements in the design, which may dilute the genuine historic design. She believed that a theater similar to the Livermore example may overwhelm the historic theater. She believed the architecture should reflect the constant evolution of the City. Mr. Lynch noted that some of the speakers had modified their comments, and he would incorporate that increased acceptance into his decision-making process. Mr. Piziali would prefer to send the design to City Council with the Pla… | 13006 | |
211 | 211 | appealed it. She noted that the Council may send it back to the Board. In response to an inquiry by Vice President Cook regarding the changed color of the aluminum and glass on the upstairs element, President Cunningham replied that he agreed with the HAB's recommendation to use the clear aluminum. He wished to clarify that low-E glazing was available in many tints; the Board would prefer the clear low-E glazing. President Cunningham noted that with respect to page 3, Item 2.2, regarding the base along the theater, a spandrel would provide a base in accordance with the findings. He would like the wording to be modified to provide for a base. President Cunningham noted that with respect to Item 6, he would not recommend 6-inch aluminum clad element depths in the doors; there should not be any recessed openings. Vice President Cook agreed with President Cunningham's assessment; although historic buildings had an increased depth, the narrowness of the retail spaces would not accommodate that depth; she would prefer that be changed to enliven the retail space. The Board agreed that item would be deleted. President Cunningham noted that with respect to Items 8 and 9, a professional lighting designer should be employed for the Cineplex, rather than an electric subcontractor. That design and the signage should come back to the Board. Ms. Eliason advised that Condition 4 of the Draft Resolution already stated that the signage and lighting programs be brought back to the Board. Vice President Cook liked the addition of the brick veneer, which broke up the larger planes. President Cunningham noted that the stucco column caps could be eliminated. In response to an inquiry by President Cunningham whether the color of the brick veneer would be monotone or variegated, Ms. Ott replied that it would be variegated. President Cunningham noted that the sunlight/shading study should be included in the conditions. Vice President Cook noted that she was not extremely concerned about the shading study, and believed that the shade shoul… | 13006 | |
212 | 212 | Mr. Lynch noted that after the theater opens, it may be necessary for the police to direct traffic at the owner's expense, as they did after the Jack London Square Theater opened. Ms. Ott noted that there were provisions to handle large crowds for a blockbuster presentation at various times during the year. There would be some education programs so the public could become accustomed to the operation. Vice President Cook fully agreed with Bike Alameda's comments regarding the bike path on Central Avenue, especially with respect to their call to remove the diagonal parking on Central, and having a bike lane. Ms. Eliason noted that City Council had made the commitment to remove the diagonal parking, and to have parallel parking and a bike lane in its place. Vice President Cook was concern about losing the landscaping along the Oak Street façade; she noted that a landscaping plan would soften the large scale of the building. She would like the detailed landscaping plan to return to the Board, addressing both the Cineplex and the garage. Ms. Ott recommended that be conditioned for the garage, because the funding for the landscaping plan is part of the garage contract. She noted the project would have to comply with the City's ordinance, and that there would be street trees for Oak Street. Central Avenue will have street trees along Central as part of the City's ordinance. Mr. Lynch noted that he had concerns about the large DBH; he would like to see trees that were tall enough to soften the building. M/S Piziali/Cook to adopt Planning Board Resolution No. PB-05-27 to approve the Final design review, including consideration of Section 106 findings for the proposed Cineplex at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue, generally on the Video Maniacs site, with the following modifications: 1. The blank panels will be resolved; 2. Clear aluminum storefronts will be acceptable; 3. Low-E clear glass will be used; 4. A base for retail spaces will be provided; 5. There will not be recessed openings on retail spaces; 6. The … | 13006 | |
213 | 213 | 8-B. UP05-0008/DR05-0028 - Use Permit and Final Design Review of the Proposed New Civic Center Parking Garage - City of Alameda (DSD). Consideration of a Use Permit and Final design review, including consideration of Section 106 findings, for a new 352- space parking structure at the corner of Oak Street and Central Avenue, generally on the Video Maniacs site. This site is located at 1416 Oak Street within the C-C and C-C-PD (Community Commercial and Community Commercial -- Planned Development) Districts. (Continued from the meeting of June 13, 2005.) M/S Cook/Piziali and unanimous to continue the meeting to 11:30 p.m. AYES - 4 (Kohlstrand, McNamara absent); NOES - 1 (Mariani); ABSTAIN - 0 Ms. Ott summarized the staff report. M/S Piziali/Lynch and unanimous to limit the speakers' time to three minutes. AYES - 4 (Kohlstrand, McNamara absent); NOES - 1 (Mariani); ABSTAIN - 0 The public hearing was opened. Mr. Kevin Frederick, 1287 Caroline Street, suggested revisiting the idea of removing the garage from Oak Street to an earlier proposed location behind the Elks' Lodge, which would be a bigger site. He noted that a more efficient garage could be built there, next to a four-lane road. He expressed concern that a six-story garage could invite trouble, and that a smaller garage would reduce that risk. Ms. Melody Marr, CEO, Alameda Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of this application, and noted that this garage was badly needed in Alameda. She noted that there was no place in Alameda where people could park for a long time without getting parking tickets. Ms. Nancy Hird was not in attendance to speak. Mr. Robb Ratto, Director, PSBA, spoke in support of this application, and noted that their Board of Directors had voted unanimously in favor of this design. Mr. Christopher Buckley, 1017 San Antonio Avenue, noted that he was speak as an individual. He noted that the Board requested a design change to include stronger framing around the posters on the lower level. He had gotten the impression that the Board wanted som… | 13006 | |
214 | 214 | Mr. Harold McKenzie, 3263 Thompson Avenue, spoke in support of this item. He would like the garage to be constructed in such a way that would make it work for the City. Mr. Eric Strimlin noted that there was an increasing public groundswell against this structure because of its massiveness. He believed it was out of scale with Alameda, and did not understand why the size of the garage could not be reduced. He asked the Board to inspire, not to compromise. He expressed concern that this garage could weigh the downtown down, and requested that the design be reduced. Mr. Harry Hartman noted that he had a business on Oak Street, and added that parking garages were primarily about functionality. He believed this garage would be an improvement, and that it was not a nondescript structure. He suggested that some work be done to the panels, or that cornices be added for some visual interest. He believed that if the garage were to be well-designed, the ingress and egress would be easy for people. Mr. Jim Strehlow, 3122 Gibbons Street, noted that he supported the project, but was concerned about its size. He requested information about free parking, and hoped the plans for the garage were fiscally sound so that it could be self-sustaining. He suggested that fewer levels would enable to City to reach that goal, and that there should be subsidized parking validation for the Cineplex, to be paid back by the theater owner. He suggested that there should be parking validation for the library as well. He encouraged monthly parking rental revenue, and some methodology to determine how many people would buy monthly passes for the garage. Mr. Robert Gavrich, 1517 Fountain, believed this parking garage was not big enough and was concerned that it would be inadequate for evenings when the Cineplex was at capacity. He believed that would be a parking and traffic nightmare, and did not believe the current plan was unworkable. He noted that the City estimated the creation of 300 new jobs, but that many of them would be in construction. … | 13006 | |
215 | 215 | Appezzato. Probably the most controversial thing was they strongly recommended not building a parking garage in the Long's lot. Both mayors and design professionals said that a garage, especially one without retail on the ground level will destroy the Civic Center.' Ms. Dimusheva did not want to suggest that there be no parking garage, but she requested that the Board to pay attention to the fact that this area is the civic center, which should be designed on open space, not a canyon. She encouraged the addition of retail on the ground level. She read an excerpt from The Whole Building Design Guide: "Parking has often been reduced to the construction of the most minimal standalone structure or parking lot, without human, aesthetic or integrative considerations. This has given parking a poor public perception, and frequently disturbs or disrupts the existing urban fabric. "However, many architects, engineers and planners have envisioned and constructed far more complex, aesthetic and integrated structures. This should be the goal of good parking design "Aesthetics of garage design has become very important to communities across the country. Recently, garage design has become part of an architectural style of the surrounding architecture. It becomes part of the architectural style of the surrounding architecture, respecting the language of design and using the design process." Ms. Dimusheva believed that the City did not need a Cineplex, but did need a parking garage. She suggested that the parking garage be built with two or three levels of retail space on the bottom, with the addition of a garden and coffee shops on the top, and a cutout corner for public gathering. Mr. Jon Spangler, 1037 San Antonio, noted that he had expected more from the Planning Board with respect to the design of the parking garage and that he usually respected their work. He suggested that people use bicycles for transportation more often, and added that parking structures were not generally beautiful. He was not sure that this was the rig… | 13006 | |
216 | 216 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - - DECEMBER 6, 2005 - - 7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 7:45 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES (05-552) Mayor Johnson announced that the recommendation to appropriate $142,000 in Urban Runoff Funds [paragraph no. 05-556] was withdrawn from the Consent Calendar. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (05-553) Library Project Update. The Project Manager gave a brief update. Mayor Johnson inquired whether there were any cherry cabinets in the internal staff areas, to which the Project Manager responded in the negative. Mayor Johnson stated that cherry cabinets should be placed in areas that are visible to the public; utilizing formica countertops in other areas was a good way to save costs; inquired whether the costs for the minor redesign items need to be negotiated or whether the costs are in the contract. The Project Manager responded the Architect is responsible for construction administration; any changes are covered under construction administration; the percentage of change orders attributed to the designer would be reviewed with the City Attorney at the end of the project. Mayor Johnson inquired whether changes discussed tonight were construction administration changes and whether the changes have already been paid for, to which the Project Manager responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether pushing off the masonry work would result in any impact to the schedule, to which the Project Manager responded in the negative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Architect offered to pay Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
217 | 217 | for oversights. The Project Manager responded that the Architect does not voluntarily offer to pay recourse would be a claim on the insurance policy. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the first claim could be for the firewall, to which the Project Manager responded the firewall and staircase could be potential claims. Mayor Johnson stated that the project is moving along well; the public is very impressed with the process. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember deHaan moved approval of the Consent Calendar with the caveat of withdrawing the recommendation to appropriate $142,000 in Urban Runoff Funds [paragraph no. 05-556] ; noted major inroads have been made on the ferry service. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number ] ( * 05-554) - Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on November 15, 2005. Approved. (*05-555) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,504,278.52 (05-556) Recommendation to appropriate $142,000 in Urban Runoff Funds to repair public storm drainage facilities within the Bridgeside Shopping Center and reimburse Regency Centers for expenditures incurred. Withdrawn. (*05-557) Recommendation to adopt the Ferry Short Range Transit Plan. Accepted. (*05-558) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Five Police Communications Center Workstations. Accepted. (*05-559) Recommendation to accept the Affordable Housing Ordinance Annual Review. Accepted. (*05-560) - Recommendation to accept the Public Art Ordinance Annual Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
218 | 218 | Review. Accepted. (*05-561) Recommendation to accept Impact Fee Report for Police and Fire services. Accepted. (*05-562) Recommendation to accept the Annual Investment Report for the 2004-2005 Fiscal Year. Accepted. (*05-563) Recommendation to award Restaurant Concessionaire Contract to Tom Genanekos, Owner of Jim's Coffee Shop, for exclusive right to sell food and beverage service at the Chuck Corica Golf Complex. Accepted. (*05-564) Resolution No. 13910, "Authorizing Open Market Purchase from Sungard Pentamation, Bio-Key International and Omega Group Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter in the Amount of $307,804 for Pentamation Finance Plus and Community Plus Software, Bio-Key Fire Records Management Software and Fireview Software. " Adopted. ( *05-564A) Resolution No. 13911, "Authorizing the Purchase of Storage Area Network System Using the State of California Department of General Services, Procurement Division, Competitive Bid Award. " Adopted. (*05-564B) Resolution No. 13912, "Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of a Master Equipment Lease-Purchase Agreement, an Escrow Agreement and Separate Equipment Schedules with Respect to the Acquisition, Purchase, Financing and Leasing of Certain Equipment for the Public Benefit; Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of Documents Required in Connection therewith; and Authorizing the Taking of all Other Actions Necessary to the Consummation of the Transactions Contemplated by this Resolution. Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (05-565) Resolution No. 13913, "Appointing Morris H. Trevithick as a Member of the Economic Development Commission (Real Estate/Land Development Seat) " Adopted. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the Resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office and presented Mr. Trevithick with a certificate of appointment. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
219 | 219 | Mayor Johnson called a recess to hold the Special Joint City Council, Community Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority Meeting at 8:03 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 9:10 p.m. *** (05-566) Update on City's infrastructure investment and review of options to increase funding for preventative maintenance of infrastructure. The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson requested that a comprehensive report be brought back to the Council at mid-year. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the real property transfer tax was adjusted every year for inflation, to which the Finance Director responded in the negative. Councilmember Daysog stated $5.40 per thousand would be $5.69 per thousand if adjusted for inflation; the increase would equal approximately $180,000. Mayor Johnson stated that she received several calls on the matter the Board of Realtors supports an increase in the tax but would like to be involved in deciding the amount; the increase in home prices pus an increased transfer tax above inflation rates. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether $27 million was needed for deferred maintenance, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated nothing in the presentation reduces the shortfall in a good orderly manner making up the shortfall through the transfer tax and lighting district assessments would be hard; inquired whether the shortfall would continue to escalate and deteriorate over time. The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the recommendation tonight was to get direction on crafting a long-term strategy which would be folded into the ten-year model. Councilmember deHaan stated that he did not see any cure-all, only band-aids. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 4 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
220 | 220 | Mayor Johnson stated the shortfall needs to be handled in a more strategic manner and needs to be in context with the ten-year budget projection; the goal is to have a system in place where a certain amount of infrastructure is taken care of each year tax increases should not be considered except for the transfer tax; the public has been very generous in supporting tax increases for the library, schools and hospital; cuts [in infrastructure funding] that have been made over the past five to seven years should not happen again. Councilmember Matarrese stated spending $27 million all at once would not be possible even if the money was available; the idea of increasing taxes is a long way off; the increase could be approached through a public process; sidewalks are the most critical assets that represent the biggest risk to health and safety; the value of repairing sidewalks versus the value and necessity of having the 25% reserve should be reviewed; 25% reserve is an arbitrary figure; drawing down on the 25% reserve should be considered; the budget should be reviewed; some items are under budget because of department head vacancies; there should be an analysis for using unspent budgeted money to fix critical items. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether $2.8 million of repair projects have been scheduled. The Public Works Director responded the projects are not currently scheduled because the money has not been appropriated; resurfacing could be scheduled for the beginning of the next fiscal year sidewalks could be scheduled the current fiscal year. Councilmember Matarrese requested an analysis between the criticality of resurfacing a street versus fixing sidewalks. Mayor Johnson stated that knowing how street and sidewalk priorities are set based on finances is important ; a lot of sidewalks need to be repaired throughout the City; inquired whether there should be a focus on sidewalk repair and crack sealing [ for streets] because of potential injuries and costs. The Public Works Director responded that the total p… | 13006 | |
