pages_fts
18,746 rows sorted by rowid descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Link | rowid ▲ | text | pages_fts | rank |
---|---|---|---|---|
18546 | 18546 | Social Service Human Relations Board Minutes of the Regular Meeting, Thursday, March 23, 2006 1. ROLL CALL AND CALL TO ORDER: President Bonta called the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m. Present: President Bonta, Members Dome, Hollinger-Jackson, Franz and Hanna. Absent: Member Chen and Vice President Wasko. Staff: Beaver. Member Franz recused himself due to his affiliation with one of the recommended subgrantees, and stepped off the dais. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the February 23, 2006 meeting were carried over to the April meeting. 3A. REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: CDBG PUBLIC SERVICE FUNDING ALLOCATIONS Beaver noted that this item is referred to the Board annually by the City Council and that recommendations and that recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council in conjunction with a hearing on April 18. Terri Wright, CD Programs Manager, now administrator of CDBG funding in Base Reuse and Community Development Division (BRCDD) was introduced. Wright stated that twelve proposals were received and reviewed by BRCDD staff using criteria provided in the packet. The ; proposals were evaluated for timeliness, completeness and accuracy. A total of 120 points were possible; the ratings ranged from 80 to 109 points. There is approximately $249,000 available. Nine proposals are being recommended for funding. Eight of the nine are current subgrantees. Two agencies currently receiving CDBG didn't submit proposals this year, so there is a slight increase to remaining subgrantees in the coming year. Wright noted the funding recommendations are available on line and in DSD office. City council will hold a hearing on April 18, including the Board's recommendations. Once approved, grant agreements and scopes of work will be prepared and agencies will be able to start using the funds July 1,2006. A two-year funding cycle is being implemented. Funding in the second year is subject to the City's grant from HUD and each subgrantee's satisfactory performance in 2006-07. Wright stated there is a great deal of uncer… | 13646 | |
18545 | 18545 | Commissioner Moehring stated that the $4.00 is a good option as well, but increasing the charge to $4.00 may burden those who rely on the service. Commissioner Bellows asked how much does it cost to use the MRTIP service. Staff Payne stated the MRTIP service is free, SO they would be going from free to $2.50. Commissioner Moehring asked Staff Payne to contact Ms. Zepplin and ask her if a $4.00 fee would be feasible. Commissioner Miley asked Staff Payne if the service would remain free until the Commission decides otherwise. Staff Payne replied that the program fare change would not begin until after the end of the fiscal year or July 1st. Commissioner Bellows requested staff to create a table of the Alameda Paratransit Program fees. Staff Payne gave an update on the Safe Routes to School Draft Project Revised Submittal for Grand Street at Wood Middle School. She explained that they have made progress by receiving public input and receiving approval from the adjacent residences on the side of the public walkway, which was staff's biggest concern. She further explained that in March staff would work on the submittal and the support letters. Staff Payne reported on the Future Meeting Agenda Items. The quarterly report will be a main agenda item in March as well as the Webster Street Smart Corridor Update, I-880 and 23rd-29th Street Project and the Paratransit Program fare chart with the MRTIP fare update. 6. Announcements None. 7. Adjournment 8:00 PM Page 5 of 5 | 13646 | |
18544 | 18544 | Staff Khan stated that all comments will be forwarded to the Planning Department and they will respond to them in the final report. Commissioner Moehring is excited to see the plans moving forward. 5. Staff Communications Staff Khan reported on the Transportation Bylaws Update. He specifically noted that the commissioners' vote to hold meetings every other month may be premature and for now the meetings will be held every month until he receives more information in March. Staff Khan reported on the Review of the Draft Prioritized Transportation Project List, which will go before the Planning Board next Monday. He incorporated some of the TC members' comments specifically within the Project Readiness section. Also, some of the changes have resulted in a shuffling of the projects on the list. Commissioner Miley stated that there were concerns in Oakland regarding the Broadway/ Jackson project. He wanted to know if as the projects move forward would they come before the Commission or the public for comments. Staff Khan replied that it is an internal prioritized project list so staff could pursue funding. He further explained that if any project moves forward in terms of scoping then the Transportation Commission would be involved. In terms of the Broadway and Jackson project, as the project moves towards the next step, which is the environmental analysis and document, the public's input is essential and staff is continuing to work with the City of Oakland. He also stated that the Broadway/Jackson project application, which went into the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan, was a co-sponsored application with the cities of Alameda and Oakland, which was the first time the City has co-sponsored with the City of Oakland on this project. Commissioner Miley stated that he did not realize the project was co-sponsored project between Oakland and Alameda, so it is good to see that collaboration. Staff Khan stated that although most of the project's footprint is located in Oakland, it creates a great regional collaboratio… | 13646 | |
18543 | 18543 | Commissioner Bertken made the motion to approve the draft TSM/TDM Plan. Commissioner Miley seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. 4B. North Park Street Draft Code and Draft Environmental Impact Report Staff Khan summarized the Planning staff's report for the North Park Street Code and Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the North Park Street Code. He asked the TC members to provide feedback for the Planning Department to include the comments in the North Park Street Code's Final Environmental Impact Report. Commissioner Bellows asked when would the comment period close. Staff Khan stated that comments would be solicited until the end of this month. Commissioner Bertken asked if this meeting was the only time public comment would be received. Staff Khan replied that public comments have been received in a number of hearings, but this would be the only time public comment would be received from the Transportation Commission. Commissioner Miley explained that based on the DEIR, the City has zoned for a lot of mixed-use development. He wanted to know whether the City discussed the Sustainable Community Strategy, which is being developed by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Association of Bay Area Governments and whether that would impact this planning process and planning in general. Staff Khan stated that the amount of land use that is assumed in the DEIR is consistent with the City's General Plan. The Planning Department has not considered the Sustainable Communities Strategy for the North Park Street Code yet will consider the Sustainable Communities Strategy when it updates the Land Use Element. Commissioner Miley asked when the Land Use Element for the General Plan is updated if this item would come before the Transportation Commission. Staff Khan replied yes, the TC members would have an opportunity to weigh in. Commissioner Moehring called for public comment. Jon Spangler stated that the Planning Board is currently working on the General Plan's Housing Element update and when he spoke wi… | 13646 | |
18542 | 18542 | Jon Spangler, Alameda resident and a League of American Cycling Instructor, reported on a meeting that he had with Michael Noonan, Alameda Police Chief and Captain Paul Rolleri about extending the reach of bicycle and motorist safety education within the City. His objective is to put together a team made up of East Bay Bicycle Coalition and Bike Alameda members as well as Alameda Public Works and Police Department. The team would develop proposals to sell to other agencies and community service organizations in Alameda and they would attempt to raise up to $50,000 to conduct school outreach and motorist safety education. Mr. Spangler asked the Commission to provide comments as he moved along with the process. Commissioner Moehring asked Mr. Spangler if he spoke with local bicycle shops to get more participation. Jon Spangler stated that he will be in touch with the local business owners, but he would mainly like to receive input from the Commissioners. 4. New Business 4A. Draft TSM/TDM Plan Staff Khan summarized the background and introduced David Reinke. David Reinke, Associate Planner at Kittelson and Associates, summarized the draft report and highlighted key findings from last month's presentation made by his colleague, Cliff Chambers. Commissioner Bertken asked when talking about applicable vehicle trip reductions Mr. Reinke has a statement at the end of the paragraph, which says that achieving vehicle trip reduction rates above 10 percent by project sponsor will require public sector support to be considered during the development and approval process. He asked if the City would not expect anything more than a 10 percent reduction for non-major development type projects. David Reinke replied that national reports consider a 10 percent reduction to be realistic under the given circumstances. Commissioner Moehring and Commissioner Bertken applauded the draft TSM/TDM report stating that it is excellent. Commissioner Moehring stated although we would like a 25 percent reduction, it is realistic to have a reduct… | 13646 | |
18541 | 18541 | Transportation Commission Minutes (DRAFT) Wednesday, February 22 2012 Commissioner Kathy Moehring called the Transportation Commission to order at 7:02 p.m. 1. Roll Call Roll was called and the following was recorded: Members Present: Kathy Moehring Thomas G. Bertken Rajiv Sharma Michele Bellows Christopher Miley Members Absent: Jesus Vargas Staff Present: Obaid Khan, Supervising Civil Engineer Gail Payne, Transportation Coordinator Adrienne Heim, Administrative Assistant 2. Minutes The revisions for January 25, 2012 include the following: Commissioner Miley stated he had one correction on page 10 of 13, located within the middle of the page regarding projects that already have partial funding in place should receive higher priority to leverage other funding. Staff Khan replied that Commissioner Miley's point was captured in the staff report. Commissioner Bellows commented on the December 14, 2011 meeting minutes approval number. The approval number should have been 3-0 rather than the 4-0 because Commissioner Bellows and Commissioner Miley were not sitting on the Commission at that time. Commissioner Bertken called for approval of the January 25, 2012 meeting minutes. Commissioner Bellows seconded the motion. Motion passed 4-0, 1 abstention. 3. Oral Communications - Non-Agendized Items / Public Comments Page 1 of 5 | 13646 | |
18540 | 18540 | M/S (Wolfe, Lee) to continue this item to allow the applicant to submit a more detailed site plan of the amphitheatre, including additional information on what the stage will look like, section details such as the pitch and what the sign will look like. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2. Motion carries. The Commission is willing to hold a special meeting to accommodate the applicant's time frame. Staff will poll the Commission of their availability for the first two weeks in September. OLD BUSINESS None. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Mr. Vu informed the Commission that the mural project for the parking garage is no longer going to happen because the parking garage plans have been revised and the sheer wall has been moved. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS Staff distributed a memo regarding AB 1234 Ethics training. The City Council is requiring all Boards and Commissions complete this training by January 2007. Mr. Vu introduced staff member Debbie Gremminger. She will be the new recording secretary. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm. Respectively submitted by: Douglass Vu, Planner III Planning and Building Department G:\PLANNING\PAC)Agendas_Minutes)Minutes_06/08-23-06 draft minutes.doc Minutes of August 23, 2006 Regular Public Art Commission Meeting. Page 3 | 13646 | |
18539 | 18539 | of, but not limited to, theatre productions, musical presentations, literary readings, art shows and demonstrations. Regency Centers has arranged with the Frank Bette Center for the Arts to present artists' work in two shows within the first twelve months of the Center's opening. In addition, the Alameda Civic Light Opera will be presenting highlights of their productions with two shows also during the first twelve months of the Center's opening. When not used for performance or displays, the amphitheatre can also be used for recreational purposes such as Tai Chi classes. Information regarding the amphitheatre will also be included in the advertising for the Center's opening and areas within the vicinity of the amphitheatre will be posted stating its availability with contact information to reserve the space. Regency Centers has hired a property manager who is an Alameda resident that will be responsible for community outreach for the Center, including the amphitheatre. Barbara Price, PK Consultants, briefly reviewed the memo submitted to the Commission on construction management & public outreach. Also provided copies of Planning Board approved Resolution PB-04-64, which lists the conditions of approvals regarding light and sound. Ms. Price stated that they do not foresee having more than fifty of sixty people in the audience at a time. Vice-Chair Lee informed the Commission that she has received an e-mail from Chair Huston stating her concerns. She would like staff to address them. Her first concern was that the calculations were accurate. Staff stated they were. In response to her question if Staff has went to the site to see if the amphitheatre will create an acoustically viable space, Mr. Vu responded that he cannot say for sure whether the space will be acoustically viable, but feels the trees will serve as a buffer. Commissioner Wolfe stated that the drawings provided do not show enough details for him to make a decision. He is unclear if the stage will be big enough for the various performances and would … | 13646 | |
18538 | 18538 | MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC ART COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF WEDNESDAY AUGUST 23, 2006 CONFERENCE ROOM 360, THIRD FLOOR CITY HALL 2226 SANTA CLARA AVENUE - 7:00 PM CONVENE: The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair Lee, Commission Members Cervantes and Wolfe MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Huston, Commission Member Rosenberg. STAFF PRESENT: Doug Vu, Planner III, Debbie Gremminger, Recording Secretary MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 26, 2006. M/S and unanimous to approve the Minutes of the June 28, 2006 Regular meeting. 3-0-2. Ayes: 3; Noes: 0; Absent: 2; Motion carries. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Final Alameda Towne Centre Resolution. This is for information only. No action needed. NEW BUSINESS A. Bridgeside Public Art Proposal - Applicant: Regency Centers. Doug Vu, Planner III, summarized the staff report. Mr. Vu introduced the applicant, Bruce Qualls of Regency Centers. Mr. Qualls briefly updated the Commission on the progress of this project since last January. He informed the Commission that the amphitheatre will be available free of charge to recognized arts and performance groups. As previously approved by the Planning Board, the stage area will be approximately 55 feet wide and vary in depth from 20 to 25 feet. The glade area will be approximately 50 feet wide in front and angle towards the rear with a width of 100 feet. The amphitheatre will also be wired for sound and lighting equipment allowing staged performances Minutes of August 23, 2006 Regular Public Art Commission Meeting. Page 1 | 13646 | |
18537 | 18537 | Board member Kohlstrand asked if the account balance was correct, Laura Ajello, responded yes it comes from our finance department. President Ezzy-Ashcraft stated no motion was necessary to move forward. 10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Board member Zuppan asked the Board to come back to review the design guidelines at some point and examine specific areas that are frustrating or difficult for staff. Mr. Thomas replied that would be an excellent idea and staff talks about that all the time. Board member Kohlstrand wanted to acknowledge Jean Sweeney's contribution over the years. She passed away last week or so and she did so much for the City and spent lots of hours at the Planning Board. 11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board members may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a brief report on his or her activities. In addition, the Board may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning a City matter or, through the chair, direct staff to place a request to agendize a matter of business on a future agenda. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 9:49 PM Draft Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 13 December 12, 2011 | 13646 | |
18536 | 18536 | Mr. Thomas stated that developers pay into a public art fund if it is written into the development agreements. Board member Burton stated that staff should reach out to a wide variety of the art community. He questioned whether the Public Art Commission should make investments into one gateway project or foster the arts in some creative way by supporting local artists that benefit the community. Board member Zuppan asked staff if they looked into public-private partnerships. She found that in nearly every meeting, especially with the business community there is strong support for gateway work. Laura Ajello, stated that option would be considered. President Ezzy Ashcraft, called for public comment. Jon Spangler, Alameda resident, stated that in 2008 he discovered former Mayor Beverly Johnson failed to appoint enough members to the Transportation Commission which did not create a quorum and he soon found out that the Public Art Commission had a lack of appointment. The consequence was lack of progress and discussion by a body that was literally non-existent. He trusts that this expenditure will help get things back on track. Carol Gottstein, Alameda resident, has friends who are artists and who would like to be more involved in this process, but they don't know how to do that. They don't realize that public art projects are presented before the Planning Board. Otherwise, they would have been here. She requested that the City provide more outreach to local artists so they can become more involved. Laura Ajello, responded that staff conducted out reach to art community and had a workshop last September. She explained that the artists wanted to identify more of their peers to get public comment. She also retains artists' contacts information and sends meeting notices and appeals for public comment to bring forth before the Board. Vice President Autorino asked about the $21,000 received from Perforce Software. Laura Ajello, stated the $21,000 from Perforce is a running tally from the inception of the public art program… | 13646 | |
18535 | 18535 | She stated that developers are not contributing to the fund, given the economic climate and the Public Art Commission has not received any funding. So, with the City Manager's urging, staff wants to create an art policy that works. Vice President Autorino asked if the consultant would work with staff to either restructure or eliminate the public arts committee and how funds should be spent going forward. Laura Ajello, replied that the study would allow staff to setup a system to maximize the use of funds and how to generate of funds. Board member Kohlstrand stated that $35,000 isn't a large sum for a large study, and since the City hasn't had public art since 2008, we're not generating enough funds from large developments. She then asked if developments are required to provide art on site and/or pay in-lieu fees. Laura Ajello, stated that there is an option for developers to contribute to the public art fund in-lieu of having a project on their own site. The last contribution was for a Summer House, which contributed $7,500 to the commission's fund last fiscal year. The last public art project was built by Perforce Software on Blanding Avenue. Board member Kohlstrand asked if Perforce Software paid for the art piece directly. Laura Ajello, exclaimed yes they did and the project went to the Public Art Commission for approval. Board member Kohlstrand, asked if Perforce Software paid an in-lieu fee. Laura Ajello, answered no, the policy is either to pay to construct an art piece onsite or pay the amount you would have paid for the art piece to the Public Art Commission. She also noted that if the developer doesn't spend enough money on the public art then they would have to pay the difference in-lieu. In this case, Perforce Software went above the requirement. Board member Kohlstrand questioned the public art program's performance and the Board's position going forward. Laura Ajello, replied that in order to keep the public art program-going staff is looking for feedback from the Board and the public. One suggestion… | 13646 | |