221 | 221 | Mayor Johnson stated that the new, flexible sidewalk material seems to be working well; inquired what type of feedback has been received. The Public Works Director responded the feedback has been positive; Redwood City has tried a new rubberized concrete product; he was waiting for a report back from staff on the product. Mayor Johnson stated replacing the sidewalks with the new product saves money because less on-going maintenance and repair is needed consideration should be given to drawing down on some of the reserve to catch up on sidewalk repairs. The City Manager stated that staff could project and identify whether there would be an additional percentage above the 25%. Councilmember Matarrese suggested going below 25% of the reserve, using part of the $2.8 million [identified in the staff report] for streets, and using the amount identified in the staff report for streets from the reserve for sidewalks instead. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether different species of trees are reviewed. The Public Works Director responded a Tree Master Plan was developed to address trees planted years ago which were not the most desirable for long term. Vice Mayor Gilmore stated that trees fall down through natural attrition. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether there was a plan that identifies a tree's life expectancy, to which the Public Works Director responded in the negative. Vice Mayor Gilmore inquired whether a list was available which identifies trees with non-invasive roots. The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative stated standards for expanded planting strips and deep watering are being reviewed. Councilmember Matarrese stated that Gibbons Drive would always have Liquid Amber trees; sidewalk maintenance was greater in Alameda than in other cities because of the value of large trees. Councilmember deHaan stated that parameters need to be set for Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
222 | 222 | drawing down on the reserves; inquired whether deferred maintenance has grown experientially over the last four years. The Public Works Director responded that unfunded estimates keep growing. Councilmember deHaan inquired how the deferred maintenance growth could be lessened by utilizing available dollars and General Fund reserves. Councilmember Daysog stated that first turning first to the reserves was critical. the reserves have been built up by not funding capital infrastructure maintenance; the build up was done for a good reason because of the Base conversion; drawing down on the reserves needs to be done prudently; half of the 25% reserve is already designated, leaving the actual amount of the reserve at 8% to 12%; suggested revisiting the Henry Gardner Plan; stated lease revenue bonds were issued at Alameda Point in 1999 and were shifted over to pay for infrastructure; there should be a way to issue redevelopment bonds and shift budgetary dollars so that the capital dollars could pay for improvements. Mayor Johnson inquired whether shifting of the budgetary dollars could be done. Councilmember Daysog responded that the matter could be explored with caution; he is not sure about raising taxes; he is willing to explore adjusting the property transfer tax for inflation; stated a report on sources and uses of funds has been presented; requested a detailed plan outlining the problems and timetables for paths, sidewalks and streets; stated he would continue to push for broader community involvement in the process; moving forward was important. Michael John Torrey, Alameda, stated sidewalks are needed on the beltline side of Ralph Appezzato Parkway. Mayor Johnson stated that the Board of Realtors would like to discuss the transfer tax with staff. The City Manager stated that an election would need to be held because taxes are involved; stated that she would be happy to meet with the Board of Realtors. Councilmember deHaan stated that there is a broad range in the amount of transfer tax in other cities; the City … | 13006 | |
223 | 223 | The Public Works Director stated that the average transfer tax for Charter cities is $9.47. Councilmember Daysog stated that the last two or three years could be unique; anticipated numbers might not be realized. Councilmember Matarrese stated reviewing the current budget is important; money found should be spent on [infrastructure] projects that would provide benefit. Mayor Johnson inquired how the current budget could be reviewed to make adjustments. The City Manager responded that the Council could approve the staff recommendation regarding current funds so that streets and sidewalks can be identified and the bid award process could be initiated; staff would review the impacts of drawing down on the reserves, continue to review the budget to identify any unallocated funds or savings, and identify per year costs for ten and twenty year scenarios in conjunction with the ten-year financial projection. Mayor Johnson stated that departments should not be concerned that budget cuts would be made; contingency funds would be reviewed. The City Manager stated that acknowledging and appropriating additional revenues should also be reviewed. Councilmember Matarrese stated that a six-month run may not be reflective and was not a linear spending rate; the risk of taking the money needs to be balanced against the risk of allowing further deterioration. Mayor Johnson stated that the money could always be reallocated if necessary. Councilmember deHaan stated the matter would come back at the mid- year review and decisions would be made then; there should be an on-going viable program to ensure that maintenance would not be deferred in hard times; a certain percentage of funds could be established as a standing rate in the budget processi determining how projects will be completed with existing funds and what will be done if other funds become available is an important segment. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation with direction to 1) receive an analysis on the scenarios of drawing down below the … | 13006 | |
224 | 224 | redirected, 3) review possible new sources of revenue, and 4) provide a report on the process of exploring an adjustment to the transfer tax. Mayor Johnson stated there has been a lot of discussion on streets, sidewalks, trees, and sewers; there is significant deferred maintenance in the parks the parks and recreation facilities are very valuable parts of the community; the parks are being addressed in the staff recommendation Councilmember deHaan requested that the motion be amended to include reviewing the other assessment districts and the establishment of landscaping and lighting districts. Councilmember Daysog stated that he would like the motion to include an analysis of the Henry Gardner Plan. Mayor Johnson stated that she did not want to go into more debt unless it was necessary. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Henry Gardner Plan was a separate issue. Mayor Johnson stated that staff should not spend a lot of time exploring the matter; suggested discussing whether debt was something the Council would like to review as a solution to the deferred maintenance when the item was brought back. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether reviewing the matter in an Off-Agenda Report would be satisfactory to Councilmember Daysog. Councilmember Daysog responded an Off-Agenda Report seems to be the same as his request for analysis. Councilmember deHaan concurred with Councilmember Daysog; stated that determining how much time would be spent on the matter should be determined; that he does not understand the Plan completely and would not be able to vote on the matter tonight. Councilmember Daysog stated that he was requesting an analysis of the Plan. Mayor Johnson requested a brief Off-Agenda Report describing the Henry Gardner Plan. Councilmember Matarrese stated he would mend the motion to include an Off-Agenda - Report on the Plan piling debt on top of a deficit of deferred maintenance was not a priority for him. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
225 | 225 | Mayor Johnson stated that she did not want staff to spend a lot of time on the matter. Councilmember Daysog stated that staff should spend as much time as necessary to do a thorough job. Mayor Johnson stated that the starting threshold could be identifying the Henry Gardner Plan. Councilmember Matarrese requested that the City Clerk repeat the motion. The City Clerk stated that Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the staff recommendation with direction to: 1) receive an analysis on the scenarios of drawing down below the 25% level of reserves, 2) review the current budget with regard to under budgeted areas that could be redirected, 3) review possible new sources of revenue, 4) provide a report on the process of exploring an adjustment to the transfer tax, and 5) provide an Off-Agenda Report on the Henry Gardner Plan. Councilmember deHaan requested the motion be amended to include reviewing other assessment districts and the establishment of landscaping and lighting districts as other sources of revenue. Councilmember Matarrese agreed to amend the motion. Councilmember Daysog seconded the amended motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (05-567) Dorothy Reid, Alameda, stated a plan is before the Planning Board to expand South Shore; acknowledged the help and responsiveness of Doug Garrison, Dorene Soto and Bruce Knopf ; stated everyone involved was very concerned about receiving a comprehensive, complete report; urged the Council to support the efforts to make informed decisions. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he appreciates receiving the feedback: the Planning Department and Development Services Department staff is top notch. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (05-568 - ) Councilmember deHaan stated streaming video is available on- - line; other cities have placed City Council meetings on the web Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
226 | 226 | for delayed viewing i requested investigating how the process is done. (05-569) Councilmember deHaan stated concerns over parking spaces arose recently; at a Planning Board meeting, Development Services indicated an in depth parking analysis would be completed for the Park Street and Webster Street business areas; that he would like the study to address buyout of parking space requirements; $6500 is the current price; costs are closer to $20,000 per parking space; potential owners should not be discouraged from establishing retail and being able to buy out, however the study should review costs, including ways to handle costs and defer costs; $6500 is not a good price anymore; once a lot has been established, the area should not be used for infill at a later time; recently a parking area was bought out in order to allow construction; the policy should be reviewed in the parking study. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Councilmember deHaan is suggesting the in lieu fee be raised. Councilmember deHaan responded the fee may need to be higher and might need to be able to be deferred as well; further stated if an established parking lot has been used to meet requirements, the owners should not be able to buy themselves out to establish retail at the site and put the burden back on the City. Mayor Johnson inquired where said case occurred, to which Councilmember deHaan responded the Knowles property. Mayor Johnson stated the issue should be reviewed in the larger context of parking structures for the downtown areas having half of every lot dedicated to parking is not the best downtown planning; parking in the downtown areas should be reviewed more strategically. money going towards parking structures could be emphasized, rather than requiring parking on every lot. (05-570) Mayor Johnson stated that the weather was great for the tree lighting. Councilmember Matarrese stated that the Dancing Trees were great. Councilmember deHaan stated that the ice skating rink was well received. Mayor Johnson inquired when the lower light… | 13006 | |
227 | 227 | of the key issues at the Joint City Council and Recreation and Park Commission meeting he was glad to see some of the major elements tackled. (05-572) Councilmember Daysog stated that a resident asked him about the price of fire inspections for homes and the amount of revenue that has been generated over the last five years; requested background data on the matter. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the regular meeting at 10:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
228 | 228 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - DECEMBER 6 , 2005 - - - 6:01 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:15 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Commissioners Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-053) Conference with Real Property Negotiators; Property Fleet Industrial Supply Center Negotiating party: Community Improvement Commission and ProLogis, Inc. i Under negotiation Price and terms. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Chair Johnson announced that the Commission directed staff to prepare a timeline sheet and a summary of off-agenda issues. Adjournment There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 6:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary, Community Improvement Commission The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
229 | 229 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -DECEMBER 6, 2005 - -6:00 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:25 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (05-548) Conference with Labor Negotiators - Agency Negotiators: Marie Gilmore and Frank Matarrese; Employee : City Attorney (05-549) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Name of case : Mohlen & Skrinde V. City of Alameda. (05-550) Conference with Labor Negotiator - Agency Negotiator: Karen Willis; Employee Organization: Executive Management Employees. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding City Attorney, the Council discussed the matter; regarding Conference with Legal Counsel, the Council obtained a briefing from Legal Counsel ; regarding Executive Management Employees, the Council obtained a briefing and gave direction. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
230 | 230 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION AND ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING TUESDAY- - - -DECEMBER 6 , 2006- - -7:25 P.M. Mayor/Chair Johnson convened the Special Joint Meeting at 7:43 p.m. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers/ Commissioners/ Authority Members Daysog, deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Mayor/Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor/Chair Johnson announced that the Transmittal of City of Alameda Comprehensive Annual Financial Report [paragraph no. 05- 551CC/056CIC] was moved to the Regular Agenda. Councilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number . ] (*05-054CIC) Minutes of the Special Community Improvement Commission Meeting of November 15, 2005 Approved. (*05-055CIC) Recommendation to approve the Amended Contract with Komorous-Towey Architects, Inc. by increasing the Contract amount by $68,200 to provide additional architectural and construction administration services for the Civic Center parking garage. Accepted. *** Mayor/Chair Johnson called a recess to hold the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:45 p.m. and reconvened the Special Joint Meeting at 8:03 p.m. *** Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 1 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
231 | 231 | AGENDA ITEM (05-551CC/05-056CIC) Transmittal of City of Alameda Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005, Auditor's report on agreed upon procedures on compliance with Vehicle Code section 40200.3 Parking Citation Processing, agreed upon Procedures Report on compliance with the Proposition 111 2004- 05 Appropriations Limit Increment, Police and Fire Retirement System Pension Plans 1079 and 1082 Audit Report for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2005, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Grant Programs Financial Statements for year ending June 30, 2005, Community Improvement Commission basic component unit financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2005, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority basic component unit financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2005. The City Auditor introduced the City's External Auditor, Maria Giannell, Maze & Associates. The External Auditor gave a presentation summarizing the financial statements and management recommendations Mayor/Chair Johnson requested an explanation of the Finds, Forfeits and Miscellaneous Revenues. The External Auditor stated that the items were the aggregation of ten years of data on the statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in the fund balance. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that there was a small, steady increase from 1996 through 2004 and a large increase in 2005. The External Auditor stated other revenue was received in the Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) fund that was not Finds and Forfeitures. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that the Community Services and Capital Outlay have declined since 1996. ouncilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member deHaan inquired why general expenditures dropped for Development and Public Works since 2003, to which the External Auditor responded the drop occurred because of budget cuts. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that Public Safety expenditures Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 2 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority … | 13006 | |
232 | 232 | increased from over $23 million in 1996 to over $40 million in 2005. ouncilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member deHaan inquired whether the External Auditor observed similar trends in other cities, to which the External Auditor responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the Public Safety expenditures included pension costs. The External Auditor responded in the affirmative; stated total expenditures in 1996 were $78 million versus $118 million in 2005; the growth was not substantial. louncilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member deHaan inquired why there was a major increase in the General Government and Payments to Other Agencies expenditure. The External Auditor responded budget reorganization occurred several years back within the general government which resulted in expenditures almost doubling from 1996 to 1999. Councilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member Daysog inquired whether a statistical section adjusting for inflation could be prepared. The External Auditor responded that a separate report could be provided. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether more Sewer Fund revenue was collected than spent and where the total amount of the Sewer Fund was noted. The External Auditor responded the Sewer Fund is considered an Enterprise Fund and was accounted for on a full-accrual basis. the Cash Flow Statements address revenues collected and expended. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether $16 million was the total amount in the Sewer Fund, to which the External Auditor responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired why sewer maintenance has been deferred when spending has been less than revenues collected. The External Auditor responded that sewer maintenance might have been deferred because of limited staff and not because of cash. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 3 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