18534 | 18534 | housing. This means the City must have a transparent conversation with the community and that would include public workshops in order to have community buy-in. Mr. Thomas stated that staff has conducted workshops throughout the years, but the issue is how to get a wide range of residents to participate. In the past, the Going Forward Community Workshop posed great success and was relatively affordable. Board member Burton asked about development parking requirements and transit usage paralleling residential density. He implored staff and the Board to consider building a variety of housing for all income levels. President Ezzy Ashcraft welcomed the public's feedback. She asked Linette Lee to send Andrew Thomas examples of high-density developments before the next meeting in order to incorporate the illustrations into the staff report. She also requested that staff and the Board continue the conversation about the jobs to housing balance. She mentioned that public participation was called out as one of the deficiencies in the HCD comment report at the bottom of page 7, paragraph D. Therefore, workbooks and online responses using the Moving Forward Workshop template should be used and staff should consider taking workshops on the road. The City should also capitalize on the need for smaller square foot housing, which was reported by the Home Builder's Association and create aesthetically pleasing multifamily housing that works for all income levels. Finally, the Board must review and modify, if necessary, the proposed process and sequence described within this report. President Ezzy Ashcraft called for a motion to approve the Alameda Housing Element process as described. Board member Henneberry approves the motion, 2nd by Board member Kohlstrand, but caveat to have some consideration on public outreach, and approved 5-0. 9-C. Hold a Public Hearing to hear a Status Report on the Proposed Update to the Public Art Program and Review and Accept the Annual Report for the Public Art Fund as Required by the Public Art Ordi… | 13646 | |
18533 | 18533 | Mr. Thomas replied that he is confident that staff will get the comments and complete the package for the first meeting in March. Board member Kohlstrand commended on the handout and she stated that it is important for the public to understand the density levels within Alameda and different types of development that occur outside of Alameda. She agreed with those who believe the process should move along quickly and she urged staff to engage with all community groups. She also asked staff if they identified locations for mobile homes. Jennifer Gastelum, replied that if there are mobile homes allowed in the City's zoning ordinance then staff would look into it. There is a list of things such as residential care facilities, second units, transitional housing, and more which staff must check off. Board member Kohlstrand asked if the state published a ratio outlining the number of homeless shelters required to serve a city's total population. Jennifer Gastelum, replied that there isn't a state wide ratio, but staff has come up with a number by meeting with local homeless advocates. The state generally wants to see how many acres of land are made available for a shelter. Board member Kohlstrand asked whether the housing element evaluates the City's jobs/housing balance and integrates an economic development strategy. Mr. Thomas responded to Linette Lee's density per acre statement, which forces the City to find lots of acreage. He further explained that the City is opting to create higher density in select parcels in order for some of the sites identified as residential to be zoned as commercial. Board member Kohlstrand asked staff about zoning Alameda Point. Mr. Thomas replied that the HCD made changes to state law where cities that overpromise land for residential purposes will be penalized. Therefore, if the City overpromises residential inventory the supply that was not made available for residential use will roll over to the next evaluation cycle. Thus, staff has not rezoned Alameda Point for cycle 2007-2014 for … | 13646 | |
18532 | 18532 | that are large enough to accommodate at least 16 units are zoned at a certain density so the land can facilitate a range of housing types. President Ezzy Ashcraft raised an issue regarding residential development and its proximity to transportation, parking, and density. Mr. Thomas stated the initial list of sites is to get everyone thinking about the functionality. As staff goes through the process internally and reviews the sites with the public, then staff will be able to look at the whole list of sites in order to ask for recommendations. He reaffirmed the notion that access to public transit is part of the criteria for selecting sites, especially for higher density multi-family and senior housing types. Board member Kohlstrand stated that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission is implementing the One Bay Area Grant Program where funding is contingent on certain strategies related to smart growth, adopting a housing element, including affordable housing, constructing complete streets and a few more. The grant program is being reviewed at the regional level under designated priority development areas. Therefore, cities and counties are not sure if transit money is going where development is going. Vice President Autorino asked staff what level of difficulty does Measure A introduce to this process. Mr. Thomas responded by saying that Measure A raises some level of difficulty, but it is an insurmountable hurdle. Measure A is the citywide requirement, which says that multi- family housing should not be built and that runs into the face of state law. However, the City of Alameda does build multi-family housing, through density bonuses and other ways. As a community, we are building good projects and will continue this effort. He explained that the current zoning ordinance says maximum density of 21 units per acre and density bonuses of 29 units per acre are allowed and the City will waive the multi- family prohibition. Although, technically the City doesn't permit multi-family housing, the City will waiver th… | 13646 | |
18531 | 18531 | here in order to level the job/housing balance. She also asked the City to provide homes for all residents and to have the housing element done in a timely manner so housing can be built within a reasonable timeframe. Lynette Lee, Member of renewed Hope and former executive director for a non-profit organization that built and managed 1,400 affordable housing units. She asked the Board members to take a bold approach to get the housing element approved by considering higher densities of more than 30 units per acre. She went on to say that for the next meeting, she will bring pictures of affordable housing developments of 60 units and more to show the Board and staff how affordable housing can be attractive and complement the neighborhood. She also brought up the demise of California's Redevelopment Agencies and how the agency's revenue was critical to constructing affordable housing. Laura Thomas, President of Renewed Hope Housing Advocates, explained that the organization was formed in 1999 to fight for rehabbing the former navy housing parcel called East Housing. She stated that the former Planning Board did not welcome their organization's East Housing proposal. So, she asked staff and the Board to create residential opportunities for all income levels, working people, and families. She commended the staff and Board for taking up the housing element finally because the Board must show leadership as well as accelerate the timeline. President Ezzy Ashcraft called for Board member comments and questions. President Ezzy Ashcraft called on Board member Henneberry to make comments on affordable housing and housing for working families. Board member Henneberry stated that his day job represents mainly grocery store and butcher union members so workers housing is a critical issue. He felt that being able to live where one works comes up within the redevelopment agency and this should be addressed in the housing element. Board member Zuppan noticed that the illustrations don't show the parking impacts. She also stated … | 13646 | |
18530 | 18530 | City to qualify for more money, especially affordable housing. Furthermore, he stated that supplying housing will attract businesses and the housing element is part of being a responsible environmental community in terms of energy consumption. He would like to see the plan approved so the City has a chance to see how it works and be able remove the obstacles. So, he would like for the Board and staff to find ways to accelerate the public process and move the first hearing up to February from March. Diane Lichtenstein, Vice President of HOMES, congratulated the Planning Board and staff for their report and advancing planning throughout the year. The Alameda Housing Element will be a huge advantage for the City and will provide housing opportunities for individuals and families who cannot afford market rate housing. Helen Sause, member of HOMES, applauded the staff and the process to achieve HCD approval of the Alameda Housing Element. She first explained that the housing element is critical for the City to receive state funding and for the City to avoid lawsuits. Secondly, she hoped that density will be a non-issue as the City and public move along with the process. She also wanted to see building diversity rather than monolithic suburban style residential housing. Lastly, she believed this housing element will give the City a chance for a variety of housing types. Alameda has successfully provided housing opportunities for low and moderate residents and workers and this is an important aspect and opportunity. Doug Biggs, resident of Alameda and member of HOMES, thanked staff for getting the process started and assembling a good team that knows how to get housing built. He stated that building housing is the main objective and setting aside land and inclusionary housing for income types. He appealed to staff and the Board to use this process to showcase City pride and exhibit the City's accomplishments. Jon Spangler, Alameda resident, commended the Board and staff for moving the housing element forward and filling… | 13646 | |
18529 | 18529 | to the Housing Element of the General Plan pursuant to State Law and Government Code regulations. The Housing Element provides a seven year plan to address the housing needs of current and future Alameda citizens. The Planning Board will hold a public workshop to review and discuss revisions to the Draft Housing Element that may be necessary to comply with State of California requirements. Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, provided a brief Power Point presentation about the Draft Housing Element under the City of Alameda's General Plan. He also outlined the public process and the upcoming schedule to finalize the document. Jennifer Gastelum, Service Lead for Pacific Municipal Consultants, worked on and certified 41 housing elements in her career. She presented the remaining Power Point presentation, which explained the California Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD) 8-page response to the City of Alameda's Draft Housing Element document. The HCD's comments were separated into three categories: 1) Land Inventory; 2) Constraints and 3) State Law Updates. President Ezzy Ashcraft asked staff to define zoning and allocating land for emergency shelters. Jennifer Gastelum, explained that emergency shelters were defined for the homeless not for natural disasters. Andrew Thomas explained that he had two requests from the Board. He first wanted to make sure they understood what staff and the Planning Board were diving into regarding the schedule and public process. He also, explained that staff is looking for strategies to make this process as successful as possible. President Ezzy Ashcraft responded that many people attending the meeting have not read the staff report, thus she asked staff to give an example of multi-family housing in the Alameda. Mr. Thomas explained that in the staff report under attachment 3, there are many examples of multi-family buildings that the public can recognize, which would help educate and inform the public. He went on to give an example of the density found at the… | 13646 | |
18528 | 18528 | homeowners were to replace their wood siding with aluminum siding that would be acceptable, but homeowners cannot apply stucco. President Ezzy Ashcraft called for public comment. Wendell Stewart, 219 Santa Clara Avenue property owner, said the siding is dry rotten and cannot be refurbished, but must be replaced. Furthermore, he went on to say two neighbors whose houses are identical to his were allowed by the City to replace their wood siding with Sears Vinyl Siding. Board member Kohlstrand asked Mr. Stewart if the stucco would go all the way up to the peak and would he retain the shutters. Mr. Stewart explained the stucco would go all the way up to the peak and he would replace the shutters with new waterproof shutters that closely match the old ones. Also, the molding will closely match the existing molding. Sonia Christensen Stewart, 219 Santa Clara Avenue property owner, presented the history of their project to the Board. She explained that the present condition of the house requires constant maintenance and there were occasional leaks through the paneling during the rainy seasons. She and her husband conducted a lot of research and reviewed vinyl siding and stucco, and the findings revealed stucco was the best option. Ruth Smiler, 221 Santa Clara property owner, explained to the Board that her house contains stucco and she moved to the property a little over one year ago. According to a house inspector that was hired, her house was always made of stucco. She further explained that many houses within the neighborhood are similar in style and they have stucco material so she supports the project. Board member Burton, explained that he visited the neighborhood and found the majority of the houses contain stucco. Therefore, he believes the design guideline's clause to modernize the house using stucco does not explain the project coming before the Board. Board member Kohlstrand, Vice President Autorino, and Board member Zuppan agreed with Board member Burton. President Ezzy Ashcraft commented on her dissection o… | 13646 | |
18527 | 18527 | 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: None 9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 9-A. PLN11-0315- Wendell Stewart - 219 Santa Clara Avenue. Design Review of a single-family residence requesting to stucco over existing wood siding and shingles on residence. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Planning Services Manager, presented the staff report, provided a brief summary of the City's design review guidelines and the issues of interpreting the guideline's language in relation to the project. She further explained to the Board members that there was a fine line in interpreting the language outlining the fact that buildings with original wood siding should not have stucco applied in an attempt to modernize the building. Thus, she came before the Board to review this sentence. President Ezzy Ashcraft called for Board questions or comments. Board member Kohlstrand asked whether the proposal is to retain the shingles at the very peak of the roof and place the stucco on the bottom, and would the shutters be retained on the house. Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated that the homeowner could explain the process once he is called to speak. However, she stated most of the building would be covered in stucco. Board member Autorino stated that his perception of the design review guidelines was meant to prevent old Victorian homes from being covered with stucco. Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch responded by saying that staff struggled with the guidelines especially since there was a movement within the City years ago to modernize the appearance of homes. Staff believes given the look of the house with the other neighboring homes on the street that the stucco will not modernize the house. Vice President Autorino asked staff if the wood shingles on this house could be rehabbed and if they could not, would the replacement of the shingles and siding be considered modernization? Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch stated not exactly since as long as the design treatment and materials are compatible with the house and the neighborhood. Vice President Autorino replied that there are two opposed ideas: (1) The … | 13646 | |
18526 | 18526 | She stated that her proposal was not for conditions to be removed. She believed the permit should come back for review and then conditions could be verified or evaluated, but not be removed. President Ezzy Ashcraft, asked whether to strike those comments or remove them altogether. Board member Zuppan stated that she would like the word "removed" replaced with the word "evaluated." Board member Zuppan made comments to page 10 of 12, the 2nd paragraph regarding the parking requirements. She meant that parking should be lowered not raised. President Ezzy Ashcraft confirmed that the initial comments should be amended to say reduced rather than increased. Board member Zuppan stated yes and parking should be reduced below 200. President Ezzy Ashcraft called for additional amendments to the minutes. President Ezzy Ashcraft called a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Motion to approve by Zuppan, 2nd by Burton and 4-0, 1 abstention (. Minutes from the Regular meeting of October 24. 2011. (pending) Minutes from the Regular meeting of November 28. 2011. (pending) 5. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION: President Ezzy Ashcraft spoke to the Planning Service Manager Andrew Thomas and discussed moving Item 9-C, status report to the proposed update to the public art program, to the consent calendar. Decision was made to keep it on the regular agenda. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Written Report 6-A Future Agendas Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, provided an overview of upcoming projects. 7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None Draft Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 13 December 12, 2011 | 13646 | |
18525 | 18525 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD MONDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2011 7:00 p.m. 1. CONVENE: 7:05 P.M. 2. FLAG SALUTE: Board Member Autorino 3. ROLL CALL: Present: President Ezzy Ashcraft, Vice-President Autorino, Board members Burton, Henneberry, Kohlstrand, and Zuppan. Absent: None 4. MINUTES: Minutes from the Regular meeting of April 25, 2011. Motion to approve the minutes by Board member Autorino approved, seconded by Board member Kohlstrand, and approved 5-0. Minutes from the Regular meeting of October 10, 2011. Amendments to minutes made by Board member Zuppan regarding page 6 of 12, 5th paragraph from the bottom where the business operated without a license. Her understanding was staff would follow up with the business owner in order to make sure there were no other outstanding penalties and that was not noted in October's minutes. President Ezzy Ashcraft explained that she already calendared that to come back for review, but asked Board member Zuppan if she would like to propose an additional sentence or clause. Board member Zuppan stated that the sentence should include a follow up order regarding the issue. President Ezzy Ashcraft stated that the amendment would be noted. Board member Zuppan made comments on page 8 of 12, the 2nd paragraph regarding her problem with inconsistencies about the applicant's statements. She did not want it to be confused about the closing time. President Ezzy Ashcraft confirmed the amendment to revise the first sentence of the 2nd paragraph in order to clarify the inconsistencies of the applicant's statements. Board member Zuppan further commented on about page 9 of 12, the 2nd paragraph. Draft Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 13 December 12, 2011 | 13646 | |
18524 | 18524 | 9. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA 10. SET DAY FOR NEXT MEETING Thursday, October 9, 2008 11. ADJOURNMENT - 4 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - Thursday, September 11, 2008 | 13646 | |
18523 | 18523 | The price differential would be huge. Bill Paden, Alameda resident, stated that there could possibly be used above ground pools at a great savings. Mr. Paden stated that there should be more investigation on using synthetic turf. Some concerns are highly elevated temperatures of the turf. The synthetic turf has not been around long-enough to know if there will be other concerns in the future. The SunCal representatives will come back to the Recreation & Park Commission in approximately one month with the preliminary plans to move forward. B. Summer Wrap Up Presentation - (Informational Only) RS Russi provided a Summer Wrap Up Power Point Presentation to the Recreation & Park Commission. Special Points: There was increased participation in the Teen Program and Camp Concord. Swim-To-Live swim lessons were full with sessions having waiting lists. Director Lillard stated that the outcome regarding Measure H could have an impact on our Swim Program and whether the pools will be open or not. The End-of-Summer Family Nights at the parks were very well attended. The families really enjoyed themselves and stayed long into the evening. Staff performed a major outreach to the teens this last year and it was very successful. The Summer Teen Adventure Program had 45-50 participants each week with 15-20 teens participating in the free Drop-In Program. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See September 9, 2008 Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See September 9, 2008 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See September 9, 2008 Activity Report. D. Other Reports and Announcements Director Lillard stated that staff is working on the budget for FY 2009-2010. We have been directed to cut another 5%. This will be approximately $200,000. Also, there is a possibility that the budget cut could be higher then 5%. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL - 3 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg Minutes - Thursday, September 11, 2008 | 13646 | |