233 | 233 | Mayor/Chair stated that the City's population is lower now than in 1996. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore inquired whether the 2005 debt service was lower than in 1996, to which the External Auditor responded in the affirmative. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authorit Member Gilmore stated there have been discussions on how much bonds cost the City; everything that has been accomplished has been done without increasing the total debt service. The External Auditor stated management has been good; the last ten years have not been easy; more is being done with less. Mayor/Chair Johnson questioned the figures for the Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority original staff salaries versus actual salaries. The External Auditor stated Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) requires the original, adopted budgeted amount be presented for major funds. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired whether the staff fringe benefits were included in the salaries, to which the External Auditor responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chain Johnson inquired why there was a large difference between the amount budgeted and the amount spent for office expenditures; stated the original budget for professional and administrative services was reduced significantly expenditures were almost double the original budgeted amount; more accuracy is needed. The External Auditor responded the increase in professional and administrative services was due to an unexpected EDA grant; stated budget controls and accuracy are far better in the 2004-05 year. louncilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member deHaan inquired whether there were other improvements or further decay from the previous audit. The External Auditor stated there has not been further decay; capital assets are very difficult to control and have improved. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 4 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
234 | 234 | Councilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member deHaan inquired whether the improvement could be attributed to the Finance Director, to which the External Auditor responded in the affirmative. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated the Interim City Manager also contributed to the improvement. The External Auditor stated staff tried very hard not to have adjustments. Councilmember/Commissioner/AuthorityMember deHaan stated that the External Auditor's findings confirm the Council's beliefs. Mayor/Chair Johnson inquired why there was such a fluctuation in administrative expenses in the Police and Fire Pension Plans; stated the benefits and refunds remain about the same. The External Auditor responded the 1999-2000 increase was the cost of the GASB 25 and 27 implementation; the 2004-2005 increase was the cost of actuarial studies and implementing new accounting standards. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated money cannot be transferred from fund to fund without Council approval but can be transferred within funds ; inquired whether one department charging another department was considered an inter-fund transfer. The External Auditor responded in the negative; stated one department charging another department is not considered moving budgeted resources. Mayor Johnson requested money budgeted for one department and allocated to another department be highlighted in the next budget. Vice ayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore inquired whether the ten-year financial plan figures would be scarier for the Police and Fire unfunded pension benefit obligation. The External Auditor responded in the affirmative; stated the obligation outpaces the funding. Vice Mayor/Commissioner/Authority Member Gilmore stated the challenge would be funding the Plan without hitting other City services too much. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 5 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
235 | 235 | Councilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member Matarrese stated there was a similar finding last year; inquired what was being done to prevent the problem from reoccurring. Mayor/Chair Johnson stated that the City Manager could review and report back to the Council/Commissioners/Authority Members on the matter. The External Auditor stated the other recommendation was regarding the employees reporting directing to the City Council which are outside the normal reporting realm; suggested that the City's elected Auditor provide oversight to the City Clerk, City Attorney and City Manager departments to ensure checks and balances. Mayor Johnson stated spending issues were raised last year; significant changes were made under the direction of the Interim City Manager in the last six months of the fiscal year; stated that she has confidence in the new City Manager; the new Finance Director worked very closely with the City Manager on addressing previous issues; the City Manager and Finance Director should work with the City Auditor on an oversight proposal; stated having a system in place was a good idea. Councilmember/Commissioner/Authority Member deHaan stated the louncil/Commissioners/Authority Members have a responsibility to Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 6 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
236 | 236 | ensure that internal finances are controlled. Councilmember/Commissioner/AuthorityMember Matarrese stated having the City Auditor involved would be beneficial; inquired whether there was a way to increase the City Auditor's role. Mayor/Chair Johnson noted the External Auditor does not need to be involved. The City Auditor stated that the City was in reasonably good shape and improvement was being made in controlling costs; the ten-year study would enlighten the Council on tough issues; the Finance Director was in the unenviable position of being at the same level as other department heads; suggested that he meet with the Finance Director periodically to address issues. The City Manager stated that she would be happy to work with the City Auditor; she believes that the Finance Director was comfortable with identifying issues with other departments; discussions with the City Auditor could be more routine. The City Auditor stated that there was no need for a formal policy. Mayor Johnson stated that the discussion was not out of concern; there have been considerable changes since the City Manager joined the City; thanked everyone who worked on the audits; stated that she looks forward to the ten-year projection. Councilmember/Commissioner/AuthorityMember deHaan moved approval of accepting the submitted reports. Councilmember/Commissioner/AuthorityMember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Joint Meeting at 9:09 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger, City Clerk Secretary, Community Improvement Commission Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 7 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
237 | 237 | The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council, Community 8 Improvement Commission, and Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority December 6, 2005 | 13006 | |
238 | 238 | GITY OF of MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PENSION BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HELD 3:30 P.M., JULY 30, 2012 ALAMEDA CITY HALL 2263 SANTA CLARA AVENUE, ALAMEDA CONFERENCE ROOM 391 1. The meeting was called to order by Chair Marie Gilmore at 4:30 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Trustees: Marie Gilmore, William Soderlund, Robert Follrath and Holly Brock-Cohn Absent: Trustee: Nancy Elzig Staff: Fred Marsh, Controller, Finance and Lelia Faapouli, Administrative Technician, Human Resources 3. MINUTES: The minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 30, 2012 was moved for approval by Member Follrath and seconded by Member Soderlund. Passed 4-0 4. AGENDA ITEMS: 4-A. Pension Payroll and Financial Reports - Quarter Ending June 30, 2012 and City of Alameda Police & Fire Pension Funds Financial Reports for the Period Ending June 30, 2012 from Fred Marsh, Controller. Member Follrath moved to accept the report, which was seconded by Member Soderlund. Passed 4-0 4-B Board Members were reminded to watch the training video regarding the Sunshine Ordinance and to turn in their signed Sunshine Ordinance Declaration. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) There were no oral communications. | 13006 | |
239 | 239 | City of Alameda Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Pension Board - Monday, July 30, 2012 Page 2 6. PENSION BOARD COMMUNICATIONS (COMMUNICATIONS FROM BOARD) There were no oral communications. 7. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to come before the board, the meeting was adjourned at 4:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Holly S.COL Holly Brock-Cohn, Human Resources Director and Secretary to the Pension Board | 13006 | |
240 | 240 | APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, November 3, 2010 The meeting convened at 7:29 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Beverly Johnson Boardmember Lena Tam Boardmember Frank Matarrese Boardmember Marie Gilmore Vice Chair Doug deHaan 2. CONSENT CALENDAR 2-A. Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 6, 2010. Member Matarrese moved for approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Chair deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 3-A. Consider Request from Alameda Point Collaborative to Support their Community Planning Efforts by Reimbursing Unpaid SunCal Consultant Expenses and Collateralizing a $50,000 Loan for Relocation Planning Studies Should Funds from Private Development Be Unavailable within 36 Months. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services provided an overview of the staff report. Chair Johnson inquired if the expenditure is considered a predevelopment cost for SunCal, to which the Deputy City Manager - Development Services answered in the affirmative. Chair Johnson inquired if staff has made efforts to have SunCal fulfill their commitment for payment. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services explained that the Alameda Point Collaborative (APC) has tried diligently, without success, to have SunCal fulfill its commitment. Chair Johnson recommended continued efforts to pursue SunCal and inquired why funds from the SunCal escrow account are not being used to pay this bill. The Executive Director explained that the predevelopment escrow account is for obligations that SunCal has to the City and that the terms of the escrow account do not allow the City to direct the escrow agent to pay any invoices. Also, the City cannot interfere in the contractual relationship between SunCal and APC. Doug Biggs, Executive Director of APC further explained that he has contacted SunCal multiple times to request payment, and the responses provided no resolution to the pro… | 13006 | |
241 | 241 | Member Matarrese commented that SunCal had no problem spending approximately $50,000 on an election mailer a month ago. Member Matarrese supports APC's request, but would like to require that APC start the proceedings on their contractual remedy to the outstanding bill. Member Gilmore requested an update and report on the status of the predevelopment costs, and of the ARRA budget. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services informed Member Gilmore and the Board that staff will incorporate the ARRA budget and Predevelopment costs information into the update/staff report that will be presented to the Board in January. Vice Chair deHaan inquired how the APC will pay back a $50,000 loan. Mr. Biggs explained that the Project Implementation Loan (PIL) is from the Corporation for Supportive Housing. Traditionally, these loans are paid off by development fees, but since the development plans for Alameda Point are uncertain at this time, APC is asking the City to back them up. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated that the predevelopment planning cost will be wrapped into the total cost of the project and financed through every available funding source to make the consolidation and relocation work. Speakers: Jon Spangler spoke in support of APC's request. Member Matarrese motioned to approve the recommendation to collateralize $50,000 for the pursuit of the planning study, with the requirement that the APC formally invoke their remedy in their contract in pursuit of reimbursement by SunCal. Member Matarrese also requested that the work done by the contractor be under public domain so that it is not proprietary to APC since it is being underwritten by the ARRA. Vice Chair deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5 4. ORAL REPORTS 4-A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) representative - Highlights of October 7 Alameda Point RAB Meeting. Member Matarrese did not attend the October 7th meeting but will attend the RAB meeting on Nov. 4. Member Matar… | 13006 | |
242 | 242 | ARRA Secretary | 13006 | |
243 | 243 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 16, 2007 - -7:30 P.M. Mayor Johnson convened the Regular Meeting at 8:19 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. AGENDA CHANGES None. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (07-021) - Proclamation expressing appreciation to Rich Teske for his twenty-six years of service on the Rent Review Advisory Committee. Mayor Johnson read and presented the proclamation to Rich Teske. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of the proclamation. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which passed by consensus. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Johnson announced that the Resolution Joining the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program [paragraph no. 07-030] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Note: Vice Mayor Tam abstained from voting on the December 5, 2006 minutes. ] Councilmember deHaan thanked Alameda Power & Telecom and Fire Department for the review and recommendation on the sale of emergency generators [paragraph no. *07-028]. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number. ] ( *07-022) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority, and Community Improvement Commission Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
244 | 244 | Meeting held on December 5, 2006, and the Special and Regular City Council Meetings held on January 2, 2007. Approved. [Note: Vice Mayor Tam abstained from voting on the December 5, 2006 minutes. ] (*07-023) Ratified bills in the amount of $1,619,985.25. (*07-024) Recommendation to accept the City of Alameda Investment Policy. Accepted. (*07-025) Recommendation to accept the work of Gallagher & Burk for the Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 26, No. P. W. 03-06-08. Accepted. (*07-026) Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications and authorize Call for Bids for Crosswalk In-Pavement Lights at Various Locations in the City of Alameda, No. P. W. 07-04-07, Federal ID: STPLH-5014 (025) . Accepted. (*07-027) Recommendation to appropriate $157,000 in Sewer Enterprise Funds and award a Contract in the amount of $562,000, including contingencies, to Pacific Liners Pipeline Rehabilitation for the Citywide Sewer Mains and Laterals Video Inspection, No. P.W. 10-06-21. Accepted. ( *07-028) - Resolution No. 14057, "Authorizing and Approving Sale of Emergency Generators and Associated Electrical Equipment to Cummins West, Inc. for $832,000. Adopted. ( *07-029) Resolution No. 14058, "Authorizing Open Market Purchase from Tiburon, Inc. Pursuant to Section 3-15 of the Alameda City Charter for a Mobile Data System Upgrade in the Amount of $66,545.00." Adopted. (07-030) Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 14059, "Joining the Statewide Community Infrastructure Program and Authorizing the California Statewide Communities Development Authority to Accept Applications from Property Owners, Conduct Special Assessment Proceedings and Levy Assessments Within the Territory of the City of Alameda and Authorizing Related Actions. Adopted. The Business Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Program would apply to small-scale - development. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
245 | 245 | The Business Development Division Manager responded anyone could participate; stated usually, a $250,000 to $300,000 threshold is needed. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the City ever carried bonds before. The Business Development Division Manager responded the City has never carried bonds for private development. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether other communities have a high participation level. The Business Development Division Manager responded the Program is new; stated there is no cost; a lot of cities have joined because the Program provides an economic tool for future development. Mayor Johnson stated the Program is a financial tool that would benefit the community. Vice Mayor Tam moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember deHaan seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (*07-031) Public hearing to consider approval of Tentative Map Tract 7846 (TM06-0006) for the purpose of establishing eight residential lots within four buildings located at 626 Buena Vista Avenue within the R-4-PD Neighborhood Residential Planned Development Zoning District. and (*07-031A) Resolution No. 14060, "Approving Tentative Map Tract 7846, TM06-0006, for the Purpose of Establishing Eight Residential Lots within Four Buildings Located at 626 Buena Vista Avenue. " Adopted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (07-032) Public Hearing to consider a proposal by Warmington Homes, California for a General Plan Amendment (GP05-002), Rezoning (R05-004), Master Plan (MP05-001), Tentative Map (TM05-002), and adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration ( IS05-0003) for development of forty new, detached single-family residences, and related utilities, streets, open space and visitor parking; and an appeal of certain Conditions of Approval on Development Plan and Design Review permits (PD05-02) The project site is located at the northwest corner of Grand Street and Fortmann Way at 2051-2099 Grand Street; Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
246 | 246 | (07-032A) Resolution No. 14061, "Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program for the Grand Marina Village Development Located at the Northwest Corner of Grand Street and Fortmann Way (State Clearinghouse #2006-04-2145). " Adopted; (07-032B) Resolution No. 14062, "Approving General Plan Amendment (GPA-05-02) for Grand Marina Village to Amend the General Plan Land Use Diagram to Change the Designation of Approximately 8.3 Acres to Specified Mixed Use and Amend Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6 and Associated Tables of the Land Use Element to Reflect the Specified Mixed Use Designation. Adopted; (07-032C) Introduction of Ordinance Reclassifying and Rezoning Property Located Adjacent to the Oakland Estuary and Grand Street from M-2, General Industrial (Manufacturing) District to MX, Mixed Use Planned Development District (MX) . Introduced: (07-032D) Introduction of Ordinance Approving Master Plan MP05-01 for a Mixed Use Development Including Single-Family Residential, Recreational Marina, Maritime Commercial, and Open Space Uses, Located Within a Project Area Encompassing Approximately 8.36 Acres of Land and Water at the Intersection of Grand Street and the Oakland Estuary. Introduced (07-032E) Resolution No. 14063, "Approving Tentative Map, TM05- 0002, for Property Located Between Grand Street, Fortmann Way, and the Oakland Estuary. Adopted; and (07-032F) Resolution No. 14064, "Upholding Planning Board Approval of Planned Development PD05-02 and Design Review DR05-0126 for Grand Marina Village. Adopted. The Supervising Planner gave a brief Power Point presentation. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether staff recommends an asphalt path. The Supervising Planner responded staff recommends keeping the asphalt as long as adequate width and good transitions exist between the asphalt and other materials. Mayor Johnson inquired who would be responsible for the maintenance, to which the Supervising Planner responded the Grand Marina. Mayor Johnson inquired whether defined maintenance … | 13006 | |
247 | 247 | The Supervising Planner responded the existing asphalt path is on the Grand Marina property; stated the Applicant would do all the landscaping and improvements. Mayor Johnson inquired who owns the Grand Marina, to which the Supervising Planner responded the Grand Marina is under lease to Peter Wang. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the City has the ability to require Mr. Wang to maintain the area at a certain level, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the ability is real, to which the Supervising Planner responded he was not sure. Mayor Johnson stated she could see where the Planning Board would prefer concrete if the City does not have the ability to ensure proper maintenance. The Supervising Planner stated the property is subject to a Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) permit. Councilmember deHaan inquired who paid for the Kaufman and Broad trail, to which the Assistant City Manager responded the Municipal Services District. The Public Works Director stated the trail is maintained by the Recreation and Park Department; funding is through the Municipal Services District. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the Planning Board wanted to replicate the Kaufman and Broad development pathway. The Public Works Director responded maintenance is part of the Grand Marina lease requirement stated the Leasee would be required to maintain the area at a level that is acceptable to the City. Mayor Johnson inquired whether Mr. Wang is in compliance with every lease condition, to which the Public Works Director responded that he did not know. The Supervising Planner stated concrete would be easier to maintain; the Master Plan covers the entire area; Council could make maintenance recommendations and implement the recommendation in the Grand Marina lease. Councilmember deHaan stated the Bridgeside gravel is starting to erode; material and maintenance policies should be reviewed. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 5 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
248 | 248 | The Supervising Planner stated Council could impose a Master Plan condition that would require that the Grand Marina residential project be responsible for maintenance of the public triangular parks; the condition could be expanded to include that the Homeowners Association be responsible for the portions outside of the parks. Mayor Johnson stated the path is a public access and could become a safety issue if the Grand Marina was not responsible for maintenance; the path would become a problem for the City; inquired whether agreements exist between Grand Marina and the Applicant. The Supervising Planner responded agreements are between the City and Mr. Wang, Warmington Homes and Mr. Wang, and Master Plan entitlements. Mayor Johnson inquired whether the Applicant would have the ability to pass on maintenance costs to the Grand Marina, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. The Supervising Planner continued with the presentation. The Architect provided a video presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents: (In favor of project appeal) : David Day, Applicant; Dan Lachman, Alameda Development Corporation. Opponent (Not in favor of project appeal) : Richard W. Rutter, Alameda. Neutral Christopher Buckley, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Following the Applicant's comments, Mayor Johnson stated the Bayport duplexes are very good; inquired why duplexes were not considered for the proposed project. The Applicant responded an attached product costs more to build because of insurance; stated the proposed project has great architectural quality; height diversity is good. Mayor Johnson stated that she likes the garages in the back. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 6 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
249 | 249 | Councilmember deHaan stated he has heard complaints that the Bayport sidewalks are not wide enough; inquired whether the proposed sidewalks would be wide enough. The Supervising Planner responded public sidewalks have a five-foot minimum width. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether Bayport's sidewalks have a five-foot minimum width, to which the Supervising Planner responded some Bayport sidewalks are less than five feet wide. Councilmember deHaan inquired what was the basic selling price for the Bayport homes. Mr. Lachman responded each phase has been different because of income; the first sixteen homes sold for $273,000 based on 110% of area medium income; the other sixteen homes sold for $236,000 based on 100% of area medium income; the new phase would be $212,00 based on 90% of area medium income. The Supervising Planner stated that the Homeowners Association would cover all maintenance, including the path. Councilmember Gilmore stated that she dislikes the third story pop- upsi she appreciates Mr. Rutter's and Mr. Buckley's research; she prefers the Murano project roofline; the Planning Board does not like slider windows in developments; windows that have dividers between two slabs of glass do not provide the detail and definition for the project's caliber; she would like to add a condition that would require windows to have dividers raised outside of the glass. Councilmember Matarrese concurred with Councilmember Gilmore; stated that he does not see the need for the east/west paseo that cuts from the alleyway through Hibbard Street to the parkway; every house could be considered waterfront property; the market rate and affordable houses are dispersed; the development is better than previous developments; staff could work with the Applicant on the third floor design; the existing asphalt path does not touch the Marina Cove development because of the wooden dock; the paseo condition is not needed as long as the asphalt is maintained and matches the proposed treatments in the round areas at the foot of Hibbard… | 13006 | |
250 | 250 | any functionality beyond architectural diversity. The Supervising Planner responded the third story provides two additional rooms. Vice Mayor Tam stated Mr. Buckley proposed incorporating the third story into the roofline. The Supervising Planner stated staff could work with the Applicant on roof design. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether Council needs to help modify the third-story condition to be more explicit in terms of what staff is directed to do. Mayor Johnson stated Councilmember Gilmore suggested using Mr. Buckley's examples. Vice Mayor Tam inquired whether direction needs to be explicit in the condition. Mayor Johnson responded the condition should be revised to make the changes explicit; stated the design changes are significant inquired whether the design changes should go back to the Planning Board for review. The Supervising Planner responded staff could work with the Applicant stated residential guidelines do not address new three- story buildings, only additions. Mayor Johnson stated the changes are not small. The Applicant stated Mr. Buckley referenced a Centax project where the third floors go from side to side; one side has a three-story wall and the other side has a two-story wall in the current design; the third-floor pop-up would be closer to the street. Mayor Johnson stated she likes the Murano project design better. The Applicant stated a jewel box design was used. Councilmember deHaan stated more space could be gained with the Murano project design. The Applicant stated he would prefer to work with staff and not go back to the Planning Board. Councilmember deHaan stated that he has concerns with the material Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 8 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
251 | 251 | used at Bridgeside; staff needs to review material consistency; inquired whether common areas are part of 2,000 square-foot lots, to which the Supervising Planner responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether the project is contrary to Measure A. The Supervising Planner responded the project is consistent with Measure A, the City Charter, and the General Plan; stated every parcel is at least 2,000 square feet; all forty parcels have some form of public access easement; the overall project is well within Measure A density requirements. Councilmember deHaan stated the project is breaking new ground. The Supervising Planner stated the project design is intended to maximize public open space; the tradeoff is smaller lots. Councilmember deHaan stated the paseos work because of lot configurations but is not something he would highly recommend. The Supervising Planner stated the project provides an opportunity to try a small lot subdivision; the project was completely redesigned after the Planning Board study sessions. Councilmember deHaan inquired why palm trees are planned for Hibbard Street instead of full trees. The Supervising Planner responded palm trees need to be removed; stated the plan is to reuse the trees and align Hibbard Street to eventually come through the Pennzoil site and connect with the Marina Cove development. Councilmember deHaan inquired what is the plan for the rest of the street. The Supervising Planner stated the trees can be extended down Hibbard Street; a decision would need to be made about whether or not to continue the palm trees to the Pennzoil site. Councilmember deHaan stated past Planning Board discussions have addressed palm trees not providing enough shade; he would prefer not to have palm trees. Councilmember Gilmore stated she would like to have staff review how the houses front Grand Street; staff and the Applicant should ensure the design is detailed, not bland. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 9 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
252 | 252 | The Supervising Planner stated Council could modify the condition to include the Grand Street elevations. Mayor Johnson inquired what type of landscaping would be provided on Grand Street. The Supervising Planner responded the Homeowners Association would provide new sidewalks and landscaping; big trees are not proposed because of utilities. Mr. Day stated Warmington Homes has agreed to design the third story as close to the Murano project as possible. Councilmember deHaan stated that he does not see a distinction between the market rate and affordable home designs. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he sees the potential for forty new Alameda Power & Telecom (AP&T) customers; inquired whether an AP&T marketing plan and hookup installation could be added to the conditions, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese moved adoption of the resolutions and introduced ordinances with the following exceptions : 1) the Planning Director is to work with the Applicant to redesign the third floor pop-ups to look like the examples of the Murano project in Cupertino, 2) directed staff to work with the Applicant and Christopher Buckley on the Grand Street elevations, 3) eliminate slider windows, and 4) AP&T be installed and marketed similar to the Alameda Landing project. Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-033) Consideration of an appeal of the Public Works Director's decision to deny a request to remove eight street trees along 2101 Shoreline Drive in accordance with City's Master Tree Plan. The Public Works Director gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Gilmore inquired how many units are affected by the eight trees, to which the Public Works Director responded approximately ten to twenty units. Councilmember Gilmore inquired when the trees were last pruned. The Public Works Director responded approximately seven years ago; stated the Tree Pruning Program funding was reduced. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 10 January 16, 2… | 13006 | |
253 | 253 | Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents ( In favor of appeal) : Robert Matz, The Directly Affected Homeowners, Don Patterson, Alameda. Betty Snider, Alameda and Charles Moneder, Alameda (time yielded to Mr. Matz) . Opponent (Not in favor of appeal) : Karen Stern, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Gilmore inquired how many units are affected by the eight trees, to which Mr. Matz responded twenty. Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether the units are two-story. Mr. Matz responded in the affirmative; stated the entrance is on the second story the bedrooms are downstairs. Councilmember deHaan stated Shoreline Drive has a variety of trees; some Grand Street trees have been replaced by the homeowners; inquired whether the replanted trees are proper. The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated he has been working with the City Attorney's office on drafting a letter to the homeowners. Councilmember deHaan inquired what type of trees would be planted. The Public Works Director responded the Tree Master Plan allows for three different types; stated the New Zealand Christmas Tree is the preferred tree. Councilmember deHaan stated the trees vary in height and fullness; inquired whether the Tree Trimming Program is in force. The Public Works Director responded the Tree Trimming Program allows for tree pruning every five years when funding is available; stated recently Council restored the funding; catch-up needs to be done; residents are required to get tree trimming permits; not all residents obtained permits; enforcement is difficult. Councilmember deHaan stated some of the Shoreline Drive trees have been pruned severely. The Public Works Director stated the New Zealand Christmas Tree is very hardy and comes back rapidly. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 11 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
254 | 254 | Councilmember deHaan stated unauthorized tree pruning is concerning because trees are important to the City. The Public Works Director stated that he does not have the staff to police tree pruning; residents deny knowledge of tree trimming. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether tree infill plans are underway, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember deHaan stated the rest of Alameda would be impacted by how trees are infilled. Vice Mayor Tam stated Ms. Guthrie invited her to view the trees and visit Mr. Matz's unit; some residents have chopped the trees inquired whether the trees could be moved. The Public Works Director responded he was not sure whether the trees would remain healthy; stated the move would be very expensive. Councilmember Gilmore stated trees grow; questioned whether the same issue would come up in twenty years if the trees are replaced; she does not want to get into a cycle of replacing healthy trees periodically; the City has higher uses for money than replacing trees cyclically. The Public Works Director stated Mr. Matz's Master Tree Plan reference is not the section that addresses when trees should be removed; the section addresses how trees are selected. Councilmember Matarrese stated a trimming and pruning option has been suggested to increase the view line and preserve mature trees; the Tree Master Plan needs some updating; carbon sequesters are of greater importance; view restoration can be accomplished now is the time to take a second look at the Tree Master Plan. Councilmember deHaan stated sometimes mistakes are made when trees are planted; the intent is to add more trees down Shoreline Drive and help the eco system; street trees should be uniform; tree infilling opportunities exist throughout the City; he is not sure whether views would improve if the trees are replaced. Mayor Johnson stated many trees have died and have not been replaced; inquired whether trees are planted in existing planting areas Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 12 Januar… | 13006 | |
255 | 255 | The Public Works Director responded sometimes planting cannot be done at the same location because of the root ball; stated the Tree Master plan has restrictions regarding planting locations. Mayor Johnson stated the goal is to plant as many trees as possible; Westline Drive and Harbor Bay waterfront areas have existing trees; Council needs to be very careful in setting a precedent regarding removing trees in areas with a view; concurred with Councilmember Matarrese regarding reviewing and updating the Master Tree Plan; inquired whether the City would do the pruning every year at the expense of the Homeowners Association. The Public Works Director responded the City would prune the first and fifth year; the City would prune in the intervening years at the homeowner's expense. Councilmember Matarrese stated the five-year pruning policy would be re-instituted starting this year; the City would prune the trees down to the 25% crown with an arborist's consultation and City funds; the City and arborist would be involved if the homeowners wants the trees pruned within the five year interim; the cost would be born by the homeowners. Councilmember deHaan requested than an arborist review topping the trees to bring the trees back into proportion. Mayor Johnson stated the 25% crown pruning is quite substantial. Councilmember Gilmore stated she would never vote to remove a tree unless other options were considered; the trees are behind in the normal pruning schedule; concurred that the Master Tree Plan needs updating; stated coastal areas need attention; suggested reviewing avenues for having coastal trees pruned more frequently and involving the Homeowners Association with the pruning in the intervening years. Vice Mayor Tam moved approval of upholding the Public Works Director's decision with direction for staff to work with a certified arborist to prune the trees and reduce the height and fullness without jeopardizing the trees and to work on updating the Master Tree Plan. Vice Mayor Tam stated she has lived in the area … | 13006 | |
256 | 256 | direction that the Master Tree Plan be reviewed by the Climate Protection Campaign Task Force. Under discussion, Councilmember deHaan stated the Harbor Bay Trail and Marina Village waterfront homes have no trees; clustered trees are in park areas; he is concerned with the infill proposed for Shoreline Drive. Mayor Johnson stated trees are scattered throughout the Bay Trail area on Harbor Bay; questioned whether the Tree Master Plan review and update would occur before or after the proposed infill. The Public Works Director stated carbon sequester trees would be reviewed as part of tree placement. Mayor Johnson stated Council should review whether fines should be imposed if a homeowner removes a tree. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-034) ) Recommendation to approve funding request for Alameda Big - Box Study Support not to exceed $50,000 from General Fund Reserves. The Business Development Manager gave a brief presentation. Mayor Johnson opened the public portion of the hearing. Proponents (In favor of staff recommendation) : David Howard, Alameda: Gretchen Lipow, Alameda; Denise Brady, Alameda. There being no further speakers, Mayor Johnson closed the public portion of the hearing. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he supports spending reserve funds for infrastructure improvements he has a hard time spending reserve money on a study inquired whether the study could be funded with money budgeted elsewhere; stated that he would not support taking the money from the General Fund Reserves. In response to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry, the Business Development Manager responded all outside consultant fees have been encumbered. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether money could be used from funds that are not encumbered yet, to which the Business Development Manager responded in the negative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 14 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