18522 | 18522 | 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) None 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - Complimentary letters of summer recreation programs. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation by SunCal on Update of Sports Complex Master Plan - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Mr. Kosla and Mr. Chavez, SunCal Representatives, who provided a presentation to the Recreation and Park Commission regarding the Update of the Sports Complex Master Plan. Comments that came from the public meetings were: - Having some kind of BMX Bike trail. - Having a football field with a soccer field overlay. - Have 5 soccer fields (6 fields were in original plan) with a soccer warm up area and would leave room for additional parking. - Have a softball complex - Have one or two baseball fields. - Have covered pool for year-round use. Once all comments are received a new draft plan will be brought back to the Commission. In late October, early November SunCal will come back with a more final product and possibly have costs associated with the complex. SunCal representatives asked for comments from the Commission. Chair Ogden asked what turf would be used. Mr. Kosla stated that would depend on requests/comments. Commissioner Cooper stated that there is a huge need for soccer fields. All the stakeholders need to sit down and figure out what really is needed. Director Lillard stated that everything that can be lighted should be. Also, the total of tennis courts could be 2 or 3 instead of 6. Commissioner Restagno asked if money generated from the batting cages is feasible or had been discussed. Mr. Kosla stated it may be something that can be looked at. Linda Gilchrist, Alameda resident, stated that the pool should be an indoor pool. The weather out there is very cold. Also, it would be a better revenue generator for the City. The pool could then be used year-round. Margaret McNamara, Alameda reside… | 13646 | |
18521 | 18521 | MINUTES OF RECREATION & PARK COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 2226 Santa Clara Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 (510) 747-7529 DATE: Thursday, September 11, 2008 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Room 360, City Hall, Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street, Alameda, CA 94501 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Terri Ogden, Vice Chair Joe Restagno, Commissioners Lola Brown, Mike Cooper, and Jo Kahuanui Staff: Dale Lillard, Director Absent: Commissioners Gina Mariani, and Bill Sonneman 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The approval of Minutes: - July 10, 2008 Recreation and Park Commission Meeting Chair Ogden stated that she thought that the last bullet on the motion under Item 6.A. was to be removed. Director Lillard stated he would have Executive Assistant (EA) check the recorded minutes. M/S/C BROWN/RESTAGNO "That the minutes be approved as corrected. Under Item 6., Unfinished Business, A., Discussion of Furniture Guidelines for the Dog Park Located at Lower Washington Park, Page 5, the last bullet, "Once permanent seating options are provided the portable chairs will need to be removed after use and will not be allowed to be stored at the site." - should be removed from the motion." Approved (4) Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper Abstained (1): Kahuanui Note: EA checked the July 10, 2008 minutes and found that the motion was listed correctly. Commissioner Restagno made the motion to approve the guidelines as submitted in report dated 6/3/2008. Report is attached to these minutes for clarification. Approval of Minutes for August 14, 2008 Recreation and Park Commission meeting were tabled until next month to allow for quorum vote. - 1 - Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. Minutes - Thursday, September 11, 2008 | 13646 | |
18520 | 18520 | Chair Saxby said the building is suitable for occupancy now and is a historic structure on a historic site. He wondered why we are not looking seriously at saving one or more of these buildings. Staff Member Thomas said that they have come to the conclusion that it is not financially feasible on this site, but have not convinced this board of that. He asked what it would take for the board to reach that conclusion. Chair Saxby said he does not think it is the board's purview to address the financial feasibility of the project. He said they are looking only at the historic preservation point of view. Staff Member Thomas said they will be taking the project to the Planning Board in January. He said they will share that this board felt the historic preservation mitigations in the application were good, but that the plan missed the mark by not having a preservation element. He said they would be coming back to HAB for a certificate of approval. Board Member Sanchez said he would like to go through the process of studying a design that has a preservation element. He said always presents his clients with the "money is no object" solution to make sure that possibilities are not limited. Staff Member Thomas asked if the board would be able to move their meeting back from the scheduled January 3rd date in order to do the work required. Chair Saxby said they could coordinate a date offline and make that work. 7-B 2018-6287 2019 Historical Advisory Board Regular Meeting Schedule Board Member Sanchez made a motion to adopt the 2019 schedule. Board Member Wit seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. 8. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS *None* 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS *None* 10. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 11. ADJOURNMENT Chair Saxby adjourned the meeting at 8:20pm. Approved Minutes Page 5 of 5 December 6, 2018 Historical Advisory Board Meeting | 13646 | |
18519 | 18519 | of the housing infeasible by their mitigation measures. He said he expects the chair's idea for preservation would affect the financial feasibility of the project. Board Member Sanchez asked how the elevation of the peak of the head house compares to the elevation of the plinth (platform.) Mr. Herrero said the floor level is about five feet. He said he is guessing the building height is 21 feet up, the driveway entry of the project would be built up to nine feet. He said that would create a cocoon effect around the building. Chair Saxby asked how that would be affected if they used one of the edge buildings. Mr. Herrero said they would have to study that, and that impacts to fire department access would be a factor they would have to consider. Chair Saxby said it is confusing that the EIR is from May 2017 and we still have not seriously looked at the feasibility of preserving any of these buildings. Staff Member Thomas said they have considered the possibility of preservation, but have to consider financial impacts, and he said he is trying to consider what this building would look like visually submerged compared to the surrounding grounds and buildings. He said that if the City makes a project infeasible they would run afoul of state law. He said the Del Monte project is a preservation project, has been approved for four years, and cannot get financed. Board Member Jones said she agreed with Chair Saxby about Alameda's historic preservation commitments. She compared the potential of the Shipways site to the historic Alameda Theater. She said we like to push the envelope and wants to make sure this does not look like any other city. Board Member Wit said she agreed with those thoughts. She said Alameda needs to decide what it wants to be, a suburb or a destination. She said maintaining our history is what makes people want to come to Alameda. Nicole Bures, project manager, said this has been a large collaborative effort. She said this will be an over one hundred million dollar investment to provide for rent hous… | 13646 | |
18518 | 18518 | Board Member Sanchez said the sales office would be a good place to have some of the required imagery on display. Mr. Herrero said using that imagery on the interior portions of the common areas is in their plans. Board Member Sanchez said the landscape and waterfront elements are the most successful of relating to the history of the site. He said public access elements and experience of the site were good. He said he is concerned by the massing of the building and that the taller buildings are on the waterfront site. He said the pool areas would seem dwarfed by the taller buildings. He said shorter buildings near the pool, which is on the north side, would enhance the private open spaces on the site by allowing more sunlight to reach the ground there. He said he appreciates the changes that have been made and thinks they have gone a long way towards alleviating the historical concerns given the challenges of the site. Chair Saxby said the City should include a preservation aspect to this project. He said it was a mistake to allow four historic buildings of local and national significance be destroyed in order to build the project. He said Alameda stands strong on the integrity of its historic character. He said the finding that preserving two of the buildings was not viable came from the developer, who is not really interested in preservation. He said we could look at maybe preserving one of the four buildings. He said he does not think it is a fair choice to sacrifice the public amenities for historic preservation. He said he does not think preservation options have really been studied. He said he is not giving up on the preservation of at least one of these buildings. Staff Member Thomas asked if Chair Saxby was envisioning preserving one or more of the head house buildings and building over and around it. Chair Saxby said that is possible and would be very exciting idea architecturally and be similar to how the ships were built at the site. He said the mitigation measures considered are superficial. He said t… | 13646 | |
18517 | 18517 | Board Member Sanchez asked what the logic was for having the taller buildings along the water instead of Marina Village Pkwy. Mr. Herrero said keeping the scale down at the street and providing more units with access to the waterfront views were the reasons. Board Member Wit asked if keeping the facades of the buildings and incorporating them into the new structures was considered. Mr. Herrero said the garage walls will be built in those locations and they would not be able to keep the character of the walls. Chair Saxby opened and closed the public hearing. Board Member Jones said the celebrating of the history of the site should be enriched in the public spaces of the site. She said she wanted to make sure we took every opportunity to historically and aesthetically celebrate the site. She said she would like to explore making the design more evocative of the design elements of the original buildings. She asked about the process for finalizing the artwork. Staff Member Thomas said there is a large public art obligation, a desire to honor the history of the site, and a need to create a unique public park. He said the applicant will make a proposal to the Public Art Commission. Board Member Jones asked how confident we are that the signage can be removed successfully. Mr. Herrero said he is very confident that they can reinforce and cut out the Shipways signage. Board Member Lau asked if the park area can be built with a sloped building like the original structure and possibly swap the location of the pool and the park area. Mr. Herrero said the ability to build with a slope severely limits the usability of the interior space or would require a much higher roof or canopy structure than the original building. Board Member Sanchez said he would worry that they would be getting into the area of false historicism by replicating the building. Board Member Wit said the large pictures of old planes above the historic hangars in the Presidio are a good example of what she would like to see on the sides of the buildings. A… | 13646 | |
18516 | 18516 | APPROVED MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2018 1. CONVENE Chair Saxby called meeting to order at 6:58pm. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Saxby, Board Members Jones, Lau, Sanchez, Wit. Absent: None. 3. MINUTES *None* 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATION *None* 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS *None* 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2018-6278 PLN17-0140 - 1100 Marina Village Parkway - Applicant: Steelwave, LLC. - Public Hearing to consider the historic preservation design features for the Shipways Residential Project, a 329-unit multi-family housing complex with a waterfront park. The project will require the approval of a Certificate of Approval by the Historical Advisory Board but no action will be taken at this public hearing. The environmental impacts of the proposed project were considered in the Alameda Shipways Residential Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2017041011) Staff Member Thomas introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3763445&GUID=92741C3F 123E-4D48-9BD3-FF5B2D665A14&FullText=1 Staff Member Barrera gave a presentation. Nathan Herrero, project architect, gave a presentation. Approved Minutes Page 1 of 5 December 6, 2018 Historical Advisory Board Meeting | 13646 | |
18515 | 18515 | 389 September 17th, , from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.; the Alameda Running Festival is also on September 17th. (17-526) Report Out from Stop Waste on the Fix It Clinic. (Councilmember Oddie) Councilmember Oddie encouraged having a Fix It Clinic in Alameda. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the Alameda Library will have an event like the Fix It Clinic. Jane Chisaki, Library Director, responded the Alameda Library does not do fix it clinics due to possible damage to carpeting; Mastic Center has expressed an interest in holding a fix it clinic. (17-527) Vice Mayor Vella stated that she that received emails regarding trying to diversify the Economic Development Strategic Plan Board; she also received emails questioning why cannabis is not included in the plan. The City Manager responded that she understood the direction for the Economic Development Strategic Plan is to be grassroots; additional citizens have been invited to participate to make the group more diverse. (17-528) Councilmember Matarrese stated that he and Mayor Spencer represented the City at the East Bay Regional Parks District (EBRPD) liaison committee; EBRPD is putting a lot of money into Alameda. (17-529) Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she attended the lead poisoning prevention commission meeting; noted that she is grateful that Alameda did not cede local control over cell phone towers to the telecommunications industry. (17-530) Mayor Spencer announced the Alameda Theater is showing the film Fallen, sponsored by the Police Officers Association, on Monday, September 11th. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 10:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18514 | 18514 | 388 Amended and Restated Lease Agreement with Mr. Hi Chi Chen and Mrs. Lena Muy Chiv, a Married Couple, dba Hometown Donuts for 1930 Main Street; and (17-519A) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Grant of Non-Exclusive Easement and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of Grant of Non-Exclusive Easement to Alameda Boys & Girls Club (ABGC) and Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) for Access and Maintenance. Not heard. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS (17-520) Update on Tracking of Council Referrals. Not heard. (17-521) The City Manager stated one Firefighter and one Police Officer from the City of Alameda have gone to assist with Hurricane Harvey; the City did not apply for the Justice Assistance Grant for funds for Police Department equipment due to the application having requirements to give information about immigrant citizens to the federal government; items that are going on at the federal level which might impact the City: the Executive Order that prohibited military equipment to be sold to local Police Departments has been rescinded; the federal regulations to manage flood control have been revoked; a bill has been designed to drastically cut illegal immigration and revise the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) to allow immigrant children to have citizen status in the future. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. COUNCIL REFERRALS (17-522) Consider Directing Staff to Explore Offering Free Public WiFi Throughout the City. Not heard. (Mayor Spencer) (17-523) Consider: 1) Adoption of Resolution Condemning the Increased Incidents of Bias, Prejudice, Discrimination, Violence and Anti-Semitism; and 2) Direct Staff to Provide a Status Update on Hate Crime Training and Possible Training of Community Members; and Direct the City Manager to Provide Periodic Reports to Council on Hate Crimes. Not heard. (Vice Mayor Vella and Councilmember Oddie) COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS (17-524) Consideration of Mayor's Nominations to the Historical Advisory Board (HAB) and Public A… | 13646 | |
18513 | 18513 | 387 encroachment ordinances. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion, which FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 2. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella - 3. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she hopes the landlords and tenants get together to come to a solution. Vice Mayor Vella inquired what is the City's involvement because the matter is a referendum of a City ordinance. The City Manager responded cost. Vice Mayor Vella inquired what the cost is to the City. The City Manager responded that is dependent on which election the Council decides to put on the item; the June election would be more expensive than placing the item on the general election in November. Mayor Spencer inquired what the specific cost would be. The City Clerk responded it would depend on how many other items are on the June ballot; worse case would be around $700,000; if the item is added to the November ballot, the cost would be approximately $25,000 for printing and typesetting costs. On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft - 1. (17-517) Adoption of Resolution Appointing Patricia Lamborn as a Member of the Planning Board; and (17-517A) Adoption of Resolution Appointing Alan Teague as a Member of the Planning Board. Not heard. (17-518) Recommendation to Appoint Gene Kahane and Cathy Dana as Alameda's Poet Laureates. Not heard. (17-519) SUMMARY: Introduce Two Ordinances that Resolve Two Encroachment Issues on City Property in Order to Facilitate the Start of Construction of the Cross Alameda Trail Project along Ralph Appezzato Memorial Parkway, Between Main and Webster Streets. Introduction of Ordinance Approving an Amended and Restated Lease and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Documents Necessary to Implement the Terms of an Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18512 | 18512 | 386 3180. Mayor Spencer seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Oddie inquired if the two groups come to an agreement to put something on the ballot would be permissible. The City Attorney responded she will have to get back to Council on the answer. The City Clerk stated Elections Code Section 9241 states: "the ordinance shall not again be enacted by the legislative body for a period of one year,' which might allow the Council could put the matter on the ballot. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether there is anything the City could do to assist the tenants at 470 Central Avenue. The City Attorney responded no cause eviction entitles tenants to relocation benefits, which is the case in some instances at 470 Central Avenue; there have been some for cause eviction notices at 470 Central Avenue where the landlord claims breach of the lease; it is not within the purview of the City to determine the accuracy of those claims; the Housing Authority does monitor that the landlord is conducting business properly according to Ordinance 3148. *** (17-516) Mayor Spencer stated a motion is needed to consider remaining items. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft moved approval of hearing the two encroachment ordinances [paragraph no. 17-519]. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion which FAILED by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella - 3. Noes: Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer. Mayor Spencer moved approval of hearing the balance of the agenda, minus the WiFi referral [paragraph no. 17-522]. . Councilmember Matarrese stated he will second the motion only if it is amended to not hear both referrals. Mayor Spencer accepted the friendly amendment to the motion. On the call for the question, the motion FAILED by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmember Matarrese and Mayor Spencer - 2. Noes: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella - 3. Mayor Spencer moved approval of hearing the resolutions of appointment and the two Regular Meetin… | 13646 | |
18511 | 18511 | 385 substantially similar; any provisions in Ordinance 3180 cannot be amended for one full year. Councilmember Oddie requested staff to provide Council case law so that Council does not come up with changes that are not allowed. Vice Mayor Vella inquired if there are any impacts to the fee. The City Attorney responded that the fee is not included in the ordinance, so the fee is unaffected. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the provision to pass on part of the fee to renters is now withdrawn, to which the City Attorney responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the landlords can withdraw the ballot measure if an agreement with the renters is reached. The City Attorney responded the signatures for the referendum have been certified and cannot be modified. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of accepting the Certificate of Sufficiency for Referendum Petition against Ordinance No. 3180. Mayor Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a motion for the second part of the item. Vice Mayor Vella and Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated they would like to have more discussion. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would still like to make changes to Ordinance 3148; not allowing no cause evictions protects residents; Alameda needs more housing and the City needs to help the people who are in their homes now; she will not support the rescission. Councilmember Oddie stated an eviction in the Bay Area today is the equivalent of being homeless; he stands by Ordinance 3180. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she would like landlords and tenants to sit down and have a conversation on possible solutions for everyone involved; she is saddened that families are being displaced. Mayor Spencer stated that she supports having more conversations with the landlords and tenants. Councilmember Matarrese moved introduction of the ordinance rescinding Ordinance Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18510 | 18510 | 384 [Note: Mayor Spencer voted no, so the motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Vella - 4. Noes: Mayor Spencer - 1.] REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (17-515) Recommendation to Accept the Certificate of Sufficiency for Referendum Petition Against Ordinance No. 3180; and Select One of the Following Options: 1) Introduction of Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 3180 in Its Entirety. Introduced; or 2) Adoption of Resolution Calling an Election in the City of Alameda for the Purpose of Submitting to the Electors Ordinance No. 3180 Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Various Sections of Article XV of Chapter VI Concerning (a) Review of Rent Increases Applicable to All Rental Units and Rent Stabilization Applicable to Certain Rental Units and (b) Limitations on Evictions and the Payment of Relocation Fees Applicable to all Rental Units (Eliminating "No Cause" Ground for Eviction and Requiring Landlords to Pay Relocation Fees at the Expiration of Certain Fixed Term Leases). Not adopted. Stated the ordinance should be rescinded to work on a better ordinance: Eric Strimmling, Alameda Renters Coalition. Stated the rent ordinance needs to be amended; urged Council to push through the petition against Ordinance 3180: Lester Cabral, Alameda. The City Attorney gave a brief presentation. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the City Attorney could review the implications of what happens if Council rescinds versus putting the matter on the ballot. The City Attorney responded the Council can place the ordinance on the ballot in April, June or November of 2018 at different costs; Ordinance 3180 would be not in effect; Ordinance 3148 continues to be in effect; the voters would decide if Ordinance 3180 would go into effect; if the Council decides to rescind the ordinance, there would be a first reading tonight; the referendum prohibits the Council from doing an action substantially similar to the provisions in Ordinance 3180 for one year; if Council puts the matter on the ballot a… | 13646 | |
18509 | 18509 | 383 (*17-508) Recommendation to Accept the Work of Rosas Brothers Construction for the Repair of Concrete Sidewalk, Curb, Gutter, Driveway, and Minor Street Patching, Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17, Phase 17, No. P.W. 05-16-18. Accepted. (*17-509) Recommendation to Amend the Contract with Ranger Pipeline Inc. to Increase the Contract Amount by $4,048,544.03, which Includes a 10% Contingency, for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phase 14, No. P.W. 05-17-27, for a Total Authorized Amount of $17,375,030, for Cyclic Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Phases 11, 12,13 and 14. Accepted. (*17-510) Recommendation to Enter into an Agreement Between the City of Alameda and Waste Management of Alameda County Inc. for Solid Waste Transfer and Disposal Services for a Ten-Year Period (Ending June 30, 2027); and Adoption of Resolution Setting Per Ton Rates for Solid Waste Transfer and Disposal Services with Waste Management of Alameda County, Inc. Accepted. (*17-511) Resolution No. 15301, "Authorizing the City Manager to: (1) Execute a Professional Services Agreement and a License Agreement (the "Agreements") With XG Communities, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company DBA 5 BARS Communities ("5 BARS") Each for a Term of Five Years with Four Five-Year Extensions for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Consulting, Marketing and Management and Services for City Assets in Exchange for a Thirty-Five Percent (35%) Share of Generated Revenue" and (2) Execute Auxiliary Documents and to Perform Any and All Acts Necessary or Desirable to Permit 5 BARS to Perform the Services." Adopted. [Note: Councilmember Oddie voted no, so the motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 4. Noes: Councilmember Oddie - 1.] (*17-512) Resolution No. 15302, "Approving the City of Alameda's Continued Participation in the Alameda County HOME Consortium, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Revised HOME Consortium Cooperative Agreement with Alameda County and Rescinding Resolution No. 152… | 13646 | |
18508 | 18508 | 382 Mayor Spencer stated that she would vote no on final passage of the ordinance [paragraph no. *17-514]. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would vote no on the 5 Bars resolution [paragraph no. *17-511]. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5, with the two exceptions noted above. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*17-500) Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings Held on June 20, 2017 and July 5, 2017, and the Regular City Council Meeting Held on July 5, 2017. Approved. (*17-501) Ratified bills in the amount of $14,213,204.80. (*17-502) Recommendation to Award a Five-Year Contract for an Amount not to Exceed a Total Five-Year Expenditure of $250,000, Subject to Budget Approvals, to Hinderliter de Llamas (HdL) for Review and Analysis of Sales and Use Tax Revenues. Accepted. (*17-503) Recommendation to Accept the Quarterly Sales Tax Report for the Period Ending June 30, 2017 Collected During the Period January 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017. Accepted. (*17-504) Recommendation to Accept Report on the Appointment of Bryan Schwartz as a Member of the Open Government Commission. Accepted. (*17-505) Recommendation to Award a One-Year Contract, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, for an Amount not to Exceed $93,319.86, for a Total Five Year Expenditure not to Exceed $485,640.33, to Clean Lakes, Inc. for Vegetation Management, Debris Management, and Water Quality Monitoring for the South Shore Lagoons. Accepted. (*17-506) Recommendation to Award a One-Year Contract, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions, for an Amount not to Exceed $20,698.92, for a Total Five-Year Expenditure not to Exceed $107,718.02, Subject to Budget Approval, to Dream Ride Elevator for Full Service Elevator Maintenance and Repairs in City Buildings (Various Locations). Accepted. (*17-507) Recommendation to Award a One-Year Contract, with the Option of Four One-Year Extensions… | 13646 | |
18507 | 18507 | 381 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY- - - -SEPTEMBER 5, 2017--7:00 P.M. Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 9:43 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie and Mayor Spencer - 5. Absent: None. AGENDA CHANGES (17-495) Mayor Spencer discussed changes to the Consent Calendar. The City Attorney stated if the Councilmember is voting no on a Consent item, the vote can be recorded without pulling the item. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the Anti-Semitism referral [paragraph no. 17-523 could be heard before the referendum item [paragraph no. 17-515]. Mayor Spencer stated that she does not support moving up referrals. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether the referendum item could be heard first on in the Regular Agenda since it needs to be voted on tonight. Mayor Spencer stated she is not in favor of the request. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese and Oddie concurred with the request. PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS (17-496) Proclamation Declaring September 16, 2017 as Coastal Cleanup Day. Mayor Spencer read the proclamation and presented it to the Public Works Program Specialist, who showed a photograph of the beach. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (17-497) Gaby Dolphin, Alameda, submitted information; read a statement and suggested renaming Calhoun Street after Heather Hyer who was killed in Charlottesville, South Carolina. (17-498) Angela Hockabout, Alameda, urged doing more to develop housing. (17-499) Jennifer Geema, Alameda, discussed her rental situation. CONSENT CALENDAR Regular Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18506 | 18506 | MNIUTES OF THE SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC) TUESDAY--SEPTEMBER 5 5, 2017-6:59 P.M. Mayor/Chair Spencer convened the meeting at 9:42 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Ezzy Ashcraft, Oddie, Vella and Mayor/Chair Spencer - 4. [Note: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft arrived at 9:43 p.m.] Absent: Councilmember/Commission Matarrese - 1. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember/Commissioner Oddie moved approval of the Consent Calendar. Vice Mayor/Commissioner Vella seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember/Commissioner Matarrese - 1.] [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.] (*17-494CC/17-011SACIC) Recommendation to Accept the Investment Report for the Quarter Ending March 31, 2017. Accepted. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Spencer adjourned the meeting at 9:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk and Secretary, SACIC The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Joint Meeting Alameda City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18505 | 18505 | Councilmember Oddie withdrew the motion to call the question. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether staff is going to review the caps on manufacturing and testing as part of the draft ordinance, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. On the call for the question, the motion passed by unanimous voice vote - 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor Spencer adjourned the meeting at 9:29 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lara Weisiger City Clerk The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance. Special Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18504 | 18504 | Councilmember Matarrese accepted the friendly amendment. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is still a December 31st deadline. Councilmember Matarrese stated the answer is unknown until staff returns to Council. The Community Development Director responded staff would still endeavor to make the deadline. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the motion is to move forward with the lab testing and manufacturing only. Councilmember Matarrese responded in the negative. Mayor Spencer inquired what the motion includes. The Community Development Director responded the motion includes taking everything, synthesizing it into a new draft ordinance, presenting the new draft ordinance at a special meeting where there will be opportunity for input and further direction. Mayor Spencer inquired on which items. The Community Development Director responded on the new draft ordinance. Mayor Spencer inquired whether every type of cannabis business would be included, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. In response to Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft's inquiry, the Community Development Director stated dispensaries, with analysis of the cash business, the cap, and medical versus recreational would all be part of the synthesis; after the feedback at a special meeting, there would be potential for staff to return an ordinance for a first and second reading within 30 days; if new issues arise or staff has missed the mark, staff can be sent back to do more work; at that point, Council may want to reevaluate direction about the January 1st deadline. Mayor Spencer inquired when the special meeting would take place. The City Clerk responded not within the next four weeks. Councilmember Oddie moved approval of calling the question. Councilmember Matarrese seconded the motion. Under discussion, Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested to ask one additional question. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 6, 2017 | 13646 | |
18503 | 18503 | Councilmember Oddie stated staff has suggested the same proposal twice and Council has already said no; three Councilmembers support moving forward with dispensaries and staff has said no twice. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she believes it is fine to start with manufacturing and testing; she would like a more robust conversation on dispensaries; she would like to lay out a date for staff to return; a first and second reading can still be done in December; she would like to be realistic and have staff return with questions answered, all options and another opportunity for the community to weigh in; inquired whether there is a date certain that Councilmember Oddie would like to hear back from staff. Councilmember Oddie inquired when staff could bring the matter back to Council. The Community Development Director responded six months is a reasonable timeframe; if there is a willingness, having a special meeting would expedite the direction and discussion. Mayor Spencer requested clarification that only direction is being given, a motion does not need to be made. The City Attorney responded Council is giving direction; stated with Council being all over the map, she would suggest staff be allowed to do a little synthesizing and return to Council for a check-ir first and then return with a phased timeline. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the suggestion is to have a special meeting. The City Attorney responded an ordinance cannot be introduced at a special meeting. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether a motion is inappropriate. The City Attorney responded a motion can be done to give direction. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether his motion was out of line, which the City Attorney responded in the negative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether the City Clerk could repeat the motion, to which the City Clerk responded she had stepped out of the room and asked Councilmember Matarrese to repeat the motion. Councilmember Matarrese repeated his motion to have staff take the list of consensus and input from the co… | 13646 | |
18502 | 18502 | Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft requested the City Manager to respond to Vice Mayor Vella's question. The City Manager responded there are a number of matters that staff, legal and the City Manager's Office are involved in, such as rent stabilization, inclusionary housing and development projects. Councilmember Matarrese stated the Council has already prioritized the cannabis issue and the matter is lower than inclusionary housing and homelessness. Mayor Spencer stated the priority was determined prior to her bringing another referral. Councilmember Matarrese moved approval of directing staff to synthesize the list of commonalities with the majority votes and notes from the community and return with the next step, in a time that meets the Council priorities. Vice Mayor Vella seconded the motion. Under discussion, Mayor Spencer requested clarification on the timeframe. The Community Development Director responded the matter will return at the first Council meeting in November, but will not be the final product; stated since many meetings will need to be held, an ordinance will cannot be adopted prior to January 2nd: Council might want to give direction to have a ban with a sunset. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there can be a stand-alone meeting to be able to knock out the first draft of the ordinance. The City Manager suggested coming back with an ordinance that addresses manufacturing and testing and prohibits everything else until Council reviews the issues. The Community Development Director stated said approach allows for a first and second reading and the ordinance would be effective in 30 days prior to January 2nd. Councilmember Oddie stated it seems to him staff is trying to find a way to say no, instead of trying to find a way to say yes. The City Manager stated staff is saying yes. Councilmember Oddie stated staff is only saying yes to a piece of the matter, which was already rejected earlier; he is open to the hard ban but does not want to go much past the end of the first quarter of next year… | 13646 | |
18501 | 18501 | operator permit or the land use permit and have permits administered by Community Development; she heard a majority in support of said items; she took a lot of notes; suggested Council consider a ban. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Council has four votes for medicinal dispensaries, to which Councilmember Matarrese, Councilmember Oddie and Vice Mayor Vella responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like more information on the public safety regarding onsite consumption; she believes Council is sending staff out in a lot of different directions. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a majority vote to include distribution. Councilmember Matarrese inquired what has happened in other jurisdictions with the business being all cash and what type of risks exists; stated piles of cash put people at risk and he would like to discuss the issue. Mayor Spencer inquired whether employees pay into Social Security. Mr. Hall responded one owner's solution was to hire a temporary firm that is in charge of allocating money for Social Security; there are a variety of solutions. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated temporary agency do not give benefits; she is concerned about allowing dispensaries without knowing how to handle the cash; laboratory and manufacturing have less cash; she cannot support something that has employees brought in from a temporary agency. The City Manager stated staff can return with options for the Council to consider; staff has noted the Council direction. Mayor Spencer stated that she does not believe there should be a lot of work for staff; staff has an expert and examples from other cities; inquired whether there are three Councilmembers in support of manufacturing, testing and medicinal dispensaries. Vice Mayor Vella stressed the importance of bifurcating manufacturing and testing from medicinal dispensaries due to the outstanding questions related to dispensaries. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the issues can be on parallel tracks. Vice Mayor Vella inquired how man… | 13646 | |
18500 | 18500 | capacity as a School Board Member; she would like to hear from the community and stakeholders. Vice Mayor Vella stated that she does not want to go slow; she would like to do things in a considerate and thoughtful manner and take action with purpose; inquired if Council could bifurcate the conversation to look at manufacturing first. Mayor Spencer inquired how many Councilmembers support phasing. Vice Mayor Vella responded that she would be open to having a date certain to return. Mayor Spencer stated the phasing, which should be sooner rather than later, would be lab testing, manufacturing, distribution, deliveries, which is not brick and mortar dispensaries, and cultivation. The City Manager inquired whether staff could start with manufacturing and testing first. Mayor Spencer requested clarification from Vice Mayor Vella on her request. Vice Mayor Vella stated what she heard from her colleagues is to deal with lab testing and manufacturing. Mayor Spencer requested staff to call out the different categories and have Council respond. The Community Development Director stated lab testing is one item to address. Councilmember Matarrese stated people want a location to purchase cannabis in Alameda, which is the main issue; the easiest site to control, without a lot of cash around, is a lab; the Police Chief should not be responsible for administrating a land use and permit process; he is hoping staff can synthesize direction and provide a timeframe. Mayor Spencer inquired whether Councilmember Matarrese is requesting staff to return only with labs and brick and mortar dispensaries. Councilmember Matarrese responded said direction is what he is hearing from constituents and colleagues; stated a phased in approach can include several options. Vice Mayor Vella stated she would like staff to clarify the priorities moving forward. The Community Development Director stated that she heard a majority consensus on a desire to update the smoking ordinance and review vaping and flavored tobacco; a phased in approach with manu… | 13646 | |