257 | 257 | The City Manager stated the Development Services Director is in the process of re-evaluating the budget opportunities do not exist to fund the study in the current fiscal year. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Towne Center, Alameda Landing or Alameda Point funds are available; stated said areas are relevant to the big box study. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether money could be taken from the Planning Department impact fees. The City Manager responded money was not budgeted for the study. Councilmember Matarrese stated the question is not whether money was budgeted; the question is whether $50,000 can be taken from another source. The Business Development Manager responded the issue would need to be reviewed; stated the proposed study would not be just for Alameda Point, but the whole Island; a portion might be appropriate, but not one hundred percent. Councilmember Matarrese stated funds must have been budgeted to support the projects. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager stated the City has full cost recovery for the Alameda Landing project; all staff salaries are paid by the developer ; the developer funded a retail impact analysis as part of the entitlement process for approximately $35,000; the study led to the retail mix recommendations Mayor Johnson inquired whether a retail impact study is required for proposals, to which the Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a retail impact study is different from a big box study; stated she is surprised by the cost. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded some goals and objections may be captured; stated the measurement would address whether the proposed project competes with or is compatible with existing retail. Mayor Johnson inquired whether a retail study would include other impacts, to which the Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 15 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
258 | 258 | Councilmember Matarrese stated the first question is whether there should be big box at all; a retail impact fee would help answer the question; he does not approve of using General Fund Reserves for a study. Councilmember deHaan stated alternate funding sources should be reviewed; the June 2006 study replicates retail for the Towne Center ; leakage needs to be understood and impacts analyzed; it is unknown how the proposed Borders would impact Books, Inc. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval to direct staff to identify alternate funds and bargain the price down at the same time. Councilmember Gilmore agreed that General Fund Reserves should not be used for the study stated the study should not duplicate previous studies; all studies should be pulled together for a complete picture. Mayor Johnson stated the City has a City-wide Retail Strategic Plan. Councilmember Gilmore stated the Economic Development Commission was requested to update said plan. Mayor Johnson questioned whether any additional information would come out of the study. Councilmember Gilmore questioned whether the study would provide any new information; stated that she only wants to do a new study if it is needed. Vice Mayor Tam stated she had an opportunity to review the 2004 Citywide Retail policy; the County's examination of the Community Impact analysis adds value with respect to impacts on workers, health benefits, City services, and nearby merchants; it is hard for a financially struggling City to justify spending reserve funds for the study; stated she supports Councilmember Matarrese' motion. Councilmember Matarrese amended the motion to direct staff to convene the Task Force and use existing studies to formulate conclusions and recommendations that may include an additional study if needed. Councilmember deHaan stated the City's retail leakage requirements need to be in proportion to big boxes; the public should be involved in discussions. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 16 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
259 | 259 | Councilmember Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (07-035) Ordinance No. 2960, "Approving Development Agreement DA- 06-0003 By and Between the City of Alameda and Palmtree Acquisition Corporation (Successor by Merger to Catellus Development Corporation) Governing the Development of Up To 400,000 Square Feet of Office Space; a 20,000 Square Foot Health Club; and 300,000 Square Feet of Retail Space or 50,000 Square Feet of Retail Space and 370,000 Square Feet of Research and Development Space. " Finally passed. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager provided a brief presentation. Councilmember Matarrese stated the amendment is good and fair and is easily understood he appreciates the time and thought that staff put into the amendment; proper recognition has been given to funding the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether TDM measurements have been determined. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the success criteria would be developed and submitted as part of the TDM Program that would go back to the Transportation Commission and Planning Board; stated the Transportation Commission is scheduled to begin discussions on January 31. Councilmember deHaan stated different traffic patterns are set with entitlement changes most mitigations are not just for people in Alameda but for visitors; inquired whether the TDM would address the issue. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the minimum TDM Phase One components were all developed as part of the new, mixed-use project. Councilmember deHaan inquired whether certain mitigations could be resolved before developments are in place. The Base Reuse and Community Development Manager responded the developer has stated that the minimum Phase One components would cost more than what would be collected stated Condition 11 lays out the Phase One TDM components and has not changed since the project was approved on December 5. Councilmember deHaan sta… | 13006 | |
260 | 260 | regarding taking care of visitors coming into Alameda or Alameda Point. Councilmember Matarrese moved final passage of the ordinance. Vice Mayor Tam seconded the motion. Under discussion, Vice Mayor Tam echoed Councilmember Matarrese': commending staff. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (07-036) - David Howard, Alameda, discussed transportation and submitted a handout on a parking institute policy brief. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (07-037) Vice Mayor Tam announced that she attended the League of California Cities conference and orientation for new Councilmembers; stated approximately 440 people attended. the sessions provided a good overview of best practices in City governance, the Brown Act, updates on emerging legislation, and land use policies; the Governor's newly released budget seems to be favorable for local governments ; AB 2511 compliance is an issue; encouraged Council to participate in the July conference. Mayor Johnson stated she has encouraged Councilmembers to attend the July conference every year; requested that the City Clerk try to schedule Councilmembers to attend. The City Manager stated the conference is scheduled for July 25 through 28. (07-038) Selection of Councilmember and alternate to serve as the League of California Cities East Bay Division representative. Continued to February 6, 2007. Vice Mayor Tam volunteered to serve as the League's representative. Councilmember deHaan stated he would like the opportunity to serve also. Vice Mayor Tam stated that she was interested in serving on the Environmental Quality Policy Committee, which deals with emerging regulations such as global warming. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 18 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
261 | 261 | Mayor Johnson stated former Vice Mayor Daysog also served on the Airport Operating Committee; requested that Councilmembers let her know their areas of interest before the next Council meeting. (07 -039 - ) Councilmember Matarrese stated an Alameda Power and Telcom (AP&T) consultant report was published in the newspaper requested that Council receive a briefing on decisions and recommendations after the public workshops. The City Manager stated the process would begin this week; the public is invited to attend two public forums scheduled for Thursday and Saturday a voice over Internet protocol is one of the consultant's recommendations; updates will be provided to Council. Councilmember Matarrese requested the update be provided in the first quarter. (07-040) Councilmember Matarrese stated he has heard concerns that Alameda does not have a Cultural Arts Center; he would like to have the matter reviewed by the Public Arts Commission. (07-041) Councilmember deHaan stated webcasting is available but is only utilized in the Chambers; suggested that the AP&T workshop meetings be available to the public through webcasting. (07-042) - Councilmember deHaan requested that Closed Session information be released on Alameda Point negotiations. (07-043) Councilmember Gilmore inquired whether there is a mechanism for requiring shopping carts to have boots; stated the boots would be helpful in limiting stray shopping cart problems at Alameda Landing, Bridgeside, and Alameda Towne Center. Mayor Johnson stated the Police Department has been requested to review the issue in the past suggested that a phone number be placed on the shopping carts for stores to pick up carts within a certain number of hours. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Regular Meeting at 11:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 19 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
262 | 262 | The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 20 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
263 | 263 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION MEETING TUESDAY - -JANUARY 16, 2007 - - -7:29 P.M. Chair Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 7:50 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present : Commissioners deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Chair Johnson - 5. Absent : None. MINUTES (07-001) Minutes of the Joint City Council, Alameda Reuse and Redevelopment Authority (ARRA) and Community Improvement Commission (CIC) Meeting held on December 5, 2006. Approved. Commissioner deHaan moved approval of the minutes. Commissioner Gilmore seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Commissioner deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, and Chair Johnson - 4. Abstentions: Commissioner Tam - 1. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (07-002) Report on Alameda Theater, Cineplex, and Parking Structure Project Construction update. The Development Manager gave a brief presentation. Commissioner Gilmore inquired when the parking garage foundation would be poured. The Development Manager responded the foundation would be poured in phases, starting with the back corner of Long's and working forward; stated the first pour would be in three to four weeks. Commissioner Matarrese stated some value engineered items overlap with the list presented in July; inquired whether the parking garage exterior appearance would be altered by any of the value engineered items not presented in July. The Development Manager responded all value engineered items were on the July list with the exception of the stairs stated the top slab was eliminated and does not affect the façade. Commissioner Matarrese stated he did not see the deletion of the precast spandrel panels in the July report. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 1 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
264 | 264 | The Development Manager stated said item was in the bid form as a deduct alternative; the cast in place walls are $80,000 less. Commissioner Matarrese inquired whether the concrete appearance would be the same, to which the Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Mayor Johnson inquired whether $150,000 of the reserves would be used, leaving approximately $300,000. The Development Manager responded approximately $140,000 of the reserves would be used when small cost savings are taken into consideration stated approximately $275,000 would remain. Mayor Johnson inquired whether items could be added back in if more contingency was not used, to which the Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Commissioner deHaan stated the Cineplex went through value engineering; inquired whether architectural items were taken away. The Development Manager responded value engineering was considered when the bid was received from Overaa Construction because the original price was higher; stated very little value-engineered changes are anticipated for the Cineplex. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the removed items have an impact on the Cineplex. The Development Manager responded the design changes are minor ; stated the Planning and Building Director would determine whether the changes constitute substantial changes to design review. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the Planning and Building Director would review the changes, to which the Development Manager responded in the affirmative. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the project is on schedule since Cineplex funding is not in place. The Development Manager responded milestones and schedules are noted on Attachment 2; stated the theater and garage are on schedule; the developer hopes to be finished with the Cineplex by the end of the year; the final Cineplex schedule would be presented to Council once the General Contractor is on board and construction starts. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 2 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
265 | 265 | Mayor Johnson inquired whether the historic theater completion timeline is March or April 2008. The Development Manager responded in the negative; stated November 2007 is the anticipated completion date. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether the layout area would be a problem once the Cineplex construction starts. The Development Manager responded staff is meeting with Overaa and the developer to coordinate a number of issues; stated the site is tight ; Overaa is prepared to deal with the issues the trailers should be removed from the Cineplex site by the end of the month; Overaa could utilize some unfinished space in the historic theater mezzanine area; staff would continue to coordinate with Overaa on an on-going basis. Commissioner Matarrese requested that any Cineplex design changes come back to Council; stated discretionary decisions should not be made. Commissioner deHaan stated priorities have not been set. Chair Johnson called the public speakers. Richard W. Rutter, Alameda, outlined concerns with the value- engineered changes itemized in Attachment 3. Christopher Buckley, Alameda, outlined some parking garage "at risk" details. Chair Johnson inquired when decisions need to be made on the items outlined by Mr. Buckley. The Development Manager responded the canopy and blade sign prices are secured for six months in addition to some items that may be added later. Chair Johnson inquired whether fund raising opportunities are possible. The Development Manager responded absolutely; stated private funding could be used for the mural underneath the mezzanine wall. Commissioner deHaan inquired whether prices are secured for six months from now. The Development Manager responded prices are secured for six months Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 3 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
266 | 266 | from the day the price was received from the Contractor, which was last week. Commissioner deHaan stated the steel galvanizing issue needs to be addressed now. The Development Manager stated the City's Architect does not feel that the project's integrity would be compromised by deleting the steel galvanizing. Chair Johnson stated the Commission would be able to make decisions when items are brought back. Commissioner deHaan requested that the Development Manager provide a list of items [value engineering add back ] to be considered along with a timeline. Commissioner Matarrese requested: 1) an Off Agenda Report on the value engineered items, 2) any Cineplex and parking garage exterior design changes be approved by the Commission, and 3) a timeline outlining when decisions need to be made for adding back value engineered items; stated a decision would need to be made prior to pouring concrete on whether to use galvanized steel versus painted steel. The Development Manager clarified that all the column bases have granite tile. ADJOURNMEN'T There being no further business, Chair Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:19 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger Secretary The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Community Improvement Commission 4 January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
267 | 267 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - -JANUARY 16, 2007 - -6:00 p.m. Mayor Johnson convened the Special Meeting at 6:10 p.m. Roll Call - Present : Councilmembers deHaan, Gilmore, Matarrese, Tam, and Mayor Johnson - 5. Absent : None. The Special Meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider: (07-018) Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation; Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9; Number of cases One. (07-019) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (54956.9 ; Name of case: Attari V. City of Alameda. (07-020) Conference with Labor Negotiators; Agency Negotiators : Craig Jory and Human Resources Director; Employee Organizations : Alameda City Employees Association and Police Association Non- Sworn. Not discussed. Following the Closed Session, the Special Meeting was reconvened and Mayor Johnson announced that regarding Anticipated Litigation, Council received a briefing from the City Attorney and no action was taken; regarding Existing Litigation, Council received a briefing and gave direction to the City Attorney. Adjournment There being no further business, Mayor Johnson adjourned the Special Meeting at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Special Meeting Alameda City Council January 16, 2007 | 13006 | |
268 | 268 | CITY OF of TERRA ORATEL MINUTES OF THE ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 2022 The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 6:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Joyce McConeghey Vice President Dimple Kanji, Board Member Kathleen Kearney, Board Member Sara Strickler, Board Member Absent: Amber Bales, President Staff: Jane Chisaki, Library Director Lori Amaya, Recording Secretary ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Public Comment) None CONSENT CALENDAR An asterisk indicates items so enacted or approved on the Consent Calendar *A. Report from the Library Director Highlighting Activities for the Months of January and February, 2022. *B. Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board Meeting of January 12, 2022. *C. Modified Library Services Report for the Months of December, 2021 and January, 2022. *D. Financial Report Reflecting FY21/22 Expenditures by Fund for January and February, 2022. *E. Bills for Ratification for the Months of January and February, 2022. Director Chisaki reported that the City's mask mandate will end on Monday, March 14, 2022. Face masks will be strongly encouraged within city buildings. The Dewey's Friends Café opened on February 14, 2022. Eating is allowed outside in the courtyard only. In-person Children's programming will begin the week of April 4. Ticketing system may be used to control the number of people attending. The Grogu Library Card campaign is going well. The water bottle fill stations | 13006 | |