18499 | 18499 | Development Department; she does not feel the Police Chief should be in charge of the issue because it is not illegal; oversight should be through Police and Fire; she supports local ownership, a commercial benefit fund to support local causes, and community education; she would oppose advertising; she supports manufacturing; she is unsure about adding vaping to the smoking ordinance; the community should weigh in on said issue; she supports commercial cultivation; she would defer to the State regarding labor peace; she does not support people going off Island to go to dispensaries and is less comfortable with having deliveries from locations off the Island; she supports onsite consumption. Councilmember Oddie stated that he would like to depoliticize the selection process; he does not want the matter to linger; he would like to have the Economic Development Department handle the issue because it is a health issue, not a legal issue; he is cognizant of the park issue, but he does not want to make it impossible for businesses to be permitted. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stressed the importance of having background checks conducted. Mayor Spencer stated background checks will be done; that she would like Council provide direction to staff. The City Manager stated staff has been taking notes. Mayor Spencer stated that she would like to give direction and review the list to ensure the public is aware of the issues. The Community Development Director stated that she understood a majority of Councilmembers would like to go slow and start with manufacturing and testing. Councilmember Oddie stated his comment to go slow did not mean phasing; he means drafting an ordinance that is not rushed; other cities already have ordinances in place. Mayor Spencer inquired what go slow means to staff. The Community Development Director responded she understood there is a desire to hear feedback from the community and other stakeholders; inquired whether Council wants to have community outreach before an ordinance is drafted. Mayor Sp… | 13646 | |
18498 | 18498 | reviewed; there is value in reviewing onsite consumption to keep smoking out of parks; she would like a town hall meeting to keep community members informed before the final issuing of a permit to an applicant. Councilmember Matarrese stated that he believes the City needs to start small in a phased in approach; he is concerned with the locations; the Planning Board should help with the land use issue; the requirement should be 1,000 feet buffer due to federal issues; he would like parks entered into the equation; onsite use still needs to be debated; the City should ensure the Police Department is paid and expanded to handle the issues that cannabis brings to a city; questioned how the City could mitigate the liability of having a heist at one of the locations; how to ensure workers are paying into Social Security or being paid overtime if paid in cash; stated that he agrees with no City or federal property; he would like to start with a pilot to see what the issues are first. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would like to go slow; she would like to bring in stakeholders like the School District and Parks and Recreation Commission; she would like the 1,000 foot buffer, and to ensure well paid jobs are created with benefits in a cash economy; she does not want too many cannabis businesses in one area; she would favor starting slow with laboratory testing or manufacturing; she would like the buffer to include parks; she would rather have an operator with experience and a track record; she would like another town hall meeting; under the ordinance, someone cannot be denied a permit for a previous conviction under California Health and Safety Sections 11350 or 11357; inquired whether the Sections includes recreational use. The Police Chief responded Section 11357(b) is the one the Police Department uses for infraction citation for less than 1 ounce of marijuana; Section 11350 pertains to sales. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City cannot deny a permit for someone with a previous conviction based on … | 13646 | |
18497 | 18497 | able deal with a major incident; she would like retail sales to enter at a later phase and would like to see a more detailed map; 1,000 feet from schools should be considered; she would like to know what types of spaces are available and wants a more robust zoning conversation; initially, she would like the cap to be small to not inundate staff; there should be a labor peace agreement; retail should be limited to one type per district; flavored tobacco should be banned and the smoking ordinance should be Special Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18496 | 18496 | be rushing to a specific date; the rush to get something in place will cause other items to be delayed. Expressed support for establishing marijuana businesses: Debra Mendoza, Alameda. Urged Council not to overregulate or over tax the industry; stated cannabis is not toxic: Mike Rafton, Alameda. Discussed how the revenue can help other programs in Alameda, such as Meals on Wheels: Sharon Golden, Alameda Island Cannabis Community (AICC). Discussed workers, including local hires, health, safety, benefits, and unions: Augustus Rodriguez, International Longshore and Warehouse Union. Gave a Power Point presentation; discussed the benefits of cannabis: Rich Mozkowitz, Alameda for Safe Cannabis Access Group. Urged adopting local preference regulations: Linda Ashbury, West Alameda Business Association. Outlined his proposed business plan; urged Council to reconsider the proposed ban on onsite consumption: Mark Humburg, Alameda. Expressed opposition to the regulations; suggested gathering input: Don Sherat, Alameda. Expressed support for the ordinance; stated cannabis use for palliative reasons is on the rise: Gretchen Lipow, Alameda. Expressed support for three local dispensaries; suggested uses for revenue from cannabis businesses: Dorothy Freeman, Alameda. Stated that he does not support the regulations; expressed concern over the businesses being cash based: Scott Stockton, Alameda. Discussed her medical marijuana use; expressed support for local preference and onsite consumption: Mallory Penny, Alameda. Expressed support for cannabis businesses in Alameda: Sasha Stallworth, Alameda. Stated her sole concern is location; urged a 1,000 foot restrictions from schools and parks; suggested edible and advertising regulations and using some revenue for educations at schools: Jennifer Williams, Alameda. Expressed concern over locating near schools; urged a thoughtful, slow rollout: Poasseu Obot, Alameda. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 6, 2017 | 13646 | |
18495 | 18495 | The Community Development Director responded the Planning Board will have to conduct more in depth work regarding the zoning districts. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the matter would return to Council after the Planning Board, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether inserting a Planning Board meeting will affect the timeline and what the timeline would be. The Community Development Director responded if direction is given to go to the Planning Board, the Board would hear the matter in October. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a possibility to have the questions posed to Council, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; continued the presentation. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired if Council were to approve only one type of cannabis business now, could the ordinance be revised at a later date, to which the Community Development Director responded in the affirmative, continued the presentation. Mayor Spencer inquired how many people participated in the survey. The City Manager responded 600 people; stated the survey is a random sample of voters. Mayor Spencer inquired how the voters are chosen. The City Manager responded the random sample is selected from registered voters; stated a quality of life survey is done every four years and four questions were added at the end of the existing survey. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the four questions were the only ones asked regarding the topic, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative. The Community Development Director continued the presentation. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether other work would not be done because staff is busy hurrying to get the cannabis issues resolved. Mayor Spencer requested clarification whether Councilmember Matarrese is referring to other City work Councilmember Matarrese responded in the affirmative. The City Manager responded in the affirmative to Councilmember Matarrese's inquiry. Councilmember Matarrese… | 13646 | |
18494 | 18494 | Vice Mayor Vella inquired how is the square footage measured. The Community Development Director responded door to door; continued the presentation. Mayor Spencer inquired whether there is a map that includes the parks in Alameda. The Community Development Director responded in the negative. Vice Mayor Vella inquired whether staff considered parks. The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated staff took into account the States definition of sensitive use; parks are not considered sensitive use under State law; continued the presentation. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the square foot buffer or parks issues should return to the Planning Board. Special Meeting Alameda City Council June 6, 2017 | 13646 | |
18493 | 18493 | Councilmember Oddie inquired how local ownership could be encouraged. Mr. Hall responded there are programs for local hiring. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether the 600 foot regulation can be changed. Mr. Hall responded there is conflict regarding the regulation, which states both a minimum of 600 feet and 600 feet or whatever a local jurisdiction determines; stated he is unsure how the matter will be reconciled. The Community Development Director continued the presentation. Mayor Spencer inquired whether dispensaries can be both medical and recreational under State Law. The Community Development Director responded currently the regulations do not allow for co-locations; stated staff is inquiring whether or not Council would like to allow co- locations. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the City is risking forfeiture of the building if a cannabis business is on City owned land. The Community Development Director responded there is risk of forfeiture of the building or land; stated it is unchartered territory; staff would recommend reviewing how things evolve at the federal level. Mayor Spencer inquired whether any cities allow cannabis businesses on city owned land. The Community Development Director responded there was a plant in Coalinga, but it was sold; stated a unique attribute of Alameda is the former Navy Base is still owned by the federal government; cannabis is illegal at the federal level; continued the presentation. Mayor Spencer inquired what is the definition of a youth center. The Community Development Director responded the State definition is contained in the ordinance; continued the presentation. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Council could include a larger radius to include parks as a restricted area. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the ordinance contains the State minimums. Mayor Spencer inquired whether the map provided in the exhibit reflects the State Special Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18492 | 18492 | Mr. Hall responded in the affirmative. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why there is a 600 foot buffer. Mr. Hall responded the 600 feet is the State regulation and the minimum that is required in other cities. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the 600 feet regulation is only from a school or daycare center, and does not include public parks. Mr. Hall responded the regulation has also been used for public parks; stated including parks is at the preference of the city. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft how the City would know how much time a license would take when doing the license for the first time. Mr. Hall responded there is a learning curve with the industry; stated there is no real way to know the time but an estimate is given. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether vaping is included in the smoking ordinance. The Community Development Director responded in the negative; stated part of the draft ordinance before Council would update the smoking ordinance to prohibit cannabis smoking. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether tobacco vaping is in the ordinance. The Community Development Director responded tobacco vaping was not around when the smoking ordinance was adopted. Councilmember Oddie inquired what is the significance of the January 1st deadline. The Community Development Director responded January 2nd is the date the State will start issuing temporary licenses; stated a local jurisdiction needs to affirmatively regulate the industry or ban it outright ahead of the January 2nd deadline; if the City does not have regulations or a ban, the State will presume the uses are permitted solely based on the State requirements; if there is no consensus by the deadline, staff would recommend banning cannabis activity to allow time to work through the regulatory framework. Councilmember Oddie inquired whether Alameda has a ban on medicinal use but nothing in place for recreational use. The Community Development Director responded in the affirmative; stated the ordinance needs updating. Special Meeting Alameda … | 13646 | |
18491 | 18491 | MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY - -SEPTEMBER 5, 2017--5:30 P.M. Mayor Spencer convened the meeting at 5:33 p.m. ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Ezzy Ashcraft, Matarrese, Oddie, Vella and Mayor Spencer - 5. [Note: Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft arrived at 5:35 p.m.] Absent: None. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS (17-493) Workshop on a Proposed Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Repealing Section 30-5.15 (Medical Dispensaries and Cultivation) of the Alameda Municipal Code in its Entirety; Adding a New Article XVI (Cannabis Businesses); Adding a New Section 30-10 (Cannabis); and Amending Sections 24-11 (Smoking Prohibitions in Places of Employment and Unenclosed Public Places) and 24-12 (Smoking Prohibitions in Housing). The City Manager and the Community Development Director made introductory remarks. Councilmember Matarrese inquired whether Council would not be voting on the ordinance tonight. The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the purpose of the workshop is for Council to provide direction. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the workshop is a first reading of the ordinance, to which the City Manager responded in the negative. Neil Hall, SCI Consulting Group, and the Community Development Director gave a Power Point presentation. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what vertical integration means. Mr. Hall responded vertical integration means a cultivator can also be a manufacturer and can hold a license for everything but testing. Councilmember Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether testing is a standalone license, to which Special Meeting Alameda City Council September 5, 2017 | 13646 | |
18490 | 18490 | None. 8. STATUS REPORT ON ONGOING PROJECTS None. 9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, GENERAL None. 10. ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA None. 11. SET NEXT MEETING DATE: March 11, 2010 12. ADJOURNMENT Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. 7 Minutes - Thursday, February 11, 2010 | 13646 | |
18489 | 18489 | full and we are making enough money to pay for the four and on-half positions. M/S/C SONNEMAN/RESTAGNO (approved) "That 2010 Fees be approved as follows: Public Swim $5 Adult Non-Resident Lap Swim $5 Adult Non-Resident $3 Senior 50+ Non-Resident Pool Rentals Commercial Use (For profit organizations) $50/hr (grp leaders CPR/1st Aid certified, 1 ARPD Attendant) $75/hr (includes 1 ARPD certified guard) Buildings Recreation Centers Additional $30/hr non-resident fee Grounds Picnics $60/hr 3 hr. min. Non-Resident fee Alameda Point Gym Gym Deposit $1,000 Resident $1,000 Non-Resident Tennis Adult Group Lessons $15/hr Junior Group Lessons $15/hr Day Camp Preschool $5/hr Approved (5): Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Sonneman Absent (1): Mariani 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 7. REPORTS FROM RECREATION COMMISSION AND RECREATION AND PARK DIRECTOR A. Park Division See February 10, 2010 Activity Report. B. Recreation Division See February 10, 2010 Activity Report. C. Mastick Senior Center See February 10, 2010 Activity Report. D. Other Reports and Announcements Recreation & Park Commission Mtg. 6 Minutes - Thursday, February 11, 2010 | 13646 | |
18488 | 18488 | Director Lillard stated that one of the main concerns that ARPD staff has is that there are a lot of preschoolers who use the park and they might get over run by the school age children. Ms. Zenner stated that if they raised funds it would be under the auspices of Friends of Franklin Park. Director Lillard stated that they could add a second play area. So during the day the preschoolers could play in that area and then the preschoolers would not be overrun by the school age children. Commissioner Cooper asked if the second play area would be the grass area beyond the tennis courts. Director Lillard stated yes. Ms. Zenner stated it would be an early childhood play area. Director Lillard stated so that park patrons would not get over run by the school children. Commissioner Cooper stated that his only concern would be the number of preschoolers who use the park. Commissioners Sonneman and Brown also agreed. Director Lillard stated that at this point the project is conceptual but wanted to begin the Commission review process. Commissioner Sonneman asked who would pay for the gate. Ms. Zenner stated probably the Franklin School PTA. Commissioner Sonneman asked if ARPD would have approval of placement of the gate. Director Lillard stated yes, it would be a negotiated item. Commissioner Sonneman asked if the site specific plan would be unique to Franklin. Director Lillard stated it would be the first one documented besides Bayport Park. Chair Ogden asked if the use would include the tennis courts. Ms. Zenner stated no. Director Lillard stated that the time would only include during the school day. We would still have the area from 3:00 p.m. on and it does not include the recreation building. Chair Ogden stated it would not be for exclusive use. Director Lillard stated no. There will still be park access. Director Lillard stated that ARPD nor the Recreation and Park Commission could sign an agreement with the Franklin School group. It would have to be done at the Council level. Director Lillard stated that this is an in… | 13646 | |
18487 | 18487 | 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter from Franklin Elementary School Principal regarding their request for use of Franklin Park. 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Franklin School's Request for Use of Franklin Park - (Discussion/Action Item) Director Lillard introduced Lisa Zenner, Franklin School parent and Alameda resident, who provided the Commission with a preliminary plan of the request to use Franklin Park. She introduced Robert Shemwell, AUSD Interim CFO, in case the Commission has questions of AUSD and also stated that Chris Nelson (architect, Franklin School parent, and Alameda resident) provided a site plan for the proposed project area. The principal of Franklin Elementary School is requesting a shared use agreement between Franklin Park and Franklin Elementary School which will enable Franklin School students to use the park for recesses and P.E. classes. Ms. Zenner described the project to the Commission. The children would cross at San Antonio and the Franklin group proposes that a gate be placed between the north side of the recreation building and the wrought iron fence that comes to it so that the whole area could be supervised by a teacher who would be standing at the picnic tables in front of the recreation building. They could see everywhere in the area with the exception of the pathway around the corner to the recreation building which would be gated off. The second phase of the project would be to approach the Public Works Department to close San Antonio Avenue during school hours. This project phase is separate from this current request. This phase would be for safety reasons to get the children back and forth to the park safely. Commissioner Brown asked if the request to close San Antonio would be the entire street. Ms. Zenner stated that it would be the area right in front of the school. Ms. Zenner stated that the group has met with Matt Naclerio, Public Works Director, to pursue the street closure. Director Lillard stated that these types of agreements are very common. Most of the school sites… | 13646 | |