269 | 269 | Page 2 of 3 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board March 9, 2022 Meeting have been installed at the Main Library. The branches will have their installation completed within the next week. The Red Cross Blood Drive was held yesterday in the Stafford Room, and it went smoothly. The next drive will be on May 10, 2022. The Hotspot lending program is moving forward. The contract was signed yesterday and the program is expected to launch in mid-April. The internment camp grant and the Japantown marker project are slowly moving forward. There are no changes to the Draft Minutes of the January 12, 2022 Library Board Meeting. Board Member Kearney moved to accept the Consent Calendar. Board Member Strickler seconded the motion, which passed with a 4-0 vote. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Current and On-Going Library Activities (J. Chisaki) Adult Services book clubs have been virtual, and it has not been decided when they will return to in-person programming. Teen programs have been in-person since there have been no more than 15 attendees and they can be spread out. Tech. Services Supervisor, Marlon Romero, welcomes input from the board members on changes to the Library's webpage. Staff is discussing changing library hours. Any changes wouldn't start until the new fiscal year. Board Member Strickler asked if the change to the hours would be extending or limiting hours. Director Chisaki responded that it would be a reshuffling of the existing number of hours. The City has hired a firm to help organize its Equity, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) program. Employees will be pulled for interest groups, focus groups, and steering committees. Director Chisaki is pushing to include part-time staff for more diversity. B. American Rescue Plan Funding - Hotspot Lending Program (J. Chisaki) The Hotspot contract has been signed. Next steps include receiving the equipment, creating policies and procedures, and obtaining packaging. The launch is expected in April. NEW BUSINESS A. Friends of the Library (J. Chisaki) The Café has opened. The bookst… | 13006 | |
270 | 270 | Page 3 of 3 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board March 9, 2022 Meeting LIBRARY BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Board Member Kearney is working at the Friends pop-up book sale and at the new bookstore. Board Member Kanji asked if the Friends are doing set up for the book sale on Friday or if they are doing a soft run. Director Chisaki responded that they are setting up on Friday. They will be bringing boxes over from storage, unboxing books, and arranging the tables. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA GENERAL None. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane Chisaki, Library Director and Secretary to the Alameda Free Library Board | 13006 | |
271 | 271 | Chy OF RE RATER Minutes of the ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD OCTOBER 11, 2006 The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Karen Butter, President Ruth Belikove, Vice President Alan Mitchell, Board Member Leslie Krongold, Board Member Absent: Mark Schoenrock, Board Member Staff: Jane Chisaki, Library Director Marsha Merrick, Recording Secretary CONSENT CALENDAR An asterisk indicates items so enacted and adopted on the Consent Calendar. A. *Report from Library Director highlighting Library Department activities for the month of October 2006. Accepted. B. *Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board meeting of September 13, 2006. Approved. C. *Library Services Report for the month of August 2006. Accepted. D. *Report from Finance Department reflecting FY 2005-06 Library expenditures (by fund) through September 2006. Accepted. E. *Bills for ratification. Approved. Board Member Mitchell questioned the expenditures in Equipment Acquisition which put the Library $16,000+ over budget in that account. Staff will re-direct the charges so they appear under the appropriate line item. President Butter inquired about bottled water services. Library Director Chisaki said the service would not be continued for the Main Library once the move was complete, however, the branches will continue the service due to their aging facilities. | 13006 | |
272 | 272 | Page 2 of 7 Minutes of the Library Board Meeting October 11, 2006 President Butter also asked about an increase in the collection budget. Director Chisaki indicated that the Library had received a 2% increase. She had been hoping for more; however, because of staffing additions, the collection increase was low. Chisaki remarked that when mid-year budget adjustments come around, there will be several areas she will request increases for. A lot of additional expenditures have arisen with the new building that were unexpected. As an example, 6 new phone lines have been added to help monitor security and AED equipment. Another concern will be the late billing received from the Alameda Unified School District for utilities charges. The Library will still be liable for several months' worth of charges later this year, perhaps into next year, depending on how the billing cycle works out. The recent payment of $50,000 to AUSD for space rental will carry us through the month of November; no further charges to this account are expected. Board Member Mitchell mentioned an article he had read about a bomb planted at a library in Salt Lake City. Mitchell inquired as to whether we would have security monitoring equipment in the new library. Director Chisaki responded in the affirmative - there will be video cameras strategically placed around the building, and will show on monitors at the Circulation Desk. The cameras are not recorders, however. President Butter wanted to know how statistics would be calculated going forward due to the changes occurring. Supervising Librarian David Hall is currently looking into how numbers will be extracted from our new systems. President Butter asked about a payment that had been made to Tapes Unlimited, and was billed to janitorial supplies. Recording Secretary Merrick explained that Tapes Unlimited is the dba name for Alameda Office Supply. The City purchases both office and janitorial supplies from this entity on a regular basis. Alameda Office Supply gives a 30% discount to the City of A… | 13006 | |
273 | 273 | Page 3 of 7 Minutes of the Library Board Meeting October 11, 2006 B. Meeting Room Use Policy - Final Review (J. Chisaki) Director Chisaki sent out the room use policy in the board packet once again as the City Attorney's office made some language changes and additions. President Butter asked about groups setting up and putting away chairs, etc. for their meetings. Director Chisaki explained that depending on how large the group is might determine whether or not we would require them to do this. Mostly it would be for groups that have some very specific idea on how they want things set-up. Board Member Mitchell asked about item 13 regarding advertising or selling of products or services being prohibited. Director Chisaki explained that for instance, if you were giving a lecture and wanted to sell your book to a participant that would be okay. However, you could not leave any books, business cards, etc. behind in the conference room - all items must be cleared away when leaving the room. Board Member Krongold made an inquiry about the rooms that are non-reservable (the small study rooms). If you are using one of these rooms and you want it for a longer period, you could stay in there as long as nobody else wants to use the room. The Reference Desk will be in charge of the sign-ups for these rooms. Board Member Butter asked about item 9 regarding decoration restrictions in the conference rooms. The language comes straight from Park & Recreation's room use policy. The language will be revised slightly to direct meeting room patrons to use push pins on the tackable wall surfaces, and not use other wall surfaces. President Butter asked for a motion to accept the Meeting Room Use Policy with changes. Board Member Mitchell so moved, Board Member Krongold seconded, and the motion was carried by a 4-0 vote. President Butter asked Director Chisaki to provide an update at the January 2007 Board Meeting and note any problems that have been encountered with meeting room use. In six months, the Board will re-review the policy a… | 13006 | |
274 | 274 | Page 4 of 7 Minutes of the Library Board Meeting October 11, 2006 During the March closure, circulation at the West End Branch increased by almost 2,500 items over the same period last year, and at Bay Farm Island, over 1,300 items. Hours had not been extended, and it was quite rainy which tends to depress circulation. During the current Main closure, West End hours were extended to include Sundays, 1:00-5:00, and Bay Farm is open on Fridays, 9:30-5:30. All Main Library reserves are being picked up at the West End, and all Main check-ins are being handled there as well. Some reference items are now at the West End - the Reference Department is sorely missed. Lots of questions on local history, etc. are difficult to answer without them. At the heart of the operation now are the Library Aides. They make sure everything gets back on the shelves quickly, and with increased circulation there is a lot more to this. The Aides have also been doing a great job at keeping the shelves in order, and Benzie-Youssef is very pleased with this. The biggest challenge for the branches is the lack of phones. More specifically, with the Main being unreachable, it is very difficult to help with delinquent collections, obituaries, homebound items, etc. The branches will pick up some extra staff now to help with the increased demand for services. Between the two branches, there is a Library open 7 days a week. Benzie-Youssef suspects that after the new Main opens, it will be very quiet at the branches, as everyone is so excited about the new building opening. B. Alameda Free Library Foundation (A. Mitchell) Board Member Mitchell was very disappointed that there were not firmer plans in place for the Gala. It was as if the Foundation was still trying to figure out what to do. Director Chisaki said that is usually how the meetings go. They are now meeting every week, and at last weeks meeting they were still going sideways. Part of the problem is there is no set agenda, and when they get off the subject being discussed, they don't come b… | 13006 | |
275 | 275 | Page 5 of 7 Minutes of the Library Board Meeting October 11, 2006 come out on October 20th The invitations for the Grand Opening still aren't quite done, however. The graphic designer has put together some really nice drafts, but the invitations aren't at the printer yet. Foundation members will go into the Library right after the docent training on October 24th and put the shelf tags in place. There have been donations of water, some wines and hors d' oeuvres from local restaurants for the Gala. There will be music in four different areas in the building. The architect, Tom Hacker, will be attending and he may be asked to speak. Yuki Nagase, artist of the Oracle of the Tree behind the circulation desk, and the Cadence of the Water limestone medallions on the outside of the building, will be in attendance as well. All the posters advertising the Gala have been distributed around town. There are plenty of bookmarks and pamphlets still available, which won't be any good after the Gala event. C. Friends of the Alameda Free Library (M. Skeen) Friends President Molly Skeen was not in attendance for the meeting, so Director Chisaki spoke in her place. The book sale the previous weekend at the O'Club grossed $13,000. $8,000 came in on Friday night alone. It was a very nice turnout. There were 100 boxes of children's books because two elementary schools weeded their collections. The Friends beautiful new book bags were on sale as well. D. Library Building Watch (M. Merrick) Recording Secretary reported that because of having no office equipment to speak of due to the move, it wasn't possible to release an issue of the Library Building Watch. Merrick is hopeful, however, of getting one more issue out prior to the Gala and Grand Opening events, to make them fresh in people's minds. Board Member Krongold suggested having something visible at the Gala so people could sign up to receive the newsletter. Perhaps people could just drop a business card if they were interested. Having some copies of previous issues displayed was a… | 13006 | |
276 | 276 | Page 6 of 7 Minutes of the Library Board Meeting October 11, 2006 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment) Li Volin was in the audience and mentioned that she went to the Independent Booksellers Association the prior weekend for an author signing. She brought along the new Friends book bag and it was decided that it rated number two from the assortment that day. The only bag scoring higher had pockets for a cell phone and water bottle on the outside. LIBRARY BOARD COMMUNICATIONS President Butter commented that she received information on The Hummingbird's Daughter because she was on the San Francisco Friends group mailing list. There was a nice pamphlet describing how book clubs could participate, discussion questions, etc. Director Chisaki said the "One Book Program" is definitely something she would like to see happen at the Alameda Free Library as well. There are generally events all year long relating to the book that's being promoted, such as themed and cultural programs, etc. The Friends and Foundation have already expressed their interest in assisting with this endeavor. President Butter said the Board would also be interested in participating in any way they could. President Butter requested that "Selection of Art for the New Library" be put on the agenda for the November meeting. Board Member Mitchell mentioned one library that had a swashbuckling theme for their readers and it was very well received, probably due to the Pirates of the Caribbean movie coming out at the time. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS Director Chisaki spoke about how well the building was coming along. It is the third day of the collection move, so books can now be seen through the front window. The Library has not experienced any problems with the moving company, Doubleday. Circulation Supervisor Laura Chaquette is the lead for the move, and deserves a lot of the credit for how smoothly things are going. The staff furniture was delayed, which delays installation of computers and phones. The furniture did arrive and is being installed n… | 13006 | |
277 | 277 | Page 7 of 7 Minutes of the Library Board Meeting October 11, 2006 ADJOURNMENT Board President Butter called for a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:07 p.m. Board Member Mitchell so moved, Board Member Krongold seconded the motion, and it was carried by a 3-0 vote. (Vice President Belikove left the meeting at 8:02 p.m.) The next meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board will be held in the new Main Library. Respectfully submitted, Jane Chisaki Library Director and Secretary to the Library Board This meeting's agenda was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. | 13006 | |
278 | 278 | MINUTES OF THE OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMISSION MONDAY OCTOBER 1, 2012 - - - 7:00 P.M. The meeting was convened at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Commissioners Jensen, Oddie, Peterson, Spanier, and Wong - 5. Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA 2-A. Matthew James Fitzgerald, Alameda, introduced himself. AGENDA ITEMS 3-A. Approve the May 7, 2012 Meeting Minutes. Commission Jensen moved approval of the minutes with correction to the spelling of her last name on page 3. Following Commissioner Spanier's comments, the City Clerk clarified that agendas need to go out twelve days before a City Council meeting; stated a noticing complaint could be filed before a meeting is held. Commissioner Wong seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. 3-B. Receive a Status Update on the Public Records Index. The City Clerk stated the Public Records Index is required by the Sunshine Ordinance and would be posted on the City's website to inform people about the types of documents maintained in each department; the Sunshine Ordinance requires that documents be labeled "Open,' "Partially Open," or "Has been determined Exempt;" the list has been drafted and staff is finalizing the documents' open or exempt status; the Index would be brought back to the Commission once the status has been finalized. Commissioner Jensen inquired whether current City website documents would need to be categorized or just the new documents, to which the City Clerk responded all documents would be categorized. COMMISSIONER COMMUNICATIONS 4-A. Commissioner Peterson discussed the public's lack of awareness of the Commission; stated the Sunshine Ordinance should be added to the Open Government section on the website; future meeting dates should be on the calendar now; that he is still concerned with not having Commissioners' email addresses on the website; he Meeting of the Open Government Commission 1 October 10, 2012 | 13006 | |
279 | 279 | does not believe public correspondence should go through the City Clerk's office but should go directly to the Commission; not having Commissioners' email addresses on the website by now is inexcusable and unacceptable; that he has addressed said concern with the Deputy City Manager. Commissioner Jensen concurred with Commissioner Peterson; urged adding Commissioner e-mail addresses and fax number on letterhead; stated Commissioner email addresses should be unique rather than using the City Clerk's office email address to ensure continuity and privacy. Chair Oddie noted the Commission's meeting date and minutes are listed on the City's website. Commissioner Petersen stated no one attended tonight's meeting; that he does not understand why Commission meeting dates are only calendared on the City's website shortly before a meeting. The City Attorney stated Commissioner Petersen's concern [regarding email addresses] would be restated to the Deputy City Manager; a major revamp of the City's website is underway; domain names have been discussed; clarified that the City Clerk is the repository of all City records and complaints need to go through the City Clerk's office. Chair Oddie inquired whether any complaints have been filed, to which the City Clerk responded in the negative; stated a meeting would have been scheduled if a complaint was filed. Commissioner Jensen requested that the City Clerk's email address be placed on the next agenda. The City Clerk stated all agendas contain said contact information. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Wong moved approval of adjourning the meeting at 7:15 p.m. Commissioner Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Meeting of the Open Government Commission 2 October 10, 2012 | 13006 | |
280 | 280 | CITY OF TERRA Minutes of the ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING March 14, 2007 The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 7:03 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Karen Butter, President Ruth Belikove, Vice President Leslie Krongold, Board Member Absent: Alan Mitchell, Board Member Mark Schoenrock, Board Member Staff: Jane Chisaki, Library Director Marsha Merrick, Recording Secretary CONSENT CALENDAR An asterisk indicates items so enacted and adopted on the Consent Calendar. A. *Report from Library Director highlighting Library Department activities for the month of March 2007. Accepted. B. *Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board meeting of February 14, 2007. Approved. C. *Library Services Report for the month of January 2007. Accepted. D. *Report from Finance Department reflecting FY 2006-07 Library expenditures (by fund) through February 2007. Accepted. E. *Bills for ratification. Approved. President Butter noted there was not much fluctuation in Children's check-outs, and Director Chisaki concurred. Butter then asked if there was any way to capture statistics for Overdrive, which is the Library's on-line audio book feature, sponsored by Califa. Director Chisaki believed that information should be available, and will ask Technical Services Supervisor David Hall if he can pull that out of the system. President Butter asked for a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Member Krongold so moved; Vice President Belikove seconded the motion which carried by a 3-0 vote. | 13006 | |