18486 | 18486 | Joe Woodard, Alameda resident, stated it is frustrating that when they do receive recommendations for funding sources, for instance from Pete Starks's, and they are unable to pursue them further without the city's interest. They cannot interest anyone in doing the fundraising. Vice Chair Restagno asked if the Commission could recommend that the city at least look at this issue. Director Lillard stated yes, the Commission can support it. Commissioner Sonneman stated that the Commission supports parks and open space. Director Lillard stated that he could set the meeting if the Commission would like to be part of the sub-committee or the representation. A representative from the Commission could be at the meeting. Vice Chair Restagno stated that the City should at least take a look instead of stone- walling the group. It did not do a lot of good with the Measure WW funds. Ms. Freeman stated that there are a lot of people that really do know that the Commission supported the parks on that issue. She feels that the Commission received a lot of kudos for that. Director Lillard stated that the Commission's position was pretty clear on the issue. Commissioner Sonneman stated that the bottom line is that the Commission does support open space and parks and commended the efforts and work that the group has done. But, how to get the City to apply for money is not a Recreation & Park Commission charge. Director Lillard stated that the Recreation Commission can approve the concept and then he could set up the meeting if the Commission would like to name a member to attend the meeting that would be up to the Commission. Chair Ogden stated she would like to be at the meeting. Whenever the meeting is set with the City Manager she would be happy to be at the meeting. Ms. Freeman stated that their group has had a lot of meetings with Mr. Thomas and he has been meeting with the property owner to come up with some kind of agreement. But, if he has no support from the rest of the city then he is spinning his wheels too. Ms. Freeman s… | 13646 | |
18485 | 18485 | M/S/C SONNEMAN/RESTAGNO (approved) "That the October 5, 2009 Recreation Commission Special Meeting minutes are approved." Approved (4): Ogden, Restagno, Cooper, Sonneman Abstained (1): Brown Absent (1): Mariani The November 12, 2009 Recreation & Park Commission Regular Meeting minutes are tabled until the next meeting. M/S/C COOPER/RESTAGNO (approved) "That the January 14, 2009 Recreation Commission Meeting minutes are approved.' Approved (4): Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper Abstained (1): Sonneman Absent (1): Mariani 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, AGENDA (Any person may address the Commission in regard to any matter over which the Commission has jurisdiction or of which it may take cognizance that is not on the agenda.) Dorothy Freeman, Alameda resident, asked if there is a proposed time of when the Alameda Boys & Girls Club Measure WW application will be available. Director Lillard stated that their application has to be filed by March 31, 2010. But, if it is submitted before that time he believes it is a public document. Ms. Freeman requested a copy of the Alameda Boys & Girls Club Measure WW application when it is submitted. Director Lillard stated that copies can be provided once it is submitted. Ms. Freeman asked the four names of the people who were to work on the Alameda Beltline Park. Director Lillard stated that it was himself, Public Works Director, Deputy City Manager, and Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager in Community Development Department. The Deputy City Manager is the chair of the committee and is in charge. Ms. Freeman stated that her pet peeve in all of this is Estuary Park. They have been working on this project for approximately nine years; they have gone out and found money, talked to public officials and the only people they cannot seem to get on board is the City. This park could have been built several years ago if they could get some support or somebody from the City working with them. They would like to know what it would take to get some cooperation. They as individuals cannot go and ap… | 13646 | |
18484 | 18484 | a NOTICE OF MEETING ALAMEDA RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSION MINUTES FOR REGULAR MEETING DATE: Thursday, February 11, 2010 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Room 360, City Hall, corner of Santa Clara Avenue and Oak Street, Alameda, CA 94501 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Terri Ogden, Vice Chair Joe Restagno , Commissioners Lola Brown, Mike Cooper, and Bill Sonneman Staff: Dale Lillard, ARPD Director Jackie Krause, Senior Services Manager (SSM) John McDonald, Park Manager (PM) Absent: Commissioner Gina Mariani 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approve Minutes of: - September 10, 2009 Recreation & Park Commission Regular Meeting - September 10, 2009 Recreation & Park Commission Special Meeting - October 5, 2009 Recreation & Park Commission Special Meeting - November 12, 2009 Recreation & Park Commission Regular Meeting - January 14, 2010 Recreation & Park Commission Regular Meeting M/S/C BROWN/SONNEMAN (approved) "That the September 10, 2009 Recreation Commission Regular Meeting minutes are approved.' Approved (5): Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Sonneman Absent (1): Mariani M/S/C SONNEMAN/RESTAGNO (approved) "That the September 10, 2009 Recreation Commission Special Meeting minutes are approved." Approved (5): Ogden, Restagno, Brown, Cooper, Sonneman Absent (1): Mariani | 13646 | |
18483 | 18483 | Staff Member Thomas previewed upcoming agenda items. 10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS *None* 11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS Board Member Teague asked what happened at City Council with the appeal of the Park St. hotel project. Staff Member Thomas said they denied the appeal. Because the hearing was "de novo," they said the design of the building needed to be redone. Board Member Teague asked if the cannabis dispensary was appealed. Staff Member Thomas said the dispensary was not appealed. He said the council is having a hard time with the ordinance but the use permit went through without appeal. Board Member Mitchell said many design decisions are being made in response to the dark skies ordinance. He wondered "if that ship has sailed." Staff Member Thomas said they have always included conditions of approval regarding lighting, and they just have finally been able to put that in the zoning ordinance. He said not much has changed. President Sullivan asked if the ordinance affects residential properties. Staff Member Thomas said that they do have requirements that must be met when people come in for permits. 12. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 13. ADJOURNMENT President Sullivan adjourned the meeting at 8:35pm. Draft Planning Board minutes Page 6 of 6 March 25, 2019 | 13646 | |
18482 | 18482 | Board Member Teague added a condition to his motion that the Harbor View Park and Graving Dock edge landscape plans return to the Planning Board for final approval. He suggested exploring putting the railing around the Graving Dock at the top of the slope instead of the bottom of the slope. Board Member Saheba agreed with exploring that location for the railing. He said the transition of the railing from the Harbor View Park to the Graving Dock would be important. Board Member Cavanaugh asked to see the presentation material ahead of time when it comes back. The motion passed 6-0. 8. MINUTES *None* 9. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS 9-A 2019-6695 Planning, Building and Transportation Department Recent Actions and Decisions The staff report can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3889842&GUID=AEOE0136- B027-487E-BF1D-DB5EC6C9FD80&FullText=1 Board Member Teague said he was surprised to see that nothing on the 1300 block of Lafayette was on the Study List. 9-B 2019-6699 Status Report on Design Review and Development Plan for an approximately 113,000- square-foot hotel with 172 guest rooms, and an approximately 7,000-square-foot restaurant with coffee shop at 2900 Harbor Bay Parkway The staff report can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3889843&GUID=C9418C20- OA7E-4ABE-9085-23CB6D5C6747&FullText=1 President Sullivan said she was meeting with the developer and the landscape architect this week. 9-C 2019-6702 Oral Report - Future Public Meetings and Upcoming Planning, Building and Transportation Department Projects Draft Planning Board minutes Page 5 of 6 March 25, 2019 | 13646 | |
18481 | 18481 | March 25, 2019 | 13646 | |
18480 | 18480 | President Sullivan suggested that the applicant recycle some of the large, old, beams from the site's original buildings as benches. Board Member Curtis asked how frequently the decomposed granite would need to be maintained. The landscape architect said that every five years is a good estimate. Board Member Saheba asked if the decomposed granite provides any benefit near the wharf promenade, given that it is only covering a very small area. Sean Murphy, applicant, agreed that the decomposed granite near the wharf promenade could be removed at the board's pleasure. Board Member Cavanaugh asked if the decomposed granite would spread onto the Bay Trail and create a potential safety issue. He said a rock on a sidewalk can ruin his day when he is rollerblading. The landscape architect said that they can remove all of the decomposed granite given the board's concerns. Board Member Cavanaugh asked if the BBQs would be available to the entire community or only the project residents. Staff Member Thomas said they would be available to all residents. Board Member Teague said he would like park users here and throughout the city to be provided information on how to use the BBQs in the most ecologically friendly way. Board Member Mitchell asked about the status of the view corridor through the building. Staff Member Thomas said that the two corridors would be designed with the buildings when they came back to the board for design review. Board Member Saheba said that he would be comfortable with that as long as the parameters of the easement are established. Staff Member Thomas said the height and width are established in the master plan. Suzanne Diers said she is concerned that the project does not have adequate parking and will spill over into the neighborhoods. She suggested using concrete benches like the ones used at Jean Sweeney There were no more speakers. President Sullivan closed the public hearing. Draft Planning Board minutes Page 3 of 6 March 25, 2019 | 13646 | |
18479 | 18479 | President Sullivan asked if they were reviewing a final plan or just a general layout for the open space. Staff Member Thomas said that this is the final public hearing on the open space plan. He said they do have several conditions of approval that will require more details to be approved at the staff level before it goes to construction drawings. He said there are a number of subsequent approvals that will be required before the project proceeds. He said the lighting plan will come back to the Planning Board. Board Member Curtis said the condition about issuing the boatyard RFQ needs to be stronger. Staff Member Thomas said staff agrees with Board Member Curtis' position regarding the boatyard and is balancing the need to give the applicant a resolution that they can take to BCDC. Cindy Ma, project architect, gave a presentation, detailing the changes that have been made since the previous study session. Board Member Mitchell asked why we are creating a vegetative buffer along the shoreline in the Harbor View Park. Ms. Ma said they got feedback from various stakeholders. She said the softer edge allows for a more attractive shoreline edge condition as compared to having a seawall with a railing. President Sullivan explained her concern about maintaining decomposed granite and asked exactly where it was planned. Ms. Ma showed where the decomposed granite would be placed in the plan. The landscape architect explained where and why they wanted to use the decomposed granite. President Sullivan said she does not think the Chinese pistache trees would do well in the salt water environment. She gave feedback on other tree options to be considered. Board Member Teague asked if the Water Life Park would be named that and signed as such. Clay Fry, project architect, said HAB would review and approve names for the parks, including Water Life Park. Draft Planning Board minutes Page 2 of 6 March 25, 2019 | 13646 | |
18478 | 18478 | DRAFT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD MONDAY, MARCH 25, 2019 1. CONVENE President Sullivan convened the meeting at 7:00pm 2. FLAG SALUTE Board Member Curtis led the flag salute. 3. ROLL CALL Present: President Sullivan, Board Members Cavanaugh, Curtis, Mitchell, Saheba, Teague. Absent: Rothenberg. 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION *None* 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS *None* 6. CONSENT CALENDAR *None* 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7-A 2019-6700 PLN19-0046 -Design Review for Alameda Marina Waterfront Park 1829 Clement Avenue. Applicant: Alameda Marina Development, LLC. The Planning Board will hold a public hearing to consider a Design Review application to construct approximately 3.5 acres of publically accessible waterfront open space, parks, landscaping and roadway and sidewalk improvements on the Alameda Marina property generally located between Clement Avenue and the Oakland Estuary and between Alameda Marina Drive and Willow Street. The environmental effects of the proposed project were considered and disclosed in the Alameda Marina Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2016102064). No further environmental review is required under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed improvements. Staff Member Thomas introduced the item. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3889844&GUID=AB4AF026- CA46-44C5-BBF6-D380DF015D78&FullText=1 Draft Planning Board minutes Page 1 of 6 March 25, 2019 | 13646 | |
18477 | 18477 | 6-A Status Report on Homeless Services Staff member Johnson provided the following update: Winter Warming Shelter: Services have concluded. Dine and Connect: Hosted a volunteer appreciation event, which was well attended. Emergency Housing at Alameda Point: City Council passed the rehab/outfitting of three homes. Approval of Site A: City Council passed the building of 600 housing units (market & BMR mixed). Homeless Encampments: Monthly clean-up with Planning & Building and Alameda Police Department are happening on second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. Village of Love: Currently looking for a new location. 7. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA None. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None. 9. ADJOURNMENT President Lewis adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Eric Fonstein, Board Secretary | 13646 | |
18476 | 18476 | Vice President Furuichi Fong and Board member Yamashiro-Omi support the idea of highlighting community members and their lived experiences, specifically around their interactions with social service providers. Board members discussed a community press release and kick-off event with shared stories from the community. Possible collaboration with the College of Alameda, high school students and Shaun Daniels with Castaway. Board member Yamashiro-Omi suggested mirroring some of the material presented by Alameda Point Collaborative. President Lewis summarized SSHRB consensus, confirming that it will remain on the agenda for next month's SSHRB meeting. 5-C Workgroup Reports Domestic Violence (DV) Task Force (Furuichi Fong): Board member Furuichi Fong attended the May 19 meeting. Discussion included, DV Awareness Month (October) and the need to provide additional resources to the public prior to. With the assistance of DABA & WABA, the Task Force plans to post resource flyers around Alameda, specifically in restrooms at bars and restaurants. Alamedans Together Against Hate (Yamashiro-Omi, Furuichi Fong): Board member Yamashiro-Omi confirmed they are still reviewing consultant proposals. Infrastructure Workgroup (Lewis, Means): President Lewis shared that they will present four (4) options/recommendations for the Community Service Awards, at next month's SSHRB meeting. 5-D Presentation on City of Alameda's Funding for Social Service Initiatives and Activities Staff member Butler presented a detailed spreadsheet of the funding sources for Social Services. The following six (6) sources, fund a total amount of $2,080,054: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Alameda County Fleet Industrial Supply Center (FISC) General Fund Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention (HHAP) Permanent Local Housing Assistance (PLHA) Board member Jagannathan asked what percentage of the General Fund is spent on social services; how much is being invested into social services? Staff member Butler said she did not know the exact percentage,… | 13646 | |
18475 | 18475 | Ms. Irvine stated that there is a lack of data from COVID-19 years, and wanted to know if SSHRB has experienced the same. Board Member Green confirmed that she has run into the same issue and plans to use the most recent data available. Ms. Irvine responded to Board member Yamashiro-Omi concern surrounding the immigration population, stating it is difficult to get data past 2018. She will share available data on Alameda County, which lists country of origin. Board member Means said that the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) indicator may be problematic, as the number of children is merely a total, and does not account for the severity of each learning disability. Board member Yamashiro-Omi asked if there is a data source for number of minority-owned, woman-owned businesses. Stating it will be difficult to have a conversation/develop a strategy about inequity without having relevant data. Board member Green stated that SSHRB will be looking to the City to assist with this indicator. President Lewis stated that she is hesitant to remove indicators as they are all important, and tell their own story. Emphasizing that SSHRB is setting the stage and the overall goal is to understand the context. President Lewis suggested replacing the officer per capita with another indicator regarding overall safety. Board member Means suggested consolidating some of the homeless information and adding accessible housing stock availability. President Lewis asked the Board if there was anything missing. Board member Yamashiro-Omi highlighted the community concern surround transportation and asked if there is a data source which would help show the lack of public transit. Board member Green shared some of the reports which provide transportation data and agreed it would be an essential indicator to add. Board member Yamashiro-Omi mentioned her concern regarding the lack of indicators within the social connection category. Board member Green stated there is a very little data available and suggests this is a topic for the focus groups… | 13646 | |
18474 | 18474 | City of Alameda, California SOCIAL SERVICE HUMAN RELATIONS BOARD THURSDAY, MAY 26, 2022 APPROVED MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER President Sarah Lewis called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: President Sarah Lewis, Vice President Kristin Furuichi Fong, Board members Dianne Yamashiro-Omi, Samantha Green, Scott Means and Priya Jagannathan. City staff: Eric Fonstein, Lois Butler, Veronika Cole, and Marcie Johnson 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3-A Review and Approve April 28, 2022 Draft Minutes A motion to approve the minutes of April 28, 2022 was made by Board member Green and seconded by Board member Yamashiro-Omi. Ayes: President S. Lewis, Vice President Furuichi Fong, Board members Yamashiro-Omi, Jagannathan, Green, and Means. Nays: none. Motion passed 6-0. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. AGENDA ITEMS 5-A Continued Discussion of the Development and Implementation of the 2022 Community Needs Assessment President Lewis introduced Angela Irvine, consultant, president of CERES Policy Research. Ms. Irvine shared her background and goals for working with the City on the upcoming focus groups. Board member Green and Jagannathan presented the list of indicators. SSHRB reviewed the spreadsheet, and discussed suggested indicators. The following is a summary of discussion points and questions: Board member Yamashiro-Omi asked if the indicators would reflect disaggregated data. Board member Jagannathan clarified that the indicators will be listed tables, and not interactive. Staff member Butler mentioned that the reported population for the City of Alameda may not be accurate, as the Census count was cut off early. Board member Green mentioned an adjusted Census population count, which did not include Alameda. Staff member Butler confirmed she will look into this. Board member Green modified the source for population. | 13646 | |
18473 | 18473 | President Ezzy Ashcraft requested that bike parking would not be reduced if less parking was needed due to this ordinance change. She encouraged that bike parking requirements be increased. Board Member Kohlstrand suggested that bicycle parking could be possibly handled with in-lieu fees on properties that have space constraints. Board Member Ibsen is not in favor of reducing bicycle parking requirements. He also stated that safe bicycle storage is missing in Alameda. Board Member Ibsen moved, seconded by Board Member Lynch, to recommend the ordinance as amended to City Council for approval. Motion carries 4-0. 10. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 11. BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: President Ezzy Ashcraft presented a publication on healthy neighborhood planning by the Institute of Local Governments and suggested that interested board members receive one too. 12. ADJOURNMENT: 9:16 p.m. Planning Board Page 4 of 4 Approved Meeting Minutes 9/13/2010 | 13646 | |