281 | 281 | Page 2 of 5 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board Meeting March 14, 2007 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (Public Comment) There were no comments from the public, so Director Chisaki took this opportunity to introduce the Board to the new Supervising Librarian for Adult Services, Annemarie Meyer. Ms. Meyer spoke briefly of her background, and indicated she had several great and wonderful ideas she would like to implement, one of which is the "One Book, One Community" type of program. Director Chisaki mentioned that they were looking into possible grant funds from a website sponsored by Hamburger Helper called "My Hometown Helper" to assist with the cost of this program. $15,000 is awarded every month to community groups to help with special projects or needs. One of the requirements to get this grant money is a 501(c)(4) IRS status, so Director Chisaki is sending out feelers to other Alameda groups to see if there is an interest in partnering with the Library in this effort. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Donations Policy for the Main Library (J. Chisaki) Per direction from the Board, Director Chisaki had expanded the introductory paragraphs to contain more information about the Friends and Foundation. After a brief review, Board President Butter asked for a motion to accept the policy as presented, which was given by Vice President Belikove, seconded by Member Krongold, and carried by a 3-0 vote. Director Chisaki will add an adopted by date at the bottom of the policy. B. Branch Upgrades and RFP's (J. Chisaki) Councilmember Matarrese had requested an operations and branch status update which was provided by Director Chisaki via an off-agenda report. The $1.5 million left over from Measure O funds has been invested in graduated accounts of 1 year, 18 months and 2 years. We are still waiting for the final closeout from the State to determine the exact amount of funds available. Once that has happened, and it is known how much will be spent on a consultant, the balance of the funds will most likely be invested so they c… | 13006 | |
282 | 282 | Page 3 of 5 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board Meeting March 14, 2007 road, including operational costs, provide a written recommendation, etc. Chisaki will inquire with the City Attorney if it would be a violation of the Brown Act to e- mail a copy of the RFP to the members of the Board. If it is okay, she will e-mail a copy of the RFP to each board member for their review to keep the process moving forward. Member Krongold asked about the cost, and Director Chisaki said she had included a request within the RFP that asks for a detailed description of the fee structure. By seeing what the Library would be individually charged for, there might be an option to throw out some things that could be lived without, or perhaps add in other things that would be more beneficial in the long run. Chisaki has a list of consultants that other libraries have used and will send each of them an RFP, as well as advertise the search on the City and Library web pages and list serves on the internet. Vice President Belikove will provide a name and contact information of someone in Alameda who would be interested in this opportunity. President Butter suggested talking with the Planning Department to ensure that the Library is given consideration in the City's Master Plan for the Alameda Point development piece. Director Chisaki promised to do SO. NEW BUSINESS A. Alameda Free Library Foundation (A. Mitchell) Foundation member Marc Lambert said their next meeting would occur on the following Monday. Director Chisaki announced that the Foundation will celebrate National Library Workers Day in April, and a group picture will be taken at the all staff meeting to be held on March 29. The Foundation continues to work on the shelf tags which now go up quarterly. Member Krongold asked if signage was being fabricated for the Community Meeting Rooms which are to be named after Regina K. Stafford. The Foundation will be working with their graphic designer, Cairdea, on this item. A ribbon-cutting ceremony was suggested once the signage was… | 13006 | |
283 | 283 | Page 4 of 5 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board Meeting March 14, 2007 B. Friends of the Alameda Free Library (M. Skeen) Friends President Skeen started by giving a big thank you for the March 6 proclamation given at the City Council meeting. The committee working on the "Celebration of Friends" event on March 24 has come up with celebrity reads, balloons, string music in the Café and a small book sale from Ann Muir's estate as entertainment. Director Chisaki mentioned there would also be a 2 hour cartooning workshop held in the Teen Room. The Friends and Foundation are teaming up to celebrate National Library Workers Day on April 17 by providing box lunches for the staff. The Café has been named "Dewey's Friends Café", and they are currently working on publicity and signage. Someone had stolen some of the Café money, so the Friends were thinking of stepping up their security and possibly getting a safe. The next book sale will be on the first weekend in May. Vice President Belikove asked Friends President Skeen if they would be placing some kind of greenery around the building for the celebration on March 24. Skeen indicated they would be using balloons as decorations. Belikove indicated an interest in seeing plants and flowers in the building on a regular basis to give it more warmth. C. Library Building Watch (M. Merrick) Recording Secretary Merrick had nothing to report. D. Patron suggestions/comments (Speak-Outs) and Library Director's response. A request was made to bring back the old system of the sticky note with the date due stamped on it. That system had been discontinued to prevent repetitive motion injuries to staff, and because people were either stealing the date stamps or changing the dates so they were in error. A local video of Neptune Beach was also requested, which turns out to already be in the Library collection. LIBRARY BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Board President Butter spoke about the CALTAC workshop she had attended. Susan Hildreth, State Librarian, was also present and gave a speech. There… | 13006 | |
284 | 284 | Page 5 of 5 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board Meeting March 14, 2007 DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS Legislative Day is coming up on April 18th. SB156 is the new $4 billion construction bond, and will have its first hearing on March 28 by the Senate Education Committee. Personal letters of support at this point would be very useful. The minimum award amount has increased from $50,000 to $500,000, and the maximum award increased from $20 to $30 million. There will be no priority given to previous applicants, so everyone starts on an even playing field. The number of requests from other cities to visit the new Main Library is increasing daily. Pleasanton will visit on March 24, the same day the Friends celebration will be going on. Chisaki had attended the room use policy lecture in San Jose and it was a disappointment. The focus of the lecture was to highly recommend that when writing your room use policy, make sure to get your City Attorney's opinion. Director Chisaki passed around the handout she had created which outlined interesting facts about the Main Library construction, what is contained in the building, etc. The Board gave a few suggestions on improvements to the brochure, which will be incorporated with other facts Project Manager Bob Haun had asked to be included as well. ADJOURNMENT Board President Butter called for a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:28 p.m. Vice President Belikove so moved, Board Member Krongold seconded the motion, which carried by a 3-0 vote. Respectfully submitted, Jane Chisaki Library Director and Secretary to the Library Board This meeting's agenda was posted 72 hours in advance in accordance with the Brown Act. | 13006 | |
285 | 285 | CITY of of MINUTES OF THE ALAMEDA FREE LIBRARY BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 The regular meeting of the Alameda Free Library Board was called to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Catherine Atkin, President Kathleen Kearney, Board Member Nancy Lewis, Board Member Gertrude Woods, Board Member Suzanne Whyte, Vice President Absent: None Staff: Jane Chisaki, Library Director Lori Amaya, Recording Secretary ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Public Comment) None. CONSENT CALENDAR An asterisk indicates items so enacted or approved on the Consent Calendar *A. Report from the Library Director Highlighting Activities for the Months of July and August 2016. *B. Draft Minutes of the Regular Library Board Meeting of July 13, 2016. *C. Library Services Report for the Months of June and July 2016. *D. Financial Report Reflecting FY16/17 Expenditures by Fund for July and August 2016. *E. Bills for Ratification for the Months of July and August 2016. Director Chisaki informed the Board that the last Strategic Plan update is through 2019 and doesn't think there are any revisions necessary. | 13006 | |
286 | 286 | Page 2 of 4 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board September 14, 2016 Meeting There was a small end of summer reading ceremony with approximately 150 children. Next year the program will start at the beginning of June and finish at the end of July with the end of summer reading ceremony at the beginning of August before the children go back to school. There were approximately 250 participants in the teen/adult summer reading program. The format of their program changed from strictly reading to collecting experiences. The library set up some experiences such as a tour of Crispin Bakery, a tasting at Alameda Island Brewery, drinks at American Oak, and various park walks. Last fiscal year the library held over 1,000 programs. The speed friending program was very successful. There was great feedback and participants requested it be held on a regular basis. The craft programs for tweens have been going well. Next month, there is a Star Trek anniversary day and a Star Wars party and participants are welcome to come wearing a costume. Jon Kerpel is retiring from the Art Committee. We don't know if there is a volunteer to step up and take over the position. Director Chisaki noted that the Friends of the Library offer program funding to the Art Committee for and pay for refreshments at the art receptions. The library will be closed from 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. for staff to attend the Citywide Employee Picnic/Benefits Fair tomorrow. Hallie Fields has settled into the Teen Librarian position beautifully. Dawn Boyer has taken over running classes in the computer lab. Open lab is averaging 25 participants. There was an article included in the Board packet from Publishers Weekly about Graphic Novels. Eva Volin was interviewed because she is recognized as a national expert in graphic novels. She has already been contacted by Publishers Weekly for another article. She frequently moderates panels, is a frequent invitee to Comic-Con. There were no changes to the Draft Minutes of the July 13, 2016 Library Board meeting. Board Mem… | 13006 | |
287 | 287 | Page 3 of 4 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board September 14, 2016 Meeting A. New Logo for the Library (J. Chisaki) Since the Friends of the Library and the Alameda Free Library Foundation have merged into one group, they are in the process of rebranding and creating a new logo. The goal is for the library and the Friends to have similar logos. The library will create a new logo and the Friends will design one that is complimentary. The Board will choose the final design of the library's logo. Director Chisaki expects to have a design to show the Board at the next meeting. B. Friends of the Library/Alameda Free Library Foundation (L. Engh and K. Butter) Friends of the Alameda Free Library President, Luzanne Engh, stated that the merge was official on July 1, 2016. It is no longer a membership organization and any donor will become a "Friend." All fundraising activities, such as the book sales and the concerts will continue. The new group has developed a mission and adopted bylaws. The Friends are using a temporary logo for the upcoming anniversary celebration and will later work with the library on creating a permanent logo. The 10th anniversary celebration will include two days of activities over the weekend of November 5 & 6. There is a fundraising concert at Rhythmix Cultural Works on Sunday, November 6th. Tickets are $60 and proceeds will go to the purchase of three digital community boards at each library. Live at the Library starts this Saturday and approximately 100 out of 120 tickets have been sold. Friends of the Alameda Free Library Vice President, Karen Butter, is working on a redline version of the Gifts Donation Policy and will have a draft for the Board to review by the next meeting in November. Luzanne gives credit to both organizations because the transition went smoothly. There are 15 members of the board, including Director Chisaki. Last Saturday, there was an event for the 10th anniversary celebration which had 10- year-olds participate in a 10-year-old birthday photo in front of the libr… | 13006 | |
288 | 288 | Page 4 of 4 Minutes of the Alameda Free Library Board September 14, 2016 Meeting to get a San Francisco Public Library card as they have a number of older copies from the early 2000's so you can get a SFPL card and check out the books or we can request the via inter-library loan. They are also available as Kindle books on Amazon for $4.99. A patron was playing Pokémon Go and turned the corner and walked into the bike repair station. She admitted it was her own fault because she was looking at her phone when she cut the corner. The library has installed a wooden bench on the Lincoln Street side of the building that forces traffic to take a wider turn around that corner. The bench provides a place to sit and also helps to deter others from walking into the bike repair station. LIBRARY BOARD COMMUNICATIONS None. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS Director Chisaki mentioned that the library hosts a quarterly blood drive. Every appointment was filled and on average, 24 units is collected at each drive. The library hosts the most successful drive in the area. The city is embarking on a one year campaign called Love our Island. The kickoff is tomorrow at 5:00 p.m. at the steps of City Hall. Tuckers Ice Cream has created a new flavor called, "Love our Island," which will only be available for the year of the campaign. T-shirts, car magnets, buttons and window clings have been made for the campaign. The City has launched a Facebook page which has a link to order the t-shirts online. The community is encouraged to post pictures of anything they love about Alameda and use the hashtag #LoveOurlsland. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA GENERAL None. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane Chisaki, Library Director and Secretary to the Alameda Free Library Board | 13006 | |
289 | 289 | and ALAMEDA RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSION MINUTES FOR REGULAR MEETING DATE: Thursday, March 8, 2012 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: City Hall Council Chambers 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Joe Restagno, Vice Chair Lola Brown, Commissioners Ann Cooke, Bill Delaney and Bill Sonneman (late) Absent: None Staff: Patrick Russi, ARPD Recreation Supervisor 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Delaney had a question about the 02-09-2012 meeting. Commissioner Sonneman had said he would sit on the interview panel for the ARPD Director position, and Delaney asked if that had already taken place. Recreation Supervisor Russi said that the interviews were scheduled to be held later on in the month. Approve Minutes of February 9, 2012 Recreation & Park Commission Regular Meeting M/S/C DELANEY/BROWN (unanimously approved) "That the minutes of the February 9, 2012 Recreation & Park Commission Regular Meeting are approved." Approved (4): Restagno, Brown, Cooke, Delaney 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA None. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None. 5. NEW BUSINESS Commissioner Delaney spoke about the Council meetings that had taken place the previous evenings. There had been discussion about the Golf Course and the City's athletic fields, and Delaney was wondering why the Recreation & Park Commission had not been involved with these issues prior to those meetings. He was disturbed that there is a sub-set to the sports group that are putting out literature communicating the fact that the North Loop area has already been defined as a sporting field, and it has not. Delaney asked the Commission if the other members were concerned about these independent groups developing now and talking about maintaining some of these facilities once they get built. Delaney has met some of the people, and although they seem very nice, he wonders if they are qualified, capable and committed to such an undertaking for the long-term. Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes - Thursday, March 8, 2012 - 1- | 13006 | |
290 | 290 | Chair Restagno said this was a good observation and he sees the situation as being very similar to what happened when the Boys and Girls Club got some of the Measure WW money without first having come to the Recreation & Park Commission. They had gone straight to the City Council, and Restagno thinks the same thing has happened here, referring to a letter regarding the new sports group that the Commission had never seen. Restagno suggested that if they all feel similarly, as a Commission they could write a letter to the Council and request to see a copy of that letter. Vice Chair Brown said she was concerned as she had attended a Sunshine Ordinance meeting to understand the transparency in government the City is trying to achieve. An audience member at the February Commission meeting had come up and asked if there was another youth sports organization being formed. The Commission had responded to the individual that there was nothing happening that they had heard of. If the City is supposed to be a transparent organization, then they should have informed the Recreation & Park Commission about the letter so they could have knowledge of what is going on. Commissioner Delaney said it sounds appropriate that the Commission send a letter to City Manager Russo stating their thoughts in a productive, collaborative way, ensuring that everyone understands what the role of the Commission should be. Delaney had watched the Tuesday night meeting on television, and had attended the Wednesday night meeting in person, and a lot of the things he heard concerned him in regards that the Commission had no knowledge of what is going on. Delaney suggested that either Mr. Russo could come to their meeting next month and speak with them, or maybe a couple board members might go and meet with Russo. Chair Restagno said he would draft a letter and pass it by the Commission to see if they had any thoughts to add. He wants the City Manager and Council to know this is of concern to the Commission and he will also ask to see a copy of the or… | 13006 | |