18472 | 18472 | Board Member Lynch asked that the ordinance be reworded to use "should', instead of using 'must' to allow flexibility in parking design. President Ezzy Ashcraft pointed out that since these parking regulations are for the Community Commercial it perhaps is a good idea to not set too stringent parking regulations to encourage creative developments in the future. Mr. Obaid Khan, discussed the methodology and statements made in the parking study. Mr. Thomas explained that there are several options how parking can be addressed in the individual parking study that would be required on individual projects and explained the rationale behind the residential parking requirements. Board Member Kohlstrand and President Ezzy Ashcraft asked whether there was a significant need to also amend the residential parking requirements. Mr. Thomas explained that since staff was already amending the parking ordinance for the Community Commercial zoning district, staff decided to include an amendment to the residential section to address parking requirements that routinely become stumbling blocks in the planning project review period. Board Member Lynch asked why an expansion of a non-conforming use would be permitted to begin with. Mr. Thomas stated at the City has an old housing stock with many non-conforming situations, which essentially would prevent any expansion of habitable area. President Ezzy Ashcraft favored to not develop a development code or policy framework that would make development more difficult or prevent it to begin with. She asked how that parking demand would be met with the development of a parking structure for north of Lincoln. Staff responded that a parking structure was not planned at this time, but that an application would come before the Planning Board if applicable. President Ezzy Ashcraft asked how a shared parking agreement would be established. Staff responded that this would be a formalized agreement, but there have not been very many in Alameda. President Ezzy Ashcraft asked how bike parking was accou… | 13646 | |
18471 | 18471 | Oral Report: Presentation of the Façade Grant Program for fiscal year 2009/2010 Ms Simone Wolter gave a presentation showcasing the results and efforts of the Façade Grant Program for the fiscal year 2009/2010. Kathy Moering, West Alameda Business Association Executive Director, spoke in support of the program and commended staff on their continued effort to facilitate the program. She thinks this program is the most valuable economic development tool that the City of Alameda has to offer. 7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR: None. 9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 9-A Zoning Text Amendment - Applicant - City of Alameda. The City of Alameda Planning Board will be considering proposed amendments to the City of Alameda off-street parking regulations. The proposed amendments include but are not limited to new minimum and maximum off-street parking requirements for certain commercial uses and proposed changes to the parking waiver provisions. Mr. Thomas presented the proposed changes to the off-street parking regulations. President Ezzy Ashcraft read an article from the American Planning Association regarding the trade-offs on changing parking standards. She is in support of the proposed changes. Kathy Moehring, WABA Executive Director, spoke in favor of the proposed changes. Board Member Kohlstrand supports the proposed changes, however, she considers the parking ratios as too cautious and would prefer seeing the minimum parking requirements numbers be used as maximum parking requirements. She would like to see even more relaxation of the requirements. Board Members Lynch and Board Member Ibsen seconded Board Member Kohlstrand's comments. Mr. Thomas stated that the resolution could be recommended to City Council for approval with changes attached. Planning Board Page 2 of 4 Approved Meeting Minutes 9/13/2010 | 13646 | |
18470 | 18470 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2010 1. CONVENE: 7:05 p.m. 2. FLAG SALUTE: Board member Ibsen 3. ROLL CALL: Present: President Ezzy Ashcraft, Board members lbsen, Kohlstrand, and Lynch. Absent: Vice-President Autorino and Board member Zuppan. Staff Present: Andrew Thomas, Planning Board Secretary; Erin Garcia, Recording Secretary; Simone Wolter, Planner; Obaid Khan, Public Works. 4. MINUTES: Minutes from the Special meeting of July 15, 2010 Board Member Kohlstrand moved motion to approve the meeting minutes, seconded by Board Member Board Member Ibsen. Motion carries 4-0. Minutes from the Regular meeting of July 26, 2010 Board Member Ibsen moved, seconded by Board Member Lynch, motion to continue this item to the meeting of September 27, 2010. Motion carries 4-0. Minutes from the Regular meeting of August 9, 2010 Board Member Ibsen moved, seconded by Board Member Lynch, motion to continue this item to the meeting of September 27, 2010. Motion carries 4-0. 5. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION: None. 6. STAFF COMMUNICATIONS: Written Report 6-A Future Agendas Mr. Andrew Thomas presented an overview of future projects. 6-B Zoning Administrator Report The Zoning Administrator Hearings for August 17, 2010 and September 7, 2010 were canceled. Planning Board Page 1 of 4 Approved Meeting Minutes 9/13/2010 | 13646 | |
18469 | 18469 | 9. ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned at 8:09 p.m. by Chair Johnson. Respectfully submitted, Itema Glidden Irma Glidden ARRA Secretary | 13646 | |
18468 | 18468 | Member Tam inquired if there was opportunity for Alameda to get funding for the EIR process. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services responded in the affirmative, stating that staff has discussed funding possibilities with the Navy. There are some technical issues as the Navy has a contract for their NEPA process, and the City has a CEQA contract, but it may be possible to combine the processes so that it is cost efficient. Member Tam inquired if there are synergies between the sister federal agencies (Lawrence Berkeley Lab is with the Dept. of Energy, and the Veterans Administration has close ties with Navy). The Deputy City Manager - Development Services explained that, regarding the VA, the Navy understands that there has to be coordination to the extent that City staff can work with the VA to leverage their infrastructure and develop that relationship, not just in terms of regulatory process, but also with actual physical improvements and infrastructure. With regards to the Lawrence Berkeley Lab's requests for proposals for land to host their second campus, the City is prepared to submit a proposal in coordination with the Navy. The Interim City Manager added that the City is prepared to respond to the Lawrence Berkeley Lab RFP process with a very competitive proposal. There are opportunities to have strategic alliances as a result of the DOE and the Navy that makes Alameda Point uniquely competitive. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services stated that staff will be providing the Board with updates at the monthly ARRA meetings. Vice Chair deHaan inquired if the Navy is willing to do phased conveyance. The Deputy City Manager - Development Services explained that the Navy is exploring the boundaries, the pros and cons of phased conveyance, and that the Navy is open and listening to ideas. There was discussion from the Board about the management of the utilities at Alameda Point and whether there was a formal decision made about it. The Assistant General Counsel - ARRA stated that there has never … | 13646 | |
18467 | 18467 | The Planning Services Manager gave an oral presentation on the schedule of the Alameda Point Community Forums, an initial eight month public outreach effort of the first phase of planning, which would end in June 2011 and restart the environmental review process. The Planning Services Manager explained that while the City of Alameda is doing a CEQA document EIR, the Navy will be doing a NEPA document. The Navy process won't start until there is a project description or general description of the City's plan. The goal is eight months. The eight-month schedule starts with a series of community outreach efforts, including community workshops and internet outreach. The tentative schedule of the first three meetings is: November 9 at the Grand Pavilion, November 18 at Mastick, and December 8 in west Alameda. These workshops and key components of each meeting will be consistent from meeting to meeting. The Planning Services Manager summarized the six key areas as noted in the staff report: 1) Community Facilities, 2) Land Use Mix, 3) Streets, Parks, and Open Space, 4) Transportation Access, 5) Architectural Character and Building Types, and 6) Historic Character and Adaptive Reuse. There are plans for a Tenant Forum in the spring focused on economic development strategy, a Developer and Business Forum, and discussions with each of the Boards and Commissions. A summary will be presented to the ARRA Board in March 2011, and a project description in June 2011. Member Gilmore requested an overview of where Alameda and the Bay Area stand in the commercial and industrial real estate market. The Interim City Manager discussed the application of a citywide real estate management policy which will include the information Member Gilmore requested about comparable leases. Member Tam requested an evaluation of internal competition, i.e., Marina Village VS. Alameda Point. Member Matarrese discussed the commercialization and industrialization approach to development at Alameda Point, stating that the markets already out there are no… | 13646 | |
18466 | 18466 | APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ALAMEDA REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, October 6, 2010 The meeting convened at 7:10 p.m. with Chair Johnson presiding. 1. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Beverly Johnson Boardmember Lena Tam Boardmember Frank Matarrese Boardmember Marie Gilmore Vice Chair Doug deHaan 2. CONSENT CALENDAR 2-A. Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 1, 2010. 2-B. Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease for Jim Bustos Plumbing, Inc., Building 612, at Alameda Point. 2-C. Authorize the Executive Director to Execute an Amendment to an Agreement with Russell Resources for Environmental Consulting Services for Alameda Point Extending the Term for 12 Months and Adding $140,000 to the Budget. 2-D. Authorize Negotiation and Execution of a Sublease for NRC Environmental Services, Inc. Building 616 and Yard D-13, at Alameda Point. Vice Chair deHaan moved for approval of the Consent Calendar. Member Tam seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS None. 4. ORAL REPORTS 4-A. Oral report from Member Matarrese, Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) representative - Highlights of September 2 Alameda Point RAB Meeting. Member Matarrese was not able to attend the Sept. 2 meeting but received materials regarding remediation activity in progress with a new technology, and a brief report on the University of Florida study of the remediation technique. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA (PUBLIC COMMENT) There were no speakers. 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNICATIONS 6-A. Presentation on "Going Forward" Community Forums for Alameda Point | 13646 | |
18465 | 18465 | Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that there are adverse effects on shading and lighting and if the applicant were to go back and redesign and the neighbors continued to object that the Board could overrule the objection. She stated that she cannot in good conscience make the finding. Board member Knox White motioned to continue the meeting to 12:30 a.m. Vice President Burton seconded the motion. Motion carried, 5-0; no abstentions. Staff clarified that four votes are need to uphold the appeal. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that by narrowly looking at the findings she cannot make the finding that Mr. Butkovitch's privacy is impacted since the addition is looking in on the attic which she does not consider living space. Board member Knox White motioned to uphold both appeals. Board member Henneberry seconded the motion. Motion does not carry 1-4; no abstentions. 9-C Recommendation to Approve a Zoning Amendment, Design Review Manual, and Final EIR for the North Park Street Planning Area. Item Continued to a later date. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS NONE BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: Board member Knox White requested that the Board receive copies of the St. Joseph's Master Plan prior to Board review of the item. He suggested that Harbor Landing send an update letter to the Board as an off agenda item. He stated that Otis Street, a priority bikeway, was recently and no bike facilities were installed. He questions if proper protocol was followed and would like to find out how ensuring proper protocol is followed is going to be addressed. President Zuppan stated the Southshore Center needs to come back for review because they have not met all compliance requirements (bike lane, sidewalks, etc) 12.ORAL COMMUNICATIONS NONE 13. ADJOURNMENT Approved Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 13 July 23, 2012 | 13646 | |
18464 | 18464 | Board member Knox White stated that most houses on the block are two stories but the distance between the buildings are much wider. He stated that he is considering approving the appeal and denying the addition. He concurred that the lighting will be impacted. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she spoke with Board member Burton and determined that the design review could be improved. She suggested that the Board consider going back and redesigning the addition. Mr. Suji, stated that he is going by the recommendation of planning and that although it is difficult to consider a redesign, it is something he would consider. Board member Knox White confirmed that if the appeal is upheld then the project is denied and the applicant must start over. Board member Knox White motioned to extend the meeting until 12:15 Board member Henneberry seconded the motion Motion carried, 5-0; no abstentions. Board member Knox White clarified with the applicant that the applicant is not interested in applying for new permits when his neighbors are probably going to oppose the redesign. He stated that he may be interested in approving something that is consistent with the code, but not necessarily this particular design, stating that if the applicant is following the rules it is very difficult for the Board to not approve the permit. President Zuppan stated that based on the staff report it is clear that the neighbors are not interested in a redesign since they oppose the addition of a second story. Vice President Burton clarified with staff that a variance is not being asked for. He stated that there are no rules against a second story addition, and that there won't make much difference with the amount of light and air if the leaves height is maintained and the addition is set back two feet. He stated that since the applicant has designed according to the code and he has a hard time upholding the appeal. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that the one applicant is concerned with privacy, while the other neighbor is concerned with l… | 13646 | |
18463 | 18463 | President Zuppan has closed public comment. President Zuppan clarified with staff that story poles were not part of the requirements, and that requirement is not embedded in any city regulations. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 13 July 23, 2012 | 13646 | |
18462 | 18462 | Board member Ezzy Ashcraft clarified with staff that the Fire Department would prefer to maintain fire access on both Tilden and Park Street. Staff stated that they will make the driveway as small as possible and report back to the Board with the final measurements and justifications. Board member Henneberry commented that a building on the other side of town was recently approved with very few windows. Board member Knox White stated that he will not hold up approval because of two windows, but he encourages the applicant to increase real windows, and reduce the window boxes. Both board member Köster and Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with board member Knox Whites statements. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft motioned to approve the staff resolution as amended. (See attached final Resolution) Board member Henneberry seconded the motion. Motion carried, 5-0; Vice President Burton recused. 9-B Appeal of Design Review PLN11-0208 - 1333 Broadway - Winslow Holmes & Ray Butkovich. Appeal approval of a design review project that consists of adding a second story to the single-family residence. The height of the home will increase by 8'-4"; the maximum height of the addition is 28'-11" (35 feet permitted). Grounds given for appeal: shading and loss of privacy Board member Köster left the meeting. Board member Henneberry motioned to continue item 9C to the following meeting. Board member Knox White seconded the motion. He also suggested that an ad-hoc sub-committee be formed to work with staff and address some minor details of the amendment. President Zuppan assigned Vice President Burton, Board member Knox White, and herself as members of the ad-hoc committee. Motion carried, 5-0; no abstentions. Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, gave brief presentation. Board member Knox White motion to continue the meeting until midnight. Approved Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 13 July 23, 2012 | 13646 | |
18461 | 18461 | Motion carried, 5-0; Burton recused. Board member Knox White expressed concern that all the activity generators (ATM, etc ) are located at the back of the building and suggested that the activity generators be moved to Park Street. President Zuppan concurred with Board member Knox White and clarified with staff that the current condition regarding Park Street entrances does not orient the front of the building to be on Park Street. She inquired if the driveway can be moved and clarified with staff that a condition of approval to review shifting the driveway. Board member Köster confirmed with that the exit on Foley Street can be moved to be closer to the end of the street and negating lights from shining into residences. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft clarified with staff that the landscaping space in the parking lot is not walkable but just decorative. Staff clarified that a condition of the approval for the landscape requires either a wall or hedge on Foley Street. President Zuppan is supportive of the comments from board member Knox White regarding the median and sidewalk. She supports the installation of benches, REA parking agreement, trying to address employee parking, moving the trash bins, smaller Park Street entrance, and limiting truck delivery on Tilden outside of rush hour, and the removal of the drive-thru when occupancy changes. She would prefer to see a higher bike parking ratio than 1:10. Obaid Khan, Public Works, stated that blocking traffic with a loading zone needs to be reviewed by the Police Chief and the Public Works Director. He clarified that loading zones are usually created in parking spaces, not travel zones. Josh Eisenhut, Armstrong Development, clarified that he requests that the operating hours be at least the same as the current locations hours of 7 a.m.-11 p.m. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would support the store and drive thru to operate between 7 a.m.-11 p.m. Board member Knox White requested that if the drive way width be larger than 14 feet, curb to curb, than it come… | 13646 | |
18460 | 18460 | Board member Köster stated that narrowing the street and providing a larger building space in Pad B is a good idea. He stated that Tilden Way should be one way entrance and exit and the sidewalk should continue to Buena Vista with turning lanes, truck parking access, and a bike path. He concurs with Board comments regarding the 24 hour use permit. He requests as much screening between the parking lot, drive- through, and residents as possible. He would prefer regular windows on Park Street and referenced a new CVS in San Francisco that has real windows. He also concurred with comments made by Board member Knox White. President Zuppan clarified with staff that the Newspaper Stand in front of Pad B can be moved if it is in the public right of way. She clarified with staff that the crosswalk from Pacific currently has crosswalk lights. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft clarified with staff that the in-pavement lights have been repaired and signs have been installed. Board member Köster stated that bulb outs assist with pedestrians stepping out and allowing motorist to see them before crossing. President Zuppan clarified with staff that residents have a preferential parking permit program; however they would have to incur the cost of implementing the program in their neighborhood. She expressed interest in seeing the condition that the drive- through be removed in the building changes occupancy, which would require a new tenant to request permission to use it. She concurred with Board member Knox White's suggestion to decrease the width of the entrance. She expressed concern with the left turn lanes from Park Street and how traffic and pedestrian safety will be impacted without lights. Obaid Khan, Public Works, stated that access from Park Street may requires emergency vehicle access and Municipal Code requires a driveway width of 20 feet. He stated that staff will review the code and try to accommodate the request to reduce the width. He stated that pedestrians must exercise judgment when crossing streets, and that the Cit… | 13646 | |
18459 | 18459 | Staff expressed a need to maintain lanes for exclusive transit services and bike lane requirements. Staff suggested reviewing the posted speed limit and working with the police department for speed enforcement. Board member Köster stated that the sidewalks are not continued onto Tilden Way between Foley Street and Buena Vista and is a problem with pedestrian access. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft requested that staff look into whether proper signage is posted throughout the area. She stated that the conditions address comments regarding light and noise pollution. She clarified with staff that truck deliveries would be limited to 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Board member Henneberry stated the one way entrance and exit on Park Street is a good compromise and is supportive. He stated in terms of fairness that the drive- through pharmacy should be permitted. He questions the need for the 24 hour operating permit and suggested that CVS apply for that permit at a later time, once business conditions prove the need. He stated that he would prefer fewer spandrel windows. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft stated that her preference is to allow only for an entrance into the development from Park Street with that customers exit onto Tilden or Foley. She will support the drive-through pharmacy, but questions the actual need for it. She is not supportive of the 24-hour use permit stating that there is not a current need, and that there is no point in burdening the residents. She stated that she wants the majority (3) of the Park Street windows to be windows and the remaining two could be window boxes. Board member Knox White commented that Tilden needs to be changed into a 25 mph zone. He stated that he would like the City to find a way to make the current proposed design on Tilden work temporarily while the City works through the process for redesigning Tilden to make sure the City gets what it wants. He recommended that the one way Park Street entrance be approved and reduce the lane width, which would allow Building B expand in size. He … | 13646 | |
18458 | 18458 | Jacqueline Miranda, resident, concurred with previous speakers, and requests that the Foley Street entrance and exit be closed and the right turn only exits on both Tilden and Park be installed. Irene Dieter, resident, expressed surprise with the acceptance of the statement that housing over retail establishments on Park Street doesn't make economic sense, and stated that the same thought could be applied to Alameda Point and sets a bad precedence. Requested explanation for allowing one and not the other. Lear Blitzstein, resident, concurs with Mr. Herrick's statements and is opposed to CVS, a corporation moving into the neighborhood. Expressed concern with light and noise pollution, parking impact, traffic congestion and speeding. Heath Carlisle, resident, concerned about the extra traffic from the development especially with a 24 hour use permit, and requested that no entrance/exit be allowed on Foley Street. Brian Kernan, concurred with comments made by Nanette Berdict regarding Foley Street, disagree with 24 hour use permit, and expressed concern with delivery times and inadequate amount of parking. He requested that Tilden way be reduced to single lanes each way, with metered parking. Jacqueline Cooper, resident, generally opposes the CVS, concerned with the placement of garbage bins, and against the 24 hour drive through. She asked the Board to consider whether a development that includes a CVS pharmacy and Chase bank keeps with the smaller boutique businesses that inhabit Park Street. David Maxcy, resident, he likes the design and believes it will enhance Park Street. He expressed concern regarding traffic impact on Park Street. Lorre Zuppan closed public comment. Andrew Thomas stated that the zoning is commercial manufacturing, that there is an increase in the parking ratio. He clarified that if the Foley Street entrance/exit is closed there will probably not be an REA with the Market Place, which would impact the proposed landscaping and improvements on the Market Place parking lot. He stated that the tr… | 13646 | |
18457 | 18457 | Board member Knox White clarified with Mr. Eisenhut that the addition of a Park Street entrance/exit only provides convenience to CVS customers as well as the smaller retail stores that will inhabit the other building. Board member Köster clarified with staff that any modifications to the driveway will be applied to the two parking plans which have been provided, one with an REA and one without. President Zuppan opened public comment. Patsy Paul, resident, stated that she is against 24-hour use permit because of increased traffic, safety, noise pollution, light intrusion, additional CO2 emissions, and parking impact. She requested that the Board deny the application for the use permit. Nanette Burdick, resident, expressed concern with the design permit commenting that the Foley Street entrance is problematic, because it is a narrow residential alley with limited residential parking. She expressed concern about additional employee parking impacting already limited residential parking. She suggested that Tilden Way, be changed to a one way street with parking for employees, and Tilden way become the main entrance for CVS. She expressed concerned about safety, noise pollution, lighting, trash be placed at least 50 feet away from any resident, 4 foot attractive brick wall providing some privacy and proper screening so neighbors aren't looking into a parking lot. Robb Ratto, Executive Director of PSBA, completely supportive of the project. Expressed support of the drive-through pharmacy, which will allow CVS to be competitive with both Walgreens. He stated the window boxes are imperative for running a retail business, and asks CVS to incorporate public art into the window boxes. He said he liked the diagonal entrance on Park Street because it mirrored the buildings in the core section, and allow a little characteristic, He asked the Board to allow for ingress and right turn only egress on Park Street, stating it's imperative for traffic flow and customer ease. Audrey Lord-Hausman, resident, expressed concern regarding… | 13646 | |
18456 | 18456 | Foley Street, Tilden Way, and Park Street. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit for approval of a drive-thru lane and window and 24 hour operations. The application also requires the removal and replacement of up to two existing street trees in the Tilden Way median. Vice President Burton recused himself. Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, gave brief presentation. President Zuppan clarified with staff that the plans have changed and now included actual windows facing Tilden. Greg Kline, architect, gave brief presentation and corrected staff's presentation stating that CVS prefers the right turn only option from the driveway onto Park Street. He clarified that the arched glass above the window boxes is clear glass and allows pedestrians to see in. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft clarified with Mr. Kline that the glass used in the window arches on Tilden Way, the arched windows in the rear of Pad A building as well as the Pad B is spandrel glass, which has a coating that doesn't allow people to see through it. She confirmed with staff that the code requires 1 bicycle parking space per every 10 vehicle spaces. Obaid Khan, City Traffic Engineer, confirmed that two long term bicycle parking spaces (bike lockers) have been included in the conditions (number 61), which is in addition to the regular, short-term bicycle parking. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft clarified with staff that turn-around space according to the traffic study REA has been provided. She clarified that space in the parking lot for a holiday tree has also been reserved. Josh Eisenhut, Armstrong Development, gave brief presentation. Board member Henneberry clarified with Mr. Einsenhut that by requesting the 24 hour use permit now, before business conditions warrant the need, allows CVS all the necessary permits to quickly implement operational hour changes in the future without seeking additional approval. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft clarified with staff that it would take less than two months to hold a public hearing and seek approva… | 13646 | |
18455 | 18455 | 8-B Approve a Modification to the Master Street Tree Plan to Add Robinia pseudoacacia (Black Locust) to the Planting Palette for the 1300 Block of Bay Street. Planning Services Manager gave brief presentation. President Zuppan opened public comment. Karen Flanders, resident, stated that the residents of the street would like the tree- scape to remain as is. David Maxcy, resident, stated that the current trees are pink, and the residents of the street would like the replacement trees to be the same or at the very least, the same color. President Zuppan clarified with staff and informed the residents that the Robinia pseudoacacia trees are in fact pink and the plan modification is to guarantee that the correct tree is planted. Belinda Ray, resident, stated that the arching trees that meet in the middle make the street beautiful and create character. She said she would like the trees to remain the same. She referenced the amount of commercials filmed on the street because of the trees. Tim Rumberger, resident, stated he is not aware of any invasive issues, or sidewalk damage caused by the current trees. He referenced the amount of commercials filmed on the street and cited economic incentive for keeping the same species of trees; he urged the Board to approve the motion as it has been amended to allow for the pink version of the tree. President Zuppan closed public comment. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft voiced her approval of the amendment and suggested to staff that more of these trees be planted throughout the City because of their economic value. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft motioned to approve a modification of the Master Street Tree Plan. Board member Knox White seconded the motion. Motioned carried, 6-0; no abstentions. 9-A Conditional Use and Design Review Application- - PLN11-0378, 1600 Park Street (Former Good Chevrolet Site) Proposed commercial buildings, including two one-story structures and a parking lot to be accessed from Approved Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 13 July 23, 2012 | 13646 | |
18454 | 18454 | Andrew Thomas requested that item 9D be continued to a date yet determined to allow staff more time to prepare the report. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft motioned to continue item 9D to a date yet to be determined in the future. Board member Knox White seconded the motion Motion carried, 5-0; no abstentions STAFF COMMUNICATIONS 6-A Future Agendas Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, provided an overview of upcoming projects. President Zuppan arrived. 7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS President Zuppan opened Oral Communications. Kelly Johnston, St. Joseph's Elementary School, stated that the school will issue a written response to the community comments and concerns. She reiterated that the project is in compliance with the master plan and will result in a net zero population increase. She stated that the financial aspects of the project are outside the Board's scope. She invited the board members to tour the campus and see how the project complies with the school's master plan. President Zuppan closed Oral Communications 8. CONSENT CALENDAR. 8-A Zoning Administrator and Design Review Recent Actions and Decisions. A report of recent actions on minor variances, minor variances, and design review applications. Item 8-B was moved to the Regular Agenda Items. Board member Knox White motioned to approve the consent calendar. Vice President Burton seconded the motion. Motion carried, 6-0; no abstentions 9. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS Approved Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 13 July 23, 2012 | 13646 | |
18453 | 18453 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD MONDAY, AUGUST 27, 2012 1. CONVENE: 7:08 p.m. 2. FLAG SALUTE: Board member Köster 3. ROLL CALL: Present: President Zuppan (arrived late), Vice-President Burton, Board members Ezzy Ashcraft, Henneberry, Knox White, and Köster. Absent: None 4. MINUTES: Minutes from the Regular meeting of June 25, 2012 Board member Knox White motioned to approve minutes as amended Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion Motion carried, 6-0; no abstentions Minutes from the Regular meeting of July 9, 2012 Board member Knox White motioned to approve minutes as amended Board member Henneberry seconded the motion Motion carried, 4-0; abstentions Vice President Burton and Board member Köster Minutes from the Regular meeting of July 23, 2012 Board member Knox White motioned to continue the minutes Board member Ezzy Ashcraft seconded the motion Motion carried, 6-0; no abstentions 5. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION Andrew Thomas, Planning Services Manager, requested that item 8B be moved from the consent calendar to the regular agenda items. Board member Ezzy Ashcraft motioned to move item 8B from the consent calendar to the regular agenda items. Board member Henneberry seconded the motion. Motion carried, 5-0; no abstentions Approved Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 13 July 23, 2012 | 13646 | |
18452 | 18452 | Staff announced that 1600 Park Street would be holding a temporary ice rink during the holiday season. Staff also noted that a demolition permit has been submitted to the city for the buildings on the 1600 and 1608 Park Street. Building records indicate that the oldest structure on site was built in 1942, therefore the permit is ministerial. However, any new information would as to the date of construction should be forwarded to staff. Navy 106 Report for Alameda Point was released and should be sent to the libraries and cd's are be available. 10. ADJOURNMENT: Motion by Board member Raulk to adjourn second by Board Member Hoffman. Motion carries 5-0. Approved Meeting Minutes 12/1/2011 Page 6 of 6 Historical Advisory Board | 13646 | |
18451 | 18451 | 1942 properties considered for demolition could then be added to the study list. Also, accessory buildings issue are also challenging to resolve, the need to save water towers and carriage houses, but not other utility buildings that are not worthy of preservation. He also noted that the interior alteration purview issue was mostly in error. However, he is open to allow owners to voluntarily allow interior purview if the Board felt that it was warranted. Board member Hoffman and Rauk support that the owner should have to support interior purview. Board member Lynch was ambivalent towards interior purview, but would believe that some persons would find the interior purview an honor. Ms. Kavanaugh-Lynch noted that landmark status, including items of significance would run with the land, not with the individual property owner. Board members discussed items noted by the AAPS presentation, including; a. Relocation of structures on and off of lots and/or on other places in the lot. b. Findings should be added for actions of the Board. C. Offer Building Official the ability to allow a limited emergent demolition as part of the policy discussion. d. Consider the Historic Preservation Permit - zoning and potential conflict between purview of the Planning Board. Could add findings to allow certain examples where a restoration of a monument would be allowed to exceed development standards. e. Trees. Board noted that trees that are noted in the municipal code are protected, however not clear as to which Board would be best for this work or if it could be done by staff. There was also some discussion that the document should be reviewed by the State Historic Preservation Office early in the process. This discussion item was continued by the Board members to the February meeting. 7-F 2012 Historical Advisory Board Meeting Schedule - The Historical Advisory Board will consider and approve the Historical Advisory Board meeting schedule for 2012. Motion by Chair member Owen to approve item to 7-F second by board member Lynch. Mot… | 13646 | |
18450 | 18450 | Board member Rauk and Hoffman both voiced concerns on the change from pre-1942 to all buildings over the age of 50 years being considered for demolition control. They both noted that it could be a deterrent to residents complying with city standards when working on their homes. Chair Owen noted the ordinance could reflect the period of significance, which is likely 1942. He also noted that the issue is demolition not alteration control. Board member Hoffman thinks that Alameda Point should be given special consideration. He supports purview over the exterior of buildings, only. Chair Owens noted he would suggest the addition of massing and form to the definition of integrity as surface material can be restored and/or removed. He also supported that post Approved Meeting Minutes 12/1/2011 Page 4 of 6 Historical Advisory Board | 13646 | |
18449 | 18449 | Staff member Kavanaugh-Lynch clarified that the subject property was not a City Monument, but the decision to hold the restoration to that standard was made in 2005. She presented a brief staff report. Members of the Board asked clarifying questions of the staff. Anthony Pham - applicant for 500 Central gave some clarifications on the building restoration. Members of the Board questioned the applicant on the proposed modifications and the difficulty the applicant has experienced in finding appropriate materials. Board member Hoffman suggested that a subcommittee be created. Christopher Buckley spoke in opposition of the proposed changes. Kevin Frederick spoke in opposition of the proposed changes. Board member Jasper and Hoffman agreed to be on the subcommittee, The applicant agreed to work with the subcommittee. Motion by Board Member Lynch to create a subcommittee with Board Members Hoffman and Jasper and continue this to the January 2012 meeting. Second by Board Member Jasper. Motion passes 5-0 Motion by Board Member Rauk to continue item to 7-A to the January meeting second by Board Member Lynch. Motion carries 5-0 7-E Historic Preservation Policy Document - City Wide. A new draft document has been prepared for public review by a subcommittee of the Historic Advisory Board. This is the first meeting before the full Board and an overview will be presented. No action will be taken at this meeting. Staff Member Kavanaugh Lynch gave a presentation on the Preservation Policy Document. Board member Lynch clarified the difference between Historic Signs and other City Monuments. Chair Owens noted some changes were left out of the last version of draft code, including the differentiation of interior VS. exterior purview of HAB on Monuments, and clarification of penalties. Approved Meeting Minutes 12/1/2011 Page 3 of 6 Historical Advisory Board | 13646 | |
18448 | 18448 | Jeannie Graham spoke on the history of her home and the decision to request that the home at 1240 St Charles Street be designated a historic monument Woody Minor gave a presentation and slideshow of the home. Board Member Lynch thanked Mr. Minor for his presentation, and noted she believed that this home is eligible for to National Landmark Standards. Board Member Lynch stated that the architect should be included if in the resolution is stating architectural significance. Chair Owens asked if there was a period of historic significance. Mr. Minor stated yes 1897 when it was built to 1944 when the Bruton's left. Recommend to the City Council as the thirtieth monument, to adopt a resolution with the addition of Fred P Fischer as the architect and the period of significance to be 1897 to 1944. Motion By Board member Lynch seconded by Board member Hoffman. Motion passes 5-0. 7-C Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0340 - 1234 Hawthorne Street - Patricia & Alexander Bernstein. The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Approval to allow removal of one Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia). According to a Certified Arborist Report, the approximately 30-foot high, 25.7-inch diameter tree, located in the front left side of the property is in poor health with extensive decay. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Planning Services Manager gave a brief report. Board member Hoffman noted he visited the property and agreed the tree was diseased, and removal should be approved. Chair Owens expressed that the disposal of the diseased tree should comply with the recommendations of a ASA Certified Arborist. Motion by Board member Hoffman to approve the removal of the tree as stated in the resolution with the addition that the tree should be disposed of as recommended by a ASA Certified Arborist. Seconded by Board member Rauk. Motion passes 5-0. 7-D Certificate of Approval - Alteration of a City Monument - PLN11-0346 - 500 Central Avenue - Dominic Chan Nguyen. Applicant is requesting to alter the restoration plan. The modifications include: 1. R… | 13646 | |
18447 | 18447 | APPROVED MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, December 1, 2011 1. CONVENE: 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL: Present: Chair Owens, Vice-Chair Rauk, Board Members Hoffman, Jasper, and Lynch Absent: None 3. MINUTES: Meeting of October 6, 2011 Board member Jasper moved, seconded by Board member Lynch, to approve the meeting. Motion passes 4-0. (Vice-Chair Rauk abstained) 4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSIONS: None 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None. 6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS: 7-A Certificate of Approval - PLN11-0272 - 1518 Park Street - Italo Calpestri. The applicant requests a Certificate of Approval to reconfigure the storefront of a contributor in the Park Street Historic Commercial District and remove the recessed corner entry and square off the building with removable window panels on both facades. Applicant requests a continuance to the January 5, 2012 Meeting. 7-B Proposed Designation of New City Monument.-PLN11-0343 - 1240 St. Charles Street - Jeannie Graham. The property owner has submitted a designation proposal for the subject property, prepared by Woody Minor. Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Planning Services Manager, gave a brief introduction of the project. Approved Meeting Minutes 12/1/2011 Page 1 of 6 Historical Advisory Board | 13646 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE [pages_fts] USING FTS5 ( [text], content=[pages] );