291 | 291 | M/S/C BROWN/DELANEY (unanimously approved) "That the Park Master Plan be approved." Approved (5): Restagno, Brown, Cooke, Delaney, Sonneman 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division B. Recreation Division C. Mastick Senior Center D. Other Reports and Announcements Recreation Supervisor Russi spoke about various activities going on in the department. At Krusi Park, some trees were removed and other demolition done in preparation for the remodeling project. The pool heater at Emma Hood was also re-built. In the recreation world, the big event coming up is the Splash into Spring Egg Scramble which will take place on Saturday, March 31. The event is a collaborative effort between EBRPD, the Rotary Club and ARPD, and typically draws between 1,500 and 2,000 participants. This year there will be a "green theme" with a mobile fish exhibit from EBRPD as well as some beach exploration going on. In addition to the traditional chocolate, healthier snacks such as pretzels and bag carrots will also be in the mix to provide a more well-rounded offering. Swim lessons are coming up and adult basketball is already underway. Softball registration will begin in mid-April following Spring Break, and Little League opening day will be Saturday, March 10. It's quite a busy world for recreation right now getting ready for summer activities. Mastick Senior Center as always has wonderful programs going on. Mayor Marie Gilmore will give a State of the City address on March 13; an art exhibit of works created by Mastick members will continue through May 1; and, there will be a presentation by Douglas Borchert on the America's Cup. Commissioner Cooke added that the Alexander Technique program run by instructor Lenka Fejt is very good, and well worth taking advantage of. Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes - Thursday, March 8, 2012 - 3- | 13006 | |
292 | 292 | 8. STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL Chair Restagno thanked Vice-Chair Brown for her comments on Tuesday evening, as they were well stated. Also, in keeping with the green theme, Restagno asked if future Activity Reports could be produced two-sided; Recreation Supervisor Russi will pass that along. Chair Restagno spotted Recreation employee Sandi Bertero in the audience and asked her what camp will be like this year. Ms. Bertero gave some details, saying camp would survive another year, thanks to community support, and encouraged Commission members to come out and visit. Bertero then commented about the reorganization; she knows it will affect the department and asked the Commission to do what they can. Chair Restagno suggested the Commission do a park tour, possibly visiting the camp site sometime during the summer. Vice-Chair Brown reiterated that in regards to the issue that Commissioner Delaney had raised, she really wants to make sure that the Commission is as accessible as possible and transparent as well. She feels that the letter previously mentioned about the new sports group in town had to have had some information in it gleaned from someplace else, so she wants to make sure the Commission is at least a party to anything going forward. Commissioner Sonneman had arrived after the discussion about this letter, so Chair Restagno briefed him on the conversation and the result of their decision to send a communication to the City Manager, copying City Council members as well. Commissioner Cooke asked Chair Restagno why the City Council would accept this without it having first gone through the Recreation Commission. Restagno had no idea why this had happened and said this is exactly why their letter is so important, as there had been at least one major issue in the past where the Commission had been bypassed. Jon Pecson, Field Coordinator for the Alameda Soccer Club, came forward and urged the Commission to send the afore-mentioned letter, because right now there's an effort b… | 13006 | |
293 | 293 | MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY-JUNE 17,2014- 7:00 P.M. Mayor Gilmore convened the meeting at 7:12 p.m. Councilmember Tam led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Chen, Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Tam and Mayor Gilmore - 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES (14-249) Mayor Gilmore announced that the resolution establishing integrated waste rates [paragraph no. 14-263 was continued to July 1, 2014. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY & ANNOUNCEMENTS (14-250) Proclamation Declaring June 21 and 22, 2014 as Relay for Life Alameda Days. Councilmember Chen left the dais at 7:14 p.m. and returned at 7:16 p.m. Mayor Gilmore read and presented the proclamation to Lisa Leverton, Event Chair. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (14-251) Michael John Torrey, Alameda, announced the USS Hornet Annual Field Day event would be on June 28th and 29th. (14-252) Rion Cassidy, Alameda, stated that he is concerned about the impacts of the Del Monte warehouse proposal, specifically noticing and permit parking. CONSENT CALENDAR Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*14-253) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on May 20, 2014. Approved. (*14-254) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,118,813.90. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 1 June 17, 2014 | 13006 | |
294 | 294 | (*14-255) Recommendation to Accept the Treasury Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014. Accepted. (*14-256) Recommendation to Award Contract for Legal Advertising for Fiscal Year 2014-15. Accepted. (*14-257) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $1,885.144.50 and Allocate $471,286.13 in Contingencies to MCK Services, Inc. for Repair and Resurfacing of Certain Streets, Phase 33, No. P.W. 02-14-04. Accepted. (*14-258) Recommendation to Award a Contract in the Amount of $1,299,000 and Allocate $195,000 in Contingencies to Dixon Marine Services, Inc., for Alameda South Shore Lagoon Dredging, No. P. W. 11-13-26. Accepted. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (14-259) Resolution No. 14932, "Reappointing Marguerite Malloy as a Member of the Civil Service Board.' Adopted; (14-259 A) Resolution No. 14933, "Appointing Elizabeth Kenny as a Member of the Commission on Disability Issues." Adopted; (14-259 B) Resolution No. 14934, "Reappointing Timothy Scates as a Member of the Golf Commission." Adopted; (14-259 C) Resolution No. 14935, "Appointing Chee Chan as a Member of the Historical Advisory Board." Adopted; (14-259 D) Resolution No. 14936, "Appointing John Piziali as a Member of the Historical Advisory Board.' Adopted; (14-259 E) Resolution No. 14937, "Reappointing Catherine Atkin as a Member of the Library Board." Adopted; (14-259 F) Resolution No. 14938, "Reappointing David Burton as a Member of the Planning Board.' Adopted; (14-259 G) Resolution No. 14939, "Reappointing Kristoffer Köster as a Member of the Planning Board.' Adopted; (14-259 H) Resolution No. 14940, "Reappointing William Delaney as a Member of the Recreation and Park Commission." Adopted; (14-259 !) Resolution No. 14941, "Appointing Mario Mariani as a Member of the Recreation and Park Commission." Adopted; (14-259 J) Resolution No. 14942, "Appointing Ruben Tilos as a Member of the Recreation and Park Commission." Adopted. (14-259 K) Resolution No. 14943, "Appointing Audrey Hyman as a Member of the Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 2 June 17, 2014 | 13006 | |
295 | 295 | Social Service Human Relations Board.' Adopted; and (14-259 L) Resolution No. 14944, "Reappointing Jennifer Williams as a Member of the Social Service Human Relations Board." Adopted. Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolutions. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. The City Clerk administered the oath of office and presented certificates of appointment to Ms. Kenny, Mr. Scates, Mr. Piziali, Mr. Burton, Mr. Köster, Mr. Delaney, Mr. Tilos and Ms. Hyman. (14-260) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of a Lease with Pacific Automated, LLC for Five Years with an Additional Five Year Option in a Portion of Building 25 Located at 1951 Monarch Street at Alameda Point. Introduced. The Economic Development Division Manager gave a brief presentation. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved introduction of the ordinance. Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (14-261) Recommendation to Authorize the Establishment of a Basic Life Support (BLS) Ambulance Transport Program as a Regular Service of the Alameda Fire Department's (AFD) Emergency Medical Services Division. The Fire Chief provided a handout and gave a Power Point presentation. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether revenue payments lag up to a year, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Tam inquired whether the one year payment lag is typical for Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance service. The Fire Chief responded ALS takes a third less time to collect than BLS; stated BLS deals with MediCal and MediCaid, which are more careful to prevent fraud. Councilmember Daysog inquired whether staff time to collect payments is programmed into the expenditure, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative. The Fire Chief continued presentation. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council 3 June 17, 2014 | 13006 | |
296 | 296 | Councilmember Tam inquired how cost recovery translates to revenue generation, specifically market share and potential. The Fire Chief responded revenues were over estimated at first; stated the goal is seven transports per day; adding a second ambulance captures more transports per day; transports are run five days per week, 10 hours per day; there is potential to add evenings and weekends in the future; based on market share, Alameda has definitely hit goals and will establish new goals including obtaining contracts for skilled nursing facilities services; the revenue and cost sharing will be caught up this year; there is always a billing lag. Councilmember Tam inquired whether 45% of the outstanding collection would be reimbursed, to which the Fire Chief responded in the negative; stated if $100,000 is billed, $45,000 payment is expected. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether the Fire Department is recovering cost, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative; stated fiscal year 2012-13 was a wash; the current year will be a net positive, which will grow in the future; the department has good partners and good support. Councilmember Tam inquired whether prevailing wage applies to private companies. The City Attorney responded that she does not know the prevailing wage situation. The City Manager stated the City is not contracting with other providers, the providers are contracting with the City. Councilmember Tam inquired whether prevailing wage would change the outcome, to which the City Manager responded that he did not think it would; stated there is an exchange; prevailing wage applies when people are hired to do work. The City Attorney stated she will look into the issue and provide an answer later. Mayor Gilmore inquired whether prevailing wage is viewed as a competitive advantage or disadvantage. Councilmember Tam responded prevailing wage levels the playing field. The Fire Chief stated there is no law in Alameda County for exclusivity; Alameda County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) can choose to give… | 13006 | |
297 | 297 | The Fire Chief responded Alameda is one of 11 pilot cities selected for the program; the scope issues will be reviewed; there will be more training for paramedics to provide relief for patients with chronic illnesses; patients will not be readmitted because paramedics will provide intervention before going to the Emergency Room. In response to Councilmember Chen's inquiry, the Fire Chief stated service calls are received 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Councilmember Chen inquired if additional certifications are provided to the EMTs, to which the Fire Chief responded in the affirmative; stated the Fire Department wants EMTs to be successful, graduate, and become full time Fire or Police Officers. Councilmember Chen inquired how Alameda decides which independent contractor to use. The Fire Chief responded the process needs to be evaluated; stated Alameda Hospital receives priority; service can be scheduled in advance; as calls come in, independent contractors are used. Councilmember Chen inquired whether the Alameda BLS program would be a collaborative partner or competitor with the County. The Fire Chief responded the County is reviewing contracts for efficiency and effectiveness, both of which the City can offer; stated Alameda does not want to over tax the current situation and neglect the needs of the community; Alameda needs to evaluate the County's expectations; with a clearer understanding of the County's needs, there is opportunity to increase business and assist the County. Councilmember Chen inquired whether the City would be self-sustaining without a contract if it becomes a competitor to the County. The Fire Chief responded hopefully; stated the answer will be known moving forward. Councilmember Daysog stated the community values the service; inquired whether there is enough data to decide to make the pilot program permanent. The Fire Chief responded the pilot program is expiring at the end of the month; stated Fire would like to make the program a regular part of its services; if the program does n… | 13006 | |
298 | 298 | Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the transports tax the two ambulances now, to which the Fire Chief responded in the negative; stated the program is still in early stages and will need monitoring to determine issues. Provided background information and outlined the benefits of the service: Debi Stebbins, Alameda Hospital. Commented on the excellence of the service and all it does to get patients to the Wound Center: Beth Brizee and Sophia Telmo, Alameda Hospital Wound Care. Outlined his experience as a former employee of the program: Myles McMillian, former BLS employee. Councilmember Chen moved approval of staff recommendation. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog stated that he wished there were more data points for Council to evaluate the program as a business entity and the effect and lasting impact of the additional ambulance; he knows the Fire Chief will be vigilant in monitoring and ensuring the success of the program; he supports the program. Mayor Gilmore suggested that the matter be brought back to Council in one year to evaluate the progress and impacts of the program. Councilmember Chen and Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft agreed to amend the motion to include a report back to the Council in one year. On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (14-262) Recommendation to Approve Parking Improvements for Park Street and Webster Street Shopping Districts. Councilmember Tam left the dais at 8:25 p.m. and returned at 8:28 p.m. Councilmembers Chen and Daysog recused themselves and left the dais. The Public Works Coordinator and Assistant Engineer gave a Power Point presentation. Mayor Gilmore stated it appears the parking goal for Webster Street has already been met; Webster Street does not have the same side-street business pattern as Park Street; that she suspects the red indicates inadequate parking for residents rather than for business; she is interested in seeing more data; inquired whether the electronic sign Regular … | 13006 | |
299 | 299 | that counts spaces has the capability to say "Full", to which the Public Works Coordinator responded in the affirmative. Mayor Gilmore stated the parking sign has a lot of information for drivers to process. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Mayor Gilmore; stated there is too much information on the parking sign; that she would like to see Lot C across from Theatre reconfigured to be more accommodating and efficient; she likes the electronic sign for the parking garage; inquired why kiosks were not chosen. The Public Works Coordinator responded residents did not express a dislike for kiosks, but rather a preference for the smart meter; kiosks are more expensive; Park Street Business Association (PSBA) and Webster Street Business Association (WABA) prefer the smart meter; smart meters did not exist five years ago and have become more popular. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is a need for more bike parking, but bike lockers take up lots of space; more bike parking encourages people to use bikes instead of cars. Councilmember Tam stated the garage is underutilized; suggested moving the 13 spaces from the Oak Street and Alameda Avenue gravel lot into the garage, and repurposing the lot; a best and highest use for the lot should be found. The Public Works Coordinator stated that he would definitely look into the suggestion. Mayor Gilmore complimented staff for an excellent report which provides a lot of information; inquired whether there was any feedback regarding why the bike rack in front of Lot C is unpopular. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft's inquired what day of the week and time the photo of the bike rack in Lot C was taken, to which the Assistant Engineer responded he does not recall. In response to Mayor Gilmore's inquiry, the Assistant Engineer stated staff had the same thoughts about the unpopularity of the bike rack in Lot C; stated staff will collect data on bike rack parking. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there were any suggestions about how to deter jay walking, to which the Public Work… | 13006 | |
300 | 300 | at repurposing some of the lots to achieve parking goals. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion which carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. [Absent: Councilmembers Chen and Daysog - 2.] Mayor Gilmore requested an off agenda report on additional Webster Street data. (14-263) Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Establishing Integrated Waste Collection Ceiling Rates and Service Fees for Alameda County Industries, Inc. for Rate Period 13 (July 2014 to June 2015). Continued to July 1, 2014. (14-264) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14945, "Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments, Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, All Zones." Adopted. Mayor Gilmore and Councilmember Daysog recused themselves and left the dais. The Public Works Management Analyst gave a brief presentation. Councilmember Tam moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Chen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 3. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog and Mayor Gilmore - 2.] (14-265) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14946, "Approving the Engineer's Report, Confirming Diagram and Assessment, and Ordering the Levy of Assessments, Maintenance Assessment District 01-01 (Marina Cove).' " Adopted. The Public Works Management Analyst gave a brief presentation. Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the allocation from reserves needed to cover expenses is expected to be reduced after there are more homes at Marina Cove. The Public Works Management Analyst responded in the affirmative; stated the formation of the Community Facilities District will be presented on July 15th Vice Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft moved adoption of the resolution. Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. (14-266) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 14947, "Confirming the Webster Street Business Improvement Area (BIA) Report for Fiscal Year 2014-15 and Levying an Annual Assessment on the Webster Street BIA." … | 13006 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE [pages_fts] USING FTS5 ( [text], content=[pages] );